WEBVTT - Beating The Book: Warren Sharp, 2020 NFL Strength of Schedule Analysis

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh, check it down, man, now down. Then it's the

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book Podcast. Still at rand Warren Sharp is

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the guest today kind enough to join us as he

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>does each and every year right about this time, to

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about strength of schedule in the upcoming National Football

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>League season. We'll talk about the easiest and the toughest

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>overall schedules, the easiest and the toughest starts, and a

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of different details, whole bunch of different angles

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>within the scope of the National Football League schedule. Think

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll enjoy this, A lot of good tidbits to file

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>away for when, if, and when we have the National

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Football League season. Warren Sharp, enjoy Welcome back to a

0:00:52.240 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers game with Jill Alexander. It is our number two

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of a numbers game right here at Visa the sports

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>betting network, Gil Alexander Serious x M Channel two oh four,

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Visa dot Com, the Visa app, Bobos Link Game plus First.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>This is always a treat. We do this about this

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>time every year with this gentleman. Uh. You can find

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter at sharp football, but really the sites

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are great. Sharp football stats dot Com, Sharp football Analysis

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com puts out a preview guide every year for

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League season. But it's the strength of

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>schedule this time of year that we always have him

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>come in on and he is kind enough to do so.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Yet again, it's our buddy, Warren Sharp. Good morning, Warren.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing man? I'm doing great. You know

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>how are you? I'm doing well. We have a beautiful

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>photo of you. I know you get a lot of

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flak for the mustache, but I appreciate

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're still rocking it. Still rocking it, um,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoying it. Uh, you don't see it if I'll leave

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the house with my map. You don't see it if

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I leave the house with my mask on. But that's

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>why I don't leave the house. Technically, I'm staying right

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>here and say, can sound inside? Yeah, I don't know

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>if that mustaches is quality pandemic germ prevention care if

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. You might have to shave

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that down. Just yeah, well that's as long as you

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>as long as you keep it under the mask. Um,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>it's not a factor. But yeah, if you take the

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>mask off, you know it definitely stuff can get get

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in there and you don't want to have to deal

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. Okay, Well, I'm glad we got that taken

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>care of. Here. Here is we have so much to

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>get to that I want to get started here, Warren. Uh.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And let's just start with the with the statement that

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we should always start with, which is that you know,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years, the mainstream media has

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>always done a very lazy hack about strength of schedule.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>They use the wind lost percentages of teams from projected

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>forward when the schedule comes out, and you have been

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the loudest voices in saying that's crap. It

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>should be done. Perhaps the best barometer is by NFL

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>season win totals established in the betting market. Uh. And

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so through that prism, let's just let's just start with

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>your fist overall, let's start there that we'll work our

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>way down. Okay. The toughest schedule by far is the

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons. And there's a couple of interesting quirks for

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons, but they definitely face the most difficult

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>schedule of opposing teams this year. And it's not easy

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, it's not easy at the end. At

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, they're going up against the four straight teams

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna be fighting for wild card contention at

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>worst in the NFC if we're talking about the Seattle

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks and Dallas Cowboys, the Chicago Bears and the Green

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers um and in a division as difficult as

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFC South is this year, with both the Saints

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Bucks in a virtual arms race for acquiring

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>talent over the offseason to bring in there, it's gonna

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>be hard to win that division. Wild card might be

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the best bet for the Falcons, and you can't take

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>any of these games to start the season lightly because

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>those teams are gonna be buying for the wild card

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. The good news for them as they play

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers a couple of times, but the bad

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>news is Carolina can't be as bad as they were

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>last year without really a quarterback at all. They have

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater there this year. They're improved on defense, So

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I still think that those are winnable games for the Falcons.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, their schedule really is not all

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that easy at all. No real teams that you can

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>tell all this is a slam dunk terrible team besides Carolina,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe Detroit throwing them in there. You've got everybody else

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the seven and a half wins or more most teams

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>are forecasted to be above five hundred that they're going

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to face. That's a brutal schedule. Yeah, look at that.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's Seattle at Dallas, Chicago at Green Beata start

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>uh New Orleans at the Chargers, the Bucks at the

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs at the Bucks to close the West Coast trip

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>throw it in. That is just brutal for the Atlanta Falcons.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Who's two through five real quick, we don't have to

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>dive into him. But who's second to fifth toughest by

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>your Yeah, so the second toughest, we're going up to

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>New York and we're hitting the Giants at second toughest,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Jet the third toughest. And the interesting nugget

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>here on the Jet is that last year, although it

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like it because they didn't have a great

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>overall season, part of their wins were probably helped by

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they played the fifth easiest schedule. They've

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>got the third toughest schedule this year, so they move

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the easiest to the worst in terms of shifting ends

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum. There. Then you've got the fourth toughest

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>is your Las Vegas Raiders making their first season in

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. They or the fourth toughest and the fifth toughest.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Another team from the a f C West, the Denver Broncos.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>To round it out, tough sledding for all five of

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>those teams, specifically the Falcons Gil Alexander Warren sharp it

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>is a numbers game right here, at least in the

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>sports betting network. Uh And you make the point often Warren,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and it should be stated that when you go through

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>these if if someone says it's the thirteenth toughest schedule

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>versus the seventeenth toughest, not that big a deal. The

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>extremes are what matters, right absolutely, because at the end

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the day, any type of strength of schedule this

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>time of the year, with so many unknowns, is not

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be perfect. Right Like last year, I predicted

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the five easiest schedules, and by the end of the

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>year the five easiest schedules. I did nail three of

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the five teams. In terms of the teams that were

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the five easiest, But you're going to have a lot

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of variants in the middle of the pack, and so

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly you said, the difference between thirteenth and nineteenth or

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth at the end of the day is relatively meaningless. Um,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to make a difference as to whether

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>these teams actually have good or bad seasons. So it's

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not really emphasizing that too much. It's definitely the outliers

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>or the extremes. Yeah, and we're throwing this and we're

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>throwing this up at Visa dot com and the Visa

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>app right now. And this is sort of portending right

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>now when we get into the easiest schedules. But you

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>make the point in one of your tweets here at

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>sharp Football. UH note small differences between teams are irrelevant,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>just like the example you game. But we talked about

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta five games versus teams rejected UH sub five hundred

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>nine against nine plus win season win total teams. The

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>converse of that the Indianapolis Colts, which I'm guessing will

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be your easiest schedule. Then they play eight games versus

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>teams projected UH to be sub five meaning win total

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 1>of less than eight games, a fewer than eight games

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>eight wins rather and only four in the nine plus range.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Is Indianapolis your easiest overall schedule. Yes, they are. As

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, they're just very fortunate with some of the

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>opponents that they face. Who knows what the Jacksonville Jaguars

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>are actually going to be doing this year from a

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>football perspective, but they get to go against them weeks

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>one and week seventeen, So hopefully you get the season

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>started off well and then you host them week seventeen

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.559
<v Speaker 1>in between the toughest games that you're going to play.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Take a look at this, there are three non division

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>games that you're going to play that they're the toughest

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on your schedule. Uh, You've got the Minnesota Vike games,

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Ravens, and the Green Bay Packers. All three

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of those games are home games for the Indianapoli Cold.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So home field, as I'm sure you've discussed before, probably

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not as big as a factor this season Number one,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Number two. As I've studied predicted heading into last year,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>home field is not as big even regard regardless of

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, it hasn't been as big of a factor

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>as it once was. Um, but not having to travel

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to those opponents, Uh, it's just a slight benefit that

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>any team who gets to play at home is going

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from. And so you're playing three of the

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>toughest non division opponents and you get to host all

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>of those games. That's a factor here as well, but

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of the overall strength of those opponents,

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely looking good for the Indianapolis Colts. Yeah. Look

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that the single toughest game on that schedule, arguably, maybe

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe not arguably is the home game in week night

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens after a by and a game against

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. So like it couldn't even be more favorable

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>than that, right, I mean, they get they catch a

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>break in every single way. It seems like who's two

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>through five of easiest behind the Colts. So number two

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is another a f C South team that's play the

