WEBVTT - Everyone Else Admits We Were Right About Inflation

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Pod cast. It it's a podcast that you're listening to.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it could happen here. It's the the show where

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>things fall apart and so as you put them back

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>together again. And actually, okay, you know, I really should

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have checked the calendar before I did it, before I

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>tried to do this introduction where I've referenced the thing

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that I'm saying came out last week but might actually

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have come out like no, no, no, okay, okay, I got

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>it right. I got it right. It should never have

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>doubted myself. Last week we did an episode about inflation,

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and we told maybe half that story and the part

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of it that we didn't tell. You know, we got

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>through the most of the part about like, you know

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>what this sort of theory of inflation that the people

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are trangged better to fellows. We got through what it was.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>What we didn't really talk about was what happened next,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a very very interesting set of sort of

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>maneuvers that happened where this theory started spreading through a

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of very disparate academic circles and you know, sort

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of like economic circles and different political circles that usually

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything to do with each other. But we're all,

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, taking taking things in very interesting directions

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and to talk about how how how this sort of

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>supply Chaine theory of inflation like spread through the world

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>and all of this very very interesting, somewhat bizarre stuff

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that happened. Next, we once again have Steve Mann and

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>John Michael Cologne, who are co editors of Strange Matters. Yeah,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve jmc welcome back to the show.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having us.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm glad, glad glad we could have YouTube back,

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and glad we get to talk about the really really interesting,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhat strange things that happened next, which was, Yeah, a

0:01:54.720 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people started picking up your theories and starting

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to work with them.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I worrying if you talk a bit about I guess

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like how that kind of first started and how people

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>first started sort of coming to you for stuff.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like last year. So last year when the first

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>of these pieces came out notes toward the theory of inflation,

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 3>we got like a really good response in general from it,

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 3>and it was kind of provoking discussions between groups of

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>economists and like readers of econ stuff on Twitter and

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. Who otherwise wouldn't have really been talking

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to each other, but suddenly having a different theory of inflation,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>one that was like a lot different than what sort

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>of like the people who thought it would be super

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>transitory or the people who thought it was like purely

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>a monetary phenomenon or something like that. Like having that

0:02:53.440 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 3>option sparked good conversations, and it eventually led to some

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>writers approaching us who are sort of inspired by those conversations,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>and particularly a few of them really wanted to follow

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>up on like specific key like either points from the

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>paper or follow some of the implications as far as

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 3>they think they could take them. So one such paper.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh and by the way, just as a refresher, the

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>original theory that is laid out in part one of

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 3>this series that we're doing is essentially saying that inflation

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>has a tendency to propagate along supply chains first and

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 3>then through supply chain networks secondarily. And so it's it's

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>saying it's essentially that that's that's how it propagates. It

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>starts in supply chains. Things like bottlenecks along production processes

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>have give the price setters, who are people at companies

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>social acceptable reasons to eventually if they need to raise prices,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>and but they but that generally pricing managers refrained from

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 3>raising prices unless that us like every other lever they've pulled,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 3>essentially has not worked. So like people took that theory

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 3>and wanted to follow up on it, and so one

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>author who did that was Alex Vacolo who approached us,

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and we essentially wanted to do an updated version of

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the pricing manager survey that we found really helpful in

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>writing those initial pieces. So we like in my piece

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 3>and that sort of theory of inflation, I relied upon

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>like a wealth of pricing manager surveys that showed that

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>where they asked these pricing managers under what circumstances would

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 3>you raise prices? And they sort of went through each

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 3>scenario of that over the decades, starting in the thirties

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>and going into the nineties, and do that in order

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>to not have a replication crisis, Like we need more

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 3>and more studies, right, Like this is a that's phenomenon

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 3>across social sciences and elsewhere, So you want to have

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>good replication studies. One way to do that is to

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 3>have an updated pricing manager survey that talks to like

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of modern corporations in the twenty twenties, So are

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>they still concerned about some of the same things, are

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>they not? Are there innovations and pricing that we should

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 3>know about? And so Alex Paccolo, who's a financial journalist

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>by trade, he went and interviewed some managers at Walmart

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 3>and other big companies and some smaller ones and found that, like,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 3>broadly speaking, a lot of the same issues are at play.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 3>So companies have cost plus market pricing as kind of

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>their bedrock, and from there they developed some innovations such

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 3>as like so called dynamic pricing, where they have the

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 3>like if you're a larger company who knows that they

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>are viewed as a price leader, you have some leeway

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>in responding to sales forecasts and changing your pricing, like

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Walmart does what they have like everyday low prices, that

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 3>type of thing. And if you're a grocery store and

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 3>one of your competitors is Walmart, Serve on the flip side,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you might start developing indexes of prices set by Walmart

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 3>or like one of the other big like behemoth chains,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 3>knowing how important they are to the overall supply chain network.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>And knowing how important they are for the demand for groceries.

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Like if wherever Walmart goes, many people have no choice

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>but to follow them in terms of their pricing schedules.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 3>And so that's another thing that is going on, Like

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 3>people are developing just entire price indices of like Walmart

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>or Costco or Sam's Club or whoe have you.

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was something that's I think interesting in terms

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of like the the difference between the way that like

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>economists think about sort of price, the difference between and

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>how it's actually getting set, which is like a lot

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, a lot of it. Very much seems to

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be like if you are if you are like the

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>largest company in a market, like if you are like Walmart, right,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you have this incredible ability to sort of like like

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you have this ability to like like force people force

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>your like downstream or like I guess upstream suppliers to

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>like sell it to you at low at lower prices,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because you have this enormous sort of like you know,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of buying power that like, you know, if you're

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like if you're like a smaller thing, you don't necessarily

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like like the same company will charge

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like another grocery store more for like the same thing,

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>because Walmart, Walmart has the ability to sell it a

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lower price than if I'm remembering this right, I'm gonting,

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm getting strange looks.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's it's it's important not to mix up

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>two separate things. One is Walmart's relationships to suppliers and

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the other one is relationship to its competitors. Right, So

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the supplier bit, you're totally right on the right track.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 2>It's like, you know, like people who supply Walmart with

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>products because Walmart is such a big customer, you get

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>the Walmart contract and you're a small producer or a

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 2>medium sized producer, like you're set right because like you know,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>then you can basically just like you know, they can

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>even be your only customer in many cases. But that

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 2>comes at a cost, which is that you sell at

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the price that Walmart dictates. Otherwise they'll just tell you

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to fuck off basically. And you know, it's not only price,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 2>it's also the quality. You have to hit the standards.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>And oftentimes what these firms that are like the big

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>important firms, so called nuclear firms in a supply chain

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>do is that they set those standards like very rigidly,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 2>and you have to be certified with them. So McDonald's

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>does this for example, you know, like all those poultry

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 2>farmers or whatever who supply the chickens for the chicken

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>mc nuggets, they have to go through this extremely rigid

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 2>process in order to be able to qualify to be

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 2>a McDonald's certified supplier or whatever, because that's how they

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>keep the product standardized even though they're not in house.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 2>And then the other thing that you were alluding to,

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>which is a vocalos piece, is the relationship to competitors.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So obviously Walmart's able to keep things cheap all the

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>time in their famous every day low prices beca because

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 2>basically those they have economies of scale. You know, there's

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 2>this notion, I think common sense for a lot of people,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>especially those who don't have a lot of business experience,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>is that the more that you make of something, the

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>more expensive it's going to be. But actually it's almost

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the exact opposite. Any firm that has survived, like over

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>a period of time being able to make more and

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>more of something has generally found ways of making more

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and more of the same thing using fewer inputs and

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 2>less labor like you know, and that's something that happens

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>through automation, but it's also something that happens through administers

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 2>rate of innovation and through and sometimes through less than

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the nice things, right through through through you know, Amazon

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>warehouses where people aren't allowed to take bathroom breaks, or

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>through sort of like you know, coercive measures that they

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>can do because they've found a nice little spot in

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the economy that lots of people are depending on them

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and they can dictate terms. But whatever it is, you know,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>as firms get bigger, it actually gets cheaper to make

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 2>more of their kind of thing. So people in a

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 2>bodega can't match Walmart's prices for everything from like hamburgers

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to detergent right because for them, it's more expensive to

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>produce or to acquire. So what they do instead, knowing

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 2>this and they're able to survive, is that they do

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Walmart's price, and then they do a markup over Walmart's price.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So in the same way that like by themselves they

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 2>would do a markup over their costs, Walmart's costs are

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 2>lower and they do a markup, so they do a

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>percentage over Walmart's markup. And as long as it basically

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>is something that's doable in terms of cost, they do that,

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>which means that they're basically advertising them selves to customers

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 2>as the slightly more expensive but more local you know,

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 2>more you know, more reliable or easier to get to

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>you can just walk to the corner store or whatever,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, whatever conveniences. They're kind of like justifying themselves

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>with to the customer base. And in cities, this can

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>be enough to keep you know, small to medium sized

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>you know sort of retailers in business, although in the

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 2>suburbs the competition is basically just all other all gobbalistic

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 2>firms on Walmart's scale, like you know, Wegman's, or in

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 2>Florida it will be something like Public's, you know, and

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing. So generally, uh Vacola was discovering,

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 2>was I want to just emphasize Steve's point about replication, Like,

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, if if a lot of the supply chain

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>theory depends upon a story about prices that most economists

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>just don't believe in. Economists believe that supply and demand

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>are automatically adjusting based on changing prices, and that those

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>adjustments determine in turn how we spend and how we produce.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's that's supposedly how everything works. They believe

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 2>in this thing called the price mechanism. The supply chain

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>theory depends upon a story where the vast majority of

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>prices in the economy are a markup over costs or

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, beyond that some kind of strategic decision being

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 2>made in pursuit of a certain strategy. But like, you know,

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 2>if some studies had verified that, but then other studies

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 2>refuted it, then you would have a situation like psychology

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>where you know, the psychologists are always saying all human

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>beings really have a neck fetish. But then you know,

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 2>because some study of like some college students you know,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>said this, and then six months later it'll be like, actually,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>that failed to replicate this. It turns out that human

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 2>beings don't have a neck fetish. You know. And I'm

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>being rude to psychology, but this is a real crisis

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that happened there, called the replication crisis. Now. Fred Lee

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>that the economists who kind of like started us along

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>this track in his famous book POSTKINSI and Price Theory,

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 2>found seventy one pricing studies and they form Appendix called

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 2>Appendix B in his book, which ought to be legendary,

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>but it's not, because all this stuff is very obscure.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 2>The seventy one studies from very different book length studies

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>from very different people with very different like political and

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>economic commitments. Some of them are business school literature. Some

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>of them are empirical studies commissioned by states or by

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>corporations on how corporate management works. Some of them are

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 2>by like Marxist economists, some of them are by neoclassical economists

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 2>like and they all converge, no matter what the biases

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of of the people involved, upon this same kind of

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>similar cost plus administered prices model. Vocolo writing now in

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the present day, not in the period that Lee was

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about, which is roughly from the thirties to roughly

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>the nineties, Like you know, he is talking about the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenties. He just went out and started talking to

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>pricing managers and capitalists and all this other stuff, and

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 2>lo and behold he found the exact same thing. So

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the evidence base, the empirical evidence base, for the underlying

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 2>basis of the supply chain theory is very very sound.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>The ball is in other people's court in mainstream economists

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 2>court who want to defend the supply and demand bullshit

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>and the price mechanism bullshit to to prove us wrong,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>because frankly, the weight of the evidence is so strong

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 2>that they're the ones who have the who have to

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>prove their case, not the other way around. You know

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that the what's it called when you when you've got

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the the I think the burdensump the

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 2>burden of proof, thank you. The burden of proof is

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>on their side.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And so something also I think is really interesting from

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the color pieces that like, you know, there is a

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>bit in there about firms that try to do this

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like like in real time reacting to supply

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and demand stuff. And it's like Uber and if you

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Uber's like, okay, so Uber has a couple

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of things. One they don't have, like the thing that

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they're like they don't really have the supply chain really,

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a B. They don't make any money. They never make money,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They will never make money. And the third thing that's

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>really interesting about is that like that kind of pricing,

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like you know, if if if you have some people

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>who go in ideologically and like we're gonna build an

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>algorithm to like try to have pricing respond to demand

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it like. It fucking sucks and everyone hates

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it because it means that, like, you know, suddenly, like

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>when you actually need a thing, it's unbelievably expensive, and

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it pisses people off. Like most most people who have

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to deal with actual like the normal things that a

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>business do don't do. And the only people who do

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it are like the insane tech people who are like like,

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it. I almost want to call it

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like intensely ideological, and also assholes and also don't make

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>any money, which is just I don't know, it's it's

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of a coincidence. But it is

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just very funny to me that the people who actually

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>try to use the neoclassical like pricing theory, it sucks

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and everyone hates them.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and uh, the Colo kind of summarizes like the

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>several different pricing procedures that he witnessed and to just say,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 3>like on both on both determining your company's costs and

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 3>determining what market markup you should have, so the cost

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 3>plus markup you need to you need to figure out

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>both of those pieces. It's anything but automatic. Yeah, it's

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a very manual process. And even I would I would

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>go so far as to say, like Walmart has teams

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 3>of tech people, Yes, but they're liaising heavily with the

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 3>finance department and sales and marketing to determine what is

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 3>an appropriate margin based on historical like in industry and

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 3>sub industry trends and like what is our historical cost

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 3>structure for each product down to the product level. And

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 3>they have so many different products that they might actually say, well,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 3>because we're selling everything to everyone, maybe some things can

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 3>just be what are called lost leaders and have a

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>negative margin because they get people in the store and

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 3>then those people are there and they see other things

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>which have higher markups and then they buy those and

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>then overall they've made more of a profit because they

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 3>use something's a negative margin on them. And it's like

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>it's a really complex process. And even if an algorithm

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 3>is being developed by say by say Uber to like

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 3>dynamically priced things up and down based upon events like

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>a baseball game or something they're going on in a

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 3>city so you can get more revenue, that was still

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 3>a people. It was a group of people in a

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 3>room in a very extremely manual process. Coding is extremely

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 3>manual still, and like liasing with like sales, marketing, finance

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 3>people all at once.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is that it's like supply and

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 2>demand is afraid that gets thrown around anytime that there's

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 2>any kind of interaction between like the amount of people

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>who want something and the amount of people and the

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>amount of stuff that there is, right, which is a

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of different situations. But the specific supply demand price

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>theory that's at the core of neoclassical economics is this

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 2>price mechanism story whereby you know, companies basically all make

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 2>one thing. The price of that thing is not something

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 2>that is really under their control. It automatically fluctuates based

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>on demand, which I guess you can roughly measure as

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>sales and like the UH and in turn, like what

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the price of that thing is determines how much they

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>produce and how much of it people buy, because people's

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>buying decisions are in some fixed functional way, and people's

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>production decisions in some fixed functional way are tied to

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that price. Like if you want to create an algorithm

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 2>that includes as a consideration doing a discount when you

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't yet sold all the seats in an airplane in

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the hopes that you'll get some last minute sales, which,

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 2>by the way, statistically is shown to not actually help

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 2>that much. Those kinds of last minute sales and discounts.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I suppose in a flight where there's a

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 2>time limited thing, it might work better. But for a

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>typical product, it doesn't move the dial very much in

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 2>terms of sales, which is why Walmart pursues an every

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 2>day low prices strategy, just keeping prices down in general,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>so you don't do sales and discounts which don't move

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the dial much. But like you know, that's a strategic

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 2>pricing decision that you've chosen to make because you think

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that it might move the dial in some way, and

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>you experiment it with it and see if it works

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. That's not the automatic lawlike functional relationship that

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to exist according to neoclassical theory between supply

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 2>demand and prices. People will say that the algorithm is

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>about supplying demand, but that's not really how it works.

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>That's it's it's not the same thing as the theory, right,

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just a pricing system that takes into account among

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>many other variables and usually not as the primary thing

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>whether or not for example, there is available available slack

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>in the in the you know, in what you're producing

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to be able to get some last minute sales if

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>you do a discount or something like that, like or

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>like Steve was saying, like, you know, there's a there's

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 2>a game today, so you can do surge pricing because

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 2>people are gonna you know that a bunch of people

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 2>are going to want to get in the game, So

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>you're basically just price gouging based on this opportunistically based

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 2>on this event that's happening or whatever, like like, yeah,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you can do that, and you can say that it's

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>pricing that tries to take into account supply and demand,

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's not the supply demand price mechanism of neoclassical theory.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And also, as McColo like you know, finds out it

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>attempts to do this are very very mixed in their

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>success at best. You know. Basically, people who are trying

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to do it are like, yeah, maybe it could work,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 2>and then they try it, and nine times out of

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 2>ten it doesn't work very well. So they go back

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>to some variation on a cost plus model, you know,

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 2>or a price leadership model or something like that. You know,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the kinds of methods that Lee discusses.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the customer good will that you kind

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>of put at risk with these more dynamic pricing models

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 3>is like often a little too risky, like even for

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 3>big companies like Uber, Like there's been a backlash against

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Uber for doing that.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely the only reason they can maybe get away with

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 2>it has been because they have access to infinite finance.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, how long is that gonna last?

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Like, and that's an everything's interesting, Like you know this

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>is this is to some extent like a different economic question,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but like you do at some point have to ask

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the question, like to to what extent can you learn

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>things about the economy based on companies that don't have

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a revenue model or the revenue model is they will

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to be headed piles of money by like the

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>same seven billionaires they've conned. And that's like a I

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's an interesting interplay of how dependent you are

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>on actually making like actually having revenue be the source

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of like the continuing existence of your company, and how

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ideological you can be about running do you have a gameshom.

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, it's actually very funny that You say this

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>because one of the people that Vocolo talks to is

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 2>this guy Cohen. I can't find his first name right now,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and I don't want to scroll up. But somebody whose

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 2>last name is Cohen is quote unquote more skeptical of

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the of the dynamical pricing, and he says, I think

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a sexy idea, and probably it has a lot

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 2>of intellectually valuable pathways, except when it crashes into the

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>sensibility of the customer. He said, it could create a

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>universe of very inconsistent prices across categories in time, which

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. Human beings to align to these dynamic

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 2>models need common sense judgment attached to them, which is

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>not always necessarily available. Now, this is a very diplomatic

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 2>statement by somebody who's formerly of Sears Canada. Now I

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 2>find this very funny because there's a kind of subtext here.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Vocola doesn't get into it, but Sears Canada obviously kind

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of related to Sears. In the nineties, Sears had a

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>CEO who was like this ultra libertarian, you know. He

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 2>basically believed that the problem with the free market is

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's not free enough. Right at the height of neoliberalism.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>So he's really pissed off about the fact that inside

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the corporation there's no free market. It's all a planned economy,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, which is true. There's no there's no market

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>exchanges in there, like, it's all allocations, Like, Okay, we

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 2>have this goal, so we're going to allocate these workers

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to this place and blah blah blah blah. You know,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and and we're and and and you know, anything that

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 2>the company owns, they just use it to pursue their goals.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 2>He wanted everything inside the company to have a bress

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 2>so that everything could just be you know. But and

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 2>this is kind of a mad scientist experiment done on

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>this like very old American corporation. But somehow, I guess

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 2>it was the nineties, you know, people were coked up

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 2>on this kind of thing. They tried it, and it

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 2>was a catastrophic failure that actually generally seen as contributing

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 2>to the end of Sears as a as a major

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>player in retail. And it's like like, so it shows

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>so I think that the fact that this person very

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 2>diplomatically from Sears is like this doesn't work, you know,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 2>And that might be born of more experienced than than

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 2>than not.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, okay, we have to go to an

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>advak Before we do that, I want to tell one

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>more insane nineties Like people in the nineties really really

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>had market brain in a way that's like difficult to

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>understand now. And you can even see this kind of

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>through Obama, Like they really have market brain. And like,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the most market brain thing anyone ever did

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>was the the I think it was the Army Joint

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>chiefs of Staff brought in like a group of aonomists

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>who were you know, like you were doing the whole

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like okay, we like, how how can we make how

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>can we use the market to make the army run

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>more efficient? And the first polls that they put on

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on the table is we're going to have each each

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like like each like section like what's the tap time declartum.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have each branch of the military bid for

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>control of who of who gets controlled the nuclear weapons.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>And there's a bunch of just like five star generals

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting at this table going like what the fuck are

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you guys talking about? This kid about and that that

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>was the end of like but that was like like

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>peak absolute peak nineties brain of like these these people

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>thought you could solve terrorism by like having futures markets

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on like where when terrorist attacks would happen, Like it

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>was these people were wild. None of this stuff worked,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Unlike the products and services that you're gonna you're gonna

0:25:48.240 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>now hear ads for and we're back from these fine

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>products and services. If you're if the thing you were

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>doing right now is you have your finger on the button.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We are about to message Sophie about the fact that

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we have gold ads again, like please don't like please

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>leave Sophie alone. Oh my god. I think we we've

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten We've gotten a little we've we've gotten sort of

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>into the weeds of I guess, like the kind of

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>research stuff it's been produced, but I wanted to move on,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think to some of the some of the other

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like kinds of like I don't know, kinds of discourse

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and kinds of sort of work that's been produced out

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of this.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Sova Cola's piece I think was was very, very accomplished,

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and it adds to this proud tradition of pricing surveys

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 2>like you've been saying. But the piece that I would

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 2>say ended up having the biggest impact in the sense

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that it really kind of started getting followed up on

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 2>by a lot of people and it got a lot

0:26:54.960 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 2>of attention, was Tim Dimetzio's piece, So a little bit him.

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 2>He's an economist based in Australia and I should remember

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the name of his university, but it was the University

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 2>of Something and it starts with W and it's a

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 2>very long name there you go, University of Yeah, And

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>he's a political economist. He does a lot of stuff

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 2>pertaining to kind of like international relations type stuff, but

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 2>he also comes at economics from a particular perspective. So

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned last time that there's these the orthodoxy and

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>economics is this one school called the Neoclassicals, who believe

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>in the supply and demand stuff and along with a

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of other dogmas. Then there's a bunch of

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 2>dissident heterodox schools. And there's a whole bunch of these,

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and one of them is called the capital as Power school,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 2>which is named after a book called Capitalist Power by

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 2>these two professors called Bickler and Nitsen, and it has

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things to say about a lot of subjects.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>But so Capital's power is a book that says a

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 2>lot of things and a lot of different subjects, but

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 2>at its core is the idea that what makes the

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>capitalist system tick is the process of capitalization, and that

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 2>that process of capitalization is controlled by certain people, and

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 2>their control over that process is the basis of the

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 2>entire economic system. That's very heavy stuff. It tends not

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to have to do with what we're going to be

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>talking about, but it informs the perspective that Demutzio comes from. Now,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Demuzio saw Steve's brilliant essay on the splashing theory of inflation,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>was very inspired by it because there are certain affinities

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>between the framework that we're coming from in this kind

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of research and the capital's power framework. They don't agree

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent on everything, but there's a lot of

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>common ground there. So he basically hopped aboard to say, well,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 2>why don't we talk about interest rates? Because remember the

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>main upshot of Steve's of Fred Lee's administrative crisis theory,

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and then and then by extension, Steve's theory about inflation

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>is that inflation is not about money, it's about prices.

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>And in order to understand inflation, you have to understand

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 2>why people set the prices that they do, and why

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 2>prices across the economy will go up at any given

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 2>moment because it's people who set prices, not the market,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 2>not the money supply, and not any of these other

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of automatic general macroeconomic things. It's a microeconomic decision

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 2>made by particular people within particular institutions with the ability

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to pull the lever on particular prices. Right, So the

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>interest rate is a price, you know, it's a very

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 2>important price too.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Because we should look, we should we should back off

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for a second and explain what when when you say

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate, you should explain what that is, because well, yeah,

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's under explained.

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's totally exactly where I was going. Because

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 2>there's actually many interest rates out there in the economy.

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>When we talk about the interest rate, what we tend

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to be talking about is the interest rate that is

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>set at the central bank of the country that control

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 2>like of the currency under discussion. Right. That is basically

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>an interest rate that sets the price for credit for

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 2>loans in the rest of the economy. And it's basically

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you can see it as a supply chain, even though

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not a physical one and it's basically the main

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>cost for banks that want to borrow, you know, and

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>they then have to set a markup over that cost

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 2>as the price for anyone who wants to borrow from them,

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 2>which includes other banks but also includes end consumers and firms.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's basically I mean, I'm oversimplifying and Sea probably

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 2>a more nuanced version of this, but that's the basics.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Banks, just like any company, need to determine both

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 3>their cost structure to except that they are able to

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 3>themselves and their markup and markup is they like banks

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 3>have costs just like anyone. One of their principal costs

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 3>is the rate of interest that they pay on deposits

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 3>of their customers in order to get them to get

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>new customers in Like, that's one of their main services

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that they provide is checking checking accounts and savings accounts

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and like, so how much interest are you is a

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 3>bank willing to set on its savings account is like

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 3>an important decision that's like part of its cost structure.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 3>But where people if the Federal Reserve were to raise

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>its federal it's the federal funds rate, it's a principal

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 3>policy rate up to what they have now five and

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a half percent or so, when it was less than

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>one percent only a year ago. In order to compete

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 3>with all of the other products which are based upon

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>this so called risk free rate of return that the

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 3>central bank offers that governments used to like set the

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 3>rate of things like treasury treasury bills and stuff like. Eventually,

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 3>if you're a bank, you have to start charging higher

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 3>and higher interest rates. Sorry, you have to start offering

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 3>higher and higher interest rates on your savings accounts. And likewise,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 3>you need to, like, you need to start charging higher

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 3>interest rates on the products that are your actual money makers,

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 3>like mortgages and home equity, lines of credit and that

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing, and so like the cost so the

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 3>cost structure of a bank will shift as the Federal

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Reserve is changing its policy rate, and so too will

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>its margin over time as it competes with other banks

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>for like a narrowing pool of qualified mortgage applicants, and

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 3>also for people who are willing to shop around for

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 3>where to keep their deposits in a way that they

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 3>previously they weren't because there was no sort of differential

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 3>in interest rates at all. It was just being held steady.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, So the key thing to understand, and by

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the way, up to now, Steve and I have been

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 2>describing what we regard as the real world. Like everything

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that we've just described, we can see it in action

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>like in the world right Like if the FED raises

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>this interest rate effectively, what that means is that this

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 2>whole supply chain of people lending to other people, who

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 2>lend to other people, who lend to other people, the

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 2>cost of lending has essentially increased, which will eventually lead

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to a rise in the cost and the cost of

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>lending to people downstream until for end consumers, which is

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 2>basically like firms and households trying to get a loan

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>from the bank, those loans are going to be more expensive.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>And conversely, if the Fed's interest rate goes down, those

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 2>prices will tend to go down as well.

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 3>If you like. Crucially, none of it is just automatic.

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 2>That's Y's absolutely true.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 3>There's even just just because it's a bank doesn't mean

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 3>it's any different than the story that Facola was laying

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 3>out for retailers.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm, that's exactly right. The Fed's rate is a

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 2>very important rate because it's basically the first, the first

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 2>one in this chain, and it's a cost for pretty

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>much everybody who's doing business and dollars. But that doesn't

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 2>mean that it in some simple way just controls everything else.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 2>You can hope that it controls if you're the central banker.

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 2>But of course all these firms are making their own

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 2>decisions based on their own reasons, so you know, they

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>can make all sorts of decisions based on their priorities

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and based on like like, all sorts of things. Now,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 2>by the way, if you want the more detailed version

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 2>of this story that actually talks about the different agents

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 2>at each step of this process in much more detail,

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you should check out Perry Merling's work on this. And

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 2>there's even online online lectures that kind of get into

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the nitty gritty which I have absorbed and then since

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 2>completely forgotten the details of, so I would need to

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>watch them again to actually be able to name the names.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But the point is that so far, so real. Right. Now,

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 2>here's where things get a little bs.

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Remember that the mainstream theories of inflation are all basically

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 4>descended in their DNA, even though they've been moving further

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 4>and further away from.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>It from the old school quantity theory of money. The

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>idea that the amount of money in the economy basically

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 2>determines the price level. More money that there is circulating,

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the less that money is worth because there's too much

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 2>of it, so the price of it goes down, and

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 2>the price of money basically determines like how much your

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 2>money is able to buy. Now. People have been moving

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 2>away from that towards theories that get more realistic, but

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 2>still retain the basic structure where the money supplies the

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>main thing that matters, and they'll say, for example, that

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 2>it's the amount of money circulating in people's pockets relative

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to the amount of goods being produced, such that if

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>too much money is chasing too few goods, like there

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 2>isn't enough supply to meet the demand, and that causes something,

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 2>although people disagree on what, that causes prices to be

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>bid upwards, and that's called the demand poll theory. It's

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>the dominant theory that most economists, classical mainstream economists that

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you talk to today will will will pedal to you. The

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 2>ones who are not orthodox monitorists, they still believe in this,

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 2>which means that they still think that you have to

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 2>when there's an inflationary event, you have to attack the

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 2>money supply now from them. From their point of view,

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't have to do with the absolute amount of

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 2>money circulating. It has to do with the amount of

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 2>money in people's pockets relative to the amount of stuff

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 2>that can be bought. So, if there's too much money

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 2>in people's pockets, how do people use their money? They

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 2>spend it on goods and services that are produced by firms.

