WEBVTT - Why is Meta's Andy Stone wanted by Russia?

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Tech are you? If you've been listening to tech Stuff

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for a while, or if you keep up with tech

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>news in general, the name Andy Stone might ring a

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>bell now. Unlike a lot of the other folks that

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I talk about on the show, you know, like geniuses

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like Ada Lovelace or Nikola Tesla, or you know, company

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>founders like Gordon Moore or Steve Wozniak, or even controversial

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>corporate leaders like Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg, Andy Stone

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't that deeply rooted in the world of tech. In fact,

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>until twenty fourteen, he spent his professional career working in

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>government and campaign positions and stuff related to that. And now,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>according to reports, Russia's Interior Ministry has added Andy Stone's

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>name to its wanted list. So I thought we could

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do a short episode about Stone, the job he's held

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>since twenty fourteen, and what might have led him to

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be considered a criminal in Russia. Here in the States,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>there are people who certainly take issues with some of

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the things Stone has said, but I'm not sure anyone

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>would go so far as to call him a criminal.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Here in the US, Stone's forte is at least presumably

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in communications. He attended George Washington University, a prestigious college

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, and he studied political communication while

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he was there. That school happens to be located in Washington,

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>d C. There are a couple of other schools in

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that area where typically the students who are going to

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>those schools often end up working with the government in

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>some form or another. It's pretty common, like a lot

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of jobs are directly or indirectly connected to the US

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>government or at least a government there. Because my partner

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>attended Georgetown, which is in DC, and worked for the

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>French embassy for a while, so again it's a place

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>where you make connections. Stone worked for presidential candidate John

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Kerry's campaign in two thousand and three, and in late

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four he joined M and R Strategic

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Services as a consultant. Now that's a company that primarily

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>focuses on political communications, so not affiliated with any specific

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>candidate or party, but is there to act as a

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>consultant for the purposes of creating political communications, so again

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>very much in line with what he had already been doing.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>He would then become the communications director for Congress in

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, and you kind of see where

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this is going. The nature of politics here in America

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>means that any role you hold in government, like if

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you're actually connected to a governmental party, it's likely on

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>borrowed time election cycles change up who's in charge on

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the rag. Now there are, of course, federal employees who

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>typically hold positions from administration to administration, and they don't

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily change each time there's a change in leadership, although

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>there are efforts to make that be very different. Anyway,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that's getting into a whole different realm. But from two

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three to twenty fourteen, pretty much all of

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Andy Stone's work focused on political communications, either as part

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of a campaign or part of a governmental body or

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the private sector, but still catering to politics.

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Now that changed in the spring of twenty fourteen, That

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is when Meta, then known as Facebook they had not

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>changed their name yet, offered Stone a gig as a

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>policy communications manager for Facebook. Now, by this time, Facebook

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>had already sailed past the incredible milestone of having a

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>billion active users per month. That had happened actually back

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twelve, so it was definitely already a huge

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 1>company by twenty fourteen. They had also acquired Instagram. Also

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twelve, and just before Stone would join

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>the company, Facebook had announced it was acquiring Wattsapp. This

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was a truly huge acquisition deal in the billions of dollars,

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>so a lot was going on. In fact, when Stone

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>joined Facebook, that very same month, the company announced its

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>intention to acquire Oculus VR, so a lot of the

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>components that make up you know, various foundational elements of

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Meta today, those were all being acquired around the same

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>time that Andy Stone joined the company. Now, on top

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of all that, the company was also launching some very

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>progressive features. For example, one month before Stone joined Facebook,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the company updated its platform to allow for different gender

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>designations in support of the LGBTQ plus community, So you

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>suddenly had a lot more pronouns that you could use

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>when you were creating your profile and thus represent yourself

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>more accurately. This was a pretty progressive approach, especially in

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, and Andy Stone had focused a lot of

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>his career on how to communicate progressive policies to the public,

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>because most of the time he was focusing on socially

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>progressive democratic campaigns and policies, So this kind of was

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a type of synergy when he joined Facebook. I don't

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have very much background about Andy Stone beyond this. I'm

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sure there's stuff that's out there. Right now, the news

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>cycle is just flooded with this story about Russia putting

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>him on a wanted list. But when I started trying

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to dig around and just learn a little bit more

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about him, I mean, I've seen his name dozens of times.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>When I tried to learn more about him, there really

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a whole lot to find. Again, I'm sure if

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I did a super deep dive, I could change that,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting to me that someone who has

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>dedicated his career in public communications has also managed to

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>maintain a pretty low profile. Stone's name pops up a

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>lot since twenty fourteen. These days, according to LinkedIn anyway,

