WEBVTT - Full Episode - Both Parties Point Fingers… And Fix Nothing + What Does A Winning Democratic Coalition Look Like In ‘28?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by Ethos and what Ethos does is it helps you

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>find life insurance. Let me tell you why life insurance

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bailed me out. My father died when I was sixteen.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a lot of money when it happened,

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were in a pretty tough financial spot after

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. I'm an only child. Suddenly my mother's single,

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>single mother. She had a job, suddenly lost a job,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for another job, and we were struggling. You know,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad didn't leave us in the best financial situation,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but he did make one purchase. He bought a life

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy. Wasn't a huge chunk of change, but it

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was enough when we found it. And when I say

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we found it, meaning we went through his desk and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we found, oh, look at this, let's see if there's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>anything here. And it helped us out at a time

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we really needed it. And that's why I think

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>it's important that if you can, especially if you have

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>young children, if you can get life insurance, you should

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get it. Life is full of unexpected emergencies, unexpected things happen.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It is an extra bit of security, something you can

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>leave and help out at a time when you're not

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there to help. So what does Ethos do well? Ethos

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>makes getting life insurance fast and easy, and it's one

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent online. You can get a quote in seconds,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you can apply in minutes, and you can get same

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>day coverage. They will find you the right fit. There's

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no medical exam. You just answer a few simple health

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>questions online. You can get up to three million dollars

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and some policies are as low as thirty

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, and you'll get your lowest rate from

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their network of trusted carriers. So take ten minutes to

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>free quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. That is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>e Thos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and rates may vary. Hello Aaron, Welcome to another episode

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Chuck Podcast. Let me give you a quick

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>rundown of what we have for today's episode. Look, I've

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>got a little more fallout from the events on Saturday

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and frankly a laments, I'm not gonna lie to Yeah,

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, I know we're all shocked that

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>our leaders aren't meeting the moment, but our leaders aren't

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting the moment. Let's not take our eye off the

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>ball of Iran. We have just hit essentially a new

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>high and gas prices since the start of this war.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>We're now at a high on gas prices that we

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>had to deal with at the start of the Ukraine

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Russian War. The problem here is that there doesn't seem

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a near term solution on the horizon. Then

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a bunch of political updates. We have a

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>new house map in Florida. It's a fascinating new map.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>My quick headline is this is a great map for

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in a presidential year. This is a shaky map

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans in a midterm year, particularly a midterm year

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>where they could where they're the party in power. I

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>will dig into that a few Senate race developments, and

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>then my conversation today is with Atima Omara. She's the

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>author of a new book called The Instigators. It's basically

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about the role black women in particular have played as

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of the leading voices inside the Democratic Party at

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>least in the twenty first century. But there's also more

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>historical elements here. A Teama is not necessarily a full

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>time historian. She's a political strategist. She has been in

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:18.519
<v Speaker 1>the trenches on democratic politics and on the politics of

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the African American community, and she's got some

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting insights. We talk a lot about sort of twenty

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, the future, what the future of the party is,

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the very splits and divides. Plus her book. Just trust me,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're a political junkie're trying to understand where it's

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party headed, you know what could work, what

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>might not work. This good conversation for you. I think

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to enjoy it. Obviously, it's Wednesday, so it's

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Top five day, and I've got a fun little take

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on a top five list today. The top five races

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that are that are the most dangerous for Donald Trump

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to cement lame duck status. Right, The test of his

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>political strength inside the Republican Party is these are five

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican primaries that will tell us how lame the duck

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Oval office is these days. Right, So I

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to enjoy that. And Plus I'm gonna

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>take some questions. But let me begin with a lament.

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And I know this isn't a shock or a surprise,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is still striking to me over the last

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of days that you know, to see what didn't happen.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>After last Saturday night's events, we had a man show

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>up at the White House Correspondent Center armed had written

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a manifesto anti Trump's screed. He was stopped at a

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>security checkpoint, and the response from the White House has

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially been, well, we should tighten security and build my ballroom.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's the Democrats and the left's fall. And that

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>tells you something because there was a time in this

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 1>country not that long ago, when something like this would happen.

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>A president in particular would treat it very differently. There

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>would have been an attempt, at least in an attempt

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to study the country to lower the temperature, like what

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush did after nine to eleven, making it

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>crystal clear that the United States was not at war

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>with Islam. Right, there was an important he had to

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>say it, and it took an American president to say it.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>There isn't there was nobody else that could say it

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that would have any sort of meaning beyond the President

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>of the United States in that moment. Presidents are in

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>charge of the thermostat of the political temperature of the

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>country period, and he chose to turn down the thermostat,

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>saw what was building, feared what was building, and he

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>turned down that thermostat. But we haven't really had that moment, right,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they even had the moment where this president said this

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't who we are, this is not acceptableybe, it's time

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to take a breath here. I know we've all allowed

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>political rhetoric to get out of hand, right, And yet

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not the instinct right now, is it? And that's

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the problem. So instead of reltigating how we got here,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's part of the problem, right, that

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody feels pretty confident that they're right and the other

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>side is wrong. I have felt it. I wrote sort

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of a similar thing on in my column this week

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for Newsphere and substat that essentially argued that, look, we're here,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, yes, there's no doubt that Donald Trump's

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>arrival in twenty fifteen accelerated this moment, but that doesn't

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>excuse the behavior now on the laugh to just say, well,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>donald Trump started eight, you'r reporce you. So that's not

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>good either. So that's why you know, we can re litigate.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's definitely nobody can deny how this began,

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>but everybody's in charge of their own behavior here. And

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I still believe ultimately it takes a president, and we

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>may have a president who is not interested in turning

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the temperature down. But here's the simplest way I can

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>explain it, because we've produced a new kind of political

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>environment that's quite scary. For years, we treated certain rhetoric

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as performance. And I know we're going to go through

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this again, and some of you may roll your eyes, Oh,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been through here before. Yeah, we have, and apparently

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't learned the lesson, so we've got to keep

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>going here, right, But we treated the rhetoric that's campaign stuff,

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and there was you know, you know, I think, frankly,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a higher tolerance than most right because I'm

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>used to heated campaign rhetoric. It's crowd stuff. It's right

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the WWE and that's what Trump thinks, that

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he's doing it for entertainment purposes and things like that.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't really mean it, and I believe that. I

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think he really meant it. But that's me. That

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean what other people and then there are people

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that act in his name that did mean it right.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But when this has started to when this is when

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this starts happening at scale over time, it stops being

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>performance and it gets turned into a permission slop and

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then after a while becomes something bigger, becomes the environment itself.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We can trace that shift pretty quickly. Right. We know

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump didn't invent anger in politics, but he absolutely

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>changed what was acceptable to say out loud, punching protesters,

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>carrying them out on stretchers, personalizing everything, turning all personal

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>opponents into enemies. Many of us felt it personally. And

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, with fellow Republicans who are not MAGA members,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>many of them don't speak out for fear. Out of fear.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, I've had every single mainstream reporter has had

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this conversation with an elected Republican, every single one in Washington.

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>We all all have an off the record, and I

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have multiple off the record conversations with elected Republicans essentially

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>saying I don't call it out because you have no

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>idea what his people do to me or due to

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>my family, or the threats that are made. Right it is,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a coercion that has taken place here, and

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's sometimes frustrating to watch this. Right, some

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people only want to look back the last four years

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, boy, look what the Democrats have done. And

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's some truth to that, right, the democratic cretoric has

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten harshir the violence that being prone to violence, it

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>does seem in the last couple of years coming more

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>from the left than the right. But you're sticking your

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>head in the sand if you don't realize we're living,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>if you don't pull back the camera more and realize, oh,

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>how did we get here? This is how we got here, right,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And the fact is, anybody that's been doing this for

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a decade knows this is how we got here. Now

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you can choose to put your partisan blinders on and

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>say it's their faults. Look at how nasty and awful

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the left is. Look at how nasty and awful Donald

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump is. The fact is both things can be true

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you know, and that's something. And

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this isn't both siding everything. This is you know, two

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wrongs don't make right. Our politics is fucked up because

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of too many people believing that two wrongs make a right,

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and this sort of idea that you fight fire with fire,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's on things as sort of arcane as

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>drawing congressional district lines to the rhetoric that is used

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to describe a political opponent that you don't agree with.

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is the line has been moved

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and we have created the conditions for more of this,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>not less. Now, we spent years talking about January sixth

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in that matters, But here's the thing I think we've missed.

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't the end of something. That was actually the

0:10:55.880 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of something, especially after he pardoned everybody in January sixth.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So the real question now is what happens after that

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of permission has been established and what is it

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>going to take to create a safer sense of normal

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in our political discourse. Because here's what we've learned right now,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>the permission slip of January sixth has has not stayed contained.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It has spread, and it didn't spread ideologically. It's not

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on one side of the aisle. It has spread culturally,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>and you can see it big and small. You see

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it in moments that would have been unthinkable before. A

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting president reacting to the death of a former FBI

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>director Robert Muller by saying, good, I'm glad he's dead.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You know that moment, the fact that he couldn't even

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>fake it until the man was buried. In that moment,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't think about people that loved that man, who

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>were children and grandchildren and nieces and nephews and spouses.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That was the President of the United States's reaction. And

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>then we're surprised when people who don't like this president decide,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're going to fight fire with fire. It

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>should be an earthquake in American politics, and it's barely

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a tremor. So why does that moment matter? Not because

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's shocking, but because it's not shocking. Nobody's batted an

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>eye at it. It just simply got absorbed, filed away,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>added to the pile of incendiary rhetoric that we've now

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>decided is normal. And that was the tell. That was

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the normalization. And once you get there, this is how

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>it works. It doesn't take a movement and it doesn't

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>take coordination. It just takes one broken person who may

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have their own problems and who may decide maybe their

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>own sociopathic tendencies and their own narcissism they think somehow

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they can solve a problem, or they can be a hero.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>One unstable, angry person who looks around, seize the tone,

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>seize the language, thinks that this is now more acceptable

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>than ever, or that it's the only thing left in

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the arsenal to do, and then they decide to act

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>within it, within that environment. That's it, that's the mechanism.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Now let's layer something else on the top of all this.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>The last decade has made a lot of people feel

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like they've lost control. These technological changes are fast. Our

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>cultural changes are super fast. Right, Economically, culturally, socially, it

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>feels we've all we feel less stable in all parts

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of our lives today. And then we have an information

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that is exploitive, reinforces one idea over and over.

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Someone else is responsible for the situation. Point the finger,

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>don't look in the mirror. There's no such thing his

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>personal responsibility anymore, no self reflection, right, you see it.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Politicians refuse to take to take stock in their own behavior.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>They just point a finger. Political parties won't take stock

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in their own behavior. They point fingers or exploit for

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>political gain. Quote the system, right, and this is what

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the system looks like. And once you've believed that, the

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>distance between blame and justification gets a lot smaller. And

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>here's the part. A lot of people are going to

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>miss or ignore the guy on Saturday Night right, and

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the left has to deal with this. And this wasn't caught,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't somebody acting on Trump's behalf. His grievances ran

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the other direction. But he chose to believe this

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was the way out. He'd lost faith in the political system.

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not a contradiction, it's a confirmation that we have

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The environment has changed. American politics is now brutal, it's

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>now violent, and this cold civil war is warming up.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We should not want this environment to set in. It

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>takes and there's only one president at a time. And

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>now we've learned this doesn't stay directional. It gets adapted,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it gets mirrored, and it gets thrown back. And you know,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been disappointed in watching the reactions from the left,

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>which has been frankly similar to the reactions on the right.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Just coming up with the evidence of why it is

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>all Donald Trump's fault. And there's a strong case that

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>he created the conditions for this moment. But it doesn't

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>justify the behavior, and it doesn't justify amping up your rhetoric,

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't justify any of the behavior with fighting. No,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all you're doing is accelerated your tape. It's a race

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom, and you're trying to win. Nobody wins

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a race to the bottom. Yeah, you can comfort yourself

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>by saying Trump's reaping what he sewed, but it doesn't

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem. You and I aren't any safer with

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that attitude. The question is what are you doing to

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>change this. I'm sorry that most people don't think Michelle

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama was right. I don't even know if Michelle Obama

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>believes she was right that when a political opponent goes low,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you go high. Because the minute you start rationalizing your violence,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>well they started it even rhetorically, you've crossed the same line.

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>You're no longer arguing about politics. You're justifying outcomes, different side,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>same logic. And that's what this environment is produced. That's why, unfortunately,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a president that can deal with this

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>moment and take it head on, because it would take

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>self reflection. He doesn't have it. It would take an

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>admission that he was a big contributor to what's to

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>this broken environment that we're living in. But I don't like.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, those on the left should

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>take no comfort that he started. It doesn't justify the

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>actions or the behavior. So what would leadership Would a

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>good leadership moment look like right now? Well, it certainly

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>would sound different. You'd hear a president acknowledging the moment,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not spin it, not assign blame, just simply acknowledging it.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>You'd hear something like, we've all contributed to this own here,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to say it back, we need to lower it,

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 1>and I need to do a better job myself. How

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>do you know some of you are probably laughing if

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump would ever admit anything. I'm just telling you what

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it would look like if we were modeling this moment correctly,

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd at least see an effort, a small one, to

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>create space to try to interrupt this cycle. That's what

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>leadership in this moment would look like. That's not what

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we have. And now we have leadership on the Democratic

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>side who's like, screw them, let's go. We don't have

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the president we need right now to get through this moment,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're not going to get what we need from

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this White House. So instead, what we're going to get

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>as finger pointing, one sided explanations and political framing of

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this moment. There'll be no acknowledgment of how we got here,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and without that, there's no way to actually deal with

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>this moment. So we're going to end up moving on,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not because we should, but because we can't get out

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of it. Right we don't have the people at the table.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The voters are going to have to give us new

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>leaders to see if they can get the country unstuck here.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And look, we might hear a lot about security, more barriers,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>more distance. Boy, is that that's not the issue. And

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if anything, ratcheting up security only makes this worse. You

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>want to create more barriers between the elected officials, the powerful,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and the actual rank and file people. That's not a

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>free society anymore. Security is not the problem. Fact, security

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>worked here can't secure your way out of a culture.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>This is not about just going into a bunker or

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>finding a ballroom on grounds that are impossible to get

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>on unless you've given biometric issues. So right now we

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have the leadership that's interested in reversing this. We

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>are escalating. We believe that you can't show weakness, and

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's this fear of ever showing weakness politically, we

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>now default to confrontation. And the problem is that confrontation

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is only going to make us less safe. We're less stable.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's a lament. I'm not going to be labor

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this anymore. I am going to do my best to

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>canntinue to highlight why we have You know, we've this

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is a This is a collective failure of American leadership.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's on top, but he's not alone. Get to

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the ballot box and realize that character matters, that morality matters,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that temperament matters. Policy goals matter too, But how do

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to achieve those goals? How do you plan

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to achieve those goals? Persuasion or coercion. It's a big difference.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>One is something you do in a democracy, the other

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is something you do in an authoritarian regime. It's the

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>decision we have to be and we have to make.

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of pouring fuel on this fire. As I was

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>putting this monologue together, we got news that at federal

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>grand jury North Carolina, somebody went shopping for a grand

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>jury and dieted former FBI director Jim Comey the Justice

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Departments to attempt to criminally charge the former FBI director

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump fired. The charges are not immediately clear,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>but apparently the case stems from a photograph that James

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Comy posted online last year showing seashells on a beach

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that were arranged to write out the numbers eighty six

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and forty seven, with forty seven supposedly being representative of

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the president in eighty six meaning banning or removing someone,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>or slang for killing someone. So you can see exactly

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>what the Trump administration is up to. They are taking

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to weaponize this moment to prove that

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>all of this is on the backs of Trump critics

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and that somehow they have clean hands and they have

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with amping up this rhetoric. The amount

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>of exploitive ways the president has ordered his government to

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>harass the Komi family, including his daughter, who had a

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>job in the federal government, and she's now in the

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>middle of a lawsuit about her firing. Look, I'm not

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>going to sit here and justify Komy doing what he did.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It was stupid, and I think a lot of Komy's

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>actions while he was FBI director, were just horrendous. He

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>had the disease of eye alone can fix it disease, right,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>But the First Amendments, the first Amendment, and unless this

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>government can prove that this is connected to anything, was

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>an instigated Actually somehow somebody took it as an order.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where this case is going, if this

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>has anything remotely to do with that, with that social

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>media post, but that is pouring fuel on this fire.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That is not an administration interesting in turning down the temperature.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is my fear of Democrats get into office

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and win a majority in the House and the Senate

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and immediately go for impeachment. We are just going to

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>be in a cycle and a race to the body.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I know the elected officials I'm looking for. I'm looking

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>for people that are going to turn the page, that

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>want to restore honesty and credibility and trust into government

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and they show a little bit of humility and character

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and morality while in office. That might be too much

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to ask for in our politicians, huh, But if this

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is what we ask for in our friends, this is

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what we ask for and how we raise our kids,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know what it should be what we ask

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for and what kind of representatives that we have in

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this country. Character is destiny. It's a cliche for a

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>reason because it's amazing how often it turns out to

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be true. By the way, one final point, I'm the

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel's stuff. Jimmy Kimmel should apologize. Do I think

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the government should be going after him like this? Of

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>course not. He's got First Amendment rights. But the joke

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight after the events on Saturday, looks terrible. So

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>say it, Admit it. It's okay. You can say I

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was not intended for what it got interpreted as, which

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>means you've got to write a better punchline or you

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>got to write a better joke. I'm not sitting here

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>defending the behavior of this government or the president in

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>targeting Kimmel. But see, this is sort of the problem, right,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Everything is about you got to pick a side, or

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you're on Jimmy Kimmel's side or you're not on his side.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Jimmy Kimmel's side. I'm on the side of

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech. But if I said that and then that

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>event happened and somebody got mad, I'd have apologized because

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd have felt like shit because it wasn't what he

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I do believe it was not what he intended, but

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not here to explain him. I just think that again,

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to are you going to be a

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>de escalator or do you want to be an accelerant

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in this moment. It's pretty simple decision people have to make.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Toodcast is brought to you

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, artisonal pastries, and

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code the

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. You use the promo code toodcast at checkout,

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions. I really dig this.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>worth giving Wild Green to try. Right now, Wildgrain is

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first box plus

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>free croissants for life. Come on when you go to

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today.

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>That's thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>or simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>A few other things. I really want to highlight an

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>interview I did for Newsphere with a long time intelligence

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>analyst from in US government, Beth Saner. She's now out

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of government, but one of her last jobs was being

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>basically the only effective daily briefer to the president in

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the first term. To President Trump, she built a rapport

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>with him where he at least started to accept some intelligence.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I urge you to watch the interview in WHULL. I

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hope some of you have subscribed a newsphere. I'm just

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>telling you it's really it's a high end news product

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and if you really really want not just reporting, but

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>really smart analysis, looking around the corner type of stuff,

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>newsphere is the place for you. But I want to

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>share a little bit because look, we're in the middle around.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>We just hit a new high end gas price. This

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is not getting resolved tomorrow. And the impact on our economy,

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is. You know, there's been this sort

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of like stick the markets have been sticking their head

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the sand, very hopeful, almost like on some sort

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of AI high if you will, right. But I can

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>tell you the way consumers are going to feel. Consumers

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to hate this economy, and they already hate

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this economy. But I just want to sum up a

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>few things. My conversation with best Sayer, I would call

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>was very sobering, and she kept returning to one basic

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>point in our thirty minute sit down that the US

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>may be measuring this war one way, bomb damage, destroyed ships,

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>degraded assets, but Iran is measuring it another way. Entirely,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>as Sanner put it, Iran's measuring stick is regime survival.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Something I've been emphasizing here that the problem we have

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is what does our victory look like and what does

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>their victory look like? Right now? Their victory simply surviving

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>gives them leverage, and that means we may be winning

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>tactically while still moving farther away from what was supposed

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a strategic solution. So her argument is that

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we've fallen into a very familiar American pattern assuming military

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>superiority can solve a political problem. She compared it to

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam to Iraq to Afghanistan, moments when we misunderstood the culture,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the leadership, the decision making, and the resilience of the adversary.

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how many times do we have to wash

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>rents and repeat? Apparently we had to do it again.

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And one of her sharpest lines in this interview was

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we're fighting the Iranians in time, right, that's the warning.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>We're focused on what we can destroy and they're focused

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on what they can survive. And that brings us to

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Strait of hormones. Sander said, the strait is now

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the immediate crisis, not because the nuclear she has gone away,

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>but because this is the thing that can blow up

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the global economy right now. I love this line she

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gave me. She said, the strait is an emergency, which

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is the alligator closest to the boat. Yes, and our

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>nuclear armed iron is bad. You know what's the worst

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>thing right now? And a rhine in control of the

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Strait of hormones. It's the alligator closest to the boat.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't get to the other one until you deal

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with this one. That's the frame. The nuclear program is

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>still the long term strategic threat, but the strait is

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the crisis sitting in front of us. Shipping, insurance, energy prices, allies, China, Russia,

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>all of it, all of it choked off at this

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>choke point. And Sander's broader critique is that we are

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>not sequencing our power very well. We actually sequenced our

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>power really well in Venezuela. She used Venezuela as a

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>net positive comparison. Right, we had diplomacy, we had information, military, force, economics.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>These are all the tools that she outlined that are

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work together, but you need to do them

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in a certain order. And instead she's arguing we're relying

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.719
<v Speaker 1>too heavily on the military hammer and then wondering why

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the diplomatic door is hard to to reopen. And she

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>made this chilling observation, the Iranians understand us better than

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we understand them. That does seem like a scary proposition.

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>They see the threats, they see the pauses right, they're

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>paying attention, they see the extensions of the ceasefire, and

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>every time we threaten something and don't do it, they

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>read that as proof that they're winning. The bottom line

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>from Santa is this, you can have overwhelming military success

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and still not have an endgame, or she put it,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you can have overwhelming conventional military success and still be

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 1>no closer to a solution. Welcome to the Iran that

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we have in front of us right now. That's the warning.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't end with a bomb damage assessment. It's going

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to end with diplomacy and right now. The question is

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>not just whether Iran comes back to the table. It's

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>whether we know who exactly we're supposed to be negotiating

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>with and whether we know how to get to an endgame.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me get through a few political questions

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that I know you guys are interested in. Let's start

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>with the Florida remap here, and it is, like I

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>said at the top, this is a map that if

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you're Republicans, you would have loved to run on in

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and you may like to run on it

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eight, especially if Marco Rubio's on the ticket.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>It basically dilutes some Republican some big Republican congressional districts

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in central Florida, both near Tampa Bay and near Orlando,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and makes them a little bit more competitive. Ditto in

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>South Florida. And that all makes sense in a presidential year.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>The problem with this map for Republicans is it's made.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It has now put more seats in play for Republicans.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It now means they have to spend more money than ever. Yes,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>they can claim Democrats have to spend a bunch of

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>money because the Democratic seats they have to fight for

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and then they have to see if they can win

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of others. So let me give you a

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>few little highlights for those of you that are familiar. Basically,

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't make any changes in the northern part of

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the state. It really is sort of Tampa Bay, Orlando,

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Miami mostly the Miami for Lauderdale market, a

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Palm Beach. So let's start with Jared

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Moscowitz W Washerman Sultz. This is Districts twenty three and

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. This is parts of so Moscow. It's basically used.

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>It's been the congressman for Parkland, right, and so it's

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>both I think, a little bit of Palm Beach and

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Broward County and W. Washerman Soults,

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>who used to be almost all exclusively browd County. It's

0:35:54.160 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten more Miami, so there's less now a Broward County

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>base in District twenty three, which was Moscowitz, and that

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>puts them in danger. Meanwhile, you've got W. Washerman Soultz's

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth district now essentially is a coastal seat and

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>now is Delray Beach to Miami Beach. So it's both

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>heavily Latino and really wealthy. You know, she's if she

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.439
<v Speaker 1>were not pro Israel, I'd say she'd have a hard

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>time holding that seat. But she can hold the seat.

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It may be a swing district now, and she's not

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>running swing districts very often, and that's something that might

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be different, you know, to me. You know, there's certain

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress. When you're always in a swing district,

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of you have muscle memory for it, you develop.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like anything when you have one workout routine. If

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you do the same thing over and over again, that's

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what I do. Unfortunately, I don't diversify my workouts. I'm

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I sort of I'm really I'm really good

0:36:56.080 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at handling treadmill running. I'm really bad at handling anything else. So,

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think what's new for w Wasserman Chols

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be being in a swing district mindset.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But she's kind of I've noticed she has lowered her

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>national profile a bit and gone more I think frankly

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in response to I mean, her district has been getting

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more competitive over time. Meanwhile, the twenty

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>second district, this is lowis Francle, this was mostly Palm Beach. Well,

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it now is shifting parlis and balances across both Palm

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Beach and Broward in central Florida. The ninth district, this

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is Darren Soto. This one gets dramatically. This one essentially

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>gets erased. It's moved from a majority Latino seat to

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a plurality white one. And if you just look at

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the data, goes from a plus three point five Harris

0:37:53.800 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>district to a plus eighteen Trump district. Meanwhile, Kathy Casters

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>seat in Tampa Bay fourteenth district, it's been we've drawn

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>to be much more competitive, and it shifts to a

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>narrow plus three Republican edge. The point is that Castor

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>has been targeted, but this is not an automatic loss here. Meanwhile,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>there's been some huge fallout, right. So Daniel Webster, longtime

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress in Florida, he'd been one of the

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>louder voices saying don't do this. He walked. He's like,

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not defending this new seat. Here's what happened to

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>his seat. The seat is no. He had a R

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty fortress. The new lines moved parts. He had

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the villages in his district, so it took the deep

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>red villages and put them into some adjacent districts, and

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just turned what was a very Republican district into

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially a lean R And I think they just assumed

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Webster, who's been everybody, Yes, he could hold it,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't want to hold it. And as an

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>open seat midterm year, this is the first district created

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>that could start to get us into dummy mandar territory.

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And then to make Castor work, they had to pull

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican voters from neighboring thirteen and fifteen districts. Well, the

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth is represented by Anna Paulina Luna, who was already

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in a fairly competitive district as it is, and she

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who's always been seen as a little bit

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>too conservative for the district she's represented. Well, now what

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is it Now? She's even more you know, so she

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>might not be the right person to hold that for

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans. So that seat arguably now has become more vulnerable.

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And then in South Florida, in order to do this

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this sort of cracking and packing of they did that

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they to spread out the Broward County voters a little

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>bit so that they didn't all get consolidated. They had

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to move some reliably Republican voters into these more competitive districts.

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.439
<v Speaker 1>What it is left is, it's left both Mario Diaz

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Billard and Carlos Sementez with more diverse and less predictable

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>red electorates in Dade County. And it wasn't that long

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ago that both of those districts had plenty of Democratic

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>voteds Miami. Dade County is a swing county. It's still

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a swing county. Yes, a lot of Republican money has

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>moved to Miami, a lot of major private equity firms

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have moved to my All of that is true. But

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>all the people they bring are they're bringing, They're not

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily bringing Republican voters. And it is not clear that

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the Latino vote is going to be as Republican in

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty six as it was in twenty four. And if

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it is not, then suddenly these two districts are in play.

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And Maria Salazar was already in play, although that got

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>configured a bit too so bottom line, I know I

0:40:54.760 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>went through it individually. Bottom Line, this will be a

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>good map for Republicans in twenty eight, but they may

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>this basically may not pick up four, probably is maybe

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it picks up one or two, could be break even.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But it has done this. It's made Florida. It's actually

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this is what it did is that Florida was not

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be home to many swing districts, and now

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it is. Now there's going to be more money spent.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Right Virginia created a situation where there's much fewer swing districts,

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>much less money will be pouring in from either party.

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:39.760
<v Speaker 1>This new Florida map actually increases the need for campaign spending.

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>You'll see there's a bit more competition. And then we've

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>already seen that both the governor's race and the Senate

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>race aren't cakewalks for the Republicans. So it's Florida battle

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 1>around state again. I'm not quite ready to go that far,

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is more competitive and might have as many

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>house seats in play, certainly more house seats in play,

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or maybe as many a house season play as a

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>state larger than it than Texas. A few other nuggets

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>just to share with you. One interesting new Democratic poll

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>out of Texas that shows tall Rico within a high

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>single digit lead over Paxton and a low single digit

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>lead over Cornyn. That's not surprising. I think what's surprising

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that there is still a lead over Cornan. I think

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the real question is if Cornyn wins this runoff, is

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this still a competitive race? Now? The problem that Tallarrica's

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have is that I think if Cornan wins

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a runoff, they'll be less national. There'll be less money

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>coming from the Senate packs because there'll be a belief

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that it and we know John Thune's going to be

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>more willing to spend more money than ever. Now, Look,

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>do I think no matter who the Republican nominee, there's

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a ton of money poured into Texas.

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I do, But there'll be more if it's Corny than

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's Paxton. So that's a note there. And I

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>still you know, you still see all the and I'm

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get to this in my top five list,

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but you're still going to see You're still going to

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>see Paxton still seems to have the advantage of the runoff.

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins deciding to go negative on Graham platter before

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the primary. If you're Jana Mills, this is exactly what

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you were hoping for. But it might but there's another

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 1>way to look at this, The fact that the Colins

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>superPAC has decided to engage Platiner now rather than after

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary sort of gets there was this growing conventional

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>wisdom that if Collins could choose, she'd rather face Platiner

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>than Mills. Well, guess what the super pac has decided. No, no, no, no, no.

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>They want to kill Platiner. Now they want to face Mills.

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, I think the Collins people are right,

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think we've been watching this race together. You've

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 1>probably seen me evolve on this a little bit myself.

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I was a little skeptical, and now I see the

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>strength of Platiner, don't get me wrong. And so it's

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting now you see the Colins super pack essentially deciding,

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>oh no, we much rather face Janet Mills. Look, she's

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>just not a good candidate. Doesn't mean she might now

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>make a great senator. She's just not a good candidate,

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>whether a primary candidate or general electric candidate. It's been

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:27.839
<v Speaker 1>exposed in the primary by Platner, who's a very good

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>political athlete, and now the Collins people see it in

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>their numbers. Right, This just reinforces what we've all been

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing in these public polls. Platner's a strong is in

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a strong position at the moment to win this senencee.

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Collins would much prefer to face an opponent who also

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>is an incumbent politician. Pretty logical to me. All right,

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>let's sneak at a break when we come back my

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation with a Tim O'Mara. Like I said, she's a

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Democratic strategist, but also look, she's written this great book

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>called The Instigators about the history of sort of and

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>power of black women in politics. So you know, whether

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>she wants to be known as an historian or not,

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>she now is as well when you go down this road.

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think you'll enjoy the conversation, especially if you're

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>truly trying to understand what the future of the Democratic

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Party and the Democratic Coalition is going to look like.

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a break. This episode of the

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Check podcast is brought to you by Soul. So if

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you love that end of the day unwined but hate

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the hangover, Soul's out of Office is for you. These

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>sparkling THHC drinks and gummies give you the same relaxed

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>social feeling without the alcohol, without the calories, and without

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the crash. Soul is a wellness brand that believes feeling

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes in delicious

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hemp derived, THCHC, and CBD products designed to boost your

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mood and help you unwind. They're best selling out of

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>office gummies were designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz,

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>boost your mood and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>different strengths, you can tailor the dose to fit your vibe.

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So also has a variety of products specifically designed to

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's rest, including their top

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy Gummies, a fan favorite for deep restorers. Sleep. Look,

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I have made no secret. I am a believer in

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, in cannabis and hemp derived. I do not

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>partake in alcohol. For the most part, I think this

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff is a lot safer than alcohol, a lot less

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>addictive than alcohol. And yes, I have to say I

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>love these drinks. It is the glass of wine and

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know after work that's what this is. So no

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:46.399
<v Speaker 1>hangover and no excess calories like this. I'm a big fan.

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Sold today right now. Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.959
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order. Go to getsoul dot com

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and use the word podcast. That's getsol dot com promo

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>code podcast for thirty percent off. And yes, I too,

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:09.919
<v Speaker 1>am a customer. So joining me now is a first

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>time author. The book is called The Instigators, And as

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see the author here Atima O'Mara, she's even

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>she's got merch. I love it like you know, you

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>got a shirt with it there. I mean, you are

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:28.320
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily well prepared. What this book is about. It's essentially

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about the role that black women in particular have played

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and are playing right now in American politics, and the

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>influential role that younger Black women are playing these days

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>in American politics. So this book is part analysis because

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>she's in the advocacy space, political strategy space, but also

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.919
<v Speaker 1>historical because this is not a new thing. Black women

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in many ways have carried the banner for civil rights

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and for voting rights and for just rights in general.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Teama joins me now, team, Welcome to the podcast.

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, one of the big pushbacks that your book is

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>attempting to do, Rich is there's the general consensus that

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the that it's white swing voters, suburban moderates that decide elections,

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways this is an attempt to blow

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>up that myth a little bit. And I think we

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>all have realized that swing voters are not people that

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:34.720
<v Speaker 1>swing between two sides. Actually, most swing voters swing between

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>voting and not voting as much as they swing actually

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>between the two parties. Not saying that there aren't some

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 1>voters that do this and they become incredibly decisive when

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the margins are super thin. But is that a fair

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is that? Is that a fair marker here? That it

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was one of the big MythBusters you wanted to do,

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>was that?

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Definitely.

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to challenge sort of a narrative that if

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.959
<v Speaker 3>we are are focusing on trying to get this why

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 3>moderate swing voter, you know, trying to think of thinking

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 3>of that particular guy and you would know this from

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 3>your coverage, I'm forgetting him.

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 2>But he's like the guy and like the plumber.

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Well yeah, the plumber, he's one, and there's like another

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 3>one where he's just like I'm still deciding and everybody

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 3>off his park.

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Dad, Right, We've got that one, right.

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, Sometimes you get like the NASCAR mom or

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 3>soccer mom who's.

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Just trying to make decisions.

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 3>And I get that that is is fascinating sort of

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:40.240
<v Speaker 3>in coverage in media, but it's it's it's not great

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 3>as the basis as the foundation of a political strategy

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.280
<v Speaker 3>for certainly the Democratic Party.

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Well, you start your book, you start with Virginia.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is something I'm very familiar with, and certainly

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>my listeners over the last few weeks have gotten very familiar.

0:49:55.400 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about Virginia in general. But it's it's, uh,

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about the Ralph Northam scandal and his

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>black face scandal and sort of the role walk me

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:10.720
<v Speaker 1>through the role you think black women played in that,

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and I guess would be his political survival.

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Uh, So you had elected officials, You had cabinet members

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 3>of his as well as advocates who were like, all right,

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 3>if you want to stay in political power, we are

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 3>going to make you put in the work for it.

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 3>So you had organizers like Chelsea Higgs Wise who had

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 3>started ah, you know, marijuana advocacy organization that was grassroots

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 3>to push for the legalization, Like, forget the criminalization, We're

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:46.240
<v Speaker 3>just going to go the full legalization and organizing people

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 3>around that young you know, black single mother.

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And then you had Adam McClure.

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:55.760
<v Speaker 3>She's now a state House representative House of Delegates in Virginia,

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 3>but was head of the Virginia Legacity of Black Caucus.

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 3>That's use this to put together a very ambitious legislate

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 3>of agenda. Maybe not everything's going to get passed on

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 3>criminal justice reform, social safety and such, but we are

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 3>going to put it forth in this in the in

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 3>this opportunity.

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 2>And then you have a Voting Rights Act.

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 3>We have our own state Voting Rights ac modeled off

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 3>the sixty five Voting Rights Act thanks to then State

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Senator Jennifer McClellan. And then you had a lot of

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the initiatives just in state government and policy that were

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 3>being pushed by cabinet secretaries at the time who were

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 3>younger black women.

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, a lot of this happened as Northern.

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Was trying to figure out how to rebound and take

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 3>advantage of trying to stay in place. And it came

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 3>right into the spring of twenty twenty when George Floyd

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 3>was murdered. And now we're all inside and now it

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was really an additional captive audiences. As they say in

0:51:55.520 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 3>public policy, the Overton window had shifted traumatically, and they

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 3>were poised to take all that work and knowledge and

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 3>strategy and push for a lot of the change that

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 3>we now have in Virginia.

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it look you had leverage over him, he decided,

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was I don't want to say it was

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>accidental leverage, but it was. It was almost leverage that

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was lost. I mean not to get into the tragedy

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the of the of the late now late lieutenant governor,

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but because he politically was essentially paralyzed at the moment

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>then and unable to be seen as the as the alternative. Uh,

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:39.800
<v Speaker 1>if there was a if, if Northam decided to resign

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the in this case, was it easier to get

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 1>leverage on him or was it actually harder when it

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when he felt quote politically safer because his LG had

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:58.839
<v Speaker 1>separate political issues that made him a fraud potential replacement governor, It.

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Probably and I lluded to it there in the book

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 3>that I think it made him feel like, Okay, I've

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:08.760
<v Speaker 3>got more room to try and assert that I stay.

0:53:09.600 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 3>And that is where that sentiment that winter and going

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 3>into spring of twenty twenty, where folks were like, all right,

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 3>if you won't stay, we're gonna make it work for it,

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 3>and how a lot of those policies, and you know,

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 3>he made himself very amenable to that because I think

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 3>he realized, certainly.

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Politically, it was going to be hard.

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Their cabinet members are elected officials, we're going to resign

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 3>or certainly make his political life not very uncomfortable if

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 3>he had not been as amenable. So credit to him

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 3>being amnimal, but I also think he was put in

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 3>a position where, you know, he felt that he had

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 3>to be a lot more to prove to folks that

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.880
<v Speaker 3>he was what he believed himself to be as a

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 3>better changed person.

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>How often do you think, I actually think sometimes interest

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>groups don't take advantage of what I would call transactional

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>leverage moments, meaning you know where, look, this is not

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody that would normally be your ally, but they kind

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of need you more than you you know, and you

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:14.359
<v Speaker 1>know what, maybe we can extract some concessions out of here.

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's so much pressure these days, frankly not to

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be seen as working with somebody who maybe was against

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your interests six months ago, six years ago, you know

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the you know what always invited, what always made to

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>me what the most inviting thing of our democracy in

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>general is that even at its founding, it was intended

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a negotiation, right that it was always a negotiation.

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So if we if you think of politics as a negotiation,

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it means you're going to actually make some common cause

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with people you don't normally agree with, because it's a

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:49.359
<v Speaker 1>quote negotiation. And yet I feel like that art has

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>been lost in modern politics, more so in the democratic

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>side of the eye. I am I being a little

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>overly critical here, not.

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean there are moments where, you know, listen, there

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:08.720
<v Speaker 3>are folks realizing, okay, I voted for something three times

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:15.760
<v Speaker 3>that is now pretty terrible, and I'm not super interested

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 3>in being buddies with these folks.

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 2>However, if there is an operation, I.

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to be lectured at for supporting this entity

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>for the less right right yea lecturing like telling me

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong, Okay, I was wrong, And for me.

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's like okay, listen, like you're going to be on

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the same page and voting great, but you don't want

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:42.239
<v Speaker 3>to do this again. We don't want to have to

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 3>go through this again. We are going to on the

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 3>other side of this, have to have a conversation about

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:51.399
<v Speaker 3>why you did what you did and why you thought

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 3>that this made the most sense. So I'm one of

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:58.400
<v Speaker 3>those people where it's like I understand the point of coalitions,

0:55:58.520 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, all right, let's just be in the

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 3>room on this one point and win, so that we

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 3>can at least have a conversation.

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:11.240
<v Speaker 2>On the other side about how we retain this victory.

0:56:13.080 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about twenty four because in here you're pretty

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty tough on the Democrats. Walk me through it.

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:24.480
<v Speaker 1>What could have been was it was this an election

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that was lost on persuasion or mobilization.

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Very much mobilization.

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I think some of the things that have been leaking

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 3>from the twenty twenty four Action Report point.

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 1>That we're never going to see.

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You're ever going to see it? Yeah, you're never going

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 2>to see.

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I've had an opportunity to get some

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 3>insights into into what it was from some briefings that I.

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Who did it, who took in charge of this briefing

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of this autopsy, of.

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 2>This autopsy, I actually don't know.

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 3>There was like a whole committee formed, and I know

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:57.279
<v Speaker 3>that there's like a couple of strategists who.

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Did some of the probably just two or three people

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:00.799
<v Speaker 1>that did like ninety percent of.

