WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 5 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Come Down Now Thursday morning, October

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>The Beating the Book podcast of Megapod Week five, Skill Alexander,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Who's happening? How you doing? Party people on the show today.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Not only a famous rotating guest, but a guest that

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we've had on for nine years. He's never too big

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to come on the podcast. We love him for it.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the staples of the show. On my

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>right from Circus Sports Ladies and Gentlemen, he's the conciliary

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to Derek Stevens over there. He's also the vice president

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of Operations. By a more formal title, he's Mike Palm.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Michael, Good morning Gil Very excited to have

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe joint us this week. Joe people now or they're

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>like who I think I know who this is? And

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 1>on my left from Showtime's docuseries Action and also a

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>guy who comes on the Numbers game on Visa every

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday during football season, Todd wishnev Hello Todd Todd twelve

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and eight and Circus. That means you get to brag

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and boast you're feeling good. Well, I feel like I'm

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>about to put my new system in place where I

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have Mike palm past post me for the last and

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll be the only one who passed posts

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and still finds a way to lose. You know, that's

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that's funny. But on the other hand, like Mike, is

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable because you can't really say that out loud because

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>then it gives the appearance of impropriety, So you can't

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really do that. I don't think well, being that they

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>post all the pics ahead of time, I don't think

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>it's really post It's probably true. That's probably true. Um,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>before we get a Circuits Sports million update, because we

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have a quarterly winner, ladies and gentlemen, somebody who raked

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.639
<v Speaker 1>in over a hundred dollars. The rotating guest Mike tipped

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>us off here. He is the host of Joe Lowan

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Dibbs The Game in San Francisco. They do the morning

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>show over there. Very successful morning show, but for our purposes.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps more known for his appearances on Daily Wager ESPN

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>two is Daily Wager, which airs money through Friday, hosted

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>by Doug Kazarian six pm Easter three pm Pacific. Ladies, gentlemen,

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's Joe forton ball. What's happening to Joseph gil it's

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>great to be back. Thank you so much for the

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to appear on this podcast. I can't believe it's

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>been nine years. But more importantly, as I become more

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and more famous and successful and I continue to leave

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the little people behind me, it becomes very difficult to

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>book me as a guest. And this is a podcast

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that I very easily could have looked past. But when

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>you told me you got rid of the other two

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bombs who used to appear on this thing, I said,

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm absolutely in pick any day or time.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and let's do it. Decide it's good to

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be back with you. We did. That was not expected.

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Joe. I appreciate that you do not step

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on the little people that we are here. Um. By

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, just on a serious note, are you loving

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a daily wager? Does it make you less prepared for

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>your morning show? Like? How do you juggle all of that?

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I love the fact that Okay, so there's there's two

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>things I love about it. One is this like unintended

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>consequence that I think the show didn't set out for.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's something that we've been hearing a lot of

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>from from the viewers and a lot of people who

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>they're they're learning about sports betting. Sure, but some people

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy the show and they're not even that big

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sports betting. They just like the fact that

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a show that talks about games, right like in

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this in this world we live in with the media now,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the hot take, it's the embased, embraced debate.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of controversial conversations and wild statements, and

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what gets people to tune in. We don't really

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do any of that. That's not what the show is.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not what you guys are doing in Vegas. You've

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>got games, you're breaking it down, you're trying to find

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the edge. And we've noticed that a lot of the

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>feedback has been from people who just enjoy hearing about

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the game. So so that has been a lot of fun.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>The other part of doing it is that you really

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have to be on your toes. A guy like Preston Johnson,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is is one of the absolute best in

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the business. So if you're gonna appear alongside these guys

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis, gotta do your research, You gotta

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>do your homework. You can't mail it in, you know,

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>some guys can just show up on the radio or

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever and and and get through by saying whatever, that's

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it works. So it's really pushing me

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to try to to do get better at at sports betting,

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>at researching, at finding what works, and uh, you know,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a grind, but in a very good way.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It's very enjoyable. I just love seeing sports betting emerge

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>into what it is. I mean, Gil, you and I

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about this stuff for years back when

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I kind of had to live in

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the shadows. And now that it's out in the light

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can you can really start to embrace it.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's been a lot of fun. Couldn't be happy or

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for your success, Joe, Really, I am so happy every

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>time you you just ascend more and more. That's a

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating point where you just made actually just people

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about games. It's sort of like the

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>old MTV thing. We just want to see videos every

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, right, and so that there's a

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>lesserular you think people don't want to hear the five thousand,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and seventy four iteration of this lebron better

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>than Michael Jordan's. That is correct, although calling tactic, although

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Colin Coward would tell you right that with his audience,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>he knows that that's exactly what they want to hear.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So it really does you know, It really depends on

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>establishing your brand, I guess, and and then if you

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>build it, they will come kind of thing um to

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the last part about that, then, Joe, do you find

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to be as honest as you

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>could be here because nobody in San Francisco's listening right now, Joe,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but do you find that it enhances your preparation for

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>your morning show or in some way you just can't

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>do it all as well as you could before? I Um,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I I had the morning show prep on a pretty

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>good schedule, So I think the problem was never going

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the morning show prep. It was gonna be

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 1>whether or not I was able to create enough time

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to prep for Daily Wager, because it's two very different approaches.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The morning show is four hours, and three of our

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>segments run for fifty or more minutes, so we're not

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>doing fifteen minutes on fifteen off. I mean we're going

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for fifty five minutes straight, you know, and then five

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>minutes off and then another fifty five minutes. It it

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is a la the Meadi Show. So you're preparing in

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a very different way. You have longer, more verbose conversational points,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas on Daily Wager it's like, look, you've got thirty

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seconds for this answer. You gotta look good, you've gotta

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>sound good, you've got to be accurate, you've got to

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pay well, and you've got to get out on time.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And you'll have someone in your ear that I'll tell

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you ten five and you want to be out. So

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't so much about changing the prep or what

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I needed to do for mornings. I'm coming up on

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>five years here. I've got a pretty good sense for

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>how I need to be ready. It was more about

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Daily Wager, like how I'd be able to create enough

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>time to be on top of everything that's happening and

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>then be prepared to accurately deliver that information in a

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>way that can be consumed. You know, it's one thing

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to to pick a game correctly, very difficult,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's one thing to do that. But then when

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you get on TV, Now, how are you going to

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>present it? If you throw two hundred and thirty five

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>numbers at somebody, you might lose them in the process.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to be able to educate, entertain, in

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>form and then also uh, be insightful and accurate. So

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on. But now that I've kind

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of got the system down, it's really just eliminating free time.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the time of year where there's absolutely

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no free time. It's TV, it's radio, and it's

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>parenting and husbanding, and that's it. Like there's no going

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to the movies or going to the bar anymore. Parenting

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and husbanding. That's, by the way, why Joe I try

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to throw a two d thirty six numbers at people

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so that they can really get the full flavor of

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a game. Dude, you are You are popular up here too,

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, congratulations on your success. I work with

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know Ray Ratto, who's been covering sports

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Ray listens to Visa and he

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>loves you guys. He always comes in referencing because he's

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on the afternoon show here, so we'll cross over because

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I stay here to do my TV prep and then

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll be coming in to do radio prep. He loves Visa.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>He he's all over you guys. Oh sweet, that's good

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear. Good to hear San Francisco newspaper staple, who

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>has been multimedia there now for some years. All right,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So given then that people just want to hear about games,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about games. Last thing of business before we

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>do that. Mike uh circuits Sports million. Quarter of the

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>season done. Everybody's zero and zero going into the second

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterly prize. But who won the first quarter? We had

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman out of New Jersey Camden, New Jersey CB Elite.

