WEBVTT - Ep46 "Who says you're dead?"

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you know when a person is dead? I mean,

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a straightforward problem, but this is often

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a very complex issue, both medically and legally, because, as

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see in this episode, death is not an event

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but a process. So where do the medical and legal

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>systems face off against one another in this question? Can

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a person be declared legally dead even though he's very

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>much alive. Why in twenty eleven did an enormous number

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of families choose to pull their loved ones off life

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>support just before the new year? And what does this

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>have to do with getting buried alive or with your

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>family's religious beliefs, or whether someone's head stays alive after

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the guillotine. Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a neuroscientist and author at Stance, and in these

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes we sail deeply into our three pound universe to

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>understand why and how our lives look the way they do.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is about the science, the ethics, and the

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>questions about the end of life, What qualifies as death,

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>who gets to say that you are dead? And what

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is the future of this? Okay, so let's start with

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's perhaps macabre and unexpected. But if you're a

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>modern adult and you die suddenly, you have all these

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>bill pay and credit card payments and automatic withdrawals that

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are scheduled, and your finances might keep on trucking for

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. You may even receive some auto deposits into

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>your bank account, And with all the comings and goings,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it would look to someone who didn't know that you're

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>still making transactions. And if you happened to have some

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>pre scheduled emails that you'd previously written, those might go out,

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and various legal things get triggered at different points, and

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it will probably look for a little while like you're

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>still making stuff happen in the world. And I was

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this the other day as an analogy to

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens with your biology. Generally speaking, death is declared

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>when a heart stops beating and or someone stops breathing.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But even though we think about death like a binary event,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no central command center in the body that says, okay,

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>now we're done. Everyone stop working. Because the body is

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>made of literally trillions of cells, and all of their

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>chemical signals are connected and intricate cascades and loops and

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when something stops running, these nested feedback loops tend to

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bump things back to the normal range. We have this compensation. Now,

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at some point the whole show grinds to a halt.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The compensatory mechanisms can't keep up with the catastrophic failure

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of loop after loop that stops working, and eventually the

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>whole system stops. But death is not a moment in time.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It is a process. In other words, the individual cells

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily know that the heart has stopped or the

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>brain has stopped its cognitive whirlwind of activity, so they

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just keep trucking along for as long as they can.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So here's an analogy so we can think about this.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you are a space alien that's looking down on

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the Earth and you see a large blobby organism moving

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>towards some fortress. And then the blobby organism extends two

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>arms around the fortress and starts to squeeze it. But

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>then some explosions go off and the organism stops moving.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems to die. But then you use your alien

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>telescope to zoom in more closely, and for the first time,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you notice a single warrior running up the hill, turning

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>back swinging his sword, falling to his knees in lamentations,

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and regaining his footing and running towards the fortress again.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>So you start panning your telescope round and you notice

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a dozen of these rogue swordsmen in different locations around

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield. And that's when you realize that the blobby

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>organism who came upon the fortress was actually composed of

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of little individual agents, all of whom worked in

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>concert and maybe had hierarchies and rules of engagement and

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>backup plans such that even when most of the army

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>was killed, that didn't necessitate that every part stopped the

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>survival of individual warriors. Suddenly, rev feels that the blob

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was made of these little swordsmen all along, even though

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that was difficult to see. And this is what happens biologically.

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>We are made up of cells that operate together. This

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is what makes a person or any animal. Trillions of

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>cells collaborating to make this giant creature that moves around

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and finds other collections of cells to eat and take

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>their energy. And researchers have made recent discoveries about cells

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that stay alive and actually get more active well after

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the body has been declared dead. In

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>other words, these little swordsmen warriors that are still running

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>around even after the blob has stopped. For example, some

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>researchers at University of Illinois Chicago looked at little pieces

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of fresh brain that get removed during brain surgery, and

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they looked at these either right when the tissue was

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>removed or at different times after the removal. So they

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>called this a simulated death experiment, and their point was

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to think about what happens when tissue gets separated and dies.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And what they found after the tissue is removed is

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that some brain cells actually increase their activity. These cells

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>will often grow really large and they sprout long finger

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like processes for several hours after death. Now, in some

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>sense this is not too surprising, because these are glial

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>cells in the brain whose job is to take care

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of inflammation. But the researchers pointed out that most people

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even look at the brain after death because they

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>assume that everything dies. But in fact, eighty percent of

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>the genes being expressed kept on being expressed at their

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>normal levels. Twenty four hours later. A few genes had

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>their expression levels go down, but there was a third

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>group of genes, which they called zombie genes, whose activity

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>went up, and as a result, you have all these

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>cells still running around and doing stuff. And if we

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>zoom out our camera, we find that different organs keep

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>functioning for different amounts of time. So, for example, at

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>some point we would say the brain is dead. That's

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>followed a little later by the heart. Then the liver

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>dies next, then the kidneys and pancreas can last another

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>hour past that before they die, and other parts of

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>your body like your heart valves, and the corneas of

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>your eyes and your tendons and your skin that's still

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>alive after about a day. So the idea that everything

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>stops when you die is not correct. Returning to the

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>space alien analogy, imagine that the medics come in to

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>take care of the fallen warriors, and so there's still

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lots of activity even after the main army has fallen.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But it gets even weirder when we talk about things

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that the larger level of the creature. And there's been

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a history of asking these questions. For example, you might

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think that death is really clear if say a person

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has had their head cut off with a guillotine, I'm

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going to dive into that issue in a future episode

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because the whole thing is so wacky and fascinating. But

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll just mention now that in the eighteen hundreds, when

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the guillotine was very popular, people got interested in this

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>question of whether the head can stay conscious after separation

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from the body, and what they would do is pick

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>up the freshly severed head and try to get it

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk or at least blink its eyes on command.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And at that time, other scientists were trying things like

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>taking a decapitated head from a German shepherd dog and

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>reattaching it to the blood supply of another dog to

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>see if simply restoring blood flow through the brain was

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>enough to restore its function. So stay tuned for that episode.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But what these experiment it's highlight is that this question

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of where to draw the line between life and death

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>has been with us a long time, and in modern

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>times we have things like the field of cryogenics, which

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is the art of freezing a body after death, so

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it has a chance of being revived by future scientists

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>who might know how to do that, even though we

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know now. In the field of cryogenics, it's popular

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to sometimes just save the head and get rid of

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the body, and the assumption or the hope really is

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that that can be sufficient, and that if you are

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>maintained at ninety six degrees below freezing, then you're not

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>actually dead, but you're in a state of suspended animation

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and can eventually be rebooted. So why does all this matter,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this question of where to draw the line between life

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and death. Well, first of all, it matters for the

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>medical system, and we see cases come up all the

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>time in hot hospitals where there is confusion or disagreement

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about how to make the call. There was a case

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>in Texas where the doctors told a man that his son,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>who had been in a coma, would never return back

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to consciousness, and so the doctors wanted to make the

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>call to remove the young man from life support, and

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the father was so distraught that he pulled a gun

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>on the doctors and medical staff and wouldn't let them

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>near his son in the hospital bed, And so the

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>police were immediately dispatched and this man was arrested and

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>put in jail for eleven months. But incredibly, the son

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed a full recovery and once the father was released

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>from jail. The two of them were happily reunited. All

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of this points to the difficulty in determining when a

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>body has died irreversibly, and the question of life and

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>death matters enormously for legal systems because so much pivots

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on whether a person is considered alive or dead in

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of the law. How do we know when

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that line has been crossed? So there are so many

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fascinating medical and legal and ethical issues around deciding when

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a person has died, and those viewpoints don't always align,

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps surprisingly they often conflict badly. And add to

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this particular religious practices that people have and business issues

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>like tax implications, and what you have is a fascinating

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>set of questions that arise. So that's what I want

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about today. How we as a society make

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that call and how should we so To dig into this,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I called up my friend and colleague, Jacob Appel. Now,

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Jacob is a very accomplished thinker and writer and man

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of many talents. He has seven graduate degrees, but for

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>today's episode, the two most salient are his law degree

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>from Harvard and his medical degree from Columbia. Jacob works

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>as an emergency room psychiatrist in the Mount Sinai Health System,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and he also serves as the director of Ethics Education.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So I called him up to talk with him about

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the question of how we as a society should think

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>about making the tough calls about whether a person should

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be declared dead or not, and the complexities that lurk

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>inside that seemingly simple question, complexities that are scientific and

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>legal and cultural. How do the medical and the legal

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>systems decide when you are dead?

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's interesting because the medical and legal systems have

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 2>very different histories and very different approaches. As a legal concept,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>being dead has significant implications not just for you, but

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 2>for your loved ones and for society. So, for example,

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>if you're dead, your spouse can re marry, your heirrors

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>can inherit, You stop getting social Security. So, whatever your

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>biological status, if you're declared dead, it can have significant

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 2>implications for the.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 3>World and for you as well.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm reminded several years ago a man from Romania had

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>gone to work in Turkey, and he'd been gone for

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a long time.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>His wife couldn't find him.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 2>She had him legally declared dead, and then he came

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 2>back as a surprise, and he couldn't run an apartment

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>or get a job his casement all the way to

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the Romanian Supreme Court because he was legally dead and nobody,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>even though he was standing in front of him, would

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 2>overrule us. And I will mention also legally there are

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>these gray areas. So for example, if you were lost

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>to see historically, how did we know how long you

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 2>had it be gone before you were dead? And there

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>were different rules for how much time had it passed

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>before they could give away your property versus not having

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>rights over your children.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 3>So you can be dead for one purpose and alive

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 3>for another.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't there some sixteenth century French soldier that this happened

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to last name Gear?

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a great movie, The Return of Martin Gear,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 2>which is a classic case of this, where someone allegedly

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I believe it was in one hundred Years War, came

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 2>back after being lost in battle. It turned out he

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 2>actually wasn't the person who claimed he was. But there

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>were a number of famous cases like this over the years,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 2>and as a famous poem by Tennyson about Enoch Arden,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>hence the term that has come into the English language

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Enoch Arden laws which the laws would refer to how

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>long you have to be missing before you're dead.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Okay, So from the legal point of view, there

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are all these things to be considered, including, for example,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tax laws. Can you just mention what happened between the

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two nine and twenty eleven?

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, So the Bush administration had enacted tax laws that

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 2>gave people a significant tax break on their inheritance, and

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>they were going to expire at some point, and people's

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>inheritance taxes would go up substantially as a result of

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>which many people who were at the end of life

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 2>life on life support or their families want at their

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>life support terminated before January first, when their taxes would double.

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>At an entire boutique corner of a major New.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 2>York City law firm is actually devoted specifically to this practice.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, somebody was on life support and the adult

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>children would say, look, it's December, let's go ahead and

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pull this now so that he dies before January first.

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they would say, Grandpa would much rather die on

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 2>December thirtieth and leave one hundred billion dollars to his

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>grandkids than die on January second. Still unloose it. Two

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 2>days later, and leave them nothing. And honestly, I can't

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 2>argue with that.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So how do hospital ethics boards deal with questions

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like that? Sure?

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Are so most decisions in hospitals or recommendations, you're done

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>by committee. So you have an ethics committee, You have

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a consultant who actually gathers the information and presents it

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to the committee, which consist of experts in a range

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>of different fields, so not just medicine, surgery, pediatrics, but

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 2>social work, nursing, the hospital chaplain. They sort of build

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a consensus and then obviously, if you can't build a

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>consensus or can't get the family on board, then cases

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>end up going to court, and ultimately, in cases like this,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the court usually will decide looking at all the evidence

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>brought before them.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and so there are all these legal considerations, what

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>are the medical considerations when we think about what is death?

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Sure, and the medical considerations are actually just as complex.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>In an earlier era, you probably have seen movies like

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>The Cursed Living Dead, where people are believed dead and

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>then they come back to life suddenly, and people who

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>are afraid of being buried alive.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 3>It was actually a fairly.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Ineffective diagnostic tool to be certain someone was dead, they

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>would do things like hold up a mirror to your

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>mouth and see if there was actually vapor on it,

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to see if you were breathing.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>So they made mistakes.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So actually this actually happened where people were buried alive.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean it wasn't a common occurrence, but it

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>did happen. I will add, as strangers who may sound

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it still happens occasionally. Today you hear these stories about

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>people who show up in the morgue or show up

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 2>in a funeral home and suddenly they wake up. Usually,

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I will add, by the way, those people are still

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>in a very bad shape and they don't make it

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>in the long run. I don't know of any case

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to people who have actually been to the morgue and

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>then got home and good health. But people have gone

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 2>and they started breathing and ended up backing the ice

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 2>you before, So that should give us pause.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>How does that happen currently? Is it in areas where

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there's not good medical diagnosis of what has happened?

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be that critical.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's a very hard There are a

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of different tests for determining whether someone is dead.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Now and different diagnostic tools and doctors do their best.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes if you're barely breathing, and if your pulses

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 2>very sporadic and they catch you a couple of times

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 2>at the wrong moment, maybe you get unlucky.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I will add often this.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Does occur in the developing world, where maybe their diagnostic

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>tools are not as strong. I don't know of any

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>cases in New York City with my luck, I'll be

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the first.

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So back to a few decades ago or a

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>century ago. So you hold a mirror to the mouth

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and you see if there's fog on the mirror, and

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>then what happened.

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>So eventually we did no enough about anatomy to recognize

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>cardiac and pulmonary death. Cardiopulmonary death, you stop breathing and

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you don't get a pulse for a propracted period of time,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 2>we accept that you're dead.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Like how long? What's a protracted period?

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 3>That depended on the doctor.

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, if you're not breathing or you know, a pulse

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>for a good ten to fifteen minutes, the odds of

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 2>you reviving naturally on your own get pretty darn low.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 2>When you get much past that, your odds for surviving

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>in a way that is meaningfully cognitive or very low

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and most people stop at some point, stop crying. But

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that was the diagnostic tool back then. I will add,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>by the way, that most people historically back then were

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 2>in very bad shape by the time they reached that pointing.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>It's been other death bed for hours or days or weeks.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So what happened next?

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 2>So there were technological developments in medical science that allowed

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>us to check for cardiopulmonary death basically to figure out

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 2>whether or not your heart was still beating, whether your

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 2>lungs were still breathing, And that was the test for many,

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>many years until the nineteen sixties. And if you stop

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>breathing and if your heartstep beating, you were dead. And that,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I will add, by the way, is the test still

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 2>used in some religious communities, in some cultural traditions. Starting

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>in the late nineteen sixties with the advent of organ transplant,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>which meant there was a need to harvest organs or

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 2>procure organs from the individuals as quickly as possible, and

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the rise of artificial ventilation and later artificial heart support,

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>which meant that people could be kept alive for months

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 2>or even a year or two on a respirat or

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>on a ventilator. That created the challenge of how did

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 2>we know when these individuals were dead? And there was

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a debate over whether brain death should be acceptable, and

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate decision was made by a committee of experts

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard that has been adopted widely that whole brain

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 2>death would be the standard. So, if you have two

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>flat EEGs, your brain stops functioning entirely, you are now

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>legally dead in every state. I will add New Jersey,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and to a lesser degree under some circumstances. New York

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 2>allows people with a religious belief only in cardiopulmonary death

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 2>to opt out of that standard, but other states do not.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So give me an example of having a religious belief

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and how that might change the decision that a family makes.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So let us say that my grandfather is on a

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>ventilator which is artificial. One support and intet to buy

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>that which is a machimee that for a short period

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>of time to fairly late the period of time. Now

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 2>with new technology can replace the heart, so it's entirely artificial.

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 2>And yet he has two flat egs. His brain is

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>showing no function at all. In New Jersey. If I

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 2>have a religious tradition that says that only cardiopulmonary depth

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 2>is alive. In theory, I could raise the funds to

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 2>bring that individual home to my living room and keep

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>them on ventilator support and buy bad support until they

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 2>can no longer support their cart and lungs with those machines,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 2>which could be a year.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>And this happens sometimes right where someone takes a person home.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>It is rare, but it has happened.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 2>I believe there was a famous case in Utah, a

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Jesse Kutchin case where it has happened. In addition to

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>which there have been cases where people the Johi McMath

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>case may be the most known, who were what was

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>presumed to be a state of brain depth for families

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 2>who do not accept that definition, who brought their relatives

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 2>to New Jersey to then replace the facilities that keep

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 2>people who are alive in a cardiopulmonary manner but is

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>ceased by the brain death standard alive.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And what's the reason that people do this. It's because

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>their religioustration tells them even though they're on a bivalve

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and there on a ventilator, they do they think the

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>person could come back, or they have other issues. I

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know you wrote once about somebody's belief in reincarnation and

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>how that affected.

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 2>So there are two different categories of people, and we

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 2>might treat the cases the same way or differently.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>There are those.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Individuals who truly believe that their relative is going to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 2>revive themselves, even though the data, overwhelmingly from past practice

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>says that's not going to happen, and they're hoping for

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a miracle.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 3>So to speak.

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.479
<v Speaker 2>There are other individuals who may say, you know, I

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 2>understand that my grandfather isn't really going to wake up again,

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>but either I, or more appropriately, he had a deep

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 2>religious belief that it was important to die of quote

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 2>unquote natural causes or if you believe in reincarnation, to

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 2>die at a certain time, and I want to fulfill

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 2>his wish, even though I understand that by your standard

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 2>he's dead. By a religious standard of our book, our Bible,

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 2>or tradition, he's not dead, and I want to wait

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the process out.

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll add one more thought on that it's okay, which.

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Is you also might want to ask the question, does

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 2>it matter whether if someone's been declared brain dead you're

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>willing to pay for it when you take them home,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>whether you're asking the taxpayers to put the bill for it,

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 2>because then the vast majority of us would say, the

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 2>taxpayers are paying to keep a dead person on a

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>life support system in your living room. And the other

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>thing to think about is there's something inappropriate or grotesque

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 2>about it. If I were to want to bring my

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 2>grandmother home embalmed like Lenin on display in his tomb

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 2>and prop work in my living room, our society would

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>not let me do that, not just for public health reasons,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>but probably for reasons of what we would call common

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>decency or horem or appropriateness.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Some would argue, this is not that different.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And how does this work in terms of making decisions

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>for somebody else. Let's say that somebody is in critical condition.

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look likely they'll recover, but maybe there's some

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>extreme measures you can take that involve amputations and other things,

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and a decision has to be made about whether that

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>person would want that kind of heroic medical treatment with

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the possible consequences. How does a hospital make the decision

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>about that?

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 2>So, while there is some variation among state laws, the

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 2>general accepted principle in this country is that we use

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>a substituted judgment or vicarious judgment standard, which if we asked,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>what would this person would have wanted if they were

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>still awake and lucid and able to express an opinion.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 2>The only two groups of people we don't use that

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>approach for are children, where parents can decide based on

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>what they perceive to be the best interest within certain

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 2>societal parameters, and people who've never had the capacity or

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 2>ability to make that decision. We view it as too

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 2>far elite to say you were born with a such

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 2>a significant cognitive impairment that you could never understand his question.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>But if you hadn't been bored in that way, what

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 2>would you want to have had done.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 3>I've actually been critical of that latter approach.

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Because in that situation we use a societal best interest standard,

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>what society would think is in your best interests. I

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>have argued that for certain communities, let's say you're an Amish,

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Mennonite or a Casidic Jew, it might be more appropriate

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to ask what would be the best interest standard in

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>your community, because it doesn't seem too far a bridge

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>for me to say, if you were born a Mennonite,

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 2>you would want what a Menonite tradition speaks to not

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>be overall societal standard.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about what happened during Hurricane Katrina with the

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>ventilators and what that means.

