WEBVTT - Sam Le Cornu on the Markets (Radio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong is pushing for this full reopening, whether or

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not that last. Let's discuss all that with Sam Lacorner,

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO of Stonehornet Global Partners with us

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>in our Hong Kong studio. So Sam, a lot to

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>discuss on the global front, but let's start with Hong Kong.

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Because the dismantling of hotel quarantine business is now pushing

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for a full reopening. How much does this thing? How

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>much does this change things for Hong Kong? Yeah, good morning.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those things where it's definitely a step

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. Um. I still think that there

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is the communication and what's required for a full unconditional reopening.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Just having discussions over the weekend and people come in

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to Hong Kong in the near future. Um, there's still

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>things that were required to be done. So I think

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that COVID is essentially obviously coming down here in Hong Kong.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>You can see that with the statistics. But the economy

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>has been hurt, has been hurt in China as well. UM,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and a whole reopening, I think we'll remove some of

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the anxiety that's caused with the lockdowns that have been

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in place when it comes to mainland China stock investors

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>very much looking to capitalize on any potential policy shifts

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Communist Party Congress next month. Do you think

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it is likely we will see a pivot away from

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>dynamic zero and of course how much that changes the

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>outlook for China's economy. Yeah. The twentie Party Congress is

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the most important media in China for the last decade.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It is so fundamentally important for the politic borrow to

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>get the right people in. And there's an arm wrestle

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>within the Communist Party at the moment in terms of

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>opening up and those who are sort of leaning towards

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the historical sort of ideologies as well. So something like

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID has been devastating to the to the underlying macro

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>economy and lifting it is something which they need to prioritize,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, economic policy needs to be prioritized over

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of political sort of internal issues that they're facing

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. So this, this this meeting cannot come

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>too soon. It's such a fundamentally important one. And then

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they really have to get on with it because the

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>economy is faltering. It's not just the COVID policy. It's

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a proper to crisis as well. Where do you look for,

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess, kind of exposure to stocks that might either

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the reopening or some support for the policy

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the property sector. It's a really good question. The

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>property sector is something which has been induced. So they

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>have the three Red Lines policy trying to get property

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>developers to de leverage starting from about three years ago.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So you'd expect them to have a firm grip on this,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think they've underestimated the issue. And the issue,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I say is consumer confidence. The policies that China is

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>putting in place a really supply side there. There's plenty

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>of abundant liquidity. They're lowing the various loan prim rates

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and mini term lending facilities, so adding the liquidity and

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>cutting cutting interest rates, but people still aren't going out

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and spending, and they're certainly not purchasing property at this point.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really issue because the oversupply is something

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like about two million to two million rather units of

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of unfinished inventory, and unless that clears, you're not going

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to have people come out because they're worried that the

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>property price is going to continue to decline. So it's

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a really tricky one at the moment for China. And

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>do we continue to see weakness in say the MSCR

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>China Index, which is down about quarter versus a loss

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of less than five percent for global stocks. Yeah, it's

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental valuations are the most important thing. And you know

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Hangsing Index at a round about eight een thousand,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's just one of those things where you're

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>at sort of two thousand and eleven lows and you

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can pick up these tech names and Chinese sort of

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>internet names at record low valuations. So that's the most

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>important thing is to try to put everything into the perspective.

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's a lot of negative sentiment, there's a lot

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of issues in regards to consumer confidence. But we're seeing

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that these valuations are almost at record lows, and that's

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're focusing our attention on. A lot of the

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>fair hikes. Momentum is really boosting dollar as we know.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there a concern that we could see a reprise

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of financial crisis level stress for Asian currencies? Yeah, it's

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Um, we've been looking through that and

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Asia in itself, there are the vast majority of m

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>c I Asia extrapan in current account surpluses, so it's

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not essentially the same as it was at seven. And

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>also if you look at the excess foreign debts, so

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>US denominated debt as much lower as well. But whenever

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a situation like this, where there's a bit

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of a crisis and confidence, you will see a rush

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to quality, and that's the US dollar, you know, the

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>international trade exchange rates, so there are pockets of concern.

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The rupee in India has depreciated to all timeloads. You've

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>got some other markets which are more commodity based, like

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>in Indonesia, but they are running a slight current account surplus,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and other countries which are benefiting from the manufacturing sectors,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>such as the Vietnamese Dong, is holding up relatively well.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So across Asia, you'd expect emerging markets to have a

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>big sell off in currencies. We're seeing that, but not

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that you'd expect. You say, global tightening

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is tough, but it is necessary. Do you agree with

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what Raphael Bostick told CBS that the US economy still

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is strong because of that strong labor market. And I

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>guess to that point, how much of a downturn could

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we see. I think it's a little bit more than that.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the the US market is strong because there's confidence,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and that confidence comes because people are happy to have

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>their capital there. Um, that's where China is really failing.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>If anything. I think the US has underestimated China for

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>for a period of time, and now China's underestimated the US.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And what you have is a real disruption in that confidence.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So the US market will continue to be strong. They're

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>bringing jobs home. Obviously the inflation effect is an impact,

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>but long term, I think you'll see more people happy

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to do business in the US, and the US I

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think are winning over these sort of supplied chain constraints

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and disruptions that are occurring through tariff and protectionism, et cetera.

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>These policies are essentially working and their weakening China. So

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we're we wait and look to see what concessions China

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>will make and what the new era of China will

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>look like. So perhaps a bigger global headwind then is

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the energy crisis, and of course what we've been seeing

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in the UK as well. How much of a of

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a reaction could we see from from what we saw

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in the pound and these tax cuts the implications more

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>globally there. Yeah, so I think the supply issues are

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue. Um, you know, we still need a

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>lot more money spent renewable energy. China's got their own

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>policies essentially they look to do like the new goals

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and new measures and the national determined contributions and and

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>favoring solar is their big area. Um. But I just

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>feel that right now that the China has the economy

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>has so many other issues that if they're not prioritizing

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>these things, um, and over time, you know, um, we'll

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. The the issue with the fossil fuels,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so you look at oil, gas, coal win particular, which

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is used in I p p s have all gone

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>up significantly, but now are starting to drop off a

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So we'll see where they settle. And obviously

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the Europe is a big issue on

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>these underlying commodities. So are you of the class that

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is granting more momentum that the school of thought? I

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>should say that we should be looking now at cuts

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to three growth forecast for China as well. I mean,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>forget two which we know is not going to meet

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near their growth target three also look very shaky.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It depends what they do after the Congress meeting. So

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it really depends on what policies they have, on what

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>their priority is as well. So they need to focus

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on economic policy right now. China is at a massive

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>crossroads and they have the control to make the right decisions.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Um And they need to obviously see and and work

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>out where do they sit in this new world aura

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>order that they were the export nation of the world.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Are they entered the w t O in two thousand

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and one, but now they're moving up the supply chain

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and putting out sophisticated capital goods. What did look like

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future and what policies will help them in

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>an export nation? Um So it really depends, like I've

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>never seen it, this, this sort of like a two

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>way Yeah, alright, Sam, always a pleasure. Thank you. Sam

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Lacanu is co founder and ce I O of Stonehorn

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Global Partners with us in our Hong Kong studio here

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia