WEBVTT - COVID Docs Released by Ratcliffe, No Taxes on Tips-Can it Happen plus Obstruction during Confirmation Hearings Week In Review

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in his verdict with Ted Cruz Weekend Review, Ben

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson with you, and these were the major stories that

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>we chatted about this past week that you may have missed.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>First up, John Radcliffe being confirmed as a CIA director. Well,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>he then decided to release COVID info that was readily

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>available when Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were in the

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>White House, but they deliberately chose not to share it

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with the American people. What is that information? I'll explain

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it to you in just a moment. Also tips no

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tax on them and no tax on Social Security? Can

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this idea from Donald Trump actually pass through Congress? Senator

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Cruz explains the real opportunity here to change things in

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a big way for seniors. And finally, Democrats moving to

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>obstruct the confirmation hearings as much as they can, and

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get at least one of Trump's nominees

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to fail. So what is going to happen next? We'll

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>explain that for you. It is the Weekend Review and

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it starts right now. I want to move to this

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>other big headline, and that deals with the CIA and

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>releasing new analysis on the COVID origins.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't matter where you read the headline.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's Fox News, Politico, AP, BBC, Wall Street Journal,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they're all writing the same article. Now, and I'll go

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to Politico. CIA now says COVID nineteen is more likely

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to have originated from a lab leak. Now, the most

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting part about this transparency that we're getting from the

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>CIA director John Ratcliffe, a friend of both of ours,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that he made it clear, Hey, I'm

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>releasing information that they had already come to a conclusion

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>on Center when Biden and Harris were in charge. They

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just didn't want the American people to know it. So

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if you think I'm the one giving you this intel,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not me. This is intel from Biden and Harris

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that they hid from you.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>So the CIA had already come to this conclusion, and

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 4>for for a number of years, the CIA's public position

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 4>was it could not conclude with certainty where the pandemic started.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>And yet two days after John Radcliffe was sworn in

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 4>as the new director of the CIA, they issued a

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 4>public statement that said, quote, we have low confidence in

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>this judgment and will continue to evaluate any available, credible,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 4>new intelligence, reporting, or open source information that could change

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 4>CIA's assessment. And by the way, low confidence typically when

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 4>the intelligence community has a conclusion that they will report

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 4>it with low confidence, with moderate confidence, or with high confidence.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 4>So they're saying that they're not convinced it's absolutely right,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 4>but they think it's correct, but it's at the lowest

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 4>confidence level. And they did note CIA continues to assess

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 4>that both research related in natural origin scenarios of the

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 4>COVID pandemic remain plausible. It is striking striking, however, that

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 4>as you just said a second ago, the CIA had

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 4>concluded this some time ago. It's just under Joe Biden

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 4>and Kamala Harris they didn't bother to tell the American people.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Listen to John Radcliffe explaining this.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 5>Part of what we have to do is we have

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 5>to restore Americans trust in our own institutions like the

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 5>intelligence community and law enforcement, and that includes the CIA.

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 5>And you know, one of the things that the President stress,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 5>you know that the purpose of the CIA is to

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 5>protect Americans, to keep us safe from foreign threats and

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 5>foreign adversaries, but we also need to be truthful with Americans.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 5>And he has stressed to me and others that you know,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 5>these aren't mutually exclusive missions. We can do both. And

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 5>so in the case of the CIA, which is the

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 5>best foreign intelligence service in the world, after five years,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 5>to not have a public assessment to be honest with

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 5>the American people about where the likely source of a

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 5>pandemic that killed millions around the world, including a million Americans,

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 5>and really impacted all three hundred and forty five million

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 5>Americans in some way. People lost jobs, they lost houses,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 5>they lost their health, they lost their businesses, all of that.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 5>And so I had the opportunity on my first day

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 5>to make public an assessment that actually took place in

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 5>the Biden administration, so it can't be accused of being political,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 5>and it does assess the CIA has assessed that the

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 5>most likely cause of this pandemic that has wrought so

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 5>much devastation around the world was because of elaborated incident

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 5>in Wuhan, and so we'll continue to investigate that moving forward.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 5>But I think it was important for the American people

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>to see an institution like the CIA get off the

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 5>sidelines and be truthful about what our intelligence shows at

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 5>the same time of protecting us from adversaries like China

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 5>if they caused or contributed to this.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, E said, wow, what else can you say?

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>This is all intel that we already had that they

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hid and lif to the American people about.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Well listen, and I know John Ratcliffe, well, he's a

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 4>good friend of mine. He is someone I sat and

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>spent about an hour talking with him a week ago

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>before his confirmation. And I'll tell you one of the

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 4>things I urged John to do is bring maximum transparency

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>that's possible. Look, the nature of the CIA, you can't

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>be transparent and everything. Obviously, we don't want the public

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 4>to know the identity of covert agents or or you know,

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 4>secret wiretaps or things that would jeopardize national security. But

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 4>the consequences of the politicization and weaponization of both law

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 4>enforcement and the intelligence community is that the public's trust

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 4>in those institutions has been severely diminished. That's what John

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>was talking about in that clip you just played, And

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 4>so I urged him. By the way, it's the same

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 4>thing I've urged Pam Bondy, who's been nominated to be

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Attorney General. It's the same thing I've urged Cash Betel,

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 4>who's been nominated to be FBI director, is have the

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 4>maximum transparency possible, and in particular, I've urged them with

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 4>respect to COVID and the origins of COVID and by

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 4>the way, any US government complicity in terms of funding

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese research and the gain of function research that

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 4>may have created the COVID virus, that we need maximum

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 4>transparency concerning that in particular, and I think John Ratcliffe

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 4>is following through with that. I've also urged maximum transparency

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 4>concerning January sixth and any US government informants who may

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 4>have been involved who may have enticed or entrapped people

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 4>into conduct on that day to make that public as well.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>And I'm hopeful and by the way, I'll mention Trump

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 4>is also releasing the files on JFK and RFK and

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Martin Luther King's assassinations. I will note Ben when Trump

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 4>said he was releasing the JFK files.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I know where you're going with this.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I did at least tweet just wondering what are the

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 4>non extradition countries Again, I'm asking for a friend.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't say that without telling the backstory on this one, right?

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you find people the humor here on this?

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 5>Sure?

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 4>During twenty sixteen, Trump accused my father of killing JFK, which,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>for the record, no, my dad did not kill JFK.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 4>He did kill Jimmy Hoffa. Jimmy Hoffa is buried my

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 4>dad's backyard, but he didn't kill JFK.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>And so it's it's a thing. And so if he's

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>releasing the the.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 4>JFK files, I got to tell you, I'm buying a

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 4>plane ticket for my dad to go to Bolivia right now.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Between that and the Zodiac Killer, you're just making headlines,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>And it was amazing.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 4>So Ben, there is actually a real poll that I

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>have seen that show, this was a few years ago,

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 4>that twenty eight percent of Floridians believe I may well

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>be the Zodiac Killer.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 2>That's one I would frame him put on my desk.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>It really is.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 4>And given that the Zodiac Killer killed a number of

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 4>people in northern Klifornia in the nineteen sixties before I

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 4>was born, that's an amazing talent to be able to

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 4>murder in Utero, to reach like back in time. That

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>that's just you know, I'm kind of proud of that.

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if liberals another reason to be afraid of

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you just know that Center crews can time travel per

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>per Internet report, So.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>As the meme says, FAFO, I.

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Love it all.

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, let's talk about the last thing on our list,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and it is one.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Were you right in your prediction? When did you get home?

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>If you listen our last show, we were talking about

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>our Democrats going to hold out through the weekend. Are

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you gonna have to stay in DC all weekend? Are

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you gonna get to come home? They were holding up

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the nomination jet again. So tell us how that went down.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>When did you get back? Were you right?

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 5>So?

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I was right. I said I thought we'd get back Saturday.

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I thought the Democrats would fight tooth and nail to

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 4>try to beat Pete hegg Seth. I said they'd lose,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 4>and I said when they lost, they'd give in and

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 4>they want to get out of town because they want

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 4>to get home, just like we do.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's exactly what happened.