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Sure, so, I think during Hurricane Katrina there was a

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>medical crisis where they had patients who were ventilators who

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 2>needed them to stay alive, and a number of questions

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>around end of life arose. One the medical teams for

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>safety had to leave some of these patients. Some of

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>them could not be evacuated, and they had to decide

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>whether or not to continue them on life support, whether

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>or not to use morphine or other techniques to ease

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 2>their suffering that could have the risk of death. Into trial,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 2>there was a doctor Poe was actually put on trial

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and eventually acquitted for her role in this.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 3>These were not easy.

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Questions, right, because the decision she made was, you know,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>if we are going to run out of power, then

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>people will suffer if they don't have the ventilator on anymore,

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and so do we pull the plug before we run

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out of power? Was that the issue?

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that was what she was accused of doing.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>As she describes it. I believe she would say she

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 2>was giving people morphine or other medication with a dual

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 2>intent that might have ended their life as a result,

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 2>but the primary goal was to ease their suffering. And

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 2>in palliative care and end of life decision making, we

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 2>often do recognize this concept of dual intent. We may

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 2>intend to do one thing that inadvertently is a different consequence,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 2>but intending to relieve suffering that leads to death, we

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 2>view conceptually is very different from intending to cause death.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so the way we make decisions about death now

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has to do in part with this concept of irreversibility.

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And my question to you is how do you think

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>about this in terms of the new technologies that are

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>coming along and change that definition of irreversibility.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this comes up not just with defining death,

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>but an all end of life decision making. So people

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>may be toward the end of life and have what

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 2>we call it terminal prognosis, but there's no way to

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 2>be certain that a new technology will develop that can

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 2>cure their illness. And there have been cases now of

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 2>people with rare cancers that seemed to one hundred percent fatal

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>they always had been before, where new immunotherapies suddenly appear

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in the market or emerge as experimental treatments that then

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 2>save their lives.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 3>And who are we to.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Take away someone's hope, which is why we generally defer

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to what the patient's wishes are. And that also creates

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 2>an economic challenge, because we may know society that almost

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>everyone in this situation dies, or even that so far

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>everybody has. But who are we to take away hope

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>from the veryous one number of people who want to

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>be the teals, so to speak, and not the bell.

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 3>I can give you a very concrete example of this.

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's still true, but there was

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 2>a time when if you went on the internet, let's

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 2>say you were diagnosed with ALS blue garage disease and

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 2>typed in prognosis ALS blue garage disease on Google, the

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 2>first picture that came up was not lou Garage.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>It was Stephen Hawking.

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>The physicists who lived I'm guessing thirty forty years with

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the illness, even though the vast majority of people died.

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Within a few years.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And once you see that, it's hard to make any

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 2>meaning out of statements like a certain percentage of Medicare

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 2>or Medicaid dollars are spent in a certain period toward

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the end of life, because as I always ask the

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 2>medical students after I explain that, I say, if if

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 2>you're in the last six months of life, raise your

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 2>hand now.

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>And obviously we don't know.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So Jacob, when you think about the question of irreversibility,

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about cryogenics?

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not one who can say that cryogenics will

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>never work, though my guess is there will be other

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>technologies that will be developed beforehand that may be far

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>more effective at life lengthening, or life preserving, or even reversibility.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I can say that nothing I have seen suggests that

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 2>criogenics as it works now is very effective. I would

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 2>not suggest having your head caught off now in storage somewhere.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>What else are you seeing that seems like it could

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be more effective?

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think at some point, and this is

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>obviously in a far fetched way, many many years in

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the future, we may be able to download people's personality,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>download their brands into some kind of system A computer

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 2>might be too simplistical word, but some kind of extra

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>intelligence system that can then reprogram individualism in a way

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 2>That is not something I would say that you should

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>bank on in your lifetime or mind. I think we're

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 2>far better off focusing on technologies that can extend human

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 2>life as it exists now. And I will add even

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 2>beyond that, we may ultimately have that technology to transfer

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>heads from one individual or a brand from individual into

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>bodies of another, but again we are nowhere near prime

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>time on that. I know there's an Italian sturage, and

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 2>thinking about doing that, I would be very reluctant to

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>try that procedure because not only the possibility will work,

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>which the possibility, what would suffer immensely during the process.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe it was Paul Broca. Somebody actually did

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 1>this with German shepherd dogs, where they cut off one

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>head and attached to the vasculature to the heart of

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>another dog and kept the head alive that way.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if it always broke up, but a

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 2>number of different people have done this over the years,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>with more or less suctatistic with various animals, So the

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 2>theoretical concept is there. There obviously are both a number

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of logistical premises is in terms of attaching neurop tissue,

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and also a large number of ethical dilemmas. It's very

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to say easy, but it's much more

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 2>easy to get decided to accept killing a German shepherd

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to say of another German shepherd.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 3>They get used to kill one person to say of

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 3>another person.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Although as I as I understand it, it's

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea is taking somebody who is brain dead but

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their body is still functioning, and then taking somebody else

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>who has a functioning brain. But let's say they're quadriplegic

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and their body is degrading. So it's somebody who is

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>already judged to be dead by brain dead standards. Is

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the first body?