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The team name went seventeen and three, went five and

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>oh and week four need the the Jacksonville cover. And

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then it was him against one of their entry heads

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>up in the Dallas New Orleans game. He had New Orleans.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So he takes it down, surprising a singular winner. No

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>pushes there and Uh one thousand, seven hundred fifty dollars.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>He flew in last night from New Jersey. He's getting

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>paid on Saturday, but he'll be on my guys in

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the desert at three o'clock today. He'll be with us

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>from Long Bar with Derrick Stevens and I when we

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we do our weekly hit on Thursday. That's on Visa

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on Sirius XM channel two oh four. Cool. Congratulations to

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>him and Todd. You're five games back, so you're good

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for the season. Right now. You're in it, my friend,

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm in it. Okay, let's start. Let's start with the

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>best bets for Week five in the NFL Joe Thursday

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Night Football. Oh right, that's the format first before we

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>go best best any thoughts on Thursday Night Football, Joe anything? Tonight?

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It is the Rams at the Seahawks. Actually a really

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>good game, uh in the NFC West to three and

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>one team's Seattle favored right now by one and a

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>half totals forty. Yeah. I like Seattle here. I do

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>not trust Jared Golf at Century Link Field in this

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>environment tonight, and we saw him the Super Bowl. How

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you can confuse him? He is very dependent upon his

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>communication with Sean McVeigh, the head coach, who makes a

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>quick read on the defense and then tries to relay

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in information to mcveigh's or to Golf so he can

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>make the proper determinations. It's very college like the way

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>they've coached him up, but Belichick and the Super Bowl

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>just came up with a simple solution to that. He

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>muddled the defense and he didn't have them properly aligned

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>until very late in the play clock, so Golf couldn't

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>make accurate reads that came in from McVeigh and as

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a result, they were held to what three points in

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that game. Communication is gonna be very difficult tonight. That's

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>only the second biggest problem for Jared Golf. The first

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>big problem is that this offense, much like the Dallas offense,

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>runs through the running back. You don't see that around

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the NFL in this day and age. Kansas City runs

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>through Mahomes, Philadelphia runs through Went, and on and on

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>down the list. Dallas with Elliott, and the Rams with

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Gurly or formally Girly because he's got problems that with

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that me Those offenses run through the running back, and

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>when they can't establish the running game, the quarterback falters.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>You saw that with Dallas at New Orleans on on

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. Is he carried what eighteen times for about

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine yards. They couldn't get the ground game going,

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So Elliott Prescott couldn't get it going through the air.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Now you look at the Rams, Gurley is only averaging

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve carries per game this year. That's five below his

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>career low, which was just over seventeen. Last year, they

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>ranked third in rushing. They were putting up about a

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty yards per game. This year they're not

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>even at a hundred yards per game. There twenty second

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and rushing, and as a result, it's having a dramatic

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>effect on Jared Golf. If you can't run the ball

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Rams, Golf's out on an island trying to

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>figure it out for himself and he's exposed. I'm not

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>saying he's terrible by no stretch of the imagination, but

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that really hinders his play. So now it's a short week.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You don't have the running game, You certainly don't have

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the defense you used to trot out there, and you're

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna go up to Seattle to play the Seahawks, who

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>have played some pretty good football this season with that crowd,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>noise and not hostility. Let's also throw in the fact

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that Seattle's better yards per play this season and they're

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>better in turnover differential. I'm not saying I love the

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>game or anything like that, But I am playing it.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing Seattle tonight, playing Seattle. By the way, me

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh Michael Lombardi or Sin Pattico on the whole

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Jared Golf thing. I really would not have thrown all

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that money at him, a hundred thirty four million, hundred

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ten of which was guaranteed. I thought he could be

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this great case study of the first good team that

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>used a quarterback on a rookie contract and then recycled. Uh,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a little too progressive for the NFL. They threw

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the money at him. But I think we're at this

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>interesting point in the NFL where teams like the Redskins

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with Kirk Cousins now the Vikings with Kirk Cousins, and

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rams with Golf have to make these really huge

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions about quarterbacks that aren't exactly guarantees for the Hall

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of Fame. UM to your point about Gurley, last week,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>five carries sixteen yards. It ain't the same Todd Gurley.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It ain't the same Los Angeles Rams. We'll see what

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>happens tonight. By the way, the Rams also got to

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>clean up their penalties last week, thirteen for one oh

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>six in a penalty filled league. Mike Palm any thoughts

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on tonight's game, Yeah, Eileen, Seattle, I haven't made a

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>play yet. I I just can't get over Jameis Winston

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>picking that Rams defense apart and uh, just how bad

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>this Rams team might actually be. Um I would I

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>would have made this game closer to a three in

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of the Seahawks, uh being the real number in

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this game. So I think there's some value with it

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>under three. Still at one right now, So it's probably

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a Seahawks played for me. I like the way they

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>played last week against Arizona, going on the road and

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>taking control of the game early and then shutting that

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Kyler Murray down. So Lane Seahawks Tonight Lean Seahawks totty. Uh.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. I liked everything Joe said. I am

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>off this game. Maybe I'll do something in game. The

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>only thing I want to add, and the reason I

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bet Seattle is here's who they've beaten. Cincinnati.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>We know that's not a football team, Pittsburgh on the

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>road with Mason Rudolph and it was closed only because

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of that fumble, But I mean, who did they beat

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that Mason Rudolph please New Orleans. They didn't look good

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in that game with Teddy Bridgewater coming into their house

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and beating them. And then they beat Arizona again, a

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>team that's not exactly a football team. So you've got

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>three wins against teams that aren't even football teams. And so,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, although I agree with everything Joe said, I'm

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit this one out. Makes sense. Um, I will

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>probably be as much into a baseball game as I

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>will be into this game. So that's gonna be my struggle.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Cardinals this afternoon. I believe Mike Palm,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you're also on the Cardinals this afternoon. First five, first

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>five for anything on tonight's game the Dodgers and the Nationals.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>While this game is going on, you know, I lean

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Corbin here, but I have the Nationals to win the

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>National League at twelve to one, so I'm invested already.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I might not get into this series until maybe Game

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>three when it switches back to the Nation's Capital. Yeah,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nationals for the series at plus one nine six.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I may not get involved in this particular game that's

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>upright against the Rams and the Seahawks. Okay, best bets, right, Todd,

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what we do now, best bets. Yeah, I like

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Corbin because you know, the Dodgers aren't as bad against

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>lefties as we make them out to be. This year

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>though three two weighted on basic like not the worst

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>thing in the world. Okay, well we'll see all right, Joe.

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts on baseball today, by the way, before we

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>go on, no, but I'll happily tail that St. Louis

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>pick that you guys like so much. You know how

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I come to you every year for some baseball stuff.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You like it, I'm with you on it. Oh you

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>missed two good days man Nationals and raised back to

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>back then tell me that now? How how it feels

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>like I'm getting it on the munch? By the way,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>how how bitter are Oakland Athletics fans at that loss yesterday?