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 4>So we were there, We were there late Friday night,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 4>and then we ended up finishing the vote Saturday morning,

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 4>and we all flew out Saturday afternoon. So i'm you

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 4>and I are recording. It is twelve eleven in the

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 4>morning right now, Sunday night, Monday morning. I'm in Houston

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 4>and tomorrow morning. I'll fly back to d C to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 4>go back to the Senate tomorrow. So we did get

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 4>out and where are we on the confirmations? So right

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 4>now four cabinet members have been confirmed. The first to

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 4>be confirmed was Marco Rubio, a Secretary of State. He

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 4>was confirmed on January twentieth. The vote was ninety nine

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 4>to nothing. The second to be confirmed was the guy

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>that you just played that clip from, John Ratcliffe, ats

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 4>a director. The vote was seventy two to twenty six,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 4>so big bipartisan vote. And it's striking though that the

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Democrats delayed that several days even though there was clear

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 4>bipartisan support for him. Ratcliffe should have been confirmed on

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 4>January twentieth. Also, in fact, we thought he was going

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 4>to and the Democrats delayed it several days just because

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 4>they're engaged in obstruction.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to delay everything, and.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>We're way behind schedule compared to other administrations.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 4>So people understand that way behind is strong, but they're

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 4>dragging their feet and that's why that's why we ram through,

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 4>forced them to stay through the weekend, CAPE, kept them

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 4>late Friday night, kept them their Saturday.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 3>To make clear.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Listen, if you delay, We'll just motor through, and so

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 4>you can decide do you want it to be unpleasant

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 4>or do you want to move forward. We're going to

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 4>move expeditiously and confirm these nominees. The Democrats, if they want,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 4>they can abuse the procedural rules. They can drag things out,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 4>but that means they're going to be there on Fridays

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 4>and Saturdays and Sundays and they're not going home. And

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 4>that's the most effective way to get them to give

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 4>cave in, which is what they did. And so Friday

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 4>night the third cabinet member was confirmed, that was Pete Hegseith.

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 4>And then on Saturday we confirmed the fourth cabinet member,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 4>which is Christy nom for Secretary of Homeland Security. He

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 4>was confirmed fifty nine to thirty four, so a respectable

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 4>bipartisan vote. Not overwhelming, but she got six Democrats. And

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 4>next week we have teed up Scott Bessen for Secretary

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 4>of Treasury, Sean Duffy for Secretary of Transportation, Chris Wright

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 4>for Secretary of Energy, and Doug Bergham for Secretary of

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 4>the Interior. All of them are out of committee. All

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 4>of them are teed up. I think all four of

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 4>them will be confirmed next week. We may have some

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 4>others confirmed next week as well, but we're moving expeditiously,

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>and as I said, my prediction is that we will

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 4>confirm all of Trump's cabinet nominees within thirty days. We

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 4>also have next week in Judiciary, we will vote Pam

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Bondi out of committee and we'll have the hearing on

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Cash Battel. And by the way, one of the things

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I did last week is participated in in a moot

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>preparation with Cash Battel, which was very productive.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Cash.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to do a good job. The

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Democrats are going to go hard after Cash Battel. They're

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 4>going to go hard after Tulsi Gabbard. Those are their

0:11:58.679 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 4>top two targets.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you want to hear the rest of this conversation,

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you can go back and listen to the full podcast

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from earlier this week. Now onto story number two. All right,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so taxes tips. It was clearly a big campaign issue.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It brought in a lot of voters. A lot of

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>people came to Donald Trump and said this couldn't have

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge impact. Now it's paying off on it, Is

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>there a real chance?

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 4>So yes, and I believe this will happen. This will

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 4>happen by the end of the year. So let's rewind.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 4>In the middle of the presidential campaign, Donald Trump was

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 4>in Las Vegas, Nevada, and he actually told us the story.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 4>So he came by in the middle of the campaign.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 4>He had lunch with all the Republican senators and he said, listen,

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 4>I was in Vegas.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I had a rally that night.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 4>And he said, I was having lunch and he said,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 4>there was a waitress who came. It was serving me

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 4>my meal, and he said she began like complaining about

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 4>the enormous burden that the Biden administration had put on

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 4>recording her tips, on paying taxes on tip.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 3>And he said, I pulled out.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 4>A piece of paper and I got out of pen

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 4>and I just wrote, no taxes on tips.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 3>They said, it's just.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 4>An idea that popped in my head. And he said, look,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 4>some people, they they focus group things, they do white papers.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 4>He said, I didn't do any of that. I just

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 4>wrote it down from the conversation I had with the

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 4>waitress over lunch. And he said, I had that rally

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>later the day and I had thousands of people there,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 4>and he said, I just threw it out there no

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 4>taxes on tips, and he said, and they went crazy,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 4>They went absolutely crazy. And I got to say, there

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 4>are times when when Trump I just think has an

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 4>instinct that is a very good, gut instinct, and I

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 4>think this policy makes enormous sense. And so when he

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 4>announced it, He's right, the crowd went crazy.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I looked at it and I said, this is this

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>is a great idea.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 4>I immediately went to my team and I said, let's

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 4>draft the legislation to make this happened. So the next

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 4>week I filed federal legislation of no taxes on tips.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Now what's interesting, Ben is when I filed this, it

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 4>immediately became bipartisan. Both senators from Nevada, Jackie Rosen and

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Catherine Court's Master, both of them immediately co sponsored it.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 4>One of them said to me, she said, look in Nevada,

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty five percent of the employees in the entire state

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 4>are tipped workers. And so it was bipartisan. And then

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 4>shortly thereafter, Kamala Harris endorsed it and she said, this

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 4>is a great idea. So it became there was enormous

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 4>bipartisan support. Now, obviously Trump is won. We have a

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Republican Senate. At Republican House, I've refiled my legislation. Here's

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 4>what I'm pressing to happen. So Trump just was back

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 4>in Nevada and Las Vegas just made a huge push

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 4>to pass this. I am pressing for Congress to pass

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 4>the legislation right now. It doesn't have to be part

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 4>of budget reconciliation. Now, for any tax bill under the Constitution,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 4>the House of Representatives has to originate it. So if

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 4>that's a provision of the Constitution, the Senate cannot start

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 4>a tax bill. A tax bill has to originate with House.

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 4>So I am merging the Speaker of the House. I'm

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 4>merging the majority leader take up my legislation no taxes

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 4>on tips.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Just pass it.

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 4>We have the votes in the House, Republicans can pass it.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 4>If it passes and goes over to the Senate, I

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 4>believe we can pass it in the Senate, and I

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 4>think we'll get sixty votes, so we don't have to

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>wait for reconciliation. Reconciliation is the process that gets around

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 4>the filibuster. Lets us pass something with just fifty votes.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we need that for no taxes on tips.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 4>If the House passes it. What I'm merging, John Thune,

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 4>the Senate majority leaders put it on the Senate floor.

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 4>I think we'll get sixty votes, and that means we

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 4>could pass it. It would be a big bipartisan win,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and we'll put it on President Trump's desk. He can

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 4>sign it into law as a huge victory. And by

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 4>the way, it's a win win man. If we put

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 4>it on the floor and Democrats decide to be partisan,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>they decide, Okay, we're going to oppose it because we

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 4>just oppose any tax cut, we oppose anything Trump wants. Okay,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 4>that's not the end of the day. If Democrats defeat

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 4>it in the Senate because we can't get to sixty,

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 4>that's fine. Then we'll stick it in budget reconciliation. We

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 4>can get it done with fifty. But it's a win

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 4>win because every Democrat senator who votes know that is

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 4>an ugly issue in two years to go face the

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 4>voters and say, hey, I voted against no taxes on tips.

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Even though every waiter, every waitress, every bartender, every taxi driver,

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 4>every uber driver, every barber, every hairstylist, every nail salon person,

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 4>everyone who is relying on tips cares a lot about this,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 4>So if the Democrats all want to vote against it, look,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I think this policy is an incredible embodiment of the

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 4>most important political transformation of the last decade, which is

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 4>that Republicans have become a blue collar party. We are

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 4>the party of waiters and waitresses and working men and women.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 4>And so Democrats can decide where they stand, but I

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 4>think we ought to get this passed, and one way

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 4>or another, my prediction is this will get done before

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>the end of twenty twenty five.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Is this one of those issues where people should call

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 2>their congressmen their sinners? I mean we talk about this, Yes, yes, yes,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean yes, And what do you say?

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>This is good for my state, this is good for

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>my city, this is good for hourly workers.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 4>It's the best argument. Just pass no taxes on tips.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 4>So look, one of the things to understand when you

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 4>call your hungers, when you call your senator, if you

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 4>make a detailed, subtle argument, that doesn't get through. So

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 4>every member of Congress gets what I get every day,

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 4>which is I get an email. So all right, let

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 4>me find my email from today.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Call totals.

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 4>So on t eight twenty five, today there were one thousand,

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and seventy two calls to my office. There

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 4>were seven hundred and fifty four to DC, there were

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 4>six hundred and eighteen to Texas. There are four hundred

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 4>and eighty two live calls, so we had interns and

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 4>staff assistants who answered four hundred and eighty two calls. Today,

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 4>there were eight hundred ninety calls that went to voicemails.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Of those calls, oney three hundred and twenty two Texans called,

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 4>fifty non Texans called, so overwhelmingly the calls were Texans.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 4>So let's break it down casework. So that's I've got

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 4>an issue with Social Security, I've got an issue with

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 4>the VA, I've got an issue with government. Forty five

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 4>of those calls were casework, and I've got a whole

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 4>team that works to help Texans deal with the government

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 4>every day. Twenty four dealt with the academy, so young

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 4>men and women in high school students that want to

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 4>go to service academy. So twenty four of them. Eight

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 4>concerned the campaign. I don't know what they concerned. Ninety

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 4>one concerned scheduling, so people calling and saying, hey, can

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 4>you come and do this event or this other event

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>now of the breakdown. Eighteen called in support of me,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight called in opposition to me. So people called

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 4>and said, I can't stand Cruise, He's terrible. Okay, that

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 4>gets recorded. Ten people called in support a President Trump,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 4>Seventy nine people called in opposition to President Trump. Now nominations,

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 4>seventy five people called in support of President Trump's nominees.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Seventy people called in opposition to President Trump's nominees. Now,

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting. FK Junior got a bunch of calls. One

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred and eighty seven people this is yesterday called in

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 4>support of RFK Junior for HHS Secretary. Ninety three people

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 4>called in opposition to RFK Junior, so about two to one,

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Kennedy, the calls were coming in. Nineteen people called

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 4>in support of Cash Battel for FBI director. Four hundred

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 4>and thirty two people called in opposition to cash Battel

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 4>as FBI director. And I think there probably were some

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 4>liberal groups stirring up calls, because that number is big enough,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 4>four hundred and thirty.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, when you see days like that,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you got to be thinking somebody went on an email

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>campaign or a Callboitz campaign and said, yeah, target this

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>member today specifically, because if it doesn't match the day before,

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the day after, that's when that's kind of the tel right.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 3>And that happens.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 4>There are groups that will focus and say make these calls.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think those calls the four hundred and thirty two,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 4>that's a big enough number. That's where that probably came from. Now,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 4>in a day, forty eight people called in support of

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Tulsa Gabbard, twenty two people called in opposition.

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 3>To Tulsa Gabbard.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 4>On legislative issues, thirteen people called in support a border

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 4>of security, two people called in opposition to border security,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 4>and interestingly enough, four hundred and seventy four people called

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 4>in opposition to the omb pause of federally appropriated funds.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 4>So look that's the sort of report. I get that

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 4>report every day and I read it every day. Now,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 4>look what we get over the course of the year,

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of thousands of calls. So I can't listen to

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 4>every voicemail that comes in. I could literally spend all

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 4>day long doing nothing but listening to voicemails and not

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 4>do any hearings, not do any legislation, and I still

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have enough time. So the way I consume that

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 4>data is through report like that. I just read you

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the report that came today. Every other member consumes that

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 4>this same way. What I'm saying is, if you want

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Congress to pass no taxes on tips, you don't need

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 4>to present a long, detailed, subtle argument as to all

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>of the pros and cons. Just pick up the phone

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 4>and call your member and say, pass no taxes on tips.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 4>If you say that sentence, it will get recorded in

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 4>a report just like that to the House member of

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 4>the senator you're calling. That's how the information gets consumed.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 2>That's encouraging.

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way you said, everybody looks at their call

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this like the same way you do.

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 3>It, I hope.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know that there may be some people

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 4>that don't give a damn.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I look at it every day.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I can't promise that all five hundred and thirty five

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 4>members of Congress do, but I certainly look at it

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 4>every day because I work for thirty one million Texans,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 4>and so I want to see what issues people are

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 4>engaged on and what they care about.

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>As before, if you want to hear the rest of

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this conversation on this topic. You can go back and

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dow the podcast from early this week to hear the

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>entire thing. I want to get back to the big

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>story number three of the week.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 2>You may have.

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Missed that obviously means the pace is moving up. When

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at so far what's happened there does seem

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit of a change.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>We're noticing it with the Democrats in the media especially,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there's a real appetite to just get

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a nominee whatever when they get their hands on to

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>not pass.

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that part of the gainsmanship that we're witnessing. Am

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I reading the room the right way?

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, I still believe, and I've said this a number

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 4>of times, that all of Trump's cabinet nominees are going

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 4>to be confirmed, and I think they'll be confirmed within

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 4>thirty days.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 3>That we are leaning in.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 4>We're putting the pedal to the medal under the Senate

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 4>rules that the Democrats can delay some, but I think

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 4>within thirty days we'll get them all through. Now, the

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 4>three that they are going after hardest are in terms

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 4>of cabinet nominees, Tulca Gabbert for Director of National Intelligence,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Kennedy for Health and Human Services. And then it's

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 4>not a cabinet position, but Cash Pateel for Director of

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 4>the FBI, which it's a sub cabinet position, but a

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 4>very very important law enforcement position. Those are the three.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 4>It's not complicated or subtle. Those three are the top

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 4>targets of the Democrats.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Today.

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 4>In the Senate Judiciary Committee, we had Cash Betel's hearing.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I was vigorous at the hearing defending him. I will

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 4>tell you I think I think Cash did very well.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 4>I think he acquitted himself in an excellent way. This

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 4>evening I was on Sean Hannity, and as I put it,

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 4>I said, my assessment of the Democrats' behavior at Cash

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Betel's hearing reminded me of the quote from Shakespeare's Macbeth.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 4>It was a tale told by an idiot, full of

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 4>sound and fury and signifying nothing.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>That is a great.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Accurate way of describing I mean, it was, you know

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what show is how I was going.

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>To put it.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 4>But they didn't land any material blows. And look, the

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 4>point on Cash what they're attacking him on not that

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 4>he's not qualified.

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 3>He's clearly qualified. He has.

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Over a decade of experience in law enforcement, national security,

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 4>including having been a federal public defender, including having been

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 4>a federal prosecutor, having worked in the National Security Division

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 4>of the Department of Justice, having worked in the White

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 4>House and the National Security Council, having been a senior

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 4>intelligence staffer on Capitol Hill, and having been the chief

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 4>of staff at the United States Defense Department. They're not

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 4>arguing he's unqualified. What they're arguing is they're terrified he

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 4>will do exactly what President Trump promised he would do,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 4>which is eliminate the politicization and weaponization of the FBI

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 4>and get it back to its core function. I believe

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Cash Bettel will do that, and I think the Democrats

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 4>are freaking out because they don't want him to do that.

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 4>But I think Cash will make it through. We also

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 4>had hearings this week for both Bobby Kennedy and Tulsea Gabbert.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, it is not impossible that one of

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 4>those nominees is defeated, but I think they all make

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 4>it through.

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now, when you look at the Republicans, when Democrats

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are pushing this obstructionism the way that they are doing

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it and trying to slow things down, does that unify

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the Republican base more because it's like, all right, come on, guys,

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>does that make it actually easier to get the votes

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you need because you realize what you're up against.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 4>A Look, potentially, you had Pete hag Seth, who is

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.239
<v Speaker 4>the one they went after the hardest so far, and

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 4>that vote was fifty to fifty. We lost three Republicans.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 4>We lost Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Mitch McConnell. Because

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 4>we have a fifty three to forty seven majority, losing

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 4>three made it fifty to fifty, and that meant the

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 4>Vice President jd Vance could break the tie.

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I am glad we have fifty three.

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 4>If we had a fifty one vote majority, I would

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 4>not be nearly so saying, and I would not be

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 4>saying every Trump Cabinet nominee is going to be confirmed

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 4>if we had a fifty one vote majority. But because

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 4>we have fifty three, we can lose up to three,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 4>and so I think all of these make it through. Listen, Tulsi.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Tulsi was a Democrat for most of her career. She

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 4>is perceived if you look at Republican foreign policy, they're

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 4>interventionists and isolationists. There are many who perceive Tulsi as

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 4>much more of an isolationist, So there are Republicans who

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 4>have real concerns with her. Will that play out into

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 4>no votes? I don't know. I think the President deserves

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 4>a considerable amount of deference in naming his cabinet members,

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 4>and he has decided to name Tulci Gabbert. I'm going

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 4>to vote yes, but I don't know. It's not impossible

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 4>that we get four no votes, which would take down

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 4>the nomination. Likewise, Bobby Kennedy. Bobby Kennedy's a complicated situation.

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 4>Both Kennedy and Tulsi, until like twelve minutes ago, they

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 4>were both Democrats. Yeah, and so Bobby Kennedy obviously a

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 4>scion of one of the great Democrat royalty families, Camelot.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 3>It is a curious dynamic.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 4>It's not clear to me any Democrat is going to

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 4>vote for him, which is an interesting situation.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Listen, there's some conservatives.

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Kennedy, until recently, on many policies is his views

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 4>were quite left of center. I'm going to vote for

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Kennedy because I think he's a change agent, because

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 4>I think he has courage to take on I think

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 4>some of the corruption that we have at HHS, particularly

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 4>with big Pharma, that gets in bed with the career

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 4>bureaucrats there and stifles competition and drives up costs. I

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 4>think if you have a terrible disease, you should have

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 4>a right to access.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Life saving medication.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.959
<v Speaker 4>And I'm one of the original sponsors of the right

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 4>to Try legislation. I think that's very important and and

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I think Bobby Kennedy is going to shake up the

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 4>the cronyism that that that that has characterized HHS.

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 3>What's not clear to me.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Is I don't if any Democrats want that cronyism shaken up,

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 4>and to be honest, there may be some Republicans that don't.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's play this exchange.

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 4>So this is Bobby Kennedy responding to Bernie Sanders Bernie's

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 4>going to vote now. When Bertie was attacking him like crazy,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 4>but I got to say, Bobby Kennedy popped him back

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 4>pretty hard.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Listen to this exchange.

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to make America healthier than other countries in

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.479
<v Speaker 6>the world. Right now, will you guarantee do what every

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 6>other major countries. It's a simple question and by the way, Bernie,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, the problem of corruption is not just in

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 6>the federal agents, is in Congress too. Almost all the

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 6>members of this panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 6>millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical And.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I did no interest. Oh, I thought that that would no.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 6>I ran for president like you. I got millions, millions

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 6>of contributions. They did not come from the executives, not

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 6>one nickel of pack money from the pharmaceuticals, and they

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 6>came to twenty twenty. In twenty twenty, you were the

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 6>single largest because I receiver comminations from workers all over

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 6>this country. Workers. You were this not a nickel from

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 6>corporate You was the single largest pharmaceutical dollars from workers

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 6>in poor three five million.

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, out of two hundred million.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, but.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 2>You have not answered last question.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that you want to talk about a beatdown

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>with the facts there, Bernie, you've accepted millions of dollars

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in the pharmaceutical industry. In twenty twenty, you were the

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>single largest receiver of pharmacual dollars one point five millions.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Like, let's just move on here.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he did not like that exchange.

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 4>By the way, I've never seen a confirmation hearing where

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 4>the nominee refers to the senator by his first name.

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 3>He keeps calling him Bernie.

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Like it's clear Bobby Kennedy and Bernie Sanders they know

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 4>each other well. I mean, they've got a long history there.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Because that's that that that's quite unusual too. But I

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 4>gotta say Bernie was not anticipating that pop back. We'll

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 4>see how it plays out, but I think Kennedy's gonna

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 4>get confirmed. I want him to get confirmed. I like

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Kennedy, and I also think there are a lot

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 4>of Americans, a lot of Americans who are not even

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 4>very political, a lot of moms who are worried about

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 4>the garbage that that our kids are are consuming, are

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 4>worried about the rise in in in in chronic illness.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 4>That that that that I think Bobby Kennedy is a

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 4>very good person to take that on.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 2>As always. Thank you for listening to Verdict.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Was center Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with you don't forget

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to deal with my podcast, and you can listen to

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>my podcast every other day.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Hey, you're not listening to Verdict or each day when

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Listen to verdict afterwards, I'd love to have you as

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a listener to again the Ben Ferguson Podcasts, and we

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>will see you back here on Monday morning.