WEBVTT - What Trump's Tax Proposal Means for Retirement Plans

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a report from HSBC this morning that

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>showed that millennials expect to retire at age fifty nine,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which is two years younger than the working age average

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of six one and seems rather remarkable in an era

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of incredibly low benchmark yields. I want to bring in

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Peter Fendler for some perspective. Peter Fendler is a principal

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>at Hub International New England LLLC, based in Portland, Maine,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>who focuses on retirement accounts and advising people. And how

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>likely do you think it is that this current generation

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of upcoming workers will be able to retire at age

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>fifty I think it's really unlikely, given the fact that

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we're living longer and we're saving less than we ever have.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>What's more realistic, I think seventy is the new the

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>new sixty five and UM, you know, we're sitting with

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>UH participants in retirement plans and looking at their average

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>account balance and trying to project forward what they should

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to retire on. There's a pretty large disconnect

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>between what they have, what they need, and what they

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think they need. You know, Peter, I wonder if you

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>could just offer people a little bit of an insight

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>into your business and also the changes that you have

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>seen in your business. I mean you UH were independent

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and now you're part of Commonwealth, you know, family of

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Advisers and UM and HUB International is of course made

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition. What if you could just describe your role

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>on how it has changed over the last couple of

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>years and what's foremost in your mind. UM. I think

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of consolidation going on and there's going

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a narrowing of of what we do as

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>retirement plan advisors under the new realm of the fiduciary

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>rule that's been promulgated recently. UM still in its finalization,

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but assuming it it maintains its current form, there are

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of advisors that UM make

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the election to get out of this business because of

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the risk. UM, I think there's going to be Uh,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got a conflict of interests that's inherent in the

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>way that our retirement plan advisory work happens right now,

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>where there's commission based resources and conversation formulas as well

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>as fee based, and the fiduciary rule really attacks the

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>commission based variable pay element of what's going on, and

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it puts a premium on being a fee based advisor

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>such as ourselves. UM So to that extent, I think

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>with that increased liability under a commission based relationship with compensation,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see those advisors that don't want to

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>move to a fee base, or are not prepared to

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or don't have the infrastructure to go to that direction. UM,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps exit the market. Well let's let's ask a question

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that might seem basic, but are so many advisors for retirement?

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Are they necessary? Is it is? It is a certain

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>consolidation important, right, I think there is, I thinks a

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>great question. I think there are a lot of advisors

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that have two or three plans that aren't really expert

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in the retirement plan space. But um, they have a

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>friend that has a company and they become the advisor

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just through kind of convenience and in relationship. But um,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with the fiduciary standards that are coming out now and

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the attention on fiduciary capability, UM, it's it's going to

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>be one of those things where it gets rolled up

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to people that are expert in that space. So how

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>small do you expect this interest try to become? In

0:03:58.400 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>other words, can you give us some perspective and how

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>big is now and how small you expect it to become?

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. I don't I really don't know

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>how large the advisor community is, but I think it's

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>reasonable to expect that there's strinkage in the in the

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>realm of twenty to thirty maybe that's a lot. Yeah,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, where are those assets go? I think

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they will remain with advisors, but with advisors that do

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of the work that are specialized in

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the retirement plan space. So where is the area. Is

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there a specific specialized territory where advisors are really necessary?

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh with respect to people crafting retirement plans? I don't

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think it's up and down the market.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's not specific to a certain industry. It's

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not specific to a size of a company. Um, if

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you are an employer and you are launching a four

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>one K plan or or four or three B plan

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nonprofit space, it's a complex world and it's

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>not one of those things that you really want to

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>do for yourself. End employers or fiduciaries and they're looking

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to offset that fiduciary responsibility by hiring a co fiduciary

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>through eight relationships which we are actually providing on the

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>three twenty one level. That sounds expensive. Is it getting

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>more expensive? Actually it's getting less expensive. Um, how much

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>does it cost? So that that's a really good question

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's a complex answer. What's happening is there so

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>much attention on fees that that there's been a continual

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>compression of costs and what we're doing and within our

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>organization is saying, look, here is our baseline UH set

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of services that where we're acting as a fiduciary at

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the plan level, helping you with plan design, with fund selection,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>fund monitoring, and and educational fiduciary standards those things. That's

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>one fee set and it's based upon our liability as

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>advisor UH and the side as a plan. The other is,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>do you want us to act as a fiduciary for

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>your employees helping them with education, investment selection, one on

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one advice, um, And the fee for that is really

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>time sensitive. How much are we doing, how how often

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>are we sitting with your employees? It sounds like, but

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like at least that that the latter scenario

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>um is Uh. It is, you know, part of the

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>whole education process and is considered to be a positive

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if you can afford it. It is And I think

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>employers needed time to change it from a fee space

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to an investment space because what's happening in the United

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>States going back to Lisa's original question, is that Americans

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are underfunded for retirement. We're woefully underfunded and um, we're

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of going along going forward, and if we stay

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that way and don't have enough money to retire, we won't,

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>which has the upstream of higher costs for employees and

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>employers by employees not retiring on time. Well, we'd all

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like to retire on and I want to thank you

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>very much for helping us. Peter Findler, he is a

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>principal Hub International, New England. We're broadcasting live and the

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth Financial Networks twenty seventeen Retirement Symposium in Boston. Well

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Oil has been on a wild ride of late. Just

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>days ago it was above fift dealers of barrel. Now

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's down to forty seven dollars a barrel. Despite news

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that Saudi Arabia is tightening the screws on Qatar as

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>punishment for its ties to Iran. And I want to

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>bring in Javier blast who's our chief energy correspondent for

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence talking to us. Come just set the stage

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for us. Why did Saudi Arabia take these measures against Quaitar?

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>What exactly are the exact parameters of these measures? Well

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years that the relations between Saudia,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Abbia and Catar has been strained for a number of reasons,

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in part because Catar support the Muslim brother could a

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>movement that Saudi Arabia does not, in part because Qatar

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>has been trying to add some mediator between the conservative

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>countries in the uh in the in the goal for

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the Arab conservative countries in the golf by Saudi Arabia

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and on the other side Iran. And also because of

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all Jasira, the Doja Base television station that Qatar controls

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>has been quite critical of the Saudi regime. Those disagreements

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have been in crescendo over the last few months, and

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they erupted into a crisis last week. And now it's

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia is retinally eighteen and getting several other countries

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>behind it, several relations between itself and and and Doha.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That is something unprecedented because Saudi Arabian and Qatar in

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 1>theory on the same side uh in the Gulf Corporation Council,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and also because both both countries are close allies of Washington.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Is a very unusual situation in the Middle East. Well,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking at some of the headlines of

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers in the Middle East tier and the United

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>aramids quitar armed terror to spread chaos. Uh Iran is

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>encouraging Qatar to leave the sixth Nation Gulf Cooperation Council

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>and so on. And then you have also the same

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing in Saudi Arabia, and the response of

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the in Qatar is bark as you wish Qatar won't

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>change its principles. Uh isn't the United States have a

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>huge military presence just outside of Doha. It does and

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right, and that's what I was emphasizing. It

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is a very unusual situation in wh when you see

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>two Middle East nations or or one one group of

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Middle East nations led by Saudia, we in the United

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emidates and on one side and the other side Qatar.

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Because the both sides of these confrontations have close links

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with the United States. Washington has a huge military operation,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a military air base used on the Outskirs of Doga,

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Central Command that oversees all the operations in the

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, and also in Afghani style, ten thousand more

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>than ten tho troops. Yes, they's ten thousand troops, are

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>huge air base and and the central Command that oversees

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>all the operations in the Middle East and Afghanistan, all

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of that is based in Qatar. Yeah. Well, you know,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>let's let's put this in perspective. Saud Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and the United Arab Emirates and Egypt that they will

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>all suspend air and sea travel to and from Qatar.

