Speaker 1: All right, thanks scotch On an hour two Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: told free on numbers eight hundred and nine to four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: One of the things I'm very proud of as a
Speaker 1: member of the press, I have never been to a
Speaker 1: White House correspondence dinner. I've been pressured a lot over
Speaker 1: the years to attend, and somehow I was able to
Speaker 1: withstand that pressure doesn't come down anymore. But in all
Speaker 1: the years I've been doing talk radio and my twenty
Speaker 1: ninth year on the Fox News Channel, I've never I've
Speaker 1: just found a way out of it. Every time I
Speaker 1: was asked to go, didn't want to go. Don't particularly
Speaker 1: like a lot of the people in the media. They
Speaker 1: don't particularly like me, So let's be upfront about it.
Speaker 1: And it's just interesting the self righteousness in this room
Speaker 1: of people that really don't understand that. Whether or not
Speaker 1: they'd like to admit it or not, Legacy media, as
Speaker 1: far as I'm concerned, is they're dead. If they were
Speaker 1: going to have impact the years they spent and destroying
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and smearing and slandering and peddling lives and
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories Tamala Harris would have won by a landslide.
Speaker 1: That didn't happen because the American people rejected their message.
Speaker 1: With all that said, over the weekend, they had their
Speaker 1: correspondence dinner where they've pat themselves on the back. They
Speaker 1: get all dressed up and they try to look real
Speaker 1: pretty and handsome, and well, here's the president of the
Speaker 1: White House Correspondence Association. We are not the enemy of
Speaker 1: the people, and you got to stand and go.
Speaker 2: We journalists are a lot of things.
Speaker 3: We are competitive and pushy, we are impatient, and sometimes
Speaker 3: we think we know everything.
Speaker 2: But we're also human.
Speaker 3: We miss our families and significant life moments in service
Speaker 3: to this job. We care deeply about accuracy and take
Speaker 3: seriously the heavy responsibility of being stewards of the public's trust.
Speaker 3: What we are not is the opposition. What we are
Speaker 3: not is the enemy of the people. And what we
Speaker 3: are not is in and the of the state.
Speaker 1: They allowed so many lies to be told about Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Did they have a tell the real valuation ofmar A Lago.
Speaker 1: Let's start with something very very basic, fundamental and simple.
Speaker 1: There's a lot that they have done, and there's a
Speaker 1: lot of lying that's taken place, and a lot of
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories that have been peddled. There's one moment of truth,
Speaker 1: but frankly, it's way too little, way too late, and
Speaker 1: they missed the whole boat. On Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
Speaker 1: Alex Thompson, Axio's reporter, said this one.
Speaker 4: Serious note to my bones. I believe that reporting and
Speaker 4: the White House correspond Association is as necessary as ever.
Speaker 4: President Biden's decline and its cover up by the people
Speaker 4: around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless
Speaker 4: of party, is capable of deception. But being truth tellers
Speaker 4: also means telling the truth about ourselves. We myself included,
Speaker 4: missed a lot of this story, and some people trust
Speaker 4: us less because of it. We bear some responsibility for
Speaker 4: faith in the media being at such lows.
Speaker 5: I say this because.
Speaker 4: Acknowledging errors builds trust and being defensive about them further
Speaker 4: erodes it.
Speaker 5: We should have done better.
Speaker 1: Okay, they didn't miss it as an institution, They purposely
Speaker 1: ignored it because they have a political agenda, would be
Speaker 1: my analysis. Anyway, here to weigh in on this and
Speaker 1: so much more, Editor in Chief, Two Way, host of
Speaker 1: his new show next up with Mark Halprin. It's on
Speaker 1: MK Media, which is which is Megan Kelly's network. And anyway,
Speaker 1: he's here to talk about his new show, and he's
Speaker 1: going to have interviews upcoming with Ted Cruz and again
Speaker 1: our old buddy Gavin Newsom. Mark Calprin is back with us.
Speaker 1: Who's a good friend of the program.