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the same story. You know, we tried to do

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a post mortem on air this morning and discuss you

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>know what's next, how would you grade the year? And

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to divide it up. Well, the year was

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in A but you know the playoffs were in F

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, blah blah blah. It's the same old story, man,

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like you gotta get over the hump last night. I

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>could see them loose. If you lose six five fine,

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>if you lose one nothing, fine, But to go out

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>there and not pitch well and then not hit, It's like,

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the deal man? You keep winning nineties seven games

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can't get over the hump. A lot of

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>people not happy with Bob Melvin. Maybe he's not a

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>big game manager. I don't agree with that, but that

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>was just if you're looking for the thoughts on what

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>happened last night, I mean, they took their own crowd

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>out of it immediately, like immediately, they sucked the life

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>out of that building, which is exactly why they can

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>get no traction up here. Like they want ratings and

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they want support, but they just can't figure out how

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to deliver what the people want. Can I ask you

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a question, what was what was the relux reluctance to

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>start Sires last night? That's a great question. Um, So

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they passed on him last year. I think with Mania,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>he came back and you guys know all the numbers

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for how he looked this season as a lefty. There

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of talk about how that would face

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Tampa matchup, and I think they view Mania

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as a frontline guy that's gonna be, you know, the

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>future ace of the staff, and that the injury shouldn't

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>get in the way. I think that they were all

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just very excited about what he brought to the table.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They see him as a big game pitcher. They figured

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this was the best opportunity and then talking about the

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>platoons and how it matches up best with Tampa and

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to throw them off. I mean, you saw what

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they were doing. They waited until the last possible minute

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to announce the starter because they wanted to give Tampa

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>as little head time as possible to get up on that.

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So that that's kind of where they were coming from.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The fan base loved it too. I mean, that was

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a very popular decision to go with Mania. I'm not

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>saying you program your team based on what the fans want,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but that was a really popular decision before yesterday. As

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Billy Bean likes to say, my ship doesn't work in

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, and what that means is over a hundred

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and sixty two games right of a sample size like

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that moneyball works, but in a small sample size, high

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>variance situation of a postseason, the biggest example of which

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>would be a one off wild card game. There's no

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>guarantee anything works, and and nine straight times now in

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a winner take all postseason game, the A's of lost,

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>which is an all time record. Here's how the A's

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>finished their season. If you take the game yesterday back

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>into the into the regular season, they finished the year

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 1>two for forty nine with runners in scoring position two

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for forty nine. God, yeah, exactly right, Like that's not

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Bob Melton's fault. Anyway, back to football best betst time, Joe,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>we start with you. You're the guest. What do you

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>got first? So do I do all three at once?

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Or do I just how how do you? How do

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you like the structure. It's gonna be a lot of

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>talking from one individual. Let's do one from you and

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>then we'll go around the horn. All right, So one

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from me. Okay, I'll start with this one. I'm still

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>a little tentative on this. I'll be completely on and

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>said I don't love the card this week. So I'm

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna come right out and be like, oh my god,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>here's a five star play for you. But I I

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>find myself I'm worried about the Stefon dig situation with Minnesota,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but I find myself gravitating to the Minnesota Vikings at

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. I like the Giant story over the last

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, but I'm not buying into that defense one

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bit at all. That defense stinks and they've gotten very

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they got very lucky last week that Tina made a

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>couple of mistakes early and then Gruden inexplicably decides to

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>put the unprepared, not ready for primetime quarterback Dwayne Haskins

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in and hangs him out to dry. As a Redskin fan,

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to I don't need to recap any

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>of this your Gil. I'm sure you're suffering it, and

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for your loss having to deal with this

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>team on a regular basis, But don't be fooled. New

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>York secondary is terrible. After week too generous, Jenkins was

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>telling the media he can't cover anybody for ten seconds.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>He was basically calling out the pass rush and they,

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tampa should have been able to take more

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it. They didn't, and the Redskins couldn't do

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>anything last week because of how in up they are.

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I do not see Daniel Jones and the Giant offense

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>without Barkley having a lot of success against this defense.

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So right out of the gate, I think this Danny

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>dime story, which has been a lot of fun, is

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>not gonna play. Washington's defense has allowed opposing quarterbacks to

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>complete seventy eight percent of their passes this year. Daniel

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Mitchell Trabinsky combined to complete seventies seven percent

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of their passes in those two games. That is inexplicable.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So this matchup sets up so much better for Kirk

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Cousins than it than than people realize. But the big

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>situation and the drama unfolding in Minnesota has got me

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tentative about laying the points. I know

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's defense is going to be able to get the

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>job done against the Giants. I just wonder if they

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>can put this stuff that they have going on but

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>behind them, they can go out and get this win.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>They they they've had problems connecting deep down the field.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>This secondary is Taylor made for you to connect down

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the field. Going into the tam the game, I want

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to say or actually no, sorry. Going into the Washington game,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giant defense had given up eight hundred and eighty

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>seven total yards combined to the Bills and the box.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And I know the Bucks hung some points last week,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't view the box as a Drew Brees

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers let offense. Whince has been better, don't get

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, but I do not see them as one

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of the elite offenses in the NFL. So right now,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I do find myself wanting to lay the points with Minnesota.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>It's risky, it's a lot on the road. Diggs was

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>back at practice today. He did meet with the media afterwards.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>So if they get it cleaned up by Sunday, I

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>think they could hammer the Giants, all right. So let

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>me just jump in because that is one of mine

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. And I will just jump in and say

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>count me in for that game as well. That was

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the four games on Guessing lines for those

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>who listen to Guessing Lines on this podcast with Chrissie Andrews,

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the four games you know that

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I came up with there too, uh, And I feel

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the same way about the Digs thing. For those who

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>missed it. Stefon Diggs very unhappy, uh not getting the ball.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>He did have seven catches this past week for a

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred eight yards in the Vikings loss to the Bears.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't last week. The Vike's lost the Bears last week, yes,

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>six six. He did catch seven balls. Before that, he

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was getting nothing. Adam feeling is upset. Diggs has asked

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>for a trade. The Vikings say, under no circumstances will

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they trade him. You know what that means, Stefan Digs

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>will be traded, probably in sometime in the near future.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'm with Minnesota too, for all the reasons stated,

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>despite the digs complaints and perhaps a a near mutiny

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>situation in Minnesota. Mike, we go to you next. We're

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>doing that at minus five. Girl, We're doing it at

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>minus five. Current numbers minus five. It was minus four

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half on guessing lines on Monday. I had

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>guessed that Minnesota would be six point favorites, so I

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>will play it at minus five. Mike, all right, I'm

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with the total for my first best bet.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>And I know Josh Allen's status is not cemented yet,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but I like this game either way, even more if

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>he's not playing in its barkley. I'll go under thirty

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half in the Buffalo Tennessee game, I

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think the Bills proved the point that we've been talking

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>about there one of the two best defenses in the

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>NFL last week against Tom Brady, who had one of

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>his ten worst career games. Really, without that block punt,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't win that game. I think you have two

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>extremely well coached teams here. I think this is gonna

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>be a real grinding game where they'll try to get

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the running game going for Tennessee and they're not gonna

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>take too many chances. I see this game being played

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in the teens on both sides, whether it's seventeen thirteen,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen thirteen type of game in the twenties. For a total,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Bills and Titans under thirty eight and

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a half before it drops. If there's any news on

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Alan under thirty eight and a half of we still

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the what the story is on Josh

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Allen right, correct, he's still he's now in stage four

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of concussion protocol. Um he's practicing, but not Barkley is

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>getting the first team reps. So I just beer that

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>if you don't take it now and we and he

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>does not play this number will come down another couple

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of points. Are you seeing the thirty eight and a

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>half everywhere or just in certain spots? I saw it

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in two spots, but I haven't looked across the board.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's the number I saw when I looked at

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>stations at CIRCA this morning. And if store a lot

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight and a half, it is for like palm

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>under Buffalo, Tennessee. And we'll find out about Josh Allen Todd.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Minnesota too. I like the Minnesota vikings

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and here's why. Um, First of all, if you watched

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Giants Buffalo game, there were guys wide open like

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a college game in the secondary, you know how,

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Like remember Mason Rudolph on Monday Night, throw that ball

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and a guy was so wide open you were like,

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is this like Notre Dame against Bowling Green or something.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's what it looked like when the Bills played

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the Giants a couple of weeks ago in in the Meadowlands. Um,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I think Minnesota can score enough against the Giants. And

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I just don't believe in the Danny Dimes hype. I

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>know he played great the second half against Tampa Bay,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, beating the Redskins, what does that mean?

