WEBVTT - What's Wright? - Game 1 Reactions: Lakers BLOWN OUT vs. Wolves, Warriors-Rockets, Clippers-Nuggets

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Right with Nick Right somewhat emergency reaction

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Episode two, Day one of the NBA Playoffs Saturday and Sunday.

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess Day one and two, But game ones across

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the board eight games three and a half interesting ones

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is to my eye. Maybe you could say three and

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>three quarters interesting ones, depending on what you think of

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Pacers Bucks. We're gonna start with Warriors Rockets. We will

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>then get to the Lakers getting absolutely unraveled by the Timberwolves,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and then probably the best game of the weekend Clippers Nuggets.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>With a few minutes on the.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Four other games, most notably Nicks, Pistons, Warriors, Rockets. Watched

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it live last night, rewatched the bulk of the second

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>half this morning, and there are some things that should

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not surprise you at all. The Rockets defense being as

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>advertised all year. That's a good thing for them. The

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Rockets offense being as you worried about once the playoffs

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>got going, that's a bad thing for them. Both of

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>those showed up. This is my pick in this series

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>was Rockets in seven. And I'm not going to lie

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to the audience that that game didn't shake my faith

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that the Rockets can go blow for

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>blow with the Warriors.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>It did shake my faith a bit.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And if this team gets to a game seven, do

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they have anyone that is going to be able to

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>make shots now the Rockets or if you didn't watch

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the game, the Rockets are not going to be six

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nine from three throughout the series. And you

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>did see how the how limited the Warriors offense is

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of Steph and Jimmy. But the outside of Stephan

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy doesn't matter when the the Warriors defense, which has

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been the number one defense in basketball since they got

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Butler, can suffocate the Rockets, holding him to eighty

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>five points.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And when Steph.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Curry, who the last time the Warriors played the Rockets

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>scored three scores thirty one. And so my biggest takeaways

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>from this game in no particular order, Shingoon's got to

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be even more active, and Shingoon has to be willing,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was in this game to his credit.

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 2>If Draymond is going.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>To give you those eight to fourteen footers, you just

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>got to take them I E. And now Shingoon made it,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>took and made that one end of shot clock three.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who on the year only you know,

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he took just over one to three a game and

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was twenty three percent. It's not his game. He almost

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>has to be willing to take one or two of

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the game, not just end of shot clock, because they

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>are giving him so much space and maybe that can

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>open things up. Obviously for the Rockets side of things,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>they need Van Vliet to be better. Van Vliet hit

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the one shot late, and that's what was so interesting

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about this game. Rockets found themselves down by twenty four

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>after the Warriors avalanche twenty three to twenty four steph

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>hits the insane three, and then they punched back and

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they got it all the way down to four points

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with Fred van Vliet finally hitting a three after starting

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the game one of ten. But they weren't able to

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>get over the over the hump. They had used a

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>bad challenge earlier in the game or in the fourth

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>quarter on a block charge, which just unless you are

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent like those aren't getting overturned. And because

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of that, they weren't able to use their challenge on

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>an out of bounds call when the ball went off

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Draymond down four late in the fourth they can't challenge it.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Warriors inbound it. Steph hits a rainbow three from thirty

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>feet and all of a sudden.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>You're down seven. And they never got closer.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So they had their opportunities. But Jalen Green is going to.

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Have to show up.

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And the concern for the Rockets on the Jalen Green

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>front is and I understand it's a weird spot because

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they had everything locked up. He wasn't playing big minutes.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But Jalen Green now his last four games five point

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>seven points, two point seven points. That's your leading scorer

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on the season, and so he's going to have to

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>get going. Amon Thompson seems shell shocked by the game.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, second year player, first playoff game. He's going

0:04:55.440 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to have to be more impactful defensively because because the Rockets,

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>despite aim In Thompson not having his typical aim In

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Thompson esque impact on the defensive end, the Rockets will

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sign up for the Warriors scoring ninety five points in

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>every single game. It was the Warriors defense combined with

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets total inability to score that allowed the Warriors

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to control this game. And now on the Warriors side

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of things, credit where credit is due. Jimmy was excellent

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the ball again, twenty five seven, six,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>five steals, only one foul plus minus can be misleading

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in this instance, it wasn't plus fourteen in Jimmy's minutes

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and Steph after I think starting zero for three then

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point made eleven of his next twelve or

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven of his next thirteen, and just those backer Layton

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>shot clock, good defensive possession. The Warriors did a good job.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, the Rockets did a good job staying attached

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to Steph. These weren't practice shots by any means, and

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Steph made them pay anyway. If so, I know, I

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>game ones are tough because you don't want to underreact,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>but also you're you're prone to overreact. Steph and Jimmy

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>combining for fifty six points is something the Warriors will

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sign up for every game the rest of the series.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's great production. The fact that they combined for fifty

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>six and the rest of the Warriors combined for thirty

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>nine is something the Rockets will sign up for every

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>single game the rest of the series. And I think

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors only hitting twelve threes is not really going

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to be an out liar for this series because the

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Rockets are that good defensively. The question is can the

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Rockets find anybody who seems comfortable taking tough and big shots.

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's one other element that I haven't even discussed

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the biggest stories of the game, which

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Steven Adams minutes the only person on the

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Rockets with a positive plus minus. And again I'm not

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to lean too much on plus minus, but it

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>passed the eye test. When Adams was out there, he

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not only was the biggest player on the court, but

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>he looked even bigger than he actually is. So we'll

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>get to Steven Adams in a minute. The player for

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets that I would be looking at and saying, hmm,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>could he be a guy who does more for us

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this series is a guy who they took third in

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the draft a few years ago and has kind of

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>stayed the same level player since his rookie year. He's

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>been a thirteen and seven eight guy as a rookie,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's a thirteen to seven and seven or eight

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>guy as a third year player. And that's Jabari Smith.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Jabari Smith is six to ten guy that can shoot.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>When he was drafted that high, the hope was that

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>if he can develop his shot and again after being

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a thirty percent free throw or three point

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>shooter as a rookie, he's around thirty five percent. Could

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>he be Michael Porter Junior, worst jump shot, better defense,

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but a really tall guy who presents matchup problems who

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can hit threes. Again, Michael Porter Junior is probably a

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>bad comp because even in those same height, Porter Junior

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is a huge defensive liability and a great shooter. You

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>hope Jabari Smith can be a good defender and a

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>good shooter. But Jabari Smith in this game, the only

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>guy who's hitting all his free throws hit is three

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>shots from the field. H is won three. Can he

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit more? And the other question for

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets is Steven Adams, who is in this weird

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>place where he's in year thirteen, but he just turned

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty one. I think can Steven Adams play not just

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes, but thirty minutes? Because the Steven Adams minutes,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors look tiny and Quinton Post has nothing for him.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Quinton Posted out there just to shoot threes. The Warriors

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to play Looney. They have put Jonathan gaminga

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>totally on ice, and so can't Are the Rockets comfortable

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>playing a lot of minutes with the two bigs. Here's

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing, and this is the problem with losing game one.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>When you're the home team and you're the young team,

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to matter the long series adjustments if

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't respond in game two with a great shooting

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>performance and bounce back. Because what I do know is this,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>even though I think the Rockets are a better team

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>than the Warriors, they lose the first two at home,

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that series is over, and so they are. I would

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they are tiny favorites in game two, two point favorites.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>That is we do you know, silly must win on

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the TV show. That is definitionally a must win for

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets. I still think this is a seven game series.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>My faith in the Rockets being able to get to

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred points in a game seven, even in their

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>building wavering a little bit after that performance. Now, speaking

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of faith wavering, the game I was most excited for

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that was a good game for about a quarter and

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a half, and then an absolute route. Timberwolves won seventeen,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Lakers ninety five. Now some folks are going to say, well,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Timberwolves go twenty one to forty two from three nas

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Reed and Jaden McDaniel's combined for almost fifty, you're just

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose that game. That's not my analysis of it.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I wish that was my analysis of it. If a

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>team has an outlier shooting night and they barely beat you,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>or it's a close game like the Warriors did to

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the to the Lakers about three weeks ago, that one

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I can chalk up to. Okay, one team made shots,

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the other team did. That is not the game that

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw Saturday night, because yes, the Timberwolves had an

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>outlier shooting night, but they blew the Lakers out.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, the Lakers.

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Made a slight rally late like maybe are they going

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a game? The answer was no, they were

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to make it a game. And I said

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on Friday that I thought Anthony Edwards was going to

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>average thirty to a game in this series, because I

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>thought the Lakers were simply going to take their medicine,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to have matchup advantages. They would

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>stay home somewhat on shooters and say listen, aunt have

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>at it. But you're not going to beat us two

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>points at a time. That is not at all what

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they did, not even close. What they did they being

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers, was packed the paint what you expected, and

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>then also send help to Aunt who just sprayed the

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ball all around the court and it led to the

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Timbrels starting the game twenty one to forty from three

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>before the bench came in. The Lakers will lose if

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they keep that up. I think the Lakers are a

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>better team. I think that there are a lot of

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>pieces on the Lakers offense side we can get to.

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But the Lakers choosing because we don't have rim protection,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to leave shooters rather than because we don't

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have rim protection, we're just gonna take our medicine. If

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Edwards goes crazy, I think that is the wrong

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>fork in the road to take. I think that you

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>cannot let all of these Minnesota role players feel good

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on, be more engaged on defense because

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing the ball go through the hoop and approach

0:13:54.320 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it that way. I also think that the Timberwolves approach

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>defensively on Luca was a smart one, which was Luca,

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>if you get forty you get forty, you are not

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>going to generate a million open threes. And that's why

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Luca had thirty seven points and one assist. I thought, listen,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Luca was the one Laker who I thought played quite well.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think his defense killed him. The one assist

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was because things were not available. The idea that that

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Luca took other guys out of the game, I don't

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>buy that. So I and the Lakers got blown out

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in the non Luca minutes. They didn't do great in

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the Luca minutes, but then Luca's off the court for

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>eight minutes, they lose those. By god, I don't even know,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ten points in eight minutes. Like so that is Luca

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bears the least brunt of the blame here, but.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 2>They the Timberwolves.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Defensive approach to the Lakers needs to be more of

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers defensive approach to the Timberwls. Now, I understand

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if people are listening and they're like, well, the Timberwlves

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have Rudy Gobert and because of that they can stay

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>home with shooters today have a improtector.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand the Timbrels are expected to be a much

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>better defense than the Lakers, and they are a better

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>defense than the Lakers. I get that, but there needs

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a There needs to be an

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>adjustment in the Lakers defensive approach, and there also needs

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to be an adjustment on if you think Jackson Hayes

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is you know, I wouldn't necessarily change the starting lineup

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in Game two of the playoffs, but if he's only

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>playing eight minutes, there's not really much of a reason

0:15:58.760 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to play him any minutes.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And if you just want to start really small. The

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>one thing that grim Wolves.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Didn't do was take advantage of the lakers lack of

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>size by letting Gobert get involved on lobs or jump hooks,

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Gobert two shot attempts. They just wouldn't

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>pass him the ball. But Gobert was effective. He had

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>some good defense on Lebron Drives, some good defense on

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Luca Drives, and you give him credit. Now, am I

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>panicked if I'm the Lakers? No, I'm not panicked.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>And we did see and you know during the bubble, they.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Lost Game one to Portland, won the series in five,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>lost Game one to Houston, won the series in five.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They this does not feel like those series felt. But

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.359
<v Speaker 1>there are obvious adjustments. One is Lebron being more aggressive

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>from the opening tip. Now we've seen Lebron in Game ones,

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we know that that is not really his mo and

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he kind of got it going a bit in the

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>second quarter. But him being more aggressive early and the

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>other thing, and this is no shocker, Austin Reeves has

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to play better. Austin Reeves was the lakers worst defender

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and probably their worst offensive player, so none of that

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is gonna work. So everything bad that the Lakers could do,

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they did in this game, which is why they lost

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>by twenty. What I will tell you is the Timberwolves

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and they shouldn't be are not scared at all. And

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the Timberwolves and Anthony Edwards, a team that stared down

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant and Devin Buoker last year, and that stared

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>down Nikola jokicch and Jamal Murray last year and walked

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>them down into Game seven, are not intimidated by Luke

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lebron. I thought it was disappointing that the Lakers

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>were not able to attack Mike Conley Moore, and I

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>thought some of the Lakers' defensive disadvantages should have been

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>muted to a degree by the fact that they shouldn't

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have needed to guard Gobert because the Timbrels just wouldn't

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>give Gobert the ball. Now, another small silver lining for

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. If you think this, you know, if you're

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>not writing them off after game one playoff. Julius Randall

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>does appear to be here, had some dumbfouls, seemed to

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be in a weird machismo thing with Lebron, had a

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>half dozen turnovers, and yes, he hit his threes, but

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>not much else, And so that's something to watch for.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>How aggressive Lebron comes out to open game two is

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>something to watch for. And do the Lakers trim down

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hayes's eight minutes to even less.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that you really can.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's their plan, but I almost

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like it needs to be zero or it needs

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to be fifteen. But eight minutes doesn't make a hell

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of sense to me. So it's not

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>panic time for the Lakers. But you cannot chalk that

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>game up to add they were the Timberwolves were hot.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>There were bigger issues than that, and Lebron's got to

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be better. Austin's got to be way better. And any

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>game that Luke has one assist, Lakers are gonna lose.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And again, be clear, I don't I'm not putting the

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>blame on Luca there. But when the Timberwlves have twenty

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>nine assists and the Lakers have fifteen, that feels accurate.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>And typically the team with more assists might also have

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of turnovers because the balls popping around the court.

0:19:58.920 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't the case here.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Only had ten turnovers, and again Julius Randall had almost

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Everyone else who was handing the wall

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and Timbrelves did a great job. So Lakers got to

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>fix that quickly. And I think they have to adjust

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing defensively as far as listen, take your

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>medicine with Anthony Edwards. Don't let those shooters have I

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>think of their forty two to three point attempts, I

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think thirty five of them, maybe thirty seven of them

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>were open or wide open. All right, get to the

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>other games quickly, But let me remind you the NBA

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty two game grind is done. Now the real fun begins.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>NBA playoffs are here. It's time for high stakes drama,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>clutch moments, and jaw dropping plays. If you're looking to

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs even more exciting, Draftings Sportsbook as you

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>covered as an official sports betting partner of the NBA

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from the play in games all the way through to

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the finals. Now's the time to back your favorite players

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and teams as they chase glory All season long. Draft

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Gings has been the go to spot for NBA player

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>props and that doesn't stop now. Want to make your

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>playoff experience even more intense, try placing a bet on

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>your favorite player's performance. Will they drop thirty forty more?

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Your call? Ready to place your first bet, download the

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Draftings Sportsbook Gap. Now lock in your bets and let's

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>make this playoff run unforgettable, something special for first timers.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 2>New Draft Gings.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Customers bet five bucks to get two one hundred dollars

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets. Instantly make it a playoff run to remember.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>With DraftKings, download the DraftKings Sportsbook Gap and use code right.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's code right for new customers to get two hundred

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets when you bet just five bucks

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>only on DraftKings. The crown is yours gambling problem called

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred gambler. In New York, call eight seven

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to seven eight hope and why, or text hope and

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>why for six seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is available for problem gambling call eight eight eight seven

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>eight nine seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org.

