WEBVTT - Tesla Cars Recall and Apple's EU Antitrust Challenges

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heinder Blomberg's Weltead quarters in New York, and

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I'med Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Tesla recalls two million cars to fix autopilot's safety flows.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Well breakdown what it.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Means for drivers and indeed the eed maker as it

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 3>faces its biggest recall ever.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 4>And Apple is set to be hit by an EU

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 4>antitrust order in its fight with Spotify over rules that

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 4>govern the iPhone makers music streaming rivals. Will break down

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 4>the potential ban.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus, for the first time ever, Netflix is revealing viewer

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>data on every show in an effort to boost transparency

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>that's in the way of the whole with strikes. We'll

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>discuss that and so much more throughout this hour.

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 4>The other top top story is Tesla, and actually Tesla's

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 4>declines have really accelerated. This is a recall in name

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 4>only of two million vehicles. Tesla plans to fix the

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 4>issues around autopilot with over the air software updates. Those

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 4>started on the twelfth, which was yesterday. Let's get the

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 4>full picture and bring in Bloombergs keep laying out of Washington, DC.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 4>What do we know about this Tesla auto pilot recall? Well,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 4>this recall is years in the making. Literally.

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 6>NITSA, which is the top auto safety regulator here in Washington,

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 6>first began looking at autopilot in twenty sixteen, and the

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 6>pace of the investigation is definitely picked up under the

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 6>Biden administration. The agency launched the current probe into autopilot

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 6>in twenty twenty one, and then they also launched a

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 6>probe into Tesla's full self drive beta system in twenty

0:01:55.560 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty two, and NITA said that those probes were This

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 6>recalls a product of those probes that Tesla has agreed

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 6>to recall almost all of their cars across all models

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 6>and push out this update, which they say will address

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 6>some of the flaws with making sure drivers are fully

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 6>engaged and aware that the cars are not capable of

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 6>driving themselves. The autopilot system is also subject to several

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 6>other investigations of other agencies. Tesla's faced criticism of their

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 6>marketing of the systems, with people pointing out that there

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 6>are no cars currently on the road that are capable

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 6>of full self driving.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what is it?

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>The agency has open more than fifty special crash investigations

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>involving Tesla cars that are suspected to be linked with

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the autopilot. Ultimately, it feels as though this is just

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 3>an awareness an education process to the driver. Why isn't

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 3>this something that other regions are looking into, not just

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the United States.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of this is centered on Tesla's marketing.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 6>As I mentioned of the systems in the view hicles.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they have the system that they're calling full

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 6>self drive, and even they acknowledge that the cars are

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 6>not capable of driving themselves. So I think that's why

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 6>there's a bigger focus on this in the United States

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 6>right now, a.

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Little bit more of a marketing message perhaps, and indeed

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>just making people, oh, basically have their hands on the

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 3>steering wheel that little bit more. Keith Lang, really great

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>to have you on the show. Thank you so much

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>for joining us. Meanwhile, let's stick on Tesla and at

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>least it's leader Elon Musk because x we understand a course,

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 3>his social media platform is on track to bring in

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 3>roughly two and a half billion dollars in advertising revenue

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three. It's a significant slump from priors.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>It's all according to people familiar with the matter. We know,

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>we want to talk to one Kirk Wagner now who

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>put out this story and just give us the context here.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 5>How much of a fall off is it?

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean it's well over forty percent from the

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 7>last full year that the company reported, which is twenty

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 7>twenty one. Obviously last year we didn't get full numbers

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 7>because the deal had closed in the middle of the year.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>But you know, this is a huge deal.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 7>Twitter or now X has historically made about ninety percent

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 7>of its revenue from advertising, right, And so when you

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 7>see this big decline in their core main business, it's

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 7>obviously not a great sign.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 4>And that's why you see Elon out.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 7>You know, a couple of weeks ago, he was saying, hey,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 7>this advertising issue could lead to real trouble for the company.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 7>He's talked about bankruptcy before, right, And that's because this

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 7>core part of their business is really struggling.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Ka, you and I have been crunching numbers and talking

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>as sources about what's happening right now because a lot

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 4>changed from the second to the third quarter, third quarter

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 4>to fourth quarter. Minderstanding is it's seventy five percent ads,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>and then the twenty five percent that remains isn't just

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 4>subscriptions for premium or premium plus, right, it's data licensing.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, actually more data licensing than subscriptions. You know, what

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 7>our understanding is that the subscription part of that business

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 7>is very small. I think the external estimates are about

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 7>one hundred and twenty million a year. We'd heard that

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 7>there's just over like a million PAIN subscribers right now.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 7>The data licensing historically has been you know, a much

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 7>bigger business, five hundred.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 4>Plus million dollars.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 7>And that's for you know, people who are paying for

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 7>access to what we call the fire hose of tweets, right,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 7>all of the tweets that are coming through public tweets.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 7>And so that business I believe has stayed maybe a

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 7>little bit stronger because it's not as impacted by you know,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk coming out and saying the things that he

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 7>says that advertisers are bothered by.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Right and real quick. An ex executive did respond to

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 4>our story. You can read his full statement in the story,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 4>which says, we gave an incomplete picture of what their

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>business currently looked like Bloombo's technologies. Kirt Wagner, thank you, Kara,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 4>what you got?

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's dive into time for talking tech head because

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 3>we're going to stick on the world of Elon Musk.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 3>But SpaceX this time will sell insider shares ninety seven

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 3>dollars apiece and a tender offer a price increase that

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>moves the value of the space and Satellite company closer

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>to one hundred and eighty million dollars, according to sources. Meanwhile,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Tesla posted a video showing improvements it's made in its

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>humanoid robot prototype dubbed the Optimus. But the human Mimicking

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Machine is part of Tesa's venture into developing AI, and

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 3>it utilizes a trained neural nets work to perform basic

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>tasks mat me have a bit of a dance as well,

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 3>as you can see in this current video. Banwhile ever,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>in New York, the law could require social media platforms

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to provide data app nom charge to third party apps

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>that allow users to block hate speech, which has been

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>surging online now. This comes after x and Reddit began

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>charging third party apps earlier this year.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 4>Ed what for Got coming up on the show. Apple

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 4>is in the crosshairs of EU antitrust regulators about its

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 4>app store rules for music. Rival's going to bring all

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>those details on that Bloomberg exclusive plus Netflix ready to

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>tell the world how many people watch it shows. We

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 4>will have all of that data next. Very quickly shares

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 4>a Betsy of pair the decline of as much as

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 4>eight and a half percent, currently down five percent, on

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 4>track for their biggest drop since September, cutting eleven percent

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 4>of the marketing workforce, and also giving us an update

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 4>on their outlook for the fourth quarter. Gross merchandise volume

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 4>is going to drop in the low single digits. Top

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 4>line growth two to three percent. But this is a

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 4>real slow down and clearly things not going well for Etsy.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 4>The stockdown four percent. This is Bloomberg technology. Apple is

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 4>set to be hit by a ban on its app

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 4>store rules that govern music streaming rivals and a potential

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 4>hefty fine that according to Bloomberg sources, the EU regulators

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 4>are putting the finishing touches to a decision that would

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 4>prohibit Apple's practice of blocking music services from pushing their

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 4>users away from the app store and iOS to alternative

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 4>subscription options. The decision is slated to come early next year.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in Bloomberg's Aggie Cantrell out of Germany for

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 4>more on this. This is anti steering provisions that the

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 4>EU is trying to address, and the potential penalty for

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Apple is large. A fine, what do we know about it?

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so essentially the fine itself could be up to

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 8>ten percent of annual sales to Apple and that's a

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 8>real concern for the company, of course, and in the

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 8>past we've seen that the EU has really been at

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 8>the forefront of incredibly tough regulations on big tech. This

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 8>is especially coming from the EU's antitrust Amodivestia and this

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 8>is also coming at a time when the EU is

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 8>about to launch its digital markets at Provision next year

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 8>in March, and that's going to be a critical focus

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 8>for big tech because essentially that's designating companies like Apple

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 8>as gatekeepers for our online ecosystem, and that really means

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 8>that those companies need to conduct their business practices in

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 8>a way that is not anti competitive for the smaller

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 8>players in the market, and that is what is.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Being discussed here.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 8>This suit was originally brought forward by Spotify almost four

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 8>years ago. And what we're essentially seeing now is that

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 8>Apple may have to change its practices. It may have

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 8>to allow for platforms to facilitate the app store to

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 8>facilitate people being able to.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Go to other subscription platforms like Spotify.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 8>And the reason for this for Apple to changing their praxices,

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 8>this isn't the first time that they've actually thought about

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 8>doing this off the back of EU legislation.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>We also saw this, for instance when the app Apple

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>app Store.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 8>The Apple announced earlier this year that they would make

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 8>we would most likely have to consider allowing third party

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 8>app stores to access access to iPhones as of twenty

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 8>twenty four off the back of the Digital Markets app.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Other than competition, the EU is being pretty busy. Aggie

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 3>is also being busy when it comes to labor protection.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Just tell us what they're considering or proposing when it

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 3>comes to workers of well delivery for example or over.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 8>So essentially, the Platform Workers Directive is about trying to

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 8>standardize the labor rights for gig economy workers. Essentially, there

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 8>are a lot of people who work for these platum

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 8>forms that are currently deemed self employed, and the EU

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 8>believes that around five million so about nineteen percent of

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 8>the self employed platform workers in the EU are misclassified

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 8>and should actually be considered employees, and they have bailt

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 8>out a system of criteria. These criteria include, does the

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 8>platform you work or have control over your hours? Do

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 8>you have an upper limit on how much you can

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 8>earn on that platform? Is their control over your appearance

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 8>or your conduct while you're working on their platform? And

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 8>so what most people would consider standard aspects of being employed.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 8>And if two of those five criteria are fulfilled, the

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 8>proposal is essentially that then those people would be considered employees.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But this is still in a preliminary discussion.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 8>The deal has been met, but it's still awaiting approvals

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 8>from the European Parliament.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 3>Business models under fire, Aggie Cantrell, thank you so much

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 3>for joining us.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, let's stick on a part of Europe. Because Airbnb's Irish.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Unit has agreed to pay the Italian tax authorities five

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred seventy six million euros, which is two hundred and

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>six hundred twenty one million US dollars, to settle allegations

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 3>that it hadn't paid enough tax from twenty seventeen to

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one. Now the home showing company says it

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't acknowledge quote any liability as part of the settlement,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 3>according to the regulatory filing ed what's going viral?