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't prove anything to me. And I love the

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that Minnesota got whooped last week while the Giants

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>looked great. So to me, give me Minnesota minus five.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not you know, all I have to do is

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one by a touchdown, So I'll take Minnesota, by the way,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>since you bring up the Redskins, And how dare you?

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, is Jake Gruden really truly considering starting

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins against the Patriots? Like could you think of

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>anything worse to do to that kid? He can't possibly

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be thinking, can't you. We We we all know anyone

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>who's been around football twenty minutes knows what Belichick does

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>two rookie quarterbacks. You are going to ruin that draft pick.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>If you put him out there again and let him

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>get destroyed like that, You'll shatter all confidence. You'll take

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>everything away from the kid, and he'll just be floating

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>around for the rest of his career. Like that's it's

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's I think Lewis Riddick used the term. I'll use

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it as well. It's it's coaching malpractice. Yeah, I think

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what he's gonna stink. Anyways, is that a hey, hey,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff with that? Would you? Is? Uh? Is that? Is

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that a Lewis riddick or is that a Michael Lombardi

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>coaching mal practice. I wonder we'll have to get the

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>origin of that. Mike may have used that as well.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening. I worked with him at n FP.

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I've known it. I love that guy, and that could

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely be from him. He's the greatest megapodcast last week.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact. Alright, Joe two, all right,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's another situation where I'm inna lay points on the road. UM,

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I honestly want the backup quarterback to play,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'll take the Bears over the Raiders in London. Um.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Khalil mac game, and he's a leader

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on that team. And I know this is a narrative.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people might say doesn't mean anything when

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the line, and that's fine, But being

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>here in the Bay Area, I saw what happened when

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they traded Khalil mack away, and I still can't really

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out the why. It feels like the narrative behind

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the scenes about how Mark wasn't gonna have Mark Davis,

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the owner wasn't gonna have enough money to pay him,

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so they tried. So they moved him because they just

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all the cash is tied up in Vegas and he's

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of the poor owners in the NFL.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>That's why they let him go. And Druden just had

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to stand up there and take the bullets for him. Um,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it was just it's a bad move. It's a fan favorite,

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a destructive player. You saw what he's been doing

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. He he was talking this week and he

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>never said stuff like this, but he's been talking about

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>how he's had this game circled for the longest time,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that he cannot wait to play in this game. The

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>last thing you want is that guy coming after Derek Carr.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So here's what happens. He makes those comments, Gruden and

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Car clearly realized that they don't want him wrecking the game.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Gruden does not want to be embarrassed on an international

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>stage by the guy he traded away for a bunch

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of draft picks that as of now aren't really are

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>either hurt or not really doing anything. So what's gonna

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>happen is they're gonna pay too much attention to Khalil Mack.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna double possibly triple as this guy is trying

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to destroy them. And if this were a lousy defense

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>with one good player, that'd be one thing. But this

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Bears defense is absolutely ferocious. They can hit you on

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>all three levels. They can rush and attack from everywhere.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>And Oakland does not have a good offense. The skill

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>positions are questionable. I like Josh Jacobs is a running back,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>but that offensive line. While it looks like they've taken

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>a step forward, I still don't buy into it. I

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>like to win it. Indie I did. I was. I

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was on the wrong end of that. I liked what

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they did last week, but Indy was banged up and

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>could never get it going. They made so many mistakes.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I see Oakland going international. I think the Bears defense

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>smothers smothers with the with the Raiders will do offensively,

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and then if Chase Daniel gets to start, good good

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>because he can do as well as Travisky, if not

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>better in my opinion, And I don't think you're gonna

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have to ask too much of them. You're gonna have

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>good fuel position throughout the course of the day. It

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>might not look pretty on offense. But if if I

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>need to cover five and a half, it's not like

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a true road game and someone else's building. You're

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>both dealing with the same circumstances going over to London.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So all day the points were the Bears. Well, I

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>hate to jump in again, but and I'm not suggesting

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that Joe listened to guessing lines. I'm not suggesting that

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>at all, but it's as if he did, because for

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>those of you who listen to guessing lines, you know

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that's one of my other picks. I am also on

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bears in London for many of the reasons stated. Look,

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is a absolutely circled game for

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Khalil Mack. I do think the travel I think I

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>said on guessing lines. If you played this game in

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tim Buck two, you know the line gets even shorter.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So the travels somewhere in some respect mitigates the the

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>talent edge for the Bears. But five and a half

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>points is what it is right now. I'll happily play

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bears in London against the Raiders, and um, I'm

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with you. I hope it's Chase Daniel. Both Mike Paul

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I had the Bears ecause we had the Vikings

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Bears, and we both felt the

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>same way. As soon as your bisky went down, we

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>knew we knew we were sunk because it's like, oh wait,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't handicap this against Chase Daniel. I handicapped this

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>against your bisky. So I'm on the Bears as well.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That's pick number two for me, Mike. I have to

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you I cannot play the Vikings on the road

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with Kirk Cousins. I'm just done with it. I mean,

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>what if Dalvin Cook can't run the ball. That's how

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel about Denver, by the way. But stop playing

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a real team. They're not playing a real team. What

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>will happen? Cousins won't see the open receivers. He he

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>has to look at them on film on Monday to

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>see if they're open. I can't beat eight four million

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a little tape review. All right, My I

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can play is gonna be uh Gardner Minshew and the

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jague wires catching three and a Carolina. Uh. I

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>think that this Jacksonville defense um people overreacted and it

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>was no good anymore because of what Mahomes did in

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Week one. Mahomes got hit play after play after play

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and continued to deliver the ball. This defense is gonna

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>stand up against most NFL offenses, um whether the cornerbacks

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be there or not. And I'd like Gardner

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Minshew over Kyle Allen in this spot catching three and

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a half points. I think that Jacksonville is able to

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>move the ball against most teams, and that you know,

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Minshew will not turn the ball

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>over where we see Kyle Allen has a propensity and

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>despite three fumbles, were able to win in Houston last week.

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I know they have a pass rush Carolina, but I

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>think Minshew also is has a little more escapability than

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>people think, as we saw in that game when he

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.239
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passed. So I'll take Jacksonville plus plus more than

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a field goal on the road. And it should be

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that Kyle Allen did fumble the ball three times

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and Caroline has went over the Texans last week. Texans

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>could only take advantage of it once, uh couldn't do

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>anything with it the first couple of times. So Jacksonville

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half at Carolina for Mr Palm

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Todd pick number two. I want to I want to

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be very careful with that one. I don't know about

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that one, Mikey. I think Carolina is very very, very

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>very what we missed? You very what very did we lose? Todd? Todd?

