WEBVTT - Caterpillar, European, and Big Tech Earnings

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the FED is looking at tariffs?

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 2>The uncertainty of terriffs.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at the sectors and how they performed.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot of investors getting whipsaled every day by news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Events, breaking market headlines, and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Could we see a market disruption of market events?

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>So people just too exuberant out there?

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 3>You see some so called low quality stocks driving this

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 3>short term rally.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries that our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Today it's another major earnings week, but we'll break down

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>some big tech earnings from this week. Spoiler alert, the

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>AI fuel spending search keeps racing.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Ahead, plus that AI frenzy is now spilling over to

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>heavy machinery and oil fracking. We look into how Caterpillar

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 3>fared when they reported this past week.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>But first, Verizon, the US largest mobile service provider, reported

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 2>a loss in wireless phone subscribers in the third quarter

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>as a new chief executive officer laid out an aggressive

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 2>growth strategy to reclaim market share.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Dan Shulman, a former CEO of PayPal, was appointed just

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago to replace Hans Westbrook over at

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Verizon after two straight quarters of subscriber declines and a

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>stock performance that has lagged the two main rivals.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 2>senior telecom analyst. I first asked John to break down

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Verizon's earnings.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 4>So this first of all, I'll tell you the dividend

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 4>is safe, Paul. I mean, that's the good news for Verison.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>And it's safe because new CEO Dan Shulman, who recently

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 4>replaced Hans Wesperg at the helm of Verizon, sort of

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>laid out is his new plan for growth. I think

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the real watchword of the day here for Verizon is

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 4>to pivot from a very technology or network oriented company

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 4>to now Shulman is going to turn them into a

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 4>very consumer focused company. I think he's really going to

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 4>take a page out of T mobiles book, but in

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>terms of promoting, I think, unlike T Mobile, he's going

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to do it in a more discipline manner.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>So I guess as I think about the wireless business,

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we all have a phone in our pocket,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it just seems like the only way to grow revenue

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>is either add subscribers, which can be expensive, or raise prices,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>which how long can you do that? How do you

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>grow the business?

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's one thing he talked about, was how

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 4>to grow the business here. And what you're seeing with

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the telecoms is they're all pushing more heavily into broadband.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>They're doing a very good job there with Verizon, like

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>AT and T, they've got two avenues of growth there.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 4>One is fiber broadband. Verizon is buying frontiers, so they're

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 4>going to onboard about a new fiber subscribers in the

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 4>new year. And the other is fixed wireless access, which

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 4>is sort of that wireless link into the home. It's

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>been very popular with people. So once you get those

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 4>broadband subscribers, probably more than half of them don't have wireless,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 4>and so Verizon's game is to continue to build that

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 4>broadband base and then cross sell wireless.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Into that base.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 4>You've also got switching activity that goes on in any

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 4>given quarter. No matter how hard the carriers try, you're

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 4>always going to lose some subscribers and they're up for grabs,

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think for Verizon now was looking to get

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>their fair share of those. And there's also modest, very

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 4>modest organic growth in the business through population growth and

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 4>some immigration, although immigration is down this year.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 5>YEP.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know where we are, John, in terms

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of the five G, six G, four G. Are there

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>technological changes coming to the wireless business or are we

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 2>at kind of where we're at in terms of capacity

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and usage and so on.

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 4>So capacity is on the rise. Spectrum is the lifeblood

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 4>a wireless The more spectrum you have, the more network

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 4>capacity you have. To put it in Layman's terms, for

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the average smartphone user, that means higher download speeds. And

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Verizon is currently activating what's called cband spectrum. It's very

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 4>high capacity, and so you're going to see their average

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 4>network speeds across the nation edge up over time as

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 4>they activate that spectrum. In terms of the generational upgrades

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 4>that you alluded to, the three G four G five G.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 4>We're mid cycle now. We launched five G about five

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 4>years ago, and I think you'll see an upgrade to

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 4>six G as we get towards twin thirty. But right

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 4>now it's sort of status quo on that front.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess the issue for of a Verizon is now

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>going more customer centric and as you mentioned, when I

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>read that, it seemed just like what T Mobile's been

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>doing for years and years and years. Gone back to

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>John Ledger, Is this a strategy you think can be

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 2>successful for Verizon?

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 5>We'll see.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's their big challenge, right I mean, T

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.559
<v Speaker 4>Mobile was always the branding king. They did a great

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 4>job there, just as you said, starting with John Ledger,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 4>who made himself the face.

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Of the brand.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>They really did a terrific job there. They went out

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 4>as a sort of a hip, counterculture, consumer friendly brand.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 4>Verizon was at the opposit opposite end of that spectrum,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 4>leaning into their great network coverage. They still have that.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>They have probably the best coverage in the industry, but

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 4>in terms of network speed and performance, the other two

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 4>AT and TS and T Mobile have really caught up.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 4>So the challenge for Verizon now is to nurture a

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 4>more consumer friendly brand image. Dare I say I'm a

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.799
<v Speaker 4>fun brand image? I have to chuckle. That really isn't

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 4>something we would associate with Verizon. But I think Shulman,

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 4>given his background at other telcos and also in a

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 4>reviving PayPal, has some experience there with branding, and I

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.559
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to be interesting to see he does

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 4>with Verizon to improve that brand image.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Telecom Analyst.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 6>This week.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Boeing on Wednesday announced a four point nine billion dollar

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>accounting charge and delayed debut for Triple seven ex Jetliner,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 2>every reminder of the long covery ahead for the US planemaker,

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 2>even as rising aircraft deliveries bolster its cash.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The setback underscores the challenges ahead as CEO Kelly Orbrok

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>works to stabilize Boeing even as the company benefits from

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.119
<v Speaker 3>surging air orders with support from the White House.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst. We first asked George

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>for his key takeaways on Boeing's earnings.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 7>What I saw from earnings is that the commercial airplane

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 7>business had about a four hundred thirty million dollar loss

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 7>when you back out that about five billion dollar charge

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 7>for Triple seven. I think that number was a bit

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 7>better than consensus, a little bit better than what we

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 7>were looking for. I think it's another sign that commercial

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 7>airplane is getting closer to break even. And then in

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 7>the cash flow statement, Boeing was cash flow positive at

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 7>an operating level and free cash flow. It was about

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 7>a billion dollars in the operating level and free cashflow

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 7>a couple hundred million. I think that, you know, that's

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 7>above where consensus expected it. We saw five billion dollars

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 7>an inventory get unlocked during the quarter, meaning you know,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 7>Boeing has been sitting on something like ninety billion million

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>dollars inventory that is like eighty seven I think was

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 7>exact number, and that came down to eighty two billion

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 7>because they've been buying from suppliers, putting things on shelves

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 7>as they try to keep the supply base healthy while

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 7>they've been going through some of their challenges here, and

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 7>now they're starting to take that, you know, that inventory

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 7>off the shelves, put it into airplanes. That's gonna that's

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 7>going to hyper drive some of the cash generation of

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 7>Boeing as they bring that inventory I think down to

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 7>probably a sixty or fifty billion dollar level. So I

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 7>think those are both big positives in the charge was

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 7>largely non cash for an airplane that I think is

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 7>still very competitive, just gets delayed a bit.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, how about the deliveries of the seven thirty seven.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>What's the guidance there, George, because we know that's the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>big cash driver.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 7>I think, yeah, so they're you know, Boeing is kind

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 7>of out of the game of giving guidance right now,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 7>but they've they said, you know, the FAAS allowed them

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 7>to go to forty two a month build rate, which

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 7>would which would be above what they've done in in

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 7>the last quarter. I think we've got a modeled at

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 7>about forty four or forty five per month for the

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 7>next three months because there's still some inventory airplanes they'll

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 7>deliver as as well as what they're building. Just heard

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 7>Kelly Orpberg say on the call that he would anticipate

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 7>sort of cranking up those build rates from forty two

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 7>in increments of five every six months.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>No sooner, obviously.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 7>Won't break unless they feel like they've got things stabilized.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 7>So I think we've got a path here to hire

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 7>build rates over, you know, to the end of the decade.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 7>So you know, I would expect that as they get

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 7>a year down the road here will be probably break

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 7>even in this business. You know, maybe a little bit longer,

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 7>but I think we'll be break even in that business.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 7>And again that's I think all part of the turnaround

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 7>is getting seven three seven to perform. That's that's going

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 7>to be the financial driver.