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what has been going viral is Netflix releasing viewer

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 4>data on every single show a movie on its service.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Is the first time that what the streaming giant says

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 4>will be regular, reports Bloomberg's Flex Gillette joins us, Now,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 4>this is the biggest disclosure from Hollywood or any streaming

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 4>service anyway. Infinite amounts of data on eighteen thousand titles.

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 4>What do we actually learn from it? Or we learned

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we've been waiting for this moment for ten years,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 9>wondering what exactly people are watching on Netflix. And I

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 9>think the biggest takeaway from yesterday is that, you know,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 9>more than fifty percent of the view in the first

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 9>six months of the year was driven by Netflix originals,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 9>so original movies, original TV series, And that's sort of

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 9>a validation of all the spending that has been done

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 9>on original programming by these streaming services over the past

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 9>several years.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I got to say, I haven't watched a single minute

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and in any of those I mean, maybe that's what's

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>more to a parent than it is to intend netflix

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>lack of addiction. But ultimately this has been forced in

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 3>some way by the strikes. Why was this transparency wanted.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, the creative community has been demanding more transparency for years.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, there was really no way to know of

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 9>your show was a hit, was it a failure. You

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 9>kind of had to take this streamer's word for it.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 9>And so Netflix, you know, yesterday acknowledged that part of

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 9>this was that by keeping this data to themselves, it

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 9>had built up all this mistrust with their creative partners.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 9>And so yeah, this is a way for everybody to

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 9>know this is where you stand, this is what people

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 9>are watching. And it's a big flex by Netflix also

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 9>because it's going to show the world how much more

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 9>people are watching on Netflix than any of the competitors.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>And it's important for the act is in the context

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of the strikes we just had, because this was at

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 4>the center of tools.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, also the compensation model in terms of

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, rewarding you know, creators and actors you know,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 9>and writers residuals based on you know, if your show

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 9>was really popular. Part of that was you need to

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 9>know what's popular. Now that data is going to go

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 9>to the guilds anyways, but it also now allows the

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 9>rest of the world to check this out. You know,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 9>you can bet that every writer, actor, producer, even the

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 9>competitors are going to be pouring through this data wanting

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 9>to know, Okay, this is what people are actually watching.

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Thin begs for Lexilatt, thank you so much.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 10>I think investors need to get confident that the.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 4>FED is done raising rates. I don't think they need

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 4>to lower them a.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 10>Bunch for the IPO market to happen, but I think

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 10>are to pick up. But I do think they need

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 10>to get a sense that may rate rising is done,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 10>which you know, who knows. I expect we'll see more

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 10>tech IPOs in twenty twenty four than we saw on

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty three, but that's not very hard to do.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 10>You don't need many.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Important As we look ahead to FED Day, which is

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>today a little few hours ahead of time, Mitchell Green

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>of lead Edged Capital with his outlook on what fed's decisions.

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Mean for the IPO market.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now with her perspective Rachel Gering's just Ey

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>ipo practice cohed and is Rachel the IPO market, particularly

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 3>tech IPOs go be dictated by Macro or is there

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>some more well LP pressure that's going to come in.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll actually be a combination of both.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 11>But the improving macro backdrop is certainly going to help

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 11>the situation and making it encouraging. Sitting here today, as

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 11>I look ahead to twenty twenty.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Four, Rachel, just like me getting organized with my holiday shopping.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 4>My understanding is and behind the scenes, there's a lot

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 4>of work going in to preparing for IPOs in twenty

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, the groundwork and confidential filings. Does that tally

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 4>with what you're hearing from clients and from your network.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, not only what we're hearing from clients, but what

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 11>we're experiencing firsthand. Really encouraged by the amount of preparation

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 11>companies are putting into their IPO plans, whether that's for

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty four or even beyond into twenty twenty five.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 11>Clients are really taking this opportunity.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Of the lacking of IPOs happening today, that's being used

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and the time is being used today to prepare for

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the future and really to be able to optimize when

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the market does return, allowing these companies that optionality to

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>take hold of that market opportunity when it's right for them.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 4>There is a market mechanics story happening where companies are

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 4>filing confidentially and then doing nothing sitting on it. In

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 4>your experience, how much flexibility does that actually give a