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you there? Oh? Skype? Say it again, Todd. Yeah,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a great piece because I was like right on

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the edge of my seat to that. Yeah, very un

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>what Todd? What did I say? You said, be very

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>very careful of that Jacksonville game. I'm I don't like

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it at all. I like Carolina in that one. But okay,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but but you said very un you were gonna say,

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think Carolina is very un underrated? That was

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>very exciting? All right? That your second pick? Then? Yeah,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr Man, is that your second pick? It's not my

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>second pick, but you know, you know we have we

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have too much agreement already on this call. And I

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was gonna go with the Bears too, but I'm not

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that. I'm gonna go with the under in

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay Dallas game. Under. If the Bears were

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>actually your second pick, you should stick with it. But okay,

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you do your thing. I may I may come back

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Bears from my third pick, but right now

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go under Green Bay Dallas forty seven. Um.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>If you remember last year, Dallas Cowboys were a huge

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>under team. UH. They have a great defense, or let's

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not say great, but they have a very good defense.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They end. What I love about them for unders is

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they just run the ball and they take eight billion

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>seconds off the play clock every single time. And as

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you saw what happened in No Orans, I had under

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in that game. It was just an under festival. UM.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be under again. I think Green

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Bay's defense is pretty decent. They're not gonna get run

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>all over by by Dallas. Forty seven still pretty high.

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.959
<v Speaker 1>And I just love Dallas games going under. And I

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>love that the scent has been has been taken away

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>from them being an under team because of the first

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>two games that they had this year, which were against

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Philly and um the other blowout against uh who was

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the other blowout against that Dallas had early in the year,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>which also shouldn't have really gone over. And you're talking

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.959
<v Speaker 1>about Dallas. They got Washington early, didn't they? Washington Giants?

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Right right? Dallas beat the Giants thirty five seventeen. There's

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a reason why they scored thirty five. It's against the Giants.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>They was thirty one one against Washington. There's a reason

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>there was over thirty points scored in that game. It's Washington.

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, now, I think we're back to

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>regular Dallas, which is it's gonna be low scoring. There's

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great defense, there's gonna be running of the football,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be tick tick tick tick off the clock.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I went under Green Bay Dallas. First of all. I

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>blocked out the Redskins Cowboys game clearly already. And I'm

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna step in and button line again for my third pick,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>because mine is sort of correlated with that. And again,

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to guessing lines, you might be able

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to guess what my third pick is. It's Green Bay

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half for many of the reasons

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you stated. I think it's gonna be a lot of

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>ticking of the clock. I don't really see the justification

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for the hook. I had Dallas as a three point

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite here, but if you're giving me three and a

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>half with Aaron Rodgers, a lot of this will come

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>down to Davante Adams for me. Do we have a

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>status on Davantae Adams. I should really have found that

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>out before the show. But Davanta Adams was just unstoppable

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>last week until he got the toe injury ended that

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>game with ten catches. It says now he's unlikely to go.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>If he's unlikely to go, I feel a lot less

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>about this. But if he does play, I love the

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. I've already betted, so I'm already

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>locked at three and a half. I think his uncertain

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>status is why this hasn't gone to three yet. I

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do think by game time it will give me the hook.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Packers plus three and a half is

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>my third pill. Let me put let me push back

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on you one sec. And I'm not I'm not taking Dallas.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious because as I studied this game, the

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing I was thinking about was like, when Dallas

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>gets that running game going and unlocks everything, Philly ran

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to the left side and that Thursday night game against

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the Packers and just gash them in that game? Does

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that How does that factor? And I'm wondering, don't you

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just see Dallas having the same level of success with

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that offensive line or just walked me through that. If

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind, it's a good point. Green Bay has

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>extra rest here. We had a guy who used to

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>be on this show. I don't know if you remember

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>him show, who you you criticized earlier on the show.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>His name was Marco uh and he used to say,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>no team is as good as they are one week.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>No team is as bad as they are one week.

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think we saw the worst of the package

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>defense in that case. And the Cowboys. Here's the thing.

0:34:56.400 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys have to be less predictable on first down runs.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The Packers really didn't know what was coming with the Eagles.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys better figure out Kellen More, better figure out

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>how to be a little less predictable on offense, because

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that was an issue for them. So, yeah,

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>we can look at the Packers and say they had

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>trouble with the Eagles. I would look at the Cowboys

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and say, be more creative. Because Dennis Allen handed Kellen

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>More his jock on Sunday night, I thought, and I

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Packers will be able to outsmart him as well.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>They only rushed for twenty rushes for forty five yards

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>against New Orleans. Yeah, we'll see. I mean that's that's

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>also a blueprint to right. We can look at it

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>both ways. Joe pick number three. Al Right, so this

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>one isn't as good as where I liked it earlier

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 1>in the week. It's a total. It's now sitting at

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>forty six and a half. I like the under in

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Saints Buccaneers game to be played in New Orleans

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. Um, let's start with Teddy Bridgewater. Bridgewater is not,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>under any circumstances whatsoever looking to take shots down the field.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>He has no desire to let that ball rip. And

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not just from the Dallas game. Go back and

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>look at his entire career in Minnesota. He does not

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>want to take shots. He wants to dake and dunk.

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He wants to avoid big mistakes. It's death by a

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand paper cuts, which is a good thing for the

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>under because they're essentially just slightly more elaborate running plays.

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 1>And you're also going to run the ball a little

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more with Alvin Kamara, and you want to get

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>him involved when you have Teddy Bridge Rutter running your offense.

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater currently thirty second in the NFL and yards per

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>attempt at six point one. He's behind guys like Luke

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Falk and Josh Allen, and he's a quarterback who tends

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to play to the under. I know it's a trend,

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to go back and look at how

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he performed in Minnesota, and he made eighteen regular season

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>starts over over two years when he was with the Vikings.

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>The under was eighteen nine and one eighteen nine and

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one to the under in his two years as a

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>starter in Minnesota. Again, he's not looking for the big play.

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You saw this against Dallas. He'll take what the defense

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>gives him. He doesn't want to take many risks. And

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>even Withdrew Brees in the game and a half that

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he played, these guys are only averaging one points per

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>game this season. The offense doesn't look that great, but

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>they have gone up against some better defenses. Now for

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, a lot of people and I think this

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>might be factored into the line. You saw him hanging

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus on the rams on the road last week,

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're thinking, all right, these guys are starting to

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>get explosive. They have played better offensively, but this is

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>their third road game in four weeks. They were at Carolina,

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>then they hosted the Giants, then they're at the Rams

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and at the Saints. That's a brutal schedule. Bruce Arians,

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the head coach, was actually complaining about that early in

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the season, how bad the NFL got him on this

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>schedule early in the year. Then you look at pace factors.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay's fifteenth in the NFL and pace this season,

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans ranks all the way down at seven. So

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of those situations where you

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>see what Tampa did last week. In terms of hanging points.

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>We still view the Saints as this high powered offense

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that puts a lot of points on the board. But

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the cases New Orleans isn't scoring all that much and

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Tampa has come off a really high scoring performance, So

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps there maybe a little bit overvalued in that department.

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>You saw this game around forty seven and a half.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>It's come down a little bit. I still like it

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at under forty six and a half. This game is

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more of a grind, I think due to

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Tampa's exhaustion and due to the way the Saints have

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>been playing football this year. I like the thinking. I

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. Jury still way out on Teddy Bridgewater

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>here in his post injury career. We'll learn more this

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>week under forty six and a half for Joe Tampa Bay,

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. One of ten NFL games on Sunday morning,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>only two in the afternoon. What are they doing? God,

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it's so bad ten early morning games that we all

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>have the red zone our way through with all of

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>our multiple bets. And then two games, one of which

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is Denver in the Chargers. So it's like, who's gonna

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.959
<v Speaker 1>really be fixated on that unless you have a bet

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Dallas being the other in the afternoon, Mike

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>final bet. I'm gonna take Todd Wish and have his

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite coach and lay four and a half points with

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the fighting Bill O'Brien's against the Falcons. Oh no, you

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>mean my hated coach. Yeah. Atlanta is god awful alright,

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>god awful Twins taking over the defensive play calling. They

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>still can't stop anybody. They gave up twenty four points

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to Marcus Mariota in the first half. What's even more

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>concerning for Atlanta as they cannot run the ball. Remember

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in their Super Bowl, You're the only year that uh

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that that that they were really prolific on offense. It's

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>because they were able to run the football first. You know,

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll steal a phrase from someone you mentioned earlier,

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Gil and Colin Cowherd, who said, you know, Matt Ryan

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is just Andy Dalton in a dome. I mean, they're

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they're behind by three touchdowns, so he can pile up

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 1>these yards. But in the first half, when these games

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are competitive, they're not getting it done. I'll take to

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Shaun Watson against this team. I think Houston breaks out

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on offense this week and I'll lay four and a half. Yeah,

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they're among the most penalized teams in the NFL every

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>year the Falcons, their defense gets torched. Got torched in

0:39:58.200 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl by the Pats. They've been getting to

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>which ever since they have had bad injury. Look, but

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan certainly has regressed terribly. I'm not really sure

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what dan Quinn is good at. Quite frankly, you know,

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if Jake Gruden has a run for

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>his money and the first coach to be fired here, Todd,

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your final pick, Okay, my final pick. I am gonna

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>go even though I do like the Bears, I'm gonna

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>go with the Philadelphia Eagles, and I'm gonna do something

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're never supposed to do, and that's laid double

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>digits in an NFL game. The only thing is it's

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not really an NFL game because it's the Philadelphia Eagles

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>against Luke Falk, so it's really Philadelphia against Washington State.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how the Jets can score some points.

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>The Jets got zero point zero against the New England Patriots. Now,

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately I had under ten that day and the Patriots

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>decided to fumble one in the end zone and let

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>stid Him come in and throw a pick six. But

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that was the only way the Jets even got to fourteen.

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>The week before that, we watched them being napped against

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns. Now, I know they've had tons of

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>time to um milk Donald back to health from kissing disease.

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But Luke Falk, uh, you know, he looks like he

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>has uh has mono too, because he can't move the

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>ball either. So the Philadelphia Eagles are a good team.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be able to score some points,

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>get to twenty one or so. I don't see how

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the Jets get more than seven here. So I'm gonna

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>go I'm gonna do something a little crazy here, and

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lay thirteen points with the Philadelphia Eagles against

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Let's go Bird. You're not suggesting that the

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>mono transferred from Sam Donald to Luke Falk, are you.

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It's quite possible that some of these guys in the

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback meeting might have gotten you know, it's very excited

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about one of the film. You know, the plays on

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the film, and might have started kissing each other and

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>who knows what happens. Sorry, all right, Uh, Joe, I

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>forgot to tell you there's a teaser of the week

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>for of this right before we get to the final

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>two questions, so we'll hold off on yours. We'll give

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you some time to can cocture six point teaser of

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the week. As always, guys, Support for today's show comes

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>from bookmaker dot eu and industry leader for close to

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. Pro players consider them a musk because their

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>first post odds take the highest limits and pride themselves

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on never having kicked out a winning player. That is huge. Bookmakers,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a high volume sports book best suited for the sophisticated player,

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>also caters to large recreational players, and their motto is

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>always is where the lines originate, because chances are the

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sports book at which you've been betting follows their lines.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Pretty damn good chance, as a matter of fact. And

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash gill,

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's Bookmaker dot eu slash g I l L, you'll

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>claim your exclusive welcome BOTUS of up to three hundred dollars.

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 1>That's Bookmaker dot eu slash gill. To join and claim

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your welcome botus of up to three hundred dollars right now.

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You will not regret it betting the only way I

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>know how, the indispensable Bookmaker dot eu. Check it out,

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>thank me. Like there, Todd, let's start with you there,

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you like? Teaser wise? Teaser wise, I am

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna tease the l A Rams up to seven and

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 1>a half so I can go through ever present three

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and seven. I think the Rams, while I did agree

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 1>with what Joe said, I don't think they're gonna get

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>blown out two weeks in a row. I'll take the

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams up to seven and a half. And then I

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>was really struggling to find another team to put this with.

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna do something also a little crazy and

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>take the New England Patriots from fifteen down town or

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and a half down to nine and a half?

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I are they at fifteen and a half is

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>at the correct number? Okay? So if I can move

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 1>them down through fourteen, thirteen and ten down to nine,

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I will take England minus nine along with the Rams

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>up to seven and a half. I don't hate it. Mike, Well,

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what my formulaic teaser is. Um, It's yes,

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's traditionally I teased down the Chiefs. Will keep doing that.

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been It's worked every every game so far. So

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>teams the Chiefs from eleven down to five against the Colts. Um,

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this Colts defense is pretty bad. I mean, if if

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:16.879
<v Speaker 1>if Kansas City wants to run the ball, they can

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>do that as well as throw. And remember, with luck,

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the rematch of a divisional playoff game last

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>year that Kansas City really dominated with luck. Now, without luck,

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll tease him down to five. And I'm gonna go

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 1>against our team gil that that we have bet to

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>win the NFC West. And on Monday Night, I'm gonna

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>tease um Baker Mayfield and the Browns up to nine

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half in San Francisco. I was. I was

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressed with the bounce back performance of the Browns

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>UH and Kitchens play calling lo and behold mixing Nick

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Chubb into the game plan. I mean, they rolled up

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>almost six hundred yards of offense against Baltimore, and I

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.479
<v Speaker 1>watched a lot of that game. I thought they looked

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty dominant on both sides of the ball. And I

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>think this is a close game, UH should be a

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>very well played, competitive game in San Francisco. So I'll

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>take that number through through the seven to nine and

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. Yeah, I'm doing Cleveland as well as a

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, and both Mike and I, as he

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>alluded to have the Niners pre flop before the season

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>started to win the NFC West at near four to

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>one odds. But I do have Cleveland going through the

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>UH the seven here in Cleveland plus nine and a

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 1>half on Monday night, I'm pairing it with the Bears

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in London. I'm just knocking that down to basically the

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Bears plus a half so that all they have to

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do is win the football game. So Bears, Browns my

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>two team six point teaser of the week. Joe, Wait,

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so you have Bears And did you say Brown's just

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like Mike. Yes, sir, Yes, sir, that's what I said.

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>First half, I'll go with Kansas City. I'm looking for

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to get involved in their games just about

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>every week. Not because I think I'm smart or anything

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. I just really enjoy watching them. I've been

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>playing a lot of Chiefs teams total like they they

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just cruised to thirty points. They cruised to thirty And

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I've learned I did bet baalt More

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, and I got that back door.

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing I learned, and you'll you'll notice

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this type of stuff when you're gambling against the team,

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like good luck stopping these guys three possessions in a row.

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm not saying

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been done. But when you bet against them

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and you watch them take the field, third and eleven

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is where you're supposed to be comfortable, you're not. Like

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you're just never comfortable with This offense has been shredding people.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>The the efficiency, the speed, the manner in which they

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>can strike from anywhere on the field the Lions. By

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 1>all accounts, you to won that game. Like if Kansas

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>City is an average team or an above average team,

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 1>they lose that game based on the way it played out.

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>But they're great team now. Whether or not Andy Reid

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>can manage them through the postseason into the super Bowl

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is one thing. But they are a great football team.

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they just they scheme in a way that

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>makes other defenses look stupid. And Patricia put together a

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>great game plan with corners running with specific wide receivers

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and they still hung thirty on the road in that game, Like,

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they still got there. So this week, because you have

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>them as a huge favorite and you a fifty six

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>point total, you start looking at the imply team totals.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of points for a colts team that's

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to try to slow it down. So I

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I messed with that, but I like

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea of teasing them down to five. If Indianapolis

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>does not find a way to keep this really close early,

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get put in a position they don't want

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be in and then that's gonna be a shootout.

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And and Jacoby Brissett is not an up tempo quarterback

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna sling it all over the field with a

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 1>variety of weapons in a chance to win a game

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>forty to thirty eight, Like Indie needs to drag it

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 1>down in the mud. They need to force a couple

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of turnovers. They need to get Kansas City off their game,

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and even then, you know, keeping it within five is

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very difficult. So the Chiefs on one half

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the other half. I'll take the six and a half

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Chargers and I'll knock that down to a half.

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers have not looked very impressive this season, but

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that the Broncos are are awful.

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 1>They are just awful. Then here's the question, what do

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos do well? I mean they I don't think

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there's anything we knew when Vic Fangio took over. The

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>offense was probably gonna be an issue with Joe Flacco

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>digging and dunking. But at the same time, they're not

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>playing defense. That's what worries me is that if a

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>defensive minded head coach takes over at a great defense

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and that defense struggles, like how can you keep the

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>guy on as a head coach that's the big problem

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>for me. They're they're not sacking anybody. Bradley Chubb's out

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>for the season, so you've lost that weapon. Um, it

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just looks like a real big struggle. So as sloppy

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>as the Chargers have been at times, just winning this

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>game is not going to require them to play their

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>best football. They're gonna have to play smart football. They

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>can't turn it over like they've been known to do

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in some of these games that they should win. But

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Chargers minus a half and I'll tease

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City down to minus five. All right, Chief Charge

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:37.959
<v Speaker 1>is your two team six pointer. And yes, Bradley Chubb

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:41.399
<v Speaker 1>out for the season. As Vic Fangio continues to walk

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 1>around a museum with a Fannie pack with his hands

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>class behind his back in that very slow fashion that

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we see at every museum in the world, that's Vic Fangio.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Al Right. Here's the thing, this last last final two questions,

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this one question the big favorite, most likely to lose. Outright,

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I gotta fudge this this week because obviously New England

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>fifthen point favorites at Washington Philadelphia thirteen and a half

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>point favorites hosting the Jets. Those are the two biggest spreads.

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>After that, you go all the way down to the Chargers,

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 1>who are six and a half point favorites at home

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>against Denver, And just to make it interesting, I'll add

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in we'll go below that number, which we don't usually do,

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but let's throw in Chicago five and a half point

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>favorites at London against the Raiders, the Vikings five point

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:28.719
<v Speaker 1>favorites season five and a half, but con since it's

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>five point favorites at the Giants, and the Houston Texans

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>five point favorites at home against Atlanta, I throw all

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of those in. Joe, who's the most likely to lose

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>outright in Kansas of course? By the way, Kansas City

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, Yeah, yeah, yeah, I really like the Colts

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in that game. That should be great night football and Arrowhead.

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It's easy spot to go get a win against that offense. Um,

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>most of these games I've already picked, and I've already

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>picked the favorite in some way, shape or form. So

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the one I have in is probably uh the choice

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>by default, which would be Atlanta Upsett in Houston. But

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like, I feel like I want to puke making

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that selection, because you laid out, You guys laid out

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier all the issues with Atlanta, and I agree. I agree.

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a fool's gold team that that pads

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>these stats and makes you look like just look at

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happened since Kyle Shanahan left. That's the key. Since

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he left, they don't do a whole lot offensively. The

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>numbers have dropped. Um, they haven't dropped off as much

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as you would think, but again it's a lot of

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>garbage time numbers. They don't cover spreads. They don't cover

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>spreads on the road. I guess the main reason I

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>would make this pick is Houston seems a bit off

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to me watching them weekend and week out. That first

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>week they look great against New Orleans and then they

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>blew it late, and then they grinded that win out

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:42.399
<v Speaker 1>against Jacksonville, and then I can't remember what the third

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>game may have been they I guess maybe they gotta

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>win somewhere in the third game. They went to the

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and figured out how to get a win. That

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:49.959
<v Speaker 1>was a good win. But then last week against Kyle

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Allen and Carolina, they just couldn't get it going. And

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I like Kyle Allen in North Turner system. North Turner

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to get vertical down the field. I think there's

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 1>something interesting to watch there. I'm not saying it's going

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a great success, but it just feels like

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 1>there might be something brewing there to an extent. But Yeah,

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>with the way Houston's looked, with the way they're failing

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to protect DeShawn Watson yet again, they're just such a

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 1>poorly run franchise. They don't have a GM O'Brien's making

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the decisions. It's not something I love. But if I

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have to answer the question, I guess I'll take Atlantic

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because I've already taken the favorites everywhere else. Yeah, DeShawn

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Watson another six sacks last week. That dude, before the

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>game before that, when he only got sacked two times,

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>eight straight games where he got sacked at least four times.

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:34.760
<v Speaker 1>That's happened like half a season where it's four sacks

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 1>every time out. It's just at some point the criticism

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 1>on that has got to ramp up because I do

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 1>think he gets a bit of a free pass on that.

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it, that's your game. You can't take that

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>many hits weekend and week out Mike, same question. Well,

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough spot for me here, Gil, Yeah,

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, checkmate. I limited to either the Chargers or

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Arguments for the Chargers are one Anthony Lyndon,

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and to home field advantage playing in that soccer stadium.

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But then again, you're playing against the Broncos who have

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just been pathetic on most aspects. The other one, Vikings

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is all your top pick. But I'm still very emotionally

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 1>stung by what they did last week. Uh No, I'm

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 1>very angry. You've got an apathetic quarterback, they're in fighting.

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>That offensive line is not good, doesn't travel well, and

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I just think if they cannot run the ball, but

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe they will be able to because this Giant's defense

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't the Bears defense. If they cannot run the ball,

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you're playing against the franchise with New Life with Daniel

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones at the helm. Uh. Boy, this is a tough pick. Um.

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to go with the Giants that to beat

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Vikings most vulnerable, Todd, I'm gonna go with

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta too. I hate Atlanta. I can't stand Matt Ryan,

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't stand the coach, but I can't stand Bill

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien too, so maybe it's a can't stand versus can't

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.879
<v Speaker 1>stand and I get lucky at Lanta at least has

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:07.319
<v Speaker 1>some talent on the field. Uh. You know, Matt Ryan

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of course is gonna make big mistakes in big spots,

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but at least they have some talent on the field.

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And Bill O'Brien has had a propensity to keep the

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>other team in the game. He's not the kind of

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>guy who blows you out. So you know, there might

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.839
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of a couple of turnovers here or there,

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and maybe Atlanta finds a way to squeak it out.

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course I don't like it either, but if I

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have to pick one, I guess I'll take Atlanta. I

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:33.760
<v Speaker 1>understand your dilemma, Mike, I too have the same dilemma,

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but I am going to pick the Chicago Bears, one

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of my best bets. But you know, there is a

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 1>scenario here where the travel just doesn't agree with the team.

0:53:44.600 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And as I understand that the Bears are traveling tomorrow

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to London, I did not confirm that, but that was

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the word earlier in the week that the Bears were

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>waiting until the weekend to travel basically, So I would

0:53:56.520 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>say the Bears just because body clock could be a

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>factor that I didn't factor into this, so to speak,

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So that would be my pick for that. A little

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>quirky one a game in London. Final question, we live

0:54:08.920 --> 0:54:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in a bizarro world? Their fifteen games this week? Who's

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on the by this week? By the way, Detroit and

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 1>who else? How about the Dolphins? It is the Biami Dolphins.

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Detroit and Miami both on a bi So fifteen games.

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say we lived in a strange, bizarre world where

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you had to pick a side on everything, but you

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>got one free pass one game where you did not

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have to bet it. Which is the game you would

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>want no part of? Joe Arizona Cincinnati would probably be

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the first one that comes to mind, although Baltimore Pittsburgh's

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>close because the Ravens the last two weeks have really

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>raised some big questions for me after I liked them

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the first two weeks, and what's the big difference. Well,

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the first two weeks they played nobody. The second two

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:48.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks the competition got a little bit tougher. So I'm

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>still a little iffy on that, especially laying three on

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the road against Pittsburgh, which you know, they found a

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 1>way to look good against Cincinnati this past week, which

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:57.879
<v Speaker 1>brings me back to Cincinnati. So the Bengals are home here,

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they're laying a ton of points against Arizona. No. I

0:55:00.680 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>mean like Cincinnati was pathetic. They were pathetic in that

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>game on Monday Night, and they were also pathetic in

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Niners. Like Zach Taylor looks. See,

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing is when the guy comes from the McVeigh

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>coaching tree, that's what everyone focuses on. Hey, hey, look

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>at this guy's from Sean mcveige's coaching tree. Yeah, but

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>ask a second question. Why is he in Cincinnati, And

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's because he's cheap. That's what the Bengals do. They

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hired cheap. They always go cheap. They're the team looking

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to exploit market inefficiencies with guys like Pacman, Jones and

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Vantes Perfect. They take the risks on the character concerned

0:55:35.760 --> 0:55:38.440
<v Speaker 1>guys because they fall in the draft. They're high talented,

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but they also bring a ton of concern, which is

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:42.279
<v Speaker 1>why when you finally get a chance to win a

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:45.800
<v Speaker 1>playoff game, Pacman and Perfect go nuts cost you a penalty.

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Steelers kicked the field goal and move on. That's what

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals are. Now you've got Zach Taylor there, he's cheap,

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he's in over his head. Shanahan coach circles around him.

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>In Game two, they looked lost in this game against

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, who haven't played well this year at all.

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's no I can lay the points with Cincinnati.

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Then I look at Arizona and I think to myself,

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who hires Van's Joseph to coach defense? He's proven on

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 1>every possible level. He can't coach defense. He couldn't coach

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>defense as a defensive coordinator, he couldn't coach defense as

0:56:13.080 --> 0:56:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a head coach. He took a really good defense in

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Denver and randed in the ground immediately. And now Cliff

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury comes in the league and gives him a job,

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:23.240
<v Speaker 1>so that that game all the way around, literally anything

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can occur in that game. I could see a two

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:28.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing final. I could see I want nothing to do

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:31.439
<v Speaker 1>with Arizona and Cincinnati. I'm so rooting for the two

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to nothing final. This is, by the way, this is

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a hard question this week because there's a few games

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that could qualify that might be as good a choice

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>as any. Mike. Yeah, I have the same answer for

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 1>me is this. It's a standout answer for me. I

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>really actually like the Steelers in that game, Joe, I think,

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:52.920
<v Speaker 1>oh nice. The mental state is just it's a polar

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>opposite one eighty here, right, the Ravens get scorched by

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a Browns team and all of a sudden their defenses question.

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And here's the Steelers who are all in three. He

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly only a game back, and I'll get to play

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:04.439
<v Speaker 1>at home here and be right back in the race.

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>So I just think the mental states a lot better

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Steelers. And they haven't really even let Rudolph

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball yet, so I lean them there. I

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want anything to do with the Bengals and the Cardinals.

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 1>On Monday night, the Bengals look like, uh, you know,

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they were in tank mode with Miami on trying to

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:20.120
<v Speaker 1>get a draft I mean draft pick. That was just

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:23.439
<v Speaker 1>god awful that effort. Andy Dalton didn't want to be there.

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Um so in what we we know, the lack of

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>talent in Arizona and the coaching issues, so I want

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>no part of it. I don't care whose favorite, I

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care what the total is stay Away. Andy Dalton

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was piste on Monday Night got sacked eight times in

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that game. Todd, I'm gonna say, I don't want any

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>part of Indie Kansas City. And the reason I don't

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:47.520
<v Speaker 1>want any part of that game is because eleven points

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>now Joe regaled us with tales of offensive wizardry, and

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree with them more, including the amazing play

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>last week, which you never see in an NFL game.

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And I actually jumped out of my sea when Um

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey flipped it back to Shady and on. It

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>made it so easy. They made that look so easy.

0:58:08.640 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That was just I wonder why they don't do that

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff more, And I, of course I know the reason

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is if they actually do that and fumble the ball,

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the head coach then cuts the guy's arms off like

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in a Caliban style maneuver because he's like, what are

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you crazy? That's not in the play ball. But I

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>love that Kelsey too, Shady. The only thing is the

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City defense is not good, and I think it's

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.439
<v Speaker 1>being um. I think it's being masked by the fact

0:58:34.520 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the offense is so fantastic. Um. They could have easily

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>lost that game against Detroit, and were it not for

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that fumble at the goal line where the Chiefs picked

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it up and they didn't blow the whistle, it could

0:58:44.840 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have easily lost that game. Now indeed doesn't have ty Hilton, granted,

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but eleven in an NFL game is just so much

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so the Chiefs better be ahead by more than eighteen

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in the end because the backdoor is coming and it's

0:58:57.520 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>coming fast. So I don't want any part of that

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:01.760
<v Speaker 1>game for me. There was a lot of choices here.

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Like Monday Night Cleveland, San Francisco. I don't have particular

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 1>conviction about that one, if I'm not teasing it, but

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on the number, I don't. I don't like it at all.

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Tennessee is is odd, but that one I have

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a little more conviction on. Tampa Bay New Orleans is

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>another one I considered. It's one thing to play Dallas,

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 1>which is run first, but against Tampa Bay's throwing the

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ball around the yard. We see Tampa Bay come into

0:59:22.200 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that Super Dome and score a lot of points. I

0:59:24.440 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I would gravitate towards that game. Uh. Interestingly,

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I do like New England, Washington and the Jets in

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia with those big numbers, but ultimately for me, it

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:35.000
<v Speaker 1>comes down to Arizona Cincinnati, and that's why I pick.

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just sclaring on the schedule. It's just like a

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>beaming light blinking that says, do not play me because

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you have no clue what's gonna happen here. We suck

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so bad on each side of the ball. Good luck

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to you and betting us, So that would be the

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one that I would gravitate towards. Thank you all appreciate it.

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>We've done all we can do. Todd wish to have

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm Staples of the show and Joe fort Ball

0:59:56.240 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>from Daily Wage on ESPN two, and of course Joe

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Low and Dibbs there at nine point seven the game

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Joe always appreciated. Nine years in a row,

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>made the street continue. You know, it's a pleasure, Gil,

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. Generally you do radio hits

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything and you just ask questions. But like I

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>say this to you, every year, I genuinely get to

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>come on here and learn while listening to everybody else.

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So thanks to all you guys, man, it was a

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>real pleasure to sit here and have these conversations with

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you today. You do say that every time. It's always

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a great compliment. I appreciate that and we from you.

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you all, Thank you to everybody. Good luck with

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all your bets. Week five in the National Football League,

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>good luck with that baseball as well,