WEBVTT - Super Bowl on Paramount and X's WWE Partnership

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>From the Heart where Innovation, money and power.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Love Love.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline, head of Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 4>and I'm Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 4>We pushure ahead to the advertising event of the year

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 4>and sit down with the head of the company streaming

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 4>super Bowl fifty eight. You guessed at Paramount CEO Bob

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Backish joins us to break it all down Plust.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>We stick with advertising and streaming and sit down with

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the head of partnerships at x as the social platform

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>also announces a deal with the WWE, and we.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Take a look at this state of sport spelling amid

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 4>this sprning event of the year.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Is it down the fang?

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 4>You'll see you, Amy Howe, just apart from the Super

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:08.279
<v Speaker 4>Bowl as the patient.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the end of what's been a pretty busy

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 2>earnings week. Two names behind me, Pinterests and Affirm both

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>moving to the downside. Pinterest is interesting, so sales missed,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>but it had top line growth of twelve percent. It's

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>monthly active users still continue to grow, but I think

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 2>there's just a lot of read through concern with what

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.919
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing with Snap. They've kind of pegged their strategy

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>on direct response ads, where if you've go on Pinterest,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're decorating your home, you're getting married, whatever it is,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>they want to amplify the opportunity to click through and

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>actually buy something. They were down significantly after hours, like

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent, but they announced the deal with Google, which

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>again made the street feel a little bit better because

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, Okay, Google's global, and there's a chance that

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>you take the images on Pinterest and Google's technology takes

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you through to a buying opportunity.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 5>A firm is also lower.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Basically, they said that transaction volume this year isn't going

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to be what the street expects. That has got some

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>nerves going in the street. We're going to speak to

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>a firm CEO, Max Levskin later in the show. Another

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>deal we're tracking, but this time interesting. TKO, the WWE parent,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>doing a deal with X the platform.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 5>And company formerly known as Twitter. It's a weekly series of.

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Short form WWE matches. WWE produces the content ex does

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the distribution, and we'll hear from my interview with X's

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>headed partnership Brett White's later in the program about why

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.679
<v Speaker 2>they did that, as well as the super Bowl, which

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I think is the dominant theme of the show today.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean it is a theme.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 4>But so two are these markets, So two are these

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 4>deals on content and ed You so brilliantly summarize the micro.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to the macro a little bit with Meghan Honoman.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 4>She's with our CEO of Vernet's Capital Advisors, and Meghan,

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about content at the moment, we're also more

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 4>broadly talking about where the investor's mind is at when

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 4>it comes to content.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 6>Producers and technology.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, can we still anticipate a reason to be

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 4>buying into heady valuation when it comes to tech and

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>we're broadly in an S.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 7>And P A five thousand, Well, we wouldn't at this point.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 7>You're looking at valuations that are really top heavy. Here

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 7>you mentioned it. I think from the technology standpoint, what

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 7>you're seeing is this drive forward in these names is

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 7>specifically just that fear of missing out. Investors are worried

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 7>about missing out on that next new evolution that we

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 7>see here from technology and while this is a long

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 7>term theme, we just think there's a price that you

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 7>that you should be willing to pay for, and at

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 7>this point, I think it's just a little bit expensive.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 7>I think there can be some consolidation as we go forward.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Megan, economic data has been really important for this show

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology this week. You know, historically we may not

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>have focused as much on CPI revision or not, but

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>we are because of the point you make valuations and

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 2>what will or won't happen with the FED and rates.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that how you approach the technology sector. It's sensitivity

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>to rates in twenty twenty four in particular.

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think there's you know, it's sensitivity to rates,

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 7>but also the valuations. We're seeing rates move higher and

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 7>these names are still moving higher the technology side. So

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 7>that's why I believe it's just part of this fear

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 7>of missing out that investors have they're going to miss

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 7>out on this tech rally. I just think from an

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 7>interest rate perspective that there's risk there and what's going

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 7>to take some steam out of this rally will be

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 7>when there's I guess a bit more realistic view on

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 7>what the FED can do. Where we have rate cuts

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 7>priced in now as early as May. I think that's

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 7>still is a little aggressive. Inflation is coming down, but

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 7>it's still is above the Fed's target. And what we're

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 7>concerned about here from the macro level is the dubbish

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 7>tilt that the FED took back in December has now

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 7>reignited the economy and it is really putting a risk

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 7>of reigniting inflation. And we're seeing that in some of

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 7>the economic data that we've gotten in just the past

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 7>couple of weeks.

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 5>I want to linger on something that Dara Kross Rashah.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 2>He told us that uber CEO and the show in

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of days, which is basically all around

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the world, they see the consumer being really strong that

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe we didn't cover as deeply as well as they're

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>also seeing increased corporate spending on their platform, and I

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>thought that was just a really interesting proxy for the

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>global economy.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 5>How do you.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 2>Feel right now about where we are globally? Consumer strength,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 2>corporate spending, all the things that we've had such anxiety

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 2>about for the last couple of years.

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 7>So for the consumer standpoint, you have to remember they

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 7>are spending, but they're spending because the labor market's been strong.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 7>Labor market is always a lagging indicator, and we've seen

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 7>in this earning season.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 5>A lot of layoffs.

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 7>We're waiting to see how that filters into the employment

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 7>market and how that filters into the data. That's a

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 7>bigger concern that we have. The other thing from the

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 7>consumer standpoint is they're spending on credit. Credit card debt

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 7>is rising. Along with that, you're seeing not only autodelinquencies

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 7>but also credit card delinquencies starting to rise. I think

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 7>the consumer is just still stuck in this mentality that

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 7>the Fed will come in and save the day at

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 7>any sign of weakness. This is what we've been dealing

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 7>with for the past couple decades. This is not the

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 7>case anymore. We are in an inflationary environment where the

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 7>Fed has to be very careful on what they articulate

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 7>to the markets as well as what the economy can

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 7>handle from the inflation standpoint.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Very briefly, Megan, we very easily default to talking about equities.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 4>The bomb markets are bigger and indean. We've had a

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 4>lot of treasuries taking down this week. What about corporate

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 4>debt in this particular instance, particularly among some of the

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 4>tech names and tech space more broadly.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 7>So, I have to be honest, corporate debt has surprised

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 7>me as far as how well it's performed last year

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 7>and even starting out this year, because you have been

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 7>seeing defaults rising and defaults are expected to continue to rise.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 7>But yet spreads in the corporate market, in investment grade

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 7>as well as the high yield market are extraordinarily tight.

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 7>This is just again I think people chasing for yield,

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 7>and I don't think it going forward that that's something

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 7>you want to do, especially when you're looking at spreads

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 7>that are.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Just so tight.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Megan Horman, cio Verden's Capital Advisor is great to have

0:06:59.600 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>time with you.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Super Bowl fifty eight almost upon us big day for

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>sports fans and for ad lovers too. How are you

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 4>going to watch well across Paramount properties, CBS, Paramount plus

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Nickelodeon for the kids, even now joining us to discuss

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 4>the Sunday Super Bowl and much much more. Paramount Global

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 4>CEO Bob Backish live from Las Vegas, an anticipation of Sunday,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 4>and I'm interested in NFL on CBS.

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 6>Of course, you've had a record regular season.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 4>We're anticipating record eyeballs for Sunday.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 6>What about those ads?

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence think you might be raking in as much

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 4>as seven hundred million dollars?

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 6>Is that the right sort of a Mountbob?

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 8>So, Caroline, it's been an incredible season for the NFL

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 8>on CBS. We set the high watermark for ratings since

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 8>the property returned in nineteen ninety eight. We set the

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 8>all time record for a divisional playoff game. And to

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 8>your point, we set the high watermark for ad sales

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 8>for Super Bowl and it's looking like on SAD on

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 8>Sunday will set an all time viewing number with any luck.

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 8>So it's an incredible year to be the NFL on CBS.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 6>We're a technology show.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 4>From a technology perspective, Just how much of a feat

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 4>is it to be able to put this across audio properties,

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>to be able to have SpongeBob doing his thing, whether

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 4>it's on Nickelodeon, but also to be consuming it via

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 4>cable or streaming.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. So the infrastructure around the Super Bowl to ensure

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 8>that the world's audiences can see it is truly extraordinary.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean the number of cameras, remote cameras, etc. I

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 8>think it's like one hundred and forty or something like that.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 8>And to your point, where we obviously have the main

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 8>feed on CBS here in the United States, we have

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 8>the first ever alternate telecasts of a Super Bowl on Nickelodeon,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 8>which is going to be super fun. And to your

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 8>point on tech, we're actually going to do all the

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 8>graphics and enhance since real time. When we did the

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 8>last Nickelodeon game last year, we did that very quickly,

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 8>but it wasn't real time. The tech has now allows

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 8>us to do it real time, so that's super cool.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 8>And then of course we have it on Paramount Plus

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 8>streaming simultaneously. So yeah, a lot of infrastructure, a lot

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 8>of people behind the scenes, but we're feeling great about it.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 8>And we've been doing Super Bowls longer than anyone else,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 8>so we'll get it done.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Let's talk about anyone else.