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>company filing confidentially on the timing and method of going public.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 11>I think it really does provide a lot of optionality,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 11>and it's definitely a course we would always recommend for clients. One,

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 11>it's allowing companies confidentially, as you mentioned, to work through

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 11>that process with the Securities and Exchange Commission, work through

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 11>those comments and so forth, without the pressure of needing

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 11>to go on file publicly eminently, and as the broader

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 11>macro backdrop continues to play out and continue to improve,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 11>that's when companies can really choose the timing that's right

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 11>for them, but be ready have that, have a lot

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 11>of the review process complete, be ready for that roadshow,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 11>and then really complete a very efficient process in that

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 11>last part of the IPO journey.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 3>And then be ready to be a public facing company

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 3>in many ways. Member, speaking to Fijisimo over at Instacart

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 3>after their listing, I was like, well, how is it off?

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Your first cord rouping in public companies, just like I've

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of been doing this for ages because they've been

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 3>waiting to go public for so long, they've had all

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>that documentation and rythmarole.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Anyway to that point, are you likely.

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 3>To see, well, some of the companies that do eventually

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>becoming go public have a similar sort of business model

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 3>to an instacot in terms of showing some sort of.

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Evidence of profitability.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>Do they have to be talking up AI a lot

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 3>at the moment or will more types of companies come.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 11>I think we're going to continue seeing companies come to

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 11>market from a broad range of sectors. I anticipate looking

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 11>ahead to twenty twenty four, it will probably be much

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 11>of the same, so meaning large companies scale already with

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 11>profitability or eminently reaching profitability. So I don't anticipate that

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 11>changing immediately. But as the current crap of IPOs continue

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 11>to perform, this very next crap of IPOs perform, well,

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 11>then I see the IPO opportunities broad mean to others

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 11>kind of that more traditional tech type company, probably in

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 11>the later part of twenty twenty four.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately, do you think the sort of pressure that a

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 3>lot of these companies are on the to go public

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>for a liquidity event to give money back to LPs

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 3>to employees. Has it become in some way unsustainable? Have

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>there been too many VC backed companies of late?

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 11>Well, when we definitely are seeing you know, a rise

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 11>in VC backed companies and then long long holdings, right,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 11>So there's definitely pent up demand. When you think about

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 11>pe VC investors, they've been holding these investments for a

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 11>long period of time, definitely anxiously awaiting a monetization event

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 11>of some sort. We're seeing the IPO market, you know slow,

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 11>the m and A market slow, So definitely a lot

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 11>of pent up demand. But at the same time, the

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 11>PE investors, those VC investors are also recognizing the importance,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 11>particularly around valuation. We still have that valuation tension of

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 11>what you know, buyers want to sell and buy at

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 11>versus what companies want, you know, what companies are targeting themselves,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 11>So that valuation tension is still there.

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I think to get.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 11>Deals done going into twenty twenty four, having realistic pricing

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 11>expectations as an absolute must.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Rachel, what about the competing forces? What are the biggest

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>factors that are causing technology companies in particular to hit pause,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 4>hit the brakes and hold them ongoing public.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 11>Really, I think the broader macro backdrop, I think is

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 11>one reason why companies are waiting on the sidelines.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens today.

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 11>I think everyone is expecting the Fed to hold tight

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 11>on interest rates. You know, we've had IPOs and high

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 11>interest rate environments before, so it doesn't mean that we

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 11>can't continue.

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the predictability.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 11>I think companies want to know that rate hikes have

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 11>stopped and then even see some encouragement that they might

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 11>even start to come down sometime in twenty twenty four.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 11>So that level of predictability will be definitely helpful for

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 11>the IPO backdrop, and then broader macro trends that the

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 11>data is trending in the right direction. So it provides

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 11>hope for twenty twenty four, absent any unforeseen shack.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Rachil Gering of Ey, thank you so much.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Blue meag Technology. IM Caline Hide in

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 5>New York.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I met love though in San Francisco, Caro. I was

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 4>going to bring you a magic market moment, but then

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 4>trading on the NAZAQ one hundred in the session conspired

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 4>against me. This is what the NAZAT one hundred looks

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 4>like here to date, and we're way off session highs

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.719
<v Speaker 4>this this morning, but for just a moment, we're at

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 4>a fifty percent year to date gain on the Nasdaq

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 4>one hundred. And the reason I bring you up bring

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 4>that up so you look at the far left n

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 4>side of the screen. A lot of that recent momentum

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 4>has come since November first, which was the last FED

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 4>meeting on the Nasdaq one hundred. More than one hundred

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 4>names that largely hire multiple software stocks than megacaps, some

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 4>of the EV names as well, and that's why I

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 4>track that index. It is FED decision day. The expectation

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>for this meeting absolutely nothing's going to happen, But think

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 4>about twenty twenty four and the narrative that's coming. The

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 4>white numbers that you're looking at are the forecast for

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 4>cuts at the next meetings across twenty twenty four. The

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 4>red numbers are the one day changes in expectations for

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 4>each of those meetings. And whether you think about private

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>markets like bench Capital, you think about public markets. Historically,

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 4>when rates are high, investors assign more money to bond

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 4>funds less to equity funds, so the world is watching.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 4>If you're a VC or you're an equity market trader

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 4>and you think about technology, then you care. Let's continue

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 4>the FED conversation and bring in Joe Chaw Matt co

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 4>founder a managing partner at Leniar Capital, and Joe, I

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 4>guess is that where your head is at this morning

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 4>as you wait for the FED?

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Thanks, Ed, good to see you again. Yeah exactly.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 12>So, I mean, you know, we're expecting the FED to

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 12>pause and to start cutting twenty twenty four. And when

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 12>the first against cutting twenty twenty four, then market parta'

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 12>spens like us probe Que hundred capital funds, we began

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 12>to build in these rate path into our financial models

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 12>and really began to do more deals and all things.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Eeople.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 12>You know, prices of companies are just a future casual

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 12>divided by discount rate, which is basically the fund rate

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 12>plus a premium. So when the gnometer goes down, the

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 12>present of these stat should go up. And that's why

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 12>you're seeing the market reactions in public markets, and I

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 12>expect that will extractly to the private markets in twenty

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 12>twenty four as well.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 8>Jo.

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>The reason we love you is not only because you're

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>so active in the VC community but also used to

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 3>work within monetary policy over at the FED, and I'm

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 3>interested as to how much your view on valuation has shifted.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 3>All your pitches have ultimately been based upon the fact

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 3>that all these valuations we see at very heavy heights.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>It feels like the AI is still happening when interest

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 3>rates are pretty high, and they might come down.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, a couple of points.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 12>One is, you know, the last time I was I

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 12>was on your show and made the point that if

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 12>AI is this big in a very tough monitored policy environment,

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 12>imagine when monitor policy and financial conditions received, how much

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 12>bigger they a phenomenon is going to be.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 4>And AI did be here.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 12>The total jule market is unthinkably big. But when it

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 12>comes to fintech and VC investments, you know right now,

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 12>you know, you know, I speak with a lot of LPs,

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 12>whether they're some wealth funds and two stands, pensions, family offices.

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 12>You know, if you're an LP, if you put yourselfing,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 12>they're shoes. And the math is pretty simple. If you

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 12>can put your allokay, your capital into a fixing confined

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 12>and generate let's say five percent in treasuries in ten

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 12>twelve percent in credit and probably will be even though

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 12>a little bit higher fifteen to eighty percent in some

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 12>of the adventure private credit. Why would you out here

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 12>capital the venture capital and get five percent, So that's

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 12>sort of what they're thinking so right now, and that's

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 12>what that's what we've seen in the last couple of

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 12>eighteen months. But what we're seeing is right now alps

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 12>are active in venture secondary funds provactly secondary is funds

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 12>because secondary you can you can actually buy some of

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 12>these shares at fifty to eighty percent down in private markets.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 12>And the second thing is is is as soon as

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 12>the the ip of market reopens and you're seeing sort

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 12>of the is getting their capital back, then LPs will

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 12>be bele to reshuffle their capital back in the VC.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 12>So what what I'm trying to say here is the

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 12>last eighteen month indventure has been probably one of the

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 12>toughest period in recent memory in the last and the

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 12>fifteen years sens of GFC. If you're a VC fund,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 12>you're a founder, and you basically you know house your ground.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 12>The last eighteen months you basically may have passed the test.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 12>So right now where you got to do with. You

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 12>got to just hand tight, keep working, and twenty twenty

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 12>four should be a much better You're for asset class.

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I just think of, for example, those that did decide

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 3>to take it on the chin when it came to valuation.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I think of a Stripe for example, and still some

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 3>of those shares are available on the secondary market for

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot less than their peak valuation, but not all

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 3>are below. I think of SpaceX for example, that I

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 3>know is in your portfolio, and they're currently looking to

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>be selling inside shares at the moment at what huge valuation.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of that?

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I would say, you know, you know, when I

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 12>look at the name, let's stripe, you know the fact

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 12>that it's evaluation, the new round is down fifty percent

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 12>from the last round is actually not a surprise.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 4>There's a couple of reasons.

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 12>One is, know, you know, just you just put in

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 12>a higher interest rate in the financial model that the

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 12>fifty billion or so invaluation is actually you know, fair value,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 12>right o versus the ninety five billion dollars that they

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 12>had to raise that lash round. And the second thing is,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 12>you know, in public markets, whether you look at you

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 12>look at the peer group, of so far marketa you

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 12>look at you know, New Bank, the local et cetera, Robins.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 12>You know, the public peers are also down, you know,

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 12>more than fifty percent, So it makes sense that the

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 12>private name are also going to be down a little

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 12>fifty person a little bit more so, so the valuations

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 12>are adjust based on a DCF model.

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Joe, been writing any checks in the world of AI,

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 4>do you want to tell us about.

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 12>I've been working a lot on these names again. You know,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 12>AI is you know, as we look at you know,

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 12>let's not. I was going to show me the point.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 4>That AI is really software squared.

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 12>AI is the next generation of technology as we think

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 12>about you know, the evolution of tech from mobile to internet,

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 12>the cloud, the AI. AI is just the next generation

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 12>of technology. And so you know, right now, I guess

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 12>what I'm seeing in in the private markets. You know,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 12>we started in twenty twenty one. A lot of the

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 12>deal flow that begin se in twenty twenty one was

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 12>getting a little bit repetitive. For example, you will see

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 12>many many payments businesses for every single bit, for every

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 12>single purpose. But AI is really going to lead every

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 12>vertical into the new generation. And so when we when

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 12>we think about AI. You know, we've invested in several

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 12>of these AI companies. We're really investing in the infrastructure layer,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 12>betting on the whole industry. And in the next five

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 12>to ten years, we expect to see existing tech verticals

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 12>like software, cyber and fin tech to marry AI and basically,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 12>you know, become drive the next legged growth.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 4>Joe, what's going to be keeping you busy in twenty

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, you know, whether it's thematically or you're just

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 4>under pressure to find some exit somewhere from your existing portfolio.

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, we have several companies in the preactial

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 12>pipeline and we expect them to file in twenty four

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 12>and twenty five. And then second to that is when

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 12>we look at new opportunities. There's two strategies. One is

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 12>we're working at a lot of secondary opportunities because some

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 12>of the early shareholders would like to cash out, they'd

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 12>be in the company for ten to fifteen years. Some

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 12>of the early vcs also need to seek access because

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 12>their funds have to be shut down their LPs for

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 12>commanding their capital to be returned. So this creates a

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 12>really good opportunity for secondaries focused funds to be able

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 12>to be able to find some value in private markets.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 12>And then secondarily it's ai you know, we think AI

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 12>is is the driver of growth. And as we're going

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 12>to the new business cycle, looks like the fat is

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 12>almost done or is done. And if the fat begins

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 12>to cut and you know, equity is received more capital

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 12>from allocations from LPs. You know, we're seeing sort of

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, everything kind of rebounding for a venture. So

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 12>we think that starting in twenty twenty four, twenty twenty

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 12>twenty five, I think its inventor should be a lot easier.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Has and has not show jaw. Thank you so much,

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Millennia Capital. Great to have you on. Meanwhile, let's just

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>you gears a little bit and go back to the world.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 3>That was all the hype back in twenty twenty one.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Not so much now.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Crypto three Hourrows Capital co founder Sushow for the first

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 3>time faced questioning in the Singapore court about the crypto

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 3>fund's collapse, giving liquidators their best chance yet to gather

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 3>information as they seek to.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 5>Recoup some of the billions of dollars for creditors.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 3>Now, the two day court hearing this week requires you

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to respond to lawyers for the liquidator to know people

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 3>familiar with the matter, said ed, all.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Right, coming up here on Bloomberg Technology, Charlotte Slayman from

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Public Knowledge joins us in the efforts to rain in

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 4>the power that Google and Apple wheeled over the wrapp stores.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 4>We will get back to that top story about Apple's

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 4>antitrust action in the EU as well. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's just take another look at the shares of Apple

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and Spotify, because, as we were mentioning earlier, Apple is

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 3>set to be hit by an EU antitrust order in

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>its fight with rival music streaming platforms such as Spotify.

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Greenberg's Mark German joins us now to discuss what seems

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>to be everyone taking aim and these app stores.

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 5>What's the nuance in this one? Mark?

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So today we reported the European Union is going

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 13>after Apple about this interesting rule, right that actually Apple

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 13>mitigated a couple of years ago.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, Apple for.

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 13>A long time did not allow outside developers to advertise

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 13>lower pricing from outside the app store. The other thing

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 13>Apple didn't allow or developers like Spotify to include a

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 13>button in their app where you can click the button

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 13>to go to Spotify's website. To sign up, they made

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 13>you sign up via the app store through in app purchase,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 13>which gives Apple a thirty percent cut. Now, Apple mitigated

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 13>this starting in late twenty twenty one, they allowed developers

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 13>to advertise lower pricing via email to customers. They also,

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 13>starting in early twenty twenty two, allowed Spotify in other

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 13>what they call reader apps, anything having to do with

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 13>video CloudStore like Dropbox, some business apps, music, magazine books,

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 13>newspaper apps. Reader apps is the name for that category,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 13>allowed them to point out to finish their transactions online.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 13>But now the European unit is going after Apple for

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 13>that old practice, ensuring that that practice doesn't come back

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 13>into effect, and potentially the company could be fine for

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 13>having done that. Obviously, Spotify is a European company. It

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 13>has been pushing against Apples rules for some time now.

