WEBVTT - Apple Kicks Off Terns Era with First Foldable Phone

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.369
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts.

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:06.210
<v Speaker 2>Radio.

0:00:06.650 --> 0:00:16.510
<v Speaker 1>News. Bloomberg Tech is live from the heart of Silicon

0:00:16.570 --> 0:00:25.410
<v Speaker 1>Valley with Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:00:25.430 --> 0:00:27.970
<v Speaker 1>We're live from Apple Park in Cupertino for what could

0:00:27.990 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be the iPhone maker's most consequential product launch. in years

0:00:31.730 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>all eyes on john turnus making his first major public

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.020
<v Speaker 1>appearance as apple's ceo since taking the helm on september

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>1st and bloomberg reports apple will unveil its first foldable

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>iphone a device nearly a decade in the making marking

0:00:45.020 --> 0:00:48.060
<v Speaker 1>the biggest change to iphone's form factor in almost 20

0:00:48.060 --> 0:00:51.460
<v Speaker 1>years we'll bring you the details and analysis throughout the

0:00:51.500 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>hour so apple's kind of treading water down a percentage

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>point on the stock but really the story has been

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.570
<v Speaker 1>about a comeback on the shares since late june you

0:00:59.610 --> 0:01:03.570
<v Speaker 1>remember in june Apple raised prices on everything apart from

0:01:03.590 --> 0:01:07.290
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone, reflecting higher memory costs. A rally of 15%

0:01:07.290 --> 0:01:11.569
<v Speaker 1>since then, adding $ 580 billion or so of market cap,

0:01:12.010 --> 0:01:16.210
<v Speaker 1>is in part reflective of enthusiasm around this latest generation

0:01:16.230 --> 0:01:19.450
<v Speaker 1>of products with the folding iPhone at the center of it.

0:01:19.490 --> 0:01:21.830
<v Speaker 1>Let's get out to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who leads our

0:01:21.860 --> 0:01:25.100
<v Speaker 1>coverage of Apple and consumer technology. And let's just start

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.260
<v Speaker 1>with the basics, Mark. You've done a lot of reporting

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on what Bloomberg says will be called the iPhone Duo.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.180
<v Speaker 1>What are the specs? What do we need to know?

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.500
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so I'm hearing the phone will be called the

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>iPhone Duo. This is the foldable phone. It'll start at $ 2, 000,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.690
<v Speaker 3>5.5-inch screen on the outside, 7.8-inch screen on the inside,

0:01:45.450 --> 0:01:50.670
<v Speaker 3>dual 48-megapixel cameras on the back, software-based telephoto, so there's

0:01:50.690 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>no dedicated telephoto lens similar to the iPhone Air that

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.150
<v Speaker 3>came out last year. Come in dark blue, come in white.

0:01:59.930 --> 0:02:03.830
<v Speaker 3>There will be storage capacities up to two terabytes and

0:02:03.870 --> 0:02:07.830
<v Speaker 3>that model will cost roughly $ 3, 000.

0:02:06.270 --> 0:02:07.890
<v Speaker 4>And so at.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 3>The $ 2, 000 price point, they are eating a lot of

0:02:10.700 --> 0:02:12.860
<v Speaker 3>the memory costs here and they're going to be passing

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.580
<v Speaker 3>it on to international shoppers where the price tags are,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, are less influential and less, you know, read

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.770
<v Speaker 3>into by Wall Street. They really want to keep the U.S.

0:02:22.850 --> 0:02:28.570
<v Speaker 3>prices at $ 19. 99 threshold for effect. And you'll see that

0:02:28.950 --> 0:02:32.889
<v Speaker 3>be announced today and go on sale in October. So

0:02:33.090 --> 0:02:36.670
<v Speaker 3>slightly later than the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max

0:02:36.710 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>that are launching this month. Speaking of 18 Pro and

0:02:40.980 --> 0:02:43.940
<v Speaker 3>Pro Max, lots of talk about price increases over the

0:02:43.980 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>last several months. Here's the deal. $ 100 more on each

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.180
<v Speaker 3>of those models. So not that $ 300, $ 500 price increase

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.620
<v Speaker 3>that some are expecting $ 100. Why are they doing this?

0:02:56.139 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Samsung and Google, they recently raised prices. They did $ 100.

0:02:59.900 --> 0:03:02.020
<v Speaker 3>Apple doesn't want to go past that. They want to

0:03:02.100 --> 0:03:05.179
<v Speaker 3>eat these costs. They're chasing market share here at a

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 3>time where they really could raise prices substantially.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:09.460
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.140
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, stay with us. We have some breaking

0:03:14.180 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>news on the Bloomberg terminal out of the U.S. Treasury.

0:03:16.740 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's international economics and policy correspondent, Mike McKee, has those details. Hi, Mike.

0:03:22.910 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 6>Hi, Ed.

0:03:23.210 --> 0:03:25.450
<v Speaker 7>Well, all of our bond market friends are getting the

0:03:25.490 --> 0:03:29.790
<v Speaker 7>information they were looking for. The Treasury is going to

0:03:29.889 --> 0:03:35.700
<v Speaker 7>buy back $ 6 billion in worth of 10- and 20-year notes.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.780
<v Speaker 7>The question had been, would they go above the $ 4

0:03:39.380 --> 0:03:42.610
<v Speaker 7>billion that they suggested, which was double the normal $ 2

0:03:42.290 --> 0:03:44.990
<v Speaker 7>billion amount? And they have gone over that, maybe to

0:03:45.010 --> 0:03:47.530
<v Speaker 7>send a message that they are serious about all of this,

0:03:48.030 --> 0:03:53.470
<v Speaker 7>starting on September 10th. They will raise the size to

0:03:53.470 --> 0:03:59.070
<v Speaker 7>$ 6 billion. Tomorrow we get the first buybacks of the day.

0:03:59.630 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 7>And you can see the debt distribution right now of

0:04:03.180 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 7>what we have out there that people can pick and

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 7>choose to try to sell back. These will be off-the-run

0:04:10.980 --> 0:04:14.140
<v Speaker 7>treasuries that the Treasury Department has been buying back because

0:04:14.180 --> 0:04:17.700
<v Speaker 7>they say it's a liquidity need. But the market thinks

0:04:17.820 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 7>that perhaps the ramping up of the number to $ 6

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.550
<v Speaker 7>billion From $ 2 billion is really more a question of

0:04:23.630 --> 0:04:27.510
<v Speaker 7>trying to bring down rates. And as you can see there,

0:04:28.210 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 7>that didn't work immediately. Rates have gone up quite a

0:04:31.620 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 7>bit on the 10-year note. This is just early moments,

0:04:35.220 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 7>but we'll see how this plays out. The rates right

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.060
<v Speaker 7>now are higher than they were when they first said

0:04:40.100 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 7>they were going to do this, Ed.

0:04:44.570 --> 0:04:47.650
<v Speaker 1>Treasuries falling, UK bonds also extending their drop. Mike McKee,

0:04:47.690 --> 0:04:50.590
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. I'm live at Apple Park in Cupertino.

0:04:50.930 --> 0:04:53.190
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to Los Angeles and Blumeau's Mark Gurman.

0:04:53.210 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about the foldable iPhone that you've reported

0:04:56.900 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>will be called the iPhone Duo. I want to go

0:04:59.180 --> 0:05:01.980
<v Speaker 1>into some of the backstory, Mark, if we can. The

0:05:02.100 --> 0:05:05.900
<v Speaker 1>idea initially, and this work's been going on since before 2019,

0:05:05.900 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>when Samsung came to the market with a foldable, maybe

0:05:08.620 --> 0:05:12.950
<v Speaker 1>Apple looked at an iPad form factor. You're reporting details

0:05:12.970 --> 0:05:15.370
<v Speaker 1>that Tim Cook made a pretty clear intervention on this

0:05:15.410 --> 0:05:17.890
<v Speaker 1>needing to be an iPhone. And then John Ternus more

0:05:17.950 --> 0:05:21.930
<v Speaker 1>recently got it over the line. Bring us that reporting. Yeah,

0:05:21.950 --> 0:05:23.250
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly what you said, right?

0:05:23.270 --> 0:05:27.109
<v Speaker 3>Initially, Apple looked at foldable displays, its core technology teams.

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.780
<v Speaker 3>This was over a decade ago. 2019, Samsung launches their phone,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.700
<v Speaker 3>Huawei launches their phones, Tim Cook goes to Asia, Korea, China,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.309
<v Speaker 3>sees that these are popular, gets enthusiastic about the category,

0:05:39.580 --> 0:05:41.570
<v Speaker 3>which was rare for him. He really was never close

0:05:41.589 --> 0:05:45.150
<v Speaker 3>to product development. Really pushed the hardware engineering team to

0:05:45.190 --> 0:05:47.670
<v Speaker 3>develop this into a phone. And around 2023, Apple had

0:05:47.690 --> 0:05:53.570
<v Speaker 3>its aha moment. where the core technologies, making the crease slimmer,

0:05:54.330 --> 0:05:56.650
<v Speaker 3>making battery life to a better place, durability to a

0:05:56.650 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>better place, that intersected with this idea of a passport-sized iPhone,

0:06:02.300 --> 0:06:05.460
<v Speaker 3>a shorter display, a wider internal display.

0:06:05.500 --> 0:06:06.420
<v Speaker 1>That all came together.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, three years later, this is coming to market in

0:06:09.660 --> 0:06:10.900
<v Speaker 3>just about a month and a half from now.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be speaking to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, our

0:06:15.779 --> 0:06:18.580
<v Speaker 1>managing editor for ConsumerTech all day long. Big thank you

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to Mark. Joining us here at Apple headquarters is Carolina Milanesi,

0:06:22.380 --> 0:06:25.870
<v Speaker 1>president and principal analyst at Creative Strategies. And what was

0:06:25.890 --> 0:06:27.550
<v Speaker 1>so interesting in some of the kind of history that

0:06:27.589 --> 0:06:30.870
<v Speaker 1>Mark detailed is Apple isn't always the first to enter

0:06:30.890 --> 0:06:35.289
<v Speaker 1>a category, but when it does, they're often ready. Your

0:06:35.430 --> 0:06:39.540
<v Speaker 1>expectations of how that would play out in the foldable category?

0:06:40.110 --> 0:06:43.130
<v Speaker 5>I mean, for Foldable, it's really about taking friction away

0:06:43.390 --> 0:06:47.050
<v Speaker 5>so that consumers are ready to take advantage of a

0:06:47.089 --> 0:06:47.890
<v Speaker 5>new form factor.

0:06:47.970 --> 0:06:49.450
<v Speaker 4>We are so used.

0:06:49.290 --> 0:06:51.870
<v Speaker 5>To a slab of glass that we've been using for

0:06:51.950 --> 0:06:56.150
<v Speaker 5>so long. So taking the software together with the hardware

0:06:56.270 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 5>and then the ecosystem of apps that will come alive

0:06:59.950 --> 0:07:03.180
<v Speaker 5>from a larger form factor. And it reminds me of

0:07:03.260 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 5>the iPad days, right? The beginning, it was like, basically,

0:07:07.100 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 5>it's an iPhone, but bigger. And that was enough for

0:07:09.540 --> 0:07:12.580
<v Speaker 5>people to understand what they could do with it. But

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.380
<v Speaker 5>then it was the attention to the software and the

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.650
<v Speaker 5>application that came optimized for that screen size that really

0:07:19.670 --> 0:07:20.730
<v Speaker 5>brought the device to life.

0:07:22.610 --> 0:07:25.110
<v Speaker 1>Taking an interest in the software story in two ways.

0:07:25.230 --> 0:07:29.350
<v Speaker 1>There's what Mark reported about how Apple has got ready

0:07:29.830 --> 0:07:32.330
<v Speaker 1>for the foldable on the software side, but it also

0:07:32.350 --> 0:07:33.670
<v Speaker 1>kind of links to Siri AI.

0:07:34.010 --> 0:07:34.730
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:07:35.030 --> 0:07:35.690
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that?

0:07:36.050 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 5>Because I think there is a way for AI to

0:07:39.620 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 5>have all devices, all categories of devices really come together.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 5>So I'll be curious to see if there are going

0:07:47.540 --> 0:07:52.820
<v Speaker 5>to be applications that Siri will have specifically on the

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 5>Duo or maybe that it plays out slightly differently. I'm

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 5>also curious to see if Apple have paid attention to

0:07:58.940 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 5>other devices aiding or coming together. with the Duo in particular.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:09.460
<v Speaker 5>You know, I don't know if it's something with the

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.670
<v Speaker 5>earbuds or with AirPods or with watch that might bring

0:08:15.050 --> 0:08:17.350
<v Speaker 5>the ecosystem even tighter together.

0:08:18.590 --> 0:08:21.310
<v Speaker 1>Pricing is going to be one of the biggest watches

0:08:22.020 --> 0:08:26.060
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg reporting is that the Duo will have a

0:08:26.140 --> 0:08:31.700
<v Speaker 1>floor of about $ 2, 000, but for higher storage spec, $ 3, 000.

0:08:30.420 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>But even the next generation of iPhones being $ 100 higher

0:08:34.020 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>than the prior generation, Apple has to do that really,

0:08:37.850 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>don't they?

0:08:38.900 --> 0:08:41.300
<v Speaker 5>They don't have much of a choice. Supply chain is

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 5>what it is. Cost is going up. Obviously, you know,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 5>one choice they could have had is eating into their margins.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.830
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure Wall Street wouldn't have appreciated that very much.

0:08:52.850 --> 0:08:57.210
<v Speaker 5>But it's that balance is how much they can give

0:08:57.290 --> 0:09:01.429
<v Speaker 5>back from a cost perspective to consumer, but also make

0:09:01.470 --> 0:09:05.010
<v Speaker 5>sure that they do have an upgrade cycle that matters

0:09:05.090 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 5>to them. And so it's that balance. And Apple has,

0:09:08.050 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 5>in a way, an advantage over other OEMs, which is

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.260
<v Speaker 5>that they have a lot of content. They are generating

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 5>revenue from services. And so that's the other part, is balancing, okay,

0:09:20.260 --> 0:09:23.949
<v Speaker 5>maybe I'm not raising my prices as much because I

0:09:23.990 --> 0:09:27.070
<v Speaker 5>know that I have some money coming in from subscriptions,

0:09:27.130 --> 0:09:28.690
<v Speaker 5>which is something that others don't have.

0:09:29.770 --> 0:09:35.460
<v Speaker 1>How is Carolina Milanese and Creative Strategies modeling in John Ternus?

0:09:36.340 --> 0:09:39.490
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? On the future, what might

0:09:39.510 --> 0:09:40.530
<v Speaker 1>be different for Apple?

0:09:41.500 --> 0:09:43.650
<v Speaker 5>I've been saying that at the end of the day,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 5>you're still talking about Apple, right? So you're not having

0:09:47.179 --> 0:09:49.309
<v Speaker 5>a wild card that is going to now take the

0:09:49.370 --> 0:09:52.750
<v Speaker 5>company into a totally different direction, but it will make

0:09:52.850 --> 0:09:55.510
<v Speaker 5>its mark. And so from somebody that is coming from

0:09:55.530 --> 0:09:59.849
<v Speaker 5>engineering and product, I think as we turn more into AI,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.359
<v Speaker 5>that to me is really important. I've been saying for

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 5>a while that you still need to sell hardware before

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.820
<v Speaker 5>you sell AI. And that is where the integration of

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.689
<v Speaker 5>silicon hardware and software is going to bring AI to life.

0:10:15.130 --> 0:10:18.189
<v Speaker 1>The global smartphone market will probably be a billion units

0:10:18.230 --> 0:10:20.370
<v Speaker 1>this year, something like that. Foldables is going to be

0:10:20.390 --> 0:10:21.170
<v Speaker 1>a very small part.

0:10:21.190 --> 0:10:21.650
<v Speaker 5>Very small.

0:10:21.670 --> 0:10:23.210
<v Speaker 1>But if I can take you back to what Apple

0:10:23.230 --> 0:10:26.410
<v Speaker 1>said at earnings, it really surprised me. Put memories one side.

0:10:26.460 --> 0:10:29.980
<v Speaker 1>They basically said we misread demand. And so we didn't

0:10:30.020 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>place orders for the processors. Demand seems really robust around

0:10:33.780 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. What are you seeing?

0:10:36.570 --> 0:10:38.780
<v Speaker 5>As much as we want to talk about what comes

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 5>after the phone, the phone, the smartphone is still our

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 5>most precious device. And I think that consumer, especially at

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 5>times of economic pressure, rely on this device so much

0:10:50.460 --> 0:10:52.449
<v Speaker 5>more because it's everything to you.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:53.830
<v Speaker 4>It's your internet device.

0:10:53.910 --> 0:10:55.170
<v Speaker 5>It's your calculator.

0:10:55.309 --> 0:10:56.010
<v Speaker 4>It's your wallet.

0:10:56.370 --> 0:11:01.770
<v Speaker 5>So we've become highly dependent. And over time, consumers have

0:11:01.830 --> 0:11:03.829
<v Speaker 5>proven that that's where they're going to put their money.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Just to go over the basics, you know, John Ternus

0:11:06.700 --> 0:11:08.900
<v Speaker 1>has been on stage before. It's just that this time

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.420
<v Speaker 1>he's the CEO. Does it matter what he says, how

0:11:12.460 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he says it? Oh, absolutely.

0:11:14.750 --> 0:11:16.949
<v Speaker 5>You know, not that, bless him, not that before it

0:11:17.090 --> 0:11:20.189
<v Speaker 5>didn't matter. But, you know, the weight that you carry

0:11:20.690 --> 0:11:23.170
<v Speaker 5>when you speak as a CEO versus, you know, a

0:11:23.230 --> 0:11:27.270
<v Speaker 5>lead engineer is very different. So yes, we'll be watching

0:11:27.530 --> 0:11:30.860
<v Speaker 5>and I'm curious to see what he will anchor himself

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 5>on as far as who he wants to be as

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 5>a CEO.

0:11:34.940 --> 0:11:37.660
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly, you've been on campus for 24 hours or so.

0:11:37.940 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it different this time? There's a lot of excitement.

0:11:41.380 --> 0:11:44.830
<v Speaker 5>I think people are not just around the foldable iPhone,

0:11:44.870 --> 0:11:47.830
<v Speaker 5>but really about the change of the guard.

0:11:47.470 --> 0:11:51.860
<v Speaker 1>And what comes next. Carolina Milenanesi, Creative Strategies. Thank you

0:11:51.900 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us here at Apple Park Cupertino.

0:11:54.820 --> 0:11:57.170
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we're going to talk through consumers' preference changes

0:11:57.490 --> 0:12:00.429
<v Speaker 1>and what it means for Apple with Nicole Peng from Omdia.

0:12:00.470 --> 0:12:02.670
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back from Apple Park in just a moment.

0:12:02.809 --> 0:12:13.490
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Tech. OK, let's get back to that

0:12:13.530 --> 0:12:15.580
<v Speaker 1>breaking news at the top of the hour. The U.S.

0:12:15.630 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Treasury said it will buy up to $ 6 billion of

0:12:18.860 --> 0:12:21.660
<v Speaker 1>longer-dated government debt. This is the first operation under an

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.809
<v Speaker 1>expanded buyback program. Bloomberg International Economics and Policy Correspondent Mike

0:12:25.830 --> 0:12:28.089
<v Speaker 1>McKee is back with us. I see market moves on

0:12:28.110 --> 0:12:28.670
<v Speaker 1>this news, Mike.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 7>We're seeing the kind of moves that the Treasury Department

0:12:32.340 --> 0:12:34.870
<v Speaker 7>did not want to see as the 10-year note yield

0:12:34.970 --> 0:12:40.069
<v Speaker 7>rises on this news. Originally in August, when Treasury Secretary

0:12:40.130 --> 0:12:44.130
<v Speaker 7>Besson said they would increase the size of the Treasury's buybacks,

0:12:44.770 --> 0:12:49.059
<v Speaker 7>it was thought that it would bring down the yields some,

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.060
<v Speaker 7>and it did in the short run. But then yields

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.140
<v Speaker 7>started climbing again as people in the bond market started

0:12:56.179 --> 0:12:59.780
<v Speaker 7>worrying about things like the U.S. debt, about inflation. about

0:12:59.820 --> 0:13:02.350
<v Speaker 7>what's going on with the war in the Middle East,

0:13:02.420 --> 0:13:05.550
<v Speaker 7>and it looks like that is continuing through. Besson's buybacks,

0:13:05.610 --> 0:13:08.110
<v Speaker 7>as you mentioned, $ 6 billion, up to $ 6 billion. They

0:13:08.150 --> 0:13:10.470
<v Speaker 7>don't have to go that high, but they likely will.

0:13:10.830 --> 0:13:14.410
<v Speaker 7>Maturities between 10 and 20 years, and this operation will

0:13:14.450 --> 0:13:15.650
<v Speaker 7>take place tomorrow.

0:13:16.050 --> 0:13:19.950
<v Speaker 1>There should be a decent enough response to the auction.

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.140
<v Speaker 7>Because there's a lot of paper out there that is

0:13:22.260 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 7>lightly traded and could get turned back into the Treasury.

0:13:26.020 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 7>What we didn't get today is any kind of indication

0:13:28.940 --> 0:13:31.350
<v Speaker 7>about how this is going to be paid for or

0:13:31.550 --> 0:13:34.929
<v Speaker 7>whether this is going to go on beyond this one operation.

0:13:35.570 --> 0:13:39.250
<v Speaker 7>They have been buying back regularly in this debt maturity

0:13:39.309 --> 0:13:43.580
<v Speaker 7>range $ 2 billion worth. And do they intend to keep

0:13:43.620 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 7>this at $ 6 billion? Will they raise it? Do they

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 7>go back to $ 2 billion? Those are unanswered questions right now.

0:13:49.059 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 7>And then the other unanswered question is, do they fund

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.530
<v Speaker 7>this by selling more T-bills? Or do they fund this

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 7>out of the Treasury general account? It may depend on

0:13:58.260 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 7>how often they're going to continue to do this. So

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 7>still questions for the markets to have answers to, but

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.579
<v Speaker 7>at least we know what the initial amount is.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.060
<v Speaker 1>That's quite a pop in yields we're seeing. What is

0:14:12.100 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury trying to achieve here, Mike? What are they

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.230
<v Speaker 1>trying to affect with this action?

0:14:17.770 --> 0:14:19.970
<v Speaker 7>This is coming under the rubric of the program that

0:14:19.990 --> 0:14:24.500
<v Speaker 7>they say is for liquidity help. They want to make

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:29.900
<v Speaker 7>these bonds more liquid, more available to sell. So they

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 7>will be the buyer of last resort, which would then

0:14:32.260 --> 0:14:35.300
<v Speaker 7>give people in the Treasury market more money to buy

0:14:35.500 --> 0:14:39.210
<v Speaker 7>newer bonds. But really, the market thinks that that wasn't

0:14:39.250 --> 0:14:42.290
<v Speaker 7>really a problem. And they're just trying to bring down

0:14:42.350 --> 0:14:45.790
<v Speaker 7>yields because the higher the 10-year goes, the higher the

0:14:45.830 --> 0:14:46.830
<v Speaker 7>whole yield curve goes.

0:14:47.190 --> 0:14:48.370
<v Speaker 1>The more they have to pay.

0:14:48.190 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 7>In interest, and it's getting very, very expensive to do that,

0:14:52.460 --> 0:14:55.300
<v Speaker 7>plus the fact that we're seeing a reaction because the

0:14:55.340 --> 0:14:58.420
<v Speaker 7>debt keeps going up and these added interest payments only

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.380
<v Speaker 7>add to that. So it's a kind of a vicious

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:06.770
<v Speaker 7>circle that the market suspects the Treasury is trying to

0:15:06.910 --> 0:15:11.130
<v Speaker 7>sort of stop. The question is, can they? Maybe not,

0:15:11.170 --> 0:15:14.290
<v Speaker 7>if this is any indication of what's happening today. And

0:15:14.510 --> 0:15:17.690
<v Speaker 7>can they afford to keep doing this? Also, there's an

0:15:17.750 --> 0:15:21.050
<v Speaker 7>impact on the Fed because they want to take cues

0:15:21.090 --> 0:15:24.710
<v Speaker 7>from the Treasury market on what the economy is doing

0:15:24.750 --> 0:15:27.530
<v Speaker 7>and what the Fed should do. And instead, they're getting

0:15:27.980 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 7>a market that is manipulated by the Treasury and that

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.100
<v Speaker 7>will throw off whatever they're calculating.

0:15:36.610 --> 0:15:39.020
<v Speaker 1>Lumos, Mike McKee, thank you very much. Equity is also

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at session lows, but Apple on a points basis, one

0:15:41.260 --> 0:15:44.590
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest drags. Apple's foldable iPhone is expected to

0:15:44.610 --> 0:15:47.890
<v Speaker 1>be the crown jewel of product announcements later today, but

0:15:47.930 --> 0:15:50.090
<v Speaker 1>how will it fit into the wider picture of what's

0:15:50.150 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a growing but nascent segment. Nicole Pang, Research VP covering

0:15:53.980 --> 0:15:57.750
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Hardware Application at Omdia is with me to discuss.

0:15:58.290 --> 0:16:00.950
<v Speaker 1>The pricing is the focus, right? They are going to,

0:16:00.990 --> 0:16:05.390
<v Speaker 1>according to Bloomberg's reporting, price iPhone Duo at $ 2, 000, up

0:16:05.410 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to $ 3, 000 for higher spec storage. Where does that sit

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market today?

0:16:10.540 --> 0:16:13.830
<v Speaker 4>Actually, it's not a surprise for us for this pricing.

0:16:13.990 --> 0:16:16.350
<v Speaker 8>It seems that all the foldable in the market is

0:16:16.390 --> 0:16:22.510
<v Speaker 8>sitting at around $ 1, 900 on the US dollars on a

0:16:22.550 --> 0:16:26.910
<v Speaker 8>retail price. And for Apple, we don't expect anything less

0:16:27.370 --> 0:16:32.470
<v Speaker 8>than that. It's still three times than the average selling

0:16:32.490 --> 0:16:34.850
<v Speaker 8>price of a normal smartphone in the market.

0:16:36.290 --> 0:16:38.550
<v Speaker 1>It is a premium market anyway, isn't it? I mean,

0:16:38.590 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>if you think about consumers in different geographies, a foldable

0:16:42.620 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>iPhone would almost be like designerware.

0:16:46.830 --> 0:16:49.510
<v Speaker 8>I will say that if you look at the market

0:16:49.530 --> 0:16:53.270
<v Speaker 8>data these days, in fact, China is more than 50%

0:16:53.270 --> 0:16:55.790
<v Speaker 8>of all the foldable chips.

0:16:55.810 --> 0:16:57.270
<v Speaker 1>The existing foldable market.

0:16:57.330 --> 0:16:59.830
<v Speaker 4>Exactly. And US is about 15%.

0:16:59.830 --> 0:17:07.859
<v Speaker 8>Then 12% is coming from developed Asia, for example, Korea, Japan. Indeed,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 8>in those markets, they look at such a device as

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:17.939
<v Speaker 8>very much premium and also early adopter. And what is

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 8>interesting is in China, the early adopters usually are.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:24.220
<v Speaker 4>Very high-end consumers as well.

0:17:24.700 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 8>So these fit in very well with what they need

0:17:28.290 --> 0:17:30.570
<v Speaker 8>and what they want at the same time.

0:17:31.310 --> 0:17:34.869
<v Speaker 1>How important is it that the iPhone Duo, which Bloomberg

0:17:34.930 --> 0:17:37.170
<v Speaker 1>is reporting is the name of this foldable to come

0:17:37.210 --> 0:17:42.780
<v Speaker 1>later today, is AI-ready, that they've taken into account the

0:17:42.859 --> 0:17:43.540
<v Speaker 1>AI age?

0:17:44.300 --> 0:17:45.700
<v Speaker 4>It's an interesting question. I will offer.

0:17:47.010 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 8>different perspective here. We did a consumer survey across the world.

0:17:52.980 --> 0:17:54.620
<v Speaker 4>Some of the places.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Are really keen to get everything AI, for example, India, China,

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 8>and US is somewhat in the middle. And we look

0:18:03.020 --> 0:18:05.980
<v Speaker 8>at Europe, it's much more reserved when it comes to

0:18:06.210 --> 0:18:10.950
<v Speaker 8>AI feature. We asked them what are the top factors

0:18:11.010 --> 0:18:14.170
<v Speaker 8>that influence how they buy a smartphone brand, how they.

0:18:14.090 --> 0:18:15.070
<v Speaker 4>Choose a smartphone brand.

0:18:16.060 --> 0:18:19.490
<v Speaker 8>More than 50% of the user, they want it from

0:18:19.530 --> 0:18:23.310
<v Speaker 8>a trusted company with reliable quality product.

0:18:24.250 --> 0:18:26.750
<v Speaker 4>Second factor, best user experience.

0:18:27.250 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 8>Third factors, best specs, top specs. Four factors, security, privacy.

0:18:34.980 --> 0:18:37.940
<v Speaker 8>So when it comes to AI feature, cool AI feature,

0:18:38.180 --> 0:18:41.620
<v Speaker 8>guess what? It comes down to the eighth of the

0:18:41.619 --> 0:18:43.139
<v Speaker 8>12 factors that we asked them.

0:18:43.900 --> 0:18:47.109
<v Speaker 4>So these days, but we can't do without AI.

0:18:47.510 --> 0:18:51.550
<v Speaker 8>All the companies coming with cool AI feature, really helpful.

0:18:52.050 --> 0:18:55.190
<v Speaker 8>I think it's really fitting into the number two factor

0:18:55.210 --> 0:18:57.290
<v Speaker 8>where we're saying the best user experience.

0:18:57.820 --> 0:18:59.460
<v Speaker 4>So the AI ready.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.980
<v Speaker 8>What I'm thinking is not just AI feature that.

0:19:03.859 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 4>You're talking about.

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 8>Talking about or a GPT or a chatbot. It's more

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.470
<v Speaker 8>about how you enhance the user experience. That is the

0:19:11.530 --> 0:19:14.030
<v Speaker 8>number two factors that are helping people to choose their.

0:19:14.170 --> 0:19:16.490
<v Speaker 1>Phone these days. But those other factors seem important as well.

0:19:16.510 --> 0:19:21.219
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's reporting detailed that Apple spent a lot of time

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.060
<v Speaker 1>on the hinge. on the margin or the fold and

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>by necessity in a foldable you have to make some

0:19:28.500 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>compromise lower battery life lower quality camera yeah to achieve

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.620
<v Speaker 1>the aesthetic um how important do you think those that

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.740
<v Speaker 1>it will be that apple nails.

0:19:38.510 --> 0:19:43.330
<v Speaker 8>That that's why it takes so long so photo bear

0:19:43.390 --> 0:19:45.830
<v Speaker 8>is not new and then it's been like 10 years

0:19:45.930 --> 0:19:49.050
<v Speaker 8>already but what we're seeing quite a lot of breakthrough

0:19:49.170 --> 0:19:52.060
<v Speaker 8>actually only have in this two years.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:54.780
<v Speaker 4>For example, battery breakthrough.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.500
<v Speaker 8>There is a new battery technology that really enhance and

0:19:57.550 --> 0:20:00.750
<v Speaker 8>making it very thin and light at the same time

0:20:00.790 --> 0:20:04.830
<v Speaker 8>very durable. Hinge of course and then screen technology is

0:20:04.910 --> 0:20:07.290
<v Speaker 8>only just come out these two years and then making

0:20:07.350 --> 0:20:11.389
<v Speaker 8>it much better. reliable devices that you can use longer.

0:20:11.890 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 8>So I believe what we are looking at here is

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 8>not just the cost of purchasing a device, it's the

0:20:17.859 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 8>cost of owning it, which is actually preventing a lot

0:20:21.340 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 8>of people not buying it at the moment. How expensive

0:20:26.740 --> 0:20:28.100
<v Speaker 8>it might be taking to repair.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.179
<v Speaker 1>Nicole, Apple has spent 20 years trying to get us

0:20:32.220 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to live our lives through a rectangle. this foldable iPhone

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.620
<v Speaker 1>is going to be short and wide. Yeah. Like a passport,

0:20:39.660 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we keep saying.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:20:41.770 --> 0:20:43.930
<v Speaker 1>Is that what the form factor that the market wants?

0:20:44.910 --> 0:20:48.690
<v Speaker 8>I think it's another very interesting question, how we evolve

0:20:48.790 --> 0:20:51.770
<v Speaker 8>from a bar form factor that actually comes from a

0:20:51.810 --> 0:20:52.370
<v Speaker 8>feature phone.

0:20:52.390 --> 0:20:53.570
<v Speaker 4>Do you remember BlackBerry?

0:20:54.170 --> 0:20:54.650
<v Speaker 1>Just about.

0:20:54.670 --> 0:20:57.780
<v Speaker 8>So you have a screen on top and a keyboard

0:20:57.820 --> 0:20:58.859
<v Speaker 8>on the bottom.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 4>But when you're coming to.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:08.690
<v Speaker 8>tablet how people consuming a lot of video content multitasking

0:21:09.130 --> 0:21:10.030
<v Speaker 8>it's a completely.

0:21:09.710 --> 0:21:13.230
<v Speaker 4>Different form factor so we are moving.

0:21:12.950 --> 0:21:18.629
<v Speaker 8>From actually a phone from a tablet light devices and

0:21:18.690 --> 0:21:22.170
<v Speaker 8>other also very interesting when you're looking at immersive experience

0:21:22.550 --> 0:21:26.949
<v Speaker 8>everything is about wide and a wider TV that you

0:21:26.970 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 8>got at home, a wider cinema screen, and now it's

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.909
<v Speaker 8>a wider phone. So what we look at here is,

0:21:35.130 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 8>we found that from our other devices that you look at,

0:21:38.230 --> 0:21:42.350
<v Speaker 8>it's quite hard for people to go back to the

0:21:42.390 --> 0:21:44.820
<v Speaker 8>previous experience and when they're starting to experience a much

0:21:44.859 --> 0:21:49.419
<v Speaker 8>more immersive experience here. So this is especially important as

0:21:49.460 --> 0:21:54.100
<v Speaker 8>well in this AI world because all the interaction has

0:21:54.140 --> 0:22:00.430
<v Speaker 8>become much more voice-centric and we are consuming much more information.

0:21:59.950 --> 0:22:00.470
<v Speaker 4>On the phone.

0:22:01.030 --> 0:22:06.130
<v Speaker 8>So it could be a more AI-ready form factor compared

0:22:06.170 --> 0:22:07.929
<v Speaker 8>to previously it was a phone.

0:22:07.990 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 4>It's supposed to do what the phone needs to be doing.

0:22:11.140 --> 0:22:11.750
<v Speaker 6>Things like that.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.460
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Peng, Omdia on Bloomberg Tech here live at Apple

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Park in Cupertino. Thank you very much. Another big story,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is tapping yet another corner of the global debt

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.620
<v Speaker 1>market to fund its AI ambitions. Tech giant is expected

0:22:24.660 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise more than 5.8 billion in its first ever

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.479
<v Speaker 1>sterling bond sale, drawing nearly $ 16 billion in investor demand.

0:22:32.510 --> 0:22:35.070
<v Speaker 1>That's according to a Bloomberg source. Joining us now is

0:22:35.090 --> 0:22:38.689
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Ronan Martin. The hyperscalers keep going and this is

0:22:38.710 --> 0:22:41.590
<v Speaker 1>an interesting sterling move by Amazon. What do we know?

0:22:43.369 --> 0:22:44.310
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it is.

0:22:44.330 --> 0:22:48.330
<v Speaker 10>It's a kind of another market that the hyperscalers are tapping.

0:22:49.210 --> 0:22:52.020
<v Speaker 10>Amazon are following quite a well-trodden path at this point

0:22:52.180 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 10>of coming over to Europe to raise more debt. Amazon

0:22:55.150 --> 0:22:58.100
<v Speaker 10>obviously did a Euro deal earlier in the year, and

0:22:58.140 --> 0:23:01.940
<v Speaker 10>I think it's their fourth global bond so far this year.

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 10>They're following Alphabet into the sterling market. Slightly different deals

0:23:07.260 --> 0:23:09.540
<v Speaker 10>to Alphabet. Alphabet kind of tapped the market earlier on

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.300
<v Speaker 10>in the year, in February, when demand was still going

0:23:12.340 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 10>crazy for these deals. They even sold that century, 100-year

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 10>century bond that really kind of blew it out of

0:23:19.500 --> 0:23:20.100
<v Speaker 10>the water.

0:23:20.180 --> 0:23:21.540
<v Speaker 1>This one's a little bit more reserved.

0:23:21.580 --> 0:23:25.430
<v Speaker 10>We're seeing investors pulling a bit more demand and kind

0:23:25.450 --> 0:23:31.429
<v Speaker 10>of placing a bit fewer bids for the deals. We

0:23:31.450 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 10>also see Uber in the market, a debut Euro bond sale.

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. I don't know that I saw this with

0:23:38.140 --> 0:23:42.850
<v Speaker 1>Uber happening. What's our reporting there? Yeah, it's an interesting one.

0:23:42.890 --> 0:23:45.149
<v Speaker 10>I think some of the first assumptions were it was

0:23:45.170 --> 0:23:48.050
<v Speaker 10>going to be around the delivery hero deal. But we're

0:23:48.070 --> 0:23:50.570
<v Speaker 10>hearing that that financing for that isn't going to be

0:23:50.609 --> 0:23:52.830
<v Speaker 10>until next year when that all gets approved. So this

0:23:52.890 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 10>is kind of just another diversifying their funding sources.

0:23:57.100 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the U.S.

0:23:58.460 --> 0:24:00.940
<v Speaker 10>Market has been so well tapped so far this year.

0:24:01.340 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 10>Hyperscalers have raised so much debt there. Even there's the

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 10>whole conversations around whether hyperscalers are affecting the Treasury market

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.910
<v Speaker 10>with how much is going on there. And so for

0:24:11.950 --> 0:24:15.990
<v Speaker 10>these global companies, diversifying some of their debt into a

0:24:16.030 --> 0:24:22.230
<v Speaker 10>different market with European investors who typically massively underserved in

0:24:22.270 --> 0:24:24.909
<v Speaker 10>terms of tech companies, there just isn't that kind of

0:24:24.970 --> 0:24:26.970
<v Speaker 10>same level of tech issuance over here.

0:24:27.369 --> 0:24:28.370
<v Speaker 1>So for some investors.

0:24:28.390 --> 0:24:30.230
<v Speaker 10>This is a great opportunity to get a new name,

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:31.389
<v Speaker 10>a well-known company.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.340
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Bronan Martin with what's going in corporate debt. Thank

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Coming up from Apple Park, Cupertino, IDCs,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Nabila Popal, with the impact that a foldable iPhone could

0:24:45.660 --> 0:24:48.659
<v Speaker 1>have in what is a nascent foldables market. We'll be

0:24:48.720 --> 0:25:07.410
<v Speaker 1>right back. This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:25:07.430 --> 0:25:09.870
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to New York with Bloomberg's chief economic correspondent,

0:25:09.890 --> 0:25:12.149
<v Speaker 1>Mike McKee, for an update from the Treasury and the

0:25:12.190 --> 0:25:13.929
<v Speaker 1>buybacks and their impact on the markets.

0:25:13.950 --> 0:25:14.250
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Mike.

0:25:14.270 --> 0:25:15.290
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Ed.

0:25:15.330 --> 0:25:17.869
<v Speaker 7>Well, we're having a significant impact on the markets, at

0:25:17.950 --> 0:25:22.530
<v Speaker 7>least for the long-dated notes. The 10-year and 30-year at

0:25:22.570 --> 0:25:26.129
<v Speaker 7>this point yields are much higher after the Treasury announced

0:25:26.170 --> 0:25:29.020
<v Speaker 7>it would do $ 6 billion in buybacks in the 10

0:25:29.020 --> 0:25:33.470
<v Speaker 7>to 20-year space. The administration apparently looking to bring down

0:25:33.570 --> 0:25:37.300
<v Speaker 7>or at least control yields, and that goal is not

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.820
<v Speaker 7>being met at the moment. The latest development is that

0:25:40.900 --> 0:25:44.500
<v Speaker 7>they have updated their buyback schedule going forward to show

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.740
<v Speaker 7>that future buybacks.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>In the 10 to 20-year space.

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Will be $ 4.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Billion or greater.

0:25:51.540 --> 0:25:53.859
<v Speaker 7>Now, that's what they originally said on August 18th when

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 7>they announced this first buyback operation, that it would be

0:25:57.180 --> 0:25:59.510
<v Speaker 7>doubled to at least $ 4 billion, and they come in

0:25:59.570 --> 0:26:02.649
<v Speaker 7>at $ 6 billion. so they could easily raise those in

0:26:02.869 --> 0:26:04.970
<v Speaker 7>the future. But they're going to have to see how

0:26:05.010 --> 0:26:10.020
<v Speaker 7>this all plays out and whether this sell-off in bonds continues,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 7>whether it sticks because of the market's concerns about the

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.020
<v Speaker 7>overall U.S.

0:26:16.140 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Debt.

0:26:17.100 --> 0:26:19.940
<v Speaker 7>It is a concern for the administration because the more

0:26:21.260 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 7>yields rise, the more expensive it gets to pay for this.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 7>and the budget deficit gets bigger. Also, because it's the

0:26:28.460 --> 0:26:31.929
<v Speaker 7>10-year note yield, that's tied to mortgages. Mortgage rates go up,

0:26:32.010 --> 0:26:33.890
<v Speaker 7>and that's not very good for a White House that

0:26:33.970 --> 0:26:37.929
<v Speaker 7>is trying to convince people to vote Republican in the

0:26:37.990 --> 0:26:40.650
<v Speaker 7>midterm election. So, Edward, keep an eye on this all

0:26:40.690 --> 0:26:44.190
<v Speaker 7>day and see if we fade this. It's faded just

0:26:44.230 --> 0:26:46.990
<v Speaker 7>a little bit, but it's still a big jump up

0:26:47.390 --> 0:26:53.210
<v Speaker 7>and not what Treasury may have been expecting. Bloomberg's Mike McKee,

0:26:53.230 --> 0:26:54.070
<v Speaker 7>thank you very much.

0:26:54.090 --> 0:26:56.010
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot going on in the world of technology,

0:26:56.310 --> 0:26:58.710
<v Speaker 1>in the world of AI, particularly when it comes to

0:26:58.730 --> 0:27:01.830
<v Speaker 1>the equities market. Bloomberg's Carmen Reinecke joins us now. Carmen,

0:27:01.850 --> 0:27:02.250
<v Speaker 1>what you got?

0:27:02.670 --> 0:27:03.229
<v Speaker 4>Thanks, Ed.

0:27:03.290 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 9>Yep, tech stocks are the biggest movers of the day today.

0:27:07.180 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 9>Shares of Meta are particularly having a great run. The

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.700
<v Speaker 9>stock is having its best day in more than a

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.939
<v Speaker 9>month as Wall Street analysts are cheering its Muse AI campaign.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:17.940
<v Speaker 4>Agent.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 9>So this is something that people have sort of been

0:27:20.460 --> 0:27:24.830
<v Speaker 9>waiting for, looking really great here. Mizuho analysts are writing

0:27:24.850 --> 0:27:28.030
<v Speaker 9>that the agent marks the start of a substantial product

0:27:28.070 --> 0:27:31.410
<v Speaker 9>cycle that's not priced into shares. On the flip side,

0:27:31.430 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing some big AI stocks also weighing on the NASDAQ.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It's down today.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:41.140
<v Speaker 9>Some of the biggest decliners are Amazon, Alphabet, and actually

0:27:41.220 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 9>Apple at this point. So Should be noted, Amazon and

0:27:44.220 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 9>Alphabet also have AI agents. There could be some competition there.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 9>There's also the Bond sale, as well as Alphabet's Google

0:27:51.820 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 9>spending more than $ 15 billion in AI structure in Finland.

0:27:57.619 --> 0:27:59.859
<v Speaker 9>And of course, we're all watching shares of Apple.

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:02.460
<v Speaker 4>Stock is actually seeing.

0:28:02.300 --> 0:28:05.450
<v Speaker 9>Some selling pressure today, heading into their event, obviously, later

0:28:05.490 --> 0:28:07.730
<v Speaker 9>in the afternoon. We're going to be watching here for

0:28:07.910 --> 0:28:10.010
<v Speaker 9>the new foldable iPhone. Back to you, Ed.

0:28:12.740 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Bloomberg's Comrade Reinecke, thank you very much. Apple's new

0:28:15.100 --> 0:28:18.070
<v Speaker 1>foldable device is expected to come with a price tag

0:28:18.369 --> 0:28:21.770
<v Speaker 1>of around $ 2, 000. But despite that cost, a head start

0:28:21.790 --> 0:28:25.670
<v Speaker 1>by rival phone makers, IDC predicts Apple's entrance will breathe

0:28:25.730 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>new life. into the foldable space. Nabila Popal, Senior Research Director,

0:28:29.980 --> 0:28:31.460
<v Speaker 1>is with me. And I really want to dig into

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.100
<v Speaker 1>the data here. What's interesting, actually, is we saw the

0:28:34.140 --> 0:28:37.710
<v Speaker 1>market for foldables, which is quite small, contract in the

0:28:37.750 --> 0:28:40.230
<v Speaker 1>first half of this year. But if you zoom out

0:28:40.370 --> 0:28:44.070
<v Speaker 1>for some clarity, you know, a billion smartphone units this year,

0:28:44.730 --> 0:28:47.860
<v Speaker 1>it's foldables where we could see growth and Apple's responsible

0:28:47.900 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for it, to your mind.

0:28:49.460 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:28:49.980 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we haven't been this excited for an Apple

0:28:51.980 --> 0:28:54.830
<v Speaker 6>event in a long time. And, you know, with the foldable,

0:28:55.630 --> 0:28:59.210
<v Speaker 6>as everyone's expecting to launch from Apple, it's going to

0:28:59.250 --> 0:29:02.830
<v Speaker 6>reignite growth, right? And not just reignite growth in a

0:29:03.070 --> 0:29:06.250
<v Speaker 6>overall smartphone market that's declining, but to a very high

0:29:06.310 --> 0:29:09.700
<v Speaker 6>value segment, which currently is only under 2% of the market.

0:29:09.740 --> 0:29:12.180
<v Speaker 6>So we're expecting Apple already within the first four months

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:13.340
<v Speaker 6>of launch to grow.

0:29:13.730 --> 0:29:15.430
<v Speaker 4>Capture 30% share.

0:29:15.710 --> 0:29:19.170
<v Speaker 6>Obviously, it's very small, but still very relevant foldable market.

0:29:19.270 --> 0:29:22.810
<v Speaker 1>So Bloomberg's reporting is that the iPhone Duo is what

0:29:22.890 --> 0:29:26.170
<v Speaker 1>it will be called, goes on sale in October. Wall

0:29:26.190 --> 0:29:29.850
<v Speaker 1>Street estimates vary, actually. 6 million units, 10 million units

0:29:29.890 --> 0:29:32.690
<v Speaker 1>in the December quarter. What does IDC think is possible?

0:29:33.810 --> 0:29:37.850
<v Speaker 6>We are forecasting about 10 million units in the first

0:29:37.850 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 6>12 months of launch. So, I mean, we're really, you know,

0:29:40.540 --> 0:29:42.340
<v Speaker 6>I think just given those numbers and then by the

0:29:42.460 --> 0:29:45.780
<v Speaker 6>end of next year, so Apple will capture about 40%

0:29:45.780 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 6>share and just over 30% this year. So there is,

0:29:49.100 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, given the fact that the total foldable market

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.750
<v Speaker 6>is about 23 million this year, that's going to, you know,

0:29:54.770 --> 0:29:58.310
<v Speaker 6>make up a huge portion. But more importantly, we're excited

0:29:58.350 --> 0:30:02.110
<v Speaker 6>about to see how Apple brings more relevance to the category, right?

0:30:02.190 --> 0:30:03.890
<v Speaker 6>What are the new elements that it brings to play?

0:30:03.930 --> 0:30:07.210
<v Speaker 6>Because it's a very crowded market. Foldables have been around

0:30:07.250 --> 0:30:09.810
<v Speaker 6>for eight years now and there's a ton of competition.

0:30:09.830 --> 0:30:11.890
<v Speaker 6>So how is Apple really going to stand out and

0:30:11.950 --> 0:30:15.790
<v Speaker 6>differentiate the product aside from its obviously, you know, brand

0:30:15.850 --> 0:30:16.970
<v Speaker 6>value that it has?

0:30:16.990 --> 0:30:19.710
<v Speaker 1>What does IDC feel is most important then for the

0:30:19.780 --> 0:30:22.500
<v Speaker 1>product itself? What is it that Apple has to have

0:30:22.540 --> 0:30:25.940
<v Speaker 1>got absolutely right when they show us this foldable later today?

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.900
<v Speaker 6>Well, considering it's going to be at a banging price

0:30:29.020 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 6>of $ 2, 000 or $ 2, 500, right? We don't know where it's

0:30:31.940 --> 0:30:34.180
<v Speaker 6>going to land. We're expecting on the higher end of

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 6>that range. And the most important thing is going to

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 6>be really the look and feel. It has to feel premium.

0:30:40.140 --> 0:30:43.130
<v Speaker 6>They have to get the... decrease, right? It was rumored

0:30:43.210 --> 0:30:46.410
<v Speaker 6>to be, you know, invisible. So let's see how they get.

0:30:46.470 --> 0:30:49.330
<v Speaker 6>But I think more importantly, to make the product relevant

0:30:49.450 --> 0:30:53.170
<v Speaker 6>or really impressive is how are they going to define

0:30:53.190 --> 0:30:57.070
<v Speaker 6>and polish the user experience? Until now, consumers are really like, eh,

0:30:57.150 --> 0:30:58.830
<v Speaker 6>you know, why do I really need a foldable and

0:30:58.890 --> 0:31:01.990
<v Speaker 6>what can I do differently? So the seamless, you know,

0:31:02.010 --> 0:31:05.820
<v Speaker 6>the Apple's all really great about, you new things in

0:31:05.860 --> 0:31:09.420
<v Speaker 6>a very user-friendly way. So I'm excited to see how

0:31:09.580 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 6>Apple brings, what it brings to the OS, right, in

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 6>terms of the extra screen size and what can you

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 6>really do with it. So I'm excited to see how Apple,

0:31:18.780 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm curious what Apple does about that.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.620
<v Speaker 1>The luxury or premium segment is really interesting in the

0:31:24.660 --> 0:31:28.150
<v Speaker 1>context of China. You were cited by Boombox Mark Gurman

0:31:28.210 --> 0:31:32.450
<v Speaker 1>in his latest piece, likening the potential of the foldable

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>phone to what we see in the luxury bag space.

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Explain that bit to me.

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:38.570
<v Speaker 4>Right, the Birkin comment.

0:31:38.590 --> 0:31:39.690
<v Speaker 1>The Birkin, yeah.

0:31:39.750 --> 0:31:43.209
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, last year, orange of the 17 was

0:31:43.250 --> 0:31:46.190
<v Speaker 6>so popular and Chinese consumers were liking it to the

0:31:46.290 --> 0:31:48.380
<v Speaker 6>Hermes orange, right? So I was saying, yes, with this,

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.300
<v Speaker 6>despite this high price, I won't be surprised if the

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 6>new iPhone foldable, you know, or Duo, whatever it ends

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 6>up being called, ends up being like the new Birkin

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:02.410
<v Speaker 6>of smartphones, right? So high price, very luxurious, very limited.

0:32:02.570 --> 0:32:04.210
<v Speaker 6>And so, you know, that's why I do think that

0:32:04.330 --> 0:32:06.250
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be a blockbuster product.

0:32:06.270 --> 0:32:09.620
<v Speaker 1>It's We have the IDC numbers and expectations both for

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 1>China for the foldable segment, but also just in general

0:32:13.780 --> 0:32:16.980
<v Speaker 1>globally over to the end of this decade. What's the

0:32:17.020 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>pathway for foldables over the next few years and how

0:32:20.620 --> 0:32:22.780
<v Speaker 1>big a driver is Apple of that growth?

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.980
<v Speaker 6>So, you know, the two largest markets for foldables are U.S.

0:32:27.020 --> 0:32:31.210
<v Speaker 6>and China. China with over 60 percent share and U.S.

0:32:31.270 --> 0:32:34.310
<v Speaker 6>with over 20 percent share. Now, Apple is almost 50

0:32:34.310 --> 0:32:35.050
<v Speaker 6>percent of the U.S.

0:32:35.110 --> 0:32:35.490
<v Speaker 1>Market.

0:32:35.510 --> 0:32:37.590
<v Speaker 6>So right there, it tells you that Apple being the

0:32:37.630 --> 0:32:39.690
<v Speaker 6>largest number one player in the U.S., for example, and

0:32:39.730 --> 0:32:42.410
<v Speaker 6>now number two. um two in china it's going to

0:32:42.430 --> 0:32:45.020
<v Speaker 6>um you know launching a foldable device it's going to

0:32:45.130 --> 0:32:50.260
<v Speaker 6>really take momentum add momentum to the category um and

0:32:50.340 --> 0:32:52.660
<v Speaker 6>increase the share of the foldable space but more importantly

0:32:52.700 --> 0:32:54.510
<v Speaker 6>it's going to add a ton of value to you

0:32:54.630 --> 0:32:57.530
<v Speaker 6>know apple's proposition um and revenue.

0:32:58.150 --> 0:33:00.390
<v Speaker 1>Really quick is there anything else you're watching out for

0:33:00.450 --> 0:33:02.770
<v Speaker 1>beyond the foldable Yeah.

0:33:02.930 --> 0:33:06.020
<v Speaker 6>I'm actually super excited to see what they do with

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 6>the rumored red or burgundy or whatever color it's going

0:33:09.700 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 6>to be launched. I'm a big colors person last year. Yes,

0:33:12.020 --> 0:33:13.970
<v Speaker 6>the orange was a big hit, but it wasn't my thing.

0:33:14.030 --> 0:33:17.110
<v Speaker 6>So I am really excited to see where in that

0:33:17.190 --> 0:33:20.030
<v Speaker 6>range they fall. And then, of course, the camera improvements

0:33:20.050 --> 0:33:21.230
<v Speaker 6>with the Pros and Pro Max.

0:33:21.430 --> 0:33:24.630
<v Speaker 1>The 18th generation. Nabila Popal, Senior Research Director, IDC. Great

0:33:24.650 --> 0:33:26.300
<v Speaker 1>to have you back on the show. Thank you. Thank

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.180
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Now, coming up, defense tech startup Covenant

0:33:29.220 --> 0:33:32.500
<v Speaker 1>emerges from stealth with a long-range missile built to close

0:33:32.540 --> 0:33:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the West's deep precision strike gap. Covenant President Abby Denberg

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>joins us next. This is Bloomberg Tech. An AI researcher

0:33:55.180 --> 0:33:58.140
<v Speaker 1>has resigned from Anthropic and called on other staffers to

0:33:58.220 --> 0:34:01.460
<v Speaker 1>rethink their work. In a post on X, Jacob Coxon

0:34:01.540 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>cited his concern that the company and its top competitor, OpenAI,

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.819
<v Speaker 1>are acting irresponsibly in their all-out pursuit of a technology

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.620
<v Speaker 1>that possesses increasing safety concerns, saying, quote, they are racing

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:17.469
<v Speaker 1>straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. Bloomberg's

0:34:17.810 --> 0:34:20.050
<v Speaker 1>senior tech editor, Mike Shepherd, joins us with the details.

0:34:20.250 --> 0:34:22.149
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of a two-parter as well, because after

0:34:22.170 --> 0:34:25.310
<v Speaker 1>that initial post from the employee that had resigned, one

0:34:25.350 --> 0:34:28.669
<v Speaker 1>of his colleagues, a current anthropic researcher, weighed in as well.

