WEBVTT - Do Our Pets Lie to Us?

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, welcome to Science Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>My name is horthe Cham and today in the program,

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll be asking the question do our pets lie to us?

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a question that pet owners have been asking themselves

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for centuries. Is my feline friend fibbing? Is my dog

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>duping me with deceit? We're gonna tackle the general question

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of whether animals can lie, and we're gonna ask if

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>they have the same tells that humans do, can you

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>catch them in the act. We're going to talk with

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a biologist and also a brain scientist to get to

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of this. Now, this is a special episode

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 1>because today's question comes from a friend of mine, and

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not just a friend, a famous friend. Mary Robinette Kowal

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>is a well known science fiction writer. She's only one

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen people in history to have won all three

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>major science fiction awards, that's the Hugo, the Nebula, and

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Locusts. And she's asking this question for a very

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>peculiar reason. She's taught her cat to talk, but now

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>she's wondering if her cat is lying to her. So

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>here is my chat with science fiction author Mary Robinett Kowal,

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>answering her question of whether our pets are being perfidious

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that means they're lying anyways, enjoy.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 2>My question is I want to know about animals lying

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>and if they have the same kind of tells that

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>humans have.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great question. What made you think of

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this question?

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>What made me think of it is I have a

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>cat who uses buttons to talk. Were part of a study.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>There's thousands of animals in this study out of University

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>of San Diego. But we're also part of this very

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>large movement of people whose animals use buttons to talk.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>It's called augmentative inner species communication. It started with a

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>woman named Christina Hunger in twenty nineteen. She was a

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>speech language therapist who basically thought, what happens if I

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>use the same techniques that I use with my nonverbal

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>patients if I use them with my new puppy. And

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 2>she spawns this global movement. So, Elsie, my cat, has

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty word vocabulary, and she, to all appearances,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>will lie to me. For instance, I had just given

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>her the button for sleepy, and you model it for

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>them the same way you'd model for a child. And

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>then she said bedroom lie down, sleepy, and you know,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd been in the kitchen. I was making my lunch.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>But I'm like, I'm going to abandon lunch. I'm going

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 2>to model this. Let's go lie down. And so I

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 2>walk into the bedroom and I lie down. I'm like,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>why is my cat not here? And I go in

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 2>and she's eating my lunch.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>She fooled you, she fooled me to the bedroom to

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>leave the room. I feel like you're living in a

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>science fiction world.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I am, yes for that story from up the Pixar

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>movie with the dog with the speaker.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is like the way I describe it is,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I am living with a non he an intelligence who

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>is an el toddler covered in fur and an alien.

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I feel like I could spend the rest

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of you just asking you about this

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>movement and your pet. Yeah, but if I'm going to

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>try to answer your question.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>We should get to it.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, please do Okay?

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm not an animal expert or psychologist, so

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know the answer. But fortunately I do know

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>someone who happens to be both of those things. So

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to my friend Katie Golden, and Katie

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is a podcaster. She's a host of a podcast called

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Creature Feature, and she's a trained behavioral biologist and a

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trained psychologist. I thought perfect person to ask this question. Okay,

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so here is her first part of the answer.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 4>There's obviously a ton of deception in nature. You look

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 4>at a leaf insect or stickbug, it's being deceptive, right,

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 4>It's disguised.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>As a leaf or stick camouflage.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's camouflage. So like, there's there's so much deception

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 4>in the natural world. You know, there's even deception on

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>the microbial level, like viral DNA tricking the immune system

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 4>into allowing it to go through the body. You know,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 4>there's so many levels of deception. But I feel like

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>what your question and what Mary's question is kind of

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>getting at is lying, which to me feels different from

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 4>like passive deception. Like if you're born as a leaf

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>insect and you look like a leaf, you're not trying

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>to trick anyone necessarily, that's just how you are. But

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>evolution has pushed you into this state. When you look

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 4>more and more like this leaf or like the stick,

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 4>you tend to survive more. So it's a type of deception.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 4>But to me, it doesn't feel like lying. Lying feels

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 4>like I am communicating something to you directly that is

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 4>false and intentionally, so like I am intentionally misleading you

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 4>to get what I want or to avoid consequences.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're saying the concept of lying in

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>this context of the question, it's more about playing mind games.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You're not just like wearing some sort of suit to

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>help you hide. If you're you're intentionally aware of the

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>other organism or person out there, and you're intentionally doing

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>something to mess with their minds.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. One of my favorite examples of lying without any

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 4>vocalization is in squirrels, where squirrels will bury a ton

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 4>of nuts and they have to do this to survive

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 4>the winter, so that they have these nut caches, and

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 4>so once things are barren and there's not as much food,

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 4>then they can dig them up and eat them. And

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 4>one thing that squirrels will do is they'll try to

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>steal each other's nut cases, because why spend all this

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 4>time looking for nuts when you can just see another

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 4>squirrel bearing a nut, remember where they buried the nut,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 4>and then steal it. And so squirrels have come up

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 4>with a way to combat the thieves, and that is

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 4>by deceiving them intentionally with a behavior which is pretending

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 4>to bury a nut while a thief is watching and

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 4>then leaving the area, and as the thief is busy

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 4>sort of trying to dig up that nut for itself,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 4>then it buries the nut for real. So it's this

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 4>intentional perception of like, look, I'm bearing a nut, and

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 4>then the thief goes there and looks for it and then.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't find anything, and then it gets ah nuts eggs.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 4>That's the one squirrel joke that they make.

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So then a squirrel will pretend to hide a

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>nut because it knows that it's being watched by another squirrel.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Now is that proven would only do this fake hiding

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>nut behavior if it knows it's being watched.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 4>I believe they've found that they do more of the

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 4>hiding behavior when they think they're being observed.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Katie will tell us an example

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of animals actually telling a lie, and then she'll tell

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>us how she thinks her dog is lying to her.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to sign stuff. Welcome back to science stuff.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Katie had another interesting example, and this one does involve

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>telling a lot.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 4>There's another animal, which is maybe one of my favorite liars,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 4>and this one is actually lying verbally, so we're getting

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 4>really close to kind of human lies. Right. So, alarm

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 4>calls are done by an animal to warn its family

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 4>that a predator is about. And sometimes it's really specific.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes they're like they'll have a call that's lookout. It's

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 4>a hawk, look out, it's a snake, look out, it's

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 4>like a coyote, you know, different calls for different predators.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 4>So there's this animal called the fork tailed drongo, which

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>sounds kind of like an insult, like, does not sound nice.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 4>There are a species of bird that lives in South Africa.

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 4>They look kind of like a blackbird, but they have

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a thicker beak and a forked tail.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 4>And so these birds will watch other animals handling a

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 4>food item and then issue an alarm call. But this

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 4>is a false alarm. They're crying, they're saying, I see something,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>uh oh, And it's either mimicking the alarm call of

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 4>that species, like say a meer cat alarm call, or

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 4>they're using their own alarm call. And something that's kind

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 4>of interesting about alarm calls is animals learn the alarm

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 4>calls of other species because that helps them. Right, if

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 4>you hear some other animal using an alarm call, you're like, oh,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 4>well they think something's up, so I should also run.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 4>And so these birds, these drongos, learn that they can

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 4>either mimic an alarm call or use their own type

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 4>of alarm call and animals will run away. And they

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>do this when they are observing their targets, they're victims

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 4>eating food or handling food. And then once their victims

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 4>have run away because basically they've been lied to, they've

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>been told there's a predator, then the drangle goes in

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 4>and eats the food. And in this case, I know

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>for a fact that they have done research where they've

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 4>found that they do more of these false alarm calls

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 4>when they are watching an animal handling food directly. So

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 4>it is very linked to an awareness of like, look

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 4>that's food I want. I can get it to run

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 4>away if I fake an alarm call.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that is amazing. It makes me sort of have

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>any immediate humanizing reaction. It makes me not trust this animal,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>or it makes me think of this animal as being

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>deceptive or not a good person.

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we make a moral judgment.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So birds lie too, Mary, that's so cool. They literally

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>cry wolf.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is amazing. This is a surprise to maybe

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and also a moment of like, well, of course some

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>bird would have gone like, oh, that worked, well, let's

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 2>do that again.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And I like this example because it's sort of like

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the classic hey, look behind you, or like well there's

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a tiger coming for you to fool somebody you're trying

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh no gods.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 4>In terms of verbal lying. So I don't have a

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 4>study here, but I do have an anecdote of my dog.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 4>She will verbally lie to me about danger when she

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 4>sees something outside the window. She does her job as

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 4>a little guard dog, even though I didn't hire her.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 4>I don't know who did. But she barks at pigeons,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 4>at whatever, like any birds, any activity, another dog barking.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 4>She has a certain sound, a certain tone to that bark.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Her hackles raise, her tail is stiff. It's alertness, right,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>like I am in a protective mode and there is

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 4>something out there and I am alerting you, which again

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 4>is not something you see in wolves. This is a

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 4>dog specific trait that we've bred into them. And so

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 4>she'll do this right, But if I'm about to leave

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 4>the apartment, she'll bark, but her tone's very different. She's relaxed,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 4>her tail's down, but she's looking out the window, and

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 4>her body language is otherwise very like relaxed and calm,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 4>but she barks, and her tone is different when she's

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 4>barking and she's staring out and there's nothing there, right,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 4>there's nothing out the window. And I think she's doing

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 4>this every time I'm about to leave, to basically say like,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 4>don't leave. There's something weird, there's something interesting or weird

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 4>over here. You should stay. So she's trying to lie

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 4>to me about there being something at the window.

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing, Katies, there's a pigeon out there.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Pigeons are dangerous.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Stay in exactly, which I find is so interesting. And

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 4>the fact that her tone kind of is different, so

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 4>it's like she's trying to make it sound convincing, but

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 4>I can kind of tell the difference. She has a

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 4>different sort of tone, a different sort of like body language.

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Everything's a little bit different when she's lying and I

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 4>see there's like literally nothing out there, versus when she

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 4>actually sees something. I look out and there's like a pigeon,

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 4>which you know, big deal, thanks.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Cookie, meaning Cookie is not good at lying, Like she

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>tells that you can tell she's.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Lying, right, which I only know because I know her

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 4>baseline behavior, and I also know dog body language, right,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 4>like tail being stiff and the hackles being raised. There's

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 4>a lot like the stiffness in the body can show

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 4>you like how anxious or alert a dog is, and

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 4>whereas if the tail's lower and they seem more relaxed,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 4>but then they're barking and like running around in a circle,

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 4>you're like, hmmm, it's interesting.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like smart enough to think about lying to you

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so that you don't go out, but not smart enough

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to notice her own tails.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's probably hard to control those too, because like

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of those tells are not something that she

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 4>has executive control over, right, Like the same thing with humans.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 4>We can't control everything we do. Maybe with practice, we

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 4>can control our heart rate and our sweating or something,

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 4>but it is really difficult for a human to control everything, right,

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Like you can't. If you're like I is twitching a

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 4>little bit, you can't turn that off necessarily. So we

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 4>don't have complete control over our body language, nor do

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 4>I think dogs don't have complete control, but they have

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 4>some control, and sometimes they'll manipulate that to get what

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 4>they want.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow, what if you put Cookie in like acting lessons,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you never leave the house.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, if Cookie got an oscar, I would

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 4>stay home with her all day.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons I was curious about this is

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that there are self soothing actions that humans will do

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 2>when they're lying. Not always, but often people will fidget

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more, or they will fidget less because

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>they're aware that they need to look super calm. So

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>there are these things that people will do. There's a

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>study that people tend to look up into the left

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a little bit when they are telling a lie versus

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 2>when they're accessing a memory that really happened.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>The part of your question was do animals lie? Do

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:35.239
<v Speaker 1>they have tells? And do they correlate to tells in humans?

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, If there is something common we have with animals

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>when we lie, does that mean that it's genetic and

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we can fight it or is it just cultural? Part

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of your question was or tells cultural or not?

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, So I got really interested in this question also,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I reached out to a psychologist at the

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>University of Oslo who's been publishing a lot recently on

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the kind of neuroscience of lying.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm so excited by this.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is Tim's description what he does.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'm a psychologist. In my area is cognitive psychology,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 3>so memory and mental processes, how we think, And more

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>recent years I have spent time doing research on how

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>cognitive processes link up to emotional processes, more recently specifically

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>looking at light detection, which is pretty important task or

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>job throughout the legal system. You know, from the time

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>a crime is committed, when the police turn up and

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 3>they want to look for witnesses or victims or perpetrators.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, the task of deciding, well, you know, is

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 3>this person telling me the truth or art is quite

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 3>important all the way through the detective work into the

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 3>court system. You know, you have witnesses there and the

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 3>jury or the judges have to decide, you know, well

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>they can't both be telling the truth, so which one

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 3>is it? So it's an important topic, you know, obviously

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>important in a practical sense.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Tim, doctor Brennans are as a psychologists. But

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>then when the lawyer approached him and said Hey, you're

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>someone who knows about emotions and things like that, can

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you come and be an expert on this case? And

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how he got a really interesting idea of lying,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's so crucial in a legal case, right, like

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>two people are saying different things. Who's telling the truth?

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you determine who is guilty? In some cases

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a matter of life and death? Right, Yeah, although he

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>says in Norway they don't have death penalty, so it's

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a matter of life in prison.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess does he talk to you about ways he

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>can tell?

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The basic question I asked him was what's going on

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in your body when you're telling a lie? Neuroscience psychology

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>point of view, what's your body doing?

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 3>So, what's happening in our body and brains when we're

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>telling a lie? We're deliberately trying to deceive. Most of

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>us on a daily basis, we know how it feels

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>to tell a lie, and so from the inside you

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>can feel a bit of stress and you're wondering, is

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>this person understanding that I'm not quite telling the truth here?

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 3>And so on. That's one of the main things is

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 3>that the stress is associated with lying and mental effort,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>because it's much easier just to tell the truth and

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>retrieve from memory rather than having to keep track of

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>what you've said to whom and which details you've made

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>up and so on. There's more mental effort involved. One

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>line of research it hopes to be able to pinpoint,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>for example, where in the brain this extra effort is

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>being expended. And generally people are looking at the cognitive

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 3>load hypothesis and to say, okay, is there a way

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 3>for measuring cognitive load or rather imposing cognitive load. So

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 3>if you're telling the truth, you should be all right,

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 3>but if you're lying, you've already got the extra cognitive

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 3>blowed and this will tip you over the edge so

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that it all collapses. And there's some research in favor

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of that sort of idea that you can distinguish between

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>liars and truth tellers by imposing cognitive blow to a

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>certain extent.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's cool. And then there's another part of my

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>brain that's like every ADHD person is just going to

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 2>look like a liar if you're just putting more targahiveload

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>on us.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it seems like you know the way he

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>looks at it, And I guess scientists look at it

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>is that this idea of tells, it kind of boils

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>down to what your brain is trying to do. Right,

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to tell a story that you know is

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not true, and so therefore there's two things associated with that.

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>One is stress. One is that he might be worried

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about the consequences of lying. You might be worried about

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what if I get caught? How is it going to look?

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And you also have to think more than you would

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>if you were telling the truth, because when you telling

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the truth, you're just maybe recalling and then spitting it out.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>When you're trying to lie, you have to think about

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the lie? What was the actual thing that happened?

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Might be self consistent? How do I make sure that

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling the right lie? Yeah, And so that can

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then manifest as some of these things that we call tells.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're thinking extra hard telling you lie, you might

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>stammer more, or you might say oh more, or you

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>might feel the stress, and so you avoid the other

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>person's gaze.

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>So that because the information that I have about lying

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>comes from reading about basically spies, cia interrogators and things

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 2>like that, where they're looking at the external behaviors, whereas

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>doctor Brennan is looking at the root causes of those behaviors,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 2>which is so interesting.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's interesting. You can talk about tells, but

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>really it's helpful to just think about what is your

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>brain trying to do when you're trying to lie? Right?