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas twenty one plus age in eligibility varies by

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction Void voiden Ontario New customers only. Bonus bets expire

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For additional

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>terms responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot co slash audio. Okay,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so the other games Nuggets Clippers was a game it

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>felt like to me the Clippers needed to steal. And

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not steel as in they had been thoroughly outplayed.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It was far from that. But because that game was

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>in Denver, because you put forty plus minutes on Kawhi

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and Harden, I know it went to overtime, but that's

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>more damaging for them than I think for other teams

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>because just as you know the schedule works out, they

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they are they are playing tonight, so they don't get

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the two days off everyone, but you know, I shouldn't

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>say everyone, but half of these teams are going to

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>end up with multiple days off. Clippers Nuggets draw the

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>short straw on that one, which is more damaging because

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the game went to overtime and so you got the

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>full Russell Westbrook experience. I'm not breaking news on that

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he made the huge three. He also made some insane decisions,

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>including not getting a shot off late and that you know,

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as time expired in regulation, the driving to the basket

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on a critical possession when he just needed to pull

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it out. And he also took seventeen shots. If you're

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers, you are thrilled that he took seventeen shots.

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Thrilled.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you're the Clippers, I think you are preparing

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of Russell Westbrook out there because they

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>put Michael Porter Junior on ice in that game. I

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about the minutes minutes for the Clipper for the Nuggets,

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Gordon forty six, Jokis forty six, Murray forty eight, Brown

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>forty five. It was another way. The biggest winner of

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this weekend really was Oklahoma City, and they earned it.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>They they played a leisurely twenty minutes, annihilate the Grizzlies

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in historic fashion and get real evidence. Nuggets Clippers is

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be a war. They're gonna have a week

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>off before Round two starts, and these the Nuggets just

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>once you put Michael Porter Junior on ice because he

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have it. In some concerning comments from Joker after

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the game, I don't know he was talking about him

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or not where He's basically like, listen, if you're not ready,

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't if you're not. I don't want to misquote him,

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but the jokicch quote after the game about staying locked

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in or something seemed odd, and it seemed like it

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was maybe about Michael Porter Junior. You're gonna get a

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of Russell Westbrook. Now, his rebounding was excellent, his

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>energy was excellent. He made the huge three. But you're

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna live with Russ. You're gonna die with Russ. I

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>do like the Nuggets in this series. I said that

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>before the series, Clippers, if they could have stolen that

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one could have shifted a lot. I am curious at

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>altitude the legs of both of these teams, but notably

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Kawhi and Harden just forty eight hours after a forty

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>plus minute game. Jokicch and Murray have been playing these

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>forty plus minute playoff games forever. Gordon seems fine and

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian Brown's young. I think Russ, I'm sorry, I think

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>think that Kawhi and Harden are the guys to watch

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the I would imagine. I haven't looked at the line

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for this. Yeah, it's basically pick them Clippers by one.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I expect this to be a seven game war. Game

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>one going to overtime only confirm that the other. Listen,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>three of the games are totally irrelevant. The Grizzlies don't

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be there. The Magic put up a good fight.

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't say irrelevant, but the Magic put up a

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>good fight for a half. And then the inability to

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>score is gonna hurt you. Yes, I mean we had

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>three teams this weekend not break ninety, and the Grizzlies

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't break. They scored eighty and allowed one thirty one,

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the Magic, who had thirty seven second half points, and

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>then the Rockets. We talked about earlier scary moment with Tatum,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like his wrist is fine. Heat calves

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>going into the fourth, It's like, Oh, are the heat

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna make these guys work?

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>The answer was no. And then the Knicks.

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>After looking really shaky for the first three quarters, have

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their best run of the season, Garden on fire, Michale

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Bridges on the bench, something to watch, and they go

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty one to nothing. And the Pistons, who are thinking,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna steal a game when k doesn't even

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>play that well, the answer is no. I'm gonna be

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Knicks Pistons game tonight, at least I think

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I am. And we'll be back with the regular pod

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>with de Monsey Tuesday morning. We might do a bunch

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of these quick hitter kind of thirty minute bite sized

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>reaction pods after the great games or weekends of a

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>ton of games. Please like, rate, subscribe review that way

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you know when the extra pods come out. Thank you

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to Paul for work an extra for us, and see

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you guys Tuesday with Demonsey reacting to Game two of

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Clippers Nuggets, Game two of Pistons Nicks, and even deeper

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>dive on the Warriors, Rockets, and the Lakers Timberwolves.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>What's right