Speaker 6: Mark, how are you sewand with you?
Speaker 2: My goal is to only book friends of yours onto
Speaker 2: my show. It's going to be like a running.
Speaker 5: Is that it? Well, I guess that's it. I'm panned
Speaker 5: from your sholf.
Speaker 1: I'm never gonna make it, you know, in light of
Speaker 1: what took place and all the lives that have been told,
Speaker 1: and it's very specifically about Donald Trump, and they're standing
Speaker 1: with the American people.
Speaker 5: I think is next to niro a zero.
Speaker 1: Had they been if they had influence, you tell me
Speaker 1: if I'm wrong or not. If they had had influence,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump never would have been elected. I think they've
Speaker 1: lost trust and I don't think they have the ability
Speaker 1: to get it back anymore.
Speaker 2: Well, I listened to your list of stories that they
Speaker 2: did a poor job on and and as you said,
Speaker 2: not just because they were lazy or they didn't, you know,
Speaker 2: get up, get get up and be aggressive, but because
Speaker 2: of a desire to see keep Donald Trump from winning.
Speaker 2: And it was like, I mean, this is an offense.
Speaker 2: It was such a partial list. I mean, you had
Speaker 2: about ten things on there, and you and I could
Speaker 2: come up with fifty more. This is you know, there's
Speaker 2: so many things going on in what you played from
Speaker 2: Alex Thompson, who, to his credit, was one of the
Speaker 2: few reporters besides us who tried to cover the obvious
Speaker 2: cognitive decline of the president. But when he says we
Speaker 2: got to be honest and he gets tep a applause,
Speaker 2: the influence will be diminished. I think the influence could
Speaker 2: come back, but it would require a level of acknowledgment
Speaker 2: of what they did and why that I think is
Speaker 2: probably beyond most of them. He didn't do the why right.
Speaker 2: He just said we fell short and I fell short.
Speaker 2: Didn't say why, and you and I know the reasons. Why.
Speaker 1: Wait when did you first notice his decline? Because I
Speaker 1: noticed it and was talking about it before the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty election.
Speaker 2: Twenty twenty seventeen, I saw him do a book event
Speaker 2: for book he was promoting in twenty seventeen, and he
Speaker 2: was interviewed by a very friendly interviewer in front of
Speaker 2: about one thousand people. And when the event ended, I
Speaker 2: turned to my wife and I said, thank goodness, his
Speaker 2: career in public life is over. And how embarrassing that
Speaker 2: his family is letting him do this book tour because
Speaker 2: he's in no shape to do a book tour. He was,
Speaker 2: he was glassy eyed, he was he had trouble following
Speaker 2: the conversation twenty seventeen, and I was talking about it
Speaker 2: and writing about.
Speaker 6: It since then.
Speaker 2: And as I said before, you didn't need inside sources
Speaker 2: to see a cognitive decline, you just needed a stand subscription.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, exactly. And there were very few of us
Speaker 1: willing to call it out. And when I did call
Speaker 1: it out, I was, you know, absolutely excoriated early on
Speaker 1: for doing it. And then it became like a nightly
Speaker 1: segment on the show because there was almost any time
Speaker 1: Joe spoke, it was transparent and obvious. I would also
Speaker 1: argue that, as you know, we're now at the one
Speaker 1: hundred day mark of the Trump presidency, that I see
Speaker 1: these polls come out, and Matt Towry rightly, he said,
Speaker 1: don't be fooled by these polls, and you were one
Speaker 1: of the few objective journalists that saw the trends leading
Speaker 1: up to this election that were very favorable to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And you kept telling people, if you want to if
Speaker 1: you want to delude yourself and buy into what primetime
Speaker 1: MSDNC is telling you, that's fine, but that's not what's
Speaker 1: really happening on the ground.
Speaker 5: But if you look at the.
