WEBVTT - The Rise of Digital Banking

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get to Lovely

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in studio now. We've been talking about UM having her on,

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're excited to get you on Lovely. And you're

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of BM Technologies. It's among the largest digital

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>banking platforms in the US. I wonder how much can

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be done, And I was thinking about this when coin

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Base went public, or at least had their had their

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>direct listing last week. It'd be great if I could

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>have my bank accounts somewhere, trade things like you know,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies, stocks and bonds, and also somehow input my

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>employment details so that my tack UH filings would be automatic.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Can Can something like that ever happened with with an

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>online with a digital banking platform? Yes? Absolutely, thanks so

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>much for having me Um. I think a couple of

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>years ago we saw a lot of exuberance and excitement

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about fintech. Spintech, we're really coming in and saying, hey,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>banking your your old school, you're not doing this in

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a consumer friendly way. We can come and, uh, really

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>disrupt what's happening and provide a way better customer experience.

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And many um you know players came in, did that

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood coin based, you know, so Fi, chime et cetera,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>b M Technologies, etcetera. But what a lot of them

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>started doing was really unbundling financial services where it was

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>one product at a time. Someone's gonna do personal loans

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>better than what exists today. Someone's gonna do you know,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>investing better than what exists today. Someone's gonna do banking

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>better than what exists today. But it was all separate

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>rather than you know, really creating a fulls of a

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>digital banking platform. And what is now happening is the

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>realization that we can create a technology platform where all

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of this is weep together. Maybe that institution doesn't even

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have to provide all of those services. They can plug

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in through a PI. Is the best in breeds from investing,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>from crypto trading, from banking for advice, um, and that

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>is what we're seeing and that can absolutely happen. I'd

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>love to get your thoughts, lovely in a kind of

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>about how your business has been impacted, how it has

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>changed over the past fourteen months with this pandemic. You know,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing the obviously lots of stories that people are

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>doing more and more of their banking digitally. How has

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it impacted your business? Absolutely? I think in general, the

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic force and acceleration of digitization, the use of technology

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>forcing all segments, all generations to begin using technology for

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things, grocery and e commerce, uh and

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>banking being one of them. And so as it relates

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to our business, we did see exponential growth last year

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in our new business lines. We saw si plus growth

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and deposits, we saw two plus growth and spend over

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the year, and so overall we saw a lot of

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>consumers logging into their app, a lot more, using a

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of the features, the functionalities, the saving and budgeting tools,

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and obviously increased usage spend balances across the board. Does

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it matter what, um what platform people use or I

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mean like iOS versus Android, Are you agnostic or do

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you head for that? Absolutely agnostic? We have to move towards.

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if people want to have a truly

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>better banking experience, you can't create barriers like that. And

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so not only iOS, Android, but really across different channels,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>whether that's your phone, whether that's you know, online mobile,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>whether that's being able to access through Alexa. You know,

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we're coming into a world where we use and access

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>many different devices, and we should be able to do

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>banking and everything else that's important to us through various

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>different channels and devices. And I think that's the direction

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>people are heading. And so as b M Technologies, BM

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Technologies lovely and love to get a sense of kind

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of where what's the kind of environment for your company

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and where do you see growth going forward? Yeah, so,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>as you had mentioned in the beginning, we are one

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the largest digital banking platforms in the country today

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and we have over two million account holders and and

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we're growing quite rapidly. We did go public earlier this

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>year through his fact vehicle where our tickers b M,

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>t x UM and you know, for for us, it's

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really about how do you continue to expand the

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>digital banking experience in the most profitable, high growth way

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>while still addressing customer pain points, and so a lot

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of players out there are taking a director consumer approach.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank Mobile is actually taking a bat data the approach

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and something called banking as a service. Our belief is

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that every single customer in this world, really, you know,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>would benefit from having access to financial services, and that

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>banks shouldn't be the only one to have the ability

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to offer this service. You know, every business, every employer,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>every government entity should be able to offer banking. And

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.559
<v Speaker 1>that is where you get into the strategy of banking

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as a service. And that is uh the vertical that

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that we are most invested in creating and helping non

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>banks get into the banking business with fully branded banking

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>services to be able to create more loyalty, more engagement

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with their customers and with their employees. Lovely and thank

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. They really appreciate that.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>A really interesting story, a growth story here on the

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>consumer banking front as digital plays a bigger and bigger

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>role in consumer banking. Lovely and sid Do chair CEO

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and founder of BM Technologies. Kind of a fascinating story there.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, just speaking for myself, I'm doing much more

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of my day to day consumer banking on the digital

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>platform that I did prior to the pandemic, and I

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're hearing from a lot of financial institutions that

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>consumers across the border having a similar experience. So lots

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity for technological innovation. Matt let's switch gears talk

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about the fixed income markets. No better person to do

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that with than r J. Gallows, senior portfolio manager for

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>fixed income is also ahead of the missile bond group

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at Federated Hermes. R J. Thanks so much for joining

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>us once again. Here I'm looking at the ten year

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>uh one point five eight percent. It doesn't scream inflation

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to me. Give us your thoughts here on the fixed

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>income market and maybe some concerns creeping in about inflation. Yeah, well,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>good morning, thanks for having me back. Um. You know,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at an interday charge, it wasn't

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>all that terribly long ago, and the tenure peaked out

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on March thirtieth, I think it was or one around

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>one seventy seven, so you know we've traced give a

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>take twenty basis points since then. Um, at the time,

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the market was very focused on the reflation trade, let's

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>call it, maybe even the inflation trade um and I

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think we still believe that that we're going to have

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a massive rate of growth as we come off the

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, difficulty economic period related to COVID that we've

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been through. And we do feel inflation is biased upwards.

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it in the year of a year numbers.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I just think the market might have gotten a little

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead of itself. Maybe at the end of March. If

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you look on a year to day basis, you know

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 1>that the ten year real yield is up about thirty

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>basis point thirty two basis points call it, and then

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the break even on top of that is of about

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty six. So on the air real yields are up,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they're still negatives very low. Probably we'll go up further,

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and inflation break evens are well north of two percent,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>which the ft has to like. We think that the

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>retraceman yields we've seen so far is some of the

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>fear came out of the market, but the trajectory is

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>still upwards, and nominal yields, real yields break evens maybe

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a little less so because inflation is starting to perk up,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>than these break evens are pricing in well north of two.

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So we don't think that this most recent trade is

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>time to get long bonds. We still like short. And

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on inflation, I mean, you see huge growth coming up,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>do we have huge inflation? And does it stick? I me,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's the key question. I think that everyone

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>understands base effect. You know, the price level doesn't fall

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all that much in American history what it did last springs,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the COVID shock set in so as we laugh that

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>by twelve months the year of year numbers are high.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But does it stick? And that's the key question. And

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's debating. And I would say internally at our at

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>our shop at Federated Herme's, we believe that the inflation

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>trajectory is upwards. Now there's some people and I would

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>say it's almost like a demographic difference. People who were

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>in this business in the seventies and eighties, Uh, you know,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they feel like we need another Paul volcra I mean,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're much more concerned the inflation is not

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>only gonna stick, but accelerate. People who've been in this business,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, called from the mid nineties on, you know,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to be like, I'm not so worried, and then

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the younger people didn't worry about aation at all because

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they've never really seen it. Um Our view is is

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of in the middle. I think that inflation is

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a tail wind. I don't think it's

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going to become unhinged. I don't think we're talking about three,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>four and five percent rates of inflation by any means.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But I do think the Fed will have some success,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>some satisfaction after decades of being disappointed by inflation exceeding

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>two percent. Their framework opens the door for them to

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>react as opposed to be preemptive. That's a massive difference

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>from Paul Bulker and the decades that followed him. All Right, So,

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to have inflation on any meaningful scale

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>r J, presumably it has to come from wage inflation

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to some of the other commodities that we're

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>going to see a base effect over the next couple

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of quarters and some of the reported numbers. So do

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you foresee presumably higher wage inflation in this economy of

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve eighty months. Well, I think that workers

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to be incentimized to come back in into

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the workplace, and some of that is going to involve

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>enticing them with higher rates of pay. You know that

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>translates to allery and wage increases, especially in the areas

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that were the most severely COVID effect of like travel

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and hospitality, etcetera. UM. I think over time, yeah, you

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>will be seeing some higher rates of nominal pay increase. UM. Again,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in the camp that it becomes an unhinged problem.

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I believe. I actually believe the FED when they say

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we know what to do if inflation gets too high,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we all know what to do. They would tighten,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and they would tighten in fifty to seventy five bases

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>point increment, something that hasn't been done in like forever.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think if they did, what do you think

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions would do? They would roll over. People would

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be very nervous if the FED suddenly was spiking real

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>rates to Dallas inflation, and that's the tool they know works.

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>There has been an asymmetry in the Fed's toolkit. They

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to get inflation up. They know how to

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.599
<v Speaker 1>douase it, so they change their framework class August to

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.599
<v Speaker 1>becoming reactive let the inflation show up. It's called the

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>bunker hill, you know, don't tighten city, see the whites

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of inflations eyes. That's the new new approach, very different

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>than the re emptive forward looking uh tightenings that we

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>saw in the past. Well and even then, don't tighten right.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that inflation is just gonna run right

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>by you and be gone. Yeah, I mean I think not.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So their framework is what they want inflation to rise

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>above two. They wanted to have signs that it's going

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to stay above two before they tightened. So what if

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it goes above two and it hits two and a half,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think one can infer the two and a

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>half would be fine from the FED standpoint. If it

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>just stays there for a month or two it starts

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to roll back over then yeah, and then you do

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have a problem. Their framework doesn't produce the tightening that

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they want. Um. That's why I think they're in a

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>sense pouring some men around their feet and say no,

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>we're standing here and we want you the market to

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>believe inflation goes up. Because inflation is a little bit

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of a game theory concept. Right. If if price setters,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>those who charge prices for goods and services believe inflation

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>is rising, they put it into their pricing decisions and

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it becomes self fulfilling. So if the Fed can allow

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that to happen without becoming you know, boiling over and

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>too hot, then you get the inflation you want and

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>you hopefully don't have a boiling over economy. If you

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>do have the boiling over economy on the inflation front,

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED knows what to do. So, I mean people

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>might criticize me. I used to work there a long

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>time ago, the New York. I think it's gonna work right.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna take time, and rates are heading up in

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the meantime. All right, r J, thanks so much for

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>joining us. As always, we appreciate your thoughts and input.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>R J. Gallows, Senior portfolio manager Fixed Income, is also

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the amunicipal bond group at Federated HERM. He's

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>giving us his thoughts on the credit markets and on inflation.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Not too concerned here in the near term, Matt, let's

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about semiconductors here. If there's definitely been an issue

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>with supply of these chips on a global scale, and

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that's happening ripple effects across the global economy, I'm talking

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>about you know, just take global autos for example, a

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the manufacturers saying that they can't meet the

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>production goals because there aren't enough chips. Let's get the

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>latest on what this means and how this might play out.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>We do that with Rory Green, China, economists at T. S.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Lombard based in Soul South Rio. Rory, thanks so much

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Give us a sense of what's

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>going on in the semiconductor market right now. What's the

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>state of the market. Yea, COVID nineteen has really brought

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>forward an acceleration in a structural demand shift. So it's

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not just autos, We're talking about demands for consumer products,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>data centers, um, whole range of different academies of demand

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>really spiking off of COVID nineteen and likely to stay

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>high for you know, a few years now. This is

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a structural shift we're looking at, which were in the

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>very early early days on How do you expect it

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to hit GDP growth? I mean mostly I think of

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the US and Europe, but I guess you're you're thinking

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.719
<v Speaker 1>about it more globally obviously, Yeah, that that's right, I

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think mainly, and the main hit is going to be

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a quarterly hit rather than a moment rather than

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a hit to annual growth rates. So it will be

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a q on hit for the big auto producing nations

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>from Germany, Mexico, slight slide drag in China, but over

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the course of the year, it's still expecting that these

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>um the production lost in Guan will be made up

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout the subsequent subsequent quarters. So it's rory. You know,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm here. I'm here in Berlin, so I mean we

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>produce a ton of cars and motorcycles in this country obviously,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and throughout Europe there big plants, and in the US,

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I know where all the plants are. I don't know

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>much about the production in China except that you know,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is making Tesla's there and everybody wants to

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have everybody's got a joint venture there. How much auto

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing is there actually in the world's second biggest economy. Yeah,

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a big manufacturing, big chunk of the economy.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And they say everyone's got a joint venture there, and

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>then you've got a huge, huge chunk which is just

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>purely for the domestic domestic market as well. So it's

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot a lot of cars being made um

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and a big employer as well, so the intent of

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the labor intensity is very high. So it compared to

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Germany where it's all automated, in China it's still a

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>big employer, So it's it's a very important sector in China.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Or as we think about the global you know, the

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>chip market, it's I guess what we've learned maybe starting

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump and some of the teriffs and then

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic, is that you know a lot of

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>countries are thinking about reassuring some of their chip manufacturing capabilities.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect that to be a real trend? Or

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we go to see more semiconductor manufacturing sites, say on

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>continental Europe, in North America, certainly in North America, and

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Europe's plan is still a bit lacking because what we're

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about here is it needs a lot of political

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and financial capsule to be invested to get it's a

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>reassuring process underway. Recording talking about ten twenty billion dollars

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to build just one fabricane one semi conductor fab So

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it needs a lot of investment, and Biden, I think,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is putting this in place. Intel has made a very

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>big effort, made a large bid to become the West,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>not just the US, the West geo politically secure manufacture,

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's decided to make investments accordingly. So I think

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we are going to see this trend increasing going ahead.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But Europe still seems a bit called. Whether they really

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to stump up enough money to to get

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>some some more fabs there, Who's going to be hard

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to see. I don't know how to compare the announcements,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>but the Intel announcement you mentioned seemed big at twenty

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>billion until I heard Taiwan Semiconductor say they want to

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>invest a hundred billion. Is that just spin or is

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that legitimate investment in that size? That's as a legitimate

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>investment um that over the next couple of years, so

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>probably learning about twenty five to thirty billion a year

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in CAPEX. So it's a large investment and very positive

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>signs for the industry at the whole. And this is

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason that t SMC and Samsung to a lesser

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>extent or ahead of the intail it consistently just pumping

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>money into both capacity and R and D, and that's

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>what's enabled them to build leading edge that they have

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>now ahead of the intail and the rest of the

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>world in chip production. Alright, just real quick for thirty seconds,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is Taiwana career? Are they still the leaders in global

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>chip manufacturing? Yes, they are still the leaders and I

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think likely to stay that way for the next step.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, very interesting stuff indeed, and that um, that

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>investment really does put the size of US and European

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>investment to shame. And maybe Biden will turn that around.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Roy Rory points out he's behind a big part of

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the reassuring. I don't know who would be behind it

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>here though, Paul, because the EU can't even agree on, like,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, buying vaccines. Yeah, so exactly. I don't know

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>how that works on over there on your scale there,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>matt Um, you know, and it kind of just makes

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the Brexit folks, uh, I guess feel a little bit

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>smarter indicated. Yeah, absolutely, It's got to be done really

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on a national level here, I think is the lesson

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>being learned in any case, Rory Green great to spend

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>some time with him. China economist at TS Lombard staying

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>up late in Seoul where it is what eleven thirty

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>at night. This is Bloomberg One of the key stories

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of today is around global soccer, and a group of

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the world's richest soccer clubs, including Manchester United and Real Madrid,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>announced plans for a European breakaway league starting in August.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's got people all up an arms, not just

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in Europe but around the world, as it is a

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>global sport. Let's get the latest. We would do that

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>with David Hellier, Bloomberg Reporter, David, I don't have a

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>dog in this fight here. I'm not a huge fan

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of European soccer. I follow it, but I'm not passionate

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like so many people are. To me, this just looks

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>like a money grab. Talk to us about what's going

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on here. Yeah, I mean, I'd agree with you it

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is a money grab. It's um. But there's lots of

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>different layers to um. Businesses do because they wanted they

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>want to make money. Yeah, you've got a group of owners,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>three of whom are American Arsenal Liverpool and Memphister United. UM.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And you could argue a sen Land is Elliott, the

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Hedge Fund UM and uh they for a long time,

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the owners in Europe have been thinking about, you know,

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how do they how do they play more often amongst

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the bigger clubs. Um. They get a bit frustrated when

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they have to go to play in Denmark or you know,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>uh in Croatia, Uh, some club that they've probably never

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>heard of. Um. And they think that for an international

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>audience would be much more attractive if they could always

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>play against the top clubs. And so they put this

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>thing together. They've been doing it behind the scenes for

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>for a while now. I mean we've been reporting about

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it since about a year ago, UM, and they finally

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>come out of me open. And so they've got twelve

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 1>teams to twelves, you know, absolutely top teams in Europe

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to sign up to it. But it is horrified everybody, Politicians, fans, uh,

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, leagues, everybody. UM. You know some of the

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't I haven't seen such an extreme reaction. Uh.

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>You know all the years I've been reporting on soccer,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't we I mean I tend to have initial reactions

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to things that are maybe conservative and based in my

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>free market upbringing. Often I'm wrong when I look back

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>at my initial opinion. But my first take, um, David,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is that let the market decide. Why do we have

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>all these politicians jumping in. You know, if people don't

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>want to watch a Super League, Um, then they won't write,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the business venture will fail and the Champions

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>League will continue. Everything that they that they want is

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be there, and the stuff they don't want

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they just don't tune into. Yeah, I mean, you know

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a it's a very good point, um, I think.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the politicians are jumping in. You've

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>got Boris Johnson, who's who's a conservative politician. Uh, he's

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>jumping in because he knows that a lot of his constituency,

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fans up in arms, and you know,

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just he's doing it for his own purposes. I think

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>he probably believes exactly what you just said. Um, so

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's been truth to his his word. Really, um,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>why not let it just go? I suppose, um for me? Anyway,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the bit I haven't really explained is that what they're

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>doing is so alien to the competitive element in sport

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in in Europe. Is trying to set up a league

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>which has fifteen permanent members who can never get relegated

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>and never come out of the league no matter how

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>badly they do. Concept that Yeah, Yeah, exactly it works

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL because that's always been the case. I think.

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like, I don't know, maybe we're deluded,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>but we we believe quite passionately in this history of

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>soccer and hundred years or you know, have as longer

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred years now, Um, you know, I don't know.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>We just have an attachment in Europe, I think to

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the the concept of promotion and relegation, and so because

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we believe so firmly in that, allowing this simply to

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>go ahead actually alters the whole pyramid. I think that's

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. And if it was just the cases

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>let them go ahead, I mean, but you know, there's

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a good I think you're right in a way. I mean,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, why not let them And some people even

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who hate hate the concert for saying just let them go,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>let them go. They'll fail and then they want to

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>come crawling back and we'll tell them know, um, you know.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's kind of um, but I mean basically,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just aroused a lot of emotion, really, and

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting. I think the the fact that a

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is becoming focused on the American investors. UM.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's JP Morgan Bank who are financing it, um

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>As I said, it's Liverpool, Man United, Arsenal, all owned

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>by Americans. There's been an incredible invasion of US money

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>into European football or soccer um and I think that's

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>because the franchise values in America are just so huge,

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so enormous, and it's very hard to get a hold

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of franchises. And they've seen that European soccer clubs are

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>changing hands quite readily, so they've they've all come in here.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>But it's this how this might play out. Is this

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>just a bargaining chip for other negotiations or can this happen?

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, no absolutely. I mean so that the current

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>league organizing u A, for the current organizing of the

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Champions League, they've got their own plans to extend their competition,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>have more matches, potentially get more money um to fatisfy

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the clubs in in that way. But I'm not sure

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they've left it too late because these guys

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>have already signed. So it depends on that. You know,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>we're being told they've signed finding agreements they can't come

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>out of it. But you know that if if there's

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a good enough deal being offered on the other side

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of the street that they you know, they might look there.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I just look at, you know, Formula one as a

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>model for how badly this could turn out, because it's similarly,

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>all big money, it's all encased now in one big

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>league that it's just dreadfully boring. Yesterday's're Racing the Malo

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was okay, but it's nobody wants to watch anymore the

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>way they used to. And that could be where these

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>guys are headed. Yeah, I mean it could very well be.

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know that, I mean that would be an

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>amazing uh you know, punt taken by JP Morgan, who's

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who was sort of they've got four billion at risk here? Um,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but who's your team, David, who who do you support?

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>My team? My team is owned by a Russian oligarcus Chelsea,

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So there. I mean, I I thought I didn't expect

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>them to go into it. The the you know, the

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>signals were that they wouldn't necessarily go into it, But

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're they're in it not because they

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>need the money, obviously, but because of the fear of

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>missing out. Absolutely the Pomo there David Hellier, Thanks so

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>much recovering this for us. Is a Bloomberg reporter on

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this European soccer story or football as they call it here,

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and it is playing out massively across the continent. Thanks

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three and on Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.