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I'm so excited. This is very cool.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, an interesting thing about that is if you offer

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>people around the world and there's this big study being

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>done a few years ago asking people from seventy five

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>different countries and people agree around the planet that if

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>you don't look me in the eyes and you're looking

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>a bit shifty and possibly lying, you know, this is

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>deemed to be a q to deception. And in all

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>these different countries, over all these different languages, was finding

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 3>huge similarities.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>This is this international constortium of basically lying scientists or

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>scientist that's dirty lying. And they did this huge survey

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>where they send the questionnaires to like forty people in

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>each of seventy five countries and across the world there

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of similar answers, meaning like this thing

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>cuts across cultures in South America and North America, Europe, Africa, Asia,

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and so The number one thing that most people say

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a tell is that you're avoiding eye contact.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>That's fascinating.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're verting gaze. And so something like seventy percent

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>of all cultures in the world mentioned this as a

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>clear sign that you're lying, which I think makes me

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder is it easier to lie over zoom?

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Then right?

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody expects you to the eye.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh, that is interesting.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these cultures mentioned nervousness. You're a little incoherent,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You're not making a lot of sense, you're making too

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>many body movements, too many facial expressions, you're sort of

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent in your story. You're saying um a lot or uh,

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you're pausing a lot. There was another one of the

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>signs that people mentioned.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Do you know if in that study that's seventy

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 2>percent with the eye contact and being important, do you

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>know how that relates to the culture's overall relationship with

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>eye contact.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great question. An interesting fact about the

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>study that they found was that it was very universal

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>except in cultures for which direct eye contact is considered

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe rude. So, for example, some parts in the Middle East,

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's considered rude to look someone directly in

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the eye, maybe if you don't know them, or if

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to be showing some respect to them. And

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so in those countries, eye contact was not high on

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the telltale signs of line.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. So it's something that crosses a lot of different cultures.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But if you have a culture where people are socialized

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>to think that eye contact is impolite, then that que

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 2>becomes not a meaningful queue, right.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Because they know that if you're not looking in the

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>eye just means something else where. I imagine like if there's

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a culture where people move their arms allot when they talk,

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>or they say oh a lot, or they take a

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of pauses while they talk, then definitely those are

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to be things that people say are clues

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>about lying. Don't go anywhere you're listening to science stuff.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 2>So this makes me think that dogs, which are an

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>evolutionary bye product of humans being like, let's tinker with

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 2>this wolf, but bread to cohabitate with us, and eye

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>contact is very important for dogs, that dogs would also

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>have eye contact as a potential tell, but that cats,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 2>which are not as interested in eye contact might not

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>have eye contact as a tell.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, There's an interesting study that I found related to dogs,

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which is that, you know, dogs didn't evolve out their

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nature like elephants or lions. What we call dogs really

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of evolve from walls with us. Yeah, they wouldn't

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>be dogs without humans kind of basically. Yeah, And so

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>dogs evolve ways to gain our sympathy, and one of

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>them for those ways is to look at us in

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the eye. But more importantly, some scientists think this ability

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to kind of shed tears on sort of on cue

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>whenever they need to get something from me or gain

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>your sympathy.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So if they want to connect with you or they

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have connected with you, it will trigger some hormone and

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>then that hormone will trigger them to shed extra tear

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>or so there at least to have sort of like

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>watery Wow, I know the way they're sort of lying

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to you when they with puppy eyes. I don't know's

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, a blurry line.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Like I had read that dogs had developed eyebrows

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 2>basically to be more appealing to humans. Wow.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that they have significantly more muscles around their eyes

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 2>to create the iron show more white as well than wolves.

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 2>And the speculation is that it is something that happened

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 2>specifically because it makes them more appealing, right right, yeah,

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 2>not expressive, whereas cats who did not do that. Having

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with a cat is like talking to someone

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 2>whose entire face has been botoxed.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Like they don't care.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they would be good poker players, right, exactly.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>There's a CTV these commonalities between animals and humans just

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>from the idea of what lying is, which is that

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you're pretending that to do something, or to say something,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>or just state something that you know it's not true.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a common base and we sort of see

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that with Katie and her dog and how she can

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>tell that the dog is maybe lying because the dog

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>is not a good actor. Yeah, and we see that also.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems in humans. It appears that there are common adalytes,

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>even among cultures. However, the plot to us here is

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that Tim doesn't believe in tells at all. Oh wow, yeah,

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>here's what he said.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's really dissociation between what people believe and what

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the research shows. So we have solid research showing that

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 3>nonverbal cues are at best faint, you know, faint cues

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 3>to deception. Can't there so far from being usable in

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the forensic context, the sort of figure that we would

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 3>normally throw around is fifty four percent, where fifty to

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 3>fifty is the chance level. Right, So it's as if

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 3>we humans can pick something up, but just very little,

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 3>you know. And the research has been done in a

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 3>whole wide variety of situations, also situations that are really

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 3>meaningful for people, where it turns out some people have

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>been lying in a press conference about whether they knew

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 3>anything about the disappearance of one of their loved ones,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 3>you know. And then afterwards you can when you've got

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 3>a set of those press conferences, and you can determine, Okay,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.239
<v Speaker 3>this group of people, well, they have nothing to do

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 3>with it, this group of people, they turn out to

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>be the perpetrator. The question can then be asked of

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>independent observers participants in experiments, what can you tell which

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of these people are lying? You know? And we just can't.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Yeah huh, But like I hear that, and I

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>understand it, and I don't question it. And also I

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 2>think everyone has experienced a thing where you've been talking

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 2>to someone and you know that they're lying to you,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and you're right about it.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's sort of this conundrum right where intuitively we

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>know that tells exist and sometimes you can tell if

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>someone's lying, and yet people like Tim are saying these

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>non verbal cues, this idea of being able to tell

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>someone's lying is not true. Like at best, he said,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we can guess if someone's lying fifty four percent of

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I wonder this is such a semantic split. It is

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>a difference between lying and acting.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean?

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>So there's a really famous quote by Marlon Brando when

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>people ask him, you know, what the secret to acting was,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 2>and he's like, I'm just lying. That's all I'm doing.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And when you think about it, that is what an

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 2>actor's job is. An actor's job is to fake an

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>emotion in order to convince you that they are experiencing

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the things that they're experiencing, but none of it's true.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I talked to Tim for quite a bit,

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's his main point.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that when we're telling a lie, we

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>do have this connective break in our heads that might

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>manifest itself in your body doing things that you can't control.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is is that liars are also very smart,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and basically, if you're a liar. You've learned very early

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on in your lying career, perhaps that if you don't

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>look at people in the eye, then they're going to

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>know you're lying. Right, So good liars know to look

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>people in the eye when they lie, or you know,

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they're smart enough, unlike Katie's dog, to pick up on

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they have these tells, and so good

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>liars they're good at hiding these tells. Basically what actors

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do to just kind of convince their bodies that they're

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not in a stressful situation. And so what the translations

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>to the data is that basically you can't really rely

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on these tells, or that if you do, you're going

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>to be fooled by good.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Lifety four percent.

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and it's not just tells that Tim also

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>has looked into things like polygraph tests. Oh and so

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>his general perspective is this.

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 3>But the question is to what extent can people adjust

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 3>these and compensate and hide the fact that they're lying

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and they play the system, And the empirical evidence as

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 3>it stands would suggest that sort of machine is not

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 3>reliable enough to what would one want in the legal system.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.479
<v Speaker 3>Ninety nine points something percent you know, but we're just

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 3>not there, partly because of the issue of what it

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 3>called countermeasures that you can take when taking a polygraph,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 3>so you can confuse the machine. You can trigger your

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>own physiology either by thinking something if you just at

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 3>random moment start thinking something horrible or exciting, or if

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you have a stone in your shoe that you press

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 3>your big toe on every now and then you get

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 3>the same sort of activation. You know, so I'll be ooh,

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 3>there's something here, but you'd just be confusing, adding noise

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 3>to the whole system, you know.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, So then what's the average accuracy of something like

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph test?

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean there are different variants of it, different uses,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>but to put one figure on it, it's around seventy percent.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's higher than you and me observing people and guessing.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's obviously picking something up. But like I mentioned

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 3>about the brain data, it's pretty messy data and there's

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 3>lots of loopholes in there.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think that's where it stands. It's like

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>tells do exist if someone is it a novel liar,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Like kids are not good liars because they don't have

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experience lying for you, know the kinds

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of things that Tim looks at, which is like ego cases,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>These things are basically useless in a courtroom to say

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that someone didn't pass a polygraph test, or to say

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they look to the right or they look to the lab.

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Basically you can't really use that because even though you

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>might have statistical data that says, oh, you know, sixty

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time that someone looks at the right,

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they're lying, that's not going to fly in a corner. Right,

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Or even I guess with your cat, right, your cat

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>could also be becoming a better liar as you interact

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>with your cat, right, Like, if your cat tries to

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>lie and sees that you didn't buy it, then the

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>cat might be learning like, oh wait, maybe it's because

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I press it too hard or went too quickly to

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>press it or something, and your cat maybe is intelligent

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>enough to figure out that, oh, if I do this,

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>then Mary robin Att is going to believe me.

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that's terrifying.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's basically Tim's point is that there's

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>really no way to tell someone's lie. I mean, you

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>might get a sense of, well, I'm fifty four percent

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>sure they're lying, but really, if you need to make

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>an important decision based on that you can.

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Huh, So I guess then the answer to my question

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>is that animals do lie, but that tells just don't exist.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, basically, animals lie. They might have tells. There is

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of physiological connection between line and some sort

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of non verbal cue or some sort of things that

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you do. But it's so easily hackable, especially for humans

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who are really smart and can learn after the first

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>lie what works and what doesn't work, that you probably

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bet the house on thinking that someone

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is lying based on the tell.

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>This is amazing to me. I am absolutely in love

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 2>with all of this.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, there is a little bit of hope. So Tim

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>has been thinking about this a lot, and so his

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>basic solution, or the thing that he proposes is basically

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the only way you can really tell that someone is

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>lying is by catching them in a lie. So he thinks,

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't waste time with polygraph tests in the court system,

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just do good detective work. Yeah, ask the person what happened,

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and then hide some of the information that you have,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, you have cameras that were pointing at

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>him when that person did it. But don't tell me.

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I have the footage and then ask them what happened,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you can catch them in a line, and

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>then that can then tell you if they're lying about

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>other things.

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting, Yeah.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Like data, basically have data or try to outsmart the

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>liar in some way.

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like Elsie has tried to send me out of

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the room on a couple of other occasions to go

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 2>after my cheese sandwiches. And so now I know that

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 2>if I am preparing food and she suggests that I

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>need to leave the room, that I need to put

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>whatever food I'm preparing in the microwave so she can't

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 2>get to.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It, right right, Yeah, yes, I'm sorry to say, Mary Robinette,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't trust your cat.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I can trust her on a lot of things,

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>but unfortunately nothing involving food.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, thank you so much, Mary Robinette. It's

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>been a pleasure to explore the idea of not telling

0:31:58.120 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the truth.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you so much for doing all of the

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>research on that. That was fascinating and I have a

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 2>feeling that it is going to turn up in a

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 2>novel at some point.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Hey, that's cool. Which part the cat or

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the squirrel, the.

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Squirrel, the school cat, the cat has already turned up,

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and so many things.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's fascinating to see process that in real time

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and to see that seed being planted for maybe a

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>future novel.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 2>So interesting. Thank you so much for this.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thank you for joining us. Thanks to Mary Robinett

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Kwal for being on the show. You can find her

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>award winning book The Cut Collating Stars wherever books are sold.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Science Stuff, the production of iHeartRadio,

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>written and produced by me Or hitch Ham, executive producer

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Rowland, an audio engineer and mixer Kasey Peckram. Can

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>follow me on social media. Just search for PhD comics

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the name of your favorite platform. Be sure to

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcast, and please tell your

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>friends We'll be back next Wednesday with another episode.