Speaker 1: Actual pollsters that were more accurate in twenty four you
Speaker 1: get a very different story told about where Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is and what they're not factoring in is the first
Speaker 1: hundred days of the Democrats, where three or four of
Speaker 1: the last most recent polls show their approval rating at
Speaker 1: the lowest level level in the twenties, and a party
Speaker 1: that has also I think taken a very hard, sharp
Speaker 1: left turn towards the radicalized left, with Jasmine Crockett AOC
Speaker 1: the Squad and Bernie leading the way.
Speaker 2: Well, you're right about the poor shape of the Democrats,
Speaker 2: but I disagree with you about where the president's poll
Speaker 2: standing is because they're play of private Republican polls to
Speaker 2: show the same thing these public polls. I think you know,
Speaker 2: first of all, the President's not running for election in
Speaker 2: the midterms are over a year away. So we've seen
Speaker 2: other presidents like President Reagan have had low poll numbers
Speaker 2: or President Clinton and then and then are able to
Speaker 2: come back. So I don't think people should overreact. But
Speaker 2: there's no doubt that whatever wherever you want to put
Speaker 2: is general approval rating, wherever you want to put his
Speaker 2: approval rating on things like the economy or the border,
Speaker 2: his numbers are down. They've not cratered, they've not collapsed,
Speaker 2: but they are down. And even his own advisors would
Speaker 2: tell you they aim to do better this week, trying
Speaker 2: to dominate the news by talking about the first hundred
Speaker 2: days and the next hundred days, but also by getting
Speaker 2: more results, particularly on the economy, than they've gotten. So
Speaker 2: the President's numbers are down, but they're not disastrously down.
Speaker 2: And again it doesn't mean much at this point as
Speaker 2: long as he finds a way to get things to
Speaker 2: be improved.
Speaker 5: I think he's got a long way to go.
Speaker 1: I think he's taking taking on and has taken on,
Speaker 1: some of the most consoplet quent and difficult issues of
Speaker 1: our time. Certainly by give him very high grades securing
Speaker 1: the border and the process of keeping his promise to
Speaker 1: get rid of criminal immigrants to start, I would say that,
Speaker 1: you know, taking on trying to bring peace to Europe
Speaker 1: and peace to the Middle East.
Speaker 5: Those are heavy lifts.
Speaker 1: I think the president doing something that no president has
Speaker 1: done in fifty or sixty years, challenging unfair tariffs that
Speaker 1: have been placed on America by friend and foe alike,
Speaker 1: is a pretty bold move. Time will tell whether he's
Speaker 1: successful at it or not. Also, moving towards energy dominance.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's not a single issue he's taken on
Speaker 1: here that is not transformational. You know, eliminating you know,
Speaker 1: extending his tax cuts, making impermanent, eliminating tax on tip,
Speaker 1: social security, and overtime. These are are all big ideas.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look, three quick things one Time will tell, And
Speaker 2: people shouldn't judge him by his pulle numbers currently and
Speaker 2: they say the same thing about democratic presidents judging by
Speaker 2: the results. If he ends the war it was Ukraine
Speaker 2: and Russia, fantastic, If to terrorift lead to a stronger
Speaker 2: American economy, fantastic, So number one, judgement buyer results. Number two,
Speaker 2: he is trying to do historically big things, and that's
Speaker 2: inevitably going to shake things up and cause people to
Speaker 2: have concerns if they don't understand exactly what he's doing.
Speaker 2: And number three, on things like Ukraine and tariffs and
Speaker 2: what the terrorists are aiming to change. I have sympathy
Speaker 2: for the President and his advisors when they say, what's
Speaker 2: your alternative? People who want to carp about what he's doing.
Speaker 2: What's your alternative? How do you plan to have long
Speaker 2: term economic growth for the United States? How do you
Speaker 2: plan to end the war in Ukraine? If you don't
Speaker 2: have an alternative plan, I think it's you've got less
Speaker 2: standing to say what child Trump's doing isn't going to
Speaker 2: work or isn't a good idea. These are the things
Speaker 2: he ran on, and he's doing them, and I think
Speaker 2: I think we'll know in the next hundred days a
Speaker 2: lot more about on those two projects and some of
Speaker 2: the others you mentioned where he stands.
Speaker 1: We continue now friend Mark Alfern as well us. He
Speaker 1: has his new podcast out and it is next up
Speaker 1: with Mark Alfern. So you kind of dismissed when I
Speaker 1: brought up the issue of the Democrats, but we saw
Speaker 1: the quote sit in this weekend. We've seen a lot
Speaker 1: of singing and chanting and now the Party of dropping
Speaker 1: a lot of f bombs. And we saw them at
Speaker 1: the joint session with their bingo paddles, and they couldn't
Speaker 1: have the decency to stand for mothers that lost their
Speaker 1: children or young man that be cancer. And I don't
Speaker 1: really see any leadership out of them. I see a
Speaker 1: lot of fear in their their leadership, like Hakeem Jefferies
Speaker 1: and Chuck Schumer, that they wouldn't dare take on the
Speaker 1: more radicalized party because for fear of losing their power.
Speaker 5: Am I wrong?
Speaker 2: No? I basically agree with your nasis. I think todam
Speaker 2: a great party is in a world of herd and
Speaker 2: they're not in a terrific position to be the opposition.
Speaker 2: They're benefiting now though, because they're you know, particularly because
Speaker 2: the media environment is back to being very anti Trump,
Speaker 2: they're able to have things to talk about. I think
Speaker 2: that that you take the case for instance of this
Speaker 2: judge who was arrested in Wisconsin. I mean, the facts
Speaker 2: don't seem to be in dispute. Judge tried to let
Speaker 2: someone go who not only had committed a federal events
Speaker 2: by being in the country legally, but by engaging in
Speaker 2: violence against other people, and it seems like the judges'
Speaker 2: attitude was, I'd rather this person be free than be
Speaker 2: in federal custody. The Democrats have turned that into some
Speaker 2: sort of assault on the separation of powers and an
Speaker 2: effort to intimidate the judiciary. I suppose that there was
Speaker 2: another way to do it, to be less intimidating, But
Speaker 2: I would think anyone who cared about law enforcement and
Speaker 2: the rule of law would be delighted to send a
Speaker 2: message that judges shouldn't be running underground railroad for illegal aliens.
Speaker 1: So well, I mean, in this particular case, they're claiming
Speaker 1: a constitutional crisis, but yeah, the judge in this case
Speaker 1: helped an illegal and that had been through through the
Speaker 1: court system and with a deportation order go through a
Speaker 1: back room and to escape ICE officials, knowing that they
Speaker 1: that these ICE officials were there waiting to arrest this
Speaker 1: individual after that particular court hearing which dealt with domestic abuse. So,
Speaker 1: I mean, if that's the hell they want to die on,
Speaker 1: or a Brego Garcia and bringing a Brego Garcia back
Speaker 1: to the United States, I think they're making very poor choices,
Speaker 1: and I think congressmen quay, are the Democrat is.
Speaker 5: Right on that?
Speaker 2: Yeah? I agree and that And then my point is
Speaker 2: the two examples the judge and then I'm the so
Speaker 2: called Maryland man, I think are indications that the Democratic.
Speaker 1: Maryland man, if I hear Maryland man one more time,
Speaker 1: I'm going to jump.
Speaker 2: I said it in their quotes. It just shows to
Speaker 2: me their examples that the party does not have its bearings.
Speaker 2: The Trump's arrangement syndrome is still too high for them
Speaker 2: to really understand where to be picking their spots to say,
Speaker 2: here's what we stand for, Here's what the Republicans stand for,
Speaker 2: to say, here's what we stand for law US judges
Speaker 2: and people in the country legally who who have affiliations
Speaker 2: with gangs and a history of spaslo accusations dispaslobies. I
Speaker 2: just those to me are rare, resonant examples of why
Speaker 2: there's reason to doubt that the Democrats have their act
Speaker 2: together at all at this point.
