WEBVTT - What is membrane theory?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It's the

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>credit card designed for iPhone. It gives you unlimited daily

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>cash back that can earn four point four zero percent

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>annual percentage yield. When you open a high Yield savings

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>account through Apple Card, apply for Applecard in the wallet

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>app subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Apple

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Card owners subject to eligibility. Apple Card and Savings by

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch Member FDIC

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>terms and more at applecard dot com. When you pop

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a piece of cheese into your mouth, you're probably not

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the environmental impact. But the people in the

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>dairy industry are. That's why they're working hard every day

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to find new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. How is US Dairy

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic digesters to turn

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the methane from manure into renewable energy that can power farms, towns,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and electric cars. Visit us dairy dot COM's Last Sustainability

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn more.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Most deals are barely worth mentioning. But then there's at

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and t's best deal on the new Samsung Galaxy Z

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Flip six featuring Flexcam with Galaxy AI. You can get

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 2>it on them when you trade in your eligible smartphone,

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>any year, any condition.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a deal so good you'll be shouting from the rooftops.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>So grab a latter and learn how to get that

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>new phone on AT and T AT and T connecting changes.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Everything requires trade in a Galaxy s NOTEWORZ series smartphone.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Limit time off for two hundred fifty six gigabyes for

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Z your dollars. Additional bees terms and restrictions apply. Seatt

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>dot Com Slash Samsung Worp has an AT and D

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 2>store for details.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 4>As a United Explorer Card member, you can earn fifty

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>thousand bonus miles plus look forward to extraordinary travel rewards,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 4>including a free checked bag, two times the miles on

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 4>United purchases and two times the miles on dining and

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 4>at hotels. Become an Explorer and seek out unforgettable places

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 4>while enjoying rewards everywhere you travel. Cards issued by JP

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC subject to credit approval.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Offers subject to change.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Terms apply.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Hey Daniel, have you guys figured out what's inside a

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>black hole?

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Yet unfortunately not still pretty confused.

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it sounds like you guys need to go back

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to the drawing board get some new ideas.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, but like from where the smartest people on

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the planet have been stuck in this question for literally decades.

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>See that is where you are going wrong. You are

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 3>looking to the smart people. If you need wacky, crazy ideas,

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>you need to ask the wacky crazy people like me.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You're saying we should go to the insane asylum and

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>ask people what they think is inside a black hole.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>I think that they could come up with some good ideas.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 3>They might be insane enough in the membrane to figure

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>it out.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Insane in the brain. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>physicist and a professor at UC Irvine. And if you

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't get my Cypress Hill reference, you're officially young.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I am Katie. I am not a physicist. I like animals, though,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and I like the universe. And I got that reference.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Because you're insane in the membrane.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, just the membrane, though the rest of me is

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>perfectly sane.

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And Welcome to the podcast. Daniel and Jorge explain the

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>universe in which we do our best to bring this

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>insane universe into your brain. We try to make it

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>all make sense, from the tiniest little quantum particles to

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the hugest swirling accretion disks surrounding super massive black holes.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>We have this hunch that maybe the universe is understandable,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's a big mathematical puzzle, that we can eventually

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>figure it out if we put all of our brains

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and membranes together, and our goal on this podcast is

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to explain all of it to you.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, that's another song, super Massive black Hole. I think

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>news soundtrack to that really sort of indie movie called Twilight.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure that wasn't part of the hip hop

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>wars in the nineties, super Massive black Hole.

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't say. In the nineties, I was not cool

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 3>enough to know.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, maybe there are some secrets in music

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that can help us crack the mysteries of the universe,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>because you know, some people say the universe is musical

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a connection between music and mathematics, right, So

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe we have been looking in the wrong places.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like I've heard this in terms of string theory,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>where strings aren't you know, they're not like violin strings,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's something about some like either vibration or pattern. Honestly,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>I do not understand it, but you know, I think

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 3>that is interesting saying that there is the idea that

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the mysteries of the universe could be

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>about certain frequencies or patterns, which is also what is

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 3>the major components of music exactly.

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Although if you listen to Terrence Howard on Joe Rogan,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all frequencies.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Man, is all frequencies?

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Man?

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Why am I not on Joe Rogan? See, I just

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 3>can say that too.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I can because you believe that one times one equals one,

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and Terrence Howard proves that it equals to and wow,

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're just not mathematically qualified.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 5>To be.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 3>I just can't think outside of the box enough to

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 3>not do mouth good exactly.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But we are fascinated by the mysteries of the universe.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We do think that there are mathematical solutions to them.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they are encoded in the sonatas of Mozart. Maybe

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the engineers are right that it's all vibrations all the

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>way down. But we hope that there is an explanation.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And one of the biggest things that we need an

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>explanation for is how to think about the universe on

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the smallest scales. What happens when things get really, really

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>dense and really really tiny. One of the biggest puzzles

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in modern physics is how to put together the two

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>pillars of our understanding of the universe, relativity and quantum mechanics.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We've been banging our heads against this for almost one

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, basically since we've had relativity and quantum mechanics

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and realize that they are fundamentally incompatible at the smallest scale,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've been trying to figure this out. And today

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, we'll be exploring yet another attempt to

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>unify relativity and quantum mechanics. So on the podcast today

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll be answering the question what is membrane theory?

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, as a biology nerd, I'm pretty sure I can

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 3>answer this. A membrane is a semi permeable barrier. So

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 3>I did it. I solved it. Congratulations to me.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>What about the audio barrier between us and the listeners

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the ideas from our brains and that their brains have

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we permeated a membrane? I?

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, why not? I don't know enough about audio engineering

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to say no or philosophy, So I'm gonna say yes.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>We're like salt ions through the airwaves, permeating the membrane,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 3>so hopefully you can reach homeostasis.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not surprised that when you heard this phrase

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you thought of cellular membranes divisions between solutions. You want

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep osmosis from like moving all these bits of

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>salt over here, or using fats to keep that over there.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's not just in biology that we have membranes.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that they are fundamental concept in theories

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of quantum gravity. But before we dig into that, I

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>was curious what everybody else out there thought when they

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>heard membrane theory, So, as usual, I asked our andre

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of volunteers to speculate on the question without the opportunity

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to use Google. So if you would like to join

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this group of volunteers in the future, please don't be shy.

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Write me to questions at Danielandjorge dot com. We all

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>want to hear what you have to say. In the meantime,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>check out these answers from listeners. What do you think

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>membrane theory is? Here's what people had to say that's

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the first time I'm hearing golf it.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 6>But if I had to guess membranes, the function of

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 6>the memoranes are to pass on stuff in one direction

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 6>and other stuff not in the other direction. So maybe

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 6>we're talking about it's a mechanism about particle coexistence through

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 6>a wall of things, something like that.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 7>Just I guess what comes to mind for me on

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 7>that one is that it's something that you use to

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 7>separate things, like in a fuel cell car. You know,

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 7>you separate components and you make energy. Maybe it's like

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 7>a desalination thing where you take salt.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Out of water.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 7>So maybe there's some membrane here in the universe that's

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 7>uh in that in space.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm guessing membrane theory has to do with the outside

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 5>of a cell. Maybe how the membrane, you know, protects

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 5>the core of the cell and how it stays intact.

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to do with string theory. There

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are strings that vibrate in there one dimension, and I

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think a membrane is a.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Something similar that can have more than one dimension.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 3>See, I'm I'm definitely with the theory that everything is

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a cell. If you look at the universe, it's just

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 3>a giant body for some kind of huge animal. You know,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense, right, you're saying the universe is alive. Yeah,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a big maybe a giant cat. I don't know,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>have you ever looked at like a black cat? Right,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 3>it's it kind of has that sort of quantum mechanics

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 3>and general relativity paradox. Right, it's like a fluid, it's

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a solid, it's sweet and le and then it bites you.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think the universe could be a giant cat.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 3>And when you get down to the tiniest components there

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 3>cells and yeah, it's been solved.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome and we're done, Thank you very much. Physics

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is over. Katie wins all of the Nobel prices.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 3>Yay.

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're definitely hearing from listeners the connection to biology,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which makes a lot of sense, and the idea of

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>having two dimensional surfaces or even connections to string theory.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of good stuff in here that

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to dig into and explain in this episode.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But a plus to all the listeners.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I would assume that, yes, it's probably not

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 3>like a cellular membrane, but if we're talking about a membrane.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I would guess it is some kind of barrier through

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>which certain physics transactions can occur. But that would be

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>my guess.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Is this whole podcast a physics transaction? We are taking

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>your time and exchanging it for knowledge, is like a

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>physics transaction, you know what?

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty good. I think I'm wondering about the exchange

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>rate though, because that's that's the real issue.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we're too high on the jokes permitt

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it and too low and the physics permitted so far.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's try to flip that right now.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, well, okay, let me have it, Like, what's

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>going on with this membrane theory?

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So membrane theory is an attempt to crack the puzzle

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of quantum gravity. So let's start with that. What is

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle of quantum gravity? Why do we want to

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>crack it? What is the issue? Why are all the

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>smart people on the planet thinking they need to go

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>into the insane this islum if they can't figure this out.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>The basic issue is we have two ways to describe

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe. There's general relativity, which tells us about space

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>and time and energy and the expansion of the universe.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Describes a lot of the big stuff. It tells us

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>how gravity works and how the universe is expanding and

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>how far away galaxies are getting red shifted and all

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that good stuff. And then we have quantum mechanics, which

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>describes the really small stuff, the little particles light and

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>all the kind of quantum fields and sort of our

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>understanding of microscopic matter. And the issue is that we

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to make these two things play well together.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 3>They don't play nice because I've actually, I think I've

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>been on the show a couple times when we talked

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>about this conundrum, and so it seems like, you know,

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 3>when you have these mathematical theories that describe each of them,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 3>it works within it. So the general relativity math works

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 3>within general relativity. It seems really nice and neat and good.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Same thing for quantum mechanics. But then when you try

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 3>to cross the beams the math beams, suddenly it doesn't work.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Like if you're trying to use general relativity math to

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 3>describe what you know is observed in experiments happening on

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of the quantum level or vice versa, it no

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 3>longer works. Is that more or less?

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love crossing the math beams. That's awesome. I

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>want a T shirt that says I'm crossing the math beams.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's basically the idea. And remember that what

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we're doing in physics is trying to build a mental

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>model that describes the universe easy. Those mental models are

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>always imperfect, they're always incomplete, they're always simplifications. Even if

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about like the flight of a baseball, Right,

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>how does a baseball fly across the field? Well, I'm

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>going to use a parabola in Newton's equations, but I

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>can't do the calculation very easily. I fad to include

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>air resistance, so I decide I'm not including that because

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not important, and really, to answer my question

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of whether the guy's going to catch it, air resistance

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. I'm not going to include effects of humidity

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>and the sizillion things I could include in my model

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to make it a very accurate description of the universe

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that I don't need to to answer my question. And

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>so the models that we build to answer questions about

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe are always incomplete. There are always approximations, but

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they're still very, very useful, And that's The issue with

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics and general relativity is that they are two

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>different approximate descriptions of the universe that make different approximations,

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>different foundational assumptions that go in building those models that

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>are incompatible, and they let us describe different parts of

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe, as you say, very very well. So if

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about how two electrons scatter off

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of each other, I can use quantum mechanics and talk

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about how they interact and the virtual particles they exchange

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or the fields that ripple between them, and it all

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>works out amazingly well. And that can ignore what general

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>relativity would do in that situation because it's irrelevant. It's

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>like the wind resistance or the humidity on the baseball.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't affect the calculations, so I can ignore it.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Or if I want to say, hey, how do galaxies

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>form and how do they swirl around each other? I

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>can use general relativity to answer those questions, and I

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can ignore the quantum effects because who cares what one

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>electron does in Andromeda doesn't affect whether our galaxy is

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>going to crash into that galaxy. General relativity dominates. The

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing thing is that in every situation in our universe,

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you can use either quantum mechanics to explain it or

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>general relativity and ignore the other one. They're like a

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>perfect divorced couple that have separate to their lives and

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>never have to interact. You know, there are no arguments

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at McDonald's about who's taking the case. They're co parenting

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And so you might think, all right, great,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem, right co parents can live in harmony

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>without ever talking to each other. Well, there's two problems.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>One is that's really unsatisfying, right, Like, we want one

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>explanation for the universe. We don't want two different explanations.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't want a Russiaman universe where both parents tell

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>very very different stories about what's going on. Right.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Note, we think that.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>There is one story about the universe. There's something that's happening,

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and that there are rules that are being followed, and

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to know what they are. We want our

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>best approximation of them. So it's deeply unsatisfying to have

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>two different, incompatible theories of the universe. And also, there

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are moments in the universe, a very few places in

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>times when you can't ignore one war or the other.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You need both things like the heart of a black

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>hole a singularity. In general, relativity is incompatible with quantum mechanics,

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>which says you've got to have some fuzziness or the

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang or the very early universe when things were really,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>really hot and dense. You need the rules of quantum

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>mechanics to describe those particles. But you can't ignore gravity

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because things are so hot and so dense. So we

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>desperately want to find a way to bring these two together.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But as you say, the math beams don't cross, right.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's like, as physicists you now kind of

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 3>have to play as a couple's therapists, where you have

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>these two theories that are essentially speaking different languages, and

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 3>they cannot come to an agreement, and they can be

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>perfectly functional on their own, but then when they come together,