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:03.280
<v Speaker 3>The work the work, right, Yeah, and then there's like, yeah,

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 3>so there's just generally this committee And so we definitely

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 3>lost it in mobilization. Not to say that racism and

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 3>estotrapy didn't play a role, because there were certainly these

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 3>people who were like, well, I remember distinctly Arizona, some

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 3>young person being interviewed and why you know, who are

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:24.000
<v Speaker 3>going to vote for Trump?

0:57:24.040 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 2>And why well, I'mala didn't show up on the Joe

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Rogan podcast.

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I was just like, okay't I don't think that was

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the deciding factor. I feel like that was a good excuse,

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 3>but okay, sure, so you had those, but when you

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:42.040
<v Speaker 3>have Trump didn't actually get as much as he was, like,

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 3>this was a landslide.

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 2>It was small amounts.

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Of margins of votes in all the seven states, And

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 3>when you looked at what happened in twenty twenty, where

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 3>we were trying to make it more accessible to vote for.

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Folks, and obviously that rolled back.

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 3>But then you also looked at Trump's margins. You didn't

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 3>do that much better than twenty It was the Democratic

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 3>turnout that was lower. And it's not a combination of

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 3>voter suppression and not having dealt with that, but also

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the mobilization is now and I cite it in the book.

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Lots of stories from black staffers who were trying to renegade,

0:58:18.640 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 3>just figure out how to do operational work on the

0:58:21.560 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 3>ground in communities that we needed to vote, as well

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 3>as you know, black consultants who weren't sort of getting

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the resources they needed and black led, brown led organizations

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 3>to turn out their communities that they got in twenty

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:36.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty by comparison.

0:58:36.680 --> 0:58:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, to me, you know, I've always said that the

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>damning part of this election on the mobilization front is

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not the seventh the results in the seven states, it's

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 1>actually the results in the other forty three. Right when

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at the the number of blue states that

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ended up single digits close to five points, like Illinois,

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey to me or the probably the best examples,

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but this was across the board, right, It just felt

0:59:05.840 --> 0:59:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like that there was somewhere, you know, I do think

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I go back to what I believe more so today

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>than I even believed a decade ago, which is that

0:59:14.880 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 1>swing voters are those that swing between voting and not voting,

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>which means it is a mobilization tool, But it doesn't

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>mean you don't have persuasion. Right, Yeah, And this is

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>why I hate saying, you know, and I did it

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to you, right, I said Pick one was a mobilization persuasion. Well,

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is you couldn't persuade those

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:34.440
<v Speaker 1>who normally are with you to go vote. So guess what,

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you had a mobilization problem that was also a persuasion problem.

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:43.440
<v Speaker 1>That is like, there just weren't people excited. Now we

0:59:43.600 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>all have our theories. Were they not excited about her

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because she was trying to straddle the fence between sort

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the old guard of the party and the progressive wing.

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Was it because she was saddled with an unpopular president?

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Which is frankly, sometimes I look at things and it's like,

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>let's stop being complicated. Where to Humphrey didn't win, al

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Gore didn't win, Kamala Harris didn't win. It's hard to

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>succeed a president who is unpopular for one reason or

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the other, either personally or professionally, and my goodness, look

1:00:14.520 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>how close she came, and yet and yet he was

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>holding it right. So I still at the end of

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the day put this on Biden that we could sit

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>here and nitpick all we want. If Biden had been

1:00:24.760 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a more popular president, Kamala Harris would be president.

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it was, and yeah, there was a the fact

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 3>that the margins were so tight, and then the fact

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>that you had she had one.

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Hundred and seven days.

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>And as somebody pointed out when they were talking about

1:00:43.120 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the election, I.

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Was going out and thought about it.

1:00:44.880 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 3>But she's like a voting started basically after the convention,

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>so she was already behind before she started. And so

1:00:55.840 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>that is you know, that's where I sort of am

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>as well in thinking there was not a lot that

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>between his popularity and then the operation that was handed

1:01:06.840 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to her that set her up for.

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Success, and she closed that gap.

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Like the stories about him being under the water and

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>then he couldn't have pulled it out were as we

1:01:15.040 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 3>now know true, And she really didn't as much as

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>she could to close.

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>The gap and came very close.

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>She saved three or four Senate seats. I look at it,

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think people, I mean, you know,

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>let's Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada. What am I leaving out here?

1:01:31.320 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it Michigan? Yeah, it's Michigan. Right, four Senate seats

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden would have lost. Joe Biden been the nominee,

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>he'd lost all four of those Senate seats go down.

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty convinced to that because he probably has something.

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>He's probably performs two or three points lower than she does.

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I felt that as well. That was the failing.

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Even just the energy on the ground in volunteer enthusiasm

1:01:56.360 --> 1:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>is completely shifted of people who were of the the

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>diehards wanted to get work done, and volunteer shifted with

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>her at the top of the ticket.

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go back to black women voters, and

1:02:11.920 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it is more and more Democrats talk about that black

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>women are the heart and soul, certainly in primary politics.

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the things though, that I think is nobody

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>quite knows the answer to. And I see people in

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the media just as presume that black women are primary

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>are are super voters, so that must mean they're super lefty,

1:02:32.600 --> 1:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's not the same. I think that that's always

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest mistake most amateur analysts make with black voters,

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but walk me through sort of the ideological spectrum of

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>black women and what works and what ideological arguments don't.

1:02:46.920 --> 1:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Like why do some progressives have such a hard time

1:02:52.400 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>convincing black voters to support them?

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I think oftentimes, and I'll say this from my own

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>perspective and the conversations in my cohort, is that you're

1:03:02.760 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you're having conversations with people who are not having an

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>analysis of an economic issue that takes into account the

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>experiences of what it means to be black, brown, or

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 3>woman in this country. You know, every single time I

1:03:19.120 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>heard Bernie Sanders say, all right, but it's about the economy,

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like abortion rights, and in response to abortion

1:03:26.640 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>rights or anything that just wants.

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:33.720
<v Speaker 4>To do it, he kept saying, oh, it's downplaying it

1:03:33.800 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 4>when every single, every single sort of study that has

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>come out says that, you know, the essentially the discussion

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 4>around whether you grow a family or not.

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I know, it's personally is based around how many children

1:03:49.040 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>you have, whether whether you can feed that child, provide

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>for that child, and with things, yes, costs or rising,

1:03:56.120 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 3>but it is it is that's taken away, that's a

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:02.840
<v Speaker 3>big part part of an economic discussion. So as an example,

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:07.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, talking about criminal justice reform and and not

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you not talking about it in a way that at

1:04:12.200 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>all takes into account the humanity of black people, you know,

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>not talking about the environment. What's happening right now in

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 3>this country around you know, data center organizing, like anti

1:04:23.040 --> 1:04:28.160
<v Speaker 3>data center organizing, and not really realizing it's very much

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 3>of an environmental justice issue. And you know that we

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>have a great opportunity because it's like a multi racial

1:04:36.960 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>now sort of organizing. It's happening in some of the

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>redist areas to some of the more blue areas against

1:04:43.880 --> 1:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>this this sort of pushing of corporate stuff, but not

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>really kind of capturing a lot of that energy or

1:04:50.640 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>understanding or proposing policies that really take into account the

1:04:55.040 --> 1:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>experiences of what it means to be black or brown

1:04:58.360 --> 1:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>in the US.

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So, So let me ask you this, do you describe

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a two track system of insiders and instigators? Are they?

1:05:12.240 --> 1:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>How much do those worlds trust each other? And how

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>much are they just fundamentally intentioned?

1:05:20.000 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>They know, there's always been attention and there should be

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:24.640
<v Speaker 3>a sort of a natural attention to somebody who's like

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:28.600
<v Speaker 3>an elected official and government highest and you know, halls

1:05:28.600 --> 1:05:31.600
<v Speaker 3>of power as it were, and those who are doing

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>the activism. I do think that that has become even

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>more tense in recent years, and there's.

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Like less respect.

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Really on either side, you know, certainly for the roles

1:05:46.600 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 3>that everybody has to play.

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of why is there less respect? What's

1:05:50.400 --> 1:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>your sense is it? Is it money has sort of

1:05:55.040 --> 1:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>clouded the picture for the groups, and the groups are

1:05:57.600 --> 1:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>just so driven by finances. What is it?

1:06:01.360 --> 1:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I think on the elected official side, I think it's like,

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:05.920
<v Speaker 3>why don't you trust me to.

1:06:05.880 --> 1:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Just get the work time? I think it's that's their

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:09.280
<v Speaker 2>their feeling.

1:06:10.040 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>And I think on the activist side, I think it's

1:06:14.920 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 3>more so that because we don't see you doing a

1:06:19.880 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of that. We don't even see you trying to

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:25.919
<v Speaker 3>put together piecemeal reform in the direction of.

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, making change, and so.

1:06:29.400 --> 1:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>You're asking us to trust you based off of And

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 3>a good example I think of is like right after

1:06:37.680 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty get the Senate and granted Mansion Cinema were

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the hold up on why we couldn't get a lot

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>of things through Build Back Better Voting Rights Act.

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess what they call for the people was the legislation.

1:06:55.400 --> 1:07:00.600
<v Speaker 3>And and and so it's like, okay, literally, well you know,

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:02.360
<v Speaker 3>we can't get it through, and they're like.

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 2>What do we just push to put you in power?

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>For?

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>What are the ways around?

1:07:10.280 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, what are alternative things that we can do

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to expand the right to vote? Because we're telling you like,

1:07:16.920 --> 1:07:19.919
<v Speaker 3>if we don't, we're seeing a whole slew of voter

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:24.560
<v Speaker 3>suppression bill is going to come, which they did. And

1:07:24.680 --> 1:07:26.959
<v Speaker 3>so I think it's that that's like, Okay, you're asking

1:07:27.040 --> 1:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>us to trust where there isn't something, and officials are like,

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I need you to trust that we're going to do

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 3>the right thing. And it's like got to be a

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>little goob and take in that relationship.

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a dance. You know.

1:07:48.840 --> 1:07:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you think democrats in the Biden White House spot

1:07:52.000 --> 1:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't it.

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Not as much as they should have known?

1:07:55.960 --> 1:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>What would that have looked like? I mean they certainly

1:07:58.560 --> 1:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>risked now part Look, I think you had President Biden

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>has the heart of a legislator, not an executive. So

1:08:05.680 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we had more patients for sort of the Senate games

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>been shipped and perhaps other presidents would have And you know,

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's if you want to know the

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>real secret difference between a senator becoming president and a

1:08:18.439 --> 1:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>governor becoming president. It is probably that level of patience. Right,

1:08:22.040 --> 1:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Obama had more patience for the process then maybe I

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>remember a lot of people thought that he should. Biden

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>had a lot more patients for the process, because you know,

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they've been on the other side. You know, even if

1:08:32.160 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>briefly they you know, they're too personally friendly with those

1:08:36.360 --> 1:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>But what would that have looked like? And what if

1:08:38.120 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing had blown up and you wouldn't have

1:08:40.120 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>gotten anything? And perhaps you just think, you know what, No,

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they would have you know, a little hardball wouldn't have

1:08:46.040 --> 1:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt them.

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I actually don't think a little hardball would have

1:08:49.840 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>hurt them.

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think about because you.

1:08:52.840 --> 1:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Know, channeling his inner LBJ, you know lb J.

1:08:57.240 --> 1:08:59.519
<v Speaker 2>Like one of my favorite stories I read about olbi J.

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>It's lesser known, was he was trying to get the

1:09:03.920 --> 1:09:06.599
<v Speaker 3>voting right ZAC pass. He did a whistle stop tour

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>like and he had Lady Bird Johnson go through the

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:14.559
<v Speaker 3>South have teas with all the Southern senators. There was

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 3>one senator in Virginia. If I'm not mistaken, I believe

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>that he was the father of one of our evangelical leaders,

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Pat Robertson. I believe I think it was his father, right, yes, yes, yeah,

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>And so he was like, absolutely, I am not meeting

1:09:34.040 --> 1:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>with her. I am not voting for this thing. The

1:09:37.240 --> 1:09:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Jenet was like, Okay, that's how you want to play ball.

1:09:40.760 --> 1:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Found a primary opponent, groomed him and did an operation

1:09:45.840 --> 1:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>to essentially take.

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Out Senator Robinson. And I think about that, I'm like, wow.

1:09:52.280 --> 1:09:55.479
<v Speaker 1>That is sounds like Donald Trump. By the way, when

1:09:55.520 --> 1:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get his way, what does he do? What

1:09:57.680 --> 1:10:00.799
<v Speaker 1>he always said? Right? No, there's like parts of Trump

1:10:01.479 --> 1:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that are a little LBJ and a little Teddy Roosevelt, right,

1:10:04.400 --> 1:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know which is you know, it's a little showmanship,

1:10:06.720 --> 1:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's you know, it's always like you know, one

1:10:09.840 --> 1:10:12.479
<v Speaker 1>of the worst mistakes opponents of Donald Trump make is

1:10:12.479 --> 1:10:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that they assume everything he says is wrong or everything

1:10:14.800 --> 1:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>he does is wrong. It's like, you know, there's some

1:10:16.720 --> 1:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some things to learn from him. You know, he's

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>won twice. Don't don't think he doesn't know what he's

1:10:21.360 --> 1:10:23.519
<v Speaker 1>doing here. That doesn't mean you have to emulate him,

1:10:23.840 --> 1:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>but there is tactics you can learn from him, just

1:10:27.720 --> 1:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like you would learn from your enemy in a war.

1:10:30.320 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, that was pretty smart. Well you got to

1:10:32.400 --> 1:10:34.639
<v Speaker 1>try that, you know, when it comes to drones or whatever.

1:10:35.200 --> 1:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And sort of what Trump shows is that the

1:10:40.360 --> 1:10:44.679
<v Speaker 3>example of LBJ are the example of FDR even because

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>there was like a point where he thought he was

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:47.040
<v Speaker 3>going to expand.

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The supreme and he did primaries, you know, primary somebody.

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. And is that to push for what you

1:10:56.120 --> 1:10:58.719
<v Speaker 2>believe in and what you want to get done?

1:10:59.320 --> 1:11:03.160
<v Speaker 3>And most of our legislation that passed in this country

1:11:04.600 --> 1:11:07.639
<v Speaker 3>was through very much not on the dogged persistence of activists.

1:11:07.640 --> 1:11:09.880
<v Speaker 3>But then you know, when it came leg slatively, these

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>folks were like, all right, I'm going to make this happen.

1:11:12.479 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how I'm gonna make this happen.

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna find ways to do it, whether that's breaking

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:18.559
<v Speaker 3>up the bill, doing an executive.

1:11:18.080 --> 1:11:19.559
<v Speaker 2>Order, what have you.

1:11:19.840 --> 1:11:22.639
<v Speaker 3>And not surprising you, though, are some of our most

1:11:22.680 --> 1:11:26.519
<v Speaker 3>popular farm more fondly remembered presidents for their agendas too.

1:11:27.800 --> 1:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>What's a how does an act? I'm a little skeptical

1:11:33.160 --> 1:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of advocacy advocacy groups these days that they don't have

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the influence they once had, and I sit there because

1:11:38.760 --> 1:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I fear as if the only influence that matters now

1:11:42.200 --> 1:11:45.599
<v Speaker 1>is money or votes in a primary. And maybe I'm

1:11:45.600 --> 1:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>being a tad cynical, but you know, how would you

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>advise today's activist groups to get more leverage in the

1:11:51.680 --> 1:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>non campaign seasons.

1:11:54.200 --> 1:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, first to just continue to do advocacy and

1:11:58.600 --> 1:12:02.160
<v Speaker 3>organizing in need on campaign seasons as someone who you

1:12:02.200 --> 1:12:05.960
<v Speaker 3>know does this work through you know, my own advocacy

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>and consulting firm.

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I just.

1:12:08.800 --> 1:12:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I have, I have counseled often. All Right, you want

1:12:13.479 --> 1:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>folks to mobilize and come out around these issues as

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>we are getting into the time of as you know,

1:12:21.960 --> 1:12:24.600
<v Speaker 3>many folks call it lake stage capitalism, where housing is

1:12:24.640 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>more expensive, you're working more jobs, and need used to

1:12:27.360 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 3>your distraction is kind of all over.

1:12:29.040 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 2>The place with social media.

1:12:30.560 --> 1:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>You've got to find a way to break through and

1:12:33.320 --> 1:12:35.960
<v Speaker 3>let people know, all right, some of these things that

1:12:35.960 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 3>you're frustrated with you.

1:12:38.520 --> 1:12:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Can do something about.

1:12:40.439 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 3>And I know that there are some organizations that's just

1:12:43.160 --> 1:12:45.439
<v Speaker 3>recently at the America Votes Conference who would love to

1:12:45.439 --> 1:12:49.080
<v Speaker 3>spend more time on the doors and organizing, and they're

1:12:49.120 --> 1:12:51.479
<v Speaker 3>not getting the funding at the levels they should something

1:12:51.520 --> 1:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I talk about in the book, and how that has

1:12:53.840 --> 1:12:58.880
<v Speaker 3>led to sort of an erosion of this support in

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:02.840
<v Speaker 3>election years. If somebody is not talking to the not

1:13:03.000 --> 1:13:08.720
<v Speaker 3>politically engaged like you and I, you know, there is

1:13:08.800 --> 1:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>just more challenging.

1:13:09.640 --> 1:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>To do it. It is amazing to me how this

1:13:11.920 --> 1:13:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is flipped within twenty years. Yeah, Democrats used to dominate

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the off year messaging, and it was Republicans that sort

1:13:19.120 --> 1:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of just sort of campaign hopped, and now it's sort

1:13:23.280 --> 1:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, you know, basically since Obama it has

1:13:27.040 --> 1:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>been you know, oh it's election season. Let's you know,

1:13:30.520 --> 1:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>round up the usual suspects, round up the usual billionaires,

1:13:33.840 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's fund what are we going to call the super

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>pac this year future forward? Okay, we'll try that. Like

1:13:38.520 --> 1:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just like redoing whatever they thought worked in twenty twelve,

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>right the last time it all kind of came together,

1:13:45.720 --> 1:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a consistent attempt to replicate twelve. And

1:13:51.479 --> 1:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they're almost thinking that these you know, and there's been

1:13:54.439 --> 1:13:57.599
<v Speaker 1>something missing here right in the off year. What did

1:13:57.720 --> 1:14:00.639
<v Speaker 1>what did the right do? Well? They used crypto organize

1:14:00.680 --> 1:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>young men and that had a bigger impact, and I

1:14:04.240 --> 1:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think I expected it also wasn't just young white men,

1:14:06.880 --> 1:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it was young men of color. Right. I think crypto

1:14:09.240 --> 1:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>has been you know, I think I've got a lot

1:14:12.120 --> 1:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of skepticism about it. I got a lot of concerns

1:14:14.080 --> 1:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>about it. But politically it has been very effective for

1:14:17.439 --> 1:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the right to woo young men under forty, regardless of race.

1:14:21.240 --> 1:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Am I not wrong about that? No?

1:14:23.400 --> 1:14:25.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean they have taken the media.

1:14:26.040 --> 1:14:29.800
<v Speaker 3>The growth of social media, the growth of podcasts is

1:14:29.800 --> 1:14:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the reason they call twenty twenty four the podcast election.

1:14:32.400 --> 1:14:35.120
<v Speaker 3>The matisphere is quite real. We see it now, even

1:14:35.240 --> 1:14:37.960
<v Speaker 3>for those who might not be engaged in politics, seeing

1:14:37.960 --> 1:14:38.400
<v Speaker 3>it in there.

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I see it.

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:44.519
<v Speaker 1>My son's nineteen, My youngest iseteen, nineteen year old boy.

1:14:45.320 --> 1:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Young man. I'm sorry, he's nineteen now, and you know

1:14:48.800 --> 1:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>he's he certainly has knows what I do for a living,

1:14:52.479 --> 1:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but so he keeps He lets me know, but he'll

1:14:55.000 --> 1:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be down in one of his sports things or whatever,

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, man, it gets political real quick. And

1:15:01.280 --> 1:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a little more aware of it because of what

1:15:03.040 --> 1:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>dad does for a living. But I see it. It

1:15:07.360 --> 1:15:10.599
<v Speaker 1>is quite effective because you don't really know you're being

1:15:10.600 --> 1:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>given a political argument. You realize it.

1:15:13.520 --> 1:15:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they have moved into pop culture and fitness and

1:15:18.520 --> 1:15:22.559
<v Speaker 3>healthcare and and we're still like, all right, let's have

1:15:22.720 --> 1:15:23.759
<v Speaker 3>political podcasts.

1:15:23.800 --> 1:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, Okay, that's great for you, and I'm.

1:15:26.920 --> 1:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>They're only talking to you and I I know, you.

1:15:29.360 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Know, but that's not you know, there are amazing podcasts

1:15:33.360 --> 1:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that I listened to with some very thoughtful people who

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>are talking about like what's happening on reality TV that

1:15:42.600 --> 1:15:43.759
<v Speaker 3>that's a right audience.

1:15:45.200 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, do you do you want to know what

1:15:50.000 --> 1:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the what the politics of your hosts are for your

1:15:52.360 --> 1:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>non political podcast or do you fear finding out what

1:15:56.200 --> 1:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the politics are of some of your favorites, Like I

1:15:59.320 --> 1:16:01.519
<v Speaker 1>do this with this World and I'm like, you know,

1:16:01.560 --> 1:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll hint at something political, going well, we're not

1:16:04.240 --> 1:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>touching that because of this, And then I'm like, wait,

1:16:07.080 --> 1:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>where are they coming down? Like I don't maybe I

1:16:08.760 --> 1:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to know. I enjoy this too.

1:16:10.320 --> 1:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Much, right, I mean, it's funny.

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>I have I have sort of discerned in some of

1:16:17.280 --> 1:16:19.280
<v Speaker 3>the stuff that I listened to, and I think because

1:16:19.280 --> 1:16:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm like my ear is like, oh, oh's.

1:16:22.120 --> 1:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You look for the red coded or the blue coated?

1:16:23.960 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but you know, and there are some who are

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>who are talking about.

1:16:29.680 --> 1:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what's happening on Summerhouse right now, that's the

1:16:32.160 --> 1:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>topic of.

1:16:32.680 --> 1:16:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Conversation pop culture, and they have very thoughtful takes on

1:16:38.479 --> 1:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>raise and gender analysis and easily.

1:16:40.560 --> 1:16:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Just doing it through the prism of this TV show

1:16:42.640 --> 1:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than yeah yeah, mm hmm. So that's the space

1:16:47.439 --> 1:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that that the left needs to get better at.

1:16:50.720 --> 1:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>What funny is that the right was convinced that the

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>left was always better than them at.

1:16:54.240 --> 1:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>This Yeah, that's that's the irony, and maybe that paranoia

1:16:58.680 --> 1:17:01.799
<v Speaker 3>gave you know, got them that funding and that energy

1:17:02.000 --> 1:17:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to sort of, you know, really take over podcasts and

1:17:08.040 --> 1:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, influencers they pay that they compensate their influencers

1:17:11.600 --> 1:17:14.599
<v Speaker 3>in a way that left wing influencers are not.

1:17:14.840 --> 1:17:17.960
<v Speaker 2>To be compensated. Yeah, they're just and that's a whole

1:17:18.000 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>chapter in the book.

1:17:18.800 --> 1:17:23.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just on on how that influence has allowed you know,

1:17:23.840 --> 1:17:27.760
<v Speaker 3>very much of a of a perspective to thrive us.

1:17:27.720 --> 1:17:29.599
<v Speaker 2>Kind of gone challenge in a lot of quarters.

1:17:30.000 --> 1:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So it totally has. Let me ask you this about

1:17:33.479 --> 1:17:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you think the two parties are going to sustain themselves

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>as the two major parties in this country for the

1:17:40.880 --> 1:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future, or do you think that our

1:17:43.640 --> 1:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>two party systems vulnerable right now?

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I always feel like, you know, the duo, I have

1:17:50.680 --> 1:17:53.599
<v Speaker 3>like love hate relationship with the duopoly as somebody who's

1:17:53.640 --> 1:17:56.479
<v Speaker 3>like done a lot in the Democratic Party. But I

1:17:57.000 --> 1:17:59.880
<v Speaker 3>approach to sort of with that pragmatic sense of things,

1:18:00.000 --> 1:18:03.040
<v Speaker 3>all right, you know, the mechanisms of change, and I

1:18:03.200 --> 1:18:08.160
<v Speaker 3>still for the foreseeable future see it that way because structurally,

1:18:08.360 --> 1:18:12.400
<v Speaker 3>to build, you know, to have a country with multiple

1:18:12.400 --> 1:18:16.160
<v Speaker 3>political parties requires some structural changes to electoral college and

1:18:16.920 --> 1:18:18.559
<v Speaker 3>our districts.

1:18:17.880 --> 1:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Just simply primary rules, right, primaries perhaps or something like that.

1:18:21.800 --> 1:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's sort of my head is at.

1:18:23.479 --> 1:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, yeah, I do feel like we are

1:18:25.720 --> 1:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a nation that is more diverse than the options we

1:18:29.880 --> 1:18:33.559
<v Speaker 1>offer on our politics, right, Like, Yeah, imagine going into

1:18:33.600 --> 1:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a store or even go on a website and buying

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of T shirts and the only sizes available

1:18:41.240 --> 1:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>were extra small and extra large, Right, that a lot

1:18:47.360 --> 1:18:50.559
<v Speaker 1>because it's usually the last two that sell, right, those

1:18:50.560 --> 1:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two sizes that sell. Well, that's essentially what

1:18:53.000 --> 1:18:55.559
<v Speaker 1>we've done with our politics. We have two choices. You know,

1:18:55.720 --> 1:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>good luck if you want a different you know, the

1:18:57.360 --> 1:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>spybe got a different size. Good luck that. And I know,

1:19:01.080 --> 1:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>are we have a structural you know, there's no doubt

1:19:06.320 --> 1:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the people have spoken about their dissatisfaction with the two parties.

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>How do we know they're not registering in either one

1:19:12.200 --> 1:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of them? It's a rejection, collective rejection. But we don't

1:19:15.960 --> 1:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have a way. This group of voters is begging for

1:19:20.920 --> 1:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>something different, but we don't know how to offer it.

1:19:22.800 --> 1:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And I say we, meaning the collective, we left and right.

1:19:26.160 --> 1:19:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, one of the things that I wanted to

1:19:29.080 --> 1:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>really address in the book is somebody who's just been inside,

1:19:33.880 --> 1:19:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, all the way from local to national party

1:19:36.880 --> 1:19:40.040
<v Speaker 3>politics and Democratic Party is that you know, in the

1:19:40.160 --> 1:19:42.360
<v Speaker 3>entire time even that I've been involved in, Democratic Party

1:19:42.360 --> 1:19:47.320
<v Speaker 3>has evolved in change. You couldn't talk about abortion at all,

1:19:47.400 --> 1:19:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and people were like third rail.

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:55.599
<v Speaker 2>Now if you're not, you know, pro choice, that's a problem.

1:19:55.680 --> 1:19:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And most pretty much most parts of the country as

1:19:57.640 --> 1:20:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat now and that's because of folks who got

1:20:01.240 --> 1:20:04.439
<v Speaker 3>involved in the party and were active and activists, and

1:20:04.520 --> 1:20:07.280
<v Speaker 3>so you know, people look at the DNC and they

1:20:07.280 --> 1:20:09.360
<v Speaker 3>think of it as an entity that cannot be moved

1:20:09.360 --> 1:20:12.559
<v Speaker 3>and changed, and this party has evolved over time because

1:20:12.560 --> 1:20:15.880
<v Speaker 3>of the people who got involved and moved and changed it.

1:20:16.439 --> 1:20:18.400
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I say that, you know, you may

1:20:18.479 --> 1:20:20.840
<v Speaker 3>even be frustrated with the structure of the party as

1:20:20.840 --> 1:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>it is now. For me, I found, you know, common

1:20:23.840 --> 1:20:26.479
<v Speaker 3>cause of people who felt similar to me in what

1:20:26.520 --> 1:20:29.680
<v Speaker 3>we were advocating for. You know, Working Families Party has

1:20:29.720 --> 1:20:31.880
<v Speaker 3>become a good holding space for a lot of those

1:20:31.920 --> 1:20:35.040
<v Speaker 3>folks who are pretty frustrated you can vote a certain

1:20:35.080 --> 1:20:37.479
<v Speaker 3>line and not have to run a Democratic party in

1:20:37.520 --> 1:20:40.720
<v Speaker 3>New York. They're building power in other places. But I

1:20:40.800 --> 1:20:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, say, hey, Working Families Party exists primarily to

1:20:44.880 --> 1:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>organize people who agree on some of these issues around

1:20:49.080 --> 1:20:52.360
<v Speaker 3>a multiracial democracy, as you know, a stronger social safety

1:20:52.479 --> 1:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and all of that.

1:20:53.080 --> 1:20:54.839
<v Speaker 2>And you know, use that.

1:20:54.720 --> 1:20:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Community to sort of change your Democratic party in your area,

1:20:59.520 --> 1:21:02.559
<v Speaker 3>within whatever the structure that we have now. But I

1:21:02.640 --> 1:21:06.960
<v Speaker 3>never like to talk about our duopoly like we cannot

1:21:07.520 --> 1:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>in a democracy as a people moved to change it

1:21:11.240 --> 1:21:13.479
<v Speaker 3>because there are many people who have made it a

1:21:14.439 --> 1:21:17.120
<v Speaker 3>better on a lot of fronts as it is now.

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Well it's funny, it's both parties are coalitions and they

1:21:21.200 --> 1:21:24.559
<v Speaker 1>have been. It's just you know, I think twenty sixteen

1:21:25.080 --> 1:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>actually gave us our most vivid version of this. We

1:21:27.479 --> 1:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>saw that both parties actually had pretty bright line divisions,

1:21:31.280 --> 1:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. And if we had been a four party

1:21:33.160 --> 1:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>European sort of like the French, we would have had

1:21:35.800 --> 1:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>four finalists, you know, Bernie with the Greens, yeah, and

1:21:38.880 --> 1:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton with the you know labor, let's center labor,

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and maybe Marco Rubio with the sort of

1:21:44.800 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>center right party, and then the nationalists being Donald Trump

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>right like, that would have been your European breakdown. And

1:21:51.040 --> 1:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>who knows what that coalition would have looked like. It's

1:21:53.000 --> 1:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>possible Sanders and Trump would have bound together in a

1:21:56.479 --> 1:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>run off situation, you know, or Rubio or Clinton or

1:21:59.840 --> 1:22:02.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe not right, it could have been based on the

1:22:02.600 --> 1:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>cultural lines that are drawn. So it is. I do

1:22:07.200 --> 1:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think Americans want that kind of flexibility in their politics.

1:22:10.280 --> 1:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know how to deliver that system.

1:22:12.960 --> 1:22:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, And I think that it will take electing

1:22:17.320 --> 1:22:23.720
<v Speaker 3>people into office who are willing to push, you know,

1:22:24.040 --> 1:22:27.880
<v Speaker 3>for those changes, certainly so that we have a system

1:22:28.400 --> 1:22:29.320
<v Speaker 3>that it's better reflective.

1:22:29.320 --> 1:22:30.679
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of folks who are just not happy

1:22:30.720 --> 1:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>with the electoral.

1:22:31.360 --> 1:22:36.080
<v Speaker 3>College for obvious and good reasons, right, and we haven't

1:22:36.200 --> 1:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, organized the will around changing it.

1:22:38.640 --> 1:22:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that will change.

1:22:40.080 --> 1:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I will tell you my obsession with dealing with

1:22:42.160 --> 1:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college is to actually double the size of

1:22:44.280 --> 1:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the House. And then you actually make the numerator. The

1:22:48.080 --> 1:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>electoral college issue goes away. And it doesn't mean it

1:22:51.200 --> 1:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist, It just goes away if you raise the numerator, right,

1:22:56.320 --> 1:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like that's been And oh, by the way, if we

1:23:00.080 --> 1:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have more members of Congress than you actually have more

1:23:03.280 --> 1:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>people with access to power, and you've opened the door,

1:23:06.120 --> 1:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you've lowered the barrier to entry, and you may diversify

1:23:09.360 --> 1:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in all sorts of ways what Congress looks like. You

1:23:13.479 --> 1:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>know that for some reason, that's an easy reform to

1:23:16.439 --> 1:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>do without a constitutional amendment. And it's really hard to

1:23:18.600 --> 1:23:19.519
<v Speaker 1>get people engaged in.

1:23:20.240 --> 1:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think it's, uh, it'll be interesting. I'm

1:23:24.080 --> 1:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually curious to see if some of the energy

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:32.000
<v Speaker 3>for those changes really kind of takes hold with a

1:23:32.040 --> 1:23:34.479
<v Speaker 3>lot of a lot more folks as as they are

1:23:34.520 --> 1:23:39.320
<v Speaker 3>realizing now you know everyday folks that it's not working well.

1:23:39.479 --> 1:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>AI job, fear of AI job displacement could be that trigger.

1:23:43.920 --> 1:23:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, job a spliceman not be able to afford homes, right,

1:23:52.000 --> 1:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>jobs just not paying what they used to.

1:23:54.920 --> 1:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, talk to me right now about what you think

1:24:06.760 --> 1:24:09.599
<v Speaker 1>a winning Democratic coalition looks like in twenty twenty one.

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:14.559
<v Speaker 3>Winning Democratic coalition, Well, it's definitely going to have to

1:24:14.560 --> 1:24:23.080
<v Speaker 3>be somebody who is very unapologetic about addressing the previous

1:24:23.280 --> 1:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>harms of the administration.

1:24:24.800 --> 1:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know that people.

1:24:27.400 --> 1:24:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Who and you do it without looking like you're looking backwards.

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>You get my drift like, yeah, get you got to

1:24:33.400 --> 1:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>right wrongs And I'm with you there, but you got

1:24:36.000 --> 1:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to look like you're worried about the future. Right, it's

1:24:37.680 --> 1:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a it's a it's a tough it's a tough It's

1:24:39.720 --> 1:24:40.559
<v Speaker 1>tougher than you think.

1:24:40.960 --> 1:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah no, And it's one of those things where I

1:24:43.080 --> 1:24:48.599
<v Speaker 3>feel like, you know, all science point to unless something

1:24:48.640 --> 1:24:52.320
<v Speaker 3>goes really weird, Democrats will get the House. They will

1:24:52.360 --> 1:24:58.760
<v Speaker 3>have an opportunity to attempt to pass legislation and draft

1:24:58.840 --> 1:25:00.360
<v Speaker 3>legislation that.

1:25:00.200 --> 1:25:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Speaks to the concerns of the American.

1:25:02.600 --> 1:25:09.800
<v Speaker 3>People, housing economy, and a winning coalition looks like a

1:25:09.880 --> 1:25:17.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of people at the table who it's diverse. It's

1:25:17.520 --> 1:25:21.519
<v Speaker 3>racially diverse, it's people from all different walks of life.

1:25:21.800 --> 1:25:24.799
<v Speaker 3>The base of the party might be very racially diverse,

1:25:24.880 --> 1:25:27.000
<v Speaker 3>but those who have sort of made the decisions you

1:25:27.000 --> 1:25:29.080
<v Speaker 3>said earlier about twenty twelve.

1:25:28.720 --> 1:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>And it seems like we're stuck on twenty twelve.

1:25:30.680 --> 1:25:32.639
<v Speaker 3>And I would say that that is very much because

1:25:32.680 --> 1:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the people who are still running it

1:25:34.439 --> 1:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>are some of the folks who were involved in twenty twelve.

1:25:38.600 --> 1:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's Look, it happens to every generation of operatives.

1:25:42.479 --> 1:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a moment where they become the geniuses, and then

1:25:44.960 --> 1:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>there's the moment when they're the past. And right, I

1:25:48.320 --> 1:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>think the geniuses of the Obama era haven't accepted the

1:25:51.840 --> 1:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're no longer genius.

1:25:53.640 --> 1:25:58.080
<v Speaker 3>They're no longer the geniuses and are not the future.

1:25:58.560 --> 1:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>And it will be a hopefully a lot more.

1:26:02.600 --> 1:26:04.519
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't want to throw my gen x

1:26:04.600 --> 1:26:06.439
<v Speaker 2>ers completely out the window just yet.

1:26:07.040 --> 1:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Please, we never got our chance to lead. I am,

1:26:09.640 --> 1:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I am, I have this like you know, it is

1:26:12.720 --> 1:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one of these like we're I fear that we're the

1:26:15.000 --> 1:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>generation that's just going to get skipped, all right, We've

1:26:17.160 --> 1:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we like sucked up to the boomers for like my

1:26:20.320 --> 1:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>entire lifetime, and now we're going straight to millennials and

1:26:23.280 --> 1:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z you know, as my generation screamed reality bites, right, So, yes,

1:26:31.320 --> 1:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

1:26:31.800 --> 1:26:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Where it is the next generation. You know, we have

1:26:35.760 --> 1:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the gen xers. Finally millennials and gen Zers who are

1:26:39.760 --> 1:26:41.960
<v Speaker 3>are really and it's you know, millennials and a Z

1:26:42.080 --> 1:26:44.000
<v Speaker 3>are much more racially diverse generation.

1:26:44.520 --> 1:26:47.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's large, and it is large generation.

1:26:47.360 --> 1:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>She isn't a combined Is that fifty percent of the population, right?

1:26:50.640 --> 1:26:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Just yeah, right, yeah, yeah, just about just about, if

1:26:54.360 --> 1:26:55.639
<v Speaker 3>not by twenty eight for sure.

1:26:56.360 --> 1:26:58.640
<v Speaker 2>So and especially voting.

1:26:58.600 --> 1:27:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Vot voting popular, yeah yeah, and having a Folks have

1:27:04.200 --> 1:27:06.240
<v Speaker 3>different walks of life. Because one thing that struck me

1:27:06.439 --> 1:27:09.920
<v Speaker 3>when I was really looking at data is not only

1:27:10.080 --> 1:27:15.400
<v Speaker 3>these racially diverse generations, but also the different perspectives that.

1:27:15.320 --> 1:27:17.200
<v Speaker 2>You have as a result of it.

1:27:17.240 --> 1:27:19.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're more likely to have grown up in

1:27:19.960 --> 1:27:25.400
<v Speaker 3>household where parents are no longer together, you're blended families.

1:27:26.560 --> 1:27:32.799
<v Speaker 3>You likely maybe have related to immigrant people, folks who

1:27:32.800 --> 1:27:36.280
<v Speaker 3>came from somewhere else in the world. You know, you

1:27:36.840 --> 1:27:42.120
<v Speaker 3>are likely to have okay, counter economic strubles. You're likely

1:27:42.160 --> 1:27:45.599
<v Speaker 3>to have been in debt. You know these are people,

1:27:45.880 --> 1:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, Ayana Presley says, the people who are closest

1:27:48.080 --> 1:27:50.719
<v Speaker 3>to the pain should be closest to the power. And

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:53.920
<v Speaker 3>those are the definitely the folks who should be at

1:27:53.920 --> 1:27:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the table. I mean one thing, even just to go

1:27:55.960 --> 1:28:00.679
<v Speaker 3>back to sort of the David pluffs and Carvill's Carvil

1:28:00.720 --> 1:28:04.040
<v Speaker 3>who's long since been eating out on his time.

1:28:05.080 --> 1:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So he kind of admits it, like he will go

1:28:07.160 --> 1:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>out there, right, Remember he called out. You got to

1:28:10.760 --> 1:28:12.519
<v Speaker 1>give him credit for this. He goes, he called out

1:28:13.080 --> 1:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to name names, but certain them

1:28:15.360 --> 1:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>consultants who are worried about their carried interest clients and

1:28:18.080 --> 1:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not putting together a populous economic plan. So I hear

1:28:21.160 --> 1:28:23.519
<v Speaker 1>you on James, but he's still a populist at heart,

1:28:23.600 --> 1:28:25.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean at heart.

1:28:25.640 --> 1:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>But he has his moments. We're like get it. It's like, okay, sir,

1:28:29.120 --> 1:28:31.919
<v Speaker 2>like we are getting to be a more diverse America.

1:28:32.000 --> 1:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's let's start to sound like that that populace is

1:28:34.920 --> 1:28:36.280
<v Speaker 3>reflecting that the people.

1:28:36.520 --> 1:28:39.559
<v Speaker 2>And you know, when you think back on sort.

1:28:39.400 --> 1:28:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Of that, when you when you think of where this

1:28:42.600 --> 1:28:45.400
<v Speaker 3>country could be if you have those people at the

1:28:45.439 --> 1:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>table making those decisions.

