WEBVTT - The Original Prediction Market Was Betting on the Pope

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of The Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Joe.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 2>Prediction markets.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love them.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I know you do. I find them mostly entertaining versus insightful,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and I like looking up things that people are betting on.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 2>So I saw today people are betting on the temperature

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in New York. There's one pool for will Doge and

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk claim there's missing goal at Fort Knox before May.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 2>There's political stuff obviously, like who will be the next

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 2>German Chancellor, But we haven't actually done that many prediction

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>markets episodes. We did one with Nate Silver late last year,

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>but we should talk about them more.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I totally agree, and I'll see two things in

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 3>their defense. One is, I to the point like it's

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see what people are betting on. It's sort

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>of an interesting news filter in and of itself, because

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 3>I'll look at a polymarket and it's like I didn't

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>even know people were talking about this. Whatever it is

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>is someone going to have a baby, is so and so,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, gonna be with so and so on. Love

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>is blonde or whatever. Try don't watch, but you know

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 3>it like gives you a read on like, Okay, this

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 3>is interesting right now. And I do really think there's

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 3>something to be gleaned that's in the price that in

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>several of these And it's not that they're right or wrong.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>And I've never thought about the usefulness of prediction markets

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 3>from a right or wrongs standpoint, but more like, you know,

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>if you have an opinion on something, how does it

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>differ from conventional wisdom right now? Is there a big

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>gap between your sense of something happening in the market

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>sense of something and so sort of taking the temperature

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of the betting public, and it is a narrow slice.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, not everyone bets, but you know, generally speaking,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>there isn't gold lying on the ground, right Like generally speaking,

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>there aren't tons of obvious opportunities to make money from

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 3>these markets.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 2>So I will just say one of the big debates

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 2>is whether or not this has social value. If you

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>add financial incentives into betting the betting mix, do you

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>actually get better predictions? As you say, there tends to

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 2>be a certain type of person who is betting on

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>something like polymarket and Calshi, so maybe it's a good

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 2>thing for getting a read on a particular slice of

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the population, but I definitely have questions Anyway, all of

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 2>it kind of got me thinking we've probably had some

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 2>form of early prediction market, way way back before we

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 2>had things like poly market and Calshi and I guess

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>getting philosophical. All markets are essentially prediction markets. People think

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>a company will do well or bad. But there must

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>be some early examples of people betting on very specific

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 2>social things. And it turns out there is one. There's

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a really good example, and it is the PayPal prediction market.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 3>This is crazy to me. I had no idea this existed.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so in Renaissance Rome, betting on who would be

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the next pope was a thing, and in fact, a

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>very interesting market was built around it. So we should

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>talk about that. And I'm glad to say we have

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest to talk papal prediction markets. We're going

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to be speaking with Ryan Izako. He is the author

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>of the No Dumb Ideas sub stack. So Ryan, welcome

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to the show.

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm thrilled to be here.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Why did you decide to become an expert in Renaissance

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>papal betting? Markets.

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question. It goes back to I was

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 4>writing a substack about prediction markets in general. I typically

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 4>write about economic or social ideas through the lens of

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>a business pitch, and I wrote one about the idea

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>of paying lobbyists through prediction market contracts, and that got

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 4>me onto poly market regularly to check what the latest

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>bets were. And I saw when the Pope was in

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 4>the hospital and I'm glad to say he's doing better

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>that one of the top markets.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Or recording this March eleventh, I could.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 4>Go, yeah, one of the top one of the top

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 4>markets on polymarket was new Pope in twenty twenty five,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>and that just seems so shocking to me. It's like

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>such an outrageous thing to bet on. And when I

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 4>went to the comments, which were a mix of compassionate

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 4>and tasteless, I saw this idea that you could be

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 4>excommunicated for gambling on this market, and while that's actually

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 4>no longer true, that led me down this rabbit hole

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 4>of trying to understand what were the dynamics around this,

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 4>why was this put into place, what did it mean?

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 4>And I started looking at the academic literature and I

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 4>saw there wasn't a lot of public facing writing that

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 4>went any deeper than this market existed, and you could

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>be excommunicated for it. And so I figured, if not me,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 4>then who else that's warted writing about it?

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>All?

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Keep going? So what years are we talking about? When?

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>At what point did the Catholic Church have a ban

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>on betting on the next pope?

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so the ban was put into place in fifteen

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>ninety one. It was called Colgetos. That's my attempt at Latin.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 4>And this papal bowl was just sort of a decree

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>that has the rule of law in the Catholic Church.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Banned all forms of betting on cardinals' duration of a

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 4>pope's length, duration of a conclave, and who the next

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>pope would be. And in the bowl it had a

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 4>punishment of automatic excommunication. Is which the bowl b U

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>l L animal. It's like the animal. And so it's

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 4>a it's a papal decree that essentially has the rule

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 4>of law. And papal bulls made up a lot of

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 4>historical Catholic law until nineteen eighteen, which is when there

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 4>was a massive reform of the entire canon law, all

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 4>the law of the Catholic church, and the bowl was

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 4>not renewed as part of that that reform of the law.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 2>So let's back up a bit and talk about early

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>fifteen hundreds. What was this market exactly and who were

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the participants? Who was making the bets?

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. So there were three broad types

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 4>of groups that were making bets on these markets. The

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>first was what you might call gentlemen's bets, so aristocrats

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 4>cardinals would make side bets with each other. There's records

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 4>of cardinals betting things like gloves, jewelry over the outcome

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 4>of the conclave, and the conclave, just to take a

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 4>step back, is the process that happens where the new

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 4>pope is elected.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 2>When I saw the movie good, yes, I still.

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 4>The movie is a pretty accurate representation of the process.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 4>And so group one was just sort of you can

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 4>imagine it being kind of equivalent today and making a

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 4>bet with your friends over a sports game. The second

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>group was the biggest one, and this was a group

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 4>of brokers called sinsally who would take bets from all

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 4>social classes, from regular workers all the way up to

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 4>aristocrats and also cardinals sometimes and their attendants. And these

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 4>brokers were often people like cloth merchants, spice traders. They're

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 4>often tied to the Florentine financial industry, and they took

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 4>bets on everything, not just papal elections. It took bets

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 4>on the outcome of sports matches. The most popular games

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 4>in Renaissance Room was essentially kind of translated as boy

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 4>or girl. They would find a pregnant woman and they

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 4>would take bets on whether shoes and give birth to

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 4>a boy or a girl. Wow. And this was an

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 4>incredibly popular game. It was so popular that it actually

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 4>was banned in the late fifteen hundreds. And they took

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 4>bets on everything from will new cardinals be nominated? Who

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 4>will the new cardinals be? How long with the pope rain?

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>For?

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 4>How long will the conclave run? For? Who will the

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 4>new Pope be? And alongside these these market makers were

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 4>it was a whole information ecosystem. You had handwritten newsletters.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 4>There was a lot of gossip going around, a lot

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 4>of room or spreading, and you can talk about that

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 4>in a minute. Maybe it's fascinating the rumors that went around.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 4>And the last group was actually sort of an early

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>form of risk catching. So you had financial institutions banks

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 4>that would in the same ledger give updates on shipping

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 4>insurance that an investor had underwritten and the results of

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>their paper bets, and so these same institutions would actually do,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 4>would actually offer both. There wasn't a clear distinction between

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 4>gambling and financial investments in some of these environments. And

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 4>you sort of think this is an early form of

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 4>political risk catching. Because in the fifteen hundreds, the pope

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 4>ran a major country, the Papal states, it was going

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 4>to think of it as covering a large part of

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 4>central Italy, and when a new pope came in, it

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 4>often meant it was a new family that had political influence.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 4>It often meant that projects or taxation policy would change,

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 4>You might might might go to war, and so there

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 4>was really a big policy changes that would happen as

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 4>popes switched. And it makes sense that some investors might

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 4>want to hedge against that money real money.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>There's so much meat here that's interesting. I mean, first

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of all, you know, Tracy said in the beginning talk

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 3>about some of the social utility, there's certainly the disutility

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 3>when you mentioned Cardinal's betting, right, this is what we

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 3>worry about with modern prediction markets, that there are actors

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 3>who might try to influence the outcome of a specific

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 3>event that's being bet on to make their bet payoff.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 3>And so that is one reason we might be concerned.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm just fascinated by the sheer proliferation because this is

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the characterization of society right now, whether it's pure betting

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>on sports, something that's a little then crypto, and then

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>you get a little closer to the spectrum of like

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>real trading or something options and then stocks. We have

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>this incredible spectrum of opportunities to bet or trade.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>That distingmbling culture is I would call it.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we live in a clear gambling culture. Talk to

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 3>us more just about that gambling culture that proliferated. Why

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>was it so big? What was going on?

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean gambling goes back historically in Rome, all

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the way back to the Roman Empire. There's lots of

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 4>stories and lots of media about gambling on gladiator games,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 4>around the outcome of wars, and in Rome there were

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 4>two big drivers of it. When was this this historical

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>culture of of gambling. The second was that it was

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 4>a center of politics and intrigue, and so a lot

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 4>of our information on the odds throughout the conclaves, and

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 4>the fifteen hundreds comes from ambassadors from Venice, from France,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 4>from Genoa. And because there was all this interest among

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 4>all these other foreign powers, there was a lot of

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 4>information that leaked out of the conclave. And so when

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of information and there's a market where

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 4>you can try to make money off at information, you

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 4>can sort of see how the incentives aligned to drive

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 4>a lot of interest in the market, and because sew

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the incentives align to try to do market manipulation. So

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 4>one of the more interesting stories was in fifteen to

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 4>fifty five, I believe it was Cardinal Carraffa, who was

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 4>one of the favorites to when about seventy percent odds

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 4>to when a rumor went out after he missed Mass

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 4>that morning that he had died, and his odds dropped

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 4>down to thirty percent. People who clearly didn't fully believe

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 4>that he had died, but there was enough to see

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 4>some change in the odds, and it turned out he

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 4>was very much alive. He was elected pope, And you

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 4>have to imagine that there were some unscrupulous brokers and

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 4>rumor spreaders who made a lot of money off of

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 4>the shifting odds there.

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>That reminds me how did bookies actually make odds, because

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I will admit I don't really understand how bookies make

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>odds nowadays on sports games and things like that, But

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>for something like who the new Pope will be that

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 2>seems even more complicated, especially when we're talking about the

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>fifteen hundreds, where presumably information flow is not as fast

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>or as heavy as it is now.

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's a interesting point. So I think there

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 4>were two big drivers what I've been able to uncover.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 4>The first one is that there was a lot of

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 4>insider information, not just cardinals but also their attendance. People

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 4>involved with bringing in food or wine. They would bring

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 4>back information on what had happened, and so bookies had

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 4>some level of information on what was happening in the conclave.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 4>These are also really politically. There's contentious elections, and there

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 4>were factions, and so if you know all the players

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 4>and you know the dynamics with foreign powers, you have

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>some indication of which alliances of factions might come together

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 4>to elect of pope and who the kind of logical

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 4>compromise candidates would be. There was an idea, and I'm

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 4>going to butcher it at the Italian Papa Belli. I

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 4>think of this person who was sort of seen as

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 4>a potential future pope, and so the people who were

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 4>candidates who were likely to be chosen were already sort

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 4>of identified in the public sphere. And then the last

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 4>dynamic that would drive odds was money flow. So if

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 4>you set odds and you started getting a ton of

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 4>bat on those odds you set, that would create pressure

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 4>to lower those odds and to make to basically protect

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 4>yourself from offering two good of odds on a candidate

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 4>who might win. And so there was a direct flow

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 4>of that, where you know, people would adjust their odds

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 4>based off of the flow of wages. There is also

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 4>sort of a proto secondary market. We have some records

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 4>of people saying they sold their ticket after the odds changed,

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 4>so sort of like a prediction market, right, you buy

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 4>it at ten cents, you sell it at fifty cents.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 4>People would sell their tickets that were at one hundred

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 4>to one odds when they went up to ten to

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 4>one and lock in their gains. And so that's that

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 4>also I've made, but I didn't cover exactly how prevalent

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 4>that was. But that also could have been a driver

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 4>of setting prices for these different candidates.

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that you mentioned is that there

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 3>were real stakes involved for some of the participants by

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 3>who the next pope was going to be, because major

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 3>policies could change, because you know, there was geopolitical consequence

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>of this, and so therefore there is you know, what

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>they would say, real money at stake, and then you

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 3>can obviously have people ride along that who have nothing

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 3>really at stake, but they just want to bet, which

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>is characteristic of all markets today, including the popular prediction markets.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Some of the prediction markets like so and so going

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>to get pregnant, there probably isn't the real money. You

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 3>probably don't really see much activity there, but you know

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things certainly areas like presidential elections or

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>midterm elections. It's some of both. But the other thing

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm really interested in is, you know, Tracy and I

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 3>work on financial media, which is subsidized by people who

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>want to sell access to investment products, and these days

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>it's more ETFs, but et cetera. This idea that like

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 3>betting has always been a subsidy. Betting or investing or

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>gambling has always been a part of what subsidizes the

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 3>existence of news media.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one hundred percent. I mean, it's interesting because there's

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 4>a mix of the idea and then the proliferation of it.

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 4>So the idea of these newsletters was really common. This again,

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 4>this is a longstanding Roman culture. If you ever look

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 4>up Roman graffiti, you'll see this. There's a long history

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 4>of spreading rumors and spreading ideas in Rome. But you're

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 4>right that the demand for these newsletters was shot through

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 4>the roof because of a financial incentive. And there wasn't

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 4>just it wasn't just the newsletters that spread information. There

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 4>was also taverns people would spread rumors and share information,

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 4>and caverns. So there's a statue called the Pekino which

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 4>has been for hundreds of years, this place where people

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 4>would leave anonymous notes to spread information. And so those

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 4>notes often had information on what was happening inside of

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 4>the conclave. And the other piece that it was interesting

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 4>was that the diplomats, the foreign diplomats who were in

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Rome would report back to their kings, monarchs, whoever, whoever,

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 4>the leaders on what was happening inside the conclave. And

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 4>so that definitely created a lot of demand for getting

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 4>that initial firsthand information which presumably was passed off informally.

