WEBVTT - Invertebrate Emotions, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuct to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>we're back with part two of our exploration of invertebrate emotions.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>In the last episode, we talked about the paper Nautilus

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or the argonaut. We read that great Marion More poem.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>We talked about what emotions are, the difficulties and studying them,

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about anecdotes about people really seeing personality,

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>character and emotion in octopuses, but then also scientific studies

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for certain types of measurable cognitive effects of emotions

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or emotion like states in invertebrates like bees. We talked

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>about the judgment bias test and how bees might have

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>biases that come about in optimistic or pessimistic ways based

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on how they're quote feeling. Yeah, A big part of

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the conversation last episode was I think, ultimately about stripping

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>down emotion to something that doesn't depend upon the subjective

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>human experience, and in doing so, something that I don't

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>want to make it sound like we're, oh, we're just

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we're cutting out all the important stuff. I think a

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of what we're cutting out is the poetic stuff,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the the the the extra like self contemplation stuff, and

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>getting down to the root of what is an emotional state,

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>How does it affect um our behavior and our expectations,

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, how do we see that echoed

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in other organisms? Right? Well, we're cutting out yeah this

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>by cutting out the subjective element. We're cutting out the

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>part that would be impossible to study in other animals

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 1>and just trying to say what our emotional states as

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>manifested externally. Yeah, But then of course the difficulty, as

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we discussed, is by taking out the subjective aspect of it,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we're taking out the part that is closest to us

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and the thing that you instantly think about when we

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>even say the word emotion of sweet emotion. Oh no,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that song fills me with bad emotion, did you. Oh?

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I ever gotten to do this

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>rant before. Y'all know I hate Aerosmith. Oh no, I know, well,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you may have mentioned it once in passing. Yeah,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>even even the early stuff. I don't know. I mean,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I can be that classic rock radio uncle, like you

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>know when led Zeppelin comes on, I'm like, yeah, I

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>feel it, but I don't know that. Something about Aerosmith

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>just turns my head three sixty degrees. Well, I have

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to admit it. Really like in dream On that's that's

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>if I hear that one on classic rock radio, I'll

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>tune in and listen. Well, I'm glad you like it. Hey, folks,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>this is Joe from the Future swooping in to alter

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the past. Sorry about the audio, but I realized on

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>listening back to this episode that in our excitement about

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the topic, we forgot to reintroduce the paper that we

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about in the first episode, and then we're

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about throughout this one as well. So

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that paper was by Clint J. Perry and Luigi Bachi,

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a Donna, and it's called Studying Emotion and Invertebrates What

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>has been done, what can be measured, and what they

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>can provide. It was published in the Journal of Experimental

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Biology in Okay, now back to our original conversation. Okay,

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but uh so, the last time we we talked about

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the main three branches of external ways of

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>studying emotions and animals. We talked about you know that

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they're there are perhaps cognitive effects of emotions, that emotions

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>affect how you perceive the world and how you think.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>That there are behavioral tests of emotions, that emotions affect

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>how you act, and that there are physiological tests of

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>emotions that emotions affect involuntary physical reactions in the body.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And we last time we looked at cognition. This time

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at the other two. So the first

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would be behavioral tests behavioral signs of emotional states. And

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I think we should first

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge is that I'd say this is the primary way

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that we sense emotions in other people. What do people

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>usually do with their bodies, especially their faces, when they're

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>feeling various emotions. But as the authors point out quite helpfully,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>they say, quote, invertebrates lack the facial musculature for any

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>real type of comparisons to be made in this regard.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the jury is in. You can't

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>tell if a hornet is smiling. You can't tell if

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>there is disgusted on the face of that crab. Yeah,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as if a crab had a face anyway. Right, Um,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but my flogging that horse again, it's not really a

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>horse I flog, but no, no, no, actually you're right.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd degree the crab. I don't know crabs

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pushing it. I don't know if a crab has a face. Yeah,

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it definitely has the front of a head.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But that front of a head with the crab is

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>not really it's not used for communication. Crabs depend on

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sound as well as you know. The claw waving and

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>overall movement displays general body language, but predominantly sound is

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>their their form of communication. The wasp, for their part, uh,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they depend primarily on smell for a communication. We will

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>get into that a little bit in the last episode

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with the beest. So their commune occasions since realm is

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not really our own, um, they exist in a in

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a different realm in that regard. Right, But the behavioral

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>effects of underlying emotional states are not limited to facial

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>expressions alone, just because that's maybe the main way we

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>see emotions in other people. Uh. The author's right quote.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>A substantial amount of work in mammals has utilized other

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bodily expressions and motor behavior in response to stimuli to

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>assess both valence meaning the pleasantness, and intensity, meaning the

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>level of arousal of emotions, and I really think the

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>horse is a great example of this for a couple

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. First of all, the horse is an animal

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that is, that lives in close proximity to humans, that

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is adored by humans. That is, that is often you

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>know championed as being this next to the dog and

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know the cat. I guess it is. It is

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a friend of humanity. And uh, and my wife being

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>super into horses and pretty knowledgeable about them, she's just

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>told me about some of this before, but I was

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I also looked up a source on this for this

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>episode How to Read Your Horses Body Language by Jennifer Williams,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>PhD for Acquis Magazine, and Williams points out that if

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a novice or to view a skilled horse trainer in action,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they might well guess that this individual is psychic or

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>has some sort of mystical Cormick McCarthy in connection to

