WEBVTT - The coaching carousel goes round and round...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Don Dude, do do Do Do Do Do? Yeah?

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This as the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Here are the

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports rare new network alongside Frankie stamfel, I am

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sauce, been Franky? What's going on about? What's going on?

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Hump day here? Also happy birthday too, thought i'd get

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that out at the top of the show. Let's talk

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about creating, including some breaking news. Yeah, we have three

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>new head coaching hires or a official and let's start

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with the latest wonder Frankie, and that is that the

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns kind of did the sensible thing here and

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>promoted Freddie Kitchens from offensive coordinator to head coach. It's

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting because Greg Williams is obviously the head coach second

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, but there's Freddie Kitchens that got

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>lauded by everyone with the job he did. Kitchens was

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to interview anywhere else. He was unther contract

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns, and the interviewed them, loved what they heard

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and promoted him to the head coach. And one of

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the first things I texted you today was my hope

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets was that they were they were, the

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Browns would hire someone else and then the Jets pounce

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on Freddie Kitchens. That's obviously not going to happen. But

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I have absolutely no problem with this higher just based

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on the way he took over the offense once Hugh

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Jackson was gone and once Hodd Haley was gone, and

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what he did with Baker Mayfield and got the most

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>out of Nick Chubb. And there was a lot of

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about once he took over the way the offensive

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>line protected Baker Mayfield. I mean, there's a lot to

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>be said for that. I know that once he took over,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield was was one of the fewest touched quarterbacks

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like QB hits and QB hurries. Once

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Kitchens took over, so he obviously knows what he's

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>doing in terms of protection scheme. Uh again, Nick Chubb,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what he was able to do. It really was kind

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of like a run first offense with Chubb. But even so,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield was awesome. You look at the metrics. I mean,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>he just broke the rookie record in terms of passing touchdowns.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We know how good Baker was coming out of college,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate college pastor of all time, and that

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, huge and Todd Haley weren't getting that out

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of him. So just to go from see that kind

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of advance in his statistical output game to game, from

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>huge accidents hot Haley to Freddy Kitchens. I love the

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>job that he did. I don't have a problem with

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the higher at all. And with that we have more

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, Frank. Another head coach has been hired, this

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>time in Denver, where Vic Fangio has been announced as

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the head coach. Longtime league defensive coordinator. I think the

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>dude's pretty old. It's like sixty years old. Fangio has

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>never got an opportunity to be a head coach anywhere.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>He was the defensive coordinator with the Chicago Bears, obviously

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had a fantastic job this year, the nice job under

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>John Foxes. Well before that, he was the defensive the

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>coordinator in San Francisco and Jim Harball and they're awesome

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>defenses with Patrick Willis and whatnot. It's gonna a matter

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot who the offensive coordinator will be in Denver.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But Vic Fangio the brand new head coach for the

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos. Yeah, the Broncos kind of zigging when everyone

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>else is zagging right now, you mentioned it. Vic Fangio

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is sixty years old, So he's not the Cliff Kingsbury.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>He's not your thirty nine year old head coach that's

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>coming in here and he's gonna teach his spread offensive concepts.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the exact opposite. But we also have the

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>job that his defense with the Bears did this year.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned he's never really had an opportunity to be

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a head coach. You defensive coordinator with the forty Niners,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, from defensive coordinator with Stanford. Before that,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he spent some time with the Baltimore Ravens. This guy

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>has been around football for a long time, dating back

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to New Orleans Saints back in he was a linebackers coach.

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>So again, this will this is kind of this. This

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>will be a good test to see, like what works out?

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it more of do you want that leader of

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>men type guy and surround yourself with with a good

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>O C and see what happens here. This will be

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a good test because everyone else is trying to find

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that next Sean McVeigh, right. You know, Matt with Flora

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>ends up with the Packers, um Cliff Kingsbury. As we mentioned,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see who he brings in as

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the OC. I don't really mind because Denver, you know,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years, has prided themselves on defense.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>If you still have some defensive pieces, I don't think

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a terrible move. I think he's deserving. But yeah,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be big to find out who they hire

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at the OC. You talked about Ziggy win zagging here

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with Vic Fangio. I mean, he's certainly not young, and

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not on the offensive side of the ball. He's

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>been a defensive coach. Defense is assistant in the NFL

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>consistently really since nineteen six. He was a linebackers coach

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Saints. Back then. He was the defensive coordinator

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first three years of the Carolina Panthers organization

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>under Don Cabers. Went from there over to the Indianapolis Colts,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>then went to the Houston Texas defensive coordinator once again

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with Don Cabers, was a defensive assistant with the Ravens,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was a linebackers coach with the Ravens, defensive coordinator in Stanford,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator with the Niners, and then the defensive coordinator

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>with the San Francisco for Niner has been around a

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>long time, appens, he said, sixty years old. Is Vic

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Fangio the brand new head coach of the Denver Broncos.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I Right, like the strong linebackers there, Bradley Chubb von Miller,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to coach them up. You want to be

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a defensive team. The offensive coordinator doesn't matter in a

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>major way for the players that we care about, right, Frankie.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 1>For the Philip Lindsays of the world, the Roy Spremens

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of the world, the Courtland Suttons of the world, and

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>whoever the quarterback is out there for the Devern Barbaraco's

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>um interesting higher there by John Elway. You wonder if

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Gary Kubia could be the offensive coordinator there and then

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you're the most boring team ever and that would just

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>defy everything else that's happening in the NFL going with

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Gary Kubiak probably just run the ball thirty times a game?

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything based on where he's been before? Just

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at it like people he's worked under, Like who

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>is who would he be tied to in terms of

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like an offensive quarter Like is Kubiak actually one of them?

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Or can you see one of these other kind of

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>often offensive minded head coaches who just got fired land

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>here is an o C maybe like an Adam Gaze

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or something like So Adam Gaze has very bad blood

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with John Elway from not getting the job previously. So

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that so that's not happening. Um, they didn't work together

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago Geese uh and Fangio, but so it's possible.

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 1>The name that just comes to mind is Dwell Luggin's

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was the opposite coinator in Chicago with Fangio. He's been

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>off as the coordinator all all around the block. He

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>was there with John Fox, Yes, and Fangio was while

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fangio was defensive coordinator, so they do have some

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>experience working together. So that's like one name that immediately

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. I mentioned Gary Kubiak um because of

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>always love for Kubiak. Obviously he was his backup. He

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was the head coach in Denver on the Super Bowl there. Um,

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's somebody I'm sure that that if he's helped

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>his right that lay would want to happen. Um, those

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are probably the names that come to my most. Um. Yeah,

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess that kind of does it like like Peth

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's they worked together at one point, so um, yeah,

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's probably what comes to mind there in Denver,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Frank Denver those one way with the older sixty year

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>old Fangio. I'm not saying that's bad, it's just different

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>than for everyone else is doing. Dude's deserving. He's been

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>around forever and he's done a really nice job. In

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>his last do you Stops Arizona, they went the complete

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>other way. They promoted were signed should say Cliff Kingsbury,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>who frankically give you all the stats in just a

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>few moments with what he did at Texas Tech. But

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury is the model for Sean is Jean mcphay is

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the model of Kingsbury, Right, So it's all the same.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a young, good looking dude that has had a

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of success on the offensive side of the ball

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as a head coach. Not so much, Frank and said,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll give the stats in a second. He's been lauded

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for developing Patrick Mahomes, He's been lauded for having Baker

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield on his team. He's been lauded for his ideas.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>He was a former offensive coordinator at UFC USC Rather,

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about the morals of that yesterday, but we

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't get into, Frank is, what kind of success we

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>expect Kingsbury to have in Arizona and how will shape

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the offense. We're all about finding out what the offensive

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>coordinator is and jumping on his tendencies rather than just

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>assuming it will be all of the same. What do

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know about Cliff Kingsbury and what do you expect

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. So Cliff Kingsbury was the the up and comer,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the hot young candidate, you know, only thirty nine years old,

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>spent some time in the NFL as like a third

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>string quarterback. I played with the Patriots. He was drafted

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>by the Patriots originally in two thousand three with Bill Belichick.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Played for the Saints the Jets. He was only in

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the league for about three years. Went out to Houston,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was an offensive quality control coach there. He was a

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>co offensive coordinator, quarterbacks coach. He was there. He worked

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>with case Keenum when case Keenum played in college, and

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>case Keenum was an awesome college player. So this he

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>does have history coaching up quarterbacks. You've seen some of

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the names that his other names he's worked with. He

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>was at Texas A and M as the offensive coordinator there,

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>worked with Johnny Manzel. Went out to Texas Tech where

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he was the head coach from and a lot of

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>people point to his record while he's at Texas Tech

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty five and forty. Now is that completely relevant. I

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to old that against him. I think there

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are other things that you can hold against Cliff Kingsbury,

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>which I'm going to get into. But he did he did,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, bring in Baker Mayfield. He was also the

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who let Baker Mayfield go. He you know, he

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ended up benching Baker Mayfield for David's Webb while he

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was at Texas Tech, and then he also had Patrick Mahomes.

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>But having Patrick Mahomes and seeing what we just saw

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL this year, a quarterback who in his

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>second year through for five thousand yards and fifty touchdowns

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is a blessing and a curse because if you had

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, why weren't your teams better? Why weren't his

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers better? Why wasn't he more successed? Why wasn't he

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>higher than the tenth overall pick in the NFL draft?

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And I know there's some trepidation with teams drafting quarterbacks

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the Big twelve, so on and so forth,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with the spread offenses. But Patrick Mahomes his final season

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at Texas Tech or do you want touchdowns? Ten interceptions?

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>A great season, but it wasn't good enough for him

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to get drafted higher than ten. Why couldn't he get

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>more out of Patrick Momes? Why why couldn't he get

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a nun at of ten? Mad? No, it's not bad,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>No it is, But why wasn't he one of these

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>guys that was considered like a consensus, like Toua or

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence or something like that. So it's both a

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>blessing and a curse, the fact that he had Patrick

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and didn't get enough out of him. I'll give

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>credit where it's due. I was listening to the Pick

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>six podcast on my way in today from the CBS

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports podcast network, and they were talking about in Patrick

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>mahomes Is final game as a member of Texas Tech,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>he lost six six under Cliff Kingsbury. There was a

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>reason why Cliff Kingsbury was fired at Texas second he

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>went on to USC where he was the offensive coordinator.

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about this a little bit yesterday about you know,

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened between the time when he was named o

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>C and like November, December whatever it was till now

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>where he left them, and a lot of people are

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about that today, and you know how it's ethically wrong.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about it. Whatever, that's fine. I don't have

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a problem with him leaving that job to become a

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>head coach at the NFL level. The problem is, why

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>couldn't he get more out of Pat Mahomes or you

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>know why what if his offense was so successful, why

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>wasn't his record better? Right? You know, I'm not even

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna hold the record against him, but they're already you know,

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I've read things about how his his personality is it

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna messtion er Josh Rosen. Josh Rosen is kind of

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like a closed off dude. Didn't really get along with

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like the coaching staff this year in Arizona. I know

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there was like personality issues with a U c. L A.

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So again, he runs like the spread offense. It's like

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this air raid offense, which originally came from Mike Leach.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Right if if I'm if, I'm not absolutely Kingsbury as

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback under Mike Leach. So that's what they're trying

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to find. They're trying to find these new concepts and

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to find ways to successfully pass the ball at

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the NFL level, because that's the way of the NFL's training.

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.239
<v Speaker 1>You have to be able to pass the ball successfully.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And he gets that out of Josh Rosen. That's what

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping. That's why they make this higher. I see

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the coin. I don't necessarily hold the

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>record against him, but I do hold the fact that

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he had a quarterback in Baker Mayfield, who as of

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>right now it looks like he's gonna be a pretty

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>damn good NFL quarterback bench him for Davis Webb. So

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know what he had in Baker Mayfield and

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then didn't ultimately get the like he was very good

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>with Patrick Mahomes, but to me didn't get the most

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>out of him because obviously we see what Andy Reid

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and Eric b Nimi or b Enemy got out of

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes this year. Just a quick update, looks say

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I was right by the way corn Adam Schefter Vic

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Fangio runs the defense in the Broncos. The offense were

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>run by Gary Kubia Gary Kubiak as we As we mentioned,

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Kubiak um took time off had some major health issues,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>so he had to retire essentially as the head coach

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Broncos, working in their front office. But you know,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>you know that he likes the love. He loves John Elway.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>They have a love affair with each other and and

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Kubiak will return to the sidelines as the offensive coordinator

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>in Denver. Just can't quit. I just can't quit the

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Kubiak creety. No. I think it's interesting what going back

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona here for a second, and after the break

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>will get into what tamp Bays doing. But um I

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>got an interesting Frankie in Arizona where we know we

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>talked all the time and specifically yesterday about teams doing

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of what they what they've done in the past.

