1
00:00:01,720 --> 00:00:06,600
Speaker 1: Also media. Welcome to dick It app and here, a

2
00:00:06,600 --> 00:00:09,520
Speaker 1: podcast about things falling apart and putting it back together again.

3
00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:14,440
Speaker 1: I'm Mia Wong, I'm with Garrison, and it is my

4
00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:18,400
Speaker 1: singular honor and pleasure to introduce our guest, doctor Julia Serrano.

5
00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:22,560
Speaker 1: She is the author of many books, including Excluded, Making

6
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:26,240
Speaker 1: Feminists and queer Movements More Inclusive, Sex Stop, How Society

7
00:00:26,280 --> 00:00:29,560
Speaker 1: Sexualizes Us and How we can Fight back, Outspoken, a

8
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:34,080
Speaker 1: Decade of transgender Activism and Transfeminism, and most famously, Whipping Girl,

9
00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:36,320
Speaker 1: a new edition of which is coming out in March.

10
00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:38,000
Speaker 1: Doctor Serrano, welcome to the show.

11
00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:40,680
Speaker 2: Hi, thanks for having me.

12
00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:44,320
Speaker 1: I'm really really I'm really happy you can join us.

13
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:51,160
Speaker 1: So okay. Whipping Girl, I think is really the one

14
00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:54,840
Speaker 1: of quietly the most influential books of the twenty first century,

15
00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:57,800
Speaker 1: to the extent that in kind of classic trans woman fashion,

16
00:00:57,840 --> 00:01:00,560
Speaker 1: I don't think I don't think people realized that the

17
00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:04,280
Speaker 1: ideas that it introduced have an origin. So for people

18
00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:06,160
Speaker 1: who haven't read the book, and you should, this book

19
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:09,680
Speaker 1: is great. I guarantee you have seen its influence. If

20
00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:12,760
Speaker 1: you've ever heard someone like who's not trans referred to

21
00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:16,920
Speaker 1: as sis, like that's that's from this book. The concept

22
00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:20,600
Speaker 1: of misgendering is also from this book. The word trans

23
00:01:20,640 --> 00:01:26,040
Speaker 1: misogyny like also from this book. And this I think

24
00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:31,080
Speaker 1: gets at something from the twenty fifteen second edition preface

25
00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:34,520
Speaker 1: that you wrote, which is something I've been wondering about,

26
00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:37,880
Speaker 1: is what is it like to sort of experience writing

27
00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:40,319
Speaker 1: a book and have it just like ripple across society

28
00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:40,600
Speaker 1: like this.

29
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:42,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's uh.

30
00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,000
Speaker 3: I was very much hoping and you know, as I

31
00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:47,920
Speaker 3: was writing it, I was hoping that I thought that

32
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:51,320
Speaker 3: it would resonate with a lot of trans female and

33
00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:56,080
Speaker 3: transfeminine people, and I hope trans communities more generally, and

34
00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:58,400
Speaker 3: the book. This is something that a lot of times

35
00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:00,560
Speaker 3: people who pick up the book now and like the

36
00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:04,400
Speaker 3: twenty twenties don't necessarily realize, is that nobody was reading

37
00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:11,200
Speaker 3: anything about trans people outside of feminists and LGBTQ plus communities,

38
00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:15,120
Speaker 3: and so I was basically just speaking to those groups, and.

39
00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:16,840
Speaker 2: I thought it would resonate with some people.

40
00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:19,959
Speaker 3: But yeah, definitely it kind of went out into the

41
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:22,960
Speaker 3: world and did a bunch of stuff that I wasn't

42
00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:27,119
Speaker 3: necessarily expecting. And I'm very glad that the book has

43
00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,640
Speaker 3: kind of touched a lot of people's lives and changed,

44
00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:36,600
Speaker 3: you know, kind of societal understanding and quote unquote discourses

45
00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:37,600
Speaker 3: about trans people.

46
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:42,079
Speaker 4: So yeah, it must be kind of bizarre, like being

47
00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:45,399
Speaker 4: twenty years ago writing about you know, a niche term

48
00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:49,160
Speaker 4: like sis and now the richest man in the world

49
00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:51,880
Speaker 4: thinks it's like the most evil word.

50
00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:57,400
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's quite bizarre, and I do want to definitely

51
00:02:57,480 --> 00:02:58,960
Speaker 3: kind of clear this up, but I kind of make

52
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:01,720
Speaker 3: this clear in the preface. So I didn't invet like

53
00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:05,040
Speaker 3: sis versus trans like a that's like a prefix that

54
00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:09,040
Speaker 3: has existed a long time. And I've since seen other

55
00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:12,680
Speaker 3: people like point out, oh, this person was using it

56
00:03:12,760 --> 00:03:18,360
Speaker 3: in nineteen ninety something, or some German writer like coined

57
00:03:18,520 --> 00:03:21,880
Speaker 3: cis vestism or something like back a million years ago.

58
00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:24,160
Speaker 3: So what I will say is that when I when

59
00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:26,760
Speaker 3: I put out the book, I was inspired by Emi Koyama,

60
00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:32,040
Speaker 3: who was and is an awesome activist intersex activists who's

61
00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:36,040
Speaker 3: written a lot of really influential trans related essays over

62
00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:39,920
Speaker 3: the years, And it was from her blog post that

63
00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:41,880
Speaker 3: was the first time I saw sis and trans and

64
00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,240
Speaker 3: the idea of cis sexism. And at the time it

65
00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:47,480
Speaker 3: was while I was writing the book, and it really

66
00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:49,840
Speaker 3: I was like, oh my god, this is kind of

67
00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:52,440
Speaker 3: the overall idea. I was talking about all these different

68
00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:56,360
Speaker 3: facets of basically double standards between trans and non trans people,

69
00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,720
Speaker 3: and so I kind of grabbed onto it, and I

70
00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:03,120
Speaker 3: was really worried about it actually because nobody, almost nobody

71
00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:05,560
Speaker 3: was using those terms. It was very niche at the time,

72
00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:09,280
Speaker 3: and so the book popularized that language. And so now

73
00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:11,840
Speaker 3: it is kind of funny every once in a while

74
00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:18,000
Speaker 3: seeing yes overreactions by SIS people to the idea of

75
00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:22,520
Speaker 3: of SIS being a slur or whatever. So yeah, and

76
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:25,800
Speaker 3: so yeah, so that's definitely something that is kind of

77
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:28,400
Speaker 3: is the one thing I one thing I did coin

78
00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:30,800
Speaker 3: in the book that has kind of also taken a

79
00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:33,479
Speaker 3: life on its own is trans misogyny. So that is

80
00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:37,719
Speaker 3: something that kind of originated with this book and particularly

81
00:04:37,760 --> 00:04:40,280
Speaker 3: a chap book that I wrote in two thousand and

82
00:04:40,320 --> 00:04:43,440
Speaker 3: five that some of those essays became chapters of the book.

83
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:45,719
Speaker 3: And yeah, and so there are other ideas that kind

84
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:47,880
Speaker 3: of are out there, Like I think it was one

85
00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:50,080
Speaker 3: of the first. I think it was the first book

86
00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:52,920
Speaker 3: to talk about like the idea of SIS privilege. I

87
00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:56,039
Speaker 3: misgendering is an idea was out there, but I kind

88
00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:59,560
Speaker 3: of dove into it a little bit deeper. So yeah,

89
00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:01,560
Speaker 3: so they're definitely things I was doing at the time

90
00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:05,960
Speaker 3: that I didn't know whether they'd be to abstract or

91
00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:08,280
Speaker 3: how they'd be taken up, and so, yes, it's been

92
00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:08,960
Speaker 3: very interesting.

93
00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:13,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, I wanted to talk about misgendering a bit because

94
00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:15,599
Speaker 1: I think it's become this word that just means not

95
00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:20,000
Speaker 1: saying someone's pronouns correctly, and I think that's, at the

96
00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:25,280
Speaker 1: very best, like an incredibly reductionist and simplified version of

97
00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:27,160
Speaker 1: the analysis that you were presenting. So I guess I

98
00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:30,560
Speaker 1: have two questions here. One can you briefly sort of

99
00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:33,080
Speaker 1: talk about what you were trying to get at when

100
00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:36,760
Speaker 1: you sort of did your analysis of the process of gendering?

101
00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:39,520
Speaker 1: And two, what do you think about the way that

102
00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:43,240
Speaker 1: it's kind of become flattened into this I don't know,

103
00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:46,960
Speaker 1: kind of weirdly narrow thing in modern discourse.