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about how well sports content is so hot

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 4>right now and everyone wants to think about how we

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 4>can offer it through a streaming product. I look at Disney,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Fox and Warner Brothers, the announcement this week you've shown,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think about how Super Bowl actually twenty twenty

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 4>one was, how you announce Paramount Plus and the breadth

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 4>of content, But how do you tackle the focus on

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 4>sports coming from rivals.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 8>So we love sports here at Paramount Obviously it's a

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 8>key component of CBS. I think about it as a

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 8>slice of the wheel. It's part of our programming offering.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 8>Same with Paramount Plus. You know, we talk about Paramount

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 8>Plus as news, sports and amountain of entertainment. Obviously the

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 8>NFL is a key part of that. But I want

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 8>to emphasize that we like.

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 5>A broad product.

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 8>We've looked at sports only plays in digital, both a

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 8>standalone basis and with partners, and we continue to believe

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 8>that broad is better. We see that in people coming

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 8>in for sports properties, subscribing for things like the NFL.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 8>But if you look at the sports viewer on Paramount Plus,

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 8>believe it or not, ninety percent of their engagement i e.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 8>Time spent is with non sports programming. So again, bring

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 8>them in with sports, but key to the model is

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 8>elongated and entertain them quite frankly with other stuff as well.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 8>We firmly believe that leads to accessing a bigger TAM,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 8>bigger market and it is better for the business model,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 8>and so we like broad.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Probably in the ten division audience around the world. Were

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 2>speaking to Paramount Global CEO Bob Becket. It is Super

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Bowl weekend, and Bob, just what you were saying about

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the profile.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Of the consumer on the platform.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I use the platform for Champions League football,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and you have such a long season. With the Champions League,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you have your in studio talent component, but you're also

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the ability to show multiple games in the same evening.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 2>You have choice, and at the end of the season

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you have a big finale and the NFL kind of

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 2>works the same way. Right, you had a great regular season,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 2>as Caroline points out, but proportionately for your business, what's

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 2>more important the big standalone single event this Sunday or

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the traction you get over the duration of a season.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 8>So a couple things. As we said, you know, the

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 8>NFL this season set a record for CBS in terms

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 8>of viewership since nineteen ninety eight, which is pretty extraordinary.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 8>And clearly the divisional playoff game, which also said an

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 8>all time record, was important. But I think it's the

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 8>arc of the whole thing. And frankly, there's nothing like

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 8>the Super Bowl in the world, and obviously that's a

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 8>big event for us, but you mentioned UEFA two. We

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 8>love YUEFA. As you know, the UEFA season is going

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 8>to start right after the American football season, and that

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 8>is also a great product for fans of Paramount Plus.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 8>And we just extended that deal and the new format

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 8>for UEFA includes a more exciting so I call it

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 8>playoff format. So again, great product, and we do see

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 8>people consuming that product alongside entertainment product. So we love sports,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 8>we love the NFL, we love YUEFA, and we love

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 8>it as a part of Paramount Plus.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Sound it interesting what you said about the consumption of

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>non sports content. Halo season two prime example of that.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>You talk, it's about UEFA following the Super Bowl. How

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 2>much will you be putting into advertizing this weekend? So

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 2>why you've got to all those eyeballs you can say, hey,

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>this is what else Paramount Plus is offering in the

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>coming weeks and months.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Great point.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 8>We are using the Super Bowl as a showcase for

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 8>Paramount Global. I'm sitting here at our CBS set on

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 8>the strip in front of the Bellagio. We had CBS

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 8>Mornings going from here today and yesterday, and we have

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 8>other properties operating here in Vegas. We are also using

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 8>the Super Bowl as a promotional platform. So you see

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 8>a new Pluto look and feel brand campaign rolling out,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 8>You see Paramount Plus spots. You see the Bob Marley

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 8>movie which is opening on for Valentine's Day weekend. So yeah,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 8>we're showcasing Paramount Global to the biggest audience in the

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 8>world on the biggest weekend in the world. And frankly,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 8>it's great to be in Vegas.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 5>It's a lecture, Bob.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 4>People see value, a lot of value in your content,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and people therefore see value.

0:13:58.200 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 6>In your company.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 4>And we know there's been plenty reports of a fording

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar offer for the business.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 6>Are you for sale?

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 8>So look, as a management team and our board of directors,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 8>we are focused on shareholder value creations. The most predictable

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 8>route to that is execution. So we are a laser

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 8>focused on execution, driving Paramount Plus elongating earnings in the

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 8>traditional media sector, opening movies, et cetera. But simultaneously or

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 8>in parallel, we continue to look at other options as

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 8>we have been, including transactional ones. So again a lot

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 8>of activity. But I think what's important about it is

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 8>it really shines a light on the incredible value of

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 8>Paramount Global. We have an unmatched content engine in terms

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 8>of our studios, new production, whether that's episodic series or films,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 8>as well as irreplaceable libraries across demographics, whether it's kids

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 8>with Nickelodeon, adults, et cetera. So it's an extraordinary asset.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 8>We're focused on maximizing the value of that asset again

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 8>day to day through execution, but also continue to.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 5>Look at other roots.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 4>And this is a sensitive one, Bob, but we've had

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 4>analysts come on the show and say, you know, there

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 4>are just too many players in the space, and you've

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 4>got to be huge.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 6>You can't even just be medium sized.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 4>From your perspective with Paramount Plus and streaming, are you

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 4>getting to profitability? I know you've got your earnings around

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 4>the corner, but how soon can you sort of deliver

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>that because I know you spoke to that in the

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 4>third quarter for example.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So i'd tell you a couple of things. One is,

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 8>you're right that narrative is out there. There are people

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 8>with that point of view. But i'd point to our

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 8>third quarter call where we continue to show paramount plus

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 8>is a growing service, continues to have the most net

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 8>ads of any streaming service since we launched point one

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 8>point two is On our third quarter call, we talked

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 8>about the fact that we expect and I have to

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 8>be careful with my word choice here because, as you

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 8>point out, our fourth quarter calls in two weeks, but

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 8>we expect twenty twenty two was in fact our peak

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 8>streaming investment, not twenty twenty three, which we guided to.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 8>That says we're head of plan on the path to

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 8>profitability for streaming, and we're very excited about twenty twenty four.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 8>But I'll have to leave it at that until our

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 8>earnings call in a couple of weeks, where we'll have

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 8>more to say.

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Bob, a Global CEO, has to pass a lot of

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 2>data quantify the impact of Taylor Swift for me on

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>this Sunday Super Bowl.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Look, Taylor's obviously a phenomenon. She's a force in music.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 8>For all of us that have seen her tour, it's

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 8>incredible and she has, without a doubt been incremental to

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 8>audience on the NFL. There's different points of view on

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 8>how incremental, but she's a great addition, widening the net

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 8>of the NFL viewer even further. We're looking forward to

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 8>having her here in Vegas this weekend at the game,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 8>and I think it'll be just an incremental thing. But

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 8>the main point is the NFL on CBS and Paramount

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 8>Plus is just an extraordinary property. As I said, we

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 8>set the high watermark already for a Super Bowl in

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 8>terms of ad revenue. It's looking like we will set

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 8>the high watermark on viewing. And is Taylor part of that. Yeah,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 8>she probably is an incremental part of that. But it's

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 8>just great.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm tuning in for usher to gott to be said

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Paramount Global CEO Bob Backish, it is so good to

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 4>speak with you.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Thank you very much, indeed, thank you.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, X is teaming up with the WWE for

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>an exclusive weekly series. We hear from Bette White's ex

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Headed Partnerships and Talent on that deal. Next to disclam

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 2>their technology, a WWE series is coming weekly to X.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 2>Brett White's X headed part Since Talent outlined it all

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>for us earlier have listened.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 9>We couldn't be more excited obviously about the new initiative

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 9>that we're doing with WWE. We announced the partnership yesterday.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 9>We are in market here in the next you know,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 9>call it five days with assets to start selling the show.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 9>We've got a lot of interest we you know, XES

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 9>what I would say, the home for wrestling fans.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 3>We are We're going to go very big when it

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 3>comes to this.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 9>What this offering is the idea of catering to an audience.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 9>Last year alone, we had fifty nine billion impressions when

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 9>it came to wrestling alone.

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>So the idea that we can.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 9>Actually super serve this this incredible content to you know,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 9>an audience that is there is that is vibrant and

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 9>waiting for it couldn't be more exciting for us.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 3>So we are ready to go and in market.

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 5>When does this turn profitable?

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 8>How many of these types of partnerships do you need

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 8>to really make money off of this?

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question. I mean it really is, you know.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 9>When you when we've worked with Nick con and his

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 9>team trying to figure out exactly what the mechanics are financially,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 9>we are we're going to be playing this these episodes

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 9>once or twice a week on X. They're going to

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 9>be on platform, you know, for in perpetuity honestly, and

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 9>we'll start making money.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, over the course of the year.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 9>We'll see how the financials actually work out, but the

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 9>investment that we're making the content really is you know,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 9>at some point will become profitable, probably in the next

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 9>couple of.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Years, I think.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's been a lot of news this morning

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 2>coming out of X you also have the Super Bowl

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and bet related stuff. But just lay out the partnership strategy.

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Your your job title is head of Partnerships and Talent Verticals.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you expect to move into your backgrounds in wrestling

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 2>over at turn and other things? But there is a

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 2>difference here between pure sports, live entertainment and then you're

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot of news as well.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 3>We are And so I got here, thank you.

