1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,600 Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from Coast to coast AM on iHeartRadio. 2 00:00:04,800 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 2: In recent week or so, there was news about building 3 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:13,600 Speaker 2: nuclear reactors on the Moon in order to I guess, 4 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:16,239 Speaker 2: give us the power to build what they want to 5 00:00:16,239 --> 00:00:20,400 Speaker 2: build their vision of expanding onto the Moon. So I 6 00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:23,160 Speaker 2: think a lot of people just assumed, oh, you'll just 7 00:00:23,200 --> 00:00:26,479 Speaker 2: put big solar panels on the surface and that'll be 8 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 2: enough to power what you need. But I mean, based 9 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 2: on the exploration that they're discussing, it seems like they 10 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:35,640 Speaker 2: need a little something more beefier. So what do you 11 00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:38,879 Speaker 2: think about this plan about building these reactors on the 12 00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 2: Moon in order to sustain civilization up there. 13 00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:45,239 Speaker 3: So this has been this has been something that's been 14 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 3: in development for many years. I mean, it's probably been 15 00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:50,360 Speaker 3: in development since at least the nineteen seventies, but I 16 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 3: dare say it's older than that. But contemporary nuclear reactors 17 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:58,480 Speaker 3: is something that there's been a phenomenal amount of research 18 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:02,880 Speaker 3: going into a building anything. Building a nuclear reactor in 19 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:06,440 Speaker 3: the United States is nearly impossible because of regulations, and 20 00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 3: so both NASA and contractors who've who've been working with 21 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 3: nats over the years, we're kind of hamstrung. We stopped 22 00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 3: at you know, we really stopped in the seventies, but 23 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 3: it's just been on the drawing board since then. 24 00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:22,959 Speaker 4: But there have been sort of breakthroughs. 25 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:28,679 Speaker 3: And let me see if I can remember the exact 26 00:01:29,319 --> 00:01:32,120 Speaker 3: I won't remember the exact technical phrase, but basically, it's 27 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:35,160 Speaker 3: a it's a lower yield uranium that they can use 28 00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:39,120 Speaker 3: for powering these reactors, and it just falls under the 29 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:44,320 Speaker 3: regulation sort of regime so they can actually develop them. 30 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,680 Speaker 3: And they've they've had just phenomenal breakthroughs. We've got we've 31 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 3: both in terms of nuclear surface power reactors and also 32 00:01:54,160 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 3: propulsion systems. In fact, DARPA is going to be launching 33 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:07,240 Speaker 3: a nuclear a nuclear propulsion system in the coming years. 34 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 3: I think it's twenty twenty seven right now. But the 35 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:14,519 Speaker 3: cool thing about reactors on the Moon one solar power 36 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 3: can kind of work, but you start running into serious 37 00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 3: issues very quickly. The Apollo missions were fairly short duration 38 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 3: stays on the Moon. With the Artemis program, assuming that 39 00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,520 Speaker 3: we are serious about it and we really do follow through, 40 00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:33,640 Speaker 3: which hasn't really seemed to be the case so far. 41 00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 4: But if indeed we. 42 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 3: Do follow through it, these are long term missions and 43 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:41,120 Speaker 3: remember you know, every two weeks the moon is plunged 44 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:43,760 Speaker 3: into total darkness or are the place where we land, 45 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:48,799 Speaker 3: just by virtue of the phases of the moon. So 46 00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:50,240 Speaker 3: solar power won't work in the dark. 47 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:52,120 Speaker 4: And that's where reactors come in. 48 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,520 Speaker 3: And I would also add that they have a secondary benefit, right, 49 00:02:57,639 --> 00:03:00,359 Speaker 3: Reactors generate heat. So if you've got like a little 50 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 3: moon rover that you use to drive around, you park 51 00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:05,720 Speaker 3: it right next to your reactor and you can keep it. 52 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 3: You can keep it warm and cryogenic temperatures. 53 00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:11,880 Speaker 2: And for the most part, that's a lot of how 54 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:14,000 Speaker 2: these probes get energy. 55 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 1: Right. 56 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 4: The heat is off of uranium is how it works. 57 00:03:19,919 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 3: Right, So they have what's called a multimission radio asopto 58 00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:28,840 Speaker 3: radio radio astive thermoelectric generators or something to that effect. 59 00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 4: And basically, right. 60 00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:38,920 Speaker 3: As these as plutonium decays very slowly eating it's a 61 00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 3: tiny amount of heat and there's a there's a there's 62 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 3: a very famous and very old reaction where the coldness 63 00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:51,440 Speaker 3: of space with the heat of the uranium can create 64 00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 3: a passive power source. These reactors, though these would be 65 00:03:54,640 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 3: active you know, active power are literally reac actors, right, 66 00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 3: So they're actually doing the job in a way that 67 00:04:05,760 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 3: goes beyond just hot rocks. 68 00:04:08,600 --> 00:04:09,120 Speaker 4: Mm hmmm. 69 00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:13,480 Speaker 2: So what's at stake when it comes to exploration on 70 00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:16,720 Speaker 2: the Moon. What's left to learn about the Moon? 71 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:20,440 Speaker 4: I mean, the truth is, we know virtually nothing about 72 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 4: the Moon. So there's an awful lot to learn that 73 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 4: The rocks that we've collected have been great. 74 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:28,720 Speaker 3: But when you look at the Apollo landing sites, which 75 00:04:28,760 --> 00:04:32,560 Speaker 3: by the way, the greatest engineering achievement in human history. 76 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:34,720 Speaker 4: So nothing that I'm going to say should be a diminishment. 77 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:37,160 Speaker 3: But the whole point of the Apollo program was to 78 00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:41,320 Speaker 3: get there, and so we landed at these absolute safest 79 00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 3: sites possible, right, especially giving the technology at the time, 80 00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:53,400 Speaker 3: The Artless program looks to aim at more strategic landing sites, 81 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:56,599 Speaker 3: sites where you would potentially want a base, So places 82 00:04:56,640 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 3: around Shackleton Crater where you've got these permanently shadowed regions, 83 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 3: where there's going to be water ice that you could 84 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:07,400 Speaker 3: that you could mine and sustain yourself up there. You know, 85 00:05:07,440 --> 00:05:11,960 Speaker 3: these are these are medium term goals, and they are 86 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:14,440 Speaker 3: achievable with current technologies. 87 00:05:15,080 --> 00:05:16,440 Speaker 4: It just really. 88 00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:20,839 Speaker 3: We just need a focus at NASA in order to 89 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:21,280 Speaker 3: achieve it. 90 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:23,080 Speaker 4: And I don't know that we've seen that yet. 91 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:27,280 Speaker 3: But but in terms of the composition of the Moon, geology, 92 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 3: how it works, where it came from, how it affected 93 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:33,400 Speaker 3: the formation of life on Earth. You know, when I 94 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,839 Speaker 3: think when the when all is said and done, we 95 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:40,119 Speaker 3: know very little about our celestial companion up there. 96 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:45,039 Speaker 2: Yeah, some people have theorized that the Moon could be hollow. 97 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:46,279 Speaker 2: Do you have any take on that? 98 00:05:47,720 --> 00:05:48,800 Speaker 4: Seems unlikely? 99 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:54,520 Speaker 3: But I am not a planetary scientist, and there's an 100 00:05:54,520 --> 00:05:58,880 Speaker 3: awful lot of well, it would be very difficult for 101 00:05:58,960 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 3: that to have been the case to form naturally, but 102 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 3: who knows. 103 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 4: Stranger things have happened. Well, that's part of I guess 104 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:08,840 Speaker 4: exploring it. 105 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:11,600 Speaker 2: Do you think the United States is in a position 106 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:16,200 Speaker 2: to still be the leader for space exploration. It seems 107 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:20,279 Speaker 2: like these other countries have really ramped up their programs China, India, 108 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,599 Speaker 2: they want to send probes and rovers to the Moon 109 00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:25,520 Speaker 2: as quick as possible. It seems like they've kind of 110 00:06:25,600 --> 00:06:28,560 Speaker 2: lapsed US in some ways, at least when it comes 111 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:29,560 Speaker 2: to Moon exploration. 112 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 4: But by far is the United States still the leader? No? No, 113 00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:36,600 Speaker 4: I wouldn't say so at all. 114 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:42,919 Speaker 3: If we're talking about getting back to the Moon technically 115 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:45,280 Speaker 3: gets I mean, obviously, America won the space race in 116 00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 3: the nineteen sixties, so let's you know, but if we're 117 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:55,680 Speaker 3: talking about this generation putting human beings on the Moon, China. 118 00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:57,560 Speaker 4: Is running circles around us. 119 00:06:57,720 --> 00:07:03,320 Speaker 3: China has a very disciplined, well funded, highly technical lunar 120 00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:07,719 Speaker 3: exploration program. They've made no bones about exactly what they 121 00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:09,360 Speaker 3: want to do and when they want to do it, 122 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:13,120 Speaker 3: and they're keeping track or keeping pace they're doing it. 123 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,680 Speaker 3: The United States has been floundering for decades with respect 124 00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:23,200 Speaker 3: to lunar exploration. My personal belief was that back in 125 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,560 Speaker 3: twenty twenty earlier than that, really, but we'll just use 126 00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 3: twenty twenty as the starting point. Rather than even bother 127 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:36,400 Speaker 3: going to the Moon, we should have just gone straight 128 00:07:36,440 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 3: to Mars because we did have dominance in terms of 129 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 3: Mars exploration and China had zero experience with it at 130 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:44,040 Speaker 3: the time. 131 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:46,600 Speaker 4: China has rapidly caught. 132 00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 3: Up with us in terms of Mars exploration now, so 133 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 3: even that is sort of called into question. I think 134 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:55,840 Speaker 3: that we still have to lead in terms of putting 135 00:07:55,920 --> 00:08:00,280 Speaker 3: humans there, but not the Moon. We just don't know 136 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 3: how to land people on the moon yet. 137 00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:07,440 Speaker 2: Okay, So if you were to rank the space explorers 138 00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:10,440 Speaker 2: out there, you know, I'll give you three and you 139 00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 2: can rank them in terms of advancement. Who's in the 140 00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 2: best position to go to let's say Mars. Let's say China, 141 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:22,000 Speaker 2: United States, and Elon Musk so we're privatizing it. 142 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 4: What order would you put them in? Most likely to 143 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:26,520 Speaker 4: get there first? 144 00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 3: For the Moon is going to be China, and there's 145 00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:34,280 Speaker 3: just no China would have to have some sort of 146 00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:38,040 Speaker 3: catastrophic setback in order to not beat us back there. 147 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:46,320 Speaker 3: In terms of Mars, that's an interesting question. 148 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:48,520 Speaker 4: I think SpaceX is. 149 00:08:48,520 --> 00:08:51,480 Speaker 3: Going to go to Mars, whether or not the NASA 150 00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 3: wants to go there. I think, however, NASA would not 151 00:08:57,840 --> 00:08:59,760 Speaker 3: sort of allow that to happen. And I don't mean 152 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:01,640 Speaker 3: we're going to stop you from doing it. I mean 153 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:04,600 Speaker 3: NASA would write the check to have that NASA logo 154 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:08,840 Speaker 3: on the side of the rocket. I so it's hard 155 00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:12,120 Speaker 3: to put SpaceX above NASA. I do think that any 156 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:15,720 Speaker 3: impulse that NASA has to go to Mars is completely 157 00:09:15,800 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 3: driven by SpaceX's desire to go to Mars, and they 158 00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:24,040 Speaker 3: are obsessive about it like they I was at SpaceX 159 00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:27,960 Speaker 3: headquarters at Hawthorne a couple of years ago, and I 160 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 3: spoke with just about every senior executive there aside from 161 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:35,040 Speaker 3: Elon Musk, and every one of them said the same thing. 162 00:09:35,240 --> 00:09:37,320 Speaker 3: They said, whenever we have to make a decision, it 163 00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:39,920 Speaker 3: doesn't matter how big or small the decision is. We 164 00:09:39,960 --> 00:09:44,040 Speaker 3: ask ourselves one question, will this get us closer to Mars? 165 00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:45,480 Speaker 4: If the answer is yes, we do it. If the 166 00:09:45,480 --> 00:09:46,559 Speaker 4: answer is no, we don't. 167 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:48,800 Speaker 3: So I do think that if the United States go, 168 00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 3: if NASA goes to Mars, it's because SpaceX pulled them there. 169 00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:55,440 Speaker 3: And I think that we are still better positioned to 170 00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:58,600 Speaker 3: do it than China simply because we've landed so many 171 00:09:58,679 --> 00:10:00,440 Speaker 3: spacecraft on Mars six tesfully. 172 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:07,160 Speaker 4: But you know, NASA is really good at tripping over. 173 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 3: Its own shoelaces, and a lot of that's not it's 174 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,640 Speaker 3: followed a lot of that, as you know, political influence 175 00:10:13,679 --> 00:10:18,480 Speaker 3: and just paying for this stuff. So you know, it 176 00:10:18,520 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 3: remains to be seen. I would love to see humans 177 00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:26,520 Speaker 3: on Mars in my lifetime. I there's an old saying, 178 00:10:26,559 --> 00:10:29,160 Speaker 3: you know, we we've always been twenty years. 179 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 4: Away from going to Mars. 180 00:10:30,920 --> 00:10:32,839 Speaker 3: And if you ask me right now, how long is 181 00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:34,079 Speaker 3: it going to take for us to get there. I'd 182 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:36,439 Speaker 3: say about twenty years. 183 00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:40,160 Speaker 2: It's always the same, perpetual twenty years. But we think 184 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:44,720 Speaker 2: about the space race in the nineteen sixties and how 185 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 2: that really reignited people's imaginations. It's funny how you mentioned 186 00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:54,120 Speaker 2: SpaceX and their drive to get to Mars and not 187 00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:56,199 Speaker 2: so much of a race as it is. The United 188 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:59,560 Speaker 2: States would almost want to stick their branding on that 189 00:10:59,679 --> 00:11:04,720 Speaker 2: rocket to take partial credit for the mission, as opposed 190 00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:07,400 Speaker 2: to allow China to do that first, which I totally understand. 191 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:11,360 Speaker 2: But a fascinating idea that you've brought up in the past, 192 00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:14,480 Speaker 2: and you're saying when you talk to engineers at SpaceX, 193 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:17,720 Speaker 2: their main goal is if this helps us on Mars, 194 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:19,599 Speaker 2: then let's do it. If it doesn't, then it's a 195 00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 2: waste of time. What are some of the things that 196 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:25,160 Speaker 2: they've worked on here that would indicate all signs are 197 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:27,199 Speaker 2: pointed towards Mars for that company. 198 00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:32,440 Speaker 3: Oh wow, that's a good question, and then there's a 199 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:35,080 Speaker 3: big answer to it. So first of all, I'm going 200 00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:37,520 Speaker 3: to say, and this is probably a much bigger conversation, 201 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:42,360 Speaker 3: I'm happy to have that Elon Musk has sort of 202 00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 3: proven himself to be I would not want to live 203 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:52,200 Speaker 3: on a colony owned by Elon Musk. I'll just say that, 204 00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 3: so I and we can talk a lot about that, 205 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:58,560 Speaker 3: because that there's a lot to unpack there. However, I 206 00:11:58,559 --> 00:12:03,640 Speaker 3: will say this, if you look at Elon Musk's portfolio 207 00:12:03,679 --> 00:12:06,200 Speaker 3: of companies, what do you have? You have a car 208 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:09,160 Speaker 3: company that are a electric car company. You've got a 209 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:14,560 Speaker 3: solar panel company. You've got the Boring company that drills tunnels. 210 00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:22,760 Speaker 3: You've got SpaceX, you've got Starlink. These this portfolio, you've 211 00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 3: got AI Like. These companies make no sense under a 212 00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:28,440 Speaker 3: single portfolio. On planet Earth. 213 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:33,160 Speaker 4: You've got you've got hyper Loop, right, the tunnels that are. 214 00:12:34,520 --> 00:12:39,520 Speaker 3: Powered by uh, you know, a certain highly pressure eyed system, 215 00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:41,320 Speaker 3: and things just kind of dart through it like they 216 00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:45,760 Speaker 3: should do with the bank. This portfolio of companies makes 217 00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:48,839 Speaker 3: no sense on planet Earth, like there's no commonality between 218 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:52,600 Speaker 3: the Boring Company and SpaceX. However, if you take all 219 00:12:52,640 --> 00:12:55,800 Speaker 3: of those companies and you put them on planet Mars, 220 00:12:57,440 --> 00:12:59,800 Speaker 3: suddenly things start to make sense. Because if you want 221 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:01,719 Speaker 3: to go Mars, what do you need to do? Well, 222 00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:04,080 Speaker 3: you're probably gonna need rockets. Okay, so you got space 223 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:06,560 Speaker 3: that you're going to need power, right, so solar power 224 00:13:06,600 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 3: is going to be very useful. Okay, well we've got 225 00:13:08,360 --> 00:13:11,439 Speaker 3: a battery and solar power, solar panel company. You've got 226 00:13:11,440 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 3: to deal with cosmic rays and radiation. Well, good thing. 227 00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:18,760 Speaker 3: You're gonnaed to be able to build tunnels because subterranean 228 00:13:19,960 --> 00:13:22,480 Speaker 3: living is going to be the way that you prevent 229 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:25,640 Speaker 3: everyone dying of cancer. Okay, well he owns up a 230 00:13:25,679 --> 00:13:32,240 Speaker 3: company that builds tunnels. You need communications, well, starlink, The 231 00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:34,760 Speaker 3: same technology of starlink on Earth is going to work 232 00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:35,880 Speaker 3: perfectly around Mars. 233 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:38,160 Speaker 4: Okay, so you check that box. 234 00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:41,079 Speaker 3: And then you look at something like hyper loop, which 235 00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:44,960 Speaker 3: again we've seen no success on Earth. However, you put 236 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:47,719 Speaker 3: that same technology on Mars, and Mars just happens to 237 00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:51,040 Speaker 3: be the perfect atmosphere pressure for the thing to run 238 00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:56,160 Speaker 3: without without tubes. So suddenly that portfolio makes an awful 239 00:13:56,200 --> 00:14:00,359 Speaker 3: lot of sense. So I think in terms of the developed. 240 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:01,240 Speaker 4: That how far along. 241 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:04,600 Speaker 3: Or sort of elon Musk companies in terms of doing 242 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:08,160 Speaker 3: this stuff, I think there's a lot of serious, serious 243 00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 3: effort and thought that's going into what they're going to 244 00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:13,920 Speaker 3: take to put people on Mars. Again, I wouldn't want 245 00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,200 Speaker 3: to live under it, And I much prefer the idea 246 00:14:17,200 --> 00:14:23,760 Speaker 3: of the United States itself, or at least some sort 247 00:14:23,800 --> 00:14:28,800 Speaker 3: of democratic republic establishing these sorts of colonies and things 248 00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:29,120 Speaker 3: like that. 249 00:14:29,280 --> 00:14:31,040 Speaker 4: But when you look at technology. 250 00:14:30,480 --> 00:14:35,920 Speaker 3: Development, certainly SpaceX and the broader portfolio of Musk companies 251 00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:38,160 Speaker 3: seems to me pretty far along. 252 00:14:40,480 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at 253 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:46,720 Speaker 1: one a m Eastern and go to Coast to coastam 254 00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:47,880 Speaker 1: dot com for more