WEBVTT - Ep. 109 - PGA Championship preview with Kyle Porter 

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Clubhouse with Shane Bacon, presented by Tift

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>dot Com by the PG Tour. I am your host,

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bacon, And just a reminder, Bell Reeve Country Club

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't the only must play in the St. Louis area.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Tap A Wingo National Golf Club. I hope I'm saying

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that right. Tap a Wingo and that's a great name.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope that has a good logo. Is a Gary

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>player design that features the same tight tree line fairways

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in Classic Parkland Phil. Plus, it's a little easier to

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>get on the first tea not in St. Louis. More

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of a links player, no worries. Tift dot Com by

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour and it's thousands of courses have you covered?

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So book your next tea time on tif dot com

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>by PG toward, the official tea time reservation site of

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour, and you do so without booking fees.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, no booking fees every course, every tea time. Plus,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>as a valued listener to the Clubhouse, you'll get to

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>save an additional on deal times with the single use

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>promo code t Off Bacon. And yes, it is PJ

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Championship Week final major of the year, final time that

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the pjh Hchip will be the final major of the year.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So plenty that goes into this week as we not

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just look ahead to the next four days, but look

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead to kind of the historics. And so I asked

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Porter, a good buddy of mine, to come on

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and chat about the week, the year, who needs it,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't really need the win, and of course what

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like to to cover Tiger Woods in eighteen Unlike

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of what we've seen in the past.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, covering Tiger four or five years ago was

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>golf related, but the last couple of years before it

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was more about, um, the stuff around the golf. It

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>was more about, you know, the injuries and the w

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>d s and the and the the pain he's gone

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>through and all of those things. So it was interested

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to have him come on and just chat a little

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bit about that. That's towards the end of the podcast.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We of course jumped into some of the p J

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Champions stuff early. It was a fun list and so

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoy it. And before we get to it,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to tell you that when it comes

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to golf, equipment. We always want the newest driver that

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>hits the ball really, really far, or a ball that

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>goes five yards further, or shoes that are the best

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world. One thing that never gets the attention

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is one thing you use every shot, and that thing

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that holds it protects your golf clubs and it is

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>an essential part of your en course fashion. That's your

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>golf bag. Haven't changed your bag in five or even

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ten years. Will treat yourself to an upgrade today with

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Osio Sirius Bag. It's fully loaded with all the

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>features you want in the golf bag, yet still remarkably light.

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>You can carry it effortlessly while also protecting those brand

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>new golf clubs of years. Complete with a water resistant

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>pocket for your valuables and a rapid access pocket, make

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it a quick and easy to get a new ball

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>after you send one into a backyard. I know you

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. They just wrote that, but I know

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't hit him out of bounds. Check out Osio

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com or your local golf retailer to get your

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hands on the Sirius today. Stop carrying around the golf

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>bag you've had since the nineties. It's time for an

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>upgrade Osio the world's best bags. All right, Colin, I

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>went fairly long, so let's get right to it, and

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we welcome back into the clubhouse. It's it's been a

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>bit cole porter. You know Kyle from CBS Sports. He

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>does an unbelievable job with the golf stuff over there.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And also you might not know this, but Kyle helps

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out with Pistols Firing blog dot com, which focuses on

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State football. As we fast approached it and Kyle,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this might be one of the first times ever that

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Arizona landed a cover of Sports Illustrated. And maybe Oklahoma

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>State was not involved in that. I mean, Arizona football

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>actually getting a little love. How nervous are you about that? Um?

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I texted Joel Klatt yesterday and I told him I

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that his top twenty five videos were great, and

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>all he wrote back was I didn't have Arizona in

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>my top and I was like, well, thanks, just literally

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the only thing I ever asked. But people came here

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for some golf talk. Of course, it's PJA Championship week.

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And let me just say, for the last time, I'm

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it, despite everybody hating the fact that we

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>still bring it up. This is truly Glory's last shot.

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the last time we're gonna have the PGA

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Championship wrap up the season. It's always been the major,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the identity that at least it's the

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>final one, and that's going to change next year. So

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I asked you to start, which player do you feel

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like needs this major the most this year? And which

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>player might not really need it? Which player where if

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they go through this week and don't win, it's not

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>really going to be that big of a deal. That's

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a good question. I think the player that needs it

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the most is is probably it's probably Ricky Fowler. I

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>know everybody came here for the golf Ocahoma State Crossover

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>takes um, but I think it's I think it's Fouler

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just from a man. It seems like we talked about

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>him a lot in the fallout from every major. And

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a difference between needing it the

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>most and having the most to gain, because I think

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the player with the most to gain is Jordan's speek.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote about this for CBS Sports dot Com

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and in a piece on I think it's Monday or something. Um,

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's speek can go from sort of this narrative about

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>how it's been a down year, even though we add

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the caveat a down year for Jordan's two one of

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the most historic seasons ever in that he could win

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the career Grand Slam, and it's like, there's no there's

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>no leap that's greater for anyone who could who could

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially win this tournament. So those are the two guys

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on that side. And then the guy who I think

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>has the least a game by winning is actually somebody

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>like Rory McElroy. Um, he's got four majors. Does it

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>does another p g A really add to the way

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel about him? I? I don't. I mean historically no.

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe because it's been a while, yes, But from a

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>historical context, I don't think it really does. Well, we

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't play in this, but that is about as good

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>as Segway as we could possibly have. The next question

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna ask was about Rory and Jordan's. Um,

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>these are two guys that were the next big things, right,

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean Rory came on and he was going to

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be the protegee to to Tiger and he was gonna

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>take over the tour when Tiger got out of here,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and Phil and Sergio and Adam Scott they all left,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and then of course Jordan's speak burst on the scene.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And he doesn't look like the whatever you wanna call it,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the dominating figure that is Rory mclrory, but all he

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>has it is between the years and he's able to

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>close things out. And you mentioned the Open wind last year,

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and these two guys have had brutal seasons. I mean,

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Rory had one really hot back nine and he got

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the wind out in in Florida, and speed has it

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on since that Open Championship you mentioned a year ago.

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.119
<v Speaker 1>We talked so much about these two guys, and while

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we're chatting about them, there's guys out there that are

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that are getting better and that are winning consistently. And

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about Dustin Johnson and Justin Thomas. I mean,

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys are one A and one B. Why does

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it feel like when the conversation comes around these big

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>events and the major championships, we all want to ask

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>about Rory, we want to ask about Jordan's and we

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>forget that we're seeing two players. I mean, Justin Thomass

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>has really just turned himself into a world beater, and

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Dustin continues to do what Dustin does, and he picked

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>up his nineteenth win a couple of weeks ago. Yeah,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably because they're so far out in

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>front in in terms of of majors, and so you

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the guy who can get to

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>eight or seven or nine or whatever it is in

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of major championships. And I always got to go

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the fact that it's insane to me. And

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you've talked about this on here before, but

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's insane to me the list of players who have

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>one major, right mean, Jason Day, Dustin Johnson, Justin. I

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>mean it, Sergio, it's a joke. And so you start

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking around major championships about the guys, you know, concerns

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>who get to seven. We don't really I think the

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>general public doesn't really care if somebody gets to like two,

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's why there's maybe even more

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>further around JT, because he's, you know, eight or nine

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>years younger than than DJ, and so you're like, oh,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>how many? How many could he get to? We're so

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with the final number, and I think that because

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Speech and Rory are are so far out in front

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of everybody else in terms of total majors. That's why

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they get brought up so much around the four biggest

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>events of the year. Yeah, but it's it's still, you know,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the major talk. And this is major talk. I mean,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a major championship week. But you know, when you

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a guy like Dustin who goes

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>out there weekend and week out and puts himself in

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversation and wins these events all the time, and

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and he does it better than anyone else has the

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>last few years on the PGA Tour, and you think

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to yourself, he's playing similar fields, if not equal fields

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at some of these events, and he's able to win.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Yet again, as you mentioned, he has one major. And

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the backlash I got. I mean, I wrote

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>after his win, I said, you know, we're watching somebody

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that's historically great, and I got a whole bunch of

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>people that said, he only has one major. Only as

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>one major championship. He's been in the conversation a lot,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it just hasn't worked out those four weeks. Do we

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>discredit these PGA Tour wins because we're so obsessed with,

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, kind of the final major number. Yeah,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we do. I really struggle with this because to me,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>and I was talking to Chip Patterson of CBS about

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this the other day, it's like, what's the difference between

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, legitimately, what's the difference between the winning bridge

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>shown and winning this week at Belery right? I mean

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the field wise that I mean, you have more play,

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you have more golfers in the field at Bellerive at

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the PGA, but half of the half of the additional

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ones that you're adding are are pg A pro They're

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not they're not professionals, like they're not on I mean,

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not professional golfers. There are these guys that just

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of got into the tournament of the PGA of America,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And so you're basically beating the same field at a

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>similar course, and and we're so obsessed with just slapping

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the label of PGA Championship on there. And and I

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that we underrate UM winning I

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>mean DJ winning nineteen times in this era, is that

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be some normalization, like like we do

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with UM, you know how you always do with so

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I made this much money in nineteen sixty

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and and you factor in inflation, there has to be

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of deflation I guess or whatever looking backwards,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>because to win nineteen times in this era is unbelievable.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But we also, I think we we underrate winning at

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>specific courses. So I was thinking about this. I think

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that I think that Justin Thomas is gonna win a lot,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>But what's the what's the best course that he's take

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>him down? And I've gotten into, of course architecture a

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more over the last year or two, and

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so you look at Jordan Speed and it's like, Wow,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he wants Barkdale, he wont Augusta, he won Colonial, Like

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>those are Yeah, of course, shout out to Fox, Uh

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>those are those are amazing courses. And I wonder how

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>much like it just doesn't it doesn't feel like we

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>separate guys who won at at certain courses from from others.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I agree with you that we overrate, we

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>overrate winning majors, and we underrate winning We under rate

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the level of field, right, because if you

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tiger winning eighteen deb g C, say whatever

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you want about the de w GC that it's an

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>elite field, and fields make fields make great tournaments. If

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>if all of a sudden everybody stopped going to the Masters,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be the Masters. It just wouldn't. And so

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to have great fields to

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have great tournaments. And um to, I don't know that

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>there there's no like different level of winning these these

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>events other than the difference between Majors and everything else.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And and I feel like there should be and and

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's to me, and I thought about it a

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more this year than I ever have. Is the

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.239
<v Speaker 1>PG eight Tour in in the sense of intrigue amongst

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the players, the guys in the field when it comes

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to winning or finishing fifth, I think is the lowest

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's ever been because there's so much money involved in golf.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>There's so much money on the p g A Tour

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that if you win the bridge Stone, that's great, But

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>if you finish third, you know, that's also really great.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean you, I think we we were chatting in

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>our little nerdy golf group chat about Ricky's performance in

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the w g c's over his career, and he has

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>no wins and has made over four million dollars, and

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what the PGA Tour is. And to me, when

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to majors, that's the four times a year

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that these players really care about winning because they know,

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as we've chatted about already, where it puts them historically,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>where it puts them amongst their peers. And so I

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>almost feel like the players more than than than the

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>media and more than the fans. The players hype it

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>up themselves, and maybe that's why some of these guys

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>have such a hard time winning them. I mean a

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul case you're a Lee Westwood. These guys were able

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to win, you know, of course, you know Paul Casey

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>mostly on the other side of the pond, but they

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>were able to win at events when they got themselves

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in contention. But for some reason, the major idea of

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a major championship, you see guys fall apart late way

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>more than you do at any other regular tour event. Yeah. Now,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's totally true. And you mentioned the money there. I

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>do wonder and I don't know if if you've ever

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>talked to anybody about this off the record. I know

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that I haven't because it's sort of a weird thing

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about but when you talk about the money,

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>just what is it's so hard to stay motivated for

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like twenty years exactly as compared to when like we

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>always joke about how Arnold Palmer or Giant Nicholas only

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>made like one point five mill in their career or whatever.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That that was like they still made good money because

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they had all these endorsements or whatever, but they were

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not making this just these egregious amounts to where they

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't ever have to worry about I mean, they were

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>still like building towards something throughout their career. And you

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>look at somebody like Rory and it's like, wow, I'm

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, I have probably a hundred million dollars, have

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>won four majors, and you start looking around and you're

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like the only thing I have left to do is

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to win the Masters, right exactly. And that's why it's

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>quote made more sense this year. Yeah, And it's like,

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you stay motivated? Like, even

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're the most ambitious, driven person on the planet,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there has to be some level of of fall off.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why you start. I mean, we've

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten this run of of one time made our first

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>time major winners over the last two years. The Patrick

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Reids kept going last year, Sergio, because those guys are

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>still building towards something, They're still working towards something, and

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that falls off after you just naturally after

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you win. And I don't I don't know, I don't know.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This is not the question you asked. But I was

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about that as you were talking about money

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and when he Majors, Yeah, you you know what it's you.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You brought up something that will be very interested to see, is, say,

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Rory wins the Masters next year, what does he do

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>with his life? I mean, because we we know that

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there are those those groups of the players that you know,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they they seem to always be together, and then there's Rory.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>He was a little bit of an outlier in that group.

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, he doesn't he doesn't, you know, stay at

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the house at Carnousti with the entire group of guys.

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And he he hasn't been kind of in in any

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of the whatever you'd call it. I mean, I

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bring up the spring Break Boys, but

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that wasn't his his thing. That's never been

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>his thing. He's always taken golf as a business and

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that's been his business approach. And literally the money he

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>made is what kicked him off of his own Twitter

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>when he when he when he responded you don't remem

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>who was it, Steve Elkington about how much money he'd

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>made and if he wins the Masters, which he has

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>been quoted as saying, is the last check mark in

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing he's focused on every year. What's he gonna do,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the Bell Reeve and what's he gonna

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>do with these courses coming up? That maybe he's not

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>massively passionate about it, it's gonna be very interesting that.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing to me was, i know, talking to

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Rory and talking to some people around Shinnekock headed into

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that US Open, that he was so pumped about that

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>US Open. He loves that golf course, he'd been out

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there as much as anybody else, and then he struggled.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, maybe it's the motivation can be obviously

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>be a benefit, and we've seen it at times and

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>then it could be a detriment. And of course we've

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>seen that at the Master's overtime with him, where he's

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>struggled when he's got himself in contention. After two thousand

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and eleven, he'll probably started, probably started a podcast. He's

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to Inney beat all of us out. This thing

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be done. Now. That's that's what's so

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>impressive about about Phil, I think, and we don't. I mean,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's in it's insane that he's almost fifty years old

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's just toiling away on the PA. He's going

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to Memphis and all these places, and you're like, this

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is crazy, like this, who what what? Nor? I mean seriously,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's just he's just a lifer. And I don't

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some young guys like that. I

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think I think speeds a little bit like that, But

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that all of them are and is

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>like his his Dustin Johnson gonna play the Senior Tour.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just it's a different it's a different era,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a different way of of doing things. And I'm

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>really intrigued to see how it's sort of because we

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>always talking about, oh, all these young guys are winning,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, maybe it's just the fact that

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>everything skewing younger and we're we're not gonna see players

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>play as much into their early mid to late forties.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this fills second year that in when when he

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>passes away in whatever hundred and fifty years from now,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be his gonna be the year after

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>oh four that we remember him the most four because

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he he literally has done from start to finish, from

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>winning too losing his mind to the commercial I feel

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like the might be the most headlines we've ever had

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>from Phil Nicholson. Yeah, his win in Mexico feels like

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it was like eight years ago. Honestly, you forget to

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>be in a playoff. They keep showing that Justin Thomas

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>highlight during that that kind of the recap um you know,

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like the whole out and the Rory fist pump

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and all those things, and and you're like, oh, that's right,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it was Justin Thomas in the playoff with Phil. Yeah.

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It It's interesting because this is another thing that I've

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about with some people, and I don't like all

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is hilarious and like he's obviously just a legend.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But I also feel like the the worst you get

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>at golf, like the more your game falls off, the

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>less funny of that stuff becomes. Because you're like well,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>how much of this is just trying to stay in

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the public eye. And I don't really think that's what

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it is right now, because he's still playing pretty good golf.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>He won this year. I mean, he's played you know,

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he I think over the next few years,

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and in the past few years, we've seen him kind

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of taper off at the end of the year just

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>because he's almost fifty years old and so, but I

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>still think he's he's competitive, he's good. I just worry

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>that into his fifties and maybe beyond, it's like is

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this is this still funny? Or what are we doing here?

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You know? This this has seemed like, at least for me,

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'd have to actually go back and see, I

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like I did pick Phil Niolson to win the Masters,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like I do that every year, but

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this has seemed like the first year where headed into

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the post AUGUSTA Major championship schedule, I didn't ever feel

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like there was a realistic chance that Phil was gonna win. Yeah,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I now he I've seen it some places. This week.

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>He's like a hundred one at the p g A

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's just as high a number as I've seen

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for him since I've been covering this, you know, it's

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like he has a real shot at

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these places. And then of course you're

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the one tournament and you've been big on

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this and I agree, and probably at Augusta where he's

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>like fifty three and wins and we're like, oh my gosh,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Phil is the greatest golfer of all time, and you

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>know whatever, and so as as long as you get that,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like I'm all in on all of it, but the

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>end of his the hind of the end of his

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and Tigers careers, and especially if they're gonna dovetail together

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like it seems like they are, it's gonna be super interesting.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break to just remind you the

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Bell Reef Country Club isn't the only must play in

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the St. Louis area. Tape Wingo National Golf Club is

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a Gary player design that features the same tight tree

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>lined fairways and classic park land field. Plus it's a

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>lot easier to get on the first t y because

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you use tf dot com. If you're not in the St.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Louis area and you're more of a link player, no

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>worries t dot com by the PGA Tour and it's

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thousands of course, as have you covered. So book your

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>next tea time on t op dot com by the

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>p g A toward the official tea time reservation site

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of the p G A Tour, and you do so

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>without booking fees. That's right, no booking fees every course,

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>every t time plus is a valued listener to the

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>clubhouse to get the saving additional twenty on deal times

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with a single use promo code t off bacon. That's

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a t off dot com. Use t off bacon. You'll

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>save twenty five. All right. Back to Kyle Okay to

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ask a couple of pg Championship questions, and then we're

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna jump into a little tiger and it's gonna be

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>tiger talk unlike you expect. First things first is and

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't about the golf course. Is about the p

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>G A. How much better is p G A year

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when you know the Ryder Cup is is after it? Yeah,

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's way better because like and I don't know,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if everybody thinks like this. I know

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that I do. I know that you probably do. I

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>know that a lot of the people in the golf media. Dude,

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the this is the last week to qualify

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>for the Ryder Cup. And I think that's sort of gone,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>um just kind of it's fine under the radar. I mean,

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>if if Tony Fine wins this week, he's he's probably

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Ryder Cup team. If Andrew Shoffley wins this week,

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he's probably on the Ryder Cup team. And so I

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you'd have to do the math. I don't

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>know how it all works out, but it is really

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because if you get somebody on either team that

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>wins this tournament, they're gonna not only do you win

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a major, but you get onto a elite stag Writer

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Cup team. And I think that that makes it. You know,

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen the first three winners this year all

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the Ryder Cup. It would be

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool if if all four of them are for

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for somebody who wins the p G A. Yeah, it's

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a different Writer Cup approach. I

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like this year everybody's like it's it's we can't

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>wait to see what the teams are. So then if

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we can spend too much debating two months debating on

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>which team is gonna be better. It's gonna be unbelievable.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But I just always think to myself, normally this week

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is a little depressing because you're like, Okay, great, you

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>know it's p g A. It's gonna be fun, it's intriguing,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and then that kind of drops off after, you know,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>until we get into the FedEx Cup playoffs, which I mean,

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, for what they are, they're still somewhat interesting

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for people that that are interested in golf because you

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>want to see what people do in those four weeks.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But normally, when it's not a Writer Cup year, you're

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bummed out after the p GA. So it's

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>always nice to have that second is this, think about

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Think about next year. You're gonna have the Open at

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the end of July and then you don't have anything

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>until another major until April. Well, you have the President's Cup.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Come on, just to see how the President's come It's

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>where is the Presidents Cup next year? Australia. It's a

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>rule Melbourne. At least you get past that. Yeah, I

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it might be like who knows what time it'll be,

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it'll be great. I can't wait to see

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on Robanla here he get just waxed by Brooks. Go one,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>go one in five. Career wise, it was I did.

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I did the President's Cup last year and um, I

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>did it with with with for the World feed, which

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>is basically if you're in any country that's not the

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>UK or the United States, you sadly have to hear

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>my voice talk through the the President's Cup for five

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>hours and um, you know, going into it on paper,

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you were like, man, this is gonna be really really rough.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>And then it was really rough. And we had to

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>do the Curtis Cup this year and the same exact

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thing went down. And I had the Walker Cup last

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>year and it was like three team events in a row.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I did. We're headed in. I was like, there's no

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>chance the Americans are gonna win this, Like that's how

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>good these teams are and it'll be interested if if

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the Americans win this Ryder Cup team you're gonna have,

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, really across the board dominance. And you know,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the Solheim Cup, of course, is is lacking, you know,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>some of the best players in the world because they

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have anybody from the from the you know, South

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Korea is and from Japan and China. But you know,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Americans holding all those titles for this

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>many years in a row. Uh, it's really flipped in

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the sense of how team events have felt, because it

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>always felt like we were the underdogs going into almost

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Yeah, and especially because this was supposed

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the era in which golf exploded all over

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the world and and you see you see basketball and

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all these things going more global, and it's like, well, wait,

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is the US actually like securing their stranglehold on these

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on these big time team events. I don't know. It

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen, but I do think that that's

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. Okay, I want to ask about this golf

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>course because I feel like not a lot of people

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>know about it. Um, we've seen the if you if

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen them yet, I'm sure you will. I mean,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the weather has been brutal there. I know, they had

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>an awful winner and then a really hot summer and

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the greens aren't what they want them to be. And

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see him get worse and worse in my opinion,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 1>throughout the week, which only brings up one thing, and

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's patients and ball striking, so or those the

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>types of players that you're looking at this week to

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have success, considering these greens are going to make people

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>miss four and five footers. Yeah, I looked at I

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>looked at struction strokes gained off the tea and strokes

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>gaining on approach shots, which obviously isn't those are two

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>categories that you normally look at. But I think I

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thought Andy over at the Friday brought up a good point.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a course where the rough is going to

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be pretty thick, and so if you're everybody's gonna miss fairways.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>But if you're long, if you're really long, you're gonna

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>have a nine iron out of the rough instead of

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're you know, the Zack Johnson type where you

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have like a four iron out of the rough. And

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that disparity. The difference between having a wedge

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the rough out of thick ruff versus having

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a four or five or six iron is it's pretty stark.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's big, and so I think

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that just like we said, I mean, you could take

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Firestone leaderboard and just apply, like just slap all

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the names on this one. I'd be like, yeah, pen

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>now okay, kepka, yeah, can'tle Rory j oh yeah, DJ yeah,

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh so I wouldn't be surprised to see pretty

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>much the exact same leader boarder. It is interesting because

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I was watching sort of the flyover whatever video of

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>all these holes, and there's a lot of elevated greens

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of these big drop offs around

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the green. So if you miss some of these greens,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you're dead. Like it's double it might be out of bounds.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And in addition to that, there's a lot of these

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>huge bunkers in in kind of the surrounding the green,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>so you might you might miss a green and it

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>rolls to the center of this bunker and all of

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you've got a I don't know, a fifty

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>foot shot out of the sand. It's gonna be I

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think a little bit different than you see on on

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a normal PGA Tour event in terms of the sand.

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring something up. You mentioned Zach Johnson

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and this guy has two majors. Is his legacy going

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a pg Tour staple like major winner it's

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in Andrew's and Augusta or is his legacy going to

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>be the guy that anytime we in the media needed

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to mention a short hitter for twenty years, we mentioned

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Zach Johnson's name. I feel like he's the the all.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>What other go too is there? His legacy might be

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>eating corn out of the cart jock. That was not good.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't need that. But like it's so hard to reconcile, right,

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Like he want Augusta and St. Andrew's. I mean, what

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>am I supposed to do. It's one thing, Okay, if

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>you win St. Andrew's and you don't want anything else whatever,

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fine. If you want Augusta and you don't

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>want anything else. But if you win both of those

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>over a long period, like it was the difference in

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>like six years. I mean, that's a that's a career

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's one, I don't know, twelve times. I don't

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>really know what to do with him, honestly, because I

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think that he gets he sort of gets made fun

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of by people, but he's he's got twelve one anyone

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a gust and st Andrews. It's I mean, it's funny

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we we always seem to It's like when you're grasping

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for the short hitter to compare to the guys that

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>bomb it. It's always like, well, you've got Dustin and

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>you got Zack, and you're like, man, poor Zack Johnson.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>This guy is like the best wedge player in twenty

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>years that he's got this great short game and it's like,

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but he can't hit he can't hit the two seventy five,

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so we gotta throw him in there. That's I mean,

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Speed Speed has in a way fallen into that category

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit where it's like the player that's not

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the new player, even though Speed hits it, you know

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously plenty far and is one of the best ball

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>strikers in the world. He's he's become that kind of

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>new age player. No wonder they're they're good buddies and

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to actually share the corner out of the clearer jug.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get into Tiger for a minute,

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and it's about Tiger. It's about your year

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with Tiger Woods. That that makes sense. You know. I

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>used to write online and I know that that that

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you chase headlines and you chase storylines, and your editors

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>want you to do stuff sometimes that you don't get

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to do. And I'm sure over the past four and

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>five years writing about Tiger Woods was a little bit

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of a slog and I'm sure you had times where

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it was a bummer to have to write another Tiger story.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>This year has had to feel different. This is a

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>kind that's competing, and he's making this comeback, and he's

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>putting himself in an opportunities to win big, big events.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course the Open Championship was really the

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>culmination of all that. So what's it been like this

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>year covering Tiger compared to maybe the last four and

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>five years, where it hasn't really been about the golf

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been more about the name. Yeah, I think. I

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>think in a micro sense it's been really hard and

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>not that fun because you are writing note. I mean

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we see every shot, right, we see it on whatever

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that work is covering the event, they show every single

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Tiger shot, and they should like I I there's no

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a that's a good business decision to

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>do that. But because of that, you know, I'm I'm

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>having to take notes on that live blog that right

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>about every round and you're just like, oh my gosh,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>like we can you go back to like the nine

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>events schedule instead of the seventeen events schedule, and so

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from that, From from that sense, it's been it really

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't honestly been that fun, but from a macro since,

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been fascinating. And so I love the midweek or

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the preweek, you know, like the Monday Tuesday piece for

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I get to sort of pull back thirty feet and say, Okay,

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>how does this fit into the bigger context of golf historically,

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Woods historically, and and the way that Tiger sort

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of interacts with golf historically. That's the stuff that I

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>love writing. And I think it's been so fascinating to see.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's he's so much more multidimensional now as

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a dad, as a golfer. Before he was he was

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>he was superman, and so you you sort of were

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>inn awe, but you never related. And now when he

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>when he leads the open and goes double and then

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>bogey to lose the opening, hugs his kids, You're like, wow,

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually sort of relate to that. I mean, I'm

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>not leading the open, but there's disappointment in life and

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then your kids are there and and all these different

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>things that I don't know how much he personally has

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>changed but I think the way that we relate to

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>him as a human being has changed quite a bit

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten years. And what is it like, Um,

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, readership wise, is the interest and intrigues still there?

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it still a boom when you write

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a Tiger story versus any other player in golf? Yeah.

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I went back and looked, Um, you know, we we

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>do these these live bogs for each Tiger round, and

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are a joke, and you sort of get

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff into Google and and and people start just searching Tiger. Honestly,

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like people are just like, I wonder what tigers doing.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>He's that much on sort of the the minds of

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are falling golf. But the two pieces that

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to compare, I went back and looked at

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I wrote this thing after Rory, so I kind of

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pick the next biggest name. I guess it's Rory.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe Phil, But I picked Rory because

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he won Arnold Palmer sort of dramatically. And I wrote

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a long thing about him the day after on Monday,

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and it got I think it got like ten thousand

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>page views, and I spent I spent a ton of

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>time on it. I was I was deep at it

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was pretty good, and you know,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I threw it out there on Twitter and everything. And

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>then a couple of days before bridgtone, I wrote this

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>piece on Tiger that was just it just popped in

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>my head and I banged it out in like twenty minutes.

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It was like five stats that show why Tiger has

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>actually been a little bit better than you probably think

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. And I did a mild amount of research

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on it, and he got uh far, I think he

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>got like it was up to twelve or thirteen thousand

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>page hees so so far more than the Rory piece did,

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>even though I spent you know, like a quarter of

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the amount of time. And and that's that's hard because

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>part of you is like, well, maybe I should just

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>write eight Tiger things exactly. But that's that's not fun

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because you're just sort of becoming a robot. You're becoming

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this like computer program that just spits out uh mad

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>libs of Tiger Woods playing golf and it and it's absurd,

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know it, it's tough because, like I said,

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with TV, the same with the internet. It's business decisions

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and you want to attract readership and viewers and page

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>views and all that stuff, and and Tiger certainly still

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>does that. Yeah, we we, uh you know amongst kind

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of the golf media and the golf fans. You know,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the first two days at the US Open, you know,

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>people are asking us on Friday and of course the

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>lling at me on Twitter, you know, why are you

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>showing Tiger? Why are you showing Tiger? Why are you

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>showing Tiger? And you're going, well, but you control the camera. Hey, yes, yeah,

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Mark Loomis is gonna let me produce it.

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know it's it's uh Tiger. You know, Tiger

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>transcends the sport that we are loving, you know, I mean,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Tiger is a bigger thing than then you know, everyone

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>else in the field combined, and for better or worse,

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>when he's playing, there's intrigue. If it's great, awesome, If

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's bad, that's also a story, and so there's something

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow along on that end. And um, you know

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>knew that we we of course, I mean that we

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>actually plan. I don't know if people knew that in TV,

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but we plan ahead of of what's going on and

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, as as the weekend approach, you know,

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we were preparing for, you know, the last few groups,

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and it looked like Tiger was gonna miss the cut

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff. But you know, people are going

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to tune in on a Friday afternoon and they probably

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>want to see this guy that they know by one name,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>unlike you know, a Molinari or somebody like that that

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you and I follow and pay a lot of attention to.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So it is interesting you you do. As you said,

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it can feel exhausting at times to follow along. I

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>know there's been times where this podcast has been posted

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh and my grade editor has has written Tiger

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in the headline, and at times you kind of go, oh, well,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not really that much about Tiger, But then you

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>think to yourself, you know, when people are on the

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast search and Tiger pops up, that's good. I mean,

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that's good for business. So it's a little bit of

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a balance. But I was very interested in kind of

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>your side of it because I know, and I can

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine the last three or four years without Tiger really

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>being involved, You've had to be creative, You've had to

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>find ways to to get stories out there. That people

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>clicked on and read as actually, in this new age

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of of not really going to a website, we're finding

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the news to via social media. So um, I'm sure,

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>as you said it, it's interesting to hear that it's

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>been both positive and negative at times, because it's felt,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little exhausting, but at the same time,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know there's gonna be a lot of eyes on it. Yeah,

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's the thing, Like, you get to the end

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and I'm sure you guys have experienced

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit too, that you did end of

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a year and it's like, oh wow, your numbers were

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>up nine and it's like, well, I don't know if

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I was that much better of a writer this year

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or people were just google in Tiger Woods, you know.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So I it's it's tough, and it feels like nobody

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear either of us complain about covering professional

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>golf for a living, and that's certainly not what I'm

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not complaining about it. I think it's amazing. I love

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>getting to do it. But I think that people I

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's a misperception that people in the media just

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>worship Tiger Woods and that's all we want to do

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>is cover Tiger and think about him and write about him,

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he's really interesting. But that I don't think

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that viewpoint is necessarily true of most people. Yeah, and

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this has been the most interesting year of

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Tiger's career. I mean personally, I mean, even if he

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't win, which it really is starting to look like

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna win this year. I mean maybe he

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>snapped a FedEx Cup title or something. I don't think

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna win this week. But even without that, I

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 1>think this has been, as you've said it, the person,

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the human the the ups and downs that they're actually

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>missing big puts on the eighteenth toll when he used

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to make the big puts. You know, those types of

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>things have made this very interesting to watch. And I

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>do not apologize for eighteen Tiger coverage because it's needed

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be what it is. It's needed to be fun

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because it should have been fun, and it should be

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fun for people to see a legend, one of the

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>best ever try to come back. That's that's intriguing and

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. And that's why eight six is the best

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>golf story ever. Because there's been a lot of times

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>where Tom Watson had a chance to win a fifty eight,

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or Greg Norman was in the hunt at the Open

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in his fifties, or Phil Nicholson, for goodness sakes, gets

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt at late forties, and and it's cool

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to see these guys with one last gasp. And in

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>eight six we finally got to see the guy pull

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it off, which rarely, if ever, happens. And if Tiger

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>does it this week or at Augustine next year, or

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll take it at the US Open, for

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>goodness sakes, if he does it finally, it probably will

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest golf story ever. Yeah, and you get

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>to watch a guy who is in his four days

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>with kids sort of wrestle with his own mortality. And

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't, uh, we don't see that a lot because

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the the I don't know, guys don't usually don't reach

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the heights that Tiger did. And so he feels in

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 1>two thousand or two thousand and five even like he's

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>just immortal and infinite. And then all of a sudden

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about what losing the Open meant for the

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for what he taught his kids, and you're like, wow,

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that is that's like the most human thing that's like

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a very immortal, uh finite thing that I can identify with.

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that that outside of the golf,

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like that's sort of narrative is um is endlessly intriguing

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>to me, and so with you. I just I think

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Tiger at forty two and hopefully at forty six and

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>forty nine, uh is is way more fascinating as a

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>as a person. And I think that translated translates into

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the golf as he plays than he was when he

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was thirty one or twenty six or whatever. It's crazy

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to me that I think Rory earlier this season kind

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of complained about the star studded pairings and groupings and um.

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's been plenty of the young players that have

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about being in the Tiger bubble, and they threw

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Rory and JT and with Tiger for the first two

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>days the p G A It's like, here you go, guys,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>here's here's what you wanted. Yeah, it was j T

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at Rivereia that said I think, or maybe it was

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Rory that said, I think he loses like a quarter

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of a stroke around or whatever. And then and then

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, well, Okay, great, I'm gonna lose a

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a strung around as well. Uh yeah, that's

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Man. I loved the way they opened to

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the pairings. Um. I saw some people talking about that

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and stuff, but it was just and part

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of this is going off the first tea all day

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and you're spreading everything out throughout the day. It just

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>feels like the p G A Okay, we've got this

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>four hour window of you know, everybody that's awesome on

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the course, and then the other ten hours or whatever

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you're like, okay, like Charles how Is at three under,

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's great, that's good. Good for me going a

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of ways. But yeah, I don't. I'm not a

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of the the big time feature groups. Um.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna be refreshing Marty Jerdson's page um all

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again because I just want

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, as you said, like there's a

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent amount of the field that's made up of

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 1>these PGA professionals, and I always just root for the

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>two or three that I know to make the cut

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>because you can only imagine what that must feel like.

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that's their battle. They're going in

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to try to make it to the weekend. Um and

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and so you know you just go, well, you

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>know you might go out there and compete for a

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Um. Are you excited about anything in particular

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this week when comes to either the golf course, the field,

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the pairings, the players, um, the hopes of seeing something.

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that's kind of sticking out to you

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>or is it just kind of a a look at

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it from a wide angle and see what happens. I

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, you know, I'm super biased and

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you probably are in some ways as well. I think

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Rory winning again would be pretty cool to see. Um,

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't he. I picked him like immediately after he

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>finished the Open. I picked him to win this week

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>because I felt like he I feel like he's not

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>playing that well, but he's still scoring, which is is

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>really impressive because that's the thing that Spith has always

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>done so well. Um, So I think to be that

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I've never I've never covered a Rory winn or a

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Rory Major win in person, So I think that would

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be pretty cool. There's just there's so many I'm always

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by these major championships. There's so many different legacies

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that sort of hinge on a Sunday afternoon and you're

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in You know, it's probably less so at the p

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 1>g A than at than at a Shinnecocker in Augusta.

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, like we've been talking about, it's so

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a big deal to win a major, and I just

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I hope that we continue to get these. I don't

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>know that I necessarily care who ends up on top.

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Like at the Open I did. It didn't bother me

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.399
<v Speaker 1>at all that Molinari one, as long as we got

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>just a thrill in Sunday afternoon. And I hope, and

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten a lot of those in recent memory. I

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>hope we got another one at Belle reve Yeah. And

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's there is a lot of for grabs in

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the sense of if you do win this week, what

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>does it mean? I mean, d J and j T.

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You know we've had great seasons already with three wins each. Um.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You know you've mentioned robbery. Of course, you know Speik

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>would would be it would, as you said, make the

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>season and complete the crewery and slam and then you

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>keep going down the list. I mean at Jason Day

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has had a great season, you know, and would love

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to add this to it. A Tommy Fleetwood is still

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking for the first one and looks more

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and more comfortable doing it. But you can look down

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the list and I do feel like the storylines, if

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, have burst out because we have had an interesting,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>if you will, major championship year. I mean, Patrick Read

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>winning was was great for Patrick Read and and for

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>golf fans that either love him or hate him and

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>kept go winning back back US Opens was great for

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the historics of that, and then of course you get

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Millinary who maybe he's not going to translate a ton

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but it was great for Italian golf.

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But it hasn't been like a year where it's you know,

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Speed winning and and and then j T and then

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Dustin and then you come here and you're like, who's

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna claim this one. It's been a little bit more

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of kind of a random ish major title line. So yeah,

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting. I I I'm looking forward to it.

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We of course if Fox have um the Women's ambitor

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this week, so I'll be covering that and then keeping

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a second eye on the p G A

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as the weekend comes around. But um, yeah, I mean

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I just hope the Greens hold up for goodness sakes.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, I wouldn't mind if we got

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>a leaderboard a little bit like what we just saw

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>last week at the bridge Stone. Yeah. We we've gotten,

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we've gotten winners that have been top

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>ten players probably statistically but maybe not necessarily unpopularity, and

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so it would be I didn't be cool to get

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>one that is just I don't not more well known,

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but the people get more like I don't know how

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>fired up people were about Princesco Mollinari winning in the Open.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought the whole day was amazing, but I'm not

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that the sort of general golf public or world

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>or whatever was as excited about that. Indian is as

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody you know, as as those of us in the media,

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>where yeah, Kyle Stanley's winning this week, that'll be fun. Kyle.

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you coming on. Always, always a good chat.

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>You can always check out Kyle at CBS. You can

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>check out the entire website, which I know people don't

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>do anymore, but do it. There's a great stuff. They're

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>always articles flowing through and uh, and then when this

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>when the season raps will be focus in Oklahoma State football.

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 1>How many articles are you write in a week about

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State right now as football starts, I'll probably do

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I did like two or three yesterday, so I'll probably

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>end up doing I don't know ten or so. Jeez,

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you did two or three yesterday. Yeah, but some of

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>them are short. They're they're not you know, they're not

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like a thousand words. It's it's like three words on

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the new defensive coordinator, you know whatever. I just understand

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>how you're skinny. I don't get how you're skinny. You've

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.280
<v Speaker 1>got kids and a wife and you write like fifty

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>golf articles a day and you're doing all this stuff.

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. Um, Hey, congrats on congrats on having some

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>good genes, Kyle. I will we'll chat. Let's chat after

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rider Cup because I know you get so pumped

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>about it. Yeah, I probably won't sleep that whole week,

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited about that. You enjoy the women's am

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we'll talk soon. It looks like I'm a wreck.

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Well that we'll do it for this week's clubhouse. Just

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a reminder when it comes to golf equipment. We always

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>want the newest driver, period with the ball that flies

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>five yards further. The one thing that never gets enough

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>attention is the thing that holds and protects your golf clubs,

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's an essential part of your on course fashion.

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 1>That's your bag. Treat yourself to an upgrade the day

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Osio Sirius bag. Check out Osio dot com

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or your local golf retailer to get your hands on

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a Sirius today. So stop carrying around the golf bag

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you've had since the nineties. It's time for an upgrade.

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Osio the world's mass bag, and I have a serious

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and I of it. I've been using it for over

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a year now and the upgrade they made to the

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>new one is well worth your time. Check that out

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at o gio dot com. I will have my PGA

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Championship pick on Wednesday on Twitter if you care, and

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be covering the US Women's Amateur this week

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for Nashville. We start on Wednesday on FS one and

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>then we roll through the weekend. So when you're done

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>watching the p g A, if you get sick of

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the p g A, if you want to DVR something Wednesday,

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>we get going at four to seven pm Eastern an

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>FS one. Thursday, same time, Friday, same time, four to

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>seven and then Sunday the finals ten am to twelve

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>pm on U s g A dot Org. And then

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>two to five pm Eastern. That's on FS one. That

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>will be the finals of the US Women's Amateur in

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the next week boom right under the US Amateur pebble beach.

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a fun couple of weeks. Hope you guys

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fall along with us, and we'll check back with you

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>next week.