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Right last year, the Arizona Cardinals took their time with

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their coaching search, and there was kind of a a carousel,

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if you will, more than the coaching carousel, but like

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a merry go round of where the coaches will end

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>up with that Patricia and Pat Shermer and Steve Wilkes,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and there are three jobs with the Lions, the Giants

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals. These three guys were gonna end up

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with and it kind of landed where Shermer ended up

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in New York, Patricia in Detroit, and Wilkes in Arizona,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Wilkes the well, it's relatively veteran head coach,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator, you know, mid forties, exciting, solid dude, one

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>year piece could put. The offense was pathetic. Now, a

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of that's on general manager Steve Kinmen. There's not

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>enough talent there. The offensive was obviously pathetic. Mike Boyd

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>deserves part of the blame. He lasted like four weeks.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So what do the Cardinals do this time? He complete

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and utter opposite. The interview very few candidates. They meet

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury one time and they hire him within hours.

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Will it work? Will it be successful? I don't know.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>People forget that when the Ramps hire Sean McVeigh, it

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't they interviewed this dude and then immediately hired him.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVeigh was interviewed, is part of a very long

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>process for the Rams that went on for weeks, and

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they took their time and they decided, you know what,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy seems like the best candidate. Cardinals didn't do that,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>rushed to hire Cliff Kingsbury. And I don't know if

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jets were that interested where they had to, otherwise

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he may have gotten out. I don't know. Matt naked

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Bearers. I mean the Bearers took their time

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with this search. They interviewed several different candidates before they

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>hired Matt Neke. Cardinals seem like they rushed this one

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Will it work out? Does it matter?

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't know, but everyone Wing Crown Cliff Kingsbury, what's

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>your horses a little bit there? And there's a big

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>debate on Twitter too, because there's a lot of analytics

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>guys that see where the NFL is going, where the

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL is trending in terms of the passing success that

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you need nowadays, and that's why they're in support of

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury. And then there's the old guard who's like,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't the guy, you know, why don't more guys

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like Vic Fangio get opportunities. So, you know, there's a

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>big clash on Twitter right now between at least what

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I've seen between you know, those who are advocates of

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Cliff Kingsbury are more like the analytics guys, like

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the the guys who are kind of you know, those

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>are That's what's happening right now when it comes to

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury. And the Cardinals are all in on them,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like they're you know, they're putting out all these highlight

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>packages of him and releasing all these videos and they

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>got the Arizona Cardinals Twitter is they're spelling Cardinals with

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>k now like they're all in on this, And there

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was a report with that apparently when he met with

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. He had already. It was basically a lock

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that he was already gonna be with the Cardinals. Like

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the only reason he even met with the Jets so

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that they could pick his brain about his offense. Justus

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to get more Jets than that anything Like with the Jets.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We come back because my friends are killing me today

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want them to as an objective, totally objective.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't want them to hire Mike Michael McCarthy and

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that Gary Kubiak is hilarious and they think

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a joke. Let's talk with us in a second.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>More on the way after this. Daily rodo dot Com

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't just

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>give you advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily roado dot Com

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>optimize her in minutes, build an optimized line up for

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>cash games and attorneys learned from the game's best DFS

0:17:53.800 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>players joined Daily Roado dot Com. Frank's Susan here Fantasy

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network. I wanted to

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the reading the second, but I'm getting really frustrated. I am, oh,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I love triggered Greggy getting really frustrated, and I'm talking

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to you. I don't always call you a sensible Jets fan,

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think you are an No, not particularly, but

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping you're going to be for the sense of

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. Okay, So I'm getting roasted at the moment.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>My roast of Greg Sussman in my group shot a conversation.

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I let being roast megroup chat because I don't think

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the Jets hiring Mike McCarthy or Adam Gaze is a

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>good idea. I laughed when the Denver Broncos promoted Gary Kubiak,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and the response I get every time, specifically with McCarthy

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and Kubiak, they want a Super Bowl. Oh yeah. So

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy developed Aaron Rodgers. They they went to the playoffs

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>nine of his thirteen years. I understand, but like he

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>got fired because their offenses of vanilla and that hasn't

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>changed in years. And the responses, well, he developed Aaron

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and clearly he's doing something right. And there was

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a riff there that personality didn't work and it's like

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid and it was time for a change. When

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Gary Kubiak, he won a Super Bowl

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of years ago. What's great higher And

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, what, Yes, that's true, but the one

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because of their defense. Well, it's always something with you.

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>You make excuses, you need to follow what everyone on

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter saying. You need the young, sexy ire like everybody wants.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just like, no, I just don't think Gary

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Kubiak is creative. I don't think McCarthy's creative. I think

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gaze did a terrible job in Miami using the

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>skill they had. But look at his record, look at

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>his record, and they got lucky. See, it's always something

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with you. Well, who do you want the Jets to hire?

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 1>I go on not all honestly, like, and you know

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this has said this on the show, like I don't

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like Todd Monken any there personally, I don't have I

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't, unfortunately, have a good answer for you.

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't see like the best candidate out there. Right,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's been no candidate where I've said I've

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>said to you, frankly, I said this from yesterday. I

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>said from the beginning to me, there was no ended

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>it like that that stood out. And I've said this

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>to you, like, I don't have a good answer for you.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>There's not one guy who I'm pointing out like that's

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly who the Jets should hire right there. There's there's

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone candidate for the first any team, Like, and people

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ask me that I think Monkin or Matt Rule would

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be better than a car and but like the response

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to you would be like, you just want a younger,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>sexy name. This is it, that's what you want. And

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, I don't, I don't I understand why

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you're using that argument against me, because that's what Twitter sayers.