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the soul of the horse, you know, the deep, dark,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>mystical soil soul of the horse. But it's really all

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>about knowing how to read these other signs, the overall

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>body language of the horse, and then these other sort

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of non facial or semi facial cues. Well, yeah, I

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>mean think if you're a dog person, if you've got

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a dog in your house, think about like, how finally

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a tune you are to your dogs feelings, levels of excitement, motivations,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and and quote emotional states or you know, there's something

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that is analogous to these emotional states. Uh that if

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>somebody who had never met a dog before or hadn't

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>spent much time around dogs saw you interacting with your dog,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they might well think the same thing. You must be psychic. Yeah,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but no, A lot of it is about picking up

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on all of this language, or indeed just knowing what

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to look for. So in in the case of the horse,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for instance, um ear position is very important. This is

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the apparently the first things you tend to

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>learn about about understanding a horse's emotional state. So that

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the ears may face forward, meaning they're interested. They may

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>be pinned back, meaning they're angry and they're prone to

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>bite or act you know, aggressively slashed defensively. Uh. They

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>might be turned out to the side meaning they're relaxed.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>They might be turned back but not pinned, and this

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>means they're listening to something behind them and it also

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>means they might decide they need to turn around to

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>go look at it, and horses, being large animals, that's

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>something to be aware of. Uh. And then they also

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>might be rapidly swiveling, meaning that they're anxious or at

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>their you know, at a high level of alertness. But

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that there's also head carriage, head

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe lowered, elevated snaking. You have to consider four leg

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and hind leg movement and position, muzzle activity, which this

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>some of this it's more in line with what you

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>might expect from a face, you know, like what are

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the nostrils doing? Uh? You know, what what's the mouth doing?

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>What are they doing with their teeth? That sort of thing.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>There is a certain level of like what are their

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>eyes doing? Uh? You know, to someone that doesn't really

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know anything about horses, it's easy to sort of think

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the eyes as being sort of like big empty

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>glasses without a lot of emotion. But there is stuff

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you can read into it. There's the movement of the tail,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and then there's just general whole body stuff like what

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is the overall bodily tension of the animal, how is it?

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>How is it moving? And uh? And you can read

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>take all of that and read into the emotional state

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of the horse. But if you just look at you

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>know what you might be tempted to call the face

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the horse, You're not necessarily going to pick up

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on on all those cues you have. And I think

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>part of this two gets we have to think about

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the human situation. So clearly humans have body language. You know,

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there's more than just the facial communication array with human

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>beings totally, but we do depend on the facial communication

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>array a lot and do fixate on it to a

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>very large degree. But basically, what I'm trying to say,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>using the horses in an example that there are there

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are there are various parts of an organism that you

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>can look to to to figure out what their emotional

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>state is, and it may or may not be something

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that matches up with the human idea idea of a face. Yes,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so what would be some of these external behaviors that

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we could measure in invertebrates? One of the most obvious

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>behavioral signs of underlying emotional states and animals is retreat behaviors.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So but you know, like in fear or anxiety, animals

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>will retreat, retracting or covering vulnerable body parts, adopting defensive posture,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and running away. These are some of the clearest ones

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to look for in all of animal behavior. And so

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the first example cited by the authors here looks at

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly that. And it's actually a study we've already mentioned

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on this show before. It came up in our episodes

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>titled Devour of Memory. Remember that about about the planaria

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and the and the research about whether you could gain

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's memories by eating their body. Uh So in this

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>episode that we mentioned to study about a type of

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>large sea slug called the California sea hair or Aplasia californica.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh And in that other episode the study came up

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>because it demonstrated associate of learning and classical conditioning in

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an invertebrate sea slug. So, you offer a sea hair

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some delicious shrimp extract, but in the test group, well,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the sea hair is munching on the shrimp extract, it

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>gets an electric shock to the head that this painful

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>stimulus results in not a frown, of course, but measurable

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>behaviors in the slug. It withdraws its head, it withdraws

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>its siphon, it inks, and it moves away from the

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>shrimp at extract, and sure enough if you train it

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on these associations when simply when the animals from the

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>test group are simply presented with shrimp extract, they will

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>pull back the siphon and move away. By the way,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>see hair and the electric shrimp extract would be a

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>great name for a band. Just to put that out there,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a Bob Weir side project. Okay um.

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>But whether or not it makes sense to use the

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>same word we use for emotions and other mammals quote

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the observed behavioral responses to conditions stimuli resemble the actions

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of conditioned fear in mammals. Subjectively, it might not make

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>sense to talk about fear in a sea slug. We

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but it certainly behaviorally looks like fear. It

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like the same thing we recognize this fear in

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>mammals or in other humans. Because of course, nothing about

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the shrimp extract itself causes pain. It couldn't be a

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>simple stimulus response. It has to be this association with pain,

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>the memory of you know, the fear caused by the memory,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of invertebrate studies into emotions look for

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>signs of fear because fear is easier to study. Presumable

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fear inducing stimuli are relatively easy to create, and behavioral

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>response says are relatively easy to detect. There's another example

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that the author's site here, which is fear research into

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Drosophila also known commonly as fruit flies or as vinegar

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>flies small fruit flies. Uh. This is an extremely common

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>organism for lab research. You'll find tons of studies modeling

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>other things in complex organisms as they appear in Drosophila.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So in T. Gibson at All studied fear and Drosophila

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>caused by the stimulus of an overhead shadow. They used

