WEBVTT - Week 9 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 125)

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Pros podcast, brought

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to you by bet MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. It is

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>week nine. It is time to talk about our best

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bets for the weekend. And to do that with me

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is Andrew Cayley, senior betting analyst over at Covers. Find

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>him at Twitter at Underscore. No wait, sorry, Saratt, what's

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter handle? And I totally messed up Covered?

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Kley is out Underscore, Kaylee.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I totally messed it up. I totally messed it up

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Covers Underscore Kaylee c A l e Y. We're off

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to a brilliant start, Andrew, despite me mangling your Twitter handle?

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 3>How are you? Thanks for joining me.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing very well. I'm happy that I could figure

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>out all my technology. I was away for a couple

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of weeks from from the betting boards for my wedding

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and a little honeymoons. So ready to get back into

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the action right now. So hopefully I don't disappoint a

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 2>little rusty.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, apologies again.

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I know you had me asked me to be your

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>best man.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't make it.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm really sorry, a very busy weekend for me just

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with the NFL, you know, so well, it's great to

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>have you back. Congratulations like getting married. I'm kidding, obviously,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding. And again, you know we've got some Aaron

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers drama. Last time you were here back in probably

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>week two, and we were doing it during the Monday

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>night football game and before things turned around, which they

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately did in that game. While we were watching, they

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>looked like they were about to lose again and it

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>was the Is Rogers tanking. And now we have the

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing with him going to miss this game with

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen. So this might be your last time on

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast if our Green Bay fans.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Had anything to do with it, because they're going to

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>be pretty pick Yea.

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm unlucky. I'm sorry, I'm sorry.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, it's all right, it's all right, don't

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. All right, So let's get to it.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Three best bets of the weekend for each of us,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>whether we're doing spreads, totals, teamed totals, money line, whatever

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we want. Then we'll very quickly run through the remaining

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>spreads and just talk about if we have a lean

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or if it's a total stay away for both of us.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But first, our latest offware from bet MGM. New customers

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>can bet ten dollars on any team to win an

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL game and win two hundred dollars in free bets.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>If the team they bets on scores a touchdown. That's

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it again, bet ten dollars win two hundred dollars in

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>free bets at the team that you bet on scores

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. That is available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana,

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington, DC, Arizona,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and Wyoming. The code there is Juice one hundred. That's

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the promo code to be able to get that offer again.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Juice one hundred from our podcast, The Daily Juice Daily

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>every single day with Matt Prault.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, very quickly, let's run through last week.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Our guest Ryan Noonan had a nice week two and

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one hit on the Cowboys, getting one and a half

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Vikings the Rams team total over thirty and

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a half, but he did miss on the Bucks slaying

0:02:58.480 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>five and a half to the Saints.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I went one and two again.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, I did hit on the Steelers, getting three and

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Browns, which was my favorite bet,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but I missed on both my totals, the under fifteen

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half in the Bucks and the Saints and

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the under fifty one on the Colts and Titans. That

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>puts me at fourteen and ten on the season fifty

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. So that's fine, but let's do better this time.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Remember I'm going to be using the Betting prosconsensus line

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot Com consensus lines that'll show you lines available

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at all the various books, but also the aggregate of

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all the lines that are there. You can fade us,

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you can follow us, you can do whatever you want.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's get started. Andrew, you are our guests. Please your

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>first selection.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I am going with the Chiefs team total over twenty

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half. I'd take it over twenty eight.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a juice to about minus one depending on the book.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I know the Chiefs look broken right now. It's it's

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>as a guy. I have many shares in Patrick Mahomes

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>in my Dynasty Fantasy football leagues, and it's been a

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>little iffy recently. But there's no Aaron Rodgers this week,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 2>and the total immediately dropped from about fifty five and

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>a half to forty eight and a half forty eight ish,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So a better touchdown he's worth a better touchdown. But

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying not to look at what the Rogers being

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 2>gone will mean to the game overall, and I'm just

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>going to try to focus on the Chiefs and that

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 2>makes it a little easier for me. Like as they said,

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs obviously look broken on offense, but I'm going

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to give them a little bit more faith for at

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>least one more week. The Packers have already lost several

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 2>key guys on defense this year, and that's a defense

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>that rings twenty second in Dvoa right now. And now

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>they have the several more guys who are questionable over

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Elier this week, and now we get the Jordan Love experience,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not sure what we're gonna get out of

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the pan. If we get I expect him to give

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs at least one, if not multiple short fields,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 2>So I think that could help their scoring a bit

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in this game as well, And I think they're going

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to want to show that they're not broken anymore. But

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 2>what I've seen My biggest issue from what I've seen

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 2>from the Chiefs right now is that Pafrick Mahomes is

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 2>me moving out of the pocket too quickly right now.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And I understand why. I get it. That offensive line

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 2>has been pretty terrible, but it's been so terrible to

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 2>point now. He's moving before the pressure gets there, and

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 2>he's running around and he's forcing frozy. He's always forced

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>throw tea shut and he has that ability and he

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>trusts his arm a little too much at times, but

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>it's been to the extreme at this point. So I

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 2>think that the Packers aren't going to get much of

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>a pass rush on him in this game, so he'll

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>be able to settle down a little bit more and

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>just trust his arm a bit, and they'll be able

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>to show that there's still a team that needs to

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 2>fear on offense this week. So we're gonna go over

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven and a half team total.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't try you on this one.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And really, I well, here's the thing. Why didn't they

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>show it this week? I mean a Monday night football

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>game at home against the Giants. That seems like the shot, right,

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That seems like this is where they're gonna get, right,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what they're gonna do, and they looked as

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>broken as ever. I mean, is this just the you know,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the Packers don't get a great pass rush the Giants

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>zone either generally speaking, but the Packers don't get a

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>great pass rush and they're injured, and you just kind

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of expect, because you have so much faith in what

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>they've done in the past, that they're just gonna happen

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to get right in this.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 2>But the Leonard Williams is that's the type of thing

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 2>that the Bucks did well. You go right up the

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>middle and you get them, you get them out of

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.239
<v Speaker 2>the pocket right away. And I agree, yes, they probably

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>should have done it against the Giants as well, but

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>this is I think this is just a spot where

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a get right spot for them, and I

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 2>think they'd do it. And I it's still trust what

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 2>I see in the talent on that team. I still

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 2>think they're well coached. I think Andy Reid is kind

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 2>of like overthinking things a little bit with some of

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>these goal line plays at times that that does trouble

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>me a little bit. Like they'll be running these draws

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>on first and goal from the nine where they get

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>zero yards and then they do a trick play and

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 2>then you're like, oh, it's just a regular pass, Like,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>just do your regular play. Sets in the goal to

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>go situation and they'll be fine. That they have the

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 2>talent they have that they can do it. They just

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>have to trust themselves a little more, and I think

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they do that well.

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope you are correct. I'm going to be

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>watching this from the sidelines. I'd like the Chiefs to

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>get right, and again I have faith that they will eventually,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>like because Mahomes is too good, Read.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Is too good.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But for now, I'm just going to watch it from

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines. But I am really interested to see what

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this game looks like right now. I think the spread

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>has jumped from one and a half to seven and

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a half when the move is made there at the quarterback,

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So I look forward to watching. I'm going to take

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a game that I know you were on as well,

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I feel good that I took it,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>except for the fact that the spread is moving in

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a crazy fashion, which isn't surprising given the injuries. So

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I will take where the consensus line is at the

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>time that we make this pick, which is the.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Forty nine ers. Now laying two to the Cardinals.

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, I will tell you that I have so much

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>action on this game because it was originally the Cardinals

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>laying two and a half to the forty nine Ers.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So I have teased the forty nine ers up already

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>twice in two different teasers to eight and a half.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Then when it went to one and a half, I

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>tease them up to seven and a half. Now, when

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I was doing this this morning, it was the forty

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>nine ers laying one. The consensus line is now two.

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>There are still some ones out there, some one and

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 3>It's at two.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. I'm willing to do it, but it takes

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>away my money line bet. So again it's moving because

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of the injury concerns. I'm sure again we're doing this

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, before the Thursday night football game. Neither Kyler

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Murray nor DeAndre Hopkins practice this week. There was a

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>report earlier in the week did they expect Kyler Murray

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to go? But even if he goes, he's going to

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>be extremely limited. But even without that, okay, like take

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that away, give them full strength. I still kind of

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>think the forty nine ers are going to win this game. Regardless. First,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>they should have beaten them last game, right, I mean,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. They had Trey Lance right starting his

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first start. They almost scored, you know, they got stuffed

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at the goal line. They couldn't convert a fourth down.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>They were very close throughout that. They wound up losing

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen to ten, but easily a game that they could win.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The forty nine ers are getting healthier. Everything I've seen

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>suggest that George Kittle is going to be able to

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>make it back for this game, which not only helps

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>their passing game, but also helps their running game because

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>he's such a good blocker. Elijah Mitchell returned to practice today.

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel is still working on the side, but again

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he was battling the calf thing last and last week,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and he did play. Jim and Garoppolo look good. Brandon

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Ayukuz coming along a little bit more so. I think

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>their offense here is just getting better and there is

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>regression coming for the Cardinals, and we started started seeing

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it last week. JJ Watson jury actually is you know,

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>does have an impact, especially on the run. Cliff Kingsbury

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>entire his entire career is based around tanking in the

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>second half, like you look at his college career, look

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at his pro career. This is what his teams do.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like, all right, we're just gonna basically play, you know,

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, a three you know, win one out of

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>every three games down the stretch here and then we

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, the injury concerns are really massive, because even

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>if I thought Somer Francisco was going to win this game, regardless,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not as much Hopkins.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a big deal.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>A J.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Green's obviously on the COVID list. We don't know if

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play, but it's Murray, and it's the fact

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that it's his ankle, and if you take away Murray's mobility,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's worth so many points in a spread, which is

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>why it's moving so significantly. So you know, for me,

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a spot where it just feels like the

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers are gonna kind of go on a

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>mini run here. They got the Rams next week, so

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>who knows, But it just feels right now like the

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>bill is coming due a little bit for the Cardinals

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and with a bang up Murray, as long as it

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>stays under a field goal, please come on.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going on the bad side of doubtful Murray.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and it's just the backup I believe is

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 2>still a little inside of it is Chris Streveler, the

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 2>former CFL quarterback and the last he is. He was

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>on the Gray Cup champion Winnipeg Blue Bombers before Kingsbury

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 2>signed him. But he's like he has a big arm,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 2>but he's mostly they used him on the goal line

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>to like rush in touchdowns and he had twelve touchdowns

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in Uh. Is it still is McCoy the number two listed?

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I think it's I was just chelling.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh god, I had it wrong because

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was Colt McCoy.

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>He is on the team.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I I I don't know.

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Actually, to be fair, I guess that's true.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether or not.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, I think we can safely say that it's

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a minor downgrade from Kyler Murray. Whoever it is. Yeah,

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's really what it is. And again, yeah, I was

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 3>His his week.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>His injury was originally called like a one to three

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>week thing. So the fact that they thought he was

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>going to play is fine. And if you're the Cardinals,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>really because you're seven and one, this is a spot

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to rest him, I think, even against the divisional opponent.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I know you want to hold off the Rams, but

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got long term plans here. This isn't the spot

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think where you let that defensive line go after

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>him and possibly injure him more.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>So if he sits.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But even if he plays at this point, you know

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to be anywhere close to one hundred percent.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>So if you were listening to this and the spread

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is still under a field goal pounded and again God

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>helped me. If the forty nine ers lose this game

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>now with yeah, I have and if they lose it

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>badly because I have so many teasers Andrew that I

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>got just past when it was until it got past one,

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, give me seven, give me them getting

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, give me them an eight and

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Another one that I know we discussed a little bit

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>off there that we were both on the same side here.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going Chargers and I I have it down

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>as minus too because it's the same thing less than

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 2>a field goal. But now I'm seeing minus one a

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of places. I don't know if that okay, Yeah,

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 2>it's still too okay. But I have been hearing that

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Sharps have been all over the Eagles the last few weeks,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like the trend is continuing this week

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>because I just saw the line. I saw it too,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, that seems wrong to me. It

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 2>just it just felt wrong. The Chargers are the better

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>coach team by a mile. I think I have no

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>way to Nick Sirianni at all when it comes to

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>leading that team. They have a better quarterback than Justin Herbert. Yes,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>he's been struggling, I give him a little pass. Like

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the Phil Checks just seems to have the Chargers number,

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and he just knows how to deal with young quarterbacks

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 2>better than most, or at least coaching against young quarterbacks

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>better than most. And I think this is another guy

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>who's gonna get a bit of a get right spot

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 2>against an Eagles defense that I think is a little

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>overrated and also a little banged up. At the same time,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers also don't even have to deal with the

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>West Coast. Hey, we've got to play early, and we

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>have a morning game that it's in the late time slot,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 2>so it's a normal two pm start for them. Sort

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 2>of thing, so I don't really get it. So obviously

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a very square play, and I've seen a lot

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 2>of early public people on it. Call me square, I guess,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 2>but I just love this number. I think the Chargers

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>win it by by at least a fuel goal, so

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy. I'll happily take the minus two minus one.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you're gonna give me, I'll take it with them.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me as just kind of a very very

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>classic Bilo sell high. Right, everybody's off the Chargers because

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they look bad last week against New England. The Eagles

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>finally dominated a game, you know, against the Lions. So look,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right, it's got to count as half a win

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at best. I like the Eagles, I always have. I

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like they should be better. It was nice to

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>see them win. But yeah, this is very simple, and

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I mean the four o'clock time, you know,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the start for that. It's a pretty big deal because

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a thing for West Coast teams a lot

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of times to come east and take a one o'clock game.

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Their internal clocks just aren't right. This makes it a

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>little easier, and I do think that the Chargers are

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>just a better team. And again they're four and three.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>They've lost a couple here, but Staley's great and he

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>has them playing the right way. So you know, I

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the Eagles defense is strong enough to

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, make Herbert uncomfortable. So I think

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with that, I do think that they win by more

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>than field goal. I agree, as long as it's thunderfield goal,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I would have taken it. Yeah, the way it works,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I've told everybody, like I get from our guests ever

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>since week one, where Sean was sort of doubling up

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on all the same picks. I get the guests just

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>today three, so I don't have it. And then when

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you get we can tell the public. I mean, were

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you were gonna take Miami laying six and a half,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>But then, of course we learned that Tarrod Taylor is

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>going to start.

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>That changed the equation.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So in between I said, all right, well you were

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna change I said, all right, well I'm taking San

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and I saw that one from you. But you

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>did mention this, and I would have taken this as well,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So we are on the same side. I'm interested in

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>hearing your thoughts on my next pick, because this one

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was something where when I first saw the line, I

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was on the other side, and then I dug into

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit and I came out with the

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns getting two and a half from the Bengals. This

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>feels like the line is out there begging you to

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>take the Bengals right Like maybe they think that the

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>public's going to be a little off the Bengals because

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they lost to the Jets, but I feel like it's

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>much more about how can anybody want to back the

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns right now because of all the drama they lost

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Steelers and you've got the Odell Beckham junior

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on. So this strikes me as if you're

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>giving a team like the Bengals, who I think the

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>public's really excited about despite the Jets loss and laying

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>less than field goal to the Browns who are in disarray,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just begging you to take the Bengals. And that's

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>why I'm gonna take the rounds. I'm gonna wait because

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not gonna move anywhere. I'm gonna hope

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that it gets to three. I don't think it will.

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm gonna wait, so if you're in on this,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I would wait.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So if they're I haven't seen. I haven't seen the

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>actual betting numbers, so these are for These are free

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 2>play numbers for anyone who doesn't know. So it's not actual,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not actual money wagers, but it's still a gauge.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Like we have a pretty advanced, advanced community, and I

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>would say an intelligent betting community, and they're they're on

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals right now. But it was something I noticed

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>about the Bengals and that losses that they did not

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>actle very well in that Jets game, and I expect

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>that the Browns are just say here you go, Nick

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Chubb and let them let him do.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>His You are, you're doing my work for me, man,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I love it well.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I will say that again.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>We have the bet analyser over at Betting Pros as well,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a bunch of people from around the

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>industry who make picks and submit picks, including me, and

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they're right in line with what you have from covers,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>which is seventy six percent are taking the Bengals. So

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind that.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind being there.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, there's no reason not to wait, like it's

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere. It's it's certainly not going down. Maybe

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it gets to three. So again, wait and if it

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>gets to three, that's gonna be my official player, right

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>because I have said that you should wait everybody for

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the record. It's on there, and if I tell you

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>if it goes down to two, that'll be my wherever

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it is by the time we close, That's where I'm

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna take it. But I think what it is is

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bengals are overrated, man like that. That's

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what it boils down to. I think the Browns just

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, like looking at the entire team versus

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire team, I think the Browns are a better team.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And you look at just DVOA, right, not the be

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.239
<v Speaker 1>all end all, but the total overall DVA Browns are

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>six and the Bengals are twenty first. And then you know,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so the Brown's a had a lot of injuries that

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they've dealt with for most of the season, but they're

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot healthier. I think their offense plays well,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it, you know, I think that you know,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals have issues tackling. I think that they're going

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of Nick Chubb here as he's

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>healthier after coming back last week. And I think I

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put too much stock into like the

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>mental part of it, but Odo Beckham Junior is not

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>going to play here.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 3>It's been a huge distraction.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me as a rallying cry for a team

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that's very good and needs sort of a point to

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>come together, and that kind of is what I think

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see here.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 3>And again, I backed the Steelers correctly.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Against the Browns last week, and one of the big

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>things I had was that the Steelers are able to

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>get pressure without blitzing. That is something that really messes

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up Baker Mayfield. You've just seen it throughout his career.

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not what the Bengals do. The Bengals don't get

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a ton of pressure. Twenty four point nine percent pressure rate,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's like middle of the road. And again, with the

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Browns getting a little healthier on the offensive line, at least,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think their offense is going to do well. Conversely,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>again selling the Bengals a little bit, you know, I

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think really their you know, their record is good obviously,

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think their reputation is inflated a little bit

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>because of that beatdown of the Ravens. They've lost to

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, they beat the Jaguars by three, and they've

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Bears. Okay, this is not a dominant

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>team by any means. And Burrow is sort of like

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, by the way, is that he struggles when

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you get pressure without blitzing, sort of, you know, like

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I figured the Steelers would. The Browns are pretty much

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the same. Twenty seven point eight percent pressure rate that's

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>fifth in the league, but just a twenty one point

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>seven percent blitz rate that's eleventh lowest in the league.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's how you get to Burrow. Javian Clowney didn't practice.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's gonna play, but Miles Garrett

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna play, and that's really what you need to

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get the pressure. So I don't know, man, this is

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a spot for me for the Browns. The money line

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>is plus one fifteen. It's you know whatever. I'll probably

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle on that because if you're going to take a

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>short dog, you might.

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>As well sprinkle the money line. But I'm gonna go

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>with the Browns.

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And I realize, like you said, I'm in the minority here,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know, man, After looking at it for

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a while, I actually think the Browns escape here. And

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>again the homefield advantage, by the way, it doesn't really

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>mean anything when it's Cincinnati versus Cleveland in the divisional game.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, so.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to money football and I am We've you

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>talked a bit about the Steelers there a second ago,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'm actually going to fade the Steelers this week. Again,

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I think these are two okay teams. That's a good

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>way to do. I think the Steelers are a little

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 2>more okay than the Bears at this point. Obviously, the

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Steelers got their big win last week, but their big

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 2>win it's the stead of them scoring to fifteen points

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and he's on his He's said it looked to me

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 2>it looks like his arms hanging by a thread for

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the most part. And I just don't see them covering

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>six and a half points they've been at the Sealers

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>have been a terrible bet as a favorite so far,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and I expect that to continue against a team like

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>the Bears. And while they do get the Steelers do

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>get good pressure. Some One who can handle pressure is

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Justin Fields, who can improvise and make

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 2>things happen with his legs like we saw last week.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 2>And I expect this to be another low scoring game. Obviously,

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the total is only forty, so it's expected to be

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 2>a low scoring game, and will them there is Obviously

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not a double digit. But you're getting almost a feel,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 2>almost a touchdown with the Bears, and that's pretty much

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>as simple as it as it is for me. I

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 2>like getting all these points with the Bears. I like

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the dynamic play of Justin Fields. I'm a big Justin

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Fields guy. I really hope they start. Oh I was.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I was really big coming with him coming into the draft.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought he should have been the number two guy

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>taken after after Lawrence. But hopefully I didn't mind not

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>seeing Maggie on the sideline. I think he would benefit

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>from a little another guy who would benefit from a

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>different head coach as well. But if they just let him,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I think so as well. But if they just kind

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>of like let him loose, I think he can do

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>do enough against this Steelers defense to keep this one

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>close and to cover that six and a half point spread.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 2>So I just don't have it mostly a Steelers offense thing. Don't.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't see them being able to cover a six

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and a half point spread at this point. So that's

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>why I'm on the dogs in this one.

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not on the other side.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I will promise you that there's no way you can

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>back the Steelers as six and a half point favorites.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, follow Mike Tomlin.

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not a spot you back a Mike Tomalin mud

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Steelers team, for sure. And I agree they can't score,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the Bears still have a passable defense.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a close game here,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and I like the under as well. Like I understand

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the unders low, I'm not betting it, but at forty

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's going to be low.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 3>And you're right. Whenever you see a spread that's creeping

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>up towards.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>A touchdown with a total that low, something is off there,

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with you there. So if I had

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to pick a side, I would go with the Bears

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and again hopefully even with naggy back, they

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to roll out fields and let him use his

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>legs because the game plan last week was a game

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>changer for him and clearly accentuated his strength. So I'm

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna run away from it. I'm going to a

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>total for my last one. It's not exciting, but I've

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>been recommending a lot of unders on this podcast, as

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>our our listeners remind me, So I am going to

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>go over, and I missed a couple in a row,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to go with an over one here,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's the Vikings and the Ravens over forty nine

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and a half. This whole thing just strikes me as

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a high scoring game when I looked into it. The

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Ravens should put up a ton of points after the bye.

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>They're always good under Harbaugh after a bye, the offense

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>getting healthier. Rashad Bateman is fully there. I guess Sammy

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Watkins probably will come back, and the Minnesota defense, and

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this is really what doesn't for me.

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 3>They're just absolutely destroyed by injuries, like they're.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Just forget about how how poorly they had played. Regardless

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>no Daniel Hunter. That's a huge loss for them, obviously.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson already on I don't think Cam Downson is

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>going to suit uphu miuspractice again today. Michael Pierce may

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>still not play. They're just they're devastated. I see the

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Ravens basically being able to score almost at will. And

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings obviously had a tough game offensively, you know,

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>last week there, but this is sort of a good

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>matchup for them because the one thing that Kirk Cousins

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really does well is he does very well against the blitz.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>That's just kind of his m O. And the Ravens

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't really care. They're not going to stop blitzing

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because a quarterback does well. They blitz all the time,

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fifth highest clip in the league. And this is sort

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of when I buy Kirk Cousins and the Vikings when

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they look like crap the week before and it looks

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like they can't do anything, and then they're gonna come

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>up and they're gonna put up thirty two points. So

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not taking them against spread, but I think there's a

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of scoring in this one, So I'm going to

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>go with the over forty nine and a half.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 3>There are some fifties out there.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with fifty as well, but my official play

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is forty nine and a half.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, quickly, what do you think of that one?

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>He's instant pressure on a team for a team, and

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's really tough to see that, and while

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I am not a Kirk Cousins guy, that's the numberson

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 2>saying that he's been at least okay, this is yearlight,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, and this is not the Ravens defense we've

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 2>been we've been accustomed to over there, So if you

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>had to make me take a bed here, it'd probably

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>be the over.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I am making you take a bet, and you are

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 3>taking the over, so we're good, all right. Very quickly,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 3>let's recap.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Chiefs team total over twenty seven and

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>a half, the Chargers laying two to the Eagles, and

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bears getting six and a half from the Steelers.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the forty nine Ers now laying two to

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, which just keeps moving right now, the Browns

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>plus two and a half against the Bengals, but again,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>if it goes to three, I get it because I'm

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>not betting it yet. And the Vikings and Ravens over

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and a half. Very quickly, let's run through

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the remaining spreads. How do you feel about the Bills

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>laying fourteen and a half to the Jaguars in Jacksonville?

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Probably have to take the flour or lay the points. There.

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville is a complete stay away from me, like you

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 2>can Faye Jacksonville, I think can just be pretty happy

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 2>with that to the way the situation is going there.

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I just no faith in what the Jags are doing

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>right now. So and the Bills, I think, obviously Josh

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Allen is going to try to make a little noise

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not he should actually be the MVP

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 2>of the league this year. So you see a big

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 2>game from Josh Allen, I expect.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm in agreeing with you.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no way I could back the whereas under any circumstances.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I will also say that eighty nine percent of our

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>experts are taking the Bills laying the points. So there

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you go, Tennessee visiting the Rams on Monday night football.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe no Sunday Night football seven and a half

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are laying What.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there is another one of these weird ones,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't think the Titans will be able to

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>stop the Rams, but I still think it's too many

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>points of probably getting more than a touchdown. The team

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that I think is probably better than that, Like I'll

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 2>probably I'll side with the underdog here. Well, I'll just

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>say it. We're taking the underdog plus seven and a half.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I like more than the touchdown in this spot.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like it when it first came out. It

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with seven and I had the rams there and more

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown. I need to dig into it. Just

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that Titans have some magic man. Even without Derek Henry,

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they managed to keep things close. So I'm going to

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>sit out for now on it. I need to rethink.

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But more than a touchdowns really hard to refuse. He

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>already talked about the Chargers and the Eagles. We already

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about the Browns and the Bengals. How about an

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. It's a lot tough because we don't know

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be a quarterback. But the Patriots are

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Panthers, and the Patriots are laying three and

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a half points.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Probably the pass Darnald just has, even if he is

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>able to go in this game, he has taken. He

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 2>has reverted to your Sam Donald of the Jets, and

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 2>as it looked so great to the last I still

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 2>don't understand why they don't try to get Robbie Anderson

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the ball more. Obviously, Tuba Hubbard is not Christian McCaffrey

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>and that hurts, and they've had some injuries on defense

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 2>as well. So the Patriots are playing well, they're gonna

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 2>have a shot out of playoff spot, so it would

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>probably be the past. I'd like it to be three.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd prefer three, and I think it was three at

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 2>one point. Yeah, but some paths was come in obviously,

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 2>so a little less happy about that. Yeah.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if it's p J.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Walker, I can't back that. I mean, really, how much

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of a downgrade could he be from Donald at this point?

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 3>But I think I lean towards the Panthers.

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think just their defense right now, well as it's

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>getting so much healthier. I really think it's going to

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be tough for the page. I mean, I wouldn't mind

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the under. It's a low total, obviously, but I think

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if I had to pick, I might just take the

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>hook with the Panthers. But it's it's certainly a stay

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>away from me. We didn't talk about the side on

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this one, but Baltimore laying six to.

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>The Vikings, I'd stay away.

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would stay away as well. And this could

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>strike me as a game that the Vikings could keep close.

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be high scoring, that's the one thing

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, so we'll go with that. Dallas is laying

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ten points to the underdog.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>There's I know, I know the Broncos have been a

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 2>bit of a disaster in the in the second month season.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 2>But the Cowboys, I guess the Cowboys, I know they're good,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and I know Dak is back, and it's just I

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have faith in them to cover a double digit spread.

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 2>So we're gonna go with the underdogs. And I know

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>the they just got rid of Bond Miller. The Broncos

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>got rid of von Miller, but.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 3>And Bryce Calaan is injured.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But still, I just think it's too many points.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to have to take them.

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I probably won't, but it's a hold your nose and

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>take the Broncos, right, Yeah.

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, This one's an interesting one.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders, who obviously, you know, are dealing with everything

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that they've got there visiting the Giants and they're laying

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>three points to the Giants.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that brings them together? They have kind

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 2>of a bringing together move for the team, Like obviously

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>they're not trying to win it for Henry Ruggs or

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 2>anything like that, but it could gell them a bit

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Giants obviously a bit of a letdown. They're

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 2>coming up a bit of a letdown, almost beating the Chiefs,

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and then you come home. Sometimes that's the spot where

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>you kind of get spanked. I probably side with the

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Raiders here. They have played well since or played better

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 2>again since Gruden's been gone, so I probably lean that way.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm surprised. I mean, I don't know.

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't you didn't know how the Raiders were going

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to react when Gruden left, and they rallied so they

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>could rally here. But are a much better team than

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. I mean, that's the bottom line. Giants are

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in a short week, and regardless of who is or

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is not healthy, I mean, we assume Saquon Barkley's not

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to play this game regardless.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 3>So I have to go with their Raiders.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But it does feel a little bit like a trap,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like the spread should be more like

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>four or four and a halfs, So I feel like

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's asking us to take the Raiders. But I'm gonna

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>walk into the trap. It's fine if I have to.

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>H What do you think about the Saints at home?

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Link six and a half to the Falcons.

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually looking at the under there. This was the

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>other one I was tossing up before, and I was like,

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>you were saying all your unders, though, I was like this, Oh,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I was wondering if he was gonna take this one

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know what. The Saints weren't exactly electric

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>with Jamis Wilson under which with Jameis Winston under center,

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and now it's it sounds like Taysom Hill is gonna

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>be the guy obviously. I mean, played pretty well last

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 2>week in their win against the Bucks, but I'm not

0:30:55.840 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>expecting that to really continue. And Matt Ryan as obviously,

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that's no Calvin Ridley for him anymore. It's the Falcons

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>offenses has been an absolute mess. So I think this

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 2>is like a twenty to seventeen kind of game, and

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I will happily take the under.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't argue with that. I don't want any

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>piece of this of the side at all. I'm staying

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>far away from it. What do you think about the

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs link seven and a half to the Jordan Love

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lead Packers been.

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Just such a bad bath. It's so terrible, like they

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>should like they should cover, they should have covered last

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>week we did. We were talking about this. I don't

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I would stay away from this. I'll maybe u I'll

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe put a few chiefs teezers, like.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>You got to tease it down, exactly, you got it's

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>begging you to tease it down. I don't care. I've

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>got to tease it down, which I have in several

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>spots I've teased it down. Ah, the Dolphins laying I

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's our last game. Yeah, the Dolphins like five

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half now with with Torod Taylor there to

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the Texans in that.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Like you mentioned, I liked the Dolphins when it was

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be Davis Mills there because the exits haven't been

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>defending the pass that well recently. And two was actually

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 2>thrown the ball well against bad teams. When he has

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>not played the Bills of the Patriots this year, he's

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 2>played fairly well, and I thought he would have kind

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of a nice like comeback game for him. But with mister,

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Tyron's covered eight straight games that he started

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and you're giving him all those points. He lost a

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>couple there, but it's a weird. The Dolphins now give

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>me a weird feeling, and it's a big stay away

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>for me.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm staying away from it too.

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I like some props in this game, like I've got

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the over Devonte Parker receiving props. That's where I think

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go, Oh yeah, we didn't.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Talk about that.

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you want to give a prop? Because I know

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we had said, oh do we want to? We want

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to stay away from it right now.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I didn't dive deep enough into any

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 2>of this year to really to really get ones that

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I feel really confident about.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>If you want more props, okay, if you want props,

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I do as video that I recorded earlier today with

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>my five favorite props at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead and subscribe. And also I give Matt Perolt.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna be able to be on the Betting

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Pros livestream on Sundays at eleven this week.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I've got to do a Fantasy Pros one.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Sorry about that, but I will give Matt a couple

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite player props. But Devonte Parker receiving yards prop,

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the over that you want on that one? All right,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>very good? I like your picks. Let me recap them

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>one more time, just so everybody has everything together.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>You've got the Chiefs team total over.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Twenty seven and a half, the Chargers laying two to

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles, and the Bears getting six and a half

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>from the Steelers. I've got the forty nine Ers laying

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>two to the Cardinals, the Browns getting two and a

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>half from the Bengals, and the Vikings.

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 3>And the Ravens over forty nine and a half.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Andrew, you have a very busy Thursday night football ahead

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of you, as I know, so just very quickly tell

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody where they check out all your great work, and

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>then let's schedule another time where we want Aaron Rodgers

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to have some sort of drop perfect.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 2>You can find me on Twitter at Covers Underscore Kaylee.

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Lots of football at this point obviously, and some Raptors

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>stuff as well. And I'm covering the Raptors pretty exclusively

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 2>from a betting perspective as well. So if you if

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 2>you're into the NBA and the Raptors, I'm gonna be

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>your guy.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's too bad I'm missing out on all your

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays bets, but that was a favorite part of

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>my baseball season. In the meantime. Congratulations so much on

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>getting married and your honeymoon. Again, very sorry I missed it.

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I hopefully you know I can be there when you

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>need a.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Godfather for your future child. You're on the short list,

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 3>all right, my friend.

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I love it of course. Again, thank you for joining us.

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody again. Check out the live stream on Sunday morning,

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven am to noon Eastern on YouTube dot com slash

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros. Until then, I'll talk to you again on

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Monday when we look at the early week ten NFL lines.

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 3>I will talk to you though

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 2>It is