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And I have to follow Twitter, and it was just

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter. There are people on Twitter who actually like

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy too, Like that's more of the old guard. You're

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>basically the fantasy hipster right now, Greg, that's what they're saying, right,

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that you're saying something just because it's like

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the trendy thing to do, right because you these are

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>probably the same people who think like wins matter in baseball,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>right Like when you're looking at like pictures like these

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are the same guys that say like winds matter essentially,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not the same thing like that. Just because

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>he had a good record in Green Bay doesn't mean

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that you're a great coach like you have. Yes, he

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>coached up Aaron Rodgers, and Rodgers also sat behind bred

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Far for a couple of years. He got to learn

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>under one of the best quarterbacks, you know, one of

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the better quarterbacks of all time as well.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That also factors into it. The only one one super

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and you know, but Payton only won one Super Bowl.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>The response to days, I would love on Super Bowl.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Just let me make the playoffs. Give me one super Bowl? Sure,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>someone responsive, What do you want Tom Coughlin, do you

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>want John Groomy? Do you want them to coach your

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>team right now? Yeah? Because they want to just because

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to stay wanted. My point is, I'm with you.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I agree with like, I don't want

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the jetsic is to hire Mike McCarthy or Adam Gates.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, one of those hires is like the safe

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you will go seven and nine, eight

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and eight. That's what they're doing instead of kind of

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like shooting for the moon. And that's what the Cardinals

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>did right, like they shot to the moon and trying

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to get Cliff Kingsbury. Whether it's right or wrong, I'll

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>leave that up to you decide. I kind of painted

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>both of the picture. Personally, I don't mind it. I

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think the Cardinals are thinking outside the box. Yes, it's

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>completely different than like Steve Wills, Who's what they just

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>had before. We referenced that that they wanted to go

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in a completely different direction. Is it right or wrong?

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna debate that. We're not gonna know that until

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a year in two years into the regime, if he

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>even gets that. I mean, it would be pretty crazy

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to have two back to back. One and done right,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So so my the other. I'm everywhere right now from

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>it together. Stop arguing and get it together. I'm arguing

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>because it makes sense on this show, right when a

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>guy like Gary Kubiak, who and Nick fans you with

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a brock Who's just did they want to be like

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Seattle and Dallas who always is a fantastic run games

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>from the Shanahan shre. I'm never gonna speak that, you

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel there's more ways to win than one. Well,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's the question. There's more ways to win than one.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Fine Seattle their waters played a defense, orld of football

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and limited mistakes that destroyed them in the playoffs. Dallas

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is a better version of that. Right, they run the ball,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they play the defense, ball control, they don't. We'll see.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the test. This is the test. Correct.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>It's Cowboys against Sean McVeigh. I've already seen people, you know,

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>analytical people on Twitter saying we need to root for

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams to win because that will push analytics forward more.

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Sean McVeigh got it done. And if

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>something like Jason Garrett in the Old Guard where you

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>played defense and you run the football and you you

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>give Ezeki Elliott the ball thirty times, so we keep

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Rams off the field. That's that's that's

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact debate that we're doing right now. But where

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>does My question is where does Michael McCarthy fit into

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that mix. He's kind of like a blend of both.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>He's not good at either. Like, he's not a young

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>offensive play caller. He's not creative. We know that already.

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>He hadn't changed the offense in ten years with the

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers, So nor is he neither. Is he

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a young offensive mind or is he an old guard,

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 1>old style, defensive minded head coach. He's neither. He's in

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Where does how does that? Where does that work?

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on this, Like I don't want McCarthy,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want Adam Gates. But what if he couldn't

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>win with Aaron Rodgers, how is he gonna win with

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald? So they'll dispute it's saying he didn't win

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>with Aaron Rodgers when Aaron Rodgers was younger, when he

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>had less of an ego, where it wasn't the same

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that they just grew apart, and people grow apart. And

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact is, you look at Andy Reid. That's what

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 1>it's constantly pointed out to me. I was telling the argument,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and I've seen that argument as well. Andy Reid, they

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>said the same thing about him when he left and

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he went to they see and he reinvented himself. Greg.

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the question, does Mike McCarthy reinvent himself when he

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gets to the Jets, because that's what Andy Reid did.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>He changed that sty exactly how I respond, But from

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>everything that we've seen from Mike McCarthy, where he was

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>too stubborn to change his style in Green Bay? Does

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>we have to go based on that He's going to

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>change his style of offense and play calling when he

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>gets so. I was into it with Jets Van Jeff

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for a while this morning, and he got it and

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>he got this right, and he listed his head coaches

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like he thinks Matt rules a home run higher. I

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know why, but it's fine, and now you want

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that rule. Also, he would love Todd Monkin and you

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>guys are want to say wavelength. He wants nothing to

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>do with him Gaze and he says he's good with

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy as long as his offensive coordinator isn't Joe Philbin

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Ben McAdoo. Someone that's um though, what's his name? I

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>would Edgar Bennett. That's the question. Why wouldn't it be?

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you he goes, He goes for me, if

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael McCarthy is the head coach and they can somehow

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>priorca Zack Taylor from the Rams, I'm interested, like this

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is reinventinging, this is new ideas, this is something different.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But if it's someone the same old for Mike McCarthy,

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which is what I think it will be. I know

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what's what you think it will be. I want nothing

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with that and for the head coach, And

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean you to sit here and talk about

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jets for a while, but I think it's important

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are these different views in the NFL how

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you can win. Clearly, John Elway wants a good run

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>game with a great defense. That is the point of

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>hiring Vic Fangio and Gary Kuba game managing quarter or

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>whoever the quarterback is, to be a game managing quarterback.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, that's what he wants. Clearly. As you said,

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is shooting for the moon, right that that's what

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the point is for the New York Jets. What is

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the right answer, do you shoot for the moon or

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>do you you know, bringing a guy, someone that's safe,

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>someone that probably will be fine. I don't know. Tamm

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Bay Buccaneers, what did they do with the hiring of

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals. Now this is closer to like Mike

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy as well, I think. So it's not one of

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the young guys. And he didn't bring any that in

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody young. He literally just transported his staff from Arizona

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Byron left, which is a younger mind. And he was

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on his staff. He was on the staff, but he

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>was like a QB coach back then and he's still

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a passing the game. I mean literally his entire

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.959
<v Speaker 1>staff from Arizona. But it worked though what it worked,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it worked until it didn't. Is that the case though,

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Like it wasn't a case that Carson Palmer was too old.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Carson Palmer wasn't good enough if you look at his

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>record what Bruce Arians did. He was great with the cardinal,

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>yes he was. He was great. And his vertical passing

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>attack down the field. I think it's gonna work. Wonders

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>with James Winston. It's I just find it interesting, like

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like I don't I'm whoever one a super Bowl he

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>might have like under like the Cold City. It's like

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers he might have, certainly not. But Bruce Arians,

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I just find it very interesting that, you know, I

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>want to kill the vic fangios where you're anti Mike McCarthy,

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, But Bruce Arians goes to Arizona brings old