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Jags twice, and that's the Tennessee Titans. Number three the

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns. And they're really interesting one at number three

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>because we know they didn't live up to expectations last season.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But last season they played the tenth toughest schedule of

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>opposing teams and now they get to play the third

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>easiest schedules. So that's a big uh. It's the largest

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact, moved from hardest to easiest over one off season.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>They have a new coaching staff. They're doing things a

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>lot differently with this staff in terms of bringing heavier personnel.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>They've added an extra tight end, better alignment through the draft.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>They brought in a fullback in free agency. Uh, They're

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do some things I think that accentuate what

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield does well. Baker does so much better when

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he thinks everything is going to be blocked up. When

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he is worried about his protection. His passing numbers dropped precipitously.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So they're a big team that's moved up. The Baltimore

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are the fourth easiest schedule, one of the best

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league, it's not the best, gets to

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>play a much easier schedule this upcoming season. Now, they

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>had the eighth easiest schedule last year, so it's not

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a big jump in terms of ease of schedule for them,

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but they do get to face the top five easiest

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>schedule and then the Chargers play the fifth easiest schedule

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season. M interesting, uh and Cleveland. I think

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>when you go at sharp football stats dot Com, you

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can see you you break them down and you do

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it so well and with visual graphics of the units

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're facing, and I think with with Cleveland, you

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pointed out a third easiest overall, they go from facing

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult schedule last year to really easy one

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. But specifically it's the past defenses as well

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think turn on it said, don't they were? Baker,

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield and company get to face a much easier group

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of those Yes, absolutely, um. Last season they played the

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>number one toughest defenses as a whole, and the number

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>three toughest past defenses virtually by any metric. Where they're

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at efficiency, where they're gonna look at yards

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for pass attempt, whether you're gonna look at these teams

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>again defending explosive passes, how many explosive passing games? Just

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at that particular metrics, they faced the third toughest

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>schedule in all of those metrics. This year, they get

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to play the number one easiest schedule of past defenses,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and the teams that were the worst against explosive passing

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of defending big gains of twenty pluss yards,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they faced the easiest schedule of those past defenses as well.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really expecting Kevin's defense. You come in here

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and make the changes required to make things easier on

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield and improve the ceiling of this passing attack.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And when you factor in that, he's moving from number

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>three most difficult to number one easiest. Inherently, even if

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you did nothing, Baker is gonna look better this year

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>based on the from the schedules of teams that he's

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>going to play, and you factor in all these coaching

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>change is that are going to be occurring in player

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>improvement in terms of protections. It's definitely going to raise

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling for Baker Mayfield in and might have some

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sick fantasy implications for those who are thinking fantasy football

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>right there for a guy like Baker Mayfield as well.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>UM talking to Warren Sharp of course at sharp Football

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. What's the name of the podcast, Lauren, what's

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>your podcast that you're doing these days? Well, we just

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>started one up. I actually took a hiatus from all

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>podcasting last year in terms of hosting UM and and

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was guesting on others. But this year we're doing the

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Sharp Angles podcast. At least what we're doing for the

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>time being UM to kind of control some of the

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff we get out there, so you can subscribe to

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that on virtually any platform. We also have a fantasy

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>only podcast, uh called Priestnap Motion where we've got a

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of fantasy guys talking talking fantasy football and how

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that relates to real football and that sort of thing.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But um, yeah, podcasting is great. I haven't had time

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to do as much as I would have

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>liked to in the in the past couple of years,

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but um you know when I when I get the opportunity,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I certainly like talking football. So alright, So one of

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that I do now with NFL seasons just

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>from a football betting standform, from his fan standpoint, we

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>all like to know what teams. It's one thing to

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about the overall schedules, but we're all focused in

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on tough and easy starts as well. I know one

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the most fun and I always

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>talk about this through the years on my podcast being

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the Book Podcast and here on a numbers game at Visa.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the greatest betting vehicles I'm ever involved in

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is this sort of off the grid football stock market things.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So for that I love to know the ebbs and

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>flows of the season. Just starting just talking about the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>starts of NFL seasons, who which teams were in have