1:28:48.040 --> 1:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>That is, that can be a coalition that wins.

1:28:53.400 --> 1:28:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Let me throw I I've I've made this observation a

1:28:57.560 --> 1:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>few times, and I think it it always lands awkwardly.

1:29:00.760 --> 1:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how, but I think we sometimes don't fully

1:29:05.280 --> 1:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the fact that we still have a large chunk

1:29:10.240 --> 1:29:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of voting Americans who grew up in segregated America. And

1:29:15.880 --> 1:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm look, I started kindergarten nineteen seventy seven

1:29:20.200 --> 1:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. I believe if I had started kindergarten eight

1:29:23.960 --> 1:29:27.519
<v Speaker 1>years sooner, I'd have been in a segregated system, right,

1:29:27.960 --> 1:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know that when that generation, as I like

1:29:34.760 --> 1:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, ages out of voting, that's like a big

1:29:40.360 --> 1:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>structural like I don't I sometimes think we don't fully appreciate,

1:29:46.120 --> 1:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, how young are. Multi ethnic and multi racial

1:29:49.439 --> 1:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>democracy really is, right. It has only been around since

1:29:52.240 --> 1:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty five, and there's you know, a third of

1:29:56.400 --> 1:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>American of the American electorate lived a in a free,

1:30:00.560 --> 1:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>multi racial society. It didn't mean it didn't exist, but

1:30:06.920 --> 1:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one that we actually recognized.

1:30:08.920 --> 1:30:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:30:10.040 --> 1:30:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I kind of allude to that. I think I

1:30:14.120 --> 1:30:17.120
<v Speaker 3>say it very directly in the book which is that

1:30:18.240 --> 1:30:22.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, when you don't realize how good you had it,

1:30:22.520 --> 1:30:27.519
<v Speaker 3>because a lot of the freedom's joid, the rights that

1:30:27.560 --> 1:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>we've had has been because of sort of the work

1:30:30.160 --> 1:30:34.320
<v Speaker 3>that came before. And you know, I think at the

1:30:34.520 --> 1:30:41.160
<v Speaker 3>organizing muscle for a long time of keeping a democracy

1:30:41.320 --> 1:30:45.240
<v Speaker 3>vibrant and pushing back against encroaching on sort of those

1:30:45.320 --> 1:30:49.519
<v Speaker 3>rights kind of atrophy. Right, Like you're like, okay, everything,

1:30:49.640 --> 1:30:50.320
<v Speaker 3>everything's working.

1:30:50.360 --> 1:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Look, we've we've we've equalized voting. Okay, yes, you've equalized voting,

1:30:54.040 --> 1:30:56.519
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't equalize opportunity, and you still have an

1:30:56.520 --> 1:31:00.559
<v Speaker 1>equalized opportunity. We still have an equalized education attainment we got.

1:31:00.600 --> 1:31:03.799
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I would argue that the single most underrated

1:31:03.840 --> 1:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>issue going into twenty eight is our fracturing public education system,

1:31:09.160 --> 1:31:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think it is I admire that Ram Emmanuel

1:31:13.800 --> 1:31:15.479
<v Speaker 1>is one of the few talking about it on the

1:31:15.520 --> 1:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>democratic side. I mean, I've got my skepticism about Ram,

1:31:18.560 --> 1:31:22.519
<v Speaker 1>whether Ram can shed the establishment baggage of his previous

1:31:22.520 --> 1:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>eras and all that stuff, but he's right about this topic.

1:31:25.880 --> 1:31:29.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think the shattering of the public education system

1:31:29.880 --> 1:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>actually brings us apart as a society as well, Like

1:31:33.640 --> 1:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a polarization issue. It's not just

1:31:38.880 --> 1:31:43.479
<v Speaker 1>bad for education outcomes, it's actually bad for the culture.

1:31:44.040 --> 1:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>If we don't have a shared public education.

1:31:46.439 --> 1:31:49.080
<v Speaker 3>System, we not have a shared public education, we don't

1:31:49.080 --> 1:31:51.800
<v Speaker 3>have a shared memory.

1:31:51.920 --> 1:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And other Well, that leads to that, like I think

1:31:54.439 --> 1:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>one leads to the other. That's why I think it's important.

1:31:58.760 --> 1:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>What was brilliant about our public education systems and in theory,

1:32:02.600 --> 1:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't work this way everywhere. I'd like to

1:32:06.520 --> 1:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>argue that I just got a taste of it living

1:32:08.920 --> 1:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>where I lived, because Miami was its own little unique experiment.

1:32:12.320 --> 1:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I always say, we're you know, Miami had this reputation

1:32:15.160 --> 1:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of being where the city of the future, meaning you know,

1:32:17.240 --> 1:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's problems are happening right now in Miami, and then

1:32:20.800 --> 1:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we solved. We went through all this in the eighties,

1:32:23.439 --> 1:32:28.519
<v Speaker 1>right then. And yet now it's you know, you don't

1:32:28.560 --> 1:32:32.519
<v Speaker 1>have socioeconomically wealthy people and socioeconomically poor people in the

1:32:32.520 --> 1:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>same schools, and you don't it's not even a close call.

1:32:34.840 --> 1:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That actually was a reality in the eighties.

1:32:36.680 --> 1:32:39.599
<v Speaker 3>You had that, Yeah, and more of that, and yeah,

1:32:39.680 --> 1:32:43.720
<v Speaker 3>it's changing in ways that is intentional.

1:32:45.320 --> 1:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course this voucher system. Yes, it is. It's

1:32:47.840 --> 1:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>all about it.

1:32:48.360 --> 1:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in religion, ye, and you know the running joke.

1:32:53.240 --> 1:32:54.920
<v Speaker 2>You may have heard it, but you know a lot

1:32:54.920 --> 1:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>of folks it's like.

1:32:55.640 --> 1:32:58.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, I mean Iraq and Afghanistan war is bad,

1:32:59.040 --> 1:33:03.880
<v Speaker 3>but really no child left behind is legacy in you

1:33:03.920 --> 1:33:07.720
<v Speaker 3>know what what it sort of opened the door to

1:33:07.960 --> 1:33:12.439
<v Speaker 3>which it's like the kind of this acceleration of you know,

1:33:12.560 --> 1:33:16.080
<v Speaker 3>not a set of agreed to ways to make sure

1:33:16.120 --> 1:33:18.800
<v Speaker 3>that everybody is getting sort of like a shared public education.

1:33:18.840 --> 1:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Because in the countries where they're all like on the

1:33:20.800 --> 1:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>same page about the Holocaust and.

1:33:22.840 --> 1:33:26.840
<v Speaker 3>What happened in Germany, right, I mean you never again

1:33:27.000 --> 1:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>mean something right, And it's the same where twenty twenty.

1:33:32.080 --> 1:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Was interesting to me.

1:33:32.880 --> 1:33:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I was luckily raised by people who made sure that

1:33:35.000 --> 1:33:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I understood the history of this country and the contributions

1:33:39.479 --> 1:33:41.800
<v Speaker 3>of many people. But when you have somebody who's like,

1:33:42.200 --> 1:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know about Tulsa, like so many things, so

1:33:46.920 --> 1:33:50.640
<v Speaker 3>many people like wait that happened.

1:33:50.560 --> 1:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, and look we had it similar in Florida.

1:33:53.000 --> 1:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm taught Florida history. I wasn't taught about axe Handle

1:33:55.439 --> 1:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Sunday in Jacksonville right, you know, And that was one

1:33:58.720 --> 1:34:00.519
<v Speaker 1>of those you realize you don't know which you haven't

1:34:00.520 --> 1:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>been taught. If it never gets introduced.

1:34:02.520 --> 1:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>It never gets introduced, right, And there is an intention

1:34:07.200 --> 1:34:10.120
<v Speaker 3>obviously behind that, because then if we're not exploring those things,

1:34:10.120 --> 1:34:12.240
<v Speaker 3>then we're not trying to think of what led to

1:34:12.280 --> 1:34:13.719
<v Speaker 3>that and how can you do better?

1:34:14.600 --> 1:34:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Fascination and so you know when I I.

1:34:19.160 --> 1:34:21.559
<v Speaker 3>One of the points I wanted to make about sort

1:34:21.560 --> 1:34:25.000
<v Speaker 3>of pluff to some extent Carve Believen though he's Southern,

1:34:25.520 --> 1:34:30.720
<v Speaker 3>but many of the strategists from the Avamba universe are southers,

1:34:32.320 --> 1:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and I think that and I think that has contributed

1:34:38.439 --> 1:34:43.320
<v Speaker 3>to some of the issues we've had because our politics

1:34:43.320 --> 1:34:46.920
<v Speaker 3>in a way at large, while it's like this American thing,

1:34:46.960 --> 1:34:52.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's very much affected by the seg The.

1:34:52.080 --> 1:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>South is the mood music for our politics still.

1:34:55.360 --> 1:34:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, in a lot of ways.

1:34:58.320 --> 1:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And it and soul of the Republican Party, right, and

1:35:02.960 --> 1:35:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's cultural base is in the South, right, And.

1:35:06.720 --> 1:35:08.920
<v Speaker 3>If you don't understand it and you didn't grow up

1:35:08.960 --> 1:35:13.120
<v Speaker 3>around it, which most black people have. And there's a

1:35:13.160 --> 1:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>chunk of white strategists to have, but they're not the

1:35:16.120 --> 1:35:21.280
<v Speaker 3>one sort of of of leading that work, and then

1:35:21.320 --> 1:35:23.720
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have some tone deaf responses like I

1:35:23.760 --> 1:35:28.320
<v Speaker 3>remember as reclined at some point after you know, Kirk

1:35:28.439 --> 1:35:31.479
<v Speaker 3>was murdered, where he said, you know, what is it like,

1:35:31.640 --> 1:35:33.640
<v Speaker 3>what would it be if we like went into a

1:35:33.720 --> 1:35:38.120
<v Speaker 3>church and argued about abortion rights and folks from like

1:35:38.680 --> 1:35:41.439
<v Speaker 3>in the South and the Midwest are like, we'd be dead, Like,

1:35:42.320 --> 1:35:48.240
<v Speaker 3>we don't, that's not how we organize here around that. So, yeah,

1:35:48.280 --> 1:35:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that lack of understanding when we have people who are

1:35:52.120 --> 1:36:00.040
<v Speaker 3>polsters and strategists, and.

1:35:57.560 --> 1:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to ste in that a

1:35:59.680 --> 1:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more because I do think that you know,

1:36:03.800 --> 1:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there's always been that joke about, you know, in the South,

1:36:12.000 --> 1:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>whites and blacks are more honest about race. In the North,

1:36:14.880 --> 1:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's more polite, but they're more dishonest about race. Do

1:36:17.960 --> 1:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you still feel that in sense that.

1:36:21.320 --> 1:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And there is this belief that because.

1:36:26.080 --> 1:36:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you know, we're the North, that we're not subject

1:36:33.640 --> 1:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to the same you know ills the South.

1:36:37.280 --> 1:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not the racist we're the Northerners. Yeah, we don't

1:36:39.880 --> 1:36:40.559
<v Speaker 1>have a history.

1:36:40.439 --> 1:36:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Right yet when you could point to so many many.

1:36:45.600 --> 1:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Different right yeah.

1:36:47.840 --> 1:36:51.759
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and it's it's interesting.

1:36:51.800 --> 1:36:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean, somebody was like, I found Confederate

1:36:54.520 --> 1:36:58.160
<v Speaker 3>flags in the hard parts of rural New York, and

1:36:58.160 --> 1:36:59.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, do you know what part of the country

1:36:59.640 --> 1:37:02.720
<v Speaker 3>you're in, Like, yeah, and I remember it was I

1:37:02.720 --> 1:37:05.400
<v Speaker 3>think it was Trusty McMillan Cottam I heard or say, like,

1:37:05.560 --> 1:37:08.559
<v Speaker 3>you know, because it was it clicked for me when

1:37:08.600 --> 1:37:11.439
<v Speaker 3>she was saying, like, you know, the culture of the

1:37:11.560 --> 1:37:16.360
<v Speaker 3>South has very much migrated into other in other parts

1:37:16.360 --> 1:37:17.920
<v Speaker 3>of the US and even other parts of the world,

1:37:17.960 --> 1:37:20.400
<v Speaker 3>you can find Confederate flags and other parts of the world.

1:37:20.680 --> 1:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Even no, I mean even just country music is more

1:37:23.040 --> 1:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>mainstream today in the Midwest than it was back in

1:37:27.360 --> 1:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in even the eighties, seventies or eighties

1:37:30.840 --> 1:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on that. You know, though, it's interesting you say that.

1:37:34.280 --> 1:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I always thought that Barack Obama's superpower as a political

1:37:39.280 --> 1:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>victor was being from Illinois. You know, when you looked

1:37:44.479 --> 1:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at the just the simple power of the states you

1:37:48.360 --> 1:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>know that were that touched Illinois were all important moments

1:37:52.840 --> 1:37:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for him in the primary. First of all, there was

1:37:55.320 --> 1:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Iowa Indiana late in the process, a statey loss, but

1:37:59.080 --> 1:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>almost one Missouri on Super Tuesday, one that he eked out.

1:38:03.240 --> 1:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It was important to eke one out against her and

1:38:06.520 --> 1:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the power in general, and he did really well and

1:38:10.040 --> 1:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>basically anything that was touched in Illinois. But you know,

1:38:15.800 --> 1:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>because there's this assumption to does the swing vote is

1:38:20.840 --> 1:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the swing area of America still the Midwest? Or you know,

1:38:25.160 --> 1:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is that the last time the Midwest sort of was

1:38:27.320 --> 1:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the swing area and just everything is down south? Now?

1:38:30.520 --> 1:38:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think I think, you know, biased

1:38:33.960 --> 1:38:36.439
<v Speaker 3>here being in Virginian, but I think a lot of

1:38:36.439 --> 1:38:36.960
<v Speaker 3>it is.

1:38:37.560 --> 1:38:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, I took that Virginia seceded from the Confederacy sometime

1:38:40.760 --> 1:38:45.479
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty eight. But that's yeah, right, you know

1:38:45.680 --> 1:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that Mason Dixon line keeps moving, you know, right, Yeah.

1:38:48.600 --> 1:38:53.560
<v Speaker 3>We'll be having a very different conversation if Georgia, North Carolina, Florida,

1:38:53.680 --> 1:38:57.160
<v Speaker 3>and Texas were different electorally. There's a reason that most

1:38:57.200 --> 1:39:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of the pushback to progress, some of the most horrific,

1:39:02.040 --> 1:39:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, voter suppression bills that you've seen, anti abortion,

1:39:06.400 --> 1:39:11.280
<v Speaker 3>anti liber all happen in the South, some of it

1:39:11.400 --> 1:39:12.240
<v Speaker 3>in the Midwest.

1:39:12.439 --> 1:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, look at the National Party. They seem allergic to

1:39:14.600 --> 1:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>actually trying to work on the South. Outside of Georgia,

1:39:17.720 --> 1:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and North Carolina and that yeah, I mean, I'm sorry,

1:39:20.400 --> 1:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi and South Carolina are totally underfunded and have enough

1:39:26.240 --> 1:39:29.240
<v Speaker 1>potential vote to be competitive. You just have to put

1:39:29.280 --> 1:39:32.519
<v Speaker 1>a little elbow grease into it. In Texas and Florida

1:39:32.600 --> 1:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>arguably the same way. They're expensive, but there's this consistent

1:39:36.560 --> 1:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>well the money will go further if we just lock

1:39:39.479 --> 1:39:41.639
<v Speaker 1>down Michigan, right, And.

1:39:41.600 --> 1:39:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it's because of those are the areas in

1:39:43.200 --> 1:39:46.320
<v Speaker 3>which they feel comfortable. And that goes back to saying, oh, okay,

1:39:46.320 --> 1:39:49.839
<v Speaker 3>well we don't have like Southern strategies, especially come brown organizers.

1:39:49.880 --> 1:39:53.240
<v Speaker 3>You've had to navigate around all of these challenges if

1:39:53.240 --> 1:39:56.200
<v Speaker 3>you're from Chicago and you go down to you know,

1:39:56.880 --> 1:40:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the South. I mean, when I think of some tomes

1:40:00.240 --> 1:40:02.640
<v Speaker 3>of stories I would hear from like fellow, you know,

1:40:03.160 --> 1:40:03.720
<v Speaker 3>folks in.

1:40:03.720 --> 1:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Virginia other parts of the South.

1:40:05.240 --> 1:40:08.439
<v Speaker 3>Then they would get somebody who mentioned the name of

1:40:08.479 --> 1:40:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a street where it was and then said it incorrectly

1:40:12.560 --> 1:40:15.680
<v Speaker 3>or didn't have sort of an understanding of a cultural

1:40:15.800 --> 1:40:20.679
<v Speaker 3>nuance of why you refer to, you know, a black

1:40:20.800 --> 1:40:26.439
<v Speaker 3>elder in a certain way, or the nuances of food

1:40:26.680 --> 1:40:27.599
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that.

1:40:27.760 --> 1:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you one that I ran into when I

1:40:29.320 --> 1:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>first joined NBC, which was like, well, we can't poll

1:40:32.080 --> 1:40:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on a Wednesday night. Why can't you poll on a

1:40:33.800 --> 1:40:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday night? And this was in South Carolina, like Wednesday

1:40:36.479 --> 1:40:39.599
<v Speaker 1>night's church night. And if you don't know the culture

1:40:39.600 --> 1:40:41.479
<v Speaker 1>of the South, you wouldn't know that you'd get a

1:40:41.479 --> 1:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bad poll number on a Wednesday night. You know, just

1:40:43.640 --> 1:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>special eating, you know, because there's just all sorts of

1:40:46.080 --> 1:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>noise because and it's like, just because people go to

1:40:48.439 --> 1:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>their church on Wednesday nights doesn't mean they're religious fervor

1:40:51.600 --> 1:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it might just simply be that's what the community does

1:40:53.960 --> 1:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to get together on a Wednesday.

1:40:55.000 --> 1:40:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Night, that's what the community does. My first campaign, I

1:40:58.160 --> 1:41:02.200
<v Speaker 3>remember he was in the deeper southern part of our district,

1:41:02.479 --> 1:41:04.639
<v Speaker 3>was a real southern district, and he said, yeah, I'm

1:41:04.680 --> 1:41:07.000
<v Speaker 3>not even a religious person, but I am definitely putting

1:41:07.040 --> 1:41:09.320
<v Speaker 3>up the sign on Sunday morning that says gone to

1:41:09.520 --> 1:41:14.040
<v Speaker 3>church if anybody's coming by the campaign or whatever. And

1:41:14.200 --> 1:41:19.439
<v Speaker 3>understanding the culture of the district. And so yeah, I

1:41:19.479 --> 1:41:22.720
<v Speaker 3>think that that has absolutely presented challenges and to the

1:41:22.760 --> 1:41:23.439
<v Speaker 3>type of work that.

1:41:23.400 --> 1:41:23.880
<v Speaker 2>We can do.

1:41:23.960 --> 1:41:25.360
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things I was going to say

1:41:25.479 --> 1:41:28.280
<v Speaker 3>was that. You know, Obama's superpower to me was that

1:41:29.000 --> 1:41:32.840
<v Speaker 3>he he at least I think, because he had grown

1:41:32.920 --> 1:41:36.040
<v Speaker 3>up living around the world, had lived in a multiracial

1:41:36.120 --> 1:41:41.400
<v Speaker 3>place like Hawaii. He kind of really early on understood

1:41:41.400 --> 1:41:45.559
<v Speaker 3>how to talk to everyone. That was his talent.

1:41:46.200 --> 1:41:47.280
<v Speaker 2>And you still.

1:41:47.040 --> 1:41:50.400
<v Speaker 3>See a lot of election no scar tissue, no scar tissue.

1:41:51.160 --> 1:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody does what you get through. But he didn't have

1:41:53.640 --> 1:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of scar tissue in that. There's something freeing

1:41:57.120 --> 1:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>about that as a politician.

1:41:58.760 --> 1:42:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that that is having something.

1:42:01.840 --> 1:42:04.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Jimmy Carter also had that talent too, Like

1:42:04.439 --> 1:42:08.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, his primary, you know, he did

1:42:08.800 --> 1:42:11.360
<v Speaker 3>well because he knew and was comfortable in the room

1:42:11.400 --> 1:42:15.160
<v Speaker 3>with black people, like just soon how to deal with them,

1:42:15.880 --> 1:42:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Unlike a lot of other folks he was you know,

1:42:17.840 --> 1:42:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, other folks he was in the primary

1:42:19.920 --> 1:42:20.599
<v Speaker 3>with at that time.

1:42:21.000 --> 1:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me get you out of here on this.

1:42:23.479 --> 1:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Give me four. Give me four people, one of you know,

1:42:27.560 --> 1:42:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the four people in your head who think are most

1:42:29.520 --> 1:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to be the actual Democratic nominee, not who you

1:42:33.000 --> 1:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>want right now, Give me four. You know, it's sort

1:42:37.000 --> 1:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of like it's way early, but I'll give you. That's

1:42:39.000 --> 1:42:41.280
<v Speaker 1>why I'm going to give you four of which one

1:42:41.320 --> 1:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of whom you know you're You're just sort of like,

1:42:43.720 --> 1:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like, look, this is my field, so narrow, this

1:42:46.520 --> 1:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>giant field of about forty mentionables these days. Who give

1:42:51.800 --> 1:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>me a quartet where you think, yeah, the VP or

1:42:55.160 --> 1:42:56.439
<v Speaker 1>P is going to come out of this?

1:42:57.400 --> 1:42:57.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:42:57.760 --> 1:43:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I you know, I see Pritzker. I'd be interested in,

1:43:04.680 --> 1:43:06.880
<v Speaker 3>especially if he kind of fashioned himself in a modern

1:43:06.960 --> 1:43:09.840
<v Speaker 3>day sort of FDR that same sort of.

1:43:09.880 --> 1:43:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Fact I am. I was a skeptic until I saw

1:43:14.080 --> 1:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>him play party machinist in a very effective way, and

1:43:18.400 --> 1:43:21.240
<v Speaker 1>during the primary he did for Juliana Stratton. I'm like,

1:43:21.240 --> 1:43:23.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm not going to dismiss him anymore. Yeah,

1:43:23.479 --> 1:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not dismissive.

1:43:24.600 --> 1:43:26.639
<v Speaker 2>That's yeah, that's kind of where I'm with him too.

1:43:28.160 --> 1:43:29.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, he says no, because I think I was

1:43:29.920 --> 1:43:31.439
<v Speaker 3>the thing of the thing you say when you're running

1:43:31.479 --> 1:43:32.479
<v Speaker 3>again for you a senate.

1:43:32.560 --> 1:43:36.320
<v Speaker 2>But I see as off in the mix somehow more.

1:43:36.160 --> 1:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So than made Warnock too right in that like a

1:43:39.280 --> 1:43:41.599
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the only one can run.

1:43:42.000 --> 1:43:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well only one can run, and that is like

1:43:45.200 --> 1:43:47.280
<v Speaker 3>warn Oxhmbison I wouldn't be surprised if it is. He's

1:43:47.840 --> 1:43:51.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, preternaturally talented on stump and inlakable.

1:43:52.680 --> 1:43:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And gosh.

1:43:54.120 --> 1:43:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I will see her in the mix, whether

1:43:59.000 --> 1:44:02.200
<v Speaker 3>she is whether she's actually successful again in the d

1:44:02.200 --> 1:44:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of the nomination of no but I could see the

1:44:04.920 --> 1:44:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Vice President Kamala Harris back in the mix as well.

1:44:07.880 --> 1:44:12.800
<v Speaker 1>She got a we're all in Washington underestimating her strength

1:44:12.880 --> 1:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>at the current elector in army.

1:44:15.520 --> 1:44:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I feel so, I do, and I think she could

1:44:18.800 --> 1:44:22.320
<v Speaker 3>be an interesting candidate again now that she's less tied

1:44:22.439 --> 1:44:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to trying to essentially accommodate an administration that she's part of.

1:44:29.120 --> 1:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I've been through this, and I hate

1:44:31.280 --> 1:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I know they hate when people like me put them

1:44:33.000 --> 1:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on the couch. I will go to my grave believing

1:44:36.479 --> 1:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that she's yet to run a campaign that was her campaign,

1:44:38.960 --> 1:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>yet that she's always been running somebody else's race or

1:44:42.040 --> 1:44:45.959
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's, you know, suggestion. I found her primary campaign

1:44:46.000 --> 1:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to be this attempt to be all things to all people.

1:44:49.160 --> 1:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>She was trying to straddle write the Medicare for All

1:44:51.920 --> 1:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>mindset sort of told you everything you needed to know.

1:44:54.280 --> 1:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>She was trying to be all things. To all parts

1:44:56.920 --> 1:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the party. It felt very consultant driven her twenty

1:45:01.080 --> 1:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen race per Senate with Holp, consultant driven her twenty

1:45:04.080 --> 1:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ten campaign. You know, so she's always had I think,

1:45:07.040 --> 1:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and so my guess is you're right, we will see

1:45:11.040 --> 1:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a different version of her. And I'm very curious what

1:45:13.000 --> 1:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah, Sam, very curious what it is. So

1:45:16.920 --> 1:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that's three Pritzker awesof and common don't think I didn't

1:45:21.000 --> 1:45:21.679
<v Speaker 1>keep count.

1:45:23.680 --> 1:45:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh my goodness, all right, I'm not keen on it,

1:45:29.360 --> 1:45:31.240
<v Speaker 3>but he gonna find some way into it.

1:45:31.280 --> 1:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Dewson, Yeah, I don't know what he's four.

1:45:37.320 --> 1:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what he's four either. That's why I

1:45:39.000 --> 1:45:41.640
<v Speaker 2>said I'm not Yeah, but I.

1:45:42.400 --> 1:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Know what he's good at, which is being a resistance leader. Right.

1:45:46.120 --> 1:45:47.720
<v Speaker 1>He knows how to do that. And that's what I

1:45:47.720 --> 1:45:50.639
<v Speaker 1>think about Pritzkert. I don't know what they're for, although

1:45:50.640 --> 1:45:54.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more meat on the bones with Pritzker, right,

1:45:54.600 --> 1:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I get that.

1:45:55.800 --> 1:45:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I would say, Yeah.

1:45:57.840 --> 1:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>No's he's sort of he's in charge of the Illinois

1:46:01.760 --> 1:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party. Kevin Newsom is not in charge of the

1:46:04.000 --> 1:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>California Democratic Party. And you can feel that difference in

1:46:07.479 --> 1:46:09.280
<v Speaker 1>their government styles and their campaign style.

1:46:09.720 --> 1:46:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

1:46:10.640 --> 1:46:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And if I knew what Newsom was for, it's

1:46:16.960 --> 1:46:19.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of interesting. I saw him when he was speak

1:46:19.400 --> 1:46:23.439
<v Speaker 3>when he was an elected mayor. He's very different and

1:46:23.560 --> 1:46:26.280
<v Speaker 3>you evolved in your politics. But I'm like, okay, was

1:46:26.320 --> 1:46:27.200
<v Speaker 3>that for version? Real?

1:46:28.920 --> 1:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>This version he's all sorts of talented. Yeah, there's no doubt,

1:46:33.400 --> 1:46:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like he is a I used that. I like to

1:46:35.400 --> 1:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>use the expression political athlete. He's a really good political athlete.

1:46:40.560 --> 1:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But you've got to have a specialty, right, You've got

1:46:43.360 --> 1:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to be what are you fighting for? Right, It's got

1:46:46.040 --> 1:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to be it's got to be a thing, not a

1:46:48.200 --> 1:46:51.559
<v Speaker 1>not a not just winning. That isn't the idea, you know,

1:46:51.880 --> 1:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see. Look, this book's a great you know

1:46:56.040 --> 1:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the instigator. Do you when do you think this translates

1:46:59.600 --> 1:47:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to more black women getting elected on their own right statewide?

1:47:02.680 --> 1:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Although I think we're finally starting to see that breakthrough.

1:47:05.520 --> 1:47:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I think we are some of the treatin also Brooks.

1:47:10.840 --> 1:47:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm actually hopeful in this next couple of years,

1:47:14.680 --> 1:47:18.160
<v Speaker 3>like twenty six and setting up for twenty eight, that

1:47:18.240 --> 1:47:21.360
<v Speaker 3>we'll start to maybe finally get that, you know, black

1:47:21.360 --> 1:47:22.880
<v Speaker 3>woman governor, So I haven't got one yet.

1:47:24.840 --> 1:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You know that could have lands bottoms is probably the

1:47:27.080 --> 1:47:27.519
<v Speaker 1>best shot.

1:47:27.640 --> 1:47:30.479
<v Speaker 3>This probably be shot this year, I think, yeah, this

1:47:30.680 --> 1:47:34.679
<v Speaker 3>year for sure, but I do see an increase just great.

1:47:35.560 --> 1:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well a team of this has been great to

1:47:39.120 --> 1:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>talk with you, great to meet you. I mean, yeah,

1:47:41.280 --> 1:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that we've not met before. Where are you

1:47:43.920 --> 1:47:45.479
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia? Where did you grow up in Virginia?

1:47:46.479 --> 1:47:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Northern? Well, actually I grew up in just outside of Richmond, and.

1:47:51.280 --> 1:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Now I love northern Virginia. Where does Northern Virginia d now?

1:47:57.200 --> 1:47:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Fredericksburg.

1:47:58.840 --> 1:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like this blob that keeps growing, right, Yeah,

1:48:03.479 --> 1:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>what's bigger? Northern Virginia or the Atlanta suburbs? Right, it's

1:48:06.720 --> 1:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>almost it's a very similar thing.

1:48:08.360 --> 1:48:11.000
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, no, I'm like when they say Atlanta suburbs

1:48:11.000 --> 1:48:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like, that's not that's like an hour out

1:48:13.400 --> 1:48:14.679
<v Speaker 3>and they're like, now still the suburbs.

1:48:16.080 --> 1:48:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I know. Right. It's like it's well, if we

1:48:19.520 --> 1:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>were all one state, we'd talk about Washington Baltimore as one. Yeah, well,

1:48:27.080 --> 1:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about if we you know, if

1:48:29.200 --> 1:48:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump had really been clever about this whole Arlington splitting

1:48:32.320 --> 1:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>putting Arlington back to d C. You know what he

1:48:34.680 --> 1:48:37.840
<v Speaker 1>really would have done. What is is we're going to

1:48:37.920 --> 1:48:40.519
<v Speaker 1>put give Arlington back to d C and advocate for

1:48:40.600 --> 1:48:43.639
<v Speaker 1>d C statehood. Then if you really want to put

1:48:44.479 --> 1:48:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pressure like that would be a fault line. They're not

1:48:48.360 --> 1:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that clever. This is why I'm like, they're terrible at this,

1:48:50.800 --> 1:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Like they could be much smarter about their policy. Like

1:48:53.160 --> 1:48:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to drive a wedge. Yeah, offer offer to

1:48:56.280 --> 1:48:59.479
<v Speaker 1>give Arlington back in exchange for statehood? You want state? Hup,

1:48:59.520 --> 1:49:00.519
<v Speaker 1>you got to take Arlington?

1:49:00.920 --> 1:49:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, yeah, gosh, that would be kind of interesting.

1:49:05.840 --> 1:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're never that Like I said, they're never

1:49:08.080 --> 1:49:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that clever. It's all a sledgehammer everything, you know, every

1:49:10.840 --> 1:49:14.760
<v Speaker 1>problem is a nail, every hammer. Anyway, Well, the book is,

1:49:15.120 --> 1:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's terrific. It's a good especially I've got a lot

1:49:18.000 --> 1:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of political nerds in a good way. I say that

1:49:20.080 --> 1:49:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a compliment. Thank you know that listen that want

1:49:23.280 --> 1:49:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to know more. And this has also got plenty of

1:49:25.280 --> 1:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>data in it too, So thank you for coming on.

1:49:29.280 --> 1:49:31.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, thank you again for having me Jack, and I.

1:49:31.720 --> 1:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>See you down the road and I love the merch.

1:49:33.320 --> 1:49:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Well then, well, thank you you can order on the

1:49:35.520 --> 1:49:37.360
<v Speaker 3>website as well The Instigators book dot com.

1:49:39.439 --> 1:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Well said he have a great evening. Well, I hope

1:49:52.320 --> 1:49:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed that conversation. As you saw, got a little

1:49:54.840 --> 1:50:02.000
<v Speaker 1>blunt there about twenty twenty four and Joe Biden. But

1:50:02.040 --> 1:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely I think a book a book worth getting

1:50:05.960 --> 1:50:10.479
<v Speaker 1>to understand just how big the importance is in a

1:50:10.520 --> 1:50:14.840
<v Speaker 1>primary particularly. But I found what I found really fascinating

1:50:14.840 --> 1:50:18.240
<v Speaker 1>when Atimo was making the case is sort of, do

1:50:18.800 --> 1:50:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic strategists who aren't from the South just not get

1:50:21.760 --> 1:50:26.519
<v Speaker 1>it right? Let's just say there might be something to that,

1:50:26.680 --> 1:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>right too many I could tell you this, if I

1:50:29.200 --> 1:50:31.400
<v Speaker 1>were running for national politics, I wouldn't hire anybody that

1:50:31.400 --> 1:50:34.759
<v Speaker 1>lived in New York or DC. Right, you want people

1:50:34.800 --> 1:50:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that are grounded somewhere else. I think you know it

1:50:41.360 --> 1:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just is, you know, certainly at least as one foot

1:50:44.040 --> 1:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>outside the coast. I certainly would be as far away

1:50:47.120 --> 1:50:50.679
<v Speaker 1>from New York as I possibly could culturally in California,

1:50:50.720 --> 1:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think right now for the Democratic Party, the

1:50:53.280 --> 1:50:58.559
<v Speaker 1>coasts coastal connections are sort of radioactive. All right, let's

1:50:58.560 --> 1:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>go with the top five list.

1:51:01.479 --> 1:51:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Chest top top chest.

1:51:07.240 --> 1:51:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Then this is a fun one today, which it's the

1:51:09.560 --> 1:51:15.800
<v Speaker 1>top five races that are essentially that are going to

1:51:15.880 --> 1:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>decide win. Lame duck status kicks in for Donald Trump, right,

1:51:21.160 --> 1:51:24.400
<v Speaker 1>every second term president becomes a lame duck at some point.

1:51:24.439 --> 1:51:27.479
<v Speaker 1>And I've condentned it's very possible Trump's already a lame duck.

1:51:27.520 --> 1:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>We just haven't fully realized it yet. Sometimes you have

1:51:30.160 --> 1:51:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to go back, you have to go forwards, and then

1:51:32.680 --> 1:51:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you'll go, oh, it turns out that he was a

1:51:34.479 --> 1:51:37.439
<v Speaker 1>lame duck starting, you know, with the with the you know,

1:51:37.479 --> 1:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it could could have begun all the way on tariff day, right.

1:51:40.000 --> 1:51:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It was like with Joe Biden. You know, in the

1:51:41.920 --> 1:51:44.479
<v Speaker 1>moment of the Afghanistan withdrawal, it you didn't realize, oh,

1:51:44.479 --> 1:51:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the beginning of the end of his presidency. Then

1:51:46.680 --> 1:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the farther away we got from it, and the less

1:51:49.280 --> 1:51:52.360
<v Speaker 1>unless he recovered from that moment, the more you're like, oh, hey,

1:51:52.360 --> 1:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that turned out to be the beginning of the end

1:51:53.840 --> 1:51:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of his presidency. Right. In some ways, that's when it began, right,

1:51:57.320 --> 1:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And it is one of those things you sometimes it

1:51:59.439 --> 1:52:03.879
<v Speaker 1>takes takes a beat to look back. But I definitely

1:52:03.920 --> 1:52:07.320
<v Speaker 1>think in this midterm cycle, especially with the way that

1:52:07.400 --> 1:52:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has tried to exert a grip on the

1:52:10.560 --> 1:52:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party, right is he took over he you know,

1:52:14.000 --> 1:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>at first it was hijacking, and now he's done a

1:52:16.360 --> 1:52:22.439
<v Speaker 1>purge and this is his party. His endorsements usually lead

1:52:22.479 --> 1:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to victories. And that's what I'm framing my top five

1:52:26.960 --> 1:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>list around, which is the top five primaries where Trump

1:52:30.400 --> 1:52:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is most vulnerable to seeing his choice lose and essentially

1:52:37.640 --> 1:52:41.360
<v Speaker 1>which would then trigger the narrative that perhaps his grip

1:52:41.439 --> 1:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on the party itself is loosening. And we know that

1:52:44.200 --> 1:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that has all sorts of contagion effects, right, And there's

1:52:48.360 --> 1:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>no doubt you can probably guess what the number one

1:52:51.080 --> 1:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>race is going to be. But all of this begins

1:52:53.200 --> 1:52:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of weeks. Okay, four of my

1:52:56.000 --> 1:52:59.439
<v Speaker 1>five primary races are all in the month of May,

1:53:00.280 --> 1:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to find out in the month of

1:53:01.960 --> 1:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>May whether Trump's grip on the party is as strong

1:53:05.640 --> 1:53:09.479
<v Speaker 1>as it has been over the last few cycles. So

1:53:11.200 --> 1:53:14.439
<v Speaker 1>my top five races that will be to me are

1:53:14.479 --> 1:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a measurement of his strength in the party and will

1:53:18.960 --> 1:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be a essentially success. Right, Well, then the critics quiet

1:53:24.400 --> 1:53:29.160
<v Speaker 1>down and his grip on the party. Titans failure and

1:53:29.200 --> 1:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the grip starts to loosen. How many multiple failures and

1:53:34.240 --> 1:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing could collapse. So number five on my

1:53:37.160 --> 1:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>list is actually not a primary. It's the only non

1:53:39.400 --> 1:53:41.160
<v Speaker 1>primary I've put on the list in his North Carolina

1:53:41.200 --> 1:53:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Senate because Michael Wattley essentially got handed the nomination right

1:53:47.880 --> 1:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>he was the de facto candidate after Laura Trump decided

1:53:51.760 --> 1:53:54.280
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to be a senator. But this was

1:53:54.400 --> 1:53:58.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially Trump blessed. This was Trump's rn Sea chair, so

1:53:59.080 --> 1:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he walked. So this is somebody that Trump

1:54:01.400 --> 1:54:07.679
<v Speaker 1>has groomed to be a party leader, essentially shifting him

1:54:07.720 --> 1:54:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to the top spot at the RNC and now shifting

1:54:11.320 --> 1:54:15.280
<v Speaker 1>him into the nomination slot for the open US sendency

1:54:15.360 --> 1:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to replace Tom Tillis. And oh, by the way, he

1:54:18.160 --> 1:54:22.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially chased Tom Tillis out of the party. Don't believe me.

1:54:22.320 --> 1:54:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Just look at Tom Tillis's behavior right now in the Senate.

1:54:25.760 --> 1:54:29.479
<v Speaker 1>He ain't doing Trump's bidding. Look, losing to Roy Cooper

1:54:29.600 --> 1:54:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is not a sign that Donald Trump has lost his fastball.

1:54:32.560 --> 1:54:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay that I'm not going to sit there. But if

1:54:34.800 --> 1:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Wattley loses by double digits. Then this is proof

1:54:38.600 --> 1:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that Trump really just absolutely made a gigantic mistake. Right,

1:54:43.880 --> 1:54:46.720
<v Speaker 1>probably should have let if he didn't really have confidence

1:54:46.720 --> 1:54:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in Watleys as a statewide candidate, well, let a primary happen.

1:54:50.800 --> 1:54:53.080
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, a competitive primary might have given new

1:54:53.160 --> 1:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>name id to somebody that's a rising up, might have

1:54:55.480 --> 1:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>been a member of Congress. But that is not how

1:54:57.880 --> 1:55:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to handle things. So I do this race,

1:55:01.560 --> 1:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and for me, the marker is double digits versus single digits.

1:55:04.400 --> 1:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>A double digit Roy Cooper victory really is an indictment

1:55:08.440 --> 1:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on Trump's political acumen, right, and will be will cause

1:55:13.040 --> 1:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>all sort because this is a former R and C chair.