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 3>So Kelly Orpberg has now been CEO for just over

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>a year. He started in August of twenty twenty four.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe it's been that long already. I know,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I know, and a lot has happened, clearly. And what

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize is that Boeing is still facing some

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>labor issues. Saint Louis Aria machinists still strike. They've been

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 3>striking for more than three months. What does this say

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>about Kelly Orberg's leadership and what kind of grade would

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 3>you give him, George for his leadership so far?

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean I'd give him a very high grade.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 7>Right again, I think that, you know, the biggest thing

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.359
<v Speaker 7>he needed to do was like improve morale, improve quality,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 7>and it appears to you know, to be the case.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, the proof is again build rates

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 7>the FA, returning some you know, giving Boeing the ability

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 7>to go to forty two, and returning some of their

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 7>ability to certify some of the airplanes. So I think

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 7>i'd give it all high in Saint Louis right now,

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 7>Saint Louis is where the defense business is centered. Out

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 7>of right now, the defense business not performing great, but

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 7>getting better, you know. I think there's definitely more to

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 7>come in the defense business as they start building the

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 7>F forty seven, which is the sixth generation fighter that

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 7>they won, but that's still some preliminary work. My guess

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 7>is that the sides are still a little bit a

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 7>part on, you know, where they want to be for

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 7>an agreement, and it's not as critical to get those

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 7>folks back to the production lines as it was to

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 7>get a commercial seven thirty seven machinists back to production lines.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 7>So he's probably doing the right thing for the business here,

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 7>and you know, making sure he can get an agreement

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 7>he can live with, especially in defense where it's harder

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 7>to bear increased costs. And again i'd give I'd give

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 7>him high grades. I think the company's at a turnaround

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 7>right now and doing well.

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>George about the thirty seconds left. Just we don't talk

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>about the Triple seven much. How does that kind of

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>figure into their portfolio, into the economics of Boeing.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, when it finally gets certified, it'll be the biggest

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 7>airplane in production, So it kind of replaces seven four

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 7>seven and A three eighty as the queen of the skies.

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 7>A three fifty dash one thousand's the closest competitor. Can

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 7>it can't be as densified, It can't have as many

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 7>seats inside it, So I think you'll find a seat

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 7>cost advantage in the Triple seven. It's got core customers

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 7>in those you know, in those Middle East carriers, those

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 7>Asian carriers that are the big sort of East West connectors,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 7>And I think it'll be fine. I think the delay

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 7>won't won't hurt its ability to be sold. And it's

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 7>already got five hundred in the backlog all right.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Airlines analyst, coming up.

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>AI demand is going so fast that the cloud giants

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 3>are racing to catch up. How did that fare for

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 3>some big tech earnings this week. That's next.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing end

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies in one hundred.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 8>And thirty industries.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlett Foo and.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Demand for AI keeps growing so fast that the cloud

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>giants are racing to catch up. At least that was

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the message this week from tech giants Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>And the company they're looking to catch in Vidio. This week,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 3>the tech giant became the first company ever to have

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 3>a market cap of over five trillion dollars.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>The AI spent is not slowing down for more. We

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>spoke with Ana rog Rana, Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 6>See I think the common theme is that capital expenditures

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 6>are going up, which means there to spend a lot

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 6>more money to expand their data center footwork and need

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 6>more chip capacity to take care of the AI demand

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 6>that they are saying. So, I think that's the common

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 6>message for all of them. When you look at Microsoft,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 6>I think their CAPEX numbers nobody was expecting would go

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 6>up this much. I mean, we were expecting them to rise,

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 6>but they basically came out and said, you know, we

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 6>thought we'll be fine by now. But they're still capacity constrained.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 6>The demand is coming through. They talked a lot about

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 6>their open AI agreement, the revised one. You know, I

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 6>still think they're probably in one of the better places

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 6>than they have been in the past several years.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's just compare and contrast Meta and Google.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>We had talking about big CAPEX increases. Is that just

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the market saying, hey, we trust you Google with this

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>increased spending. Maybe not so much over there at Meta.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, if you're looking at between both of them,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 6>Google is showcasing that they are seeing the benefit of

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 6>AI in actual revenue generation from their cloud business. Cloud

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 6>business accelerated, It accelerated last quarter as well. We're really

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 6>seeing tangible benefits. Then you have Nthropic signing up with