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the toughest scheduling starts, let's say over the first quarter

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and then what what teams have the

0:13:54.640 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>easiest starts? Yeah, and and look, I love that. I

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's a big factor in terms of figuring out,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, when quarterbacks, like rookie quarterbacks might be getting

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to start. I love the fact that you get to

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>see which teams might get off hot, which siems might

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>get off cold. A team that's really had some changes

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this offseason was the Houston Texans in terms of like

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a perineal playoff team that hasn't had any success in

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the postseason, has hasn't been lucky in some certain situations

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, uh, some of the games that they've played, uh,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>blowing some leads and whatnot. But if you look at

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>their schedule, they play the number one toughest schedule to

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>start the season and it's number one toughest bike bar

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing it without DeAndre Hopkins, now their best

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. They're playing at Kansas City to open the

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>season Week one on Thursday night. Then they have to

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>host the Baltimore Ravens, So you've got the two best

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>teams in the a f C possibly all of football

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks one and two. Then you have to go on

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the road to play the Pittsburgh Steelers after you play

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, and then you have to host the Minnesota Vikings,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>another very difficult opponent that's certainly stacked. So, I mean,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at if you look at one to

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, it's pretty much a consistent line that goes

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>down in terms of just looking at how these teams

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are ranking if you're doing it visually, and then the

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Texans are off the charts much harder than anybody else,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge gap between them and number thirty one, So

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>they're by far the most difficult. And I will know

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>gil that it's really interesting this season as you compare

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it to prior years with how this season, let's pretend

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we're starting Week one, but how these teams are going

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to prepare themselves for the season at

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this time of the year. Some of the coaches that

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I speak with their typically working on their pass game.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>They're doing a lot of seven on seven's, They're perfecting

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>their pass game right now. And when it gets to

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>pads and you're in training camp, that's when you're working

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on the run game. Well, some

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of this uh timing and figuring out what you're gonna

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do from a passing perspective that is being lost. Right

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing films sessions, you're doing classroom sessions right now

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on zoom and other poor olds, but you're not being

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>able to work with that passing attack quite as well.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things I look at is you

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>know which teams are going to come out with the

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>most difficult schedule of run defenses or past defenses, and

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>which teams might have the easiest schedule of run defenses.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And like the Baltimore Ravens, for example, are very fortunate

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they're playing the first five weeks they play the number

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one easiest schedule of run defenses in the NFL. They

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>literally play five straight opponents that ranked bottom ten in

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of run defense last year. So I mean, the

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>team that already wants to be able to run the

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>football is getting a really easy slate and should be

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>able to get off to a really good start in

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season as a result of that. Yeah, Baltimore,

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, guys back in the studio, we

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have a tweet from Ward about Baltimore specifically, easiest run

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>d schedule over the first five weeks, easiest schedule of

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>run defenses is weren't just pointed out Cleveland at Houston,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Casey at Washington, Cincinnati as if Lamar Jackson needed that

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>help to start the season, and uh Ravens running attack.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the easiest overall schedule over the last five

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks Dallas at Cleveland on eleven days, rest Jacksonville, the

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Giants at Cincinnati. Back to the to the Texans who

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have the easiest excuse me, the hardest start, the toughest

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>start at Casey, Baltimore at Pittsburgh Minnesota. I mean, that's brutal.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And you point out thirty one, which is the Redskins

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not even close, Like the next toughest start is not

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>even close to a start as to as tough as

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the Texans start. Is. Just to give people a sense

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>if you look at those first four games and you

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>do the whole win loss, win lost thing, all right,

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>let's give the Texans a win there in some in

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in one of those four games. Let's say they go

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>one in three, which is you know, realistic when you

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have that tough of a start uh eight dot com.