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So if you reduce that amount of money, that basically

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the only way that you can do it is by

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 2>putting people out of work, right, you know you by

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 2>because then they don't get the wages which they would

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 2>have spent on stuff that you know, the factory is

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 2>in Walmart and everything else, the agriculture and whatever, all

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that gets made, the goods and services. Now

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>they think that if you raise the interest rate, it

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 2>makes the cost of finance more expensive. Some firms are

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 2>depending on finance, so if that cost increases for them,

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 2>they're going to go under. And when they go under,

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 2>people get unemployed. When people get unemployed, they have less

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 2>money in their pockets, which means that they're spending less,

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 2>which means that some other firms go out of business,

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and then those people go unemployed. Now, the full version

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 2>of this is like the crash of two thousand and

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 2>eight or nineteen twenty nine, where suddenly a whole bunch

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 2>of people are unemployed and a whole bunch of companies

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 2>are empty. They don't want to go all the way

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 2>with that, but they want to kind of get part

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 2>of the way to that. They want to put the

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 2>squeeze on the economy and get some companies put out

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 2>of business and some people unemployed on the dole so

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 2>that people don't have money in their pockets, so that

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the supposed pressure of too many people spending money on

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 2>goods that are not being produced enough to meet that demand,

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the demand pressure goes down, so therefore it equilibrates and

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>inflation prices. Inflation ceases because prices go down too, because

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the idea is that there's a law like relationship between

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 2>demand and prices such that if demand goes down, the

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>price will go down. The actual explanation for this is

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>will vary depending on the thing. They basically accept it

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>as a religious orthodoxy, and then different economists justified in

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 2>different ways. But that's why they're trying to raise interest

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 2>rates so that basically people get thrown out of work

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and that'll cause prices magically to go down. Now, as

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 2>we discussed, the actual cause of the inflation was an

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 2>exogenous shock based on like the chip shortage, the labor shortage,

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and key things like agriculture, the container shortage and the

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 2>war in Ukraine causing increases and grain prices that have

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 2>cost cost increases. That firms tried to hold off price

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 2>increases as long as they could, but then they couldn't,

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 2>and then they traveled down the supply chain and a

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of prices across the economy went up. So

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.959
<v Speaker 2>we know that because we have looked at the news

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 2>stories that you know, and talk to people at these

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 2>different companies. By we, I don't mean strange matters. I

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 2>mean like you know, journalists or whatever, and like you know,

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 2>that's what they say. And yet nevertheless they're trying to

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>make the interest rates go up to throw people out

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of work and partially induce a recession in the hopes

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>that that will drive prices down.

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 3>But they can't even get that, right.

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, they haven't.

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Actually they haven't been able to get unemployment up either.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's.

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Exactly well, and what's really funny is that Demucio basically says, Okay,

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>why do people believe this? They believe it for a

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of reasons, but they think that it worked in

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 2>the seventies. That's the myth. Right. You asked Larry Summers,

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>why do you think this shit will work? And Larry

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Summers will say, well, you might not like it. And

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 2>I think he actually said things like this, like a

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks ago, you might not like it, but

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 2>this is how we got out of the crisis of

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 2>the seventies. If we hadn't done the vulgar shock, which

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 2>is basically the same thing, they raised interest rates through

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 2>up the yazoo, you know, like like we and hadn't

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 2>induced that unemployment or whatever, prices would never have come down.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>But you see, Demucio did something that you're not supposed

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 2>to do, which is that he actually checked up on

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 2>the relationship between between interest rates and prices. And what

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:49.919
<v Speaker 2>he found was that basically, there's either that I believe

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 2>that I explained his essay is that there's a strong

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 2>version of his argument and there's a weak version. The

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 2>week version is definitely true. The strong version is speculative.

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So he charted it and you found that there is

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 2>absolutely no inverse relationship between interest rates and prices. They

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>raise interest rates, they raise interest rates, the prices keep

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 2>going up. Then they're not coming down, right, And the

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 2>prices don't start to go down until oil because remember

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.439
<v Speaker 2>the oil shock caused by the war in the Middle

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 2>East between Israel and Weal and UH and Egypt and

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch of other places caused OPEK to raise

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:26.399
<v Speaker 2>their prices in order.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>point in a thing, which is that the actual story

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>behind that is slightly more complicated, which is that, like, okay, so,

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to be completely one hundred percent accurate about this, OPIK

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>had a meeting where they decided to raise prices, and

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:46.919
<v Speaker 1>then the war started, and then like like two weeks afterwards,

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and then they kind of tacked their explanation on to

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the back of the price increase they'd already decided on.

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, but.

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this this this is the thing that like,

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there was a there was an oil

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>historian who went back and like spent a bunch of

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>time looking through the records of OPEC and shit and

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what the actual sequence of events was.

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>But it it is true that like one of the

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>things behind keeping Opek together so that it could increase

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil was like the like what was

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:21.800
<v Speaker 1>their sort of solid aarity and they faced the opposition

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of the war. But also it's slightly more complicated than that,

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and I want to I want to I want to

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>put that on the record, just because the oil knowers

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>will get mad at us. We Yeah, yeah, so that's

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the version of it that like like ninety nine percent

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of accounts will give you. It's just slightly not quite

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly what was happening.

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I gotta wrote that book.

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it was, God, I don't remember what

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>book I think it was in. I think it was

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.919
<v Speaker 1>in Carbon Democracy, maybe like eighty percent.

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I read like four books about oil and coal

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in like incredibly rapid succession, like several years ago, and

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.879
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I have trouble remembering exactly which one which thing

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is from. But yeah, although I want to say sorry,

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess I want to say one other kind of

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about that that makes specifically trying to use

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates arguments about like I think it is

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it is pretty clear that raising the interest rates directly

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>would like did not immediately did wasn't the thing that

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>brought down prices. I think there's like an interesting there's

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like a weird thing going on there too, because the

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like almost all like when when economists tend to look

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at this, what they tend to look at what the

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>interest rate rises was what was happening to the US

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>economy and the other the other thing that the vocal

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>shock did was it raised the interest rates on It

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>raised raised the interest rates in all of these adjustable

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>rate loans that like all of these countries like all

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>over the world had and those economies got fucking obliterated.

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.399
<v Speaker 1>And that actually I think, I think actually that there

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>there is an argument that like my my argument would be,

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it kind of probably prevented prices maybe from

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>going up more, But it did that because it prevented

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>any more opex fromforming and just like absolutely annihilated any

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of political movement to like have pricing be set

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by like raw material producers rather than by like countries

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that do production. And this is a kind of like

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>separate thing, but like this is I think, I think

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the moral of my story with this before we get

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>back to sort of like the I don't know, the

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the other arguments about this is that like that moment

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>was such a fucking shit show. There were so many

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>things going on. It's so complicated. It is absolutely nuts

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to try to base literally your entire theory about how

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you stop inflation by raising interest rates on one event

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in like probably the most complicated economic crisis, and it

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like we've ever had. And yeah, because like it did,

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>like the Volker shock did a lot of things that

0:44:55.880 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't what Volker or not even not not what Vocal

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do, but it did a lot of

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't what economists talk about when they talk

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about what the Volcan shock did. Like it had all

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>of these incredibly like powerful political ramifications that they just

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>don't put in the equations because it doesn't feel like

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you mathematically model like the collapse of the

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>like like the collapse of the non online movement and

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>like the Third World movement, Like you can't, right, And

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so they just sort of like wave their hands and

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>pretend that it was just like directly it caused more unemployment,

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment prot inflation rydown.

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting to think of the global effects of

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the Vulcar's shock. It's like you have countries who are

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 3>dependent upon USD finance suddenly are facing a much stronger dollar.

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 3>So if they didn't already have dollars, that's a huge problem.

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and again, yeah and again. Also just like like

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.720
<v Speaker 1>just literally the interest rates on their loans like increased

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>by like twenty percent. And that's like, you know, like

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you're it doesn't really matter what your economy is. You can't,

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's it's unbelievably difficult to survive them

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, on the four x dimension and just on regular

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 3>lending terms, in dollar lending anyway, it's going to get

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 3>way tougher. They even domestically, like to de Mitiu, superimposes

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the oil price onto the inflation and like the the

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 3>inflationary crises of the seventies and early eighties, it was

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a double it was a double victim, if you remember.

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 3>And so like the first time the FED chairman who

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 3>proceeded Paul Voker was blamed for not raising interest rates

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:44.879
<v Speaker 3>during an inflationary crisis because of the emerging theory, said

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 3>that maybe that would be a good idea, and so

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 3>like the monitorists had like their one moment after that

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 3>to say like they were, they became more than simply

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 3>an academic movement and became like briefly hegemonic. With with

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the the vulgar interest rate arise that happened to like

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 3>in set in nineteen seventy five or so, when the

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 3>oil price was about fifteen dollars per barrel. That's when

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 3>inflation and the oil price start to move closely in

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:22.359
<v Speaker 3>conjunction with each other, going into nineteen eighty, which is

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 3>also when the interest rates are being raised more like

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 3>give or take nine to eighteen months or so, and

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 3>the economic historians, the neoclassical economic historians, will forget about

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the supply chain pressures like the oil price, which has

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 3>nothing to do with the FED, and like that happened

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 3>in this inflationary when oil prices were up to like

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.720
<v Speaker 3>one ten. During our current inflationary crisis, this exact debase

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 3>debate was taking place again. Yeah, which like where it's like,

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's like all of the prices that the

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 3>FED has no control over. It's like, well, if you

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.879
<v Speaker 3>ignore those ones, then actually our theory is like kind

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:06.879
<v Speaker 3>of getting close to being right.

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.839
<v Speaker 2>And the worst part, the worst part is that the

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>interest rate correlates positively with prices.

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 5>This is so like so like so like the interest

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 5>rate when it's high, theory expects that prices will be low,

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 5>but actually and and and and like even.

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 2>If you adjust for like a delay where maybe like

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the prices get low afterwards, like no, that's not what happens.

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like the interest rate goes up and prices go

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 2>up to prices go down, and the interest rate goes

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, like like like.

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like yeah and like and Demucio is like it

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 3>when he eventually he super imposes old price, fed funds,

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.399
<v Speaker 3>thorough funds, rate, and inflation all in one chart. It's

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 3>just like this epic wave of all three going up

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 3>at once, like almost in lock step. And then oil

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:05.479
<v Speaker 3>goes back down, and then interest rates go back down,

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:06.879
<v Speaker 3>and then prices go back down.

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't think prices first before interest rate. Let

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 2>me see.

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah yeah like inplation, Chris, like yeah, somewhat concurrently

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 3>with the federal funds and then the uh, the oil

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 3>price eventually falls like like shortly thereafter.

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then and this this just gives you a disaster,

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>right because you like, okay, so the you will get

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 1>neoclassical economists who are like, oh my god, oh no,

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>all these idiots are saying that increasing the increasing the

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 1>interest rate actually increases prices. It's not what happening. It's

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like you get into this mess. You have to figure

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out the new classical explanation, right, is that like, okay, well,

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the reason it looks like the fund rate increasing increases

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>prices is because you do that in response to the

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>inflation happening. Right, But like you can also just very

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>easily look at this as like a panic index basically

0:49:57.120 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like where you know, it's like, okay, well, prices go up,

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the Fed panics and so they raise their

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't, and you know, like it's it's this is

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where like the neoclassical economists have

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>invented a mechanism that like allows them to explain their

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>own actions in a way that's plausible enough that they

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:21.400
<v Speaker 1>can call anyone that they've they've gotten a fagiblity that

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>could say anyone who says they're wrong is just like nuts, right, right,

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And also it's it's it's entirely possible that not only

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are they not right, they're literally perfectly exactly wrong.

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that yeah, they tried out the like the

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the econometric jargon long and variable lags when people say,

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 3>when our interest rate's gonna cause unemployments arise, when our

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 3>interest rate's gonna cut down on inflation by themselves and

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 3>not some other supply chain phenomenon, And they say like, well,

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:57.959
<v Speaker 3>the monetary transmission mechanism has long and variable lags, which

0:50:57.960 --> 0:50:59.919
<v Speaker 3>means that like nine to eighteen months from now, it'll

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 3>settle down and then we'll know it's from interest rates.

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Trust us, right, And.

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Even their purported explanations are demonstrably false. So theoretically, the

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:11.760
<v Speaker 2>mechanism by which this happens is that the monetary that

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the money supply will go down. Well, yeah, M two

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 2>is our best estimate for the monetary for the money supply,

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:21.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's not even a perfect one. You know, interest

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.320
<v Speaker 2>rates go up, interest rates go down, M two keeps

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 2>going up. And this is over the course of like

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 2>from the seventies to the nineties, you know, like like, yes,

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 2>another graph of the mussios.

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:36.240
<v Speaker 3>That's another important point that like the money, it doesn't

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.399
<v Speaker 3>even get the money supply down.

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So like it's quite questionable whether this interest rate

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 2>adjustment thing even works at all on its own terms,

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 2>because all the evidence says that there's at least and

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 2>this is what I mean by the weak version of

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 2>the Vicis argument, that all the evidence shows that there's

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 2>at least no relationship between interest rates and the price level,

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 2>that there is like no relation ship whatsoever. It basically

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 2>just is useless for controlling prices one way or the other.

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 2>The uh. Now, the strong version of argument is he

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 2>takes the he takes the the the fact that interest

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 2>rates track prices very seriously, and he's like, well, what

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 2>if making finance more expensive actually raises business costs and

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 2>businesses choose to respond to it by raising their prices?

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, what if you what if you actually, by

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 2>raising the interest rate, are contributing to inflation. Now, this

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:35.879
<v Speaker 2>is this is kind of how we framed the whole

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 2>article in our title editors make titles, not not not

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 2>not writers do interest rate hikes worsen inflation? And I

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 2>remember showing this to some of my friends who were

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 2>financed bros. And they were like, what what are you

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about? This is a crazy idea, But like it

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 2>makes a lot of sense because if you look at

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:56.360
<v Speaker 2>things as a supply chain. At the very least, rising

0:52:56.440 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 2>financially rising cost of loans would be a higher cost

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 2>for some businesses. Theoretically they could respond to that by

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 2>raising their prices. Now, in actual fact, it probably at

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 2>least my solo opinion is this is a small effect,

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 2>if it exists at all, it's much more plausible that

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 2>there is simply no relationship. Yeah, and the general price.

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that and that and that and that, Like

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're correlated is just it's just a

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>panic index on the on the on the on behalf

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of the fed that they just get scared and do

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing and it doesn't it has no effect, but

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they've got to press the panic button.

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think I'm for a variety of reasons, I

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 3>think I'm a weak form demusiist on this point. I think, like, like,

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 3>especially these days, there's so many other like a relatively

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 3>small percentage of commercial and business credit is variable right

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 3>to begin with, These days, more of it is fixed rate,

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 3>and like especially for more well certainly for mortgages, like

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 3>it's it's like eighty percent plus approaching eighty five percent

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 3>even fixed rate, which will not be affected. And then

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 3>businesses have other so many other means of liquidity other

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 3>than loans these days, particularly the like medium large scale businesses,

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:18.760
<v Speaker 3>like the you know, you can go to the capital markets,

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 3>private equity or the stock market and get the funding

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 3>you need. That I'm in ways that don't don't depend

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:30.439
<v Speaker 3>upon what the federal funds rate is doing or only

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 3>weekly depend upon it. So it's just like there's so

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 3>many other liquidity sources, especially like in the last thirty

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 3>years or so, like well since since the Vulcar Shock.

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Basically they've like all of these like private equity and

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 3>other capital markets methods for liquid you have opened up,

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.359
<v Speaker 3>and a good deal of the debt, a good deal

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:52.680
<v Speaker 3>more of the debt, that's a percentage of total debt

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 3>is fixed rate. So like on that basis, I'm like,

0:54:56.200 --> 0:55:00.120
<v Speaker 3>all right, well, maybe it doesn't maybe it doesn't increase prices,

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 3>but there is at the very least it's like non correlated.

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 2>This caught a lot of people's attention, Like once Stevens,

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:19.440
<v Speaker 2>you put this paper out there, this is one of

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 2>our most successful essays because it got picked up by

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:27.919
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of folks. I mean, Investipedia cited it as

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 2>a source Economy called this a blog and not a magazine,

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, like like it ended up being taken up

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.839
<v Speaker 2>by another capital as Power influenced economists Blair Fix, who

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:41.920
<v Speaker 2>found yet more empirical evidence that there is no relationship

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 2>whatsoever between interest rates and like the general price level,

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:49.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, and to the extent that there is, it's

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 2>only because you induce a recession, you know, that that

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that puts people out of work, in which case you've basically,

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, you've in order to deal with a paper cut,

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 2>you've cut off your hand, right and even then, like

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 2>they can't they can't reliably get unemployment up, you know,

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 2>by raising rates. So like what like what use is

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 2>that even if you accept that mechanism. So they found

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.240
<v Speaker 2>more evidence and they got even more attention. Cory Doctoro,

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the science fiction writer and futurist and kind of left

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 2>wing all around public intellectual, he found both Demusia's study

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and Blair Fix's study and was like really excited about it.

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.800
<v Speaker 2>And after that it really took off. It started getting

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:32.280
<v Speaker 2>debated all over the place. There's a heterodoxy economics international

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 2>organization called Rethink Economics, which is all about like, you know,

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:38.720
<v Speaker 2>inciting pluralism and the discipline, and in their Australian blog

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 2>because they're all over the world, an economist called Matthew Harris,

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, took up took up the controversy and basically

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 2>sided with with Demusio like and JW. Mason writing in

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Baron's also basically sided with us in an essay called

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the Fed Can't Fine Tune the Economy. JW. Mason's a

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 2>very important hederodox economists who's often on the cutting edge

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of these kind of theoretical developments. Interestingly,

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the first fellow though, Matthew Harris at Rethink Economics, he

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 2>actually found a study which I was not aware of,

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 2>which is why I love these. When we started all

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 2>these conversations all over the place, people dug up stuff

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that we didn't even know about. There was a study

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 2>done by the National Bureau of Economic Research by two

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 2>professors from the University of Chicago, but notably they were

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:30.200
<v Speaker 2>not University of Chicago economists. They were in the University

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 2>of Chicago Business school. And as many people have pointed out,

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, capitalists started business schools because economists are basically

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 2>just propaganda. But like you actually also need people who

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 2>know how the world actually works in order to run

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 2>your companies. So that's why economics and business schools are

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 2>two separate schools.

0:57:48.800 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 1>This is like a real like I remember this on campus.

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>This is like, this is a real thing, where like

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're so the business school, if I'm remembering correctly,

0:57:56.760 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the business school is like is most I think it's

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I only be a grad school for han

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sot me let me look this up. Yeah that was

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>my memory of it.

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So so this is a real thing because because the University

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Chicago doesn't have an undergrad business program, you get people

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>who want to do business who go into ECON, and

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the ECON people fucking hate them because they see them

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:23.439
<v Speaker 1>as like like they see them as sort of like

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like these like inferior like fly by night people who

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>don't care about like the sort of deep like the

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>deep math and like the deep sort of like you know,

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:36.439
<v Speaker 1>like intellectual like political pursuit of economics. They just want

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to like go be a business person. And this has

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 1>really interesting effects because it means that like you know,

0:58:45.800 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like the business school. I say, it's not like the

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>business school is like a bastion of leftist or whatever.

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But they don't agree on stuff a lot because they're

0:58:55.400 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like like the University of Chicago Economics program. It it

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 1>produces basically two things. It produces like a bunch of

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>people who go on to be investment bankers where you

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:07.919
<v Speaker 1>don't actually need to know how a firm works at all,

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes on to produce a bunch of

0:59:12.200 --> 0:59:15.240
<v Speaker 1>people who become economists. And so like it's it's actual

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of ideological purpose is is specifically it's it's a

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>school that trains other economists, right, it's a school that

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 1>teaches like the ruling class what to think, whereas the

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:27.320
<v Speaker 1>business school is like the school that teach And this

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is like this is a very very very explicit It's

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's something that like when you're there you can like

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 1>watch like in practice, the fact that these aren't the

0:59:36.240 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>same thing and the fact that like you know, they're

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're going to produce different conclusions because you know,

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the the like because like because their actual like purpose

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is different. One is ideological, the other one is like

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 1>making money.

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and and and this is a great case study

0:59:56.720 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 2>of it because these folks at the Business school their

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 2>names are Nil's, Nils Gormson and Killian Huber, they actually

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:11.479
<v Speaker 2>went and asked companies what they do when credit gets

1:00:11.480 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>more expensive. Now, according to the theory, and this is

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the most sophisticated theory the theory that people at the

1:00:16.320 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 2>FED will tell you, which is, you know, you might

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>need to put a few drinks into them first, but

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like we have to induce a partial

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>recession in order to make it so that people have

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:26.479
<v Speaker 2>less spending money in their pockets and prices get bidded down.

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:00:27.280 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Theoretically, the mechanism by which this works at the individual

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>firm is that the firm sees that the cost of

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>capital goes up and they invest less, you know, or

1:00:34.760 --> 1:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>just outright go out of business. Right, But in fact

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>future investment is only weekly correlated to the cost of

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>capital because of the limited transition into discount rates, you know.

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>In other words, like basically, there's no real effect. So yeah,

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>they go around and do business service.

1:00:54.800 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, go ahead, companies. Yeah, they do a good amount,

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>if not perhaps most, of their capital investment from cash

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>on hand before going before seeking out finance.

1:01:13.520 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that and that, like and that means that

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have an effect.

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>And then even if you need financing their non debt finance.

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 3>So there's like equity finance, either private or republic that

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you have as an option site alongside the debt options.

1:01:28.160 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. So we go from like a situation where we

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>publish this article in twenty twenty two, right, and it's

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 2>got a title that for a mainstream economist, even a

1:01:39.520 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>very sophisticated one, is unthinkable, like do interest rates hikes,

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, cause inflation to get worse or even just

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>don't matter for inflation. But then suddenly, like you have

1:01:54.360 --> 1:01:57.320
<v Speaker 2>a bunch once it gets taken up by a larger discussion,

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>you have a bunch of quite reputable people saying the

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 2>exact same thing, citing this directly, and even in one case,

1:02:05.160 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 2>six months after our article comes out, Lo and behold

1:02:08.560 --> 1:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>that a certain little known economist rights in the Guardian.

1:02:13.920 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>In fact, raising interest rates could do more harm than

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>good by making it more expensive for firms to invest

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>in solutions to the current supply constraints the US federal reserves.

1:02:23.480 --> 1:02:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Monetary tightening has already curtailed housing construction, even though more

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 2>supply is precisely what is needed to bring down one

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest sources of inflation housing costs. Moreover, many

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>price setters in the housing market may now pass the

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>costs of doing business onto renters. You know. So in

1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>other words, like maybe higher interest rates can actually induce

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>price increases as the higher interest rates, and do businesses

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to write down the future value of lost customers relatives

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to the benefit of higher prices to be sure, a

1:02:47.920 --> 1:02:50.880
<v Speaker 2>deep recession you know, parenthesis like the kind of they're

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>trying to induce. That's my parenthesis. Back to the quote,

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>a deeper session would tame inflation. But why would we

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>invite that, you know her own Powell and his colleague

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>seemed to relish cheering against the economy. Meanwhile, they're friends

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>in commercial banking are making out like bandits now that

1:03:06.880 --> 1:03:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the Fed is paying four point four percent interests on

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>more than three trillion dollars a bankers or balances. Blah

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. Now, this little known economist writing for

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>The Guardian is Joseph Stiglitz, who won the Nobel Prize

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>in economics. Now does he cite our article who's talking

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>points he's basically going through point by point? No, does

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>he cite any of the better known places that cited

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>us that are header box. No, he basically presents it

1:03:33.800 --> 1:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>as if it's his own idea. Now, maybe he did

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>have this idea six months after we started.

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Extension in like Stingletz has not had a single idea

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in like fifteen years. Like that man, Oh, that man

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is a transpe parent medium through which the stuff that

1:03:50.360 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he reads appears on a page. I'm going to be made.

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm sick of doing this bullshit.

1:03:57.760 --> 1:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know the worst part is, like, you know this,

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>this is something that happens a lot. There's an orthodoxy

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>that says certain things that are nonsense. The heterodoxy goes

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:09.560
<v Speaker 2>through the hard work of like figuring out the reasons

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>why it's not true and presenting an alternative model. It's

1:04:13.040 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>denied at first, but then increasingly it's just plagiarized, you know,

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>perhaps accidentally, probably not, you know, like like and that

1:04:24.120 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it's presented as if actually, this is what the theory

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 2>has always been all along, you know, and like, how

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>can anyone think differently? And it's this, it's this unfortunate

1:04:32.680 --> 1:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>thing because since the neoclassicals control the discipline, they control

1:04:36.840 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>advancement through the ranks of the economists, so they're always

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>wrong and never right, but they're never punished for it,

1:04:43.520 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and they control all the leavers of who gets to

1:04:45.680 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>be an economist. So it's this sort of like continual sad,

1:04:50.040 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate thing. But on the bright side, we were right.

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>We were right early A bunch of people picked it up,

1:04:56.360 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and our talking points ended up making it too very

1:04:58.920 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>very distant and well regarded places to the point where

1:05:01.440 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 2>now it's it's a viable alternative that exists out there

1:05:05.840 --> 1:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>in the world in terms of like, you know, why

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 2>keep raising rates. It's not doing any good. It could

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>even do bad. And that's the talking point that I

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:15.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think would have existed if it hadn't been for

1:05:15.800 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Democillo's research, which depended entirely upon the supply chain theory

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>of inflation framework that Steve developed out of Fred Lee's work,

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>which is basically a research program that now the magazine

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:28.360
<v Speaker 2>has put out there in the world that and it

1:05:28.400 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>is continuing to build up on that. That actually makes

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it make more sense.

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I want to just sort of like take

1:05:35.560 --> 1:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a second to highlight like how impressive it is had

1:05:37.760 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this happened, because like again like like a year and

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a half even like like like even like even like

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, right for the entire time I have

1:05:48.360 --> 1:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>been alive. If you tried to say that raising interest

1:05:51.920 --> 1:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>rates raises inflation, like people would have thrown bananas at you,

1:05:56.960 --> 1:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like like volleys of tomatoes, like they would have like

1:06:00.480 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you would you would have gotten sixteen contracts to be

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a professional clown Like this. This was a thing that

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like you could not you couldn't even like suggest this,

1:06:10.200 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, like within a pretty rapid span, suddenly

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>like Stinglets is being like, ah, what this is really

1:06:16.000 --> 1:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really maybe this is a plausible thing. It's like, oh my,

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, I think it's I think it's

1:06:21.040 --> 1:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really it's really impressive watching how fast I don't know,

1:06:27.160 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like how fast the combinations of like reality and having

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an explanation of reality that actually like lines up with

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it has been able to change, like has been able

1:06:38.160 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to actually just sort of like change what the discourse

1:06:40.840 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at like the highest levels of power and sort of

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>like what what has actually been happening in the economy

1:06:46.520 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like has shifted. And that's wild, Like I would not

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have guessed that that that was a thing that was

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>even remotely possible, And and yet we are now here.

1:06:57.320 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at the Overton windows has shifted so far that

1:07:01.440 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>like the idea that interest rates just don't seem to

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:08.000
<v Speaker 3>have any discernible effect upon the price level is kind

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:09.439
<v Speaker 3>of like becoming the base case.

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:07:11.600 --> 1:07:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so like the entire yeah, the entire spectrum has shifted, like, yeah,

1:07:17.440 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>it could be a strong form and have like I'm

1:07:21.680 --> 1:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>starting to use that phrase now by the way, and okay,

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>people won't be throwing a ton of They'll still throw

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>some things at you, but like it's it's like manageable now.

1:07:35.840 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can always point to that argument from authority,

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>but Stitz says it might be so yeah, so you know,

1:07:42.000 --> 1:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like.

1:07:43.840 --> 1:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Question he won the Nobel Prize prize too.

1:07:57.840 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>This is a whole.

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>The so called Nobel price in economics is not actually

1:08:04.360 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the Nobel Prize in economics. It's that there's Nobel prices

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>in science and you know, literature and all this stuff

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:17.760
<v Speaker 2>that's administered by the Alfred Nobel Organization and the and

1:08:17.840 --> 1:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the fund that he left and whatever. This started in

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the sixties, like I think some seventy years after the

1:08:24.360 --> 1:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Nobel started or something like that, and it was started

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>by the Swedish Central Bank to imitate the Nobel Prize.

1:08:29.920 --> 1:08:33.679
<v Speaker 2>So technically it's the Nobel Memorial Prize in economics, you see,

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and it's and it's just it's basically like peeling off

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the skin of the face of the Nobel Prize and

1:08:38.960 --> 1:08:41.320
<v Speaker 2>then wearing it, you know, and saying, where we have

1:08:41.360 --> 1:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a Nobel price too. Totally basically it's not and you know,

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>it puts the loution on its skin or else it

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>gets the hose again, you know. And they did this specifically.

1:08:58.000 --> 1:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a historian of of economics. Oh my god, what

1:09:02.880 --> 1:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the hell is his name? The it's it's the it's

1:09:06.880 --> 1:09:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the more heat than like guy. He's Oh my goodness,

1:09:12.080 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I cite him in the Friendly thing and I can't. Morowski.

1:09:16.600 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the guy. Yeah, okay. So he actually like went

1:09:19.360 --> 1:09:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and like studied the origins of it, and it turns

1:09:21.920 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>out that they specifically did it as a scheme to

1:09:25.080 --> 1:09:27.439
<v Speaker 2>only give the Nobel Prize to people who are basically

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:31.960
<v Speaker 2>like neoclassical economists, and they mostly have so sometimes they've diversed,

1:09:31.960 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 2>but mostly they've done it to very reactionary economists in

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>order to promote neoclassical economists in Europe. Because it was

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:40.439
<v Speaker 2>stronger in America than it was in Europe. And in

1:09:40.520 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>order to promote the idea of central bank independence, which

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>is a fancy term for uh, you know, a central

1:09:47.080 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 2>bank should not need to operate under a political, uh

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a democratically controlled you know, legislature that says, actually, we

1:09:58.720 --> 1:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>don't want more unemployed because that would be bad, so

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>don't do that. Like, instead, they should have independence, the

1:10:04.240 --> 1:10:07.479
<v Speaker 2>independence that allows them to technocratically decide that it's time

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>for people to get out of work, you know, and

1:10:09.280 --> 1:10:12.839
<v Speaker 2>and and that kind of thing. So you know, that's

1:10:12.880 --> 1:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>that's the story of the so called Nobel Prize. It's

1:10:15.400 --> 1:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>really the fake Nobel, yeah, which is I just call

1:10:17.600 --> 1:10:19.559
<v Speaker 2>it the fake Nobel yeah, which is.

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Also really funny if you talk to other people, like specifically,

1:10:22.160 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that happened to me when I

1:10:23.800 --> 1:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was in the university was like I knew a bunch

1:10:25.320 --> 1:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of people who were like really really good at math.

1:10:29.360 --> 1:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Like one of my friends was like like like actual

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>genuine prodigy was doing like like was doing like like

1:10:36.120 --> 1:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>graduate level like math in high school. And if you

1:10:38.640 --> 1:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>talk to these people and you talk to like math

1:10:40.439 --> 1:10:43.519
<v Speaker 1>professors about the Nobel Prizes, they like, they will like

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>yell about it for like twenty minutes because the math

1:10:46.520 --> 1:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is so bullshit. It's like, yeah, this guy like the

1:10:49.040 --> 1:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>like the math involved in these Nobel prizes are like

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they figured out too plus two weekos four and they

1:10:54.160 --> 1:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gave them like this fucking fake Nobel prize. You look

1:10:56.800 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>at like the fields metal and it's like, I don't know,

1:10:59.520 --> 1:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's, it's, it's it's it's really nonsense. All

1:11:02.160 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the math people are really mad about the fact that

1:11:03.840 --> 1:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the econ people think that they know math because they don't.

1:11:05.880 --> 1:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And the consequence of this is you get these like that,

1:11:08.280 --> 1:11:10.479
<v Speaker 1>you get people handing out Nobel prices for saying shit

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like the economy can't miss like the market can't miss price,

1:11:14.600 --> 1:11:17.639
<v Speaker 1>like in like assets that are like the price of houses,

1:11:17.720 --> 1:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the entire housing market immediately implosed because it

1:11:20.680 --> 1:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was all miss priced. It's it's it's a disaster. It

1:11:23.439 --> 1:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>has been. I don't know. We should everyone at all

1:11:27.520 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>times should be doing anti fake Nobel price propaganda against

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the economics Nobel price because it's it's it's fake and

1:11:35.280 --> 1:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bad and we should all say it more.

1:11:37.280 --> 1:11:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Uh, you know, there's on the heterodox side of things.

1:11:41.080 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 3>There's some really promising uses of mathematical economics to create

1:11:45.240 --> 1:11:49.559
<v Speaker 3>like input output matrices. Yeah, and to model, like do

1:11:49.640 --> 1:11:53.680
<v Speaker 3>an io model of the economy that the math is

1:11:53.840 --> 1:11:57.920
<v Speaker 3>very much subservient to empirical data that is coming in

1:11:58.160 --> 1:12:01.320
<v Speaker 3>that trains the model. And then like like to so

1:12:01.400 --> 1:12:04.960
<v Speaker 3>much of economics is well, data fits, data fits the model.

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 3>Data fits the model, like over and over again when

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:09.160
<v Speaker 3>it should be the other way around.

1:12:10.200 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, does the model fit the data, because if

1:12:13.200 --> 1:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't, then you got to throw it out. Like

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:18.599
<v Speaker 2>this whole like raising interest rates is going to control prices? Bullshit?

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:22.519
<v Speaker 2>When has that even happened? Theoretically happened in the seventies.

1:12:22.560 --> 1:12:24.559
<v Speaker 2>But then you look at it and yeah, it doesn't

1:12:24.560 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>tell you that story, so you know, do they throw

1:12:27.880 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>it out?

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:37.439
<v Speaker 3>No, Like brief brief callback to Fred Lee's table table

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>b was it?

1:12:39.160 --> 1:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:43.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, is the Blinder study in there? I forget, Yes,

1:12:43.920 --> 1:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>yes it is. That's like an instance. That's an instance

1:12:47.160 --> 1:12:51.679
<v Speaker 3>where Alan Blinder is neoclassical economists who like he messed

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:58.160
<v Speaker 3>up and did real science and what he found was

1:12:58.160 --> 1:12:59.759
<v Speaker 3>was the administrative price theory.

1:13:00.200 --> 1:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he made a terrible mistake of thinking that his

1:13:03.960 --> 1:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>bullshit theory would be vindicated, and then it turns out

1:13:07.000 --> 1:13:07.559
<v Speaker 2>that it was not.

1:13:08.400 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's just like the history of intellectual thought for

1:13:13.960 --> 1:13:16.479
<v Speaker 3>economics is like replete with examples where they kind of

1:13:16.479 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 3>like they screw up and they actually do real science

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:21.639
<v Speaker 3>for a change, and like find things like cost plus

1:13:21.640 --> 1:13:24.559
<v Speaker 3>markups happening, and he.

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Tries so hard to explain it away, you know, he's like, well,

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>supply and demand exists. It's just that these prices are

1:13:32.720 --> 1:13:35.439
<v Speaker 2>sticky because the cost of changing the price on the

1:13:35.479 --> 1:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>menu is actually too expensive, so they choose not to

1:13:40.280 --> 1:13:42.639
<v Speaker 2>and that's why prices are sticky. They can't they can't

1:13:42.720 --> 1:13:46.439
<v Speaker 2>change the stickers. You know, it's completely insane.

1:13:46.960 --> 1:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>It's like the cost of admit, there's a cost to

1:13:49.080 --> 1:13:54.479
<v Speaker 3>administering prices themselves, and that's why they don't change prices.

1:13:54.600 --> 1:14:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Like the price mechanism for neo classical economics would suggests.

1:13:59.360 --> 1:14:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Look for the stickers, and he couldn't find it. You

1:14:03.120 --> 1:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>couldn't find the costs. So he's like, well, I guess

1:14:06.040 --> 1:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not sticky because of menu costs. It's like, I

1:14:09.080 --> 1:14:13.560
<v Speaker 2>wonder what it could be. What a mystery?

1:14:14.600 --> 1:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we should we should start wrapping up because

1:14:16.720 --> 1:14:18.479
<v Speaker 1>this has been this has been a very long episode already,

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to ask before we go, what what what,

1:14:22.400 --> 1:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what are you all doing next? And what other incredibly

1:14:25.760 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 1>funny economics discourses can we expect to have giant like

1:14:29.960 --> 1:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>creators punched into in the next couple of years.

1:14:33.720 --> 1:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>So one thing we've started to work on, and we've

1:14:36.240 --> 1:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>discussed a little bit on this podcast, I believe, Yeah, Well,

1:14:40.920 --> 1:14:45.639
<v Speaker 3>Beck was the importance of for X foreign exchange for

1:14:46.040 --> 1:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of microeconomic things, like inflation being one of them.

1:14:50.280 --> 1:14:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Like if you're a small country that that does not

1:14:56.280 --> 1:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>have hegemonic monetary authority like the US do is to

1:15:00.960 --> 1:15:03.400
<v Speaker 3>get people to use its currency and you have to

1:15:03.439 --> 1:15:06.479
<v Speaker 3>go out and import things and some other currency, how

1:15:06.520 --> 1:15:09.800
<v Speaker 3>does that affect your ability to socially provision yourself as

1:15:09.960 --> 1:15:14.439
<v Speaker 3>a nation state and like do development work. And we're

1:15:14.520 --> 1:15:18.599
<v Speaker 3>developing a theory of for X essentially that is it's

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:24.759
<v Speaker 3>a it's an extension of the chartlist framework that informs MMT,

1:15:25.680 --> 1:15:30.320
<v Speaker 3>but with some important criticisms about how like the central

1:15:30.800 --> 1:15:34.439
<v Speaker 3>MMT insights sort of is like you can create if

1:15:34.439 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 3>you're the sovereign issuer of your own fiat currency. You

1:15:39.040 --> 1:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>can always provision enough of it to you can always

1:15:41.920 --> 1:15:44.439
<v Speaker 3>spend as much of it into existence as you need

1:15:44.520 --> 1:15:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to to do productive things. And yes, that's true. You

1:15:49.320 --> 1:15:52.080
<v Speaker 3>can create infinity of your own money, but your own

1:15:52.400 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 3>not other people's money. Yeah, So other currencies like if you're.

1:15:58.479 --> 1:16:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Like, uh, really Sri Lanka for example.

1:16:06.439 --> 1:16:11.639
<v Speaker 3>Problem if you're Sri Lanka or Mexico or whoever, most

1:16:11.680 --> 1:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>of most of the world, basically you need to maintain

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and augment your balance of like the trading the major

1:16:20.080 --> 1:16:25.439
<v Speaker 3>trading currencies US dollars, yen, the euro, to name three,

1:16:26.720 --> 1:16:31.120
<v Speaker 3>and have balances of those. You need to maintain your

1:16:31.120 --> 1:16:35.840
<v Speaker 3>balance of payments and your balances of specific currencies in

1:16:35.960 --> 1:16:41.760
<v Speaker 3>order to meet the biophysical obligations that your whatever your

1:16:41.800 --> 1:16:48.639
<v Speaker 3>development strategy necessitates, because in most instances, not all, but most,

1:16:49.240 --> 1:16:51.599
<v Speaker 3>you're going to need to Like no one's going if

1:16:51.600 --> 1:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>you're Sri Lanka, no one's going to want to to

1:16:54.920 --> 1:17:00.160
<v Speaker 3>transact in your currency for major purchases of like staple goods,

1:17:00.800 --> 1:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>You're going to need to use like dollars or euros

1:17:03.200 --> 1:17:05.720
<v Speaker 3>or end or are you on perhaps you know who

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:10.200
<v Speaker 3>knows exactly one of the major trading currencies, and this.

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Also raises the question of how it currency becomes a

1:17:12.080 --> 1:17:15.479
<v Speaker 2>major trading currency, and that almost invariably takes you in

1:17:15.520 --> 1:17:19.559
<v Speaker 2>two directions. One is which countries are powerful and able

1:17:19.600 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 2>to industrialize and make capital goods that nobody else has

1:17:22.600 --> 1:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that everybody wants a piece of. And two, which are

1:17:25.800 --> 1:17:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the powerful imperialist great powers. And it turns out that

1:17:29.120 --> 1:17:34.920
<v Speaker 2>those are the nexus that's created between imperialism, development, and

1:17:34.960 --> 1:17:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the balance of payments. Those three things can't even be

1:17:38.120 --> 1:17:42.360
<v Speaker 2>discussed independently of each other. And the politics of what

1:17:42.520 --> 1:17:44.479
<v Speaker 2>is going to be used as the what Steve and

1:17:44.479 --> 1:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I are tentatively calling the international means of payment, in

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>other words, what you can use in international transactions across

1:17:52.120 --> 1:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>a whole region or across the entire planet. That is

1:17:55.439 --> 1:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>a hugely political question that all the major great powers

1:17:59.000 --> 1:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>in their interimperial conflict or constantly fighting over. So right

1:18:02.280 --> 1:18:05.360
<v Speaker 2>now it appears that China is attempting to make a

1:18:05.400 --> 1:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>bid for a global UoN. First they tried to do

1:18:07.840 --> 1:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>it through the digital UoN. Now they're seemingly trying to

1:18:10.680 --> 1:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>do it through bricks by getting the other bricks countries

1:18:13.280 --> 1:18:15.879
<v Speaker 2>to agree to a kind of EUON gold standard, mirroring

1:18:15.960 --> 1:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the Breton Woods Agreement that was basically the dollar piggybacking

1:18:19.280 --> 1:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>off of gold to reach global pre eminence. Will it work,

1:18:22.960 --> 1:18:26.400
<v Speaker 2>will it not? Nobody really knows. It's a total mess.

1:18:26.760 --> 1:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>But in theory, that could be one way that you

1:18:29.720 --> 1:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>could suddenly have, like the YUON, at least in a

1:18:32.960 --> 1:18:36.479
<v Speaker 2>certain currency zone, be used as the main way of

1:18:36.560 --> 1:18:41.799
<v Speaker 2>doing imports. And if the US suddenly needs an import

1:18:41.840 --> 1:18:45.600
<v Speaker 2>from that zone, which hypothetically, if it existed right, they

1:18:45.680 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 2>couldn't use dollars anymore, or or maybe dollars would be

1:18:49.040 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 2>at a high disadvantage, you know, in the exchange rate

1:18:51.400 --> 1:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>between dollars and that currency at that point, or maybe

1:18:54.000 --> 1:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>they would just be banned entirely from using dollars. They

1:18:56.280 --> 1:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>have to get it in that currency, which means is

1:18:57.840 --> 1:19:00.400
<v Speaker 2>suddenly the US, which has basically been able to print

1:19:00.439 --> 1:19:03.840
<v Speaker 2>for X, to print the international means of payment for

1:19:03.960 --> 1:19:06.920
<v Speaker 2>some fifty years now, would suddenly have to actually hold

1:19:06.960 --> 1:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>reserves of this thing. Now, if we have to hold

1:19:09.320 --> 1:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>reserves of it, that means that we have to sell

1:19:10.880 --> 1:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>something to the people who issue that currency. That means

1:19:13.920 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>that we suddenly have to worry about which firms are

1:19:17.320 --> 1:19:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the most profitable exporters. And I bet you anything that

1:19:20.880 --> 1:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>none of our listeners know what the most important company

1:19:24.080 --> 1:19:30.799
<v Speaker 2>in America would become if that situation happened. Is it Luber?

1:19:31.280 --> 1:19:31.439
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

1:19:32.400 --> 1:19:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Is it Amazon? Is it? Is it? All these like

1:19:35.640 --> 1:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Fortune five hundred companies and whatever?

1:19:37.439 --> 1:19:37.719
<v Speaker 4>No?

1:19:37.720 --> 1:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, it's one of the Fortune five hundred,

1:19:39.400 --> 1:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>but it's not like towards the top of that list.

1:19:41.560 --> 1:19:47.479
<v Speaker 2>It's Boeing. Boeing is by far our single greatest exporter firm.

1:19:47.560 --> 1:19:50.839
<v Speaker 2>It would be, in a situation like this, the national champion,

1:19:51.040 --> 1:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, to use language that's usually reserved for

1:19:54.960 --> 1:19:58.679
<v Speaker 2>less developed countries than the US. And this is exactly

1:19:58.720 --> 1:20:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the kind of like thinking that is important because you know, obviously,

1:20:03.120 --> 1:20:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the other thing that would happen if dollar hegemony ended

1:20:05.120 --> 1:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>is that it would be a huge economic crash in

1:20:07.080 --> 1:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the US, Like suddenly the import the costs of importing

1:20:10.280 --> 1:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>anything that we're in that zone would skyrocket, and it

1:20:13.200 --> 1:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>would mess up, you know, our balance of payments, and

1:20:16.040 --> 1:20:18.599
<v Speaker 2>it would cause inflation. Depending on how quickly it happens

1:20:18.640 --> 1:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and how how little, how much or how little time

1:20:21.160 --> 1:20:24.479
<v Speaker 2>firms have to adjust their supply chains and stuff like that.

1:20:24.800 --> 1:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's, uh, this is exactly what you need in

1:20:27.760 --> 1:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>order to understand everything from the decline and fall of

1:20:29.960 --> 1:20:34.439
<v Speaker 2>the Roman Empire to current geopolitics today. And and and

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping that that Steve and I, through developing the theory,

1:20:37.400 --> 1:20:40.120
<v Speaker 2>will create a general framework that can be used to

1:20:40.200 --> 1:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>tie discussions that people usually have in purely political terms

1:20:43.720 --> 1:20:47.880
<v Speaker 2>about interimperial conflict into economic questions so that there's no

1:20:47.960 --> 1:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>longer a kind of division of labor between between economics

1:20:52.560 --> 1:20:54.880
<v Speaker 2>which denies the existence of imperialism. And then the people

1:20:54.920 --> 1:20:57.960
<v Speaker 2>who study imperialism as historians or political scientists or whatever.

1:20:58.720 --> 1:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The stage stay tuned for more theories dropping at some

1:21:03.840 --> 1:21:04.839
<v Speaker 1>point in the future.

1:21:06.720 --> 1:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh and we should do our marketing pitch. If you

1:21:09.720 --> 1:21:12.400
<v Speaker 2>like the stuff that you hear, you should seriously consider

1:21:13.080 --> 1:21:15.360
<v Speaker 2>checking out the magazine which is at Strange Matters dot

1:21:15.400 --> 1:21:17.880
<v Speaker 2>co op. And also please consider if you have the

1:21:17.920 --> 1:21:22.479
<v Speaker 2>ability to subscribe or donate subscription storty five dollars. And

1:21:22.520 --> 1:21:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it really it really helps because all the money that

1:21:26.680 --> 1:21:28.839
<v Speaker 2>we get that doesn't just go to our capitalist overlords

1:21:28.880 --> 1:21:31.160
<v Speaker 2>for basically like you know, paying for the services that

1:21:31.200 --> 1:21:33.360
<v Speaker 2>we use to keep the website going. And the magazine going.

1:21:33.680 --> 1:21:35.200
<v Speaker 2>All of it goes to our writers, and we try

1:21:35.200 --> 1:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>to pay them a both market rate for little magazines

1:21:37.120 --> 1:21:40.559
<v Speaker 2>of our size. So if you want to see more

1:21:40.560 --> 1:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of this stuff and more arts, philosophy, anthropology, history, all

1:21:45.080 --> 1:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the other kind of stuff poetry that we publish, definitely

1:21:48.840 --> 1:21:49.559
<v Speaker 2>please consider.

1:21:50.200 --> 1:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well we'll we'll put we'll put a link to

1:21:52.120 --> 1:21:55.559
<v Speaker 1>the magazine and the description. Yeah, Steve gen C, thank

1:21:55.600 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much for thank you so much for being

1:21:57.320 --> 1:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on the show and for yelling at the Econobo priced

1:22:03.080 --> 1:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with me.

1:22:06.479 --> 1:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>It's been a pleasure.

1:22:07.840 --> 1:22:09.120
<v Speaker 2>It's been great mana thank you.

1:22:09.640 --> 1:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you can find us at it could Happen here,

1:22:13.040 --> 1:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>What that Happened here pod on Twitter and Instagram. Yeah,

1:22:17.160 --> 1:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a website where you post our sources. It's

1:22:20.080 --> 1:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>cool Onmedia dot com. There's other stuff there. You should

1:22:22.080 --> 1:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>go there, and yeah, go into the world and make

1:22:26.479 --> 1:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>life worse for mainstream economists. It could happen here as

1:22:34.040 --> 1:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a production of cool Zone Media.

1:22:35.760 --> 1:22:38.439
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

1:22:38.439 --> 1:22:40.680
<v Speaker 2>cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the

1:22:40.720 --> 1:22:44.160
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

1:22:44.720 --> 1:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You can find sources for it could happen here.

1:22:46.479 --> 1:22:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Updated monthly at cool zonemedia dot com, slash sources.

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening,