WEBVTT - Surveillance: Covid Communication Efforts

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. This is not

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>only the Interview of the day, the Interview of the month,

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>but indeed I would suggest this is the conversation of

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the summer. It was long ago and far away where

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a radiologist from Mount Sinai came into my studios through

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on the ground some X rays from Wuhan and said, Tom,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>this is serious. That is followed with medical people worldwide

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>helping Bloomberg Surveillance to understand this horrific pandemic. Nowa it

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is time for education with leadership in the first founding

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>partner at Verizon, Hans Westberg joins us, the chairman, the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer, and we're thrilled that the woman that's

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>making this up, Lisa Sherman of the Acclaim ad Council

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>joins us today. Hans. Let me go to you first. Simply,

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you got on board before Apple before Benny off its

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>salesforce and said, this matters. Why is Verizon that communicates,

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is Verizon helping Lisa Sherman and messaging what we

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>need to do on COVID And this says, well, well,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>no one. As you mentioned in the beginning, this is

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>unheard of. Pandemic has hit so hard on this count

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world. And of course one

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that is important, of course the communication around it

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and and raising the awareness and the science around the

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccine coming up right now. And we thought that when

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is coming out, we have a very big responsibility

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>as a huge employer and it's a big company to

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be part of that communication about their awareness and also

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>about the science around it. This I sup in our

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>society that as a government of the information and that

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>has been heating most heatd by these pandemics. So for us,

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a national to be a founding bout Runce

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Sherman. My mother sold war bonds. This is a

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>few wars ago, and that was started by the AD

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Council in the nineteen forties. I grew up with only

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you can prevent forest fires, and now it's only you

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can prevent COVID. The AD Council has been definitive and

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>messaging America. How are you going to message education to

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>get the courage to vaccinate in America? Well, first of all, Tom,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Uh. We're clearly dealing with the

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 1>biggest public health crisis in our lifetime, and we fundamentally

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>knew at the AD Council that we had to launched

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the largest public the public education effort in our history.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Um So we've recently launched a massive, coordinated communications campaign

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that brings in every every sector in the economy, and

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>our focus is really on trying to get people to

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have confidence in the COVID nineteen vaccines, which you know,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have them in such short order

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is is nothing short of of heroic. But at the

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, what we're seeing is high levels

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of vaccine hesitancy. Just the data probably pretty current, about

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty cent of people right now have either begun the

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>process of vaccination, have it at least one of the shots,

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or intend to get vaccinated. The other end of the spectrum,

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got about fifteen percent of the people who say

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>they're never going to get it. So our focus is

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>really to to talk to the thirty five percent of

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Americans who frankly are taking a weight and see attitude. Lisa,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us about the nature of that thirty

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>five percent? In other words, is there a unifying characteristic

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of individuals in the United States who don't want to

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccine? You know, we've done a lot of

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.559
<v Speaker 1>work and trying to understand hesitancy, and it's pretty complicated

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's very nuanced. You know, it ranges from everything.

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>People have a lot of questions and they just want

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>answers to their questions. Some of it could be you know,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>how did this happen so quickly? Did people trade off

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>um efficacy for speed? Others have longstanding concerns because of inequities,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and especially in the black and Hispanic communities where there

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have been long standing inequities in the healthcare community. So

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we see higher levels of hesitancy among Black and Hispanic communities.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We also have begun to see more hesitancy among conservatives. UM.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>These are folks who also have a lot of questions UM.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And really the common thread I would say, Lisa, is

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that people don't want to be told what to do.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They want the information, They want to be able to

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ask their questions. They want to feel empowered to make

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>decisions with themselves and for their families. So we go

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>from the public health side to the business side, and Hans,

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a question of mobility and cities of traffic to

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>retail stores. You see the nexus of all of this,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>both with mobile data as well as your retail stores.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing people materially increased mobility as vaccinations pick

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>up or has it been slower than you would have

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>otherwise expected. It was a time in the May last

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>year and we measured this sometimes on how mobile people

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>are is how the moving in between radio towers, and

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it was done in some of the most urban places

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty six, meaning people moved sixty percent less they were

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>staying home. That mobility is slowly coming back, and we

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>have seen a clear and improvement the loss of the

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>months are where as the optimist not coming. But as

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we all know, and the optimism is in the end

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the tunnel, so we just need to see that

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we get to this first. But clearly we see more

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>food traffic in urban areas, more mobility in areas. Right now, Lisa,

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to the branding of all

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this you did this advitacount for years. The idea of

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a mind is a terrible thing to waste. The crying

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Indian ad campaign, which I remember clear as a day

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>from Earth Day, years and years ago. Can you just

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>message now or do you need celebrities? Dolly Parton has

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>had the biggest impact so far. Miss Parton was out

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there with her COVID confidence. Do you need celebrities? So

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Hans Vestberg is happy with your program. Well, what I

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>will say that, and I mentioned it at the top.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, trust is at the core of hesitancy, and

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I think what we have, what we know

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and believe, is that not only is the messaging important,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but the messenger is also critically important. Who are those

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 1>trusted messengers that each of these hesitant groups really believe

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and trust and feel comfortable with. And so for the

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>common thread again, another common thread to Lisa's question is

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that medical experts are at the forefront. They're the number

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>one people want to understand from their nurses, pharmacists, have

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they taken it? And then there are amplifiers, those people

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that can allow sort of helpful So I don't mean

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to interrupt because of time, I think your observation is

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so so important here. Franklin Graham set up a set

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of tents on Central Park outside Mount Sinai at the

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this What do you need from the evangelical

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>leadership away from the medical community to get evangelicals and

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>conservative Republicans on board? What does he add, Council need

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>from Franklin Graham. Look, we've engaged broad based faith faith

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>leaders who understand that this is not an either or decision.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You can have deep faith and believe that the vaccine

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>can help you and and free you to get back

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to life um and and and keep your family safe

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>hunts hunts. There also a question about the faith in

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a better future, and we're looking at a way to

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>track towards a modern era of tech prowess. And before

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we let you go, we have to ask about the

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bill that Biden has put together and the five

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>G build out in the United States. What's your impression

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of what's laid out in the proposal as it currently is.

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>How much will it help get five G roll out

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in a smooth and consistent way across the United States?

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>As I think that five years an important piece of it.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think that when we understand where lead from

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>five to seven years when it comes to digitalization in

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>this country, Taylor Health, remote learning and all of that.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important. And there's three pieces that's all

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the the in front accessibility, a broad band, affordability

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and usability and all these three needs to play together

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in action, the close and the digular divine that when

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>open with this leap from with one of the most

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>sustainable technologies mobility broad by the clown. So I think

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that's what we what we are talking about and talking

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to the administration about that we need to think holistically

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to solve the problem. It's not only one thing,

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but clearly five D is an important piece of it.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>We're rolling out quick and we've ever done before, and

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>more than we're ever done before, we have increased our

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>called capis again. So this is an important piece for USS.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Hans Vetsburg, thank you so much for joining us today

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with Verizon and their leadership on this program. And Lisa Sherman,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>good luck on your program. To me, it's absolutely definitive.

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>As we go into the end of two thousand twenty one,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Miss Sherman with the AD Council President and ce Oh

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Man here for a three hour conversation. She's City

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Group Global Chief Economy is Kathy Man. I really want

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the locomotive here, that is the US.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Geta gop and Haff talks about the divergences that are real.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Are there any trains behind the locomotive and what's the caboose? Well,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US is a locomotive. It's the one

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>country that's growing faster than everyone else relative to its

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>historical experience. So it's the one that is going to

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be running a larger trade deficit over the next year

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or so um and virtually everyone else is either running

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a smaller deficit or running a bigger surplus. So, uh,

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the US is back back on track to be the locomotive.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The problem is it's not quite as large as it

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>used to be relative to the global economy. It's not

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>quite as powerful locomotive as it used to be, So

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a challenge to get up the hill.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's also a question of how much this really

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>brings the rest of the world along with it. And

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the big disagreements frankly on Wall Street

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm hearing how much just continue to bet on

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the US versus the rest of the world, or to

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>bet on other areas that will get carried along. What's

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>your view on that? Based on a concept of a

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>strengthening dollar given the amount of dollar denominated debt out there, well,

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so emerging markets are the ones who tend to be

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>most at risk UM when we're talking about dollar denominated debt.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's important to think about the two

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>factors that are relevant when thinking about an appreciation of

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. The first role is that it does and

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and the stronger U s economy that's associated with the

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>stronger dollar UM. That is the trade channel, which is

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>an important channel bringing in imports, helping economies to grow

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>through that channel, relative to the concerns about dollar denominated

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>debt and the exposure that countries have when you have

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>an appreciation of the dollars, So those two are in

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>opposition to one another. What we have found in doing

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>some work looking at the Taper tantrum period relative to

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>where we are now, is that many more economies are

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the position of gaining when the dollar appreciates, because

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>not only do they have dollar denominated debt, but they

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>also have dollar denominated reserves, and so you have to

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>consider that as well when thinking about the exposure on

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the financial side. So this is an argument perhaps that

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world can come along more than

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>some people think. Is that your view here that we're

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see an acceleration that picks up speed in

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets in perhaps Europe? Perhaps two is the

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>U s slows down well, So I think we have

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to consider not you know, the US is not the

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's in is going to be positive for

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. There are a lot of negatives or downside risks,

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course that has to do with the vaccination

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>path um and how soon those economies can get vaccinated

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and how soon they can get back on track with

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>their own internal domestic demand. I mean, that's an important

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>ingredient in the growth process for any economy, is domestic demand.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>They can't entirely depend on export led growth. Again, we

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have to remember the US as a locomotive is not

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as strong a locomotive as it used to be, say

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty years or four years used to be. In part

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of this, Catherine Man, is whether we are a more

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>open or less open economy. Where does the US stand

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>right now is an open economy that dynamic to other nations. Well,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the globalization as as a general rule has

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been on the back foot for more than a decade

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>um in terms of their slowing of integration into the

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>global economy. There's basically been a generalized slowdown in terms

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of that integration, and the US is no exception from that.

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh And, of course, on the back of the last

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>administration's approach to trade policy, which was to be very protectionists,

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that of course, uh made the US less open. The

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>general tenor of the debate is not towards openness. So

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to be concerned about both the politics of

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of of an enlargening trade deficit that we that we

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>will see in the data. We have to worry about

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the politics of it leading to potentially even more of

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a retrenchment in terms of globalization. Do we have to

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about debt sustainability? Uh So, debt sustainability, it's very

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>much a question of whish economies are going to be

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>able to grow fast enough to put them on put

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves on a sustainable path. Uh So, there's an intimate

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship between domestic demand led growth export orientation. For most

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the world UH and debt sustainability. But in the

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>longer term, of course, what really matters for debt sustainability

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is long term capacity or of what we call potential output,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and that depends intimately on business investment. We've got to

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>have business investment being catalyzed by the infrastructure programs that

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the US is talking about, that Europe is talking about,

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that a number of countries are talking about in the

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>context of their net zero commitments. Something that is climate

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>oriented is going to require private sector investment, and that's

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a critical ingredient, along with of course labor markets and

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>UH and and productivity growth. Kiltainman, a few years ago

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, you had the privilege

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of working with Rudy Dornbush. He handed you to the

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Bible as you graduated from m I T tell us

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about the Bible, that the great Rudy Dornbush, and did

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you right? So Rudy was one of my thesis advisors,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Grupman being the other. And what really gave me

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>signed copy of the first edition of Robert Mundel's International

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Economics um and that really represents both both Rudy's his

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>first edition, by the way, open economy macro economics which

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>integrated goods and markets and asset markets in one place.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that his bible and then of course his

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mentors bible, meaning Robert Mundel's international economics. Those are really

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>my bible's today. The continuity of this doctor man is

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely extraordinary. I can think of nowhere else where there's

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>such a cadence as there is an international economics. What

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>do we think today that Robert Mundel invented fifty years ago? Well,

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most famous thing that we have been

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>working with in the open economy that has his name

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on it is the Mundell Fleming model, which put three

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>different markets together, the sort of the I S curve

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning the the investment savings part of the economy, the

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy the so called LM curve, and then the

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>open economy meaning balance of payments and how that change

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with regard to exchange rates and external demand. So um,

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>those are the three markets that continue to be the

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>important ones. How we measure them as different, how we

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think that they work together is different, But those still

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>are the drivers of economic performance, and today taken for

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>granted and at the time foundationally and revolutionary for Robert

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Mandel dr Man, thank you so much. With City Group,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>their global chief economists, Laureate of Columbia years old, who

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>were to do here is really frame where this equity

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>market is. And you can do that by looking back

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at decades long ago and far away. On a Friday evening,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Martin's wide would sit across some LaRue Keiser and he

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>would quietly whisper, don't fight the Fed. She was at

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>zwag Avatar years ago, Liziene Saunders out of Delaware, and

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of course has become one of our most important equity

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stock market voices across this nation. Lizene Saunders joins us

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning from Charles schwab Boy. I'll tell you, Lizie,

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the money that's been lost by people don't fight this Fed.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>They've gotten crushed, haven't they. It really is quite extraordinary,

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and but a lot of people don't remember, since we're

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>not all that past the when your anniversary at below

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is that it was actually on Latch twenty third, two

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty that the said announced many of the

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>backstop learning facilities they were put in place specifically for

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic that kind of bridge over to help the

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>main street side of the economy, and that just showed then,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think we'll bill are watching the power of

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's words, even if it predates specific accents. The

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>consensus launch of earnings off of grimness a year ago

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>is up fifty earnings. What is the liz Ane Saunders

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>run rate of actual earnings growth forward? Well, so fifty

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>four is for the second quarter, which, of course the

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>comp relative to the second quarter of last year is

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the easiest. First quarter consensus is up twenty four, and

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got big leadership areas in terms of contributions at

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the sector level consumer discretionary, financial material. So clearly the

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>cyclical bias to what you're going to see the biggest

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>pops um you know, longer term, we've seen earnings growth

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.719
<v Speaker 1>significantly above GDP growth obviously, but I think the story

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead will be one potentially about profit margins, and

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's key to watch and list sent two

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in this quarters or first quarter orange season, which begins imminently,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is what do we hear from companies um, not just

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about first quarter earnings but guidance for the out earnings.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Do more companies step up their pace of guidance, because

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>remember you had a record number of companies with drawing

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>guidance altogether at the midpoint of last year. But also

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what many of the price increases that we're seeing in

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this gutting inflation, what that means for profit margins as

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we look to the next couple of quarters. And behind

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>this uncertainty is a question of whether we're setting the

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bar too high or the bar too low. And just

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>want to bring you this news from CNN that President

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden wants all adults vaccinated or at least eligible to

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be vaccinated by April nineteen, again bringing forward the deadline

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>originally it was May one this idea of perhaps we

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>set our expectations too low at the outset when it

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to earning lissans. Are we setting our expectations too

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>low or too high? I don't think we know the

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>answer to the yet. The latest trends in terms of

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>revisions and ostensiblieve that's as as analysts get more guiding

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is for the first quarter we're up to sixty seven

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>positive revisions versus negative revisions, So that trend is good.

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But we certainly may get to a point where you

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>shift from last year's story of analysts when left basically

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to their own devices to try to gauge where UH

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers were going to fall. Ended up bearing on the

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>side of setting the bar too low, and that's why

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>we had a record beat rate in the second quarter,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>record beat rate in the third quarter, we had a

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>strong beat rate in the fourth quarter. In the fourth

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter we actually went back into positive territory in year

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>over year growth terms. The question is the enthusiasm associated

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with the reopening of the economy that strength were likely

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to see in GDP numbers. UH The analysts now been

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>beholden enough that they're going to raise the bar, and

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there's just there's there's no precedent for the kind of

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>environment and the nature of this crisis and the impact

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to earnings and visibility even at this stage, regardless of

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>what we know about her immunity and vaccine. So I

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's still really really tricky to try to

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>gauge where the bar is set relative to where companies

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to report LAS. And there's a wisdom of analysts,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a wisdom of markets. And right now

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>from the what you can see in markets are equity

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>traders pricing in a greater proportion of beats than the

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>equity analysts on Wall Street, the idea that they're actually

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>foreseeing and pricing in something much more robust. Well, those

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>companies that are providing guidance are are quite optimistic, and

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where you're seeing the upward revisions. I think analysts

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>covering industries or companies where there's still that limited guidance

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can think about the obvious areas, whether it's

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in leisure, hospitality, the service society, the economy where they're

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>still isn't that visibility or based knowledge yet of the

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>reopening is going to look like that's still a prospective thing.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I think on the good side of the economy, I

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>do worry that estimate bar may have gotten up a

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I think the whole pent up demand story

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>which has been driving optimism, I think is more valid

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on the services side of the economy than it is

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on the good side of the economy. Pretty much across

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum of durable goods, be it um, housing, autos,

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>these cars, anything home improvement related electronics UM I actually

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a risk of pent down demand,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not so much pent up demand, because we're well above

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic levels in those segments. Of the the economy,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's too much extrapolating of that strength

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past year out into the future. Is that

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>one final question, what are we doing with our money?

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>What does Schwab see that we're actually allocating out in

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>four oh one case. You know, it's been interesting the

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>flows lately. They've definitely taken on a little bit more

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of a defensive posture, at least at the subasset class level.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So the flows into utility utilities are actually the strongest

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past months, which is quite extraordinary. And then

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>prior hot areas like communications services and financials are on

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the lower end of the spectrum, but also at the

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>broader asset class level, definitely seeing a pick up an

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>interest outside the US, so positive flows in the map

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>past month or so into parts of the rest of

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, particularly emerging markets, and actually a bit of

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>outflows out of the domestic equity side. And we we've

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>had an you know, and overweight on developed international um

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>equities since the beginning of this year, and uh, we're

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in the flow data at least in the

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>past month or two. It Sanders, thank you so much,

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Chief investment strategist of Charles Schwab Right now on our

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>domestic politics in America. We look northeast of St. Louis

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to Cardinals Territory, moveing up southeast of Springfield, and then

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on up somewhere in the vicinity of Chicago. It is

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a narrow district, the thirteenth Congressional District of Illinois, and

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Rodney Davis joins us UH this morning, Congress

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>from thank you so much for joining us. Do you

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>need a six lane highway from Taylorville into Springfield? What

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna get out of the infrastructure bill? You

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, we already have four lanes between Taylorville and Springfield.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>It's great for for our community here in Grade, for

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>central Illinois. UM. You know, I just hope we get

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>some bipartisanship out of the infrastructure bill. That's what I'm

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping for. When we get by partisanship, we need to

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>go to centrist Democrats who need to get reelected and

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>centrist Republicans two cycles ago you barely won reelection this

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>time around, granted you did better than ever. Are you

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a centrist Republican and what is the common ground you

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have with Senator Mansion of West Virginia. Well, I am

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>listed as the thirteenth most bipartisan member of the House

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>according to the Luger Center Senator Mansion. He's showed that

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he can be a force in the Senate. The problem

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>we have right now with this infrastructure package and bipartisanship

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was the message that Ranking Member Sam Graves and I

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and a small group of Republicans sent directly to the President,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to the Vice President, to Secretary BUDDA. Jedge in the

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Oval Office a few weeks ago, that we need by partisanship.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think Speaker Pelosi and Leader Schumer are

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to allow the administration to go that route. Though, Congressman,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>giving your experience on the Committee UH for Transportation Infrastructure,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Roads and Bridges, this is your purview. What does a

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan bill, a true bipartisan pill that could pass look like?

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>How big is it and what does it focus on? Well,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to get into debates about how much

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>something could cost. Let's actually dedicate a bill towards rebuilding

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>our roads and our bridges, our waterways, our airports are

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>locks and dams. If we can do that, you will

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>have Republicans crawling all over each other to support a

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bill that The problem we're going to have, though, is,

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe this infrastructure proposal is going to be nothing

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more than the Green New Deal disguised under a convenient

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure title that will dedicate a small amount towards Rhodes bridges, waterways, etcetera.

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's very frustrating. You see in the proposal the administration

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to spend fifty billion dollars to stand up another

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>agency within the Department of Commerce and forty two billion

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>for all of the locks and dams, all of the waterways,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the ports and even airports in this country.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not a proposal, the congressman putting aside this particular proposal.

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's say there was a bipartisan agreement on the infrastructure

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>plans that you thought were necessary, and let's say it

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty expensive plan, would you support raising corporate

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>taxes in order to pay for it? Not at all.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I think opening up the income tax code UH to

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>pay for infrastructure is the wrong way to go. UH.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of talk from Secretary Buddha Jedge and

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>others who I had We've already enjoyed a good working

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the Secretary Um talking about jobs being created

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>with this package, I want to know how many jobs

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to be cost in the small businesses that

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to pay more in taxes coming

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>out of a pandemic. That's the last thing we should

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>be doing. Corson Davis, I'm sure that you wanted the

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>All Star Game to be held under the stadium there

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the shadow of Stan Museal and St. Louis Cardinals

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that went to the Rockies. I understand that, but it's

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the why the move of the All Star Game. On

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>this debate in Georgia over the Voting Rights Act and

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what Georgia will do about its elections, common please on

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what the Republican response should be to find fairer elections. Well,

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I just wish some in in corporate

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>America would have read the bill in Georgia and would

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen the expansion of access to voting for all Georgians.

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>We had problems in Fulton County run by Democrats where

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they had lines out the door. Um. This bill would

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>open more precincts, and those are the types of issues

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that I certainly hope Corporate America stays off a Twitter

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and starts actually looking at legislation. My biggest fear is

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats are going to try and act like HR

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>one that passed only with a partisan roll call, and

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the only bipartisan about it was the Democrat opposition joining

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>all Republicans. I think they're going to try to turn

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that into the national version of George's reforms, and that

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>bill would be a disaster Congress. From the Georgia distinction,

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>as we're moving the decision process of elections from the

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State of Georgia and the executive branch over

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to legislative control, legislative controls and ancient art form and

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>your state of Illinois, is that the trap we have

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and that our voting processes become a legislative process and

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>not that of the executive branch. Well, we need to

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>make sure that our states and our localities have control

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>over their elections as the Constitution puts forth. The Bocrats

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>have tried now for two Congresses, and I've led the

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>fight in introducing HR one, which would nuclear rise and

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>expand expand procedures like ballot harvesting that have already been

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>corrupted with fraud. We didn't seat an elected Republican in

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina's ninth district in because one of his operatives

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>used a fraudulent process by trying to create a ballot

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>harvesting process in that district. And the unfortunate thing is

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll likely go to jail because of that. But if

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he was in California, what he did would have been

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>perfectly legal, and that's wrong. Those are the types of

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>policies that Democrats in Washington are trying to push forth.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Also there to add seven point two million dollars in

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>public money to their own campaigns. And I don't want

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>HR one to become the next rally and cry because

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it is not a voting rights bill at all. Congressman,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>part of what I'm caring for you has heard of

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this decrying of an attempted by partisanship that absolutely fizzles.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Is now very much a democratic effort in the House

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and on the presidency. But a lot of people say

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that they just learned from prior administrations, including the Obama administration,

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that tried to do something on a bipartisanship level and

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't get anything done. Just quickly, what's your response to

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that on on infrastructure? Because they failed miserably and what

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they proposed. You can't come up with a piece of

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>legislation that you know was only going to appease one

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>side and say take it or leave it. Look at

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the last time we had a non reauthorization infrastructure package

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that was under the Obama administration with the Obama Era

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Area Era stimulus bill called ARA. That bill had about

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>six percent of the funding dedicated towards infrastructure. Even the

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>current Democrat Chair of the Transportation Infrastructure Committee, Peter Defacio,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>voted against that bill because it wasn't enough infrastructure. I

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>see Democrats going down that exact same path. The proposal

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they laid for is woefully underfunded when it comes to

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding our roads and bridges, And if that's what's going

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen, they're going to negotiate with the far left

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of their party and it's only going to get worse

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for jobs. Rodney Davis, that is the largest backyard I've

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>seen and I think thirty years. I hope the kid

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's mowing that lawn is not using a push mower.

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>They're out on the John Dere golf cart or whatever

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>pushing it around. Rodney Davis, Thank you so much to

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Congressman from the thirteenth District in Illinois right now and

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to focus on China with Stephen Roach of Yale University,

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>his book The Next Asia, years and years ago set

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the tone for essays on China. He followed it up

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with an important book on the dysfunction UH that we

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have with China. And right now, folks, it is a

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>new UH dysfunction. Steven Stephen Roun tell me about the

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>new codependency of China with China and AMERRAA Is it

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the same as the old codependency? Well, the thing we

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>know about codependency tom UM, whether it's human relationships or

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>economic relationships UH, is it's never constant. It reflects the

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>tension that builds between interpersonal in this case bilateral UH

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>partners in UH trade and economic commerce. And you know,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>China's changed its growth model. We're uncomfortable with that. We've

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>raised a lot of other objections about China's behavior in

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>areas like geostrategic strategy and human rights UH, and so

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we've taken a unilateral trade action against them and the

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. And what my fear is, and I wrote

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about this recently, is that by not changing from Trump's

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>policy UM President Biden's administration has been boxed in by

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>UH really venomous politics and is afraid to break out

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and try a new approach. And we need a new

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>approach or this relationship we're going to go from add

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to worst. Your US saying Project Syndicate was exceptionally important.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to expand it from boxed in with China

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to take off your book of years ago, boxed in

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the next Asia and the idea that it's not

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just about China, but it's about the Pacific room as well.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>To use a phrase from President Obama, what should be

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the pivot in strategy of the Biden administration. Well, the

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>pivot was a part of the problem because it was

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly aimed back in the Biden ad excuse me, the

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration of putting a lot of pressure on China,

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>excluding China from what then was called t P p

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>UH and UM. That really pushed China to take a

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of I think destabilizing actions of its own UH

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in the South China see in the Belt and Road initiative,

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and that then culminated in the trade war that we're

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>now trying to find a way out of after four

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>years of disaster. And the Trump administration. Professor Roach, do

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you think that the infrastructure Plan as it's laid out

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>as a way to increase some of the capacity of

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tech sectors and the five G willed out in the

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>United States is an effective way to engage in this

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>codependency that you talk about, perhaps get a little bit

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>more independence for the United States. Well, we certainly need

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade our infrastructure. A lot of people have been

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about that that for a number of years. I

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have to give the the creative side of the Biden

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>administration a lot of credit for expanding infrastructure into areas

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that we never considered it at all under the general

0:34:55.800 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>elk of what is infrastructure? But you know, the question arises,

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and you've debated on the show, is as noble as

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the objectives are. Is anybody giving much consideration to how

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>we pay for this? I mean, with interest rates at

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>zero right now, you can do anything you want, including um, uh,

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>not just infrastructure, but uh all sorts of massive social programs.

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>But what happens if and when interest rates start to

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>go back normal? And uh, that's the unanswered question right

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>now and is to be Steve. All of our listeners

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and viewers want to know what you think about asset

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>bubble inflation. You were definitive on this at Morgan Stanley

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago of saying there's mandates of the FED, and

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>one is to monitor asset bubbles. Is the FED monitoring

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>an asset bubble right now? Well, it's certainly monitoring it,

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's also doing a great job in creating it. Um.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>And so you've got uh, the combination of zero interest rates,

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>massive liquidity injections uh spilling over into financial markets. And

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you guys reported you know on your show

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>every day from um you know, SPACs um to UM

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin uh two. And now we have I guess a

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of froth in housing markets. This has all the

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>classic manifestations of a very frothy environment. And you know,

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the FED is basically um uh talking out of both

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 1>sides of its mouth. It was worried about asset bubbles,

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>yet it is responsible for creating the conditions that are

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>creating these bubbles. At the same time, although you will

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>some people have said that the FED policies and some

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of the fiscal spending that we've seen will lead to

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a very depreciated dollar, one that is highly below where

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it is currently. That leads to some sort of inflationary

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>push that is really detrimental to the country. We have

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>seen the opposite this year, as we've seen the growth

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that has stemmed from some of these policies. Do you

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>think that this is short lived and that we will

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>continue to see a tremendous dollar weakening or do you

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>think that this highlights the potential success of some of

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 1>these programs. Now, I've been one of the ones who

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>have been outspoken about the downward pressures coming on a

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar at lisa UM. You know, it was a call

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that was out of consensus in the second half of

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, and it worked and it's not working uh

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:37.479
<v Speaker 1>so far in two thousand twenty one. But I think

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the combination of plunging domestics saving a massive current account

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>deficit a fad that would normally respond to those um

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>developments by tightening policy, but won't uh that that's going

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue to put further sharp downward pressure on the dollar.

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not working now, but I suspe will as we

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>moved through the year. Stephen Rhodes, thank you so much

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with Yale University, and of course Steven wrote some would

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>say in helping with that Hyman to invent modern market economics.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening.

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene and this is Bloomberg