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You start the season one in three Warren fourteen percent

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of teams that start one in three get into the postseason.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>That's why that matters so much. Yeah. Absolutely, I think

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people overall overlook UH schedule. You know,

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so crazy because in in college football we

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about schedule all the time late this season because

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to pick the four most qualified teams to

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs. Right, But in the NFL, since everything's

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>done automatically and automated based upon you know, how you

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>fall out in tiebreakers and whatnot, we never really discussed

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule in pro football. But as we know,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>these schedules are determined except for two games, they're determined

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>years in advance, and they vary between one year to

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the next in terms of team a versus team being

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a different conference. In those limitsed opponents you're playing in

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>those sixteen games, there's a wide disparity in terms of

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what your strength of schedule is actually going to be

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>from one year to the next. Um and then you

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>throw in the fact that the fourth place team plays

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a fourth place schedule in the first place team two

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>more games against most difficult opponents that they could play

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in those respective divisions. Strength of schedule is a factor

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing these teams is a factor, um, and

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it definitely doesn't get the airtime that it deserves. UH.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And you also point out another tweet that we have

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders face. If you were to extended out to

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the first eleven weeks, they've got the toughest schedule first

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>eleven weeks, but then that turns on its head, second

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>easiest from weeks twelve through seventeen. So it varies obviously

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>depending on what range of games you're talking about. So

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>no gifts for the Las Vegas Raiders there, um. Just

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to wrap this up, the easiest start to a schedule

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>would be, UH. Number one is the Arizona Cardinals. And

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>then you've got the Indianapolis Cold to have another easy schedule.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We talked about them before their whole season isn't isn't tough. Um.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Buffalo Bills clocking in at number three,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars number four, and the Chicago Bears at

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>number five. And one note on the Chicago Bears, Uh,

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they had the I think it's the eighth toughest schedule

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>last year. They have the sixth easiest this year, so

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get a chance to mention them after the

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>l A Chargers, but they do fall in there as

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the sixth easiest. So they have the second easiest swing

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>from twenty of any team, and they have the fifth

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>easiest in the first month of the year. So interesting.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>And and again, since we did this with Houston and

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the toughest start, UH, let's take Arizona, which you said

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>had the easiest start first five weeks at San Francisco,

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's difficult. No one's saying that's not. But then

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>after that Redskins at home, Lions at home, at Panthers

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>at Jets. Uh, don't get much easier than that. So

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>going back to the five dot com stats, if you

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>go four in one, and I'm not saying Arizona is,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but let's just say they do because they have winnable games.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>If you go four and one to start a season,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy of those teams get in the playoffs, per dot Com.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the starts matter, and they matter for

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so many reasons, some just team unity, psychological reasons, um.

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's all very fascinating. The there's so many little

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>tidbits that you have here, Warren that will go through

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>um because I want to after the break, we'll squeeze

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in a break here, but afterwards, I want to get

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>into this notion of West coast travel to play early

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>games on the East coast. Conventional wisdom wise, that's been

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing that people who UH talk handicapping have always said, Oh,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the worst thing in the world. You

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have a team that debunks that, and you actually have

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a situation, uh in modern day NFL history that is

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>far worse than that. Actually, we'll get into that. We'll

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>get into this notion of teams that play and the

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that this applies to three consecutive road games without

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a buy and how they fare a TS in weeks one, two,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and three, uh in that situation. And then there's this

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>notion of just playing teams two out of three weeks

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. Really interesting scheduling quirks, and I mentioned the

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets earlier who played the Dolphins, have a buy and

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>play the Dolphins again. We'll get into all that with

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a great Warren sharp at sharp football coming back right

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>after the break right here exclusively on a numbers game

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>at Visa these Sports Betting Network. Welcome back to a

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game with Jill Alexander, back on a numbers game,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Gil Alexander, just like the man said, Warren Sharp kind

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to join us this morning. We were talking off

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>air about these quirks again. The Jets playing the Dolphins

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>back to back but with a buy in between, but

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't play another team before playing the Dolphins consecutively.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons, as mentioned earlier, they play the Saints two

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.239
<v Speaker 1>out of three weeks late in the season and then

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>turn around and play the Bucks two out of three

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks late in the season. Just really interesting scheduling quirks, Warren.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's throw these up rapid fire. And let's start

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with what I teased before the break about the notion

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of teams from the Pacific time zone playing early games

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Eastern time zone. And there is a team

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that here's all that talk and just scoffs at it,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>isn't there? Yeah, the Seattle Sea Hawks. Since they drafted

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, they have a league best nineteen and six

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>record on the road in the Eastern time zone. They

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>just do not seem to get rattled by having to

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>play games. And most of these games on the Eastern

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>time zone are of course the early one pm kickoff

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>games um, and they do extremely well with Russell Wilson

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>uh in that time slot. And you were saying, the

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>situation that is much more difficult is what is it

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Eastern time zone teams playing prime time West Coast games?

