Speaker 1: You know how much I love my pillow, how much
Speaker 1: it's changed my life for the better. Well, I figured
Speaker 1: it was about time that I let you know about
Speaker 1: my pillow sheets Now. Mike Lindell has a passion to
Speaker 1: help you get the best sleep of your life. That's
Speaker 1: why he has created the new Giza Dream Bedsheets. Now.
Speaker 1: These sheets are made from the world's best cotton, Giza
Speaker 1: that's only grown in a very small region where the
Speaker 1: Sahara Desert, Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River all meet
Speaker 1: to create the ideal weather conditions for growing cotton. These
Speaker 1: Giza sheets are available in a variety of colors. They
Speaker 1: come with Mike's ten year warranty sixty day money back guarantee.
Speaker 1: The first night you sleep on these sheets, it's heaven.
Speaker 1: You'll never want to sleep on anything else. Now, right now,
Speaker 1: you my listeners, You're gonna save thirty percent and get
Speaker 1: free shipping when you use the promo code Shawn seven
Speaker 1: Sea and seven when you go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com again, that's promo code Sewn seven Sea and seven
Speaker 1: at mipillow dot com. I glad you with us right
Speaker 1: down our toe free telephone number. You want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. You know it's sad. I M.
Speaker 1: We're gonna interview later in a program today, and I
Speaker 1: give the President a lot of credit for this. There's
Speaker 1: a guy, Eddie Gallagher, Navy seal, and he's gonna be
Speaker 1: put on trial, and you know, he's literally been put
Speaker 1: in prison, and you know the prosecutors are going after
Speaker 1: this guy because he's a He murdered an unarmed, incapacitated
Speaker 1: teenage isis detainee receiving medical aid in the city of Mosul.
Speaker 1: You know, you got him, Then you got Christian Saucier
Speaker 1: takes pictures of his submarine. Then you got Clinton land
Speaker 1: Clint la Rands was given thirty years in jail. And
Speaker 1: because of Obama rules of engagement, this guy has to
Speaker 1: make a split section second decision as the platoon leader
Speaker 1: for his men when two guys on a motorcycle start
Speaker 1: racing towards them, which, by the way, it happened a
Speaker 1: week and a half prior, and a week and al
Speaker 1: prior members of that platoon were killed by guys on
Speaker 1: motorcycles doing this. Then he makes the split second decision.
Speaker 1: What does he get for it? Thirty years in jail.
Speaker 1: I mean we're gonna send men and women out to
Speaker 1: fight for our country, and we're gonna put handcuffs on
Speaker 1: him to begin with. Then we're gonna try them if
Speaker 1: they make a split second decision and they have to
Speaker 1: defend their troop, their platoon members, like in this particular case,
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable. The whole thing is, I mean, why would
Speaker 1: anybody want to sign up and fight for their country
Speaker 1: under these rules? And the President, to his credit, has,
Speaker 1: you know, with the belief of due process, presumption of innocence,
Speaker 1: is moving Edie Gallagher to a less restrictive confinement while
Speaker 1: he awaits his day in court. He said the process
Speaker 1: should move quickly. But you know, in the case of
Speaker 1: Clint Laurents, he's been in jail for six freaking years.
Speaker 1: It's a long time to be in jail. Long time,
Speaker 1: and he's got thirty years. Great, appreciate you serving your country.
Speaker 1: Sorry you made it, Sorry you made a mistake, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, now we have new evidence that came
Speaker 1: up in this case, biometric evidence, forensic evidence that actually
Speaker 1: showed the guys on the motorcycles that were approaching the
Speaker 1: platoon in fact had been responsible for and again we
Speaker 1: have fingerprints, we have evidence, we have DNA to prove
Speaker 1: that they were planting IEDs in the exact same same area.
Speaker 1: Oh so they really were, she hoot us according to
Speaker 1: the evidence that of course. Now, how long does it
Speaker 1: take somebody to get a new trial. It's unbelievable. Anyway,
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine for one, Shawn, you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. I want to go back
Speaker 1: and I want to I want to talk about this
Speaker 1: issue involving the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia, the Commonwealth of Virginia. Now,
Speaker 1: if you remember we had the incident involving the House
Speaker 1: of Commons member, Remember the lady that was what was
Speaker 1: a butterfly? She's protecting the Yeah, well Kathy Tran or something,
Speaker 1: all right, right, she said, yeah, you no, No, my
Speaker 1: bill would allow abortions even up to the point of labor.
Speaker 1: When a woman's dilating. When a woman's dilating, that means
Speaker 1: the baby is coming any minute or hour. Now, that
Speaker 1: means it's time for birthday, gonna be the kids about
Speaker 1: to be born. Yeah, my bill would allow abortions even
Speaker 1: at that point. Like what and followed up by the
Speaker 1: idiot governor you know, along with the I guess the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State, but the governor, you know, in black face.
Speaker 1: It didn't get in trouble for that. But I can
Speaker 1: assure you if it was a Republican they would have.
Speaker 1: And that was there in the comments about abortion from
Speaker 1: you know, Governor Northam of Virginia, which is mothers in labor.
Speaker 1: I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant
Speaker 1: would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the
Speaker 1: infant would be resuscitated if if that's what the mother
Speaker 1: and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue
Speaker 1: between the physicians and the mother himself as a doctor,
Speaker 1: he's a pediatrician. Then we have the case. So he
Speaker 1: says that, and then we got the lieutenant governor who
Speaker 1: they thought was going to replace Northam after these idiotic statements.
Speaker 1: And in the case of Northam, you know what do
Speaker 1: we find out that, Oh, Northam can't be replaced because
Speaker 1: the lieutenant governor is being accused, oh of rape in
Speaker 1: one instance and in another instance serious sexual assault. Now
Speaker 1: I've been asking the question, well, where are all the
Speaker 1: me two people, Where are all the I believe people?
Speaker 1: Where are they all? Are they around anywhere, because we
Speaker 1: don't hear a word when it's a Democrat. The only
Speaker 1: reason you're hearing anything about creepy uncle Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: because the people that are critical in that case, well,
Speaker 1: they're running against them as it relates to the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty nomination, so they want to hurt Biden. But the
Speaker 1: rest of the I believe, I believe, I believe people.
Speaker 1: They're nowhere to be found. So the woman that was
Speaker 1: raped claiming rape. Now, we believe in due process, we
Speaker 1: believe in the presumption of innocence, but we also you know,
Speaker 1: believe in it for everybody. And that goes for the
Speaker 1: Lieutenant governor of Virginia. But remember what happened in the
Speaker 1: Kavanough case. In the Kavanaugh case, I believe, I believe,
Speaker 1: I believe, I believe, I believe, I believe, I believe,
Speaker 1: I believe. Okay, well, in that particular case, everybody believed,
Speaker 1: and even the allegation they got so absurd, you know,
Speaker 1: with one woman claiming, well, almost every other weekend, these
Speaker 1: kids were spiking the punch for these young girls in
Speaker 1: high school and after they spiked the punch. Then the
Speaker 1: girls would pass out, and then they'd line up in
Speaker 1: the hall and they they'd take their turns gang raping
Speaker 1: these teenage girls. And it happened almost every other weekend.
Speaker 1: And then the story evolved into well, I never really
Speaker 1: saw Kavanov spiking the punch, and he was near the
Speaker 1: punch bowl. The punch bowl. Now, I never really saw
Speaker 1: him give a woman anything from the punch bowl, but
Speaker 1: he was holding a red Solo cup. Well and by
Speaker 1: the way, two of the women recanted, you do. Nobody
Speaker 1: seems to ever remember the rocanting because that never gets
Speaker 1: to play that the allegations make. And then after that, well,
Speaker 1: he wasn't lined up in the halls, but he definitely
Speaker 1: was in the hall. And this was a frenzy to
Speaker 1: Bork or Clarence Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh. Well, okay, so now
Speaker 1: we have let me play this woman who's making this
Speaker 1: allegation against the Lieutenant governor of Virginia. Her name is
Speaker 1: Vanessa Tyson, and I want you to listen to her
Speaker 1: tell her story. Now, I'll give you a warning, it's
Speaker 1: hard to listen to other facts. In this case, both accusers,
Speaker 1: one accusing rape, one accusing a violent sexual assault. Both
Speaker 1: of them say they told people immediately thereafter, and those
Speaker 1: people have since corroborated those stories. But if you have
Speaker 1: kids in the car and me want to just kind
Speaker 1: of be careful what they hear. Here we're kissing, lying
Speaker 1: down and we're kissing like so our heads are level
Speaker 1: with each other. And then it was like my neck
Speaker 1: didn't work. What do you mean? It was like I
Speaker 1: couldn't I couldn't feel my neck. I couldn't hold my
Speaker 1: head up. He's using his hand on the back of
Speaker 1: my neck, and I still didn't know what was going wrong.
Speaker 1: I thought there was something wrong with my neck, and
Speaker 1: he's pushing down and pushing down and I couldn't hold
Speaker 1: my neck up, and I didn't know what was going on.
Speaker 1: I honestly didn't know what was going on. And then
Speaker 1: the next thing, I know, like my head is like
Speaker 1: literally in his crotch and I'm choking and gagging, and
Speaker 1: you know, I couldn't say anything because I'm choking and gagging,
Speaker 1: and so you know, it continues for it needs to
Speaker 1: holding my head so I can't lift Like I'm trying
Speaker 1: to lift my head back. I can't. Is he saying
Speaker 1: anything to you, Vanessa? Nothing, nothing, And what are you
Speaker 1: thinking at this moment? To be honest, I'm a total shock.
Speaker 1: Do you say anything to him? No, I didn't know
Speaker 1: what to say. I mean, it's so shocking and so unbelievable.
Speaker 1: And you know what, I believe in due process. Remember
Speaker 1: I said it about Michael Avanati. Well, by the way,
Speaker 1: has since been brought up on these other charges involving
Speaker 1: I guess extortion with Nike, And shockingly, I'm sure what
Speaker 1: would ever, what would what would what would Mark Garrigos
Speaker 1: be doing with Avanati? I never understood that. I actually
Speaker 1: like Garrighoes over there. We've never agreed. But I mean,
Speaker 1: he's not a dumb lawyer. He's a smart guy. So
Speaker 1: I don't know what his involvement is or isn't in
Speaker 1: this particular Okay, But I said when the allegations came
Speaker 1: out there with three separate investigations into Avanadi asn't related
Speaker 1: to his I guess girlfriend at the time or whatever
Speaker 1: of some type of violence, those three investigations ended up,
Speaker 1: all of them exonerating him. So you gotta believe in
Speaker 1: due process. You gotta believe in the presumption of innocence,
Speaker 1: and I'll do that here in the case of the
Speaker 1: Lieutenant governor. But that's pretty compelling testimony. These are pretty
Speaker 1: compelling stories. And here's where the problem is. Well, we're
Speaker 1: consistent and we're saying due process. The silence among the
Speaker 1: Eye believers has been deafening. Did they not see the interview?
Speaker 1: Are they just ignoring the interview? When? Did has happened
Speaker 1: yesterday with I guess Gail King on the CBS Morning
Speaker 1: Show and I see those great interviews, I think, see
Speaker 1: those really good interviews, and so this takes place and
Speaker 1: I don't hear a word from any of them. Now
Speaker 1: I've got a montage of the I believers. You know,
Speaker 1: this is what they were saying back then. Not only
Speaker 1: do women like doctor Ford, who greatly comes forward, need
Speaker 1: to be heard, but they need to be believed. They
Speaker 1: need to be believed. The men of this country just
Speaker 1: shut up and step up do the right thing. Let
Speaker 1: me just say right at the outset, I believe doctor Ford.
Speaker 1: I believe the survivor here. I believe her. I stand
Speaker 1: with her and shows up on Monday. I don't think
Speaker 1: she should be bullied into this scenario. I believe her.
Speaker 1: I believe Professor Ford. I think she's credible. I believe, well,
Speaker 1: does anybody believe Vanessa Tyson who was on the CBS
Speaker 1: Morning Show with Gail King. Now, what I did think
Speaker 1: about the Republicans during that time with Professor Ford and
Speaker 1: all these allegations, you know, I actually said, for the
Speaker 1: first time, they Republicans actually got it right. They showed
Speaker 1: the proper seriousness of the issue and conducted themselves properly,
Speaker 1: and you know, and it got to a point until
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham stepped in and that changed the entire narrative debate.
Speaker 1: And I think one of the best speeches I ever
Speaker 1: heard in the Senate Chamber came from Susan Collins of Maine,
Speaker 1: who looked at all of the facts in the case.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was a It was a testament to
Speaker 1: somebody that just wanted the truth, that's all, nothing else.
Speaker 1: And I've been critical of her in the past, and
Speaker 1: I understand Maine is she hasked to represent her constituents
Speaker 1: of Maine. She does so very well. Was an incredible moment.
Speaker 1: But the fact that they've been so so why does
Speaker 1: this guy not get the same treatment? Now? I know
Speaker 1: we're talking about creepy Uncle Joe and crazy Uncle Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: I mean it is creepy, crazy, creepy Uncle Joe. I
Speaker 1: mean it really is, and I don't get it. I've
Speaker 1: had this experience at different times. Are my people that
Speaker 1: get in your personal space? I love Scott Shading, creepy
Speaker 1: crazy Uncle Joe, Joe Biden, the clothes stucker. I just
Speaker 1: love Scott. He's amazing. He always got the number one
Speaker 1: morning show in New York City, number one any he
Speaker 1: has forever number one morning show. His ex wife, boy,
Speaker 1: I bet they're regretting that decision letting him go for
Speaker 1: two seconds. His work ex wife it with Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: what I mean, is you know? I mean he's married
Speaker 1: to Church forever, who's wonderful, and his daughter's wonderful too,
Speaker 1: very successful. Hey, if you're one of thirty four million
Speaker 1: Americans that smokes, you know what a hassle that can
Speaker 1: be for me. I'm out playing off and I come
Speaker 1: back smelling like cigars. It's the smell on your hands
Speaker 1: and your breath, your clothes. But now, thanks to Jewel,
Speaker 1: you don't have to worry about it anymore. Jewel is
Speaker 1: a vaporizer. It does contain nicotine for a satisfying transition. Now,
Speaker 1: when I found Jewel, it was a complete game changer
Speaker 1: in my life. I don't smoke any cigars any longer.
Speaker 1: And Jewel was designed by smokers for smokers to be
Speaker 1: an alternative to whatever it is you're smoking. So if
Speaker 1: you're one of thirty four million adults who do smoke cigars, cigarettes, pipe, whatever,
Speaker 1: well there is an alternative to all of them. Now
Speaker 1: to discover the smoking alternative that's like nothing you've ever tried.
Speaker 1: Just visit Juul dot com slash switch America. That's Juul
Speaker 1: dot com slash Switch America. Now, warning, this product does
Speaker 1: contain nicotine, and nicotine is addictive. I just don't think
Speaker 1: it's unfair to say, where are these people? You know,
Speaker 1: this really irks me and really bothers me because it's
Speaker 1: so transparently political. Everything they do is transparently political. You know,
Speaker 1: liberals are generous, but only with your money. You know,
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi. We go to her district and she lives
Speaker 1: in the million plus a enclave of the gated community
Speaker 1: where all the other rich people in San Francisco live.
Speaker 1: In our district, though are oh streets, tons of homeless people,
Speaker 1: tons of drug addicts neat We showed the pictures and
Speaker 1: images feces in the street all over the place. When
Speaker 1: you have needles and bloodstained clothing in the streets, that
Speaker 1: can't be safe for anyone. I do see like needles
Speaker 1: and then you know feces everywhere, and then that's obviously
Speaker 1: about drugs and stuff like that kind of makes it
Speaker 1: a trap. When you walk around you see needles and
Speaker 1: also a playground and just feces that we're having the
Speaker 1: smell of it all. It's kind of definitely have to
Speaker 1: look on the ground when you're walking and it's then
Speaker 1: it's definitely an uptick because I've lived in this city
Speaker 1: more than thirty years and this is probably the worst
Speaker 1: I've seen it. Why doesn't Nancy Pelosi walk around our neighborhood,
Speaker 1: get pledges for money, build a shelter for homeless people
Speaker 1: that feeds them, allows them a nice place to shower,
Speaker 1: and maybe even a place to sleep. And maybe as
Speaker 1: part of that, maybe they can hire a couple of
Speaker 1: drug counselors and do it on her own with all
Speaker 1: her rich French he's a multi multi, multi multi millionaire. No,
Speaker 1: but you'll only be generous with your money. You know,
Speaker 1: Democrats care about building a wall, but only if Obama's
Speaker 1: president in his second term. Now Trump wants to do
Speaker 1: forget it, the all important dreamers DACA. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: that all gets cast aside because that would mean actually
Speaker 1: talking to Donald Trump and making a deal. You know, Oh, well,
Speaker 1: what about the furloughed employees. They don't care about them either.
Speaker 1: It's the safe if it's Kavanaugh or Trump, and it's
Speaker 1: me too against a Republican boy, they're all on board.
Speaker 1: Got a significant allegation or rape and violent assault against
Speaker 1: the woman, not a peep out of most of these
Speaker 1: same people. It's so despicable. When he came back in
Speaker 1: the room, he sort of stood blocking the door, was
Speaker 1: sort of imposing the way he walked in the room,
Speaker 1: and he shut the door, and it was sort of
Speaker 1: like simultaneous. I heard the door click and the light
Speaker 1: went off, click, like locking the door, and you think, what,
Speaker 1: oh no, what's about to happen? You became concerned, and
Speaker 1: he did things that you shouldn't do to someone without
Speaker 1: their permission. And I tried several times to get up
Speaker 1: and leave and let's push back down and what happened.
Speaker 1: He forcibly sexually assaulted and raped me. I was not
Speaker 1: on the bed. Initially, there was a couch and he
Speaker 1: pulled me over and I tried several times take it
Speaker 1: up and was pushed back down, held down, And you
Speaker 1: made it clear this is not what I want. It
Speaker 1: was very clear, because you know he is saying this
Speaker 1: night was consentual. If you have to hold someone down,
Speaker 1: it's not consentual. All right. That was Meredith Watson. That's
Speaker 1: the other accuser forcibly sexually assaulted said she was raped
Speaker 1: in two thousand. Lieutenant Governor. You know, I honestly, I know,
Speaker 1: We've been so busy with so many other issues, and
Speaker 1: I've been watching and watching and watching and wat and
Speaker 1: it came up in my mind last night. All Right,
Speaker 1: we're doing creepy. It's so creepy, crazy Uncle Joe, crazy
Speaker 1: creepy Uncle Joe. You know, I just I don't even
Speaker 1: know what to say about it. I mean, you know
Speaker 1: how many people were writing me last night like, oh,
Speaker 1: stop showing those pictures. Well, I gotta tell you something.
Speaker 1: There are many we weren't able to show, like with
Speaker 1: young kids grabbing their face and kissing him on the lips.
Speaker 1: I like, I don't get that. Where's the well you
Speaker 1: say it on Mike? I did say it on Mike.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the parents I don't know. I mean,
Speaker 1: I look, I have met touchy, touchy, touchy in your
Speaker 1: face people my whole life. There's some of them that
Speaker 1: they don't give you any personal space, like all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, like they want to talk and they're right
Speaker 1: up in your grill, and I'm immediately uncomfortable, naturally, and
Speaker 1: so I'll even if you take a step back, they
Speaker 1: just moved a step in closer, move another's I moved
Speaker 1: three steps. I start doing a dance, moving back so
Speaker 1: fast and they can't stop. And by the way, and
Speaker 1: almost ninety percent of the time they have bad breath.
Speaker 1: I was just gonna say, why are they so unaware
Speaker 1: of their breath? Why are they so unaware of their
Speaker 1: invasion of someone's personal space? How do you how do
Speaker 1: you not respect somebody's personal space? I don't get it now.
Speaker 1: And then they got the other side of this, which is,
Speaker 1: you know, he like takes people by the neck and
Speaker 1: pulls them in and they're like kissing on the lips,
Speaker 1: and then it wasn't all these people well rubbing, the
Speaker 1: rubbing the shoulders thing, Hey, I stop, get your hands
Speaker 1: off me. Am I the only one that fuels See
Speaker 1: the picture of his wife. Oh yeah, that's on Drudge
Speaker 1: right now. Ysterical, they say, they're just that's yeah, that's
Speaker 1: very effective, very affection of people. Actually a group of people.
Speaker 1: They just like to, you know, inappropriately touch one another.
Speaker 1: A right, So as we're talking about this though, and
Speaker 1: I'll let people make up their own minds on this
Speaker 1: whole thing. But you know, and then you think the
Speaker 1: crazy uncle Joe side and man, you got the first
Speaker 1: African American and he's articulate, clean, man, that's storybook like,
Speaker 1: what is wrong with you? You know where I can't
Speaker 1: believe you got away with that? Then became the vice
Speaker 1: president and you know, you can't work at a Dunkin
Speaker 1: Donuts or seven eleven unless you have a can not
Speaker 1: go to a seven eleven or a Duncan Donuts unless
Speaker 1: you have a slight Indian accent. It's a you got
Speaker 1: the first listen to this street, Main Street first, ye
Speaker 1: who is articulate and bright and clean and vice looking guy?
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a story book. Romney wants to let
Speaker 1: the He said in the first one hundred days, he's
Speaker 1: gonna let the big banks once again write their own
Speaker 1: rules on Chain Wall Street. You're gonna put you all
Speaker 1: back in Chase. And you don't know my state. My
Speaker 1: state was a slave state. My state is a border state.
Speaker 1: My state is the eighth largest black population in the country.
Speaker 1: My state is anything from a Northeast liberal state. Okay,
Speaker 1: my state's a slave state. And I know he projects
Speaker 1: the zamtrack image of his but we're learning a lot
Speaker 1: more from Peter Schweitzer can stay a funny story. So
Speaker 1: I was thinking Amtrak because I can take it every day.
Speaker 1: But I was taking it and there was a huge
Speaker 1: giant picture of Joe Biden, ginormous picture am Track Joe.
Speaker 1: Is that what they're trying to convention? Joe Biden the
Speaker 1: close stucker. I don't think I'm alone in the Let's
Speaker 1: take a survey of our Jason. Do you like people
Speaker 1: getting in your grill like that? Or you've had people
Speaker 1: to try to, you know, kiss you on the lips
Speaker 1: and you're like moving your face a million different preferably not.
Speaker 1: Although I unlike you, I'm not averse to having a massage. Okay,
Speaker 1: somebody so so a stranger walks up behind you and starts,
Speaker 1: you know, massaging and soldier massage. No, no, no, all right,
Speaker 1: well man, that's what we're That's what crazy creepy uncle
Speaker 1: Joe does that that. I wouldn't stand for that. Kylie,
Speaker 1: what are you? Where do you stand on this? I
Speaker 1: think it's so creepy. I don't want anybody touching me exactly,
Speaker 1: not at all, Ethan. I'm in the same boat as you.
Speaker 1: Even the massages is freaky to me, like, no, no,
Speaker 1: don't touch me. All right, Blair, jump in here. You
Speaker 1: know where are you on all of this? It's to home?
Speaker 1: Bring your hands home? What about or in your grill?
Speaker 1: I mean, oh, I don't know. I always carry mins
Speaker 1: with me, always carry me, you know. I say, if
Speaker 1: you had a tik tak, go for the shouldest, get close,
Speaker 1: get in for the real thing. Back up, you creep
Speaker 1: that's right. Well, if you didn't have a tik tak,
Speaker 1: I'm with Hillary, back it up. But here's the thing.
Speaker 1: Do you agree you've experienced this yourself? Right? If you, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. If ye about the tik tak, it's enlightenment.
Speaker 1: What about somebody just, you know, trying to kiss you
Speaker 1: on the lips. You're not you don't know this person
Speaker 1: or very unfamiliar with this person. I know some people
Speaker 1: I know in their colleagues and they just come over
Speaker 1: and they're like, hey, how you doing la on your lips?
Speaker 1: And you have no problem with us? No, I have
Speaker 1: a problem with it. But what are you supposed to do?
Speaker 1: What are you supposed to do? I don't know because
Speaker 1: it listened. It comes from a place of like a
Speaker 1: lot of listen, listen Rocky. If Rocky wants to kiss
Speaker 1: me on the lips, by follow me. It's Rocky. Wow,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna call Sylvester Stallone, please do all right? So,
Speaker 1: but or has any guy ever come up behind you
Speaker 1: and start giving you a must neck or back massage? Yes? Ah,
Speaker 1: the worst is when they hands a sweaty. Oh so creepy.
Speaker 1: Sorry that's real, but we were. This is why people said,
Speaker 1: why why are you? I was in a real massage
Speaker 1: where they had to call the police. What are they
Speaker 1: going for a happy ending? What was that? When I
Speaker 1: got over on my back, my massuse was naked. What
Speaker 1: I turned around and I said, uh, hey, where's the
Speaker 1: where are your clothes? How's your response? Hey? And he comes,
Speaker 1: I swear to God. He goes, oh, this is a
Speaker 1: this is a new type of massage that we're offering here.
Speaker 1: And I said, I'm pretty sure that this is not new,
Speaker 1: and I'm pretty sure I don't want any part of it.
Speaker 1: And I got up and I got out of the room,
Speaker 1: and they had to call the police. He was taken away.
Speaker 1: That's really creepy, freaky, yeah, right here, right here in midtown.
Speaker 1: All right, you know what, I just I don't need
Speaker 1: strangers touching me. I just don't leave me alone. Leave
Speaker 1: me alone. I don't want any part of you touching
Speaker 1: any part of me. Every night, I have to run
Speaker 1: the stupid wire down the back of my neck. There
Speaker 1: is a process that everybody must actually witness that. All right,
Speaker 1: So I put my earpiece in, I put it over
Speaker 1: my ear myself, I throw it over my back there
Speaker 1: to pull it back and then click it in perfect.
Speaker 1: Then I will pull down the earpiece to the exact
Speaker 1: level of tension so it won't show on TV, and
Speaker 1: they put a piece of tape over it. Then I
Speaker 1: put my jacket on. That's it simple, because other day,
Speaker 1: first of all, that is a complete misrepresentation of what
Speaker 1: actually happens. You fidget like a little kid waiting the dentist.
Speaker 1: I don't want to talk about nightmare. I got a
Speaker 1: better story. Alc Baldwin is being sued. Baldwin was on
Speaker 1: with Howard Stern the other day and apparently they were
Speaker 1: talking about me. Why is Howard Stern, you know, taking
Speaker 1: this idiot side. I don't get it. He's not taking
Speaker 1: his side. Took Jimmy Kimmel's side, and about it, he
Speaker 1: has not taken their Sideward Stern actually said, and this
Speaker 1: guy's brilliant, he's smart, and I couldn't believe he said, Well,
Speaker 1: why would Kimmel ever be in a fight with Hannity.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's on network, and Hannity probably dying to
Speaker 1: be on network. I'm like, Howard, you know better than everybody.
Speaker 1: Howard is dying for you to say, you know what.
Speaker 1: I want to clear the air. I want to come
Speaker 1: on your show, Stern. I want to talk. Howard doesn't
Speaker 1: want to talk to me. Oh, Sean, No, seriously, I
Speaker 1: don't have no wife. Do you want me to say?
Speaker 1: You know what? Am I gonna have to answer the questions?
Speaker 1: Do you pleasure yourself? Do you do this? Do you that?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't feel going there? Who cares?
Speaker 1: Didn't say what you felt like doing? What he would
Speaker 1: never understand is his book Private Parts. Although I do
Speaker 1: a very different kind of radio than he does, and
Speaker 1: I think he's smart and entertaining and fun. And you know,
Speaker 1: I listen to him on Serious XM, especially during Christmas.
Speaker 1: I get to hear the all the highlight interviews from
Speaker 1: the year because I don't listen to radio much at
Speaker 1: any other part of the year. But and I've interviewed
Speaker 1: him and he on my radio and TV show and
Speaker 1: it was fun. I mean, he's a fun, smart guy.
Speaker 1: But when he said that Kimmel Hannah, he's probably dying
Speaker 1: to be on a network. I'm like, Howard, where you been?
Speaker 1: We get two three times the ratings of this idiot,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, you should know that, Sean. What it's
Speaker 1: called just stirring things up, creating a little tension. Yeah,
Speaker 1: probably getting your attention and hug me. They'll put their
Speaker 1: hand in me going thank you, to put their hand
Speaker 1: over their mouth like they're going to cry and go
Speaker 1: now you're doing so. He has Alec Baldwin on and
Speaker 1: I forget what everyone was telling man. I just didn't
Speaker 1: feel like listening to it. Anyway, I'm gonna call for this.
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin is being sued and compared to President Trump
Speaker 1: by the man that allegedly he allegedly hit during that
Speaker 1: parking dispute late last year in New York City. Apparently
Speaker 1: had to go off to some anger management classes in
Speaker 1: New York and allegedly went off on a man who
Speaker 1: parked in a spot. One of the actor's family members
Speaker 1: was holding him and Baldwin is holding for him. And
Speaker 1: Baldwin has since appeared in court where he pled guilty
Speaker 1: to second degree harassment forced to undergo anger management. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we remember the tapes with his daughter. I remember beating
Speaker 1: in a Twitter fight with Alec Baldwin his daughter. Actually
Speaker 1: what this one? I was on Twitter, which I'm not
Speaker 1: anymore because we were compromised apparently in Twitter anyway, her daughter,
Speaker 1: his daughter wrote me directly, please stop fighting with my dad.
Speaker 1: I said, Okay, I stopped. I'm like, well, why don't
Speaker 1: you ask your dad? I mean, she seemed like a
Speaker 1: nice kid. I don't want to buy I don't want
Speaker 1: to bring kids into this, I just leave him alone.
Speaker 1: So anyway, long story short, Now he's being sued and
Speaker 1: he slams now. Baldwin has a horrific temper, cameraman, fights
Speaker 1: in people's faces with cameras all at paparazzi. All I
Speaker 1: have to say is hello and walked by. Leave the guy.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't know why he's being so hostile.
Speaker 1: And then one day he's so he's trying to fill
Speaker 1: in on radio. Me and Mark Levin tag team him.
Speaker 1: He got so angry he walked off the show he
Speaker 1: was hosting. Brian Whitman was assisting in the hosting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: where we have that, but we're not going to do
Speaker 1: that now. But then so he still wants to do
Speaker 1: talk radio, so he goes to our affiliate in Philly, PHT.
Speaker 1: I mean that was at our ex wife in New
Speaker 1: York radio station WABC. We're now on the all new
Speaker 1: Am seven ten w R. Anyway, so what's funny about
Speaker 1: it is he's practicing being He really was doing a
Speaker 1: talk show. This is part of this is we None
Speaker 1: of this is fake. This is Alec Baldwin auditioning to
Speaker 1: be a talk radio host in Philly. When we come
Speaker 1: back Uh, oh, we're up some time. Oh great, well
Speaker 1: we're gonna h when can we take some calls? Ivan,
Speaker 1: whenever we want? Do we have calls that are on
Speaker 1: there now? No calls? No calls yet? What number do
Speaker 1: people call to get on the air? Ivan? Do we
Speaker 1: have that number? It's right there? Do I have the
Speaker 1: call number in front of me? Oh? I'm so sorry.
Speaker 1: That's interesting? Interesting at twelve ten at pht of course,
Speaker 1: any other questions you have, any other comments you have,
Speaker 1: call us um to the what else? Call us please
Speaker 1: at one twelve ten Now, Um, if you don't call,
Speaker 1: we're gonna keep reading from the Scientology manual. You might
Speaker 1: not feel it. You might not feel the energy right now,
Speaker 1: you might not feel the swell of what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Everybody calls yet? There Ivan, no calls. Let's read some
Speaker 1: more about scientology. Is Sean Hannity a scientologist Alec Baldwin
Speaker 1: posing the big questions tonight? Here? Do we have any
Speaker 1: calls here? Ed? Ivan? None? Boy, it's just incredible, unbelievable. Well,
Speaker 1: you leave us no choice, listeners. And then he ended
Speaker 1: up calling his mother because nobody would call his show
Speaker 1: Who soul Mate? That was the best tape I've heard
Speaker 1: this is when he was trying out in New York
Speaker 1: on w ABC, walked off the show and walked out,
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity, Is that Brian Whitman? Hi, Sean alec I
Speaker 1: wanted to give you an official w ABC welcome, considering
Speaker 1: you you were supposed to come on my program last
Speaker 1: week and you you didn't show up. What happened? No,
Speaker 1: I wasn't supposed to come on your program, Sean Hanny.
Speaker 1: Was supposed to come on the program, because the deal
Speaker 1: was made with your agent that if you were going
Speaker 1: to come out with Brian first, you'd come out with me.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't dream of coming on your program, Sean Hannity,
Speaker 1: because I'm here with Brian, I'm here with a really
Speaker 1: talented people. Are you don't tell the truth? I'm here
Speaker 1: with a really talented broadcast. Why would I want to
Speaker 1: come on the show with a no talent former construction
Speaker 1: worker hack like you? Are you the guy that said
Speaker 1: all right, stop right there? I'm He apparently said the
Speaker 1: same thing. I'm really proud that I did all work
Speaker 1: in construction for all those years. Clearly he doesn't like
Speaker 1: hard work. I'm proud that I was washing dishes at
Speaker 1: twelve and did every job in a restaurant for ten years.
Speaker 1: It's my roots of my who I am. I'm proud
Speaker 1: of all that. He's got a much harder job reading
Speaker 1: lines off a telephone. So it ends like this. Levin
Speaker 1: calls in right after, and can you move it forward
Speaker 1: a little bit because we can't actually move it forward,
Speaker 1: but we'll play it on the other side of this
Speaker 1: break just for fun. All right, we'll take a quick break.
Speaker 1: We will come back. Eight hundred and nine four one,
Speaker 1: Sean told Frey telephone number. All right, here's the clip
Speaker 1: I was talking about with Baldwin. How are you forty
Speaker 1: or fifty pounds overweight? Now? Come on, now, who is that?
Speaker 1: I just told you got a two digit IQ? And
Speaker 1: who's that? Who's your little cabin boy? There? Cabin boy?
Speaker 1: You are Sean? How did these cabin boy? Can I
Speaker 1: get you Alec to you have nothing to sit him? Well?
Speaker 1: Can I talk to Alec Ballist? Or no? We're gonna
Speaker 1: end this right now. I'm so pissed off of you. Anyway,
Speaker 1: it's my patriotic duty to get this story out there.
Speaker 1: If I didn't speak out loud, probably you know no
Speaker 1: one would have ever understood that Stefan Helper was an
Speaker 1: informants trying to spy on the Trump campaign. He brought
Speaker 1: me to London to meet with him. And the same
Speaker 1: day that I met with Stefan Helper, where he was
Speaker 1: part of an operation against me, the British Ministry of
Speaker 1: Foreign Affairs invited me to basically speak to me as well.
Speaker 1: So when I explained that the British and the Australians
Speaker 1: were working hand in hand with the Obama administration to
Speaker 1: spy on members of the Trump campaign, you'll see in
Speaker 1: my book at the height of the FAISA abuse scandal,
Speaker 1: around the summer of two sixteen and the fall of
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, the British government was actively seeking me out
Speaker 1: to question me and to spy on me. And people think,
Speaker 1: tell me that you know what months were that was
Speaker 1: this happening, And I said, it all happened around the
Speaker 1: time that Stefan Helper reached out. It's so important that
Speaker 1: the statement that President Trump made a couple of days
Speaker 1: ago on the Hannity Show regarding declassifying materials is so
Speaker 1: important that it's going to shock so many people because
Speaker 1: what's going to be revealed in that declassification is going
Speaker 1: to show that no one with the Trump campaign was
Speaker 1: in a conspiracy or conspiring with the Russians, but we
Speaker 1: were essentially all targeted by what we thought were allies
Speaker 1: of the United States. And you know, a couple of
Speaker 1: months ago the British when Donald President Trump was openly
Speaker 1: discussing declassifying materials, there were two US allies that called
Speaker 1: him and said, please do not declassify anything. And no
Speaker 1: one knew who those allies were until a little later
Speaker 1: we figured out it was both the UK and Australia.
Speaker 1: So they're involved. They were spying, they were actively trying
Speaker 1: to undermine the campaign by you know, bringing people like
Speaker 1: Alexander down Or and Stefan Helper to interact with the campaign.
Speaker 1: And I think that's what the classified materials are going
Speaker 1: to show. And obviously my congressional testimony that's not public
Speaker 1: is quite clear that people like Congressman Mark Meadows and
Speaker 1: others who are privy to these materials also understand that
Speaker 1: that's what's in that declassified classified material and that that
Speaker 1: will be counterinvestigations, you know, sort of accounting for this
Speaker 1: hoax that exonerates him. You know, what I'm saying, to investigate,
Speaker 1: perhaps you, perhaps others, do you fear that, do you
Speaker 1: think that's coming down the pike. I don't fear it personally.
Speaker 1: I fear it as a citizen right investigate what investigate
Speaker 1: that investigations were conducted, and what would be the crime
Speaker 1: you'd be investigating. So it's a terrible cycle to start.
Speaker 1: He's already started it with calling for the locking up
Speaker 1: of his political opponents, including people like me, and so
Speaker 1: it would just be more of that dangerous step. And
Speaker 1: I would hope, although they continue to disappoint me, the
Speaker 1: Republicans would finally stand up and say we don't do
Speaker 1: that kind of thing. But me personally asked me questions
Speaker 1: go ahead, I'd like to answer them in the daylight
Speaker 1: if I could. It's amazing by the way that James
Speaker 1: come cut, same guy that said he could be fired
Speaker 1: for any reason or no reason at all, And I say,
Speaker 1: maybe it was because Trump was obstructing and he doesn't
Speaker 1: understand at all. The Muller report. George Popadopoulos tapped into
Speaker 1: something really really important here and when he started going
Speaker 1: off and explaining, and yes, the President did say on
Speaker 1: my TV show last week that a lot of this information,
Speaker 1: the FAIZA warrant applications, the Gang of Eight information, the
Speaker 1: three h two information, another information is going to come
Speaker 1: cascading down on Democrats. We have the new dump by
Speaker 1: Congressman Doug Collins today as it relates to the FBI
Speaker 1: guy Bill what's his name previous and what the thing's
Speaker 1: pre step the things that he's set anyway, George Stephanopolis,
Speaker 1: George Papadopolis, Sorry, that's a horrible thing to say. And
Speaker 1: his wife Simona are with US deep State target how
Speaker 1: I got caught in the crosshairs of the plot to
Speaker 1: bring down President Trump. By the way, it's up on
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com, bookstores everywhere. Um, how
Speaker 1: are you guys? Good, good to talk to you again.
Speaker 1: Thanks for coming back. Oh, thanks so much for having
Speaker 1: us Sean, it's a real honor. Thank you so much,
Speaker 1: so thanks again for being there with you. Let me
Speaker 1: ask you this when you're saying that this classified material,
Speaker 1: because I my sources have been telling me a long
Speaker 1: time that, because our intelligence community actually has laws and
Speaker 1: rules they've got to follow, sometimes they kind of farm
Speaker 1: out to other intelligence agencies work that maybe they themselves
Speaker 1: cannot do, which would hence result in resistance of even
Speaker 1: allies like Great Britain and Australia, good great allies of
Speaker 1: the US from wanting that information out because it would
Speaker 1: show maybe they were doing things at the request of
Speaker 1: our intelligence community that they shouldn't be asking them to do.
Speaker 1: George Sean, That's exactly what happened. And there's only one
Speaker 1: person on this plan that that was interacting with both
Speaker 1: the British and the Australians to the points. I want
Speaker 1: to make it clear that the British governments when Donald
Speaker 1: Trump was elected president, ended up sending me the letter
Speaker 1: of congratulations from Teresa May for me to pass along
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump, and I ended up passing it along
Speaker 1: to Steve Bannon. I'm sure Steve Bannon passed it along
Speaker 1: to President Trump at the time. So I was the
Speaker 1: one in these meetings with the Australians and the British.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't think anybody else in the campaign
Speaker 1: except a couple others, were dealing with people like Stephan Helper.
Speaker 1: But I saw with my own eyes and I was
Speaker 1: so suspicious of these meetings I was having, you know,
Speaker 1: which you know, as a foreign policy person, you're supposed
Speaker 1: to be meeting with US allies, but you don't expect
Speaker 1: them to be spying on you and trying to sabotage
Speaker 1: you in the campaign you're working with simultaneously. So this
Speaker 1: guy Alexander down or we could get into him in
Speaker 1: a little bit, but I just want to make it
Speaker 1: clear that he was His behavior was so disturbing, and
Speaker 1: this is the Australian diplomat that I foolishly reported him
Speaker 1: to Bob Muller and the FBI because I thought that
Speaker 1: he was spying on me and I thought he was
Speaker 1: trying to undermine me in the campaign. So even before
Speaker 1: that New York Times story came out about drinking or
Speaker 1: whatever that nonsense was, I reported this guy to the FBI.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot more to the story regarding US
Speaker 1: Allies and them in the Obama administration farming out on
Speaker 1: surveillance tactics to them that I'm here, I really want
Speaker 1: to clarify. Well, I want you to go a little
Speaker 1: deeper when you say that. Look, I gotta be honest.
Speaker 1: When it comes to our intelligence community, we need them
Speaker 1: so desperately, which is why we give them these powerful
Speaker 1: tools to protect us. I have no problem with them
Speaker 1: spying on all of our enemies and if need be,
Speaker 1: even our allies. And but it's when the powerful tools
Speaker 1: of intelligence then get used against and turned on the
Speaker 1: American people, which I believe happened here, that's a problem.
Speaker 1: And if they're farming out that aspect of intelligence gathering
Speaker 1: not to protect us but for political reasons, that I
Speaker 1: have the big problem with that. It's it's that That's
Speaker 1: why I call it an abusive power. Can you expand
Speaker 1: on that? Absolutely? Look here here's where it gets even
Speaker 1: more disturbing. I'm a man who to this day, okay,
Speaker 1: has never met a Russian official in my entire life,
Speaker 1: let alone on the Trump campaign and transition. Okay, So,
Speaker 1: by the way, you know, people have said, well that
Speaker 1: your wonderful wife, Simona, who you know, I've gotten to
Speaker 1: know both of you so well, they always thought she
Speaker 1: was from Russia. She's not exactly. Still this morning on
Speaker 1: Rasta today, and I made the point, I said that
Speaker 1: there is nothing Russian about me, and you know this
Speaker 1: is this is the proof. But how much this apprecate
Speaker 1: everything up to the point that he married the Russian
Speaker 1: Italian woman? So you're you're you grew up in Italy. Yes,
Speaker 1: I'm Italian. I grew up in the south of Italy
Speaker 1: and uh, you know a part of my family is
Speaker 1: in Switzerland, which is nothing to do with the Russia,
Speaker 1: by the way, so I'm full Italian. People question my accent,
Speaker 1: my look. I always says, I don't know how my
Speaker 1: accent sounds, but definitely non. No Russian national ever told
Speaker 1: me it is crazy, and you know it's resulted also
Speaker 1: in that threat for me, many people over this amounts
Speaker 1: telling me you have to die, you're a Russian agent
Speaker 1: to get out of the United States. I mean, there
Speaker 1: are many bad aspects of this fake propaganda. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: people hate haters using this against Neal the time in
Speaker 1: a very violent way. So at the beginning it was
Speaker 1: a joke, but honestly it's not, and that I blame
Speaker 1: also my country. Why nobody came out saying she's Italian. Well, listen,
Speaker 1: I feel for you, I really do, and I think
Speaker 1: it's very hard when you know both of you have
Speaker 1: gone through all that you've gone through, and you know,
Speaker 1: Georgia's have gotten to know you, and Simona, I just
Speaker 1: realized that you are a victim and all of this
Speaker 1: and the title of your book is absolutely correct. You
Speaker 1: know you are a target and you end up spend
Speaker 1: twelve days in jail. Thank god it went quickly and
Speaker 1: it wasn't terrible. But I find that a lot of
Speaker 1: innocent people in this now have been targeted at very
Speaker 1: high level. And what part of this deep you know.
Speaker 1: I know some people did not understand what I meant
Speaker 1: early on by the deep state when I was talking
Speaker 1: about the deep state, But why don't you say in
Speaker 1: your words what deep state is what you experienced absolutely
Speaker 1: And this is the perfect platform to do that. So
Speaker 1: I'm going to go step by step here because it's
Speaker 1: very important for people to understand how in depth the
Speaker 1: deep state went to go after me and others on
Speaker 1: the campaign. There's this person named Joseph Mipsud, who is
Speaker 1: the professor who was at the epic center of the
Speaker 1: fake Russia collusion story that got everyone involved in it
Speaker 1: for the last three years. This was a man who
Speaker 1: told me in London out of the blue that the
Speaker 1: Russians possessed thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails, okay, and then
Speaker 1: later on Bob Muller told the world that this was
Speaker 1: a Russian asset and a Russian intermediary offering to sabotage Clinton. Okay,
Speaker 1: that was the fake story that Bob Muller and the
Speaker 1: FBI and the intelligence agencies propagated to the world in
Speaker 1: order to make people like myself, the campaign, and President
Speaker 1: Trump look bad. Now here's the reality. And this is
Speaker 1: just so the listeners understand how incredible well the PSI
Speaker 1: op was that was used by the intelligence community, probably
Speaker 1: in tandem with the media to get that fake story out.
Speaker 1: The reality is this person, Joseph Mifson, who told me
Speaker 1: that the Russians have emails was introduced to me by
Speaker 1: a woman named Arvinder Sambe who was the FBI's legal
Speaker 1: at TACHE in London. And this woman also has a
Speaker 1: personal working relationship with Bob Muller dating back to nine
Speaker 1: to eleven. So I meet him after she encourages me
Speaker 1: to meet with this person in Rome at a place
Speaker 1: named Link Campus. David Ignatius of The Washington Post has
Speaker 1: written an incredible article about this place. Link Campus is
Speaker 1: a spy training school for the CIA and the FBI.
Speaker 1: So I hope you're getting my drift here. So the
Speaker 1: guy who tells me that the Russians have thousands of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's emails is introduced to me by an FBI intermediary,
Speaker 1: and all of his contact publicly and privately are to
Speaker 1: Western intelligence organizations, including the CIA, the FBI, and the
Speaker 1: British governments. So this person tells me this information, and
Speaker 1: then a week after he tells me this information, I
Speaker 1: have Alexander Downer, the Australian diplomats, spying on me to
Speaker 1: see if I would make any off the cup remark
Speaker 1: regarding what he had told me, And that's what I
Speaker 1: think Congressman Mark Meadows was referencing a couple of weeks
Speaker 1: ago when he stated that ambassadors were conspiring with the
Speaker 1: FBI and Western intelligence groups to hurt Donald Trump in
Speaker 1: the campaign. So this is the entire story, the entire
Speaker 1: Russia collusion narrative, and the foundation of it not only
Speaker 1: was corrupt, but it was completely fabricated and preplanned by
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. And that's why I have been so
Speaker 1: vocal and not and trying to get the story out there,
Speaker 1: because I think the President and his administration really needs
Speaker 1: to talk to the Australians, the British, and even the
Speaker 1: Italians and find out what they're in exact role was
Speaker 1: in creating this. U you know, this a fake off
Speaker 1: that was targeted at not only myself, but others in
Speaker 1: the came I got to take a break here. We'll
Speaker 1: come back and we'll continue. George Popidoppolos's wife's Simona with Us,
Speaker 1: Deep State Target. How I got caught in the crosshairs
Speaker 1: of the plot to bring down President Trump. I've I've
Speaker 1: heard this from numerous sources that these countries are scared
Speaker 1: to death at what the President may declassify. Amazon dot com,
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com, bookstores everywhere. It is a fascinating read.
Speaker 1: All right, as we continue, George Popidoppolos's wife Simona with
Speaker 1: Us their best selling book, Deep State Target, How I
Speaker 1: got caught in the crosshairs of the plot to bring
Speaker 1: down President Trump? What is it? I've been reading a
Speaker 1: lot of what you've been saying in your interviews, and
Speaker 1: you really feel, both of you that this is your
Speaker 1: patriotic duty to actually expose how the Obama administration everyone
Speaker 1: seems to forget as the Obama administration and there this
Speaker 1: happened under their watch. Most people seem to forget that, George, look,
Speaker 1: and that's and if they do forget it. That's exactly
Speaker 1: why I'm screaming from the rooftops trying to remind everyone
Speaker 1: that exactly what you just stated, that the Obama administration
Speaker 1: was the ringleader behind that entire operation to try and
Speaker 1: bring candidate and president from down. Yeah, and Simona, you're
Speaker 1: going through all of this with him at any is
Speaker 1: he telling you these some of these thoughts at different
Speaker 1: times that he thinks this doesn't feel right, you know,
Speaker 1: be it the London Professor or Downer or Stefan Helper
Speaker 1: or any of these people. Oh well, I could witness
Speaker 1: personally one of the character which is professor means to
Speaker 1: the I used to work for in London, and I
Speaker 1: witness it many times, both with the FBI, the Congress,
Speaker 1: the Senate, and also to the media that this man
Speaker 1: has ties to intelligence. It is likely to be an
Speaker 1: Italian asset. So seeing this mischaracterization of the entire investigation,
Speaker 1: and George in the center of that because he met
Speaker 1: to this allegedly Russia spy that can know for sure
Speaker 1: not being a Russia spy, I felt it was my
Speaker 1: duty to the truth and my loyalty to my man
Speaker 1: to put the truth. If you guys can hang on
Speaker 1: just a couple more minutes longer. I know we're gonna
Speaker 1: let you go. We put it up on our website,
Speaker 1: Deep State Target, How I got caught in the crosshairs
Speaker 1: of the plot to bring down President Trump. George Papadoppolos's
Speaker 1: wife Simona also play the rest of the Alec Baldwin
Speaker 1: Hannity Levin tape. They're all begging me. I'll get to
Speaker 1: it all right, twenty five to all the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, eight hundred and nine for one Sean. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, we
Speaker 1: thanks for staying over. We continue a little bit longer
Speaker 1: here with George Papadoppolos's wife Simona. I know you're asking
Speaker 1: me to play more of the Alec Baldwin Annity Levin tape.
Speaker 1: Get to that in a minute now, because Alec is
Speaker 1: getting sued anyway. His book, Their book is really important.
Speaker 1: It's called Deep State Target how he had caught in
Speaker 1: the crosshairs of the plot to bring down President Trump.
Speaker 1: And I want to get to this point, which I
Speaker 1: think is very key, and I want to I want
Speaker 1: to make the usual well, I want to delineate between
Speaker 1: rank and file FBI field agents and special agents and
Speaker 1: people that literally, you know, put their lives on the
Speaker 1: line and protect us every single day. That's the ninety
Speaker 1: nine percent. And unfortunately we're talking at about a few
Speaker 1: abusing power at the highest levels. But you really believe
Speaker 1: it was the FBI set up. Now, I want to
Speaker 1: just give a little foundation here. We know from the
Speaker 1: testimony that came out that all of these top FBI individuals,
Speaker 1: we know that all of them were made away of
Speaker 1: the fact that this dossier was tainted, that this dossier
Speaker 1: was not verified, that this dossier was Hillary Clinton Boughton
Speaker 1: and paid for, but then they ended up using it,
Speaker 1: and James Colemey signing the first one in October of
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen and then telling Trump in January twenty seventeen
Speaker 1: as president elected. Trump tower though I have no idea,
Speaker 1: it's not verified, but it's delicious. So he lied once
Speaker 1: or the other. And I know this guy, he doesn't
Speaker 1: really understand his need to remain silent at this point.
Speaker 1: But anyway, and the Democrats now demanding that Attorney General
Speaker 1: bar testify about the Muller Report. Now interesting, you know,
Speaker 1: Gerald Nadler was opposed to the release of the Star report,
Speaker 1: not that that would matter anything type of consistency Bill preestap.
Speaker 1: This is news and information from Doug Collins today, a
Speaker 1: senior member of the FBI's counterintelligence team. He was worried
Speaker 1: about Struck and Page having been compromised by a feign
Speaker 1: adversary because of their affair, and anyway, we learned that
Speaker 1: and more thanks to Doug Collins, is going to be
Speaker 1: a lot more information cascading down. They want to bring
Speaker 1: everybody back. By the way, if they call you back
Speaker 1: to testify again, will you go? Yeah, Sean, So I've
Speaker 1: been invited to testifying from the Senate Intel Committee later
Speaker 1: this month, and I plan on going, And you know,
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be a very interesting testimony
Speaker 1: because it's Postmuller Report. Obviously, the world knows now that
Speaker 1: I had nothing to do with Russia, and neither did
Speaker 1: anyone on the Trump campaign or even President himself, the
Speaker 1: president himself. But you know what's the most interesting thing
Speaker 1: back here, Well, let me ask you a question. If
Speaker 1: you're going to testify under oath and you say one
Speaker 1: thing that is inconsistent with maybe previous testimony, you do
Speaker 1: know that they get to decide whether you committed perjury
Speaker 1: lied to congresses, even though it could be the most
Speaker 1: innocent thing ever. I don't know that's but oh sorry
Speaker 1: now that you know it's part of that. But you know,
Speaker 1: I want to make sure that the truth is out there,
Speaker 1: and also I really want to make it clearer because
Speaker 1: this is probably the most disturbing part of my story
Speaker 1: and probably part of the twenty sixteen campaign. What my
Speaker 1: actual case was really all about. Or was Bob Muller
Speaker 1: and Jim Comey actually spying on me from my ties
Speaker 1: to Israel. This is like new information that I've just
Speaker 1: been releasing now and it came out in my congressional testimony.
Speaker 1: But they were going to hit me with a far
Speaker 1: a charge. I think I was going to be the
Speaker 1: first person in history to be charged with working as
Speaker 1: an unregistered agent of the State of Israel, and that
Speaker 1: I just want to make it clear. That's the extent
Speaker 1: that these people wanted to go to to nail me
Speaker 1: and to make me basically lie to them, to do
Speaker 1: everything in their power to undermine Trump with my case.
Speaker 1: Of course, I never lied. I did an undermine President Trump.
Speaker 1: I landed in jail for twelve days off for it,
Speaker 1: but I wouldn't change a thing, and it goes to
Speaker 1: the same day. Why would you allow yourself? I'm very
Speaker 1: serious here, you've already given your testimony. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: why would you allow yourself to go under oath? And
Speaker 1: knowing that they are the ones that would decide. Now
Speaker 1: we're gonna have criminal referrals from Devin Noness this week.
Speaker 1: Why would you put yourself in a position where, if
Speaker 1: you're under oath, I wouldn't testify without immunity in your case,
Speaker 1: and I would insist on it. And if you don't
Speaker 1: get it, don't do it. It looks like that's when
Speaker 1: my lawyers are asking for. I have a great new
Speaker 1: legal team and that's what they're asking for. And quite frankly,
Speaker 1: I agree with you, and if I don't get it,
Speaker 1: we're probably not going to do it. But I was currently.
Speaker 1: Let me check with Simona here because she went to
Speaker 1: visit you all twelve days when you were in jail. Simona,
Speaker 1: whose side are you? Are mine or his? I'm on
Speaker 1: your side, thank you. No, you can't do it. And
Speaker 1: let me tell you. You've already testified everybody. How many
Speaker 1: hours did you testify total? Between you know Muller and
Speaker 1: everybody else probably about thirty hours. You know what I'm
Speaker 1: making I'm going on the record. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: testify to the Senate. That's a I'm going to make
Speaker 1: sure that my lawyers take care of that. But you're
Speaker 1: absolutely right at this point, I've testified for over thirty hours.
Speaker 1: My testimony the Congress to the Oversight Committee has been released.
Speaker 1: That's the story, and that you're absolutely right at this point,
Speaker 1: we could there could be trouble. So yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: I do feel scared now because they testified the Congress
Speaker 1: and the radio. No, let me tell you something and
Speaker 1: then let him hold you in contempt. You've given thirty
Speaker 1: hours of testimony. And I would call Professor Alan Dershowitz
Speaker 1: because he gave some case history last night on my
Speaker 1: TV show about how it was. I guess either the
Speaker 1: McCarthy hearings or water again, I don't remember which one
Speaker 1: he was referring to. That there comes a point where
Speaker 1: this is harassment. All these people being brought back to
Speaker 1: testify and asked the same questions over and over again.
Speaker 1: It becomes a perjury trap if you misremember something and
Speaker 1: b you know, these people can't afford these attorneys. Is
Speaker 1: it's so expensive? Totally true? All right. Timona is a lawyer,
Speaker 1: and you know she's been advising me very well, and
Speaker 1: she she agrees with what you just stated. So I
Speaker 1: think we're all no. By the way, I would recommend
Speaker 1: anyone else that testifies, tell no way, I'm pleading the fifth.
Speaker 1: And so they are asked me too. I've been there
Speaker 1: twice already, and they keep wanting to me to say
Speaker 1: the same thing over and over about me, sue, but
Speaker 1: they never release my and if you ever say it
Speaker 1: differently the second time, boy, they get to decide, oh,
Speaker 1: criminal referral, here we go, and then then more years
Speaker 1: zero life is room because of these idiots. All right,
Speaker 1: last question, how was the FBI, as you've been saying,
Speaker 1: meaning the upper echelon, how is how is this a
Speaker 1: set up by them? This was a set up by
Speaker 1: the upper echelons of the FBI because based on the
Speaker 1: simple fact that the man at the center of the
Speaker 1: entire Russia fake conspiracy, the professor who told me in
Speaker 1: London that the Russians had thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails,
Speaker 1: this guy was introduced to me by an FBI legal
Speaker 1: at tache in the UK named Arbender Sambe, who had
Speaker 1: a direct relationship to Muller after nine to eleven. And
Speaker 1: I have just found out recently that the same lady
Speaker 1: who introduced me to this person who created this, I guess,
Speaker 1: this chaotic situation we found ourselves in the last three years.
Speaker 1: She also was introducing the equivalent of the Deputy Attorney
Speaker 1: General of the UK to Bruce Or at that infamous
Speaker 1: dinner of the Ores four days before the Trump Tower
Speaker 1: set up meeting that also we later found out was orchestrated.
Speaker 1: So this entire thing was a pre planned, orchestrated event.
Speaker 1: No one on the Trump campaign was even meeting with Russians,
Speaker 1: let alone conspiring with Russians. But it was assets of
Speaker 1: the FBI and people that were led and directed from
Speaker 1: the FBI to make contact with various members of the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign. We're doing it for the sole reason to
Speaker 1: make it seem that people were working with Russia when
Speaker 1: we had nothing to do with it. So somebody was
Speaker 1: taking orders, and those orders came from the top of
Speaker 1: the FBI into Obama. That's what I mean by that.
Speaker 1: We're going to get to the bottom of it. We're
Speaker 1: going to hold them all accountable and you're helping us.
Speaker 1: George Papadoppola, Simona, thank you, Deep State target how I
Speaker 1: got caught in the crosshairs at the plot to bring
Speaker 1: down President Trump? And it's on Hannity dot com, Amazon
Speaker 1: dot com, bookstores everywhere. Guys, thank you so much for
Speaker 1: being with us, and we wish you both the very
Speaker 1: very best of luck. And listen, don't trust any of
Speaker 1: these people. I don't trust any of them. These members
Speaker 1: of Congress are on a witch hunt that they'll never stop.
Speaker 1: That's a great point, Sean, and thanks so much for
Speaker 1: having us. You've been a tremendous friend and a great person,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad you're on our side. I appreciate you
Speaker 1: telling your story, both of you, and I wish you
Speaker 1: this time goes on, that you move on from this
Speaker 1: have great life as you deserve. All right, let's go back.
Speaker 1: Everyone is are you busy in there? Oh? Oh, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: you're distracting my producer. All right, so we everyone is
Speaker 1: riding me. Play more of the ALC Baldwin stuff. All right,
Speaker 1: here's what we're gonna play. Play a little bit. I
Speaker 1: guess came up playing cut twenty where Alec Baldwin is
Speaker 1: attacking me and Levin on Stern show. Play that Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity who lacks self awareness and any level, He's got
Speaker 1: zero self awareness. Zero. You had a discussion with him,
Speaker 1: have you? No? No, no, Why why would I waste
Speaker 1: my time doing this? Is it? Levin? I'm sorry you see, yeah,
Speaker 1: of course, yeah, he's very fine, right, Levine is an
Speaker 1: idiots is these guys have no talent, no talents, and
Speaker 1: it's troubles there. Horrible, they were horrible broadcaster. Levine is
Speaker 1: a black belt idiots with the things he says, it's
Speaker 1: just not interesting. Horrible broadcasters were Now, just to remind you, now,
Speaker 1: this is the first time Alec Baldwin wanted to be
Speaker 1: a radio talk show host. At the time, we had
Speaker 1: a program director at my former station in New York,
Speaker 1: proud of my new station, w R. I still have
Speaker 1: friends over there, a lot of friends and anyway, and
Speaker 1: Levin included anyway. So the deal was that he was
Speaker 1: going to come on my radio show and then we
Speaker 1: were gonna let him try out on a Sunday night.
Speaker 1: And Brian Whitman, who's a broadcaster used to be on
Speaker 1: our New York station but is now in Los Angeles
Speaker 1: doing really really well. Very funny guy. We don't agree politically,
Speaker 1: but I love him a lot. He's a great guy. Anyway,
Speaker 1: he was sort of like helping Alec first time hosting,
Speaker 1: and anyway, I called in. I'll just play a little
Speaker 1: bit of that part again, Sean Hannity Whitman, Hi, Sean Alec,
Speaker 1: I wanted to give you an official w ABC welcome
Speaker 1: considering you. Uh, you was supposed to come on my
Speaker 1: program last week, and you are you didn't show up?
Speaker 1: What happened? No, I wasn't supposed to come on your program,
Speaker 1: Sean Hannah. Was supposed to come on the program, because
Speaker 1: the deal was made with your agent that if you
Speaker 1: were going to come on with Brian first, you'd come
Speaker 1: on with me. I wouldn't dream of coming on your program,
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity, because I'm here with Brian, I'm here with
Speaker 1: a really talented you are you don't tell the truth.
Speaker 1: I'm here with a really talented broadcast. Why would I
Speaker 1: want to come on the show with a no talent
Speaker 1: former construction worker hack like you? All right, and he
Speaker 1: goes on attacking what I did for a living, which
Speaker 1: I'm proud of anyway. Mark Levin calls in one big
Speaker 1: happy family and well, let's just say, Alec, who was
Speaker 1: guest toasting, decided to leave the studio after this. Are
Speaker 1: you forty or fifty pounds overweight? Now? Come on now,
Speaker 1: who is that? That's the bloator? I just told you
Speaker 1: you got a two digit IQ. And who's that? Who's
Speaker 1: your little cabin boy there with you? Cabin boy? You
Speaker 1: are Sean cabin boy. You have nothing to hit him? Well,
Speaker 1: can I talk to Alec Ballis or no. We're gonna
Speaker 1: end this right now. I'm pissed off of you anyway.
Speaker 1: You please don't leave. I beg of you. Go ahead
Speaker 1: and take your headphone. I beg of you. Not folks,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. Stay right there. We're gonna be
Speaker 1: back with the stare at there with the no talent
Speaker 1: and you are a no talent ignorant fool from long on.
Speaker 1: You should go back to building houses out. Good luck. Okay, listen,
Speaker 1: Sean come back, come back, Alec, come back. They're gone, Alec.
Speaker 1: Alec has walked out of the studio. Alec, please come
Speaker 1: please come back. He is uh in the other room.
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin has put on his jacket and he has left.
Speaker 1: I just went into the station lobby to the elevator
Speaker 1: bank to see if I can find Alec Baldwin and
Speaker 1: ask him to please return to the radio show. But
Speaker 1: he is gone. They left. He walked out, so he
Speaker 1: wasn't done trying out for a talk radio. Then he
Speaker 1: went to Philly and this is him on rate. By
Speaker 1: the way, he's saying, Oh, these guys are horrible. Okay,
Speaker 1: listen to the You're right, Alec. I can't duplicate this.
Speaker 1: This is the best radio I've ever heard in my life.
Speaker 1: This is Alex casting. Uh we got some time? Oh great,
Speaker 1: well we're gonna uh we know when? Can we take
Speaker 1: some calls whenever we want? Do we have calls that
Speaker 1: are on there? Now? Calls yet? No calls yet? What
Speaker 1: number do people call to get on the air? I mean,
Speaker 1: do we have that number? It's right there? You know?
Speaker 1: Do I have a call number in front of me? Oh?
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. That's interesting. Interesting at twelve ten at
Speaker 1: PHT of course, any other questions you have, any other
Speaker 1: comments you have, call us um to the uh what else?
Speaker 1: Call us please at to one ten now. If you
Speaker 1: don't call We're gonna keep reading from the Scientology manual.
Speaker 1: You might not feel it. You might not feel the
Speaker 1: energy right now, you might not feel the swell of
Speaker 1: what's happening here. Aybody calls you out there? Ivan, no call,
Speaker 1: Let's spead some more about scientology. Is Sean Hannity a scientologist?
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin posing the big questions tonight? Here? Do we
Speaker 1: have any calls here yet? Ivan? None? Boy, it's just incredible, unbelievable. Well,
Speaker 1: you leave us no choice listeners. That was real. He
Speaker 1: got no calls and had to call his mother. It's
Speaker 1: the greatest tape in talk radio history. I could play
Speaker 1: him calling is what fourteen fifteen year old daughter? A rude,
Speaker 1: thoughtless little pig. But you know what I really I
Speaker 1: you know what my problem is. I don't I don't
Speaker 1: not mean enough to do it anymore. I just don't
Speaker 1: have the heart to do it to the kid anyway.
Speaker 1: That's him. Talk show host to the Year alib Oh
Speaker 1: who's failed TV on He was on MSNBC. That show
Speaker 1: tanked his show on NBC. I guess it was tanked ABC.
Speaker 1: What was the show? Calls? Anybody remembering? Who knows? Nobody
Speaker 1: lasted like three weeks that nobody would watch it. I mean,
Speaker 1: had lowered numbers than even fake news CNN. Yeah, this
Speaker 1: guy's now he's being sued and he has to go
Speaker 1: to anger management classes. He's nuts or no exception. There
Speaker 1: was a very contentious committee hearing yesterday when Fairfax County
Speaker 1: Delicate Cathy Tran made her case for lifting restrictions on
Speaker 1: third trimester abortions as well as other restrictions now in place,
Speaker 1: and she was pressed by Republican delegate about whether her
Speaker 1: bill would permit an abortion even as a woman is
Speaker 1: essentially dilating ready to give birth, and she answered that
Speaker 1: it would permit an abortion at that stage of labor.
Speaker 1: Do you support her measure and explain her answer? Yeah,
Speaker 1: and I'm you know, I wasn't there, Julie, and I
Speaker 1: certainly can't speak for Delegate Trand, but um, I would
Speaker 1: tell you one first thing. I would say, this is
Speaker 1: why decisions such as this should be made by providers,
Speaker 1: physicians and the mothers and fathers that are involved. There
Speaker 1: are you know, when we talk about third trimester abortions,
Speaker 1: these are done with the consent of obviously the mother,
Speaker 1: with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician,
Speaker 1: by the way, and it's done in cases where there
Speaker 1: may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's
Speaker 1: non viable. So in this particular example, if a mother
Speaker 1: is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen.
Speaker 1: The infant would be delivered, Uh, the infant would be
Speaker 1: kept comfortable. UH, the infant would be resuscitated if if
Speaker 1: that's what the mother and the family desired, and then
Speaker 1: a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.
Speaker 1: So so I think this was really blown out of proportion.
Speaker 1: But again, we want the government not to be involved
Speaker 1: in these types of decisions. We want the decision to
Speaker 1: be made by the models and their providers. And this
Speaker 1: is why Julie that legislators, most of whom are men,
Speaker 1: by the way, shouldn't be telling a woman what she
Speaker 1: should and shouldn't be doing with her body. And do
Speaker 1: you think multiple physicians should have to weigh in as
Speaker 1: is currently required. She's trying to lift that requirement. Well,
Speaker 1: I think it's always good to get a second opinion
Speaker 1: and for at least two providers to be involved in
Speaker 1: that decision, because these decisions shouldn't be taken lightly, and
Speaker 1: so I would certainly support more than one provider. Right now,
Speaker 1: women are able to access an abortion in the later
Speaker 1: stages of pregnancy under certain conditions, with the approval of
Speaker 1: medical doctors. I've done nothing to change that. How late
Speaker 1: in the third trimester, could a physician perform an abortion
Speaker 1: if he indicated it would impair them mental health of
Speaker 1: the woman or physical health? Okay, okay, I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the mental health. So I mean through the third trimester.
Speaker 1: The third trimester goes all the way up to forty weeks, okay,
Speaker 1: But to the end of the third trimester, yep. I
Speaker 1: don't think we have a limit in the bill. So
Speaker 1: where it's obvious that a woman is about to give birth,
Speaker 1: she has physical signs of that she is about to
Speaker 1: give a birth, would that still be a point at
Speaker 1: which she could request an abortion if she was so
Speaker 1: certified she's dilating, mister Chairman, that would be a you know,
Speaker 1: a decision that the doctor, the physician, and the woman
Speaker 1: understand that. I'm asking if your bill allows that, my
Speaker 1: bill would allow that. Yes. Last year House Delicates Member
Speaker 1: Kathy Tran proposed a late third term trimester abortion bill
Speaker 1: heard the whole flak over it. Basically, you can terminate
Speaker 1: the child as they're coming through the birth canal effect
Speaker 1: your successor. Governor Northam said, even after its support, it
Speaker 1: would be up to the parents resuscitated, make it comfortable,
Speaker 1: and then maybe maybe terminated, executed, whatever the word is.
Speaker 1: That created a firestorm. If you were a governor, would
Speaker 1: you have veto that bill if it hit your desk?
Speaker 1: The bill is, I believe it was. You know Virginia
Speaker 1: law currently acquires. You know that four women can end
Speaker 1: a third trimester pregnancy. She must get three separate doctors
Speaker 1: to evaluate the pregnancy and really certify that it's necessary.
Speaker 1: You know, this was a common sense bill that in
Speaker 1: the sense you go from three to one to help
Speaker 1: people in rural communities. It very rarely, as they say,
Speaker 1: twice in nineteen years, but unfortunately it became political. Governor,
Speaker 1: would you have veto the bill? We yes or no.
Speaker 1: I would not have vetoed that bill. I would not
Speaker 1: have vetoed that bill. And that way we got to
Speaker 1: go back. We just heard this woman who introduced the bill.
Speaker 1: By the way, on the same day she introduced the
Speaker 1: bill to protect these butterflies that aren't called butterflies whatever
Speaker 1: they were called. Kathy tran House of Commons. Remember, she
Speaker 1: was asked specifically, oh, what about during the dilation process,
Speaker 1: in other words, that is the birthing process, the canker worm,
Speaker 1: which she first you know, she introduces it the same
Speaker 1: freaking day, protect the worm that becomes some type of
Speaker 1: offshoot of a butterfly. And then she said, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I would what if a woman's in labor, what if
Speaker 1: she's dilating, Yeah, I'd support abortion under those conditions. Yes,
Speaker 1: this bill would allow that. And then Governor Northam, well,
Speaker 1: I could tell you exactly what we're going to do.
Speaker 1: We're going to well, first we'll deliver the baby and
Speaker 1: make sure the baby's comfortable, so compassionate, and then the
Speaker 1: mother will decide whether or not we resuscitate the baby
Speaker 1: or give the baby, you know, medical care or not.
Speaker 1: And then we'll have a discussion with the doctor after
Speaker 1: and then all these states and you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable, and it resulted in us having an abortion
Speaker 1: survivor on this program who's living a happy, productive life.
Speaker 1: Why Democrats have latched onto this. Imagine if somebody wanted
Speaker 1: to do this to a kitten being born or a
Speaker 1: puppy being born. You know, think of Animal Rights Act?
Speaker 1: Where are they in all of this? Well, anyway, that's
Speaker 1: that was Terry McCullough sans or he's thinking about getting
Speaker 1: into this twenty twenty Race House Minority whipped. Steve Scalise
Speaker 1: is here. He's filing a discharge petition on the Born
Speaker 1: Alive Protection Act, and if he gets enough signatures today,
Speaker 1: it will force an anti infanticide vote on the House floor. Good,
Speaker 1: let's put all these people on record. You know, you
Speaker 1: can't let evil continue like this. This is These are
Speaker 1: fully formed babies. This is not a about abortion, even
Speaker 1: if you allow on fantaside. Anyway, how's Republican whip Steve
Speaker 1: scalisias with us? How are you hey? Doing well? Sean?
Speaker 1: Great to be back with you, and thank you for
Speaker 1: highlighting just how barbaric this process is the procedure of
Speaker 1: murdering a baby when it's born alive, and what we're
Speaker 1: doing to stop it. Okay, So you need though, even
Speaker 1: if I assume you're going to get every Republican right, yeah,
Speaker 1: we are. By the way, we just started collecting signatures.
Speaker 1: We've already exceeded one hundred and twenty five signatures. There
Speaker 1: was a line literally out the door of the House
Speaker 1: Chamber today during the one thirty votes series. And we're
Speaker 1: still collecting signatures and my goal is to be well
Speaker 1: over one hundred and fifty by the end of today
Speaker 1: and to get every Republican to sign, and then to
Speaker 1: start getting some Democrats to sign, and frankly shan to
Speaker 1: engage people all around the country who when I talked
Speaker 1: to people about it, it's not a question of whether
Speaker 1: or not to support it. People are shocked showing that
Speaker 1: it's legal in America to murder a baby after it's
Speaker 1: been born alive outside the womb. It literally transcends the
Speaker 1: abortion debate because they're pro choice people that think it's
Speaker 1: wrong to kill the baby after it's born alive, and
Speaker 1: yet there are no illegal protections. Some states have protections,
Speaker 1: but clearly, as you saw in New York, in Virginia,
Speaker 1: in other states they're allowing it to happen or moving
Speaker 1: to try to legalize it. We need to stand up
Speaker 1: and say, you know, all innocent life is precious, but
Speaker 1: those most vulnerable are the ones that need the protections
Speaker 1: the most. And this sporn Alive bill, it's a Wagner's
Speaker 1: bill from Missouri. But my discharge petition that I signed
Speaker 1: today would go around Pelosi who refuses to let us
Speaker 1: have a vote. It literally would bypass Pelosi enforce a
Speaker 1: debate and vote on the House floor. All right, so
Speaker 1: you need twenty one Democrats? Have you gotten any end?
Speaker 1: I have talked to a few Democrats who are supportive
Speaker 1: of what the legislation does. There's a lot of pressure
Speaker 1: by Pelosi to try to hold everybody off. I think
Speaker 1: we will get some Democrats to sign this discharge petition.
Speaker 1: And look, once you see that happen in Sean, I
Speaker 1: think there's gonna be a ground swell the grassroots movement
Speaker 1: all across the country of people that are going to
Speaker 1: just ask the simple question, not whether or not my
Speaker 1: member Congress will sign, but why hasn't my member of
Speaker 1: Congress sign? And look at my website, Republican whip dot gov.
Speaker 1: When you go to Republican whip dot gov, we're going
Speaker 1: to have a list and you can click on the
Speaker 1: list and see who signed the discharge petition. See if
Speaker 1: you're a member of Congress, is there and if they're
Speaker 1: not there, pick up the phone and call and say
Speaker 1: not what are you or not you going to get on?
Speaker 1: But you have to sign this bill if you if
Speaker 1: you dare say your pro life, you have to sign
Speaker 1: the discharge petition to bring this bill to the floor. Unbelievable. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, let me ask you a question as we
Speaker 1: move on for this. I really want you to be
Speaker 1: successful and everything here I want to ask, and I
Speaker 1: guess this goes to the heart of what the Republican
Speaker 1: Party is going to stand for. Why is there resistance
Speaker 1: among some Republicans to go forward with the president taking
Speaker 1: on healthcare again? Why is there some resist since, you know,
Speaker 1: among Republicans as it relates to the emergency order, which
Speaker 1: by the way, is supported legislation legislatively. What I think
Speaker 1: it's ten USC two eighty four. My mind serves me right,
Speaker 1: my memory serves me right. And also constitutionally, a president
Speaker 1: has the job as commander in chief. And I think
Speaker 1: there's been enough homicides. I think there's been enough you know,
Speaker 1: sexual assault cases, biomassault cases by illegal immigrant criminals that
Speaker 1: would show that it is in fact a real crisis.
Speaker 1: Is even Obama's DHS Secretary J Johnson said, you know,
Speaker 1: why is their resistance for some Republicans just stand up,
Speaker 1: take a stand and fight. I don't get it, well, Shana,
Speaker 1: and we know that there are members in other places
Speaker 1: on if I strongly support what President Trump is doing
Speaker 1: to build the wall, to even go to the step
Speaker 1: of declaring the national emergency because it is, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a serious crisis at the border. I've seen the
Speaker 1: problems of talk to Secretary of Homeland Security Nielson about
Speaker 1: the problem, and we were able even with Pelosi, We're
Speaker 1: able to get a four and a half billion dollars
Speaker 1: of new wall funding. But there's still more that needs
Speaker 1: to be done, and that's why the National Emergency declaration
Speaker 1: is so important. And then let's shift to healthcare, Sean,
Speaker 1: because you know you brought up this this lawsuit that's
Speaker 1: out there. Let's keep in mind it wasn't Donald Trump
Speaker 1: but Nancy Pelosi who wrote Obamacare. It was Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: who famously said, you have to pass the bill to
Speaker 1: find out what's in it. And if Nancy Pelosi's bill
Speaker 1: that they rammed through Congress that nobody read, if Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi's bill is ruled unconstitutional, which many of us by
Speaker 1: the way, predicted it would be back then, when we
Speaker 1: voted against it. Then it's not Donald Trump's fault that
Speaker 1: she wrote an unconstitutional law. But frankly, not only is
Speaker 1: it unconstitutional, it doesn't work. It's hurting families with preexisting
Speaker 1: conditions who have to pay double digit increases in their premiums,
Speaker 1: who in some cases are paying ten thousand dollars deductibles.
Speaker 1: Let's focus on protecting people with pre existing conditions and
Speaker 1: lowering premiums by letting you decide what's best for you
Speaker 1: and your family. Pick the plan that's best for your family,
Speaker 1: and buy it from wherever you want to buy it,
Speaker 1: whatever state you want to buy it from. That's how
Speaker 1: healthcare should work. And right now, that's not what we
Speaker 1: have under Obamacare. And so again, Nancy Pelosi is the
Speaker 1: one who rammed the bill through Congress knowing that there
Speaker 1: were serious legal problems with it. She wasn't concerned about
Speaker 1: that when she passed it. She should be asked that question.
Speaker 1: All right, congressman, thanks for what you're doing. Keep us
Speaker 1: up to speed. And if we need to put up
Speaker 1: a few Democrats that are in pro life districts, remind
Speaker 1: their constituents will be glad to help you in any
Speaker 1: way we can, and a lot of them ran saying
Speaker 1: they'd be pro life. Sean, We're going to hold them
Speaker 1: accountable for send us over a list of thus, send
Speaker 1: me a list of that, we'll send you the link.
Speaker 1: We will definitely send you the link. Let's go defend
Speaker 1: the lives of babies who were born alive. All right,
Speaker 1: thank you, Congressman. A right, as we continue down, we're
Speaker 1: gonna get to your calls at the bottom of this
Speaker 1: half hour. I'm loving this fight, as I mentioned earlier,
Speaker 1: between Congresswoman Alexandria Casio Cortez or AOC. You know, that's
Speaker 1: what I guess her fans call her, because she's at
Speaker 1: AOC on Twitter anyway. So she's in a battle with
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney over the twenty second Amendment to the Constitution.
Speaker 1: And it's interesting because they're going after each other. And
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney took issue with Acascio Cortez's statement during a
Speaker 1: conspiracy tinfoil hat town hall on MSNBC in which the
Speaker 1: freshman congresswoman talked about Democrats being in control of Congress
Speaker 1: in the thirties and forties when our party was the
Speaker 1: boldest all the time of the New Deal the Great Society,
Speaker 1: the Civil Rights Act, and so on. No, that was
Speaker 1: in the sixties, but we'll get to that in a minute.
Speaker 1: We had and carried supermajorities in the House, the Senate,
Speaker 1: we carried the presidency. They had to amend the Constitution
Speaker 1: of the United States to make sure that Franklin Delano
Speaker 1: Roosevelt did not get reelected. She continued. Liz Cheney writes, well,
Speaker 1: we knew that Democrats let dead people vote. According to
Speaker 1: at AOC, they can run for president too. According to AOC,
Speaker 1: Congress amended the Constitution to prevent FDR from being elected. Well,
Speaker 1: the problem is FDI. FDR died in office in nineteen
Speaker 1: forty five. The twenty second Amendment was in nineteen forty seven.
Speaker 1: Whipsie Daisy, and in response, Cheney tweeted, well, you know
Speaker 1: what I just said about Well, now that dead people
Speaker 1: can run for president. She writes back, Hey, Representative Cheney,
Speaker 1: I see from your dead people comment that you get
Speaker 1: your news from Facebook memes. But the National Constitution Center,
Speaker 1: a Newsweek, or just two of many places where you
Speaker 1: can clarify your misunderstanding of the history of the twenty
Speaker 1: second Amendment, she wrote, And well, according to that discussion
Speaker 1: of the twenty six twenty second Amendment and term limits
Speaker 1: began in nineteen forty four after presidential candidate Thomas Dewey
Speaker 1: warned a sixteen year term of Roosevelt was a threat
Speaker 1: to democracy. So on and so forth. Cheney, Well, she
Speaker 1: actually has a jd. Law degree from the University of
Speaker 1: Chicago Law School nineteen ninety six. Hey, AOC, I know
Speaker 1: you're busy, so I thought this short would be helpful
Speaker 1: to introduce you to the basics of the Constitution if
Speaker 1: you're trying to figure out how the bill becomes law.
Speaker 1: They have a great video of that too, which is hilarious.
Speaker 1: And she writes back, AOZ, does you know she has
Speaker 1: nothing to say because she's wrong as usual? All Right,
Speaker 1: your calls coming up straight ahead as we continue the
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity sh'll awesome, Hannity tonight, tell you about that
Speaker 1: coming up ninetiestern Fox News. Glad you're with us, Hi,
Speaker 1: and my name is Anna Lawrence. This is my husband,
Speaker 1: Tracy Lawrence, and we're the proud parents of Lieutenant Clint Lawrence,
Speaker 1: who is currently serving a twenty years since at Fort
Speaker 1: Leavenworth Prison. President Obama, I would like to ask you, please,
Speaker 1: please please give my son a full pardon and send
Speaker 1: my boy home. President Obama, to date, you have shown
Speaker 1: mercy and granted presidential pardons and commutations to over six
Speaker 1: hundred Americans who made poor choices and ended up in prison.
Speaker 1: With all due respects, Sir, my son didn't make a
Speaker 1: poor choice. The only choice that he made was to
Speaker 1: serve his country. Mister President, you've acknowledged that those who
Speaker 1: that you have helped have taken full responsibility for their
Speaker 1: actions and they deserve a second chance. Our son, too,
Speaker 1: deserves that second chance, Mister President. If I could speak
Speaker 1: to your heart for a moment, parent to parent, I
Speaker 1: would like to tell you a little bit about who
Speaker 1: my son is. My son is a very very outstanding
Speaker 1: young man that loves his country and willingly and proudly
Speaker 1: chose to service country. What you just heard there was
Speaker 1: the mother of Clint Laurance. This was a video she
Speaker 1: put out pleading with then President Barack Obama about the
Speaker 1: case of her son. We have covered this many, many,
Speaker 1: many times on this program. Now, the President had something
Speaker 1: very interesting this week as it relates to Navy Seal
Speaker 1: Eddie Gallagher, and he said, in honor of his past
Speaker 1: service to our country. Navy CeAl Eddie Gallagher will soon
Speaker 1: be moved to less restrictive confinement while he awaits his
Speaker 1: day in court. Process should move quickly and in the
Speaker 1: case that Gallagher was arrested on September eleventh while receiving
Speaker 1: medical care, Camp Pendleton has been held in San Diego's
Speaker 1: Naval Consolidated Brigg Miramar with like oh sex offenders, rapists, pedophiles,
Speaker 1: you know the lawmakers blasted during a Capitol Hill rally
Speaker 1: on Thursday. Gallagher has pleaded not guilty to war crimes
Speaker 1: stemming from a deployment to a wreck nearly two years ago.
Speaker 1: And you know, we have this problem where, especially under
Speaker 1: the rules of engagement of Obama, we have a problem
Speaker 1: that is that you have men and women in the
Speaker 1: battlefield that are being second guest while they are having
Speaker 1: handcuffs put on them, and then if they make a
Speaker 1: wrong decision, this is during a time of war, then
Speaker 1: they are being held accountable and they're trying to prosecute
Speaker 1: these people and it's not you know, we told you
Speaker 1: about Christian Saucier. Okay, he had six pictures of the submarine.
Speaker 1: He was so proud to work in thankfully, and he
Speaker 1: served his time. How to leave his mother and his
Speaker 1: wife and his daughter and spend a year in jail
Speaker 1: on the case of Clint Laurance, you know, this is
Speaker 1: another travesty of justice because of these Assinine rules of
Speaker 1: engagement during the Obama years and they were put in place,
Speaker 1: and literally Clint had just become the platoon leader about
Speaker 1: a week or a week and a half after members
Speaker 1: of that platoon were killed by Jee Hottest, radical Islamist
Speaker 1: in Afghanistan that were riding motorcycles like it for example,
Speaker 1: like they were with a car bomb. So all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, Clint is there with his platoon, he's leading
Speaker 1: that platoon and he only really has a split second
Speaker 1: to decide, Oh, are these people in the motorcycle that
Speaker 1: are coming towards his platoon just like what happened before
Speaker 1: I got here that killed these guys. Are they Ji Hottest?
Speaker 1: Is this another example or not? So he had to
Speaker 1: make a split second decision. He made the decision that
Speaker 1: he couldn't risk the lives of his men and as
Speaker 1: a result, well now he's facing what thirty years in jail.
Speaker 1: And the sad part is is since this trial and
Speaker 1: all this took place. New evidence was discovered in this
Speaker 1: particular case where they actually the people that died on
Speaker 1: the motorcycles. Yeah, their fingerprints. In other words, DNA evidence
Speaker 1: is available on ieeds that were planted in and around
Speaker 1: the same area. You know, biometric details that they didn't
Speaker 1: have in place. Evidence that exonerates Clint because he rightly
Speaker 1: figured out they were who they were. Which, by the way,
Speaker 1: you know, if we're gonna send our brave men and
Speaker 1: women to go fight in the battlefield and we're gonna
Speaker 1: put handcuffs on them, we're gonna tie their hands behind
Speaker 1: their back and they have to make split second decisions
Speaker 1: that we're gonna sit back in the comfort of our
Speaker 1: own protected homes thanks to them, and them put them
Speaker 1: on trial and put them in jail for the rest
Speaker 1: of their life. No, that can't happen, not in this country.
Speaker 1: Don Brown joins those He's the author of The Travesty
Speaker 1: of Justice, The Shocking proces Secution of Lieutenant Clint Lorentz,
Speaker 1: also a JAG officer, and he's on Clint's legal team,
Speaker 1: and this book is exposing what is now overwhelming evidence
Speaker 1: to exonerate Clinton Lorentz. He's not guilty of anything. And
Speaker 1: you know, do you know if this has gotten into
Speaker 1: the hands of the president as the president aware of
Speaker 1: Clint Lorentz's case. Sean, thanks for sticking with a fight here,
Speaker 1: and this is a marathon for justice and you've been
Speaker 1: a warrior. You're right, Clint is guilty of nothing. I
Speaker 1: don't know whether this has gotten into the President's hands,
Speaker 1: but I know a guy named Sean Hannity could walk
Speaker 1: it over there to him when we get a copy
Speaker 1: of the book in your hands. But I can tell
Speaker 1: you this now is a time for action. Clinton needs
Speaker 1: to be exonerated now. And as you mentioned, John Maher,
Speaker 1: who's been on your show number of times, lead who
Speaker 1: is lead counsel for the defense team in this case,
Speaker 1: was kind of not the bring me on board as
Speaker 1: the fourth jag aufstar fighting for Clint's freedom with Kevin,
Speaker 1: Michael Schuck and David Bolgiani. And this is not a
Speaker 1: close call. What we are hoping to do is to
Speaker 1: see President Trump's son, will we call a disapproval of
Speaker 1: findings in sentencing to vacate the whole thing, not just
Speaker 1: a pardon. A pardon would be nice, but the problem
Speaker 1: shown with a pardon is it applied, it implies guilt.
Speaker 1: He's guilty of nothing. You know. Colonel West said recently
Speaker 1: that trying to charge these guys for murder in a
Speaker 1: battlefield is about a stupid is riding speeding tickets to
Speaker 1: the day till in a five hundred. And I can
Speaker 1: tell you this, Clint's been rotting at Leavenworth for six
Speaker 1: years and he's got you know, he had a twenty
Speaker 1: years sentence that was commuted one year down in nineteen years.
Speaker 1: He still I was under the thirteen years to sit
Speaker 1: there because he put his necks on the blind from
Speaker 1: me and you. And it's time to right this wrong.
Speaker 1: I can tell you this. These more recent travesties against
Speaker 1: Eddie Gallagher and against Matt Goldstein really shooting a bad
Speaker 1: acid into the morale of the current US military. Clint
Speaker 1: has been gone for six years, but we got to
Speaker 1: clean this up. President Trump's doing a great job trying
Speaker 1: to secure the border. But you gotta secure the military,
Speaker 1: and you got to have good order and discipline, and
Speaker 1: you can't have these despicable political prosecutions. But Clinton needs
Speaker 1: to be freed now, not tomorrow, not thirty minutes from now.
Speaker 1: Not a year from now, but now it's time for
Speaker 1: him to walk out free. And by the way, Sean,
Speaker 1: I was with Clint five times last year at eleven Worth,
Speaker 1: and when he's finally out, he's going to be one
Speaker 1: of the greatest interviews that you ever. The guy is unbelievable.
Speaker 1: He's a patriot, he still loves his country despite the
Speaker 1: fact that he's been shafted. He still loves the army,
Speaker 1: and he still wants to serve. And President Trump, if
Speaker 1: you're listening, disapprove of sentences and findings. Now restore Clint
Speaker 1: active duty and give him back pay for the time
Speaker 1: that he's been riding away eleven Worth without pay, and
Speaker 1: then promote him commissary. With his time and service, it
Speaker 1: is time to write this wrong to see you. Let
Speaker 1: me let me ask you one question which I never
Speaker 1: understood in this case. I understand the insanity of the
Speaker 1: Obama rules of engagement. I think I described accurately the
Speaker 1: circumstances under which he had to make a split second decision, right, okay,
Speaker 1: And I explained I think pretty accurately that the rules
Speaker 1: of engagement were in place, and you know the biometrics
Speaker 1: evidence that exonerates Clint literally has not been used as
Speaker 1: it relates to forensics, as with the Tushie hottis that
Speaker 1: we're approaching this platoon. What I don't understand is why
Speaker 1: that evidence didn't be brought before a military jury. They
Speaker 1: know that Clint's man had shot and killed the enemy,
Speaker 1: and the prosecution portrayed the motorcycle riders as if they
Speaker 1: were on a Sunday stroll in the park, and you
Speaker 1: know they were. These were just poor in us and farmers.
Speaker 1: We now can prove beyond any doubt that that's not true.
Speaker 1: But what I don't understand is that Clint's men were
Speaker 1: ordered to testify against him or faced murder charges themselves.
Speaker 1: Now we now know, just following this whole special prosecutor issue,
Speaker 1: that it is a very common practice that if you
Speaker 1: sing or compose, you will get a get out of
Speaker 1: jail free card. Right, okay, But the problem here is
Speaker 1: how many of these of his own guys did that
Speaker 1: to save their own I asked, from going to jail
Speaker 1: themselves for the rest of their lives. Sean, you ask
Speaker 1: a very good question. This evidence, this biometric's evidence. A
Speaker 1: lot of most Americans don't know that one of the
Speaker 1: things that General Petreus put in the place around two
Speaker 1: thousand and seven is the US Army was taking fingerprints
Speaker 1: of just about everybody in Afghanistan the original and so
Speaker 1: we're doing that because as you set it up earlier,
Speaker 1: these IDs would would go off. More Americans were killed
Speaker 1: by bombs in the ground than by bullets in the
Speaker 1: Afghan warriors. You know this. This patrol on the morning
Speaker 1: that these Yahoos were shot by Clint's men had to
Speaker 1: march in a straight, single file line one hundred or
Speaker 1: so yards long because you stepped to the left the right, boom,
Speaker 1: you blow up. So we were collecting evidence and so
Speaker 1: Lieutenant Colonel maher Jahmer, her league counsel, did not take
Speaker 1: the case until afterwards. John had some experience working in
Speaker 1: Afghanistan with this biometrics prosecution program, so he knew about it.
Speaker 1: But to go back to the original trial, the defense
Speaker 1: team at the original trial, which is a different group
Speaker 1: of lawyers, did request discovery asking for a biometrics data
Speaker 1: and it was not delivered. It was hidden from then.
Speaker 1: The military judge referred to it as going deep into
Speaker 1: the abbess. This was exonerating evidence head deliberately from the
Speaker 1: military jury. Why because they wanted to deliver Clint's head
Speaker 1: on a silver platter to appease the Car's eye. Administration
Speaker 1: hany Car's eye. Now you've nailed it on the head
Speaker 1: with these rules of engagement. It really dates back to
Speaker 1: the summer of twenty eleven, but there ninety six days
Speaker 1: between Operation Neptune Spear taking out Bin Laden and the
Speaker 1: shootdown of Extorting one seven August six, twenty eleven. Things change.
Speaker 1: Obama comes out on June twenty fourth, announces we're pulling
Speaker 1: out of Afghanistan. He gives a definite pullout date, and
Speaker 1: of Carzy goes ballistic because he knows he can't survive
Speaker 1: without American military power. So he starts negotiating with a
Speaker 1: Taliban and then Sean we starting negotiating the Taliban. The
Speaker 1: Taliban is complaining about we're killing him, and they they're
Speaker 1: complaining about it under the guise of civilian cabs. It
Speaker 1: was which a bunch of bs. So the Obama administration
Speaker 1: reacts by tightening the rules. One of the rules in
Speaker 1: places is basically is basically you got to play battlefield lawyer.
Speaker 1: You have to get to you can't shoot unless you're
Speaker 1: shot at first. But if you're going to shoot without
Speaker 1: being shot at first, you got to play battlefield lawyer,
Speaker 1: which required these guys to go through a two part analysis.
Speaker 1: Number one, is there a hostile intent? Number two? Is
Speaker 1: there a hostile act? Well, hell, by the time a
Speaker 1: motorcycle comes up on him and pulls the repcord, you're dead.
Speaker 1: And that's the situation Clint had to face. It was
Speaker 1: a no win situation. And I tell you this, Sean,
Speaker 1: I spent a lot of time with last year John
Speaker 1: Maher are going out to see him again this coming weeknd.
Speaker 1: But the young man said that, hey, if I had
Speaker 1: to make he said, I had to make a decision.
Speaker 1: The decision was either to protect my men or take
Speaker 1: the wrist. They're gonna get killed. This platoon would have
Speaker 1: gone home in thirty days, and Clint was to termed
Speaker 1: that none of them would go home in body bags.
Speaker 1: And so in the split second decision, you said, as
Speaker 1: you said, he's a pull the trigger. And and Clint
Speaker 1: told me that had he been wrong and not pull
Speaker 1: the trigger, had not ordered his men. Actually, Clinton never
Speaker 1: even saw the motorcycle. He was far enough away from
Speaker 1: it didn't see it. But if his men had not
Speaker 1: fired and he'd been wrong. They've been taken out. He
Speaker 1: told me he would have lived in a prison that
Speaker 1: was far worse than the prison that they put him in,
Speaker 1: because that prison, knowing that his men's blood were on
Speaker 1: his hands, would have would have haunted him for the
Speaker 1: rest of his life. And we've got to put an
Speaker 1: end to it. This is an opportunity for the President
Speaker 1: to go in and clean up some of this crap
Speaker 1: going on the military, where we have political correctness at
Speaker 1: the top echelons of military's still bleeding over from the
Speaker 1: last administration, where bureaucrats put the lives of the enemy
Speaker 1: ahead of the lives of Americans. We've got to stop it,
Speaker 1: and we have to improve good organ discipline and more
Speaker 1: route in the military. And President Trump didn't do that
Speaker 1: by freeing Clinton now and wipe away this crap with
Speaker 1: Eddie Gallagher and Matt Goldstein and do it now, mister President.
Speaker 1: I don't think I can say it any better. Will
Speaker 1: you please send my best wishes, my thoughts, my prayers
Speaker 1: to Clint Lorantz and I'll do my very best. People
Speaker 1: think I have a lot more contact than I actually do,
Speaker 1: but I'll make sure that if I get an interview
Speaker 1: at any point in the near future with the President
Speaker 1: or even at a later point, I will get that
Speaker 1: book to his staff and in his hands. Sean, we're
Speaker 1: trying to get a million copies out. We set it
Speaker 1: down at two nine and nine in the e book.
Speaker 1: We want a million Americans to read it and call
Speaker 1: the White House to free Clinton. Now, all right, I
Speaker 1: appreciate it. I agree completely. And by the way, the
Speaker 1: ebook price of this is only two ninety nine. That's it,
Speaker 1: and you need to get this. We'll put it. We'll
Speaker 1: put it up on our website, Hannity dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break, Thank you so much Don Brown for being
Speaker 1: with us. Eight hundred nine one. Sean is our number.
Speaker 1: All right, Hannity tonight, nine eastern. We have a great
Speaker 1: show tonight. You don't want to miss it. Dan Bungeno
Speaker 1: versus Holdo. That's always fun. Also, Lindsey Graham stops by
Speaker 1: Mark Morgan, Lucy Obama's border guy who says, yeah, it's
Speaker 1: a real crisis, it's a real problem. Uh yeah. We're
Speaker 1: gonna talk a little Alec Baldwin tonight and much much more.
Speaker 1: Ninety eastern Hannity on Fox News. You will not get
Speaker 1: from the hate Trump media mob on the Fox News channel,
Speaker 1: and yes, we're holding them accountable. See it tonight at nine.
Speaker 1: Back here tomorrow