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>What prompted this action? Now, I mean, did did President

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump's visit to the Middle East have anything to do

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with us? Was in part that UM. Probably there was

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a bit of a link or that, because

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Saudia authorities have felt more UH

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in a stronger position of the after the Trump bus

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>it UH to take a more um aggressive for or

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or or a more confrontational stanza towards towards Catar. There

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>were also some comments carry by Katari stay home media

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and attributed to the mere Um criticizing the Saudist authorities

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>during the Trump bus. It very quickly those comments were

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>deleted from Catari media and and the catarists they said

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that those those were not real comments, that they were

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the work of a hacker, but very few people believed

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that explanation in Saudi Arabia. So really a couple of

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>events after the Saudi the Trump busy to to Saudi

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Arabia really triggered this crisis. So let's talk about the

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>market effects here, because the initial effect was the crude

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 1>values rose as sensibly from the expectation the Catard be

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>unable to ship as much crude and therefore that it

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>would cramp supply to some degree, that gain has been

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely raised. And then some what's going on here? Well, uh,

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very classic um spike in the oil

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>market when we have some kind of geopolitical noise um

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>during trading hours in Asia, the media reaction is used

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to buy by futures using case something really goes really bad,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but immediately has become very clear today that the oil

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is continuing flowing from Qatar as our six hundred excuse me,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand barrels a day UM, and the same

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with the l n G, which is a much much

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>more significant proportion of global supplies. So at the moment,

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any significant impact in the oil market

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>unless this crisis really escalates, We're gonna leave it there,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but boy, this is going to be a story that continues.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And also you have the issues of whether the Opeque

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>nations are mindful and stick to their limits in terms

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of production, and because that was something that also is

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>looking to be renewed well, and this also crazes the

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>question what are the standards for some of these Middle

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Eastern nations to sanction each other or not. I mean,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it sort of seems a little bit out of the blue.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Um cutting ties with a country that hosts an air

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>base that has more than ten tho U s personnel,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>what can you say, I want to now bring in

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson, our aerospace defense expert when it comes to

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh, Georgia wanted you to give us just

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a preview of what you understand the President may

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>be speaking about in just a few moments having to

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>do with privatization of the air traffic control system. Hey m,

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>good morning. Yeah, we had we expect the President to

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>announce something of a privatization of air traffic control, a

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>structure that's going to look pretty similar to nav Canada.

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And essentially what it would do is, um create a

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>separate entity that's probably gonna that's supposed to be removed

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>from government bureaucracy to oversee both the day to day

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control as well as long term investment in

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that in the systems that support air traffic control. So, um,

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've we've heard that President Trump is laying

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at his vision, but it's going to include a separation

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of air traffic control operations from the Federal Aviation Administration.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest opposition to this? You know, I think

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that um, I don't know that there's a huge amount

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of opposition here. I think that there is a bunch

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of jockeying between the interested parties about who's going to

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pay in the future. Um. And for the interested parties,

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>let's get a sense of of sort of who's on

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>what side here? Sure, so interest party is going to

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be airlines, of course, would be the most interesting party

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're most affected by air traffic control, But other

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>users of airspace are going to be business aviation and

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>general aviation, and so I think those three parties are

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out who's going to pay. I think

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they all would probably agree that they want this air

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>traffic control system out of the federal government because they're

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>their modernization efforts that I think all of them would

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>agree should have happened by now are going too slowly

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or risk of not occurring the way they thought they

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>would occur. Um. So again, I think what we have

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a discussion about, Okay, what's the right fee for

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the business aviation community do you pay? What's the right

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>fee level for the airlines to pay? And then g

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of general aviation is in the mix too,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but much less of a user. George, I want to

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>know is is the air traffic control system in the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>United States? Is it considered world class. No, not now.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you talk to some people, you know, talk

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to some people at different groups indeed see that advocacy groups,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and they'll tell you that, you know, they're still using

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>paper strips with airplane numbers on it, uh, you know,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to line up airplanes for approach and departure at major airports. Um.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of the computing systems are fifty years old. UM.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's clearly not state of the art. And meanwhile

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>technology is evolved so that we can get a lot

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>better information on each individual airplane. Instead of using radar,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which we use now, we can have them uh collect

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>information on their speed and their exact location from GPS

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>signals and then shoot that down to ground stations or

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>even back up to satellites and provide air traffic controls

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the much better picture of uh, the air traffic environment.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And they can use that to space airplanes much closer

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and make make the system a lot more efficient. UM

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of where we want to go. We're

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. We're still using radar and fifty year

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>old technology computing technology. George do a sense of how

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>much it would cost to bring the US aviation system

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>up to speed. Um. So, look, I think nobody really

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>knows this number correctly. I'll tell you that the f

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a A says it's a thirty billion dollar number, and

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>they think that roughly thirty million. They think fifteen billion

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of that is it is something the f a A

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>has to spend. Any other fifteen billion of that would

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be equipment in the airplane to the airplanes need this

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>equipment to shootout the signal that tells their direction, their speed,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>their exact location, things like that and the Sorry, now

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm struck by the idea that it probably could save

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>airlines money. No. I mean, basically, if things were more streamlined,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have the delays, they wouldn't have to do

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the vouchers as much to compensate people who have gotten

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bumped in, uh you know, off of really crowded planes

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because of delays. I mean, it seems like it would

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>actually save money and there could be some way of

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, expediting this money saving aspect it. And so

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the airlines are they're the ones that have absolutely showed

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 1>their cards. They're absolutely in favor of this privatization. If

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of their organizations like airlines for America,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the group organization that represents them. UM. They've

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>got papers out where they're absolutely in favor of getting

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control out of the federal government and into

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of a semi private organization. George, is there any

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is there any precedent for doing this? Uh So, internationally,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we do have some precedents for I think one of

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the more prominent ones is UM is NAV Canada. UH.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, if a NAV Canada was spun out of

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the federal government UM airline. Actually, airspace users, including the

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>majority funded by the airlines, pay the fees UH for

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control, and Canada they issue bonds to buy

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, UH, capital equipment for long term investment, and

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they pay those bonds off with excess user fees, and

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're in a situation now where they're actually lowering sees.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like in Canada UM this type of

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>system has been quite effective. I think the airlines are

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>looking at that thinking they'd love to have that. You know, Georgia,

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that this is not already happening, and I'm wondering,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's been a lot of discussion about the

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>problem with air traffic control in the US. What's being

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>done right now, if anything, to sort of bring it

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>up to speed. Yeah, So the FAA is marching down

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a m marching down a road to modernized airspace. A

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is about this next gen air traffic

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>control and these systems on airplanes that will shoot their

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>um their coordinates to ground stations. UM. So it is

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>being done. Airlines are critical that it's being done slowly. Uh.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>If you read some of the position papers, they're very

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned that there's not the maybe the project management skills

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that you might find in a more nim bull private

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>organization inside the f A A. You know, there's concerns

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about how the FAA funds themselves. They have a they

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>have a six billion dollar trust fund in them and

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress sort of dips into that trust fund to pay

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for operational costs every year. So maybe there's a lot

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of concerned again and met the skill set in f

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>A A kind of about the funding, long term funding,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's the reason people want to see it out

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of there. But they are marching down the road trying

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to implement modernization. I just want to follow

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>up on the funding issue that what makes anybody think

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that the private corporation is going to be more ad

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>child in terms of funding then the government. I thought

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the funding was at least some members of Congresses that

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the funding has been held up by Congress and it's

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>been intermittent, so that that's one of the reasons why

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that big revamp of the air traffic control system has

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>been so sort of caught up in a budgetary no turbulence. Yeah,

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the thought is to get it away from some of

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the political influence of Congress, Right, So, uh, Congress sort

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of always always struggles with that challenge where somebody wants

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to build done and uh, you know, a congressman from

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this state of that state wants to improve their small airport,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and they try to pull money out of some of

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>these trust funds and such to fix their small problem,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which might not be a big, you know, a big

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>issue in the in the broader scheme of things. And

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>so I think the challenge is to get it out

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of the political um arena so that funding can be

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>set aside and and um and projects prioritized by necessity

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than the political influence. And again, Congress is using

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what you'd consider sort of long term funds trust fund

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of money to fund operations. Um, you know, you could,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you could bring in consultants and perhaps optimize operations, improved

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>computer systems and reduce the cost of operating it. Congress

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always have an incentive to do that either. So yeah, George,

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about political considerations, I think about what

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Chan and Pettapeece said just a few moments ago. Chan

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and Pettipeces our White House correspondent for Bloomberg, and she

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>was talking about all the things that are going on

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, and we are awaiting the president right now.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right, We are awaiting the president who is expected

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to make remarks on this air traffic control reform initiative

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about with George Ferguson. George, why is

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump coming out today with everything going on with

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending? Although I suppose this could be part of

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.239
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending, uh, you know, with everything that's going on

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>with his travel ban, etcetera, with tax reform, um, why

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>why now is there something in particular that he is addressing.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think this is just part of his

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>broader agenda. You know, maybe he said if a structure

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was going to be an important part. You know what

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we heard. I heard airline executives talking about this um

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right after the election, and even before he had made

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>it to the White House. You know, he that she

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>got installed as president about this being a priority. So, uh,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been on his agenda. I think he's bringing it

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>forward now. I mean, whether there's some timing around other

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 1>news in the world that he's trying to distract from.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll let Shannon sort of answer those questions. But I

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>think that there's always been part of his agenda, and

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he also thinks this is a bit uh costless,

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you can get it done quicker um and sort of

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>get his agenda and moving that way. But maybe some

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of that sort of thought process there too. George. While

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we have you, though, I want to ask you something

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 1>about the industry, because I know you put out some

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>original research today and I wonder if you could tell

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>us about production rates and how each of the individual companies,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the Boeing but there's seven three seven, whether

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know a ye Neo, if you could just give

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>us an update on that. Yeah, So from the air

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>framers PIM, we are we are bowling an airbus being

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the largest two manufacturers of commercial airplanes in the world.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They're both ramping up production of the seven, their narrow

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>body airplanes, which are their most important, most profitable airplanes,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>which is good stuff for them long term. Uh. You know,

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be at production rates that I think they're

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be around fifty for each company. UM the UH. Again,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these are sort of the the prime money maker airplanes

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for these companies. UH, And so longer term it's very

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>good news for their profitability and their cash flow. The

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge is short term that these are new versions of

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>these airplanes that they're they're introducing as they ramp up

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>there and the seven thirty seven Max. So there's some

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>costs to the UH, to the learning curve of building

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>those airplanes. So we'll watch that. That probably hurts them

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to the end of this year. But

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>again as they get those the productions of those airplanes down,

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>UM not out to help their profitability cash flow. And

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're watching in these companies right now is wide

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>body demand. I'm seeing some rumors out today that Airbus

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>may even cut production of the A three eight more.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>UM that airplane hasn't sold well, it's the biggest airplane

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world. It's a real challenge to get it

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>into markets, you know, into into an Airport's all of

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those tickets and flying to a single airport not a

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>dilute the price you sell your tickets for to fill

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the airplane. So it's not surprising we're getting ready to

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>go into Farnborough air shows. So we're gonna watch those

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wide body owners closely, especially three eight. But the other

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>two wide buddies are having challenges are the three thirty

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Triple seven, the three thirty from Airbus and

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Triple seven from Boeing. Generally we're seeing, um, we're

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing weakness and long haul ticket prices for overseas travel

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ticket prices, and that means that airlines and less stores

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are less excited about taking the newest long haul airplanes.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>The Triple seven and the three theory don't have as

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>much a backlog as some of the new airplanes have

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>just been introduced. Uh So we keep watching that wide

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>body space and trying to figure out one that's gonna

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>when the dynamic dynamic there's going to improve. Thank you

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so much, George Ferguson. We really appreciate you giving us

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the perspective as we await President Trump's comments about air

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>traffic control reform, which is badly needed in the United States.

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson is our senior Aerospace, Defense and Airline analyst

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. You know, despite the sell off and

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>municipal bonds at the end of last year, they have

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>come roaring back, and there is a story on the

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg today saying that US state and local bonds are

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the pricest against treasuries since the recession. How are these

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>figuring into people's retirement plans? I want to bring in

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Marci Sprofits Principle at Boult Donnally and Suprofits consulting Group

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in Worcester, Massachusetts, and Marcy, as we talk about President

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump's tax plan and how people should prepare for retirement,

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>how much do municipal bonds play into this? Because they

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>are tax free and they were a popular investment, and

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they have been traditionally uh popular investments for wealthy individuals

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>who want to preserve that tax free benefit over the

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>long term. Do you think that these investments are still

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>warranted because there will not likely be that much of

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a change to tax laws. Well, I think with um Obviously,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with a Republican White House as well as a Republican

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>controlled Congress, we are very likely to see some form

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of tax reform over the next couple of years. It's

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>um so it's probably not so much a question of if,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a question of when. Uh. We we don't know

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what this point, big unknown exactly what that will look

0:27:55.480 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like if um, if the rules are changed in the

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>way that that would be Trump's calls. His biggest tax

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>reduction is on the corporate side of things, right, moving

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>from a rate down to about fifteen pent um. It's

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to tell at this point how his tax

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>plan will affect individuals because it's very light on specifics. Um,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't have much detail there. So he wants to

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>reduce the number of tax brackets, he wants to raise

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the exemptions, he wants to eliminate certain deductions. So it's

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>very hard to judge without specifics whether people's taxes are

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go down so much that municipal bonds wouldn't

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>play much of a role. So this this creates kind

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of a problem if you're advising clients, right because you

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have to have long term planning and if there's a

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>high likelihood that there will be some kind of tax

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>reform which will probably change the investing dynamic for wealthier

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>individuals or anyone who's planning for retirement. How do you

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>come up with and some advice. Well, that's a very

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>good question, Lisa. It's very hard to plan in in

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this environment. UH, specifically as it relates to municipal bonds.

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think for the average well off investors there's

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>still going to be a place for that. I think

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the bigger issue we see with tax or form is

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>how the changes might affect UH Middle America. Because of

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>possible changes to I ras and four oh one keys

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and the tax preferences that they have, there's gonna be

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>some way to pay for the major tax cuts that

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants for corporations and retirement plans tend to be

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a big juicy target there because of their current tax

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>preferences and because of the way the government co currently

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>scores revenue, they only look at a ten year period.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second, Does this mean that you think

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're probably will be some kind of increase to

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the amount that the raw fires and the furrow one

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>ks are taxed? Um? No, that that's that's not exactly

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, but there have been suggestions that the

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>limits on contributions perhaps be cut back to help pay

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for corporate tax reductions. That have been suggestions that instead

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of allowing people to contribute on a pre tax basis,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that they only contribute on an after tax wrath basis,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>because today that increases revenue and allows the government scoring

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>which only looks at a ten year period, to pay

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for the corporate tax cuts. That's our concern. Marcy. I

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>know that you've done a work for the American Association.

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You've t to find before converse about the fiduciary rule

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and so on, what is the most pressing issue that

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you would like to bring to the attention of the industry,

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's rollovers, whether it whatever that you feel h strongly,

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes you just can only get one thing in

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>people's minds and get everyone behind. What would that be

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you talking specifically regarding the fiduciary It could be

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>anything in your in your particular industry, because you kind

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of have a broad understanding of it. Um well, looking

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at the fiduciary rules, I think a lot of people

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are very much in agreement with the concept do everything

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the best interests of the client. I think the

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>problem lies in the execution because the way those rules

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>were written, the oversight is in the plaintiff attorney's hands

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and UH and that's something we would certainly like to

0:31:54.160 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>see changed. On the tax reform front, we that most

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress can um understand that the retirement tax

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>preferences are permanent deductions. The way mortgage interest is that

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that money comes back into the system when people take

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>their money out of retirement plans. It's taxable at that point.

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just the government scoring doesn't look at it that way.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So those are two things. I know you asked for one,

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but UH, two things that we're really focused on. How

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are you advising clients at a time of pretty low

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates across the board when you do have an

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>increasing number certainly have pensions going into risk your and

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>risk your assets, and you have investors who you have

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>individuals who have to save up bigger and bigger cushions

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for the uh, the the age that they're trying to

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get to to retire, which is getting older and older.

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you advise them? What's the biggest you know, UH,

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>concern that you have as far as people sort of

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ignoring some of the risks versus uh, the potential rewards. Well,

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, as we all know, it's all about the

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>time horizon. So for young people who are investing for

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>retirement today and have a lot of years before they're

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>going to actually access that money, they have a lot

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of time to ride those ups and downs. And if

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the market historically, we know that over

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>longer periods of time the trend is up right. So

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who are much closer to retirement, it's very

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult in this low interest rate environment to take out

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of risk and yet get the returns you need.

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for spending time

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. Marcy Provitz is the principal at Boulay, Donnelly

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and Consulting Group, and they are experts when it comes

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to retirement planning. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud or whatever podcast by from you prefer.

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one before the podcast. You

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Blueberg Radio.