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator top bowls with him. He's old offensive cornator

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Harold good Roou with him his old quarterbacks coach Byron

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>left with with him. He brings everybody with him, everybody

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. And I feel like people forget and again

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>understand the quarterback was in Jurney constantly dealt with quarterback problems.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like people forget that. When Bruce Arians retired

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>two seasons ago, there are questions if he if he

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>should be fired, like, we don't know that that may

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have been a bit of a forced retirement Bruce Arians.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I get it what he did that vertical passing game

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was awesome, But Bruce Arians is one of these guys

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that is stuck in his ways. But we want to

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>predict the offenses. We know what Bruce arians offense is

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be. Jamis Winston is going past the ball

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>down the field constantly to Mike Evans like you know that.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's a good thing for fantasy purposes. Is it

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for the books? I don't know. Is

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it a good thing for Jamis Winston? Probably, And if

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians can improve Jamis Winston, then it's a good higher.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's ultimately the answer to that question. But is it

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>being I guess agist if I'm just like, what are

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you doing with this Bruce Arians thing. Maybe to be fair,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted Bruce Arians. You did, Yes, you did. I

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted Bruce Arians for the Jets. And I understand what

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I know he didn't win a super Bowl,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think here and I think ultimately as I

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>talked to think that Bruce Arians in his time with

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals did a better job than what McCarthy did

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Packers, probably because one roll one didn't. And

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you're using the same arguments that you're friends. I'll tell

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you why it is naive of you, Carson Palmer is

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not like if if you have Aaron Rodgers on the Cardinals,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>how many super Bowls are the Cardinals win? Right? You're

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right? But is it the failure of Bruce Arians

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or the failure of Steve Kim The Bruce Arians in

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Arizona never developed a quarterback? Like that's an issue to me.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy. Yeah, Aaron Roddy got the most out of

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Carson Palm, definitely, but he couldn't do it again at

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that point was like a little washt journeyman whatever wash

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>off of it. But who's year of his career thirty

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>five touch? Definitely definitely, definitely, definitely, And I think for

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, Bruce Arians would have made a lot of

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>sense to develop Sam Donald. I agree with you, pretty

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>young quarterback, and it's the guy I wanted that I

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>go back, that was the one guy, And I said

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that in the middle of team said I wanted Bruce

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Arians for the Jets. My thing is, why didn't they

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>get a young quarterback for him to develop in Arizona,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Like he's going to Tampa Bay to fix Jamis Winston.

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That is the goal. He helped Andrew Luck developer. Probably

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thought their defense was good enough and that Carson palm

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Or could win them games. He helped Andrew Luck developed,

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>He helped Ben Roethlisberger developed. He has a history of

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>develop quarterbacks. Absolutely, so I get it that was the

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>guy probably for the Jets. Fine, I'm in on that.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's a bit of a question, like

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I just think you talk about guys innovating like I

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>want brus Areus as the head coach. I wish he

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't have his same old crew. It worked, How could you?

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But it worked? But it didn't work? Wouldn't he didn't

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're holding him to the measurement that he didn't

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>win a Super Bowl, that just didn't get to us.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll look at his record as the first I got her.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I understand, I understand it worked. You're right, it worked.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But if it worked as a head coach and worked

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for him, how can you not say it worked for McCarthy.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It's my only question. How could you say more with

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers? No, I don't think yes, yes, And the

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that he was unwilling to change. Now, the thing is,

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>does Bruce arians offense need to change? Like, yeah, he'll

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>probably tweak some things. I don't know. Maybe it's unfair

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to say that about Arians, but you know, and assume

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that Mike McCarthy wouldn't. There's still a chance, Like if Mike,

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if Mike McCarthy took the Jets head coaching job and

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>brought in some o see from the college ranks to

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>help him get more creative, than I would be on

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>board with that. I'd be like, all right, you know what,

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at least the guys trying to do something different. If

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he comes in here and Ben McAdoo is the offensive

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinator of the New York Jets, how as a Jets fan,

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are you on board with that? There's just no way

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where I'm at. I think Bruce I like the

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians higher for the the Tampa Bay Bucks much

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>more than I would Mike McCarthy with the Jets. You

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>look at what Larry uh, what Carson Palmer did in

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bruce Arians. Every year, there was three years that

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>he played at least fifteen games under Bruce Arians. You

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>threw for at least two hundred yards in each of

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>those seasons. You through for at least twenty four touchdowns

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in each of those seasons. Obviously was the money year

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>forty four thousand, six and seventy one yards, thirty five touchdowns,

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven interceptions, eight point seven yards per tempt with Carson Palmer.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Carson Palmer, Greg, it was also that year that Larry

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald finished as wide receiver seven overall. John Brown finishes

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty six. I think we should bring it

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>back to fantasy a little bit here, Greg, I had

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a pole but out before the show with this higher

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the connection now with Bruce Arians and Jamis Winston, these

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Jameis win to shoot into the top twelve next year

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as a Fantasy quarterback because based on what he did

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. Why can't Mike Evans be the wide receiver

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>seven that Larry Fitzgerald was. Why can't Chris Godwin be

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a top thirty near top twenty five wide receiver that

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>John Brown was? John Brown one for a thousand yards

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that year. Why couldn' Chris god would do that? Next year?

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>They also have O. J. Howard. We'll see what they

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do at running back. Peyton Barbrow is a restricted free

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>agent they had. They drafted Ronald Jones in the second

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>round last year. He has no ties to that, so

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if Ronald Jones is gonna get an opportunity.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's already been whispers about Levian Bell. I don't

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>think they have enough catch based to sign Levian Bell.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna throw that out. I don't I don't

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think Levian Bell is gonna happen. They take take a

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>chance on a guy like Kareem Hunt, they draft a guy,

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>draft someone themselves. I think with Bruce Arians in place,

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>James Winson is pretty close to the top twelve quarterback

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>next year. Now you right then yesterday we didn't get

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to it on the program, but you ranked the top

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks going into next year's fantasy football draft season. That

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes number one makes sense. You still be Aaron

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers too. Uh. Andrew Luck number three after what he

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has done, makes sense. Shawn Watson number four. I don't

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>really think those are arguable, to be honest with you.

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the old guys, a big band and

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, cam Newton, Russell Wilson doesn't throw the ball,

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>which is an issue. H Philip Rivers, Jared got, Drew Brees,

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Drobiskey, Baker Mayfield. That was where we had it,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and I remember, I just agree with you. I would

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have a Baker Mayfield at twelve um over Mitchell Driskey

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>personal Las stand by that would you still would you

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just flip flop them? Would that still be like your

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>top thirteen? That's not maybe not in the same order.