Speaker 1: I hope you take a look at the Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: and the Santas debate that I was able to moderate
Speaker 1: before you interview Gavin, because Gavin's a little bit out
Speaker 1: of touch with how well his state is doing and
Speaker 1: blaming Fox News for it. But anyway, Mark Alperm, we
Speaker 1: always appreciate you being on the program.
Speaker 5: Thank you so much, sir.
Speaker 2: Thank you, sir. Good to talk to you all right.
Speaker 5: Bill in New York, Bill, Hi, how are you glad
Speaker 5: you called? Sir?
Speaker 6: Hey Sean love your show. I just wanted to say.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 6: And I just never could figure out, being a person
Speaker 6: who studied history, why we would even think that Russia
Speaker 6: would give up the last segment of their western border
Speaker 6: and lose out on their western port to access the Mediterranean.
Speaker 6: And with the promises that we had made related to
Speaker 6: the Ukraine and not joining NATO and everything else, why
Speaker 6: are we poking a Russian bear? And I couldn't understand
Speaker 6: the past administration. And yeah, we empowered them to fight
Speaker 6: to last as long as they did, but at the
Speaker 6: end of the day, it just doesn't make sense logistically financially,
Speaker 6: and it's left in their hands now to lose land
Speaker 6: and lose a tremendous position that they had that they
Speaker 6: could have negotiated honorably and kept the promises that they
Speaker 6: were made.
Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you the biggest, the biggest mistake
Speaker 1: Ukraine made was many many years earlier. I think Clinton
Speaker 1: was president when they gave up their nuclear program. That
Speaker 1: was their biggest mistake. They never should have given it up.
Speaker 1: That was number one, number two. I think. You know
Speaker 1: then we had Mince one and Mince two. And you know,
Speaker 1: unfortunately in this case, if you look at Crimea, which
Speaker 1: is what eleven years ago now that that land was
Speaker 1: annexed under Obama and Biden, if you look at what
Speaker 1: happened three years ago that happened under Joe Biden, and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden had an opportunity is as Putin was amassing
Speaker 1: troops and he didn't take advantage of it. If Putin
Speaker 1: had territorial claims, I think there were certainly better ways
Speaker 1: than the one he chose to resolve it. And you know,
Speaker 1: maybe it wouldn't have gotten resolved. Maybe the war was inevitable,
Speaker 1: but the way it evolved is it became a proxy
Speaker 1: war between the United States and then with Russia. And
Speaker 1: we don't have hundreds of billions more dollars to pour
Speaker 1: into this thing, and there's now an opportunity for peace.
Speaker 1: It now seems to hind the two sides and whether
Speaker 1: they want this to continue. I would argue, I don't think.
Speaker 1: I don't think Europe will ever step up and provide
Speaker 1: the weaponry that would be needed to allow this to
Speaker 1: continue to be a stalemate. And I think it's inevitable
Speaker 1: that Putin's going to win this war. And I think
Speaker 1: it's frustrating because I think Putin is a murdering dictator thug,
Speaker 1: and I wish he never did this, but I can
Speaker 1: wish till the cows come home now. Now, basically, you
Speaker 1: dealt a horrible hand. And I give a lot of
Speaker 1: credit to President Trump for trying to resolve this. If
Speaker 1: he can pull this off, it'll be miraculous. It's not
Speaker 1: going to be a great ideal. It's not going to
Speaker 1: be a great deal for Ukraine. But they don't have
Speaker 1: any cards to play here. They have nothing. The only
Speaker 1: thing they have left is to count on the good
Speaker 1: graces of other countries to fight the war and give
Speaker 1: them the weaponry to fight it, although they're running out
Speaker 1: of manpower to even fight the war anyway.
Speaker 6: Well, you alluded to it just before, and it was
Speaker 6: all about diplomacy. We have three eight hundred pound guerrillas
Speaker 6: on the search US, the Chinese and the Russians, and
Speaker 6: when we have a beef, we don't communicate, we get
Speaker 6: involved with a proxy war. Did anybody do even game
Speaker 6: theory analysis or just look at it from a practical
Speaker 6: point of view.
Speaker 1: You're asking me if Joe Biden thought about it. When
Speaker 1: he was asked at the time when the troops and
Speaker 1: the military equipment were amassing on the Ukrainian border by
Speaker 1: Plutin in Russia, he was asked what would happen, what
Speaker 1: the consequence would be in his answer was, well, it
Speaker 1: depends if it's a minor incursion. And this after Crimea
Speaker 1: had been annexed when he was vice president. So he's
Speaker 1: rather dumb, naive, checked out, and absolutely responsible for the
Speaker 1: mess here. And somehow that the American people are going
Speaker 1: to tolerate endless wars and proxy wars like this. It
Speaker 1: just is not going to happen. And I don't think
Speaker 1: should happen. I really don't anyway, my friend. I appreciate
Speaker 1: your insight, your call eight hundred and nine to four one, Seawan,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: Dan my free state of Florida. Dan, how are you
Speaker 1: glad you called? Oh?
Speaker 7: Hi, Sean Hi. It's an honor. Naturally, I must compliment
Speaker 7: you for the words you said, just a few simple
Speaker 7: words before the last election over Eber the fifth. It's brilliant,
Speaker 7: but so simple. You said, you are all you're my deputies.
Speaker 7: I'm deputizing all of you. You have to get out
Speaker 7: and vote and ten tell ten other people to vote,
Speaker 7: and tell them to vote and so on.
Speaker 1: And I was also deputizing people that they get informed.
Speaker 1: That's why we created the Kamala files, that Tim Walls files,
Speaker 1: so that people could be aware of what they would
Speaker 1: Otherwise what we would have been stuck with wouldn't have
Speaker 1: been good.
Speaker 7: Well, I can't tell you brilliant people in the world
Speaker 7: like you, and you might say, well, pardon me no
Speaker 7: to say a few things in a few words. What
Speaker 7: I wanted to say is way back in nineteen sixty six,
Speaker 7: about this time of the year, I was part of
Speaker 7: the Florida National Guard in a mass unit like the
Speaker 7: TV show. I was at Fort Stewart, Georgia getting OJT
Speaker 7: and I had a dear Special Forces sergeant. When the
Speaker 7: first that I got there, I gave my shot. My
Speaker 7: end was shaking. It's still Shakespeare for a different reason.
Speaker 7: I'm a couple of years older than my nephew, Donald Trump,
Speaker 7: who I love dearly. He was a dear man. He said, Dan, look,
Speaker 7: don't get fancy, just stop the bleeding. If you don't
Speaker 7: do that, nothing else matters. I have that written in
Speaker 7: my kitchen, hanging up on the wall. I'll never forget
Speaker 7: it because it's the truth. Donald Trump is doing nothing
Speaker 7: but nothing short of that. He's got his hands on
Speaker 7: all the arteries of our country. And that's why people say, oh,
Speaker 7: he's doing this, he's doing that. He's too fast. He's
Speaker 7: trying to make up for four years of a horror show.
Speaker 7: And he has got everybody who he has hired so
Speaker 7: far I think is fabulous. And the people at Fox
Speaker 7: are fabulous. You're saying, you're trying to save our country.
Speaker 7: Nothing short of that shot.
Speaker 1: Nothing well, I mean, honestly, I can't imagine. I don't
Speaker 1: think we would have had a shot, I really do.
Speaker 1: I think it would have been we would have been
Speaker 1: too far gone. He's got a very heavy lift in
Speaker 1: front of him. He's taken on a lot of damage
Speaker 1: that was done prior to him. Joe Biden left him
Speaker 1: a mess on the economy, He left it a mess internationally,
Speaker 1: and to his credit, he's moving at the speed of
Speaker 1: light and he's trying hard to resolve all of it.
Speaker 1: A lot of these things are going to take time.
Speaker 1: I think probably in this first one hundred days, the
Speaker 1: greatest success that we can see that is visible is
Speaker 1: on the border.
Speaker 5: But then there's going to be more.
Speaker 1: I would argue, you're going to see a lot of
Speaker 1: trade deals over time, and when that happens, I think
Speaker 1: it'll calm people down, calm the markets down a little bit,
Speaker 1: and I think people will see the wisdom in challenging
Speaker 1: a system that has ripped us off for fifty sixty years.
Speaker 1: And at least he had the courage to stand up
Speaker 1: to these people and say stop ripping us off. But
Speaker 1: you know, I don't like being ripped off. I hate
Speaker 1: when people rip me off.
Speaker 7: No too, But Shana, I don't know what we do
Speaker 7: without you and Fox.
Speaker 6: I saw Tom Holman this morning.
Speaker 7: If I could see him, I doubt I ever will
Speaker 7: I give him a hug. Same with you, Same with
Speaker 7: we appreciate Fox. There's no way to say it. I
Speaker 7: don't have the time, you don't have the time. I
Speaker 7: just want Donald Trump. I think he's too dear a person.
Speaker 7: He doesn't want to hurt people, certainly, and I ran
Speaker 7: certainly children, but we have got to stop them whatever
Speaker 7: by any means necessary. He has to be it.
Speaker 1: They cannot get a nuclear weapon. That you have to
Speaker 1: start there. And I think if they're going to make
Speaker 1: a deal with Iran, it's got to include dismantling their
Speaker 1: nuclear capability facilities. That means every one of them, every
Speaker 1: one of them, and they need to be done by Americans.
Speaker 1: And I think there's got to be anywhere, any place,
Speaker 1: anytime inspections. And if they decide they don't want the
Speaker 1: peaceful plan and the peaceful out if you will, then
Speaker 1: they will be responsible for what happens next, and to
Speaker 1: me that will be very catastrophic. They will lose their
Speaker 1: nuclear sites, and I would argue they probably should lose
Speaker 1: their refinery so they don't have the ability to have
Speaker 1: the monies to film in any more terror. Anyway, my friend,
Speaker 1: I appreciate your kind words and your patriotism. God bless you.
Speaker 1: You are certainly not what is wrong with our great
Speaker 1: country right now, that's for sure, all right, Quick break
Speaker 1: right back to our busy phones. Eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one Sean. As we continue this Monday.
Speaker 8: The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
Speaker 8: to miss it, and stay tuned for the final hour
Speaker 8: free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Right back to our phones eight hundred and nine to
Speaker 1: four one, Shawn, if you want to join us, Amanda,
Speaker 1: You're next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 9: Hi, Hi, how are you?
Speaker 5: I'm good? What's going on?
Speaker 9: I just wanted to touch base because the last well, for
Speaker 9: a while now, you've been talking about your new Tesla
Speaker 9: and how much you love it, and the really the
Speaker 9: thing that sticks out to me is the fact that
Speaker 9: you keep talking about how it drives itself. It's got
Speaker 9: the capability to do that by itself. I was just
Speaker 9: kind of wondering if that's ever going to be something
Speaker 9: that maybe possibly could be used for people with epilepsy
Speaker 9: because a lot of them cannot drive. But if we
Speaker 9: had a vehicle that could sense not that it's coming on,
Speaker 9: but a person's having a seizure and they could go
Speaker 9: into auto drive and pull over so slowly, well.
Speaker 1: I could tell you that technology is here. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're they they already have prototypes for like self driving ubers.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's going to be a massive shift in
Speaker 1: the workforce in a lot of ways. That's why I
Speaker 1: think it's kind of important these ten the ten trillion
Speaker 1: dollars has been committed in new manufacturing, you know, between
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence and this this kind of new technology. I mean,
Speaker 1: you literally are looking at the possibility of driver lest
Speaker 1: transportation now in the very near future, and you know,
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence and robotics and all these things. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's replace a lot of jobs. Funny story about a
Speaker 1: talk show host in Australia. Apparently they had an artificial
Speaker 1: intelligence voice do a radio show for the better part
Speaker 1: of six months before people caught up to it and
Speaker 1: caught onto it and then people felt portrayed by it.
Speaker 1: But the fact that they could do it is pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: Now I happen to know somebody that has really advanced
Speaker 1: in AI, and I get deeper and deeper into it
Speaker 1: myself in my spare time. It's it's pretty amazing and
Speaker 1: pretty wild. And I could I could put in their
Speaker 1: information about what the news of the day is, and
Speaker 1: you know what would Sean Hannity think about it? It'll come,
Speaker 1: It'll spit it out in mere seconds. It's crazy.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I just that would be awesome because I know
Speaker 9: my daughter has epilepsi and to try to get a
Speaker 9: job is very difficult because she has to work around
Speaker 9: everybody else. So I just whenever you keep talking about
Speaker 9: your Tesla and that being an awesome feature, I just
Speaker 9: can't help but think that that would be an awesome
Speaker 9: feature for someone who.
Speaker 5: Oh absolutely think.
Speaker 1: I definitely think that you're going to see this sooner
Speaker 1: than then later, to be honest, I mean, once they
Speaker 1: can prove that it's safe and effective. You know, there's
Speaker 1: even been talk of people that, hey, you can put
Speaker 1: your car to work or you while you're not using it, Like,
Speaker 1: for example, I went to the movies I told this story,
Speaker 1: and I parked the car far away from the movie theater,
Speaker 1: and there is on the control app on a Tesla,
Speaker 1: you know, where I just press a button and says
Speaker 1: come to me, and then I'm watching in real time
Speaker 1: my tesla with no driver, pack out of a parking
Speaker 1: spot safely and then make its way towards me like
Speaker 1: it's a valet, and it drives right up to where
Speaker 1: I am, and I get my car and I take
Speaker 1: it from there, and then I can put in my
Speaker 1: navigation where I'm going and press a button and it
Speaker 1: will take me right to my front door. And I
Speaker 1: don't have to do a thing. I don't have to
Speaker 1: press the pedal, I don't have to hold the wheel,
Speaker 1: I don't have to do I just can't text on
Speaker 1: my phone.
Speaker 5: Because it picks that up like instantly.
Speaker 1: You do have to pay You do have to pay
Speaker 1: attention even though you're in self driving mode, right.
Speaker 6: But that's where I was.
Speaker 9: I was kind of saying, if it could just censor,
Speaker 9: because I know she has a monitor on her on
Speaker 9: her arm, it gives her freedom to more.
Speaker 1: Into I guarantee, I guarantee you that technology will exist
Speaker 1: one day and somebody like her will be able to drive. Guarantee,
Speaker 1: I just a matter of when. And I think that's
Speaker 1: that's it's great. It'll enhance people's lives. But you know
Speaker 1: that that's also part of the genius of where Elon
Speaker 1: Musk is in terms of his thinking. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: what neuralink is all about, you know, using AI to
Speaker 1: help people that are blind perhaps see again, and people
Speaker 1: with spinal cord injuries that they may one day be
Speaker 1: able to walk again. I think is great thank you,
Speaker 1: But you know, we we've got to understand the world
Speaker 1: is changing and a lot of jobs that i'm will
Speaker 1: will be taken over by artificial intelligence, and people are
Speaker 1: going to have to adapt to the marketplace. There was
Speaker 1: an article today about gen Z gen Zers now rejecting
Speaker 1: college and larger and larger numbers and a lot of
Speaker 1: people going a trade school. If you want a job
Speaker 1: that's going to be secure. I can't see AI replacing
Speaker 1: a construction worker or a plumber, or an electrician or
Speaker 1: somebody in the trades. I can't see that. But I
Speaker 1: can't see them replacing auto workers and people on the
Speaker 1: line that I can see for sure. Anyway, I appreciate
Speaker 1: the call. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
Speaker 1: on number. You want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Our friend Mark Simona at the top of the next
Speaker 1: hour