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 3>they are unable to communicate. And the Yeah, I mean,

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>it seems like resolving that difference between the two theories,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>like resolving why they don't work with each other, would

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 3>actually reveal some big things that we just fundamentally have

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 3>not understood yet about the universe.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>M M. You know, I've heard anecdotally about couples that

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>don't actually speak the same language you know where they

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have like literally have now yet they've fallen in love.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>That's actually true, they have some other love language.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Hi language interpret of there love.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>At first sight, right, doesn't love it first word.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, you're right that quantum mechanics in general relativity don't

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get along, and one of the reasons is that they

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are built on very different assumptions. Like general relativity says

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe is smooth, it's continuous, it's precise, there's an

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>infinite number of locations. It says that you can divide

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>space an infinite number of times, like relativity agrees with

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Zeno's paradox, right that between you and the candy store,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there's always a distance that you can cut in half.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Space from the point of view of general relativity is

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>something that's smooth and continuous and you always have a

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>very specific location, whereas quantum mechanics says not nothing is

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>actually smooth and continuous. There aren't not infinite number of

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>locations between any two points. Things are discrete and chunky.

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>A beam of light is actually made up of little

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pieces of light, little packets of light. Everything in the

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>universe is discrete, and it's also imprecise. None of these

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>little packets have a precise location that have probabilities. So

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you see the foundations of these two theories are very

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>very different. They start from two very different places, and

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>so weave in them together has a lot of challenges.

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>People have been trying to make theories of quantum gravity

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, let's take gravity and try to describe

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it in the language of quantum mechanics. For example, think

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of it like a quantum field. They are exchanging virtual particles.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>They even have a name for these particles. It would

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be the graviton. But when you sit down and try

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to do those calculations, gravity is different from the other

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum forces because it couples to itself. Everything that has

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>energy has gravity, and so if you emit a graviton,

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it also feels gravity, and it emits gravitons, which emit

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>more gravitons. You can infinite number of graviton and then

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you start to get nonsense answers. So as you say,

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the math beams don't cross.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of gravitons, is that something that has

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 3>ever been able to be studying in the same way

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>that you can study protons or is it just sort

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>of a byproduct of this? Seems like this could be

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 3>a thing based on the math that we have theorized about.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, gravitons are purely theoretical, and they're not even coherently theoretical.

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Theories that have gravitons in them just don't work their

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>problems with them, and so it's not just that we

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen them. We don't even understand how they would

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>work if they did exist. And there also would be

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>really really hard to spot, Like if you're thinking about

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>gravitational waves from rotating black holes, for example, those are

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>not gravitons. Those are ripples in space and time. They

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>are like a beam of light. Gravitons would be like

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>taking that beam of light and breaking it up into photons.

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So you take that gravitational wave and now break it

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>up into tiny little gravitons. But even gravitational waves are

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard to see. Gravitons would be much much tinier,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>well beyond our capability. But also mathematically they just don't work.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>If you try to do calculations with gravitons, you get

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>weird answers, like what's the probability that this electron is

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>going to go left. Oh, one hundred and forty percent.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>What that doesn't make any sense, right, And so that's

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>telling you that fundamentally there is a problem with the

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>mathematics that you need to go deeper and start from

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>something else, change one of your assumptions in order to

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>make a working theory of quantum gravity.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean this kind of reminds me in biology of

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>how like the history of biology and medicine, where we

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 3>would start to understand things like we would start to

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>understand how certain medications work, or you know, understand things like,

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, a man and a woman make a baby

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>and the like. There seems to be these germinal cells responsible.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 3>But then we didn't have the ability to get tiny

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 3>enough inside the human body where we couldn't see like proteins,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>we couldn't see you know, maybe we at some point

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 3>could see cells, but we couldn't see DNA. So there

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>were so many strange and interesting theories that kept circling

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 3>around trying to get closer and closer to the truth.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Like there were really funny ones like imagining that there's

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 3>just like a tiny person inside of a sperm cell

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and then that grew into a baby. But essentially it's

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>like we were able to make scientific observations, but without

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 3>the ability to get small enough in terms of like

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 3>we didn't have electron microscopes, we didn't have the technology

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 3>or understanding to study DNA. These theories could not kind

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of you know, interweave until we got to that point.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>And that kind of seems like where, you know, sort

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 3>of like what's happening with the universe? Like we're able

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 3>to you know, make all of these really interesting scientific

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 3>observations and they're not necessarily wrong, but there is some

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 3>fundamental aspect that it's not necessarily that it's too small

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to see, but something that we can't see yet or

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 3>something that is really hard to observe that might help

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 3>tie these things together exactly.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And because it's a question mark, it's deeply unsatisfying to

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not have figured it out. We suspect that when we

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>do figure it out, it'll be something new, something fascinating,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>something that tells us about the basic nature of the universe,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's telling us that Gr's description of the universe

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. Space is not just some bendable manifold, and

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the quantum mechanics description of the universe is wrong in

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some important way. That's what I love about physics, because

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not just I have a model in my head

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that is predicting the universe. You can then look at

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that model and ask questions about it that are philosophical

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and like, huh, why does the universe work this way?

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Or you can look at it and say, oh, that's

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>why time flows forwards and there's only one dimension of

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it in three dimensions of space. If you have that

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamental theory of the universe, we hope that those kind

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of answers can come from it deep insights about the

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>very nature of reality. People who think like, oh, that's

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so weird and abstract, I mean, that's like the context

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of our whole lives, you know, our entire existence. Understanding

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the basic nature of reality of space and time and

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>matter and energy like that is the stage of our life,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the context of our existence. The stakes could literally not

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be higher.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's interesting because I'm really curious about things

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>like animal and human behavior, understanding them and understanding things

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>like perception and you know. But those kinds of questions

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't see as too fundamentally different from the questions

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 3>that physicists are answering because in a way, you know,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 3>our perception of things are sort of like behaviors and stuff.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 3>That is how we're able to perceive the universe. And

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 3>so these kinds of questions of understanding. Of course, the

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 3>methodologies are very different and what we find are going

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to be very different with these two questions, but it's

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 3>that's still that kind of desire to understand what are

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 3>we and where are we? How do we function and

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 3>how do we function in real to our environment? And

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, of course the universe being the largest environment

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 3>that we can think of in which we are. But

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 3>you know what, we should probably take a quick break

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>while I really ponder an egg and the membrane of

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 3>an egg and try to think about whether this is

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 3>something that could describe the universe.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>With big wireless providers, what you see is never what

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you get. Somewhere between the store and your first month's bill.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>The price you thought you were paying magically skyrockets. With

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>mint Mobile, You'll never have to worry about gotcha's ever again.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>When mint Mobile says fifteen dollars a month for a

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>three month plan, they really mean it. I've used mint

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Mobile and the call quality is always so crisp and

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so clear I can recommend it to you. So say

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>bye bye to your overpriced wireless plans, jaw dropping monthly

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>bills and unexpected overages. You can use your own phone

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with any mint Mobile plan and bring your phone number

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>along with your existing contacts. So dig your overpriced wireless

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with Mint Mobiles deal and get three months a premium

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wireless service for fifteen bucks a month. To get this

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>new customer offer and your new three month premium wireless

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>plan for just fifteen bucks a month, go to mintmobile

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash universe. That's mintmobile dot com slash universe.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Cut your wireless build a fifteen bucks a month at

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>mintmobile dot com slash universe. Forty five dollars upfront payment

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>required equivalent to fifteen dollars per month new customers on

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>first three month plan only. Speeds slower about forty gigabytes

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>On unlimited plan. Additional taxi, s, fees and restrictions apply.

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>See mint mobile for details.

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 8>AI might be the most important new computer technology ever.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 8>It's storming every industry and literally billions of dollars are

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 8>being invested, so buckle up. The problem is that AI

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 8>needs a lot of speed and processing power. So how

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 8>do you compete without cost spiraling out of control? It's

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 8>time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud.

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 8>Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or OCI. OCI is a single platform

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 8>for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. OCI

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 8>has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 8>offers one consistent price instead of variable regional pricing, and

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 8>of course nobody does data better than Oracle. So now

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 8>you can train your AI models at twice the speed

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 8>and less than half the cost of other clouds. If

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 8>you want to do more and spend less, like Uber

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 8>eight by eight and Data Bricks Mosaic, take a free

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 8>test drive of OCI at Oracle dot com slash strategic.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 8>That's Oracle dot com slash Strategic Oracle dot com slash Strategic.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It's the

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.959
<v Speaker 1>credit card designed for iPhone. It gives you unlimited daily

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>cash back that can earn four point four zero percent

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>annual percentage yield. When you open a high Yield savings

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>account through Applecard, apply for Applecard in the Wallet app,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Applecard owners

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>subject to eligibility. Apple Card and savings by Goldman Sachs Bank, USA,

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Salt Lake City Branch Member, FDIC terms and more at

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>applecard dot com. When you pop a piece of cheese

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>your mouth, or enjoy a rich spoonful of Greek yogurt,

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not thinking about the environmental impact of each

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and every bite, But the people in the dairy industry are.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>US Dairy has set themselves some ambitious sustainability goals, including

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 1>being greenhouse gas neutral by twenty to fifty. That's why

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>they're working hard every day to find new ways to

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>reduce waste, conserve natural resources, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Take water, for example, most dairy farms reuse water up

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to four times the same water cools the milk, cleans equipment,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>washes the barn, and irrigates the crops. How is US

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>dairy tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic digestors that

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>turn the methane from maneuver into renewable energy that can

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>power farms, towns, and electric cars. So the next time

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you grab a slice of pizza or lick an ice

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>cream cone, know that dairy farmers and processors around the

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.959
<v Speaker 1>country are using the latest practices and innovations to provide

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the nutrient dense dairy products we love with less of

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>an impact. Visit usdairy dot com slash sustainability to learn more.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we are back. I've been staring at

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 3>this egg for five minutes, Daniel can attest to that,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I think maybe the universe could be

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 3>an egg with yellow stuff on the inside. What do

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I love your egg theory of the universe. I want

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to see the math behind it before I really commit

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to it.

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 3>One plus one equals two? Or wait, one time is

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>one equals too? I accidentally did I'm so bad at math.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to make a joke where I did

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 3>it bad and I did it correctly.

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Oops oops oops.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 3>So, Daniel, I really want to get deeper into these

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 3>ideas because we've talked about how these things don't seem

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 3>to add up, and these attempts to make things add

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 3>up have in some sense, I don't want to say failed,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>but they haven't reached the finish line yet. So, like

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 3>rabtons don't make sense yet, are there is there anything

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 3>promising where we are seeing some revelations that may help

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 3>us get closer to why there is this fundamental miscommunication

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 3>between general relativity and quantum mechanics.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So there definitely has been some progress. Nobody's totally figured

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it out, but some of the smartest folks on the

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>planet have some ideas. And before we get into membrane theory,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you need to take a step back and understand where

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it came from, which is from string theory.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm excited because I remember I remember watching I

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 3>think like a PBS nova thing and they tried to

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 3>explain string theory and it just confused me more than

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, like if you just said, like,

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>imagine what string theory is, I'd probably be less confused

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 3>at that point, until after watching this documentary. I'm not

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be mean to PBS, but I

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 3>don't think they really explained it very well because it

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 3>was like they were like these vibrating strings like on

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.239
<v Speaker 3>a violin, and it's like, I don't know that that

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 3>makes a lot of sense, and I'm confused. You mean,

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>there's tiny violins everywhere. What's going on? Are the world's

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 3>smallest violins making up the universe? So I do want

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 3>to understand better.

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's see if we can do better than

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian Green on PBS. The idea is to avoid some

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of the mathematical problems that come when you try to

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cross the beam those infinities. A lot of those infinities

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>come from the basic assumption that things are points, that

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>particles are tiny dots, because those have infinities in them.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>There's infinite densities and the zero volume, et cetera. So

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of having points, string theory says, what if everything

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is a line? So a point is like zero dimensions, right,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't go in any way, but a string is

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>one dimension. It's like, well, let's have it have some extent,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and having it have a length means it's not infinitely densitymore,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there's like a fundamental length to it, and that avoids

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the infinities in the calculations. Is like a

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>minimum size to stuff, and that's the length of a string.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And so these strings would be the fundamental bits of

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Essentially the universe is strings. But these strings

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>can do things. They can wiggle, right, just like strings

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in our world, like a violin.

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 3>String can wiggle Daniel, or.

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Or a guitar string if you prefer that. But we

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>can't see those wiggles directly, and so what we see

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is something really zoomed out, Like the string wiggles this way,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it looks like an electron. When you zoom way out,

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the string wiggles that way, it looks like a mue.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>On the string wiggles another way, it looks like a quark.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is not that the electrons and the

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>quarks are made of tinier particles the way that like

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the atom is made of smaller particles, but that you

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>get something fundamentally different. Right, we need something fundamentally different

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to solve this puzzle of quantum gravity. We need a

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>new idea, And so we say that these particles are

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>instead made of vibrating strings, and they just look like

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>different particles because we're too zoomed out to see the details.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess for me, the question is like I understand

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the difference between a point and a line in terms

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 3>of dimensionality, but in terms of like a line of

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 3>what Like That's where I get caught up, because I,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, usually it's so hard to think about the

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 3>fundamental like unit of something because maybe this is just

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 3>biology brain, but everything has a smaller thing in it, right,

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Like you've got You've got a mouse, and the mouse

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 3>has tissues, and the tissues have cells, and the cells

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 3>have proteins, and the proteins have molecules, and the molecules

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>have atoms, and the atoms have quarks, et cetera, et cetera.

