WEBVTT - US Retail Sales Rise, EV Latest

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on focarplaying Enroud Auto with

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 2>your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's get over to Dave Peacock. He's the CEO of

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Advantage Solutions. He joins us live from Saint Louis, Missouri,

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 3>and we want to talk a little bit about retail

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>sales and the economic data that we got in this morning. Dave,

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>I see retail sales coming in stronger than anticipated on

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the headline, but if you take out.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Cars, they're weaker. Cars and gas they're weaker.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 5>What's your view.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we're seeing i'd say resilient consumer, but at the

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 6>same time a little bit sluggish, especially in the space

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 6>where we work, which is food and personal care, primarily

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 6>the retail sector. And some of that is because of

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 6>the twenty two percent higher prices for groceries that you've

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 6>seen kind of coming out of the pandemic. Well, wages

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 6>are catching up with that. I think for certain consumers

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 6>it's forced them to go value seeking.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 7>Are we still way above pre pandemic levels. As far

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 7>as things like that, the stuff that I actually.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Use and eat, we are so depending on the category,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 6>but overall groceries are around twenty two percent higher than

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 6>they were pre pandemic.

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 7>As far as promotions, I want to set the table

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 7>for Thanksgiving, so to just stick to promotions, the thing

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 7>that the things that are discounting.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, our proprietary research, the advantage we've got says

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 6>that forty percent of shoppers are going to either pull

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 6>back or trade down as a shop for the holidays.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 7>So when you have to trade down from a turkey, though, well.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Side be honest because it's ull per pounds, so you

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 6>might actually see people buy a smaller turkey.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 7>You also have.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Different price points if it's frozen or fresh. And then

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 6>if you look at the other items in the store,

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing private label products growing in the retail sector

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 6>while national brands are flattish to declining of it.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>So rather than go with the butterball, you look at

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the Kirkland turkey. Are consumers trading down still from you

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 3>name brand stores. I'm not going to go to Chico's,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm more likely to go to Costco.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 5>Is that the case with everybody else.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 6>You're continuing to see channel shift into the value segment,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 6>into the club stores, into mass merge, and so yeah,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 6>you are seeing that channel shift with with some consumers.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing the discounting? I mean John mentions it,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>he's always on the lookout.

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 5>For a sale.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 3>But are producers offering discounts more than they normally would

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>around the season?

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 6>You know you're seeing continue discounting, But if you look

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 6>at percent of volume within the grocery store more broadly

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 6>sold on deal or sold on promotion, we're still actually

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 6>a little bit below pandemic levels. What consumers are doing

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 6>to value seek is some are looking for promotions, but

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 6>at a lower rate overall than pre pandemic. But they

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 6>are looking at private label and they are looking at

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 6>different channels where prices can be lower.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 7>If retail sales are up in this period, does that

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 7>mean debt is also? Are they putting it on credit cards?

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 6>Do you measure that you are seeing credit card balances

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 6>increase and an increase somewhat dramatically. When you look at

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 6>items like food and personal care, they tend to be

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 6>within the normal budget on a month to month basis

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 6>for most consumers, and so where you're seeing debt creep

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 6>up potentially is things like higher value durable goods.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 7>This is a question for both of you, who can

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 7>afford a new car of these days? Well, I mean, it's.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Not average, it's not the average, Jill right. I'll just

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 5>step in John and say.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News did a great story last week pointing out

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 3>that even you know, the top quintile is finding it

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>difficult to afford a new car, and therefore look at

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>used cars.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 4>That's why you.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Know, you see the retail number, retail sales advancing month

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>over month zero point four percent. We were only looking

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>for zero point three percent. So it's doing well. Then

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 3>you look at the x auto number and it's doing poorly,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and I guess that's because the price of new cars

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 3>is just so high.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that is that the case, Dave?

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 6>I think that's the case. And you know you're looking

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 6>at dollar increases and so the pricing plays a factor.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 6>So one thing that we look at, because we operate

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 6>in the retail space of grocery stores, convenience stores mass merged.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 6>But if you look at restaurants, you saw I think

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 6>zero point seven percent in the service sector growth but

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 6>pricing overall in food away from home has been growing

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 6>at three plus times the rate of food at home recently,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 6>so food at home is prices have been going up

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 6>around one one and a half percent in the last year,

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 6>and food away from home and restaurants has been closer

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 6>to three and a half to four.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 5>But on the.

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Durable goods, do you see prices of other you know,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>big ticket items like appliance is as high as they

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 3>are with automobiles.

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you're seeing pretty inflated pricing. And what's you know,

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't know because we don't work in the automobile space,

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 6>But the question would be how much inventory or dealers

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 6>holding and how what kind of deals are being offered

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>by both dealers and manufacturers to get product off.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 7>These lots going forward. Are retailer's confident that they can

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 7>still pass costs along to consumers?

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it's to some degree, And it's really

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 6>a question of manufacturers more than retailers, because retailers are

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 6>often the one receiving runs, receiving the pricing. There are

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 6>commodities depending on what you're making, what food you're providing,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 6>what personal care item for instance, that are still increasing

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 6>or still at elevated levels, and so you know, cocoa

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 6>and chocolate is a good example of that, and we

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 6>saw that during Halloween and it certainly suppressed some of

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 6>the volume during the Halloween windows. So people are going

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 6>to pass it on when they have to, but I

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 6>think they're more reticent given the economic reality.

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 7>What does all this mean for the holiday shopping season.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 6>It's a short season, right, so we have a late

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 6>Black Friday, we have a late Thanksgiving, and so you

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 6>know the season will spread over twenty two or so

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 6>days versus thirty four. And I think it'll be interesting

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 6>to see how supply chains hold up relative to a

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 6>more compressed demand. Sixty three percent of shoppers, based on

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 6>our research, indicate they're going to shop a little earlier,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 6>so we may be seeing some of that creeping in

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 6>earlier in November. So it'll be interesting to see where

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 6>the retail sales come out for the next month.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 7>Hey, can you address for us the divide between the

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 7>haves and have nots and what the overall retail picture

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 7>looks like right now?

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 6>When you say have and have nots, do you mean

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 6>by retailer or by consumer?

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, we'll do both.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 6>I suppose yeah, I mean what we're seeing, let's look

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 6>at the consumer, because I think everything starts there. What

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 6>we see is, you know, lower income consumers are really

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 6>kind of strained in this economy, especially with the elevated

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 6>grocery prices we talked about, which are a day to

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 6>day item, and so they're the ones that are going

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 6>to different channels. They may be pulling back a bit

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 6>on their purchases, which is why you're seeing slower volume,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 6>and they are looking at private label products on the

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 6>upper end. One thing, at least in the food space

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 6>where we operate, you are seeing for some is golp

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 6>one drugs. You know, is as much as fifteen percent

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 6>of a company's pharmaceutical expenses within their benefits plans. Kimmy

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 6>going now to golp one drugs. Depending on the company,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 6>it's not saying it's everywhere, but there is a belief

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 6>that it is having an impact on demand, especially for

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 6>that higher lend consumer. They can afford those medications.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I can't afford them, but I can't wait to

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 3>get my hands on some weig of eurozempic.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Doesn't your healthcare plan pay for that?

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 5>They won't? They say, I'm not fat enough yet.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 7>But what about me?

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing my best.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>John Tucker, we can both try and find it from

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>an unregistered pharmacy.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 2>in ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android Auto

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen live

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's shift gears a little bit to politics, or least

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 3>large corporate involvement in politics. Brook Sutherland joins us Bloomberg's

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Boston bureau chief. She's also the writer of the Industrial

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Strength newsletter, and she has a story out on the

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 3>terminal entitled Nobody Knows What's going to Happen CEO's Brace

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 3>for More Trump Brooke, it's interesting you kick off the

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 3>story talking about how corporate leaders just really didn't want

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the same thing that the American public wanted, and that

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 3>is Donald Trump in a second term.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I mean, I think you know, if you look

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 8>at a lot of the post is that he has proposed,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 8>they're not necessarily pro business. You know, of course you

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 8>have the prospect of lower regulation, lower taxes. Those are

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 8>the types of things that businesses love to hear. But

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 8>you also have the disability of a trade war, and

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, a reignition of inflation, which is not helpful

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 8>for business leaders. And then you know there's also just

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 8>the chaos factor, you know, the possibility of governance by

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 8>tweet returning and becoming sort of a commonplace thing. I

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 8>think we all all forget a little bit about what

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.599
<v Speaker 8>exactly it was like during Trump's first term, but he

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 8>would rather frequently target specific companies who he was frustrated

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 8>for for whatever different reason, and that creates a lot

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 8>of volatility, a lot of instability for these companies that

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 8>really crave predictability and like to make their decisions on

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 8>a playing field that they understand and can anticipate.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, did you hear Jamie Diamond talking

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>to Lisa Bromwitz yesterday from the APEC summit in Peru.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 4>He said, bank.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Leaders, whether they voted for Trump or Kamala Harris, were

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>dancing in the streets.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 5>He was pretty upbeat.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 8>Brooke, Well, I think it might on one industry you're in.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think banking is certainly one that expects

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 8>to see a lot of relief on the regulatory front

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 8>and probably would be less likely to be directly affected

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 8>by anything like tariffs. Whereas manufacturers, even those with substantially

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 8>US manufacturing operations, it's extremely rare for those companies to

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 8>have entirely domestic supply chains. They like to talk a

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 8>lot about local for local manufacturing, but what that means

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 8>is North America in terms of supplying their US operations.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 8>It's not necessarily just America. And so a lot of

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 8>these companies rely on raw material or component imports to

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 8>some extent, and all of that could potentially be vulnerable

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 8>under the tariffs that Trump has proposed. Now there is

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 8>a sense that, you know, some of this is perhaps bluster,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 8>it's a negotiating tactic that you know, the policies that

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 8>he's put out there, whether it's sixty percent tariffs on

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 8>China goods, you know, up to one hundred percent tariffs

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 8>on goods from Mexico, ten to twenty percent on everybody else,

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 8>that these are not necessarily the final destination. It's you know,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 8>meant to be more sort of a negotiating tactic. And

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 8>if that is the case, then you know, I think

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 8>a lot of these companies have shown an ability to

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 8>be adept and pivot their supply chains. But I think

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 8>it's very unpredictable right now and it's not entirely clear

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 8>what his goals are. And he has focused a lot

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 8>on Mexico. And if you look at Mexico, that really

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 8>was one of the biggest beneficiaries of the tariffs from

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 8>his last term, you know, because a lot of companies

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 8>who had supply chains in China decided to bring those

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 8>back to North America. But they didn't put them in

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 8>the US. They put them in Mexico, which has seen

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, a really big boom and spending, specifically by manufacturing.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, is there really a cost effective way for companies

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 7>to bring their stuff back to the United States.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, to do it effectively, you have to have robots

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 8>or automation. And you know, there are some industries for

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 8>which that works better, for which it you know, makes

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 8>more sense to invest in automation, and there are others

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 8>for which it is much trickier. And you know, some

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 8>of the companies that have been investing in Mexico are

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 8>doing so part because they really struggle to find the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 8>labor that they need in the US. And so you know,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 8>whether or not you have automation, just getting that the

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 8>people that you need can be very challenging. And even now,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, as we've seen sort of some of these

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 8>labor shortages ease, you still hear manufacturers talking all the

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 8>time about how difficult it is to get a quality workforce.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 8>And it's important to remember that this was a challenge

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 8>for the industry even before the pandemic, which certainly exacerbated things.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 8>But this has been sort of a long standing issue

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 8>in the US. Factory jobs tend to be very rigid.

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 8>There's no work from Hull. They tend to operate on

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 8>like a very set schedule, and that is not appealing

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 8>to a lot of the American population.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's I think a fascinating story and a fascinating topic.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I just spoke with Peter Rollinson, the CEO of Lucid,

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and we were asking him if he was bummed about

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe losing the tax credit or the fact that his

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 3>chief rival, Elon Musk is like best friends with Donald

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump now, and he pointed out, Hey, you know, we

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 3>build and produce our pus here in the United States

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of America, and I think Donald Trump wants to keep

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing here.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 7>One of the things that CEOs and investors always want

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 7>is certainty.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't sound like from that that's true, and that's.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 7>Reporting that they're getting much of it right now.

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 3>I think Brook's main point. Brook, thanks so much for

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 3>joining us. Definitely recommend you read the story. Nobody knows

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen. CEOs brace for more Trump.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Car playing Android

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Outo with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube now.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>We had seen shares of Tesla and Rivian sliding yesterday

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 3>on a report that Trump plans to acts the seventy

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 3>five hundred dollars EV tax credit put in place unto

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 3>the Biden administration. You do see Tesla shares bouncing back

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 3>a bit today. They're up three and a half percent

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 3>after falling five point eight percent yesterday. Rivian, though still down,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>and I spoke earlier this morning with the CEO of Lucid,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Peter Rollinson. His shares are off another four percent a

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>day after falling five percent yesterday and have hit an

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 3>all time low at less than two dollars Rivian or sorry,

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Lucid trading for a dollar ninety nine a share. I

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 3>want to bring in Steve Man, Bloomberg Intelligence, Global autos

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 3>and Industrial Research Manager, and Steve, I guess the main question,

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 3>how will the EV industry be affected by the Trump administration?

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, if Trump decides to kind of remove or cut

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 9>the seventy five hundred tax credit or EV tax credit,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 9>I think most people believe that the EV penetration will stall.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 9>If not stall, it will probably fall because a lot

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 9>of the consumers are relying on that that's seventy five

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 9>hundred dollars to make sure, you know, to bring down

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 9>the price, the effective price of the vehicle. Most evs

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 9>sold in America are still very expensive. There's only a

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 9>limited number of them that are under fifty thousand dollars.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 9>So the fear is, uh, you know, it's going to

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 9>stall EV penetration. The automaker is going to have a

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 9>hard time because they's already invested. They've already committed investing

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 9>a lot of money under the Inflation Reduction Act, about

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 9>one hundred and over one hundred and fifty billion dollars

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 9>to onshore a lot of supply chains. So it's going

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 9>to cost a lot of chaos within the industry.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 7>So they'll be under no pressure whatsoever moving forward, possibly

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 7>to increase sales of evs.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think the automakers are going to have to

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 9>increase incentives. I think what could happen if the EV

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 9>penetration rate does decrease from about eight percent currently in

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 9>the US. You know you're gonna lead.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 5>He's gonna be.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 9>Left with the strongest players, And that to me, that

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 9>looks like it's Tesla, because Tesla does have the lowest

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 9>costs structure amongst all the EV makers in the US,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 9>and if the market shrinks, the weaker ones will probably

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 9>fall on the wayside.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 7>And oddly enough, First Bro or what do we call him,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 7>first friend, Elon Musk, he's not necessarily in favor of

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 7>these these tax subsidies for evs.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think, you know, to him, I don't. He

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 9>thinks Tesla doesn't need them, And you know, it's it's

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 9>partly true if you look at the amount of cars

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 9>that are least and eligible for the seventy five hundred.

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 9>Actually a lot of the seventy five hundred tax credit

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 9>as actually from leased vehicles If you look at the

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 9>amount of leased vehicles that Tesla have sold in the

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 9>past twelve months, it's about twenty percent, so you know

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 9>they'll get impacted. But if you compare it to Rivian,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 9>you know, Rivian has about fifty percent of their vehicles

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 9>and those and eligible for the seventy five hundred, so

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 9>it could be a bigger impact in Rivian. Then that's

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 9>probably why you're seeing their stop falling much more.

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a limit on you don't get the tax

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 3>credit if you're buying a vehicle that costs more than

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 3>eighty thousand dollars. And I believe there's a household income

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 3>requirement as well, you have to be below a certain level.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>But if you lease it, you can get around at

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 3>least one part of that tax credit.

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Isn't that right, Steve? That's right.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 9>That's actually what I'm referring to. So when we look

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 9>at the companies who's going to get impacted, we really

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 9>look at, you know, how many of those vehicles are leased.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 9>If you look at EV's in general in the US,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 9>the you know, the leasing penetration is actually upwards of

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 9>seventy five eighty ninety percent, so a lot of people

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 9>that actually buy evs are leasing it to get that

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 9>seventy five hundred dollars.

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 3>What does the EV market look like right now? I mean,

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I know, if you read the headlines, you would think

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that no one has bought an this year. Like you know,

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 3>the industry is in trouble because they're so unpopular, not

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 3>just politically, but you know, since there's difficult to charge

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of people, it's just not an option. However,

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 3>don't we still see EV sales actually growing?

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 5>We are.

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 9>We are seeing EV sales growing, especially in the second

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 9>half of this year, because there's been a lot of

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 9>price cuts right over the past eighteen twenty four months

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 9>in the industry and a lot of these vehicles have

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 9>become more affordable, and even especially in the used EV market,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 9>those vehicles are very competitive to gasoline cars. What the

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 9>industry is really facing is really it's affordability, and it's exaggerating.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 9>It's getting more impacted by the fact that interest rates

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 9>are high. A lot of people cannot afford expensive cars

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 9>these days, and EV's are a little bit more expensive

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 9>than ice at the moment. So what the industry was

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 9>trying to do, and I think what the IRA was

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 9>trying to dude. We're trying to onshore a lot of

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 9>the production well on shore, a lot of the supply

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 9>chain in the US in hopes of braining costs down

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 9>so automakers can offer more affordable evs. And that's what

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 9>we were expecting. We were actually expecting the EV penetration

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 9>rate to rise, especially into twenty twenty six and twenty

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 9>twenty seven.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I got to break in here because I feel like,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, Americans have shown a propensity for taking one

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars plus monthly payments. I don't think it's about

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 3>the price. Frankly, what do you are that's the big problem.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm test driving right now at GMC Sierra EV. It

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 3>is a fantastic vehicle. It's expensive, but I think a

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of people are willing to take on debt to

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 3>own a car like that.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 4>The problem is there's nowhere to charge it.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 3>I park in a garage across the street in Manhattan,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, capital of the world, and the only option

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>they offer is the slowest potential charge for twenty dollars

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 3>a day.

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 5>So it's just not worth it.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, think that's a very good point. Affordabuild. It is

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 9>not the only hurdle. It's the charging and the range,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 9>and you know, depending on the use, I think a

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 9>lot of people with the second vehicle may may get

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 9>an EV. Uh, someone who's using it for daily commutes

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 9>make an EV. But you know, America is a big

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 9>country and people love to drive cars, and there are

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 9>a big majority of car buyers that are you know,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 9>are you know, probably staying away from EV.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Because of that?

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 4>All right, Steve, great update, We got to hang out man.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 5>I need to talk to you a little bit more.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Steve Man there Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos and Industrial.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Steef, not me research manager.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 3>He knows more about cars than you do, and that's

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 3>what I want to rap with him about.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>station just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 5>I know that you have plans tonight.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 7>We were just talking about it.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 3>You're an empty nester, right, You're gonna You're gonna hit

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the town with some Wall Street big wigs. I, however,

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 3>have little kids at home, so I don't get to

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 3>go out.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 5>But I'm excited.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Nonetheless because iron Mike Tyson, a fifty eight year old

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 3>man is preparing to knock out a twenty seven year

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 3>old punk on Netflix. And there's no way I'm gonna

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 3>miss that. Keitha wrong And Athen joins us right now

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence analysts for US Media, and she covers a

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 3>course Netflix as well out of Princeton, New Jersey.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 7>Is he really expected to win this thing.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Mike Tyson?

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 3>He's not gonna lose a boxing match to fifty eight,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 3>all right, Keith.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you've got the odds on the fight,

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 4>But what is this event?

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I never I hadn't really realized it was going to

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 3>be on my TV until I started reading the news

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 3>this morning.

0:21:59.760 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's just been so much buzz building up

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 10>for this matchup. It's been heavily promoted, heavily hyped, and

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean regardless of whether Mike Tyson or Jake Paul,

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 10>regardless of who wins that. I mean, obviously the big

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 10>winner in either case is going to be Netflix. You know,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 10>they have over two hundred and eighty million subscribers all

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 10>across the world. This is by far their biggest foray

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 10>into live sports. And remember they're really trying to build

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 10>a business here from scratch, that business being the advertising business,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 10>and you need eyeballs for that, and they know they

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 10>will get the eyeballs with this matchup.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 7>So how many people signed up just to see this

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 7>match that?

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I so we are.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've obviously I think everybody who wants a

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 10>Netflix subscription already kind of has one, but you know,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 10>for those who probably don't have one, I think this

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 10>is obviously going to give them that impet us to join,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 10>and we think it'll actually end up triggering a lot

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 10>more subscribe viers to go on the advertising tier, which

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 10>is one of the cheaper options out there at seven

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 10>dollars a month. And that's actually what Netflix really wants

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 10>because at the end of the day, they want to

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 10>kind of build up that viewer base so that they

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 10>can sell ads against that. So we're actually projecting that,

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 10>you know, Netflix over the course of the entire quarter

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 10>will actually end up adding about ten more than ten

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 10>million subscribers, which is a really healthy number for the

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 10>fourth quarter.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 7>I remember the conversation my brother had with my father

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 7>way way way back when to get cable. The great

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 7>thing about cable they don't have any ads. How quickly

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 7>that changed. Yeah, now it's changing.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 5>For streaming, dreaming, streaming as well, KEITHA.

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 3>The main question, and I don't know if you're read

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>in on this that I have, is is it a

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 3>real fight?

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Is it a setup?

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, are these two really gonna go at each other?

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 4>No, hold bar, It's a real fight.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 10>This is not WWE where it's stayed, so it's a

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 10>real fight. I mean, I know all the bets are

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 10>out there, so you know everybody's excited.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm pumped.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 7>This gives you some indication of like just boxing in channel.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 7>Can you name who is the world heavyweight champion right now?

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 5>No idea.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 3>But I also don't really know who Jake Paul is,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not caught up on non financial news.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 5>In terms of entertainment.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 3>The only thing I know is like what drives money

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 3>making and streaming and squid Game is one of those things.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 5>KEITHA.

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I think a ton of people watched this, and my

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 3>sense is you had to get to the end, and

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 3>when you did, you realized what an incredibly depressing, like

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>disappointing letdown. I never want to go through something like

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 3>that again. I would pay money not to watch Squid

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 3>Game again. But Netflix is going to bring out another

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 3>season of this. Is it going to do well?

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Or have we all learned our lesson.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 10>Want to be gangbusters? I mean, Squid Game one was

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 10>by far the most watched series for Netflix ever. And

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 10>why that's surprising is because this is a non English series.

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, this, this came out of Korea. It was

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 10>made for you know, you have series here that are

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 10>made for something like three hundred four hundred million. This

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 10>entire series was made for something like less than twenty

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 10>million when when it first came out. So it just

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 10>kind of showed how, you know, hits can be generated anywhere,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 10>how content can resonate across the globe. And Netflix will will,

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 10>you know, obviously go all out on the second season,

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 10>just kind of knowing how much of buzz and how

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 10>much of anticipation has been built already, you know, for

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 10>the after the first season launched.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.479
<v Speaker 7>So the Korean producers this time or are they challenging

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 7>Netflix a premium for this programming.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 10>I'm absolutely sure that they are.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 3>What apparently listen, dude, apparently the writer and Geith it

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 3>correct me if I'm wrong. I think I read the

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 3>other day or heard from Katie Orshnale the writer lost

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 3>seven or eight because the production process was so stressful.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Is that true?

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 10>I read the same thing. Yeah, I mean it obviously

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 10>they went all out. Yes, it is true, and I

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 10>saw the same thing as well.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 7>I lost like ten teeth when they told me I

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 7>had to co host with Matt today.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 4>Dude, I haven't lost teeth since like the fourth grade.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 5>How do you lose teeth?

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 7>I guess it's stress thing.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 5>And I chewed tobacco for like thirty years.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 3>All Right, keitha wrongnoth and thanks so much for joining us.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 3>She is a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst on US media and Netflix.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 5>If nothing else, at least you know.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 3>From listening to us on Bloomberg Radio today that there's

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 3>something to watch on Netflix today Mike Tyson versus Jake.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 5>Paul Who I guess is like you're gonna watch this

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 5>or yeah, you know. That's a good question.

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 3>What time does this thing actually start? I have no idea,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 3>but I'm assuming it's past their bedtime. Does anybody in

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the control room know when the Mike Tyson, Mike Tyson, no, no,

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 3>no one knows. Well, we'll figure it out and I'll

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>put the kids to bed no matter what.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Now on Bloomberg Intelligence, Unis in Focus.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Focus on UNIS is brought to you by Bam.

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Bam Mutual insures municipal bonds that finance essential infrastructure and

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>provides guaranteed income to improve any portfolio. Be a part

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of Building America invest in Bam Bam insured bonds. Ma'n

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 3>me and Paul one time did a showdown from Build

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 3>America Mutual and it was a fantastic experience. Got to

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 3>meet all the guys that were working there, got to

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>really immerse ourselves in the MUNI market, which I love

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to do. We'll continue that right now with Bloomberg Municipal

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 3>bond reporter Max Adler. He joins us on Zoom Out

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 3>of Los Angeles and Max, before we get to any

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of the specific stories on your radar right now, I

0:27:55.000 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 3>want to ask about the potential to remove the tax

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 3>advantage of muni's. John mentioned it earlier on how likely

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 3>is that to happen?

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for having me. It's going to be tough

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to follow up that fabulous ad read, But on the

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>tax exemption, we don't think it's that likely. It's definitely

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's been floated. We have all of these potential

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts that the Trump administration is going to try

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to push through. They're going to try to extend the TCJA,

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and this has been floated as a possible way to

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>make up some of the tax revenue that would be lost.

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But we don't think it's that likely. Trump does have

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of finance people in his corner, Howard Lutnik

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and Canter Fitzgerald. They have some UNI holdings. I would

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not think that he'd be advising Trump to get rid

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of the MUNI tax exemption. And the federal government hasn't

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>proven that it can make up for the infrastructure demands

0:28:55.720 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that unipoke bonds take care of. Right now, muni's about

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent of the infrastructure projects that are built

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US. So there definitely would be a problem

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>financing a lot of those infrastructure projects if the tax

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>exemption was done away with.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they'd have to turn to the taxable market. I mean,

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 7>how likely is that?

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if that would be particularly likely.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We do think that the taxable market would expand a

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit if Trump does get his tax cuts through,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that would lessen the value of the UNI tax exemption

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, especially in bigger tax states. But yeah, no,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't think it's particularly likely that all of the

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>country's infrastructure needs would be met by the taxable market, all.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, So it's not likely, but this is one of

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the ways he could make up for lost revenue from

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the tax cuts. How what kind of shape are the

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 3>municipalities in right now, because you know, a few years

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 3>ago they were just swimming in cash and didn't really

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 3>need to issue too much debt anyway, how do they

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 3>look currently?

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>They're so showing some signs of strain, especially in bigger cities.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>We see a lot of different transit agencies right now

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are having a lot of problems that started before the

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID pandemic and was exacerbated during the pandemic. You're seeing

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco is having some signs of budget strain. Chicago

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>has been talked about a lot. They're having a lot

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of problems funding their public schools and just with revenues

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in general. So a lot of cities are showing some

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>signs of strain, especially now that some of the federal

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that was injected into the cities during COVID is

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>drying up.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 7>All right, let's talk about sports. Sames traffic, and of

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 7>field was pretty much destroyed by what was it, Hurricane Milton.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 7>But it's Muni's to the rescue, or is.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 5>It Probably not.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the team that is likely to be covering

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the cost of this. So as part of their lease

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>agreement with the City of Saint Petersburg, they don't pay

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>anything in rent pretty much, but they are on the

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hook for any maintenance costs and the cost of repairing

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the stadium right now. And as you said there, the

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>roof of Trump kind of Field was entirely ripped off

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>during Hurricane Milton. They have about fifty five million dollars

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in damages. The Rays have been contributing to this escrow

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>account essentially over the length of their lease, which has

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>almost been like twenty seven years at this point. So

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there is money in that account that they'll then use

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for the repairs, but it won't be it won't be

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>AMMUNI funded repair projects.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So I saw the story where the Rays. Of

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 7>course they're moving to Steinbrenner Field, the Yankee is going

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 7>to let them use their training facility, but will everybody

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 7>fit in there? And given the average fan base, yeah,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 7>they're not going to have any problems moving into a

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 7>much smaller stadium.

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 3>By the way, if people have invested in that kind

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>of paper in the past, you know, financing stadiums and

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the like, how well do those investments typically do?

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>They typically pay off pretty well. There's like a lot

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of demand for that paper as well. There are a

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of like affinity buyers that want to come in

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and buy credits of names that they that they know

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. It happens with universities, It even happens with

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>smaller schools. There was a private school out here in

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>La the Curtis School. Their bonds sold out really well,

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and that was mostly like affinity buyers. But stadiums in

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>particular do get a lot of those affinity buyers. It

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of a recent deal that the City of Buffalo,

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>actually County where Buffalo is located, was marketing recently. They

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>were trying to sell bills bonds as they were calling them,

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and that deal also was pretty well subscribed. It didn't

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>draw as much retail demand as they expected. But certainly

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the institutional investors stepped up, all.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 5>Right, Max, thanks so much for joining us.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Max Adler there, Bloomberg Municipal Bond Reporter out of Los Angeles.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 2>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal