WEBVTT - Playoff/Award Predictions, Season Recap & This or That

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jireel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Right with Nick? Great Episode two ninety

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>playoffs are here finish the r profitable gambling. Even though

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Week eighteen didn't you know, kind of out with a

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>bit of a whimper if I must say, lost the

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>season long picks contest to Parkins by one. Pit our

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>picks here deserved two and three ended up being one,

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>three and one, so not a great final week. Also,

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>speaking of gambling, before we get to it, did you

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>see gambling? Twitter demonse just drag me all week because

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 2>of my populist opinion that hey, let's try to claw

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>some of this money back from the sports books for

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>the refund your bets if you have an overtime underdone,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>They came, I mean you have, oh, unanimously and the

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>amount of boot licking these fake gambling touts were like, oh, so,

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 2>what do you you want the sports treating the sports

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>book like they're the soup kitchen. Listen here. I like

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of America's sports books, and as I told

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>you last week, I'm gonna be partnering with one of

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>them here in the next few weeks. Not sure which

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>one again, you know, have your people talked to my people,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll see we can work something out. Uh. And while

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 2>I will partner with them and they are providing a service,

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to make something very clear. It's the public

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>against the House, and I'm on the side of the public.

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a you know what I mean, I'm not

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not rooting for I don't know anything about Star Wars,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>but the Emperor Palpatine. Is that a good reference? I'm

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>not sure I will the idea that how many people

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 2>were like that would be so unfair to the sports book. Huh.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Unfair to the sports good. That's the goal here. They

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>can just give us a little. I mean, my goodness,

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 2>gracious folks like, yes, obviously that would be a are

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>these people do? These people go to casinos and look

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>at a roulette wheel that only has one zero and

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>are like, you know, probably should throw two on there.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, some places put three zeros on there.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Walking through the pits and they're like, you know, excuse me,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 2>casino manager. I know it says blackjack pays three to two,

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 2>but you know a lot of places these days are

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>doing six to five and people still pay it, Like

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>what are you doing? Rooting for the sportsbook? And I

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>gotta deal with again these fake these kids who have

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>been gam who have been alive for a shorter period

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>of time then I've been gambling, like Kelly and Vegas

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and her just sycophantic tribe of morons being like, oh

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 2>my god, did this guy just learn about gamble? Guys,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of things. You can come after me

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of things pretty fairly. There's slings and

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>arrows that I leave myself open to try to stake

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>out the corner of Nick Wright hasn't been gambling long

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>enough to know the rules when I have been. I'm

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 2>forty years old, and I have been gambling, you know,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>not for a living, but as a way to make

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>or in many times lose money that I, you know,

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>was my weekly income since I was eleven. I don't

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 2>think that like you coming to me and being like

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, what.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Amongst your friend?

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Well so no, so when I so, I real quick,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>then we'll get the football. Started playing poker with when

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I was nine, and like with family and friends with

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>my grandparents, and then not poker with my dad. And

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 2>then when I was eleven, we got a small bar

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 2>size pool table and my dad. I've told this story before.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>My dad played me a nine ball, five dollars on

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the nine, two dollars on the five, and I ran

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>up like a forty dollars worth of wins. He then

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>was like, all right, you gotta give me a chance

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to get even. Let's up the stakes. I was eleven,

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 2>so I didn't realize I was in the midst of

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the oldest hustle in the book. I said, yes. I

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>left the basement that night owing my father one hundred

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 2>and eight dollars and he I was eleven, and he

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>made me pay it. He wrote up a contract and said,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>you'll pay me ten dollars a month for the next year,

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and I was like ten, even though I was eleven.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I was like, ten dollars a month for a year.

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 2>That's one hundred and twenty. I owe you one hundred

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and eight. He's like, yeah, I'm only charging you ten

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>percent interest, and you're gonna have to find a way

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>to pay me. He thought that the lesson I was

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna take from that is gambling is risky, and don't

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 2>do it. The lesson I took from it was you

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>can make a lot of money gambling if you know

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing. So I just then ran that exact

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 2>same hustle on my friends in my basement for years,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 2>and I won so many video games. We would play

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 2>for each other's video games like you didn't have cash,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Like you get a video game for Christmas, we'd play

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.239
<v Speaker 2>for that. We played for basketball cards, all this stuff.

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And my dad, by the way, again is statue to limitations.

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I've maybe told this story, I maybe haven't. People see

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I look a lot like my father, but he doesn't

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.119
<v Speaker 2>have the nose I have. And the reason he doesn't

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 2>have the nose I have is because in his youth,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 2>when he was a pool hustler again, and I didn't

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>know this when I was playing him. He hustled a

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 2>guy in the you know, inners of Kansas City, and

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the guy broke his nose with the pool cue. And

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 2>so when he gets your nose broken, you get it fixed. Sorry, pops,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's been sixty years since that happened to you.

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I can tell that story. So again,

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to throw out all my gambling bona fides.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>But it was two thousand and three and I was

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>on South Salina Street and Syracuse playing in a poker

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>game with Albanians. Like the idea that I need to

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>be lectured on on how gambling works from idiots on

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the internet. I know how it works. And guess what, folks,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to win, so let's try to just get

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of juice back for us. Okay, it

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 2>was just I feel better. I really. This is why

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't read the comments on the internet. There's a

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of reasons why. There's one of them. I was

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>blissfully onware. I was getting absolutely annihilated, and then Danny,

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>my old buddy, Danny Parkins, says to me, He's like, oh, man, gambling.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Twitter's really coming after you. And I'm like they are

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and I look and I'm like, god, dogg it, they

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>sure are all right. Here's what missed the cut. The

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Bears are interested in Mike McCarthy. The Giants aren't making

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>any changes. Why would they. They're a mess, and Trevor

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>needs a new head coach. I want to say one

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>thing about the Trevor thing. Keeping Trent Balkey makes me

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>so sad for Trevor. He his ability to keep his

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 2>job is unprecedented. He won a power struggle with the

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Niners against Jim Harbaugh, and now he can hire Urban Meyer,

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>hire Doug Peterson, and is gonna get to hire another coach.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>There was a hilarious moment though, in the zoom the

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>media zoom split screen like this demons between the owner

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 2>of the Jaguars shot and Trent Balky, where Shod Cohn

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, we're gonna keep you know, Trent

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>in place, blah blah blah, and somebody asked him a question.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>He's like, what if the new head coach wants you

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to replace the general manager? And again Trent is on

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the zoom and Shad Cohn says he's like, well, if

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the person we decide on for the new head coach,

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, really believes we need a new general manager,

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>then I would make that change. And again a sign

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the Jags might not know what they're doing. My guess

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>is Trent Balky who gets to interview the new head coaches.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the questions are gonna be so you're gonna

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 2>replace me? Because if you are, I gotta say, I

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>don't think you're getting this job. All right, let's get

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 2>to the show one seeds love go ahead.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Detroit locked up there by with the win

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 3>against Minnesota, and now Detroit is super Bowl favorites. Uh,

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 3>do you consider them the biggest threat to your chiefs

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 3>them being Super Bowl favorites? Or is it somebody else?

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>No, it's the Bills. It's been the Bills all year,

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and the this is I didn't get everything right in

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the preseason, but this was one of them that the

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Bills were way, way, way undervalued by the world and

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>that they were still going to be excellent. And so

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>here's why I think, tell me if you because I

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>tried to explain this on the show yesterday, but I

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I did a good job of explaining it,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>or maybe I did do a good job, but it's

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>just my like my co hosts aren't as big a

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>gamblers as I am, so it didn't really translate. I

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 2>said that even though Detroit right now is the favorite

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 2>to win the Super Bowl, I think that if Detroit

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 2>played Kansas City in the Super Bowl, Kansas City would

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>be the Vegas favorite. So how do you square those

0:10:55.320 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>two ideas? And my rationale was, I think what Vegas

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>believes Detroit is more likely to win the NFC than

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs are to win the AFC, that Detroit's path

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>is cleaner because I would imagine right now, after Detroit

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and Kansas City, the two biggest Super Bowl public picks

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>are the Bills and the Ravens, and Kansas City is

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to go through, in all likelihood one of

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>those teams. And so I don't look at the Lions

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>as the biggest threat. And I do want listen, I

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>thought the Lions were going to lose that football game,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and they played great. They played great, and that listen,

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Terry and Arnold got hurt. That's another defensive injury. And

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I know folks saw how they played against Sam Darnold

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>and said, well, what more do you want from them? Like,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter they had all these injuries, look at

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>how great they were. I do not think that specific

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 2>defensive approach, which I'll explain in a moment, will work

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>against great quarterbacks, which was we're just sinning the house, man,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>we are just sinning the house again and again and again.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>They blitzed over sixty percent of the plays in that game.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Darnold did not handle it well and the Vikings offense

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>couldn't function because of it. The last thing, historically speaking,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 2>great quarterbacks love being blitzed because they get mann to

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>man coverage, they can usually diagnose it before the snap,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 2>and they know where the ball's going. Now, Detroit's in

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>a unique spot where they could make the super Bowl

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and never have to play a great quarterback because the NFC,

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, only as one, and that's Matt Stafford,

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>and Stafford is an underdog in Round one two Minnesota.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>But in the Super Bowl. I don't think that will

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>work against Patrick Mahomes. I also don't think that would

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>work against Josh Allen. And if you're playing the Ravens

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl, it means Lamar definitionally has gotten

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 2>over his playoff bugaboos, because to get to the super Bowl,

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>for Lamar, it is Steelers, then Josh Allen, then Patrick

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes assuming the bracket holes. If he does all of that,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>then lamar postseason questions are answered. So for Detroit, I

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 2>give them massive credit for what they've accomplished. And Dan

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Gampbell taking that team from three wins to nine wins,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 2>to twelve wins to fifteen wins is remarkable, truly remarkable,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think they are are good enough whole to

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 2>win the super Bowl. And listen, maybe even with all

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>these injuries, they'll just outscore people and they'll be able

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to do it. But what they did Sunday night, to me,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 2>was not sustainable against the type of quarterback they're gonna

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>have to beat to win a Super Bowl. But it

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>was very sustainable demons against Sam Darnald. And I know

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>you have a Donald question.

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, do you think that Donald played himself out of

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 3>a contract with that performance? And like it's the first

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>big game of the season.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I think if he does it again, yeah, So here's

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>here's what is simultaneously awesome and so cruel about sports.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>But really, this sport, the NFL because I get annoyed

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>at times when people dismiss playoff performances or really anything

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL with this at small sample size. Because

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a small sample sized sport. You're not gonna get

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the five hundred at bats you get in baseball. You're

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>not gonna get a seven game series you get in basketball.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 2>You get a game, couple games. That's the nature of

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the sport. And Donald went into Sunday night. So if

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 2>we just go backwards forty hours, Sam Darnald had sitting

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 2>in front of him this, if I play great tonight,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>we get the one seed. I basically guarantee myself one

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars and have a real chance to win

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl. Instead, he had his worst game of

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the year, and now he goes into his first career

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>playoff game knowing, if I played terribly again, I'm just

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Sam Darnold again, and that again, that might be unfair.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>But that's why football is so great is because it

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 2>is a little unfair, and so it's so captivating to watch.

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>And if they if he plays poorly, so he's never

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>played in a playoff game, so it is not an

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>exaggeration at all to say Sunday Night was the biggest

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 2>game of his career by a mile, and now the

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>next Now the biggest game of his career is this

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 2>weekend or sorry, Monday night. He can he can save it,

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 2>but if he plays poorly and they lose. I do

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>not believe Minnesota is giving him a long term contract.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they franchise tag him, or maybe someone else you know,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>wants to trade for him and give him the contract.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's now up in the air in a way

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>it otherwise wouldn't have been. Uh, we have some breaking news.

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>The Titans have fired their GM Ran Carthon. Listen, I

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 2>real quick on that they brought in Let me get

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the exact time on this correct, because this is breaking news.

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 2>So they brought in Ryan Carthon from San Francisco a

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago. And his first big move is

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 2>that right? Hold on? Wasn't his the January of twenty three?

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>So hold on? Was that not his first big move?

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 2>I thought his first big move was the AJ Brown trade?

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Do I just have that wrong? So I want to

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 2>be fair here hold on? So yeah, I do have

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that wrong. So who the hell traded AJ Brown? So

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Ran Carthon got there in January of twenty three. Who

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>was the GM there before? Oh, John Robinson. So that's

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 2>what happened. Okay, So this is where I had it

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>in my head. My apologies, and I'm glad I checked

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>that because that would have been bad. John Robinson traded

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Aj Brown, It infuriated Mike Rabel, and basically I think

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>because there was that severing of a relationship between Vrabel

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and John Robinson, they picked Vrabel. They then brought in

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Ran Carthon and it didn't seem like Ran Carthon and

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Vrabel wherever exactly aligned and in that instance they went

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 2>with And now that does look like it was a

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>mistake because Rabel is probably the hottest coaching candidate this

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>side of Ben Johnson, and they just decided to move

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>on from Ryan Krthon. But that is that's a short

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>tenure man January of twenty three to January of twenty

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>five with as a GM. Usually gms get more time

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>than head coaches. We don't listen, we're not and now

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 2>they are also they're in this is the spot you

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be in where you're and the reason

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 2>if I just for a moment, the reason to defend

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 2>the Giants bringing both guys back, Shane and Dable. I

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 2>don't like it. I probably would have fired both of them.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>But what you don't want to do is fire one

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and then have your GM and head coach not aligned.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>And now that's exactly what the Titans are gonna have.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 2>The Titans are now gonna hire a general manager, and

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 2>that general manager is gonna say, well, I didn't pick

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 2>Brian Callahan the head coach. It's not I want my

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 2>head coach. And so now Brian Callahan goes into next

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>year where the GM isn't his guy. And so that

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 2>part is that usually that misalignment doesn't work out so well.

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And so but the Titans, I don't know what happened.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why they waited a day. Uh, but

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>they have fired Ran Karthon. All right, Demant, let's move on.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So the regular season is wrapping up? Or is wrapped up?

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 3>And ballots or do who would your picks be for MVP,

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Offensive Defensive Player of the Year and Coach of the Year.

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so listen, Bengals fans would tell you they should

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 2>sweep the board. Bengals fans think they have the league

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>MVP and Joe Burrow, the offensive play of the Year

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>mister triple Crown Jamar Chase, and the defensive player of

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the year the sack champion Trey Hendrickson. I would say,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>if you have the three best players in the league,

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>probably should not need the Chiefs help to make the playoffs.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>So those wouldn't be my picks my MVP pick, And

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 2>again Wilde said it exactly exactly right. There is no

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>argument for Patrick Mahomes to be the MVP except for

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he's the league's most valuable player. That's

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 2>really the only The only argument for Mahomes this year

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>to be MVP is that he is actually the most

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>valuable player in football. But of course that's not good enough,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 2>so it's not Mahomes. I thought that if Donald or

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Golf were awesome Sunday night, they would have the winner.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>If they were awesome and they won, that guy at

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>fifteen and two for award, that's become quarterback only would

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>have to get real consideration. Darnold was terrible, Golf was

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 2>not that good, and so they're both out. So it

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 2>really just is Lamar and Josh and everyone seems to

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>be trying to equivocate on why you know it should

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 2>be Josh over Lamar. I have less of a problem

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>with it. To me, it is very very simple. I

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 2>think that they were both outstanding this year. They both

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 2>led their teams to division championships. Josh didn't have Derrick

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Henry and Josh hasn't won one, so I'd give it

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 2>to Josh. And if people are like, oh, it's not

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 2>like the people seem to be uncomfortable with the idea

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that one guy having two and the other guy having

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>zero should play a factor in this. But it always

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 2>has like the if it's really really close on awards,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if it's the Golden Globes, the Oscars, MVP,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the cy Young, any of it. If it's really really

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>close and one guy's wanted a couple times and the

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>other guys never won it, then the guy who's never

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>won it gets the nod. So and the other reasoning

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 2>is the entire rationale behind Lamar winning it last year

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 2>is the rationale for Josh winning it this year. Didn't

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 2>have the most eye popping numbers, but did more with less.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 2>The team won thirteen plus games. You know that was

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>excellent in the biggest spots. So he gets it, like

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>to me, and also the only reason we don't have

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>right now a team going for a three beat while

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 2>also being undefeated is because of what Josh Allen did

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 2>on that fourth and two play. Now you can say, well,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs ended up losing twice. Maybe I'm wrong. I

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 2>don't think they would have played their JV roster had

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 2>they been going for a super Bowl. All right, I'm

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>sorry going for an undefeated season, which also I didn't

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 2>even think about this. It's just occurred to me in

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 2>real time. It's be the ultimate pain for Bills fans.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Did the Bills beating the Chiefs this year increase the

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs chances of beating the Bills in the playoffs again?