1:55:15.120 --> 1:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll cause all sorts of handwringing and blind quotes and

1:55:21.680 --> 1:55:23.760
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff saying, you know, this was crazy,

1:55:23.800 --> 1:55:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what was even made the nominee? This is all Trump? Right,

1:55:27.600 --> 1:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So he is just large ownership of the North Carolina

1:55:30.720 --> 1:55:32.960
<v Speaker 1>center race, more so than Maine, more so than really

1:55:33.040 --> 1:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>any other competitive center race. Right, this is his creation. Right,

1:55:38.760 --> 1:55:41.480
<v Speaker 1>He bullied the till Us out of the party, he

1:55:41.600 --> 1:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>put his person in there, He cleared the primary field, right,

1:55:46.000 --> 1:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so there is no Senate race. He in some ways

1:55:48.720 --> 1:55:50.880
<v Speaker 1>owns more than this one. So that's number five of them,

1:55:50.960 --> 1:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>list number four. It's another center race Louisiana Senate. Now

1:55:54.000 --> 1:55:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we've got the primary on the sixteenth of May, and

1:55:56.400 --> 1:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's likely to be a run off because we've

1:55:58.560 --> 1:56:01.320
<v Speaker 1>got a three way competitive race, and with of course

1:56:01.920 --> 1:56:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cassidy the incumbent, Julia Letlowe congresswoman, and then John Fleming,

1:56:06.680 --> 1:56:08.440
<v Speaker 1>who's been in this race before. So it's a three

1:56:08.440 --> 1:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>way race. They've all got reasonable money and there's going

1:56:11.560 --> 1:56:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to be two that make it through. If Cassidy's one

1:56:14.360 --> 1:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of the two, you know, Cassidy is a puncher's chance

1:56:21.080 --> 1:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in this thing. Now, look, they've rigged the rules in

1:56:24.240 --> 1:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana to try to punish Cassidy. Right, this is the

1:56:26.600 --> 1:56:29.800
<v Speaker 1>first time they're ever doing a cartisan primary. That Louisiana

1:56:29.840 --> 1:56:31.800
<v Speaker 1>used to be an all party primary, one ballot and

1:56:31.800 --> 1:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>then there was sort of a runoff situation. Frankly, it's

1:56:36.760 --> 1:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>actually a model that I wish more states would have adopted.

1:56:39.160 --> 1:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a shame to see this go the

1:56:40.960 --> 1:56:42.400
<v Speaker 1>other way. But we know why it went the other way.

1:56:42.440 --> 1:56:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Cassidy voted to convict Donald Trump after the second impeachment

1:56:47.480 --> 1:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and this was they knew that in the old system

1:56:51.200 --> 1:56:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Cassidy would survive. How do we know this, Well, there's

1:56:53.800 --> 1:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>still two impeachers in the House, Dan Newhouse in Washington

1:56:58.560 --> 1:57:01.240
<v Speaker 1>State and David Valade. And what do they both have

1:57:01.320 --> 1:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in common? They are in all party primaries. They did

1:57:03.880 --> 1:57:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not have a partisan primary that they had to get through.

1:57:06.520 --> 1:57:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Anybody that had to get through a partisan primary lost.

1:57:09.640 --> 1:57:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So look, I am I certainly think Cassidy's the underdog here.

1:57:15.600 --> 1:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll get into the runoff. I assume he loses,

1:57:19.840 --> 1:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But what a repudiation to Trump. If he doesn't. It's

1:57:25.800 --> 1:57:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a big win for Trump. If Cassidy doesn't even make

1:57:27.960 --> 1:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the runoff, it's a small win for Trump. If he

1:57:32.400 --> 1:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>knocks him off in the runoff, it's a humiliation. If

1:57:37.240 --> 1:57:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Cassidy wins renomination Texas Senate. This is number three on

1:57:41.680 --> 1:57:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the list. Look, even though Trump is supposedly not endorsed,

1:57:47.040 --> 1:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear Paxton's Maga Cornin is not right. So

1:57:52.680 --> 1:57:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump is. You know. My guess is if he the

1:57:56.440 --> 1:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that he hasn't endorsed now means he's probably not

1:57:58.720 --> 1:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going to because he's afraid. I think of this one

1:58:01.160 --> 1:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's not clear. I don't know, you know, I

1:58:04.600 --> 1:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think he has the standing with the party anymore

1:58:06.800 --> 1:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that endorsing Cornan would put automatically put him over the top.

1:58:10.640 --> 1:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Put it this way, he's afraid to find out, and

1:58:12.920 --> 1:58:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the lack of him not wanting to get involved in

1:58:15.240 --> 1:58:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this race says more about his own fear of exposing himself. Right,

1:58:22.760 --> 1:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>does the Emperor have clothes on or not moment than

1:58:26.800 --> 1:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>anything else. So you know, he'll take credit for a

1:58:32.560 --> 1:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>corn and win if Cornin somehow gets out of this runoff.

1:58:34.640 --> 1:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this runoffs May twenty six, end of

1:58:36.280 --> 1:58:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the month, right after Memorial Day, so likely to be

1:58:39.000 --> 1:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>low turnout, usually not a good sign for the for

1:58:41.960 --> 1:58:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the for the more center right candidate or center left candidate,

1:58:46.000 --> 1:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, always usually an advantage for the base. But

1:58:49.960 --> 1:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this is one that I think, you know, Cornyn surviving

1:58:53.720 --> 1:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a repudiation Omega, and that in it indirectly

1:58:59.280 --> 1:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is a repudiation a Trump or a loosening of the grip.

1:59:03.280 --> 1:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Next time, this is Georgia governor, and this is going

1:59:05.360 --> 1:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to be an interesting test. So Trump's already endorsed in

1:59:07.720 --> 1:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Governor. He endorsed the Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones, and

1:59:10.760 --> 1:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he's endorsed him from the beginning. And Burt Jones has

1:59:12.960 --> 1:59:15.160
<v Speaker 1>been somebody that has flirted with some of these conspiracies.

1:59:15.240 --> 1:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>He's been on the MAGA train from the beginning, very

1:59:17.360 --> 1:59:22.120
<v Speaker 1>much like Paxton in Texas well. A new candidate jump

1:59:22.120 --> 1:59:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in this race, sort of a former healthcare executive named

1:59:25.200 --> 1:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Rick Jackson. Got a terrific personal story that really I

1:59:28.680 --> 1:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>think resonates with people. He's essentially a foster kid that

1:59:32.720 --> 1:59:35.880
<v Speaker 1>built his own life after that and he's been incredibly

1:59:35.920 --> 1:59:39.560
<v Speaker 1>charitable with Foster organization. So he's just he's got a

1:59:41.560 --> 1:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have the usual political narrative for a biography.

1:59:45.800 --> 1:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's quite syllable, and I think him is

1:59:47.640 --> 1:59:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, if you're gonna ask me, I

1:59:49.360 --> 1:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think Brick Jackson's the favorite to be the next governor,

1:59:51.320 --> 1:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>let alone the primary winner. Now. Rick Jackson, in some

1:59:55.880 --> 1:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ways he's been He jumped in this race, and he

1:59:57.880 --> 2:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>proclaimed himself, you know, very much a Trumper, basically trying

2:00:01.120 --> 2:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to trying to trying to triangulate a little bit and

2:00:07.400 --> 2:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of either forced Trump to duel endorse like he's

2:00:10.080 --> 2:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>done in the past when he sees somebody playing up

2:00:12.800 --> 2:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to him or in some ways dare Trump to back

2:00:17.640 --> 2:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>up his endorsement. And I think that's you know, if

2:00:20.400 --> 2:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump doesn't come to Bert Jones's aid here because Rick

2:00:23.320 --> 2:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Jackson is self funding, well, what's Trump raised all this

2:00:27.680 --> 2:00:30.839
<v Speaker 1>money for? Right? Is he going to use his money

2:00:31.240 --> 2:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to show to defend those that stood with him and

2:00:34.800 --> 2:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know, got in early or not. And if

2:00:38.920 --> 2:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't come in and help Jones here, if this

2:00:41.840 --> 2:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Maga super pac, I really think it does send this

2:00:44.520 --> 2:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>broader message and it's a bad look for the Trump

2:00:49.560 --> 2:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>movement that hey, it's a one way loyalty street and

2:00:53.440 --> 2:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to he will run away from you if

2:00:55.920 --> 2:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you look like you're weak or losing, even if it's

2:00:58.760 --> 2:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>not on you. And you know, the idea that he

2:01:02.560 --> 2:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is not a reliable ally, I know is going to

2:01:04.640 --> 2:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>shock people. But you know, if Burt Jones wants to

2:01:07.480 --> 2:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>know what this feels like, he can go ask the

2:01:09.240 --> 2:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Lensky what it feels like. Right. And the number one

2:01:13.120 --> 2:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on the list that to me probably matters more than

2:01:16.600 --> 2:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>any of the other races on this list is the

2:01:18.960 --> 2:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>May nineteenth primary in Kentucky's fourth congressional district and Thomas Massey.

2:01:25.160 --> 2:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>A Thomas Massey victory, I think cements the narrative that

2:01:28.800 --> 2:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Elaine Duck, his his his control of the party

2:01:34.880 --> 2:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is loosening and there's no going back from it, like

2:01:37.360 --> 2:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it becomes just it is. It is probably the single

2:01:41.840 --> 2:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>most powerful narrative reaction of anything on this top five list.

2:01:46.000 --> 2:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's number one for me on this list.

2:01:48.200 --> 2:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this has the you know, he has repeatedly

2:01:51.480 --> 2:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gone after Massey. This is one of the few races

2:01:53.400 --> 2:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>he's put his money where his mouth is. Massey has

2:01:56.680 --> 2:01:59.879
<v Speaker 1>done his thing, and he's gone back, and he's certainly

2:02:00.480 --> 2:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not been shy about trying to fight fire with fire

2:02:03.360 --> 2:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>back on him. You know, past is if past is

2:02:10.640 --> 2:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>any guide here, Massy's gonna lose. But there is risk

2:02:17.280 --> 2:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>if Massy wins this, and he's pretty connected to this

2:02:19.800 --> 2:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>district and Kentucky Republicans tell you talk about a group

2:02:24.480 --> 2:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans that just aren't cookie cutter, right, and there's

2:02:29.320 --> 2:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>none of them you can point to and say, well,

2:02:30.880 --> 2:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, look at the Senate race, right, There's

2:02:34.600 --> 2:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to make the case that they're non Maga

2:02:36.680 --> 2:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>than Maga there is this own sort of independent streak

2:02:41.760 --> 2:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that they have. McConnell is no Maga Republican for different

2:02:44.720 --> 2:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons than Ran Paul is no Maga Republican for different reasons,

2:02:48.280 --> 2:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and Tom is Massey, And then you could keep you

2:02:50.760 --> 2:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>got the Secretary of State, Michael Adams is a different

2:02:52.760 --> 2:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>type of Republican, but so is Daniel Cameron, and so

2:02:55.840 --> 2:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is Andy Barr. I mean, it's just been you know,

2:02:59.240 --> 2:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, I'm going to be culturally surprised if

2:03:02.280 --> 2:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Massey loses, because it's not in the culture of Kentucky politics.

2:03:05.960 --> 2:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, right history shows that when

2:03:09.720 --> 2:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump really wants to weigh in on something and throws

2:03:12.480 --> 2:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>actual money behind that way, he can have some success.

2:03:16.040 --> 2:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you're trying to keep track, when does lame

2:03:19.240 --> 2:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>duck status officially begin for Donald Trump? Thomas Massey victory

2:03:23.280 --> 2:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on May nineteenth would cement the narrative that is that

2:03:30.120 --> 2:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he's fully in lame duck status. Ask Chuck, all right,

2:03:42.920 --> 2:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>let's do a little last chuck here. First question comes

2:03:45.880 --> 2:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>from Doug and Shaker Heights, a wonderful community in Cleveland,

2:03:53.280 --> 2:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and he goes new listener here, really appreciate the measured

2:03:55.120 --> 2:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>analysis on the show. I'm wondering if Ohio Democrats made

2:03:57.560 --> 2:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it a strategic mistake by backing shared Brown again, given

2:04:00.320 --> 2:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>concerns about his age, branding and his association with the

2:04:03.040 --> 2:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>national party leadership. With nominating younger, newer candidates be a

2:04:06.160 --> 2:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>better way for Democrats to rebuild their image and compete

2:04:09.360 --> 2:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>more effectively in states like Ohio. Curious to hear you

2:04:11.560 --> 2:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>take thank you, Doug and chicker Wright. So I think

2:04:14.960 --> 2:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>big picture your instinct. I could see where you're thinking,

2:04:18.080 --> 2:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of tend to agree with it. And

2:04:20.880 --> 2:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest, I was surprised that Brown got into

2:04:23.760 --> 2:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this race because do you realize and I bet I

2:04:25.960 --> 2:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you do, And I don't know if

2:04:27.360 --> 2:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>many Ohioans realize this. This is technically not the time

2:04:32.800 --> 2:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>for this seat to come up, but this is a

2:04:34.640 --> 2:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>special election to fill out the JD Vance's term that

2:04:38.920 --> 2:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>began in the twenty twenty two cycle, right, and John

2:04:43.000 --> 2:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Houstad was the appointed successor. He was the lieutenant governor

2:04:46.840 --> 2:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>before that, the Secretary of State sort of really sort

2:04:49.080 --> 2:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of a more of an Ohio Republican and anything on

2:04:52.480 --> 2:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the megaside of things. But this was DeWine's appointment and

2:04:58.160 --> 2:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's only for two years, and you're reward for winning

2:05:01.200 --> 2:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this massive, expensive Senate race in twenty twenty six, is

2:05:06.400 --> 2:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you got to run again in twenty twenty eight? And

2:05:09.040 --> 2:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I just couldn't believe that Shared Brown was going to

2:05:11.120 --> 2:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sign up after running in twenty twenty four. We know

2:05:14.800 --> 2:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he already did this running in twenty twenty six and

2:05:17.920 --> 2:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>then running in twenty twenty eight. Is he really going

2:05:20.320 --> 2:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to have run three straight Senate races? If he wins,

2:05:25.280 --> 2:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>does he not run for reelection? And then if he

2:05:28.200 --> 2:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't run for reelection, who the hell are Democrat's going

2:05:30.360 --> 2:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to find that can somehow hold a seat when it

2:05:33.040 --> 2:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently is going to be proof that only only a

2:05:37.000 --> 2:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Shared Brown can hold the seat. So yeah, it was

2:05:39.360 --> 2:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a head scratcher to me on a number of levels.

2:05:42.840 --> 2:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And I expect that Shared Brown I knew he wasn't

2:05:45.200 --> 2:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>done running like he just certain people his motor was

2:05:47.960 --> 2:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>still going right. The one office he never ran for

2:05:51.920 --> 2:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was governor. He's run for a lot of state wide offices.

2:05:54.040 --> 2:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he was Secretary State at one time. I

2:05:55.800 --> 2:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think he ran for another state white office. I mean,

2:05:58.040 --> 2:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he and Mike de Wine have you know, and the

2:06:00.440 --> 2:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one you know, he could have and there would have

2:06:02.280 --> 2:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>been some sort of poetic irony, you know, following Mike

2:06:05.440 --> 2:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>de Wine, because the one office Mike the Wine always

2:06:09.160 --> 2:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that he had eluded him before finally winning in uh

2:06:15.160 --> 2:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty eighteen was governor. So I figured Shared

2:06:21.080 --> 2:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown would run for governor because it's a four year term.

2:06:22.880 --> 2:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Number one, I think it was an open seat, it

2:06:25.040 --> 2:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was winnable. I think Ramaswami has proven to be two

2:06:27.280 --> 2:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>week a very weak Republican nominee, and maybe Amy Acton,

2:06:32.920 --> 2:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be the likely Democratic nominee for governor,

2:06:35.480 --> 2:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>switches over to the center race. Now I don't you know.

2:06:37.600 --> 2:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And and my concern about Shared Brown as the nominee

2:06:43.440 --> 2:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is that Houston. You know, normally what makes a midterm

2:06:47.480 --> 2:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>year advantageous for the out party is you get to

2:06:50.240 --> 2:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>run against incumbents, and I guess Shared Brown could run

2:06:54.840 --> 2:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>against Trump, and he's going to run against Republicans. But

2:06:57.160 --> 2:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard not for voters to see him as

2:06:59.840 --> 2:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>any anything but part of the establishment, just the Democratic establishment.

2:07:03.440 --> 2:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So all your choices, do you want the Republican establishment

2:07:06.120 --> 2:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or do you want the democratic establishment? That's it. I

2:07:10.120 --> 2:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's a stronger Democrat that anybody that

2:07:13.520 --> 2:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you could have found other than Chuck Schumer for the

2:07:15.360 --> 2:07:18.839
<v Speaker 1>center race. I think governor's races are still winnable in Ohio.

2:07:18.880 --> 2:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if center races are, but maybe Shared

2:07:21.080 --> 2:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown's the one Democrat that can win. Maybe Tim Ryan

2:07:23.920 --> 2:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>could have you know, maybe there's somebody new or younger.

2:07:28.320 --> 2:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's a taller Rico out there. I've always sad,

2:07:30.200 --> 2:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know it is. I do believe Ohio

2:07:32.360 --> 2:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is a light red state, not a dark red state.

2:07:34.360 --> 2:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So the right type of Democrat can still win out there.

2:07:37.680 --> 2:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe maybe Greg Landsman from the Cincinnati area. Right.

2:07:41.680 --> 2:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's just say I've I've gone at this one

2:07:49.600 --> 2:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred ways from Sunday, I think from sixty thousand feet.

2:07:54.400 --> 2:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree with your take on this that this is,

2:07:58.560 --> 2:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's also an argument to be made who else

2:08:00.960 --> 2:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>could have done it in this environment for the cost

2:08:05.240 --> 2:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of this race. And when you look at the larger

2:08:07.440 --> 2:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>map that the Democrats were facing, this was you know,

2:08:11.840 --> 2:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a tried and trude and proven voke get her in Ohio. Right,

2:08:17.640 --> 2:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of and I've given you all

2:08:19.800 --> 2:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why I'm surprised he said yes, and that

2:08:24.000 --> 2:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to me is, to me still the biggest surprise because

2:08:27.440 --> 2:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>by saying yes, I think you've inadvertently signed that if

2:08:30.040 --> 2:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you win, you've signed up for one more ride on

2:08:33.160 --> 2:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight And my god, I know he used to

2:08:36.520 --> 2:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be a House member and you're used. But senators usually

2:08:40.040 --> 2:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like to have to run every two years, and

2:08:42.600 --> 2:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>if he wins, his reward is to run again, literally

2:08:46.200 --> 2:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in two years. Dean from Long Island rights with Donald

2:08:52.040 --> 2:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump paying off wind companies to abandon offshore Win project,

2:08:55.080 --> 2:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I we thank you for writing this in I have

2:08:58.960 --> 2:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece of my monel that I put together that

2:09:00.960 --> 2:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to be on this, and then I just

2:09:03.080 --> 2:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so many other things that piled on top of it.

2:09:05.040 --> 2:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm so glad this is a question. So thank you, Dean.

2:09:08.160 --> 2:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But let me bears repeating with Donald Trump paying off

2:09:10.480 --> 2:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>win companies to abandon offshore win products, so you know,

2:09:13.080 --> 2:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>if that would be considered interference with contracts, could be

2:09:15.800 --> 2:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>allowing the States to sue the administration and keep the

2:09:17.720 --> 2:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>companies involved. Thanks Deem from Long Island. Look, I think

2:09:20.640 --> 2:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting way to go. I think there could

2:09:23.080 --> 2:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be lots of lawsuits on this, but I just this

2:09:26.440 --> 2:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, you know. Again, it goes back to sort

2:09:31.960 --> 2:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of what's wrong with our politics in general. Not everything

2:09:34.640 --> 2:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is either or. Some things are ants, okay, and we

2:09:39.520 --> 2:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>need energy badly. Why are we ruling out parts of energy? Right?

2:09:45.120 --> 2:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, weaning yourself off of any energy

2:09:48.560 --> 2:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is a bad idea at the moment. All of the above,

2:09:51.720 --> 2:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's really foolish not to be thinking about alternative

2:09:54.560 --> 2:09:58.919
<v Speaker 1>energy sources at a time when literally wars get started

2:09:59.040 --> 2:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>over access to energy. So this is just stupidity. This

2:10:05.320 --> 2:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is bad policy, This is bad for the country long term,

2:10:10.200 --> 2:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all because of a fetish about climate change. I mean

2:10:14.400 --> 2:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this is literally like, well, I don't want to I

2:10:16.920 --> 2:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do these wind farms because somehow it'll

2:10:18.920 --> 2:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>make us think we believe in climate change and we

2:10:20.720 --> 2:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>will need to prove that renewables don't work. Why don't

2:10:22.800 --> 2:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to prove that renewables don't work. All we're

2:10:24.440 --> 2:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>doing is handing more more power to China. Right. The

2:10:30.000 --> 2:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>war of choice against Iran has absolutely scared a whole

2:10:34.080 --> 2:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of smaller and middle sized countries who don't have

2:10:36.240 --> 2:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>their own energy access who rely on buying oil from

2:10:40.000 --> 2:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the Strait from the Gulf, and it comes to the

2:10:42.280 --> 2:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Strait of hormones, it go man. We got to find

2:10:44.320 --> 2:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>alternative sources. And it isn't all just finding alternative sources

2:10:47.480 --> 2:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for oil and gas. There's going to be a surge

2:10:51.560 --> 2:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in interest in renewables. And guess what country they're going

2:10:54.360 --> 2:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to for the supplies to tap into solar

2:10:57.040 --> 2:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and to tap into wind. It ain't going to be

2:10:58.760 --> 2:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States because this administration is gutting the entire industry.

2:11:04.440 --> 2:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It's again, this is self inflicted. There's no part of

2:11:09.920 --> 2:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this that makes any sense. And the amount of people

2:11:14.200 --> 2:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that don't say this is nonsense. This is not about

2:11:20.120 --> 2:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>climate change. This is about preparation by the freaking insurance policy. Sorry.

2:11:28.160 --> 2:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I find the war against climate change to be just

2:11:31.400 --> 2:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so asinine because at this point, who cares whether it's

2:11:37.360 --> 2:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>man made or not. The climate's changing. We have more

2:11:40.840 --> 2:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>wildfires happening, we have stronger hurricanes, we have coastal erosion.

2:11:46.240 --> 2:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Why does it matter how it started? We should all

2:11:50.120 --> 2:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be trying to mitigate it, and all be trying to

2:11:52.760 --> 2:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's no interest. Literally, this ideology on the right

2:11:56.080 --> 2:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is to pretend it doesn't exist, that it's made up up.

2:12:01.080 --> 2:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You want to disagree in the origin story, fine, but

2:12:03.800 --> 2:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the results not made up. This is the world we're

2:12:07.160 --> 2:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. The climate has changed. Do you want to

2:12:09.920 --> 2:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fight over whether it was a hidden hand above or

2:12:14.080 --> 2:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>an actual person or an industry or entity? Sorry, I

2:12:21.400 --> 2:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>know I get a little rant about this. I just

2:12:23.600 --> 2:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>find this one of the dumber things. Where did we do?

2:12:27.360 --> 2:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, why wouldn't we want the insurance policy?

2:12:30.960 --> 2:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Pete. What do you make of

2:12:33.280 --> 2:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the what if scenario where Trump bought the Buffalo Bills

2:12:35.680 --> 2:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fourteen? Could owning an NFL team have kept

2:12:38.320 --> 2:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>him from unning for president of twenty sixteen? And if so,

2:12:40.760 --> 2:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>how differently do you think that election in the broader

2:12:42.600 --> 2:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>political landscape since might have played out? Pete, that's a

2:12:46.720 --> 2:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>good one. It is a what if. You know, when

2:12:50.560 --> 2:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I did my original what if on twenty sixteen, I

2:12:53.320 --> 2:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think I was riffing with Jonathan Martin. I worry this

2:12:56.840 --> 2:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is on the old NBC feed. The their own They

2:12:59.640 --> 2:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to own the name, but they owned my

2:13:01.960 --> 2:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property there. But we went through all these various

2:13:07.160 --> 2:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>scenarios on that. Do I think if he were the

2:13:09.520 --> 2:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>owner of the Buffalo Bills he wouldn't have run president? Yes,

2:13:11.560 --> 2:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I do, And I think the NFL would be something.

2:13:18.000 --> 2:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Put it that way, and you'd have, you know, the

2:13:22.480 --> 2:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>war between Jerry Jones, Bob Craft and Donald Trump, those

2:13:26.760 --> 2:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>three egos fighting each other for supremacy among owners, right, like, man,

2:13:32.320 --> 2:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's get that. Forget the TV series running

2:13:35.840 --> 2:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>point about you know, loosely about the Genie bus Lakers.

2:13:40.480 --> 2:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's do that, right, Craft, Jones and Trump NFL owners, right,

2:13:45.120 --> 2:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the New Housewives of the NFL, but starring

2:13:49.800 --> 2:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Jones, Donald Trump and there. So what would happen

2:13:53.320 --> 2:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen? I will tell you so if Trump

2:13:58.120 --> 2:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>never runs, there's sort of two what ifs that I've

2:14:04.600 --> 2:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>entertained on this and they and I have to talk

2:14:09.760 --> 2:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about them sequentially because this if there's no Bridge Gate,

2:14:15.600 --> 2:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Christie's the nominee in sixteen. Chris Christie's personality fit

2:14:22.960 --> 2:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the moment, right, because Donald Trump proved that this is

2:14:26.640 --> 2:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what kind of the country was looking for. It fit

2:14:29.720 --> 2:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment. But he'd have been a lot He's he

2:14:31.200 --> 2:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>probably wins big, not small, Christy versus Clinton, Christy probably

2:14:35.600 --> 2:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>gets fifty one to fifty two, fifty three percent of

2:14:37.320 --> 2:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the vote, and Christy would have been challenged from the

2:14:42.840 --> 2:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>right by you know, by the Ted cruises of the world,

2:14:45.760 --> 2:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been hit hard on judges, on abortion and

2:14:48.200 --> 2:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these cultural issues that I think wouldn't have

2:14:50.600 --> 2:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>mattered because Christy was just a better debater and he

2:14:53.040 --> 2:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been, you know, without Donald Trump involved, Christy

2:14:56.200 --> 2:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been the star of that show. All right,

2:14:58.920 --> 2:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's one scenario. But bridge Gate did happen, and

2:15:02.480 --> 2:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a different It was a you know, it's funny.

2:15:05.600 --> 2:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of like a wounded version of Chris

2:15:07.400 --> 2:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Christy in that primary, and we didn't get the best

2:15:10.440 --> 2:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>version of him it would have been, because I do

2:15:12.920 --> 2:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think if Christy's in that race, Trump's just an endorser

2:15:15.240 --> 2:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of Christy. He never jumps in because he doesn't think

2:15:18.000 --> 2:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>he can be Christie. So that's sort of where one

2:15:21.560 --> 2:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of my head. That's one of my what if scenarios.

2:15:23.680 --> 2:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>The second one if on this is so let's say

2:15:25.560 --> 2:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>bridge Gate happened, and so what you essentially have is

2:15:28.800 --> 2:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is I think Rand Paul would have been a much

2:15:31.760 --> 2:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger factor because Paul had the non traditional Republicans that

2:15:36.720 --> 2:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>were interested in something new. Now, the minute Trump got in,

2:15:40.640 --> 2:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it was like a vacuum cleaner on Paul's support. Right

2:15:43.760 --> 2:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the first chunk that he took, first, lunch money he

2:15:47.120 --> 2:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>took was not Jeb Bush's lunch money, it was actually

2:15:51.080 --> 2:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Ran Paul's lunch money. And so I think without Trump,

2:15:56.840 --> 2:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul's a much bigger player Rand Paul. You know, there's

2:16:01.200 --> 2:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where Ran Paul's nominee and Paul versus Clinton

2:16:04.480 --> 2:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is very similar to Trump versus Clinton, except probably a

2:16:08.000 --> 2:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>little less personal. And I think given what we saw

2:16:13.920 --> 2:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with the with the vote and the desperation that there

2:16:18.000 --> 2:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was among you know, there's sort of the obstinates that

2:16:20.520 --> 2:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>there was and the electing Hillary Clinton right, there definitely

2:16:23.040 --> 2:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was a strong anti Clinton chunk of voters that just

2:16:27.440 --> 2:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>were put a low ceiling on her ability to gain votes.

2:16:31.120 --> 2:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think Paul, so Christy, Paul, and then probably

2:16:35.280 --> 2:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. That's probably the order of likely nominee with

2:16:38.240 --> 2:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>no Donald Trump and no Bridgegate. I think Christy with Bridgegate,

2:16:44.360 --> 2:16:49.039
<v Speaker 1>I probably think the nominee is still Paul or Cruise.

2:16:50.120 --> 2:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Rubio. I think we found out that

2:16:52.800 --> 2:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Rubio was trying to straddle too much there. Now, maybe

2:16:57.520 --> 2:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Rubio looks like a better candidate, but you know it's

2:17:04.520 --> 2:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>pot You know you could, you could if you want

2:17:06.600 --> 2:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to argue with me, that maybe Rubio gets in there. Now,

2:17:08.640 --> 2:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Rubio and no nominee probably wins by a bigger margin

2:17:10.720 --> 2:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>over Clinton too than Trump. I do think both Rubio

2:17:14.160 --> 2:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and Christy would have been stronger candidates than Trump. I

2:17:16.400 --> 2:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think both Crews and Paul would have been kind of

2:17:18.920 --> 2:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the exacts, very similar races where we're some sort of

2:17:22.959 --> 2:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>split decision. That was fun. Pete, all right, Next question

2:17:32.320 --> 2:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from Ben s from Tona, Wanda, New York. One

2:17:36.560 --> 2:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite undergrad courses I took at the University

2:17:39.000 --> 2:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of Rochester was titled the Mythology of the Founders. I

2:17:41.480 --> 2:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>remember writing my final paper on Congressman Raoul Labrador on

2:17:45.760 --> 2:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the Tea Party advocating for the repeal of

2:17:47.800 --> 2:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the seventeenth Amendment because it deviated too far from the

2:17:50.560 --> 2:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Founding Father's intentions, for better or worse, Many Americans mythologize

2:17:54.280 --> 2:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>our founding documents and their authors, and I wanted to

2:17:56.959 --> 2:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>know how you might navigate that with some of the

2:17:58.560 --> 2:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>proposed constitutional members you have to discussed on the podcast

2:18:01.200 --> 2:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Go sabers ps. Did you have a favorite course from

2:18:04.640 --> 2:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>your college days? I did. I had all. I would say,

2:18:11.040 --> 2:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna you know, it's gonna be a bit dorking out.

2:18:14.120 --> 2:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I loved all my history classes. It didn't matter which is,

2:18:17.160 --> 2:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had a general one. I had an

2:18:18.600 --> 2:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at least history that I took. Two different mid least

2:18:21.640 --> 2:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>history courses I took, but I always say this the

2:18:25.840 --> 2:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>two courses that I used the most in life, in

2:18:29.120 --> 2:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>my professional life, after I took an elective on the

2:18:32.200 --> 2:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>federal budget, which is the type of the type of

2:18:35.280 --> 2:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>course that only at GW is going to offer. Right

2:18:37.640 --> 2:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you're in DC, and it was taught by somebody that

2:18:39.879 --> 2:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>worked at OMB, and I just it was you know,

2:18:44.800 --> 2:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly benefited me in my ability just simply

2:18:47.840 --> 2:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>learning how to read a federal budget right when you

2:18:50.440 --> 2:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>see how you look at it and things like that,

2:18:52.640 --> 2:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and how it's done and how the math works. Right,

2:18:54.720 --> 2:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the math isn't the rules of math for federal budgets

2:18:58.440 --> 2:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily follow the general rules of bath. That was

2:19:03.160 --> 2:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a big one for me as well, but

2:19:08.760 --> 2:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>as for your So, I I believe in founders intent, right,

2:19:13.879 --> 2:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean you don't modernize with founders intent.

2:19:17.000 --> 2:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>The seventeenth Amendment is an interesting debate. You know, in

2:19:20.680 --> 2:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>my class how Washington works that I briefly talked about

2:19:25.280 --> 2:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>here that I teach part time at USC for for

2:19:28.240 --> 2:19:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the visiting students that have internships in DC. We just

2:19:33.120 --> 2:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>did our final They just did their final prison. They

2:19:35.920 --> 2:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just did their oral presentations on what their final paper

2:19:38.440 --> 2:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on, and one of them is

2:19:41.680 --> 2:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for And the whole is what's what's a you know,

2:19:44.800 --> 2:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>how would you try to make Washington work better? What's

2:19:47.200 --> 2:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>run reform you would do to make Washington work better?

2:19:52.200 --> 2:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's one gentleman who picked repealing the seventeenth Amendment

2:19:56.160 --> 2:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and about how you know it would and one of

2:19:59.680 --> 2:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the best of fits that he believed brought to it

2:20:02.080 --> 2:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was that it would actually make state legislative elections more important,

2:20:05.720 --> 2:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>more people would look into that, more senators would be

2:20:10.959 --> 2:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>more representative of their states, rather than an ideology. So

2:20:16.440 --> 2:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting argument on the seventeenth On the seventeenth Amendment,

2:20:27.000 --> 2:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we know what the intent, but the intent of the

2:20:29.120 --> 2:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Electoral College was to actually be a bit of a

2:20:31.400 --> 2:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>vetting mechanism in case the public went too far off

2:20:34.360 --> 2:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the mainstream. And we've let the states essentially

2:20:38.560 --> 2:20:44.039
<v Speaker 1>create what are likely unconstitutional faithless elector laws on that.

2:20:44.120 --> 2:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But we've never tested the faithless elector issue in court

2:20:48.840 --> 2:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>per se. But right now states just bound electors, and

2:20:52.800 --> 2:20:55.039
<v Speaker 1>so they've kind of made the electoral college no longer

2:20:55.040 --> 2:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a vetting issue. So I think I am a believer

2:20:58.160 --> 2:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in Founder's intent, which means to me, if my amendment

2:21:03.520 --> 2:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't easily be defended by something already written in the

2:21:06.360 --> 2:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>federalist papers, then I might I might be willing no

2:21:11.520 --> 2:21:14.959
<v Speaker 1>longer to defend that addition to the Constitution. And in staid,

2:21:15.080 --> 2:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>just why don't you just codify this? Look, there's certain

2:21:17.440 --> 2:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>ideas that should just simply be codified into law by Congress.

2:21:22.120 --> 2:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't think there should be a constitutional amendment

2:21:24.600 --> 2:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for reproductive rights. I think that's something that should just

2:21:28.400 --> 2:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>simply be codified into law, why you know, And it's

2:21:32.480 --> 2:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of a fear of doing it that now makes

2:21:35.520 --> 2:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, I guess you got to do it

2:21:36.680 --> 2:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as a constitutional amendment. And it's perhaps if you make

2:21:39.040 --> 2:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a better argument about equal protection that the equal protection

2:21:42.840 --> 2:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>argument on reproductive rights Trump's the original back and forth

2:21:47.480 --> 2:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on Row and Dobbs anyway, but set that aside. But

2:21:51.959 --> 2:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of it. I take your point here. Like so,

2:21:54.959 --> 2:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for instance, I think the nullification of a presidential pardon,

2:21:58.760 --> 2:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the way it is framed, this constitutional amendment actually fits

2:22:04.000 --> 2:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the vision of the Founders, right. It uses the same

2:22:06.959 --> 2:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>logic of a supermajority that a that overwriting a veto

2:22:09.879 --> 2:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would use it, doesn't you know. It's still it respects

2:22:14.920 --> 2:22:18.039
<v Speaker 1>the idea that a president does have this power. It

2:22:18.200 --> 2:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just offers a nullification by Congress if it's if Congress

2:22:23.000 --> 2:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>deems it so. So I could argue that that, you know,

2:22:26.240 --> 2:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think that I I where I generally agree

2:22:29.480 --> 2:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with you is that proposed constitutional amendments that there should

2:22:34.760 --> 2:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>already be federalist papers written that already would defend the

2:22:38.480 --> 2:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>concept even if the amendment hadn't been proposed back then.

2:22:42.160 --> 2:22:44.279
<v Speaker 1>And I could argue in some of these proposed amendments,

2:22:44.320 --> 2:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on whether it's on money campaign money, I

2:22:53.760 --> 2:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're you know, whether it's on the election of judges. Right,

2:22:57.160 --> 2:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there's there's certainly the Founders have made their made their

2:23:02.160 --> 2:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>They've told us what they meant based on the Federalist papers,

2:23:06.440 --> 2:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'd sort of think that should be the guidepost,

2:23:10.000 --> 2:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. Last question it comes from fred a. Hey.

2:23:13.600 --> 2:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about Thomas Jefferson's quote that the tree

2:23:15.760 --> 2:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with

2:23:17.760 --> 2:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the blood of patriots and tyrants, and now it's often

2:23:20.160 --> 2:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>used to justify a more extreme interpretation of the Second

2:23:22.440 --> 2:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Amendment parts of the country. That idea still resonates deeply,

2:23:25.920 --> 2:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if it's something we should be moving

2:23:27.680 --> 2:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>beyond as a modern democracy. How do you interpret that

2:23:29.840 --> 2:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>quote today's political context? Best regards freda A. Look, I

2:23:33.520 --> 2:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think that that you know, we didn't there wasn't many

2:23:38.600 --> 2:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>democracies and free societies that even existed when Jefferson said

2:23:43.840 --> 2:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that quote, and there were a lot more authoritarian regimes

2:23:49.720 --> 2:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we called the monarchies, but they were just that you know,

2:23:52.520 --> 2:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know my attitude on this. I think the monarchies

2:23:54.720 --> 2:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are just a just a way to beautify the term dictator.

2:24:00.400 --> 2:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that we you know, one of

2:24:06.000 --> 2:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the things and the sort of fits hand in glove

2:24:08.000 --> 2:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with the last question. Actually, one of the things that

2:24:11.800 --> 2:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we failed to do is understand, you know, what moment

2:24:15.240 --> 2:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>were they living in at the time. And that's why

2:24:17.560 --> 2:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I would emphasize this, what moment was he living in

2:24:19.959 --> 2:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time, Right, he was living in a moment

2:24:22.280 --> 2:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>where there was some where you had revolution brewing in France,

2:24:25.760 --> 2:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and he certainly had been an ambassador there. He knew

2:24:27.840 --> 2:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that there was right we had it brewing, and and

2:24:30.440 --> 2:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it already happened in the United States. So there was

2:24:34.120 --> 2:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>definitely we definitely had you know, you could you could

2:24:39.160 --> 2:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>feel it. I find it hard to believe that he

2:24:45.040 --> 2:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thinks this would apply to our democracy that instead it

2:24:49.440 --> 2:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>applies if democracy you know that, you know, every once

2:24:53.240 --> 2:24:57.039
<v Speaker 1>in a while, you got to fight for democracy. I

2:24:57.040 --> 2:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's what it is. But there's no doubt that

2:25:04.959 --> 2:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>quote gets gets weaponized by those who rationalize or justify

2:25:12.959 --> 2:25:17.959
<v Speaker 1>behavior that is that a mature democracy shouldn't be dealing

2:25:17.959 --> 2:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>with right that with a steadier instead of leaders. But

2:25:25.320 --> 2:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not in a stable place right now, and so

2:25:35.080 --> 2:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what I think that quote really means is that you

2:25:38.680 --> 2:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>got to fight for democracy and freedom every once in

2:25:40.680 --> 2:25:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a while, because notice it says the blood of patriots

2:25:43.959 --> 2:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and tyrants. Right So, now where what may be subjective

2:25:49.959 --> 2:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is one person's patriot is another person's tyrant. It just

2:25:53.879 --> 2:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like I've always said, one person's patriot is another person's terrorist.

2:25:58.040 --> 2:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Right the British monarchy thought the American those that were

2:26:04.600 --> 2:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>revolting were terrorists. We call them patriots. So yeah, I

2:26:16.080 --> 2:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of think that Jefferson is responding to the moment

2:26:18.600 --> 2:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he was living in, and then it didn't apply to

2:26:23.360 --> 2:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a mature, modern, two hundred and fifty year old democracy

2:26:26.560 --> 2:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're supposedly celebrating this year. All Right, love the

2:26:32.400 --> 2:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Q and A. You guys got made to pop off

2:26:34.400 --> 2:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on the environment. I've been waiting to find a way

2:26:36.200 --> 2:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to pop off on that, and I think even my

2:26:37.600 --> 2:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>producer might split that out. You might see that part

2:26:40.200 --> 2:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Q and A separated out. We rarely rarely

2:26:44.400 --> 2:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>do that with the ass Chuck segment, but to say

2:26:47.840 --> 2:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you touched a nerve as an understating on that way.

2:26:50.320 --> 2:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So with that, I'll see you twenty four hours