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 4>And one other piece that set odds your question earlier.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Another piece that set odds was if a certain person

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 4>who was considered in the know would make bets. So

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 4>you had certain people like if a Venetian ambassador made

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 4>a major bet, that would be a strong signal that

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 4>person had some insider information and that they this person

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 4>was likely to win.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So, Joe, I don't know if you've ever looked at

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the comments section on something like polymarkets.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, it's I don't.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Know how to describe it, a bit of a mess maybe,

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 2>But one thing that does happen there is everyone talks

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>their own book, right, Everyone is trying to sway the

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>odds and get their prediction right. Did we see that

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>in Rome as well?

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you did see a little bit of that. So

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 4>you definitely saw people hype up their their candidates and

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 4>even saw people try to force the hand. So just

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 4>take a step back. The way a papal election works

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 4>is up two hundred and twenty cardinals go into a

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 4>locked room. They swear not to share any information, which

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 4>I think is better in force today than it was

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 4>back then, and they vote up to four times a day,

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 4>and every time they vote, if there's no if no

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 4>one has a two thirds majority, they burn the ballots

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>this black smoke, oh yeah, yeah, famous, the famous black smoke.

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 4>And they try again up to three more times that day.

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 4>And some of these conclaves were on for months. They

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 4>were conclaves where they had odds and how long the

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 4>conclave would go for, and there was a ten percent

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 4>actually implied odds of never in one of the conclaves

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 4>that they would never pick up hope, and so they

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 4>this is also a piece with these rumors could try

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 4>to force the hand of these these cardinals. So in

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 4>fifteen ninety Paliotti was considered one of the cardinal Palioti

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 4>was considered one of the favorites to become the next pope,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 4>and he's about seventy percent chance, and someone put out

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 4>a rumor that he had actually already been elected, and

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 4>the rumor spread so rapidly that the city started to

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 4>put up his coat of arms. He started to set

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 4>up as if he had won. If they sent guards

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 4>to protect his house, because typically after pope was elected,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>they people would go and raid their house. It's an

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 4>interesting cultural norm and it turned out he hadn't won,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 4>he hadn't gotten two thirds, and so there's an implication

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 4>that that was done in part to try to pressure

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 4>the last few cardinals to make that yeah, make that

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 4>bet and acclaim him. Didn't work, did not work. Instead,

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 4>we got Pope Gregory the thirteenth, who started the crackdown

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 4>in earnest on some of the paper gambling that was happening.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Did the premature victory like turn people against him, like

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>would he have probably one had it not been for

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 3>or do we not know?

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question. I don't know for sure, all right,

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 4>but you can imagine for sure.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So this brings me to a very important idea, which

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 2>is did all this betting actually have an impact on

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the church in the sense of, you know, I imagine

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic Church isn't a big fan of betting, and

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 2>you have this huge betting culture that's pegged to the

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>internal political dynamics of the church. Did it change people's

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 2>perception of the Catholic Church.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a really good question in terms of the perception

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 4>of the Catholic Church. I'm not as sure. The Catholic

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Church certainly felt threatened by it, and so the Catholic Church,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 4>starting even before the hammer really came down, had tried

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 4>to ban these types of bets from happening, and so

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 4>they had issued bans, they'd sent police freights out, but

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 4>they were never rigorously enforced because there was enough intermixing

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 4>between the betters and people in the Vatican that there

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 4>was there wasn't a lot of impetus for aggressive enforcement.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 4>But when we as you get to the late fifteen

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>eighties and into the early fifteen nineties, you started to

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 4>see popes do really really aggressive crackdowns, and the level

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 4>of aggression implies that there was a real threat to

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 4>the church, and so they would they would raid broker

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 4>shops and arrest everybody in torture them to find out

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 4>who had place bets. They set up a system of

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 4>thirty if proved brokers that were allowed to take bets

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 4>on some things, not on the election of cardinals, not

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 4>on the boy er girl, bets for pregnant women, and

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 4>if you if you made bets outside of those thirty groups,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the punishment was five hundred scooty, which I did a

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 4>little bit of calculation, I think it's about seventy five

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred dollars, which a year's wage for a rural work

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 4>was about fifty scooty, so ten times the wage of

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 4>an average worker. And you can even be sentenced to

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 4>serve on the galleys, so being kind of conscripted into

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 4>the military for being caught on this. But the real

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 4>crackdown came with Kogetos, which is the Papal Bowl, banning it.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 4>And I actually brought a copy with me from the

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>from the Yale Binding Key ra Book Library.

