WEBVTT - Why Are Noncompete Agreements So Common?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of iHeart Radio. Pay brain

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Lauren bog Obam Here. If you're working for a

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>company that you don't like and decide to go work

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for its competitor instead, will that first company come after

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you for switching jobs? That can depend on whether you

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>signed a noncompete agreement. A noncompete agreement is a type

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of contract that prevents an employee from working for a

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>competitor within months or even years after leaving a particular company.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>In other words, non compete clauses are designed to protect

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>an employer against workers taking their talents and trade secrets

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to the competition. That might make sense for high paid

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>corporate executives, TV anchors or tech workers whose sudden departure

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to the competition would pose a real threat. But the

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>wild thing about non compete agreements is that American employers

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have asked all types of workers at all age levels,

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>design them home health workers, sandwich shop employees, even dog walkers.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>According to data published in the Journal of Law and Economics,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>around one in five American workers are bound by a

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>noncompete agreement. For the article this episode is based on

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Spoke with study co author Evans Starr,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>an assistant professor of Management and organization at the Robert H.

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland. He said,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll find noncompete agreements in every corner of the US

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>labor market. They're being signed by interns, minimum wage workers,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>even volunteers for nonprofits in states like California that won't

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>even enforce noncompete agreements. According to STARS Research, nearly of

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the eleven thousand, five hundred and five U S workers

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that he surveyed have signed a noncompete agreement at some

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>point in their careers, and eight are currently bound by one.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That includes one third of workers earning forty dollars a

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>year or less. Another study by the Economic Policy Institute

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>found that tent of employers paying less than thirteen dollars

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>an hour required their workers to sign noncompete agreements. Of

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the folks in the top earning tier of their study,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>those making fifty and above, thirty six point five percent

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>had signed noncompetes. So do noncompete agreements serve a legitimate purpose?

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>The classic argument in favor of noncompete agreements is that

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they take some of the risk out of hiring and

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>training new employees. Companies invest time and resources in training

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>their workers, and part of that training includes sharing inside information,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe even trade secrets, about how the companies do business.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Starr said, if the worker is allowed to walk across

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the street and join a competitor, then that puts the

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>firm at a competitive disadvantage. The company had to create

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that information and spend lots of money developing it. Another

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>argue in favor of noncompete clauses is that workers aren't

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>technically forced to sign them. They can be negotiated as

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the overall employment contract. If a worker feels

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>like they're giving up too much by signing an oncompete clause,

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they can ask for a higher salary or walk away.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>In reality, though, very few people are in a position

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate, or perhaps they don't consider it a hill

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>worth dying on, and Starr said less than ten percent

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of workers negotiate over their noncompete agreement. More than five

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, when a worker is presented with

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a noncompete agreement, they simply sign it. If you're one

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of the millions of Americans who have signed noncompete and

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you might assume that very few of these contracts are

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ever enforced, companies would only go after the big fish right.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>A Wall Street Journal analysis found that non compete lawsuits

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>increased by six from two thousand to A star said,

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there are about a thousand non compete lawsuits a year,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find all sorts of workers that you'd never

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>expect to be in the legal record. Consider the home

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>health aid who was sued by his Pittsburgh based agency

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>when he tried to leave and work for a rival company.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Or the famous case of the janitor who was sued

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>by her billion dollar employer Kushman in Wakefield when she

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>tried to work for arrival cleaning business. Of the company

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>dropped the case after a public outcry. Relatively few noncompete

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits ever go to court, though the very existence of

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>these agreements is usually enough to intimidate workers, whether you're

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>a janitor or a manager, from leaving for a better

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>paid job with the competition. They often use broad language,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>not just prohibiting employees from going to a competitor, but

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>stipulating that the employee will have to pay the company's

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>legal fees should the case go to court. Often, threatening

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>letters from a company's lawyers stop employees before a case

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>gets that far, but if it does go to court,

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>judges generally stick to the janitor rule when determining the

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>enforceability of a noncompete agreement. A contract is unenforceable if

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's so broad that it prevents a worker from taking

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>any job with a competitor, including a janitor. A Star

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>argues that noncompete agreements are not only bad for the

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>workers who signed them, but also for the entire US

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>labor market, employers included. He said, Let's say that in

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain market, sector of the workers are bound by

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>noncompete agreement. If you're a firm trying to fill a position,

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really hard to hire an experienced

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>worker because everybody is bound by noncompete agreements. The Star's

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>research shows that noncompete agreements come up the labor market,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>driving down wages, slowing the hiring process, and making it

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>less likely for workers not signing a noncompete to receive

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a job offer. As of right now, various types of

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>noncompete agreements are enforceable in forty states. Only California, North Dakota,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and Oklahoma have outlawed noncompetes for all workers. A handful

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of other states like Maryland have also banned noncompete agreements

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>for low wage workers, but in early July, President Joe

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden signed an executive order calling on the Federal Trade Commission,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>or FTC, to ban or limit the use of noncompete

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>agreements in employee contracts. The FTC now has to consider

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>how aggressively it wants to take this issue on. It

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>could ban non competes from being used in low wage jobs,

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>which some states have done, or it could impose rules

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to make the process more transparent. For example, lots of

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>workers are asked to sign noncompete agreements on their very

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>first day on the job, when they've already negotiated their

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pay and benefits. The FTC could require early notice for

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>such agreements. Star believes that in most cases, non competes

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessary at all. If a company really wants to

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>protect its trade secrets, then it can have workers sign

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>non disclosure agreements or n d as. If a business

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to protect its investment in clients, then it can

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have workers sign and non solicitation agreement, which would forbidden

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>employee from soliciting customers of the business they just left

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>for a certain period of time. Four job sectors that

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>require months or years of training. There are even contracts

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that require a worker to pay back a portion of

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>their training costs if they leave within two years. Starr said.

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The key difference is that all of those other agreements

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are directly tied to the interest that the business is

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect, but unlike noncompete agreements, they don't restrict

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>where workers can go. Today's episode is based on the

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>article non compete agreements target janitors as well as vps,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But why? On how stuff works dot Com written by

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Dave Rhodes. Brain Stuff is production of iHeart Radio in

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>partnership with how stuff Works dot Com, and it is

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>produced by Tyler Clang. Four more podcasts for my heart Radio,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.