WEBVTT - Ancient Egyptian Curses, Part 2

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick. And finally, that first October

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 3>chill is in the air. Rob I don't know if

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 3>you can see on the chat here, I am wearing

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 3>a long.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Sleeve shirt today.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>It's very exciting at our house, where we love the

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 3>month of October, of course, and my daughter especially is

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>just thrilled that it's actually October. I don't know if

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about this yet, but she is obsessed with

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Halloween decorations. So she like, you know, the biggest thing

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 3>she wants to do right now is go out and

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>see which houses in our neighborhood have already put selkins out,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>skeletons and vampires and all that. And there's this wonderful

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>like attraction repulsion to certain Halloween decorations, Like there's a

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 3>scary vampire that she wants to see. But then she's like,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna have to close my eyes, but I want

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>to see it.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen the new big skeletons that are out.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about the new big skeleton.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>So we had the big skeletons that just look like,

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, a giant skeleton standing in a yard. But

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>this season there are new ones where it looks like

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>an even bigger skeleton is climbing out of the ground

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of somebody's front yard. These are popping out throughout our

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>neighborhood and they're pretty great. Like, you can make a

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 2>big case for a lot of things in the world

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>being in decline, but not front yard skeletons. This is

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>an area that we're absolutely on the up and up with.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I don't think i've seen that. What we've seen

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 3>partially buried skeletons. It's almost a joke thing where people

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>have like a skull and then some skeleton hands and feet,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 3>but it's like the body is underground, like it's sort of,

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, half buried. But anyway, hello listeners. Yeah,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>if you're new to the show and you're not familiar

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>with our seasonal traditions, here's the deal. Of course, Rob

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and I are both Halloween heads, so every October were

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 3>all month long we indulge our monster obsessed brains, and

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>we devote all of our core episodes to spooky stuff,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>witchy stuff, and we also make sure that all of

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>our Friday Weird House cinema selections are in the horror genre.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we talk about horror a good bit.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 2>It's not hard for us to.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Do throughout the rest of the year too, but we

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>really drill in on horror for a Weird House in October.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, if you are new to our October season offerings.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Last year, our core episodes in October were about what

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 3>we did, a series on haunted locomotives and railroad madness.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>There was a period where people were convinced that trains

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>were creating railway mad men. We talked about the demonology

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 3>of ancient Mesopotamia. We talked about pig monsters and a

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 3>series called The Hogs of Hell, getting into mythological monster's pigs,

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and then also the paleontology record of what kind of

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>pig like animals that would actually horrify you did exist

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>in reality at one point. And then finally we did

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 3>an entry in our Grimoar of Horror series where we

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 3>each pick a horror short story to discuss and relate

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>it usually back to some kind of science or science

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>adjacent adjacent topic. And this year we've got a whole

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 3>month of stuff like that in store for you. So yeah,

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>if your new stick with us, of course, also if

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>you're old, stick with us as well.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, But earlier this week we got to jump on

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>things before October had technically begun. We got a head

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 3>start on things with part one of the series that

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>we're continuing today on Ancient Egyptian Curses. So if you

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>haven't heard that first episode, I would recommend going back

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and listening to that first. You know, there are some

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 3>series where it makes more sense to listen out of order.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>But the last time we really did kind of lay

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the groundwork for today, but for a brief refresher, we

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>talked about the general context of magic in ancient Egypt,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 3>with some main points being first of all, that to

0:03:55.840 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>the ancient Egyptians, there was not a clear distinction between

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>magic and religion like we see in some other religious

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and cultural settings. In ancient Egypt, the use of magic

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>spells and temple based religion were fully interwoven and practiced

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>by the same priests and authorities, and in fact, magic

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>power and magic spells were a fundamental part of the

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 3>regular public rights performed in Egyptian temples, So magic was

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of part of everything, and even the gods needed it. Also,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 3>we talked about how the Egyptian concept of magical power

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>or heca, was not thought to be inherently good or evil,

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 3>but was a morally neutral power that could be harnessed

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>to do all kinds of things, to protect or to harm,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>to heal, or to destroy. And we talked about the

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 3>sometimes almost litigious or legal framing in which many ancient

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Egyptians seemed to think about magic. Magic could be a

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 3>way of initiating supernatural legal proceedings. We also talked about

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 3>a few particular curse texts, a lot of great stuff

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.679
<v Speaker 3>about you know, if you do something bad in this tomb,

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 3>going to wring your neck like a goose, all that stuff,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>And we also talked in general about kind of the

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>main categories of curses that you find in ancient Egypt.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Of course, ancient Egypt spans thousands of years and many

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 3>millions of lives, so it's actually a quite varied historical

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 3>period to talk about. You can't capture everything just in

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 3>a little overview, But the main trends we talked about were,

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>first of all, personal curses. These would be the more

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>common kind of curses you would think about if you're

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>thinking in a you know, Christian witchcraft kind of framework.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>These would be where people magically settled scores with enemies

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and with people who they believed had wronged them or

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>were oppressing them. There were quite famously funerary curses, usually

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 3>leveled against anyone who would loot, to disturb or defile

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a tomb. There were political curses performed as these execration

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 3>rituals to bind, weaken, and destroy enemies of the king

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 3>and of the state. So this could include you know,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 3>rebels and the leaders of revolts, people the king perceived

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>as political traders, princes of enemy nations, and so forth.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 3>I'll talk about an example of this in just a bit,

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 3>but you might write their name on a clay vessel

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>or otherwise somehow symbolically link them to an effigy and

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 3>then destroy that effigy to magically curse the person or

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>the parties. And then finally you would have these religious

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 3>or cosmic curses. This is very interesting because I don't know,

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 3>in the more modern religious context, we often think about

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 3>what happens with supernatural energies that's sort of beyond our intervention,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're subject to them, they're not subject to us.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 3>But this, in fact, like we talked about last time,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 3>was kind of like a curse.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>The devil phenomenon.

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Like in the Egyptian context, cosmic curses were designed to

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 3>sustain the balance of order in the world and to

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>magically help the gods of order defeat the bad gods,

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the forces of chaos, like the serpent, apep

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>or Apophice. And so we're back today to discuss more. Now, Rob,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 3>let's see, we've got a couple of things we want

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to get into today. We do want to talk us

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 3>in some more specifics about famous tomb curses or alleged

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>tomb curses. But before we do that, do you want

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>to talk about this idea of threats to the reader?

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, this this You were talking a little bit

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 2>about this the other day, and of course it instantly

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>brought to mind things like the Ring.

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, I.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Watch this video in your curse. Already watched the video.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>There's no way on to do it. Yes, I'm excited

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to hear.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>More so, when you think about a magical text that

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 3>inflicts the curse, you usually think about a named or

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 3>specified target, right, For example, these personal curses that would

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 3>often be directed toward a specific person and rival oppressor.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Then you also have the cosmic, the religious curses we

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 3>talked about that were usually targeted at a named chaotic

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>deity again most often the serpent, apep or apophice. And

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>then you have these political curses that would certainly have

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>named enemies. In fact, sometimes the naming of enemies and

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the political curses, that's like the majority of the text

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>we have, and that kind of makes sense with when

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>you imagine what the rituals were, right, like you'd write

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the names on things and then destroy those things.

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>And also to come back to something we talked about

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>with tomb facilities in particular, there was often a duality

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to the statement. It would only be like fifty percent curse.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>It would be like blessings upon you if you were here,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, with good intentions, but curses upon you if

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 2>you are here with bad intentions.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to get back to that in a minute,

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 3>because there are interesting parallel dualities also, But coming back

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>to the idea of political curses just briefly, because I

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>am thinking about these names versus unnamed targets of curses.

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I found one pretty extensive translation of a particular political

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 3>curse and execration liturgy from the Middle Kingdom, and this

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 3>was translated by the American egyptologist John A. Wilson, who

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>was a professor at the University of Chicago. He lived

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>eighteen ninety nine to nineteen seventy six. So these texts

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>originally come from materials that were held by the Berlin Museum.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 3>The translation appears in a book called the Ancient Near East,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>an Anthology of Texts and Pictures, edited by Pritchard Princeton

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>University Press, originally published nineteen fifty eight. So the text

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 3>collection is called the Execration of Asiatic Princes, and in

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>this case that would refer to the rulers east of Egypt,

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>primarily rulers and peoples in the levant.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 4>So again, the.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Way these execration rituals worked is that the names of

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 3>the political enemies of Egypt and the enemies of the king,

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>you'd like inscribe them on a piece of pottery, and

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 3>then the pottery would be smashed, And then there were

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 3>other ways of destroying effigies too, but that seems to

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 3>be the main thing we're talking about here, smashing of

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>these clay vessels, because the names had magical connections to

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>their owners. This smashing, along with the ritual language, was

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 3>thought to weaken and harm these enemy leaders. And so

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>the fragments name the rulers. But they don't just name

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the rulers. They're like, here's the ruler, here's where they're from,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>and then also make sure to get all their servants

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 3>and all their warriors, so you know, one example is

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 3>the ruler of enoch Roum and all the retainers who

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>are with him, the ruler of enoch Ahi Yamumu and

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 3>all the retainers who are with him, the ruler of

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 3>eanoch Akium and all the retainers who are with him,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the ruler of Shootou and goes on like this, and

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 3>all the retainers and all the warriors and all his

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>strong men who fight. And so there are many examples

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>in this text in the book here that are just

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>naming princes, all their retainers, all the people who would

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 3>serve them, and then of course they would smash that

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to destroy and weaken those people. But in addition, the

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>political execration also extends to what feels like a more

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 3>prophylactic format when it starts cursing potential internal enemies from Egypt,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 3>because there are fragments that specify all men, all people,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.239
<v Speaker 3>all folk, all males, all eunuchs, all women, all officials,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 3>who may rebel, who may plot, who may fight, who

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>may talk of fighting, who may talk of rebelling, and

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>every rebel who talks of rebelling in this entire land.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>But this seems like they've got everybody. I don't see

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 2>too many categories that were left out.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 3>There, but it's funny that, Yeah, you would think not,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>but there's some general cleanup after this.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 4>They also just say.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Every evil word, every evil speech, every evil slander, every

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>evil thought, every evil plot, every evil fight, every evil quarrel,

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 3>every evil plan, evil thing, all evil dreams, and all

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>evil slumber.

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Evil dreams. Can't help those come on.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know what's going on there. But then

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 3>also there are some more texts that do name specific

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 3>traders and enemies within Egypt as well, Like there's this

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 3>one fragment that goes, AMENI shall die the tutor of

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 3>sit Bastet and the chancellor of sit hat Hoor, the

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 3>daughter of Nephru, and then just keeps naming people like that,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 3>often like the tutors of women within the royal family.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>There's a footnote that says, we don't know exactly what

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 3>this is about, but it seems like it could be

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 3>attacking traders who were thought to be part of a

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Harem conspiracy. So once again here we get these specific

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 3>targets of the curse. But of course, not all curses

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 3>that appear in Egyptian texts are targeted at named enemies.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Some are more like a general security system that apply

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>to whom it may concern. And a big example here

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that we've already talked about is tomb curses, often of

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the format just generally I'm not quoting here, anyone who

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 3>enters this tomb with ill intent, or who steals from

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>or defaces this tomb will face penalties.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 3>A common one is I will be judged with him, meaning,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 3>in your paraphrase from last time, Rob, I'll see you

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 3>in ghost chord, yeah, And then often having a more

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 3>violent or specific threat as well, like I shall wring

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>his neck like a goose.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which, as we discussed last time, may tie into

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 2>like the sacrificial killing of birds and temples. So again

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>that kind of blurring of the line that modern individuals

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>might think would exist between like the wizard and the priest.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's one text I just found in an older

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 3>book I found on the Gutenberg project that was a

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 3>collection of translated to inscriptions. This one was from a

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 3>tomb that in this it's translated Aqueja ichi Uh, and

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>it says it goes as follows the scribe in the

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 3>presence Ichi speaks with regard to any person who shall

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 3>take stones from this tomb of mine of the necropolis,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I shall be judged with them on this matter by

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the God. Okay, there you go, we see you and goescort.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>And then for I am an excellent ok who knows

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>his spells. So that's again like I've got the best

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>lawyers basically.

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and again I think in many cases the god

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>is going to be Osiris, or it could be a

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>regional deity.

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 3>A lot of these tombs that do make a threat,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>they invoke the power of Osiris.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, so on the subject of curses that that

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 3>function less like a targeted attack and more like a

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 3>general purpose security system, and have this to whom it

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 3>may concern energy, I wanted to talk about an interesting

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 3>curse format that I first came across in an academic

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>conference presentation. The American egyptologist Robert K. Rittner who lived

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 3>nineteen fifty three to twenty twenty one. The presentation is

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 3>from two thousand and three, and it is called an

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 3>eternal curse upon the reader of these lines. So, as

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 3>you can guess from the title, this is an Egyptian

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 3>curse phenomenon that feels like you'd be very at home

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 3>in a horror movie. It is a text that curses

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the reader for the crime of reading it, or, in

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Writtner's words quote an invocation for divine wrath directed not

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 3>against its primary victims, who are later damned by name,

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>but against the accidental discoverer.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 4>That's cold, and.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming this would be in like the ForWord off

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>set text and not like the epilog.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's funny because I have one full text that

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I could read in a minute where it happens at

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the very end.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>What it's like.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 3>By the way, if you read this, you also are cursed.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh man. Now, before I get to that, I do brieve.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Want to mention that the existence of this type of

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>curse is not the main point of Writtner's presentation, which

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>itself is pretty interesting, though a lot of it is

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 3>like linguistic stuff that was over my head, but it

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 3>is an interesting thing to read, so Writtener is more

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 3>focused on a few things. One is how this sort

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of relates to stuff we talked about in Part one. Now,

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the distinction between divine and demonic power in ancient Egyptian

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 3>religious thought is not all that distinct, and the categories

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>often overlap, with the same deities or entities often being

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 3>invoked as protectors and healers or as supernatural knife bearers

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and slaughtering demons. A major part of the presentation is

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>this linguistic argument that again was over my head, but

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 3>it was focused on the definition of a particular Egyptian

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 3>word which appears in a lot of legal, medical, and

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 3>magical teess some religious texts. In basically here, which written

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 3>or argues should be understood as a kind of divine compulsion.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 3>This word, he's arguing, means a kind of seizing by

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 3>a god or divine power and compelling action in a way.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 3>And this could be good or evil, helpful or harmful,

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 3>but the force by which a god or demon seizes

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 3>a human and forces them to act one way or another.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 3>This term often appears in what we think of as

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>tomb curses. So again, for example, the compulsion of Osiris

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 3>be on him who reads these words, his life will

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 3>be shortened. That sounds like standard curse stuff. You know

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 3>you are compulsion. You're seized by compulsion of a god,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 3>and here's your punishment. But it is not only used

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 3>with the meaning that the intruder will be you know,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 3>seized by supernatural compulsion to prevent them from harming the tomb.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 3>There are also positive in vocations of this divine compulsion.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Two for example, say that the reader of an inscription

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>or the person entering a tomb will be compelled by

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 3>divine force to do something to honor the dead, like

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 3>make an offering of water, or to do something else

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 3>on the tomb owner's behalf. So I found that pretty interesting.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 3>You would have these tomb inscriptions that say like, okay,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Osiris has seized you. You know, the god compels you.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Now it could be like get out of here, or

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>you will be killed. It could also be you will

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 3>make an offering to the you know, the soul of

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the person buried here.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, that is fascinating. I'm sure Julian Jaye's devotees

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>have some fun with that. One, But in general, I

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 2>just I like the idea of that. It's like, it's

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the positive side of that. It's like Osiris compels you here,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>you need to do the right thing in here.

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>But coming to the reader directed curse, one of the

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 3>most striking examples mentioned in Writtner's introduction, I think is

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>actually doubly striking, not only because it has this dynamic

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 3>where it curses the reader for reading, but because though

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 3>it is ancient Egyptian, it comes from very late from

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the Coptic Christian Egyptian period, and so it seems to

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 3>be basically a form of Christian in its theology. So

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 3>it is a targeted personal curse invoking divine violence from

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 3>the Christian God.

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 3>So the one I wanted to mention is a Ecoptic

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Egyptian curse known as Papyrus Lechechev. I think I'm saying

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 3>that right, that this is from the fourth or fifth century.

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I went and dug up the full text, as translated

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 3>by a scholar named Marvin Meyer, from a book called

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Ancient Christian Magic Coptic Texts of Ritual Power. This is

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 3>text number ninety in this book, and it's called Curse

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 3>against several violent people. Meyer summarizes it by saying, in

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>this papyrus, a victim similarly calls upon God in the

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 3>language of the courtroom, to bring judgment against several people

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>who have committed an act of violence. The closing lines

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>pronounce a curse upon anyone who opens and reads the papyrus.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'll give a few selections from the text, Lord,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 3>my God, to whom I look, who is seated upon

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the chariot of the Cherubim, with the Seraphim round about you,

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 3>who is mounted upon the four creatures Michael, Gabriel, the Archangel, Cherubim,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and Seraphim, Rabuel, Suruel, Cukuel, You who are seated upon

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 3>your throne and with your beloved son, along with all

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 3>those who have been named, and the place where this

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 3>will be deposited, and the Angel of the Church, You

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>must strike Pretasia and Tenunte and Ebenez quickly, deservedly. You

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 3>must hinder them as they have hindered him. You must

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 3>bring upon them the anger of your wrath and your

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 3>raised arm. As you cursed Samoa and Kimora through the

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 3>anger of your wrath. You must curse the one who

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 3>has committed this act of violence. You must bring the

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>vengeance of Enoch against them, as the blood of Abel

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>called out to Caine, his brother, the blood of this

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 3>miserable man will call out until you bring judgment on

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 3>his behalf against those who have committed this act of

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 3>violence against him. La loah, that is, Lord Sabba Oath.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 3>You must bring your wrath upon them in a disturbing way.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>You and who's in a disturbing way. You in whose

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>hands is every breath, who formed the world. You must

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 3>quickly overthrow the people who have committed this violence. Yeay,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Lord Saba Oath, you must bring judgment on his behalf quickly,

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 3>and then on the verso it has finally, whoever opens

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>this papyrus and reads it what is written on it

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 3>will come upon him by the order of the Lord God.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 2>But of note, you did not open the papyrus. You

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>merely read a translation. So I think, I think legally

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you're in the clear here. But I am no ancient

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian priest or wizard or copying priest or wizard.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean so interesting, I wish I knew more about

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the exact flavor of early Christianity that this is working from.

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, actually, for sure, but this sounds to

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 3>me like it it could be Gnostic influenced. I don't

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>want to say that I know that because I didn't

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 3>have time to look into that, but I would love

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 3>to go back and dig into that and figure out

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>exactly what the underlying theology here is thought to be.

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Though it is.

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Clearly some kind of strongly Christian influenced theology, but it's

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 3>the kind of Christianity where the person thinks that they

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>can just say, God, I've somebody did something bad to me,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 3>and God, I want you to go raise your arm

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>to them, destroy them.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is really fascinating. I wish i'd known about

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>this in high school when I was like I went

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>through a phase where I was super into angels and

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 2>like reading about the different angel names and all. Yeah,

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.719
<v Speaker 2>because this is loaded with that kind of thing. And

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 2>then it's interesting to think about this in terms of

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 2>stuff we've already talked about as sort of a legalistic argument,

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>because you can get us they're not directly invoking mot here,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>but there's still a sense of it. There's sort of like, look,

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm pointing to legal precedents to why you should act

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>in wrath against this individual or individuals, you know, So

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not directly saying this is necessary for balance

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and it goes beyond you, but it's pointing at legal precedents.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>And it is also kind of interesting to think about

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 2>it in terms of how this is just like buttering

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 2>up a terrestrial ruler, you know, a powerful king and saying, hey,

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 2>you're pretty great. Look at all your power. A powerful

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 2>ruler like yourself should definitely act in this case and

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 2>do so in accordance with these legal presidents.

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>That's a really great point. Yes, it is bringing up

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 3>case law, and in that way, it does feel like

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 3>it's very much in the egypt magical curse tradition, even

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 3>though it is not with traditional Egyptian deities but with

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Christian But it still has that Egyptian format, you know,

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 3>going back thousands of years. It like the way it

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>refers to other times God has cursed people for doing

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 3>bad things. Yeah, it's like remember when you did this,

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 3>It's like that time.

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I wonder though, you know, thinking about mot again and

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 2>I would have to research deeper on this, but I

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>wonder if the Christian God that is that is being

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>invoked here, is there a sense that this deity is

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 2>at least to some degree detached from mot Is this

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>a move away from mot as as an essential religious

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and cultural concept? I don't have an answer to that,

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I can't help but wonder about it

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 2>as we look at this text.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 3>So obviously, this particular text is different from a lot

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of the things we've been talking about for numerous reasons,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the big ones being that it's in this

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Christian context. But you could look at these earlier texts

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 3>as well and ask the general question, why curse the

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 3>reader for reading? What is the point of doing that?

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, the reader is not the person you're mad

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 3>at when you're writing out this curse, So why just

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>include a line that's like, by the way, if you

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 3>read this, everything I said applies to you as well. Yeah,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 3>in the tomb, cursing the reader kind of makes sense

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 3>because it's not so much about the reading. I mean,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 3>what's really being protected is the tomb. It's just logical

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 3>that if you're reading this in this place, you're probably

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 3>doing something I don't want you to, or you might

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 3>be ready about to do something I don't want you to.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>So therefore it stands to reason that if you're reading

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 3>this a threat should be applied to you.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 4>But does that.

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Really make sense with you know, magical papyri, a spell

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 3>written on papyrus, Like, why would you put a curse

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 3>on just a text? I think we we don't actually

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 3>know for sure, but there are some ideas. So I

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 3>think one idea is it may serve to protect the

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 3>effectiveness of the curse, perhaps by protecting the curse's ritual purity,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, so, like the curse is something that is

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 3>between the person issuing the curse and the deity that's

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 3>being invoked. And if you're just getting other random parties involved,

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, random people coming in and reading this who

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>aren't supposed to be, they might kind of be interrupting

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that relationship.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 4>It's just bungling.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Security of the signal or something, you know.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And or also preventing the bungling interference from readers

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 3>who don't know what they're doing and might be using

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the power of the curse in some way for themselves,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 3>because a common strain of thought in ancient Egypt is

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 3>that words themselves have magic power. Writing kind of has

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 3>a heca of its own, and so the act of

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>writing something has magic power, and the act of reading

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 3>something has magic power. This is something written or actually

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.479
<v Speaker 3>does talk about more in the in the context of

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>his you know, his the compulsion which can work either way,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 3>which can compel you to do things. I think his

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 3>idea is that the act of reading turns on the

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 3>divine compulsion feature. It can activate the magic power of

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the words therein, and so both writing and reading sort

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 3>of like turn the machine on.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 2>If that makes sense, Yeah, I mean I think it

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>more than makes sense. I think most of us can

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>relate to it on some level or another, just in

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of daily reading and writing. But man, I was

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>just just the other day I was looking at it

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>yet another anxiety tweaking exercise that involves writing, that involves

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 2>like writing out you know, particular thoughts, particular triggers and

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 2>so forth, and you know, in doing so, gaining distance

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 2>from them, sort of being able to manipulate their power.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>And there are any number of examples like that inside

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and outside of therapy that basically utilized the power of

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 2>human language. I mean, in talking about magic again, I've

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>heard it put before that magic is making the world

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 2>conform to language. You know, and you know, to a

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 2>certain extent, you don't have to believe in magic to

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 2>see that happen.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that's an excellent point.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So a big idea is that cursing the reader

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 3>could be about protecting the effectiveness the efficacy of the spell.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 4>But another thing might.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Just be about secrecy. And you could think about secrecy

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 3>for multiple directions.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you might be thinking about the.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Personal privacy concerns or the secrecy of the person invoking

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the curse. Maybe in some kind of papyri, you wouldn't

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>really want your neighbors to know exactly what you're doing.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that's a possibility, I think.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 4>But another way of.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Thinking about secrecy is more about protecting. It's sort of

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>like locking up the weapons. You know, there's a secrecy

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 3>element because a curse, the language of a curse is

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>a mimetic weapon. It's like information that can be used

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 3>to harm, just in the way you were talking about

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 3>the words have magical power to harm. By placing a

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 3>seal on a papyrus that has the power to curse,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 3>you are essentially practicing proper security with something that is

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 3>inherently dangerous.

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, and I wonder too like this we're kind

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of we're experienced we're talking about this as outsiders who

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>are like, whoa, this is a papyrus was cursed. But

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering too if this would have been just a

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>known fact about it, like, oh, that is a curse scroll.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, not to read that because if you're not

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the intended user there could be harmful ramifications.

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, that's a really good point.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is something I think that often gets

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>lost ancient texts because they come to us as text.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, we read a translation of a text in

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 3>a book, and so it's just the information component the

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 3>text taken out of its context. But the context is

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a physical surrounding the substrate that it's printed on, what

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>it looks like, what kind of object it was, where

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 3>it was, and things like that that all also contain information,

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>just in the way you think about anything that's written

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>in your world. You know, a street sign has a

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 3>different way you understand it than a page in a book,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and a page in a book can mean something very

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>different if it's like an instruction manual versus a novel

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>or work, you know, and so so many things that

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>are not stated within the text itself inform how we

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 3>understand a text and a lot of times that is

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 3>just totally lost when you you know, when it's taken

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 3>out of its original cultural context and just presented as

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 3>a translation in a book.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm, yeah, this is this is this is fascinating.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Reminds me many years ago, I was inadvertently sent an

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 2>email through work, and then after I received it, someone

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>reached out and was like, hey, you weren't supposed to

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 2>get that. There's an attachment in that email. Don't open it,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 2>just to lead it unseen. So similar, similar vibe. You know,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 2>they didn't threaten to curse me. But I was like,

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>all right, all right, I'm sure I don't really want

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to look at a you know, a spreadsheet of numbers

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand. So I'm perfectly fine, perfectly happy to

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 2>do that. And then I guess in another sense, we

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 2>receive emails all the time that we know are cursed,

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>that have cursed attachments, and we have to dismiss them

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>out of hand.

0:31:41.280 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, talk about information threat Yeah.

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well that's all I've got for now on

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>reader curses. But Rob, I know you wanted to talk

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 3>about the so called curse of the Pharaohs. What have

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 3>you got on that?

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, yeah, I mean, this is inevitably the place

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to take this because we have this, we have to

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>stress this a very twentieth century conception of a pharaoh's

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 2>curse that still remains pretty pervasive in the public mindset,

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and it emerges pretty much entirely in the wake of

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen twenty two discovery of tuton Common's tomb in

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the Valley of the Kings by archaeologist Howard Carter, who

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>lived eighteen seventy four through nineteen thirty nine and his financier,

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Lord Carnivon. This was also known as George Herbert, the

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 2>fifth Earl of Carnivon. He lived eighteen sixty six through

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty three. Of note twenty three, that's one year

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>after the discovery of the tomb. We'll come back to that.

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh, obviously the tomb got him.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's just logic's yeah, that's where it's going to refresh.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Tuton Common from roughly thirteen thirty four through thirteen twenty

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 2>five BCE. He only lived to the age of eighteen

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>or nineteen, though became pharaoh at age eight or nine,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>so sometimes looking at his age you can think, well,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't that must have been a very short reign,

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>couldn't have done much. But you know, when you consider

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that he became pharaoh at age eight or nine, you know,

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 2>is a lengthy enough rain to do a lot of things. Still,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 2>there does seem to be the indication that his death,

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, he died very young, and it was to

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 2>some degree unexpected. So this would have been towards the

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 2>end of the New Kingdom's eighteenth dynasty. And one thing

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to remember about King Tut's tomb is that it did

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 2>not lay completely undisturbed for the entirety of its history.

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 2>It was robbed twice within just a few years of Tuts.

0:33:55.920 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Burial repairs and restocking took place, but for one or

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>two possible reasons, the entrance to King Tut's tomb in

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the Valley of the Kings became obscured, possibly due to

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>silty deposits brought on by flooding. Not everyone agrees on

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 2>this count, and due to subsequent tomb construction, this one

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 2>is more definite. This meaning that means mounds of debris

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>workmen's huts being built in the Valley of the Kings

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to facilitate other tomb facilities, and it just becomes lost right.

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 3>So King Tut's tomb was not completely undisturbed, but it

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>was less disturbed than most other tombs from ancient Egypt.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and for a considerable amount of time. Yeah so,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 2>And this is during a time when tomb raiders are

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>just going to continue to plague the Valley of the Kings.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 2>It's my understanding that the Valley of the Kings was

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 2>established as a way to better protect the tombs. But

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 2>how are you going to provide protection, you know, across millennia. Yeah,

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>becomes difficult. But the tomb of Tuton, common itself small

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and less extensively decorated than other Egyptian royal tombs of

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 2>its time, likely adapted from a non royal tomb so

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 2>as to provide space for Tut in the aftermath of

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 2>his sudden death. It ends up again being remained, ends

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 2>up remaining undisturbed for thousands of years, and then during

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 2>the boom of nineteenth and twentieth century Egyptology, the Valley

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Kings receives a great deal of renewed scrutiny

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 2>from Europeans, and objects related to Tut were discovered in

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the area, and this eventually led to the rediscovery of

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the tomb itself, the contents of which exceeded all expectations.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 2>It took multiple seasons to remove all the materials inside,

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 2>and it is largely considered the most important archaeological find

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of the twentieth century. It's the only nearly intact royal

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 2>burial site ever found in ancient Egypt, and it provided

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 2>both a time capsule of the new kingdom and the

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>glimpse into the daily life of many ancient Egyptians. So

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of hard to overstate the important ardents of

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 2>King Tut's tomb, which at times it can almost be

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 2>counterintuitive because such a big deal was made out of it.

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was huge news, and a big deal

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 2>continues to be made out of it. You know, the

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the the materials from this discovery of still tour around

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the world. You know, King Tut inspires his own brand

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of Egyptomania. So but we have to remind us that

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 2>it's like, yeah, this was a huge deal and we

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>learned and are still continuing to learn so much from it.

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And at the time too, it was huge. The discovery

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 2>made international news. It was you know, bona fide international sensation.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 2>We've discussed Egypt Domania on the show before. There have

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>been multiple waves of egypt Domania throughout history, you know,

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 2>fascination with the look of Egyptian artifacts, the mysteries and

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the about how these people lived and so forth. And

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 2>it goes back at least as far as the ancient Greeks, Romans,

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 2>and Hebrews. But this is discovery of King Tut's tomb

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>kicked off. Yeah, this this kind of like new wave

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 2>that is sometimes referred to as Tutmania. I may accidentally

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 2>say Tutamania, but it is Tutmania that's as official as

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 2>a word like Tutmania can be. Okay, And a book

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 2>that I've referred back to before about Egypt Domania, titled

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 2>egypt Domania by Ronald H. Fritz, points out that Tutomania

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't just or Tutmania, sorry, didn't just make one splash,

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 2>but continued to resonate. As again, these artifacts from the

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 2>tomb go on various world tours. I mean, I think

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of us can can think to examples in

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 2>our own life where oh, the King tut artifacts came

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 2>to a large city that your family could drive to,

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, I remember going to it, I remember becoming

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 2>interested in it buying a soundtrack of Egyptian or supposedly

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 2>ancient Egyptian music, and you know it probably it's probably

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons that I'm here on a podcast

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 2>dot about ancient Egypt today.

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as with many things in the world, how to

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 3>put this, we should not hold it against King Tut

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 3>or any of his associated artifacts. That much of the

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 3>reaction or reception of him was cringe like makes King

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Tut himself and the artifacts no less interesting.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, yeah, so of course, again, Egyptomania was already

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 2>influencing our media well before the nineteen twenty two Tut

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>find again situating this within the nineteenth and twentieth century

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 2>Egyptomania and slash Egyptology boom. So yeah. At this point

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 2>we already had what was considered has been considered the

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 2>first mummy film, nineteen eleven's The Mummy, in which a

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>scientist revives an ancient Egyptian mummy with electricity and then

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 2>falls in love with her.

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 4>Was it.

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is sadly a lost film, but seems to

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 2>have existed.

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 4>I did not know.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 3>The first mummy film was basically Frankenstein or Bride of Frankenstein.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean clearly influenced by it, let's see.

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 2>And then we had literary works from the likes of

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He wrote an eighteen ninety story

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>called The Ring of Thoth and eighteen ninety two's Lot

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Number two forty nine. That one, of course, was adapted

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 2>in the motion picture Tales from the Dark Side the movie.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how accurately, but it is cited as

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the reference.

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 3>The one that's the segment with Christian Slater.

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think Steep, you send me in that

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 2>one as well. I need to see it again. I

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>remember liking it quite a bit.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 2>And then also we had Bram Stoker nineteen oh three's

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>The Jewel of the Seven Stars, and Fritz in his

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 2>work also singles out the eighteen twenty seven Jane C.

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Loudon book The Mummy That's with an exclamation point and

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 2>then a colon or A Tale of the twenty second

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Century points this out as the earliest long work about

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:04.760
<v Speaker 2>reanimated mummy. Edgar Allan Poe also wrote an eighteen forty

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 2>five story titled Some Words with a Mummy. I haven't

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:08.959
<v Speaker 2>read this one either.

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 4>What were the words?

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean some words, let's see. But again, nineteen twenty

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 2>two's discovery Tutmania certainly influenced everything. This is, you know,

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the prime reasons we ended up with the

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 2>universal horror picture from nineteen thirty two, The Mummy, absolutely

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 2>inspired by the discovery of King Tut's tomb and an

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 2>attempt to capitalize on it. Really kind of Mummy's spoitation,

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 2>if you will.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, like this is educational.

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And of note, we already had ancient Egyptian curse

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 2>fiction before nineteen twenty two, So one of the best

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 2>examples that's frequently cited is Lost in a Pyramid or

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 2>The Mummy's Curse by Luisa may Alcott. This was from

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 2>eighteen sixty nine. So we had these ideas already in

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>our fiction, in our dream making, due to fascination with

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 2>actual and interpreted tomb curses from ancient Egypt as well

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 2>as from other cultures. And we've talked about these in

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the show as well, from Greek culture, from Roman Roman culture,

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and from various Mesopotamian cultures.

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, So I think Rob, would you agree that while

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 3>ancient Egyptian tomb curses absolutely were a real phenomenon and

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 3>there are plenty of examples of this. A lot of

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 3>what people think about tomb curses comes from the fiction

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 3>that is only loosely inspired by them, not by the

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 3>knowledge of what these curses were like themselves.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Right right, as well as urban legends. According to Fritz,

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 2>two tales of cursed mummies were popular bits of Victorian

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 2>and Edwardian urban legend, again tying into in this case

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 2>tying into general fascination with occultism and spiritualism that were

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 2>also just a part of the public zifeist But this

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 2>post tut idea of the curse of the Pharaoh really

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 2>cooks into gear during first wave Tutmania. As again Expedition finance. Here,

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Lord Carnarvan dies a few months after the tombs opening

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 2>due to and we're very clear on this uninfected mosquito bite.

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So essentially, Lord Carnarvan here, already in not great health,

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 2>apparently nicked a mosquito bite on it while shaving, and

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 2>this bite slash wound became infected. He refused to rest

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to care for himself properly, and subsequently died. According to Fritz,

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 2>this also occurred after some ups and downs in the

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 2>following weeks, so not. I mean sudden in many cases,

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 2>in many ways of thinking, but maybe not as sudden

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 2>as invocations of a curse might make you think.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Now, I know a lot of people might be thinking.

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 3>The next place this discussion would go would be, was

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 3>it really the curse in King Tut's tomb that got him?

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, did that influence the infected wound or was

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 3>it not? But actually there isn't even a curse in

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 3>King Tut's tomb? Am I correct about that?

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 2>That is correct? Yeah?

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there is no curse to even question here.

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a fact. There are no explicit curse

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 2>threats of immediate death in or on Tut's tomb. But

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 2>that didn't stop the media. You know, the media is

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 2>resi sensationalist about this, and we're pretty quick to declare

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that he had clearly been struck dead by mysterious forces

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 2>aligned with the curse protection of the tomb. The New

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 2>York Times even reported this is like an actual quote

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 2>from The Times in twenty three Canarvan's death spreads theories

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 2>about vengeance? I mean, you know, that's not too terrible

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 2>a journalistic headline. They're not saying he was definitely cursed

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:58.800
<v Speaker 2>they're saying people are talking about.

0:43:58.600 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 4>It fair enough.

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess with stories like that, you know, the people

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 3>are talking about X stories.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 4>The question is always like, are.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 3>People really talking about this enough that it's worth reporting on?

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Or is it like this is just something that would

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 3>be interesting to talk about and a few people are

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 3>saying it, so let's just let's just talk about it.

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 2>I find it especially maddening these days, where this form

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of article might include embedded Twitter tweets or whatever they're

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 2>called these days. It's like, yeah, are we really tapping

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 2>into the public mindset? Maybe we are, but I don't know.

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'm just an old fogy, but it seems stupid

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to me. You.

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for any ridiculous or horrible idea, you can

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 3>find people saying it. So it's the fact that people

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 3>are saying something worth reporting. I mean, I'm not saying

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 3>it's never worth reporting. If a whole lot of people

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 3>are saying something, I guess it's worth reporting on the

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon of a rumor because that is news. But I

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 3>don't know, I guess I don't know, Like the what

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 3>is the tipping point? Like what is the critical threshold

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of organic conversation? About something that it becomes worth reporting

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 3>in a news source.

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but at any rate, it was more than just

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the Times talking about it and in general, like mummy

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:16.439
<v Speaker 2>curse may was spreading is covered in the j Store

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Daily article Was it really a Mummy's Curse? By Alison C.

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Meyer from twenty nineteen. You had just decades of writers

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 2>who were eager to attribute any death of any halfway

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 2>connected individual to the supposed curse. So just a few

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 2>examples of this. Sir Bruce Ingham not even part of

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the team that opened the tomb, but he accepted a

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 2>mummy's hand paperweight from Howard Carter and then his house

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 2>burned down. So people are like, was this the curse? Like, well,

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it seems a few steps removed, but I guess you

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 2>could make the case for it. Another one, American financier

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 2>George J. Gould, contracted new ammonia apparently after after visiting

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 2>the tomb. Was this the curse as well? I mean

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things are going to happen to you

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>after you visit any given place. You know. Again, this

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 2>just gets into magical thinking and all and ideas of

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 2>bad luck and bad omens. You did that one thing

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that may or may not have any sort of moral

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 2>weight to it. And then later on you wonder if

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>these two things are connected. Yeah, oh, and then this

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 2>one's really good. In nineteen seventy, nineteen seventy, again, an

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 2>alleged expedition member, so I'm not even sure this was

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 2>someone that was proven to have actually been there, was

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 2>injured in a traffic accident, and the London Time, Yeah,

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 2>in the London Times apparently was not too shy to

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 2>suggest that maybe it's a curse. If so, I would

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 2>say that curse had been read too much and was

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 2>a little weak. If it just causes a traffic accident

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:00.800
<v Speaker 2>decades later, and again not a fatal one.

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 3>And again we already said this, but there was no curse, right,

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 3>We're not saying there wasn't magic. There wasn't even a suggestion.

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 4>Of magic, right right.

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 2>The suggestion emerges completely from sensationalist news, and then you know,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:21.439
<v Speaker 2>and is tied into fiction and so forth. In two

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand and two, epidemiologist Mark R. Nelson published The Mummy's

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Curse Historical Cohort Study in the British Medical Journal, And

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:32.399
<v Speaker 2>this is worth looking up. He does a great job

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 2>breaking it all down. He points out, Okay, forty four

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Westerners were present at the opening of the tomb. Twenty

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 2>five of them you could say were exposed. So I

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 2>guess actually entered the tomb as part of the work,

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 2>and based on this information he broke it down. I'll

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 2>get into some of the ways it's broken down here.

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 2>You know. He found that there was no evidence of

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 2>any kind of a direct curse, and that there was

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 2>no effect on survival time for any exposure or numbers

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of exposures, because remember some people only when in once

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 2>other people are going in and out. Work continued there

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 2>for multiple seasons. Fritz covers this in Egyptomania as well.

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.439
<v Speaker 2>And yes, just this idea of the curse doesn't hold

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 2>up to any amount of scrutiny of the twenty five

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I've read twenty six. You know, basically, around twenty

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 2>five people present at the opening of the tomb, twenty

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 2>of them were still alive more than a decade later.

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Fritz rights, obviously, the curse was not operating comprehensively against

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 2>supposed desecrators of tuten Common's tomb, and of the six

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 2>who had died, most had died of old age. But

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 2>clearly the idea was just simply too enticing, the idea

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 2>of an ancient mummy's curses, as multiple writers have pointed out,

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 2>they just have too many cool factors here, the idea

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of ancient curses again, even though there's not one in

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 2>this particular case, but just the general idea of them,

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 2>just a sensational and legitimately important archaeological find mummies distant lands.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 2>They're just it's just too much. People couldn't help themselves.

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's one of the interesting things about

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Egyptomania in general. It's it's a broad tint that thankfully

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 2>contains and leads to a great deal of serious Egyptology

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and like serious interest in ancient Egyptian topics and also

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, ultimately contemporary Egyptian topics. But it also includes

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 2>all manner of fiction, fantasy, superstition, pseudohistory, pseudo archaeology, conspiracy thinking,

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 2>new religious thought. You know, not all of that is bad,

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 2>but some of it can be, at least if it's

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 2>then if there's too much of it at any rate.

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 2>The idea of the curse of the Pharaohs continued, with

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 2>various ideas often brought up as to just why the

0:49:54.840 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 2>ancient Egyptian tombs killed people. Again, they didn't. But the again,

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about this pervasive myth, this pervasive idea.

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, We're talking about explanations that were offered for a

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon that was actually not anything other than what you

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 3>would expect from chance.

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 2>One of the most common is just, oh, there's a

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 2>cursed tablet. And again, in many of these cases, there's

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 2>no cursed tablet or thing that end. You end up

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 2>having some sort of story about a particular item being cursed,

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 2>even though there's nothing archaeological or even like subjectively threatening

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 2>about it. Colleen Darnel brought this up in her talk.

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:39.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, there are certain Egyptian items that there's like

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.479
<v Speaker 2>a legacy of superstition about them, but they're not even

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 2>like threatening looking or anything. It's just they're pretty common.

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 2>But once you get this idea attached to them, it's

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 2>hard to shake. Oh, here's one. This was a Daily

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Mail consideration. What if the mosquito that bit Lord Carnavon

0:50:54.920 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 2>had filled up on poisonous embalming fluid. First, I mean,

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's an interesting idea, but I don't think

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>there's any reason to back this up.

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Wait.

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Wait, the lethal dose of poisonous embalming fluid didn't kill

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the mosquito, but it did kill the man that the

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 3>mosquito bit.

0:51:16.320 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then how did it get it? The mosquitoes

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.839
<v Speaker 2>are not gonna they're not going to feed on an

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 2>ancient mummy. And there are just too many problems. But

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>there's so many holes in this one. But it's so ridiculous.

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I had to mention, let's see trap toxins in the tomb.

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 2>This is another idea that's often brought up. And this idea,

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I have to admit, smacks a bit of miasthma theory,

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, trapped bad air. But you know, there is

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little more certainly more to this idea than

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>there is too deadly embalming fluid mosquitoes. You know, the

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 2>air inside a tomb may well be stale, could be

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 2>low oxygen in high CO two. So you could make

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a case with some tombs for methane and hydrogen sulfide.

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 2>But in general, these are just hypotheticals and there's no

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 2>proof that anything like this has been connected with actual

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 2>tombs in their openings or with human illnesses due to

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 2>their opening. Kind of coming back to the mosquito theory,

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Chemicals from mummification processes are sometimes brought up, but this

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to be a strong short term concern. Let's see.

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 2>They're also highly speculative ideas concerning radon gas in certain tombs.

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 2>But one of the more interesting ones is the idea, Okay,

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 2>how about toxic mold essentially toxic fungal spores released in

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a tomb's opening. This hypothesis is true. Just leaning into

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:49.760
<v Speaker 2>it for a moment. The idea is that, okay, maybe

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:54.879
<v Speaker 2>this exasperated the case of Lord Carnarvon, that just you know, like, okay,

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 2>he was already sick. You know, he's going to end

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 2>up with this cut on his face, it gets infected.

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 2>But what if on top of that we also had

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 2>toxic spores. I don't know, I don't think. It doesn't

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 2>seem like it's a very strong argument for a couple

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:13.320
<v Speaker 2>of reasons, but it does lead to a very interesting

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:17.480
<v Speaker 2>case from outside of Egypt that does involve his actual phenomenon.

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 3>At least as a possibility that's taken seriously. Right, So well,

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:24.800
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about that example. Because I didn't know about

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 3>this before you mentioned it to me, and this one

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 3>is really interesting.

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did not know about this one either until

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I took Colleen Darnell's class and the Curse of the Pharaohs.

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 2>She brought it up, and Yeah, I was instantly fascinated.

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Again Colleen Darnell, the Egyptologist. Go visit her website. She

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:44.840
<v Speaker 2>does these classes online all the time. They're very cost

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:48.359
<v Speaker 2>effective and they're a lot of fun. But yeah, this

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 2>is so again stressing that the Pharaohs curse is very

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:53.760
<v Speaker 2>much a twentieth century myth, but a persistent one stirred

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 2>on by fiction and sensationalism. But this one idea that

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 2>we've touched on that opening a tomb could in effect

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:01.880
<v Speaker 2>relief said death curse in the form of a deadly

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:06.399
<v Speaker 2>pathogen is not entirely crazy, because we have one case

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 2>where it may have happened. So this takes us outside

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of Egypt, this Texas to Krakau, Poland, and it concerns

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen seventy three opening of the tomb of Casimir

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the fourth Jagolan, and apparently opening this tomb did release

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 2>fungal spores of Aspergilius flavas, which was discovered in large

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 2>amounts in this tomb, and it may have ultimately killed

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 2>as many as ten conservationists that had opened and worked

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.359
<v Speaker 2>in the tomb, and done so within a year's time.

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So from what I understand, the many people who

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 3>did work on this opened tomb did soon die afterwards,

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and there were many spores of Aspergillus. This Aspergillus species

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 3>found there, and specifically the culprit was thought to be

0:54:56.080 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 3>what are called aflatoxins A. This is a variet of

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 3>poisonous fungal toxin or micotoxin produced by different molds and

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:13.840
<v Speaker 3>fungal species, but especially Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus mycotoxicosis,

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:19.080
<v Speaker 3>meaning you know, acute high fungal toxin exposure. This from

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:23.800
<v Speaker 3>aflatoxin exposure can have a number of serious negative health effects,

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 3>both long term and short term. It seems most importantly

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 3>by attacking the liver, potentially causing hepatitis and greatly increasing

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the risk of liver cancer. I've read that aflatoxins are

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the most potent carcinogens known of in nature,

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 3>so they attack the liver and with serious enough exposure,

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 3>it's aflatoxins can cause acute death, cause acute organ failure,

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 3>especially with the liver and death and more moderate rates

0:55:56.840 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of exposure have potentially been linked to all kinds of

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 3>other problems, including growth, stunting, and children. Though most of

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the concern about aflatoxin exposure comes not from opening tombs,

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 3>but from exposure through contaminated food crops. So like contaminated

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 3>nuts or grains or other food crops that are stored

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in like warm humid conditions can develop aflatoxin contamination through

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of Aspergillus in them, and this can be

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 3>really really bad to eat. In fact, aflatoxins I believe

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 3>were first discovered in the nineteen sixties and this was

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 3>linked to this famous case of the so called turkey

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:44.720
<v Speaker 3>X disease among not the country turkey, but the animal

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 3>turkeys in England where I was looking at. A study

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that mentions this called aflatoxins history, significant milestones, recent data

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 3>on their toxicity and ways to mitigation in the journal

0:56:58.200 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Toxins from twenty.

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:00.080
<v Speaker 4>Twenty one by p.

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Cova at All and in this overview they describe as

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 3>follows quote. In the late nineteen fifties and early nineteen sixties,

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 3>a new, so far unknown turkey disease characterized by heavy

0:57:12.680 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 3>mortality was identified in England after the Turkey disease outbreak

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of unknown nature and ideology, the Turkey so called X disease,

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the discovery of aflatoxins began. A total of one hundred

0:57:26.320 --> 0:57:29.919
<v Speaker 3>thousand turkeys died of so called Turkey X disease after

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 3>being fed with contaminated Brazilian ground nut meal on a

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 3>poultry farm in London. Though of course it has only

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 3>affected turkeys, lots of humans around the world. There have

0:57:39.880 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 3>been aflatoxin breakouts in food crops around the world and

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 3>many people have died as well. So this is like

0:57:46.800 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 3>a serious, very potent toxin, but usually the risk is

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 3>improperly stored food or contaminated food, not again, not tombs.

0:57:57.960 --> 0:57:59.920
<v Speaker 3>But of course if there were a whole lot of

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 3>aflotoxin from a strongly Aspergillus contaminated tomb, you could imagine

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that also being a serious health risk to people who

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:09.439
<v Speaker 3>were messing around in there.

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, yeah and again again why this fund

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 2>is widely distributed in soil across the globe sometimes colonizes

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 2>important agricultural crops, but is not something that's like only

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 2>found in tombs. And in fact this is like this

0:58:25.440 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 2>is the case of this occurring. I don't believe this

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to be a widespread phenomenon. Oh a little background though,

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to throw in Kasimir the fourth Yagalan who

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 2>was he? While he was a fifteenth century Polish king

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and Lithuanian Grand Duke, an important European ruler of the day,

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 2>noted for his defeat of the Teutonic Knights during the

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Thirteen Years War the fifteenth century. None of this business

0:58:48.640 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 2>with his tomb reflects on anything good or bad about

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 2>his life or rule. And to be clear, there was

0:58:54.560 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 2>absolutely no issued Yagalonian curse, despite some media sensationalism around

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 2>this as well, like he never said don't open my

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 2>tomb or there will be a fungus or anything like that.

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 2>This just is the way it panned out. But it

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 2>certainly didn't stop various folks from absorbing this information and

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 2>then saying, well, what about touch tom What if this

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 2>actual occurrence is the reason that people died because of

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 2>opening king's touch tomb. Again, all the problems with the

0:59:29.520 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 2>accuracy of that statement in play, they just couldn't help themselves.

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:38.320
<v Speaker 2>So despite again, despite the fact that with King tut

0:59:38.360 --> 0:59:42.919
<v Speaker 2>we're dealing really with only a single death with other

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 2>very well known factors in place, and we know that

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 2>no one else associated with the opening of this tomb

0:59:49.200 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 2>died of any mysterious causes. There's also no evidence that

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 2>touch tomb contained dangerous microbes or fungi of any sort. Furthermore,

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 2>according to Colleen Dornell, no one she knows of has

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 2>ever become ill from entering an Egyptian tomb. Yes, you

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>can catch pneumonia later, you can catch all number of

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>things later, and you will eventually die after visiting an

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian tomb. That's one hundred percent true. Yeah, but you'll

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>all that also happen if you don't visit an Egyptian tomb,

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>which doesn't mean you absolutely should, because again, it's going

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>to happen either way. But I guess what I'm trying

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>to say is, Yeah, this idea of there being some

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of a biological agent in the tomb that does,

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>from in a medical sense, curse the individual. It is

1:00:34.000 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 2>technically possible with certain tombs, but not this one.

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, technically possible, but doesn't even seem to be especially

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>common with the opening of tombs.

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, But it's an infectious idea, Yeah, MS T

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>three K fans, for example, especially may remember a nineteen

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>eighty two Mummy movie titled time Walker. It stars Ben

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Murphy and its plot concerns a deadly alien fungus inside

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>an ancient Egyptian sarcophagus.

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I've never made it all the way through this film,

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 3>but I love the idea of a space mummy, So.

1:01:08.400 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I haven't seen it in a while, but I

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 2>remember the ending is very memorable. I forget all the

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>beats on the way there, but the ending is a

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun.

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, another question in all of this may come to mind,

1:01:29.640 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and that is, well, what about traps? I mean, on

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 2>one level, you could say, what if there was some

1:01:34.720 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of a biological agent and it was late as

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>a trap. Well, I don't think there's any serious argument

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to be made for that being the case.

1:01:41.560 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 3>But rob we discussed in the last episode how actually

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot in a lot of ancient Egyptian thinking that

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:52.120
<v Speaker 3>it was a common thing to attack a problem with

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 3>multiple avenues, with multiple mechanisms at once. You would have

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>a magical arm of attack and a practical arm of

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:03.600
<v Speaker 3>attack right against the same issue. So if tomb robbers

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>were something you were worried about why not have both

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a curse on the tomb, you know, magical arm of

1:02:10.160 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>attack and practical traps. That would make sense, wouldn't it.

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's a reasonable question to ask on

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:19.600
<v Speaker 2>one level, given that, I mean, we look at the pyramids,

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>we look at these the great works of the ancient Egyptians.

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>We know they were capable of amazing things by contemporary standards,

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 2>or certainly their own standards, the standards of their time.

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 2>On top of that, you know, we've all seen a

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>little Indiana Jones. We've seen at least fictional examples of

1:02:37.560 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>this sort of thing going on. And you know, here

1:02:40.240 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>on the show, we've discussed the possibility of tomb traps

1:02:44.000 --> 1:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>within the context of the tomb of Chin Chi Wong,

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the first sovereign emperor of China. So if that's even

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>in the discussion for that I believe as yet unopened tomb, well,

1:02:57.080 --> 1:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>what about Egyptian tombs?

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, even in that case, my memory is we

1:03:01.560 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>were like, are there any booby trap tombs? Like in

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Indiana Jones? And that was the example where there's like

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>the best case that there might be booby traps, But

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>even in that case, it's only a possibility. And also,

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>if there ever were such traps, they're probably not still working.

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Right right and if and you know, I imagine you

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>could also ask questions like, Okay, if you have some

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of traps set up, how much of that is

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like a legitimate real world trap, how much of it

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>is indeed magical thinking, like having a stone or some

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:34.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of supercistitious or religious practice, like having a stone

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>warrior within your tomb, or like having various goods for

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the afterlife, perhaps having some sort of a crossbow set

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>up to kill someone who enters. That could as well

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>be as much a curse as it is a practical consideration.

1:03:52.000 --> 1:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>But to be clear, with Egyptian tombs, traps of this nature,

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, pure Indiana Jones traps like trap doors and

1:04:00.120 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>spike pits and darts that shoot out of the walls crossbows,

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>these are apparently unknown. And there's actually a really good

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>life science article about this topic from just last month

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>by Owen Jaris. I found it an interesting read. The

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 2>author spoke with Reg Clark, author of Securing Eternity, Ancient

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian tomb production from prehistory and the basics of this argument.

1:04:25.720 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>The counter argument to the idea of traps and why

1:04:29.000 --> 1:04:32.280
<v Speaker 2>we don't see them in ancient Egyptian tombs. It comes

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>down to three factors. So, first of all, just about

1:04:34.960 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>any booby trap you can think of would only have

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>limited success against tomb raiders because while Indiana Jones works

1:04:42.520 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 2>alone or with just one individual a love interest or

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>someone who's going to betray him, actual ancient Egyptian tune

1:04:50.000 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>raiders worked in large groups. So if you had a

1:04:53.000 --> 1:04:55.280
<v Speaker 2>death trap in place, yeah, you might kill a few

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of them, but the rest are going to keep going

1:04:57.600 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>work around the trap, or the trap's no longer going

1:04:59.840 --> 1:05:02.919
<v Speaker 2>to be be effective, and they might just not realize, hey,

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>we encountered a death trap, so I guess we're on

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the right track. We should keep going in this direction.

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>That itself sort of highlights some ways that you could

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:15.720
<v Speaker 3>have practical protections for a tomb that wouldn't be deadly

1:05:15.800 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>booby traps.

1:05:17.800 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, and again also, of course there are all

1:05:20.800 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>these practical concerns with a passive trap. They weren't great

1:05:23.800 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>in an Indiana Jones movie, but with they work in reality,

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and when it comes down to it, it seems like

1:05:30.760 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>architectural features were just far more effective ways of keeping

1:05:35.080 --> 1:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>out tomb raiders. So passages sealed with huge sliding blocks

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>or just a cascade of rocky material that would work

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 2>far better than any trap you could imagine, because you

1:05:48.880 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>know it's just just you know, you're dealing with rock,

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>You're dealing with with just sheer weight and mass. Additionally,

1:05:55.880 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>it's possible that some pyramid passages that seem to lead

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>nowhere were included to confuse robbers. I think there's still

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>some open questions about this, and I've also read like

1:06:07.920 --> 1:06:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the possibility of trying to convince the tomb raider or

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the would be tomb raider that the tomb has already

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:18.120
<v Speaker 2>been robbed is another possible strategy that was employed. And

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:22.920
<v Speaker 2>these would these would evolve, especially the architectural features, These

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 2>would have been the most effective against your tomb raiders.

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Just putting an enormous stone block between them and what

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>they want to steal. That's going to work better than anything.

1:06:31.480 --> 1:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, So we know they definitely use the locking mechanism

1:06:35.360 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 3>seal the entrance or try to hide the entrance. They

1:06:38.720 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 3>may also have used various forms of confusion against tomb robbers,

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:47.120
<v Speaker 3>like maybe a false chamber or a false passage or

1:06:47.120 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 3>something that's more up for debate. What we have no

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:53.160
<v Speaker 3>evidence of is like, yeah, spikes that shoot out or

1:06:53.200 --> 1:06:54.840
<v Speaker 3>crossbows or anything like that.

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then on top of this, first of all,

1:06:57.320 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>we have to we have to think about the fact that, yeah,

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the ancient Egyptians clearly thought about eternity and long term

1:07:06.440 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>time and the same way that humans today do as well.

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>But they also were very concerned with the actual threats

1:07:12.920 --> 1:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>of the day, and therefore it was a little different

1:07:16.440 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>than imagining Indiana Jones trumping in. Right. You were dealing

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>with known tomb raiders, known tomb raider groups, known operations,

1:07:25.760 --> 1:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>and therefore you had first of all, the potential for

1:07:28.440 --> 1:07:32.320
<v Speaker 2>just human guards to be involved human patrols, and you

1:07:32.400 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>had the dual powers of first of all, real world

1:07:34.960 --> 1:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>laws with brutal punishments for tomb raiders, and then on

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>top of that and also in case those didn't work,

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the supernatural curses we've been discussing.

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and to really hammer on something you said just

1:07:47.400 --> 1:07:52.880
<v Speaker 3>a second ago, From my understanding, the biggest concern about

1:07:53.000 --> 1:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>grave robbers in ancient Egypt wasn't about the distant future.

1:07:57.120 --> 1:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>It was about you were concerned about people who would

1:07:59.360 --> 1:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>come rob your time, whom a few months after it

1:08:01.840 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>was sealed or within a few years.

1:08:04.080 --> 1:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which was again the case with King Tut's tomb

1:08:06.360 --> 1:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>as well, like Rob twice just in the immediate aftermath

1:08:09.880 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of the burials. So yeah, this is more what they

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>seem to be concerned about. But it is almost we

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>almost have. It almost feels counterintuitive at times when we

1:08:21.600 --> 1:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>think about them, because we are. When we think about

1:08:23.360 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the ancient Egyptians, Yeah, we do get down and think

1:08:26.400 --> 1:08:28.759
<v Speaker 2>about them as like, you know, real people that lived

1:08:28.800 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>real lives and were in so many respects much like

1:08:32.600 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>we are. But on the other hand, yeah, we also

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:38.960
<v Speaker 2>think about an ancient people like and they that have

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 2>this kind of mythic quality about everything they do, you know,

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:45.879
<v Speaker 2>even if the thing they're doing is you know, consuming

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>honey honey, or trying to treat an illness or just

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>every little thing that occupies our lives today.

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:55.679
<v Speaker 3>When we think about them, it's tempting to imagine that

1:08:55.800 --> 1:08:59.800
<v Speaker 3>they were thinking about us, but probably weren't thinking about us,

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>were much more likely thinking about their own contempt, themselves

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and their own contemporaries.

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Though, one point that Colleen Darnell made was that

1:09:08.680 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, King Tut would probably be pleased to know

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:13.479
<v Speaker 2>that we are still talking about him, still thinking about

1:09:13.520 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 2>him today, you know, I mean talk about you know,

1:09:16.640 --> 1:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>long term name value or at least a resurgence. You know,

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess there was a long period of time where

1:09:21.840 --> 1:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>people were maybe not talking about Dudent in common. But today,

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean he is probably for most people, he is

1:09:28.720 --> 1:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>like the pharaoh you would name. If you went out

1:09:31.160 --> 1:09:33.839
<v Speaker 2>and ask people on the street, like, name a pharaoh,

1:09:34.200 --> 1:09:35.519
<v Speaker 2>they would probably say King Tut.

1:09:35.840 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

1:09:36.080 --> 1:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, to bring it back to the subject of a

1:09:37.920 --> 1:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Writtner's divine compulsion, one of the things that a tomb

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>would sometimes say, you know, the power of a deity

1:09:44.320 --> 1:09:46.960
<v Speaker 3>or supernatural being will seize you and compel you to

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>do is to speak the name. Speak the name of

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the person buried here, because that was thought to have

1:09:52.840 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 3>a power of its own. It's something that some people,

1:09:55.479 --> 1:09:57.799
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people buried in ancient Egypt

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 3>wanted people to do. They wanted people after they had

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:03.640
<v Speaker 3>died to continue to speak their name. That was like

1:10:04.160 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>a blessing you could bestow upon them. Yeah, yeah, so

1:10:07.960 --> 1:10:10.439
<v Speaker 3>do something nice for an ancient Egyptian speak their name.

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>There you go. All right, We're gonna go ahead and

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>close this out, but we'd love to hear from everyone

1:10:15.880 --> 1:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>out there. We'd love to hear from folks who have

1:10:19.280 --> 1:10:24.160
<v Speaker 2>engaged in Egypt, Domania, and Egyptology to varying degrees. If

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you've visited any of the sites that we have referenced

1:10:27.880 --> 1:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>in these episodes, we would of course love to hear

1:10:30.760 --> 1:10:34.519
<v Speaker 2>your experiences and gain your knowledge right in. We would

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>love to hear from you. Just a reminder that Stuff

1:10:36.960 --> 1:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to Blow Your Mind is primarily a science and culture podcast,

1:10:39.439 --> 1:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesdays we

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:44.479
<v Speaker 2>do a short form episode, and on Fridays we set

1:10:44.479 --> 1:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>aside most serious concerns and just talk about a weird

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>film on Weird House Cinema.

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

1:10:52.520 --> 1:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:10:54.080 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:58.519
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

1:10:58.880 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

1:11:09.400 --> 1:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:11:15.360 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you.

1:11:16.880 --> 1:11:31.840
<v Speaker 7>Listen to your favorite shows.

1:11:37.160 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>M