WEBVTT - Talk About Money Without Fighting w/ Dr. Sonya Lutter #1100

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How to Money. I'm Joel, and today we're

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>discussing how to talk about money without fighting with doctor

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Sonya Louter. Okay, so, money fights are one of the

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>most common and most damaging sources of tension in a relationship.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's spending, debt, or mismatched financial goals, those arguments

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can quietly erode trust and connection over time. But here's

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the good news. Money doesn't have to be the thing

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that drives couples apart. When partners develop healthy financial habits

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and they learn how to communicate about money, it can

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>actually strengthen the relationship. And that's why I'm excited to

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>welcome doctor Sonya Luter to the show today. She's both

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a marriage therapist, she's a financial planner, and she leads

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the financial health and Wellness program at Texas Tech. She

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>brings a rare research back to perspective on how couples

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>can keep money from being a stumbling block and instead

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>make it a source of teamwork. So, Sonia, thank you

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining me on the show today.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 2>Hi Joel, thanks for having me. Looking forward to the conversation.

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, me too. First question I ask everyone who comes

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>on though it helps us get to know a little

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>bit about you. Is you're trying to do the smart

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>thing with your money, but you got to splurge a

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the here and now too. What is

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it that you're splurging on?

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, life is short. We have to splurge every once

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 2>in a while. I really love a good dinner, and

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay spending a little bit extra to have the

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>better piece of steak or the perfectly paired glass of wine.

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just my absolute most favorite thing to do. The

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>am Beyonce, everything is wonderful.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I love a good dinner too. I will say, steak

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so expensive these days, right, I mean like it's I'm

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>reading all about the restaurants having a tough time trying

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to not raise prices too much

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and freak people out. But even if you just go

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>buy a stake at the store right now, you're just

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>shocked at how much it costs. It's enough to make

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a person go to chicken, isn't it.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about that.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I know I still love a good steak. Okay, let's

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about the cross section of finance and therapy. It

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>still feels like this is something that's in its infancy,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that combination of both of those, both of those things

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>like what's your unit that space.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Initially, Yeah, you know, I started in financial planning, thought

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I was going to be a financial planner, and I

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 2>didn't really feel comfortable or even know how to have

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the conversation about emotions or stress or anything else with couples.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Primarily was my interest, and so that's what drew me

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>in initially. And I was one of the co founders

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of the Financial Therapy Association, and that was almost twenty

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and we're still as a profession, as a discipline,

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>as a group of people trying to figure out what

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 2>that really means to blend these two. So I think

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>your question is spot on that humans in general know

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 2>that money is a large contributor to their relationships, whether

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that's with their partner or their children, or their parents, siblings, friends, etc.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 2>And we don't really know what to do with that, Like,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>we recognize that it's an issue, and then we struggle

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 2>with taking that next step. And there's a whole bunch

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 2>of reasons for that, but a lot of it is

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>we were never taught how to talk about money, and

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>so it's scary to start that conversation, and for me,

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>this has been my passion is to help normalize the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>experience for couples and families and friends to have more

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>natural conversations about money.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>How does someone know if they need a financial planner,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if they need a financial coach, or if they need

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a financial therapist. Like I love that experts exist in

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>each of these different realms, but I think if you

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>offer for the wrong person at the wrong time, the

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong professional, you might be paying for something you don't

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>actually need. Maybe you thought you needed a financial planner,

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but you actually needed a therapist, You needed someone to

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to about your emotions or vice versa, or maybe

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you just needed a coach to help you with some

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like basic budgeting techniques. How do you think about which

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>route people should go.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm smirking because I don't even know that I agree

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>with how you described each of those, even just ever

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>so briefly. With the financial coach being somebody to help

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 2>with the budgeting, I would see that more as a

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 2>financial counselor so there are distinctions between each of these

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 2>various things. So for me, a financial planner, if you

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 2>want to go to them, you know that it's going

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to be an investment, an investment of your time, an

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 2>investment of gathering all of the relevant information, an investment

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of making this commitment to something long term, and there's

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 2>going to be a cost associated with it. So I

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>think if you're going to go see a financial planner,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you already have a really clear sense of what your

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 2>financial goals are. You might not know how to implement them,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>but you have the goals and you're ready to take

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>action on them. See financial planner. Super solid option there.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Financial counselor was the one that I would go with

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>for the coaching example that you gave. If you right now,

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>perfect time to think about maybe coming off of holiday

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>spending and you're getting all of your bills in the

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 2>mail and you're just trying to figure out what to

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 2>do next. Financial counselors are really helpful in that regard

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to help you get the plan in place. So maybe

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just the stress of overwhelming not knowing where to start.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Counselor super great coach, I would say, is really good

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>for the person who is lost and they're looking for

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>some sort of direction. So maybe you don't know what

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the goals are, but you know you want to have goals.

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 2>A financial coach could be super good for that. Just

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>like when you're trying to learn a new sport, the

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>coach is there to guide you and tell you this

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 2>is how you do it. Yeah, same thing with financial coaches.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Financial therapists are they're still pretty rare, as you said,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of the existing financial therapists who are

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>out there have some sort of training in mental health,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>and so maybe they came to the financial space from

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 2>social work or marriage and family therapy, psychology, et cetera,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and so they are going to be much better prepared

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to go backwards in time and address why is it

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>that you're stuck right here? And I would say that's

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>something that's unique to financial therapist, is that willingness to

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 2>go backwards before going forwards?

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>How often is that a problem for people? Right? Is

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is that something where you're like, man, most people would

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>actually really benefit from seeing a financial therapist even though

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>there aren't many out there, or do you think it's

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>more of like more of a rarity. I'm guessing like

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the things the way we handle money often there's something

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>from I know for me at least, like a lot

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of stuff from my childhood is exactly why I do

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>what I do. I can clearly see that line, but

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have a hard time seeing it.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the same question could be asked, how many of

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 2>us should be going to therapy? Probably everyone at some point.

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Everyone could benefit from it, right, just like everybody really

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>could benefit from financial therapy. Just as you're saying that,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>there's pretty much nothing that I can think of that's

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a current issue that's not tied to a previous issue,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>So I would say there's definite advantages there. I think

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it's more of a willingness of if that's preventing you

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>from taking future actionsolutely, it could bolster what you're already doing.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>But I would say the financial therapist is most critical

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>when you continue to fail or you continue to struggle

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to get over some sort of barrier, and those are

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty I would I want to use the word extreme,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>but it doesn't necessarily need to be like over the

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>top extreme. But thinking of situations such as a widow

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>is coming to you as a for assistance in terms

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>of what to do as the next steps. If that

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 2>widow is struggling with just paying daily bills and getting

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>to the office to have a conversation with you, or

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 2>remembering to check in on zoom for the conversation. I

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>would say that's a pretty good indicator that financial therapy

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 2>could be helpful in that situation, because we can't even

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>take that very first step to make the next step possible.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>She needs more personal finance literally literacy necessarily, she needs

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>grief consultation. She needs someone to walk through what's happened precisely.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, somebody who's willing to slow down and have those conversations.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right, Jeel. And the same thing is true

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 2>very often for big family conversations. So if you think

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>of a family office, financial therapist would actually be really

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 2>helpful there because there's a whole lot of dynamics going

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 2>on with navigating the different relationships between the diads, the triads,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>et cetera within that family.

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You recently published a study about how people feel about

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>their money versus how well they're actually doing. I found

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that really interesting because there's just so much lately about

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>how just how people perceive themselves and then how they

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>perceive the world around them, and there's just a lot

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of it doesn't always match up. A lot of people

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>are like, I'm doing pretty good. The world's going to

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>hell in a handbasket. What did you what did this

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>study entail, and what did you find?

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 2>This has got to be one of my current favorite studies.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>That's with a former student of mind, doctor Van Deen

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>at the University of Wisconsin Superior, and a lot of

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 2>this started from her wanting to measure financial wellness, and

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I said, Okay, well, I don't know that people are

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>interpreting that the same way. So we put people into

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>quadrants of I feel like I'm doing well with my finances,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>but if you look objectively on paper, they're not doing

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 2>so great. And then if you kind of think of

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the caddy corner from that, we've got people who don't

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>think that they're doing very good with their finances, but

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 2>on paper they're actually doing really good. And then we

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 2>have the people who think they're doing bad and really

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 2>on paper it doesn't look so good. And then vice versa,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 2>people who are doing.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Good, people who are living in reality, whether it's good

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>or bad, right exactly.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And I thought that was so useful because especially those

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>two where they're not aligned, that's the problem right where

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 2>people are not living in and it's equally as dangerous

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>for people to think that they're doing well and then

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>objectively not be okay because they don't even recognize the

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>need to take action, and so we need to get

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>some sort of information out there in front of them

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and really from the stages of change perspective, help them

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>understand that their behaviors could be influencing the people that

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>they care most about and that's not even on their

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>radar at all. They think that they're doing okay, so

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>why change anything. And I mean think about this in

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 2>terms of maybe an aging parent and they're really helping

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>out their adult children and maybe even their grandchildren because

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a nice thing to do and they want to

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>be able to help them, and maybe what they're not

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 2>realizing is the damage this is doing to their personal

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>situation and potentially and not being able to support their

0:11:55.360 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>own life through the duration of their lifespan. So in effect,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>they are going to have to be relaying on that

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>same child that they're funding right now, instead of encouraging

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that adult child to take action on their own. So

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really helpful in terms of having that

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>conversation of I know that you think you're trying to

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>be helpful, but let's look at this objectively as well

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and see how this might be influencing you.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you get through to someone who who is

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>misguided even about the situation they're in. Like, I know

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>some people who have a generous heart, and it's a

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>beautiful thing, but sometimes it's to such an extreme that

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they're really harming their own potential financial future and they

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>could create other difficulties inside of their family were they

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to follow through right on some of those desires that

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they have to be generous. Not again, this is like,

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for generosity, but there's a for some people.

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's potential to be generous to a fault. So

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>when someone is lacking understanding, I guess about where they

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>fall on the spectrum. How do you get through them?

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Spot on. So these are what I would call

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the dangerous quadrant people. We are not on a good

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>pathway here, and that person isn't even recognizing it at all.

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 2>And when a person is not aware of the impact

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 2>of their behaviors, it's what we might call a pre

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>contemplation stage of mentality. And they're not even worried about

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>changing anything because there is no problem, and you can

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>give them all of the education that you would like

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>to give them. It's going to cost this much for

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you to retire. This is how much long term care

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 2>cost in case in the event that you might need that.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's the cost of rising housing, etc. Etc. It's not

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be helpful because in their mind they're fine.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So when a person is in that mentality of I'm

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 2>fine when in reality they're not, it really is that

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>extrinsic motivation that's going to be helpful and helping them

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>see they talk to them about, Okay, well what does

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 2>this look like for your daughter when she's fifty years

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>old and you are eighty years old, let's say, and

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 2>just try to help them visualize a different point in

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>time with the people that they care most about. And

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the answer is obvious to you. But no point in

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>this are you providing any sort of education or advice.

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>It's simply helping a person see different points in time

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and the different people in their life and how they

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>could be impacted by this behavior. And whenever you see discrepancies,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>then you can highlight it to where something like maybe

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>they say, I just want to be generous and this

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 2>is really important to me. You can say that back

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to it, and I'm like, yeah, I hear that you

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>want to be generous and that's very admirable. Well, and

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I love that about you, and I'm very encouraging of generosity,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>just like you said. And let's think about what your

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>generosity might mean for you whoever they just said your daughter,

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 2>when you are entering into the retirement years, do you

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 2>want to continue that generosity or are you going to

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>have to decrease some of that generosity? And you're just

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>helping them see those different points in time.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>There have been studies about the impact of financial stress

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on decision making capabilities. Oh yeah, how does that usually

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>play out? And how can folks who are living closer

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to subsistence, like they don't have tons of extra money

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>coming in, How can maybe I just think about how

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>negative financial stress can be and it can reduce that

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what average IQUS reduced by like fourteen points or something

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're feeling constant money stress, So it really like

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in actuality, being stressed about money makes you less able

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to make good decisions. Do you have any advice for

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>people like that?

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Biologically this is true and people try to fight

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>me on this topic all of the time, But the

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>reality is when you are under stress, your body goes

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>into the fight or flight response mechanism. That's something that

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I think most people are familiar with. And when your

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 2>body goes into that fight or flight response mechanism, your

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>brain is making decisions based off of habit and emotion.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>They want to get away from the situation or fight

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 2>through this situation that's based in front of them. And

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that's what makes financial stress so dangerous, is because people

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>are not worried about the long term, and they're trying

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>to do something now to prevent something in the future

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 2>from happening when their brain can't even process the future term.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>And one of my favorite things about this is stress

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>is so easy to measure, and that the fight or

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>flight response physiological stress, not your perception of stress, the

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 2>real life stress that's impacting your brain's ability to make decisions.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 2>And it's your skin temperature. You've heard the phrase, are

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you getting cold feet? It's the same thing. It's our

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>The body's extremities get colder when we go into the

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>fight or flight response mechanism. Do you know why, Joel

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>uh No? Because the blood is going back to the

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>heart to prepare for that physical reaction. And that's what

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying. We can't even stop it. This is biology

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>at play. It doesn't look the same as it did

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of years ago. We're not physically running away, but

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>we're definitely running away by pulling out our phone. You've

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>seen it when you're out at wherever and there's a

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>lull and activity and people just pull out their phone.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like we don't even know what to do with ourselves.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the automatic go to of I'm feeling kind

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>of uneasy, let me just get out the phone and

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>start looking at that. And it's the same thing people

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 2>do with their mini I'm starting to feel a little

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 2>bit uneasy. Let me just go get this thing to

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>help me feel better.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So part of the solution is being in touch with

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>our bodies, yes, at least a little bit.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly. And when you feel that your hands are cold,

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 2>you can feel the difference between your hands being cold

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 2>and warm. So ideal temperature we're looking for is about

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 2>ninety degrees fahrenheit, which is warm to the touch, compared

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to seventy, which is closer to what mine is. Right now,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 2>that is a very noticeable twenty degrees difference that you

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 2>can feel. And when you feel that cold hands and

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 2>when your significant other. I think this is great for

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 2>couples to be able to know what it feels like

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.239
<v Speaker 2>to be stressed. And if you are coming home at

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day and you're holding your partner's

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>hand and you notice that they have cold hands, let's

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>not waunch into a really deep conversation rate then it's

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to be helpful. Let's not go through our

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>monthly budget right then. Instead, let's talk about what's top

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of mind. And I think it's a really great way to

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>set up a conversation and make sure that all people

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>are in the right mentality to be able to hear

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the information and take action on the information.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>You've also said, I've heard you say that money is

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>never just about money, and I think that's true for sure.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And I guess when you first start thinking about personal finance,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it seems like math is the most important important thing

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to take into it. But I think over the years,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I've come to believe that emotions trump math much of

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. So, but is there something it's how do

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>we identify what's happening beneath the surface when we're thinking

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about how we treat money, or react to money, or

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>react to even like a money decision that a spouse

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:56.719
<v Speaker 1>or partner makes, and doesn't this imply that all financial

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>conversations are going to be so much more complicated than

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe they would seem like they should be at first glance.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Definitely they are harder than they should be and need

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 2>to be. It goes back to recognizing yourself. It's all

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>about that self awareness. So it starts by tracking. And

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 2>let's say you have a conflict, not an argument, but

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 2>a disagreement with your significant other. Write it down and

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 2>talk about what the content of that conversation was, but

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 2>also talk about what came right before and what came

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>right after it. And you're just journaling about this, so

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 2>you might recognize that maybe the conflict was about you

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't tell me about this bill that we had coming up,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>but also the things that were surrounding it were things

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>such as maybe that one of the children needed something

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>for school and we weren't able to get that thing

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>for school. So once you start to recking this, and

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 2>then maybe the next thing you see is we had

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a conflict that I don't know, you spent excusage.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>An unexpected expense came right and I was I was

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>flumb exed by it.

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. Then I also noticed that in one month,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 2>we have a competition that we're going to for one

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of the kids. And as you start tracking these things,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not obvious at the moment, but then I can

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 2>start seeing that, Okay, I'm really having these maybe more

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>reactive situations when there's also these events tied to my

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>children going on. And so for me, what that represents

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 2>is financial security for the next generation is really important

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>to me. So I've identified a value, right and so

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 2>it's not about you spent too much money without telling me.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 2>It's something else is more important to me right now,

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like you weren't listening to the thing

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that was important to me, and you're not going to

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>be able to identify that when you're in that heightened

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>emotional state. But you can start identifying the patterns yourself

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 2>when you start tracking that.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's often hard to know why, which is like

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>why I think therapy can be helpful, But it's hard

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to know why we're reacting similarly on repeat right, over

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and over to similar inputs. So it might take somebody

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a while to be like, actually, the reason I'm reacting

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>negatively to the way we spend money in that way

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>is because I want to be thoughtful about saving up

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>money for our kid's future. Like it's not like a

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>straight line, and most people have a hard time deducing

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of at the root of some of

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>their actions or reactions.

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and you really pointed to something that is so important,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's the systemic relationships that are at play. It's

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>never a to be there's always some sort of circuit

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>or A to B two C back to A two D.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And when you're dealing with families, it's impossible. Like imagine

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>all of our family members, all of our friends stacked

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>up in this really neat domino pattern, and I go

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>to knock over the domino pattern, and that has an

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>influence on all of the other dominoes at play. So

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>even though I might not be directly in contact with

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>somebody within our family system, what they do with the

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>money is definitely influencing me because it's influencing somebody else

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 2>that I'm connected with, and so on and so forth.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's hard. There's no way that I could see

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 2>how somebody else's behaviors are influencing me unless I'm willing

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to take the time and gather information and reflect upon

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 2>what's going on.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so personal work that needs to be done, there's

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>relational work that needs to be done across the spectrum.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I have more I want to get through, specifically about

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>relationships and how we can have healthier relationships so that

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we can make more productive decisions our money and have

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>just better relationships in general. Get some more questions with

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you on that front. Right after this, we're back still

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>talking with doctor Sonya Luder, and we're talking about healthy relationships,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of talking about healthy individual relationship to money just

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a second ago, but let's specifically focus in on relationships

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and money just given kind of where we're at in

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the year. It's a fun topic to hit home on,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have so much experience in this, doctor Sonya,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But like, can you maybe tell me what are the

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest predictors of financial conflict in a relationship?

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is funny coming from a woman, but this

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 2>is science based and so cannot refute the data that's

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>out there. This is not my personal opinion. This is

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>multiple people contributing to this, and it's when the wife

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 2>makes more than the husband that is such a strong

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>predictor of money conflict even today, and that absolutely blows

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 2>my mind that we could have these expectations about what

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>a man is supposed to do and earn and what

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 2>a female is supposed to do and earn. Maybe I

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>don't realize that that's what's happening. But if you look

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>at the data and you're not asking people what's contributing

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to your money conflict, you're looking at all of the

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 2>other things that are going on in their life, and

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the thing that comes up is women making more than

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 2>the husband more.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Child and that's an issue. Why Why is that an

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>issue for people? Is it? Because then it feels like

0:25:54.920 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the traditional chore sharing and kid toting cys is turned

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on its head.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Or I mean, that's kind of the direction I was

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 2>going with these expectations. So the data don't ask the why,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 2>we're just making assumptions from here. But what we do

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>see quantitatively associated with this is that when women make

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>more than their husbands, they are not doing less household work.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 2>They actually tend to do even more household work. And

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 2>so I do think where you were going with that

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 2>with these traditional gender role expectations, if you will, that

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 2>is the conflict at play. So the man is supposed

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to be the breadwinner, and so if he's not the breadwinner,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>then perhaps there's this guild or some sort of emotional

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>reaction for the woman that she's like, well, I better

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and do more of the household work because

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm messing up. I'm changing the dynamics of what is

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>suppose to be. And I'm not saying that this is

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>my personal belief or any one person's, but if you

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>look at the data, that's what's happening. And again, this

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is current day issues. This is not fifty years ago,

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 2>this is right now.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that's a recipe for resentment, right like

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that if someone feels like they have to double down

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>on home duties when they are also the primary breadwinner,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're like, uh, I feel like I'm holding up

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>this family solo, Like what's going on here? We need

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>more of a partnership. And I could see that kind

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of eroding some of the relational dynamic between between a couple.

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely. And when I've done clinical work, what I've

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 2>seen is that couples don't necessarily see this pattern playing

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>out because they got into the relationship with some sort

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 2>of set of expectations that probably can from when they

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 2>were growing up. But who knows. Maybe it was just

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>convenient at that time that she did the laundry and

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 2>he did the artwork, and that's what made sense at

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>that point in time. And then as time progresses, maybe

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 2>that set of expectations that they had at the beginning

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 2>of their relationship doesn't always make sense later on down

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>the road. And so I think that's why it's important

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to have these conversations, like maybe I used to manage

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the daily finances, but now it doesn't make as much

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 2>sense for me. And there's no reason for couples to

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>naturally have these conversations unless you schedule it. Nobody wants

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to talk about jobs that we have to do with

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 2>in the house, and so being purposeful about tax time

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 2>is a really ideal time because we're talking about money anyway.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Valentine's Day also super fun time to talk about money.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>But whatever the timeframe is for people, for couples to

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 2>schedule that time and be committed to it, I think

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>is so important.

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you have that conversation without having a fight,

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I think some people hear you say Valentine's Days

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a great time to have to bring that up, and

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, Yeah, probably not. Maybe let's take avoid

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it so we can keep some peace, have a good

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>time together, enjoy each other. And you're like telling them

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to have this conversation about really important issues that really

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>could drive a wedge in between them. Yeah, or at

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>least that's how some people feel, I think when.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>They hear that, Yeah, And I would say back, why

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>are you going towards the negative because this is also

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a really beautiful time to talk about your future together

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and your commitment together. Yeah, And I think that's really

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>what the framing is all about, and not focusing on

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>what didn't work in the past, but what has worked

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and what we want to do more of. And that's

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 2>from my therapy training, and that is a really big

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>thing and I actually have another paper on that with

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the positive framing in the financial space, when you ask

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 2>people to compare themselves if they're doing better off than

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 2>their peers, they will subsequently answer questions any more positive

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 2>view that they're using money for joy more frequently than

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>if you ask are you doing worse off than your peers?

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's just one word different, better off worse off,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>And that does make a difference in terms of how

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>people continue the conversation. So I would say Valentine's Day

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>is actually a perfect time because maybe you're more generous

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>with your compliments than what you are normally. Fantastic, that's

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>going to set you up to have more positive conversations

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 2>about the financial situation and your financial goals and what

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>you're doing within the household that's working, and always stay

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 2>focused on the positive and what's done is done. So

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 2>let's leave that Beah, but what do we see for

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>the future and make it more of that future focused

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 2>goal setting.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>The people say opposite attract, right, and but that can

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that can in the early days of a relationship that

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can be really exciting, like, oh, I'm I'm kind of conservative,

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the other person's a little little out there. It's kind

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of it's kind of fun, right like, But but specifically

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the realm of money, that can also create tension.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the further along you get in a relationship,

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it can also create tension on non monetary levels. But

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>how should people think about that? Opposites attract mantra with

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>how they handle money together. If you have, like I

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>talked to somebody a while back about people being tightwads

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and spend thrifts and how how do you match the

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the reality that we both have completely different views on money.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Some are like let's let's say forty percent of income

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>or income and the other ones like we could die tomorrow.

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's throw caution to the wind, Like how do

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you manage that as a couple.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, obviously it's a recipe for conflict, not disaster. But

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>there is increase conflict when it is the spender and

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the saber, And you're exactly right, it's really exciting at

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the relationship. And this is where those

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>regular conversations come into play. As I said, at the

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 2>beginning of our conversation, people don't even know how to

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 2>start the conversation, so we tend to go into it

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>with a bit of stress. When we're stress, we are

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>reacting based off with very heightened emotions and based off

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of habit. So it's not a good time, it's not

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 2>a good recipe to engage in a conversation. So I

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 2>already know that if you're a spender and I'm a saver,

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 2>there's probably some tension associated with that. And so let's

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 2>come to this in a more relaxed state of mind.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>A regularly scheduled time. I'm not going to spring it

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>upon you that I'm mad at you because you spent

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>too much and we agreed we were going to save

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 2>ten percent more this month. That's not helpful. But if

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 2>we have a schedule time to where that conversation is

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 2>supposed to happen, that's when people can set their emotional

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>mindset and come to it in a much more stable mentality.

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 2>What you said at the beginning of the relationship, or

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 2>you use that phrase, that is also a really key

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 2>thing in the literature from my research that the amount

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>that a couple argues at the beginning of their relationship

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>is even more predictive of later relationship satisfaction than how

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 2>much they argue later on. Isn't that crazy? And even

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 2>an increase in arguments not as important as how much

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>they argued at the very beginning of their relationship. And

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that's pointing at some of these things that

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about that we didn't set the expectations of. Well,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>when we were dating, this was really fun to have

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the vendor saver. Now that we're living in the same household,

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>not quite as exciting because we've got bills to pay

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and these other things that need to take priority, and

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 2>so that early conversation pattern setting is super crucial. It

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean if you've been in a relationship for a

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 2>long time all hope is lost. Start now, early you start.

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>The better going to take some intentionality is And I

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like that you said, like, yeah, having it on the calendar,

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>having it, having a regular time where you talk about this,

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>so that you don't have to bring it up in

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the heat of the moment, because it doesn't feel like

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>there's another set aside place in space to have that conversation.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>If it's there, then you can address the issue on

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the preordained time right And in your opinion, is there

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>like a right amount of financial transparency and communication or

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like every relationship is different? Should and

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe like, as you get more in tune with your partner,

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can you reduce the number of or just maybe shorten

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:05.959
<v Speaker 1>the time span that it takes to have those money

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>dates or whatever. What does that look like? And what's

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your advice for people?

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I will say with one hundred percent certainty that relationship

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>satisfaction is higher the more joint accounts couples have. That's

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 2>not my research. Scott Rick's research it's really fantastic stuff.

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 2>You can't have joint accounts without having full transparency. So

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I would make the assumption that full transparency is the

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 2>key to high relationship satisfaction because you can't be hiding anything,

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and it creates the opportunity for forced conversations about your

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 2>finances because I can't be doing my own thing and

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you doing your own thing from the same account. We've

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 2>got to at least have some sort of conversation about

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 2>what's going on to make sure that there's money in

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the account to do the things that are necessary to

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 2>live and to do the things that we want to do.

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm a strong proponent of full transparency. I

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 2>do think that couples should have the trust to be

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 2>able to spend what they want to spend without having

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to check in with every purchase. Though, and people always

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 2>ask me what the magic number is, Well, how much

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 2>can I spend without telling my partner? I don't know.

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>That's for you and your partner to actually talk about

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and have the conversation. It could be five dollars, it

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 2>could be five hundred dollars, it could be fifty thousand dollars.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 2>It's a very relationship specific, but you've got to have

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>that conversation with one another. So I don't think that

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>transparency is the same as asking permission. I think it's

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.439
<v Speaker 2>a matter of we all need to know what's going

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>on and feel comfortable with what's going on.

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's more important to have shared financial

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>goals or shared financial values? And which one of those

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is maybe like more predictive of long term relationship success,

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>is like we view things the same way, or it's

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like we're trying to go to the same place.

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Definitely the values values. If we're not aligned on values,

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 2>there's no way the goals are gonna come.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>To be okay. And then let's say sometimes there's also

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just a different risk tolerance down in couples, right. I

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>know we heard from a listener recently who said, you

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, the financial advisor, Like, I wouldn't want to

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>hire one. I feel like I'm good, but it's the

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>way I keep our marriage happy. Like this is something

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and I just feel like if the stock market, you know,

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>if we had a bear market next year, that there's

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 1>chance that that could if we have an advisor, hey,

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, Like we can weather it because there's somebody

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know on on our side and that my spouse trusts.

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm the one in control and we have

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a bear market, I might take the plane. So how

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think about third parties in involvement in your

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.959
<v Speaker 1>finances and how that can help or maybe even hurt

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>your relational satisfaction.

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Both people have to feel comfortable with this person, and

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 2>it goes back to the transparency. If I'm not willing

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 2>to be transparent with a third party, it is going

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to create a bit of a triangle situation to where

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the person who feels like they can trust and be

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 2>transparent with this person, they're getting a coalition to go

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 2>against my partner because they're not having that same sort

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of rapport and trust with this third person. In general,

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 2>that third person can be super helpful, and financial advisors

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 2>absolutely play a role in couple's relationship satisfaction. I looked

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 2>at that across multiple data sets, multiple wealth and income levels,

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and it stays consistent throughout that when a couple works

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 2>with a financial advisor, not only are they more satisfied

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>with their financial situation, we're satisfied in their relationship. And

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's because that third person one forces us

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 2>to have the conversation, and we're probably going to have

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 2>a fairly calm conversation because we're probably not going to

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 2>go in a full on fight in front of a

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 2>third person. Unless that's a therapist, then you might that's true,

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 2>but in general, but in general, they provide that safe

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 2>space to say what's on your mind and have the

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>scheduled conversations. And we all live busy lives and that

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 2>time has been carved aside to talk about our money. Yeah,

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's a beautiful time to do it.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned to the joint bank accounts, and I've seen

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>those studies too, and it certainly seems like that's a

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>really important predictor of relational success. And financial infidelity is

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that could be a massive problem.

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Like do you think financial infidelity where someone is maybe

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>spending money in a way the partner has no idea

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about opening up a credit card in their own name,

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>racking up debt, or bringing that into a relationship that

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just not being honest about. Is that on par

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with sexual infidelity And can that have the same ultimate ramifications?

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because it's not about the money, right, There's something

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 2>else going on there that they're spending the money on

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 2>or they feel like they can't have the conversation about it.

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And the same is true right of sexual infidelity. Oftentimes

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not about the one act, It's about how did

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 1>we get drift so far apart that this felt like

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it was okay?

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Precisely, and so there's no way that if you discover

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>this as a financial advisor, you're going to be prepared

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to guide to couple through that. That's why we have

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the financial therapist or the therapist to have those conversations.

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>But I would say, if you, if you feel like

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you are in that situation, let's not be accusatory. Let's

0:40:56.320 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>increase our financial conversations and come together and be like, Okay,

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>what are we happy about? And how can we do

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 2>more of those things that we're happy about?

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Or we got more to get to including I want

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about shame and the role that it plays

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in our finances and how we might be able to

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>undo some of the nefarious effects. I'm talking about that

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in more. In just a second, we're talking about doctor

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Sonya Luter Soddy. I want to I want to talk

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about shame. I feel like shame is one of the

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>most underrated forces in the universe, and it is something

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that we just don't talk about very much, probably because

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>we're a shame to talk about it, but like we

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>tend to act and react so often out of the

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>impulse of shame, whether it's a past money mistake that

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we've made, and it just like it just irritates us

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>when we think about it, but like we haven't really

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>been forthcoming with it, and so it just it eats

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>away at us from the inside. What advice do you

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>have for shining a light on the shame that might

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>be driving our money habits and some of the communication

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that we do and have around money.

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you feel shame, it's normal, and you're just

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 2>like everybody else. Even people who are supposedly good with

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:18.760
<v Speaker 2>money probably have some sort of negative feeling or negative

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 2>memory associated with money because we're not taught to talk

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 2>about it. And just think about a dinner party and

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 2>if somebody asked you, oh, what sort of medications are

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you one, people would definitely tell you that information. Maybe

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 2>not quickly, but somebody would say, and then everybody else

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:41.399
<v Speaker 2>would say And it's not that shaming to talk about

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 2>those things. It's like, well, physical health is a part

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of life and I'm getting older and this is what's happened,

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and that's just kind of normal or not look down

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 2>upon necessarily to have those types of conversations. But if

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you were sitting around the same dinner party and somebody said, well,

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 2>how much money do you have in your savings account

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.399
<v Speaker 2>this year? Not a single person is going to speak

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 2>up to.

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>That crickets, yeah, or what's the worst money mistake you've made?

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 2>And they're like, uh no, thank you. Yeah, yeah, But

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't have to be that way, right, And what

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 2>you see is very rarely reality, and electronics has made

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>this so much easier for us to believe that what

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 2>we see is true when in reality it's not. So

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I would say again it goes back to self awareness

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 2>that when you hear your friends talking about their vacations

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 2>or you see their post about these really beautiful things

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that they have, there might be some truth to that,

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and there's probably alternative truths that are not as obvious

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 2>from that one snapshot. And so being okay with not

0:43:54.040 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 2>knowing everybody's information and not making assumptions about everybody information,

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 2>that comparison game gets usund to trouble every time. And

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 2>that's where a lot of that shame comes from is

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 2>we're comparing ourselves to where we think we should be.

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 2>We're comparing ourselves to our neighbors, to our friends. So

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 2>just taking a step back and practicing gratitude of what

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>you do have and how you're happy with the direction

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 2>that you're going, and if you're not happy with the

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 2>direction that you're going, take steps to make it better

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 2>for you, not compared to somebody else, but for you,

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 2>what would bring you closer to your values.

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I think therapy is it's becoming obviously far more normalized

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in our culture, and I think there's a lot of

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>good to that. There are also a lot of people

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>listening who are like, it's so expensive, Like I tried

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:50.879
<v Speaker 1>to hire a therapist. It's like one hundred and seventy

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>dollars an hour. Am I supposed to go once a week?

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That's like a car payment? So do you have any

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for somebody who's like, man, I really think I

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>could benefit from doing some a deep dive with a therapist.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>What are maybe some ways that I could start to

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 1>do some of that work internally and have a better

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>emotional understanding of how I hand, how and why I

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>handle my money the way I do without seeing a professional.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, completely for free. You can start doing work right now,

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 2>and part of that is practicing gratitude. So at the

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 2>end of each day, just write down one thing on

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 2>a piece of paper in your phone app. There's even

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 2>app free apps you can download for gratitude journals. Write

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>down one thing that you're grateful for, and you're going

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 2>to see measurable improvement if you do that consistently. I'm

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 2>pretty much every area of your life. Feel happier about

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 2>your finances, you are physically healthier if you do this

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>on a regular basis, relationships are happier, et cetera, et cetera.

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's all totally free to do that. You don't

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.439
<v Speaker 2>need to pay a therapist, you don't need to dig

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 2>into your past. It's just right now today, What am

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 2>I most grateful for?

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>That's such a simple suggestion, but it has such like

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>power behind it, right. I think it's it's something that

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>people might be like, oh, okay, I mean what else though,

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like give me something, give me something harder, or news

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I can use or something, But like, there is something

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so powerful about gratitude, and we just underestimate what it

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can do for us. Yeah, I'm curious to the specifically

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>since you know, almost Valentine's Day talking to couples. You

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called Love and Money and you offered

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>guided exercise for couples to improve their financial wellbeing. Can

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you share one or two of the things you found

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to be most effective? And yes, specifically for the couples

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>who are listening and they're like, I want to have

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a good conversation, like I want to start making progress,

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and doctor Sonya said that Valentine's Day was a good

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>time to get started, So like, do you have any

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>like good prompts for them?

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there is a cost associated with the book, but

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 2>it's so low cost action of one conversation with a therapist,

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 2>So good suggestion. The values bullseye is probably my absolute

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 2>most favor activity because it sets the stage for everything

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 2>else to come after that. So with the values bullseye,

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 2>what we see happening as people go through an assessment

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to identify what their values are if they don't already know.

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 2>So maybe it's financial security, maybe it's time with family,

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's physical health. And then once we identify what

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 2>those values are, we put them on a bullseye if

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 2>you can imagine a target and the thing that's most

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 2>central to everything else, we put that right in the middle,

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and then we go out with three or four or

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 2>five values that we have, and then we come together

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 2>as a couple and identify where are we aligned or

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 2>maybe where are we a little bit different, and how

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 2>can we make a combined bullseye that reflects both of

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 2>our values in a way that that we feel comfortable

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 2>with as a team together. And then what we can

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 2>start doing is we write out sticky notes of our

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 2>financial goals or what we're doing with our money right now.

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 2>So maybe we're spending five hundred dollars a month on

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 2>some sort of membership that is not aligned with any

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.879
<v Speaker 2>of those values that we just wrote down, so we're

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>not going to get rid of it right now, but

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 2>we're going to put that goal off to the side.

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 2>We're going to do this with all of our different

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 2>goals and current spending that we're doing. And it's a

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 2>really nice visual activity to start rearranging how you're spending

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 2>your money and resources and time and how you might

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:42.760
<v Speaker 2>want to think about some of those things differently.

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I love that, And then yeah, it's so much easier

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to shift spending around when it's not for let's correct

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the mistake we've made of things where it's But when

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a positive association, it's like, here's our values. Our

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>spending doesn't curally reflect that. Let's make our spending more

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:01.919
<v Speaker 1>reflect our valuies. I think that's beautiful. That's a great

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>place to start, doctor Sonya. Thank you so much for

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>joining me. Where can how the money listeners find out

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>more about you and what you're up to?

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep, first and last name dot com Sonya lud dot com.

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Lovely, we'll put it, put it in the show notes

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>up on our side as well. Thank you so much

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for joining me today.

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Jill.

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So glad I was able to have doctor

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Sonya on today to talk about just kind of the

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>emotional underbelly of money and how we think about it

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and just it loves starting off talking about individually what

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that looks like, but then really getting into the relational

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and money is it's typically like, like doctor Sonya said,

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there's something else going on under the surface, right, those

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>money arguments they're never just about money. It's about misaligned

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 1>values or it's about things that we haven't come to

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>grips with individually, and there's just so much ability for

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 1>us to make progress in our finances as a family,

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>as a couple, as an individual when we do some

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of that work and when we're willing to open up

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the lines of communication together. So that was one of

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>my big takeaways from this conversation was that you have

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>to make it regular and you have to put her

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on the calendar, otherwise it's going to come out sideways. Right,

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to come out in the heat of

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the moment or at an inopportune time, and you're going

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>to make that accusatory finger wagging comment where it's like, hey,

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you didn't hold up here into the bargain, you spent

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>more than you were supposed to. You let the budget

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>get out of control this month. And if it's in

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a predefined time and space, it's just easier to have

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. It's like, listen, I'm not happy right now,

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we got that money date on the

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>calendar for Monday. We can just talk about it then.

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And it also, I think one of the things that

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>she alluded to on multiple occasions during this conversation was

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that you should phrase things positively and when you phrase

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>things positively, it just hits differently. And I think so

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>often when we feel like our finances are out of

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 1>control and that our relationship with money together as a couple,

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 1>as a unit isn't running on all cylinders, it's it's

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:15.319
<v Speaker 1>really easy to start playing the blame game and to

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:21.239
<v Speaker 1>start saying things in a way that gets the way

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel across to your partner, but not in a

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>way that's going to lead to positive action or good resolution.

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think she talked about just the one word

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:36.240
<v Speaker 1>difference in that survey question and how it made people

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>respond differently, and I think that's true of how we

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:42.919
<v Speaker 1>talk to each other in those money during those money

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>dates or as we're you know, kind of trying to

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>come up with what our common money money values are.

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about the negatives, but we're likely to

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>get worse outcomes and crappier responses. And yet if we

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:01.399
<v Speaker 1>do the take the opposite route and we say, let's

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>think about what the future could look like, what sort

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>of money goals do we have together? Like, I love

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that talking about the shared values then makes it so

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>much easier to eradicate the spending, and maybe some of

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the misaligned ways that we are making money choices. It's

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>so much easier to do that once you've had that

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>values conversation and you have a positive look outlook going forward,

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>then you can go back to the spending and be like,

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, that means like, clearly, based on our conversation,

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to cut here, here and here right, great,

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and then guess what we get to funnel that money

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>positively into these other directions that both of us have

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>just agreed that we care about deeply. So doing some

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of that work I think can make a big difference

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in our ability to make money progress and just feel

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like we're on the same page, like we're communicating effectively

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:52.359
<v Speaker 1>with our partner, with our spouse, with our significant other.

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, just here's hoping that we can all avoid

0:52:56.400 --> 0:53:00.319
<v Speaker 1>money conflict this Valentine's Day, enjoy our the person who's

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 1>in our lives if you have one, and that you

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can have better money conversations using some of the advice

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that doctor Sony gave today. Thank you as always for joining.

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll put links in the show notes to doctor Sony's

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 1>website and some of the resources that we mentioned today

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. Until next time, best friend out