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Because it removed the incentive to play guys in Week

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 2>seventeen or Week eighteen and potentially have guys get banged

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 2>up because they were going for an undefeated season against

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>what would have been a desperate Broncos team. Maybe I

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know, But so Josh would be my MVP? Well

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you Lamar, go ahead.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you're saying Josh won't be her MVP? Is Lamar

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>at plus three twenty? Is that enough to get you

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 3>to at least bet on that.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>No, because I think that I I think Josh is

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>an overwhelming favorite to win it. I just yeah, so

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 2>like I don't And it's not the type of bet

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, oh, I like the odds aren't going

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 2>to change very much from now to then, and so no,

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I would have Josh one. And one other thing about

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Lamar winning it last year with very pretty pedestrian numbers

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 2>but all the intangible stuff that Josh has this year,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>it was a route the voters forty nine first place

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 2>votes for Lamar, so it wasn't close in the end.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 2>All year long we thought it was gonna be close,

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and then the voters kind of hurted to Lamar. So

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Josh would be my MVP. Saquan would be my Offensive

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Player of the Year. Offensive Rookie of the Year, Brock

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Bowers has an awesome case. He's the best tight end

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 2>in football this year, not for rookies, but four tight ends,

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 2>but it's gotta be Jaden Daniels. Defensive Rookie of the

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Year has to be Jared Verse, my preseason pick, and

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>then Defensive Player of the Year. In a weird year

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 2>where Pat Sertan is the overwhelming favorite, people are gonna

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 2>say I'm a Homer. I don't care. It should be

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Chris Jones because according to the Pro Bowl ballot, and

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I assume the upcoming All Pro team, the Chiefs have

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>one good, great defensive player, Chris Jones. They have no

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 2>other defensive Pro bowlers, none, It's just Chris. And yet

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>going into Week eighteen, they had the number one scoring

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 2>defense in football. So if you only have one great

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>defensive player and you have one of the best defenses

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>in football, and TJ. Watt doesn't deserve it this year,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Hendrickson deserves it. When he was on

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>a terrible defense, I would say Chris Jones. Chris Jones

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 2>isn't gonna win it. Though. All right, let's go to

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the playoff dark horse stuff. Demanse uh yeah.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 3>So with the playoff bracket locked, let's take ahead. Let's

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 3>take a look ahead at some teams that might be

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 3>able to make some noise with how the seating fell.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Which one of those lower to your teams could you

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 3>see making a big splash in the playoffs.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 2>So listen, this isn't gonna shock anybody, but my answers

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the Rams. I think the Rams are gonna beat the Vikings.

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 2>And the Rams played Detroit in the playoffs last year,

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 2>it was a one point game. They played Detroit Week

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 2>one of this year, it went to overtime. And so

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the well, Baker's oddly no, but Baker's not a lower seed.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 2>They're the three seed, like I'm not. Like I think

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 2>when we say lower seed, we're talking four through seven.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So that removes Kansas City, Buffalo, Baltimore, Detroit, Philly, Tampa.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>And if we let's throw that bracket back up there,

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know, I think Green Bay is gonna

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>lose in round one, and I don't think that Pittsburgh,

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos, the Chargers, or the Texans have much of

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 2>a chance of doing anything. And so to me, it

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>is the Rams clearly as the one. I think they're

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna Yeah, I mean that. Do you think they're gonna

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>beat Philly?

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I do think I do you think they're gonna beat Philly?

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>But I think that's just well if they do how

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Philly was last year.

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think no, I mean that that that and

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Listen, Jalen Hurts. They seem pretty company. He's gonna

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>clear concussion protocol, but he hasn't played a full game

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 2>since Week fifteen. Week sixteen, he got knocked out early

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>miss seventeen and eighteen, So there is that factor for it.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay winning would really fluster the bracket because and

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what they did last year, is the seventh seed

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>they beat the two seed and then they you know,

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 2>went to the one seed San Francisco because the NFL

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 2>playoffs receeeds. So I'm thinking the Rams win, the bracket holds,

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and then they go get Detroit. But if green Bay

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 2>were to win, then green Bay gets Detroit and the

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Rams get the winner of Washington Tampa. So that's the

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 2>like the what you're looking if you're watching on YouTube,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>what you're seeing is a potential bracket. But just remember

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, the way it'll work is Detroit in

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City will play whomever the lowest seeded winner is

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and then the other two teams play each other. So

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>as a for instance, let's just say Pittsburgh where to

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 2>beat Baltimore. Then pitts Kana City gets Pittsburgh, you know,

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>if Buffalo beats Denver, like so the the way it

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 2>is set up is it'll be two versus three and

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 2>then the one seed against the winner of the four, five,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 2>But if two or three get upset, then that kind

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>of changes the bracket. It's also why you can't really

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>do an NFL playoff bracket March Madness style, because if

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>you get you know, you have to get everything in

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>round one right in order to know who's playing who,

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 2>and so you can't really, you know, teat game it

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>out that way.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go on to Oh, you have a

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.239
<v Speaker 3>ms of the team you picked. What did you think

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>about them not caring about their seeding in that last

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>week there?

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I I understand it. They're an old team

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that is one version of themselves on offense when healthy,

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and a totally different version when not. Stafford has not

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>been playing his best football as of late. He's the

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>oldest quarterback in these playoffs, and they determined that they

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.959
<v Speaker 2>would rather, you know, roll the dice on being the

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 2>three or the four seed versus having the guys be

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>banged up. And so I don't I have no problem

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>with it whatsoever. I also think the Rams are a

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 2>dangerous team. Man. They've won nine of their last eleven.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 2>They started one in four and finished the year well.

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 2>They won nine of their last eleven prior to week

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 2>eighteen when they weren't playing their guys. I just I

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 2>think that is a legitimately dangerous team, even though their

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 2>last they scored forty four on Buffalo Demons, and then

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>in their next three games they won twelve six nineteen

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 2>nine games and thirteen to nine. They scored forty four

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>against Buffalo and then forty four combined in their next three.

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to the last topic of the segment.

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, so the team to beat in the AFC

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 3>will not be able to be beaten in the next

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 3>month and a half. They obviously missed the playoffs and

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 3>this is back to back years now they've missed the playoffs. Cincinnati, Uh,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 3>what should they? What are they going to do there?

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 3>What's what's the plan?

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Which is well, I mean, I don't know. I would

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I would recommend they stopped talking. That's the first thing

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I'd recommend. The second thing I'd recommend is they recognize

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>September counts and they just they they can't keep getting

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>off to these brutal starts and then just thinking we'll

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 2>get hot at the end of the year. And it

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 2>is now a undeniable trend that has cost them repeatedly

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 2>as great as Joe Burrow is. He's been there five years.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 2>They've been to the playoffs twice. His rookie year. We

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 2>want to throw that out, totally understand. But they started

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>the year one five and one. His second year, they

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, was the one year they didn't start terrible,

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>but they started the year two and three. Is third

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>year they started oh and two and started the year

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 2>two and three. Last year they started oh and two,

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and they started the year two and three. This year

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>they started oh and three, and they started the year

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 2>one and four. Like those are two big a holes

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to pull yourself out of repeatedly, and you know them's

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the breaks, guys. And would it have been fun to

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 2>see them in the playoffs, Sure, But even when their

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 2>season was on the line. Two weeks ago they went

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>to overtime with a decent but not great Denver team,

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 2>and a couple days ago they needed Russell Wilson to

0:34:55.600 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 2>totally have a game management meltdown to a gape with

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 2>a win against a floundering Pittsburgh team. They're not a juggernaut.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Juggernauts don't go nine to eight. Juggernauts don't need help

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 2>in Week eighteen to make the playoffs, and.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 3>So what the defense? It's the defense. I mean, I

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 3>think they're playing well. They obviously play well, but they

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 3>just I think there's the there's the answer some of those.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's it's the defense. They also did score

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>nineteen points in Week eighteen in the game they had

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.959
<v Speaker 2>to win, and like Burrow wasn't great in that game,

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they were able to win it. And yeah, but the

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Higgins is gonna be back, and I

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 2>think that team doesn't have great coaching. They just fired

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Loui an Arumo, their defensive coordinator. Like this is a long,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>tough offseason that they earned by losing to the damn

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Patriots in Week one. Like, just get your together, guys.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 2>We don't lose to the Patriots in Week one and

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>you're not in this position. Quick break, right back, what's right?

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in what's right with Nick? Right? All right?

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>The regular season's over, demons, So we can do a

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.439
<v Speaker 2>bit of a year in recap before we get onto

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the postseason. So take over.

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's the end of the year. You finished

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 3>forty eight forty and two on your regular season bets,

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 3>let's take a look at how your preseason bets went

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 3>do you want me.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 2>To just ye oh yeah, there we go get the ground. No,

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll go through it. So I crushed win totals. Did

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 2>not do as well on the other ones, so we'll go.

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>My overs were as follows. The Chiefs over eleven and

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 2>a half they won fifteen games, so that was an

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>easy one. The Rams over eight and a half they

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 2>won ten despite resting their guys the final week. The

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Broncos over five and a half they won ten. So

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 2>those not only did those all win, those were all

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 2>locked weeks ago. The Bears over eight and a half

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 2>was locked out weeks ago. That was a bad one.

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>The Unders the Jets under nine and a half, they

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 2>won five games, that was locked weeks ago. The Raiders

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 2>under six and a half they got red hot at

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year, still never sniffed it. That

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 2>was locked weeks ago. The Giants under six and a

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 2>half they won a game at the end of the

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 2>year that was locked weeks ago. And Philly under ten

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.879
<v Speaker 2>and a half. That was a disaster. So those we

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 2>did eight preseason win totals. The six winners we had

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>were winners December first, like, those were not even close.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Now is when we get to the sketchier piece of it.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Division winner bets one great one that covered a lot

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 2>of us elsewhere. The Rams plus plus three hundred was

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a great bet, the Bears plus three forty terrible, Cincinnati

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>plus one sixty five terrible. I kind of split Dallas

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and Washington plus one seventy five and plus eleven hundred.

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Remember I put like a quarter unit on Washington. Obviously

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Philly won that. And then my division winner parlay Kansas City, Buffalo, Cincinnati,

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and again this is a lesson for folks.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I the.

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 2>This getting Cincinnati wrong cost me thirteen units. My Cincinnati

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 2>division winner bet. I didn't lose thirteen units, but the

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 2>having it I had, Yeah, right, and I would have

0:38:55.440 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 2>won that parlay. But whatever. But again, so my the

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>let me pull it up exactly here for a second,

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>because our graphics guy for the guy that does Zach,

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 2>who does our graphics for I'm gonna post this shortly

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 2>for social. So my preseason uh win totals if you

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 2>include the vig and everything. I bet nine point nine units.

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I won thirteen point eight units. So basically plus four

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>units there my division champion win totals. Because those weren't

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>all full unit bets. I bet three full units because

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 2>those were mostly half or one unit bets. I won

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 2>two point two, so I lost basically one unit there.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Now we get to the playoff bets and some again

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.720
<v Speaker 2>some good and some bad. Here. I had the Jets

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to miss the playoffs. That was a winner, Miami to

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.439
<v Speaker 2>miss the playoffs, that was a winner. Philly to miss

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. That was a loser. But those were all

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 2>plus money, so that was really good. And this is

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 2>what was really bad. My biggest bet of the year

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 2>was this Giant Raiders Saints Steelers bet plus two hundred.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 2>That was a three unit bet. If you remember, Giants

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>missed by a mile, Vegas missed by a mile, New

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Orleans missed by a mile. But Pittsburgh not only didn't

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 2>miss because if you when I made it, I said,

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 2>if it's close, if one of these teams looks like

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 2>they could make it, then I could simply, you know,

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 2>hedge my way out of it to a degree, you know,

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 2>bet them to make it. Late in the year when

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 2>it's close. That opportunity never presented itself because Pittsburgh started

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 2>ten to three, so they were always like minus a

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 2>huge number to make the playoffs. So that was a

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 2>bad one on. So I have a no hedging rule

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 2>on any bet that I make, with the exception of

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 2>a bet that I make with the purpose of potentially hedging.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 2>So let me give you an example of what I

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 2>mean there. If so, if you see a team that

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you do not think can win the Super Bowl, but

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 2>you think at some point let me give you, let

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:42.479
<v Speaker 2>me rather than do it without proper nouns, I'll try

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 2>to think. So let me go to the current NBA

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 2>odds and we can explain it maybe a little bit better. So,

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 2>gosh darn it. So let me just check the championship

0:41:54.880 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 2>NBA Champion odds, so right now. Again, example would be

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 2>so let's say, demanse, So the Rockets right now are

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 2>forty four to one to win the championship. I do

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 2>not think the Rockets can win the championship, but if

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I do believe that they have a really good chance

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>of making the conference finals, okay, I might bet the

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Rockets to win the championship with the express purpose of

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 2>if and when they make the conference finals, hedging out

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 2>of it. Yeah, betting exactly right like that. If a

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 2>team's forty four to one right now, and I think

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 2>there's a good chance that at some point they're ten

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 2>to one. I might make that bet just for just

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 2>for hedging purposes. Now, again, this missed the playoffs bet

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 2>is not exactly that because I thought I could win

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>that bet. But I also thought if I'm making a

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 2>three unit bet that I would have a chance to

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 2>lock in a profit. But again Pittsburgh was too good.

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:12.839
<v Speaker 2>These other two bets were not full units. They were

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of lottery tickets Green Bay Jets Philly. It all

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 2>missed the playoffs. That was seventeen to one. That obviously

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 2>was a disaster. And then this one Kan City Buffalo

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 2>rams Chicago to make the playoffs that was seven to

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 2>one Chica. You know, three out of four. Three out

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 2>of four doesn't pay on parlays, which is totally fair.

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:37.240
<v Speaker 2>So again on those I bet six point eight units.

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I won four point seven, so I lost two point one.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 2>And then my two Super Bowl bets, which are annual

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.399
<v Speaker 2>lottery tickets Kan City versus the Bears in Kansas City

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Bears. Those were disasters. So the way

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the full thing plays out, believe it or not, I

0:43:54.920 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 2>bet twenty one point seven units Demanse on our preseason bets.

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I got back twenty point seven. So that was a

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 2>fifteen minute explanation about how I lost one unit. I mean,

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 2>and that is like and the and so it just

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, we did all that, We did the whole

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 2>preseason gambling show, and at the end of the day

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 2>minus one unit, which considering the fact that I was

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 2>minus two units on my sixty five to one and

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 2>ninety five to one Super Bowl exactas, means I did

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. I basically broke even with a couple of

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 2>lottery tickets. So I don't mind it. All right, let's

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 2>get to now that we've recapped that, let's get to

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 2>our game today, this or that.

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we're playing this or that today, but there's

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a small twist on it. So since there's

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 3>a lot of stories circulated right now, I'm gonna go

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 3>off with two topics and use this decide which one

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 3>you want to talk about. From there, we know you'll

0:44:58.520 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 3>probably can get on both.

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 3>So after Miami's season ended, Tarreek Hill said, I'm opening

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 3>the door. I'm out bro yet. Meanwhile, Mike Evans cracked

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a thousand yards for the eleven straight season for little help.

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Would you rather discuss Tyreek Hill or Mike Evans.

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 2>The Mike Evans thing was awesome, but I'd rather discuss

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Hill because I think it's fun to discuss where

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 2>he could end up. So the team that I could

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>see if they lose to the Chiefs again trying to

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 2>make a play for him is Buffalo. But I don't

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 2>think Miami would trade him within the division, so that

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>would make a lot of sense. He would be unbelievable there.

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 2>They need a field stretcher, but I don't think Miami

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:58.439
<v Speaker 2>would do it. There is no AFC North team that

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 2>makes sense to me. There is no AFC South team

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense to me, because Houston's the only one

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 2>that Tyreek would potentially want to go to, and they

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 2>have their receivers. I wonder if the Chargers would be interested.

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>The Broncos theoretically could be interested, but again, if you're

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a team that doesn't have a great quarterback and you

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 2>just saw Tyreek kind of napalm his way out of Miami,

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 2>you probably don't want to get in that business. So

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers would be the highest on the list of

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 2>potential AFC teams. NFC teams the Cowboys make a ton

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of sense, and Mike is already recruiting him, and the

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Commanders Demons with your guy Jaden make a ton of sense.

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Those are really the only NFC teams. The Eagles have

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>their receivers, the Lions have their receivers, the Vikings have

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 2>their receivers, the Packers have their receivers, the Bears have

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 2>their receivers. Tampa has their receivers, the Rams have their receivers,

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the Niners have their receivers. And again, I only think

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 2>a contender would trade for Tyreek. So I say Chargers, Cowboys,

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Commanders are the most likely destinations for next year and then,

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 2>And people might be like, why didn't you mention the Chiefs.

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:41.240
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs are not trading for Tyreek Hill at his salary.

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 2>They're just not. They made the choice to move off

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the super expensive receiver, and they've won every Super Bowl

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 2>played since then. Now with that said, what I think

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 2>is gonna happen is someone's gonna trade for him. It's

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 2>not gonna go great, And in twenty twenty six he'll

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 2>be a Chief again. Twenty twenty five somewhere else, and

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six he'll be a Chief again, that's my guess.

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Over there, so that we'll make Bryce on in them

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 3>instant contenders next year.

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek doesn't want to go to Carolina, man, I mean

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 2>it would be he doesn't want to do it. That's

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 2>just not going to happen, all right.

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.479
<v Speaker 3>Next, So the top of the draft order is set

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and it looks different from a week ago. Would you

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 3>rather discuss New England blowing the number one pick or

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee getting the number one pick?

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, the only interesting thing about the Patriots blowing the

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 2>number one pick is this folks acting like the Chiefs

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 2>are the first team in NFL history to rest guys

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 2>in Week eighteen, when literally that same earlier that day,

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 2>the Bills put on such an epic tank job that

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 2>they lost to a team that didn't want to win,

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 2>that had only won three games all year and was

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 2>playing its third string quarterback. And that just gets lost

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 2>in the ether. And so Tennessee getting the number one pick,

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they probably draft cam Ward, maybe Shador, but

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 2>it seems like Vegas thinks it will be cam Ward

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and they hope they get it right. Like Tennessee is

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the more hopeless and least interesting teams in

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:34.439
<v Speaker 2>the league, and so you hope they get the quarterback, right.

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 2>It was never gonna be Will Levis and Titans fans

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:42.399
<v Speaker 2>who were so mouthy this offseason, because the Titans did

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 2>go for it. They signed you know what I mean,

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 2>They spent a lot of money in free agency. They

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.240
<v Speaker 2>traded for Lagerius Snead. By the way, what a great

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 2>trade by Brett Veach. Beach had a whole list of

0:49:55.640 --> 0:50:00.919
<v Speaker 2>teams offering third round picks for Lagerius Snead. He took

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the Titans because he anticipated the Titans might be terrible.

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 2>They end up being the worst team in the league

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>this year. And now the Chiefs they don't actually get

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the first pick of the third round because that actually rotates,

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 2>but they now have the second pick of the third

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 2>round because he took the best possible trade that you

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:23.280
<v Speaker 2>could get for Snead. So the Chiefs are gonna draft

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty well, assuming they win the Super Bowl, obvious, they're

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna draft thirty two, sixty four, and sixty six, which

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I like quite a bit, all right.

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Next, Aaron Rodgers entered the five hundred touchdown club and

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 3>may have played his final game in the NFL. Caleb

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Williams wrapped up his first year with the Bears, winning

0:50:41.719 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay since twenty fifteen. Would you rather discuss Rogers'

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.280
<v Speaker 3>potential final season or Caleb's rookie season?

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather Oh, I'll be honest, I'd rather not talk

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 2>about either of these right now. Feel like I've talked

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 2>about these two quarterbacks a lot. I love Caleb and

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad it ended on a high note. But we're

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna spend a lot of time talking Caleb and the

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Bears once they decide on their head coach, because that's

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the most consequential decision this franchise will make over the

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 2>next decade, is who this head coach is? And Rogers

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just sick of talking about all right? Last one?

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Week eighteen was not the most exciting week ever. Felt

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 3>like most of thee was resting their guys and most

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:32.240
<v Speaker 3>games didn't matter. Are we sure we need seventeen games?

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 3>When your Chiefs demolished thirty eight zero by the Broncos,

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 3>which is grace? Would you rather discuss Week eighteen or

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 3>your Chiefs?

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, did the Chiefs game went exactly the way

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you'd hope for? Which is nobody got hurt? So I

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 2>don't really like the Chiefs things irrelevant. Here's the thing

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 2>about Week eighteen, and nobody has put it quite this simply,

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 2>but this is the best way to think about it.

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 2>The more games in the season, the more likely the

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 2>final games meaningless. And the NFL opted to extend the season,

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 2>which means it's more likely you have a lot of

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Week eight teams like the one you just saw, where

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:18.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot of teams are locked into where they are.

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 2>And and again it sometimes things like this are the

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 2>easiest to think about if you just go max men,

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 2>if the NFL season were one game long, then the

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 2>final week of the season would always be meaningful for

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:40.359
<v Speaker 2>every single team because it would be your entire season, right.

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 2>And if the NFL season were a hundred games long,

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 2>then for a lot of teams, the final six weeks

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of the season might be totally meaningless, and for most teams,

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 2>the final game of the season would be you'd be

0:52:56.280 --> 0:53:02.280
<v Speaker 2>locked in if if it was still a sixteen game season,

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 2>how many teams were one hundred percent locked into their

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 2>playoff position in Week sixteen. The answer to that is

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 2>one the Houston Texans. That was it. They couldn't they

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 2>had already clinched the division and they couldn't go higher

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 2>than four, so they would have been the only team resting. Guys,

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 2>you extend it one week. The Chiefs are locked in,

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the Bills are locked in, the Eagles are locked in.

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The Rams are locked in a band, and they don't

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 2>care as much. The Commanders and Packers are locked in

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 2>a band and they don't care as much. Like that's

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 2>what you get, Like, that's just how it works. So

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I the it is, and if you go to eighteen games,

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you'll get even more of it. So just be careful

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 2>what you wish for on that front. Quick break, answer

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 2>some listener questions. Next, we'll right welcome back in. We'll

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 2>drive in the Great Demons. Let's go to some listener questions.

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Austin says, do you think that the forty nine Ers

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 3>quarterback contract could be could be the inflection point for

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the teams that not feel sorry to not feel obligated

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 3>to play quarterbacks and that are not top ten players

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:24.839
<v Speaker 3>and just go to the draft that year Jesus Christ.

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So to not pay quarterbacks that are not top ten guys,

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I I I doubt it, but it would be interesting.

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the thing Barnwall's talked about for years. I've

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 2>talked about, which is is will a team not in

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:45.479
<v Speaker 2>the position the Niners are in, will a team ever

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 2>do the following. Let's say that team's the Niners Rock Party.

