WEBVTT - Everybody's Business: Tariffs, TikTok, Torpedos

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey Max Schafkin here, co host of elon Inc. You're

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>about to hear a pilot of a new show that

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 2>I've been working on for the past few months. It's

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>called Everybody's Business. It features me and the great business

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>and financial journalist Stacy Vanick Smith, plus just a huge

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>contingent of some of the smartest, most interesting journalists we know.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 2>These include Lucas Shaw, Amanda Maul, brad Stone, Randall Williams.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Each week, we're going to be taking the big business

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>stories that everyone is talking about and we're going to

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 2>spin them forward with fresh reporting, with analysis, with smart takes.

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit like elon Ink, but a much

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>broader look at the world. We've been working on it

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>for months and just having a lot of fun, and

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>we think you're going to enjoy it too. The show

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>officially debuts on May sixteen. It'll be in its own

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>podcast feed, but for now, for the next few weeks,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>it'll be here in the e lining feed every Friday,

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 2>and we really hope you'll listen and let us know

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>what you think.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>This is Everybody's Business from Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Max Chafkin and I'm Stacy Vanixsmith. Hey, Stacy, Hello,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I have a question for you, Max.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>What is your question?

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Fine morning? Are you feeling liberated?

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean I am, because yesterday was Liberation Day.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Was liberation now, but I am not sure what I

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>feel liberated from.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>It almost feels like I'm liberated from any sense of normalcy.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, reality, Yes, I feel like a lot of people

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>are feeling that way. I think that has to be

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the theme of our show this week, liberation, because, of course,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>the big economic news like you just said, or maybe

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>even kind of like an economic bombshell. It felt more

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>like President Trump on Wednesday aka Liberation Day, unveiled our

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 3>country's new tariff policy and it was pretty shocking. Markets

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>are panicking, companies are panicking, countries are panicking.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 4>I am panicking also too. We can talk about that.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I am not panicking, Stacy, but I'll tell you on

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the show, we're going to continue the

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>liberation theme.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>The prospect that TikTok might be liberated from China.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Yet one person's liberation is another person's acquisition.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and I've got an underrated story about liberating ourselves

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 2>from the constraints of how we think about baseball bats

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that has loomed.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 4>So large in my mind for so many years. I'm

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 4>glad to know that. But first, of course, you know,

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 4>this is everybody's business.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 3>We wanted to see how everybody was feeling about the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 3>tariff news out of the White House this week, so

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>we had our producer Stacy Wong and Magnus Hendrickson go

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 3>out into the streets to ask the people, are you

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>worried that tariffs are going to cause prices to go up?

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 5>I am worried about prices going up.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I'm very concerned about prices going up.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it just feels like out of my control.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>On a scale of like one to ten, I'll probably

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>say like middle of the.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Pack, five. I haven't really thought of it that much.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I expect to be surprised.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm like, Okay, well, prices are growing up.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I need to make some adjustments in life.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 5>I work in real estate construction. This affects especially like

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 5>lives of New Yorkers. Have you been hoarding anything?

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>No, honestly, I've thought about it.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I am currently in the process of planning a wedding, so.

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 6>Right now, I don't have a lot of purchasing capacity, and.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Living in New York City, we have very little space

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to hoard anything.

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 6>Toilet paper, beans, finny fish, the residual pandemic hoarding.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, I mean, do you think people people are

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>really hoarding beans and toilet paper?

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if I sort of thought about it, I

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 3>started to think about what products I really love that

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 3>are from overseas that might get enormously more expensive in

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>the next couple weeks.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, like listening to that, I just feel deficient because

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I did not make any purchasing changes, no rewarding hallowing

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the incredible economic uncertainty, the chaos regime or whatever to

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>just wash over me.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Max, let's get into it.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Liberation Day tariffs The numbers that got unveiled this week

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>were pretty shocking, I think, higher than anybody thoughts.