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 13>In that combined with other lawsuits we've seen the Epic

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 13>Games lawsuit a couple of years ago, different settlements Apples

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 13>had with the Japanese Fair Trade Commission with developers. In

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 13>the US, the app store is starting to craft open

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 13>a little bit, as is Google Play, the application download

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 13>store on Android.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mark Guman there with a pretty decent explanation of

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 4>anti steering provisions and on that fine up to ten

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 4>percent of global revenue, which if you take fiscal twenty

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 4>two or the estimate for twenty three, is forty billion

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 4>dollars potentially in fines. Whether or not it happens, we

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>will see. Let's keep the conversation going on Apple and

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 4>also talk about Google after its defeat to Fortnite maker

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Epic Games in court earlier this week. Now, with key

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 4>legislation in Europe, investigations in the US and the UK,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 4>and an expected wave of follow on suits, the pressure

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 4>keeps on piling onto the tech giants, which Epic describes

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 4>as a duopoly. I want to bring in public knowledge

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Competition Policy Director Charlotte Slayman to go over what has

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 4>been an incredible week in the world of anti trust.

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with the anti steering provisions in Europe and

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's report on that action against Apple. What do you

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 4>make of that?

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so this is a problem that we've seen in

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 14>the US as well, and we don't have that legislation

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 14>in place right there's legislation in Congress right now, the

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.479
<v Speaker 14>Open App Markets Act, that would address this rule that

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 14>Apple usually uses in the US that prevents apps from

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 14>being able to tell customers you can get a cheaper

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 14>price if you come directly to our website. So that

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 14>continues to be a problem here. Consumers are paying more

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 14>as a result.

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 4>These are big stories, but what is always so surprising

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 4>is the lack of response in the stock or the

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 4>share price. I know that's not your domain, but it

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 4>begs the question, how likely is it that the courts

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 4>in the United States or the European Commission in Europe

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 4>will actually follow through in making Apple, as an example, Google,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 4>a just policy.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think they've been learning over time.

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 14>We absolutely have seen antitrust cases in Europe that have

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 14>been successful until you get to the remedy stage and

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 14>the remedy that they choose is not effective and so

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 14>competition doesn't really come in and that's really frustrating from

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 14>the perspective of a consumer advocate. But I think that's

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 14>something that the enforcers are learning. Those remedies can be

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 14>really difficult to craft, but they're learning over time, and

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 14>so I'm hopeful that they can be more effective going forward.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 3>And how will they become more effective? Because thus far,

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean Congress has been looking into competition policy more broadly,

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 3>but to put it bluntly, that nothing much of significance

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 3>has been done. The FDC, meanwhile, has been trying to

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 3>stop certain deals going through and failing there.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm interested as to whether you think there will be.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 3>A shift from a actual putting the right laws in place,

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 3>even if the courts We're.

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 5>All not going to hold our breath in the Supreme Court,

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 5>I guess where Epic Games goes next.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So I think we need to be using both

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 14>of those tools right. Congress needs to pass the legislation

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 14>that they've been working on. It's not just the Open

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 14>App Markets Act, but there's the American Innovation and Choice

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 14>Online Act. There's the America Act, which focuses on ad

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 14>technology stack. So Congress needs to work on that legislation

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 14>so that they can get it over the finish line.

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 14>At the same time the agencies are bringing these cases.

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 4>These can both be long processes.

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 14>Unfortunately, to move the law forward by bringing case after

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 14>case it can take a long time, and it makes

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 14>perfect sense that the agency would lose the first few cases.

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 14>This is a strategy that the FTC and DOJ have

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 14>used in the past. In other areas, in pharmaceuticals, in

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 14>hospital mergers, they are slowly improving the law. That's why

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 14>I think Congress really needs to jump in because we

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 14>cannot wait for that long process of bringing case after

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 14>case to show fruit.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>We need to move now.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you think business models will change because of well

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 3>legislation in the EU? When we think of the DMA,

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 3>do you think I mean South Korea is twenty twenty

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 3>one when they had the first law to require other

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 3>payment systems within these app stores?

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 4>Yees.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 14>So I think that's another example where I'm hopeful that

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 14>some learning will take place because Apple was able to

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 14>make some small changes but still prevent competition from coming in.

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 14>But yes, I think these companies may sometimes as they're

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 14>making changes for one jurisdiction, they may find it more

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 14>efficient to make that change across the globe, or they

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 14>may not. So I think it's also on the other jurisdictions, governments,

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 14>and on consumers to notice. This is what I'm hoping

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 14>American consumers will notice. Wait a minute, EU consumers are

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 14>getting the benefits of competition. They are getting lower prices,

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 14>they're getting better products, they're getting easier access and fight

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 14>for that.

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>For ourselves, we.

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Want to thank you Public Knowledge Competition Policy director Charlotte's Layman.

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 3>Really interesting take on what has been a thick and

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 3>fast week when it comes to competition. Meanwhile, let's just

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 3>go out to Germany right now, because Actual Springer is

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 3>granting chat GPT maker open Ai the right to use

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 3>content from its news outlets to develop artificial intelligence models

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 3>and respond to queries from users.

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 5>It's all part of a deal announced today.

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco based open Ai will pay Actual Springer for

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 3>articles and other content from the publications that include like

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 3>political business inside it properties like build and develot, the

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 3>company said in a joint statement Fit Dance Well. It's

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 3>reportedly backing away from plans for its next virtual reality

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 3>headset from its Pico subsidiary.

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 3>The information says that Pico will instead focus it efforts

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 3>on an updated version of the latest headset, the Pick

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 3>of Four.

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 5>This comes them in some pressure, of course, and in

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 5>terms of competing with Meta in.

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 4>The VR market right I reported earlier this year that

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Meta and Tencent are teaming up on a headset in China.

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a good segue into the broader topic of augmented reality.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Our next guest founded a company that uses AR to

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 4>help monetize tasks in the manufacturing industries. Joining us now

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 4>with more is Devin Bouchan, CEO of Squint, which recently

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 4>announced a thirteen million dollar Series A funding round led

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 4>by Sequa Capital. The use case is fascinating, right, think

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 4>of an assembly line, training workers, visualizing the industrial workspace.

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 4>But what it's unique about your technology? What is it

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 4>that you do?

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 15>Thanks for having me ed, It's great to be here.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 15>So Squint is an augmented reality product that lets you

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 15>create a how to guide for every machine on the

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 15>factory floor. So manufacturing today is going through a period

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 15>of really high turnover and as a result, they're having

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 15>to hire more workers than they ever have. Traditionally, the

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 15>way that they trained these workers was they would actually

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 15>pair them with an experience operator and that person would

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 15>look over their shoulder and guide them through the process

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 15>as they worked, and this would take weeks. Now this

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 15>doesn't scale as you hire more and more people. So

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 15>that's where Squint comes in. Squint is that app that

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 15>lives in that new operator's hands and it lets them

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 15>point it at a machine and it actually recognizes what

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 15>they're looking at, and then guides them through that process

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 15>as if they were the expert themselves, and now they

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 15>can do it without any help from that experience operator.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 4>You're clear, you are not an OEM, You're not a

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 4>maker of a headset. What you're doing is providing a

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 4>very specific software platform best use of the headset exactly.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 15>So Squint actually works on any phone or tablet today

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 15>and manufacturers can pull it up instantly and basically go

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 15>through this process and make any operator and expert.

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 3>You have a pretty lean team when it comes to

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 3>building this sort of software and technology. I'm interested, Devin

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 3>in Ultimately, therefore, what you do with this capital?

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 5>Where do you need to be driving now?

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Because you've already got a lot of well known customers

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 3>and think involve those emas Culgate.

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Palm on it for example.

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, you know, we're really excited that we raise this

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 15>Series A and really now we're looking to invest in

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 15>our go to market efforts as well as our engineering,

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 15>product and design org. And you know, we're thrilled to

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 15>basically grow this footprint of impact that we've created with

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 15>our customers.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 3>How expensive is talent now to get with Squint is

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 3>that one of the top costs right now?

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, yeah, so I think you know, talent is always

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 15>a hard thing to procure, especially in the Bay Area,

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 15>and with Squint, you know, I think the attraction with

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 15>working on new technology like this is a big help.

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 15>And you know, when we work with our customers, we

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 15>repeatedly hear that they've cut their training time in half,

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 15>and that's really attractive to new talent.

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 4>And you know, in Silicon Valley, Devin Squint's essentially a developer,

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 4>right And I wonder how much fiction straint. The hardware

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 4>is a you kind of technology agnostate, whether your customers

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 4>use devices that are iOS or Android, how does it

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 4>work in practice inside a customers factory.

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so we are technology agnostic. This works on an

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 15>iOS tablet or an Android tablet or phone. The way

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 15>that it really works is, let's say, I'll give you

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 15>an example. So a couple of weeks ago, I was

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 15>at a large food and beverage manufacturer.

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 4>Which one I can.

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 15>I'll keep going, But they had a robot arm that

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 15>only one expert knew how to use, and I was

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 15>only there for a couple hours. So what we did

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 15>was we actually walked up to this arm and I

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 15>made a map in Squint. This takes about a minute.

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 15>It just uses the camera, no additional expertise required. And

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 15>then I filmed a video of that operator doing their job.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 15>And later in the day we pulled in their HR

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 15>manager literally someone who has never used a machine before,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 15>and they used Squint and they were able to perform

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 15>that procedure at the same quality as the expert in minutes.

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Therein lies the selling point for Squint. Right now, we

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much CEO Devin Brashan joining us on

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the technology in the manufacturing, particularly arena.

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 4>In Yeah, it's been a busy world week from AI

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 4>to anti trust, Loot's recap on the podcast. Lots of

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 4>you listening to the podcast wherever you get it, Apple, Spotify, iHeart,

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 4>and every day we're publishing it to the Bloomberg platform

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>and don't forget the show is also on YouTube on

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 4>the Bloomberg Technology YouTube account. Big week still to come

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 4>for San Francisco and New York City. This is Bloomberg

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 4>Technology