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I mean that that is the theoretical approach. The

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>obviously both logistical challenges in terms of what if you

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 2>have a mismatch of heads and bodies, and the ethical

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>questions of who this person legally is going forward and

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>how they relate to their one family versus the other

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>inheritance whose fingerprints to the have in a legal sense

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 2>becomes very very complicated, very very quickly. I'm not saying

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 2>this issue can't be solved. I would say we want

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to solve these questions before we start using the technology,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 2>or we're going to find yourself painted into a very

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 2>unpleasant quarter.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So let me come back to that question about

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>how committees at hospitals, how ethics committees make this decision.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.479
<v Speaker 1>You pointed out that ethics committees are made up of

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>many different points of view. What have you seen is

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the most contentious argument that you have come across.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you that speaking more broadly, because I

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want to reveal now Sini's confidential epics debates, but

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 2>historically the most controversial issue in epics committees has related

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to a very specific scenario that occurred over and over

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>again throughout this country from nineteen seventies through the nineteen nineties,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and how to do with patients who were in accidents

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 2>with C three S force bibal fractures so they would

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 2>never be able to breathe again on their own, never

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 2>be able to to move below their neck on their own,

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and they would wake up from his accidents and say,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to live like this, turn my life

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>support off, and palliative care would say we need to

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 2>respect their autonomous wishes. They don't want to suffer. And

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 2>psychiatry would say, but we know that a certain percentage

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of people, approximately half who we do talk into staying

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>alive and do therapy with after a year are actually

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 2>glad they stayed alive and take meaningful value in their life.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 2>And they point out, for example, the Superman actor Christopher

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Reeve and Pallid of Care would cut back and say, yes,

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>but we know that the other half or not, and

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the interest to the other half to not suffer existentially

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 2>outweigh those of the first half to have a meaningful

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>life in the long run. And this was a deeply

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 2>heated debate which there's no conceptually correct answer. You can't

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 2>reduce it to any level where there's a right answer.

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you in practice, palliad of care has

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 2>won misbattle.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Ah And what was it with Christopher Reeve? Which way

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>did he go on that he was happy that he

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>had stay alive.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 3>After a year?

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Even I think before a year he'd was very grateful

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to have stayed live and he brought great meaning to

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 2>his life and helped others. But I will add, if

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>you're Superman and you have a loving family and a

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 2>great deal of financials for it and amazing doctors, it

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 2>may be easier to find that comfort zone than if

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you're indigent. If you don't have social support if you

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 2>don't have good medical care, if you're in a back

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 2>room somewhere in a nursing facility. So I think the

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 2>other major issue that is the end of life, which

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 2>we've only touched on the iceberg tip of the iceberg

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>up so far. He is medical aid and dying, which

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 2>has become a national debate over when, if ever, people

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>can choose to end their own lives. And there's a

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 2>slow consensus building that people with terminal illness, terminal physical

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>illness should be able to end their own lives if

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 2>they have a diagnosis of als or cancer and they're

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 2>not going to survive a prolonged period of time. And

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 2>we've seen from one state, Oregon in the nineteen nineties

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to I believe it's now ten jurisdictions to legalize this,

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and the trend going forward is to expand this. However,

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 2>we have really not come to terms with a question

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 2>of people who are not suffering physically but suffering psychiatrically

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>or existentially. And for example, we've seen this heated debate

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 2>in Colorado over patients with anarettia who have not responded

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 2>to treatment over a very long period of time should

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 2>be able to turn down refeeding or turn down nutritional support,

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 2>even if it means the end of their life, and

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the way we would let a patient with a kidney

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 2>problem turn down dialysis let themselves die.

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to see this question more and more.

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, if you show up in the emergency room and

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 2>you've broken up with your prom date and you take

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 2>it over as a tile and all, I don't think

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 2>any Risgilble person would say, well, you've had a long,

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 2>meaningful life, you should be able to make this decision.

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>On the other head, if you've had depression for forty

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 2>years and you've suffered and no treatment is worked after

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>every intervention and you say, if you could help me,

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 2>I want that, But since you can't, please let me

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 2>in my life.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a harder question.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>And why do you see these questions coming up more

0:35:58.800 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and more?

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think they've come up in part because patients

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 2>are raising these issues and the clinical practice. Patients often

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 2>will say, doctor, I've done everything you've asked me to do.

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm in that very small percentage of people who simply

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>don't respond to treatment, whether it's for psychosis or for

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 2>depression or for anxiety. I wish I did but I've

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 2>waited you out for forty years and there hasn't been

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 2>a new technology. I don't want to wait any longer.

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>And you've actually seen a handful of countries, Canada most recently,

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 2>adopt legalization.

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And so what do hospital ethics committees decide on these

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or is it just a very contentious issue or people disagree?

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's not yet a contentious issue in the United States,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 2>because no American state lets you make this choice yet.

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 2>But I imagine now that Canada and several European countries

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 2>have changed their rules in the last year or two,

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see at least debate over this coming forward.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 3>In the United States.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I were to hear colleges discussing this and this widespread disagreement.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on in the United States? Is medical

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>assistant suicide for someone who is physically ill, right, but

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>not mentally exactly? Okay?

