WEBVTT - NFL Week 3 Early Picks | Line Movement Predictions (Ep. 518)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome and everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It It's me Joey p joe Pisapia and

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this is betting Pros NFL. Joining me as always to

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>look ahead for the week is Andrew Erickson, the Undertaker himself.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go through the early lines here on

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a Monday morning, fresh off of what we saw on Sunday,

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and we saw a lot. We saw maybe the end

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of Bryce Young as the quarterback of the Carolina Panthers.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a time for the red rifle, Andy Dalton,

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be Andrew Erickson. We've seen Will

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Levis continue to give games away. What was your big

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from Sunday's action here? We were close to a

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>couple upsets, did not quite get them, but certainly a

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of news and a lot of well fun I guess,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and interesting moments in the NFL in Week two.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess maybe this is I'm not sure if

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm overreacting just the early portion of the season.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>But why are we betting on favorites? Why?

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the point? I don't know. Because the Ravens eliminated

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>me from my survivor pools.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why I number one? Is anyone left? Are

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>there anyone that's left in any of other survivor pools?

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was a hot shot guy. I thought

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I was really smart to fade in away from the

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bengals in Week one and then goes ah Baltimore. There's

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>no way the Baltimore Ravens is gonna lose ad home

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders. Well they did, they did. And how

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Dallas Cowboys getting poned by the New Orleans

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Saints yesterday? Are the New Orleans Saints for real? Andrew?

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 3>I think that their offense is for real?

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean Clint Kubiak, that scheme is really perfecting those playmakers.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>It's using for Shichi heat and really unique ways getting

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 2>him open downfield. Again, I wrote about this in one

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Props articles. I wrote, when he plays zone coverage,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna catch a bomb. It happens every single week,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, first thing, Oh, Dallas plays zone

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>coverage or shiet chet over how long did it take

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>from to hit the over five plays? So that's something

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to keep in mind as we're looking at the Saints now.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Again.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>The concern entering the year was the offensive line. But

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>through two weeks they've held up really, really well. So

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>again it's a combination. How do teams overcome poor offitsive

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>line personnel. It's through scheme, it's through quick passes, through motion,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>it's through play action. And Ka Koubak is doing that

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>in finals, firing on all cylinders with Derek cart the helman.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 3>He looks, he looks really good.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna go through the games for week

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>three before we do. Just a quick reminder. DraftKings Sports

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Book is available right now has incredible offer for new customers.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Bet five bucks you instantly get two hundred bonus bets,

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>plus you can enjoy one month of NFL plus premium

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>on them. Sign up today at betting pros dot com

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>slash DraftKings and make your first deposit. Again five bucks

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>get you two hundred and you can stream more football.

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like a pretty good deal to me. Only

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings Sportsbook. The crown is yours. All right, Let's

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>start with Thursday Night football. Our Patriots going on the

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>road to New York short week against the New York Jets.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>The Jets are six and a half void favorites thirty

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half is the number for this one.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The Pats on the money line plus two forty andrew

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>This line feels pretty good to me. I don't see

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>any early value right now, so I'm going to just

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>stay away from it. Where are you at with the

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Pats and Jets?

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I like the Pats six and a half points.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 2>What have we seen for the Jets that suggest that

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>they can beat a team by a touchdown with them

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 2>totally not imploding on their own. That's what we saw

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>last week with the Titans. The Titans were practically begging

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the Jets to win by a touchdown and all the things,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>because that game was close, That game was competitive, it

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>was two dominant defenses. The Jets offense isn't this. I

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 2>think it's efficient, but it's not this super high powered offense.

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>That's not how they want to run the stuff over there.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>They're not trying to score thirty points on teams. They

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 2>know that they don't need to score thirty points to

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>beat the Patriots. All they do is want to beat

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. They don't necessarily need to beat the Patriots

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>by a touchdown. And through two weeks is page defense

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>has been legit right, and they should have beat the

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks at home again, they share underdogs, and they beat

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals already, so again, it's a short week. Jacoby

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Brissette took a beating that offensive line with Patriots is

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>horrible and pass pro. It's not going to hold up

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 2>all year long, and that's going to cost some issues.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>But that's why the Jets are nearly a touchdown favorite.

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So for me, I think the values on New England

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 2>in a game that thinks can be low scoring prime time.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree if a numbers already low thirty eight and

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a half, though, geez, I mean it's already pretty low.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it might be so low too that I

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>still might go with it anyway. But I'm with you.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>If I was leaning one way, I'd be leaning on

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots side of this. In six and a half

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>does feel like a lot, but short weeks are weird.

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stay away from this one. I'm not

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>going to away from this next one, though. The Indianapolis

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Colts at home against the Chicago Bears. Caleb Williams just

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>took another sack while we were talking about the Jet game.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>They are one point favorites. The Colts are at home

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half is the number here. You're

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>getting even money on the money line for the Bears.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm looking right now with the Indianapolis Colts at

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>minus one twenty, and I think that is the best

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>wager you can make. I mean, Caleb Williams does not

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>seem like he's a good spot. You want to talk

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>about bad offensive lines, Well, the Bears offensive line it's

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>basically a repeat of the field Eers with less theoretical weapons.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they give him more weapons, but they really

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't protect him. And Caleb Williams is just taking sack

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>after sack after sack. He's running around like a chicken

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>with his head cut off. And I know that the

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Colts craft the bed in Green Bay. I get that,

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and I know the Colts defense isn't very good. But

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm still gonna go with the Colts here at home.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking them to win at home. I don't think

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are any good either. I think they're worse.

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, you look at what have the Colts been really

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 2>bad against. It's been the run. What have the Bears

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 2>shown no ability to do over the first two weeks

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>of the season run the football again?

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm trying to play again.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 2>You got to play matchups here, and honestly, I think

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Shane Stike, I think they got cute. They should have

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>just gave them the ball, Jonathan Taylor more, They should

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>have just absolutely Taylor was rushing yards and they were

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 2>getting cute trying to take the shots downfield when there

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 2>was no consistency. And I think the thing with the Colts,

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>they need to get Anthony Richardson in rhythm. There's no

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>rhythm with him. It's like, oh, he dropped back, throw

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 2>the ball eighty yards downfield, run the ball five times

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>in a row, and then he's not getting any type

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of rhythm with the passing game. And I think that

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>what could be a big boost for that is Josh Downs.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be coming back to the lineup, I

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>think next week. So I think having that underneath outlet

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>because Adan Night Mitchell. Yes, he's a big play specialist,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 2>not reliable, he is so inconsistent, but there are so

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 2>many times for him and Anthey Bridgesson are not on

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the same page and that's causing that a disruption in

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>the passing game. So I think getting Josh Downs back

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 2>playing at home, back in the Dome. I think that

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you'll see a bounce back here from the Colts, who

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>are usually a team that you want to take as

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>a favorite.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 3>So I like the Colts at homes and downs.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Was the guy in preseason that Richardson keep going on

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and on about. It's like, this is my guy. I

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>feel really comfortable with him if the report was growing.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, give me the Colts here on the money

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>line straight up there. If you want to take the

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>minus one, that's fine too. You're getting minus one ten,

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's even better, go for it. The New York Football Giants.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>They're zero and two. They're gonna head to Cleveland. Now

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland got a victory. Deshaan Watson play better. It's still

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>not great, but better. The Giants are a hot mess.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>The Cleveland Browns hour six and a half point favorites.

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Thirty eight and a half is the number. Another low

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.239
<v Speaker 1>total here under forty plus two sixty on the money

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>line for the New York Giants. Look, this is a

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tough spot here you go oh and three. If you're

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, you're fighting for your life here. You're trying

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to stay relevant. Getting off to an oh to three

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>start is not the way to do it, Andrew, But

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's going in that direction. That being said,

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is more on the Cleveland defense than anything,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like I'm looking for the Cleveland defense to get them

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>this win. Six and a half though, feels like a

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of points for the Cleveland Browns. Where are you

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at with this one?

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a lot.

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the values on the Giants, But that doesn't

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>mean I want to bet on Daniel Jones on the

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>road the Cleveland Browns because it's just there's so much.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>There's such a high percent chance of turnovers. They couldn't

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>score in the red zone against the worst defense of

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the NFL, the Washington Commanders. So if the Giants can't

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 2>score touchdowns, then how are they supposed to cover the

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>seven point spread which is a touchdown?

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Joe?

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not touching it. I think right now this

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>game is crossed off the card.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Now and maybe the under now thirty eight and a

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>half against low number.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's the thing.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's already it's so low. It's just tough. Like this.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Was it like forty one and a half, I'd be like, okay,

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe under, but thirty eight and a half are already

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of begging for it. Some of these numbers and

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>over under in week three are not encouraging, and you're

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>getting all the players hurt.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>When I was looking through this early slate, I'm like,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, these games are so gross.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:03.559
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of gross games.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He gonna gross? How about the next one? Thirty seven

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and a half for the Tennessee Titans at home against

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay Packers. The Packers ran the ball seven

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty two times yesterday and somehow came out

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with a victory. They are two and a half point

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>underdogs with Milik Willis on the road. It's the Malik

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Willis revenge game. Andrew Hoy plus one oh five for

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Packers on the money line. Give me the Packers

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on the money line plus one oh five. I'm going

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>right for it. They're gonna run the ball, run the ball,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>run the ball some more. And what have we learned

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>so far? In two games? Will Levis is going to

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do stupid things and hand the other team the game.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>He did it in Week one against the Bears. He

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>did it in week two. He thinks he can make

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>every play and every moment, and all he does is

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>literally hand the ball to the other team and take

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>scoring opportunities away from his and so far, I don't

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>see that changing. I don't know when it's gonna change,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if it's ever gonna change. But I'm just gonna go

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Packers here, which I can't believe it. I'm

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>taking a Malik Willis Packers team on the road. I

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I mean. This is we three here,

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>We're here already, this is it.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when I was handicapping this game, I think I

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>went with the Titans minus one and that was just

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of during a you know, hat tip to well,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>they're playing at home, and so, yeah, the value is

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>on the Packers here. Give me the Malik Willis revenge

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>game against the team that traded him for a seventh

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>round pick and said, no, we're gonna ride with Milik

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Willis or I mean, we're gonna ride with Will Levis

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 2>as our quarterback. And you look up and Leagui has

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 2>already has more wins this year than Will Levis.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>God, I don't even think about it that way. But

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>plus one oh five and give me plus money for

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay to find a way to win, play defense,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>run the football, figure it out, They're get Jayden Read involved. Obviously,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs is gonna work a toon Marshall. Lloyd's came come back.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Now they're just gonna run the ball and run the

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>ball some more. And I just I'm sorry, Like Will

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Levis might have that fun throw here or there, but

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it is terrible to watch him literally just try to

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>do too much every week and just implode. Imploded.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 2>So Allahan was saying on the sideline right when he

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>did that weird side throw thing.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, so appalling. All Right, the New Orleans

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Saints are two and oh they just handed the Cowboys

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>their lunch, and yet they are still underdogs at home

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>plus two and a half against the Eagles. We'll see

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>what the Eagles have in store for us on Monday

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Night football. Now. AJ Brown not playing in that game,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so we'll shall see here if he is back for

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this coming week. So that kind of does show up

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially in some of these early lines here. The way

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>things are going, it feels like the New Orleans Saints

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>are the way to go here with the two and

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a half, the total for this one much higher forty

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. If you like the New Orleans

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Saints on the money line and plus one twenty. I

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I want to go there, but I

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like the New Orleans Saints with the points here because

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>until they show me different, I've got to keep rolling

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Saints. Andrew, where are you at here?

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I think two.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>After we see the Eagles play the Falcons, I think

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 2>we're probably going You're probably going to see maybe more

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>value on the Saints.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>So I like the Saints here as well.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm fascinated to see because I think if this

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>number could change if the Eagles don't look good, if

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they lose to the Falcons tonight, if there's more news

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on AJ Brown. This is one of the more intriguing

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers to jump on early if you're watching the show

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>before Monday night when this guests released.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So when I watched this, what I will say too

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 2>is the Eagles have an early bye week. I believe

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 2>it's week five, so if they want to hold out

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>AJ Brown just because hey, like, we got bigger fish

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to fry. Playing in the NFC, the path to the

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>number one seed in the NFC is much easier to

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 2>get to than the number one seed in the AFC,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 2>for example, which seems like the Chiefs are already getting ready.

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter how players could hurt.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But handle the Ravens at home and then they handle.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah they beat two. Yeah, they just play two power out.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Their pathway to the super Bowl just got so much

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>easier with those two victories. I can't even fathom it.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're going to have the buy most likely,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably going to have the two home playoff games.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>Those those two wins out of the gate were so important.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And I know they lost, but checko for a while

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to hurt them a little bit. But

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest. They'll throw first offense anyway. They'll patch

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it together like they always do with the running back position,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's what a read's always done. Yeah, you know,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Darnold Williams, the Daryl Williams is the Yeah, the guys

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>off the waiver wires, Samashi, p Rhin will get his stuff,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and Carson Steele and who knows who else they'll sign.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>The Los Angeles Chargers are two and oh so are

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers also to and oh. The total for

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>this game is thirty six and a half. Pittsburgh has

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>been grinding out these victories. The Chargers had a Quinton

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Johnston appearance yesterday for two touchdowns. The Pittsburgh Seiers are

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half point favorites at home. That feels

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>right to me. The Chargers on the money line plus

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one fifteen. Andrew walk us through this contest here because

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't know is this where Russell Wilson comes back

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>or do we still get fields. So with that being said,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is there any early value on this one?

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I took this piece Steelers already, so I bet this

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>early at minus two and a half that I like

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>the Steelers at home. We do have some question marks

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>about the health of Justin Herbert. He took a weird sack.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>He finished the game, but he was getting tested after

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the game. So trying to get ahead of any quarterback news.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 2>I know Herbert was dealing with that foot injury earlier

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the offseason. And I also bet the under again this.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>We did this song and dance last year with the Steelers.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Every game was twenty points total, Like that's what was happening.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Because TJ Watch takes over these games, They're not trying

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 2>to score touchdowns. They want to grind it out, grind

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the games through the mud. And Harbaugh is giddy about that.

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 2>He's like, oh, sign me up, baby, I'm ready for

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a ten to thirteen, you know, tuggle war slugfest. So yes,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that the under is the play here until

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I see otherwise to suggest that the Steelers are trying

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to be aggressive on offense, and the same thing with

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers. They want to run the football. So I

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>like the Steelers by the two and a half and

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 2>the under.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I love that it's the lowest number and we're still

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>both of us on the under.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I just I just did this last year too. It

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 2>was we see something different just to keep in the

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 2>unders on the Steelers game.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, dude, I'm with you. Houston at Minnesota

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Viking has gotten off to a really good start.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They're at home Houston Texans obviously, you know, a pretty

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>complete team, a playoff team last year. Vikings haven new

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on life. Here. We do have the injury to Justin Jefferson,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like he's going to play. But regardless,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>here Minnesota three and a half point underdogs in their

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>own building. Forty six and a half is the number

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>plus one forty for Minnesota to win this game. This

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is a very tricky game here. I think for the

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans they got to be careful here because when

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a a game wrecker like Justin Jefferson and

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald keeps getting confidence every single week, I think that's

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a very dangerous thing here. I actually like Minnesota with

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the points. I think the three and a half is

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>really nice. So I'm on the Minnesota side of this one.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Houston, you know, does find a way to win,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but I can't deny what Minnesota's being able to do

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so far. And I think the confidence of Sam Donald

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is something not to dismiss. But what do you think

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about this one?

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking at one of these updated lines here

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and I'm seeing that at least that ESPN bet on

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the betting Pros dashboard, you can get the Houston Texans

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 2>minus one and a half. So I like that number

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in particular because the Texas has been a weird team

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 2>because you look at this year and you think, oh,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>they've they've been good.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 3>They're owing to two against the spread. Somehow, somehow, some way, they.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Just have they've been It's been on the slimmest of margins,

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Like it was six and a half. They beat the

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Bears by six points. It was two and a half

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>against the Colts, and the opener they won by two points,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>so they've just kind of been on that. I think

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that you're gonna see it regress a little bit. I

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>think that at one and a half, I think that

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>they can win by a field goal here. I think

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>that they are the better team over the Minnesota Vikings.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>They are playing in the Dome. I'm not afraid of oh,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 2>you know him, Minnesota's at home, afraid to look. I

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>think C CJ start. There's too many weapons for blind

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Flores to try to combat here with what they have.

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>When they can run the ball, they can throw the ball.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean you saw.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>The Nico Collins was the only receiver really involved last

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>night and they were still able to win. Right now,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Gigs and Tankdale were basically non factors, and Joe Mixon

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>was banged up during the game. They couldn't run the

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 2>football as effectively as week one, So I think they

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>find a way to get it done in minus one

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>I like those odds.

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to our next game. Just a reminder

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to sink your sports books for free. Download the Betting

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>pros app and use the tools, including Betting Systems, which

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is a tool designed to help you find winning strategies

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and make smarter bets. You can cut, demize your betting

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>systems by sport, by bet type and timeframe to find

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the best opportunities using real time data and expert analysis,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>track the performance of different betting systems over time, and

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>optimize your bets to increase your chances of success. Download

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros app right now to elevate your betting

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy and start betting smarter, not harder. Next one up

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>here on our list of games for a week three,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the Denver Broncos zero and two against my

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right, my Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and we are the

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Bucks shirt today on the show, MVP Baker Mayfield. Do

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you like the sound of that, MVP Baker Mayfield? Oh?

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The first two games, who's the MVP of the league.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's not Derek Carr.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's Derek Carr. If not, it's Baker Mayfield. And

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get another w here there are six and

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites. I know that seems like a

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>huge number. Bo Nix is wretched. We knew this going in.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think things are gonna unravel quickly in Denver. The

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>number for this one is thirty nine and a half

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>plus two to sixty for Denver on the money line. Look,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Tampa's gonna handle their business and up a

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>mudhole in Denver. And I think this is a team.

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You've really got to look now at the South and say, hey,

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Atlanta doesn't get there, you know what,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>together the Bucks and the Saints are going to leave

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>them in the dust. And I know it's early, and

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be hyperbolic, but the Buccaneers look

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>like a team that's ready to go now. Vitavea dealing

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with injury. That's one to keep an eye on. But

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I feel very confident about this one. I know it's

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a big number for the Bucks, but Denver on the road,

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I got no faith in bo Nicks. I think he's

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle again. What are your thoughts on this one?

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Am I just too giddy here with the kool aid

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Baker Mayfield Bucks? No?

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean they just beat the Lions, who were considered

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl favorite or top contender in the NS

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>in their own building, in their own building, and they're

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>playing a rookie quarterback at home, a rookie quarterback that

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>has not looked great in the two regular season games

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 2>that he has played. He's been a turnover machine. So

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 2>with Todd Bowles and that defense that I mean, they

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>played so well against the Lions, I mean Jared Goff

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 2>was making a ton of mistakes. I know that they

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>put up a lot of yards, but they were forcing

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Jared Goff to turn the ball over and that's what

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I ultimately end up getting them the victory. So I

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>think that even how they're a little bit undermanned with

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the injuries in their secondary.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Again, you mentioned the injury to Vita Villa or Vidavey.

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, last I checked, the Denver Broncos leading rusher through

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>two weeks is Bix So I'm not so sure that

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the Denver Broncos running back Caneam take advantage of Videve

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and not being there to plug up the interier because

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the Denver Broncos cannot run the football a lick. So

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>I love Tampa Bay. I thought that the spreadsheet be

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 2>closer to seven and a half. So six and a half, yes,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 2>easy for me.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The Carolina Panthers win list take on the Las Vegas Raiders,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>who got a huge road win. A great moment there

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in that game too, where Minshot throws an early pick,

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Crosby runs on the field, grabs him, holds him,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>is pumping them up, saying, don't let it bother you,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>all those things I got you while as it was wild,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and then the Raiders somehow found a way to win

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that football game. They are at home, seven point favorites.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are at home. You know, I go see

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that very often this year, but again it's Carolina. I

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Bryce Young makes it through this game.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I really don't, which actually worries me a little bit

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>about that seven, just a little bit, you know, does

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton come out there and does he, you know,

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>do enough and get things done and just kind of

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sling the football around old school Veterans style to maybe

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>keep this one closer. We'll see. Thirty eight is the

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>number for this one plus two to seventy on the

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>money line for the Panthers not touching that one. So

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a big number of the seven considering

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the Las Vegas Raiders, but coming off a huge

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>win that momentum's got to be enormous for them. I

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>got to imagine Andrew, they can build that into this

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>week and say, hey, we got a cookie match up here.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go beat this team and then continue to stay

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in this playoff hunt. And I think that is right

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there for the taking. I don't think the Raiders are

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna whiff on this one, and I don't know if

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers are up for a fight.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if the Panthers can't score a Touchdow, how

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>are they supposed to cover with the subpoints. That's a

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 2>good kind of the way I see it, And to me,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 2>it's I feel like Panthers these lines as we go

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 2>forward through the season, as Bryce Some continues to be

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>the starter for the Panthers, it's basically, how big does

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 2>the line have to be to get someone to bet

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the underdog, to bet the Panthers, Like, what is it

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 2>gonna take for It's got to be ten points for

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>me to take a shot on the Panthers at this

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 2>point because they can't score. They can't score touchdowns, They

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 2>were losing the entire game, and they are taking dink

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and dunk passes with Bryce Young. They're not attacking downfield,

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 2>he just looks overmatching half the passes he's doing.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>He has to jump. He's doing jump passes on standard dropbacks.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>And again, great college quarterback, but we see a lot

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>of great college quarterbacks not transitioned into.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Good college quarterback team. That's where I will take. I

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>will good college quarterback on a great team. That's that

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and I always felt that. So you can go back

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and check the receipts on that one. As Scott Bogwin

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for the years that we were covering college football together,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I was always very tough on Bryce Young. Miami Seattle.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Now Miami did sign Tyler Huntley recently. That just news

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>came across earlier today off the practice squad. So we're

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>pro bowler, pro bowler Tyler Huntley. So we'll see. This

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is Skyler Thompson who's playing for them, but Seattle at home.

0:20:58.080 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>They are six and a half point favorites on this

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>one at minus one tenant betting pros. Forty one and

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number for this game, plus two

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five for Miami on the money line. HM got

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a ton of work and now have a little bit

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of extra rest here. It feels like a tall order

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>for Miami to go on the road without their quarterback

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and get this w But is the six and a

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>half too much respect?

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it Nattle. I think it's too much.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's too much when you look at we

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 2>see this all the time when backup quarterbacks make their

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 2>first start.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Everyone is kind of counting them out. And what do

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 3>they do?

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>They cover the spread or sometimes they went out right.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Look who Seattle has played through two weeks. Bonix and

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the Denver Broncos offense didn't cover and the Seattle they

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 2>played the Patriots this past week and had to go

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to overtime to win. And depending on what line you got,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>they may not cover that spread either. So they've been

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>again another team very on the margins of covering these spreads,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and everyone's all. We got Seattle's at home. Count with

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the Miami Dolphins, who are coming off extra rest number one,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and Skyler Thompson is familiar with the system.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>He's been in this.

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 2>System for three years. He started a playoff game for

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the Miami dolph as thirteen and a half point underdogs

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>in Buffalo. They almost won that game outright. So I'm

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 2>a believer that when you look at the scheme that

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>McDaniel has in Miami, He's gonna put Scott Thompson in

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 2>a position to succeed with Tyreek Kill, with Jayalen Waddell,

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 2>with the Von A Chan those.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Guys can make huge plays.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 2>What team have they faced that has that heap of

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 2>weaponry Between the Patriots and the Broncos not even close,

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 2>So I think that this is gonna be much closer.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 2>So I love the underdogs here with the miam Dolphins

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 2>on the road.

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would be a huge upset if they

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>won outright, you think that's possible? You know, plus two

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on it, Like, that's that's a really intriguing you know,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you sold me so much that I almost say, hey,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean the points is safe at the six and

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a half, but now on that money line play a

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>plus two to twenty five. That's a big number.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, it reminds me of and this is something that

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Wormley has brought up on the Fantasy Pro Show.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to this Mike mcmcdonald defense from the

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Seattle Seahawks formerly of the Ravens, it's very complex, so

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it takes sometimes with the Ravens, it took a little

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 2>bit of time for their players to jell. And I

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 2>just think that these past two matchups between the Broncos

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and the Patriots, those offenses don't have the weaponry to

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 2>expose that type of defense, but Miami, Miami does. Miami

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 2>has the horses to get it done. And all Scott

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Thrump says do is, dude, just get the ball to

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>your playmakers. And I think he can do that. So

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I like Miami a lot. Here and again we're seeing

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 2>so many underdogs just win. I'm like, you know, I'd

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 2>be more hesitating. I don't know, Joe. I think they'll

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>cover Sepe. Well, if theyre going to cover, they might

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 2>as well just win too. So let's go with the Dolphins.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Plus two two five, baby, all right, here's one. It's

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>really exciting. Detroit coming off a tough home loss, going

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona coming off a big home win. Arizona's been

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>putting up points on Buffalo. They put up a huge

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>game yesterday against the Rams, a depleted Rams team but

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:46.239
<v Speaker 1>still impressive. Nonetheless, the Lions are three point favorites on

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the road. They are fifty one and a half giant

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>total for this one, the highest of the week. It's

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>plus one forty for the Cardinals on the money line.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Despite the fact that this number is high at fifty

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, I think this potential for the over, however,

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>depends on the health of I'm on Rossaint Brown. We

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>got some update on him that again feels like things

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be okay. He's gonna end up playing in

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this one. But the Lions, I think the first two weeks,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say sleepwalking, but sleepwalking Andrew. I mean,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like that's what they've been doing

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit where maybe they're reading their own press clippings.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that loss in home is exactly what they need

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to kind of jolt themselves. But this is not a

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>cakewalk assignment anymore, because the Arizona Cardinals are gonna put

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>up points. I mean Marvin Harrison Junior, oh yeah, well

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>he is good at football. Oh yeah, no kidding, It

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty incredible day for him. And guess what,

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray, is your job to find Marvin Harrison Junior

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>because when you do, you get w's. So this one

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting me. I think it's gonna go over,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a high total. That is the most

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>appealing one to me. I think this one could really

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>open up over time. I don't believe necessarily in the

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals defense. And you know, as much as eight Hundredson

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is a game wrecker and he was yesterday. I mean,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray is so mobile. He's able to get out

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there in space. And that's kind of what was the

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>undoing last week, you know, with the Baker Mayfield making

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>moves and getting out there in space. That was kind

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of the undoing of the Lions defense. And Murray is

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>even more mobile than Baker Mayfield. I think we even

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>agree on that.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I like the over as well.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, next to Ford Field, the Glendale Arizona is

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>where all the overs hit all last year.

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Every single game went over total.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 2>That was not That was the Joshua Dobbs Cardinals, that

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 2>was not even the Kyler Murray Cardinals.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 3>All those games went over the total.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 2>So the lines coming off back to back home games

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>where you didn't go over the total, I mean regression

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>to the mean baby is screaming for an overhere. So

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I love the over here play and again because it's

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 2>a game that could go so back and forth, kind

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of like my analysis last week, with the Buccaneers and

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>a Lions, Well just take the underdog if it's going

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to come down to the last possession and neither defense

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>can stop the offense. I think the value is on

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals. And again we were high on the Cardinals

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 2>entering this year, like we thought that. I mean, I

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 2>know I had NFC could they win the NFC West.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I haven't looked at the updated odds of who could

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>be the NFC West winner. I don't know what they

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 2>are for Arizona. I know that in the offseason was

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>plus the eighteen hundred, and I no, it's definitely not

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>plus thirteen hundred anymore. But so that's how I'm looking

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 2>at the situation. I like the Cardinals here, I'm gonna

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 2>keep backing them.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>You are correct, it is half of that. It is

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>plus six hundred currently, so with the way plus thirteen

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred for the Rams right now. And speaking of the Rams,

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they are at home, winless without Cooper Cup, without Pucinaku,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>without an offensive line. There are seven point dogs at

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>home against the San Francisco forty nine ers, who once

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>again crap the bet in Minnesota two years in a row.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Forty five and a half is the number out with

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the under in this one, because I'm concerned that Los

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Angeles can keep up at all the way that offensive

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>line is right now. Plus two to eighty for an upset,

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:40.239
<v Speaker 1>no thank you, I'll pass. But to me, look, this

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is a San Francisco just get right game here. You

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>handle your business and your division. You had a tough

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>loss on the road to Minnesota. Minnesota's got some big playmakers.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson rang you up. Okay, you come back home,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you run the football, you play defense, and you get by.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I still am fading them on the season overall, but

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is the week where I'm fading

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers. So I'm back on the forty

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>nine ers this week after fading them last week. So

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm very I'm very mercurial when it comes to the

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco forty nine ers this year. But how do

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you see this one?

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 2>So the only reason I can't go in on the

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 2>fort nine ers is because in this matchup last year

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>between these two teams, I remember Sean McVay kicked a

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 2>useless field goal to cover the spread for the Rams,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'll never forget it. So I'm gonna stay through

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 2>from sides here. I like the under two. This was

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 2>one of when I was doing my projections. This was

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 2>the game that went under the total on the boards

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>versus my projections the most. What did you say the

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>number was? I was seeing it at forty six and

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 2>a half and.

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Forty five and a half, forty six and a half.

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I like the under there for for sure.

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like the under two. I just don't know

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if the Los Angeles Rams can put up on offense.

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't have the horses.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It's there, no Cooper Couple, DeMarcus Robinson, Tyler Johnson, Whittington,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Kyraen Williams, Like it's just not enough.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think at the end of the day, like

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I could see them putting up thirteen. Like maybe I'm wrong,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe not, but we'll see. Uh. And again that pass

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rush with that bad offensive line right now all dinged

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>up is not good. So here we go two teams

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>coming off embarrassing losses. I never thought i'd say this,

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the zero to two Ravens yikes against the one in

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>one Dallas Cowboys. This is like a this feels like

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a fork in the road, and these hm out of

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>conference games are always weird to begin with. So the

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are one point underdogs at home. I don't know,

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's wrong. I feel like the Ravens

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>should be favored. I don't know why. It just it

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel right to me with the way the Dallas

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys looked yesterday. Forty seven and a half is the

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>number minus one fifteen for the Ravens to win out right,

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>minus one oh five for the Cowboys to win out right.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So the Ravens are favored by one, it feels like

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they should be favored by more. Let me let me

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>just be clear about that one. I don't know why.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I know they completely embarrassed yesterday. Maybe it's just that letdown,

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they just took the Raiders for granted,

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, after that big you know, it's week one,

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>We're playing the Chiefs, and he just kind of all

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that emotion kind of comes out. I think the Ravens

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>show up here. I think the Ravens win this football game.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I just have very little faith in Dallas. And look,

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the last two times we've seen Dallas at home, they

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have taken embarrassing loss after embarrassing loss. That playoff games

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Packers was embarrassing and yesterday against the Saints

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and Derek Carr complete embarrassment. Your thoughts on this.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 2>One, Yeah, So I talked about this on the Betting

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Pros live stream with Matt Perrault talking about how the

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Raiders were in a good spot and how the Ravens

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 2>were not going to cover that massive spread because the

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Ravens played down to their competition.

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 3>They do this all the time. They did this all

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 3>last year.

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>It's why the Colts went in under Gardner Minshew and

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 2>beat them in overtime in Gardner Minshew again two and

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 2>oh with the last two years against the Ravens because

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>they play down to their competition, they play with their food,

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>they don't take in fear of teams and just beat them.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 2>They're like, no, we're gonna do experiment, We're can do this,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and that they're not going to take, especially after losing

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>at home. They're not going to take Dallas lately. So

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 2>I I was able to get this one at Baltimore

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 2>plus one and a half, which I think is still

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't I think I think I don't think it's

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 2>available anymore. But I mean, if the Ravens were an underdog, easy,

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 2>easy bet to make. You always want to bet on

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson as an underdog any situation. But yeah, this

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>is a matchup where, yes, the Ravens should be favored.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if Dallas is playing at home. I

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>don't care if they're playing on the Moon. To be honest,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't really matter.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Favorite by one. I think it should be Baltimore three.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I agree, it's a It's a game where Lamar should

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 2>bounce back. This is a team that they're not going

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to be taking lightly like they did last week against

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders, so I think you're going to see their

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 2>best effort.

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 3>And Dallas look.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 2>What they just I mean, they're always set up so well,

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 2>especially when they played at home. But you're right back

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 2>to back home losses.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>No, not good Kansas City Chiefs two and ore going

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to take on Atlanta. I expect Kirk Cousins actually tonight

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a good game. Last time we saw Kirk

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Cousins in Philadelphia last year, he put up a huge

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>game and was four hundred yards passing. I know it

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>was with Justin Jefferson and all that, but still some

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the guys just play well against certain teams, and

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Cousins just plays well against the Eagles

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason. The number here for this one is

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City minus four and a half. Forty six and

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a half is the total on this one, plus one

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty four of the Falcons on the money line. Look,

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna have a check over for this game,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so it takes a hit in the run game for them,

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure, But I'm still pretty confident here. I'll take

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the four and a half of Kansas City regardless. But

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey needs to start showing up two. I know

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a big catch he had that got called

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>back on a holding call, but like a certain point here,

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if we're really like Kelsey needs to step up, he

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to start playing better because he has not been

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a factor really enough in these last two games.

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>No, definitely not involved nearly enough in the offense. I

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 2>think that the lines are pretty sharp here, four and

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a half forty five and a half total, so I'm

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>not touching this. I kind of want to see what

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta does a little bit on Monday night football, but yeah,

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably be back in the Chiefs right now.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. Jacksonville at Buffalo. Buffalo's two and zero. Jacksonville

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is winless so far. Buffalo six point favorites at home.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen just taking over games the first two weeks

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is basically he's done. Forty six and a half is

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the number, and your boy who runs between the twenties

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>scored a lot of touchdowns. Last time I looked, James

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Cook just was cooking. He was unbelievable in that game.

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>All the tds Jacksonville for the upset plus two twenty five.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It's tough here, Like it feels like Jacksonville's gonna end

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>up looking at zero to three, and it feels like

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is once again in control of this division, especially

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with Miami having this quarterback situation and the Jets looking

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like a team that you know is still trying to

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>figure things out and get out of their own way.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So I like Buffalo. The six is a good amount,

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But again, I just I have no faith right now

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in Jacksonville to get it done. So I'll take the

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>side here with Buffalo. Where are you at?

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't like this game, honestly, I think that the

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't see any value on either the side or

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the total get they're playing in Buffalo and Jacksonville office

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>has kind of been a mess. So I'm not touching

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 2>either side right now at this point.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I will say with two Monday night games too, Yeah,

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we have the Sunday night football case. This is one

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of the two Monday.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Nighters, doubleheader Monday Night football. And go back to the

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>James Cook point the entire time when he was scoring

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 2>all those touchdowns. In my mind, I'm thinking about and

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 2>happy gilmore right when he file learns out a putt.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like, hey, Kyt's Cook final ard no how to score.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Touchdowns finally learned, and you know what they should be

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>continuing to give them all. He's been fantastic, good you know.

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And plus it'll take some mileage off of Josh Allen.

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand what your thought process is too, Like I

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>get it. I get why you're a little scared of

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this game. But the way Josh Allen's played and the

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>extra rest all the way going to the Monday. So

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they played it on the Thursday and they don't play

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>again until the Monday, and they're at home. I think

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a big I think that's a big swing for

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills. The Cincinnati Bengals need a win at home.

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they get it this coming week here against

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Commanders. The Commanders are one and one. The

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are zero to two, seven and a half point favorites.

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a big number for the Bengals. I don't know

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>if I'm there with this number, but I do think

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals win this contest. Forty eight and a half

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is the total plus two eighty five for the Washington Commanders.

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So the question is this, do you want to take

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the Washington side of the points or is this the

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Bengals coming out party? In Week three?

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>This has to be the Bengals coming out party. I mean,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>is he if Joe secondary. If Joe Burrow and Jamar

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Chase don't combine for three touchdowns in this game, I'm

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 2>going to be very very sad because they need to

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 2>get going. They need to get cooking.

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Week one, he was coming off the hold in or whatever.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 2>And then week two, what do we see from the Chiefs.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 3>What do they do?

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>They try to take away your number one weapon. They

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 2>always do that, and they were making sure that Chase

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>was not going to beat thein Swaissa Yoshi vas catch

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>two touchdowns and it wasn't Chase that was really involved.

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 2>So but they always suck at September, you know they

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 2>I think they're what in Zach Taylor six seasons. They've

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 2>been owing to in five of them to start the year,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 2>So slow starters from the get go. But this is

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>where you start to see them cooking. They're back at home.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 2>The commanders have the NFL's work secondary. I mean, Malik

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Nighbors was good, Daniel Jones was good against his defense

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 2>throwing the ball yesterday. So Joe Burrow, this is where

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 2>they can build some momentum. So I think this one

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>actually could get could get pretty ugly.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you. I think Cincinnati coming out party

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. But what do you think? Drop your comments below.

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to the Betting Pros YouTube channel and Ring the

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Belt to Lit Goes Dings so you don't miss a

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>second of coverage here on BP NFL with us got

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the daily juice every single day. We got our boy

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Terrell doing all the WNBA before you know what, NBA

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff will be around the corner as well. And don't

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>forget to synk your sportsbooks for free. Download the Betting

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Pros app Start betting smarter, not harder. That'll do it

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>for us. That's the look ahead for week three for

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Rickson. I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 4>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.