WEBVTT - A Preview of Pinehurst No. 2

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a fried.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Egg Friday egg, the dreaded Frida Egg Friday Frida Egg Egg,

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg bride Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>off of the hump.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to another edition of the Friday eg Golf Podcast.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I am your host, Andy Johnson, and I am joined

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>by one of our other esteemed co hosts, Garret Morrison.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Garrett two co hosts. Hey, Andy, how's it going.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't call myself a co host. I call myself

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a host.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh so, so I get the co Well that makes sense. Honestly,

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. You did found this company in this pot.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>How are you.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing pretty well. Yeah, just getting going here in

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the morning and thinking about Pinehurst. I've been taking notes

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all morning and getting ready to talk about it. I

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>love this golf course and so very excited to kind

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of get into detail about it.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about it is like, you know, it's

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>obviously one of the great golf courses of America, and

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>to me, it's like one of the great golf courses

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that I've played the most. I think I've played it

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>six or seven times now, oh really, yeah, And it's

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 2>just you know, it's a phenomenal golf course, and I

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 2>think that it's one it's easy to get to, so

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people have played it. And yeah, I'm

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>really super excited about this championship. So this podcast, we're

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>going to go in depth on Pinehurst number two. We're

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about the golf course, and you know,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of I think in the lens of hosting this

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>US Open and where I wanted to kick things off

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>was I think just to set the stage like this

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>golf course, whether you like Pinehurst number two or not,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a prominent figure in the US

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Open moving forward. So five of the next twenty five

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>US Opens, including that, so that's including this year, are

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>going to be at Pinehurst number two. It is really

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a I think, like you could say never before frequency

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 2>of a golf course in the US Open. ROTA. I

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>know they don't like the term ROTA, but it's becoming

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>very clearly a RODA. And and this golf course I

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 2>think presents a unique challenge to golfers. And I think

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the big storyline because of how much it's going to

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>be on the on the schedule, you know, it hosts

0:02:55.120 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen. Twenty fourteen was kind of pre this

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>modern golf. It was right at this inflection point in

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the game where the game was getting younger, but you

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>still had a lot of holdovers from the previous era.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>And what I mean by previous era is golfers who

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>grew up without track man, golfers who grew up playing

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>heads that were smaller than four hundred and sixty ccs.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 2>And now we have entered this new era of golf

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that is extraordinarily youth driven, speed driven, and Pinehurst number

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>two will be a prominent fixture of this era as

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>a US Open course. And I'm very interested to see

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>ten years later from twenty fourteen when Martin Kimer potted

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>his way around the greens. But also, like you know,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>everybody talks about that Martin Kaimer, two time major winner,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>one of players at that time, I mean, this bonafide

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>great golfer, hall player, and at that time, you know

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>like he kind of it was just he blew away

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the field like he dominated. It wasn't you know, it

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>wasn't It was a tour to force, and in terms

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of this year, I'm super I'm fascinated with, like what

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>skill sets are going to be you know, like we're

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 2>going to enter this data room, like this data world

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of golf, Like what skill sets are going to be super.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Rewarded now that the game has changed.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 2>Game has changed.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think one of the things that's really

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting about the number two course is that it's not

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>really clear which exact skill set will rise to the

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>top because I think that, as Bill Corr put it

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the video that we made about Pinehurst number two

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and released a couple of days ago, Pinehurst number two

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>allows you to play your game, to try to thrive

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the way that you thrive as a golfer. I

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>could see a shorter hitter competing here. I could see

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody really making bank with their short game. I could

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>see somebody having a great putting week and winning, maybe

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly for that reason. I could also see somebody getting

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>hot with driver and just hitting it really long and

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>straight all week, having shorter approaches into these very tricky

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>greens and winning that way. So I think that one

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the exciting things about Pinehurst number two hosting this

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>major after the PGA Championship this year at Valhalla, where

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>we all knew going in exactly what the dynamics of

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the tournament would be and which skill sets would rise

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to the top. One of the exciting things about this

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>course in this US Open is that I'm not totally

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sure what the profile of player is going to be

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that ends up at the top of the leaderboard.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 2>On the weekend, Bill Corr did a tremendous renovation of

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 2>Pineers number two. Restoration, renovation, whatever you want to do it.

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>It was, I mean, the way I think I would

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like to put it would probably be historical renovation, taking

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the course back to its nineteen forties form, and I

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think it was pretty faithful along those lines. But there

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>were also some modernizing moves that Corn Crenshaw made, But

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I should mention single row irrigation, real deal native. There

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of like old fashioned aspects of this

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>golf course that a lot of the newly renovated championship

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>courses don't have, and so in this case, restoration might

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>actually be close to the proper term for what they did.

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 2>In the lens of the Championship. I think the renovation

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>thing that I would I you know, I think it's

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 2>pretty fascinating. After I played it this fall, I just

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>started think about, like, you know, it gets really narrow

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>right where I want to hit the ball, Like right

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>where I want to hit it. It gets narrow seemingly every hole,

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is what you're saying. It's like

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>where you could see a shorter hitter thriving basically on

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 2>every hole at Pinehurst number two, every par four and

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 2>par five fairways narrow at about three hundred yards, they

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>get narrow and the waste kind of comes in and

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>they're able to do this narrowing. Very It takes a

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>while to realize that this happened, like I've played a

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>number of times before I started realized. Then I went

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>on Google or started looking at it and I was like,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, Like this kind of narrows down at

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 2>every three hundred yard mark, and you know it's pretty wide.

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Then it gets really narrow at three hundred yards. So

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like it's an interesting golf course in that sense.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm super excited to see. Strategically, are we going to

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of drivers And if you think about

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 2>like even driving distance in twenty fourteen, the number of

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>players who could hit the ball over three hundred yards

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and twenty fourteen or averaged over three hundred yards in

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen pales in comparison to basically the entire tour

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>averaging over three hundred yards in twenty twenty four So

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>are we going to see a lot of drivers you

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>take on a little bit more risk. The Native is

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>really a cool aspect of the golf course because you

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 2>can get good lies. You can be in spots where

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like, oh, this is great, I can still hit

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>it at the green and in some cases, like I

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 2>like hitting it out of this because I'm going to

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>get a little bit and get some zip on the ball,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Like it's not a bad spot. You could get a

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>better angle if you're into the Native on some of

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 2>these holes where like you know, you get over and

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>you have like a really nice way to pro a

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>very difficult green to hit from the fair away. So

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>with the Native, but then also you could get into

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>spots where it's like unhittable, like and I'm chipping out

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 2>sideways type stuff. So off the tee is going to

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>be fascinating, Like I, you know, my friend's Zach Blair qualified,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm curious he's the shortest hitter on the PGA Tour,

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>but like he's going to be hitting to wider spots

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 2>in the faraway than everybody else. And how does that

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>dynamic play out over the week. My hunch is that

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>power is going to win, because it usually does. But

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be surprised, as you said, to see a short,

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>shorter hitter or a couple shorter hitters contending here.

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of this depends on how firm the course is,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not quite sure how that's going to work

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>out this time. You know, in the run up to

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty fourteen US Open, it was pretty dry in

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Pinehurst and so the course was baked out in the

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>week leading up to the US Open. They did end

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>up having some rain on Thursday night of that US Open,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and so the course was actually a little bit softer

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>than expected. On Friday. Martin Kaimer shot sixty five sixty

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>five on Thursday Friday. Some players actually went pretty low.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>We remember that Open as being brutal, but it was

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>really only very brutal on the weekend when the course

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>did dry out. And so I've looked at the forecast.

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a little bit of rain in the forecast, and

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so we might get a softer version of Pinehurst number two,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of wonder how the course would play

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for these players now ten years later, a little bit soft.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think some players could go low here and that

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we could see more of a power game start to

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>dominate at the course, because that's just what happened when

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the conditions are a little bit softer. It doesn't matter

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what the course is now. I think that there would

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>still be some really interesting dynamics to the course, some

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>really interesting holes where power players might have to make

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>decisions that they're uncomfortable making given the way that they're

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>asked to strategize the game. Now. It's just hard to

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>moneyball this course. I think it's not a simple solution

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>using the methods that tour players now use to solve

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>most courses. As you say, if you just wail away

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at driver, you're often going to find yourself in the

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>worst position on the whole, and so that has to

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>be on your mind in some way. So you're going

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to consider clubbing down, You're going to consider choosing some

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird line off the tee that might be

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>a little bit uncomfortable. You have to do some different

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>things at this course than you normally do at even

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>major championship venues, and so the details of players' strategy

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>should be very, very interesting, even if it is a

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit softer and slower out there this year than

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it was ten years ago.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to note, you know, there's gonna

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>be a lot made Like the best draining golf courses

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>are built on sand, and you're gonna hear about the

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina sand Hills a lot this year or in

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and around the tournament. And so pineher'st number two is

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>built on sand, but it is not like the world's

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>best sand, So you know there are different I don't

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>want it's.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Like sand.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't want to get two in the weeds here,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, a lot, a lot of golf

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>courses before they're built measure percolating rates of water to

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>understand how good the sand is. And I would say

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that Pineher's Number two is a lot better than a

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 2>dirt or clay based golf course at draining, but it

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 2>is not at like the at a Scottish Links level,

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 2>like that sand has a lot higher percolation rate than

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 2>Piners number two. So this golf course can recover from

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>some rain and still present firm, but it is not

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>like out of this world. And and I think the

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>main and obviously we're we'll get to this, but the

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>greens are the main defense of this golf course or not.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 2>I'd say probably the star defense of this golf course,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 2>especially for the modern game. Those targets and why they's

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>the defense is that the targets are so small and

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>they repel, often repel in all directions. And when those

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>greens are soft, the targets just get bigger. And that

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>if they if they let's just say, the softness creates

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a twenty percent bigger target. It just makes such a

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>such a huge impact on how comfortable the best players

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>in the world are going to be. And I think

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Ogilvie in the video that we get that you

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you and Cameron put together on this had just like

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a great quote about Pinehurst that I think is really

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>really true. The more you play it, the more it

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>scares you. The more times you play there, the more

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 2>times you hit great shots that you think are like

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>really good and end up in bad places. And what

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>it does is it builds scar tissue. You start to

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>think about that and that's when targets start to feel

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>smaller and smaller because you think about, oh, I hit

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that shot so good the other day and it rolled

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 2>off the right side here, like I need to move

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>my target two yards left, And I think what you

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 2>were saying about the modern game the strategy. This is

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>where Pineher's number two kind of provides some anecdotes to that,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>is that the strategy is like very it's very simplistic

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 2>how these guys plays like avoid hazards game towards fat

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>sides of the green. But when the targets are smaller

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and there's repelling edges in all directions, it becomes harder

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 2>and harder to do that. And there's no water. We

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>aren't talking about a place that has water hazards that

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you're avoiding. So areas look okay, especially if you're looking

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>at it from Google Earth. It's okay to bail right

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>here and let it repel off. But with the way

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the greens are crowned and the short grass around them,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and the way the short grass can run into waste areas,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>this is where you can get yourself in a lot

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>of trouble because the ball that you're aiming six yards

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>left of a or six yards left of a right pin.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>If you tug at ten yards left in my repel off.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>So you hit it four yards left of your target,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>it can repel off and then run another fifteen yards away.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>This is the beauty of the golf course is that

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>it accentuates mediocre shots. It accentuates the penalty for mediocre shots.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>If you hit bad shots, you're going to be in

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 2>like a world of hurt. And if you hit great shots,

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have great looks a birdie like. That's the thing.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I think this golf course similar to Augusta National with

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>its greens. They're very different greens than Augustin National, but

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 2>in a similar way, they accentuate the level the degrees

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of quality of shot really well.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a good example of this is the first hole.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is a three hundred and ninety eight. It's

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a scary hole, it is, but it doesn't appear that

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>way no on the scorecard or even maybe when you

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>play it the first couple of times. It's a three

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety eight yard par four, which is almost

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a driveable par four for the US Open field these days.

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>It plays a little bit downhill and so most players

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to be actually hitting iron off this tee

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>because there is a of that bottlenecking that you talked

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about earlier in the fairway, which by the way, is

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not a Ross design feature. It's not a BILLCRP design feature.

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>That's a Mike Davis, former CEO of the USGA design feature.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That's something that he requested from Billcore. In any case,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>this hole plays a little bit downhill, it's short. Players

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>will hit an iron off the tee for the most part,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and then a short iron or a wedge into the green.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 1>You can play this hole a couple of times and

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>hit the fairway, hit the green, move on with a

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>birdier par and say to yourself, that's a gentle handshake.

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>That's an easy hole. That's a simple hole. But the

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>first time you miss the green on that hole, that's

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>when the game starts. Say you bail out to the

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>right a little bit because you're scared of the bunker

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that's guarding the left side of the green. That bunker

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>looks really scary, It eats into the green. It looks

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>like the place that you don't want to be. So

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>you bail out to the right a little bit. You

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>try to hit the right portion of the green, but

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you miss and you end up in that little chipping swale.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You discover that there are these little contours, these little

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>mounds down at the bottom of the swale that give

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you these weird lies for your chips, and it's all

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>short grass, and you try to hit that chip and

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you discover that it's really not easy. Maybe you end

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>up hitting that chip over the green into the bunker

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, and you end up walking away

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>with double bogie and you're like, okay, I can't do

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that again. I'm not going to bail out right again.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So you come back the next time, and maybe you

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>miss a little bit left and you end up in

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that bunker. And then then you just start thinking, Okay,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>where do I play on this hole? Where do I

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>miss on this hole? What do I really have to

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>avoid on this hole? You have to avoid everywhere. I mean,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you can miss short like, that's that's okay.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 2>So I played, I played this hole. We teach it.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Really it's short though. Actually, come to think of it,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's bad too. Sorry, go on.

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's funny. I the last time we were there,

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>we teed off on ten and it was in the fall,

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and so this was my tenth hole, and I started

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 2>to play pretty well as I usually do, like you know,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>this is a working man's golf game. As you start

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to feel really good about the seventh or eighth hole.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 2>So I hit her great drive on one and I

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>had like seventy yards sixty yards, like, I threaded it

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>right through there and it was the easiest shot I

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 2>had all day. With like a lobledge what I was

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 2>looking at. I was like, God, that green's so small,

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 2>it's so so tidy. And I ended up just dump.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't hit it far o. I had like a

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>backpin and I was like, don't do not go long.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you do, don't go long. And I landed like

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of like middle of the green and it spun

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>back and spun off the front of the green. Like

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 2>it's just like an interest. Like if you don't if

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 2>you don't make committage swings, there are going to be

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 2>chipping from all day long. Like the only way to

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 2>succeed at Pinehurst is getting full commitment over your shots

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>because like you cannot. I think, like this is the

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>thing that's so interesting with modern golf. Modern golf is

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>so much about bailing out like that's half the game.

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Half the game is just like understanding I can bail here,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 2>don't dump it over here like that, That's what the

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>game is has become and hit good shots like and

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 2>there's like a commitment level that that most golf courses

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 2>allow players to get to understanding where to bail out

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 2>at Pinehurst, Like, the interesting thing is it's like when

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you start to bail out, that's when you get in trouble.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 2>When you aren't committed to hitting a really great shot

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and you're thinking about what you're where, you're misses. That

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>is that is like the biggest thing that can get

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>you in trouble. There is not stand over the shot

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and saying to yourself, hit a great shot here, And

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, like what a golf course. And I don't

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>want to dump on this golf course anymore. I think

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it's gotten enough abuse.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>But talk about golf course again.

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 2>What Valhalla allowed was like bail out anywhere, bail out

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 2>anywhere you want, and just to avoid and it created

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>this this tournament where like you could it was like

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 2>extremely hard to make double bogie because you could basically

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>just like as long as you avoided like seven areas

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 2>on the golf course, you were going to make pars

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 2>and at worst bogie. If you hit a bad shot,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 2>bogie maybe maybe badge, maybe a bogey. At Pinehurst, I

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 2>think like you can hit really good shots and walk

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 2>away with like shaking your head, like how did I

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 2>just make a bogie? And the answer usually is like,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I was a little too cautious with

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>my target.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, And you know what happens when you bail out

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and miss at Pinehurst around the greens is that you're

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>left with a variety of chip shots. Right. There's an

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>infinite variety of chip shots around the greens at Pinehurst.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They're so varied and that's part of what makes them interesting.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>But there is a certain brand of chip shot that

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you hit a lot at Pinehurst, and that is the

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>up and over. You have to hit up to the

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>level of the green pad, which is higher than you

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>are generally when you're chipping at Pinehurst because the greens

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are crowned or turtle back and so you're below the

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>surface of the green, so you got to hit your

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>shot up that first slope. But then often, as Jeff

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Ogilvie mentioned in our video, a lot of the greens

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have kind of lower middle sections, and so that means

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>that you have to then judge the rollout of your

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>chip shot or your putt or whatever you're doing. You

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have to judge the rollout of it on a downslope,

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you're hitting up a contour and down a

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>contour a lot when you bail out and miss at Pinehurst,

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>because generally the bailouts are kind of like away from bunkers,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>away from hazards, So you're going to end up in

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of short grass if you're playing conservatively. But

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>then that chip shot that you hit is the one

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>chip shot that I think pros really don't like where

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're hitting up something and then down something because it's

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so hard to judge your distance and it's so hard

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to like figure out what club to hit. Sometimes maybe

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>pros hit a lot of lob wedges, maybe they'll just

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>go for a standard lob wedge shot, but I don't

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's always the best play on these chip shots.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes keeping it along the ground is a lot more effective.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Other times you do want to fly it a little

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>bit farther, but it's hard to figure out exactly what

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>shot to hit in those situations because you have the

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>slow down pace going up and you have the speed

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>up pace going back down, and that just introduces a

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of complexity that these guys don't see a whole

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>lot at PGA Tour courses, standard PGA Tour courses or

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>major championship venues like Valhalla.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and another variable is it's bermuda grass. There's grain.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>There's just like an added layer of things that you

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 2>have to calculate when you're hitting these shots. I think

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 2>like in a way, Augustina National does this with lag putts.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>When you have long putts it Augusta National a lot

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of times it's up and over. At Pinehurst it's from

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 2>off the green. Those those qualities come from off the

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 2>green and they're up and over. And you know, this

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>is what made Martin Kimer's performance so amazing was doing

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>it with putter all week long is very hard. This

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>was not an easy thing to just be putting balls

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 2>from off the green to dead. If it was, everybody

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>would have been doing it. It was an extraordinary lag

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 2>putting week from off the green for Martin Kimer. So yeah,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I it's it'll be I'm curious how players are gonna

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 2>hit shots. Are we going to see a lot? Do

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 2>you think we'll see a lot of people putting?

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I don't think that most of

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the top pros are super comfortable with that kind of shot. Now.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the guys that are really really strong around

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the greens are going to be chipping the like that

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>have that have full confidence and technique. I think we'll

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>see some of the weaker chippers and pitchers on tour

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 2>lean on the putter. I will say, I think like

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 2>some players from Florida like that play a lot of

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 2>golf in Florida where they have like a lot of

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>runoff Bermuda runoffs. Like you could see some of them

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 2>play some bump and runs, especially like to short sided

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 2>pins where you just kind of like hit it into

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the hill and let that kill it ye with like

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a six or seven.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Iron, even a hybrid or something like that.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Where it like kind of trundles over the slope.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good play. I think that's like,

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>honestly a really good play in a lot of situations

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>around the greens at Pinehurst. But I'm saying that more

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective of an amateur than a pro, because

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>those are very different, you know, very different situations.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's take a quick break to talk about

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 2>our sponsor for this episode, which is ourselves, Club TFE.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 2>That is our membership option at the Fried Egg and

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it is we really like it. We produce a lot

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>of content in there, a lot of stuff about golf

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 2>courses in golf architecture. If you're into this golf course

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 2>discussion that Garret and I are having, you'll probably like that.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that we're going to be releasing

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 2>US Open week is in every whole video like one

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>thing about every hole at Pinehurst number two. So we

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>usually do those for a couple majors a year, you know,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 2>with with this year the US Open, that was kind

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of the big one this year, but I think last

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>year we did Okill and LACC. Those are fun videos

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>and then you get a ton of other benefits. We

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>have a Pinehurst number two profile on there that I wrote.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like eighteen hundred words about Pineer's number two.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 2>So there's a ton of stuff. Those profiles come out

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 2>just about every week of the year, so cover a

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>wide range of courses, from hidden gems to the best

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>courses in the world, So check that out Club TFF.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>If you're interested interested in joining, go to thefridagg dot

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>com slash membership. Thanks, and let's get back to Pinehurst

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 2>number two. Well, let's talk about some favorite aspects of

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. If what's kind of your let's just

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 2>say a couple of your favorite things. We'll just start

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 2>with one. I'll kind of chime in with one of

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 2>mine and we'll go from there.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, one favorite thing would have to be what all

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>the landing zones at Pinehurst number two are doing on

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the par four's and par fives. The landing zones and

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the fairways are so interesting on every single one of

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>those holes. What those landing zones do forces you to

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>choose a line from the t commit to that line,

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>make a strategic decision, be specific, be committed, and play

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a good shot in order to end up in the

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>position that you want to be, or even in order

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to hold the fairway. So what the fairways do in

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the landing zones is so consistently interesting because the fairways

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>don't just go straight down the whole corridor, which by

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, they did by the time that Bill Kohrer

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and Ben Crenshaw were brought into the course in twenty ten.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>They had kind of straightened out and turned into these little,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, very narrow strips leading up to the greens.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And what they do now is they kind of snake,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>They jog, they slant, They run on diagonals in relation

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to the tea. And then you add to that kind

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of directional variety of the fairways the topographical variety. So

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they tilt right to left, they tilt left to right,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>They sometimes run downhill in the landing zone, they sometimes

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>run uphill in other parts of the landing zone. There's

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>always something going on topographically in the landing zones at

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Pinehurst that is then combined with some sort of directional

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>trickery in the fairway. And so an example of this,

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a simple example of this would be on the eleventh hole. Now,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.479
<v Speaker 1>this is a fairly subtle hole topographically, and there are

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>other holes that might be a better example in terms

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know how big some of the movements of

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the land can be at Pinehurst, But the eleventh hole

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is a good elegant example of a fairway that runs

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on a left to right diagonal in relation to the

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>te right, so the long carry is on the right

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and the short carry is on the left, So you

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have that factor from the tee, and then you also

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have a right to left tilt in that fairway. It's

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a fairly subtle tilt, but it's there. And so what

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this does is that if you play safely out to

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the left, if you bail out to the left, the

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>safe side of the fairway that feels the most comfortable,

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that requires the least carry, the tilt of the fairway

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>will push your ball farther to the left. And so

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what that causes you to do the next time you

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>play the hole is say, okay, I got to bite

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit more of this right side in

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>order to avoid running through the fairway on the other

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>side and having a really bad angle into the green

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because the green is very hard to approach from that

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>left side of the hole. So then you start playing

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more right on that hole. But then eventually maybe you

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where you miss right and then

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you're totally dead because you're in the you're in the

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>waste area, you might be in the forest, and so

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you the the nature of the landing zone on that

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hole causes you to make calculations on the tee that

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are not just simple keep it down the middle of

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the fairway. You've got to pick an aiming point and

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got to execute it well. And that's on pretty

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>much every long hole at Pinehurst. So just pay attention

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to what's happening in the landing zones. It's always interesting.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that is one of the best features

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 2>of the golf course. It may it's what makes it

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 2>such a difficult driving golf course. I think that really,

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>like in the modern era of the best, the best

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>golf courses use diagonals off the tee really well, and

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>this is definitely one of them that that uses the

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 2>diagonals really well as well as the land you know,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and that it again, just like the greens, it goes

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 2>against the kind of formulaic nature of golf. What has

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>become with strategy where it's like, okay, I'm going to

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>just avoid this and hit it over here. What happens

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is that then you you get it yourself into more

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 2>more trouble. The waste being the like the waste, it's

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>just such a that I think professional golfers hate when

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>they don't know what they're where their balls, what it's

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>getting into. And that's what the waste presents is that

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it's not rough like irrigated rough, you know what it is.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, Okay, I know the ball is going

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to stop, and it's going to be in this type

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of life. I get a really bad lie, I'll hit

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 2>it to the front front of the green. If I

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 2>get a good lie, I've got a shot at it.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 2>You know. The waste kind of accentuates both variables of it.

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 2>It is like I could be perfect, I could be

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>but that chance that I do have chance. It's not

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>something that golfers like. So the fairways being surrounded by

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>chance rather than you know, I know exactly what I'm

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>getting into. It just presents another unique mental challenge of

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the golf course.

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>You know something about the sand and wiregrass at Pinehurst,

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is going to be a big

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>talking point on the telecast at the US Open. You're

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear a lot about the wiregrass. You're gonna hear

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the native areas and the kind of

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, randomness that they introduce into the competition. And

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I like that too, Like it's so much better than

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the irrigated rough. It's it just makes the game so

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting and exciting, but a couple of things

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>about it. So two points about it. One, I think

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>an underappreciated aspect of the sand in wiregrass at Pinehurst

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is how the wiregrass can affect shots in a variety

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of ways. It's not just either you're in a tuft

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of wiregrass and you're screwed or you're in a sandy,

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>scrubby lie and you're kind of okay. Often you will

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>find yourself next to or directly up against a tuft

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of wiregrass. Right your ball will be somewhere in the

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>vicinity of one of these little profusions of wiregrass, and

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to manufacture some kind of shot out of there,

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>because you can get to the ball, the ball is

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in a good lie, but the wiregrass is getting in

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the way of your swing somehow, and so you have

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to hit some sort of creative shot. And that's what's

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so cool I think about this native and what makes

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it a good test of skill. It requires a variety

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of techniques. It requires flexibility on the part of the player.

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It requires players to manufact extra shots and hit different

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>shapes and use different swing paths, as opposed to just

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>hacking out and using their strength in that way. Another point,

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less positively, is that the USGA, along

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 1>with Pinehurst, has introduced a lot more wiregrass this year

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for this year's us Open, Right, so we're going to

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>see you just more coverage of wiregrass, more regular coverage

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of wiregrass at Pinehurst. And one of the things that

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Corr really emphasized in his work at Pinehurst was

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>randomizing the danger in the waste areas, putting those little

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>tufts of wiregrass in a bunch of different kind of

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>randomly scattered places, not having a regular idea of where

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you're really in trouble. And so I think that introducing

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>more wiregrass and making the coverage kind of more complete

0:35:56.360 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in those waste areas has taken away some of the

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>randomness that makes that hazard what it is.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 2>It makes it a little bit more execution heavy, which

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 2>in the history of the USGA we know they love.

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, It's just an example of something that the

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>something that was done to a US Open venue that

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>just didn't need to be done. There's no reason. What

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>are we gaining by this. We're gaining, like, you know,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe a tenth of a stroke more over par

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>on certain holes, Like what is that really important enough

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to do this kind of thing. So that's that's especially

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>It's not like that big. This is not such a

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>huge deal. It's just it just struck me as totally unnecessary.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>To do it, especially considering the twenty nineteen USAM, where

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I thought the golf course shined. It was so extraordinary,

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 2>It was very firm, and it provided it. It seemed

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to perplex And I think it's important to note these

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>are college and high school players. These are you know,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 2>like very good amateur like the greatest amateur golfers in

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the world, but a little bit less experienced. The golf

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 2>course seemed to perplex them, like it they were getting

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 2>into positions where, you know, being the closer to the

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 2>hole wasn't necessarily better because the lack of ability to

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 2>generate spin on certain shots where you know, being a

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit further back sometimes with advantageous where like the

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 2>chance of the wiregrass was was really shining. So I

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 2>think the twenty nineteen us AM has been a tournament

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that's stuck with me for a long time, just in sense,

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 2>in the sense of like that was like very good

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 2>modern championship golf. So I think like one of my

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 2>favorite things about Pioneer's number two, and it's just I

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 2>think one of the best three hole stretches of golf

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 2>anywhere in the world is three four five. This to me,

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 2>there's a great Tom dok quote about you know, a

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>great golf course makes an impression in the first five holes,

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I think is what he said. But then somebody that

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Blake Conant, who works for Tom told me he says

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 2>to them, three holes, this golf course really hits its

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 2>stride at three four five to one and two are

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.919
<v Speaker 2>on pretty subtle ground. They get you out to three

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>four five, which you know is famously three Green is

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 2>right where dal Ross's house they lived in at Piners was.

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 2>But from that that stretch of holes, I think, you know,

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>we probably won't see a ton of it on the

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 2>telecast just because of its being early in the in

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the round. But if I was going to go watch

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 2>golf at Pineers, that's that's an area I would camp

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 2>out as three Green because you can kind of you

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>watch shots into five, t shots on six, shots into

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 2>three right there. So three is a short par four

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>that you kind of you're gonna lay back off the tee,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and then it's one of the most magnificent greens at

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Pinehurst number two. It is built way up in the air.

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>The target is seemingly the hood of a Volkswagen Beetle,

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and it's you know, it's a pretty easy hole to

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 2>hit the ball into the fairway and get yourself a wedge,

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>but an extraordinarily hard hoole to hit a wedge into.

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's just a great it's just a great little

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 2>par four. There's so the green just has some neat

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 2>little pockets in it. And then you go to uh

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.439
<v Speaker 2>four and five, which is you know, a classic par

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 2>nine between the two of them, long par four, short

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 2>par five. You know, if you get out of there

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 2>at under nine, you feel really good about yourself. And

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it's got some of the dynamics that you talked about

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 2>the variety off the tee. So you know on or

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 2>the fairway kind of goes cut, it cuts kind of

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 2>right to left. You're gonna be trying to hug the

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 2>left side of the fairway to cut the distance of

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 2>the hole down, but the fairway slope severely left or right.

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's a reverse camera hole, yes.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And if you can like you're trying to hug

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 2>that left side, but up the left is wiregrass, and

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not where you want to be on a long part.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Four that's like disaster. Like you're gonna see some balls

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 2>like hit up there and run down through. So like

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 2>there's this potential of hitting it up there and really

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 2>like taking on a ton of a ton of risk

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and cutting off more of the hole. But if you

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 2>play it down to the right, then you have this

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 2>really long shot into a tough green that's got a

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty vicious false front. The front kind of cuts on

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a diagonal too, which makes the proch shot even harder.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 2>And then you come back with five, which that's it's

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 2>an extraordinary golf hole. And unlike the other hole, which

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of it moves, you gotta just you want to

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 2>play like a rope draw here like you want to

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 2>just you could play it out to the right and

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 2>turn it over and that's gonna get you the biggest

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 2>drive because the hole kind of moves to the left.

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 2>And and and then that green, I mean, that's about

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 2>as tough of a green as you're gonna find in golf.

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 2>It repels every way, vicious false front and then vicious

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 2>false back. Yes, it's like that's the cool that green

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 2>is unbelievable, like you're terrified of everything, and the green,

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the way it repels in the back, and it's just

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>somewhere you don't want to be.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a great short par part five. I think because

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of the green, it really works as a part five.

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 2>And famously during the restoration Billcore flipped the pars of

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 2>these holes. Four was the par five and five was

0:41:56.320 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the par four. Now it's flipped where and I think

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 2>they did that just because there was way more space

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 2>to build a back tee on five.

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, it's it's where the old World Golf Hall

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of Fame used to be before it moved to Florida

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and became Gary Player's favorite place. Is back now, well

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're bringing it back to Pinehurst. I'm not sure

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to put it. They can't put it

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in its old place because now the fifty is there.

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they're opening it this week, the US Open week.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I hope they record a new commercial with

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Gary Player because I miss having that in my life.

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 2>But Slammer and the Squire.

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly, Slamma and the Squire and the Beaya. So anyway,

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's totally unrelated. Uh, the fifth hole I love as

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a par five. I think that was a great decision

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to make, you know, if you had to make one

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of those holes along part four. I think probably when

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Ross built them, he was more thinking, both of these

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are kind of par fives, right, Both of these are

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>long holes. This is where we're going to find some

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>some length on this course, some extra length. They were

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the latest holes that Ross added in the design of

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Pinehurst Number two. They were added in nineteen thirty five.

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>The course had started to be built in you know,

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineteen hundreds, the first decade of the twentieth century,

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and so the fourth and fifth holes were additions, and

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they were both long holes on the most dramatic topography

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the course, so they immediately feel like something different

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on this golf course. But the reason I love five

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is a par five so much is that, as you mentioned,

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>there's that terrible, terrifying false front on that green, and

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that it's a false front is so clever

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of like it doesn't just sort of

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>slope off all at once, It just kind of gradually

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>starts sloping, and then the volume on the steepness just

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>gets turned up and turned up and turned up until

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>finally it just falls off a cliff, and so that

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>false front eats so far into the green. Because of that,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the false front starts really far into the green and

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:16.439
<v Speaker 1>everything feeds down into that bunker short left of the green.

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 1>So basically, if you go for that green and you

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 1>don't get up and over that false front, if you

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>don't get to the middle of the green, basically where

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the false front finally levels out and allows for some pins,

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna probably run down into that bunker if

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's firm enough. And so your calculation from the fairway,

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're going for that hole in two, is am

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I okay with being down in that left bunker? Because

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that's the likely outcome if I go for this green

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and two and don't hit it perfectly? Or am I

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>just going to take my medicine and hit it out

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to the right to this little pocket on the high

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>side of the hole that allows for a nice little

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>wedge approach into this green that most pros can execute

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in their sleep. And so that's why I think it

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>works so well. It's just everything everything about that hole

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>makes you think that you should be going for it,

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>that this should be a long part four. But then

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>once you play it a few times and you're in

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that left bunker a few times, then you think, okay,

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe this really is a three shotthle.

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that we've hit on

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit so, but we talked about the angular

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 2>nature of the t shots. I think one of the

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 2>other things about the greens is they they're set on

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 2>really hard angles like where they they're really like if

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 2>you if you go on like Google Earth, it's really

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.760
<v Speaker 2>apparent to look at this is just how how strong

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 2>of angles the greens kind of axises are on. And

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 2>what happens with that is a lot of the false fronts,

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the runoff areas, they aren't straight lines.

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:01.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not a hit it one two and you're okay,

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 2>hit it one fifty one and it's coming down the front.

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 2>It's if you hit it one fifty two right on

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 2>your line, it's perfect. If you push it like a yard,

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>that line moves to one fifty two and a half.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 2>If you pull it, that line's one fifty one right.

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 2>So like you start, that angular nature of the front

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 2>is also like an important aspect of the golf course.

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 2>This is, you know, kind of like when you talk

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 2>about why it's such a frustrating golf course for the

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 2>best players in the world is because of these little

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 2>tiny features where like precision. You know, these guys live

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>in you know, really like five yard windows, and within

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 2>those five yard windows, the numbers that matter to them,

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:57.720
<v Speaker 2>what the front edge, what the carry number is oftentimes

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 2>is very different from the left side to the right side,

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's where you hit these really good shots. Where

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 2>any other golf course, like really, you know, almost any

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 2>other golf course in the world. These are great shots.

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 2>They're really great shots that yield fifteen foot birdie putts

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 2>at Pinehurst number two, these really great shots that you'd

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:24.439
<v Speaker 2>be happy with everywhere they play on the PGA Tour.

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 2>At Memorial this week, the week before, you'd be thrilled, thrilled,

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 2>ecstatic with the shot end up twenty yards away in

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 2>a hollow with a really hardship shot coming up.

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's it. That's the distance control is

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>so so important.

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 2>But distance control tied to accuracy, right, which is rare. Like,

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, the best iron players in the world rarely

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 2>miss numbers, but they they'll push and pull shots. It's

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, I tug that a little, I push that

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:00.080
<v Speaker 2>a little, but you see them hit the same number

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 2>at piner number two. Those small little pushes and pulls

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 2>get penalized sometimes.

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked in detail about the front nine so far.

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the first hole and then three through five.

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the back nine here is basically one banger

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>after another. I just love it from from basically eleven

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to the finish. I mean every single one of those holes.

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I said three through five, Yeah, three through nine is awesome,

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 2>but then you get into the back nine, it's like

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 2>three through eighteen to me, and I really like two

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and one. The thing about Piner's number two what makes

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 2>it great is like I don't think like there's a

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 2>few really like standout, world class holes. But what to me,

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the the greatness of Piner's number two is it to

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 2>some of all parts golf course there are? There's nothing

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 2>really I would I have like a hard time. Like

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 2>I think that one of the best questions you can

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 2>ask is what's the weakest hole at a golf course?

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know what the weakest hole at Piner's

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 2>number two is.

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I would probably settle somewhere in the six to seven

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>range for that.

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 2>If I really like seven, I love seven. I think

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 2>seven is one of the most fascinating holes there. Talk

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 2>about pick your line, yeah, well yeah, and the super

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 2>hard T shot. It's like it's the most uncomfortable T

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 2>shot on the golf course, and then the green is

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:31.280
<v Speaker 2>really cool.

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it's the most uncomfortable T shot on

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the golf course, but it's really uncomfortable because of how

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>your sight line is obscured by all that junk on

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the right.

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And it's got the angle. Yeah, it's got the I

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 2>think that that fairway moves on the hardest angle of

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 2>any of them. So it's of all the holes, like

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 2>you have to hit it on the number of distance

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and line the most of any T shot on the

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 2>golf course, and that can be hard to do even

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 2>with like a hybrid, which I think you'll see a

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of most players are going to lay back on

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 2>that hole. But it's not an easy it's not a

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 2>gimme hybrid.

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that. I mean, I think that

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>even the weakest holes at Pinehurst have a great argument

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>for them, and so that is part of what makes

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the course so good.

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I think That's the thing is, like, of all the

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 2>great great golf courses, Pinehurst might have the strongest, like

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:30.439
<v Speaker 2>might have the strongest weak holes.

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And it gives people the least excuse to talk about

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just one or two holes, you know, yeah, for whatever reason.

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it's because it just has less

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:47.399
<v Speaker 1>great holes than other courses of its caliber. I think

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that there are just a good seven or eight holes

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that you could identify as the best hole on the course,

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and knowledgeable people who have played the course a lot

0:50:57.640 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to argue with you very much about

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 1>designating that one as the best. But yeah, I mean,

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think eleven through eighteen is so brilliant at

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Pinehurst and that whole stretch that almost the entirety of

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that back nine. I love ten two, but for me,

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the course really kind of hits its stride with eleven

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:21.240
<v Speaker 1>through eighteen. Tens of brute just ten tens, a long

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>par five, and it's got some interesting features to it,

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure, But eleven through eighteen are all basically intact

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen oh seven. Those holes have been in the

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>routing of Pinehurst Number two from the very beginning. Obviously,

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 1>some have been lengthened and changed sixteen plays as a

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 1>par four for the pros instead of as a par five.

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little more interesting as a par five.

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>But that's okay, it's you know, it's part comes with

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the territory. But I just think those holes are so great,

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and you could talk about individual features of each hole,

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think what you really discover in that stretch

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of the golf course, if you're walking the golf course,

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is how clever and varied the routing is. Because for

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the back nine, you're kind of going

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. The courses is doubling back on itself

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a few times before finally wandering back to the clubhouse.

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen. Basically, you know they zigzag,

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's this wandering feeling to the routing in that

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the course where they're not just doubling back

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>straight with each other. It's not like they're playing side

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>by side. There's a little angle change with each of

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>those holes where they play in a slightly different direction

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and they form these kind of triangles instead of forming

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>straight lines, and it gives you this feeling that you're

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting lost in this property, you're not exactly

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sure where you are. You don't have a strong sense

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of orientation into the clubhouse or the starting point, or

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>even to a couple of holes ago. You're just kind

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of meandering through the property at that point, and that

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to me is where the course becomes really beautiful, where

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the prettiness of the pine forest and the sand and

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>all the native vegetation really comes through. For me, that's

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 1>where that happens. And you know, a lot of Pinehurst,

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the resort in general, is just it's very kind of developed.

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of buildings, a lot of homes,

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of golf. Right whenever you're playing

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>golf on one course, you can almost always see golf

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on another course because there's just so many everywhere golf

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:42.919
<v Speaker 1>holes out there, like it's ridiculous. You know, Pinehurst number

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>four is right next door to those holes that I'm

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about on the back nine, and in fact, parts

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of Pinehurst number four used to be part of Pinehurst

0:53:49.880 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>number two. In any case, for me, though, because of

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the way the routing moves in the middle of the

0:53:56.280 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>back nine, the property just shows off a little bit there,

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's what surprised me the most the first time

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I played the course, because I didn't expect Pinehurst number

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>two to be really beautiful. That's not really its reputation.

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But during those holes, that's where that esthetic appreciation of

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the land that Donald Ross was able to use in

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this part of the country comes through the most. And

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's something that when people, if people

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:28.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the tournament or if they play the course,

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:31.479
<v Speaker 1>that's something they pay attention to, is just how good

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels to be out on that part of the property.

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with that, and it almost like I

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 2>think that across the entire golf course. What it does

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 2>well is it changes direction subtly a lot.

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you even when you're going out, even when you're one, two, three,

0:54:51.480 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of all play in the same direction, four even,

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's slight changes. There's a slight curve to that you.

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Know, and and the greens might orient, it might be

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 2>in a little bit different position. That just change the

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 2>way you're hitting into it. I don't think it doesn't

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:07.920
<v Speaker 2>get like, let's be real, it doesn't get particular. This

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 2>is not like a windy part of the country. Pinehurst.

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think like anybody's like there but we do

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 2>see the recipe of a pine trees with some wind,

0:55:21.239 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 2>So if you get some gusts, what happens. And with

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a golf course that changes directions a lot, it's really

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 2>hard to understand where the wind's going. Tall pines wind,

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 2>So that's another recipe of the golf course. If you

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 2>get that ten plus mile in our wind, it can

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 2>be hard to tell where exactly it's coming from. And

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 2>when you couple in the penalty for really close to

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 2>right shots but just off it magnifies that something I

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 2>like about Pinehurst Number two. I don't think it would

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>ever get brought up as like the greatest set of

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 2>par threes in the world. I do really like the

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 2>par threes though, I think they have like there's a

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 2>nice little variety to them. They play. They're each pretty unique,

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I think probably if you want to make a you know,

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 2>six and fifteen kind of kind of feel a little

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 2>bit similar. But they're spaced out pretty well and they

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 2>embody the characters of the golf course where it's like,

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 2>here's a long iron, mid to long iron and it's

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:29.720
<v Speaker 2>really terrifying that it's gonna repel everywhere and hit the shot,

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 2>which which I think fits the golf course really well,

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Like in they're very difficult shots. I think nine and

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 2>seventeen are are extraordinarily great par threes. Nine might be

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 2>the prettiest hole on the golf course. I think you're

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of playing back up into the corner of the property,

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 2>great canopy of trees, beautiful bunkering, and you cannot miss long.

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:55.439
<v Speaker 2>You see all this trouble up front with the bunkers. Yeah,

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 2>long is the thing that you cannot do. And it's

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a very it's a sneaky look shallow from the tea,

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 2>but it's an extremely shallow green and it seems like

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 2>it's just like an easy place to hit it long.

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:10.919
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's like a subliminal thing where you're

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at the trouble short and you're like, I

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want to I want to miss short, you miss long? Yes,

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 2>And then seventeen. I think seventeen is a great penultimate

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 2>hole where you know, if you can stand up there

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 2>and hit a great mid iron into the green, you

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 2>can earn yourself a really good look at Bertie And

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 2>if you don't, then it's going to be a tough,

0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:32.919
<v Speaker 2>tough track for par.

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 1>If you think about each piece of land that an

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 1>architect gets as a set of problems to solve. I

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think one of the problems that the Pinehurst Number two

0:57:45.280 --> 0:57:50.080
<v Speaker 1>property presented to Donald Ross was that there aren't many

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>obvious places to put par three's. There aren't these kind

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of severe pockets of land that are scaled to a

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:02.280
<v Speaker 1>par three and that provide kind of a you know,

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a topographical movement, yeah, and a drama and a distinctiveness

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in the land itself that lends itself to building par threes.

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And so he found a couple of those pockets on

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:19.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and especially nine, right. Nine is a classic stretch

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of land to put a par three on, and so

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he found that he gets the golf course to that

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>point so that nine can play the way it does.

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And then seventeen is sort of similar. It's also a

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>ridge to ridge par three and it fits nicely into

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that piece of land. On six and fifteen, he basically

0:58:38.680 --> 0:58:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just had to manufacture interest on those part threes. They

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 1>play on basically flat land, right, and so all of

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the interest comes from the green complexes. Both of them

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are very domed, very rejecting. But I think fifteen is

0:58:55.600 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 1>especially scary because of the way that green just kind

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of rises up from the grade and almost has like

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not a complete infinity horizon. But there's not much behind

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that green that gives you a perspective or that makes

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the green seem smaller and less severe. It's just this

0:59:15.160 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of hump, you know, coming out of the coming

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the land. It's like a you know, it's

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like a whale coming out of the ocean, and you're like,

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I got to hit that from two hundred yards.

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be the hardest shot on the course.

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Not not easy at all, And six is similarly difficult.

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>That green is a little more subtle in the way

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that it presents itself to the view of the player

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>from the tee. But I think those those holes do

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>stick in your memory, not just because of how severe

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they are, but because of the little details of the

0:59:47.240 --> 0:59:50.960
<v Speaker 1>green complexes and the way they present themselves visually. They're

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 1>very nicely differentiated from each other. And the other part

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>three is on the course, so obviously like masterful, masterful

0:59:57.280 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>design to summon those part three from this particular piece

1:00:01.360 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of land.

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Another one of my favorite spots of the property is

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 2>twelve and fourteen are oh yeah, It's amazing those two

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>greens sitting down right next to each other.

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You got, I love that part of the property.

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thirteen t it's just.

1:00:16.320 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>A great place to watch golf's. Yeah, so that's the

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>other tip you mentioned the gathering point with was it

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>five green, four t three green sixty earlier? That's a

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>great spot if you're going to the back nine, twelve

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteen green would be a great spot. Yeah.

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>The thing about it is what would make it, I

1:00:34.640 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>think a really good spectating area. I'll probably have more

1:00:38.040 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>tips when I'm out on the ground, but is both

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>those shots are kind of coming down at those greens,

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 2>so you get the nice perspective of looking up at

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>a player hitting down to you, right.

1:00:49.520 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then you can watch the shot on fifteen.

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You can see the outcome of the of the play.

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>There and thirteen, which some days might be drivable.

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I wonder which I don't actually remember whether

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they ever set up thirteen is driveable in twenty fourteen.

1:01:05.600 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It is a really cool hole, you know. One last

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>little poke at the USGA. Now, I'm not totally confirmed

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on who made this change to the golf course. It

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>might have been Pinehurst. All I'm going to say is

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that this change happened in the twenty twenty two to

1:01:22.800 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three range, so clearly was done in preparation

1:01:26.800 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for this US Open. They did bring in the fairway

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>by about ten yards on the left on thirteen. Now

1:01:34.080 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>thirteen is a short part four with a sharply elevated

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>green where the whole idea of the golf hole is

1:01:41.280 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that if you challenge the right side, which is very

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>heavily bunkered and has some nasty, gnarly waste area, if

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you challenge the right side on that hole, you have

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a better angle for your short pitch basically for most

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of these players into the green. So the more you

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can kind of push to that side, the better off

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you are with your angle there. If you bail out

1:02:04.080 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to the left, then you have a very tricky shot

1:02:07.240 --> 1:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>into that green. There used to be more fairway over there.

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>They brought that in and by about ten yards, and

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, again, why are we doing this. It's

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just to make the scoring average of the hole slightly higher.

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It certainly doesn't seem to fit with the architecture of

1:02:24.440 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the hole because that's the bailout zone you want players

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and then try to deal with

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that pitch into the green. Now it's just these kind

1:02:31.240 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of regularly planted tufts of wiregrass, and it's like, Okay,

1:02:35.520 --> 1:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, why are we doing this.

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>The other aspect of that is if you make it,

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:45.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's a drivable hole, it makes the decision of

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>whether I push up like the modern golf hit it

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>as close as you can is like the theory. So

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the things I've always kicked around in my

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 2>head about how how do you make how do you

1:02:56.880 --> 1:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>make choices more difficult? How do you potentially counter that perspective?

1:03:03.120 --> 1:03:09.760
<v Speaker 2>My theory has always been make the layup like super appeally, Yeah,

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to I'm giving you a wedge from the fairway.

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving this to you, or you can push it

1:03:17.920 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>up there like every every analytic is telling you to

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:24.920
<v Speaker 2>push it up there. I'm going to give you this

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>wedge and I'm gonna give you plenty of space where

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not worried about my three iron missing the fairway.

1:03:31.280 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is where I just think like the USGA,

1:03:34.720 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I I don't know, I don't sometimes I don't think

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>it's the USGA. I think it's like just tournament set

1:03:41.640 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>up in general, Like do they do they not understand

1:03:45.520 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>like the like the dynamics at play here, like where

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>like the theory of why people hit drivers so much,

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the theory of it is is rooted in you might

1:03:58.240 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>miss the fairway with a three iron.

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Also, yeah, right, so if you make it more likely

1:04:04.000 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to miss the fairway with the three iron, what are

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they going to do?

1:04:06.680 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>They're more likely to hit the driver, right, So it's

1:04:11.080 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>if you want variability, which I think everybody wants. Everybody

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 2>wants to see these, Like, I mean, like one of

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the things I've I've really loved. I've like grown to

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>love tennis. I used to love it as a kid.

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things I love about tennis is

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the dynamic of different style players playing against each other.

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:34.439
<v Speaker 2>And it's like Medvedev, who's just like a human backboard, right,

1:04:34.880 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Like you just get to everything back playing against a

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 2>super aggressive player. Like I love watching that. Like this

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>guy's content just standing back. He's really big at the

1:04:43.200 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>baseline and just returning stuff.

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So a guy who wants long points versus a

1:04:47.600 --> 1:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>guy who wants short points.

1:04:48.880 --> 1:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So it's like I love watching like that

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of dynamic play out over a couple hours. Like

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're if you're trying to like present a golf

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>course for championship, you need to play on some of

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>these dynamics of like you know, like I want players

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 2>to think about this, and if you make it narrow everywhere,

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you just they're just gonna hit driver everywhere because it's like,

1:05:17.760 --> 1:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>oh I might miss the paraweh if Like, nothing is

1:05:20.480 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>worse than when you hit an iron and you miss

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the fairway with an iron, you feel like an idiot.

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>And then that almost always the next time you play

1:05:28.320 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 2>that hole, you're gonna be like, I'm just gonna hit driver.

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean something that's really clicking for me right

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>now based on what you're saying, is that fairway with

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>variability is such a key to getting in elite players'

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>heads and making their decision making processes more complex. And

1:05:50.840 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that's something that pinehursh number two generally does really does great.

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the thing across the golf course. This golf

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:01.680
<v Speaker 2>course does it awesome. I think there are spots where

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>you could nitpick and be like you know what, like

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>it gets a little too formulaic, but in general, there

1:06:08.360 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>are places where you can play back, you can lay back,

1:06:11.960 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and what you're doing like it's like, Okay, I'm gonna

1:06:15.160 --> 1:06:17.959
<v Speaker 2>have like x percentage better chance to hit the fair away.

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But my approach shot in with a seven iron versus

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 2>a nine iron is x percentage more difficult. So that's

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the beauty of this golf course is you're constantly weighing

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>this versus that it caused an effect, and that's the

1:06:34.680 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>best golf it's not. It's not just bludgeon.

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Totally agree. It's going to be a great US Open venue.

1:06:43.440 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope things turn out well in terms of the

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>closeness of the competition down the stretch. Obviously in twenty

1:06:51.080 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen we got to run away, and that can sometimes

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>be an effect of a course like this. We also

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>might see a slightly different version of Pinehurst number two

1:07:02.880 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this year that's not quite as savage because we have

1:07:06.880 --> 1:07:09.439
<v Speaker 1>different weather leading up to the tournament, and we also

1:07:09.520 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>have a different USGA philosophy that has taken hold since

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the twenty fourteen US Open in terms of setup, where

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they have started to become more conservative with it. So

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>those are the caveats. I'm not going to guarantee the

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>greatest championship any of us has ever seen. But I

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>love this golf course. I think it's a great tournament

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>venue and I'm super excited to see how things play out.

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm pumped too. I think we'll have more coverage

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>throughout the week. If you don't subscribe to our newsletter,

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>subscribe to that though. We'll be doing dailies. We'll have myself,

1:07:46.240 --> 1:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Porreth, and Joseph Lamannia will all be on the ground, yeah,

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and as well as Cameron Hurtis or photographer. So follow

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>our socials we'll have some photography and stuff and then

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:02.560
<v Speaker 2>new team member PJ Clark will be on the ground too.

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, yeah, making it making it podcast official, Yeah right,

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>PJ Clark. Yeah, very excited to have some some more

1:08:10.000 --> 1:08:10.439
<v Speaker 1>help here.

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:15.640
<v Speaker 2>So so anyways, we're we're we're excited. Check out our socials.

1:08:15.680 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll have more stuff rolling and if you're if you

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:22.040
<v Speaker 2>haven't watched our video on Pineer's Number two yet on YouTube.

1:08:22.520 --> 1:08:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Garrett did a awesome job scripting, and Cameron Hurtis, as always,

1:08:26.920 --> 1:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>did a wonderful job putting everything together visually in a

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:34.679
<v Speaker 2>in a very pleasing aesthetic manner. Feature.

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I just and yeah, and and Andy. Obviously you should

1:08:38.800 --> 1:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>get credit for shooting a lot of the footage and

1:08:41.200 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>also helping with the the interview of Bill Corr. So

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a true team effort. But those videos are

1:08:46.920 --> 1:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>some of our favorite things that we do all year

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and some of the things that we put the most

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>effort into, and a true showcase for the talents of

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Cameron hurt Us. You know, he's so brilliant at putting

1:08:57.880 --> 1:09:02.599
<v Speaker 1>together the stories of of these videos, and so yeah,

1:09:02.600 --> 1:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we're very proud of it and we encourage you to

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>check it out. We'll also have some more content on

1:09:07.240 --> 1:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Pinehurst number two coming in Pinehurst area courses coming in

1:09:11.280 --> 1:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Club TFE, So if people go to the Friday dot

1:09:13.760 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>com slash membership, you can see everything we're offering in

1:09:16.960 --> 1:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Club TFE. But specifically for this coming week, we're going

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to do a nice little rollout of good writing we

1:09:25.920 --> 1:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think on Pineherst number two, as well as an additional

1:09:28.840 --> 1:09:32.639
<v Speaker 1>video that I'm narrating about some of the individual holes

1:09:32.640 --> 1:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>on the course. So that's coming from members awesome.

1:09:35.880 --> 1:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, today's podcast was edited and produced by Matt Rush's

1:09:40.120 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>big thanks to Matt or maybe no it's Meg.

1:09:43.720 --> 1:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's either Matt or Meg. Matt and Meg have been

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, sharing this responsibility late lately, so

1:09:51.760 --> 1:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you to both of them.

1:09:53.160 --> 1:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, thank you to both of them. And we'll be

1:09:55.840 --> 1:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>back next week. It's the US Open week, so we'll

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of our US Open preview podcasts up on Sunday as

1:10:03.880 --> 1:10:08.080
<v Speaker 2>always for majors. And I hope this was a good

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 2>golf course primer if you got any more questions about

1:10:11.080 --> 1:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the golf course, Fire US, fire US, tweets at US,

1:10:14.800 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it may be. I can't wait to be

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>on the ground and at Pinehurst.

1:10:19.800 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Looking forward to it.