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 9>When I got here four months ago, I really kind

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 9>of went on a listening to and trying to figure

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 9>out exactly kind of what the audience was looking for,

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 9>what consumers wanted, and it is news, it's entertainment, it's fashion,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 9>it is sports, and it is wrestling. And so when

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 9>we look at the when we look at the portfolio,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 9>we have an incredible relationship with all of our sports

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 9>partnerships with at the NFL, MLB, NBA, A multi we

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 9>have one thousand publishers. Through our amplified business, we have

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 9>eighty thousand content creators. We're going to continue to build

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 9>out a great content partnership business, but also start to

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 9>serve original contents to an audience that we believe is

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 9>worthy of in wanting it. So when we went after

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 9>Don Lemon and Tulsea Gabbard and Jim Rome, we really

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 9>knew that as we build out this kind of bespoke content,

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 9>this is exactly what the audience and the consumers on

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 9>X are looking for.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 5>That was Brett White, So the X Caroline, what you.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 4>Got and don't quell you? Edward nearly enough and we

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 4>thank you.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 5>Let's check in on the market.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Friday session is also a little bit about social media.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>We had Pinterest reporting earnings and as we reflected on

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 2>top line work growth of twelve percent missed estimates. Monthly

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 2>active users did well, but as always is the case,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 2>you look at snap down half a percent. This theory

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>is building out the very big social media companies are

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 2>doing well, or advertising based companies and the very small ones.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of concern. Meta platforms highed by ten percent.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>They had a blowout quarter where the AI story was

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>going through to the advertising or their legacy business story.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Also got Google parent Alphabet on their up one point

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>eight percent of feel good around their AI story of late,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>those scenes are still in place, the big do Well,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the small We're a little bit worried about Carol.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 4>And let's talk about one of those key players. That

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Well is ultimately still finding its footing Ondred new leadership

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 4>and is airing all different types of content. For example,

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 4>X has just had the Russian President, Vladimir Putin saying

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 4>his country hasn't achieved its objectives in UKRAINI yet. In

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 4>a video from Tucker Carlson Network, Putin told the form

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 4>of Fox News host that he could consider negotiations if

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 4>the US stopped supplying weapons to Kiev. This is the

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 4>first time, actually that the Russian leader has given an

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 4>interview to Western media figures since the invasion of Ukraine.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 4>The full interview was also published on as I Say

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 4>social platform X. Let's talk about all of this with

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Jennifer Greigel, social media expert, Sociate Professor of Communications at

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 4>Syracuse University. And Jennifer, what do you make of, ultimately

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the amount of people viewing this in an unedited form?

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>How is the media landscape changing?

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and again I think you put it well it's

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 10>like airing different types of content. And I just saw

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 10>your last clip to the you know, the head of

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 10>partnerships that X has been going on and listening to her. Well,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 10>I guess I was going on and listening to her

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 10>last night too.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Like, for one, I had kind of a hard time.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 10>Finding the interview on X Twitter. You know, I'm not

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 10>sure it was really a story about that platform, though,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 10>I do, you know, think that there is value in

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, kind of discussing that Musk made a commitment

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 10>to at least platforming this video. But I also found

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 10>it on YouTube as well, so I don't know. I

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 10>think I think there's some other forces going on here too,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 10>because it definitely was like unusual content, right, Like this

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 10>is not something you normatively see here in American discourse.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 10>So I think there's a.

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Lot of factors.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 10>I think it's it speaks to the nature of the Internet.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 10>It's it's a complicated space though it has these norms, right,

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 10>but something different kind of kind of peers through over here.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 10>And it may also involve like, you know, older technology too,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 10>like the dot COM's, the websites, Tucker Carlson's websites seem

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 10>to play an important role in that so and we

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 10>don't we don't really have any insight into really how

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 10>many people viewed this because there aren't analytics on things

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 10>like older platforms like that, you know, a website.

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 4>That end and you know, I think you are referencing

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 4>in the break that you can see how many people

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 4>are viewed a pinned post. But ultimately, how do we

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 4>know how many minutes of that has ultimately been consumed?

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 4>And we therefore are left to perhaps well ingesting means

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 4>and smaller parts of it. How does that make us

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 4>yet more siloed rather than looking at broadly.

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, you know, I would say the norms, at

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 10>least in the West and the discourse coming from the

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 10>East is we're getting it through memes, We're getting it

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 10>through news stories in our press. The difference here was

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 10>that it was, as you were saying, it was kind

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 10>of interrupted. It was unfrittered information coming through in a

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 10>two hour block. So for me, you know, again, that

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 10>was what felt like something that was different and maybe discussing.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 3>A bit the discourse had changed, So.

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 10>We'll see what the market thinks of this.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's worth discussing both the science and the

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 2>art behind video content on social media platforms. Right, So

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that was a pretty long interview. And you know, we

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 2>on this show, Caroline and I, we post clips of

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting conversations on X on reels and on YouTube. Sometimes

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>we might do a longer form on YouTube, but as

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I understand it, the basic science is that the attention

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 2>span of the viewer is limited to that much shorter

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>bite or they seek out something very long. What did

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you learn about duration video on the X platform from

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 2>what happened last night?

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think some people were bored and to doubt,

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, kind of with his history in the beginning.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 10>Two hours is a long clip, but just the fact

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 10>that a two hour clip was available and that there

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 10>may have been an attention audience behind it, given you

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 10>know what Carlson brings to this. So for me, it

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 10>was really understanding.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 5>How this was.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 11>Trying to make sense of it, honestly.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 10>But like it's almost like a new media formula that's

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 10>that's rooted in, like the Internet. So it was like

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 10>must provided a platform which acts a little bit like

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 10>the broadcast, gets it, you know, out to people, and

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 10>then Carlson had the access but also his own audience.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 10>He delivered attention to this topic and also access to

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 10>a source. Putin was the source, right, so but really

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 10>for me, what was interesting was that, at least in

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 10>the United States, you don't really have access the freedom

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 10>of information to stuff like that two hours of Putin.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 10>So again, call it what you want, propaganda. It's obviously

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 10>meant to influence, but we don't usually have that type

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 10>of access into information coming directly to Americans. But I

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 10>think it also went out to other people in the

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 10>world too. I don't think it was just us as

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 10>an audience, but I do think that again, you're seeing

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 10>discourse on Twitter acts today, people who feel kind of

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 10>safe in giving the inaction to that interview. But I

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 10>think a lot of people aren't having a conversation maybe

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 10>about what was said, even having discourse, you know, with

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 10>others publicly especially. You won't see that kind of stuff

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 10>on social media, maybe in a coffee shop or a

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 10>didget table. But it feels like there's a silent audience.

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 10>And I don't really you know how big it is,

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 10>but I do think people listened last night.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Silent audience want to dig into out of the election.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Of course, Jennifer Greigel always great to communicate with you

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Associate Professor of Communications at Syracuse University.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, Ed, What have you got?

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Another story. We've been tracking.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Astronauts from Turkey, Italy, and Sweden return to Earth on Friday,

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 2>ending a private three week mission to the International Space Station.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Their SpaceX splash down in the Atlantic Ocean.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 5>Off the Florida coast this morning.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 2>The country has paid about fifty five million dollars apiece

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to Elon Musk's company in Axiom to finance that mission.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 2>All right, coming up, Fanjual CEO Amy Howe joins us

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>next as football fans get ready to place their bets

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>on the big game that's coming up next. This is

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology. It is Super Bowl weekend, and the big

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 2>game between the San Francisco forty nine ers and the

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City Chiefs is going viral on Google trends. Searches

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>for both teams have skyrocketed, with questions like where to

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>buy a new jersey? To which Super Bowl is this?

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>One spoiler, it's Super Bowl fifty eight halftime shows start

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>ushers getting a big boost as fans google.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 5>His song hit single Yeah.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Is the most searched for across America since his slot

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>was announced. The romance between Taylor Swift and Casey's Travis

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey is also in focus. Will she be at Super

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Bowl fifty eight. Finally, there's a battle for TV eyeballs

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>by tech advertisers. Snapchat's debut Super Bowl ad hopes to

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 2>convince users its platform is safer and more authentic than others.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 2>And Uber is reuniting Ross and Rachel from Friends in

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>a commercial for Uber Eats, And as we discussed earlier,

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 2>for the first time, the game will be streaming on

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Paramount Plus caroc.

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, we've got to talk bets and they are rolling in,

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 4>big game approaching, and Johnny us to talk all about Wow,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 4>how people are doing a bit of a flutter?

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 6>Is super Bowl weekend ahead of it?

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Fanjial CEO Amy Howe, Amy, it's great to have some

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 4>time with you and just I think of last year

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think of the almost what was it ten

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 4>million bets placed in the United States? How many are

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 4>you anticipating for this particular game.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 11>Well, what I can tell you is every year we

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 11>set new records and this year definitely will not disappoint.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 11>I mean, this is going to be one of the

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 11>biggest years. It's a phenomenal matchup between the Chiefs and

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 11>the forty nine ers. But if you go to FANDLE

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 11>you have an opportunity to bet on six hundred different

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 11>pre line markets. Was a huge live offering, and as

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 11>you can imagine, there's a ton of popularity around the

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 11>player props, particularly Travis Kelcey, but also Mahomes and Christian McCaffrey.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 11>And don't forget you still have an opportunity to go

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 11>onto the app and decide if Rob Gronkowski is going

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 11>to make his redemption kick, and if you pick correctly,

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 11>you'll get a share of ten million dollars in bonus bets.

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 11>So there's really something for everyone this year.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Amy, I am, in truth a fair Weather forty nine

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Ers fan.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Of course I'll watch the game.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 2>But it raises an interesting point in the context of betting, right,

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>how many people do you see come in and place

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a bet just for this game that might have otherwise

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>just sat out the rest of the season. What kind

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of short term spike in New York users do you

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 2>see visiting your platforms?

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean Super Bowl is the single biggest acquisition moment, right,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 11>and one of the things that's wonderful about it is.

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 11>You get a ton of recreational users who are first

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 11>time to sports betting, and what they're getting exposed to

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 11>is just the excitement of it right the game within

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 11>the game, and it really elevates the experience. So there

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 11>really is something for everyone. And one of the things

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 11>that's been great about this year is with so much

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 11>discussion around Taylor Swift, it's actually drawn a lot of

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 11>women to the platform as well. About thirty three percent

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 11>of our new activations are women, which is really exciting

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 11>and just demonstrates the breadth and the power of what

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 11>we're doing every day.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 6>That's fascinating.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us a little bit more about demographics because

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 4>many would say, and I don't know whether it's a

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 4>cynical view or not, that the legalization process in the

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 4>United States has in many way been understood to be

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 4>because of viewership. Ultimately, younger people are placing bets on

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 4>sports and now that coming to view it far more

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 4>across cable and also now across streaming. How much you're

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 4>seeing an older generation mosus a younger generation on your platform?

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean the honest answer is, over time we're

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 11>seeing both. I mean, what happens is when you know,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 11>when state started to open up back in twenty eighteen,

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 11>it tended to skeew a bit more towards a younger

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 11>mal audience. But as we're now, you know, five to

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 11>six years in since the Supreme Court decided they would

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 11>let the states legalize, you're getting a much broader, much

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 11>more recreational user. And I think a big part of

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 11>that is the role that the leagues. Right, we have

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 11>a phenomenal partnership with the NFL and the NBA, and

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 11>we're making it accessible, exciting, and you know, most of

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 11>our betters are betting less than twenty dollars on the platform,

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 11>but it makes the actual experience that much more exciting.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 5>Amy, let me show you something real quick.

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 2>This is this is a chart summing up the swift

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 2>effect or the Swifty effect total Instagram followers monthly for

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Ravis Kelce after that September twenty four to attendance.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so you get the data.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Are people literally betting on whether or not she'll turn

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 2>up or are we going more specific on that, like

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 2>what is she going to wear to the game? What's more,

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, likely Super Bowl ring, engagement ring. These are

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 2>real things that people talk about by.

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 5>The way just for it.

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 11>There are real things that actually in Canada, in our

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 11>Ontario province, you can go on and predict whether Travis

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 11>is going to propose to tell her swift at the

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 11>end of the game. In the States, unfortunately you can't.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 11>There are no prop that's on Teller Swift. But what

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 11>I can tell you is, ever since Tellerswift was on

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 11>the scene, the number of player prop that's for Travis

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 11>Kelcey has more than doubled. So she has certainly brought

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 11>a lot of new engagement and betting activity on on

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 11>Travis Kelcey, in particular.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 6>Engagement of a different form.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 4>We thank you fan, you'll see anyhow brilliant to spend

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 4>some time with you.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, A firm shares are down around thirteen percent, but

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>in them on track for their biggest drop since October

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 2>after the buy now, Pay Later Companies twenty twenty four

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 2>forecast the annual transaction volume slightly missed estimates. Please to

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 2>say a firm CEO Max Leftrin joins us now and

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 2>that seems to be the pretty micro focus max the

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 2>forecast for transaction volume. Should the street be concerned about that?

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm great.

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't give the street that credit whatsoever.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>We've had it absolutely blowout or every number on top

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of bottom increase our estimates or figuring forward and are

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>showing your signed up slowing down or weakness or ANYBM. Sorry,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd rarely argue with the market, but I think the

0:34:52.239 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 1>team work too hard to accomplish too much, too well. Word, Okay, we're.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Just showing the the highlights in the court had gone.

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, top line you beat considerably, matching what

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the street expected from a loss per share. What was

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 2>the biggest factor on that top line growth of all

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 2>of the different products you're now offering.

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think across the board we did extremely well. We

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>posted just really strong policy season. Our partners chopped by

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or a large contributor to our growth of pacing the

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>average hard and Detailing Week bragged about one thousand active

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>cart bolders our November of Usterer event, only to show

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have some one hundred thousand actives growing rapidly.

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a there's quite a lot of things that

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>contributed to the growth of ORL company that across the

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>board we do well.

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Can I dig in a bit more on the gross

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 4>merchandise volume and value, and I mean ultimately you call

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 4>it out in your earnings and you said, we've post

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 4>the fastest year over year GMV growth rate in over

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 4>a year, and you're basically saying, look, we can show

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 4>how we operate our business with excellence.

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 6>Then give you this moment.

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 4>To speak to an investor in an analyst community that

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 4>is saying they're slightly worried about what they think is

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 4>a GMV deceleration for the second half fiscal second half

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty four.

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 6>You say, it's the guidance is the flaw.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 4>What more can you say to an investor base that

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 4>for some reason is determining this is a slowdown and

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 4>they're worried.

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, I think the best I can speak to investors

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is about posting more results.

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 3>A form of trust me I'm not at.

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Kirk is always met with great skepticism. So we'll just

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>continue post results. The results will last for more than

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 1>speaks to themselves to flow out of growth to show

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's the exact number that we were getting borer

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and looks gunning for a better and better operative that

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>it is the law and we don't want to teach

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>our guidance strategy at all like me far we're going

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to intexty for ourselves.

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, a lot of anists can see that true securities

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Jeffrey saying that we'll be a surprise by the

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 4>magnitude of the slow down. Blueberg Intelligence also saying they

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 4>don't see They see momentum and they don't see this

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 4>sort of slow down. So tell us about momentum and

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 4>ultimately about a US consumer that feels rubbish about the economy,

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 4>but the economy still continues to go incredibly Well, what

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 4>are you seeing from a determination to spend and to

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 4>spend with you?

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So the pure wallet across our many they partners is

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>generally in preaching and very happy about that.

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 3>US consumer, I think.

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Full to speak on behalf of your consumer are feeling

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit differently than they are acting and I

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>have no idea like to that. But there are folks

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that are having our time paying their build and see

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that in the credit art industry, building up their delinquencies

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and parting to increase in filling out reserves. None of

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that is true for us. We posted another were of

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>flat for any year, any year, deliquencies, prey based higher,

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Those are all measures of our excellent credit

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>mad a firm consumer, the ones that we actually led

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to arguing find or page of build, taking amount of

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>time without I might add eighty eternal late faser gimmicks tricks.

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>The industry is starting to show signs of tracking where

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>folks are aye able bit overextended. I think that's probably

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what's playing foras mind that said, the holiday season.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Was quite strong for us.

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>We saw really great engagement from occasional buyers that when

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to our online partners and bought the gifts all the

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>way to our articholders that use the card for everything

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>from dayspend to to get bud and so you are

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>very good about our ability to help folks back and borrow.

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 3>And most important thing, I just want all.

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We add because we don't charge leading, because we don't

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>propound the interest. Our incentives are profoundly aligned with those

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that we want money to. They can pay us back

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on client on schedule. We will need much money. Our

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>growth is actually driven not just by the fact that

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of demand for buying for pferring, the

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>demand for our firm specific product and our ability.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So I understand that you and I have talked a

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 2>lot about buying now, pay later, but also the other

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>products that you offer. Right this week, I think what

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Caroline and I heard from CEO's markets guests the consumers strong.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>But as you've just pointed out, credit card is becoming

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a notable data point to track.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 5>How does that impact you in.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Obviously we watch all the industry data like everybody else.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Again, our borrower has done very well for us with

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>us and when we lend money, we take into consideration

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>their performance across other borrowing advices they have purchas, et cetera.

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So we know that from consumer is quite strong and

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>repeat and they're equos cans back and that's shown in

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>our numbers and the numbers that for you you can

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>see them more frequently than our quoily numbers in our

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>DA's reports. And so we look quite good about the

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>segment of economy that we serve. I think there are

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>folks that are starting to lead to perhaps it's really

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the running out of the pandemic stating that are taking

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>place elsewhere. We are equal to step borrowers successful.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:30.479
<v Speaker 6>Thanks lob ch it's great to have some time with you.

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much for joining the show with firm

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 4>CEO on the back of their numbers.

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Meanwhile, So that does it.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 4>This addition of Blue Metology and the week, and we've

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 4>got a big weekend to be watching some.

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Sports in Yes, super Bowl.

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Recap all the conversations super Bowl on our podcast.

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Where you're getting.

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Your podcast, we post them basically everywhere. There's the examples,

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Happy super Bowl weekend. This is bloom Bag