WEBVTT - Tariffs, Take Three: The Dumbest Round Yet | Off the Clock

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I'd mind most about the president

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is there are traditional nineteen sixties forms of masculinity, but

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a bloke who's really willing to look at

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>another man and say, I think you're handsome.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>You're beautiful, Yeah, you're beautiful of that.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The work week may be over, but the economy

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it never takes time off. I'm justin Wolpher's and this

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is off the clock unwinding the week's economic years. There's

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>no one I would rather do it with than my

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>good friend, superstar economic journalist Stacy Vanix Smith.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Justin. I'm very excited to be here with

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>you once again. I am a calmnist of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>co host of the podcast Everybody's Business, and as always,

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>extremely thrilled to be here with you talking economics on

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>a Friday.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>What else we could do at the end of the week,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he so, what are we gonna do? We're going to

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>pick through the recent economic years and we're here to

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>tell the folks at home what you should actually be

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about, what you can safely ignore, and maybe along

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the way we can find some silver linings. Stacey, We've

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>got to packed episode, so strap in. We're gonna start

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>off with the latest round of tariffs. And forgive me

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>if you think you've heard this episode before, it's actually

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a new episode. It's a different round of tariffs. We

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>can talk about what makes them different, what makes them

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>more of the same, why maybe these are going to

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>stick around, And we're going to dig into the FED.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go and talk to Handsome Kevin and

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>see how he's doing over there, and then we'll get

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>back to the most recent GDP numbers. GDP stands for

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>gross domestic product, not gus d platypus. These numbers came

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>out on Thursday, so huge week for economics. What do

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you reckon?

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Stacy, Absolutely, and don't forget Justin. At the very end

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of the show, we're going to have a little bit

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of a competition. It's chart versus chart. I don't know

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>what possessed me to say yes to this, since you're

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>an economist, you spent all day looking at charts. But

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I said yesterday and I think I'm gonna win. I

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 2>think I have the chart to end all charts.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the thing is chat versus chat. White for

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this that wrongs with art versus art because a good

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>chat is art. You have the comparative literature genius. You

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have that entire rights out of the brin so I

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>reckon you have you thought about your colors?

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>My color is like the color of the chart, Yeah,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the art of the chart. Yes, and I stand by

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the color that I chose.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, so minoring a platypos economics theme.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, mine are in the theme of the that the

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 2>government put them in. But I still stand by the

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>right and beige.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic. Let's get into it. Tell me Number one.

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Tariffs all right, justin So, Okay, a lot has happened

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>with tariffs since we last talked. I know you've done

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of videos about this already, and I'm very

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>excited to kind of break things down with you a

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit. I was wondering if kind before we dive

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>into this, you can kind of lay out what is

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>going on with this leadst round of tariffs, as well

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>as also the kind of the Canada specific tariffs that

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>also happened. Can you kind of just get us up

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>to speed economically speaking?

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So to folks at home, strap in, because there's

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on, all of it highly informed after

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>decades of careful research by one of the most thoughtful

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>administrations in our nation's history. Stacy, do you guys have

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>sarcasm in Idaho?

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, Idaho is a more of an earnest place, Okay,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and I have often been accused of being too earnest,

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>But I live in New York, where sarcasm is just

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the you know.

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give it the Idaho treatment. We have

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>had two sets of tariffs by an administration that has

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>an approach that it believes in, and if at first

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't succeed, try try again. And so I feel

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like President Trump has been talking with your father, and

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so after his first round of tariffs has ruled unconstitutionally,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>came back with a second round of tariffs that actually

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just hit its xpery date. And now we're up to

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the third round. And I'm sure your father, being a

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>true American, hates Canadians, and so he's got an extra

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>round of tariffs to just really have a go with

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>those terrible people north of our border.

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Definitely does not heed Canadians. I forgot Comedians.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I just went back to sarcasm again. I'm not very

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>good at earn all right, Okay, let me try and

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>explain what's going on. The starting point is two starting points.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>The president loves tariffs, he has a theory about why,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Constitution says that the Congress owns tariffs. So

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that is if the Constitution says you've

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>got to go to Congress, there's actually, by the way,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not a problem, a very nice opportunity. And this

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>is Idaho earnest where he could just go to the

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress and he could say, I've got a really good idea,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>why don't we have tariffs, and they'd pass a law

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and then we'd have the tariffs that have gone through

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this system of government, and there'd be checks and balances,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and our related politicians would all weigh in. I'm just

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a bill from Capitol Hill. Can you sing that for me, Stacy?

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean no, but I know the song said you

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>can't do that to people.

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a bill, bill from on Capitol Hill, and

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't grow up at America, so I don't know the rest. Okay,

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what he could do, but he doesn't like that

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't like bills, doesn't like Capitol Hill, or

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't like him. So what he needs to do

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>is he needs to find a time in the past

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where Congress has said said, you know what, we want

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to give the White House this power of a Tariff's

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>first attempt was to say it's an emergency. But the

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>emergency powers that didn't use the word tariff, and there's

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>not an emergency. The Supreme Court said all of those

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>first deliberation day tarifts for illegal were paying them back.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Then.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>He says, we're in the middle of a balance of

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>payments crisis. Hey, fun fact, the United States the balance

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of payments right now is zero dollars. It's been zero

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars for many decades in a row. The balance of

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>payments always balances when your currency floats. That's one for

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the one for the textbooks right there. Anyway, that was

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a power that says he's allowed to impose tariffs for

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>six months. The sixth, the last day came up, and

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, he discovered and I'm now going

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of Brooklyn sarcastic if I may, he

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>discovered a deep or maybe I'm being Odaho Earnest, a

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>deep and abiding passion for the worlds oppressed people around

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the world who are enslaved in forced labor, situations, and

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing the President cares more about than that. What

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he is discovered is that there's a power where if

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the United States faces some form of unfair competition, he

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>can levy tariffs. So here's the theory of the case.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>We're now putting tariffs on Australia, on Canada, on the

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom, on every country, on eighty countries around the

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>world based on this forced labor. Now, no one is

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>saying Australia has forced labor, which is good because we don't.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>What they're saying is Australia is a bit sloppy and

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>might sometimes import some goods that involve forced labor, and

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>then they might export those to America, and it's unfair

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that American workers have to compete with Australia, which might

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>accidentally occasionally use forced labor. By the way, it doesn't

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>look here's the real problem. When a grape comes across

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.559
<v Speaker 1>a border, it doesn't actually say produced with forced labor

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on it, and so it's very hard to figure out

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Okay, So then the President has put

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>tariff's on eighty countries based on the theory that they're

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit sloppy and policing forced labor. It's great that

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he does that. What this It's transparently obvious that this

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is not actually about forced labor. Almost every country faces

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the same tariff of ten percent, some get ten percent

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>or towven half percent. The difference is if you're less

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sloppy on forced labor, it's a very small incentive to

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>actually care about the issue at all. So that's now

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in place. Surprising by the way it a place to

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty countries, you might say eighty what's going on there?

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Or slightly over eight sixty economies when you include all

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the euear that's going to be eighty something. You

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>might say, way, only eighty something one of all the

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>world's countries. Will They discovered with Liberation Day that if

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they try and list all the countries, sometimes they make mistakes,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Herd and McDonald Islands home to penguins, which

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they put very severe tariffs on home literally only to penguins.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And so by.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Focus, I feel like the penguins had it come.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>In they did. Son's a bitches always trying to outdress

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the president, miss business casual and what is a penguin

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>where they think.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>They are in tuxedos. Of Yeah, that's very funny, Ustards.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're at. Now here's the weird thing. It

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:04.599
<v Speaker 1>might actually be legal because not a lawyer. Basically, the

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>law says you have to find evidence of unfair competition.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So then what you do is you open an investigation

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and you investigate. And you'll be very surprised that when

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>President trumpass Howard Lutnik in the Department of Commerce and

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the US Trade Representative to investigate whether something he hopes

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>is true is true, they come back and say it's true.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But the courts tend to give that a great deal

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of difference. They think, well, presidents wouldn't just make things up.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>They do very serious investigations. So it's very likely that

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>these will turn out to be legal. So all of

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this very long story, they say, we used to have

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>tariffs around about ten percent. We now have tariffs around

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent. How excited are you about that, Stacey?

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting. I mean, it's interesting that there's been

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 2>so much movement to stay the same. It's like a duck,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like sort of sitting on the surface.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 2>It's like the one constant is that we have tariffs

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and that the sort of feet underneath the surface or

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the reason for the tariffs. It's really interesting that it's

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of the result its results oriented and not process oriented.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 2>It's also interesting to sort of hear it from this

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>perspective because I hadn't actually really thought about it from

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 2>this way. But it's just like, I want to put

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 2>tariffs in please by any means that I need.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>To, you know, And I think that's a critical part

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of the economics of this. So the President actually had

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>a theory of the case. The theory of the case

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to be I'm going to use tariffs as leverage,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what he did with Liberation Day. He would

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>point at the Brits and you say, here's the tariff

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>coming for you. There's any one way to get out

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of this, and that's to come and kiss the ring

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and offer me some concessions. They pretended they came to

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a deal. They didn't.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 3>Really.

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a different story for a different day. But that

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was the idea. Now here's the thing. These tariffs come

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out of an investigation. The investigation have found every country

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>except America is a bit sloppy when it comes to

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>forced labor. Now, when President Trump called the British Prime Minister.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's a different blowke answering the phone now.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But secondly, he can't point at him and say, unless

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you do a bunch of favors for me, this is

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>your tariff. These are basically uniform tariffs and they're based

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on this false idea, which means the President now has

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>no when to be clear about that, no leverage against

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>any individual country. So what's happened is the President says

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I want tariff stumps his feet, tells his lawyers to

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>get them for him, and they got them for him,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but they're not the ones that actually do the job

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do, which is a rather way of saying,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I know this is going to be studying. This is

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the dumbest set of tariff yet.

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait, he can't individualize them.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Nope, why not because it's based on a legal foundation.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>The legal foundation is unfair competition from this particular country,

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and that legal foundation comes from the Commerce Department. Having

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>done an investigation and having found that every country is

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>bad on forced life.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't you say, like, oh, as it turns out the

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 2>UK isn't as bad as we thought, but Australia is

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>still super terrible, So we can keep Australia's tarif simply

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>and und So.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>At some point you might hope that the lawyers. This

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is where I'm glad I don't have a law degree,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because then i'd be a lawyer, but one might be

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>required at this point that you're absolutely right. There must

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be some way that you could pretend your whole way there.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But as far as I can tell, he doesn't really.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>At some point the courts are going to say this

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is utterly preposterous. You just met with the British Prime

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>minister and he slipped you a bottle of whiskey in

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a gold bar. While of a sudden, do you think

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're good on forced labor and so? And you

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>could even if you weren't confident of my theory there,

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And to be honest, I'm not because I'm not a lawyer.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You can actually see it in another way, which is

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the President is not making phone calls. He has not

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>called the British Prime Minister, of the Korean or the

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Australian Prime minister over and said lets negotiate over this.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So the White House is already acting as if these

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are tariffs that just are going to exist no matter

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what you know.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I find really interesting about the

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>fixation on tariffs is to me, it's it's sort of

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a testament to the power of the American consumer, because

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>like US consumers, like essentially US buying stuff is not

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>only like one of the most powerful forces in the country,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's most of the US economy. It's a

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 2>hugely powerful force in the world. It's like sixteen percent

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of the global economy. And I think he figured this out,

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that this is this powerful weapon that people are so

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>like the whole world's economy seemingly has become so dependent

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on the American consumer that to threaten to cut people

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>off from that or to compromise that is just it's

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a huge threat. I mean, it's tantamount to like a weapon,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's a weapon everybody's scared of, and you can

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>just kind of wield it at will. But it hurts

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>us too, I think absolutely.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>When you cut off the access of American consumers to

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>foreign markets, that hurts folks in foreign markets and American consumers.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But what's great, Stacey, we found something we disagree on.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You have actually, I think very well described the view

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of the administration. We hold the American consumers perse strings,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we can hold the world to ransom around that. You've

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>actually heard that very explicitly from Stephen Miller. In fact,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>he gives numbers. Here's the thing that Miller misses. So

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at consumpt the share of global consumption

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that comes to American consumers, you just gave a number.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's right. The American economy is definitely a

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>large one, but it's also one of the most closed economies.

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Closed means we trade less than other countries do, and

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so our share of global consumption is good, but our

0:14:55.640 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>share of how much are we consumers on the gloves

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>global market is substantially smaller. And you know, so I

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think our trade share of GDP is about thirty percent.

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It can be you know, twice that in other countries,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which means that the weight of American consumers is large,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but their weight in global markets is half as much.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Because the truth is, folks from Michigan buy stuff from Idaho.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to buy it from Ireland. I'm thinking

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>about potatoes. And because we're so big, we're doing a

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of trade within US across states rather to cross countries.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the reasons you think about US as

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>being a somewhat closed economy.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean another thing to consider is not only maybe

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>are we not hurting other countries as much as we

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>think we are, but I feel like we're hurting ourselves.

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I've talked to a lot of businesses and about this.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's consumer prices. I think that's one place

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>where it crops up. But another place where it crops

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>up is especially small businesses just oftentimes are not operating

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>with the time the profit. And in fact I spoke

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>with there's a small business, Burlap and Barrel. They are

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>a spice importing business. They're one of two small businesses

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>suing the Trump administration. They sued over the first set

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>of tariffs, and one a few hundred thousand dollars, and

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>now they are suing again. So it's owned, it's co

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>owned by Ori Zoharan Ethan Frish. And so here is

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>what Ethan said about kind of where the cost of

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the tariff's lands for his company, Burlap and Barrel. They

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>they're a spice company, so they import from dozens of countries.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 4>I think this year already we've paid like what like

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and fifty thousand dollars in tariffs even more.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 4>And so this was this was it was really meaningful.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 4>What we ended up doing is cutting costs wherever we could.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 4>And so that ended up being in like how do

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 4>we cut costs on packaging, how do we cut costs

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 4>on shipping? What ends up happening, I think a little

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 4>bit ironically or counterintuitively, we realized is that the place

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 4>where we could cut cost was not unsourcing the spices

0:16:58.480 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 4>because they don't grow in America.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It was in our cost in America.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's like not hiring when they would have

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 2>hired someone and other things like that. So it's hurting

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the US economy and of course hurting their business and

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the profits that they can make.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>It makes a really important point there. And you know,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been polite about the Trump tariffs. I'm not

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>going to start now. I might have called them dumb.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Another way in which they're dumb is they're across the

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>board on every product. So if you had a rationale

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for tariffs that you wanted to bring manufacturing back to America,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>then maybe what you would want to do is tariffs

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>specific the sorts of manufacturing that we're more likely to do.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The joke I used to tell, I'm going to tell

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it again. So now the joke I do tell is,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, tariffs on bananas are not going to bring

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>banana factories back to the United States. And that's his

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>point about spices. These are spices that literally aren't grown abroad.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They literally cannot do what the President wants them to do.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I think this comes to somewhat broadery issue,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be thoughtful and careful about this.

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the current moment is telling us that the

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>administration's policy isn't working. You might be drawn from that

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to conclude tariffs don't work. And even though I am

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not in favor of tariffs, I want to be more

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>careful than that, because what we've had is a particularly

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>poorly designed set of tariffs. This set you can't negotiate

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>country by country. They're across the board, not product by product,

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and then they're particularly chaotic. They're on on Monday, off

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, on on Wednesday, off on Thursday. And the

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>chaos then means that no one's going to adjust their

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>behavior around a new law that just passed that's going

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to get unpassed. The very next day. All of those

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>things are actually end up maximizing the harm that the

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>tariffs do and minimizing the benefit. So, look, I can

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>believe there's a world in which smart tariffs are smart.

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it's true, but I could believe it exists.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's no world in which dumb tariffs are good

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for us. And so if you're a pro tariff person,

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the form of the argument you would want

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>to take going forward is the real problem is and

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>we have we haven't tried smart tariff share, and I

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's something to say that.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Another thing that kind of came up in the very

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 2>beginning of our discussion is just all of the instability

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>around it, because if you're a bit trying to operate

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>a business, it is really hard. I mean, the tariffs

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 2>are changing all the time. They're legal, they're illegal, then

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 2>there are new ones that are that expire, now there

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>are other ones. So one of my very favorite conversations

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>about this happened with the seafood company. They import seafood

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 2>from all over the world. I think they import like

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of seafood every year.

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 2>But margins are really thin on seafood, and obviously timing

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is really of the essence. So I talked to this guy,

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Nate Torch. She's the co president of Sense, which is

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 2>a sixty year old seafood importer. I think you will

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 2>enjoy what he said about tariffs, although there's a lot

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>of like not very funny truth in this.

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>We're dealing in eighty million pounds of seafood a year.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of strength.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm just a little microcosm of the real

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 3>world global economy and imports into the United States. But

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 3>it is not making stense and I don't know what

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 3>my cost is going to be on containers coming in,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 3>and it's unreal. It's unfair. The fact of the matter is,

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you I don't know if I should

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>scratch my watch or whine my ass right now.

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm going to scratch.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Operate a business and not know what your costed.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, which I really I feel like that is stuck

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 2>with me all this time, because you know, for small businesses,

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it's just what do they do? Are the tariff's legal

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 2>or the illegal? I think the instability maybe as damaging

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 2>as the tariffs themselves.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, what a colorful turn of phrase. Doesn't know

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>whether to scratch his watch.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I'd never read that one before.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>This is how I can till you've moved on from

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>National Public Radio, Stacey.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I never would have. Yeah, I think ours

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>would have been right out.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to just get a few hosses out there?

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Just because I bet you've had several decades.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm all sat but I appreciate that. I might take

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>you up on that later in the show.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Ah, you're worried about your dad and night Idaho, aren't you?

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He raised your right. That's what I love about you. Hey, look,

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually a real Let me add one

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>more piece of the fire. Because what you were talking

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>about there was uncertainty. I don't know what's coming down

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the track. It makes it hard for me to figure

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>out how to do a business. But I want to

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>mate another word. It's actually conceptually distinct. It takes a

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>moment to understand why it's distinct. Is tariff confusion? So

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>tariff certainly is. I know what it is today, but

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is tomorrow. So I don't know.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what crops to sew? What raw materials to

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>get how many people to hire. Tariff confusion is a

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>different beasts. Tariff confusion is well, I need to make

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a decision, but cracky, I don't know what the tariff

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>rate is. And I bet your bloke has a bit

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I tell you why, I know that's

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 1>true because I do. So here's the wee thing. Let

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>me just confess this to folks at home. I've been

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>following this issue like right on edge, I bet you

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have two Stacy. And then occasionally I find myself on

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>twov and someone will say, well, tell me about the

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>latest set of Canadian tariffs, and iody be like, yes.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like which tariffs?

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think there was a new set of

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Brazilian tariffs the other day. And then there's the tariffs

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that are announced that the president forgets as well. And

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing is if you think about tariff confusion,

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>if a tariff rate of ten percent is one thing,

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>but instead you think if you think, well, the tariff

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>rate is somewhere between zero and twenty percent, and I'm

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not really sure, that's a different form of paralysis. And

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>if what you do is have a rule of thumb,

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>like I reckon. Whatever feels bad is what it is

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that might lead you to overrespond. There's a very interesting

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>piece of research about this, We might try and do

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some more on this soon, which suggests that confusion believing

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>tariffs are high when they aren't is actually the worst

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of all possible worlds. You believe they're high, so it

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>distorts your behavior, but they're not, so therefore it acts

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like a tariff, but they're not high, which means the

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>government gets no revenue. So you know how I talked

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>earlier about the dumbest form of all tariffs. This is

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>literally the dumbest to believe there's a tariff that's not there.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no revenue, there's no bargaining power, and there's no nothing.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But the good news is we can move from talking

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>about dumb things to talking about handsome things. Stacy was

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>not particularly handsome in the years.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Today this week, I feel like you might have like

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>a small man crush on Worrise. Is this wrong?

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone does. I mean the president does. He

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>said he was from Central Casting, when it's true. And

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the President's got two Kevin's and he needs

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to keep track of them. And I one of the

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>things i'd mind mudged about the president is there are

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>traditional nineteen sixties forms of masculinity, but this is a bloke.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>He's really willing to look at another man and say,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you're handsome, You're beautiful.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're beautiful.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Love that.

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that we need more of that in our

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 2>central banking. So obviously, justin one of the big pieces

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of news this week was interest rates, better Reserve met

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 2>and handsome. Kevin came and addressed the nation talking about

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 2>what was going to happen with interest rates. What happened

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>was exactly what was expected, which is interest rates didn't move.

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>They weren't raised, they weren't lowered, nothing. But it caused

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>all all kinds of drama and roiled the markets because

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of like the kind of nothing that it was, which was, like,

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 2>there are twelve members of the FED that vote on

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 2>interest rates, and you get to see how many FED members,

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, vote one way or the other, and there

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>were three people who dissented, and all three thought interest

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 2>rates should go up. Talk to me a little bit

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 2>about this, because I was I found this so strange

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 2>because exactly what everyone expected to happen happened. Nothing happened

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>with interest rates, but the fact that three people disagreed

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>was just seen as really concerning.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let me add one more facts. So you're

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>right that what people thought would happen happened. But actually,

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at markets, there's a betting market on

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed's going to do. It's called Fed funds futures.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>But you can think about it as culchhi for the

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed if you want. They said there was a seventy

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>percent chance that the Fed would do nothing, a thirty

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>percent chance that it would And you might say, oh,

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that seems like they really had a view, But actually,

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>normally before the meeting, it's like ninety nine to one.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Normally over the past few years, Jay Powell had done

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>such a good job of letting people know what's going

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>on that the actual meeting was often really boring, which

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is really bad news for you. Stacey's an economics journalists,

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because you have to breathlessly report we knew this would happen,

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and it happened. But great thing about business journalism is

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a great headline. So this was quite uncertain. Now

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of reasons for it to be uncertain. I

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>think the two big ones are Actually it's kind of

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>hard to know what to do. I genuinely have sympathy

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for my friends on the FED. The second is handsome Kevin.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>He's the strong, silent type. He believes that the FED

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>should stop talking, and so normally Jay Power would let

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>out a bunch of what was that, mate?

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I said, The man crush deepens.

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Certain Yes, absolutely, I mean.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about the handsome.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin and me. No, No, it's good because the thing

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>between handsome Kevin and me, it's not intellectual. It is

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>purely about the aesthetics, because I don't actually agree with

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>him on that much. So you know, man crushes can

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be purely of that form. Holy smoke. You know, sometimes

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I get invited to like Jackson Hole. I'm going to

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>be like in a room with handsome Kevin and he's

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like raise his eyebrows at me, and then

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>his staffers are going to run over. You're making my

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>life going.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>To be handled. You're going to be handled, I think, Yeah,

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>The President and I both think he's got unbelievable boyish

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>good looks. Okay, so he doesn't talk, and as a result,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>none of us will know what's going on. Okay, let

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>me come back to what you said, which is the

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>bond market had a meltdown. You have to be a

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>real nerd here, and so the timeline really matters. At

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>two pm they released the decision. The decision was we're

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>not going to raise rates. We thought it was a

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent chance before the fact, and the truth is

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>markets who are just like, yeah, who cares. That's also

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>when they announced that it was seven to three, nine

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>to three the vote two point thirty is when Handsome

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Kevin begins his press conference and what followed, and this

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make generalizations about handsome men, but

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it was utterly vacuous. Handsome Kevin had said, we will

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>defeat inflation and I'm going to do absolutely nothing about it.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And it was incoherent.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I had a hard to hand following it, and fed

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>speeches are difficult to follow often, but this one I

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>really I did. I watched it, but I couldn't. Yeah,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>it felt a little inscrutable, inscrutiny.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>If I knew what that was, I would agree it's

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't follow it. And he was like, what we're

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do is we're going to listen to markets,

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and the only way we listen to markets is by

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not talking. And if I stop talking, then people in

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the bond market will stop caring about the FED. That's wrong,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Handsome Kevin. People in bond markets still care what the

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>FED does because the FED sets the overnight interest rates

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's really important for the pricing of longer term bonds.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But it used to be that they would care about

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the FED, and the FED would tell them what the

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>FED thought. Now folks in bond markets care about the FED,

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>but the FED won't tell and that's created a lot

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of volatility. But it hasn't solved this problem that now

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the market can speak to the Fed more clearly, not

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in any way that I can at all understand. And

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>then there were my favorite parts of the press conference

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>when he would be asked a direct question, You know,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation is high, will raise it interest rates help solve

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the problem? I can tell you. You can just pick

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>up your favorite economics textbook, and I bet I know

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's Stevenson Wolfers and the answer, by the way,

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's on the final you better know the answer. The

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is higher interest rates help reduce inflation, and he

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of says, now I've got a committee looking into it.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>This didn't feel like a confident leader. This felt like

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who campaigned for the job with a bunch of

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>talking points that could please both country club Republicans and

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>mega Republicans. But he's just repeating them now and it

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all felt very empty.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Is that what got everyone's so upset that his speech

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't clarify anything? Is that more so than the three

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>dissenting boots?

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes? And the way I know that is because market's

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>got upset at two thirty when they've heard the vacuus,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>not at two when they heard that a sense. So

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to be watching minute by minute bond yields

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>as people love to do during their summer vacations. It's

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not so One view is that sound evacuous? Another view

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is handsome. Kevin has said I'm against inflation. And if

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you remember, the concern before the fact was was this

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>sock puppet Kevin, the guy who's going to do what

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the president wants? Or was this hawkish Kevin the guy

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>who hates inflation? So what's happened? He gave a really

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>good press conference after the first meeting. After the second one,

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, I am hawkish Kevin. The way he said

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that was we will defeat inflation.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I remember, and everyone was very reassured.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, he didn't say how. He didn't take a single action.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>He's appointed committees. This supplow could be great at a university.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what we do when there are hard problems we

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to solve a former committee, absolutely committee of

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>profoundly learned people. And so what this raised, though was okay,

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so we didn't actually do anything. He didn't raise rates

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>where the situation might call for it, and he sounded

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>lightly incoherent in defending that. And there's a little faint echo.

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to ever stated that. There's a faint

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>echo of wait, is this sock puppet Kevin? And if

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, then we've lost fed independence and that's what

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>really matters. So saying I'm against inflation, look mate, everyone

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>can say that. Doing something to show that you're against inflation,

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what the markets were looking to hear, and they

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear anything like that at all.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 2>So was the fact that he didn't say something that

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 2>made sense that the markets got worried that maybe he

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a plan. Is it that he doesn't have

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 2>a plan or he doesn't know what he's wit. We

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 2>just don't know which Kevin, we're going to get okay.

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So one problem is that markets, when I say markets,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>believe markets said the only thing I actually see is

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a graph of prices. So where personifying something that's not

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>quite that way. But I do think part of its incoherence.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But I also think part of it's like if you

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>say one thing, I won't do anything, then I'm not

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sure I believe at all. He didn't reassure them that

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he was committed to reducing inflation. Now there was an

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>easy way out if what he wanted to do is

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>keep interest rates low and make it clear that he

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to keep inflation low. What he would have says,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm ready to raise rates now, but

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 1>if the following happens, I will raise rates a lot.

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess what that's called forward guidance, And that's something

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that Handsome Kevin has said he's deeply against. So he's

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>boxed into a corner now and there's not much and

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't found his way out. There's going to be

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of meetings at the FARED over the next

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, as they try to figure out how to

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.959
<v Speaker 1>come across somewhat more coherently.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Interesting though. Yeah, I was wondering why the markets were

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 2>so upset. I mean, some people did say that it

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 2>was because the signal is that rates are going to

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 2>go up soon, because there were three dissenters and things

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be kind of moving in that direction. But

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 2>when I watched the speech, I didn't get much of

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 2>an impression from it, and I guess that the real

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 2>problem was the lack of impression.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so the fact that long term bond yields rose,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so the interest rate over long periods, that's reflecting expectations

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of higher inflation in the future, which is markets are

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>less convinced that it's hawkish Kevin, Okay, I know your

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite thing in the world is data or data, depending

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which country you're from.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Data, data, your data.

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I have had to move from data to data and okay,

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>very hard for me.

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 2>But in your heart of hearts, it's data.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you're going to make me think about my data,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's a sad and difficult topic as well. How

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>about we just talk about gross domestic product.

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's true. Your therapist was invoked many times in

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the last in the last show. So I think we can.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>We can stay away from parents.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I had to pay them a licensing fee at the end.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 2>We should bring them on.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:05.720
<v Speaker 1>We should. He's really good and you know, actually, Stacey,

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I can. I can do an impression for you. Say,

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Stacy's the latest growth domestic product numbers for the second

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter just came out. And Stacy, how did that make

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you feel?

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 2>It made me feel worried, really really worried.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell me more, say more.

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 2>It made me feel worried for a few reasons. One

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 2>GDP is like a very it's a very ham fisted number.

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 2>It's very imperfect. A lot of people criticize it, but

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>A sort of like my parents flash.

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, it's like a flash judgment, you know what

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean. It's like this quick snapshot of the economy.

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 2>How's it doing? Growth at one point five percent is

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 2>quite low. And what especially worried me, and I'm especially

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 2>excited to ask you about.

0:35:59.239 --> 0:35:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Is.

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's been all this promise about AI that

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that is going to start growing the economy, and there

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>was some talk that that's already happening. It's already improving productivity,

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 2>and things like that, well, that should be showing up

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 2>in GDP numbers if that's true, And the fact it

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't really worried me. It really seemed like a signal

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 2>that things are slowing down. So many mixed signals in

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the economy right now that it just seemed like the

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 2>overall snapshot was just like not good. That's why I

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>worried me.

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>What about you, I'm going to agree, I'm going to

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>blame my mother and tell you about a bad dream

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that I had. Uh okay, so one point five per

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>cents of bad number not bad, it's it's not great,

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>genuinely mediaca. And if I'd brought that home on a

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>school report I got enough with the therapist took, it

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been good now, but I would have said

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to my mom, the underlying fundamentals are a lot better

0:36:57.920 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>than that. And actually that always worked in my house

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>holiday I did well in English and math and poorly

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in music and pe. Mom was always like, that's all right,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>justin where we knew what we cared about. And actually

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>GDP is much the same way, which is there are

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>some parts where if they're doing well today, that tells

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you a lot about how well we're doing in the future.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That really particularly true for consumption and investment, So spending

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by businesses and spending by you and me, those actually

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 1>looked pretty good. What we had was rundown was disinvestment

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in inventories. What does that mean? When a company can't

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sell stuff and it leaves it in the warehouse, that's

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>actually called a form of investment, which for odd reasons

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>counts as positive economic growth. And when we get less

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the warehouse, that's less investment than that, So

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>that tends to move up and down like crazy. That's

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a big part of what's going on here. So the

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>headline was one point five percent, but it's a little

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>bit like the GPA was a little bit stronger than that.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>So look, there are two ways we have to tell

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>stories in the modern world. One is how is this

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as a serious matter, and I think this is the

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>economy bumped along genuinely moderate, fair enough. Then the other

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is how do we And that's the truth and that's

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what we should care about, But then there's our political narratives.

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Secretary howdnik Wod promised US five percent growth this year.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>One point five is profoundly less than five Now you

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>might think maybe Howard Latinik's just not very good at numbers,

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably true, but relative to the sorts of

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>numbers we've did in promise now, other thing we saw

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was through twenty twenty five, the numbers weren't great, and

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>we kept being told don't worry, the good stuff's coming

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>soon or now you know, a year and a half in,

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm less patient than I might once have been, and

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so things aren't that great. What do you think is

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>driving us law down there? Mate?

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm more excited to hear what you think about

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that than me speculating. But I'll tell you some of.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The things, which, by the way, is what my therapist says.

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Your therapist is a smart man. Yeah, I mean, I

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 2>think one of the things driving the slow down is

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the uncertainty that we talked about around tariffs. I think

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 2>because it's not just tariffs, there's a lot of uncertainty

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 2>around policy right now. The Trump administration likes kind of

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 2>surprises much. I guess, like Kevin Walsh, kind of there's

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>lots of unexpected things happening, and I know that the

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 2>markets hate uncertainty, but also businesses do not like it.

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:34.919
<v Speaker 2>They don't feel comfortable. I mean, if and you think

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 2>about it as a person too, if you don't know

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 2>what's gonna happen, there might be bad things on the horizon.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>You save a little money, you kind of you're like, Okay,

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna keep a little powder dry. You know, I'm

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 2>going to keep a little savings just in case you're

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 2>not gonna say, I think we need to open this

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 2>new factory. I think we need to hire all these

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 2>new people. Let's tick a chance, let's expand. And I

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>feel like in order for that sort of expansive growth

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to come into an economy, and I think it could

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>be in the economy because of AI and all the

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 2>promise of it, I think all the sort of fear

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and uncertainty around policy things like tariffs and gas prices

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and all that stuff, I think that is kind of

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 2>draining that some of the energy that would otherwise be

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 2>going into growing the economy. That's what I saw when

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I saw those numbers that were in me.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, so then let me give the optimist version

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of the story. And I do think both sides are true.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect you're going to agree with me on this,

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>which is there's lots of policy related reasons to worry.

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>There's war, there's a trade war, there's a new scandal

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>every other day, Boom boom. Despite all that, the economy

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of bumping around with economic growth round about two percent.

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>The unemployment rate is remarkably stable. So I think we're

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing actually a remarkably resilient American economy in the face

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of those shocks. That's the optimist view. The pessimist view

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is is building data centers really broad based economic growth

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and how much of what's going on is about that?

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And that, Stacy, is how we're going to segue to.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to do art of the chart. You wanted

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a competition charts chart.

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 2>What are we competing for? I think those pillows behind you,

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I am for really coveting your platypus pillows.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>March bet you well, no, it just you know, I

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>just I just love the platypus. I just love seeing

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Gussie makes me happy. So, Stacy, that one, right, which

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>one do you want? The white one or the green one?

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Like the partier one. Yeah, yeah, it's because it's like

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 2>a logo. It's like the Apple logo or something, you

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 2>know what, It's like if you know, you know.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Just like that. In fact, that was produced by the

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>exact same designer who did the Apple logo.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I thought so I was looking at it.

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'm willing to bet you that pillow on chart

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>versus chart, we're going to see your couch totally totally different.

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 2>So has these people going to like vote on this?

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 2>How are we going to know who wins the pillow?

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could just judge it myself. I could say,

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>whose child risky?

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 2>And wait, what do you get if you win? You

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 2>just get to keep your pillow. That doesn't feel quite right.

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I can send you peanut butter cups, but I think

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you might be set up there.

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>No, actually I really like them. They're really good.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>If you can find me some king size races, that's

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>your side of it done. But six of them, not

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just like two or three.

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I'll set you up for this for the rest of

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the summer.

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh that might need more than six months. That's going

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to get me through two days. But those things are spectacular.

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>We had people in the comments so like, justin, You've

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>got to stop going on about this. It's so obvious

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>your advertising and I'm not it's just Stacey changing my life.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 2>That's one peanut butter cup at a time. That's what

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 2>I do. I bring. I bring joy and a lot

0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:00.959
<v Speaker 2>of calories into people.

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's what we're going to do. My producer Megan

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to post a poll on YouTube and substack

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>who's got the best chart? And if you don't have

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>access to YouTube or substack, that's at Platypus Economics, then

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just leave a comment and Megan will make sure that

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>she adds your vote to the most important delection of

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>our lifetimes. So who's going first?

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 2>I see, I want to go first because I do

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 2>think it's quite an elegant segue out of our last conversation.

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Here's my chart. Oh it's GDP, what we were just

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 2>talking about. So I thought it was like very helpful

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to take a look at the GDP journey that our

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 2>economy has been on. So if you see there was

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Q one of twenty twenty five and look at the

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 2>growth in Q two and Q three, it seems like

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 2>we were like really on an exciting trajectory and then

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Q four and of course these numbers get adjusted, that

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:04.919
<v Speaker 2>must be said, but it just seems like if you

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 2>back up from the chart, it just seems like things

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>are slowing down, and that feels very counter to where

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>it feels like we should be with all of this

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>new technology coming online and making people more productive and

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 2>causing all kinds of disruption in our lives. It seems

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 2>like the good part of that should be economic growth,

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 2>but we're not seeing that. This is why I'm worried.

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 2>This is why this chart feels like such a big

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 2>seismic deal to.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Me, Stacy, you have made the strongest possible case that

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I have chart of the week, and I am so

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>grateful that was the intro I was hoping for. Suck it,

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>here comes mine.

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>My chart takes all of our economic growth over the

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>period you were talking about, so basically what's driven the

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>economy since the Trump administration. So I took all of

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>your bars and I schmushed them together. Okay, And so

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>everage economic growth has been about one point eight percent

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>since President Trump came to office. That's merely moderate, but

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 1>at least it's merely moderate. But the thing I did,

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and you were making such a pasture. Isn't it important

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>we get into AI and the AI revolution and what

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's doing to GDP, and that's what I did. Sorry

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for sounding glueful. I just realized I'm showing my personality

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and I've been told that's a bad idea to hard disagree.

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just amused at the theatrics. I feel like, if

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you really had confidence in your chart is superior chart,

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't be you know, but that's just me anyway. Continue,

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 2>So this is since Trump took office.

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>The totals of the growth growth has been one point

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. Now, what we can do is we can

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>say of the economy, there's a little tiny section, five

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of it that is investment in IT related stuff.

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's no line that says this is AI. The

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>closest proxy is this small sector that's just five percent

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. That tiny sector has contributed one point

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four percent to our one point eight percent economic growth.

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the economy imagine that sector hadn't grown.

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to put an asterix next to this, and

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it says our economic growth would have been less than

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>one percent if we hadn't had the AI boom. And

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>so the other way of saying this is, roughly speaking,

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of our economic growth has come from AI.

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I want to put two asterisks next to that, the.

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Data center construction, right, So this testament, Okay, yeah, there's

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 2>two AI stories.

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>One AI story is in the future, we're going to

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:46.800
<v Speaker 1>become much more productive at everything blah blah blah. So

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that's his productivity will grow the other stories, yes, but

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to get there we need to build a lot of

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>data centers, and data centers are spending, and GDP counts spending.

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.319
<v Speaker 1>This is basically that version of the story, and it's

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>saying the spending side, which is driving so much about

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>economic strength roat now, is what's keeping the economy afloat.

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to put a second asterix. A lot of

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we're buying for the AI rollout is actually

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>imported stuff, and so my red bar here is all

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>spending on AI related stuff, not spending on American made

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>AI stuff, and so were I able to make an

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>adjustment for that, the red bar would look smaller. So

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this one's got a little bit too much dramatic effect,

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But the underlying message is still fundamentally true, which is

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the AI rollout and the building of data centers has

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 1>been a huge part of the story about what's keeping

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the American economy afloat station. Now I think you and

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I can both agree it's over to the voters.

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I did want to ask one quick question, So,

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 2>like you me, all the work that we do, it's

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 2>all just in the little purple bar.

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you and I just a little purple bar.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I do have like one final thing I would like

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 2>to say for the voters consideration, m M, and that

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 2>is paper covers rock. This is so interesting and so

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 2>fascinating and also completely encompassed in my chart. So I

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 2>feel like my chart is really a vote for both

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 2>of our charts.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to say to people. My chart loves freedom,

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 1>my chart loves America, my chart loves dogs, my chart

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:33.280
<v Speaker 1>rock family, and my chart puts a Racey's Peanut butty

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Cup in every part.

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's it's dirty pool bringing in the

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:40.720
<v Speaker 2>cute dog for the votes.

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh den, Max, But I respect that. You know Max

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually named for economics. What do economists let to do?

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>We like to maximize, We maximize utility, we maximize the

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:51.919
<v Speaker 1>quality of our ground.

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 2>That's how you named your dog.

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's true. My critics would say it's just

0:48:57.719 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I meant to name him Max, But I don't know

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>how to spell, and Betsy would say the dog from

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the Greenches style Christmas.

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, and he works on a number of levels.

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Over to the vaders, folks, there's going to be a poll.

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Leave your comment Stacy's chart, Justin's much more colorful chart.

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's up to you. So this has been Off the

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Clock the Economics podcast in which we slow down, review

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the week that was, and try to sort out what

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>really mattered. Stacey and I were going to be back

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of weeks with our next installment. In

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, be sure to subscribe, and just as important,

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>tell a mate. So I found this podcast where they

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about peanut butter cups, dogs and freedom. So today

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you've come away feeling a little bit smarter, a little

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more entertained, a bit more prepared. Please tell a friend,

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>just say mate. Let's get it done. Platypus Economics. You

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.479
<v Speaker 1>can find us on substack, YouTube or your favorite podcast app.

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, we're going to keep on top of

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>all of the economic news that you don't have time for.

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to vote for your favorite chart, and as always,

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>stay cries