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>his title is communications director, and that means that when

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you come across a story that includes something like Facebook

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>says it's disappointed in the EU's decision or whatever, there's

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a darn good chance that Facebook was actually Andy Stone

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>who said this. He's been the spokesperson for the cum

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in many of its trials and tribulations over the last

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>several years. Stone's job is really to serve as the

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>mouthpiece for the company and to craft communications on the

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>company's behalf, and I imagine his job has grown a

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more challenging over recent years in the wake of

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a series of scandals and difficult events, such as the

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>unraveling of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Now, if you don't

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the Cambridge Analytica story, good for you. But it

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>refers to a political consulting company that leaned on an

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>app that was used to scrape data from Facebook without

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>first getting user permissions. And they were able to do

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this because for a while, Facebook really didn't provide adequate

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>protections with its application programming interface. So essentially, before Facebook

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>actually addressed this issue, a developer could create an app

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for Facebook that, when installed, could access way more information

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>than what was actually needed for the app to work.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, maybe you create a game, a very simple

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>game that is within Facebook or just uses Facebook credentials

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in or for you to log into the game, but

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as part of that installation process, the app gets permissions

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>from the user to access all kinds of data, like

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe everything that is personal information related to the user

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>gets sent to the developer. Maybe it gives the developer

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>access to view all of that user's friends and contacts

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, and none of that is necessary for the

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>game to work. But really, until the mid twenty tens,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook kind of let that go, like they just let

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>developers get access to all sorts of information, whether it

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was necessary for the app to work or not. So

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Cambridge Analytica, the company was making

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>use of a survey app, and this particular survey would

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>actually offer a fee to users. It would pay people

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to take the survey. Folks like getting money, so that

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was a huge incentive. A lot of folks said sure,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and they ended up installing this little app so they

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>could take the survey. Now, what they may not have

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>realized is that by installing the app, they were essentially

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>opening up all of their connections to scrutiny, because now

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge Analytica, through this app, could view not just the

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>survey taker's information, but all the people who that person

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was friends with. They could view those profiles as if

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they were the person who took the survey. So it

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>suddenly opened up the opportunity to scrape data on a

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>much larger scale. In fact, millions of accounts were affected

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>by this, and so you didn't have to be the

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>person who downloaded the survey. You just had to have

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a friend who did it. And if they did it,

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you were affected too. So Cambridge Analytica accesses millions of

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>people's profiles without their permission, and Andy Stone had the

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>un inviewable task of announcing findings to the media about

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that situation. So when Facebook did an investigation and estimated

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that around eighty seven million accounts were affected, this number

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>would fluctuate quite a bit throughout the investigations, but this

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was an early one. Well, Andy Stone was the person

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>who had to actually deliver that information to the media.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Not a whole lot of fun. Anyway, we're gonna come

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>back to talk more about Andy Stone in just a moment.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Before we can do that, let's take a quick break

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to thank our sponsors. So I was talking before the

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>break about Andy Stone having to deliver rough news about

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cambridge Analytica to the media as this scandal was unfolding.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But This was around the same time where Stone began

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to build a reputation for being let's call it assertive

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on platforms like Twitter and using that platform to refute

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or criticize Facebook's own critics, kind of like striking back

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>at the critics. One of the journalists who covered the

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge Analytica story was Carol Cadwaller, So on top of

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>being a journalist, Cadwaller became a member of the independent

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Board for Facebook. You might remember this board reviews

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's decisions to determine if the company is actually aligning

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with its own policies. You may also remember that the

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>board can make recommendations to Facebook, but the company is

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>under no obligation to actually adopt those recommendations, which obviously

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>brings up the question how effective the board can actually be.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Cadwaller says that Stone attempted to discredit her

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>by sharing quote deliberate deceptions regarding Cambridge Analytica and deliberately

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>trolled me. It was just in no way appropriate for

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the corporate pr of a trillion dollar company to behave

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like that toward a journalist end quote. So this would

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>not be the last time the journalists as well as

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>others would complain of Andy Stone's approach, particularly on Twitter.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Another high profile case was when former Facebook employee Francis

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Hogan came forward in late twenty twenty one with a

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower report on the company. She shared thousands of internal

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>documents that didn't exactly put Facebook in a good light.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we're still learning about stuff that was in

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>those documents, and a lot of the stuff in there

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>suggests that the people in Facebook now known as Meta

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>were more aware of negative aspects that the company and

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>its platforms had on certain users than had been previously disclosed. Anyway,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Andy Stone frequently had to go to bat for the

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>company and defend it, as report after report filed in

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>about issues like the company's influence on young users in particular.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure that Stone's efforts were always effective

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>when it came to deflecting her testimony in front of Congress,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because again he took to Twitter to try and discredit

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>her or to hang some doubt upon her and her point.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>One message he posted to Twitter, of course, now known

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as x read quote just pointing out the fact that

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Francis Hogan did not work on child safety or Instagram

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>or research these issues, and has no direct knowledge of

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the topic from her work at Facebook. End quote, which,

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were to ask me, that seems like a

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn weak defense. Because if someone dumped tens of

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of actual corporate documents in my lap and then

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>told me that this stuff comes from inside company so

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and so, and it says the company has knowingly engaged

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in some questionable stuff and continues to do so, even

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>knowing the potential consequences for that, I wouldn't really be

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>concerned about that person's expertise in whatever the field was. Right,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>assuming that I could determine that the documents are legitimate,

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that they in fact came from within the company that

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was claimed, then it doesn't matter the level of expertise

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of the person who brought them to me. I would

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>be more concerned about the actual content of the documents,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and the people who produce those documents presumably were experts

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in their field. It doesn't matter if the messenger is

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>an expert. In fact, Andy Stone should know that quite

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>well because he has been the messenger many times. He

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is not the person who creates the different message or

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the different policies. I should say, he creates the messages

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>around them, So you should know that a person's expertise

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't really the matter of concern when you're talking about

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>documents that have some pretty damning content in them. Now,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Stone's posts on Twitter prompted some pretty interesting responses around

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the journalist field and beyond. So for example, Bob Pickard,

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>who is the CEO of Signal Leadership Communication, This is

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a consulting group that helps executives create communications to the

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>public so that they can do so in a way

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that is responsible and accountable, that's going to have the

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>best impact, that's not going to run a foul of

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the law of that kind of stuff like this is

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>high level communications we're talking about here. Well, Pickman said,

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>quote Facebook's crisis comms on this issue are embarrassingly bad.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is talking about Facebook's poor PR, which is often

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a proxy for other issues, but I think the comms

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves are in d crap end quote. Now, that wasn't

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just referring to Andy Stone, but certainly Stone was being

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lumped in with this criticism. Several PR professionals question why

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Stone was even posting on Twitter at all about this stuff,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>why he was taking this particular tactic. They said it

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was antithetical to the way you would typically try to

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>build up a communications department within a company. They said that,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually you want to build relationships with the

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>press so that you can get more favorable coverage, and

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.479
<v Speaker 1>using Twitter to snipe at journalists who have posted stories

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that critique the company isn't really conducive toward doing that.

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>They compared it more to his work in politics, and

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that in politics, often communications leads to a quote unquote

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>zero sum game where there has to be a winner

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and a loser, and in those sort of of avenues,

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it was more common to see this kind of banter

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth between a PR person and the press.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Less so when it comes to corporate communications now. Earlier

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, Stone served as the messenger for another sticky

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>situation see Meta slash. Facebook has a strict policy against

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>data scraping. The most valuable asset that Meta has is

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>access to our information. We are the product. You've often

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>probably heard that that if you go someplace and the

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>thing is free, then it turns out you are the

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>product that's for sale. That's definitely the case when it

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>comes to Meta's platforms. All of our interactions, everything we

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>post to the platform, everything we look at and engage

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with on those platforms. All of that is valuable, right,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That's all data that's incredibly valuable because Meta can pack

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it this up and then sell it to advertisers. So

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the more you use Meta's products, the more valuable you become,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>and the more information you share about other people in

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>your life, the more valuable you become. We are a

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>gold mine for Meta, and Meta guards that gold mine jealously.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The fact that people don't flip out. More over, how

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>their personal information is exploited for the benefit of a

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>truly massive corporation amazes me. I guess, I guess not

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone fully understands it, and the people who do understand

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it ultimately think, ah, it's not that big a deal.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just some personal information. But it's really not.

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really a big deal. It's really not

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>something you should just dismiss. It's important, and the point

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>where it can become important for you specifically as opposed

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to just in the general, then it's too late. But

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a potentially fragile arrangement. Meta records that Meta

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>recognizes that if people wake up to the fact that

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they really need to protect their personal information in a

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive way. And if you start to see governments

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world pass laws to help actually achieve this goal,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Meta's revenue is in danger. So Meta is very very

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>careful to not really bring too much attention to this

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>part of its business, at least not in a way

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that is obvious to users. But it also means Meta

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is very jealous of this information. If some other company

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>swoops in and starts to crawl Meta's platforms in order

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to build out databases, that can threaten Meta's own business model,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>because if we notice that this other company is doing it,

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're worried about this other company, we might start

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>asking questions about Meta itself. So take Clearview AI for example.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>This company created a huge facial recognition database. But in

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>order to do that, you first have to grab a

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of pictures of people. Now that's obvious, right,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Like you have to get the pictures in order to

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>actually have a database of facial recognition photos. But where

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>do you get the pictures from? Right? You know, you're

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>not just going door to door and snapping photos of people. No,

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>what clearview AI did and the CEO admitted as much.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The company scraped various social network platforms, including Facebook to

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>build out its database of thirty billion photographs, and clearview

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>AI's customers included authoritarian organizations you know we're talking about

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like law enforcement agencies, that kind of thing that would

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>use clearview AI's databases to try and do things like

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like identify suspects that sort of stuff. So it kind

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of ties into issues like a surveillance state. So obviously

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>this kind of story can have a negative impact on

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>companies like Meta, and Meta has made it clear that

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it is against its terms of service for other companies

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to scrape Meta's platforms, you know, like Facebook or Instagram

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>or to get data. But what if journalists discover that

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Meta is also engaged in data scraping from other websites.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>And this brings us to the curious case of Meta

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and a data collection company called Bright Data. So Meta

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>recently sued Bright Data in January of this year, twenty

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and accused the company of scraping data from

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Meta platforms. However, it has also come to light that

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Bright Data and Meta have been engaged in a subcontractor

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship that Bright Data has worked for Meta and has

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>pulled data from other websites so that Meta could do

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like build out brand profiles and reportedly do things

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>like identify potential bad actors out there. So, in other words,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Bright Data was pulling data or scraping data off of

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>other sites in order to supply that information to Meta.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So Stone was pulled into action to comment on this,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and he said, quote, the collection of data from websites

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>can serve legitimate integrity and commercial purposes if done lawfully

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and in accordance with those websites terms end quote. This

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was a really awkward situation because he had to defend

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Meta's work with a data collection company, while Meta is

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>famous for going after companies that were data scraping its

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>own platforms. So, in other words, Meta saying, it's not

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>cool for you to do that to us, but it's

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>totally cool if we do that to other websites. You

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>know that's fine. So do as we say, now as

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we do. Okay, we're gonna take another quick break. When

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we'll talk more about the actual lead

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>into Andy Stone being named a wanted individual by Russia's government.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The first a word from our sponsors. Okay, why was

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Andy Stone, a communications director for Meta, put on a

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>wanted list. In fact, some outlets call it a most

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted list for Russia. Well, it relates to Russia's invasion

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine and potentially to some temporary changes to Meta's

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>policies regarding violent content on Facebook or calls for violence

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to be more specific on Facebook, and so in that regard.

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>If that's all true, this very much becomes a shoot

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Messenger kind of story. I should point out apparently

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Stone's name has actually been on this wanted list since

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>February twenty twenty two. We only learned about it this

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>week when a media outlet that keeps an eye on

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>such things posted a story about it and it went

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in viral from there. But to be clear, the actual

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>charges against Stone remain undisclosed. The media reports simply that

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Stone is quote wanted under an article of the Criminal

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Code of the Russian Federation end quote. That's not helpful.

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not descriptive at all. We don't know what code,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what article he's wanted under, right, we don't know what

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>law he supposedly broke under the Russian Federation law. But

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>let's look back at the early days of Russia's invasion

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine to kind of at least get a working

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis here. There had been aggressive actions between Russia and

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine dating back since at least twenty fourteen, but the

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>actual invasion began on February twenty fourth, twenty twenty two.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>On March tenth, Meta made a really big change. And traditionally,

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>posts on Meta's platforms that include calls for violence against

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>people are a huge violation of Meta's rules that Meta

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>would take such things down immediately or at least investigate them,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming that someone had flagged the post. That's at least

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>according to the policy. Whether or not that's actually how

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it plays out depends on the situation, but often it

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>means that that Meta ends up sending the flag to

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>someone like a subcontractor to review the incident and determine

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it was actually against Meta's policies and

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>then figure out where to go from There. Doesn't mean

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>removing the post or banning the person for a given

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of time. It all just depends on the situation.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But on March tenth, Meta announced it would allow users,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>at least in certain countries to post calls for violence

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>against Russians and specifically Russian soldiers, and this was all

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>within the context of the Ukraine invasion. Reuters reported that

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>internal messages within Meta even indicated that posts that would

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>call for the deaths of Russia's president Vladimir Putin or

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashinko were fair game. Again,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something that typically is very much against Meta's policies,

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and Reuters reported that, well, they didn't name the Meta spokesperson,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but later it was revealed to be Andy Stone. They

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>revealed a spokesperson release the statement quote as a result

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we have temporarily made

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>allowances for forms of political expression that would normally violate

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>our rules, like violent speech such as death to the

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian invaders. We still won't allow credible calls for violence

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>against Russian civilians end quote. A couple of weeks later,

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a Russian court declared that Meta qualifies as an extremist organization. Effectively,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this banned Meta's platforms inside Russia, with the exclusion of

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Watsapp because that's not a public platform. Facebook and Instagram

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>both banned, and Watsapp still was allowed to operate within

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the country. Interestingly, Again, by that time, Andy Stone had

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>already been on the wanted list according to this independent

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>website it's called media Zona. By the way, media Zona

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>monitors the Russian prison system, among other things. And again

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>they had said that he had been on the list

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>since February twenty twenty two, even before Metta had made

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the announced change to the policies, and right around the

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>time when Russia was actually invading Ukraine. So while that

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>was the precipitating factor that would see Russia slap at

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>terrorist label on the company, according to media Zona, Stone

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>had already been in Russia's crosshairs. It's just that no

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one in Russia actually announced this, so it never made

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the news. So, in other words, they had put his

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>name on the list, but they didn't announce the fact

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that he was on the list. Also, interestingly, Mark Zuckerberg

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>himself wouldn't be singled out by Russia till April twenty

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, that's when Russia formally banned with Zuckerberg from

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>entering the country. So what the heck got Stone on

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that list so early? Well, first, there's a chance that

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the report is wrong and that Stone's name maybe joined

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this list after the announced changes in Meta's policy. That's

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my best guess that Russian officials, in an effort to

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>push back against the company, named Andy Stone as a

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted individual, not keeping in mind that he's really just

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a mouthpiece for Meta, because again, Andy Stone doesn't create

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the policies, he communicates them. He's not the one responsible

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for determining that Meta's going to allow this to happen.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>He just has to tell the world that that's what's happening. Now.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He sometimes does communicate in a way that's combative and insulting,

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps this has contributed to the issue. But Stone,

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>again is not responsible for whether or not Meta allows

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for calls of violence against Russian invaders. It really is

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a shoot the messenger kind of situation here, if in

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that's why he was put on the list. But

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some other reason for Russia to name Stone

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as a wanted individual. That's possible, but based off what

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we know, it seems to me that this is mostly

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a symbolic gesture made by a country that's in a

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>position that's very difficult to defend in a global court

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of public opinion. Russia's government has long struggled to control

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>media in an effort to push propaganda and Putin's narrative.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>In particular, platforms like Facebook and Instagram threatened that strategy

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because Russia has no direct control over those platforms, so

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they are legitimate threats to authoritarian control. It almost became

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>necessary for Russia to label Meta as an extremist organization

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just to prevent a place where opposing opinions could potentially

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>take hold in Russia. Anyway, my best guess is that

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this will have little to no real impact on Andy

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Stone's life. I mean, assuming he wasn't planning on vacationing

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in Saint Petersburg or something. If he had plans to

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>travel to Russia, I imagine those are no longer on

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 1>his calendar. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure this is just going

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a little intrigue into his professional career, a

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>little interesting bit of trivia. I also expect he will

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to speak for Meta at least as long as

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he is employed there after that, who knows. It'd be

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to talk with him post his career at

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Meta to find out, like, did he really believe in

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the cause that he was championing, And maybe he does,

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know Andy Stone. I feel

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>like he's employing a skill set for an employer, whether

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he believes in that employer's actual choices. I do know.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't say. Maybe he does it, just it seems

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>odd to me considering his previous employers. But who knows.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I don't know everything that's going on

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>inside Meta either. I'm just basing this off things like

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the whistleblower report and that sort of thing. Anyway, that

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is the interesting and currently unfolding story of Andy Stone

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 1>being wanted by Russia's Interior Ministry. We're gonna keep an

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>eye on this. If I see updates, I will definitely

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>follow up with it. I don't expect there to be

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>many updates. I think this is just a really kind

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of intriguing story that breaks on a Monday after a holiday.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think it's going to lead to anything

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>else that's particularly newsworthy, but we'll see you never know.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope you are all well. I hope those of

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you who celebrated Thanksgiving in the US had a wonderful time.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope everybody had a great week last week. As

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a remind this week we're back to normal, although tomorrow

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a Smart Talks with IBM episode published, and

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>then next week I'm on vacation, so you're likely to

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hear some reruns next week. I'll see if I can

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>record some new stuff for next week in advance, but

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty packed week for me right now, so

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. I'll do my best anyway. I wish you

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.