WEBVTT - The Global Reallocation of Trust

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Just before we got started,

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 1>one thing I want to mention to you. You may

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>remember that last year we recorded some of our podcasts

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at Pama House in Edinburgh as part of the Edinburgh Fringe.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We are doing that again this year. The show is

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>called The Butcher, The Brewer, the Baker and marinsum set Web.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I will be discussing all sorts of exciting political and

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>economic things with a variety of fascinating guests. Tickets are

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>on sale now at the Fringe website. It's on the

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty second, twenty third and twenty fourth of August and

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we very much hope that we will see you there.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Merindrog's Money the podcast and with people who

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know the markets explain the markets. I'm merriornsum set Web.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Now there is a growing sense among global investors that

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it is time to start looking outside the US for

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>your equity investments at least, and we have talked about

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this a lot on the show. We're calling it, as

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>our others, the Great rotation where capital that once flowed

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>almost entirely to the US and we've looked at the

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers on that over the last few months is now

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning to move elsewhere. In particular, we've been talking about Europe.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>The dollar is softening, valuations in Europe achieved, the geopolitical

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>landscape is all over the place. It no longer makes

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sense to ignore the markets in Europe. Institutions are responding.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot going on, and we are going

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some of the things that are happening

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in markets globally and particularly in Europe with this week's

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>guest to is Stefan Boujna, who is the CEO of

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Urinex and the chairman of its managing board. Welcome, Stephan,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us today.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Before we start talking about markets, tell us a little

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>bit about Urinex, right, it's the biggest exchange operator in Europe.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You've been through a series of acquisitions, you are and

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of stock markets. Now, tell us a

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what you do.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>While Yournax is a company that was funded twenty five

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>years ago that went through all sorts of bumping times,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>was reipod after seven complicated years under the ownership of

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>New York's Regent. It was reipled in twenty fourteen, for

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 2>a market cap of one point four billion euro. Today's

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 2>a company with the market cap between fifteen and sixteen

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>billion euro, so it's much larger. And this success is

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the outcome of a significant work in terms of consolidating

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>a market infrastructure culture. So today we consolidate and we

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>operate with a single liquidity pool, a single of the book,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>a single technology platform, the market infrastructures of Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Lisbon.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>And in twenty seventeen eighteen we both the Irish trapic change.

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>In twenty nineteen we bought cost the birth VPS Way.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty we both the VP securities the CSDS

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>of Copenhagen. In twenty twenty and twenty one we both

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the box set in a group in Milan. And we

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>are in the process or in a possible acquisition of

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the Elginate Change of the ten Stocking Change. So a

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 2>significant part of our business is about consolidating marketing infrastruction

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>in Europe. It's not what we do only, but this

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>is very important and UK audience, it's important to bear

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>in mind that this single liquidity pool in Europe is

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>now twice a larger approximately than the London solid change

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>every day. We trade around ten to twelve billion euro

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>of on the single integrated market of URNX, and the

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>aggregate market capitalization of the company is listed on the

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>single market of uron X is around seven billion euro,

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>which is approximately towards the size of the London so

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Change get market capitalization. So this is for equities, for sure,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the leading platform in Europe. Obviously, alongside that, we are

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>very active in soft commodities now, agricultural commands, in inequity trading,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in fixed income trading in particular in sovereign depth trading,

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>but also in poex trading in London, Singapore and New

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>York and and and for sure in also the diversified

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>services corporate solutions culture. So historically our change business a

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 2>single integrated stocking consiness, the largest player inequities in Europe

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and the diversity sided business.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Now, okay, brilliant. Well, obviously a lot of growth under

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>your tenure. I hope you have shares.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I have some shares, but it's it's a litt state company,

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>so I make revenue, I don't make capital, of course.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, I enjoyed that talk about how everything is

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much bigger than London. But of course, we must bear

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>in mind that if you bring together the markets of

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>several large economies, that that market will definitely be bigger

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 1>than the market of a single economy. And I will

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>just point out that if you look at the Global

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Financial Centers Index, London still always comes at second New York, London,

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, and the first financial center that even makes

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it onto that list as Frankfurt at number eleven. So

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know we still have something going for us here.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 2>No, no, that's for sure. And I love your country

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and we have more than one hundred people working there

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 2>and that we have more employees to date and before Brexit.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>My point is just to highlight the fact that when

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 2>it comes to equity market, you need to compare Apple

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 2>with apples, and you have to compare the London section

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 2>equity market with the alternative, which is not a location

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>in a cellar collection of locations, but which is a

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 2>single inte greeted market. That's why we have much more

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>international ieos and much more IPOs than anywhere else in

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Europe because we operate a single integrated European market and

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 2>size that matter. And when it comes to liquidity, all right.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you that so you will have oversight then

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of pretty much everything happening across European extu markets. And

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about the extent to which you are

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>seeing this great rotation capital leaving the US for European markets.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to repeat things that are probably well

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>known by your audience, but there was a trend that

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 2>started at the end of last year, before the Trump moment,

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 2>which was all about the US is expensive and Europe

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>is cheap. The concept of evaluation multiples getting extremely expensive

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>in the US and valuation multiples in Europe not being

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>justified by the respect of the company. That was part

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of a process that initially DIDs some form of relocational

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 2>asset before January then, so that that's what we could

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 2>characterize as a votation. What has happened since January is different.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a massive global reallocation of trust. It's not

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>a votation. It's a global reallocation of First because slowly

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the world the investors realize that the US as we

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>knew it is not recognizable. And that's why First is

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>being relocated across the globe across as a classes. By

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the way, uh, everyone talks about equity, but what is

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 2>happening on the sovereign debt world is absolutely fascinating. So

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>what is happening on the equity sign as mine? The

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>perception is that weeks after weeks, the US are accumulating

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 2>all the features of what used to be called when

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>we were young and slim an emerging market. The US

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>is becoming an emergent market in every respect. The role

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of law is dislocating, and that's one feature of an

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>emergent market. Usually, the volatility of decision making of the

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 2>leadership is there. The leadership is appointing very strange people

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 2>in very senior positions. The conceptual bedrock of decisions is debatable.

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 2>You don't recognize whether they do things that are good

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 2>for them or why what's the need for themselves? So

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the lack of abviouse rationality behind decisions is also one

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>feature of an emergent market. And what is fascinating is

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is the fear in their eyes, the fact that they

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>feed intimidated and they don't want to confront the leadership

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 2>because there is a level of brutality in interactions with

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 2>the leadership. That is that is again one specificity of

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>an emerging market. So it's okay to do business in

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the emerging market. It's fine. You just need a higher return,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>quicker returns, and slower evaluations. And this is what is happening.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>So behind the global reallocation of trust, there is an

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 2>element of okay, we understand the world, the dis environment

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>precisely than before. There is a much stronger level of

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty and unpredictability, So I need lower valuations.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless, the usxrely market hits new high after new high.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>No, but I'm telling you what is happening. As you know,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the US valuation requires more than everywhere else, a clean

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>distinction between the Magnificent seven and the others. And that's

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the dominant test that needs to be applied before making

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 2>across the line and comments about the level of markets.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 2>What I'm telling you is that behind the recovery, the

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>stronger recovery of Europe markets in part continental europeen markets

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>versus the US, there is a number of US companies

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:27.359
<v Speaker 2>who tell us we can't do proper valuation of US

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 2>industrial companies because we don't know how to block the

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 2>basic metrics. What is going to be the inflation, what

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the interest rates? What is going

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to be the accent rate. What is going to be

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the cost of inputs, What is going to be the

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>probability the visibility of export for any industrial company. Many

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of those factors are open in the air because of

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the volatility of the current type war. So this is

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>there now on the dead side, Kelly. You can't add

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>so much depth and so much deficit without some form

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>of reassessment of the pricing of the yield. And that's

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 2>what the rest of the world is doing. So we

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>are not an institution where the world is massively shortening

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>us that to massively belong on your pen equity or

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>in Europeen debt. We are in a world where people

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>don't reinvest, don't all out when they redeals an asset,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the answers switching quietly, so that that's what is behind

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the great votation. A part of it is sustainable, basically

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the real location of multiples, I mean career. The current

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>valuation of the US market remains of a valued in

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the eyes of many investors. The part is just going

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to stabilize when the dust settlers in the US. Even

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 2>when if and when I think it's not a market correction,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>it's not even the vrotational asset. It's a fundamentality allocation

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of trust across the planet. I was in in Asia

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>a few days ago and in the Gulf in a

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>few weeks ago, a few months ago, and people aren't

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>telling us show us assets in Europe because we want

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 2>to diversify your way from US, because we have been

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>used to be too consultated on US assets. I've seen

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>some people in Asia telling me, okay, we were exposed

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>some larger funds were we had a strategical location of

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>five percent to Europe only we want to move to

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>ten percent. Well, ten percent is not a lot at

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 2>global level, but it's just the double of what they

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>were allocating to Europe.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, though, isn't it that from the point of

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>view of non EU, non US investors, you could say

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that the EU, and certainly independent in different countries inside

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the EU, are remarkably politically volatile as well. And I

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that situation in France is appalling on a par

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with Americas. So it's it's more the level of trust

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US come down to meet the level of

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>trust in European as it's rather than anything else.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>One guy told me Europe today is perceived as a

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>large Switzerland. It's not like everyone is getting fascinated about

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the growth prospects of the European economies or the political

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 2>stability of the pot The points you are making about

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the political fragmentation in the French landscape is there. It's

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>just the feeling that the institutional framework is stable and predictable.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>You know where you are, you know how to make assumptions,

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and you know the bandwidth on things where your business

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to be operated. So the amount of uncertainty

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>is much more reduced, so you have probably a lower

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 2>yield but much lower risk, hands a better return than

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a situation with a yield that can be strong, but

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the significant volatility and suddenly so forth certain in lessers

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 2>and that that leads to other decisions that are happening

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 2>below the screen. I've met the CEO of a larger

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>European company and telling me that it's rapet creating physical

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>assets from from the US that were ac custodied by

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a large custodians. They don't want to run the risk

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of weaponization of assets under custody in the US.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So when you when you say physical classes in the

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ussuming gold.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily gold. Gold is a very important debate. And

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 2>you know you have been you've been made aware of

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the of the rumors about some central banks in the

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>European Union decided to attatriate some gold and as you know,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>they're the public on those decisions, but they did not

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:51.119
<v Speaker 2>deny the rumor. But I'm talking about security shares or instruments,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>all sort of that can be custodian uh and by

0:14:55.800 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>by US under custody of some US institutions that are

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>being repatriated. So these things happen. So that's why I

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>think it's very scary, is that people are doing things

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 2>below the rather are and these things are happening. A

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 2>part of it cornsets into iiO evaluation. A part of

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the iiO evaluation in Europe in relative terms is driven

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>by a renewed appetite in relative terms visa bit the US,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>and as you rightly pointed out, in relative terms via

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the US. It's not like all of a sudden the

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 2>growth prospects of Europe are appearing significant Clusier. It's just

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 2>that Europe appears much much more predictable. Okay.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>The other part of this great rotation of the best

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>ti best to talk about when we'll come back to

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe to growth in Europe. But the other part of

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the Great rotation is also the patriotic side of it. So,

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, you've probably been following the debate in the

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>UK about the extent to which pension funds, for example,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>should be obliged to invest in UK assets, and the

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>extent to which people who have money inside a tax

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wrapper in the UK and ISO or whatever should be

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>obliged to invest in UK assets. And certainly this is

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>something that has come up in France, this idea that

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous to be sending your productive capital of European

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>countries to be invested in the US, and the sense

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that there should be some way to actively encourage, possibly

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>even mandate the investing of European saves money inside the

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>European Union as opposed to outside.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>One preliminary comment and then the fundamental answer diogression. The

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>preliminary comment is that it's very different to advise the

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>issue in the UK and in Europe because within the

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 2>European Union you can build relatively diversified portfolios. In a

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>block of four hundred and fifty million people. With the

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>list the second largest economy in the planet, you can

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>be the diversified portfolio across Europe. Since we cannot have

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it's forbidden by your open law, any forced allocation by

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 2>country in any way whatsoever, then it could make sense

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>at some point of time to consider incentives to invest

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>some assets within the European Union without harming reasonable diversification.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it is more complicated in the UK, just

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 2>because the UK economy is smaller, and therefore any force

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 2>or incentivized allocation within the UK economy which would lead

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to a disproportionate concentration that you don't get when you

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 2>can invest Acrossure. So that's a metastasis of Brexit or

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>contradiction of brexit. You can take back control, but the

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>more you reduce the size of the village, the more

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 2>you end up into force incestuous relationships because the pool

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 2>of assets is too small.

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think expectations ever to ask anyone for one

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of par asses and a lot better take

0:17:58.680 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the diversification argument.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>No, but that's why the debate is slightly different. But

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>now because fundamentally more it's true that both in the

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>UK and in the US, we are generating significant savings.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>More savings in the European continent than in the UK.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 2>You guys in the U kid have dept more than

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>we do in the incontinent. So it's about between thirteen

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 2>and eighteen percent of this posible income which is saved

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 2>in the in the Europe. I don't know what other

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 2>numbers in the UK should probably slightly round that or

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe slightly lower. And most of these savings is exported

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 2>in the form of investment in the US. Up until there,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>it makes perfect sense because the best thing you could

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 2>do with your savings was to allocate a part of

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>your savings to projects, whether it's growth, and for the

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 2>past ten years it was growth in the US, so

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 2>it was making perfect sense in the search of neal

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to invest in the US. What became complicated is that

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 2>when you combine the export of Europe and savings with

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 2>the strength of the US equity markets, you get to

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the formation of huge in situations. I mean, very often

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 2>people associate the success of the US economy to the innovation,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 2>the technology, energy, etc. And that's true, paliwel to an

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneurship and innovation. Technology is one leg of the US success.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 2>The other leg that nobody talks about enough is the

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 2>fact that the success of the US economy is driven

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 2>by the size of their pension savings. For everyone in

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the US, if you want to have some income when

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you are old, you need to buy shares when you

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>are young. In Europe, when you want to have some

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 2>income when you are old, you just need to hope

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 2>that people around you continue to pay taxes and social contributions.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 2>So you get to a situation with some nuances in

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the UK, but with the strength of your corporate pension

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>well and.

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Also our order and Roman system, so you know, we

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have a new vast sum of capital rising up in

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>our auto.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Large by and large many difference between a location of

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>savings in the US and in the in Europe is

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the dominance of pension savings in the US that feeds

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 2>long term defered liquidity instruments that are equity, and that

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>what has created large companies like like Clarge, players like

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Black Hog, Van Guard, Felity, etcetera. So those guys then

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>themselves work on diversification or strategical location and look at Europe.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>So the import they manage a mixed pool of European

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>savings exported to the US. Local savings collected from the

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>US auseholds and this combined pool is partly invested in Europe.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's why we have this paraducts of the US

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 2>players bumping a lot of savings from Europe and exposing

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of equity within European company.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then you have European savers savings captain cash.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely because we don't have the incentives to prepare for

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>retirement with instruments that produce a better yield than cash

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and then which go with defer equidity that you can

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have with cash.

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted to incentivize European savers to invest,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you should slash the size of the welfare states significantly

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so that faced into it.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I would not go that far. That's the intellectually pure conclusion,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 2>but clearly you should have an incentive set of incentives

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 2>in some country have it. And by the way, because

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the European Union, I mean, these pension arrangements are our

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 2>member states level. I mean the UK when it was

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 2>part of the European Union as at the moret soficing

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>indeendon pension schemes many.

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Cos we also had one of the highest highest rates

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of pension savings to GDP, which some people suggested there

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was a jolly good reason to live in a hurry.

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>My point is that it was not incompatible with being

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 2>member of the European Union. So since you left, we

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 2>have other countries with a significant share of GDP in

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>pensions funds, like Sweden, Netherlands and Denmark. So member states

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>have to address exactly the point you are making, which is,

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>if I incentivize people to invest in pension funds, does

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 2>it create a risk of pumping out resources for the

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 2>pair as you go state? Isn't such the first political

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 2>problem that ever country as to address. There is another

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 2>one which is less visible, but which is very fundamental,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is that most European countries, not all of them, but

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 2>many of them. It's not for the gest of on

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 2>in Sweden, with the case of Italy, Spain, Frances have

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 2>incentives directly or indirectly to incentivize people to buy sovereign debt,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>so the liquidity of the central debt is usually encouraged

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>by all sorts of tax incentives. Now, clearly the reason

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>why people keep cash or cause it cash is because

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 2>they have they are offered protected liquidity and protectly yield instruments.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Who to GOVI is if you want people to swep

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 2>up their investments from govies to long term equity, then

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 2>you adduce mechanically some of the equality of the sovereign

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 2>debt and governments have to accept at to make an

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 2>arbit frunde. Do they want to bonsor or to support

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>or to encourage the liquidity of their own debt or

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 2>do they want to support encourage the equity funding and

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the growth of their companies and that in the in

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 2>one case, if you want to encourage liquidity, the equity funding,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the risk taking capabilities of your companies, you encourage pension

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>funds and long term equity investments. If you want to

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>encourage to facilitate the liquidity of your debt, then you

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 2>put all sorts of incentives for people to buy govies.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>And this is another debate, the arbitwie between equity for

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 2>companies or money for gobies to find death, which is

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>complementary to the for debate, which is pensions, individual saving

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 2>buses that pully solidity skills.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Part of what's happening as a result of this conversation

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is this promotion of the European Savings and Investment Union

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or the what was the European Capital Markets Union, and

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that is going to work to do exactly as you say,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to take all this counts and deploy it one way

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>or another into European equities in the main. Is that

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what that's designed to do, and that should be another

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>another boost to European acquities across the board that inflow

0:24:59.400 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of capital.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, the reason why there was there's a

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>waking up is the multiple reason why the this saving

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 2>investment Union is going to happen. Since we're talking to

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 2>UK audience, I really want to explain why we are

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>where we are and why the Capital Market Union stopped

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 2>and did not deliver for the past ten years. The

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Capital Market Union was a very smart idea of Jonathan

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 2>Hill when he was the UK Commissioner at the European Union.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 2>And at that time the idea was very simple, was

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 2>to accelerate the integration of European capital markets because it

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>was going to be good for Europe, but it was

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>going to become excellent for London because at that time

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>London was the largest financial center of the European Union

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and it was making plenty of sense. I mean, the

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Agricultural common Policy in the sixties and seventies was all

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>about building food sovereignty for Europe, and it was a

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>French project because it was good for Europe and it

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 2>was good for friends. So you achieve a lot in

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Europe when there is a country that is a leader. Now,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>when the UK people, the British people, decided to leave

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you and Jonathan Hill left the Commission, the leadership to

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>build the Captain Market Union evaporated, and honestly, for the

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>past ten years or so, since let's say, the referendum

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 2>of June sixteen and the departure of the UK, there

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 2>was no leader or sponsor of the project. And since

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 2>the UK decided that London would not be anymore than

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the largest financial center of the European Union, but will

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 2>become the largest financial center of the United Kingdom, the

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 2>situation has been proven. We are now in the stitution

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>which is totally different. The Regi Report, the Letter Report,

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the sort of various wake up calls about the fact

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 2>that we need to finance equity in Europe. Long term project,

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>climate change, defense, the armament. All that requires a lot

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 2>of equity. Is pushing for an acceleration of the capital

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>mortgaging and the re assessment of priorities isn't going and

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>I do believe that we are going to deliver very

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 2>quickly in dius levels. Single supervision will happen and that

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 2>will be a game changer because when rules are similar

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 2>across Europe now as they are, they remain different. So

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the only way to have the same rules is to

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 2>go for same interpretation of same rules through a single provision,

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and that will happen. Clearly, the new assessment of what

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 2>are the best incentives for pension funds, even if three

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 2>mans a member state level, there will be some form

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 2>of harmonization and you can you should expect that the

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 2>combination of Member states decisions with the European decision is

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 2>going to create a station where five years from now

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the amount of would be massively more important. Is today

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 2>actually the German the government has announced that they will

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 2>launch a program. Under the previous government, they had already

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>launched it and it was interrupted by the stamp elections

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 2>and it is being renewed by the new coalition. So

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 2>you will have significant progress. It's like everything in Europe.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 2>It is slow, because that's that's the nature of our project.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 2>We are better at reacting than the net acting. But

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>even if it is slow, it will happen. The European

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Union is a Jesl car, so it takes time to

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>get to full speed. But you know, shang gun irrasc

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the euro currency. So I remember all the bashing about

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the euro during a great financial crisis ten years ago,

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and we made it through. And I think the setting

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in the spentnion will happen. But it's it's going to

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>be complicated it I was referring to the UK leadership

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that disappear in Europe. You have some countries that make

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>finance and you have some countries that just buy finance.

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 2>The point here is that we are at a moment

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>where the momentum for the capital market union is definitely accelerating.

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 2>I spent a lot of time in Brussels. I can

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>tell you that the dynamic the ownership by political leaders

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>to make it happen. Mister Merth in Germany, you know,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 2>mister Merth spended many years of his life at black

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Hawk and many years of his life in the board

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>of Deutche Boxa. The leader of Germany is very personally

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 2>focused on financial issues. The same in France, the same

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>in the Lands. So we are on the right track

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>to make it happen and Stepan.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the motivations here possible from Germany in particular,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the motivations to produce a pool of

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>cant available for spending on defense. One of the things

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that you said recently is that we should, you know,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we should look at ESG in the traditional sense, that

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we should also you know, look at it in a

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>different way and say es G. And we've talked about

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this a lot on this podcast as well. ESG should

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>now stand for energy security geostrategy, so a modern definition

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that is also about well being, long term well being

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>being of a population. So one of the motivations behind

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>providing this pool of cash is that it does go

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>into defense.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I mean we and that that's the point for

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>which the alignment with with the with the UK is

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>essential and is perfect I mean clearly in the environment

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>we are facing and the countries that have a tradition

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of building strength, of the projecting strength, of managing strength

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>is quite something common between the between the between the

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 2>UK and if you can't really like friends Norway is

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't exactly so so I think we are all

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>facing the same issues. Uh, armament projects at a very

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>low return on investment, a very low return on equity,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 2>so you need you need equity to fund this project.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 2>You need money for the government to pay as clients,

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>so they will need some debt issue will have to

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>be addressed to some public finance issues will have to

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 2>buildreated on the client side, but on the maker side,

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 2>on the supplier science, if you want to accelerate production capabilities,

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 2>if you want to accelerate innovation, if you want to

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>consolidate the players, you need more equity. So that that

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that that's why this concept of investing in the sovereignty,

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the open sovereignty of energy Situti and Joe strategy is

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>getting your tractions with industries.

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Stephan, we are running out of time, so can

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I just ask you a couple of quick questions. That's

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>something Is AI impacting your business at all? Yet I

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>finding that the way you employ and the way that

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you manage is changing result being able to use it.

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, it does mainly on like many companies, many

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 2>on the cost sign where we are reassessing many of

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 2>our workflows and processes to wear eyes. It's not going

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 2>to cure cancer, it's not going to to do everything.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not magic. So on the revenue side we are

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>more cautious because many of the things we are not

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>transformed by eye. But on the class side, on the

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>process sides, definitely has a very significantly.

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Pay And how do you feel about cryptters and asset

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>class skepticism?

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>This is typically a situation where I prefer to be

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 2>late rather than be wrong. If the rest of the

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 2>world two to play with matches and get to a

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 2>situation where they they are comfortable with with these new instruments.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I believe that exchanges, market infrastructures are full of trust

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 2>from the general public, and I just don't want to

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 2>be the shop around the corner with the window the

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 2>day everyone realizes that there is an issue. There are

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>too much assumptions, religious assumptions behind this. I said, class

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that need me to be skeptical for the moment? Fair enough?

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And finally, what are you reading at the moment?

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>You know it's a good question because I have one

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>or beyond in my life. I read one history book

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>per week. So I read a book from an Australian

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>writer and I read in French because it's more pleasant

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 2>for me. His name is Clark. He has published a

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>few months ago a book called eighteen forty eight, which

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is all about the consolidation of the revolutionary trends or

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>movements across Europe in eighteen forty eight. Yeah, thank you

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 2>very much.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading A. Clark's book as well, by the way,

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think everyone should read it at the moment.

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's quite it resonates quite well with our current world. Yes,

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, indeed for joining us. Thank you man,

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to this week's Marin Talks Money. If

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you like our show, rate review and subscribe wherever you

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts, and keep sending questions or comments to

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Marrin Money at Bloomberg dot net. You can also follow

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>me in John on Twitter or x I'm at marinas

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>w and John is John Underscore Stepic. This episode was

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Meet Marin Zumzetweb. Its produced by Somersardi Moses

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and Amantala Amadi. Sound designed by Kelly Gary and special

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks of course, as always to Stefan Ba