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a rotating opaque paddle. I don't know if it was

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a ping pong paddle that I kind of hope it was.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It was some kind of paddle that would be made

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to rotate in a circle in in in a steady progression,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>repeat passages over a container of these these flies that

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>would be, say, eating a food source or something. And

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the authors found that multiple repetitive exposures to this overhead

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>shadow caused the flies to fly around more, to hop more,

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to freeze more, and to fly away from a food source,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and there was evidence in this study that the passing

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>shadow led to a generalized internal state. The more times

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the shadow passed over, the more avoidance responses happened. So

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like within the flies, it wasn't just stimulus response.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>The shadow passes, then you fly away. If you are

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly subjected to this stress inducing stimulus, the flies appear

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to enter a state where they're just They're just in

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a semi permanent way agitated. They're flying around, they're they're

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>leaving the food source. It looks like they have the

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>internal state of being afraid, and the avoidance responses remained

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>remained more elevated even after the stimulus stopped. The shadow

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>would stop passing over, and for some time afterward, the

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>flies acted more agitated, more likely to fly away from

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the food source than flies with less exposure to the shadow.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And this makes it seem as if the avoidance reactions

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>were not just the direct and get response to the shadow,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but also influenced by this internal state within the flies

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>nervous systems, which is similar to how fear works and

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>humans and other vertebrates. Something jumps out and scares you,

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you have an immediate response maybe you shriek, maybe you

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>pee a little, you know, maybe maybe you jump, But

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>then you also remain in a state you're on edge

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for several minutes afterwards, showing these anxiety behaviors even when

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the scary thing is gone or no longer represents a threat. Unfortunately,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot of how we live our lives actually, right, Like,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>there's something that kind of like startles you, gets you

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on edge, and maybe it's not even something that would

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be a physical threat. Maybe it's just a conceptual threat.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get an email or a tweet or

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>anything that kind of puts you on edge, and then

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you just stay that way for a good long while. Yeah, yeah,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>all day generally. Yeah, what happens when you reach for

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your phone first thing in the morning, right, And I

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think that that's an important thing. It calls to to

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>attention the difference between fear and anxiety. Year of course,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is a response to the perception of an immediate threat,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a clear and present danger, and it results mostly in

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>escape behaviors by animals. You're trying to, you know, defend

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself and get away, Whereas anxiety is related to fear

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but slightly different. Fear is a response to the clear

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and present danger. Anxiety is a response to ambiguous, imagined,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>or potential threats. When there's a threat that's not necessarily

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>right in front of you, but you imagine it might

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be waiting nearby, it might be around the corner. It's

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of lurking in the the the information sphere around you,

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to being right there in front of you. Uh.

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course, the bringing back to the human experience,

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we have no shortage of fear is just sort of

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>rotating around us in the information sphere, and this state

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of anxiety actually brings us to the crowd ads. I know,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we promised we'd we'd get there eventually. A k A crayfish,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a k A. Mudbugs. Did you call girl calling him bugs? No,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what I've just heard them called. Did you

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>catch them in the creek? No? I know I was

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>never around them growing up, but I have family that

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>lives in southern Mississippi, and you know they're they're all

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>about them, uh down there. In fact, I've been to

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and this will this will be like an image to

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>come back to. As we discussed their possible emotional states,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I went to a Marty Gropp parade not the main

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Marty graparade, but I like, you know, one leading up

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to it in southern Mississippi, and there were like games

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>where live crawfish were were thrown by children, Like they

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>would throw crawfish back and forth at each other and

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then occasionally fall onto the concrete and all and um. Yeah,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time I thought it was weird and kind

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of barbaric. So maybe I'll feel even more so as

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we discussed their their their inter emotional states here, so

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it gets turned inward as well. Though. Do you ever

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>play the game, I assume you didn't or see people

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>play the game where you just let a crawdad pinch,

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, just like let it pinch your nose or

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>your finger or something. No, did you do this crowing up? Uh? No,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but I had friends who did. Where was this in Tennessee?

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>They were crawl crawdads just in the creeks. I guess

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there were probably a different species, I'm not quite sure

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>than the one we're about to talk about, but yeah,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>there were some kind of crayfish shaped organism living in

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the creeks, freshwater creeks. Yeah, okay, yeah, yeah. My main

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>experience with them is just occasionally eating them as an

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>adult um. But that's about it. Never got to like

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>play with them as a child. But for anyone out

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there who does doesn't it still doesn't know what we're

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about. It's essentially a small crustacean like a fresh

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a small fresh water generally lobster, right, tiny lobster. The

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>specific UH species that's going to come up in the

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the research we're getting to is Procamboris clarkey. And yes,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>these are the crawl fish of the famed Louisiana crawfish boil.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if they were if they were

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>boiled up with some zatarans and eating after the test.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I should also add that sometimes you'll see crayfish in

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>aquarium settings and it can be quite beautiful as well,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I don't think human and humans humanities

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the crayfish is mostly uh, mostly something that

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>revolves around eating them, but sometimes you'll see them as pets. Now,

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the idea of anxiety, we were

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about the difference between fear and anxiety. You know,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we're saying fear often results in escape behaviors. Anxiety is

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>often thought to result in conservative or defense behavior, for example,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to limit openness and to limit exploratory behavior. Animals in

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 1>an anxious state are more likely to seek out closed, familiar,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and protected in environments, whereas animals in a non anxious

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>state are more likely to explore unfamiliar and open environments.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And one type of experiment that has been used to