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I will add in all the cases in

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the United States, we do not have a euphenagia program.

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 2>We do not end someone's life if they can't make

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 2>the choice on their own. We only have a program

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 2>where we will prescribe your medication to let you choose death.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 2>When the time comes. In my own experience, having talked

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.919
<v Speaker 2>to many patients, and this may surprise people, be people

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 2>who benefit from this option the most are people who

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 2>never use it and people who know that if things

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>got bad enough, they could make this choice, which actually

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>gives them hope to keep on fighting their illness. It's paradoxical,

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's really a stunning phenomena, fascinating.

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>How does it work? Sorry, so they're prescribed the medication

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that are actually given them, medication where they can pull

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the ripcord if they want to. Is that the idea?

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So a doctor will write you a prescription and

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you fill the prescription after a number of safeguards, an

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 2>interview with a psychiatrist. I mean, you can choose whether

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to take this medication that will end your life in

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a very peaceful way. In some states people actually have

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 2>going away parties, so to speak, where they bring their

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 2>friends and family, which is not that different from how

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 2>death was in the nineteenth century, when people often had

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 2>diseases that were terminal, where they would be on a

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 2>deathbed and their friends and family would come to say goodbye.

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Now we've sanitized death in a way. People die in hospitals.

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I think as a medical resident, the most disconcerting experience

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 2>ever was showing up in a hospital room at five

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 2>in the morning, six in the morning to see a

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 2>patient you've seen the night before, and finding the room empty,

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 2>which the patient had passed away overnight and completely sanitized

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 2>and stripped down, like a hotel room where sometimes even

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 2>they already brought the next patient into the bed, which

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 2>are very different and in some ways dehumanizing process. I

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 2>understand why that may be necessary with the economic forces

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 2>in medicine right now, better than having the living person

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 2>waiting on a gurning and a foyer, but it's still unsettling.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Give me a sense of how people did used to die.

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 2>So often if you had a terminal illness by cancer

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>or heart disease, there were far fewer treatments in there

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 2>are today, So you're running time, so to speak, between

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 2>when you got ill and when you would die and

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 2>when you would make lucidity before you die would actually

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>be longer, so people would have a sense they were dying,

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and they could call their family together. They could call

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the priests for the last rites, or the minister to

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 2>say a blessing or of a rabbi to say farewell.

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 3>They could rewrite their will.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 2>There are all sorts of both cases in mystery novels

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteenth and early twentieth century about rewriting wills.

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 2>And that's because people have this window that we really

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 2>don't have today, because people live until their bodies essence

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>shut down.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I think a related question.

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Is so George Church, who's a biologist at Guganticist d

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard, talked about the prospect of bringing back not

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>just people who've been deceased, bringing back species that have

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 2>been deceased, and specifically human species. I made species like

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Neanderthal man, and that raises a whole set of complex

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 2>related questions of its own, of what rights Neanderthals would

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>have in the context of human society, whether bringing the

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>back would cause them existential suffering, whether they would have

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.479
<v Speaker 2>the same rights as Homo sapiens. But in the relation

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 2>to this context, it also risk the possibility of bringing

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 2>back Neanderthals who are not Homo sapiens and using bare

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 2>bodies to transplant human heads into which might plausibly be

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 2>doable at some point in the future, and raise really

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 2>complex ethical questions.

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you this you're a psychiatrist, among other things,

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what would you do if you were assigned the revivification

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of a Neanderthal man and you were the first person

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in the room when he wakes up. Now, obviously you

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't share the same language, So what would you try

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to do to reduce existential suffering on his part?

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I think first I would try to reduce existential suffering

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 2>on my part by standing behind something very large, because

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 2>my census Neanderthals waking up in this situation might not.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Be very friendly.

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 2>But beyond that, I think the real answers we don't

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 2>know in the same way we don't know how to

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 2>communicate with dolphins, so they may have a very sophisticated

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 2>language of their own. We may have any idea how

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.479
<v Speaker 2>to communicate or appreciate the emotional response of a Neanderthal man.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 2>It's taken us many, many years to understand in a

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 2>most rudimentary way the relationships human beings have with other

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 2>high word er apes like a relige, chimpanzees or arangutans.

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Neanderthals will be intellectually far more sophisticated. Are going to

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.439
<v Speaker 2>be a puzzile we first made them. If we first

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>made them.

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So what would you actually do if you were assigned that.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Job as a psychiatrist. I would probably wait. I would

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 2>probably do nothing until I first see how this revived

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 2>creature responds to me and take cues from them in

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the same way I would do seeing any other patient

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>in the emergency room. And I I am not comparing

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 2>any of my patients to Neanderthal men, though they may

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 2>compare me to one. But I do think it's important

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 2>first take cues from your patients, to take cues from

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>other individuals what they expect from you. And that's what

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the wisest course of action would be.

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Great, God, this is going to be a Hollywood screenplay

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that we should write, Okay, any any other thing.

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think that covers my end of life thinking.

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I have lots of other issues I can always.

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Talk about, but.

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Give me, give me a sense of one.

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure. I think one issue that is related but distinct.