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 2>We're not paying you. You have a year under contract,

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:57.919
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna play it out, and the next year we're

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 2>trading you for a first round pick to a team

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that wants to pay you, and we're just gonna stay

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 2>on the quarter the rookie contract quarterback cycle until we

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:12.920
<v Speaker 2>hit on a no doubt superstar. What we're not doing

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 2>is paying a mid tier quarterback top tier money. Nobody's

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 2>been willing to do that, and I don't think the

0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Niners are gonna do it, but I think it would

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 2>be the smart thing to do, all right, Demon, Tyler's

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:27.919
<v Speaker 2>got a question for you. Who do you trust more

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 2>in these playoffs? Jayde and Daniels or Jordan Love. I

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 2>know you're the Jordan Love guy, so I was curious.

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I gotta go with Jordan Love here. I've already

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:40.879
<v Speaker 3>seen it Jayde and Daniels. Obviously, he's had a great

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:43.839
<v Speaker 3>rookie season, but it's all been regular season stuff. Haven't

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 3>seen him in the postseason yet, so I can't say

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that I trust Jaye Daniels more. But but I mean, yeah.

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Guys, that's the exact right answer. Listen, that's the exact

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 2>right answer. Anybody that has never started a playoff game,

0:55:56.680 --> 0:56:01.879
<v Speaker 2>the you just don't know how that cauldron's gonna impact them.

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 2>And Jordan Love has played two playoff games, played unbelievable

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 2>in one and played decent in the other. So there's

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:11.400
<v Speaker 2>just more of a proof of concept there, all right.

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Next Jamal first time catching the live I normally listen

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 3>on Spotify. What do you think the best bet of

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the year? You guys made.

0:56:21.960 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Best bet? We I don't know. I mean, there's so

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 2>many good ones, but I do think us giving out

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to the audience the Bucks Rams seven to one division

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 2>winner bet when they were both underdogs for it is

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. Like midway through the year. I like that

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 2>one a lot. I mean, I did hit a nice

0:56:42.840 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 2>same game parlay on my own, but that was, you know,

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 2>that was that's separate al right.

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Next Curtis Actually Sam thoughts on the LiAngelo ball song.

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't have anything. I haven't listened to it.

0:56:57.719 --> 0:57:03.360
<v Speaker 3>You haven't listened to it at all? A little bit different.

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, no, I've seen it plenty of times, but is

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it good?

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 3>It's I've only heard the first, uh that little twenty

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 3>second snippet, but apparently it's it's the league's talking NFL

0:57:15.040 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 3>guys even they're banging it. I think after Dan Campber's

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 3>motivational speech to the players, one of the players is like,

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 3>throw that lie angel on after like all the hockey?

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Really they played the song yet? Oh good? But ms

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm not anti. I'll listen to it.

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:34.240
<v Speaker 3>There's a little follow up there that says, which ball

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 3>brother do you think will end with the best career?

0:57:37.000 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's gotta be Amelo.

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, it'll be LaMelo even though, but I

0:57:42.840 --> 0:57:47.000
<v Speaker 2>just's it wouldn't surprise me if LaMelo never once makes

0:57:47.000 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs because he's gonna always have the numbers of

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 2>a max guy. And if LaMelo is a max guy

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 2>on your team, I don't know how you're gonna be

0:57:56.840 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 2>a playoff team. Maybe he'll mature, but maybe not.

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, Curtis says, if the Chiefs three peat

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 3>this year, will you be the first to advocate for

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 3>a four peat? Or will the Broncos and Chargers have

0:58:08.000 --> 0:58:10.120
<v Speaker 3>caught up enough with the Chiefs to have a saying it.

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:14.360
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs three peat. Yeah, I'll probably think that they're

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna go ahead and keep winning Super Bowls. Yeah, But

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the idea that I'd be worried about the Broncos is laughable.

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Broncos had a really nice season. I'm happy for him.

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:29.760
<v Speaker 2>But the No, I don't think the Broncos or the

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Chargers are threatening the dynasty as of yet. And I

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 2>think the Broncos are a ways away, and we'll see

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 2>how far away the Chargers are. But no, I'm not

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 2>worried about the Broncos or the Chargers. All right.

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Last one, Jordan, aside from getting your three peat pick right,

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 3>what are you hoping the most? What are you hoping

0:58:56.920 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the most to get right about the twenty twenty four NFL.

0:59:08.200 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I that's a really good question. So I just have

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 2>to take the Chiefs out of it. I'd like the

0:59:16.400 --> 0:59:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Rams to go on a run. Oh okay, I'd like

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the Rams to go on a run because I feel like,

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 2>even though they're not my pick, I've kind of been,

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, at keeping them in the contender category all year.

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:31.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been talking them up more than most all year,

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'd really really like to see a Mahome Stafford

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:39.880
<v Speaker 2>super Bowl. We we should have gotten that three years ago,

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:44.240
<v Speaker 2>and then that second half against the Bengals happened and

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 2>we didn't get it, and so I you know, so

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd like the Rams to go on a run. All right,

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll do our wild Card weekend picks on Thursday. Great job, everyone,

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Great job to Monday. I'll see you guys on with

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Colin in ninety minutes on my show in about three

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and a half hours. What's hey, Thanks for watching. If

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>you're still here, do me a favor. Hit the subscribe button,

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:08.560
<v Speaker 2>then hit the bell so you can be notified when

1:00:08.560 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>we have new episodes. After you've done that, one more favor,

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>go to your favorite audio platform of choice and subscribe

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>there as well. Don't forget. We're live every Tuesday and

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Thursday ten thirty am Eastern Ish ten thirty five, ten forty.

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>It sometimes changes, but that's why you hit the bell.

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>You hit the bell so you're notified. You subscribe so

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>we can get to two hundred thousand followers. We're right

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>around one hundred and fifty thousand. We'd love to get

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 2>to two hundred thousand, get demanday another plaque, so like

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>subscribe rate, send a rating to do all that cool stuff.

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks guys,