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>study anxiety and animals like rats and mice and now

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in crayfish, is the elevated plus maze. So, Robert, had

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen one of these before? I don't think

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd encountered one of these before, and I don't remember

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>encountering one in a study. I've certainly never been in one. Uh. So,

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you imagine a simple platform in the shape of a

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>plus sign. You've got two arms of the plus sign

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that are enclosed by walls, and then the other two

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>arms are open. They're just straight platforms without walls. And

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this shows up in all kinds of studies. How an

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>animal moves within an elevated plus maze or EPM can

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>be manipulated by lots of variables that are thought to

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>control anxiety. The more time the animal spins in the

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>closed section enclosed by the walls, you know, sort of

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>protected and hidden, usually the more anxious it is thought

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to be, and many animals, maybe most small animals, tend

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to prefer dark, enclosed places. These are the types of

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>places that they are more likely to be protected from

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>predators in their natural environments. Like the rat in your house,

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>it likes to hide inside the walls and behind the

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>fridge and stuff. It doesn't like to hang out in

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the floor, right, like a wide open

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>spaces that's where a hawk can swoop down and q

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>out that sort of thing. Right, It will only venture

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>out into the open spaces in order to explore and

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>seek rewards. It might go out there if there's food

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the floor, um, But if it

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sees something scary, what does it do? It runs to

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>an enclosed space. The more an animal like a rat,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>has an induced state of anxiety due to an ambiguous

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or possible threat, the more it will tend to confine

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>itself to dark, enclosed spaces. And conversely, the less anxiety

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it has, the more it will feel free to explore

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>open spaces. Uh and the e p M is widely

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>used in studying animal anxiety and in the testing of

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>anti anxiety medications. Now Here's where the crowd ads come in.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So the elevated plus mayze has been widely used in

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>anxiety research like we're saying, and almost all these studies

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have been on vertebrates, but since there have been at

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>least two studies using the plus mayze test on crayfish. Again,

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this is procam Borus Clarkey, and the updated design used

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>an elevated plus mayze submerged in water with the enclosed

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>arms shaded so that they were dark because in their

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>protected environments, the crayfish like dark places. That's a natural

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive preference they have. So there were a couple of studies.

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>One was Fawcett at All in fourteen and one was

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>back quay casinave at All in seventeen, and they both

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>found that if you subjected the crayfish to frightful stimuli

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time, they would spend more time in the shielded, dark,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>enclosed areas of the elevated plus may So the examples

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>were mildly painful shocks and harassment by a larger crawfish.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So like if you take a smaller crayfish and then

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>subject it to a bigger one doing dominance displays the

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>one the little one, the one that is being harassed

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>will tend to spend more time in the enclosed area

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and less time exploring the open platforms and the author's

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>right quote. These behavioral results fulfill criteria normally designated for

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>anxiety and mammals, including being innate, being unconditioned, occurring in

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the absence of a stressor, and expressed in a novel context. Alright,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so in this experiment we see the evidence that a crayfish,

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>something we don't think of as having emotional states, really

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>ultimately has something very similar to the the fear that

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is experienced by a mouse or a rat, and therefore

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>very similar to what we experience. Right, So it's not

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just stimulus response. I mean you could you might imagine

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that an animal without emotional states could say, retreat in

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the immediate term from something that's threatening it by going

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>into an enclosed space, but even afterwards it seems to

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>remain in this internal state where it prefers to stay

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the close, protected spaces and does less exploring than

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a control crayfish if it has at some recent time

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>been threatened or harassed. It sounds like a familiar story. Yeah, yeah, Like,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like I say, if we take away sort of the

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the holy human qualities of fear. Uh, and look at

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it objectively, like that's what we're looking at here, we're

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at the fear of the crawfish. Well, maybe we

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>should take a quick break and then when we come

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>back we can discuss the joy of the fire ant.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank alright, we're back. So the authors of this

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>study we've been looking at point out one shortcoming of

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the existing body of research on animal emotions, and it's

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that it is, as on the whole, overly focused on

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>negative emotions. Quote. It is argued that the reasons that

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>positive emotions have been neglected in research are because they

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>are few in number, reflected even in the imbalance of

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>English language words for negative over positive emotions, and are

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>harder to differentiate. The asymmetry might also stem from our

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>understanding that natural selection has shaped emotions more for survival

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>than for prosperity. There are many more threats than treats

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in our environment. Also, they point out that we're looking

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for tests mirroring work done on humans. Most psychological and

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>clinical work in the history of science has been focused

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on solving problems rather than on studying ways in which

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>people are doing fine all of which I think is

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>probably true. I mean, I think all of those reasons

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are valid. But despite these limitations, it would be great

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to have more research attempting to understand positive emotions or

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the state's analogous to positive emotions in non human animals

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and invertebrates like it. It's just kind of a bummer

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and kind of limiting when it's overwhelmingly research on fear

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and aversion. Yeah, that that's an interesting point about like

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 1>even the the the English language bias for negativity as

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>opposed to positivity. Uh, it makes me think of going

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to our our neighborhood reality the only video rental store

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>in the city or state video Drome. Video Drome has

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a sizeable horror selection, and I love to lose myself

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.959
<v Speaker 1>in it. But what is the opposite of the horror section?

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>There's not really one, I guess what the maybe the

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>comedies but Robert Altman section though maybe that. I mean,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>even you know, any comedy, any drum, anything that's not

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like straight up like little Kids cinema, I mean, to

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever extent that exists, Like anything that's not just teletopies

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to have risk and danger, and these negative

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>emotions that are there to at least propel the corresponding

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>positive ones. Yeah, I think you're exactly right, And I

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think the point they're making is a good one. That

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily that there's more you know, uh, negative

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>emotion than positive emotion and human life, but that for

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>some reason we're more we're happier to let positive emotions

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>all kind of blend together and be the same thing.

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>They're all just you know, there are million different forms

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of happiness and joy, but we don't have as many

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>differentiated words for those states, you know, whereas you know,

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we're we're very into getting down in the nitty gritty

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of different types of ways to feel bad. Well, I

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>guess one of the it kind of comes back a

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit, probably to some we've discussed before, the idea

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that when you're happy, if you contemplate about your happiness,

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>if you stop to consider your happiness, then it goes away.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't need to think about it too much,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have enough time to get to nuanced

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the language, whereas a negative, a good negative emotion

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>will just really sit there and you can get to

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know it. You can you can really uh, you know,

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>formalize your relationship with it. Yeah. Now. On the other hand,

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there have been a few studies that have gone against

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this trend of focusing overwhelmingly on negative emotions in these

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>animal studies. For example, in the last episode, we talked

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about the one cognitive tests, the judgment bias test, that

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>at least appeared to show the cognitive effects of something

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>like pleasure or happiness in the bumblebee. You remember, it

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, if you give the bumble bee a free treat,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>give it some free sugar, it will tend after that

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to at least appear to have an optimistic bias to

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>interpret ambiguous information as as being something good or approachable.

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>The next line of research involves the behavior and ants

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that some researchers think may be associated with an internal

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>state analogous to happiness or joy. Uh So, what might

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the dreaded fire ant have in common with your favorite

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>cute puppy wagging? Butt wagging? Do tell? Do tell? Alright? So,

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the red imported fire ant or Solenopsis invicta has displayed

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting behavior observed by a number of researchers.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Reported in a study in Steen by Debbie Castle, christophord Liu, hun,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Schiffmann, and S. Bradley Vinson called a study on

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>abdominal wagging in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta with speculation

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>on its meaning in the Journal of Bioeconomics. So, the

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>researchers were just watching lots of hours of video taken

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from inside a fire ant nest, and from these observations

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>they started to notice a pattern of behavior where the

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.479
<v Speaker 1>ants inside the nest would basically stick their butt up

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in the air and wave it around. Quote they position

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and move their abdomen up and down at forty five degrees,

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and they called this behavior wagging. Now, raising and wiggling

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the abdomen has uses in other contexts for fire ants.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>You may have seen fire ants doing this defensively. The

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>abdomen or back segment of the body is also known

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as a gaster which is great like Charles Dickens name,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like William Gaster uh. And outside the

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>nest the behavior is known as gaster flagging. The flagging

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 1>usually involves raising the abdomen up higher something more like

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>nine d degrees. Flagging is apparently used during foraging to

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>disperse venom into the air, and it's believed to deter

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>other insects like competitor ants from the foraging area. So

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you're out trying to gather food for the colony, and

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then some other ants come in. You will stick your

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>butt up in the air and spit some venom out

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>into the air to try to drive the other ants off.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>There's also some evidence that some abdominal wagging or gaster

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>flagging emits a sound as the gaster joint rubs across itself,

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and this would be a tiny, high pitched squeak. We're

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure what role this sound plays, but it's possible

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that as a it has a role in communications, such

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as calling for help when an ant is trapped or

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>when it's in trouble. However, Castle at All believe that

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in their observations the inside the nest, wagging behavior was

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not defensive in any way. Within the nest, they found

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that the wagging emitted neither sound nor venom, no squeaks,

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>no toxins, and the stinger was never extended during this period.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So if they're just wagging around and it has nothing

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with the other types of wagging that these

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ants normally do, what's going on. Furthermore, they found that

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the inside nest, wagging happened primarily when the ants were

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>engaged in two activities, eating sugar or tending to the brood,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in other words, taking care of the young. Well, those

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are two pleasurable experiences just for humans, sure, And they

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>did not find any evidence of nestmates reacting to the wagging,

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>so they couldn't detect any role for communication in the wagging.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's it for. Well, the author's hypothesized that quote

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this in nest behavior might be analogous to facial expressions

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and bodily postures of hedonic pleasure in humans and other

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>mammals during pleasurable events. So that's a very interesting idea.

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps a fire aunt smiles by wagging its gaster in

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the air. Now we should definitely acknowledge, and the researchers

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>do acknowledge that this is far from proven. That there

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>are a few other possibilities to Maybe the wagging is

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>some kind of mechanical reaction in the body to certain

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>uses of the mouth parts. Soon the mouth parts would

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be engaged during eating or during tending to the brood.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe something's happening that just happens to make their butt

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wiggle in the air at the same time. So it

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would help if this could be paired with other types

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of tests. For example, would consuming sugar water or tending

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to the brood also caused the fire ants to have

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>an optimistic bias in judgment bias tests. That would probably

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>strengthen the case for this wagging as a bodily expression

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of something like pleasure or happiness. But I love the possibility.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the ant smiles with its But but again, this

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>would this would come down to as some physical body

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>language that is observable that would potentially demonstrate the emotional

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>state of the creature, right, and it would be helpful

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>if you could pair it with other things that were

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>presumed to be associated with that same state. Now, another

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one about positive emotions comes back to bumble bees, which

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned in the last episode. Remember earlier there was

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this research seeming to indicate that giving a bumblebee some

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>free sugar would result in an optimistic bias in these

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>cognitive tests. Another test on bumblebees looked at the effects

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of sugar water on behavior after a stressful event. So

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in the yild, bumblebees are subject to ambushes by certain

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>sit and wait predators, such as the crab spider, have

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen a crab spider in action. I'm not well.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So they will tend to wait on a flower, uh,

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and they'll just kind of blend in there among the

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>petals that they've got these wide legs, uh for a

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>big hug. And then when the bee lands on the

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>flower to try to get some nectar, the crab spider

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>will grab it with its legs and try to bite

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>down and kill it. And a lot of times in

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>natural encounters, the bee is briefly captured by the spider

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but then manages to escape. So in a experiment, Perry

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at All created a simulation of a crab spider attack

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>by putting together a mechanism that would ambush and trap

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a bumblebee for three seconds before releasing it unharmed. Now, obviously,

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>after a stressful brush with death like this, the bee

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>will take some time before it again begins to forage

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and start landing on flowers and stuff. And what Perry

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>had All found was that a treat of sugar water

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>given before the attack would shorten the duration of this

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>cool down period after the spider attack. So if a

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>bee gets a sweet treat before a simulated spider attack,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it takes the be less time to reinitiate landing on

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>flowers and feeding after this stressful event. Now, again, there

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>could be other interpretations of what's happening here. Maybe somehow

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the nutrition and the sugar makes the bee physically stronger

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and less vulnerable, etcetera, And maybe something like that. But

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one possibility is that the pleasurable stimuli of the sugar

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>water puts the bee in something analogous to a better

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>mood or emotional state, making it more resilient to stressful setbacks,

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>which I think is something that we're probably all familiar

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with ourselves. Right. You know that your emotional state is

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>uh dictate strongly how you will react to negative incoming events.

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>The same thing that floors you one day, I'll just

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of bounce off you another right right, Or if

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you've had a particularly bad day, then bad news is

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>going to you know, have a more negative effect on

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>your well being right now. The authors identify vocalizations and

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sound as a possibly very fruitful behavioral avenue for future

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>research and invertebrate emotions, noting that Charles Starwin himself speculated

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen seventy two that quote insects might potentially communicate

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>emotions such as anger, terror, jealousy, and love through their stridulation,

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the great rubbing together sounds that insects make.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 1>So what does a jealous cricket sound like. I'm not sure,

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's easy to imagine all the various anthropomorphic interpretations.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So regarding our our, our ideal cartoon cricket, I'm sure.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you even remember how in the original Pinocchio, Pinocchio

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>kills the cricket with a hammer? What? Yeah, the cartoon

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or no story? Not? No, no, not in the movie.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>The movie changed it and made it nicer in the

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>original story, Jimmy Cricket, Yeah, oh man, I don't remember

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>if he's named Jiminy Cricket. I think he's just a

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>magic cricket and Pinocchio kills him with a hammer. I

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that Pinocchio is in one of his bad phases. Uh.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think I like Pinocchio. I don't

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot. I don't have a strong affinity for

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the Disney version either. The only thing that I have

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a strong affinity for is Jimmy crickets role in the

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Christmas Carol, in which he plays what the ghost

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of Christmas past I believe. I don't. I don't know

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>if I've ever seen that. Oh, you should see. It's

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like thirty minutes long, and it's it's a pretty good

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>streamlined adaptation of a Christmas Carol. Oh, I'm sure it's

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>better than the other thirty minute version of a Christmas

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Carol I've seen, which is called the Christmas Carol and

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's narrated by Vincent Price. It's very bad. Oh man, Well,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>later this year, when Christmas rolls around again, I think

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>we should do an episode on a Christmas Carol. I

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of discuss there. Okay, well, maybe

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we should take a break and then when we come

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>back we can talk about physiological tests. Alright, we're back,

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So are entering the final phase here. We're going to

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be discussing physiological tests for emotion. Right, So we've talked

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about cognitive tests, We've talked about behavioral tests. Physiological tests

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for emotion. Uh. In people, they look for correlates between

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>reported emotional states and automatic responses in the body. So,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, somebody jumps out at you with a werewolf mask,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You're not just gonna jump back. It's not just gonna

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe give you a pessimistic bias, But you will also

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have increased heart rate, release of stress hormones like norap

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and effer and cortisol, dilation of the pupils in the eye.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You might be a bit, you know, a bunch of stuff.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of this is because it's not just

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that you saw a werewolf. It's that your body is

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>preparing you to fight a werewolf or run from a werewolf. Right,

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the fight or flight response kicks in and and it

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>entails this cascade of automatic reactions in the body, things

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>that you don't control behaviorally. They just happen without your

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>say so. And these physiological responses can usually be measured

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>objectively pretty easily, which is very handy. How our physiological

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>responses alone can be they can be hard to use

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to identify individual emotions. For example, if you're measuring a

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>heart rate, heart rate might increase in response to anxiety

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or to joy. The fact that the heart speeds up

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it's beating tells you there's some kind of arousal, but

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily tell you which. One person's heart could

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just be full of song. Right. So, sometimes if you

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>look at enough different physiological responses at the same time

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and compare them. You can start to zero in on

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>specific emotions, but not always UH. And just like it's

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to translate research on human facial expressions to invertebrates,

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>it's also hard to do so with human physiological responses

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to emotions. UH. The authors write, quote, most of these

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>types of measurements are quite difficult to apply to invertebrates

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>given their often miniature size and hard carapasts, and in

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the case of insects, an open circulatory system where heart

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>rate is not increased. But there has been some interesting research. Nonetheless,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they cited a bunch of it just to pick out

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of examples. Kita at All In two thousand

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven did research on fear conditioning, this time in pond snails,

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>very expressive species. UH. They conditioned the pond snails with

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>an association between sugar water, which normally you give some

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>give some sugar water to them and they will start

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>feeding behaviors. But they negatively conditioned this with potassium chloride

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>associations and potassium chloride causes withdrawal of the body into

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the shell. UH. Not only did fear conditioning work, the

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>snails began to react to the sugar by withdrawing, but

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>physiological monitoring also found that conditioned exposure to the sugar

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>caused the heart to skip a beat quote, suggesting physiological

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>responses similar to fear in mammals. So you train them

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to associate potassium chloride, this noxious chemical, with the sugar,

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 1>then later you just present them with sugar. Not only

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 1>do they not go for the sugar, it makes their

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hearts skip up eat though I do think it's interesting

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to note potassium chloride is literally a heart stopping poison.

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's been used to cause cardiac arrest and lethal injections.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there was no potassium chloride in the sugar

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>once it was conditioned, but maybe that's just a coincidence.

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But the idea is that been presented with the with

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the sugar, then after being exposed to the potassium chloride,

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there is this this moment of physiological fear in response. Right,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the body reacts in a way similar to mammals reacting

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to the werewolf mask, but this time it's just sugar

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>that the snail has come with training to associate with

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a bad chemical. So it seems that the majority of

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>research on physiological correlates of invertebrate emotions has to do

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>with the presence of what are called biogenic amines, which

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>are thought to play a major, if not comprehensive role

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in the creation and control of emotions in the human brain,

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>especially the hormones and neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine, and nora adrenaline.

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Now as important as these three substances clearly are in

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 1>our emotional lives, unfortunately it is not as simple as

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>saying one is a happiness drug in the body and

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>one is a fear drug, etcetera. They play complex interacting

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>roles in everything from attention and arousal to reward, motivation,

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and sleep, and the manipulation of emotions is generally not

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>as simple as just saying like, well, you need more

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of one of these things, but manipulating the presence of

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>one or more of these neurotransmitters can have some measurable

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>effects on emotions. For example, invertebrate nervous systems also appear

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to make use of these biogenic amines or analogs to them.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>For example, in bees, the hormone octopomy and appears to

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>play a role similar to that of nora adrenaline and humans,

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and so they cite one possible example of these physiological parallels.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Quote Bates and and colleagues in two thousand eleven assessed

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>how systemic biogenic amine levels changed in response to a

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>presumed negative emotional event hemal lymph. And remember that's like

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>insect blood. Hama lymph was collected from honey bees after

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>simulating a predator attack shaking bees on a vortex for

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty seconds. And this is like the thing we talked

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>about in the last episode, where you'd shake the colony

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to simulate an attacked by a honey badger. Picking up

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>with the quote. Analysis of the hemolymph using high performance

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>liquid chromatography or HPLC showed that systemic levels of the

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>biogenic amines dopamine, octopamine, chemical chemically similar to noor, adrenaline,

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and serotonin all decreased in response to bees being shaken vigorously.

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>In humans, it seems that depletion of biogenic amine serotonin, noor, adrenaline,

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and dopamine is responsible for features of depression in the

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>monoamine hypothesis of depression, and also in fourteen, Faucet and

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>colleagues reportedly used chemical manipulation of serotonin levels to alter

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:02.240
<v Speaker 1>anxiety associated behaviors of crayfish, like in the plus maze scenario.

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>One last one period, all In found that manipulation of

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dopamine levels seemed to affect the apparent positive emotional state

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of bumble bees. Remember the sugar causing the bumble bees

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to have an optimistic bias. Well, here quote the optimistic

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>behavior scene and the judgment bias test in response to

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>pretest sugar reward was abolished when the bees were topically

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>treated with the dopamine receptor antagonist flu finazine. And apparently

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the same treatment eliminated the positive effect of pretest sugar

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 1>during the simulated attack by a crab spider. So if

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you do something to this insect's dopamine levels by by

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>putting in this disruptor of dopamine, you somehow seemed to

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>interfere with the bees ability to have an optimistic bias

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in response to getting some sugar. Interesting. So, basically, the

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>more we reveal about sort of the underlying chemistry of

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.720
<v Speaker 1>these emotional states, uh as that they are in humans

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and as they are in these various invertebrate species, it

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>just reveals that, yeah, we have emotional states occurring in

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:11.879
<v Speaker 1>these organisms at least the physiological correlates of them. Right again, Yeah,

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't begin to get into the subjective aspect of it,

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which you know made you know very I don't think

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a stretch at all to say that whatever a

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>crawfish is experiencing is fear, is different than what a

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>human is experienced in his fear. It can't it can't

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>contemplate the fear at the same level that that a

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>human can. But like the root of it, like the

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>root chemical and physical, physiological, um manifestation of that emotion

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is essentially the same. Right. And I think now we've

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 1>seen maybe not conclusive, but pretty good evidence in three

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>different branches, not just the physiological which we were just

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about, but earlier the cognitive and in the behavioral spheres.

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think we should emphasize again you know what

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you're getting at. None of these tests are perfect. Even

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>if all the results are robust, replicable, they hold up

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>over time, they still don't necessarily tell us anything about

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to be a bumblebee or a crayfish.

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's always going to be that gap that

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>we are perhaps jumping with the rocket boots of anthropomorphic projection.

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But for now, experiments like these are the best evidence

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>we have to try to figure out what kinds of emotions,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if any, are present in insects, crustaceans, gastropods, and all

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>manner of creatures without a spine, And those things we

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>learned could be very helpful in helping us understand how

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>emotions in mammals, including humans, developed over evolutionary time, because there,

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we look at modern invertebrates and see

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>nervous systems. You know that their brain structure is very

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we think our ancestors may have had

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at certain times in history. We can learn what the

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>chemical mechanisms of emotional motivation states are, how they came

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to be. Humans ain't crawd ads, but crawd ads can

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>still teach us a lot. I think now at this

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>point that one question a lot of people they have is, okay,

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what sorts of animals don't have emotions? Then? Like, is

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there is there any level that we can say, all right,

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the cut off point? Um? You know, it's it's

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question to consider. Um. And I was poking

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>around and basically one thing I have to realize is

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that is, like we said earlier the quest for invertebrate

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>emotions is is not as expansive as as other areas

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of emotional research, certainly in higher organisms. So there's just

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data we don't have. Um. So you know,

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when you get down to like single

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.359
<v Speaker 1>cell organisms, I don't see. I didn't didn't find any

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:39.839
<v Speaker 1>papers arguing for emotional states there, no, uh and even

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in the weirdly like we think octopuses are more complex, uh,

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of intelligence than these other than

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like insects and crayfish are. But I wasn't really finding

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>much in the way of studying emotions and octopuses. It

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was mostly in these simpler organisms. So yeah, there's clearly

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 1>still lots of ground to cover. Uh. Now, I mean,

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one of the I don't think anybody's

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>actually arguing that, say, a slime mold has emotions either.

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But we have discussed in the show how a slime mold, uh,

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>an organism without like a central nervous system is still

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.919
<v Speaker 1>able to learn, it's still engaging in things that are

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>are are like problem solving. So you know, the stuff

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:24.919
<v Speaker 1>like that adds uh some complexity to this question. But

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>then another thing that came to mind. Uh, plants the

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>topic itself. I think we'll have to wait wait for

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>another episode. But plants can essentially here, see, smell, and

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:37.720
<v Speaker 1>respond to stimuli, and they are, according to a University

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of Missouri in Columbia plant science professor Jack C. Schultz,

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially quote just very slow animals. Um which uh, which

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is it is? It is hilarious, But at the same

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>time it you know, you you you look at say

0:46:54.560 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>time time lapse footage of save vines in action and

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and flowers and uh and so forth. There just the

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>movements of of of plants in general. And this does

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have that seem to have a ring of truth to

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it that this is this is an organism that is

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not as still as we uh as we may think.

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>We touched the this briefly, and though the recent Tolkien episodes,

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the idea of the end, the moving tree,

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the tree that thinks and reasons um, may not be

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as far fetched as as some of us think. But

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>as for emotions and plants, uh, there's actually some fascinating

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>research there as well. But that is another story and

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>shall be told another time. So hopefully we give everybody

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>some food for thought here about our own emotional states,

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what the human emotional state is and what it isn't

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>and then to what degree we can perceive and attribute

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>emotional states to other organisms, even though you know the

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lowly crawfish. I mean, I wonder if understanding the way

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that that anxiety might affect be ease or crawfish or

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 1>something like that, could in wait, help give you a

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 1>foothold in controlling your own emotions. I mean again, this

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is something we we sort of began the last episode

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about how the emotions are from our brains. They

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>are within us, but often it can feel as if

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we are in them. You know, there is see on

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which we're afloat and we have no power over them, right,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>or their external forces like something from out of Greek mythology,

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>or you know, some sort of a you know, a

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamentalist um you know, Christian worldview, Angel on one shoulder,

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>devil on the other, affecting our mental states. But no,

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's all within and it is and it is

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, a part of the same navigation, a reality

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that is taking place in all these other organisms as well.

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, therefore, if we demystify it a bit, if

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we sort of take a step back from it and

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in fact increase awareness of what it is. Then. Yeah,

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that gives us, I think, a tremendous strength. You know,

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it keeps basically keeping uh, keeping our our irksome brains

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>from the evening ourselves about what we are. You are

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that churning ocean, Yes, which perhaps is some ambiguous information

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that you may either see in a negative or a

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 1>positive light, depending on your predisposition. All right, so obviously

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you all have emotions, and you all have various interactions

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with animals, be at a dog, a cattle, horse, or

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a crayfish, or or or a b So we would

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there on the topic

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've discussed in these two episodes of Stuff to

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind. Hey, even if you have some thoughts

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>about plants, go ahead and go ahead and let us

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>know about those. Uh. In the meantime, if you want

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind,

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:41.879
<v Speaker 1>where can you find this show? Well, you can find

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 1>this show anywhere you find podcasts wherever that happens to be.

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Just make sure you rate, review, and subscribe. Those are

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the acts that help us out huge things. As always

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to our excellent audio producer, Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with feedback on this

0:49:56.760 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hi, you can email us at

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, this is the

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.