WEBVTT - Ep. 5: Shane Mahoney

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome episode number five of the Honey Collective.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm been O'Brien. I'm joined today by a unique individual

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to say in the least, and that's Shane Mahoney. Shane

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>is the president CEO of of an organization called Conservation Visions.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You may have heard him speaking in the public venue

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about conservation, about his efforts, all the things he's done

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>in his life. Shane is a native of Newfoundland, but

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he's also a scientist. He's a wildlife manager. He's a

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>policy innovator, he's a strategist. He's a filmmaker. He's a writer,

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a narrator. He's pretty much the most interesting man

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in conservation, both by his awesome beard and hat and

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the way he speaks, the way he rates, and how

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>he comes across as a hunter. I wanted to catch

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>up with Shane about a lot of things, but mostly

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about his knowledge of history and how he sees the

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>hunting world right now, and I believe it was one

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of the more interesting and passionate conversations I've had in

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>some times. So I'm happy to share that with you,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and without further ado, Mr Shane Mahoney enjoyed Shane. How's

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it going. It's going really well. Um. I'm excited to

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have this exchange his ideas and conversation with you, so

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it'll be another chance to talk about something we both

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>feel really passionate about, which is the conservation of wildlife

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and our outdoor traditions. So very happy to be here

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with you. Absolutely well, thanks for thanks for jumping on

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>with me. I think before we get into it, we

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>should address your you told me you have a shiner. Currently.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>There was a little bit of an incident the other day. Yes, well,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I was doing some tree limbing on the weekend, taking

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the fact that here in Newfoundland this winter

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't have nearly as much snow as usual, and

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I was up on a high ladder and this particularly

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>large branch of some mature maple trees I have on

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>my property decided to jump and smacked me in the

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>face and knocked me just instantly off the ladder, onto

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the onto the ground with roaring chains on my hand.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But fortunately the worst of things did not happen, and

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I just ended up with a fairly significant cut. And

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>now I'm sporting a lovely looking a bizarre I which

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't normally be a complication, except that I'm doing some

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>filming in the next couple of days, so we're trying

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out if if that can work, and if not,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll just have to postpone and wait for my my

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>eye to go back to its normal color. Yeah, I'm

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>working on a cold myself, if anybody can hear that.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're both we're both fifty, but we'll make this

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>happen nonetheless. So I wanted to just talk to you

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>about you know, I've probably got many hours of conversation,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like we've had a little bit in the past, about

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>conservation and your philosophies and the things that you care

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>about and are working on currently. But I realized I

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't really know much about your upbringing or um, you know,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>really your hunting history. So I wanted to just kind

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of start by, um getting a little bit of your background,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, growing up and your first introduction to hunting

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and conservation and and really the the beginnings of of

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of your passions. Well, I think the most important and

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>influential element in my thinking and in my life was

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that I was raised, born and raised obviously in the

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Audit of Newfoundland and lived in my early childhood period

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and into my adolescence in very rural circumstances, in an

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>incredible society, and in an incredible place where the physical attributes,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the sea and the land itself, very rugged place sort

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of imparts a sense of identity and a sense of

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>awareness of the physical and biological world that is impossible

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to miss. And I grew up in a culture where

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>there weren't any policemen. There weren't any hospitals, there weren't

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>any lawyers, there weren't any insurance companies. There weren't any

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of those kinds of things, fire departments, or things of

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>that nature. They were really communities that relied absolutely fundamentally

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>upon themselves in one another. We are the oldest non

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>native culture in North America. All the people don't realize that,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>but the firm cultural identity of a single place, no

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>other place, but no full ang goes back so far

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>as to have that, and we have, over a period

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of five hundred years approximately, um we developed a very

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>close association with the natural world. The fishing of fish,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the whaling of whales, the ceiling of seals, um the

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hunting of wild creatures, the growing of our own food,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and domestic lives, doctor so on. This became just the

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>natural order. It was the natural rhythm of things. And

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that world gave all of us

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as children, completely unfettered lives. Everyone in the community above

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a certain age who was male was known as uncle

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>so and so. And I don't mean that it's some

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of folk Taylor's way. That is absolutely true. Everybody

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who was of a certain ages of women was ant.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We went in and out of one another's homes. We

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we slept over in lots of cases, as though we

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>were parts of families. Children that got into trouble were

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>chastised by anyone in the community, but they were also

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>looked after by everyone in the community. So I also

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>came to appreciate over time the kind of values and

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the kind of cultural identity that comes with people who

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>live close to the natural world. And of course this

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>has been maintained and as exemplified in a sort of

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>very crystalline way with the the new play that has

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>made such a hit on Broadway and elsewhere now around

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the world called Come from Away, which talks about how

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Newfoundlanders welcomed sevent of all the Transatlantic travelers, most of

0:06:55.839 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>whom were Americans who were coming back to North America

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 1>on that fateful day of nine eleven. And so I

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>came to a very early appreciation of this relationship between

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>human cultures and traditions, the harvesting of wild creatures, and

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are absolute total dependence on the natural world as a concrete,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>inseparable kind of idea. Um. And of course all of

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this takes place organically, and a child and a human

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>being as they mature, but there's absolutely no question that

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the genesis of it. More importantly even than that,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps is the fact that because of this childhood, animals

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and nature became we're not only incredibly accessible to me

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and to all of my friends, siblings and so on,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was entirely possible for us to

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it every day without fear. I mean we we

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we We lived in a society where everyone knew one another,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and where no one was concerned if children disappeared for

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>long hours or played at the end of wars, or

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>when trouting by themselves, as I so often did, even

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>as a very small boy of five and six years

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of age and even earlier. And also, of course, there

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>were the domestic animals the horses and the sheep and

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the hens and so on that that people kept, and

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so you always had these kinds of companions around you.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And then if your inclination was stronger than some, which

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>there's always variation, then of course that environment set it free.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>And I came. My life with animals began as a

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>very very small boy. And while hunting has had an

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>impact on me, animals have shaped me. And so I

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>don't see hunting as the ultimate driving force in my

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>association with animals. I see animals as the driving force

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of my engagement with wildlife and with animals, and I

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>see hunting as something that is a part of that

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>um and which makes it entirely possible for me to

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>say that I hunt and I love animals deeply, without

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely any sense of contradiction or any sense of fear

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that I would not be able to defend that in

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>any circumstance or any debate anywhere in the world. And

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it extended to wild creatures as well as domestic creatures.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I love the ponies, I love the chickens, I love

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the sheep. I I and I've never lost fascination with animals,

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>whether they are domesticated animals or whether they are wild creatures.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the ultimate, the ultimate expression of that

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>journey then is that I really and this offends some people,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I really don't see very much difference

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>between so called us and then. And this opens up

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of philosophical discussions, of course, and sometimes makes

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>hunters feel some hunters not at all, but some hunters

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>feel a bit uneasy. But for me, as a hunter,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to accept that truth can still be able

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to do it absolutely absolutely well. I mean, there's a

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>lot there um to unpack, but especially but but what

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>strikes me is just in your upbringing. Um, there's a

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of aspects that we're missing in the modern world.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We're missing in the urban world and even the suburban world.

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Your connection to the people around you, A deep sense

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of trust that that you had there and that that

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>will allow you to probably explore more than maybe you

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>would have if you didn't have a sense of trust

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in your community, uh, and things like that. So I

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>think that you know your passion for animals in the

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in the connection you feel to them. I'm sure it

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was just driven closer by the environment that you you

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>grew up. And I find that to be be something

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in the modern world that we we lack. And um,

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think more folks could could take heed to the

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>way you grew up and the changes that we've seen

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last few decades. Well, I think that is true,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course it's a it's part of the great

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>conundrum for conservation in in many ways, because we know

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>that there is increasing urbanization occurring worldwide. I mean there

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is a there is a continuous and strengthening move to

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>cities of course by people in cultures all around the world,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is having a lot of effects in the

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sense that it is separating a lot of people from

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the natural world more and more. But at the same time,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it is also freeing up considerable landscapes that at one

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>time were occupied by people that are now being reclaimed

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>by wildlife at many parts of the world, um, which

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't think about. But this is

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the outcomes of urbanization which is a benefit

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to conservation in the sense that it's more spaceful for

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>wildlife to thrive and exist. Um. The flip side of it,

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>of course, is this problem of association from the natural world,

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and we are going to have to find ways to

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>bring people to a concern for animals and wildlife regardless

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of where they live. Fortunately, because our relationship with animals

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is such an evolutionary thing. I mean, it's so deeply

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>bettered in us. But the one thing that city people,

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>if we could call people city people versus rural people,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>do not differ on is their fascination with animals and

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>with wildlife. Um. That's why the television shows like the

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>BBC's Planet Earth, which to a large extent simply featured

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the biological diversity of the planet, attracts the largest television

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>audience of all time. UM. So we're not helpless in

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this debate, as some of the rhetoric might suggest. And

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because children like technology just like we did as children,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just like every human child has since we broke the

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>first stone. Um, you know this is uh, this, this

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need that. We can define a significant conservation ethic

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>within people in those circumstances, and we might be reminded,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as hunters and anglers that it was the urban elites

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the United States of America, the George Bird Grinnell's

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Theodore Roosevelt's it was the urban elites of

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>your country which led the movement for conservation at the

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>turn of the twentieth century. Absolutely there was a lot

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of Europeanism in those ideas that who would be a hunter? Right?

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, that leads into a great uh, a

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>subject that I wanted to cover up. Not I wasn't

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>sure we'd get to it today because there's so much

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but just uh, the beginning of conservation in this country, um,

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and how you know, eighty years is a long time,

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>um since we really got into the things like Pittman

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Robertson Acts and some of the more important legislation. UM.

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But I believe it was you know, the turn of

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the century when Pinochet define what conservation was and started

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to understand this idea that market hunting was going to

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>two was ruined us to our wild life into America

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and we needed to have a different set of ideals.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So talking, I know, you have a lot of knowledge

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>about that, and you've been really involved and you know

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in the North American model of wildlife conservation and theorizing

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and talking a lot about how conservation came to be

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and then in the pursuing you know, preceding decades why

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it needed to to change when it did. So I

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>would love you. I As an aside to that, I

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of hunters that do not know

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>much about that history, and in our outbit removed from

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>things like Pittman Robertson UM and and funds they pay

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>into because they are generations, removed from the idea that

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it was necessary. So I think it's it's important to

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover those things well. It is important because in

0:15:55.080 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the broadest conceptual sense, UM, knowing our history is what

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>prepares us for the present and the future. UM. And

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>also knowing our history is what helps give our nations

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and our people a sense of identity. And one part

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the history of the United States and of Canada

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>meant certainly of some other countries, but really significantly in

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States was the rise of this idea of

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>conservation and which was really kind of the forerunner of

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the sustainable use movement, etcetera. UM. You know, it's hard

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for people today to believe that a hundred and twenty

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and indeed a hundred fifty years ago, UM, the ravages

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>being applied to wildlife and other natural resources such as forests,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, but also river systems so on, were just

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>extreme in in the United States. In particular and in

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>parts of settled Canada, the depletion of wildlife was at

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>such a state that, as I have said and reminded

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>many policy makers, if we had had endangered Species acts,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the turn of the twentie century in

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States Canada, most of the iconic species that

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>most readily come to mind too people when you say

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the word wildlife, you know, such as black bear, or

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>white tailed deer, mule deer, elk, you know, species Canada, geese,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>wood ducks, wild turkeys, and all these kind of iconic species.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They would have all been on the endangered species list.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>There's absolutely no question of that. Depletions were so extreme

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and so geographically extensive and widespread that every one of

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>them would have been elicted. And yet we live at

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a time whereas hunters like to point out, most of

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>those iconic species, of course, are ones that are very

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>safely distanced from anything like an endangered species listing, and

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they are in extraordinary abundance in many cases. So we

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have somebody there are being killed in our highways and

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>turkeys in our driveways. It goes. So this is an example,

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, all the extraordinary capacity of a country

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to move from wildlife crisis to wildlife triumph. And of

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>course every country in the world is preoccupied with this

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>issue today, and yet we have a demonstration of our capacity,

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, beings to undertake such rescue missions and

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be successful. The second most important comment about that, of course,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the people who responded to the crisis were

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>people who, in many cases never needed to worry about

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>their opportunities in life at all, because they were elites,

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they were from wealthy backgrounds, and so on and so forth,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and yet they threw themselves into this fight as nationalists, essentially,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>as Americans, as people who believed, as Roosevelt articulated that

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>if you did not care you could excuse me about

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the natural resources of your country, and if you did

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not want to play a part in their management and

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>custodianship so that future generations could inherit them and share them,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>then you really had no right to call yourself an American.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>This ultimately got translated in the American social political environment

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to the White House because as a result of you know,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>an assassination, obviously um Teddy Roosevelt comes to power. He

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>becomes the President of the United States of American he

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>draws into the vortex of power are in the White House,

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>these ideas and then brings them to the nation and

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to the governors, to the to the political infrastructure of

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the country, and then sets about, you know, doing the

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>famous things that people know about him, you know, setting

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>up national parks and wilderness areas, while life reserved and

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all of that. And while all of that was important,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing that people like pin Show and

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Grinnelle and Roosevelt gave and which Roosevelt personified, was he

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>gave to the American people this idea that conservation of

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>wildlife and natural resource has mattered. And despite the fact

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that not everybody had been a fan of Teddy Roosevelt's

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>when he was in the presidency, and despite the fact

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, when he left the presidency obviously eventually, um,

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a very interesting that no American president since Democrat

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>or Republican has really done it, has really done much

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to damage the basic kind of infrastructures that Teddy Roosevelt

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>put in place. Despite the fact that he had so

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>many critics at the time, that suggests to me that

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>he embedded something in America. He embedded something in the

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>American people, and that that makes political leaders think twice

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>about changing too much the way that the resources of

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>your country are managed. And this doesn't mean that every

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>American citizen knows the history. It doesn't mean that every

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>American citizen walks around preaching this. Of course they don't.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But still there has to be a reason for why

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>his programs and institutions have been so resilient over a century. Well.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think the uniqueness of those ideas is really

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>codified in the fact that today every American values wild life.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we disagree in a lot of ways

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about how that value looks and feels, what it means,

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think we all, unlike you know, Africa or

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>other areas of the world, we all have a value

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>determined value for those animals. And I think that's really,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, the legacy of the

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>early conservationists. I mean, I think it has to be

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that that there's no one in this country that would

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>would stand for the wholesale slaughter of the animals like

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it was in market hunting times. No, I think that's

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely true, and the sensibilities of the nation have

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>changed in many ways, of course, but I think you're

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right about widlife. And and of course this is

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the great this is the great suit of armor that

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that conservation wears. Right. I mean, there's there is a citizen,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>citizen rebacking these values. It's not just a handful of

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>professionals in the US Fish and Wirelife Service or geological

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>survey of the National Park Service. It's not just a

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>group of you know, of effective bureaucrats buried within you know,

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>government offices in Washington. It's not just a Secretary of Interior.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not just anything. It really the solid fabric of

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>this movement lies in the this sort of generalized kind

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of awareness and sensibility that is now part of the

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>American psyche. And you know, I think this is what

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all opportunity for conservation going forward springs from that reservoir

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of commitment and hope. Absolutely When then you go to seven,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>specifically when Franklin Roosevelt got a bunch of people together,

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousand conservations in fact, and they call it the

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>North American Wildlife Conference, and and that was I think

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that is a huge point in the readings I've done

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the history of of conservation, because they then began

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to put together a way to pay for all these

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>ideas um, because obviously that you care about wildlife, you

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>want to take care of them and leave places for

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>them to roam, and for hunters to want to pursue them. Well,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to have some sort of funding to do that.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So talk about a little bit about you know, the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>user pays public benefits model, and a little bit about

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>what was happening in the late nineteen thirties there around

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Franklin Roosevelt and then the passing of the Pittman Robertson Act,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and then what that meant going forward, because I think

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that's often also a lost aspect of the conservation movement. Well,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the first and most obvious UM

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>residences and similarities in fact between you know, this time

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 1>period of the mid mid in late nineteen thirties and

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the original cement period of the turn of the twentieth

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>century and a little bit before, was that both were

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fueled by crisis um America obviously had you know, suffered

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the incredible effects of this sort of dust bowl era.

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>The economic challenges were there, and interestingly enough, of course,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a relative of Theodore Roosevelts is in the White House

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and does a great many things in the conservation realm,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the conservation Corps, and yes, there was a variety of

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>pieces of legislation established in that time period. Um. You know,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the the North American Conference and Wildlife Management Institute were

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>founded at that time. A number of very influential NGO

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>groups came to rise at that time, the Wildlife Federation,

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>just just the cooperative Wildlife Research Unit process. I mean,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>there were many, many, many, really substantial innovative changes that

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>took place in that period of crisis in America at

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that time under Franklin Roosevelt's Roosevelt's leadership, the the ideas

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that there should be a user pay system to some extent,

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and that that kind of in in a sense, oversimplifies

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>conservation in America. But the phrase is often used, and

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>so it's helpful to discuss it in those terms. You know,

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this this need was identified much much, much earlier. George

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Burt Runnell was the first one that I am aware

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of who actually wrote in Forest Stream, which he was

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the editor of for many decades, UM, that it should

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be the hunting community of the United States of America

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>who paid for all wildlife enforcement. Um. This was an

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>idea that was thirty forty years ahead of its time,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but nevertheless, the notion that there needed to be money,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that the resource had to be managed and protected, that

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the money had to come from somewhere. This was already

0:26:55.080 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>floating in the sort of conservation air. And when end

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we finally saw this solidify or codify, who was when

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, people decided, okay, let's pass legislation and find

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to raise significant amounts of money to help

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>support the state agencies fundamentally in your country, which were

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of course constitutionally legally given the responsibility for the public

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>trust of those resources, in other words, to manage and

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>custody of those resources that you know that existed within

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:36.239
<v Speaker 1>their individual jurisdictions. And so the idea surface that you know,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a way to do this was to put a federal

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>excise tax, you know, on commodities that will be used

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>by people who were involved in the outdoors, principally people

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who hunted um and so rifles and ammunition and things

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of this nature, and that we could place a tax

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>there that would eventually be would be redistributed back to

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the states based on the formula of land areas and population, etcetera.

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Etcetera um, and that those moneys would then be given

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>directly to the state agencies to manage the state wildlife resources.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know it. First of all, there were

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>more than hunters involved in that process, because obviously anyone

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>who practice shooting, for example, and the target practiced skate

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>shooting and trap shooting its own, and so forth, anyone

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>who actually purchased the firearms and ammunition were also contributing

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to that fund and therefore also contributing to the state

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>agencies capacities to manage wildlife, whether they were hunters or not.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So there was always a more diverse community helping to

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>fund the state agency than just hunters. But over the

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>intervening time period between nine seven and the present day,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the Prisment Roberts and Act and the moneys

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that have come from it, I mean it literally had

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has raised billions above billions of dollars every placeable amounts

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of money that had been diverted to the management of

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>wildlife in your country. And even to this day, of course,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the dollars spent by hunters and also now because of

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>subsequent legislation, the money spent by anglers people who fish

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>are a major component, a majority proportion of the moneys

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that the state agencies have to operate with. So it's

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a it was a seminal piece of legislation, bord of

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>ideas that had been launched thirty to forty years earlier,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>finally enacted and passed, and you know, has just made

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely unbelievable difference to the conservation and management of

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>wildlife in your country. And you are the only country

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 1>in the world that I'm aware of who has something

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of this specific nature. And it is not by any

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>coincidence in my view, that the the States of America

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>also has the most mature, the most complex, the most

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>innovative conservation UH institutions and system in the world. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, I think uh in my

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>research and readings, it's about six of those state agency

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>funds come from UM either license sales or or Pitt

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and Robertson funds UM or excise taxes. And that's that's

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that's huge. And over the over this eighty years of

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>its existence, there's something like eighteen billion dollars or the

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>funding that's that's been pushed in. That's just that number

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is amazing to me and it's amazing as a as

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a child that I wasn't taught that, or coming up

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>as a hunter that that wasn't in just instilled in

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>me that you're part of this history, this tapestry of

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of really smart people who cared about wildlife.

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>They created this amazing thing that you're now paying into

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>UM for this privilege. And I wonder if you have

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on why we don't as Americans celebrate that as

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>much UM as I think we should. Well, I think

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason is just that, you know, you

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have to have UM. The idea of communicating history has

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be someone's purpose, just like anything else in society. UM.

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>The idea of communicating your political history, for example, in

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America, has been a has been

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>undertaken by generations of amazing writers and historians and academics, etcetera.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you know what happened joining, for example, the

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>formative years of the founding of the United States, what

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>happened during the time of the Revolutionary War, what happened

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>at the time of the building of the consensus at

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>strife around the constitutional frameworks? UM, what happened joining to

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>America during the Civil war or what America's entry in

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the Two World Wars. You know, you know America has done.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Your country has on an amazing job of capturing that

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>history and bringing that history to the American people. Similarly, um,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the efforts of your armed forces over you know,

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a very long period of time, obviously has been widely

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>celebrated and communicated and commemorated um by you know, American

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>citizens who who who gave that knowledge and offered that

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to the rest of the public. And that's why

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there is such strong support in your country today for

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the men and women who serve in your own forces.

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But someone has to do it, someone has to take

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this on. And you know, while many people today talk

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>about the North American model, I remember when that term

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was born, and that term did not exist until nineteen

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eight, did not exist in the English language. Yet

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people I talked to today, you know,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, speak about that term as though

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of always been with us. Well, no, it

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't always with us at all. And the interesting thing

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is that it was a Canadian who came up with

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the term, of course, Dr Valerius Geist, and I was

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a student of his, of course, and remain a great

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and fast friend of this amazing man, and I undertook

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea of popularizing it and then, working with other colleagues,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we did just that. So when somebody raises the term

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>North American model, it is a primary example of what

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I am saying in response to your question. It took

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a group of people who were determined to communicate this

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>history to make that emission without any real resources. We

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any plan. All I knew was that this

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>concept had to go forward and led to efforts that

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>eventually involved state agencies and provincial agencies and governments. And

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>when I see the North American model as a term today,

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it makes me sort of marvel at the fact that

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we can bring a new concept to the broad public

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and have it embedded and have it talked about it

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and have it exercised. But what it amounted to was

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a need, a need to explain to people that there was,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact a model in North America. So in a way,

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it too was born of crisis. Because one of the

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons why that term was developed it was because there

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was a growing trend in Canada and the United States

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 1>at that time in the nineteen eighties, nineteen seventies, nineteen eighties,

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and which persists to this day of privatizing wildlife HM

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and the the arguments that developed between those who were

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in favor and those of us who opposed. The privatization

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of wildlife, which remains, as you know, a very hot topic,

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>led to the question of well, what's at stake? And

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it was a result of that question being posed in

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>people's minds that they're developed a response. And the response

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to what was at stake eventually became formulated in the

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>concept of the North American model, which described the system

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of institutions, policies, and laws that arose out of the

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>sustainable use of wildlife, which we've just talked about going

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>back to the time at Roosevelt and Grenelle, etcetera. That

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that system was real, it wasn't a falsehood. And if

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we were to privatize wildlife, many many, many of those policies, laws,

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and institutions would be rendered either unimportant, useless, contradictory um

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and eventually we would undermine the successes of North American conservation.

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's where that term came from. So it too

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>very much been was really born out of the need

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to defend something that's need, that's something really to really

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to look a look through here in this conversation. I

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that this I believe there are seven tenants of

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that model. Talk through that. I mean talk to how

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 1>those were determined or or how you call those out

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and what that structure you look like, and why that

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was important. But I think the first thing to say

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>at the outset with this, because you know, this is

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a conversation that you know often arises in as and

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as different viewpoints are brought to bear on it. You know,

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>questions of roles will know why seven went out? Ten?

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Why not this one? Why not that one? And they

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the idea of putting together this framework was not too

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 1>um was not to suggest that this was all their

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>loss or two say this could not be rewritten or

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>redefined or improved upon, or attitude. There was never any

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of authoritarian and kind of dictation going

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on when this ferment started in the late nineteen eighties

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and carried through through the nineties and now as a

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of common discussion of Parlors. No. But this was

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt to remind people in Canada and the

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>United States that we did have this system first of all,

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that there really was a system. And that system included

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>things like the Pittman Robertson Fund, and it included things

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like state agencies, and included things like government programs, and

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>included things like international treaties for migratory birds. It included

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 1>things like the strong science programs and so on and

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so forth. And it was they were like identified as

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>major principles or ideas to remind everybody that they need

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not have happened when we started the conservation movement that

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen hundreds, early part of the the late

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds, early part of the twentieth century, we had

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>very few game laws. We had no enforcement agencies. We

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>did not have any university programs. We did not have

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 1>any state or provincial agencies. We did not have any

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>federal agencies responsible for these resources. We did not have

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>the science programs at the universities. We did not have

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>any of those things, and nothing said that we had to.

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But they emerged bit by bit, synergizing and actualizing one another,

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>until we built up this system that relies on agencies

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and professionals and academ EMICs and and and participants, hunters

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and anglers and other people. And so the seven principles

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that are identified should be seen as guideposts, as very

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>important and integral, and their principles in the sense that

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they they speak to philosophical things, you know, um, wildlife,

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the marketing of dead wildlife excuse me, would no longer

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>be part of the North American system, and that obviously

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt to move against the market hunting issues.

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>The principle that wildlife is an international resource, you know,

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the idea that wildlife moved across boundaries, both across state

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>boundaries and between the United States and Canada, Mexico and

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the parts of the world, and that only by accepting

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that could we come up with the institutions that would

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be necessary for conserving the waterfowl being at best example,

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea that wildlife that hunting would be a right

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of every citizen, but of course they would need to

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 1>be appropriately trained and you know, certified, and to do

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it under legal means and so on. So these were

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of principles that were identified and originally by

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hilarious guist Uh and promulgated afterwards by many others. But

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they were identified to remind again people in governments and

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in policy institutions that these principles really mattered. For example,

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the principle that science is the basis for management. This

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>is a principle that we have abided by in North

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 1>America for the last hundred years and eighty years since

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we started to gain real knowledge of of wildlife science.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, there is a big debate today

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>about whether we are starting to turn our back on

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>science and manage wildlife from a totally emotional perspective. So,

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a really important man that the audience

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>understand that the principles are are not sort of meant

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to be like the like Moses delivering tablets, you know

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, like the there's a flexibility and an

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>organic part of all of this that we have to accept,

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and that means we have to accept a lot of

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>different viewpoints as being potentially legitimate, but of course they

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>have to all pass the critical test, and the critical

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>test is whether those viewpoints are in the best long

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>term interest of wildlife, right, And I think that it's

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>such I mean for everyone listening here. I knew a

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the beginning of that model and learned

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>about it here recently and was shocked to know that

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't longer reaching than the eighties, but I think

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 1>or you spend that in to you know, you start

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>off at the turn of the center and you spin

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that into the current day. You look at the grizzly

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>bear hunting band in British Columbia, and then the the

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>constant really just debate around wolves and apex predators, mountain lions,

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>and the emotionality that that that it's sucked into these

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:23.919
<v Speaker 1>debates where pragmatism is kind of not able to shine through.

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>You are you concerned about about those ideas? And and

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the history of our wildlife conservation is so pragmatic,

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>do you do you feel like the loss of that

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in some way is going to be one of the

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>hardest battles that conservation has to fight. I think it's

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the battles that conservation has to fight. But again,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I take a somewhat different view of all of this

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>um confusion and mayhem, if you will, because at the

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>same time that we can argue that, you know, science

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>must be the basis where decision may king. I think

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>we all really accept in any quiet moment of reflection,

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that emotionality and passion are not restricted to any particular

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>group within society or the conservation debate. Hunters of passions

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>not anters of passion and die. Hunters of passionate um.

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Those who have more of a preservation philosophy, who are

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>primarily focused on say things like national parks and and

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, protected areas. They have great passion and great commitment,

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and they have a very legitimate argument to make about

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>these these institutions and policies being a part of the

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>conservation matrix. I don't think there's anybody today who would

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>say that we do not need to consider protected areas

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 1>or national parks or stay parts of things of that nature,

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>even if they exclude hunting in some or many or cases.

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think most people would agree, yes, they're very much needed.

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>People might say, you know, well, I only think they

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>should be in place if there's an animal that's in

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>desperate need of a protected space. Other people would say no, no,

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they must be much more expensive than that.

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think most people would agree that we need

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a a if I could say, a more preservationist element

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the mix. At the same time, hunters and anglers

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are very passionate about their traditions and often speak with

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>great emotion and little science about their particular activities. Um.

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really helpful because I think if

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we were all to speak simply dispassionately about animals, I

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>don't think there would be any hope for them in

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this world. So I think the trick here is to

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>realize that there are certain elements and questions that demand

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a combination of science and passionate commitment, and that we

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>need to collectively all sides of this debate figure out

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that appropriate balance. Now, there are philosophical differences between people.

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people believe in animal rights, for example,

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>as a somewhat more extreme view, and a lot of

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>people do not. But as you move down and across

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum of conservation and ideas, you know, there's much

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>more similarity between groups of people. Then there are differences,

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and we need to find that ground as well as

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a as a basis for discussion. I am, however, very

0:45:53.520 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 1>concerned that science is being um um, the profile that

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>science has in the management of wilife is being decreased.

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we are living in a world where information

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>overload is the common practice. We're living in a world

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>because of our new technologies that allow every opinion to

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be instantly received by hundreds of thousands, tens of thousands,

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>millions of people UM. And that phenomenon is affecting a

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more than just the management of wildlife. It is

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>undermining scholarship in many ways because everybody is an expert.

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It is undermining good science in many ways because anybody

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:45.240
<v Speaker 1>can get out there in quotation marks scientific opinion. Uh,

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, through mechanisms that are not controlled in any sense.

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not like you have to publish in

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a peer review journal, because you can just get it

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:54.919
<v Speaker 1>out there through Facebook or YouTube or whatever you want

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, a Ted talk whatever. This is leading to

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a decent ableize circumstance of knowledge and I think this

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>has very significant and dangerous implications for UM, for the

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>management of wild And let me give you an example.

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So we have a great many people who are opposed

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of international trophy hunting, for example, because

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they identify it as an egotistical proposition. Somebody travels from

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one country to a place like Africa and they shoot

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>an elephant to rely on things of this nature that

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they bring back the trophies and they put them in

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>their living rooms or whatever. There's trophy rooms, and a

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have a negative view towards this, including

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, many hunters, as you know. Um. But

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the so the emotionality is I don't like this, um.

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the animals should not be taken for that reason.

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>The primary motivation is not for food, etcetera, etcetera. And

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>so I don't believe this should be done. But the

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>reality is, unfortunately or fortunately, depending on how you view

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this issue. The reality, the scientific, empirical, knowledge based reality

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is that that activity contributes to the conservation of wildlife

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:26.240
<v Speaker 1>habitat and wildlife species in many regions. It isn't perfect,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it isn't without corruption and loss and disfigurement. But there's

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>no question that when you analyze and bring the facts

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>together and interpret them, that those activities help, in some

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>specific cases to significantly improve the chances for existence for

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:53.280
<v Speaker 1>lions and pray species and ecosystems. Indeed that would otherwise

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>be lost to other activities if hunting was not occurring there,

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that would end up inevitably in the loss wildlife. So

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a classic example. Let's before

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 1>us right now. On the emotional side, many people find

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it difficult to understand. But when faced with the absolute

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>facts that here is the alternative. Have these activities and

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>protect that wildlife landscape, or lose those activities and lose

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the wildlife that exists there. And many people will say, ah,

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that. I still don't like it, perhaps,

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but I have to accept that it has merit for

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the conservation of wildlife. And I think this is the

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>important thing. Then about emotionality. The important thing is to

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have a litmus test for emotionality. So I have a

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in the non hunting world who dialogue

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>with me, and I have a lot of people in

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the hunting world who dialogue with me. And I have

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>some people in the world to dialogue with me who

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 1>say we cannot understand how you are a hunter, and

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I say, I understand why you find it difficult to understand.

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But for me, there is only one question. So whether

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I like a particular decision, you know, whether that's about

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>protected areas or or hunting and angling, or any any

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>issue that you can think about that impinges on conservation.

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>My only only question, ultimately to myself is will this

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>benefit wildless And if it does, I'm in favor of it,

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>even if I don't like it and I'm against it,

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm against it obviously if it fails that test. Yes,

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a great point you make about emotionality.

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And I just feel like because hunting and conservation, and

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in a different continent with a different set of

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>value systems, I think that the complexity and nuance is

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>lost in that emotionality. And that's what really what hunting

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is grounded upon, is that it is nuanced and that

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it is complex UM and it a lot of times

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's oxymoronic, as you as you explained, there's a lot

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of ideas that killing animals to save them is a

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>general one. Who get all the time that people say,

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>well that makes no sense. Well, yeah, maybe on his

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>face it makes no sense. But if you use, you know,

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>your question of is it good for wild life as

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the guiding principle, I think that always gets us gets

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 1>us to the right place. Do you do you feel like,

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically the British Columbia grizzly bear band is something that

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>UM will be repeated and does that concern you or

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like that's a UM an outlier in

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:52.800
<v Speaker 1>some way? No, I wouldn't say that it's an outlier, um,

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but I also think that it's a It's a classic

0:51:55.600 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>example of how of how our attachment to wildlife at

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>an emotional level and a psychological level really tends to

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>play out the issue of the hunting of carnivores generally

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 1>mountain lions, grizzly bears, wolves, um is. You know, it's

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenon that's debated intensively, not only in North America,

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's intensively debated in UH in Europe as well

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at present time, where links and wolves and even bears,

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>brown bears are expanding their range. I mean, we have

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:38.439
<v Speaker 1>we have wolves now living you know, the outskirts of Rome, um.

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And so it's generating an incredibly intense discussion and debate

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on social acceptance of the animals themselves by rural people

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and shepherds and people who have livestock, etcetera. Uh and

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of course by people who are opposed at a philosophical

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>level to all kinds of hunting. So it certainly is

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not an isolated event. And of all the hunting that

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>takes place in in Africa, of course, you know, it

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is the it is the hunting of lions which is

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the absolute most intensely discussed and debated, and

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of course the conservation programs that have developed in other countries,

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:22.919
<v Speaker 1>let's say for India, for example, which is very much

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a conservation program built in almost entirely on protected areas

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and preservationist ideals. It was the tiger, of course, that

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>became sort of the emblematic and sort of was helpful

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>or encouraging or incentivizing for that nation to to undertake

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the massive conservation efforts and very successful conservation efforts. I

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:49.959
<v Speaker 1>would point out that they have, so I certainly don't

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>see these grizzly bear carnivore the issue, you know, as

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:58.360
<v Speaker 1>being isolated in a sense. And the debate within British

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Columbia has been ongoing for a very very long period

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of time um and that province has seesawed back and

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>forth on the issue. It has mounted several scientific reviews

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of grizzly bear populations and sustainability over time. In fact,

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the Province of British Columbia has invested quite heavily, more

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily than most jurisdictions politically in trying to you know,

0:54:25.600 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of get at this question and decide whether there

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:32.280
<v Speaker 1>should be hunting for grizzly bears or not. UM. So

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that we can expect a great deal more

0:54:36.600 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of this. UM. If I were to look at this

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>whole issue from the anti hunting point of view, I

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a tremendous amount of focus globally on

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>African hunting and trophy hunting and so on in the

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>African context at the present time, which we're all aware of. UM.

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It remains to be seen. What it's going to unfold

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on the continent is many, many great complexities obviously there UM.

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:09.799
<v Speaker 1>But I think it is fair to say that there

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>will be increasing attention paid over time to the hunting

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>of the charismatic big carnivores in North America, and that

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to lead to even further increased debates over wolves, reintroductions,

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 1>management status of these species, interactions with the Endangered Species Act.

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think any of us who believe that that is

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 1>not going to continue and be an intense debate are

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>fooling ourselves. It is going to be very real. On

0:55:42.000 --> 0:55:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, UM, you know, the idea that we

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can have unrestrained growth of large, dangerous carnivores in our

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:57.640
<v Speaker 1>midst greatly bears, for example, but also wolves which can

0:55:57.680 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be dangerous animals of course, and mountain lion, which we

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>know can prey on people, etcetera. You know, whether you

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:09.320
<v Speaker 1>know society at large, it has a sort of an

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 1>unlimited either indifference or willingness to accept these large carnivores

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in their midst You know, that remains to be seen,

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know, I highly doubt that you know,

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>people are going to eventually want just you know, uncontrolled

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers of these of these big predators in their midst

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We we live in a time we're that realistically, you know,

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot play out. And of course what tends to happen

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in these debates is that the people who don't necessarily

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 1>live with the dangerous wildlife are often the ones who

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>most vociferously wanted protected at all costs. Having said all

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of that, there is a reason why these big carnivores

0:56:56.600 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>capture our imagination, generate so much emotionality. Uh. This is

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 1>not by accident, and this is not a product of

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>modern media or any of those things. You know, we

0:57:09.520 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have always had this extraordinary relationship with the big carnivores.

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we mythologize them, we feared them, we marveled

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at them. Um, you know, we have always had even

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>as hunter gatherer people's there have always been cults and

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and amulets and things that have celebrated these big carnivores

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 1>as a sense of power and prestige and so on

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So we should not see the modern

0:57:41.280 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>debate over these big carnivores as something new, or if

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you're on the anti hunting side, see hunter's interest in

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>managing or hunting those animals as something new and bizarre.

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Nor from the hunting side, we see the emotionality to safeguard, protect,

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, those those animals as being something that is

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>bizarre or new either. It kind of always has been

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>with us. And it's for that reason that alone that

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel confident that we will continue to have major

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>debates over what is best to do with with these

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 1>big carnivores. And um, you know, society's values change over time.

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 1>The values in America and the values in Canada, the

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>two countries that we talked most about within the North

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>American context, although they're not the only countries Mexico is

0:58:37.840 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there in those two countries, and I may say probably

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the United States. Um, there are really significant

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cultural shifts taking place as the society becomes more diverse,

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>as new and different values emerge in the urbanized centers.

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>As we've talked about earlier in the party cast, there's

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reason for us to expect that the

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that carnivore hunting will be criticized, you know, we

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we should expect that this is probably going to continue

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the social trends that we can see before us.

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And the real question is, then, um, how do we,

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 1>from a hunting perspective, you know, mount the most socially

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>effective arguments for having a sustainable harvesting, management based harvest

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of those of those carnivores. And some might say that

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we are already doing that. I would agree. Some might

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:51.640
<v Speaker 1>say we're probably not doing it as effectively as we

0:59:51.640 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>would hope to, and I would agree with that also.

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think we we need to be prepared for

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a continuing long term debate over the harvesting of grizzly

1:00:03.880 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>bears and it will never be settled then, in my view, absolutely.

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>In other words, is it possible for me to envisage

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>your time in British Columbia, for example, where some kind

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of limited harvesting of grizzly bears. Um. You know, is

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is permitted or could things change again? Yes, I believe

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they could, um and um. But even if they do,

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they won't change in that direction forever either. Well, and

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you make some great points there. One one of those

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is that this is just a continuing conversation like that,

1:00:43.080 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this is through generations. Obviously, you know the cultural societal

1:00:47.080 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>changes will drive this conversation one way or the other way.

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is to me just a continuing conversation. And

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and if it was, if it was one question I

1:00:57.640 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>think I feel like we all have to ask is

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and you've said this in the past, It's like, is

1:01:02.920 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing good for wildlife? Is it good for society?

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Good for for our society? That also is it good

1:01:10.120 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for wildlife? And if you can continue to answer that

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>question yes every time, UM, I think we we will

1:01:17.360 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be okay in the sense of hunting. But one thing

1:01:20.600 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that has concerned me, and we've talked about this in

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the previous podcast A good bit is just the general

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>sense that hunting in and of itself, the act of hunting,

1:01:29.640 --> 1:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>does not have the best public relations UM in in

1:01:33.840 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the grand scheme of of the world, whether that's you know,

1:01:36.960 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>moreover the Africa trophy hunting issue, but but generally just

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the killing of an animal for sport, or or how

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you would explain modern sport hunting. Do you feel like,

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in that ongoing conversation there is a way

1:01:51.120 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that you would would talk to hunters and say like, hey, here,

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>here are a couple of things we can do better

1:01:56.400 --> 1:01:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to drive this conversation in such a way that eliminates

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>some the negative pr that we currently feel. Um, whether

1:02:03.400 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you think it's due to to really what hunters have

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>put out there into the world, or that the world

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is changing in the face of hunting, long question, but well,

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a tremendous amount we can do. Frankly,

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I I've always believed this, and I've always marveled

1:02:22.600 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>at how slow we are to do them. I can't explain, um,

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't find it hard to explain to

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the debate that's going on in society at all. I

1:02:35.680 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>don't find it hard to understand the value systems, or

1:02:40.240 --> 1:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the philosophies or the opinions of people who are opposed

1:02:42.840 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to hunting at all. I don't have any difficulty understanding that, Uh,

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just as I don't have any difficulty understanding why people

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>feel so passionately about hunting and and how people can

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>become real conservationists not only through hunting, but as part

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of their hunting world. I don't have any problem understanding

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>any of that. And I don't think any group on

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>either side of that divide, if we can call it that,

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are are more or less intelligent, or more or less fanatical,

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>or more or less emotional, as I've said before, and

1:03:18.720 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of that is a distinction. What

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I really find difficult to understanding is why the hunting

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>public has been so slow to do some of the

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>obvious things that we always should have been doing, and

1:03:35.680 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to cease doing some of the things that we obviously

1:03:39.560 --> 1:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>should never have been doing. So in the latter case,

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, some of the graphic imagery that we have

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>been showing for now twenty five years, quarter of a century,

1:03:56.240 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a long time on our television shows, UM, often

1:04:02.640 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>accompanied by you know, the glorification of the kill and

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of an animal in suffering or an animal which has suffered. UM.

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>This has done incredible damage to the hunting world. Whether

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the hunters want to admit it, Whether the production companies

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>want to admit it, whether the television stations want to

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>commit it or admitted I don't really care. It has

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and it continues in today's world of almost inevitable viral exchange.

1:04:39.600 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It has opened up the possibility, through hard to track channels,

1:04:47.960 --> 1:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>an enormous flow of this kind of information to distant

1:04:51.920 --> 1:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>computers and cell phones all around the world that provide

1:04:56.720 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>no context and which inevitably need the naive observer to

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>fall on the side of opposition to hunting. Um. Things

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:12.959
<v Speaker 1>we also should never have done is we should never

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>have tried to prove to the anti hunting world that

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the only thing we care about when we call ourselves

1:05:24.920 --> 1:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>conservation is the are the animals that we hunt. So

1:05:31.720 --> 1:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to ask you, Ben, and ask your audience

1:05:35.320 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>how many of the organizations that we have that are

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>based on hunters and founded by hunters and talk about

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>doing conservation, how many of them are really focused a

1:05:47.600 --> 1:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>non hunted species at all? Yeah, how many awards do

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you see being given out at those events for people

1:05:56.240 --> 1:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>working on non hunted species? What do we think conservation

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and ended with the game animals? Well, that's the exact

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>message we give all the time, and our industries are

1:06:06.640 --> 1:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>giving it all the time. So when you ask about

1:06:11.520 --> 1:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the things we shouldn't be doing, I think there's there's

1:06:14.080 --> 1:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>probably millions of little things that go on the social

1:06:17.160 --> 1:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>media circuit every day we shouldn't be doing. And then

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to get on and say that, you know, criticize people

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>who are against hunting and say that they have no

1:06:28.720 --> 1:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>conservation ethic and so on? Did John You're not have

1:06:31.280 --> 1:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a conservation ethic? Yeah? Who's going to stand up and

1:06:35.520 --> 1:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>say that that's ridiculous? So this is the other things

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that we do as a as hunters that are things

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that we we we we should not be doing, but

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we we do all the time. We shouldn't be slandering

1:06:49.040 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>people with sort of racial nomenclatures like green eads, you know,

1:06:56.120 --> 1:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and antis. Notice how they all end in those ease

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>like Nazis and so on and so forth. What do

1:07:03.760 --> 1:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that makes us look like? I mean, these

1:07:06.600 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are all things that I look at, and I've looked

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at for twenty five years, and I've I've I've spoken

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as much, I think as any human being before hunting

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>audiences and talked about these issues to virtually no avail,

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and in my own personal estimation, I don't think I've

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>moved the needle one bit. What do you what do

1:07:22.200 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you think? What do you think it's going to take

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to change that? Is it going to take some kind

1:07:25.560 --> 1:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of you're going to take to change that? As a crisis,

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're getting damned close. In the last

1:07:32.000 --> 1:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>five years, we lost two million hunters in the United

1:07:34.400 --> 1:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>States of America. By our own surveys, we've lost two million.

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a demographic wave moving through the hunting population

1:07:43.440 --> 1:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and Canada that inevitably made were

1:07:47.240 --> 1:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>inevitably means we are going to lose millions more by

1:07:51.920 --> 1:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the demographic wave. I'm obviously referring to just we're a

1:07:54.600 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>very old age class. Yea, we call them age classes

1:07:57.520 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in the hunting world, we call them baby boomers. In

1:07:59.760 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this country, that generation, recruitment processes are not replacing them.

1:08:05.000 --> 1:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're going to need a crisis, and

1:08:07.360 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to need to have some conservation leadership

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the hunting community stand up and do certain things.

1:08:14.240 --> 1:08:16.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's fine for me to say what we shouldn't

1:08:16.760 --> 1:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be doing, but I think there there also needs to

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be ideas about what we should be doing. So. Here's

1:08:23.080 --> 1:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>an idea that I have offered up to a number

1:08:25.760 --> 1:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of organizations in the hunting world. Take some significant percentage

1:08:29.800 --> 1:08:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of all the money that comes in from the from

1:08:31.640 --> 1:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the hunting world and devoted into some broader conservation effort.

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we give ten percent of the money that

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we raise two non hunted species efforts. Yeah, sea turtles

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>or dolphins or other things that have captured butterflies, things

1:08:47.680 --> 1:08:50.759
<v Speaker 1>that have captured the imagination of children around the world.

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we prove that we are really about conservation

1:08:55.280 --> 1:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>written large, and not just about conserving the animals that

1:08:57.680 --> 1:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we shoot. Why don't we establish awards for people who

1:09:02.200 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>do things in conservation, and whether they be a hunter

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or a non hunter, treat them equally, as is now

1:09:08.080 --> 1:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>starting to happen. Why don't we develop television shows that

1:09:11.640 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the animal. I mean, there's a million things that

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>can be done. I mean, you know, and there's there's

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>good efforts starting along these roads. Then, I mean, there

1:09:23.760 --> 1:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are companies you know that that are out there are

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:29.759
<v Speaker 1>starting to do really good things in this world about

1:09:30.320 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 1>conservation and the and the new films that are being

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>produced by some of those companies are excellent, and we're

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some movement in the television world. We're starting

1:09:38.240 --> 1:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to see this, but we need to do it all

1:09:42.560 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>much harder and much faster. As I've said to many

1:09:46.400 --> 1:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>people running our hunting conventions, the day that the non

1:09:51.880 --> 1:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>hunting world, the day that the non hunting world, and

1:09:56.000 --> 1:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say even the anti hunting world can find

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>something of real value when merits for them on that floor,

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>then we will have begun to move forward in the

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>way that Teddy Roosevelt imagined. Yeah. Yeah, do you think

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that man was a fanatic about songbirds? He love birds

1:10:21.240 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>more than he loved hunting. Yeah, yeah, A naturalist, a naturalist. Yeah,

1:10:27.760 --> 1:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like, uh going forward? You know, there

1:10:33.560 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is this mentality in hunting that I've seen, and I've

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>seen it propagated by a lot of very famous folks,

1:10:39.200 --> 1:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of some of the figureheads of our industry

1:10:43.760 --> 1:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>from a celebrity standpoint, that said every hunter should should

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>support every hunter, like this idea of tribalism, like we

1:10:51.360 --> 1:10:54.639
<v Speaker 1>must if we don't all support each other, will fall

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:58.719
<v Speaker 1>at our core. Or if if if we don't support

1:10:58.800 --> 1:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>every type of hunting, re hunter or every pursuit, then

1:11:03.200 --> 1:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we somehow fail. I personally don't agree with that. Do

1:11:07.840 --> 1:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel like that's part of the reason why change

1:11:11.680 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been as a parent for the hunting world? Um,

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that some people feel that way, and I

1:11:20.040 --> 1:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have some empathy for the position, because you know, if

1:11:23.600 --> 1:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a hunting community, just like any other community, a

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>political party, or a country, you know, it's just constantly

1:11:29.600 --> 1:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>consumed by infighting, and clearly that's that's not a good thing,

1:11:33.439 --> 1:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and it destabilizes the best of messages and the best

1:11:36.800 --> 1:11:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of intentions. So I have an empathy for that viewpoint.

1:11:40.080 --> 1:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But like you, I feel there's a limit to this.

1:11:43.760 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel that we have to we have to realize

1:11:48.160 --> 1:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that hunting has to be made relevant in a modern society.

1:11:56.120 --> 1:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>We cannot continue to treat it as though it is

1:12:00.120 --> 1:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>experience of the American and Canadian frontier. We have moved

1:12:05.640 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>moved a long way from the days of Lewis and Clark.

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:12.759
<v Speaker 1>We've moved a long way from the days of Autubon.

1:12:12.920 --> 1:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We've moved a long way from the days of Roosevelt.

1:12:16.080 --> 1:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>We moved a long way from the days of Leopold.

1:12:19.680 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We've moved fifty to sixty years beyond the days of

1:12:23.280 --> 1:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Carson in Silent Spring, fifty to sixty years a generation.

1:12:29.200 --> 1:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And we have to make this activity the oldest of

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>human activities. We have to make this relevant to a

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>modern society. We have to normalize hunting in a moderate society.

1:12:44.560 --> 1:12:48.599
<v Speaker 1>And when you start to think about those as your goals,

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>which they are mine, I wish to normalize it. I

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>don't wish to exceptionalize it. I don't wish to make

1:12:54.880 --> 1:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it exceptional. I want to make it relevant um. And

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you start to think about doing things very differently. You

1:13:05.479 --> 1:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>start to think about new organizations. You start to think

1:13:08.800 --> 1:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>about new magazines. You start to think about new television shows.

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:16.519
<v Speaker 1>You start to think about new marketing possibilities. You start

1:13:16.560 --> 1:13:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to think about new coalitions. You start to think about

1:13:21.360 --> 1:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>things like food, wild food. You start to think about

1:13:25.760 --> 1:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>people whom love animals, and you want to be able

1:13:30.800 --> 1:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to reach out to them and talk to them about

1:13:33.640 --> 1:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>your own love of animals. Um. You start to explain

1:13:38.439 --> 1:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the rancher who is still believed to

1:13:41.320 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>care very much for his animals as he does, or

1:13:44.400 --> 1:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the small scale farmer who does care very much for

1:13:48.040 --> 1:13:51.639
<v Speaker 1>their animals, they know those animals will die. In fact,

1:13:51.680 --> 1:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>they're raising them for death. Yet they have managed to

1:13:56.040 --> 1:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>maintain a position in society that's viewed as relevant and valuable,

1:14:02.720 --> 1:14:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and they are believed to really care for their animals.

1:14:07.040 --> 1:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that true? It is, so we need to ask

1:14:10.240 --> 1:14:13.479
<v Speaker 1>ourselves the question, why do so many people believe that

1:14:13.520 --> 1:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't care? Is it really the animal death issue?

1:14:20.680 --> 1:14:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Because that's just the same for the rancher in the farmer.

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's us, Maybe it is. Yeah, And I think

1:14:30.600 --> 1:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>there is introspection needed, and I appreciate yours personally, and

1:14:38.000 --> 1:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>then the forced, you know, forced introspection that we can

1:14:41.080 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>all get from conversations like these. I think it is

1:14:44.360 --> 1:14:50.599
<v Speaker 1>absolutely essential to challenge every idea, um and everything that

1:14:50.600 --> 1:14:54.679
<v Speaker 1>that we believe is true. Because, as I'm sure you are,

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>our upbringings are very different. But I'm sure as you

1:14:58.840 --> 1:15:01.679
<v Speaker 1>have come to to be a part of this broad

1:15:01.760 --> 1:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>conservation movement, you've changed your ideals and adjusted with your

1:15:06.120 --> 1:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>expanded knowledge. And the more you've known, the more that

1:15:09.120 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you have theorized new things. And I think that is

1:15:12.760 --> 1:15:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that's true for me as a hunter to a smaller

1:15:14.800 --> 1:15:18.639
<v Speaker 1>scale than you, But I think that every hunter should

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to your words and just and start to examine

1:15:22.040 --> 1:15:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which they act and the ways which

1:15:24.479 --> 1:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>their groups act, and how that can be be better

1:15:27.760 --> 1:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>constituted to get to the goals that that that you

1:15:29.880 --> 1:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>put forward. UM, yes, I totally agree with you, Ben,

1:15:34.160 --> 1:15:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and I would say this too. And you know, despite

1:15:37.640 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that in this podcast we have covered a

1:15:41.360 --> 1:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of intense series and problematic areas and so on

1:15:44.240 --> 1:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, the the the the resilient truth is

1:15:51.080 --> 1:15:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that when the hunter man, woman, young, old, and when

1:15:57.880 --> 1:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the hunting community of every that mixture operates at its

1:16:04.760 --> 1:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>best with a conservation ethic in mind, with the idea

1:16:11.240 --> 1:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of what is best for wildlife in mind, it is

1:16:15.360 --> 1:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a It is an unsurpassed force for the good of wildlife. UM.

1:16:24.680 --> 1:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And the frustrations that some of us carry every day

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:34.439
<v Speaker 1>when we are embedded in these debates every day, is

1:16:34.479 --> 1:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that we know that to be true. And what I

1:16:37.640 --> 1:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>am trying to do in my small world of influence

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and with the time and energy I have, is to

1:16:46.400 --> 1:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>unlock that part of the hunting world and to chip

1:16:52.840 --> 1:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>away at things that that limit that potential. And just said,

1:17:00.439 --> 1:17:03.559
<v Speaker 1>it's free, as it was set free at the turn

1:17:03.760 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the twentieth century and which history proves did an

1:17:09.240 --> 1:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely unbelievable thing. All the odds were against us yea

1:17:17.240 --> 1:17:20.599
<v Speaker 1>as a nation's I mean not just as hunters were

1:17:20.640 --> 1:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>against our nations. Well you think about white tail white

1:17:23.280 --> 1:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>tail deer. I mean five hundred thousand of them in

1:17:26.040 --> 1:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven. Today there's thirty million of them. That is unbelievable.

1:17:32.520 --> 1:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Um And as we've often said, and that this greater conversation,

1:17:36.200 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>there's not this isn't, you know, some big attempt just

1:17:40.280 --> 1:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>to be negative. It is just an attempt to talk

1:17:42.560 --> 1:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>through some of the tougher things and get to the

1:17:44.000 --> 1:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>point where we all know where we have to be.

1:17:46.439 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Is that that you're There's the reason that hunting has

1:17:49.560 --> 1:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>changed my life and conservation surely has changed yours is

1:17:52.200 --> 1:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that it is it is transformative in many ways. So

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's important to me and to you. And

1:17:57.960 --> 1:18:01.559
<v Speaker 1>while these conversations happen, so um I that's a good

1:18:01.560 --> 1:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>way to end it. But before we get out of here,

1:18:03.240 --> 1:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I want you to tell everybody, um yeah, about the

1:18:06.880 --> 1:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>wild harvested issues. About something we've discussed in the past,

1:18:09.479 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and something I think it's very important going forward, and

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:18.559
<v Speaker 1>and something you've been working very hard on in recent past. Yes, well, uh,

1:18:18.840 --> 1:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it's very a proposed because, of course, um, it came

1:18:22.720 --> 1:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>out of my thinking, much like the discussions we've had today.

1:18:29.320 --> 1:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It came out of my thinking and my search for

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>something that would make hunting really relevant in a modern society,

1:18:38.479 --> 1:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and and instead of fighting social trends, to set it

1:18:42.800 --> 1:18:45.559
<v Speaker 1>up in a way that is shows how it is

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>actually working with important social trends. And this led me

1:18:50.640 --> 1:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of the growing concern that people have

1:18:54.840 --> 1:19:00.719
<v Speaker 1>for health, for the role that the arm it around

1:19:00.720 --> 1:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and plays in maintaining or harming their health, and with

1:19:07.160 --> 1:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the concern that people have especially with respect to the

1:19:10.360 --> 1:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>quality and source of their food. And in thinking about

1:19:16.439 --> 1:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>all of this, I began to wonder, well, how much

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wild food do we really as hunters and as anglers

1:19:23.280 --> 1:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>harvest in Canada and the United States, Given that you know,

1:19:27.200 --> 1:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>forty million of let's participate in those activities every year,

1:19:31.920 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and just knowing from myself and from friends and colleagues,

1:19:35.320 --> 1:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>just you know how much wild neat uh, some individuals

1:19:40.040 --> 1:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>consume and just how many people they share it with.

1:19:43.920 --> 1:19:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So I launched this what's called the Wild Harvest initiative.

1:19:47.040 --> 1:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It is a continent wide assessment of the harvest of

1:19:52.560 --> 1:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>wild fish and birds and mammals UM you know, on

1:19:59.000 --> 1:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in Canada and the United States. UM. It is bringing

1:20:02.720 --> 1:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>together the list of all species obviously in the list

1:20:06.360 --> 1:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of all harvests that are recorded by the management agencies.

1:20:11.080 --> 1:20:16.599
<v Speaker 1>It is estimating obviously the total biomass or total weight

1:20:17.400 --> 1:20:22.519
<v Speaker 1>pounds MS of of that harvest for all species UM,

1:20:22.800 --> 1:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>then determining through various sources the actual consumable weights of

1:20:28.760 --> 1:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>all of that harvest, working with economists to give it

1:20:34.200 --> 1:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a fair market value. And we are obviously talking billions

1:20:39.640 --> 1:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>billions of pounds of wild food that is harvested, to

1:20:44.720 --> 1:20:50.479
<v Speaker 1>give that a an actual economic value, real economic value

1:20:50.479 --> 1:20:54.559
<v Speaker 1>in today's market if it was in the marketplace, and

1:20:54.600 --> 1:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>then to work with agricultural scientists and others to say, well, okay,

1:20:59.720 --> 1:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we have this commodity. It is worth this amount. It

1:21:02.800 --> 1:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is providing this amount of food to people. Now, what

1:21:06.080 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>would happen if we ended hunting and angling? You know

1:21:08.439 --> 1:21:11.519
<v Speaker 1>what would it cause society to actually replace all of

1:21:11.560 --> 1:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this wild food? Along the way, we will be establishing

1:21:15.560 --> 1:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a sharing index to indicate just how many people those

1:21:20.920 --> 1:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>individuals who do hunt and fish how many people they

1:21:25.800 --> 1:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>actually share that wild harvest with, so we get some

1:21:28.840 --> 1:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of the the ripple effect or the generosity footprint

1:21:33.640 --> 1:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>of this activity in society. UM. And then we intend,

1:21:39.640 --> 1:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, to to mobilize this knowledge in the context

1:21:44.479 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and coalition with people who harvest other things from the

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>natural world, such as wild fruits and wild berries, wild

1:21:52.439 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>mushrooms and so on and so forth. Medicinal plants two

1:21:57.360 --> 1:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>again pursue my goal of normalizing hunting and demonstrating to

1:22:05.000 --> 1:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>a modern public, not the world I grew up in

1:22:07.680 --> 1:22:11.599
<v Speaker 1>because it has passed, but to a modern public why

1:22:11.680 --> 1:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this activity remains relevant and why people should consider engaging

1:22:17.120 --> 1:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in it or coming to understand that the people who

1:22:20.439 --> 1:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>do engage in it are doing something that is very

1:22:23.120 --> 1:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>honorable and worthwhile. UM. I see the trends of where

1:22:28.200 --> 1:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>hunters and anglers are coming from you know what, demographic,

1:22:33.320 --> 1:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what locations, and it is very clear that it is

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>possible to reach people, bending back on the earlier part

1:22:41.080 --> 1:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of our conversation, who live in you know, urban areas

1:22:44.760 --> 1:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth, because they are very

1:22:47.400 --> 1:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>much concerned with this issue of food and the quality

1:22:51.360 --> 1:22:54.599
<v Speaker 1>of food. UM. This is an attempt on my part

1:22:54.720 --> 1:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring hunting before the modern public in a way

1:22:59.600 --> 1:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>that they're already sensitive to, which, as I said, is

1:23:03.479 --> 1:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the quality of their of their food. And I'll also

1:23:06.400 --> 1:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>be emphasizing the other aspects health benefits of this activity

1:23:11.560 --> 1:23:16.519
<v Speaker 1>in terms of emotional uh sensitivities you know, at the

1:23:16.600 --> 1:23:20.759
<v Speaker 1>time spent in the outdoors and in nature, the physical

1:23:21.320 --> 1:23:25.759
<v Speaker 1>activity benefits of the activities so appealing to the broader

1:23:25.800 --> 1:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>issues of human health, for which there is a growing

1:23:29.280 --> 1:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>body of scientific evidence. Of course, um and just trying,

1:23:33.920 --> 1:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as I said, to make people understand that while this

1:23:37.000 --> 1:23:40.519
<v Speaker 1>activity may not be for everybody. While and everybody will

1:23:40.560 --> 1:23:44.559
<v Speaker 1>be a rancher, not everybody will be a farmer. For

1:23:44.680 --> 1:23:47.759
<v Speaker 1>a group of people in society, this is a way

1:23:47.760 --> 1:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>for them to take responsibility for the meat they consume,

1:23:52.160 --> 1:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and most people in society do consume meat. Um and

1:23:56.800 --> 1:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time demonstrating that this is the largest

1:24:02.520 --> 1:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>environmentally friendly food procurement system in existence. We do not

1:24:07.960 --> 1:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>destroy habitat, we defend it. We do not despoil the

1:24:11.240 --> 1:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>environment we protected, and at the same time we share.

1:24:17.240 --> 1:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We have this virtually insane drive to share this wild

1:24:23.040 --> 1:24:27.519
<v Speaker 1>food with friends, family, colleagues and even strangers. As I've

1:24:27.560 --> 1:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>said in many lectures over many years, none of us

1:24:31.880 --> 1:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>will go to the grocery store and buy a beefloast

1:24:36.400 --> 1:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or a chicken and bring it to our neighbors and

1:24:39.680 --> 1:24:42.559
<v Speaker 1>give it to them. As soon as we harvest the deer,

1:24:43.200 --> 1:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>harvest and elk, harvest wild mushrooms, harvest wild berries, harvest wildfish,

1:24:49.439 --> 1:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the very first thing we want to do is to

1:24:51.280 --> 1:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>share this. We want to give it to somebody, We

1:24:54.000 --> 1:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have them for dinner. And when we do

1:24:56.720 --> 1:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>share it with them, they're absolutely delighted to sieve it

1:25:01.200 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and they immediately want to share it. They'll say, oh,

1:25:04.040 --> 1:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>thank you. You know, my son is coming to dinner

1:25:06.680 --> 1:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night, I'm going to cook that for him, or uh,

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, my my father and mother would love to

1:25:12.120 --> 1:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have that, so I'm going to share this meal with them.

1:25:14.880 --> 1:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>There is something innately human about the drive to share

1:25:20.680 --> 1:25:25.559
<v Speaker 1>wild harvested food, and we are about to launch a

1:25:25.560 --> 1:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>major communication effort with the help of now partners, which

1:25:30.960 --> 1:25:35.799
<v Speaker 1>include you know, industry groups such like blophold at Sitka

1:25:35.800 --> 1:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and YETTI groups such as that, as well as with

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>state agencies in the data and Florida and Texas, a

1:25:42.120 --> 1:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>wide variety of NGOs, while Sheep Foundation, Dallas, Sportsman's Alliance,

1:25:47.680 --> 1:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>s c I, Houston, I mean a lot of Elk Foundation,

1:25:51.280 --> 1:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of NGOs, too many to mention. We're about

1:25:54.320 --> 1:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>too soon start to launch the information from this. We

1:25:58.280 --> 1:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have built the database. We have an amazing and the

1:26:01.479 --> 1:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>most knowledgeable database now formed database on all of this,

1:26:06.520 --> 1:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really looking forward to it being a way

1:26:09.080 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to have comfortable conversations about hunting with people from very,

1:26:14.920 --> 1:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>very diverse backgrounds. As a medical doctor from the San

1:26:18.920 --> 1:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Bay Area said to me at the end of

1:26:21.880 --> 1:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the lecture a couple of weeks ago, she said, Um,

1:26:27.960 --> 1:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are many people in the San Francisco

1:26:30.640 --> 1:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area who are opposed to hunting, But she said,

1:26:35.240 --> 1:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot more people in the San Francisco

1:26:37.920 --> 1:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area who are fanatical about new culinary experiences, and

1:26:43.439 --> 1:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things they really are intrigued with and

1:26:46.320 --> 1:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>interested in are these wild harvested foods. So you know,

1:26:51.840 --> 1:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's just my attempt to to seek in

1:26:56.000 --> 1:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of all of this debate and a quiet

1:27:00.080 --> 1:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>space that I know will matter to people. I'm not

1:27:05.520 --> 1:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to make them hunters. I'm not trying to make

1:27:08.120 --> 1:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>them anglers, although I be delighted if they would be

1:27:11.120 --> 1:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>open to that, just trying to make them understand that

1:27:14.720 --> 1:27:17.759
<v Speaker 1>this is relevant and the reason is relevant. It's because

1:27:17.800 --> 1:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's about healthy time in nature and the harvest the

1:27:22.080 --> 1:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>food of the highest quality that we take responsibility for

1:27:26.200 --> 1:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ourselves absolutely well as a hunter. I appreciate you, know,

1:27:29.439 --> 1:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not only your words, which are well spoken, but your

1:27:32.840 --> 1:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>actions in that regard. I think that's um, the ability

1:27:36.520 --> 1:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to to articulate these ideas but then also

1:27:40.479 --> 1:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>help them stand up with this data and these these

1:27:43.200 --> 1:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>efforts I think is is um can be revolutionary. And

1:27:47.439 --> 1:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you sharing those and and sharing the rest

1:27:49.800 --> 1:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of your story. And I thank you Shane for your time.

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Pat, it's been a real pleasure.

1:27:55.960 --> 1:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Care of yourself. Thank you. Okay, by life, that was

1:28:00.240 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Episode number five in the books. I

1:28:04.160 --> 1:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>want to thank, of course Mr Shane Mahoney for all

1:28:07.960 --> 1:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that he does and who he is, and for his

1:28:10.400 --> 1:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>efforts with the Wild Harvest Initiative and Conservation Visions. If

1:28:13.960 --> 1:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to learn a little bit more about that,

1:28:15.360 --> 1:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you can go to Conservation Visions dot com. Click on

1:28:19.520 --> 1:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Wild Harvest Initiative you can learn more about his efforts there.

1:28:22.720 --> 1:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I think those could possibly be industry changing numbers that

1:28:26.240 --> 1:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>comes out of his study of where our wild meats

1:28:29.880 --> 1:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>go and why they're important. Thanks again to all of

1:28:34.920 --> 1:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to episode number five. You can go

1:28:38.080 --> 1:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Hunting Collective dot com to check out the

1:28:40.720 --> 1:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>other four episodes, including John Dudley, Ryan Callahan, Steve Ronnella,

1:28:46.200 --> 1:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Aubrey Marcus. There's videos there, there are articles there. There's

1:28:51.920 --> 1:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of stuff at the Hunting Collective dot com.

1:28:55.000 --> 1:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We're also on iTunes and Stitcher. If you'd like this podcast,

1:28:58.600 --> 1:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>roll over to iTunes, give to review, subscribe, subscribe, tell

1:29:02.840 --> 1:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>all your friends to do the same. For now, that's

1:29:06.479 --> 1:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>all we have. We're gonna be joined next week by

1:29:08.960 --> 1:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the one and only Remy Warrant, my good friend and

1:29:13.560 --> 1:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>someone you all want to hear from. So thanks again. Bye,