WEBVTT - Rush Limbaugh Nov 10, 2020

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a coalition of environmentalist wackos. Last year, the

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Center for Biological Diversity, the Animal League Defense Fund, and

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Defenders of Wildlife joined forces to oppose the border wall.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Their lawsuit claimed that construction of the wall would harm plants,

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>rare wildlife habitats, and coastal birds like the California nat Catcher.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>A lawsuit also claimed that President Trump did not have

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the right to build the wall, despite the nine law

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>giving the federal government authority to construct border walls and

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>bypass environmental rules to get the job done. Now. Back

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in February, and Appeals Court sided with the Trump administration

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he could build the wall over the wackos objections and

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>despite the California nat Catcher. Well, this week, the Supreme

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Court weighed in by refusing to hear the case, meaning

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the appeals court decisions siding with Trump stands now. The

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>only thing standing in the way of the wall is

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the money, the funding, and that problem could be rectified

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>immediately if Republican net catchers in Congress wanted it to happen.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>That's really what this is about, So keep a sharp eye.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>M