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I would probably would you move Mrs tro Whiskey down?

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I would move tro Whisky down to Jamais up? Would

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I would now with this higher? I had James Winson

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen behind Lamar Jackson, would put them ahead of

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Notice very close with Baker Mayfield. Noticed, as

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.959
<v Speaker 1>we said before, Tom Brady is not on that list.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Rady's down at sixteen for me right now. And

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>according to you know, other rankors that I've seen out there,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean other people haveing closer to twenty, they have

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty. So again, like it's weird to see Tom

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Brady down this far. And this is why you should

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>play in super flex leagues because the quarterback position, once again,

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be super deep. You go twenty quarterbacks

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>deep up until I have Dak Prescott as my number

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty quarterback. Well, from weeks twelve to seventeen, Dak Prescott

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was QB three overall. So there's a lot of quarterback.

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of viable quarterbacks out there, like Jimmy

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo's to be coming back, Kirk Cousins I have his

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>QB eighteen still has great weapons, Carson Wentz is gonna

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 1>be coming back. Where does Nick Foles end up? There's

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>still Matthew Stafford that could bounce back. If you think

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen takes the leap with Cliff Kingsbury, Sam Donald,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with whoever it is, Mike McCarthy, um Matt Rule, whoever.

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>If you think these quarterbacks take step forward, like the

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks is a deep position. Please, please, everybody play in

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>super flex leagues. I don't think it hurts. I think

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Jami's Winston right now would be my QB four teen,

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>right behind Mitch Trabinsky and Baker Mathews. You'll lasts Mitchell Trobinsky.

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Your qubats well, well, it's well on the Matt Naggie system,

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>beats one to ten the's QB seven overall. Then run

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the football, which bodes well for fantasy as well. And

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think in year two under Matt Nagie he gets

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>even back. We'll talk more about quarterbacks. It's look more

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about hey, coaches, and a whole lot more stick around.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>There's more of your fantasy best friends forever on the

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>way coming up next. If you're someone that needs fantasy

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sports advice every day, Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>When you download the fn T S Y Sports Radio

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice every single

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>day right through the weekends, and be sure to listen

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to our weekend warriors like College Football Today. Welcome to

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>College Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update. They called me the

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Jesus. In this league is never short of exciting

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at I T L. And it's so much more. Download

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes and

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Google Play Store now and keep the best fantasy experts

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>right in your pocket all day long and all week long.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>At the game. You got a gut feeling, no problem.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Now you can bet from anywhere anytime. We all knew

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>my Bookie Mobile betting platform. With my Bookie Mobile platform,

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you'll enjoy the safety can means at home metting when

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you're on the go. Try that today, You'll never miss

0:37:57.920 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>another winning bet. Headed over to my Bookie down ag

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>opening account with promo code f f T S why,

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and my Bookie will match your deposit up to a

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. It's right, one thousand dollars. It's my Bookie

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>dot a G. The promo code is f n T

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>S why. All right, Frank, Greg, Sorry, I'm just just

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like so annoyed at this stuff. So damn. I'm just

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just annoyed. Like I get the you're

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>just a hot tade guys, you had coaches, blah blah blah.

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Sorry this for Matthew Barry on Twitter. Greg referriend of

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Kitchens, who we talked about earlier on in the

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>show all statsince week nine led the NFL in yards

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>per play, tied for the league lead in yards for

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>past attempt fourth in yards per game, fourth in passing

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>yards per game on three point seven five actual points

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>per game, which was the NFL. Those were the numbers

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for Freddy Kitchens, who, as we referenced, did a great job.

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't help Jarvis Landry though, which is what I'm also

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing on twit. Jervis Landry average close to twelve targets

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>per game with Todd Haley as e o C. Under

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Kitchens, that number dropped to six point eight targets

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 1>for games. So Jarvis Landry, he's an interesting one. It'll

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>probably more of like a wide receiver free next year.

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Everything that we knew coming into this season, or that

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw at least, was that Todd Haley wanted Jarvis

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Landry to be the Antonio Brown of this offense, because

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Todd Haley obviously coached Antonio Brown while he was the

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>O C in Pittsburgh, So he wanted Jarvis Landry to

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be that type of guy. It's clear that Freddy Kitchens,

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's not just Freddy Kitchens. I think I

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>think it's a Baker Mayfield thing too. I don't think

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield's zones in on one guy. We've seen that

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't just one receiver that he fell in love with.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He does the A lot of people comp him to

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees, but he does the Drew Brees thing where

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>for most of Drew Brees' career he didn't just zone

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in on one guy. I mean, now a little bit

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>later on, you know he's going to Michael Thomas a lot.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>But for years it was just gimmey whoever is open,

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert meets him, Indoor, Lance More, Marcus Colston, whatever tight

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ends there, Jimmy Graham, you would spread the ball around,

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>would spread the ball around. I think Baker Mayfield is

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot like that. We saw a big play Santonio Callaway.

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>We saw plays at times Shard Higgins here and there.

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You'd get David and Joku, a lot of Nick Chubb

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>running the football. Baker Mayfield is not a guy that's

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>going to zone in on one receiver. It's very early, obviously,

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>my preliminary analysis of the Browns passing attack. I won't want,

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I won't want anything to do with Jervis Landry from fantasy.

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>He had a very bad that's easy to see in

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the year. I want everything to

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>do Nick Chub, Nick Chubb, we'll talk more about this

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 1>mock drab. By the way, Frank and I are sitting

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>here for the Frenzy today. No Corey Porson, No Chris Ventura.

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>H So Jim Day, who I don't think news is

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Hey, Jim Day, I know you're in

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the chat. We're gonna show with you today, sitting in

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>these gonna be talking about the mock draft that we're

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. It's like the f n T S

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio way too early twenty nineteen mock draft, just

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>dipping our toes. We're doing six rounds, as we've mentioned,

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 1>just to see get an idea where players are going.

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We're in the middle of the second round right now,

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>so we'll really just talk a lot about the first round,

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>some picks that have stood out to far, because there's

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely some people trying to Yeah, Diana Hill already, Greg,

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's January ninth, and this is what

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we're doing. Whatever, we'll talk about it. Yeah, we'll talk

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. And one the reason I brought that up.

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, who expected to be a first rounder h

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.479
<v Speaker 1>went at the turn in this mock draft, and again

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>we're just in the first round. Like Blue who's walking

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>around here somewhere. It's just get him in here to

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>make his picks. They can make his pig, then I

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>can make my pick. We can make all make picks. Greg.

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>This just came out from Rural World, a report that

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Todd Bowl is actually considering the Bears DC job now

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>instead of the Bucks. Makes sense, look look better. Why

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>you go to the Bucks when to the also has

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with his scheme too, because from what I've seen,

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he runs a three four defense, and it wouldn't what

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw yesterday is that wouldn't really match the current

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>personnel that the Tampa Bay Bums. I mean, I'd have

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to look into it, but I know they have like

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Gerald McCoy and Vita Via up front in the middle,

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so that probably lends itself more like a four or three.

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Those guys are like d tackles and then you've got

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Jason Pierre Paul on the outside and whatever else on

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the other side. But um, yeah, it's it's gonna be

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever his scheme is. And I mean just from like

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>an obvious standpoint, wouldn't you rather coach the pairs and

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the defense? You want to talk more about these quarterback rankings, Greg,

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything else that stands out to you as

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I look at them? Are you making these available anywhere?

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know if I can like submit

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>them on fantasy pros. I don't know. Maybe I'll ask

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Scott like if he wants them, but I could just

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>tweet them out. I think little more. Jackson is an

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting asked me. I'll just give them to you. No,

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like you interesting. I'll give you my rankings

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for free. You're super Really, that's fine. They're gonna change,

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what. It was hard for me to rank

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and it still kind of is because

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they haven't named Dirk Cutter the offensive coordinator yet, but

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan they have. They have named him the offense

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and Mike mclarkey is the Titan's coach. I'm not kidding.

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I I don't doubt that you're kidding. Greg Um. Matt

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Ryan at QB six is this the right spot? Is

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it too high? I know he finished QB two overall

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, but I think under Dirt Cutter. Again, everyone's

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about this first year under an under an

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator for Matt Ryan, typically he does not bode well,

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but he has familiarity already with Dirk Cutter because he's

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>worked under Dirk Cutter. And if we're looking just under

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>first year coordinators, under Dirk Cutter was the most success

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that Matt Ryan had under a first year o C.

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He the thirty two touchdowns in his first year with

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Dirk Cutter as the o C in Atlanta. So I

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>actually think that this does bode well for Matt Ryan.

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I actually I like him quite a bit

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as the QB six. Yeah, I hear you. I I

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, You're not gonna You're not gonna get it

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>next year. No, no, I get it. Knowing what Dirk

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Carter wants to do, my rins fine. Like I said it.

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>While you're running down the list, Cam Newton and Russell Wilson,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the two names right behind him, huge question marks, huge

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:22.439
<v Speaker 1>question I didn't even know where to rank Cam Newton,

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>but I just think based on upside pedigree, what he's

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>done in the past and while he was healthy, looked

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in this North Turner offense. You want to

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about a guy kind of like building his scheme

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to fit the players he has. North Turner came in

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina and actually did just that. So credits to

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>north Turner and Cam Newton. They worked well together this

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>year when he was healthy, Cam Newton was very good

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>over You know what a lot of people are gonna remember,

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know we have recency bias as fantasy players,

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is the final month where Cam Newton burnt everybody. That's

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>what everyone's gonna remember. We still have to remember the

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 1>guy that typically has been a top five six quarterback

0:44:57.880 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 1>every single year. So that's why I haven't ranked at

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>QB seven. I have to figure out what the what

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks do do? Do they retain Brian Schottenheimer? What

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think I would have been fired by now? Yeah,

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. So how much is gonna change

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with Russell Wilson. I can already see the articles trick

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 1>trickling in now Greg in terms of the Seahawks can't

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>repeat this kind of efficiency. His his touchdown percentage was

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>way too high. It was the same thing we said

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about DeShawn Watson coming into this year. The same thing

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we've said about Carson Wentz is that you can't throw

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns at that rate when you don't throw for that

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>many yards. Difference is exactly what happened with Russell Wilson.

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But the difference is he didn't run the football either.

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>The difference is even still like DeShawn Watson and Carson

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Wentz like they're going to throw the football like the

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>petition hates running Sean like the text is, actually were

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty balances here, but Russell Wilson like that Ifficiawn Watson

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't throw for that many touchdowns here, nobody had that

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>many touchdown but he he rushed a lot what helped Shawn.

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But there was balanced that was more balanced in my opinion. Yeah,

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't more balanced offensive it Russell Wilson and Seattle.

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem is if he's not that efficient, he would

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to bottom out like even Judy He's like but he

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but the occasions can he can he maintain this EFFI

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is he is one of the best pure pastors in

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Greg So if you're running the ball that

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 1>effectively and defenses are respecting the run, why can't Russell

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Wilson repeat this kind of efficiency? And that's just me

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>playing devil's advocate. Why can't he if they run the

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ball that effectively because it sets up the path. I

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just knew that efficiency is really hard to match its all,

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm probably closer to you. I don't as of

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. I'm very like wishy washy on Russell Wilson.

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Just and it was all season long. You know, you

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>would see these stat lines two passing yards, three touchdowns.

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>He would rush for like fifteen yards. Weird season, very

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>very weird season from Russell Wilfs. I don't know this

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I'm looking up right now. I'm pretty sure

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>this was his lowest rushing output in it. What would

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you bet on that was? This is lowest rushing output

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I'll give you the number two d

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy six rushing yards this year for Russell Wilson. Was

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 1>that the lowest rushing output of his career? Yes? Wrong?

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.800
<v Speaker 1>He rushed for two hundred and fifty nine in ten

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>when he also threw for when he won touchdowns and

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>eleven interceptions. That was That was a brutal season. That

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 1>was a brutal season for Russell Wilson. But if he's

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not he's not adding the fantasy value with his legs

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that he used to be. He's just not throwing for

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that many yards. He threw four two hundred thirty three

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. This is actually kind of right on

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>part with his career. But he threw he also threw

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>actually no, that was that was his playoffs. This is annoying.

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Greg for two hundred and fifteen yards per game this year,

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which that number is the lowest since when he was

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a second year quarterback in fifteen yards per games. But

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he threw thirty five touchdowns, which is the most of

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>his career. It's ridiculous like that that. I don't think

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>that's replicable. Four seven passing attempts this year, the third

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fewest of his career, the lowest when he was a

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>second year quarter threw thirty five touchdowns on four seven

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>passing attempts. It's an eight point two touchdown percentage. Touchdown

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>percentage is the percentage of your throws that go for touchdowns.

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Eight point two. He's a career six percent touchdown rate. Guy,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 1>how do you project Russell Wilson next year? I think good, Look,

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the floor is yours. I don't really think I need luck.

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it to me when you are throwing touch

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as at the rate that Russell Wilson did where he

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 1>passed the ball a the lowest and is used a sophomore.

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The amount of times it was a software and in

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a career high in passing touchdowns. That that there's no

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 1>balance the right, Like, that's not something that all right,

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>this makes sense, Like you threw the most times, so

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he had the most tousdowns alright, fine, at least touches

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because he threw the least amount of times. Fine, you

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>know it was somewhere in the middle. You can get

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.359
<v Speaker 1>behind it, but the most the least. It doesn't work

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that touchdown numbers coming down. This is the offense that

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian Schottenheimer and Pete Carroll want. Clearly they do they change,

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, following what just happened in the playoffs. No,

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because it got him in the playoffs. No, but it

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lost in the playffs. Maybe they change it in the

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>playoffs next year. Right, Maybe I'm not doing Russell Wilson

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>next year. There's enough guy ranked too high at QB eight.

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's enough guys behind him, Philip Rivers and Jared Goff.

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather have either of those guys? I probably

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:33.760
<v Speaker 1>rather Philip Rivers. Yeah, I could see people pushing Philip

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Rivers down the board. I personally wouldn't. He's gonna get

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry back right like Williams is probably gonna play

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers. I'd rather Philip Rivers. I've seen a lot

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of people who have Jared Goff inside their top six

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or tomes. Yeah, the Jerry goffthing is interesting. Then Jerry

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 1>goffthing is interesting. The final months of the season, he

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was very bad, very bad because they played a really

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>tough schedule that final month. It was QB twenty five

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from weeks twelve to seventeen. Weeks twelve to seventeen, you

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>do something interesting names Greg Josh Allen was QB one.

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I have Drew Brees. I rather have Drew Brees and

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the wrestle Awson. I don't feel great about Drew Brees either.

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>You never do. I did. I didn't. Admittedly I didn't

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have Drew Brees this year anywhere. And you know what,

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and I say this every year. What I tell people

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>to do is what I do do, So you know,

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I put my money where my mouth is. Like, if

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees went off this year and he was fine,

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>look at where he finished overall, but Drew Brees the

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>first four weeks when he was him and Him and

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Kamara show Michael Thomas great. Once they traded for Eli Apple,

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the defense started to play a little bit better. They

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>get mark Ingram back, They're more of a balance attack.

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about at one point, you don't want

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to use Drew Brees for daily like Drew Brees was

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>an afterthought towards like the final month or two of

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the season. Again, they were away from New Orleans three

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the last four. Just a reminder with that,

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna sign up on YouTube now Fantasy of All

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Frenzies up next, we're gonna hang out here with Jim

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Day and talk about the first round of our Fantage

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Prouball mock draft. So we'll see you all in a bit.

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Becausing on the podcast, Like subscribe rate us five stars,

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that comment this is watching on YouTube. Subscribe, hit that button,

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Hit the subscribe button. People make it happen. Um frinsys

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>QB eight overall this year great, it's pretty good. That's want.

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff was one spot higher. I want to I

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to draft him in Russells Russell Wilson wants

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>spot behind him. I want to fry points and would

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I just tell you I want to draft Freezer could

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be eight. But just because it happens one year doesn't

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>mean you know, you gotta project forward. I understand that.

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But Drew Brees the same guy. It's changed. But what

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>if they get closer to what he was last year?

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Because we saw the first four weeks the defense was terrible.

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He had to put the team on his back in

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>these shootouts. Now, if the defense continues to take these

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>step forward and picks up from this year, you have

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to pass that month. You said that. This is literally

0:51:57.800 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the argument you had to me in July and August.

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:01.879
<v Speaker 1>It this year. You know that, right, That's the same

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>argument I made for Jared Golf. I didn't have Jared

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Goff anywhere. Nobody did. I thought their defense was going

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to dominate and he wouldn't be asked to doo much

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and it would be the girly show I had most

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>of the season. It was because of you. I had

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Saints in the first week of the NFL season,

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and I lost videos of them because they had negative

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It didn't have the Saints I did. I had the Saint.

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell you that. Like the Saints defense, the

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense, I think it gets a box now. No, no, no,

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we were both on I don't know everyone's facing the

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 1>bills the Ravens. We won the first week the Daily

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Roder dot Com partnership with DADT. Golf's back at twenty

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen with all new premium Fantasy Golf and betting tools.

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Check out the all new lot of Optimizer with the

0:52:37.120 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>customs settings in advanced grouping, customizable projections for fandel and DraftKings,

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>ownership projections, PGA Finished Probabilities and simulator outright in top

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:46.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty market betting tools, head to head in three ball

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 1>betting tools and PGA pro Tip. Subscribe to Chat and more,

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and then over to Daily Roder dot com. Click on

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Go Premium, choose Golf and into the promo code cop nineteen.

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>For discount of the Daily Rodor dot Com click on

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Go Premium, click on Golf and the promo code Golf

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen discount. Frank, we have about a minute remaining in

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the program. Anything else you wanted to tell her? Fantastic listeners,

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Where would you feel comfortable drafting? Josh Allen, Greg, I'm

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna raft Josh Allen. You're not gonna draft Josh

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen at all? Well, where would you feel comfortable ranking

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's realized they didn't have I don't have him rank

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he would be if I had to just do this

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>now on the fly. Would you rather have next year

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen or Tom Brady? Greg Brady? Come on? Sorry,

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>come on, Greg? Where's that? Where's that progressive fantasy hipstery

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier on in the show. Did

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.399
<v Speaker 1>it take Tom Brady? The same guy who would hire

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>fix Fanjio? As he said, Cook, all right, we'll take

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a break. We'll be back to the fantasy people of

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy in a moment. No Corey Parson, no Chris vet Show,

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:01.320
<v Speaker 1>just Frank Sample, gregsm and him Day. Thank you so

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.720
<v Speaker 1>much for watching and listen to the fantasy best friends forever.

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We we'll do it all again tomorrow. But dr eight,

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We hope does your fantasy team suck? Maybe you need us.

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Radio Network the only three four seven

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports radio network