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that it yea absolutely And we actually have that

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>several times this year because you know, our team like

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the forty Diners and the Rams both are doing well

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and so they've got a lot of primetime games. And

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>when these teams host teams from the Eastern time zone,

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it's actually from a Circadian bi rhythm issue actually a

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>much bigger deal uh than than people think, um in

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of it's more difficult for an East Coast team

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to play a prime time team in the West Coast

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>than it is for West Coast team to go to

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast and play a one pm kickoff. So

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it used to be reversed, but that that East Coast

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>playing West Coast is super super difficult. So example week

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>for Philadelphia at San Francisco on a Sunday night, like

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the real difficulty. Uh, those are the real

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult games. Historically. By the way, a lot of what

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about is going to be baked into lines already,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but it's little nuggets like that one right there that

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>might not exactly be baked in. Because people are so

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the West Coast teams going to the East

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Coast early. Everybody knows about that, and that's baked in.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It's those reverse ones that might not be baked into

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the lines. What about the notion of travel miles. We

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>always hear all these people talking about, Oh, this team

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>has the most travel miles. You have a cautionary note

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>about that, Yeah, because nowadays it's probably happened the last

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. UH, teams are allowed to request us

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>from the schedule makers that if they do have to

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>play a couple of teams in the same location, like

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>whether they're going to the East Coast or whether they're

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going to the West Coast, that they want to be

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>able to play those games back to back so they

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to come all the way back across the country.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And a number of teams have actually requested that of

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the league, and the league has granted it. I think

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>almost in every single one of the cases. So there's

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a number of teams, but a couple of examples occur

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>between weeks two and three. UH, team like the Rams

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>comes out east, a team like the forty comes out East.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>They're playing back to back opponents. In one case, they're

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>playing at the same exact stadium. They play the Giants

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Jet in back to back weeks. The two

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>teams share a stadium, so they're just staying out on

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast. So if you're looking at data and numbers,

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>just like looking at travel miles of where teams located,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>where their opponents are, and just doing the map on that,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not always going to account for the way these

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>teams are scheduling their travel. Wait warrant, teams can request that.

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I have never heard that. Yes, that's true, up team,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a true. Teams are able to request that now

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and the league has been pretty much granting it. And

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.239
<v Speaker 1>so there's been teams from the East Coast that has

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to go to the West Coast and play a couple

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of teams out there, like including the Seahawks that this

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>season are being allowed to do those in back to

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>back weeks and stay out West so um, it's it's

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely a thing that's started to happen. Yeah, alright, last thing,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we got sixty seconds here, Warren U. Four teams play

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>three straight row games without a bye this year, Arizona,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, New England, and Washington. Here are your numbers.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Tell us the A T S on games one, two,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and three of that subset. Well, just so you know,

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>A T S in general of teams on the road

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>cover the spread. Here, we've got fifty six percent cover

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first game, but in games two and three

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it drops well below the forty six. So what we're

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>noting is that that first game, teams know they've got

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>a tough road ahead three straight road games. Maybe the

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>coach is getting them better mentally prepared, maybe they're doing

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>good prep heading into that first road game. They do

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better in terms of performance. And this

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is over years and years. This isn't just a couple

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of years, so there's good data behind this. But when

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you go to games two and three, that's when it

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>does take a toll. Prep falls off a little bit,

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>focus in some cases falls off a little bit, and

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>these teams end up doing worse than average. Yeah, dips

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>from and then fort in weeks two and three. Of

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that's upset, Warren, appreciate it has always been best to

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you in the family, to your little girl at Sharp football.

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Warrant so much. Hey, thanks for having me.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>De'll take care. Two