0:34:30.210 --> 0:34:33.339
<v Speaker 11>Yes, and this all stands out, really, because we have

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 11>heard for I don't know how long, and you and

0:34:35.620 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 11>I have talked about it from time to time, all

0:34:38.219 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 11>this Doomer talk surrounding artificial intelligence, And the speed at

0:34:43.739 --> 0:34:46.339
<v Speaker 11>which it is being developed by all these companies. And

0:34:46.420 --> 0:34:49.529
<v Speaker 11>these calls have been dismissed somewhat by the industry to

0:34:49.590 --> 0:34:51.930
<v Speaker 11>a point. But now we're hearing the call coming from

0:34:52.090 --> 0:34:54.609
<v Speaker 11>inside the house in a way. And it really is

0:34:54.710 --> 0:34:58.020
<v Speaker 11>not only a warning to the public, it is also

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:02.060
<v Speaker 11>a warning to AI employees themselves. The poster who just

0:35:02.140 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 11>resigned from Anthropic, Jacob Cox, and really did tell his

0:35:06.100 --> 0:35:09.529
<v Speaker 11>fellow researchers to think twice about what they're doing and

0:35:09.570 --> 0:35:12.029
<v Speaker 11>whether they want to be associated with something that could

0:35:12.070 --> 0:35:15.450
<v Speaker 11>potentially have such grave consequences. And we have heard this

0:35:15.530 --> 0:35:19.750
<v Speaker 11>message from other employees within Silicon Valley who work in

0:35:19.830 --> 0:35:22.940
<v Speaker 11>artificial intelligence in July 2020. there was that letter that

0:35:22.980 --> 0:35:28.660
<v Speaker 11>was signed by 1,100 OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI industry

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 11>employees urging the industry to pace development of artificial intelligence

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.110
<v Speaker 11>so that they can reckon with some of the risks.

0:35:36.450 --> 0:35:38.390
<v Speaker 11>But now we're in kind of a new phase of

0:35:38.410 --> 0:35:42.350
<v Speaker 11>the game, the introduction last week of Astra, which some.

0:35:42.230 --> 0:35:44.310
<v Speaker 1>Have hailed, including Jensen Wang, as.

0:35:44.870 --> 0:35:47.870
<v Speaker 11>What we would term AGI, the point at which the

0:35:47.910 --> 0:35:52.549
<v Speaker 11>intelligence can outpace and outwork humans, That really puts us

0:35:52.610 --> 0:35:55.590
<v Speaker 11>in a different territory, and that highlights what Jacob Coxson

0:35:55.650 --> 0:35:56.390
<v Speaker 11>posted today.

0:35:59.850 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The specific line that everyone's talking about online on social

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:08.500
<v Speaker 1>media is the likelihood in the next decade that AI

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.860
<v Speaker 1>wipes out humanity. Could you just explain that bit very quickly, Shep?

0:36:13.140 --> 0:36:15.660
<v Speaker 11>Well, one of the concerns is that AI really does

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 11>have this ability now on a cybersecurity front on a

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.350
<v Speaker 11>health development front, in all of these areas to potentially

0:36:23.630 --> 0:36:28.190
<v Speaker 11>upend security as we know it. Waging cyber attacks that

0:36:28.230 --> 0:36:31.770
<v Speaker 11>could disrupt the financial system en masse. Being used to

0:36:31.810 --> 0:36:35.350
<v Speaker 11>develop bioweapons that really pose, as you put it and

0:36:35.450 --> 0:36:38.569
<v Speaker 11>as the poster put it, an existential threat. Now, that

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.380
<v Speaker 11>is prompting some reflection here in Washington and a number

0:36:41.420 --> 0:36:44.969
<v Speaker 11>of calls from politicians, including Senator Bernie Sanders himself, for

0:36:45.030 --> 0:36:47.629
<v Speaker 11>steps to halt this and really to ban what he

0:36:47.710 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 11>called superintelligence really as a protective measure. We're hearing a

0:36:51.390 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 11>lot of that reaction today in response on Capitol Hill,

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 11>but it is important to note that the Trump administration

0:36:57.060 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 11>so far has really looked away from the safety question.

0:36:59.900 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 11>The president himself last week saying in response to safety

0:37:03.540 --> 0:37:08.330
<v Speaker 11>concerns that the priority really is continuing with AI development

0:37:08.469 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 11>unfettered because he sees it as essential to propelling the

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.570
<v Speaker 11>US economy and also keeping pace against China in the

0:37:16.630 --> 0:37:18.670
<v Speaker 11>race to dominate.

0:37:20.910 --> 0:37:21.149
<v Speaker 5>AI.

0:37:21.190 --> 0:37:23.870
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sheppard with the reporting. Thank you very much. Let's

0:37:23.890 --> 0:37:27.370
<v Speaker 1>stay with private markets and startups. Andreessen Horowitz-backed startup Covenant

0:37:27.710 --> 0:37:30.770
<v Speaker 1>is emerging from stealth after raising more than $ 250 million

0:37:30.910 --> 0:37:34.049
<v Speaker 1>from three different funding rounds. The defense tech firm has

0:37:34.070 --> 0:37:37.509
<v Speaker 1>already signed military contracts across the US and Europe and

0:37:37.530 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>says it can make cheaper, heavy payload, long range cruise missiles.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Covenant President and Chief Growth Officer Abby Denberg is with us.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.420
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting reading about government. Let's start with the technology

0:37:49.460 --> 0:37:52.060
<v Speaker 1>that you're working on. What is this most akin to

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.770
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what's already out there in the American

0:37:55.810 --> 0:37:56.970
<v Speaker 1>defense industrial base?

0:37:57.969 --> 0:38:01.710
<v Speaker 12>I'm joining you at your power production facility in Dallas, Texas.

0:38:01.750 --> 0:38:04.410
<v Speaker 12>And behind me, you can see the Anthem, which is

0:38:04.430 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 12>a low-cost, long-range cruise missile designed to fill the deep

0:38:08.219 --> 0:38:09.300
<v Speaker 12>precision strike gap.

0:38:09.620 --> 0:38:10.780
<v Speaker 1>And we talk.

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.620
<v Speaker 12>About heavy payload and long range. There's not a lot

0:38:14.660 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 12>of capability out there that can achieve that, and there's

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.020
<v Speaker 12>no capability that can achieve that today at the price

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:25.029
<v Speaker 12>and scale that we're offering.

0:38:25.890 --> 0:38:28.250
<v Speaker 1>Abby, that looks to me, all the way over here

0:38:28.290 --> 0:38:31.189
<v Speaker 1>from Cupertino, but also from the description, sounds to me

0:38:31.530 --> 0:38:34.190
<v Speaker 1>very similar to a Tomahawk missile. Is that fair?

0:38:35.510 --> 0:38:40.529
<v Speaker 12>What I can say is that Anthem is offering... exquisite capability,

0:38:40.750 --> 0:38:43.830
<v Speaker 12>but at an affordable price point. We as a nation

0:38:43.930 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 12>have relied heavily on exquisite capabilities that at the moment

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.140
<v Speaker 12>are not at an affordable price point and not.

0:38:50.020 --> 0:38:51.140
<v Speaker 6>Being produced at scale.

0:38:51.380 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 12>And we're eager to be able to bring affordable mass

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 12>to strategic range.

0:38:59.860 --> 0:39:02.420
<v Speaker 1>Abby, it's $ 250 million out the gate. That's a lot

0:39:02.460 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of money to come out of stealth. I go back

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.589
<v Speaker 1>to the note that it's three separate rounds that happened

0:39:07.650 --> 0:39:10.770
<v Speaker 1>over time. But talk about the experience of raising those

0:39:10.830 --> 0:39:14.750
<v Speaker 1>funds and coming out of stealth right now. Why this moment?

0:39:16.230 --> 0:39:18.730
<v Speaker 12>I'll start with the rounds because what I can say

0:39:18.790 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 12>is we have an incredible cap table with investors who

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:26.830
<v Speaker 12>truly understand the deep precision strike gap today. We went

0:39:26.850 --> 0:39:29.930
<v Speaker 12>to market for our seed round two years ago. and

0:39:29.969 --> 0:39:33.460
<v Speaker 12>that was before deep precision strike was really talked about

0:39:33.500 --> 0:39:35.660
<v Speaker 12>in the way that it is today. But we found

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:41.819
<v Speaker 12>investors that really understand the criticality of bringing affordable munitions

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.740
<v Speaker 12>into the marketplace. And we have been able to leverage

0:39:45.780 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 12>that over the last two years to be able to

0:39:47.620 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 12>build a and develop the capability that you're seeing behind

0:39:50.420 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 12>me today. And so when we think about that capital,

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.739
<v Speaker 12>it enables us to build a resilient, redundant supply chain

0:39:56.780 --> 0:40:00.750
<v Speaker 12>and multiple production facilities in order to enable capability fielded

0:40:01.150 --> 0:40:01.730
<v Speaker 12>as early as 2027.

0:40:01.730 --> 0:40:07.910
<v Speaker 1>Abi, tell me about the team. What are the core

0:40:07.950 --> 0:40:12.930
<v Speaker 1>competencies of those of you that are building Covenant right now?

0:40:12.950 --> 0:40:13.890
<v Speaker 1>Where have you all come from?

0:40:15.190 --> 0:40:17.969
<v Speaker 12>We have, and I'm sure many CEOs and presidents would

0:40:17.989 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 12>say this, but we have the best engineering team in

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.299
<v Speaker 12>the world. We have been very intentional about bringing in

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.810
<v Speaker 12>only those that are really mission-driven and focused. And the

0:40:26.870 --> 0:40:31.270
<v Speaker 12>employee base is made up of reservists like myself. veterans

0:40:31.330 --> 0:40:34.509
<v Speaker 12>and patriots who are so driven by this mission that

0:40:34.670 --> 0:40:38.069
<v Speaker 12>we have worked tirelessly in order to deliver this capability.

0:40:38.370 --> 0:40:41.469
<v Speaker 12>We went from ideation to a full-scale operational prototype in

0:40:41.469 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 12>11 months at one day. And that stems from having

0:40:45.100 --> 0:40:48.420
<v Speaker 12>missile engineers who've been doing this for 20-plus years. Our

0:40:48.460 --> 0:40:51.860
<v Speaker 12>chief technology officer was the chief system engineer of Iron Dome.

0:40:52.660 --> 0:40:54.860
<v Speaker 12>And we have engineers from across the globe that are

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.060
<v Speaker 12>working with us in order to bring forward a capability

0:40:58.420 --> 0:40:59.140
<v Speaker 12>that executes.

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.859
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to what happens next. You've raised the money.

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.860
<v Speaker 1>You're joining us from the facility in Dallas. You're headquartered

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, D.C. What do you guys need to do

0:41:11.620 --> 0:41:13.950
<v Speaker 1>to get going? We already talked about the contracts you

0:41:13.969 --> 0:41:16.690
<v Speaker 1>have with both U.S. but also Western allies. Where's your

0:41:16.710 --> 0:41:19.109
<v Speaker 1>main focus right now with these funds?

0:41:20.460 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 12>The focus is to deliver. A lot of startups can

0:41:24.020 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 12>deliver prototypes, and we've seen that. But the question is not,

0:41:27.930 --> 0:41:31.989
<v Speaker 12>can new companies bring forward interesting technology? The question is,

0:41:32.030 --> 0:41:35.170
<v Speaker 12>can they produce at scale? And that's what Covenant is

0:41:35.210 --> 0:41:38.149
<v Speaker 12>about to do next. We are going to be delivering prototypes.

0:41:38.450 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 12>thousands of missiles. This production facility will be delivering a

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:45.340
<v Speaker 12>thousand missiles next year and is designed to deliver 5,000

0:41:45.340 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 12>a year. The same is true of our production facility

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:52.340
<v Speaker 12>in Germany. And so what's next is delivery, because ultimately

0:41:52.420 --> 0:41:55.550
<v Speaker 12>this is a deterrence capability. And the way that deterrence

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.310
<v Speaker 12>actually is effective is having munitions at the hands of

0:41:58.370 --> 0:41:59.070
<v Speaker 12>our end users.

0:42:03.190 --> 0:42:06.250
<v Speaker 1>Covenant President and Chief Growth Officer, Abby Denberg, the startup

0:42:06.290 --> 0:42:09.250
<v Speaker 1>coming out of stealth with $ 250 million. Great to have

0:42:09.270 --> 0:42:11.110
<v Speaker 1>you on the show. Thank you very much indeed. Now

0:42:11.150 --> 0:42:13.990
<v Speaker 1>coming up, a new iPhone and a new era for Apple.

0:42:14.010 --> 0:42:17.530
<v Speaker 1>We're counting down to Apple's biggest, probably most consequential event

0:42:17.850 --> 0:42:20.710
<v Speaker 1>in years, and it is all about a foldable iPhone.

0:42:21.250 --> 0:42:22.870
<v Speaker 1>More to come. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:42:32.450 --> 0:42:32.820
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:45.990
<v Speaker 1>The curtain's about to go up on Apple's big event.

0:42:46.010 --> 0:42:48.010
<v Speaker 1>So what's coming and what's going to steal the show?

0:42:48.070 --> 0:42:50.850
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Consumer Tech reporter Chris Welch is with me here

0:42:50.870 --> 0:42:53.740
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Park Cupertino. And let's just be honest, foldable.

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And it has a name, according to Bloomberg's reporting.

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It's called the iPhone Duo, which is going to take

0:42:58.660 --> 0:43:00.460
<v Speaker 2>some getting used to. Not the iPhone Fold, not the

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.489
<v Speaker 2>iPhone Ultra, but the iPhone Duo. I guess that, you know,

0:43:03.530 --> 0:43:05.549
<v Speaker 2>you have a foldable, right? You are a user of

0:43:05.590 --> 0:43:10.009
<v Speaker 2>a foldable. Duo represents that it has two modes. Our

0:43:10.050 --> 0:43:13.590
<v Speaker 2>reporting is that when folded, it has one screen size.

0:43:13.890 --> 0:43:15.100
<v Speaker 2>When unfolded, it has a different one.

0:43:15.130 --> 0:43:15.510
<v Speaker 1>Explain.

0:43:16.010 --> 0:43:17.830
<v Speaker 2>So it's got a very wide form factor when it's open.

0:43:18.010 --> 0:43:20.009
<v Speaker 2>So that's great for watching movies or showing photos to

0:43:20.050 --> 0:43:24.339
<v Speaker 2>your friends or... stuff like eBooks. So it's got like

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:26.140
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great use cases. But when it's closed,

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.529
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like a squat, short form factor, which

0:43:28.550 --> 0:43:29.850
<v Speaker 2>people aren't really used to. So I think it's going

0:43:29.870 --> 0:43:31.810
<v Speaker 2>to be like a learning curve once people get their

0:43:31.830 --> 0:43:33.450
<v Speaker 2>hands on this phone, it's going to feel very different.

0:43:33.690 --> 0:43:36.810
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to hear the cheers behind us of everyone

0:43:36.830 --> 0:43:41.270
<v Speaker 1>that's gathering at the Steve Jobs Theatre. This market's really interesting.

0:43:41.350 --> 0:43:45.229
<v Speaker 1>So IDC says there'll be a billion smartphone units shipped

0:43:45.270 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this year. Actually, foldables are very small. Yes. They're a

0:43:48.700 --> 0:43:51.260
<v Speaker 1>very niche market. But there seems to be some hope,

0:43:51.300 --> 0:43:54.100
<v Speaker 1>at least in our reporting, that Apple's going to give

0:43:54.180 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this segment a bit of a push. Yeah, for sure.

0:43:56.420 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Samsung kind of pioneered this category. They've been

0:43:59.620 --> 0:44:03.550
<v Speaker 2>in it for years. They've also got Google. friends like Motorola, Huawei,

0:44:03.570 --> 0:44:05.450
<v Speaker 2>they've been at this for a long, long time, but

0:44:05.489 --> 0:44:07.950
<v Speaker 2>now Apple's here. This is the first John Turner's keynote,

0:44:08.370 --> 0:44:11.029
<v Speaker 2>no pressure, here's our first ever folding iPhone. And so

0:44:11.050 --> 0:44:12.870
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna come into this market and we're gonna see

0:44:13.430 --> 0:44:17.020
<v Speaker 2>how it looks, how they made it, the hinge, the crease,

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:19.100
<v Speaker 2>will there be a crease? Have they solved the crease factor?

0:44:19.580 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That's been around forever.

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:22.919
<v Speaker 2>So there are so many challenges, but I think it's Apple.

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:25.140
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna have some kind of unique spin that's gonna

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:25.900
<v Speaker 2>make it pretty special.

0:44:26.060 --> 0:44:28.740
<v Speaker 1>Now you and the team have detailed pretty clearly that

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.170
<v Speaker 1>this work's been going on behind the scenes at Apple.

0:44:31.670 --> 0:44:34.710
<v Speaker 1>for quite a long time. I guess they must be ready?

0:44:35.410 --> 0:44:35.870
<v Speaker 1>You would think so.

0:44:35.870 --> 0:44:37.870
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's going to ship next month, apparently. So

0:44:37.910 --> 0:44:40.390
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be somewhat of a wait, but they're ready.

0:44:40.410 --> 0:44:44.580
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this has been like a several years long effort.

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.620
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to see what it looks like here.

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.500
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's got this, this feels like a big event.

0:44:49.739 --> 0:44:52.190
<v Speaker 2>It's got that air of like a special day. This

0:44:52.230 --> 0:44:54.900
<v Speaker 2>is not your typical iPhone event, so it's pretty exciting.

0:44:54.940 --> 0:44:56.500
<v Speaker 1>You've done a few of these. I've done a few

0:44:56.540 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of these. And you should be able to get your

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.540
<v Speaker 1>hands on what we think will be called iPhone Duo.

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you check for in the first

0:45:03.260 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>instance with a foldable? Just how it feels, how it opens.

0:45:05.260 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it reassuring?

0:45:06.060 --> 0:45:09.259
<v Speaker 2>Does it feel like high quality? Because people take these

0:45:09.300 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 2>things to the beach, they take them all over the world,

0:45:11.140 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 2>so it's got to be durable, it's got to work well.

0:45:13.260 --> 0:45:14.730
<v Speaker 2>This is Apple, so that's not going to be a

0:45:14.730 --> 0:45:16.610
<v Speaker 2>huge concern for most people, I feel like.

0:45:16.670 --> 0:45:19.410
<v Speaker 1>Chris and the team are going to be very busy today.

0:45:19.430 --> 0:45:22.670
<v Speaker 1>We're about an hour from the keynote where we expect

0:45:22.690 --> 0:45:25.910
<v Speaker 1>John Ternus, who became CEO on September 1st, to kick

0:45:25.950 --> 0:45:28.460
<v Speaker 1>things off. And the main event to be a foldable

0:45:28.540 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>iPhone that Bloomberg reports will be called Duo. Bloomberg's Chris Welch.

0:45:31.580 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much.

0:45:32.180 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Ed.

0:45:32.739 --> 0:45:36.060
<v Speaker 1>Indeed. That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget, check out the podcast. We had a lot

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:42.209
<v Speaker 1>of interesting... conversations that looked at the foldable market more holistically,

0:45:42.510 --> 0:45:45.810
<v Speaker 1>the forecasts for this year, what Apple's impact might be,

0:45:46.170 --> 0:45:49.509
<v Speaker 1>and also what the impact of a $ 2, 000, maybe more

0:45:49.550 --> 0:45:52.830
<v Speaker 1>than $ 2, 000 handset will be in the foldable space. You

0:45:52.870 --> 0:45:54.950
<v Speaker 1>can find the podcast on all the Bloomberg platforms and

0:45:54.989 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, iHeart, and on Apple. From Cupertino from Apple Park,

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:02.299
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:46:09.530 --> 0:46:10.780
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.