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Is the situation of conjoined twins who wish one twin

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 2>wishes to be separated and the other twin does not

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 2>wish to be separated because of the risk involved in

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the procedure.

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And you have a situation.

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Where one person's life is at stake for the other person,

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the autonomy and welfare of their being is at stake,

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 2>And there's no easy way to resolve that question. And

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 2>it sort of brings to bear all of the different

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 2>ethical issues we have raveled with his society bioethically over

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 2>the last fifty years, and that it's one of the

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 2>only questions in bioethics, by the way, where not only

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>do I not have a path to help people move forward,

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I have no visceral sense of what the right answer

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 2>is either. I feel like if I'm not in that situation,

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't even think about how to approach it.

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Wow, are there other situations where one person's life would

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be in danger if something happened that would help another person?

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>There must be other situations that are analogous.

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean there's the famous case of Shimp versus McFall,

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.439
<v Speaker 2>where there were two cousins and one of them made

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 2>a bone marrow transplant and his cousin was the only

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>person in the entire world with a bone marrow transplant

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that could match him that he needed to save his life.

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:03.879
<v Speaker 2>And he did not have a negative relationship with his cousin,

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>but they weren't particularly close and he went to his

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 2>cousin and said, please give me the bone marrow transplant,

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and the bone mara trus plant was not high risk,

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 2>but it had some risk in some discomfort. And his

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 2>cousin said, no, I don't owe you that. And then

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>he went before the court and said, I'm going to

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 2>die without this bone marrow. It's not that much of

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 2>an inconvenience or risk to my cousin. Please make him

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.919
<v Speaker 2>do it. And the court said no, and I believe

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 2>he died.

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh do you know anything about what the cousin's reasoning

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was beyond the inconvenience.

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think, and I am not an expert in

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 2>his case, but I don't think the cousin had a

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 2>great deal of health literacy. And the cousin was someone

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 2>who was a fairly suspicious of medicing a baseline. So

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 2>no matter how many times you might tell him he's

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>got a high risk procedure, it's not so clear he

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 2>really believed that.

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, incredible, And.

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I will add, by the way, even though that seems

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 2>like a shocking case, every single one of us has

0:44:56.880 --> 0:44:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the ability to save the life of a stranger.

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 3>You can give a a.

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Kidney or part of a liver, and some people do

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 2>altruistically and save someone's life, someone who will otherwise die,

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and the vast majority of us, for reasons, whether wise or.

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Not wise, choose not to. So in some sense we're

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 3>all mister ship.

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we all risk being mister McFall too.

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 3>At some point we should not forget right.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So what do you advise your students on that front?

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think I advised them in the same

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 2>way by advised students about every ethical issue, which is

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you what the right answer is. The

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 2>two things that are important, actually, there are three things

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 2>that are important. The first one is recognized and said

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it is an ethical issue, many of the difficult problems

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 2>that arise in medical ethics, or because no one matter

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 2>how wise or well attention, actually recognize this is an

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 2>ethical challenge. The second thing that's really important is that

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 2>when you start with a certain premise, you want to

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 2>logically come to a conclusion based on that premise. So

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>at some point between your premise in your conclusion a

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 2>miracle happens here, so to speak, you want to.

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Go back to square one.

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 2>And then finally, I say, once you reach those two premises,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the final step is to recognize that very well intentioned

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>people with very good values come to very different answers

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 2>about this questions from starting with different premises and different

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 2>cultural beliefs and values of their own, and the goal

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 2>is to understand them and respect them even if you

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 2>don't agree with them, because they're not fools simply because

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 2>they disagree with you. And I think our society as

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 2>a whole would be a much better place we were

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 2>able to agree to disagree with mutual respect, and we

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 2>actually would be able to find a lot more common

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 2>ground at the corners of a lot of issues where

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 2>there might be a lot of overlap.

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So that was my interview with Jacob Appel, one of

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a very small group of people who can equally address

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>both the medical and legal and ethical aspects of death

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.959
<v Speaker 1>and the complexities at the interface. What I hope you've

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>gathered from today's episode is that the issue of declaring

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>death is not straightforward, and often we find the most

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>complex cases at the intersection of medical and legal systems,

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and zooming out to the beginning, I just want to

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>remind us that although we think of death as binary,

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>it's often much more complex and we are always going

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 1>to be confronted with these problems. As technology improves, we're

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to rescue a life from different

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>states that would have been previously impossible to reverse or

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>even imagine reversing. And so as biology marches along each

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 1>year into the future, the answer to the question of

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>when you are dead is one that will change along

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in lockstep, and in two hundred years we might find

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:54.760
<v Speaker 1>our current answers unpalatable and inconceivable. But in any case,

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in each generation, with each landscape of new technology, we

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>have to con continually revisit this question, where do we

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:12.760
<v Speaker 1>draw the line between life and death? Go to Eagleman

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast for more information and to find

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>further reading. Send me an email at podcasts at eagleman

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.479
<v Speaker 1>dot com with questions or discussions, and I'll be making

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>an episode soon in which I address those. Until next time,

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.