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's just listen to a snippet from this incredible event,

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>my fellow Americans.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 7>This is Liberation Day waiting for a long time. April second,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty five will forever be remembered as the day

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 7>American industry was reborn, the day America's destiny was reclaimed

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 7>and the day that we began to make America wealthy again.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 3>L Day, Stacy L Day, A liberation Day, make America

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>wealthy again. I mean, I hesitate to point this out,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 3>but like we are already the wealthiest country in the world.

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know what to say. I'm at a loss.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm at a loss.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Stacy's having trouble articulating here because what is happening is

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 2>so weird and so surprising and so outside of the

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>norms of what somebody who follows the economy, like having

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with politics, expects out of a government.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>It's it's like we've instantly gone back in time. I

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know what, like one hundred and twenty years or

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>something to.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Do the time of mercantilism? Is that baby?

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>So let's take a look at what exactly happened on

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Liberation Day. Let's let's look at these numbers. Thirty four

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>percent tariffs on goods from China, twenty percent tax on

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>anything from the EU to twenty four percent tax on

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 3>goods from Japan. Those are our top trading partners, along

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>with Canada and Mexico.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the other thing, Stacy like, thirty four percent

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of good of tariffs on goods from China. But that's

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.799
<v Speaker 2>on top of tariffs are already there. So that's fifty

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>four percent.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Most of the stuff we import from China. That is

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 3>fifty four percent tax on a.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Lot okay stuff.

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>And not only that, but over the past decade or so,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of companies have moved manufacturing away from China

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>because they saw this coming.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>They moved it to places like Vietnam now there or.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Apple moved a lot of its operations to India.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, big tariffs on those countries as well. So the timing,

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 2>it's not immediate immediate, but it's going to happen in

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 2>the next couple of weeks.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Basically, yes, I was really, really shook.

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I was not expecting the numbers to be as high

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 3>as they were. And I've talked to economists of all

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 3>political stripes for a lot of years, and I have

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to say, no serious economists thinks that like large scale

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 3>protects of tariffs are a good idea.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 4>It's bad for an economy.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it would be like finding a doctor that

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 3>said smoking was good for your health, Like it just

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really exist. I think you can find economists say

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>in certain situations like very targeted tariffs.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>But can you just explain quickly why, because like you've

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>spent a lot of time supporting on the economy, why

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>are they so against it.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, tariffs are at tax essentially, right, I mean, this

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>is the tax. JP Morgan actually came out saying this

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 3>is the largest tax like the USS and since nineteen

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>sixty eight. So if you think of it like a tax,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty simple. So basically, you are taxing the things

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 3>that we import. Two thirds of our economy is consumer spending.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 3>That is the load bearing beam of the US economy

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>is you and me buying stuff. So anything that gets

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>in the way of that really threatens to compromise our

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 3>whole economy. So when prices go up by fifty percent,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 3>even twenty percent, thirty percent, we've all been through inflation

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>from COVID. Those prices go what people buy less, which

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>means companies sell less, they make less money, They stop expanding,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>which means they stop hiring, which means they can start

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>firing people, which leads to economic contraction.

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 4>And then like we're in.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>The situation of at least like darkness and dragons, except like,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure we can afford dragons.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 4>It's bad.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's bad, yeah, I mean.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Writing in his Odd Lots newsletter this morning, our colleague

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and fellow Bloomberg podcaster Joe Wisenthal said it was one

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>of the craziest days he could remember. You saw the

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>stock market kind of tip in real time as they

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>figured out just how.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Big Trump had gone.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 2>There had been all these reports kind of over the

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>last couple of weeks and even beyond that, about is

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>it just gonna be a little tariff, is this a

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>negotiating thing.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 4>And is it gonna be kind of vague?

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>You had all these contingents both within the White House

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and maybe on Wall Street, who I think we're kind

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>of wish casting, right, and of just hoping somehow they

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>would be able to bring Trump around to the consensus view,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the one that you just expressed, which is that, of course,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 2>tariffs are bad for our economy, as can instructed, it's

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 2>like a massive tax on consumers. Trump had this weird

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>moment during the event where he talked about groceries.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I love that word groceries.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 5>Oh my god.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a very strange.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 4>It was very long.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like a policy designed to make groceries.

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 4>More expensive moments of poetry.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Many of these things that are being tariffed are things

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 2>we do not grow in the United States. So that's

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>why everyone was hoping it would be less bad.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And here we are. It's sort of what the normy

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>business types feared.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>I was watching the announcement here at Bloomberg in the newsroom,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 3>and here at Bloomberg, everybody's got like five computer screens.

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 3>They're all covered in various charts and graphs at all moments.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 3>And I looked out across the newsroom and all the

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 3>charts were read, Like as Trump was talking, all the

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>charts were read.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 4>But this is where I was sort of hoping you.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Could offer a ray of light, Max, because you have

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 3>covered the people in this administration Trump, Trump's interactions with

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>business for a long time. And I I thought, maybe, like,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>is this typical Trumpian blusters? This is shot across the bow,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>throw us some hope.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm also just by nature like disagreeable, and my tendency

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>when like all of these economics are like this is bad,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm like.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It must be good.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Then I think there are two ways you can go here,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and but they don't agree with one another. So one

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 2>is this contingent I just talked about, which is like

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Scott the Scent, the Treasury Secretary, the CEOs of major banks,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>probably like many of the business journalists people like us

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 2>who write about the economy and share this kind of

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>consensus view is that Trump is actually not going to

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 2>go through with this. Like the stock market is down

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 2>as we speak on Thursday morning, but it's not down

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that much.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like down four or five percent.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 2>You're talking like he just broke the world, and the

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 4>It's a little bit that way when I was watching it, Yes.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So my point is clearly there are many people who

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>think this is yet another negotiating post. We saw this

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>with the situation with Mexico and Canada where he announced

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>these huge tariffs and kind of basically pulled many of

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>them back. You have people in Trump's inner circle already

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 2>signaling that this is sort of a starting point of

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a negotiation that is not the ending point of a negotiation.

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 4>He's making him an offer they can't refuse.

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that could work.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>The other thing, and this is a sort of different

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>reason which you might feel optimistic, is like, look, there

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>are things about this economy that you describe this consensus

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>view that are very bad, like a world, a world

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 2>where we just buy all this cheap crap and pay

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>huge sums of money to ship it often by air,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>creating huge climate consequences around the world. Like it is

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>not good for the world. It's arguably like a bad

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 2>way for us to go through life. And maybe like

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>this kind of consensus view did that to us. And

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>if we were able to like move towards a world

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>where more of our stuff is made locally, like that

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 2>would be a stronger and more sustainable country. I could

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 2>almost believe that the problem is that the other point

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I just made kind of undercuts it because businesses don't

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 2>really believe.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This is going to happen.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Even now, We're not going to see like shoe factories

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 2>or whatever open in the United States because no one's

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 2>going to invest years and years and years to set

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>up a whole new supply chain when they could just

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>wait till the next election or till when you know,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump changes his mind.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Also, wages are really high in this country. I read

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 3>a great article in Forbes about how much an iPhone

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 3>would cost if it were entirely made inside of the US,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and the estimate was between thirty and one hundred thousand dollars.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>So moving manufacturing back to the US and you know,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>making everything here, yes, you're right, it would be sustainable,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 3>but things would get massively more expensive. That's why we've

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 3>outsourced in the first place, and it's made all kinds

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 3>of goods affordable. I think you make a great point

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>that maybe our economy is over dependent on US consumers,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 3>and in fact, sixteen percent of the global economy is

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Americans buying stuff.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to say that kind of thought

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 2>experiment and you just gave. Even somebody who's for these

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>tariffs is not like, oh, yeah, we should pay one

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand dollars for an iPhone. Now, they're just saying

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 2>you should pay fifty percent more for some of these components.

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>You should ask consumers to pay a tax for the

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>downstream consequences of this supply chain. Like I only, that's crazy.

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>We talk about that with environmental stuff all the time.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of these businesses and economists and

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>so on don't think the idea of a carbon tax, for.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Instance, is crazy, which also is just a massive drain

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on consumer spending.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>So yes, but then you put things way out of

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 3>reach of a lot of people, especially lower income people,

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>middle income people. Suddenly cars and smartphones are out of

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 3>reach for them.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 4>That is not a great situation, I would argue, Okay,

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 4>I want to.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Stop defending this for a second.

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 2>We have to talk about this formula, the science that

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>produced these tariffs, the.

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 3>Science that produce these tariffs. Actually, there was a formula

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 3>that was used so that you take the trade deficit

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>for the US in goods with a particular country, you

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 3>divide that by the goods that that country imports.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait, yeah, you take it's the train deficit divided by

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>imports divided by two.

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>For some reason.

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, listeners, if we got that wrong, send us an email.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's at Bloomberg dot net. But you know this is

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 2>weird because number one, they talked about reciprocal tariffs. And

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you might think, oh, so that means like, if one

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 2>country is charging a twenty percent tax on imports from

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>our country, will.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Charge yes, twenty percent on theirs. That is not what's happening.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>We're basing this on like how much stuff do we

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>export to them? If we export a lot to them,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the tariff's going to be lower. Yeah, and now maybe

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense from a negotiating perspective, but it's just

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of crazy because it creates all these weird situations

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>where these like very poor countries are gonna have huge tariffs,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna be all the harder for them to grow their economies.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 3>And also, like US consumers buying stuff is also like

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest parts of is economy, Japan's economy,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 3>but also of Vietnam's economy, Mexico's economy. It's going to

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>be a really tough situation for us and for everyone

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>in the world. Like I can't think of a country

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>that's not affecting all right.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>One other thing on this formula.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 2>And again this is speculation, but there are people suggesting,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think this is plausible that the formula was

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>created by chat gpt, because we're true. If you plug

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>like how would you do a tariff into some of

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>these chatbots, they give like these kind of similar formulations.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>And if this is true, which it very well might

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 2>may not be, I think that it is maybe the

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 2>first step in seeing the limits of AI.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>AI.

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, AI should not be setting tariffs, but I did

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>want to end on the kind of a positive note,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>which is I did find a few silver linings in

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>our tariff situation, and I brought them in to the studio.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Are these like a good old fashioned American made products

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 2>or what?

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 4>No, quite the opposite. So one of them is this.

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a can of coke. It's like a tall boy

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of coke.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 3>It's like it's a can of diy coke. It was

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the only one I could find at the Dwayne read.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 3>President Trump apparently drinks twelve of these a day, twelve.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 3>But there was an exemption on aluminium steel, okay, which

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>is really good because aluminium steel are literally in everything

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>from buildings to home appliances to cans of coke.

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 4>So that is one silver lining okay.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>And then there were a couple when you calculated out

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the formula, a couple countries that came out looking pretty okay.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 3>One of them flowers flowers from Columbia.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So Columbia exempt or what ten percent?

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>So these flowers, this is Dwyane Raid, so they're nineteen

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine, so they will you know, we're talking about

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 3>like maybe twenty one dollars or twenty two dollars.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other products, Stacy, Yes, that are are final.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I think you're going to be very excited about this one.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a bag of something idiot. It's Eastern candy Cadbury.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So the UK ended up looking okay in all this.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's like the only moment where Brexit seemed like a

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>good economic idea was on Liberation Day. Because because they

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 3>don't you has like twenty plus percent tariffs, the UK

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>got off with a ten percent tariff, meaning that chocolate

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 3>from Cadbury and products from the UK, the prices will

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 3>go up less than the prices for other things.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 4>We can eat our feelings a little bit.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Drink them and get ourselves flowers.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Stacey.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember like when we were younger and more innocent,

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 2>like two months ago, and the.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Big source a couple of days ago of.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Business uncertainty was TikTok, like wood trump band, TikTok, the

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>very popular, very large social media Well, people probably missed

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>it with all the excitement of Liberation Day. But two

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>days from today, as we're recording, this is Liberation Day,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>park Dood.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the day that TikTok.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to pay a tax if you

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 3>use friends to sell itself.

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the deadline for the Chinese owners of TikTok Byte

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Dance to sell it assumingly to a US owner. There's

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of news here and I want to

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>talk about it, but because it's kind of related to

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>the conversation we had, but also just because this is

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>a huge story in its own right. And we have my

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>favorite technology journalist Bradstone, who also is my boss, the

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, indeed here with us virtually today. How are you doing, Brad?

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Hi?

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Guys happy TikTok almost TikTok.

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Liberation Day is part liberation part two?

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 5>That sounds right?

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So Brett, just to.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Catch us up, like, where do things stand with TikTok

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So April fifth? What do we expect to happen or

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what has to happen?

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, it may happen before then.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 6>It almost seems like as we speak right now in

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 6>the Oval Office, there are discussions, led in part by

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 6>Vice President jd Vance, evaluating some of these deals to

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 6>buy the US arm of TikTok, And there is reporting

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 6>that there is a coalition led by some very Trump

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 6>friendly allies, including the venture capital firm Entries and Horowitz, Blackstone,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 6>of course, Steve Schwartzman, who sort of famously endorsed Trump

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 6>during the campaign, Silver Lake, other large private capital investors

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 6>to buy TikTok's US business, and then I guess licensed

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 6>the algorithm from bytem Still a couple of questions about

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 6>how that will work.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So I encountered this story in the This Morning and like,

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 2>honestly one of the crazier deal stories I've ever read.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 2>So Brad, you you hit part of it, which is

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that you have this collection of like Trump adjacent venture capitalists,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 2>like people who are either have like donated huge sums

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of money to Trump's campaign or are like in at

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 2>mar Lago pretty much on the regularly, like Mark Andresen.

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 2>So that's fifty percent of this proposed deal. And I

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>did mention Oracle right right, there's this line, and there's

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>a line in a story out of nowhere Oracle, co

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 2>founded by Trump ally Larry Elson, would secure TikTok's US

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>data as part of the deal. So like somehow Oracle

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>gets the data, the algorithm goes someplace else. There's also

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 2>a line in this story which I enjoyed. One person

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 2>caution that the situation remained fluid, and that was possible,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the White House would abruptly change its plans, which like, do.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to write that I know a Trump's story anymore?

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Can't we just like that's just the paragraph you can

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 3>cut and paste into any story right now?

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 6>But my question if bite Dance is remains a twenty

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 6>percent owner of the business and is in some way

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 6>licensing the algorithm to these US investors, these new owners,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 6>then how are we resolving the privacy questions the war

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 6>gaming of Is TikTok a safe kind of social network?

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 6>If it's partially owned by the Chinese government? How are

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 6>we resolving any of the fundamental issues that Donald Trump

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 6>identified I think rightfully identified almost eight years ago. Does

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 6>this deal really resolve it? I think that's still an

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 6>open question.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 4>And Bye Dance has said that they are not going

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 4>to sell right.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 6>I think they've they've softened it a little bit, particularly

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 6>with this still ambiguous maybe understanding that they would retain

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 6>They're not selling the algorithm, they're merely licensing it.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 5>That was the sticking point.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Can we just quickly talk about some of these other bids,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Brad, first of all, there's this Frank mccor

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>former owner of the La Dodgers crypto bid. I think

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that's still around, and I think no one anyone is taking.

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That seriously, maybe besides Frank mccorn. I'm not sure that

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds right.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 6>He wanted to put it in some equivalent of like

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 6>an open source, public trust source the algorithm make it

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more accountable. That does not seem to

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 6>be where the current conversation is going.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, speaking of accountability, Brad Jeff Bezos

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 2>swooping in at the last minute with a letter to

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Vice President jd Vance, I believe, offering that he could

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 2>take it over himself.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, the deal comes from Amazon, right, And I don't

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 6>know how Jeff Bezos kind of propelled this is. I mean,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 6>I think a Milania Trump forty million dollar documentary that

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Amazon is funding does feel like a Bezos project. But

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 6>you know Amazon, Amazon does have a record of trying

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 6>to come into these deals to give itself.

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Some optionality to be part of the process.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I'm old enough to remember when Amazon was

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 6>rumored to be buying AMC theaters or Dish networks. But

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 6>here it would make a lot of sense. I mean, Amazon,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, sees a shopping is becoming social. It experimented

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 6>with its own short form video service called Inspire, which

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 6>it had to shut down. TikTok shop is massive, like

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 6>thirty billion in gross merchandise sales last year. And then

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 6>you've got to remember Amazon's becoming an advertising juggernaut, and

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 6>they would basically be unifying like the number three and

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 6>number four players behind Google and Meta, So that makes

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 6>a lot of sense.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 5>It was sort of immediately dismissed.

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the thing is that you know jd Evance

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 6>to the extent that he is leading this project is

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, sort of shared some of the antitrust values

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 6>with the Biden White House, and it's really hard to believe,

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, despite however many dinners. Jeff Bezos has had

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 6>a mar a lago that the Trump administration would hand

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 6>over this valuable asset to a big tech company like Amazon.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, there was a potential other buyer who came up

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>a couple months ago, which which made a certain sense,

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 2>which is Elon Musk. And the reason, I know that's

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>crazy side why not, But beyond the fact that hey,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>he runs a lot of businesses, he's close to Donald Trump,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Musk was seen and This is how it was reported

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 2>at the time as someone that Beijing that the Chinese

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 2>government which is going to have to prove this deal

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 2>because it would be the sale of a major, very

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>valuable Chinese company, basically the force sale of a major

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Chinese asset into US hands. Do we think that Beijing

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 2>could get comfortable with either of these deals, Brad? I mean, like,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about Bezos. Maybe that's one of the

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 2>reasons these the venture capitalists sort of make sense. Like

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these guys have track records of doing

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>business in China, and maybe it's easier to kind of

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.719
<v Speaker 2>get with a consortium where the Chinese company still has

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>like a substantial stake in the whole enterprise.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I recall from earlier this year that Elon

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 6>made a public statement that he was not interested in

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 6>buying TikTok. I don't know if we take that at

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 6>face value. I think for the Chinese government, right the

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 6>options are limited. I mean, it has become clear or

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:01.959
<v Speaker 6>now for many years that they were going to be

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 6>forced to divest this asset, and I think what they're

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 6>negotiating for now is less a particular buyer and more

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 6>of the ownership stake and that crucial control over the algorithm.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 6>And if Trump is willing to allow that, which you know,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 6>as I said before, feels like it defeats the whole purpose,

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 6>then the Chinese government, I think, is going to come

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 6>out of this feeling like it had a minor win.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Also, I mean, maybe it could be part of a

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 3>bargaining chip in like renegotiating.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Some of these tariffs on China.

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, would you have to pay a tariff if

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 3>you bought TikTok, because really expensive. But maybe, I mean,

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, could this be a bargaining chip in

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>a larger conversation.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think for sure, right, like, TikTok is

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 2>a major asset. It's not only valuable in the sense

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 2>that like it's a lot of money and those are

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 2>jobs and so.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>On, but valuable in a kind of cultural sense.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is like a really important Chinese cultural export,

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 2>which is of course part of the reason why a

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of conservatives and even Donald Trump, you know, back

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>many years ago, forced this conversation in the first place.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the weirdest thing about this story is Trump

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 2>suggested banning TikTok. Biden went ahead and did it. And

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 2>then Trump, probably not entirely coincidentally, after receiving a massive

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>donation from a TikTok investor, just totally changed his position.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, he also got an account and the account did

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 3>really well, and I think that actually may have tipped

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the scale too. He mentioned it like explicitly a couple

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 3>of times. Yeah, you get that little dopamine hit.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to say no.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Actually, zone.

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Zone. All right, let's move on to our final segment. Brad,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have you stick around for this. This is

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>where Stacy or I will find an underrate story of

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 2>the week and present it to the others. And I

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 2>want to start with, you know, just a great moment

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 2>in television history.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's give a listen, guys kidding, it's not about muscle.

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 2>In simple physics, calculate the velocity V in relation to the.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Trajectory T in which G gravity of course remains a constant.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not complicated. Stacy, had you seen that one?

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean this is from Seinfeld, clearly George Costanza giving Baseball.

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Lessons, Season eight, episode nine of Seinfeld the Abstinence, to

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>be specific.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 5>He works for the Yankees.

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You remember that the plot of this episode.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll just to refresher memory. I'm sure it'll come back

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 2>to you in a second. But George stops having sex

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and becomes a genius. And among the genius discoverers he

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 2>has is he figures out the physics of home runs

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and is in the scene teaching Yankee Grades, Derek Jeter,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and Bernie Williams how to hit a.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Baseball how to hit a baseball. So I'm bringing this

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>up because.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 4>That's a little old for an underreait.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>This is happening right now in real life. Torpedo bats.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>These are a new invention on innovation in the world

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 2>of baseball. This is a bat where the barrel is

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>like sort of closer to the handle. It was invented

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>by a sort of obscure coach on the Miami Marlins,

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 2>an MIT physicist. So we got the physics in there,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 2>and he hired an MIT physicist. The baseball team did yes.

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>His career trajectory is just frankly amazing. He was an

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>MIT physics PhD. He worked as a minor league coach

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 2>for a while in the Atlantic League, community college coach,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and then he hits it big in the majors and

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>he invents the torpedo bat and these things. Brad, I'm

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>sure you're aware of this because you're a baseball fan.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>It's like some people believe this is like breaking the

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>game of baseball. This is the world will never be

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the same.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it will break the game of baseball,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 6>because I think the game of baseball is already broken.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm really bummed.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 6>I feel like this season, I mean there's there's almost,

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 6>to my mind, no drama. I mean, the competitive balance

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 6>has never been more lopsided. The Dodgers are going to

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 6>win the World Series again. The formerly Oakland A's are

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 6>playing in like a stadium in West Sacramento, not even

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 6>Sacramento Sacramento, but occupied by a team called the river Cats.

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 4>By the way, because emotionally.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 6>And my team is the Cleveland Guardians. They're off to

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 6>a terrible start. But more importantly, you can't watch the

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 6>games on TV, like baseball's lost all its TV contracts.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 6>Oh and by the way, the league's probably going to

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 6>strike again next year.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Right. They've never been able to figure.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 6>Out things like a salary cap and so yeah, torpedo

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 6>bats again. It's like some teams hacking the game and

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 6>to me more evidence that than maybe Ma's Opening Day.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 8>Everybody ano they're great spring and major League baseball, but

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 8>I just feel like, you know, particularly compared to basketball,

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 8>the NBA and the NFL, major League baseball has lost

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 8>its way.

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, maybe the torpedo bat is the moment that turns

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 3>it all around and brings people back to the great

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 3>sport of baseball.

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, Stacy.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>This is great news, a great innovation. Like I said,

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 2>dreams can come true. You can be an MIT physicist

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and get a job as an assistant coach for one

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>of the worst teams in baseball. But I do think,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 2>like I think, this is very exciting. I love the story.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I love the fact that the Yankees. I'm not a

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yankees fan a Mets fan, but they hit like nine

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 2>home runs when they were using these bats.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, what do the bats do that's so special? Like,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 3>why are they better than a regular bat? I mean

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 3>they looking at them, they're.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>It's so stupid. It's like as stupid as George Cassandra.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Basically, the ball hits closer to your hands, so why

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>not put the big part of the.

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Bat closer to your hands. That's it. That's it.

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's physics, that's what that's what an MIT degree.

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So these bats you can buy them now, the Torpedo

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Pro Reserve. You can buy these for two hundred nine dollars.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>And the best part of all Stacy made right here.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 2>No tariffs, No tariffs all right.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Brad Stone, thanks for being here.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Thank you guys.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 4>The show was produced by Stacy Wong.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Magnus Hendrickson is our supervising producer, Amy Kean is our editor,

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Sage Bauman heads Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>And if you have a story that you think should

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 3>be our business, send us an email. It's at everybody's

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg dot net. That's everybody's without an apostrophe, everybody's

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg dot net. And if there's something that you

0:31:57.880 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 3>buy that you're worried that tariffs are going to affect,

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>we definitely want to hear from you. Send us an

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 3>email or a voice memo. We would love to know

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 3>what's on your mind. Thank you for listening. See you

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 3>next week.