WEBVTT - What the Russian Revolution Can Teach Us About Bond Bubbles

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe. Wasn't all so Joe,

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think? Uh oh, I'm trying to remember now. It

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>must have been maybe four or six weeks ago. You

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>were away and I recorded an Odd Lots all by myself,

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and I felt really bad because it was a really

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>good episode. I think you would have enjoyed it. It

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was the one with mittwo Galate and we were talking

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about debt defaults. Yeah, Tracy, I was sad to have

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>missed that one. I mean, I don't think you should

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>feel bad per se that you did it alone without me,

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, it's sort of occasionally I'll do one solo,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you do one solo, we pick up for each other.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But I do like that topic a lot, and so yes,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had been part of it. Well. As

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>my personal gift to you, we are going to do

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a sort of Redux episode. We're not talking about defaults

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>or sovereign debt restructurings in general. We're going to talk

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>about one very very specific instance of a debt default.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's probably one of the most famous of

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>all time. It's certainly one of the biggest. In fact,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>depending on your definition of debt defaults and how you

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>actually measure it, it is the biggest one of all time?

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what it is? No, So I was

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say, this is really embarrassing to me because

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I know which one we're doing, And if someone had said,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the biggest sovereign debt default of all time?

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You say, oh, this is the most famous one. I

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if this one would have occurred to me.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm kind of embarrassed by the fact that I

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently didn't even know in advance what the most famous

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the category was. Yeah, I think most people would

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>probably you'd say Argentina, wouldn't you. I think you say,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are Yeah, I might have said Russia in the late nineties.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, okay, well that's closer. It is. It's Russia,

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's Russia in the early nineteen hundreds. So it's

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the famous uh nineteen eighteen repudiation of Russian debt once

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Revolution happened. And it's a really interesting moment

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in time in international finance because it touches on all

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>these themes that you and I like to talk about

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>one of them is bubbles, right, Russia issued an incredible

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of debt in the run up to nineteen eighteen,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>loads of people bought it, and then suddenly the whole

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>thing collapsed. But the other really interesting idea here is

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of notion of a safe asset that suddenly

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes not so safe. There's a moment in time when

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian sovereign debt was considered you know, really really pristine,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>almost like US treasuries today. And the other big theme

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>has to be the politicization of it, or the ideology

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>behind debt. And that's something that you and I have

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>touched on at one point or another, in fact, maybe

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>most recently with modern monetary theory. I'm I'm very excited

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about this for all of the reasons you laid out.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So who are we talking to? So today's Odd Lots

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>guest is Hassan Malik. He is the author of Bankers

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and Bolsheviks, International Finance and the Russian Revolution, and he

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is also an emerging markets hedge fund analysts. So, Hassan,

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on. Thanks guys, thanks

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for having me. So this book was a really, really

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>great read. I'm just wondering why did you decide to

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on this particular episode of international finance. It goes

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>back to my days working at an investment bank in

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Moscow and really living in the center of the Russian capital.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I was walking around every day and struck by the

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>degree to which banks from before the revolution are present

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the built environment in the city center, be it

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the Lubyanka which is the former headquarters of the KGB,

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>be its old bran bank branches that are repurposed as

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>modern retail or office space. And really, when I was

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in graduate school and studying financial history, what really struck

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>me as the degree to which this financial past of

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia was largely unremarked in the histories that we we

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>have of the of of that time period. Yeah, Tracy

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>lead in with, oh, this is the most famous debt

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>default of all time. So I'm glad that there's at

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>least some people who have, you know, forgotten about this

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>period who I imagine, like me, this episode would not

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have been top of mind when thinking about debt default.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to the default, obviously, what was

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it about Russia at the time that caused so much

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>money to pour into their and for their government bonds

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as you know, a relative safe haven asset.

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So Russia was in many ways the emerging market boom

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>story of the time. The Russian government was actively tapping

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the international bond market to build up gold reserves so

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that it could go on to the goal standard, and

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>also to help finance and industrialization drive, led principally by

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the railroad industry. It really was, in many ways, not

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>unlike China today, both a massive player in the emerging

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>markets markets finance story, as well as a geopolitically speaking,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a great power at the center of European and indeed

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>global power politics. Right. So you mentioned the geopolitical aspect

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of all of this. Talk to us about who exactly

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was buying the debt that Russia was selling, because you know,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's an emerging market play, lots of people want

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 1>a piece of that. But you talk a lot about

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the political dimension of the foreign investors who were basically

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>funding the Russian government at this point. Right. So, basically

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>what was happening at the time was Germany was rising,

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and this was a story that was complicating the European

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>balance of power in diplomatic and geopolitical terms. Now, at

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, France had the highest savings rate in Europe,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and France was threatened by a rising Germany, which had

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>had fought a war with in the late nineteenth century.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Russia in in similar Vein was eyeing what was happening

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in Germany with some concern in various circles of the

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Russian government. And so this is really what under scored

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>uh not only a diplomatic but a financial alliance between

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the Russian and French governments. And ultimately what this led

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to was a huge amount of retail money moving into

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Russian bonds that were perceived at the time to be

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>very safe, investment grade assets. And so that's in some

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>ways one of the big contrasts with the present day

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets boom, insofar as it was really French individual

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>savers and then over time their counterparts in Britain and

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere in the West, that we're investing in Russian government

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>and corporate securities over the course of the late nineteenth

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and early twentieth centuries. I'm something that I'm interested in

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of government debt just or just this

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of safe haven assets. It always kind of feels

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>modern to me. And I think about the U. S

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Treasury market, and there's all kinds of very good reasons

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>why we price everything or so many bonds, whether it's

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a foreign debt or private credit markets, there's a spread

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to US treasuries and that's a common way to sort

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of measure the perceived risky nous of any other asset class.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>When did this concept of safe haven assets emerge? And

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinking back to retail investors in the early

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the twentieth century, when did these ideas like

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>start to form about what was safe asset and how

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>much part of one's portfolio one might want to allocate

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to them. Well, it's it's a great question, and it's

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental to kind of this this story of the Russian

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and other emerging markets booms. I suppose it goes back

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to the first times people started thinking about investing outside

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their own home markets. And in that sense, as emerging

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>markets deepened in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a hierarchy began to form of which markets were perceived

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as riskier versus those which were perceived as closer to home,

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>both physically and in terms of a risk profile. And

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, Russia was very much seen as a

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote European great power country. It wasn't seen as

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>some semi colonial domain out in Asia or Africa. It

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.599
<v Speaker 1>was seen very close both physically and in terms of

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the risk profile to core European economies such as Britain,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>France or Germany. So there are all these characters in

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>your book that are strategically fueling what's eventually going to

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>become a Russian debt bubble. On the Russia side, there's

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>a relatively well known finance minister, and then there are

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>all these i guess lesser known bankers from London and

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Paris who are sort of deployed to start making these investments.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the actual people, you call them gatekeepers,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the gatekeepers to Russian debt investment. Yeah. So this is

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a concept that I borrowed from a scholar and sovereign

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>debt by the name of Mark Flandre, and I think

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he very aptly described the way capital markets worked, both

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the past and the present. That is, even though

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>you have debtors and and savers, the process of channeling

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>those flows of capital happens, of course through the banks

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and the bankers and the and the investment managers that

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are present both in current markets as well as in

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the past. And that to me was a very interesting

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>nexus of people because they were ultimately individuals with all

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the biases and the prejudices and the imperfections of of

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of individual human beings. And that's really why I wrote

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this as a as a history book, as a story

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of people trying to feel their way through very difficult

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and imperfect markets at at really a pivotal moment in

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>world history. So one of the things that comes out,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, is the degree to which national biases and

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>patriotism at a time of geopolitical tension and ultimately war,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fed through to investment decision making, and how this wasn't

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just a story of clinical analyzes of of balance sheets

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or of macroeconomic accounts, but rather also of humans trying

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>to think their way through very confusing and fuzzy market environments.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You talk about these gatekeepers, but what specifically were the

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>decisions that they made that we're so pivotal in getting

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>flow funds to Russia. So there were several um In

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one instance in early nineteen o six, when the Russian

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>government was really on the ropes financially aking, and on

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the verge of having to suspend convertibility of of rubles

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>into gold, the bankers stepped in with a very key loan,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>which at the time was the largest ever recorded in history.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And this really happens because of two bankers, in particular

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in Paris and London respectively, who had cultivated relations with

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Russian finance Ministry, which the ministry levered to great

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>effects in nine six. Another example is the opening of

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the first branch of what is now City Group in

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Russia in early nineteen seventeen, the very year of the revolution.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>And again reading the correspondence that the bank had internally,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very evident that this was a decision that came

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to a large part because of the man on the

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ground and his feelings about Russia and its prospects, not

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>only long term, but because of a sense of almost

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>responsibility on the part of the US towards Russia and

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on the part of an American businessman to words his

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Russian counterparts at a time of war. Yeah, I love

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that anecdote because it's just amazing to think that City

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>was opening a branch on the eve of the Russian Revolution.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>On that note, you know, you just mentioned the loan

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that basically saved Russia in nineteen o five or nineteen

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>o six. Why did investors hold on for so long

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and why didn't they push the Czarist government for more

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>reform after they extended that loan. It's a great question,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's got a very complicated dynamic behind it. In

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>one sense, there were conflicting arguments both in favor of

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and against extending loans. One argument, of course, is it's

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>an anti democratic government and supporting them will just encourage

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior, and other arguments counter to that was that

0:12:55.360 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>actually engagement is how one pushed development and ultimately a

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>better direction in Russian policymaking. The other story, of course here,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and this is where the gatekeepers were not just bankers

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but also ministry officials in Russia itself, was that the

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Russian government became very adept at leveraging the exposure that

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>foreign governments and banks had to the Russian economy to

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>great effects. So by the time the nineteen o six

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>loan came up for discussion, the French had already invested

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>so significantly into Russia that it really becomes a question

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>of whether it was the creditors that had more power

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>over the debtor or vice versa. I love Tracy's question

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>about why didn't the investors in these bonds pushed more

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>reform because it seems like such a modern question, And

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm imagining like all the same reform talk we hear

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>about in E M these days, about like like with

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the I M F. Yeah, and you know, cutting pension

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>obligations and privatizing state owned power plants and all these

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>things that constitute reform these days. What does that mean though,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Like what were the things that would have constituted reform

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the early nine hundred, Like, what was it? What

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>were the equivalent of those things? Well, it's funny you

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you make the comparison with today, because in many ways,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the discussion points were very similar. The

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>same things that we think about as problematic in Russia

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>today and that are often ascribed to the Soviet past.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Things like corruption, bureaucracy, rule of law issues were things

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that investors at the time we're talking about in Russia

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the Czaris regime. And indeed, at the time,

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>as we got closer to nineteen seventeen, there was such

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a frustration in foreign investment circles with Bizarus regime on

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly these points, rule of law, bureaucracy, inefficient policy making,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that there was almost a pining for some sort of change,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and in some circles even an attraction towards the revolutionaries

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because they promised something different. So in in the build

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>up to nineteen seventeen, nine eighteen, what were the signs

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that trouble was brewing in the Russian debt market? What

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>were the signs that the bubble was going to burst? Well,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because when the war breaks out in nineteen fourteen,

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there's actually kind of a rally in the Russian economy

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and financial markets, and this is partly because it kicked

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>off an industrial boom because of wartime production increases and whatnot.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And so really the first couple of years of the war,

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you see the spreads the that is, the yields on

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Russian government bonds relative to the the investment grade benchmark,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>which was British treasuries at the time, shrink to multi

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>year and even multi decade lows in just weeks and

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>months before the the wheel really came off in Russia.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And eventually what you started to see worth indicators in

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the real economies start to turn over. If you look

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at the primary market data from when the Russian government

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was issuing new bonds into the market despite their attempts

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at financial repression, you start to see more onerous terms

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that the debt markets are inflicting on the on the

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Russian government. But really, until very very quite late in

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the game, bond market participants weren't really showing signs of alarm.

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one of the things that I was shocked

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>by was that even after the moment of default, when

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the yields explode, they explode quite dramatically, But when you

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>compare them to relatively recent defaults that had happened in

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the time and in Argentina and Greece, the spreads hadn't

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>been blown out to those levels, which indicated to me

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that investors still held out more hope in Russia even

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>after the communists takeover than they had held out in

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Greece and Argentina in the late nineteenth century. It is

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty remarkable I think back, you know, to some of

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these more recent defaults. Like obviously, people, you know, we

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>recognize the various political things that go on in these

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>countries that precede the default, but there's a lot of

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>focus still despite that, on sort of pure attempts to

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>quantify debt sustainability within any of these countries, and they

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>fixate on, you know, debt to GDP and primary surpluses

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>or primary deficits or cyclically adjusted surpluses, these sort of

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>attempts to, yeah, just put into numbers how sustainable a

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>country's debt is. And I'm always sort of skeptical about

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the value of those numbers in the modern situation. But

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, like what the tensions and the lead up

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Russian default tells us about what indicators are

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>actually of any use when trying to assess that the

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>end game is NI. Yeah, that's that's a great question.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean. One of the things that is different from

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in the past key versus today, is at the time,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomic accounts were both simpler and different in terms

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of what investors would look at. So, for example, they

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have access to statistics like GDP because they weren't

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>really thought of in those terms back then. What they

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>did look at, not unlike today, are things like export

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers and and a rough proxy for the current account

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>position in a country. There was a consciousness about the

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>level of debt, both in in absolute terms and in

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>relative terms. But I have to say the Russian finance

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>ministry did a good number by shifting the the accounting

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>around such that they created two different budgets, an ordinary

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote budget and extraordinary budget. And there was a

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>lively debate in investment circles about which numbers investors should

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be looking at. And also another complicating factor was at

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the time of war, investors that may have looked at

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>hard nosed analyzes of raw numbers started also including in

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>their thinking things like Russia's alliance with the West at

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the time of the war and the long term prospects

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of Russia, saying that even if right now things look

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>rather stressed over the next hundred years, say, Russia still

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>has a good future ahead of it, which brings to

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to mind the saying that every long term investment is

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>really a speculation gone bad. It's almost like an intangible

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>asset for a company, right you're sort of factoring the

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of I guess, like aura around the country. Okay,

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So Hassan talked to us about the moment of debt repudiation.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're building up to nineteen eighteen. What was

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the decision making process that went into, ultimately the decision

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to just repudiate all the debt that had been issued

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>under the Czar's government. So one of the things that

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>really struck me when I was reading through all the

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>archival material on this was the degree to which this

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>was a a very complicated decision. There is a tendency

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in the histories that have come out on this period

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to just write this off as of course the Communists

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>came in and of course they defaulted. In reality, it

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was a very complicated decision because, yes, the communists hated

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the bankers and the financiers and the capitalists, but there

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>were also some so there was, you know, this ideological

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>backdrop to it, but there was also some very practical considerations.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things was the revolutionaries basically had

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>their support in urban centers, and many of them were

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>really not representative of Russia as a whole, which was

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>still a very agrarian country. So coming in and talking

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>about repudiating the debts was a very shrewd way of

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>building support amongst the peasantry, which had run up mortgage

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>debts in the process of land reform that had preceded

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 1>the revolution. There's also the counter factual situation, which is

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that if the Bolshevik Revolution had not succeeded in late

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventeen, and there's plenty of reason to argue that

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it could not have succeeded in a different scenario because

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it was such a closely run thing. You have to

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself what would a different government have done. And

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the arguments that I make in the book

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is that if you look at the numbers, and if

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at the situation and how badly the Russian

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>economy had started to perform by late nineteen seventeen, that

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>even a more pro western, even a more liberal government

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time, would have had to default. And so it's, yes,

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>partly a story of this ideology, but partly it's also

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a story of practicality. And the other thing that I

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>would say is that at the time that the Bolshicks

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>came in, they really inherited the keys to essentially the

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>largest country on Earth, and they were so taken up

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>by the mechanics of running this large country that it

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.479
<v Speaker 1>took quite some time. Took a number of weeks before

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they were actually able to issue a decree repudiating the

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>debts which also created its own levels of confusion and

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and and uncertainty in the market. I know we talked

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>about how big this was, but what are the numbers, like,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>how big was Russia, you know, in terms of the

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>nominal amount of outstanding debt and how much of a

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>slice of the credit markets or sovereign bond market were

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>they at the time? Right, so they were the largest

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>international debtor on a net basis on the eve of

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the war. The US was larger on a growth basis,

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>but they would then re export a lot of the

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>capital elsewhere in frankly and emerging markets. If you look

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at default in roughly contemporary terms and sort of late

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of dollars, you're looking at at a default size

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that can easily be put at three billion dollars. But really,

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>given the size of Russia's economy and given the size

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the debt at the time, if you translated to

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>some other inflation metrics, you could easily make the argument

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that this was on the scale of a trillion dollar default,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>which underscores the gap between Russia nineteen eighteen and Greece

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and Argentina more recently. What were then the knock on

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>effect for the bag holders, so to speak, because even

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>with Greece, which was, you know, so much smaller, there

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are all these fears about contagion throughout the entire financial system,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and that the system couldn't handle an outright Greek default.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>What happened with the holders and who bore the brunt

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of it? Well, really, this is one of the tragic stories,

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is that a lot of the people that got hit

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>by this were ordinary savers in the West. I mean

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>when I when I talked to my French colleagues in

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets today, many of them have stories of grandparents

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and great grandparents who are rendered destitute by the default.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>There's to this day internet for a of descendants of

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>French bond holders that are still demanding restitution. There were

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a series of deals that were done, so in one

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>deal that was consummated in six bondholders essentially got four

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar um. None of this was inflation adjusted,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and so really it was a story of individuals that

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>lost out rather than the big institutions. And of course

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sufferers were people in Russia themselves, who entered

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this sort of monetary twilight zone of a collapsing real

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>economy and hyper inflation. So, Hassan, what's the big takeaway

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for emerging market debt? Can you say that all bonds

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are all debt is political or ideological or is that

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>just exacerbated with this particular example in financial history because

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about you know, Bolsheviks versus capitalists. Basically, well,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you're you hit the nail on the head

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and in talking about the political dimension, and that I

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think is the key takeaway is that all debt is

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately political. In fact, some historians have talked about debt

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>markets being the crucible of of democracy in history really

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>around the world. I think the lesson that I took

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>away as as from an investment standpoint is that as

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>important as the hard numbers analysis, thinking about balance of

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>payments and GDP growth trajectories and whatnot, are the political

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>dimension is so crucial, and in particular in emerging markets.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Investing is not something that happens in a vacuum. It's

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not just a clinical scientific process. When one is deploying

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>capital in an emerging market, one is often taking, whether

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>explicitly or implicitly, um sides in a in a political spectrum,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's very important to be conscious of what those

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>investments represent in that context. I'm afraid we're going to

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>have to leave it there. But that was a really

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>fascinating conversation that was Hasan Malik, the author of Bankers

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and Bolsheviks, thank you so much for coming on. Thank you,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. Yea so Joe. I really

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that conversation, and I hope you did too. Oh,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I love that conversation. The first thing we have to

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>do is find one of these people that still holds

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>some pre revolution Russian debt and do it a follow

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>up episode on the ongoing legal fight to get remuneration

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that we have to do that. Hassan actually mentions this

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in the book, but there are internet forums for French

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>holders of Russian debt still to this day. It's amazing.

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>There's gotta be like some lawyer involved with it. So

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>let's let's try to book that person. Seriously. Yeah, But

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the reason I found that whole conversation so interesting is because,

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned in the intro, it touches on a

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>number of things that that you and I like to

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about, such as when bubbles burst and what the

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of turning point or warning signs are. But I

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think Hassan also does a really good job of talking

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about the sort of individual and personal decisions that go

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>into fueling, in this case, a sovereign debt bubble. Yeah, totally.

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think, you know, this is something that

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I know I talk about a lot, We've brought up

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but you know, we tend to just see

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all these assets as prices on the screen, you know,

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>even with the debt today. But it's important to remember

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's like our actual human beings who have to

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>make the decision to invest in something, or human being

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>who has to go out and make the sales pitch.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And we still have that where we have you know,

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>finance minister of some country will come to New York

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and meet with investors and explain why they should invest.

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And so understanding that a country is more than just

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the sum of its statistical parts, but that people actually

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>have to go out and flog this stuff and make

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>decisions and make deals is sort of an essential element

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to this. And just in general, I always love when

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we talk about stories that remind us how things that

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we think of as sort of modern and finance really

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't that modern. So the idea of allocation to uh

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>safe haven assets, or thinking about the spread of Russian

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>debt to uh great a British debt at the time,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>just sort of all these things that feel extremely modern

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>but have been around forever. Absolutely. So one other thing

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it really reminds you of is the sort of idea

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of weaponizing debt as well. So, you know, bankers obviously

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>go into a country and they're trying to make investments

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and make some money, but a lot of what went

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on with Russia took place among Russian politicians, who either

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>use the debt to fund their various expansion plans, or

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the Bolsheviks, they basically weaponized debt

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>by undermining the provisional government's attempts to sell it domestically.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're all these sort of push and pull factors

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that are just really really interesting. And I don't think

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right. We don't think about that enough. You know,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect, it seems hard to believe, But I love

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that detail about how even after they came to power,

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there was still like a fair amount of confidence among

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the dead holders that that it would be okay, and

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that spreads hadn't really winded that much. By historical standards,

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it seems absurd in retrospect that would

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have been the case, but it's just how you never know,

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was still worthwhile opening a city branch in Moscow.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway, and also like to send a thank you

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to our Bloomberg colleague who suggested we interview Hassan. That's

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Gregor Stewart Hunter. You can follow him on Twitter at

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Gregor Hunter. And I'm Joe Why Isn't All? You can

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart, and you should

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely follow our guests on Twitter. Hassan Mollett, He's at

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>h Malik h and be sure to follow our producers

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Toe for Foreheads He's at forehas T and Laura Carlson.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>She's at Laura M. Carlson. And don't forget to follow

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levy at Francesca Goodey.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.