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 6>Google Cloud to use their TPUs. They have the chip business. Also,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 6>the big question for everybody is, well, Meta, you're spending

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 6>all this money, how are you going to monetize it,

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 6>and they talk about, you know, they're going to monetize

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 6>it internally through better ads and serving ads. Well they're

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 6>still so me at some mean all the time. Anyway,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 6>the question is where is all this money going and

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 6>how do you get it back? I think that's where

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 6>the dichotomy is between these two vendors. And Google has

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 6>i think, done a phenomenal job of explaining to the

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 6>market what their AI strategy is and why is it

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 6>working so well.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's a matter of meta not telling a story

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 3>to investors, a narrative that resonates with investors or that

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>convinces investors the way that alphabet is.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 6>See, when you think about it, spending five ten billion

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 6>would be okay, But when you talk about spending you

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 6>know sixty seventy eighty billion dollars of AI related you know,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 6>research going into your products. Well, where is the benefit

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 6>of that?

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>How is not a new story that they're telling. They

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>told this story last quarter, in the quarter before, and

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 3>investors seem to like it.

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Fair point. But when you look at now, Google is

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 6>showcasing that we actually see the benefits and actual numbers

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 6>that we are reporting. So between the two vendors. It's

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 6>very clear what I can see on the Google side,

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 6>it's not so much not so much clear on the

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 6>Meta side.

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think also another part of it is having

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>used to follow that the stock is one of the

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 2>reasons Meta was working so well over the last several years.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a cost cutting story. After the metaverse debacle.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, people were concerned about all the spending on

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the Meta rate, right, Yeah, it seemed like zeer. Yeah,

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>they got that, they saw the light and they started

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>cutting costs in the stock work O Thanks to Anna

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>rod Rana, Bloomberg Intelligence Technology Analyst. Next, we look at

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>earnings from one of the world's biggest producers of heavy machinery, Caterpillar.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 3>This week, Cat reported third quarter earnings and revenue that

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 3>beat analyst estimates. The company stated their boost and earnings

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>was driven by their power generators and turbines that keep

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>AI data centers running.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>For more on this, we were joined by Chris Chiolino,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US machinery analyst.

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 9>It was a great quarter. You know, despite pretty elevated

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 9>expectations coming into the print a bigger tariff headwind, CAT

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 9>really delivered very solid three key results. It was really

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 9>driven by higher volumes across all three of their core businesses,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 9>with particular strength and energy and transportation. Again, but I think,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, one of the more encouraging signs that we

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 9>took away from the results were that orders accelerated here

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 9>in the quarter, and we also saw a backlog improved

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 9>sequentially to a record forty billion dollars. So we think

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 9>we see you know, above average production and earnings visibility

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 9>as we begin to think about next year.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Did the company say a lot about the power producing

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 3>equipment including turbines and generators that have investors excited about

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>it being kind of a derivative play to the AI story.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, so, you know, we continue to hear more and

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 9>more about AI and data centers and Cat's exposure there.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 9>Power gens probably you know, roughly thirty percent of the

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 9>energy and transportation business, roughly you know, fifteen percent of

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 9>the overall enterprise, but it continues to be the fastest

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 9>growing part of the portfolio. They're bringing on a lot

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 9>of capacity here over these next three years. I think

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 9>you really begin to see a step change as we

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 9>move into twenty twenty seven, particularly on the large engines.

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 5>So there is.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 9>More of a focus and investment on the energy and

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 9>transportation business and it has become, you know, the biggest

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 9>part of their portfolio.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow, are there other companies or let me put it

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 2>this way, who does cat compete with in that segment

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of the business.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so there's a number of different competitors, and it

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 9>really breaks down on relative by size on some of

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 9>the gen sets. Cummins is a is a big one,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 9>Siemens Energy, and then you also have a few other

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 9>European and Asian players. But you know, this is certainly

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 9>a market that's growing, you know, pretty exponentially.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 9>Backlogs extend several years, so we think we have pretty

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 9>good visibility at least through you know, the next three years.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Does this part of the business mean that Caterpillar will

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 3>need to rely more on domestic market opportunities as opposed

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to global market opportunities.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 9>So their footprint is the largest, the energy and transportation

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 9>footprint is the largest in North America, But you know,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 9>I think the opportunity is global. They are a large

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 9>global producer that they serve you know, essentially almost all

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 9>markets around the world. I think, even particularly with an

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 9>energy and transportation it's like something like one hundred different countries.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 9>So while I think the immediate near term excitement is

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 9>more focused here in North America, I do think longer

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 9>term there's an opportunity international as well.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 2>What's the company saying about impact, if any, on tariffs

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>on their business now going forward?

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So tariffs were actually a much bigger headwind than

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 9>we anticipated in the quarter, and even KAT I think

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 9>it kind of shook out somewhere around a six hundred

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 9>million dollar headwind in three Q. But margins, margins were

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 9>better than expected, really pretty remarkably resilient despite these price

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 9>costs headwinds. Four Q will actually see a step up

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 9>in the tariff costs, and then as we think about

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 9>next year, you know, Kat's really been kind of hesitant

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 9>to pull the pricing level on a lot of tariffs

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 9>thus far. We think that's you know, more of an

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 9>opportunity for them here in the near term to gain

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 9>some market share. So as we think about twenty twenty six,

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 9>it'll be interesting to see, you know, do they continue

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 9>to offset through more costs and productivity efficiencies or do

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 9>they lean into pricing a little bit more. But tariffs

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 9>will step up here in the near term and then

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, twenty twenty six, it still remains to be seen,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 9>but i'd expect a demand backdrop to improve. So they

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 9>certainly should have the opportunity to push pricing a little

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 9>bit more aggressively next year.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Chris Chile, you know, Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>US machinery analyst.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 3>We move next to news from the logistics company UPS.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 3>This week, UPS said it expects to cut thirty four

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand jobs this year in an effort to cut expenses

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 3>and improve profitability.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 2>This comes despite the companies reporting third quarter earnings that

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>beat analyst expectations. For more on this guest host Lisa

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Matteo and I were joined by Lee Glasgow, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Senior Transport, Logistics and Shipping analysts.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 10>So it's going on to the EPs is they are making

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 10>progress and they're executing on their plan. And their plan

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 10>really is to create a network that can not only handle,

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 10>but thrive.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 5>In an ever changing environment.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 10>And that change is being driven by e commerce, it's

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 10>being driven by the uncertainty around tariffs. And what they've

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 10>been able to do is increase productivity through technology, whether

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 10>it's automation or AI. And that also they were stepping

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 10>away from business from Amazon. You know, they noted another

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 10>morning call that there are three quarters into a six

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 10>quarter glide down of Amazon business. And the reason why

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 10>they want to move away from Amazon business that tends.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 5>To be lower margin, lower yielding packages.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 10>But that's not to say that they don't want to

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 10>totally walk away from Amazon, because their return business is

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 10>a good business for them, and we're seeing you know,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 10>the success in the numbers, and you know, going into

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 10>the quarter, I think investors were cautious or had low

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 10>expectations and management kind of exceeded those with the results.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 10>And their outlook really shows us that, you know, expectations

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 10>for the fourth quarter in twenty twenty six, at least

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 10>as it relates to you know, sell side analyst consensus

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 10>is probably a bit low and it needs to move higher.

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 4>Lee, can you get more into the cuts that we

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>were talking about, thirty four thousand job cuts, where were

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 4>they seen and what kind of let's say, year over

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 4>year cost savings does it expect in twenty twenty five

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 4>from all of this.

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so you know what they're trying to do their

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 10>overall cost savings, which includes you know, the head count reductions,

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, they're looking to get three point five billion

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 10>dollars in cost savings this year. They've done around two

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 10>point two billion of that so far, and some of

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 10>the reductions are driven by you know, they offered early.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Retirement for some of their drivers.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.719
<v Speaker 10>They said they've had pretty good pickup with that, and

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 10>that payoff should be about a year from what it

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 10>costs cost something one hundred and seventy five one hundred

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 10>and eighty million dollars, and they mentioned on the call

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 10>that it will take about a year to get to

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 10>make those costs back up, so you know, it really

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 10>should be paying for itself.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 5>And they're closing a lot of facilities.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 10>So they've they've closed you know, something like ninety ninety

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 10>five facilities so far, and that's being driven by they

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.239
<v Speaker 10>don't need the network they had when they were you know,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 10>really handling a lot of Amazon business and now that

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 10>you know, like I mentioned earlier, they're walking away from

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 10>that business, they're kind of reconfiguring their network. And they're

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 10>also you know, as I mentioned, they're increasing overall automation.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 10>You know, they know, they're on their call that they've

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 10>added automations around thirty five more facilities and about sixty

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 10>six percent of their packages touch these automated facilities, which

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 10>is around three hundred basis points more than was last year,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 10>and that that numbers is going to continue as management

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 10>makes more inroads at modernizing their facilities.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Lee, what is UPS?

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 2>So maybe feed FedEx for that matter. How are they

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of talking to you guys about tariffs and how

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 2>it might be impacting their business just as a big,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 2>big part of supply chain.

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, it's interesting.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 10>So for like a UPS, you know, there's good in

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 10>bad when it comes to the tariffs and the more

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 10>protectionist policies in the US. You know, we've ended the

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 10>Dominimus exemptions, which you know stated that if a shipment

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 10>came into the United States and it was worth eight

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 10>hundred dollars or less, it didn't have to pay a

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 10>duty or a tariff. You know, the Biden administration was

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 10>working towards getting rid of that. That Trump brought that

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 10>Trump administration brought that to the finish line. You know,

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 10>first it was it was just packages that were coming

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 10>in from China and Hong Kong, and now that's been

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 10>you know, all packages coming to the United States and

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 10>that's hurting volumes they noted their US or they're China

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 10>to US volumes were down around twenty percent, and that's

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 10>having a negative impact. Now you look at their forward business,

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, because of all these packages are now if

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 10>they're are going to be coming in lower value packages

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 10>have to pay duty, they need to lean more heavily.

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 5>On their customs business.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 10>So you've seen their supply chain business outperform this quarter,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 10>and I suspect a lot of that had to do

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 10>with the additional fees that they generate from helping shippers

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 10>clear packages through customs.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Lee Clasgow Bloomberg Intelligence senior Transport, Logistics

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and shipping analysts.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we focus in on the European earning season.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So far, you're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlet Fool and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 11>Urt in the game. We tough it out, feel exhausted,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 11>we push on, feeling down, We pull ourselves up by

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 11>the bootstraps. But there are times when bootstraps aren't enough,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 11>when stress gets to us and we need to talk

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 11>to someone about what we're really going through. So we're

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 11>going to reach out because sometimes mental health is not

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 11>a one person job. Is it Love your Mind Today

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 11>dot org? That's Love your Mind Today dot org. Brought

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 11>to you by the Huntsman Mental Health Institute and the

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 11>Head Counselor.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 2>We've been covering plenty of earnings from US companies this

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 2>past month, but European earnings are also resoundingly beating expectations,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>namely in the European tech.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 3>Space, especially as growing investment in artificial intelligence lifts demand

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and counters trade headwinds on that in the overall European market.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 3>We were joined by Tim craighead Bloomberg Intelligence Global Chief

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Content Officer.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 8>So far, so good. I wouldn't say it's as dramatic

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 8>as what you're finding over here. We don't have the

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 8>big tech you know to the same degree by any measure.

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 8>But if you look so far earnings twenty I'm sorry,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 8>fifty three percent beat versus high twenty percent miss Europe

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 8>doesn't play the game like the US, where every company

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 8>is trying to manage estimates and you know, down to

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 8>the tenth degree. This is a good reporting period for

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 8>Europe so far, and there's Yeah.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 3>What are some of the big themes that are driving

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>earnings growth when there is growth?

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's an interesting thing. I'm going to put this

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 8>into a little bit of different perspective to answer your question.

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 8>If you look over the course of the past three years,

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 8>where we've seen US earnings ratchet up, European earnings have

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 8>been minus one percent. Wow, I mean, it's a shocking

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 8>dis Yeah. A big part of that is technology over here,

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 8>but a big part of that over there is that

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 8>there's been some really big drags au Those and energy

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 8>and basic materials, sink, metals, money, and chemicals were about

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 8>twenty seven percent, not to be overly precise of the

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 8>earnings pie in twenty twenty two. That group has fallen

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 8>two thirds in earnings since then to where it's now

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 8>down to ten percent of earnings, and it's just been

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 8>a massive drag. The good thing looking forward is that

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 8>those three are a smaller and all of them seem

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 8>to be settling and there's reasons to think they can

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 8>move forward, which gives a window for other businesses like

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 8>industrials or technology financials, which have been huge with earnings growth,

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 8>to start to shine through in next year.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Broadbly speaking, rising trade tensions can't be good for Europe.

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>What are the companies saying.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 8>It's interesting in that it's another element to this earning story.

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 8>You know, there's not many of the sectors that have

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 8>actually had positive earnings growth this year. If you look

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 8>at earnings revision trends across sectors, and you have to

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 8>think part of it is the uncertainty. It could be

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 8>a direct impact where you're having to pay levees, it

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 8>could be uncertainty from buyers. It's definitely a majority of

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 8>companies over the first half of the year and even

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 8>this reporting period have talked about those two elements supplier

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 8>uncertainty or direct impact that are an issue for earnings.

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 8>There's been a third or more that have said, yes,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 8>we can mitigate this, that and the other, but it

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 8>is an issue. And to the degree that things are

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 8>starting to settle out a little bit, it's another one

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 8>of those things where we could see some positivity as

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 8>we look into next year.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 3>What's the relationship between European companies earnings and AI. You

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 3>don't have the big chip makers we do in video

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that obviously benefit from the demand for AI and data centers,

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 3>but you do have ASML, which is a chip manufacturing

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 3>equipment maker, so it's tied there. But most of these companies,

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine are using AI to create efficiencies and

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 3>create productivity.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 8>It's you hit the nail on the head from the

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 8>standpoint of ASML is the proximate company there, and clearly

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 8>you wouldn't have AI to the same degree within Vidia

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 8>at AL if you didn't have AI. But it's only

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 8>one component. SAP is a play if you wanted to

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 8>be a second derivative, which again is a big component

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 8>of European tech, But it is much more of what

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 8>are companies doing to drive their business and you'll be

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 8>hearing more and more on this. We're doing some pretty

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 8>in depth work with our year head outlooks, through corporate

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 8>surveys and otherwise on what are the impacts of the

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 8>AI and we are seeing we are seeing companies focus

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 8>on customer service, better data efficiencies. It's not that much

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 8>of a headcount issue, even though you certainly see some

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 8>headlines on that here as well as over there, so

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 8>it's interesting.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 3>And then I got to ask you about the one

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.719
<v Speaker 3>theme that has been driving European stocks, which is European

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 3>defense companies. This is like where we're going to see

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the numbers, maybe because certainly there's a

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of enthusiasm for this group.

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 5>YEP.

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 8>Valuations have ratcheted up, sales and earnings have ratcheted up.

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 8>The European defense imperative is a critical theme. Everybody's talking

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 8>about it, from regulators to corporates to investors. Those stocks

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 8>have gone haywire. The evaluations are far higher than the

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 8>US comparables. Even if we go to three and a

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 8>half percent of GDP, which is now targeted across the

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 8>NATO countries for spending, it's a question of how much

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 8>of that can actually be spent in Europe. It's a

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 8>narrow window in terms of who are the European defense contractors.

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 8>Ryan Mattell is a big deal. There's a huge push

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 8>from an industrial capacity perspective to make that a broader base.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Right Thanks to Tim craigk Ed Bloomberg Intelligence Global Content Officer.

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>This week we were joined by AI expert Peter Werner.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 2>He is co chair of Cooley's Global Emerging Companies and

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Vice chairman of Cooley's Business Department. They represent and guide

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>many of the industries that are most prominent in the

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 2>startup ecosystems, such as AI, space tech, and digital health.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Peter joined a program to discuss the future of the

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>workforce and how AI is affecting various industries.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 12>It's such an interesting conundrum. I think about it in

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 12>two ways. One for us, for our large law firm

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 12>for professional services organizations generally, and then for our clients

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 12>largely technology focused clients, small ones disrupting industries and large ones.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 13>There's a real combination.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 12>And you alluded to it with the investment bankers and

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 12>open a Open a Eyes statement recently about trying to

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 12>train LLM to take to simulate the jobs that currently

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 12>invest in bankers, entry level investment bankers do for hundreds

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 12>and hundreds of hours a month per per banker. Lots

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 12>of short term, medium term optimism, right, reduction of drudgery.

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 12>People people getting to go home earlier and get more

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 12>sleep because they don't have to format one hundred page

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 12>presentations or create tables Comparing the last version of a

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 12>one hundred page merger agreement with the next version and

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 12>things like that. That all seem amazing, but then you

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 12>start to think longer term, what does that mean?

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 13>What does that mean?

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 12>For philis A referenced the junior bankers getting getting training

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 12>by virtue of those reps.

0:33:58.680 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 13>How are we.

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 12>Replacing those reps so that ten years from now we

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 12>know who the senior.

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 13>Bankers are going to be? How do we get from

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 13>here to there?

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 12>Really interesting and really complicated as it relates to big tech.

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 12>We've got earnings coming up this week for a lot

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 12>of them, and you've got a ton of companies that

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 12>work we work with that sell into big enterprises that

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 12>are ready to get acquired.

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 13>By big tech. Yeah, like they are selling into enterprises.

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 12>That don't really know what the futures of their platforms

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 12>are going to be in terms of how they're going

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:29.280
<v Speaker 12>to use labors.

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 13>So lots of uncertainty there.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Lots of uncertainty, and you raise some really good points here.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you see companies management starting to address how to

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 3>answer some of those questions, like, you know, where are

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 3>we going to get that senior talent from if they're

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 3>not going to be in the trenches in the early

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 3>parts of their career because the early part of your

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 3>career just doesn't exist anymore.

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I can speak most.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 12>Passionately about that from the standpoint of my law firm,

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 12>which is really a proxy for professional services organizations all over.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 12>We are in the middle of trying to figure out, Okay,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 12>we have first year so we have one hundred first

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 12>year associates coming to join us on Thursday across the firm,

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 12>and maybe they'll be fine, But what about the ones

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 12>that we're courting right now, the first year lawyers who

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 12>are coming here in three years, if they're not going

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 12>to get to do one hundred venture capital financings a

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 12>year form one hundred companies a year because robots are

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 12>doing it, Like what we need is do we just

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 12>need to have a virtual reality simulation of that and

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 12>we don't build them out to clients, but we put

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 12>them through their paces virtually so that they gain experientially.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 12>Still or is there a whole new way of training

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 12>those people?

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 13>Of course there.

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 12>Are also because there were we as a as an

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 12>ecosystem here in California, Like people understand that, and so

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 12>of course there are now startups that are saying, Okay,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 12>we are going to be your simulation platform to simulate

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 12>the reps that professional services organizations and other knowledge workers

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 12>wouldn't otherwise get. So hire us to train your junior

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 12>people so that in ten years you can make partners

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 12>or you can make managing directors.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Are your clients to what extent are they receptive to

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>integrating AI to their business? To maybe a little bit

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 2>reticent here, they're just not quite sure.

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 12>Well, you've got, I mean, tale of two kinds of companies.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 12>You've got these amazing AI native companies disrupting older industries

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 12>where they are all about it and they're talking in

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 12>their board meetings about the ratio of headcount to revenue

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 12>and trying to be really focused on efficiency and optimizing technologies,

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 12>building everything in a labor light way. And then you've

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 12>got incumbents who are trying to like lift up this big,

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 12>heavy organization and insert like AI technology layer underneath it,

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 12>change the way they've all been doing things forever and start,

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 12>you know, laying off people, but laying off the right people,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 12>retraining other people. I mean that's a complicated task across

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 12>all industries.

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 3>So, Peter, are what jobs are AI proof meeting. AI

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 3>can help you, but it's not going to take your job.

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Are there any industries, Are there any specific roles?

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I'd love to know the answer to that.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 12>My instinct is that the most senior, most experienced, people

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 12>with the highest EQ and the ability to read rooms

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 12>think laterally, be strategic and creative, like in the white

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 12>color world, those.

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 13>Are the last ones to go.

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 3>But that's not everyone.

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 13>Maybe they never go. Who knows right.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 12>But then and then beyond that, I would say there

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 12>is a correlation between like more manual work, et cetera,

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 12>and like it's going to take longer to replace those jobs.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 12>But you still think about the on shoring of like

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 12>American manufacturing now where we have we have dark factories

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 12>that we're building in the US that have no humans

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 12>working in them. So this is not about all blue

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 12>collar labor or like physical labor is insulated permanently.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 13>I'm not sure.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know our Thanks to Peter Werner CHERF Cooley's

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Business Department.

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries and.

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bio on the terminal.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlet Foo and.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Sweeney. Stay with us. Today's stop stories and

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 2>global business headlines are coming up right now.