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I might have skipped a few steps, but you get

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the idea, which is that I'm always thinking, like, what

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 3>what do you mean, like a string of what? A

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>line of what?

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 5>So?

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>How has that resolved? Like what is because I'm assuming

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>it is not like a literal strand of you know,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 3>like in in biology, like a strand of protein. Like

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're like, there's a string of something, I'm thinking like, oh,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 3>is it proteins? Like you know, is it lipids? What's

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>it made out of? So in in physics, like what

0:32:58.560 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 3>is this line?

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great question. And I understand what you're saying.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You're imagining string your mind. And you know, if you're

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about like a line of frosting on a cake,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking that squeezed out of some tube, and the

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>line of frosting is made out of that frosting, and

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>therefore the frosting is the basic universe stuff, not the

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>line of it, and so you're wondering, like, well, what

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that string made out of? What is string stuff? The

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>answer is, we don't know. And you're right that the

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>pattern is that stuff is made of smaller stuff, which

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>has made of smaller stuff, which is made of smaller stuff.

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And so far we've never seen anything that is just

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>itself that is not made of something small.

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 3>That's the truth.

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. But we have this hunch. We have

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this hunch that maybe it is that maybe there's a

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>bottom to the explanations of the universe. We don't know,

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and there are philosophers out there who argue that it

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>could be infinitely regressive, right, that you just could keep

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>going forever and ever and ever, and there is no

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>foundational firmament to the universe. Everything is made of something smaller.

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I hate it either way, Daniel, Like either explanation I did.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 3>It feels uncomfortable somehow, right, Like if the explanation is

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 3>like there is a smallest unit and it's a line

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that wiggles, I'm like really, And then if you're like no,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 3>but then the line that wiggles can you can infinitely

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 3>get smaller and smaller and smaller, and then still that

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 3>it's like, really, it's so hard, And I feel like

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe the reason it's so difficult is that our human

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 3>brains are geared towards a certain type of understanding of

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 3>things based on what our evolutionary needs are in terms

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 3>of something has a start point and endpoint, or something

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 3>is made out of something else and time goes from

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 3>point A to point B. When someone who is not

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a physicist is trying to think about these things, I

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 3>think about stuff that is probably not very relevant to it.

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Like when I think of I don't know, you keep

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 3>talking about wiggly lines, and I just think about al

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 3>dente spaghetti and that's not what it is and it

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 3>can't be. But it's so hard to think of. Okay,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 3>say there's a basic unit that can't get any smaller,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 3>but it's not made out of anything, and that, you know,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>it just kind of breaks my brain. I cannot conceive

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 3>of that.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me put it in another way, which is

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe easier to sit with in your brain, which is,

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't know whether strings, if they exist, are the

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamental basis of the universe, or if they're made of

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 1>something smaller. You can put it that way, right, and

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we can put it that way because we actually don't

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have to know. And this is one of the beautiful

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>things about physics is that we can do calculations at

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>various scales ignoring the internal details, not having to know them.

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Like when we did that calculation of the baseball flying

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>across the field, we didn't have to keep track of

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>all the electrons and even the air resistance and all

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>those details to mostly get the right answer. You can

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.359
<v Speaker 1>do physics at lots of different scales. So even if

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the universe infinitely is made of smaller stuff, or if

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there is some fundamental chunk to it, we can still

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>do physics about it without even knowing the answer. So

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the universe for being understandable at lots of levels.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Even before we figured out quantum gravity. You can imagine

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>another scenario where in order to do any calculation you

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>had to understand all the little bits inside of it.

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to figure out the fundamentals of quantum gravity

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>before you could make chicken soup, right, But fortunately in

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 1>our universe you can throw baseballs and make chicken soup

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and play violins without understanding all the details, so we

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>can make progress. We can say, well, maybe electrons are

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>made of strings without knowing whether those strings are also

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>made of something else, and still have some insight into

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this layer of the universe, without knowing if there are

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>more layers beyond it.

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 3>So we've got possible strings that we don't know exactly

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 3>if they exist. But it's a line that can wiggle

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 3>in the way in which it wiggles forms some kind

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 3>of different thing which I can kind of accept at

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 3>this point. Is that sort of it? In terms of

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 3>string theories, it seems like there would probably be a

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 3>lot more complexity involved.

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is more complexity. The mathemat of those strings

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is very cool. At first, when people were working it out,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>they were only able to use strings to describe some

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>kinds of particles, particles that we call bosons, which are

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>photons and the W and the Z and the higgs

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and the gluons. These are all the bosons, the force

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>carrying particles. So the original string theory could only describe bosons.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And then people worked on it and found new ways

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for those strings to wiggle, so they could also describe fermions,

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's called super string theory. Super as a reference

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to this other idea, supersymmetry, which connects fermions and bosons.

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Check out our whole episode about that. But so then

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>people developed super string theory, and then there was this

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of revolution in the nineteen eighties when people got

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>really excited about it. They call it the first super

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>string revolution, and that's when people realized, wow, this string

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>theory is not just a cool mathematical model. It can

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>describe all the kinds of particles in our universe. And

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>also it seems like a very promising theory of quantum gravity.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>They were able to avoid some of the infinities of

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier attempts the problems with gravity by describing things in

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of strings. So it was a very exciting time.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people worked on it, and the problem

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>was that they had lots of different ideas. So there's

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not like one string theory or one way to do

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>string theory. People figured out a bunch of different kinds

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of string theories, like you can have strings that are

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>always open like they're just lines, or strings that are

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>closed which means they're loops. Or you can have a

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>theory with strings sometimes are open and sometimes are closed,

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>or different kinds of ways to solve super gravity. And

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>so at the end of the eighties, there was sort

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of a confusion because there were like five different types

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of string theory that were all seemed very very different

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and all kind of worked, and people weren't sure sort

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of where to go from.

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>There, right, I mean, that seems kind of tricky because

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>it's almost like you're sort of filling in the gaps,

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 3>right with these different theories, and you can it seems

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:51.959
<v Speaker 3>like they were able to come up with different sort

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of math or different theories that did fill that gap

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 3>in different ways, and so I don't know how you

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 3>would pick which one works if they all sort of

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 3>can on average kind of like fix that gap.

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's very unsatisfying, right, because we think the universe

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is following a set of laws. We think there is

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.919
<v Speaker 1>one set of laws, and so then if you find

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>like two explanations for the universe that both work, you're like, well,

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which one is really happening?

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Is a deep philosophical question.

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Could there actually be something we're on this level? There

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 3>could be multiple sets of rules that all work at

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 3>the same time.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, philosophers think it's possible that there are multiple explanations

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for the universe, multiple theories that predict the universe and

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>describe it and explain what's happening, but have fundamentally different

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>stories about sort of what's going on behind the curtain.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if that's possible, but there's a group

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of philosophers who think it might be. And boy, I

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hope they're wrong, because that would be very frustrating. In

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the stuber strink community also was hoping they were wrong.

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>And we're trying to figure out this puzzle. And one

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>way to try to f figure it out is to

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>see are there connections between these different theories? Can we

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>show that actually these theories are really the same thing

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>dressed up in different clothing, Like are we really just

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>telling the same story using different words or using different symbols.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It harkens back to like the nineteen twenties when people

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>were developing quantum mechanics, for example, and you had Schrodinger

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he had his wave equation of quantum mechanics, and you

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had Heisenberg he had his matrix formulation of quantum mechanics.

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And those two guys did not like each other. In fact,

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they hated each other, and they also disliked each other's ideas,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Like Heisenberg really didn't like Schrodinger's wave equation. He thought

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>it made quantum mechanics like too visual and gave you

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a mental image. When instage, you'd just focus on the

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>math of the matrices, and everybody else hated Heisenberg's matrices

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because nobody could understand what they meant. And then a

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.959
<v Speaker 1>few decades later John von Neumann showed actually they're the same.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>They make the same calculations. You can convert one into

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the other, and so they're just like two different ways

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to write the same thing, the way that like algebra

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.839
<v Speaker 1>and geometry are fundamentally the same. You want to solve

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a system of equations like two lines, you can either

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>draw them on a piece of paper and see when

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they cross, or you can do a bunch of algebra

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and solve for it. In the end, those feel like

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>two different kinds of math, but they really are revealing

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, or the same relationship between concepts. So

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>people were wondering, can we do that for string theory?

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Can we show that these different string theories they're called

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>type one, type two A, type two B, so thirty.

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Two it sounds like a disease.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And E eight x E eight. These are crazy names,

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, terrible, terrible names, be deeply offended.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 3>I have type one string theory.

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry, can you? So there's a group for that.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So people were wondering, is it possible these actually are

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>different mathematical expressions for the same phenomena, And it was

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a hard problem. But there are smart people out there.

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Edwitten maybe one of the smartest dudes ever. He's at

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the Institute for Advanced Studies near Princeton, and he was

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>playing with these strings. Remember, the strings don't just exist

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in our three dimensions of space. The math works best

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if space has nine dimensions. So these strings are one

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>dimensional lines through nine dimensional space our three dimensions, and

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>then six more dimensions that we can't sense or perceive

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or really experience in any way. But the strings need

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>them in order to make their math wiggle correctly.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Hmm, yeah, no, I mean I think this is it's

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 3>always a wild time trying to think about other dimensions,

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 3>because we could probably explain other dimensions with math, but

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to try to conceptualize them, I don't know if that's

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 3>even possible with our brains, given that our brains are

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 3>three dimensional brains and function in a sort of three

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 3>dimensional way. So without your neurons being able to span

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 3>into the other six dimension. That seems difficult.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>It is very difficult. You're right. We intuitively think in

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>three dimensions. It's very hard to think in additional dimensions.

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's even hard to think in fewer dimensions. Like if

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you try to imagine a two D sheet or one

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>D line, you're imagining it in three D space. You

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>put that sheet into three D space, or that line

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in three D space. Or if I tell you imagine

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a zero dimensional dot, you think of a point and

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you skitch it out into some three D space because

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the natural playground of our mind. So if you

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>can't go down the dimension, there's no hope in going

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>up a dimension. It's really very difficult.

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 3>I almost passed out once trying to think about like nothing,

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 3>like going you know, sort of the zero dimension thing,

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 3>trying to think about nothing. And I felt very weird

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 3>to try to think about that for too long. It

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 3>felt like my brain was kind of leaving my body.

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I was just sleepy, I don't know, but yeah.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 3>There's also that book Flat Landers, where it tries to,

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 3>in an artistic way, represent how difficult it is to

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 3>bridge the gap between two D existence and a three

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 3>D existence. But yeah, fundamentally, even that book is describing

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 3>it as a visual experience, where having vision requires three dimensions.

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 3>It seems so.

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so making progress on this requires super smart

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>dudes to do superstring theory. And so ed Witten was

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these nine dimensional strings, and so those theories

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are ten dimensional because it's nine spatial dimensions and one

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>time dimension. He was thinking about these nine dimensional strings,

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and he was inspired by this leap from zero dimensional

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 1>points to one dimensional lines strings, and he was wondering,

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 1>should we take it a step further? Instead of thinking

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>about these things as one D strings in nine dimensional spaces,

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're actually two dimensional objects membranes, right, sheets in

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>higher dimensional space. And so these would be like two

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>D sheets in ten dimensional space, which look like one

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>dimension objects strings if you only look at them in

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>nine dimensions. So the idea is he invents this extra dimension,

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this eleventh dimension or a tenth dimension of space and

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>extends the strings into that space to make them into membranes.

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 3>So more like a sheets theory.

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, from strings to.

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Sheets sponsored by sheets the convenience store and gas station.

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>So the exciting thing is that Witten thought that if

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you worked with membranes instead of strings, you could explain

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all these different string theories. That these five string theories

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>were actually just five different ways to look at the

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>same sheet. So you roll it up this way, it

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like one. You roll it up another way, it

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like another. You look at it from this perspective,

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a different string theory. But these five

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>string theories that people were playing with and confused about

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:58.240
<v Speaker 1>were actually just like extreme examples of one membrane theory.

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is famous talking gives at University of Southern

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>California in ninety five where he points this out and

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>he makes this connection, and he has this diagram on

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the slide which is just like all five theories, and

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it just like draws lines between them.

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it like a corkboard was the aldest shoveled?

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly like that. Yeah, it's not very compelling as

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a diagram. And even his explanation is somewhat lacking. You know,

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have all the math. He has sort of

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like this leap of intuition. He has some hints that

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>these things do connect to each other. It's like a

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>new direction forward, and it's sort of like the way

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Fineman worked. You know, Fineman developed QED and he didn't

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>work out all the math came later, when like Schwinger

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>worked through all the details to prove that Fieman's leaps

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of intuition were correct. Witness sort of similar. He's like

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sees these connections in his brain. He knows that it

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 1>can work, even if he hasn't like actually sat down

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and worked through it all. And so this one talk

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in ninety five inspired what they call the second super

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>string Revolution and led to like hundreds and hundreds of

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>papers of people working on membranes. The interesting thing is

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that Witten himself wasn't actually sure that membranes were going

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to work. He was like, h it might be membranes,

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it might not be memoranes. I'm not sure. He knew

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that these things were connected, but he didn't want to

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>actually call his theory membrane theory, so he just called

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it M theory, and he wrote in his paper quote,

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we will non committally call it the M theory. Leaving

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to the future the revelation of M to membranes, like

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>if people really worked through the math and showed that

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>these things were two D objects or actually ten D objects,

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>then we could call it membrane theory. But until then,

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just keep it m theory in case it turns

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>out to be like mouse theory or mama theory or

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 1>something else.

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. No, I mean I like that your hedge in

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 3>your bets. I also like this guy kind of sounds

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 3>like there's this I forgot his name, but I think

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 3>he is like a quote unquote neurosurgeon who kept claiming

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 3>that he could do like head transplants, and his demonstration

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 3>was a bunch of dried spaghetti and a banana to

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 3>show how you could basically like connect all of the

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 3>arteries and spinal cord and everything. I think maybe the

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 3>banana was supposed to be the spinal cord. Anyways, it

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 3>was like a spaghetti banana demonstration, which did not inspire confidence.

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So of course, I think with the physics, when you

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 3>go out on a branch in terms of physics, that

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 3>it's maybe less risky than trusting someone who says they

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 3>can do a head transplant.

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think Edwintin I wouldn't trust him to

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>do a head transplant, but I'm glad that he's around

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's helping us figure out the mysteries of quantum gravity.

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's really cool that he was able to show

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that these theories are related to each other. You know,

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>there are these funny dualities they find where they showed

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that this theory is mathematically equivalent to that theory. You know,

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like this theory if you make it really strong, looks

0:48:57.440 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like that theory if you make it really weak. It's

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to show that the theories, even though they have

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 1>again very different sort of mathematical foundations, they really are

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 1>exploring the same concepts because the symbolism, the notation we

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>use is really just a way to describe the abstract ideas.

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And so even if you use different notations and different symbols,

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if you can show that the ideas are equivalent, then

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>you really have made a connection between them. And it's

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a relief also to think like, well, maybe there is

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a connection, because then we don't have to pick one

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the theories. We don't have to have a reason

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to choose one. We can just say, oh, they're all

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just special cases of one unifying idea. And in the end,

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that's what physics is trying to do, is come up

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:40.879
<v Speaker 1>with some unifying, simplifying explanation for everything we see out

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe.

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I find it really appealing not having to

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 3>make a decision between like really hard choices. That sounds great.

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Sign me up for physics. Let's take a really quick break,

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 3>and then when we get back, let's talk more about

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 3>membrane theory and how it could tie everything up in

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 3>a bow.

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>When you pop a piece of cheese into your mouth,

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.240
<v Speaker 1>or enjoy a rich spoonful of Greek yogurt, you're probably

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not thinking about the environmental impact of each and every bite.

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But the people in the dairy industry are. US Dairy

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 1>has set themselves some ambitious sustainability goals, including being greenhouse

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.919
<v Speaker 1>gas neutral by twenty to fifty. That's why they're working

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>hard every day to find new ways to reduce waste,

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>conserve natural resources, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. Take water,

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, most dairy farms reuse water up to four times.

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>The same water cools the milk, cleans equipment, washes the barn,

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and irrigates the crops. How is US dairy tackling greenhouse gases?

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Many farms use anaerobic digestors that turn the methane from

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>maneuver into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, and

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 1>electric cars. So the next time you grab a slice

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of pizza or lick an ice cream cone, know that

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dairy farmers and processors around the country are using the

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>latest practices and innovations to provide the nutrient dense dairy

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.359
<v Speaker 1>products we love. With life of an impact. Visit us

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:03.959
<v Speaker 1>dairy dot com slash sustainability to learn more.

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 9>There are children, friends, and families walking, riding on passing

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 9>the roads every day.

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Remember they're real people with loved ones who need them.

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>To get home safely.

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 9>Protect our cyclists and pedestrians because they're people too, Go

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 9>safely California from the California Office of Traffic Safety and Caltrans.

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 10>Hey, their fellow globetrotters and destination dreamers. If you're anything

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:24.720
<v Speaker 10>like us, you'd knowe that life's too short for boring

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 10>toasters and towels. That's why we decided to ditch the

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 10>traditional wedding registry and went with honeyfund dot com. Imagine

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 10>your friends and family chipping in to send you on

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 10>a dreamy, exotic honeymoon. Practical check, meaningful, double check. Plus

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 10>it's fee free and so fun for wedding guests to shop.

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:44.399
<v Speaker 10>So why get more stuff when you can have unforgettable experiences.

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 10>Join the revolution at honey fund dot com and start

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:49.240
<v Speaker 10>your adventure today.

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 9>Lucky Land slots asking people what's the weirdest place you've

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 9>gotten lucky?

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 10>Lucky in line at the Delhi I guess ahi in

0:51:57.280 --> 0:51:59.279
<v Speaker 10>my dentist's office more than months.

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 9>Actually I have to say yes, you do in the

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 9>car before my kids PTA meeting. Really, yes, excuse me,

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 9>what's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I never win?

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And tell well, there you have it. You can get

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lucky anywhere.

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Playing at lucky landslaughts dot com play for free right now?

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Are you feeling lucky? They'll preacare necessary veg don't need.

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Group would be prevorit to buy low eighteen plus. Terms

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and conditions.

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Apply, all right. So I was a little bit glib

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 3>about tying everything up in a nice little bow. I

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 3>know that is the desire of physics, and yet it

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 3>seems pretty tricky to do that.

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It is pretty tricky. But along the way we can

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 1>entertain ourselves by amusing notation and making up really weird

0:52:49.640 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>phrases and names for things. So, physics, as everybody knows,

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is very good at using inappropriate and confusing words to

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>describe things. And so physicists have taken this phrase membrane

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and try to generalize it to any dimensional surface. So,

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like you know, a membrane is like a two D surface.

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:08.840
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine like a sheet or like a cell wall.

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It's two dimensions, right, And so physicists don't call that

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a membrane. They call that a two brain. Okay, so

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that they can call a string a one brain, or

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like the point a zero brain.

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 3>That insulting.

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You're a zero brain. Yeah, exactly. Well even worse is

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the general phrase for it. If you have a surface

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in p dimensions, you call it a pea brain.

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 3>That's what I call my dog all the time. I'm like,

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 3>look at you, old pepe brain.

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well you didn't realize you're actually giving it a

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:44.840
<v Speaker 1>vast compliment. You're connecting it to the fundamental theory of

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Maybe Cookie can reveal something true about reality.

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I look into her eyes, I see these deep pools

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of knowledge. But then it turns out she just had

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to burn.

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Cookie had too many cookies.

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like, yeah, exactly, So Now I'm confused because

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I kind of got the idea of the membrane being

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 3>like it's not a point, it's not a line. It's

0:54:11.239 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 3>like a plane, but not necessarily a flat plane, one

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:19.399
<v Speaker 3>that could be sort of wrapped around different dimensions. So

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I kind of get that. Now we're sort of this

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 3>terminology of zero brain being a point, one brain being

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 3>a string, two brain being a two D surface. What

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 3>is the point of having brain in there? Like as

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 3>a term, like what And I don't mean this like

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 3>in a mean way, just like what purpose is that

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:44.440
<v Speaker 3>serving in terms of helping with the research or the explanation.

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good question. Maybe physicists just like saying

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>brain because it does sounds smart, sounds like they're talking

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about their brains. But physicis like to think about different

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>versions of ideas, not to be limited by our experience

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, you know, where we have one dimensional

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>objects and two dimensional objects and three dimensional objects. They'd

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like to generalize it and to be opened to other

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:10.320
<v Speaker 1>dimensions and other scales. And so for example, Edwinton's first

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 1>idea was maybe the way to do this is to

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>use two dimensional sheets, which is fascinating to think like, Okay,

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe isn't made of points of stuff or even

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.960
<v Speaker 1>lines of stuff, but maybe like sheets of stuff. It

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty weird if the universe was made of

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 1>two dimensional things the fundamental nature of it, the basic

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:33.840
<v Speaker 1>building block where sheets, that would be weird. But recently

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 1>people have been making some progress in an alternative version

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of m theory in which the brains are five dimensional,

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so they use five brains, meaning that like, you still

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:47.080
<v Speaker 1>work in a theory where there are ten spatial dimensions

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in one time dimension, but the fundamental building blocks of

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe are not sheets. There are five dimensional objects,

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty hard to think about and impossible to

0:55:57.040 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>visualize with our three brains.

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's interesting thing because usually the intuitive direction of

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 3>units right of stuff or like building blocks of stuff

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 3>is like you go from simple to more complex, right,

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 3>so like you'd start out with you know, zero dimensions,

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:20.359
<v Speaker 3>than one dimensions, than two dimensions, than three dimensions, than

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 3>four dimensions, et cetera. Right, and then like as you

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 3>get to the smaller building blocks, the kind of intuitive

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 3>way is like the smaller the building block, the fewer

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 3>the dimensions.

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 3>But I think it is really interesting the idea that

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the smallest building block could be something that is actually

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 3>operates among, you know, more dimensions than say we do

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 3>as human consciousness is because that seems, I don't know,

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 3>for some reason, that makes more sense to me than

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 3>like the smallest unit being like a point, even though

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.919
<v Speaker 3>I cannot there is no way I can even begin

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 3>to conceive of five dimensions without sounding like I'm high

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 3>on Joe Rogan.

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, though, and I think the lesson

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there is the universe is filled with surprises. You know.

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>We set up this question with we have a puzzle

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>about the fundamental nature of reality. Is it quantum mechanical?

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it general relativistic? Is this something new and weird

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and different? And we don't have an answer yet, But

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this line of investigation building strings into membranes into p

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>brains is suggesting that we've been thinking about it wrong

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of tiny little objects that actually at the

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.440
<v Speaker 1>foundation of the universe, the basic level of reality, the

0:57:39.480 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>intellectual firmament that we can finally reach, might be built

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>out of complex objects, objects with five dimensions to them,

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or even two dimensions. And that's the kind of revelation

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for, you know, that's exactly the hope that

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the math points us to structures that tell us something

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>about what's actually happening out there in reality. And in

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a way, that's a surprise because I don't expect our

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 1>intuition to correctly guess how the universe works. I expect

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it to be a surprise. It would be quite disappointing

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:10.439
<v Speaker 1>if the universe was a certain way and we were like, oh, yeah,

0:58:10.520 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Instead, I want that moment where we're like, oh, wow,

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe actually works in this weird way, how could

0:58:16.800 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that possibly be? And then it requires like a reworking

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of your mental model to incorporate that. But that brings

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you more in aligned with the way the universe actually works.

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of the whole goal of science, right,

0:58:28.960 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is to align our brains with the workings of the universe,

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not just our silly, clueless, primitive guesses about how the

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>universe might work.

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 3>So, if it was up to me, I would just

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:42.640
<v Speaker 3>hazard a guess that the universe is made out a

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 3>little worms, man, just tiny little worms.

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I see, So that's your worm brain theory of the universe,

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 1>my brain theory you and rfkgu.

0:58:53.120 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I should run for president and me and my

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 3>worms know how to run this country.

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Howard, all right, well, thanks for coming along on

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this crazy mental journey down into the fundamental nature of

0:59:08.640 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe to think about weird quantum objects, also obeying

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the rules of gravity and revealing that the universe is

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>made out of building blocks that we do not yet understand,

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but they might require one brains, two brains, or p

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>dimensional pea brains.

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for helping me understand that the universe is

0:59:27.520 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 3>not made out of tiny violence. That really helps.

0:59:32.320 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It's only possible because your brain is not a banana.

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Thanks very much everybody, and tune in next

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>time for more science and curiosity. Come find us on

0:59:47.120 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 1>social media where we answer questions and post videos. We're

0:59:50.920 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, This, Org, Instant, and now TikTok. Thanks for listening,

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeartRadio. More podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. When you pop a piece of cheese into

1:00:13.680 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>your mouth, you're probably not thinking about the environmental impact,

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but the people in the dairy industry are. That's why

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they're working hard every day to find new ways to

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>reduce waste, conserve natural resources, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions.

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>How is us Dairy tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>anaerobic digestors to turn the methane from manure into renewable

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>energy that can power farms, towns, and electric cars. Visit

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you as dairy dot COM's Last Sustainability to learn more.

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 4>As a United Explorer Card member, you can earn fifty

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 4>thousand bonus miles plus look forward to extraordinary travel rewards,

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 4>including a free checked bag, two times the miles on

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:54.080
<v Speaker 4>United purchases and two times the miles on dining and

1:00:54.120 --> 1:00:57.400
<v Speaker 4>at hotels. Become and explore and seek out unforgettable places

1:00:57.440 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>while enjoying rewards everywhere you travel.

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Issued by JP.

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC subject to credit approval,

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Offers subject to change. Terms apply.

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>You know how when you're living your life and then

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, you're out there helping cops solve crimes.

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>ABC Tuesday, I have an IQ.

1:01:14.200 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Of one sixty. I spot things that detectives missed.

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>The series premiere of Falls most anticipated new drama High Potential.

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 8>That big brain of hers is going to help us

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 8>close out a lot of cases.

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Caitlin Olsen is the new face of investigation.

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You're a single mom pretending to be a god. I

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>am not pretending.

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 10>I'm just out here super copping.

1:01:31.840 --> 1:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>High Potential series premiere Tuesday, ten ninth Central on ABC

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and stream on Hulu.