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 3>What is this amazing old document.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so when this was issued, this Papal Bowl was

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 4>translated into Italian, posted around the city, hosted on tavern

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 4>city gates, given to all of the bishops and priests

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 4>around Europe, particularly in Italy. And if you read the translation,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 4>you actually see that a lot of the it kind

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 4>of implies what some of the issues might have been.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 4>And if I can read it, individuals driven by greed

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 4>or fear of loss improperly seek to influence, obstruct, or

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 4>delay these sacred elections and promotions through illicit means, either

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 4>directly or indirectly, all those emotioniously the fame rous slander candidates,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 4>undermining the dignity and reputation of those involved. Such actions

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 4>as distract and cool the sincere prayers and devotions of Christians,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 4>and then instead many individuals pursue temporal profit or personal

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 4>gain rather than selecting candidates based solely on merit, employing

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 4>numerous fraudulent schemes lie succeed in manipulations. There's also pieces

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 4>here where they say people are trying to forbidden arts

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 4>like divination or invoking the demount of assistance, driven by

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 4>desperation and greed to figure out who who is going

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 4>to win, and so the bowl is really strict. It

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 4>says they permanently forbid all forms of wagering, betting, or

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 4>speculation regarding papal elections, the promotion of cardinals. It nulls

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 4>and nullifies any existing bets or elections that have already sorry,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 4>any existing bets or wages that have already happened. They

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 4>declare all future agreements null, void and invalid. Any any

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 4>funds or valuables involved in those should be given to

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 4>charitable institutions with no allowances, and anyone who does this

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 4>is automatically excommunicated from the church.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Which was a big deal.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 4>Was a big deal, so it wasn't just about obviously

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 4>today it's still a massive deal to be excommunicated. But

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 4>from a religious perspective back then, ex communication could be

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 4>an austivisation. You could kicked out of your community, they

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 4>could seize your property. Occasionally, you could even be killed

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 4>for being excommunicated. And so your protections, especially in the

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 4>in the in the papal states, mostly went away if

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 4>you're excommunicated. And then one of the piece that's really

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 4>fascinating is that any clergy or figures who violate the

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 4>decree are immediately stripped of their office and are incapable

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 4>of being reassigned. And so think about the intensity of it.

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 4>You can sort of see, you can sort of infer

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 4>some of the feelings that church had about the effect

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 4>this was having on these processes over time.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually there are a lot of obviously sort of

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 3>negative aspects of it. It is interesting this idea that

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 3>gambling drives people towards mystical divination. There's some other that

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 3>there's some other spiritual forces out the world that could

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>reveal information other than the church. The Church losing its

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 3>monopoly on the sort of understanding of the cosmos. Like

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a mid feels like a minor thing, but it's

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 3>also like a sort of fascinating thing, and of course

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 3>that is what gambling drives people to do. And lucky

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>numbers blowing on the dice, like all these things that

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 3>reveal a certain metaphysical reality other than the one prescribed

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 3>by the church super instant to talk to us about, like,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how we got from there to where

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 3>we are today through line.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 4>So after this, after this paper bowl came out, the

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 4>public a markets mostly went away. We still have some

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 4>evidence that people were gambling kind of on the black

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 4>market of the gray market over time, but it was

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.719
<v Speaker 4>not as anywhere near as widespread as it had been

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 4>as you get into the eighteen seventies. So the papal

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 4>states ceased to exist in eighteen seventy Italy was unified

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 4>as one country. And the eighteen seventy eight election is

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 4>one where we have New York Times reports that there's

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 4>this massive gambling on the new pope in the next election,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 4>and so you can start to see that the spiritual

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 4>authority by itself was not enough to stop this gambling.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 4>After several hundred years of success, and as you move

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 4>through the twentieth century, the next big milestone was nineteen

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 4>seventy eight, which is with the first time that the

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 4>UK bet makers offered odds on the next pope. And

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 4>what's interesting is that if you talk about prediction markets

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 4>as a way of seeing the future, they weren't very effective.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 4>John Paul the first and second weren't offered odds at

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 4>all in that year, and so that implies that it

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 4>actually was not very good at picking candidates who are

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 4>not expected right. John Paul the Second especially was not

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 4>expected to become Pope going into the conclave. And then

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 4>as we go through the rest of the twentieth century,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and five, I sort of remember this when

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 4>I was pretty young, but I sort of remember in

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and five kind of scandalized press about Patty

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Power offering odds on the pope, and I looked it

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 4>up before I came in here. It was about four

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand dollars was bet just through Patty Power on

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 4>who the next Pope would be in two thousand and five.

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 4>That was Pope Benedict, and that actually was fairly accurate.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 4>It was three to one odds that Benedict would win.

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 4>Twenty thirteen, Pope Francis, the current pope, was about a

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 4>seven million dollar market through patty power alone, and so

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 4>you can see it's already growing exponentially. And I remember

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 4>very scandalized press about this. And what's interesting is that

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the current Pope Francis started off at fifty fifty five

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 4>to one odds and never did better than thirty two

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 4>to one. And so for these closed door decisions where

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 4>like like Supreme Court decisions, papal conclaves, things where the

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 4>public information is much more limited than say an election,

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the prediction markets have a very mixed record of accuracy

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 4>and talking about the through line of some of these

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 4>same dynamics, Vatican Insider that the current Pope Francis was

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 4>starting to get momentum in the conclave and they didn't

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 4>really move the market very much. And it's one of

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 4>those interesting things with closed door decisions where insider information,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 4>especially when people aren't familiar with the dynamics around the decision,

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 4>it's hard for outsiders to get a good sense of

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 4>is the information actionable or not.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Tracy, it's interesting thinking back to Pope Francis's election and

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the relationship between the winning candidate and the time of

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 3>the conclave. As another derivative bet that you can make

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 3>because I do remember one thing that was going on

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 3>at the time. There was some interest in whether or

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>not they would pick an Italian and because obviously, you know,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the prior Poe had been German Retzinger, and prior Pope

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 3>to that had been Polish, and so this idea is like, oh,

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 3>and so the fact that it went a long time,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember some people were saying, oh, maybe this means

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 3>they haven't settled on an Italian and so you could

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of see, you know, how people try to relate

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 3>conclave duration with outcome.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I remember that debate. Okay, So, speaking of Pope Francis,

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 2>looking on polymarket right now, the odds are currently forty

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>two percent for a new pope in twenty twenty five.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we don't know if that's going to be right

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>or not. But do you get a sense perhaps that

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 2>the modern papal prediction market is somewhat improved in terms

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 2>of its predictive power? Is there, for instance, more liquidity?

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 2>There must be more people betting in general than there

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>were like when Patty Power started doing this.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think not yet. I have to imagine that

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 4>when if a conclave does start whenever that happens, it's

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be the biggest one ever. And seven million

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 4>dollars is the goal to beat the twenty twenty four

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 4>presidential election I think was three and a half billion,

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 4>and so I in terms of accuracy, though if you

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 4>look at the comments, I don't know happypore are betting.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 4>The comments are almost entirely based off of Vatican news releases.

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.239
<v Speaker 4>And I do think that there's this dynamic that's going

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 4>to start happening more and more, where like you said,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 4>we've gone into a gambling culture again today, and pretty rapidly.

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's ten years ago. I think online gamps

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 4>poker was had the big landmark case that made it illegal,

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 4>and we're seeing prediction markets, which used to be capped

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 4>as academic academic tools set eight hundred and fifty dollars,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 4>are starting to become unrestricted crypto lets. People bet on

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 4>poly market internationally, even if it's illegal in the US.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think that we've you know, in nineteen eighteen,

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 4>part of the reason why it wasn't written into the

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 4>new Canon law is that it hadn't been a problem.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 4>The papabull had done its job in stamping this out

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 4>as an activity. And I do think there's going to

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 4>be a big social discussion of do we want this

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.239
<v Speaker 4>type of market for everything? And where where does it

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 4>become an issue of taste, morality or other pieces. And

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 4>it is interesting because I think it's I think society

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 4>is largely agreed. We're okay with sports betting, We're okay

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 4>with even political betting. Where casinos are being legalized in

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 4>more and more places, is generally and moved towards gambling

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 4>culture as a as a rule, and I think we

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 4>haven't quite found the limits of where wept we're willing

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.479
<v Speaker 4>to accept it. And I wouldn't be surprised if in

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the next couple of years, if not this something else

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 4>starts that conversation of what's what's the limit of where

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 4>we're willing to let these markets run.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean two things stand out here. One is that

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>at this point, any poly market bet that exists, I

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 3>mean it's more just you know, it's macab but it's

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 3>a bet on the health of Pope Frances more than

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>any informed insight and his age and so forth, and so'll.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 3>The sort of more interesting question will be, whenever there

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 3>is time to select a new pope, what those odds

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 3>look like for the conclave itself and the names and

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the candidates that come up. You know, obviously the sort

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 3>of real money economic stakes don't exist in the same

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 3>way that they used to, so to be pure speculative.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 3>In the end, there's nothing that governments can do to

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 3>crack down on sort of offshore, crypto based prediction markets

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that are decentralized. The Catholic Church itself can come up

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 3>with a new ball that statements that its adherents are,

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, choose to either abide by or not. But

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, it is interesting, just to your point about

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the limits, Like you know, it's weird because even with

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 3>sports gambling, we find ourselves in this simultaneous, simultaneous moment

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 3>where we've accepted there's nothing we can do. It's legalized,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 3>this just exists. At the same time that many people

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>are disgusted and disturbed by the numbers that come out

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 3>about gambling addiction and ruined lives and so forth, And