104
00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:52,839
Speaker 3: Sure, and a lot of the misgendering definitely dovetails with

105
00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:56,039
Speaker 3: the idea of passing, and a lot of my kind

106
00:05:56,080 --> 00:05:58,040
Speaker 3: of diving into it in a particular way I came

107
00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:02,279
Speaker 3: from critiques that I had other trans people had as well,

108
00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:05,039
Speaker 3: but I kind of you know, put them together in

109
00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:09,560
Speaker 3: a particularly in the Dismantling I think it's dismantling Sexual

110
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:12,200
Speaker 3: Privileged chapter where I kind of go through all these

111
00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,719
Speaker 3: steps that lead to miss gendering, because I think people

112
00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,720
Speaker 3: talk about trans people passing and also the people will

113
00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:22,679
Speaker 3: talk about other marginalized groups passing is whatever dominant majority group.

114
00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:28,280
Speaker 3: The term obviously had long been used with regards to

115
00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:31,560
Speaker 3: people of color passing as white and in kind of

116
00:06:31,839 --> 00:06:36,240
Speaker 3: white racist you know, us and other societies. So it's

117
00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:38,680
Speaker 3: an old term, and a big problem with it is

118
00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:41,200
Speaker 3: that it makes it sound like we're doing something active,

119
00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:45,400
Speaker 3: that trans people are actively trying to deceive other people,

120
00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:50,760
Speaker 3: with huge scare quotes around the word deceive. And I

121
00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:54,159
Speaker 3: really wanted to highlight to people that actually all of

122
00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:59,640
Speaker 3: us very unconsciously and very compulsively gender every single person

123
00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:02,720
Speaker 3: we meet, or at least that's how we're socialized to be,

124
00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:05,520
Speaker 3: and you know, you can work towards getting, you know,

125
00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:10,440
Speaker 3: overcoming that, but I wanted to really highlight the fact

126
00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:13,720
Speaker 3: that we see people, we automatically gender them, and that

127
00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:19,080
Speaker 3: puts people who do not quite who your presumptions are

128
00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:23,000
Speaker 3: wrong about it puts us in difficult situations. It's a

129
00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:27,640
Speaker 3: double bind where do you reveal what you supposedly really

130
00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,000
Speaker 3: are or do you just allow people to read you

131
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:34,440
Speaker 3: that way? And it works out very differently, for instance,

132
00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:38,840
Speaker 3: between trans and say CIS gay people, because when cis

133
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:42,360
Speaker 3: gay people talk about passing as straight. Their passing is

134
00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:45,560
Speaker 3: something that they know that they are not. Whereas for

135
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:47,520
Speaker 3: a lot of trans people, if people read me as

136
00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:50,400
Speaker 3: a woman and I understand myself to be a woman,

137
00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:54,200
Speaker 3: there's it's a very different dynamic because it's not like

138
00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:58,200
Speaker 3: I'm not hiding anything, but people are presuming what I'm

139
00:07:58,200 --> 00:08:02,080
Speaker 3: really passing as is I'm passing assist and people are

140
00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:06,160
Speaker 3: assuming I'm this gender when the trans is the thing

141
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:09,600
Speaker 3: that I might need to or feel like I need

142
00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:12,280
Speaker 3: to clear up, or other people might put pressure on

143
00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:17,840
Speaker 3: me to either tell them that I'm trans or be

144
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:21,080
Speaker 3: accused of deceiving them. So that's a little bit of

145
00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:24,600
Speaker 3: kind of how I was approaching it when I started

146
00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:27,280
Speaker 3: working on that idea and really stressing the idea of

147
00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:31,520
Speaker 3: you can't understand miss gendering unless you understand that we

148
00:08:31,560 --> 00:08:35,000
Speaker 3: make assumptions all the time. We gender people very actively,

149
00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:39,839
Speaker 3: and you know, so trans people are often just reacting

150
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:42,880
Speaker 3: to that and dealing with that double bind.

151
00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:46,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is something that I think is interestingly

152
00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:52,720
Speaker 1: discussed in the book about like kind of this this

153
00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:56,319
Speaker 1: issue with some of the sort of prevailing gender theories

154
00:08:56,360 --> 00:09:00,439
Speaker 1: which thought of which think about sort of like Naitian

155
00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:04,320
Speaker 1: gender is pure performance. But you know, and this is

156
00:09:04,400 --> 00:09:06,000
Speaker 1: I think, like the argument that you were making that

157
00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:08,920
Speaker 1: I think is really interesting is that something that I

158
00:09:08,960 --> 00:09:11,640
Speaker 1: think is is very obvious to trans people is that

159
00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:15,520
Speaker 1: so much of gender is how people perceive you and

160
00:09:15,559 --> 00:09:17,320
Speaker 1: how you know and stuff that like you don't have

161
00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:19,480
Speaker 1: any control over. It's how people sort of gender you.

162
00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:24,760
Speaker 1: It's how people like construct a gender around you in

163
00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:26,960
Speaker 1: ways that you don't really have control over.

164
00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:33,160
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that was a big thing. So in kind

165
00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:36,239
Speaker 3: of I was writing the book in the mid two thousands,

166
00:09:36,840 --> 00:09:41,960
Speaker 3: and so the nineteen nineties is when Judith Butler publishes

167
00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:46,200
Speaker 3: Gender Trouble, which Butler never said all genders performance are

168
00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:49,280
Speaker 3: all genders drag, Yeah, but that is but that those

169
00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:52,400
Speaker 3: are like slogans or sound bites that other people took

170
00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:55,400
Speaker 3: from their book, right, and they were very popular at

171
00:09:55,440 --> 00:10:01,000
Speaker 3: the time. There's also there's a famous sociological article about

172
00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:05,080
Speaker 3: doing gender, and so people were very focused on the

173
00:10:05,120 --> 00:10:10,960
Speaker 3: way in which we create gender by doing it particular ways,

174
00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:15,319
Speaker 3: and a lot of the slogans within trans communities were

175
00:10:15,840 --> 00:10:18,640
Speaker 3: sort of like, oh, well, you know, I just have

176
00:10:18,720 --> 00:10:21,960
Speaker 3: to do my gender differently, like more transgressively, and that

177
00:10:22,000 --> 00:10:25,040
Speaker 3: will like tear down all of gender. And I felt

178
00:10:25,040 --> 00:10:28,000
Speaker 3: that there was you know, that is an aspect of things,

179
00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:31,760
Speaker 3: and most of us, whether trans or cists, most of

180
00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:36,520
Speaker 3: us have had the experience of maybe trying to.

181
00:10:36,520 --> 00:10:38,280
Speaker 2: Perform our genders in a particular way in.

182
00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:42,120
Speaker 3: Order to like, you know, not you know, in order

183
00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:44,880
Speaker 3: in order to get by in the world, in order

184
00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:47,240
Speaker 3: to not be harassed by other people.

185
00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:49,479
Speaker 2: So we've all had that experience.

186
00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:53,680
Speaker 3: So while that's true, there's the other partner of that dance,

187
00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:58,520
Speaker 3: and that's perception, and we're all perceiving people very actively,

188
00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:02,080
Speaker 3: and we're like projecting our ideas and meanings onto them.

189
00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:04,480
Speaker 3: And I felt like that was being under discussed at

190
00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:07,920
Speaker 3: the time, and that was not only a huge part

191
00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:12,280
Speaker 3: of Whipping Girl, but that's become a part of a

192
00:11:12,320 --> 00:11:15,040
Speaker 3: lot of my other books, like including my most recent book,

193
00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:18,000
Speaker 3: sext Up how society sexualizes us.

194
00:11:17,880 --> 00:11:18,920
Speaker 2: And how we can fight back.

195
00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:23,280
Speaker 3: One way that I would describe that book is it's

196
00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:27,720
Speaker 3: talking about sex and sexuality not from what people do,

197
00:11:27,840 --> 00:11:31,800
Speaker 3: but from how we perceive and interpret sex and sexuality,

198
00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:35,800
Speaker 3: because there are a lot of unconscious ideas, often really

199
00:11:36,160 --> 00:11:38,960
Speaker 3: horrible ideas, really hierarchical ideas.

200
00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:41,120
Speaker 2: That are kind of built into the way we view

201
00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:41,600
Speaker 2: the world.

202
00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:44,400
Speaker 3: And interrogating that and so, yeah, that was a very

203
00:11:44,440 --> 00:11:47,439
Speaker 3: big part of both Women Girl and then my writings

204
00:11:47,520 --> 00:11:48,000
Speaker 3: since then.

205
00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:51,840
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think I think that is something where

206
00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:54,480
Speaker 1: things have gotten better in terms of in terms of

207
00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:57,440
Speaker 1: how we think about gender, which I don't know, like

208
00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:02,280
Speaker 1: things aren't perfect, but it definitely it definitely improved things

209
00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:06,199
Speaker 1: a lot. Agreed, we're going to take an ad break

210
00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:10,640
Speaker 1: and when we come back, we're talking trans misogyny.

211
00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:21,080
Speaker 2: We're back.

212
00:12:21,679 --> 00:12:24,440
Speaker 1: Yeah. So another thing I wanted to sort of talk

213
00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:28,800
Speaker 1: about was I think, in like exactly the opposite process

214
00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:33,160
Speaker 1: that happened to misgendering, trans misogyny has become a lot

215
00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:38,800
Speaker 1: more expansive than your original sort of kind of narrow

216
00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:42,120
Speaker 1: conception of it. And I think this has been changing

217
00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:45,600
Speaker 1: a lot, especially in the last about half decade or so,

218
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:48,400
Speaker 1: So I was wondering what you think about the way

219
00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:50,400
Speaker 1: that this concept has kind of taken on a life

220
00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:52,319
Speaker 1: of its own in recent years and what it's been

221
00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:54,040
Speaker 1: doing since.

222
00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:55,320
Speaker 2: Yeah.

223
00:12:55,400 --> 00:12:59,200
Speaker 3: So I feel like trans misogyny, that there are a

224
00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:04,200
Speaker 3: lot of different dialogues and discourses about it coming, like

225
00:13:04,240 --> 00:13:08,360
Speaker 3: people coming from different perspectives with it, and some people

226
00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:12,319
Speaker 3: feeling like the word is doing things that I never

227
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:15,760
Speaker 3: suggested it was doing. It's kind of hard to know

228
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:19,040
Speaker 3: like where to actually come in on this, but for me,

229
00:13:19,840 --> 00:13:22,679
Speaker 3: when I was first writing about it, I was first

230
00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:26,280
Speaker 3: just noticing that a lot of the quote unquote transphobia

231
00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:28,199
Speaker 3: that I was facing when people know as a trans

232
00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:31,600
Speaker 3: woman was actually a lot of it was just misogyny,

233
00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:35,720
Speaker 3: and a lot of it targeted like kind of my

234
00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:41,920
Speaker 3: femininity rather than my transness, And so I wanted to

235
00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:45,240
Speaker 3: write about that, and kind of the way that I

236
00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:49,760
Speaker 3: framed it in the book was, which I think is

237
00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:52,839
Speaker 3: a really useful kind of model for thinking about it,

238
00:13:52,880 --> 00:13:55,320
Speaker 3: is that there most of the types of sexism that

239
00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:58,960
Speaker 3: feminists have described over the many years fall into two

240
00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:03,560
Speaker 3: sort of camps, one of them being oppositional sexism, which is.

241
00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:06,480
Speaker 2: The idea that men and women are kind.

242
00:14:06,280 --> 00:14:11,280
Speaker 3: Of perfectly opposite, mutually exclusive sexes that have different interests

243
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:15,079
Speaker 3: and attributes and desires, and so a lot of transphobia

244
00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:18,280
Speaker 3: and homophobia are kind of like built into this idea

245
00:14:18,280 --> 00:14:21,320
Speaker 3: that men and women are completely distinct. And then the

246
00:14:21,360 --> 00:14:24,600
Speaker 3: other one is traditional sexism, which is the idea that

247
00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:28,880
Speaker 3: femalis and femininity are less legitimate than malness and masculinity.

248
00:14:29,960 --> 00:14:34,960
Speaker 3: And a lot of CIS feminists have kind of viewed

249
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,560
Speaker 3: all of that as just sexism, right, But when you

250
00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:40,200
Speaker 3: break it down like that, it makes it clear that

251
00:14:40,240 --> 00:14:42,320
Speaker 3: the double bind that a lot of feminists have talked

252
00:14:42,360 --> 00:14:46,520
Speaker 3: about is actually kind of these two different forms of sexism.

253
00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:52,240
Speaker 3: So if a CIS woman acts appropriately femininely, so appropriate

254
00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:56,040
Speaker 3: with scare quotes. If a SIS woman acts femininely, she'll

255
00:14:56,080 --> 00:15:01,240
Speaker 3: be seen as appropriate, but she'll be dismissed because femininity

256
00:15:01,320 --> 00:15:04,440
Speaker 3: is dismissed in our culture, So that's the way that

257
00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:05,720
Speaker 3: she'll be delegitimized.

258
00:15:05,960 --> 00:15:06,720
Speaker 2: Whereas if she.

259
00:15:06,680 --> 00:15:09,360
Speaker 3: Acts in ways that are coded as masculine, and if

260
00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:14,720
Speaker 3: she acts assertive or aggressive, then people will malign her

261
00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:18,320
Speaker 3: for being kind of a barrant or deviant, right, and

262
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:22,560
Speaker 3: so oppositional sexism helps keep traditional sexism in place because

263
00:15:23,040 --> 00:15:26,760
Speaker 3: you can say that malness and masculinity are superior, But

264
00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:29,520
Speaker 3: that only works if you can also make a clear

265
00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:33,360
Speaker 3: distinction between you know, those people and people are female

266
00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:36,280
Speaker 3: and feminine, and so I think this plays out differently.

267
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,040
Speaker 3: And I want to be really clear about this because

268
00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:43,400
Speaker 3: some people have interpreted trans misogyny to mean that trans

269
00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:46,840
Speaker 3: mail and trans masculine people don't experience misogyny, which is

270
00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:50,120
Speaker 3: something I have never said. And obviously the fact that

271
00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:56,640
Speaker 3: oppositional sexism is a form of sexism, and obviously trans

272
00:15:56,680 --> 00:16:00,120
Speaker 3: maild transmasculine people experience that. But also depending upon on

273
00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:03,520
Speaker 3: how you're viewed by other people, I feel like the

274
00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:07,560
Speaker 3: same double pind that affects this woman affects transmeild trans

275
00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:10,720
Speaker 3: masculine people differently. Where there's this tendency, like in a

276
00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:17,320
Speaker 3: lot of anti trans discourses to dismiss trans masculine, especially

277
00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:21,520
Speaker 3: transmasculine youth as being merely girls quote unquote, who are

278
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:26,720
Speaker 3: like you know, misled or seduced by gender ideology, right,

279
00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:30,960
Speaker 3: And there's a lot of real anti feminine and anti

280
00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,200
Speaker 3: misogynistic ideas in there. In addition to the fact that

281
00:16:34,280 --> 00:16:40,720
Speaker 3: it misgenders, transmeild, transmasculine people. And then if trans maild

282
00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:47,960
Speaker 3: trans masculine people, when they experience transphobia, there's often you know,

283
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:51,480
Speaker 3: like they're seen as deviant for kind of breaking that role,

284
00:16:52,080 --> 00:16:58,120
Speaker 3: but often the malness or their masculinity themselves are not,

285
00:16:58,760 --> 00:17:02,760
Speaker 3: you know, denigrated in the same way, because being male,

286
00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:05,800
Speaker 3: being masculine are seen as good in our culture. It's

287
00:17:05,880 --> 00:17:08,960
Speaker 3: just that if you trans male, trans masculine, it's like, well,

288
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:11,640
Speaker 3: you're quote unquote just a woman, so you can't do it.

289
00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:15,040
Speaker 3: So I think it plays out in this very complex

290
00:17:15,119 --> 00:17:17,320
Speaker 3: way for a lot of trans mail trans masculine people,

291
00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:23,960
Speaker 3: I think for trans female and transfeminine people, because our

292
00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:27,720
Speaker 3: crossing of oppositional sexism also involves us kind of moving

293
00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:32,439
Speaker 3: towards the female, towards the feminine, that there's kind of

294
00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:36,720
Speaker 3: those two forces intersect in a way so that it's

295
00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:40,080
Speaker 3: like exacerbated. And some of the ways I talk about

296
00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:42,399
Speaker 3: this in whomen Girl is that, well, we live in

297
00:17:42,440 --> 00:17:45,520
Speaker 3: a world where masculinity is seen as natural and femininity

298
00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:48,359
Speaker 3: is seen as artificial, and since trans people are also

299
00:17:48,359 --> 00:17:51,200
Speaker 3: seen as artificial compared to this gender people, a lot

300
00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:56,560
Speaker 3: of times we're viewed as doubly artificial. Furthermore, the idea

301
00:17:56,640 --> 00:18:00,600
Speaker 3: that like women are seen as sex objects where men

302
00:18:00,760 --> 00:18:05,440
Speaker 3: aren't seen as sex objects, often are transitions or gender

303
00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:09,280
Speaker 3: transgressions towards a female towards a feminine are presumed to

304
00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:12,159
Speaker 3: be driven by sexual motives that can play out in

305
00:18:12,200 --> 00:18:15,040
Speaker 3: all sorts of ways. Whether this is the idea that

306
00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:18,960
Speaker 3: we're like hyper sexual or promiscuous, or that we want

307
00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:22,160
Speaker 3: to be sexualized by other people, or you can see

308
00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:25,320
Speaker 3: it a lot with the kind of the transgender predator

309
00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:29,840
Speaker 3: is often coded as like a man who either has

310
00:18:29,880 --> 00:18:33,520
Speaker 3: some kind of fetish or perversion or is just literally

311
00:18:33,640 --> 00:18:38,160
Speaker 3: deceiving people to get into women's restrooms to do something horrific.

312
00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:40,720
Speaker 3: So those are some of the ways that it plays out.

313
00:18:41,920 --> 00:18:45,520
Speaker 3: I feel that sometimes people view it in a cut

314
00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:49,440
Speaker 3: or dried way that either they'll assume that trans misogyny

315
00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:53,480
Speaker 3: means that transnal, trans massacine people don't experience misogyny, which

316
00:18:53,520 --> 00:18:56,879
Speaker 3: again is not what that's about. Or sometimes people will

317
00:18:57,040 --> 00:19:01,400
Speaker 3: try to make really clear distinctions. There's kind of language

318
00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:07,560
Speaker 3: like trans misogyny affected versus trans misogyny exempt. Are the

319
00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:11,480
Speaker 3: terms yeah, TME and TMA, which are not terms I've

320
00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,879
Speaker 3: used and which or that I didn't coin them.

321
00:19:15,119 --> 00:19:15,920
Speaker 2: They're not in the book.

322
00:19:16,960 --> 00:19:20,600
Speaker 3: And I think that when I first saw that language,

323
00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:23,399
Speaker 3: and I've seen people use it in a way that

324
00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:26,399
Speaker 3: appreciates the fact that some people are non binary, so

325
00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:29,720
Speaker 3: it's a non identity based way. Sometimes this can play

326
00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:32,560
Speaker 3: out in a really cut or dried sort of.

327
00:19:32,520 --> 00:19:33,720
Speaker 2: Manner that.

328
00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:40,640
Speaker 3: You know, sometimes you know, whether it's intended this way

329
00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:43,320
Speaker 3: or not, it can make it seem that, like, you know,

330
00:19:43,560 --> 00:19:48,000
Speaker 3: just boiling down a really complex experience, people's complex experiences

331
00:19:48,040 --> 00:19:51,639
Speaker 3: with different types of sexism into some people are privileged

332
00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:55,159
Speaker 3: and some people are marginalized, which I think is a

333
00:19:55,160 --> 00:20:00,320
Speaker 3: more general problem that happens kind of throughout all social

334
00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:01,160
Speaker 3: justice movements.

335
00:20:01,240 --> 00:20:05,800
Speaker 4: So yeah, and trans people are not alien to having

336
00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:08,600
Speaker 4: complex experiences be boiled down to three and four letter.

337
00:20:09,960 --> 00:20:10,600
Speaker 1: Acronyms.

338
00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:13,520
Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean I.

339
00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:18,760
Speaker 3: Did this in Twitter form, so it was like a thread,

340
00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:22,120
Speaker 3: so like now, people can't access threads unless you.

341
00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:26,120
Speaker 2: Have an account with Twitter. And it's from a couple

342
00:20:26,080 --> 00:20:26,600
Speaker 2: of years ago.

343
00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:28,679
Speaker 3: But one of the things that I talked about was

344
00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:31,240
Speaker 3: I wrote this essay about ten years ago about how

345
00:20:32,160 --> 00:20:33,800
Speaker 3: sis and trans is kind.

346
00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:34,520
Speaker 2: Of a useful.

347
00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:38,159
Speaker 3: Those are useful terms, but sometimes people fall in between

348
00:20:38,160 --> 00:20:42,040
Speaker 3: CIS and trans, and sometimes they can be used in

349
00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:45,080
Speaker 3: a way to talk about different double standards, like CIS

350
00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:47,439
Speaker 3: people are treated one way, TRANS people are treated another.

351
00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:49,640
Speaker 2: But sometimes it can be used in like a.

352
00:20:49,600 --> 00:20:53,239
Speaker 3: Sort of reverse discourse way, where it's like, you know,

353
00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:56,040
Speaker 3: SIS people of all the privilege, TRANS people of none

354
00:20:56,080 --> 00:20:58,080
Speaker 3: of the privilege, and it can be used to kind

355
00:20:58,119 --> 00:21:02,719
Speaker 3: of create this strict dichotomy that ends up excluding and

356
00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:06,480
Speaker 3: invisibilizing some people's experiences. And I feel the same thing

357
00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:09,440
Speaker 3: is happening with TME and TMA. So I don't think

358
00:21:09,520 --> 00:21:13,160
Speaker 3: that those terms need to necessarily be like, I don't

359
00:21:13,160 --> 00:21:16,719
Speaker 3: think there's anything bad about those terms per se in

360
00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:19,399
Speaker 3: and of themselves, but I think sometimes they can be

361
00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:24,880
Speaker 3: used in ways. And part of why I reference this

362
00:21:24,880 --> 00:21:28,000
Speaker 3: this SYS and trans essay that I wrote many years ago.

363
00:21:28,520 --> 00:21:30,080
Speaker 2: It appears in my book Outspoken.

364
00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:35,040
Speaker 3: I forget the complete title right now, which is but

365
00:21:35,080 --> 00:21:38,040
Speaker 3: the reason why I bring that up is so sometimes

366
00:21:38,080 --> 00:21:44,560
Speaker 3: what happens is that when people learn about sexism CIS,

367
00:21:44,560 --> 00:21:46,840
Speaker 3: people might be like, oh, I face the sexism right

368
00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:49,439
Speaker 3: if I'm a woman and I don't shave my legs,

369
00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:52,920
Speaker 3: I'm facing s sexism, and so then trans people say, yeah,

370
00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:55,960
Speaker 3: but it kind of plays out differently for us, And

371
00:21:56,000 --> 00:21:59,320
Speaker 3: so sometimes in order to stop people from kind of

372
00:22:00,240 --> 00:22:04,000
Speaker 3: those claims, which I think it is true that you know,

373
00:22:04,080 --> 00:22:06,400
Speaker 3: a woman not shaving their legs, or if a man

374
00:22:06,440 --> 00:22:09,080
Speaker 3: decides to put on a dress one day, regardless of

375
00:22:09,080 --> 00:22:09,800
Speaker 3: whether they're sis.

376
00:22:09,720 --> 00:22:11,840
Speaker 2: Or trans, they could experience.

377
00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:16,439
Speaker 3: Says sexism or transphobia, But it plays out differently for

378
00:22:16,560 --> 00:22:19,040
Speaker 3: people who are actually members of that marginalized group. And

379
00:22:19,320 --> 00:22:22,160
Speaker 3: so then the marginalized group makes the distinction even sharper,

380
00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:28,280
Speaker 3: and it just kind of becomes this escalating situation where

381
00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:31,480
Speaker 3: the language and kind of battles over it become even

382
00:22:31,520 --> 00:22:35,000
Speaker 3: more intense. In a recent piece, one of the most

383
00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:37,920
Speaker 3: recent pieces, if you go to like my medium site

384
00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:41,280
Speaker 3: where my essays usually are now is it talks about

385
00:22:41,480 --> 00:22:46,280
Speaker 3: the trans mass versus trans discourse in terms of what

386
00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:50,360
Speaker 3: I call the cultural feminist doom loop, where the doom

387
00:22:50,400 --> 00:22:55,720
Speaker 3: loop refers to kind of these ideas where everyone like

388
00:22:55,840 --> 00:22:58,600
Speaker 3: both sides are trying to talk about the reason why

389
00:22:58,640 --> 00:23:01,920
Speaker 3: their experiences are legit, and then that seems as though

390
00:23:01,960 --> 00:23:04,960
Speaker 3: the other sides are not legitimate and then that kind

391
00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:08,359
Speaker 3: of cascades in a way that ends up not being

392
00:23:08,480 --> 00:23:13,760
Speaker 3: very productive but takes up a lot of energy on.

393
00:23:14,280 --> 00:23:15,320
Speaker 2: Places like Twitter.

394
00:23:16,720 --> 00:23:19,120
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think I think that's something We've still seen

395
00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:25,439
Speaker 1: about one trillion times variety of toxic ways. But what

396
00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:27,880
Speaker 1: isn't toxic is the new third edition of Whipping Girl

397
00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:30,080
Speaker 1: coming out in March with you can ask your local

398
00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:33,960
Speaker 1: bookstore to pre order now and Yeah, join us tomorrow

399
00:23:34,080 --> 00:23:37,439
Speaker 1: for our discussion with doctor Serrano of the Anatomy of

400
00:23:37,480 --> 00:23:40,439
Speaker 1: moral panics. This has when it could Happen Here, trans

401
00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:41,359
Speaker 1: people are great.

402
00:23:46,280 --> 00:23:48,800
Speaker 5: It could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

403
00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:51,560
Speaker 5: One more podcasts from cool Zone Media visit our website

404
00:23:51,600 --> 00:23:54,680
Speaker 5: poolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

405
00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:57,920
Speaker 5: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

406
00:23:57,920 --> 00:23:59,919
Speaker 5: find sources for It could Happen Here, updated in month

407
00:24:00,480 --> 00:24:03,880
Speaker 5: at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.