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 3>yet there's this feeling of societ little helplessness that well,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 3>this is just what it is. We culturize it, and

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 3>it's the culture. And so I do find that to

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>be a sort of fascinating thing that many people across

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 3>ideological realms, across power can say this is terrible and

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 3>yet at the same time feel like and yet there's

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing we can do about it legally. It's just a

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 3>very strange dynamic.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 4>It's extremely strange, and that you know, if you think

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 4>ten years ago, you had to go to Vegas, yeah

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 4>to do it, and there was some level of inconvenience

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 4>involved with it. And I saw last last year that

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Robin Hood was trying to put prediction markets into their

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 4>into their app. And so it's interesting because the it's

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 4>not just a matter of legalization as a binary yes

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 4>or no. It's also questions of social social stigma, and

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 4>then also questions of access and ease of access. It

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 4>being in your pockets obviously is significantly different thing than

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 4>having to fly somewhere to make a bet like that.

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So speaking of social consequences, there is an argument that

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 2>people make. Joe kind of made it earlier in the intro.

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>The argument is predictions are useful, right, and getting a

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 2>sense of what will happen, or at the very least

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.719
<v Speaker 2>what people think will happen, might have some social value.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I've seen people take this so far that

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>They argue that insider trading is good for prediction markets, right,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>because you want more accurate predictions, and so if people

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 2>have insider info, that's one way of potentially getting there.

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 2>But do you see any social benefit to these types

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 2>of platforms. What would be the social benefit of, for instance,

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 2>betting on whether we'll have a new pope?

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a good I think. My personal answer is I

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 4>think there's not a lot of social benefit to it,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 4>but I think that people will find social benefit and

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the sense that a prediction bet is both a money

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 4>making endeavor, but it's also a way of signaling that

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 4>you believe a certain outcome is likely. And so I

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 4>remember in the twenty twenty four election, people would make

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 4>ideological bets on Trump whether or not they thought he

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 4>was going to win or not, and same with Kama,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 4>and there were arguments that when the odds were mismatched

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 4>in one way or the other, that there was market manipulation.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 4>And these prediction markets become part of the narrative of

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 4>what's happening. And so I wouldn't be surprised if in

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 4>the next conclave you see public figures, politicians and strangers

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 4>on Twitter start to endorse certain candidates for ideological reasons

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 4>and then place bats as a way of showing of

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 4>signaling that they support that particular outcome. And I think

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 4>that gets into really uncharted territory, or at least uncharted

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 4>since in the last five hundred years.

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I do like the idea of I

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 3>think Tyler Kawn has called it like a BS tax.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 3>So I say something like, oh AI is coming for

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 3>your jobs and if you have a t you know,

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 3>if you have a computer job, then you're going to

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>be unemployed of the next two years. And that's a

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>great way to get engagement on Twitter. But like, if

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't indicate that I've put any stakes at all

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 3>behind it, the problem is I like that idea in

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 3>theory because I like the idea of Okay, put some

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 3>money where your mouth is before you say this stuff,

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 3>because all you're doing is collecting the benefits of the

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 3>engagement without anything. But there's no way to enforce that.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 3>There's no way to get someone to okay, fine, I

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 3>put up a ten dollars bit or whatever something this

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 3>phenomenal how to like actually like force the side. So

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I like that in theory, but in practice I see

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 3>very little way to sort of enforce the BS tax.

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 4>That's a great point. I think that the liquidity is

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 4>a big part of this, right, it's this is a

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 4>reason why hedge funds don't buy prediction market contracts the

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 4>way the hedge against political political risk. They buy currency

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 4>swaps and to stay derivatives. And it's because the liquidity

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 4>in these prediction markets isn't high enough to actually make

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 4>major major bets on. If you put a million dollars

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 4>into a market, you're going to move it significantly for

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 4>most markets. And so there's sort of a paradoxical thing

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 4>where the scale will almost always be fairly small on

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 4>an individual level. Even on an agate level, it's large

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 4>until they reach a certain tipping point and he starts

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 4>to start to see big money coming in to based

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 4>off of trying to trying to make actual outsize returns.

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Ryan, that was amazing, so fun to talk about a

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 2>prediction market that's like five hundred years old. Thank you

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was great, Ryan, Thank you so much.

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Joe.

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 2>That was a lot of fun.

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm always I always enjoy financial history, financial market history,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and that was a really good example of it. One

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>thing that really struck me was this idea of predictions

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>as they become, As prediction markets become more prevalent in

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the world, the predictions, the actual predictions become part of

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the narrative of what's happening. And I think to Ryan's point,

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty four election was a really good example

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 2>of that. The official polls showed something different versus one

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>on poly market, and then as we got closer and

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 2>closer to the election, there was this sort of idea

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that maybe the prediction markets were getting it right, maybe

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>they tapped into a certain demographic of the US which

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>actually turned out to be pretty important in the actual

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.439
<v Speaker 2>voting process. So young men, lots of young men on

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>these platforms, and they all turned out and voted. So

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.919
<v Speaker 2>in that particular instance, it was a really good read

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>on the outcome and it also became part of the store.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what's interesting though about the twenty twenty election

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 3>that people don't talk about go on the prediction markets

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 3>got it wrong on the popular vote. No one talks

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 3>about this.

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 3>So like it is true that according to the you know,

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 3>you could say, okay, the polls were very closed. Some

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 3>of them had you know, it's very close, and then

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 3>the prediction markets got it right. I'm not really clear

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 3>that twenty twenty four was this unherlded success because whatever

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 3>the betters in their aggregate had in mind clearly had

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump winning the electoral vote vote through some you know,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 3>through some narrow case, but he won the popular vote.

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Narrowcase is a very diplomatic way of putting it.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, some narrow route through the map, right, some narrow

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 3>victory where he wins you know, the key states in

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the upper Midwest or whatever. He won the popular vote,

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 3>but he was not winning the popular vote in the

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 3>polymarket contract, and no one ever talked about that. They're like, oh,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 3>this great prediction market success in twenty twenty four. It

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 3>got showed that the polls are wrong, blah blah blah.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 3>So I feel like there's no one we you know,

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 3>at some point people have to reckon with actually what happened.

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>How good were the prediction markets in twenty twenty four.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I would say maybe not as great as they immediately

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 3>got credit for. Anyway, all that said, I didn't think

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 3>this was an excellent episode. It's interesting, Ryan said he

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 3>got interested in this because the idea of paying lobbyists

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.959
<v Speaker 3>in prediction market contracts, which I've wondered about this too,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Like could you have presidential campaigns in which part of

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the staff's pay was contracts. So it's like, if you're

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 3>on the Kamala campaign, you get a certain share of

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 3>your salary in long coma futures. Therefore you have a

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 3>greater incentive to win, kind of like stock options, et cetera.

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard of that happening, but you could imagine

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 3>campaign saying part of your salary is in these contracts

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 3>to create an outcome incentive for victory.

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 2>I never really got the skin in the game arguments

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 2>for these types of financial incentives, like the BS engagement

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>that you were talking about earlier. If you're a pundit

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 2>or if your job is to lobby for something or

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 2>to influence something, then surely, like the incentive for you

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to do it is your job. People aren't going to

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 2>listen to you online if you're consistently wrong.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 3>I like, say, no evidence that that's the case. I've

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 3>never seen everything that that's the case. You Like, have

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 3>you seen evidence that like, you can be wrong online

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, and that hurts your career.

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you have.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's so many.

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 2>At the very least people will point out how many

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 2>times you've been wrong. At a minimum, that does happen

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>One of the worst things about the contemporary discourse are

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 3>purveyors of garbage and cynicism, who say all kinds of

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 3>stuff just for engagement, who tear down institutions, who tear

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 3>down people, et cetera, with real decay, who pay no

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 3>who bear no cost for the actions of what they're doing.

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't really know how to stop it, but the

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 3>idea that maybe like if they were forced to like

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 3>actually like bear the cost of the damage that they do,

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 3>would be good. I would love that. I don't see

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 3>it happening, but like, I would love that if there

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>was some way to enforce that. But there's like I

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 3>would love if there was at tax on it, like

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the damage.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>There's no way of enforcing it, Yeah, for sure. But

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>my point is more like, by creating these prediction markets,

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 2>it just feels like we're creating another way for people

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 2>to like mess around with dodgy narratives. That's what it

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 2>feels like. Even though it might be tied to financial incentives.

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 2>We have no idea if the financial incentive is big

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>enough to actually make people act seriously right.

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Totally, it doesn't work in practice. The idea of like

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 3>putting your money with where your mouth is so that

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 3>you don't build a career just on making outlandish things

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 3>and like riling people up intuitively appeals to me.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 2>All right, we could go on about this for a

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 2>long time, but shall we leave it there.

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the auth Loots podcast.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy.

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Alloway and I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the Stalwart. Follow Ryan is a co at his substack

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 3>No Dumb Ideas, It's No Dumbideas dot com. Follow our

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 3>producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash O Bennett at

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Dashbot and Kelbrooks at Calebrooks. More odd laws content go

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where you can

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 3>find all of our episodes, as well as a daily

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 3>newsletter that you should subscribe to, and you can chat

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 3>about all of these topics, including prediction markets in our

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.959
<v Speaker 3>discord dot gg slash.

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Thoughts and if you enjoy Odd Lots, if you like

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 2>it when we talk about the lack of consequences for

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 2>people who get stuff wrong on the Internet, then please

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and