WEBVTT - Deep Cover Live with Emily Bazelon

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:20.836
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hey, it's Jake. Thanks for listening to deep Cover.

0:00:21.436 --> 0:00:23.876
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to work now on season four, and I

0:00:23.916 --> 0:00:26.156
<v Speaker 1>want to remind you that when you sign up for

0:00:26.196 --> 0:00:29.436
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Plus, you'll get access to binge drops of future

0:00:29.436 --> 0:00:33.196
<v Speaker 1>seasons of Deep Cover and exclusive content from other Pushkin

0:00:33.276 --> 0:00:36.036
<v Speaker 1>true crime hits like Death of an Artist, which just

0:00:36.196 --> 0:00:39.156
<v Speaker 1>rapped its first season, as well as Lost Hills, which

0:00:39.196 --> 0:00:42.796
<v Speaker 1>is returning with their third season this June. And of course,

0:00:42.996 --> 0:00:46.676
<v Speaker 1>don't miss early access to Revisionist History and The Happiness Lab,

0:00:46.796 --> 0:00:49.636
<v Speaker 1>which are both publishing year round for the first time

0:00:49.956 --> 0:00:53.996
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. Check out Pushkin dot fm or

0:00:54.036 --> 0:01:00.156
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Show page for more information. Earlier this month,

0:01:00.316 --> 0:01:03.396
<v Speaker 1>I sat down for a live recorded conversation with my

0:01:03.476 --> 0:01:07.036
<v Speaker 1>friend Emily Basilon. She's a staff writer at The New

0:01:07.116 --> 0:01:10.796
<v Speaker 1>York Times magazine and a co host of Slate's Political Gabfest.

0:01:11.636 --> 0:01:15.436
<v Speaker 1>Emily someone I go to when I'm thinking through a story. Actually,

0:01:15.516 --> 0:01:18.036
<v Speaker 1>this often happens during runs that we take through East

0:01:18.116 --> 0:01:23.156
<v Speaker 1>Rock Park in New Haven, where we both live. We

0:01:23.276 --> 0:01:25.796
<v Speaker 1>kind of nerd out on these runs. We talk about

0:01:25.796 --> 0:01:28.756
<v Speaker 1>the process of recording and the ethical challenges that we

0:01:28.796 --> 0:01:32.076
<v Speaker 1>both face when telling our stories. So we took that

0:01:32.196 --> 0:01:35.636
<v Speaker 1>conversation rum the streets of New Haven to Brooklyn to

0:01:35.716 --> 0:01:38.836
<v Speaker 1>a place called Littlefield, and just so you can picture it,

0:01:38.916 --> 0:01:41.556
<v Speaker 1>it's a really great scene. It's a bar on the

0:01:41.676 --> 0:01:45.756
<v Speaker 1>stage with these two orange leather chairs, microphones, this cool

0:01:45.836 --> 0:01:48.756
<v Speaker 1>lighting display behind us. It was a fun night and

0:01:48.796 --> 0:01:54.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to share that conversation with you here to

0:01:54.116 --> 0:01:59.236
<v Speaker 1>talk about season three, my favorite season. When Jake told

0:01:59.276 --> 0:02:01.356
<v Speaker 1>me about the idea for this season on a run,

0:02:01.476 --> 0:02:04.396
<v Speaker 1>I was immediately sold. I'm going to say this. I

0:02:04.436 --> 0:02:06.356
<v Speaker 1>hope it's true. I think I said this is going

0:02:06.396 --> 0:02:09.116
<v Speaker 1>to be the best season you did, but I didn't

0:02:09.236 --> 0:02:12.916
<v Speaker 1>know whether you're adjut you know, trying to up my confidence. Yeah,

0:02:13.116 --> 0:02:16.396
<v Speaker 1>I was certain because it's just such a good story.

0:02:16.716 --> 0:02:21.276
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we start, because I love these stories

0:02:21.276 --> 0:02:25.076
<v Speaker 1>from you, with your telling us how you found this

0:02:25.276 --> 0:02:28.076
<v Speaker 1>terrific story. Yeah, I mean, and also just say that

0:02:28.116 --> 0:02:31.276
<v Speaker 1>I years ago, an NPR producer said to me that

0:02:31.436 --> 0:02:34.756
<v Speaker 1>a good MPR segment should always feel like one person

0:02:35.076 --> 0:02:37.916
<v Speaker 1>talking to one other person. So in some ways, like

0:02:38.036 --> 0:02:40.596
<v Speaker 1>this run we had, or when I'll pitch the ideas,

0:02:40.876 --> 0:02:44.516
<v Speaker 1>that's how it starts. And so I live in New Haven.

0:02:44.596 --> 0:02:47.916
<v Speaker 1>We both went to Yale, and I've always been kind

0:02:47.956 --> 0:02:50.876
<v Speaker 1>of interested in people that faked their way into universities,

0:02:50.916 --> 0:02:52.476
<v Speaker 1>and there was a guy who faked his way into

0:02:52.596 --> 0:02:54.596
<v Speaker 1>Yale when I had been a student there, and I

0:02:54.636 --> 0:02:57.676
<v Speaker 1>started poking around about maybe there's a story about someone

0:02:57.676 --> 0:03:00.916
<v Speaker 1>who lived some kind of elaborate deception. And it turns

0:03:00.916 --> 0:03:04.036
<v Speaker 1>out I found a piece in the Harvard Crimson about

0:03:04.036 --> 0:03:06.356
<v Speaker 1>a woman named Esther Reid. I mean, this was just

0:03:06.436 --> 0:03:08.956
<v Speaker 1>kind of the tip of the iceberg, and so started

0:03:08.996 --> 0:03:12.276
<v Speaker 1>going down that path of like where else did she

0:03:12.436 --> 0:03:15.636
<v Speaker 1>go and who else was she? And yeah, that kind

0:03:15.636 --> 0:03:19.236
<v Speaker 1>of opened the rabbit's hole, and because of those years ago,

0:03:19.956 --> 0:03:22.516
<v Speaker 1>you had this kind of tantalizing lead. But then there

0:03:22.556 --> 0:03:24.636
<v Speaker 1>was this whole question of like, who is this person

0:03:24.716 --> 0:03:27.196
<v Speaker 1>now and would she talk to you? And why would

0:03:27.276 --> 0:03:29.556
<v Speaker 1>she ever talk to you. I wrote this kind of

0:03:29.636 --> 0:03:32.756
<v Speaker 1>generic letter saying who I was, and then I got

0:03:32.796 --> 0:03:37.156
<v Speaker 1>a callback from Esther And this is a bit of

0:03:37.156 --> 0:03:41.276
<v Speaker 1>a spoiler if you haven't gotten through episode six, but

0:03:41.876 --> 0:03:44.956
<v Speaker 1>she told me that yes, I'm now I go by

0:03:45.076 --> 0:03:48.556
<v Speaker 1>Esther Matthews, and I'm a professor of criminology at Gonzaga University.

0:03:48.996 --> 0:03:54.236
<v Speaker 1>I was like what, And then I just was kind

0:03:54.236 --> 0:03:57.636
<v Speaker 1>of really hooked on all right, this is really unusual woman.

0:03:57.676 --> 0:04:00.516
<v Speaker 1>What is her story? So I flew out to spoken

0:04:00.636 --> 0:04:03.796
<v Speaker 1>where she lives. I rented an airbnb. We set up

0:04:03.836 --> 0:04:06.036
<v Speaker 1>like a little studio in the living room of the airbnb,

0:04:06.716 --> 0:04:09.716
<v Speaker 1>and I just said, okay, like let's start talking. Tell

0:04:09.756 --> 0:04:12.596
<v Speaker 1>me your story. And this is kind of how it began.

0:04:13.836 --> 0:04:16.316
<v Speaker 1>This is a story about a young woman who ran

0:04:16.356 --> 0:04:20.036
<v Speaker 1>away from home. At least that's how it all started.

0:04:20.596 --> 0:04:22.476
<v Speaker 1>I think people think that I had this master plan

0:04:22.516 --> 0:04:24.716
<v Speaker 1>and I went out and did it, and like, you know,

0:04:24.796 --> 0:04:29.196
<v Speaker 1>like it's not fun, right, You're constantly scared, you have

0:04:29.236 --> 0:04:31.436
<v Speaker 1>no support, you have no one to talk to, which

0:04:31.476 --> 0:04:34.556
<v Speaker 1>is part of the reason it got so carried away.

0:04:34.596 --> 0:04:38.436
<v Speaker 1>Like if I had just talked to somebody, they would

0:04:38.436 --> 0:04:42.156
<v Speaker 1>have been like this is crazy. Along the way, there

0:04:42.156 --> 0:04:44.676
<v Speaker 1>were plenty of moments where she could have stopped running,

0:04:45.436 --> 0:04:49.796
<v Speaker 1>but she didn't. Sort of like I got on a

0:04:49.876 --> 0:04:53.916
<v Speaker 1>train track. There was clearly the wrong train track, and like,

0:04:54.036 --> 0:04:57.276
<v Speaker 1>my train is running away, and at some point you're

0:04:57.276 --> 0:04:59.676
<v Speaker 1>not thinking crap, how do we get off this train track?

0:04:59.716 --> 0:05:02.116
<v Speaker 1>You're just thinking crap, how do I stop this train

0:05:02.196 --> 0:05:05.076
<v Speaker 1>from like going off the rails. You know, I just

0:05:05.196 --> 0:05:08.516
<v Speaker 1>kept making horrible decision after horrible decision after horrible decision,

0:05:09.596 --> 0:05:12.116
<v Speaker 1>just trying to keep the train from crashing and killing

0:05:12.116 --> 0:05:19.236
<v Speaker 1>me at that point. So there's a lot of reflection

0:05:19.516 --> 0:05:22.636
<v Speaker 1>in Esther's voice, and you can tell that she's still

0:05:22.676 --> 0:05:26.236
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with the emotions she has, and the memories are

0:05:26.276 --> 0:05:29.556
<v Speaker 1>mixed in with how difficult and experience she had in

0:05:29.716 --> 0:05:32.676
<v Speaker 1>this past that you're excavating with her. Why did she

0:05:32.756 --> 0:05:37.076
<v Speaker 1>decide to talk to you? I think so at that point,

0:05:37.116 --> 0:05:40.116
<v Speaker 1>and as I say in the podcast, she was Professor

0:05:40.236 --> 0:05:44.276
<v Speaker 1>Esther Matthews. Almost no one at her university or in

0:05:44.316 --> 0:05:47.596
<v Speaker 1>this town knew that she was also this kind of

0:05:47.636 --> 0:05:52.556
<v Speaker 1>notorious figure from the tabloids, Esther Reid. But she lived

0:05:52.996 --> 0:05:55.316
<v Speaker 1>under this kind of specter of fear that someone was

0:05:55.316 --> 0:05:58.756
<v Speaker 1>going to eventually put the dots together, and that she felt,

0:05:58.756 --> 0:06:01.396
<v Speaker 1>if that was going to happen, why not do it

0:06:01.396 --> 0:06:03.396
<v Speaker 1>on my own terms and just kind of be out

0:06:03.396 --> 0:06:05.436
<v Speaker 1>in front of it, especially because she had had such

0:06:05.516 --> 0:06:08.156
<v Speaker 1>poor treatment in the media before. So I think there

0:06:08.196 --> 0:06:09.796
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a timing thing where she said, I've

0:06:09.796 --> 0:06:14.396
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about doing this. She knew that she knew

0:06:14.436 --> 0:06:18.596
<v Speaker 1>that that John Campbell had visited her LinkedIn page. She

0:06:18.716 --> 0:06:23.036
<v Speaker 1>knew that people would sometimes kind of poke around, and

0:06:23.116 --> 0:06:27.076
<v Speaker 1>so I think she just said, let's do this. We

0:06:27.196 --> 0:06:29.156
<v Speaker 1>had one of these discussions and Emily, you know, we

0:06:29.476 --> 0:06:31.596
<v Speaker 1>talked about this all the time on our runs, where

0:06:31.756 --> 0:06:34.236
<v Speaker 1>someone says they'll talk and then they say, oh this

0:06:34.316 --> 0:06:36.196
<v Speaker 1>is off limits and that's off limits and you can't

0:06:36.236 --> 0:06:39.716
<v Speaker 1>call them, and and I was waiting for that, and

0:06:39.756 --> 0:06:41.596
<v Speaker 1>she said, kind of got out in front of it,

0:06:41.636 --> 0:06:43.596
<v Speaker 1>and she said, look, I know you're going to want

0:06:43.596 --> 0:06:45.676
<v Speaker 1>to talk to other people. I'm not going to try

0:06:45.716 --> 0:06:49.036
<v Speaker 1>to control who you talk to. Look, you got to

0:06:49.116 --> 0:06:51.236
<v Speaker 1>do what you have to do. And that gave me

0:06:51.316 --> 0:06:53.276
<v Speaker 1>some confidence that I was going to be dealing with

0:06:53.316 --> 0:06:57.356
<v Speaker 1>someone who understood the process of what would be involved.

0:06:57.356 --> 0:06:59.316
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's a short answer is timing.

0:07:00.196 --> 0:07:03.636
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned John Campbell, who's the detective in this story,

0:07:03.756 --> 0:07:05.996
<v Speaker 1>and we made I think, kind of an unusual decision

0:07:06.196 --> 0:07:09.676
<v Speaker 1>to really start the podcast with him. I mean, Esther's

0:07:09.756 --> 0:07:12.196
<v Speaker 1>voice shows up early, but then you really moved to

0:07:12.276 --> 0:07:17.716
<v Speaker 1>his perspective, and he's not originally investigating Esther's disappearance. He's

0:07:17.756 --> 0:07:21.276
<v Speaker 1>investigating the disappearance of another young woman. Right. Yeah, he's

0:07:21.316 --> 0:07:24.836
<v Speaker 1>investigating the disappearance of a woman named Brooke Henson who

0:07:24.916 --> 0:07:28.716
<v Speaker 1>disappeared from the small town of Traveler's Rest, and he

0:07:28.796 --> 0:07:31.196
<v Speaker 1>wants to get to the bottom of this. But she

0:07:31.436 --> 0:07:34.596
<v Speaker 1>is vanished, and he hasn't given up on the case,

0:07:34.756 --> 0:07:37.956
<v Speaker 1>but he is the light is dim that he's going

0:07:37.996 --> 0:07:40.316
<v Speaker 1>to get to the answer and then whatever it is.

0:07:40.316 --> 0:07:42.036
<v Speaker 1>Six or seven years later, he gets a call from

0:07:42.036 --> 0:07:45.956
<v Speaker 1>New York saying, I think I found your woman, Brooke Henson.

0:07:46.036 --> 0:07:49.116
<v Speaker 1>She's a student at Columbia University. And of course it's

0:07:49.156 --> 0:07:52.836
<v Speaker 1>not really Brooke, it's Esther. But this leads him on

0:07:52.876 --> 0:07:57.316
<v Speaker 1>this quest to pursue Esther. And I'll just say I

0:07:57.396 --> 0:08:01.356
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk to John. I called him up. He said,

0:08:01.356 --> 0:08:03.916
<v Speaker 1>coming down and chat. And I really wasn't sure what

0:08:03.996 --> 0:08:06.396
<v Speaker 1>to expect when I retire. I can't wait to put

0:08:06.396 --> 0:08:09.276
<v Speaker 1>this in a drawer. I mean, this is a that's

0:08:09.316 --> 0:08:11.196
<v Speaker 1>the thing I banged my elbow on all the time.

0:08:12.716 --> 0:08:15.196
<v Speaker 1>So it's not about carry a gun. I carry gun

0:08:15.196 --> 0:08:17.276
<v Speaker 1>because we have to. I'd rather be like Andy Griffith

0:08:17.436 --> 0:08:20.396
<v Speaker 1>and just be sharing for that a gun. And he's

0:08:20.796 --> 0:08:23.996
<v Speaker 1>he's just charming in a way that I was. He's disarming,

0:08:23.996 --> 0:08:26.836
<v Speaker 1>he laughs at himself, he's kind of goofy, and he's

0:08:26.876 --> 0:08:29.956
<v Speaker 1>a good detective, and so I immediately sensed, oh wow,

0:08:29.996 --> 0:08:32.796
<v Speaker 1>this guy is going to be an important kind of

0:08:32.876 --> 0:08:36.236
<v Speaker 1>character in the podcast. Why did he care so much

0:08:36.276 --> 0:08:40.556
<v Speaker 1>about this case? I mean, he really gets preoccupied with it.

0:08:40.676 --> 0:08:42.676
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to use the word obsessed, although

0:08:42.716 --> 0:08:47.076
<v Speaker 1>it's not super respectful, but he's just really intensely driven

0:08:47.116 --> 0:08:49.276
<v Speaker 1>to work on this case. Is there not very much

0:08:49.316 --> 0:08:53.356
<v Speaker 1>interesting crime to solve and Traveler's Rest, well, funny you

0:08:53.396 --> 0:08:56.276
<v Speaker 1>should say that John. I asked John this question. He said, Look,

0:08:57.116 --> 0:09:00.076
<v Speaker 1>Traveler's Rest is like we call it the circle of Wagons.

0:09:00.116 --> 0:09:03.596
<v Speaker 1>It's a few miles across, and our job as constables

0:09:03.716 --> 0:09:08.836
<v Speaker 1>is to push the crime out of the city. And

0:09:09.156 --> 0:09:11.476
<v Speaker 1>that the kind of lawless mountains or what was once

0:09:11.476 --> 0:09:15.316
<v Speaker 1>the lawless Mountains beat a lawless mountains here. This roar

0:09:15.356 --> 0:09:17.676
<v Speaker 1>of a truck would come in and people would pile out,

0:09:17.716 --> 0:09:19.876
<v Speaker 1>and they'd say, we're looking for the law, you know,

0:09:19.956 --> 0:09:22.436
<v Speaker 1>and mountain justice had failed and they had to come

0:09:22.476 --> 0:09:26.756
<v Speaker 1>to into town to find find some law enforcement. And

0:09:26.796 --> 0:09:29.396
<v Speaker 1>so John was basically like within the circle of wagons

0:09:29.396 --> 0:09:33.276
<v Speaker 1>within this town. He felt like that he was a custodianigan,

0:09:33.476 --> 0:09:36.316
<v Speaker 1>someone who was really dependent upon to keep the peace,

0:09:36.876 --> 0:09:39.236
<v Speaker 1>and not a lot did happen, and then this young

0:09:39.276 --> 0:09:45.996
<v Speaker 1>woman vanishes, and I think he feels personally responsible in

0:09:46.036 --> 0:09:47.676
<v Speaker 1>some ways for getting to the bottom of this. And

0:09:48.516 --> 0:09:50.436
<v Speaker 1>you could say it becomes obsessed, but I relate to

0:09:50.476 --> 0:09:53.436
<v Speaker 1>that in a way. It's like you start to get

0:09:53.476 --> 0:09:55.036
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a mystery and you're not going

0:09:55.076 --> 0:09:57.596
<v Speaker 1>to arrest until you get to it. And so he

0:09:57.636 --> 0:10:00.236
<v Speaker 1>just takes it a lot further than most would, right,

0:10:00.396 --> 0:10:03.116
<v Speaker 1>And so he is trying to solve the mystery of

0:10:03.196 --> 0:10:08.316
<v Speaker 1>Brooke Henson's disappearance and esther appears in his story in

0:10:08.396 --> 0:10:11.796
<v Speaker 1>the end almost by accident, because there are different aliases

0:10:11.836 --> 0:10:15.516
<v Speaker 1>that she's grabbing hold of and Brooke is one of them. Right. Yeah,

0:10:15.556 --> 0:10:18.916
<v Speaker 1>So this the thing that's kind of remarkable about the

0:10:18.956 --> 0:10:22.436
<v Speaker 1>story is he gets the call the Brooke Henson is

0:10:22.476 --> 0:10:26.276
<v Speaker 1>actually up in Columbia, right, and he doesn't really it

0:10:26.316 --> 0:10:28.836
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really make sense that she would vanish for seven

0:10:28.916 --> 0:10:32.196
<v Speaker 1>years and then show up at this school, and he

0:10:32.196 --> 0:10:35.396
<v Speaker 1>sends a police officer. The police officer talks to her

0:10:35.996 --> 0:10:38.716
<v Speaker 1>and he presents her with a series of questions that

0:10:38.796 --> 0:10:41.836
<v Speaker 1>only Brooke would know, and she answers most of them successfully,

0:10:42.396 --> 0:10:45.796
<v Speaker 1>and at that point, you know, you would think he

0:10:45.836 --> 0:10:48.596
<v Speaker 1>just lets it go. But this is where his doggedness

0:10:48.636 --> 0:10:52.196
<v Speaker 1>comes in. He says, no, I want DNA, which I

0:10:52.196 --> 0:10:55.916
<v Speaker 1>think I say in the podcast was ballsy, and somehow

0:10:55.956 --> 0:10:58.396
<v Speaker 1>the New York City cop agrees to it, and then

0:10:58.436 --> 0:11:01.916
<v Speaker 1>she runs. So here's what I find fascinating about John. Like,

0:11:02.316 --> 0:11:04.116
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, it was kind of crazy of

0:11:04.196 --> 0:11:07.316
<v Speaker 1>him to push for DNA. On the other hand, his

0:11:07.476 --> 0:11:12.076
<v Speaker 1>hunch was right that it's possible that this person was

0:11:12.196 --> 0:11:15.436
<v Speaker 1>so adept at being an impostor that she knew these

0:11:15.516 --> 0:11:19.356
<v Speaker 1>kind of unknowable answers. And so that's the weird thing

0:11:19.356 --> 0:11:24.916
<v Speaker 1>about being an obsessive investigator is that if occasionally your unreasonable,

0:11:24.996 --> 0:11:29.116
<v Speaker 1>obsessive hunch is spot on, then you're going to follow

0:11:29.156 --> 0:11:30.876
<v Speaker 1>it at least the next time or maybe the time

0:11:30.916 --> 0:11:33.796
<v Speaker 1>after that, because you have positive confirmation that you are

0:11:33.876 --> 0:11:37.116
<v Speaker 1>right to be obsessed. And so to me, that was

0:11:37.156 --> 0:11:39.716
<v Speaker 1>a part of John that I could relate to and

0:11:39.716 --> 0:11:43.116
<v Speaker 1>that I understood. I think it's just he was on

0:11:43.116 --> 0:11:45.316
<v Speaker 1>his own train, you know. Esther says, she's on her train,

0:11:45.516 --> 0:11:47.316
<v Speaker 1>he's on his train, and it's not so easy to

0:11:47.356 --> 0:11:52.316
<v Speaker 1>get off of that. Yeah. So there are lots of podcasts,

0:11:52.556 --> 0:11:56.916
<v Speaker 1>especially movies, books in the genre of true crime. Right

0:11:56.956 --> 0:12:00.276
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a national pastime right now to follow

0:12:00.316 --> 0:12:02.716
<v Speaker 1>some of these cases. There are different choices. You get

0:12:02.796 --> 0:12:05.436
<v Speaker 1>kind of hooked on a narrative. I find that podcasts

0:12:05.436 --> 0:12:09.676
<v Speaker 1>are an especially like engrossing way to enter stories and

0:12:09.796 --> 0:12:13.516
<v Speaker 1>become absorbed in them. Are there any ethical issues that

0:12:13.596 --> 0:12:17.956
<v Speaker 1>arise in this area of reporting? I mean, you're really

0:12:17.996 --> 0:12:21.236
<v Speaker 1>digging into people's lives. These are things that happened a

0:12:21.276 --> 0:12:25.516
<v Speaker 1>long time ago to real people. How do you think

0:12:25.516 --> 0:12:28.236
<v Speaker 1>about that with the story like this? Yeah, I mean

0:12:28.436 --> 0:12:30.796
<v Speaker 1>I think that you have to ask yourself at some

0:12:31.556 --> 0:12:35.556
<v Speaker 1>level what justifies doing this? Is it? Because if the

0:12:35.596 --> 0:12:40.116
<v Speaker 1>answer is strictly entertainment, then I don't think you can

0:12:40.156 --> 0:12:43.916
<v Speaker 1>do it. And so there were a few things that

0:12:43.996 --> 0:12:47.876
<v Speaker 1>I grappled with. One was I talked to this guy,

0:12:47.916 --> 0:12:50.796
<v Speaker 1>ben Ford, who is the chief of police, the current

0:12:50.836 --> 0:12:53.796
<v Speaker 1>chief of police down and Traveler's Rest, who is doing,

0:12:54.196 --> 0:12:56.556
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, a very hard and

0:12:56.596 --> 0:12:58.756
<v Speaker 1>earnest job of still trying to find out what happened

0:12:58.796 --> 0:13:01.716
<v Speaker 1>to Brooke And this is a weird thing. This is

0:13:01.716 --> 0:13:04.276
<v Speaker 1>the only time that's ever happened to me. I interviewed

0:13:04.516 --> 0:13:07.196
<v Speaker 1>John Campbell and or I was about I hadn't even

0:13:07.196 --> 0:13:09.876
<v Speaker 1>interviewed I hadn't even gone to Traveler's Rest yet. And

0:13:09.916 --> 0:13:12.556
<v Speaker 1>I got a message, Jake, this is Ben Ford of

0:13:12.596 --> 0:13:15.196
<v Speaker 1>the Traveler's Rest Police Department. I would like to talk

0:13:15.196 --> 0:13:17.076
<v Speaker 1>to you. And that was because he knew you were

0:13:17.116 --> 0:13:18.916
<v Speaker 1>trying to get in touch with John Gimpbell. He got

0:13:18.996 --> 0:13:20.916
<v Speaker 1>word that I might be doing a story related to

0:13:20.916 --> 0:13:23.676
<v Speaker 1>Brooke Henson say. So I was like, this is weird.

0:13:23.756 --> 0:13:27.516
<v Speaker 1>Like usually on any kind of active investigation with law enforcement,

0:13:27.516 --> 0:13:30.156
<v Speaker 1>as you know, it's like they generally very leery of

0:13:30.156 --> 0:13:32.636
<v Speaker 1>the press. And so I called him and he said, look,

0:13:33.676 --> 0:13:37.356
<v Speaker 1>I'm running an active investigation. If you can get the

0:13:37.356 --> 0:13:39.316
<v Speaker 1>word out about the facts about what we know when

0:13:39.356 --> 0:13:42.436
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I'd be very appreciative. I will share with

0:13:42.476 --> 0:13:45.276
<v Speaker 1>you whatever I've got. So that was encouraging to me

0:13:45.316 --> 0:13:47.556
<v Speaker 1>because I felt like, oh, maybe there's a public service here.

0:13:47.596 --> 0:13:50.556
<v Speaker 1>And then I got in touch with a woman that

0:13:50.676 --> 0:13:53.316
<v Speaker 1>looked for missing people, and then she put me in

0:13:53.316 --> 0:13:57.476
<v Speaker 1>touch with Brook's cousins, and I just asked them straight up.

0:13:57.636 --> 0:14:00.716
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is this something you're comfortable with? And

0:14:00.796 --> 0:14:05.036
<v Speaker 1>they basically said, look, we still want to find her remains,

0:14:05.676 --> 0:14:08.716
<v Speaker 1>we're hopeful that maybe this will help, and we're also

0:14:08.756 --> 0:14:12.836
<v Speaker 1>just that she's not forgotten. And we had that conversation

0:14:12.956 --> 0:14:15.676
<v Speaker 1>and we revisited that in the fact checking part. I

0:14:15.756 --> 0:14:19.436
<v Speaker 1>ran back overall with every aspect of it with them.

0:14:20.236 --> 0:14:23.076
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I was thinking a lot about that and

0:14:23.156 --> 0:14:25.996
<v Speaker 1>the second part and we'll get to this is Esther's

0:14:26.076 --> 0:14:29.716
<v Speaker 1>treatment in the medium and revisiting that, and I felt

0:14:29.716 --> 0:14:33.156
<v Speaker 1>like there's a place where we can do a good,

0:14:33.196 --> 0:14:37.036
<v Speaker 1>hard look at the way this was played out, and

0:14:37.076 --> 0:14:38.756
<v Speaker 1>by taking a second look at it, there may be

0:14:38.836 --> 0:14:41.876
<v Speaker 1>some good that served from this. So it was as

0:14:41.916 --> 0:14:43.916
<v Speaker 1>I was grappling with this kind of looking at those

0:14:43.916 --> 0:14:46.076
<v Speaker 1>other things, that said, you know what, I think there

0:14:46.156 --> 0:14:49.316
<v Speaker 1>is value here in kind of telling the story well.

0:14:49.316 --> 0:14:52.196
<v Speaker 1>And some of this comes down again to timing, right,

0:14:52.276 --> 0:14:54.836
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about that earlier. But when you have

0:14:54.916 --> 0:14:57.636
<v Speaker 1>a cold case like this and a family that is

0:14:57.636 --> 0:15:04.156
<v Speaker 1>still wants to know answers, interest from reporters, podcasters can

0:15:04.196 --> 0:15:06.436
<v Speaker 1>be welcome in a way that it might well not

0:15:06.596 --> 0:15:09.116
<v Speaker 1>have been in the moment, right, this isn't a new story,

0:15:09.116 --> 0:15:11.796
<v Speaker 1>worry anymore. It was a big news story. Yeah, so

0:15:12.516 --> 0:15:16.236
<v Speaker 1>you're coming in at a different time. Yeah, the dust

0:15:16.316 --> 0:15:18.436
<v Speaker 1>is settled a bit. I mean, Esther is able to

0:15:18.436 --> 0:15:21.916
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. I mean there's good and bad from that.

0:15:23.436 --> 0:15:25.836
<v Speaker 1>The hard part is it time has passed, so sometimes

0:15:25.876 --> 0:15:27.556
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get people to remember what they were

0:15:27.556 --> 0:15:30.316
<v Speaker 1>thinking and feeling at the time. Another hard part is

0:15:30.316 --> 0:15:32.636
<v Speaker 1>if they were burned by the media, they don't want

0:15:32.636 --> 0:15:34.156
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you, and you have to spend a

0:15:34.196 --> 0:15:35.996
<v Speaker 1>lot of time explaining this is not going to be

0:15:36.036 --> 0:15:40.756
<v Speaker 1>a tabloid treatment of this. But yeah, it's nice to

0:15:40.796 --> 0:15:43.156
<v Speaker 1>be like talking about the Secret Service. I mean, I've

0:15:43.156 --> 0:15:44.996
<v Speaker 1>tried to do with the Secret Service before. The Secret

0:15:44.996 --> 0:15:47.796
<v Speaker 1>Service never talks in my experience, and I got don

0:15:47.916 --> 0:15:49.796
<v Speaker 1>long and basically as at she was like, it's like

0:15:49.836 --> 0:15:52.836
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I'll talk to you, you know, And so yeah,

0:15:52.876 --> 0:15:55.596
<v Speaker 1>there were some definite benefits as well. How did the

0:15:55.636 --> 0:15:59.876
<v Speaker 1>media cover Ester's disappearance once they knew she was missing? Well,

0:16:00.276 --> 0:16:02.676
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny because when I first saw the

0:16:02.716 --> 0:16:05.596
<v Speaker 1>media coverage that this story got back in the day,

0:16:05.836 --> 0:16:07.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, how this is you kind of

0:16:07.556 --> 0:16:09.756
<v Speaker 1>think like this or story has been poured it out

0:16:10.076 --> 0:16:13.836
<v Speaker 1>like I'm late to the party, right, And so but

0:16:13.876 --> 0:16:16.156
<v Speaker 1>then I started taking a look a closer look at

0:16:16.156 --> 0:16:20.516
<v Speaker 1>the way it was reported out, and it was basically

0:16:20.556 --> 0:16:23.716
<v Speaker 1>like you know, fem fatale, It was, you know, very

0:16:23.756 --> 0:16:25.756
<v Speaker 1>much not what you're hearing her say in the opening,

0:16:25.796 --> 0:16:28.156
<v Speaker 1>that she kind of embarked on this path in which

0:16:28.196 --> 0:16:32.076
<v Speaker 1>she kind of was making incrementally bad decisions and was

0:16:32.156 --> 0:16:34.556
<v Speaker 1>we learned in the podcast was dealing with mental health

0:16:34.556 --> 0:16:38.116
<v Speaker 1>and all this that you know, she's portrayed as like

0:16:38.236 --> 0:16:41.316
<v Speaker 1>almost like a Bond villain, you know, as someone who's

0:16:41.316 --> 0:16:44.156
<v Speaker 1>seducing People's a kind of female version of Catch me

0:16:44.196 --> 0:16:46.356
<v Speaker 1>if you can. In fact, that was the play on

0:16:45.956 --> 0:16:50.676
<v Speaker 1>the forty eight Hours version of this. And so the

0:16:50.676 --> 0:16:52.636
<v Speaker 1>thinking is, Okay, is there a way to re examine

0:16:52.636 --> 0:16:53.996
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean you let her off the hook. It

0:16:53.996 --> 0:16:55.716
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you give her a pass for the laws

0:16:55.756 --> 0:16:58.356
<v Speaker 1>that she broke, But can you look at this and

0:16:58.396 --> 0:17:01.996
<v Speaker 1>see maybe there's a more nuanced portrayal of a real

0:17:02.076 --> 0:17:05.236
<v Speaker 1>human being here and not just the kind of cardboard cutout.

0:17:06.876 --> 0:17:09.516
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back,

0:17:24.236 --> 0:17:27.836
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. After we grab some drinks and mingled with

0:17:27.876 --> 0:17:31.556
<v Speaker 1>the crowd, I turned the tables on Emily asked her

0:17:31.596 --> 0:17:35.996
<v Speaker 1>some questions because we do similar work. She often reports

0:17:35.996 --> 0:17:38.836
<v Speaker 1>on criminal justice for the New York Times magazine and

0:17:38.956 --> 0:17:41.756
<v Speaker 1>finds her way into all kinds of interesting and convoluted

0:17:41.836 --> 0:17:45.836
<v Speaker 1>true crime stories. And there's one in particular that I

0:17:45.876 --> 0:17:48.396
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk to her about, a story that Emily

0:17:48.476 --> 0:17:52.156
<v Speaker 1>spent years reporting on. It involves a young woman named

0:17:52.196 --> 0:17:56.556
<v Speaker 1>Nora Jackson. Nora was convicted as a teenager of killing

0:17:56.556 --> 0:17:59.916
<v Speaker 1>her own mother. She spent several years in prison, and

0:17:59.956 --> 0:18:04.276
<v Speaker 1>then one day her conviction was overturned. Emily became interested

0:18:04.636 --> 0:18:07.516
<v Speaker 1>in how someone like this happens and the role of

0:18:07.556 --> 0:18:11.956
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor, a woman named Amy Wyrick. Emily wrote about

0:18:11.996 --> 0:18:14.756
<v Speaker 1>Norah's case for the New York Times magazine. Her story

0:18:14.796 --> 0:18:17.916
<v Speaker 1>also appeared in Emily's book Charged. You should check them out.

0:18:18.076 --> 0:18:21.316
<v Speaker 1>We've included links to both in our show notes. Okay,

0:18:21.356 --> 0:18:27.996
<v Speaker 1>back to our conversation, and I'm wondering whether Emily, you

0:18:28.036 --> 0:18:31.036
<v Speaker 1>can just kind of turn back the clock and help

0:18:31.876 --> 0:18:34.316
<v Speaker 1>remind me and us how did you get drawn to

0:18:34.436 --> 0:18:37.676
<v Speaker 1>this story? What did you know initially, and what made

0:18:37.716 --> 0:18:39.516
<v Speaker 1>you think that this was a story you wanted to write.

0:18:40.316 --> 0:18:43.796
<v Speaker 1>So you are a story person who starts with like

0:18:43.876 --> 0:18:48.556
<v Speaker 1>a good sizzly concept of people who faked their ideas

0:18:48.556 --> 0:18:51.676
<v Speaker 1>to go to college. I often, to my detriment, are

0:18:51.756 --> 0:18:54.676
<v Speaker 1>more of an ideas person. And I was interested several

0:18:54.716 --> 0:18:59.996
<v Speaker 1>years ago in prosecutors who had a pattern of breaking

0:18:59.996 --> 0:19:03.636
<v Speaker 1>the rules in a way that harmed the people who

0:19:03.676 --> 0:19:10.436
<v Speaker 1>they were charged with. Prosecuting prosecutors obviously prosecute cases, but

0:19:10.436 --> 0:19:13.636
<v Speaker 1>they're also supposed to be a kind of arbiter of

0:19:13.716 --> 0:19:16.076
<v Speaker 1>justice in their own way. They represent the people. They

0:19:16.116 --> 0:19:20.956
<v Speaker 1>also have responsibilities to uphold all the laws and rules

0:19:20.956 --> 0:19:22.596
<v Speaker 1>in the justice system. And I was interested in the

0:19:22.596 --> 0:19:26.116
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors who cut corners. So there was a prosecutor I

0:19:26.156 --> 0:19:27.996
<v Speaker 1>did a little research. I was like looking around the

0:19:27.996 --> 0:19:31.476
<v Speaker 1>country for a kind of rose gallery of prosecutors. Frankly,

0:19:31.596 --> 0:19:35.396
<v Speaker 1>and at the time, the district attorney in Memphis, which

0:19:35.436 --> 0:19:38.476
<v Speaker 1>is Shelby County, her name was Amy Wyrick, and she

0:19:38.636 --> 0:19:41.996
<v Speaker 1>had a real pattern of failing to disclose evidence in

0:19:42.516 --> 0:19:46.636
<v Speaker 1>cases in which she'd gotten, you know, big convictions, and

0:19:46.956 --> 0:19:50.276
<v Speaker 1>Nora Jackson's case. Once I was like in that world

0:19:50.596 --> 0:19:54.276
<v Speaker 1>jumped out at me, you know, for some similar reasons

0:19:54.276 --> 0:19:57.076
<v Speaker 1>to why you were interested in esther. So, when Nora

0:19:57.276 --> 0:20:01.036
<v Speaker 1>was eighteen, her mother was brutally stabbed death in her home.

0:20:01.276 --> 0:20:04.356
<v Speaker 1>And her mother was a forty year old white stockbroker,

0:20:04.436 --> 0:20:07.676
<v Speaker 1>so it was like an unusual murder and the kind

0:20:07.676 --> 0:20:11.396
<v Speaker 1>of murder that is destab realizing to you know, white

0:20:11.436 --> 0:20:15.676
<v Speaker 1>middle class residence. There was no obvious suspect, and about

0:20:15.676 --> 0:20:19.596
<v Speaker 1>three months after the murder, Amy Wireck charged Nora, the

0:20:19.636 --> 0:20:23.796
<v Speaker 1>eighteen year old daughter, with her mother's killing. Nora didn't

0:20:23.796 --> 0:20:26.236
<v Speaker 1>have a criminal history, but she was known as a

0:20:26.316 --> 0:20:33.516
<v Speaker 1>kind of wild child, and the charges were brought and

0:20:33.636 --> 0:20:36.156
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of publicity, and then a few

0:20:36.196 --> 0:20:39.596
<v Speaker 1>months later the DNA results came back from the crime scene.

0:20:39.796 --> 0:20:42.116
<v Speaker 1>You know, her mother's blood was everywhere, so there was

0:20:42.116 --> 0:20:44.716
<v Speaker 1>a lot of evidence to test, and in fact, Nora

0:20:44.876 --> 0:20:49.356
<v Speaker 1>was excluded as someone who was part of that crime

0:20:49.396 --> 0:20:52.716
<v Speaker 1>scene in any way, and there were other DNA profiles. However,

0:20:53.596 --> 0:20:57.436
<v Speaker 1>Wyreck prosecuted her anyway, and for a variety of reasons,

0:20:57.516 --> 0:21:02.396
<v Speaker 1>including what was later deemed misconduct on Wyreck's part, Nora

0:21:02.516 --> 0:21:08.516
<v Speaker 1>was convicted and then later the Tennessee Supreme Court actually

0:21:08.516 --> 0:21:11.436
<v Speaker 1>overturned her conviction, and I think we have a little

0:21:11.636 --> 0:21:14.516
<v Speaker 1>clip of Nora talking about finding out about that ruling.

0:21:15.756 --> 0:21:19.436
<v Speaker 1>Three years ago, in a woman's prison outside Memphis, Tennessee,

0:21:19.716 --> 0:21:23.956
<v Speaker 1>Nora Jackson was sitting in her cell watching television en mute.

0:21:23.996 --> 0:21:25.716
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'd have three one three two and three

0:21:25.756 --> 0:21:27.636
<v Speaker 1>three and three dash two is just like a repeat

0:21:27.676 --> 0:21:30.116
<v Speaker 1>of the news in the weather. Her roommate was in

0:21:30.156 --> 0:21:33.396
<v Speaker 1>the cafeteria and Nora wanted to get some privacy. And

0:21:33.436 --> 0:21:36.076
<v Speaker 1>I just was sitting there going to the bathroom and

0:21:36.196 --> 0:21:38.476
<v Speaker 1>just like watching it, and I saw my name come

0:21:38.476 --> 0:21:41.996
<v Speaker 1>across the bottom of the screen and then I was like,

0:21:42.076 --> 0:21:45.676
<v Speaker 1>oh shit. So she turns on the volume. The Tennessee

0:21:45.676 --> 0:21:49.116
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court has granted Norah Jackson a new trial, and

0:21:49.196 --> 0:21:52.156
<v Speaker 1>she just, honestly, for a few minutes, couldn't believe it.

0:21:52.556 --> 0:21:55.596
<v Speaker 1>Nora Jackson is now awaiting a new trial. And even

0:21:55.636 --> 0:21:59.836
<v Speaker 1>though Nora had just won her appeal, something that rarely

0:21:59.956 --> 0:22:02.076
<v Speaker 1>happens in the state of Tennessee. This is after she

0:22:02.116 --> 0:22:05.556
<v Speaker 1>has spent nine years in prison. Emily Basilon has been

0:22:05.556 --> 0:22:08.796
<v Speaker 1>covering the case and like nobody was there because everybody

0:22:09.236 --> 0:22:12.476
<v Speaker 1>that dinner so I'm like screaming to get out because

0:22:12.516 --> 0:22:15.356
<v Speaker 1>I'm like wanting to get to the phone and nobody's

0:22:15.396 --> 0:22:18.756
<v Speaker 1>there missing. Is something going to eat them? Right? And

0:22:19.756 --> 0:22:23.516
<v Speaker 1>why was Norah in prison in the first place. Nora

0:22:23.716 --> 0:22:26.436
<v Speaker 1>was in prison because she was convicted of murdering her

0:22:26.436 --> 0:22:33.236
<v Speaker 1>mother Jennifer Jackson. Wow, that's an episode of The Daily

0:22:33.316 --> 0:22:36.116
<v Speaker 1>and that was I think Mike Barbarrow somehow like sounds

0:22:36.156 --> 0:22:40.676
<v Speaker 1>different now to me anyway, So go ahead, I want

0:22:40.676 --> 0:22:42.996
<v Speaker 1>to ask you a question as you're telling the stories.

0:22:43.036 --> 0:22:48.676
<v Speaker 1>So she charges Amy Rick, charges Norah with the murder

0:22:48.676 --> 0:22:50.876
<v Speaker 1>of her mother, and then you said, some period of

0:22:50.916 --> 0:22:54.116
<v Speaker 1>time later it comes out that the DNA was excluded.

0:22:54.156 --> 0:22:56.476
<v Speaker 1>So what is the sequence of events? Does she have

0:22:56.636 --> 0:23:01.196
<v Speaker 1>that DNA evidence when she makes the charge. No, Wyrick

0:23:01.316 --> 0:23:04.036
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the DNA results from the crime lab. You

0:23:04.116 --> 0:23:06.756
<v Speaker 1>might wonder why she didn't wait for them to come back. Yes,

0:23:06.836 --> 0:23:10.756
<v Speaker 1>I am wondering, Yes she didn't, but they were available,

0:23:11.196 --> 0:23:13.116
<v Speaker 1>They were part of the record. They were part of

0:23:13.116 --> 0:23:15.916
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that the jury heard, and the jury convicted

0:23:15.996 --> 0:23:20.236
<v Speaker 1>Nora anyway, And I think there are a few explanations

0:23:20.276 --> 0:23:22.836
<v Speaker 1>for that. One was the kind of failed strategy of

0:23:22.876 --> 0:23:25.916
<v Speaker 1>her defense lawyer and that didn't go very well. And

0:23:26.036 --> 0:23:30.596
<v Speaker 1>also the judge in the case admitted people saying all

0:23:30.796 --> 0:23:36.196
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stuff about Nora, like, for example, that you know,

0:23:36.236 --> 0:23:39.356
<v Speaker 1>her boyfriend had crawled in the window just you know,

0:23:39.436 --> 0:23:41.716
<v Speaker 1>one night to have sex with her a couple months

0:23:41.756 --> 0:23:44.996
<v Speaker 1>after her mother was killed. Just all of this irrelevant

0:23:45.196 --> 0:23:50.556
<v Speaker 1>but kind of scurrilous character assassination evidence, and perhaps that

0:23:50.676 --> 0:23:53.356
<v Speaker 1>had an effect on the jury. As you're talking about

0:23:54.116 --> 0:23:57.716
<v Speaker 1>the chargers being placed before the DNA evidence comes back,

0:23:57.756 --> 0:23:59.596
<v Speaker 1>it almost makes me think of a version of the

0:23:59.636 --> 0:24:01.476
<v Speaker 1>media getting out in front of the story that you

0:24:01.476 --> 0:24:03.596
<v Speaker 1>have an idea that this is who this person is,

0:24:03.596 --> 0:24:06.116
<v Speaker 1>they've done this, and then what happens when you find

0:24:06.156 --> 0:24:09.716
<v Speaker 1>evidence that might or ought to give you pause about

0:24:09.756 --> 0:24:13.276
<v Speaker 1>the theories that you've postulated prior to having that evidence. Yeah,

0:24:13.356 --> 0:24:15.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, one way to think about this

0:24:15.676 --> 0:24:19.676
<v Speaker 1>is tunnel vision for prosecutors that once they've chosen someone,

0:24:20.036 --> 0:24:24.556
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of impetus, confirmation bias, professional reasons to

0:24:24.636 --> 0:24:27.876
<v Speaker 1>kind of stick with that person as the suspect. And

0:24:27.956 --> 0:24:31.156
<v Speaker 1>that is in fact what happened to Nora. So after

0:24:31.196 --> 0:24:35.636
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Supreme Court overturned her conviction. She had a

0:24:35.756 --> 0:24:38.716
<v Speaker 1>kind of second round of like a prolonged kind of

0:24:38.716 --> 0:24:41.716
<v Speaker 1>face off with Amy Wyrick because Wireck was threatening to

0:24:41.756 --> 0:24:46.236
<v Speaker 1>prosecute her again and in order to get a plea bargain,

0:24:46.716 --> 0:24:50.596
<v Speaker 1>and Norah ended up accepting a plea bargain to manslaughter

0:24:50.836 --> 0:24:53.676
<v Speaker 1>because she thought she was going to get out of prison.

0:24:54.116 --> 0:24:56.916
<v Speaker 1>But then it turned out that her lawyers had made

0:24:56.956 --> 0:25:00.316
<v Speaker 1>a mistake in calculating her time and that she actually

0:25:00.356 --> 0:25:03.876
<v Speaker 1>had to remain in prison for fourteen months. So that

0:25:04.076 --> 0:25:08.476
<v Speaker 1>was completely horrible because first of all, she had she'd

0:25:08.476 --> 0:25:11.276
<v Speaker 1>already been in prison I think at that point for

0:25:11.556 --> 0:25:17.116
<v Speaker 1>nine years, and also it was socially for her, really horrible.

0:25:17.276 --> 0:25:19.956
<v Speaker 1>Her world were people in prison who saw her as

0:25:20.036 --> 0:25:22.556
<v Speaker 1>kind of heroic for standing up to Amy Wyrick. You know,

0:25:22.596 --> 0:25:26.356
<v Speaker 1>all these women in prison, so rare to have, especially

0:25:26.356 --> 0:25:29.876
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee, to have your sentence, your conviction overturned. But

0:25:29.916 --> 0:25:32.876
<v Speaker 1>then she had taken this plea, she'd kind of given

0:25:32.916 --> 0:25:35.716
<v Speaker 1>in in their eyes, and she was back among them,

0:25:35.756 --> 0:25:38.396
<v Speaker 1>so she hadn't even gotten what she thought she was

0:25:38.396 --> 0:25:41.556
<v Speaker 1>going to get. So that happened to be the point

0:25:41.596 --> 0:25:44.516
<v Speaker 1>when I kind of stumbled on this story and I

0:25:44.556 --> 0:25:47.836
<v Speaker 1>wrote Nora a letter in prison. I wrote her a

0:25:47.876 --> 0:25:50.796
<v Speaker 1>bunch of letters, and she wrote back to me a

0:25:50.796 --> 0:25:53.956
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, but I wasn't really sure whether she

0:25:53.996 --> 0:25:55.716
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk to me, and it actually took me

0:25:55.836 --> 0:25:59.236
<v Speaker 1>ten months to persuade her to meet with me. How

0:25:59.276 --> 0:26:02.436
<v Speaker 1>did you do that? I called her on the phone

0:26:03.876 --> 0:26:05.716
<v Speaker 1>and talked to her a couple of times. It was

0:26:05.876 --> 0:26:09.716
<v Speaker 1>very in and out, like she was responsive, then she wasn't,

0:26:10.196 --> 0:26:12.916
<v Speaker 1>And she had all kinds of reasons to mistrust the

0:26:12.956 --> 0:26:16.356
<v Speaker 1>media because by then she'd been the subject of I

0:26:16.356 --> 0:26:19.516
<v Speaker 1>think a twenty twenty special or maybe forty eight hours,

0:26:19.556 --> 0:26:22.916
<v Speaker 1>I think both, and neither of them had been helpful

0:26:22.956 --> 0:26:26.116
<v Speaker 1>to her at all, and in both cases she had

0:26:26.196 --> 0:26:28.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of been led along, or she said she felt

0:26:28.756 --> 0:26:30.836
<v Speaker 1>like she'd been misled, and then it turned into a

0:26:30.956 --> 0:26:36.516
<v Speaker 1>kind of tabloid you know, very who done it and

0:26:36.996 --> 0:26:40.236
<v Speaker 1>kind of implicating her. I mean, in these situations, there's always,

0:26:40.276 --> 0:26:43.916
<v Speaker 1>I always feel like an unspoken kind of agreement that's made,

0:26:43.956 --> 0:26:46.596
<v Speaker 1>Like you have your interest, which is writing the story,

0:26:46.836 --> 0:26:49.516
<v Speaker 1>and she has her own set of interests. Why she

0:26:49.716 --> 0:26:51.956
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decided she wants to speak with you, she's hoping

0:26:52.356 --> 0:26:55.516
<v Speaker 1>that your story will do something for her. What do

0:26:55.556 --> 0:26:58.396
<v Speaker 1>you think that she hoped your story would do and

0:26:58.516 --> 0:27:01.756
<v Speaker 1>did you feel that your story would in fact do that? Well?

0:27:01.756 --> 0:27:03.716
<v Speaker 1>When I first went to see her in prison, and

0:27:03.756 --> 0:27:06.356
<v Speaker 1>actually I went to Memphis, and then she almost decided

0:27:06.396 --> 0:27:08.116
<v Speaker 1>not to see me, but then she changed her mind

0:27:08.156 --> 0:27:10.876
<v Speaker 1>at the last minutely and we sat down in this

0:27:10.916 --> 0:27:13.396
<v Speaker 1>little classroom at um sh At that point, she was

0:27:13.436 --> 0:27:16.356
<v Speaker 1>at the jail, and what she really wanted to tell

0:27:16.356 --> 0:27:20.316
<v Speaker 1>me about were the black women she was imprisoned with,

0:27:20.436 --> 0:27:23.236
<v Speaker 1>and how much worse off they were, and how much

0:27:24.076 --> 0:27:28.156
<v Speaker 1>how strange she felt about the attention she was getting,

0:27:28.676 --> 0:27:32.036
<v Speaker 1>given that there were these people around her she thought

0:27:32.276 --> 0:27:35.676
<v Speaker 1>deserved attention. So it was that same feeling of like,

0:27:35.716 --> 0:27:38.036
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, there are all these cases, Why am

0:27:38.116 --> 0:27:42.276
<v Speaker 1>I focusing on this one particular person and not these

0:27:42.316 --> 0:27:47.596
<v Speaker 1>other people? And I was. She was very firm and

0:27:48.716 --> 0:27:53.956
<v Speaker 1>clear that other people were more deserving of being interviewed,

0:27:54.036 --> 0:27:56.876
<v Speaker 1>and that she felt that there was something wrong about that.

0:27:57.236 --> 0:28:01.756
<v Speaker 1>And so even though it only drew her to me,

0:28:02.076 --> 0:28:04.996
<v Speaker 1>drew me to her more, I didn't change course. There

0:28:05.036 --> 0:28:08.436
<v Speaker 1>was something sort of impressive about that, because she might

0:28:08.476 --> 0:28:12.516
<v Speaker 1>have wanted to keep the attention for herself, and for

0:28:12.556 --> 0:28:15.396
<v Speaker 1>a long time, I think she was very ambivalent. It

0:28:15.436 --> 0:28:19.196
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't until she had been released, until I had

0:28:19.236 --> 0:28:21.916
<v Speaker 1>really been pursuing her for a couple of years that

0:28:22.036 --> 0:28:26.276
<v Speaker 1>she started trusting me, which I totally understand. I think

0:28:26.356 --> 0:28:30.076
<v Speaker 1>that eventually the idea that it was the New York Times,

0:28:30.116 --> 0:28:32.316
<v Speaker 1>it was interested that I was going to be able

0:28:32.316 --> 0:28:35.196
<v Speaker 1>to tell her story in a way that really got

0:28:35.236 --> 0:28:39.356
<v Speaker 1>across the legal complexity and the wrongdoing on the part

0:28:39.356 --> 0:28:43.436
<v Speaker 1>of the prosecution. I think that she cared about that,

0:28:43.996 --> 0:28:47.956
<v Speaker 1>and Amy Wyrick was not interested in talking to me, was,

0:28:48.236 --> 0:28:52.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously very clearly resistant to my doing the story.

0:28:52.836 --> 0:28:55.876
<v Speaker 1>And that also, I think kind of endeared me to

0:28:56.036 --> 0:28:58.236
<v Speaker 1>Norah because she could see it was sort of like

0:28:59.116 --> 0:29:02.116
<v Speaker 1>I was. It was like a different kind of press

0:29:02.276 --> 0:29:05.876
<v Speaker 1>was coming in, and she appreciated that. Eventually, you had

0:29:05.876 --> 0:29:08.916
<v Speaker 1>asked me why I thought that John Campbell was so

0:29:09.836 --> 0:29:13.356
<v Speaker 1>vehemently interested obsessed when it was this case and that

0:29:13.516 --> 0:29:15.676
<v Speaker 1>was driving this. So I'm going to flip the question

0:29:15.676 --> 0:29:20.156
<v Speaker 1>on you. Why did Amy Wyrick double down on this

0:29:20.236 --> 0:29:22.916
<v Speaker 1>case and give so much attention to it? What was

0:29:23.276 --> 0:29:25.916
<v Speaker 1>as best as you could tell, what was her motivation. Well,

0:29:25.956 --> 0:29:29.356
<v Speaker 1>Wyreck tried this case when she was a prosecutor working

0:29:29.516 --> 0:29:33.356
<v Speaker 1>for the elected district attorney in Shelby County, and it

0:29:33.396 --> 0:29:36.636
<v Speaker 1>made her famous. She was on TV news. She was

0:29:36.676 --> 0:29:42.356
<v Speaker 1>this young woman being this very strong in her eyes

0:29:43.036 --> 0:29:46.916
<v Speaker 1>advocate for justice, you know, standing in the place of

0:29:46.956 --> 0:29:52.116
<v Speaker 1>Norah's mother and convicting someone. And it was it's very,

0:29:52.276 --> 0:29:55.316
<v Speaker 1>very unusual for children to actually kill their parents, and

0:29:55.436 --> 0:29:58.836
<v Speaker 1>especially for daughters to kill their mothers. But for Wyreck

0:29:58.956 --> 0:30:01.556
<v Speaker 1>that was only kind of part of the way of

0:30:01.996 --> 0:30:04.916
<v Speaker 1>talking about the case that she was despite all of

0:30:04.956 --> 0:30:08.796
<v Speaker 1>those obstacles, that she was doing it anyway because this

0:30:08.876 --> 0:30:11.796
<v Speaker 1>was justice. She was really that was her line, and

0:30:11.876 --> 0:30:14.916
<v Speaker 1>she wound up being elected district Attorney in Shelby County

0:30:14.956 --> 0:30:19.076
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fourteen. And I think that Nora's case really

0:30:19.116 --> 0:30:22.396
<v Speaker 1>catapulted her into the kind of front of the community

0:30:22.476 --> 0:30:25.196
<v Speaker 1>in a way that was politically helpful to her. It

0:30:25.236 --> 0:30:29.756
<v Speaker 1>seems that the evidence against Nora was extremely circumstantial, But

0:30:29.836 --> 0:30:34.636
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, did you ever have any moments of doubt

0:30:34.716 --> 0:30:39.636
<v Speaker 1>about her innocence? Yeah, I decided that I didn't have

0:30:39.716 --> 0:30:41.956
<v Speaker 1>to know whether she was innocent or not, and I

0:30:42.036 --> 0:30:44.636
<v Speaker 1>kind of set that aside. I mean, Nora would hate

0:30:44.676 --> 0:30:48.316
<v Speaker 1>that if she were here, because it's so deeply important

0:30:48.356 --> 0:30:51.596
<v Speaker 1>to her to be believed, and I completely understand that.

0:30:52.716 --> 0:30:55.076
<v Speaker 1>But I just decided there was so much wrong with

0:30:55.156 --> 0:30:59.836
<v Speaker 1>this case legally speaking, that it was okay that I

0:30:59.916 --> 0:31:04.956
<v Speaker 1>was not standing there arguing for her innocence as her lawyer,

0:31:05.076 --> 0:31:07.156
<v Speaker 1>even as a journalist. I was just telling you the

0:31:07.196 --> 0:31:09.356
<v Speaker 1>story of what had happened to her. And my story

0:31:09.356 --> 0:31:13.636
<v Speaker 1>in the magazine is really about prosecutors hiding evidence, and

0:31:13.676 --> 0:31:15.756
<v Speaker 1>I think that really was sort of how the story

0:31:15.836 --> 0:31:19.356
<v Speaker 1>unfolded in my book as well. Tell us about where

0:31:19.436 --> 0:31:21.956
<v Speaker 1>Nora is now, I mean, give us the quick update.

0:31:22.556 --> 0:31:25.036
<v Speaker 1>So for a while Nora was living in Brooklyn. She

0:31:25.116 --> 0:31:29.076
<v Speaker 1>got out of prison twenty sixteen, and she was actually

0:31:29.076 --> 0:31:31.436
<v Speaker 1>in Brooklyn for a while. But now she is back

0:31:31.476 --> 0:31:35.756
<v Speaker 1>in Memphis. She's you know, it's hard. It's really hard

0:31:35.796 --> 0:31:37.596
<v Speaker 1>to get out of prison after you've been there for

0:31:37.636 --> 0:31:40.516
<v Speaker 1>a while. You kind of have to really restart your life.

0:31:41.556 --> 0:31:44.796
<v Speaker 1>Often people have a kind of prolonged form of PTSD

0:31:46.316 --> 0:31:48.836
<v Speaker 1>that they're figuring out just how to live in the

0:31:48.996 --> 0:31:52.316
<v Speaker 1>real world again. And Nora has no family, so in

0:31:52.356 --> 0:31:55.676
<v Speaker 1>addition to the death of her mother. Her parents were divorced,

0:31:55.716 --> 0:31:57.916
<v Speaker 1>but her father had actually been murdered a year and

0:31:57.956 --> 0:32:00.156
<v Speaker 1>a half before her mother was killed, which is like

0:32:00.276 --> 0:32:03.676
<v Speaker 1>another I know, really and perhaps that it was connected,

0:32:03.676 --> 0:32:06.476
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's the kind of missing element of the

0:32:06.996 --> 0:32:11.276
<v Speaker 1>unsolved murders all along. But she really didn't have family,

0:32:11.396 --> 0:32:14.996
<v Speaker 1>and so that has been really hard for her to be.

0:32:15.556 --> 0:32:18.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, she got out of prison in her late twenties,

0:32:19.276 --> 0:32:21.396
<v Speaker 1>mid to late twenties, and she had kind of grown

0:32:21.516 --> 0:32:23.796
<v Speaker 1>up in prison, and in some ways that meant that

0:32:23.836 --> 0:32:28.156
<v Speaker 1>she didn't quite grow up. So now she's in Memphis

0:32:28.156 --> 0:32:31.636
<v Speaker 1>and she had a lawyer, or not the child Laura

0:32:31.636 --> 0:32:34.676
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about earlier, but a later lawyer who

0:32:34.836 --> 0:32:38.756
<v Speaker 1>is just a kind of incredibly caring person and so

0:32:38.876 --> 0:32:42.276
<v Speaker 1>right now she is actually working for him in Memphis

0:32:43.356 --> 0:32:46.516
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and getting on her feet, trying to

0:32:46.556 --> 0:32:51.316
<v Speaker 1>get her own place. She also has a dog named Liberty,

0:32:51.956 --> 0:32:55.596
<v Speaker 1>very deliberate name, who I'm very fond of. I actually

0:32:55.596 --> 0:32:57.796
<v Speaker 1>took care of Liberty for a little while long after

0:32:57.836 --> 0:33:00.796
<v Speaker 1>my book came out, just to be clear, and so

0:33:00.956 --> 0:33:03.276
<v Speaker 1>I just went to Memphis to see that I was

0:33:03.316 --> 0:33:05.476
<v Speaker 1>there to work on a different story. But of course

0:33:05.516 --> 0:33:08.476
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see Nora, and my big question was

0:33:08.516 --> 0:33:11.476
<v Speaker 1>whether Libert was going to remember me, which she did,

0:33:11.476 --> 0:33:14.316
<v Speaker 1>which is great. One thing I will say to you,

0:33:14.356 --> 0:33:17.396
<v Speaker 1>Emily is that there are many journalists who interview people,

0:33:17.796 --> 0:33:20.796
<v Speaker 1>hear their story, and they never call them back or

0:33:20.796 --> 0:33:23.116
<v Speaker 1>hear from them again. And I don't know of another

0:33:23.196 --> 0:33:26.756
<v Speaker 1>journalist who's more committed to treating people as human beings,

0:33:27.396 --> 0:33:29.676
<v Speaker 1>not just for the week or day, but for years

0:33:29.796 --> 0:33:35.676
<v Speaker 1>often afterwards, and it's a rare thing. Thank you. Should

0:33:35.676 --> 0:33:41.036
<v Speaker 1>we take some listener questions? Absolutely? After the break, we

0:33:41.116 --> 0:33:43.996
<v Speaker 1>talked more about Deep Cover, Never Seen Again, and I

0:33:44.036 --> 0:33:59.116
<v Speaker 1>answer a few questions from the audience. We're back next up.

0:33:59.116 --> 0:34:01.956
<v Speaker 1>We took questions from listeners in the audience. We had

0:34:01.996 --> 0:34:04.596
<v Speaker 1>them write their questions out on paper and then put

0:34:04.636 --> 0:34:07.516
<v Speaker 1>them in a bucket. Yes, very old school, I know.

0:34:07.916 --> 0:34:11.516
<v Speaker 1>It was like seventh grade, everyone passing notes. Then someone

0:34:11.556 --> 0:34:14.196
<v Speaker 1>handed the bucket to Emily and she read them aloud.

0:34:15.276 --> 0:34:17.836
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything you wanted to include in the podcast

0:34:17.876 --> 0:34:21.556
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make the cut? Yeah, I mean there was

0:34:21.636 --> 0:34:25.636
<v Speaker 1>a lot. There was a lot probably there when I

0:34:25.676 --> 0:34:29.476
<v Speaker 1>went down to Traveler's Rest, I mean, when I went

0:34:29.476 --> 0:34:32.836
<v Speaker 1>down to Traveler's Rest. Before I connected with Brooks cousins,

0:34:33.556 --> 0:34:37.836
<v Speaker 1>I connected with this husband and wife team, Patrick and

0:34:37.876 --> 0:34:40.676
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Welch, and I didn't end up getting to put

0:34:40.716 --> 0:34:43.236
<v Speaker 1>them in the podcast, and I still feel badly about

0:34:43.236 --> 0:34:47.116
<v Speaker 1>that because what they do is they basically devote all

0:34:47.156 --> 0:34:50.356
<v Speaker 1>their spare time to try to look for people who

0:34:50.356 --> 0:34:52.836
<v Speaker 1>have gone missing, people that have kind of gone off

0:34:52.876 --> 0:34:57.756
<v Speaker 1>the radar of law enforcement, and actively kind of keep

0:34:57.876 --> 0:35:00.876
<v Speaker 1>the search alive. And the first thing they told me

0:35:00.916 --> 0:35:02.876
<v Speaker 1>straight up was like, look, it's great you're doing this

0:35:02.916 --> 0:35:05.956
<v Speaker 1>on brook but there's actually a ton of people that

0:35:06.036 --> 0:35:11.156
<v Speaker 1>are missing in this area. And they were they had

0:35:11.196 --> 0:35:13.076
<v Speaker 1>like a map in their house with all the pin

0:35:13.156 --> 0:35:15.316
<v Speaker 1>points of the people and where they went missing. And

0:35:15.396 --> 0:35:17.156
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like they were all connected and this was

0:35:17.196 --> 0:35:21.116
<v Speaker 1>some conspiracy. It was just they were like the custodians

0:35:21.116 --> 0:35:24.236
<v Speaker 1>of these people's memory. And then they drove with me

0:35:24.356 --> 0:35:28.276
<v Speaker 1>up to the dark corner where Brooke may have gone missing,

0:35:28.996 --> 0:35:33.156
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing was so intense for Tammy she

0:35:33.236 --> 0:35:35.796
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to go, but she reluctantly went with us

0:35:35.796 --> 0:35:38.836
<v Speaker 1>in the pickup truck. And it was it was one

0:35:38.836 --> 0:35:40.156
<v Speaker 1>of these scenes where it was kind of late at

0:35:40.236 --> 0:35:42.996
<v Speaker 1>night and were driving down some shadowy roads in the mountains,

0:35:43.236 --> 0:35:44.756
<v Speaker 1>and I just got a sense for like, this is

0:35:44.756 --> 0:35:47.996
<v Speaker 1>how these people spent their weekends. And it just made

0:35:47.996 --> 0:35:50.996
<v Speaker 1>you think about all the stories we can't tell. And

0:35:51.036 --> 0:35:52.476
<v Speaker 1>I kind of get to this at the end that

0:35:52.876 --> 0:35:56.556
<v Speaker 1>we often fixate on very particular types of stories that

0:35:56.676 --> 0:35:58.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of play into the fem fatale or that have

0:35:58.996 --> 0:36:02.876
<v Speaker 1>some sort of Hollywood appeal, But there's all these kind

0:36:02.876 --> 0:36:05.636
<v Speaker 1>of nameless cases of people that go missing. And there

0:36:05.716 --> 0:36:08.196
<v Speaker 1>was just something really poignant and powerful about this couple

0:36:08.196 --> 0:36:11.236
<v Speaker 1>and their pickup truck kind of winding their weight on

0:36:11.316 --> 0:36:13.476
<v Speaker 1>the darkened roods of this county, kind of going to

0:36:13.476 --> 0:36:17.076
<v Speaker 1>the last spots where these people were. And they're doing

0:36:17.116 --> 0:36:19.316
<v Speaker 1>great work, and I hope that they hear a shout

0:36:19.356 --> 0:36:24.236
<v Speaker 1>out for that in this bonus episode. Another listener question.

0:36:24.676 --> 0:36:26.796
<v Speaker 1>One of Estra's lies was that she was a professional

0:36:26.876 --> 0:36:30.796
<v Speaker 1>chess player. So did anyone ever ask Estra to play chess,

0:36:31.276 --> 0:36:34.516
<v Speaker 1>that ever threatened to blow her cover? I know, such

0:36:34.516 --> 0:36:37.636
<v Speaker 1>a crazy thing to make up that there, I get,

0:36:37.716 --> 0:36:40.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, she was apparently a pretty solid chess player,

0:36:40.636 --> 0:36:42.516
<v Speaker 1>because you know from the podcast what happens when she

0:36:42.556 --> 0:36:44.956
<v Speaker 1>says I'm a tennis player, and then she's like, oh shit,

0:36:45.036 --> 0:36:49.116
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually not to play tennis. I did talk

0:36:49.156 --> 0:36:52.916
<v Speaker 1>to one former boyfriend who didn't go on the record,

0:36:52.956 --> 0:36:54.916
<v Speaker 1>but he did play her in chess. He did ask

0:36:54.956 --> 0:37:00.636
<v Speaker 1>her she did beat him. You, Yeah, exactly. I mean

0:37:00.796 --> 0:37:02.796
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about this backstage a second ago. Like I

0:37:02.796 --> 0:37:05.356
<v Speaker 1>would be intimidated if I met if you just said

0:37:05.356 --> 0:37:07.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm a professional chess player, There's no way in hell

0:37:07.116 --> 0:37:11.396
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even played checkers with you. So I suspect

0:37:11.436 --> 0:37:18.076
<v Speaker 1>that's scared off enough people that she could pull it off. Yeah.

0:37:18.156 --> 0:37:20.476
<v Speaker 1>How do you think Esther's case would have been handled

0:37:20.516 --> 0:37:25.916
<v Speaker 1>differently today? Well, we kind of we kind of talked

0:37:25.956 --> 0:37:27.996
<v Speaker 1>about this a little bit the way that my mind

0:37:28.076 --> 0:37:32.116
<v Speaker 1>goes to the media, and I just think that I

0:37:32.156 --> 0:37:36.956
<v Speaker 1>would hope that I would hope that the ass that

0:37:36.996 --> 0:37:40.996
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't just kind of immediately. Look, when you have

0:37:41.036 --> 0:37:43.276
<v Speaker 1>a story as a journalist, right, when someone brings you

0:37:43.356 --> 0:37:48.476
<v Speaker 1>a story and you're operating on impartial information, right, your

0:37:48.516 --> 0:37:52.876
<v Speaker 1>brain spins out. There's vast terra incognita, and we when

0:37:52.876 --> 0:37:54.996
<v Speaker 1>we go on our runs. Oh, I think I talked

0:37:55.036 --> 0:37:56.876
<v Speaker 1>to some of Esther and she might have done that. Well,

0:37:56.916 --> 0:37:59.116
<v Speaker 1>you ask me a question. I don't know, but I

0:37:59.156 --> 0:38:00.636
<v Speaker 1>have an idea of where the story maybe. But that

0:38:00.796 --> 0:38:03.636
<v Speaker 1>story that I have that I'm projecting out into Terra

0:38:03.756 --> 0:38:07.596
<v Speaker 1>Incognita is actually probably based on books I've read and

0:38:07.676 --> 0:38:11.236
<v Speaker 1>crappy movies I've watched, and local news stories I've read,

0:38:11.636 --> 0:38:15.356
<v Speaker 1>and is prompting me to make assumptions about who that

0:38:15.396 --> 0:38:17.236
<v Speaker 1>person is and how the story is in fact going

0:38:17.276 --> 0:38:20.196
<v Speaker 1>to play out based on like probably templates, like the

0:38:20.196 --> 0:38:23.116
<v Speaker 1>fem fatal template. So what happens is you get like

0:38:23.316 --> 0:38:26.996
<v Speaker 1>part way into the reporting, and inevitably you start getting

0:38:27.076 --> 0:38:30.196
<v Speaker 1>facts that challenge the assumptions that you've made in the template.

0:38:30.236 --> 0:38:32.476
<v Speaker 1>And our mutual friend Jack Hit always says, and I

0:38:32.476 --> 0:38:34.876
<v Speaker 1>think this is so wise. He says, as soon as

0:38:34.876 --> 0:38:37.516
<v Speaker 1>the story turns out not being what you thought it was,

0:38:38.236 --> 0:38:41.076
<v Speaker 1>that's when your story begins. But there's dissonance there because

0:38:41.116 --> 0:38:43.036
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh shit, this isn't the story I thought.

0:38:43.076 --> 0:38:45.076
<v Speaker 1>I'd mean, I told my editor and my producer was

0:38:45.116 --> 0:38:47.196
<v Speaker 1>going to be this, and I promise that, And now

0:38:47.236 --> 0:38:49.036
<v Speaker 1>you have to go back and say it's not quite that.

0:38:49.716 --> 0:38:52.796
<v Speaker 1>And I think that sometimes it's easier when you get

0:38:52.796 --> 0:38:55.916
<v Speaker 1>to that point and just say, wow, it's basically right.

0:38:56.956 --> 0:38:59.676
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she did have three boyfriends in one year,

0:39:00.076 --> 0:39:03.076
<v Speaker 1>and they were at military institutes, so she did kind

0:39:03.076 --> 0:39:06.156
<v Speaker 1>of go through them, and you could see how if

0:39:06.196 --> 0:39:09.356
<v Speaker 1>you just keep pushing and sticking to the preconception have

0:39:09.836 --> 0:39:12.996
<v Speaker 1>you could just plow down that road. And I say

0:39:12.996 --> 0:39:15.596
<v Speaker 1>that with empathy because I feel like, as a journalist,

0:39:15.636 --> 0:39:18.676
<v Speaker 1>I've stared down that and probably done some version of that.

0:39:18.836 --> 0:39:22.756
<v Speaker 1>I would think in this moment now, where there's more

0:39:22.796 --> 0:39:27.596
<v Speaker 1>awareness of the way, you know, we depict among other

0:39:27.716 --> 0:39:32.196
<v Speaker 1>people women in the news and such, that someone would say, hey,

0:39:32.356 --> 0:39:35.756
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, here is this story that we're progressing on.

0:39:35.876 --> 0:39:38.516
<v Speaker 1>Does it all check out? Are we making assumptions? Are

0:39:38.516 --> 0:39:42.316
<v Speaker 1>we playing into stereotypes and templates that may not be

0:39:42.556 --> 0:39:45.676
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent justified. That's why I would hope we

0:39:45.676 --> 0:39:48.916
<v Speaker 1>would play out differently today. Yeah, I mean some of

0:39:48.956 --> 0:39:53.636
<v Speaker 1>this is it just really depends on Esther's honesty. I

0:39:53.636 --> 0:39:56.356
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that that was a really I'm going

0:39:56.396 --> 0:39:58.636
<v Speaker 1>to use the word lucky. Maybe that's not right, But

0:39:58.836 --> 0:40:02.196
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the alchemy of your interviewing her and her

0:40:02.436 --> 0:40:07.596
<v Speaker 1>reflecting there's some like pretty gritty candor that comes across right,

0:40:08.156 --> 0:40:11.116
<v Speaker 1>I think. And I would also say that like in

0:40:11.196 --> 0:40:13.316
<v Speaker 1>fairness to people that were reporting her on back then,

0:40:13.956 --> 0:40:16.156
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest, this was a person who had his

0:40:16.156 --> 0:40:19.476
<v Speaker 1>history of not being candid when she was younger. Now

0:40:19.556 --> 0:40:21.956
<v Speaker 1>is a different story, she's a professor, it's a different life.

0:40:22.196 --> 0:40:24.076
<v Speaker 1>But at the time, this is someone who had been

0:40:24.076 --> 0:40:26.436
<v Speaker 1>a serial identity thief, who had told people that she

0:40:26.636 --> 0:40:28.876
<v Speaker 1>was a chess champion when she was in fact not,

0:40:29.236 --> 0:40:33.276
<v Speaker 1>who had told lies to her boyfriends, etc. And so

0:40:33.636 --> 0:40:36.156
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the really tricky part about telling a

0:40:36.196 --> 0:40:39.756
<v Speaker 1>story with an unreliable narrator is that you must be skeptical,

0:40:40.036 --> 0:40:42.716
<v Speaker 1>you must be dubious. You can't let them off the hook.

0:40:42.996 --> 0:40:46.116
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't give you that blank check to project

0:40:46.196 --> 0:40:49.396
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want upon them. And so, yeah, it's easy

0:40:49.436 --> 0:40:51.796
<v Speaker 1>for me to say that now twenty years later looking back,

0:40:51.876 --> 0:40:56.036
<v Speaker 1>But but you've learned a thing or two. Okay, speaking

0:40:56.076 --> 0:40:59.636
<v Speaker 1>of compulsive liars, what about who am I going to say,

0:40:59.796 --> 0:41:03.076
<v Speaker 1>George Santos? Do you have a better understanding of what

0:41:03.236 --> 0:41:07.396
<v Speaker 1>motivates people like him? I think George is his own

0:41:07.436 --> 0:41:14.036
<v Speaker 1>special creature. We can probably all agree on that. Yeah, no,

0:41:14.796 --> 0:41:17.476
<v Speaker 1>is there a short answer. I mean, I don't. I

0:41:17.476 --> 0:41:19.476
<v Speaker 1>don't presume to know what's going on with that guy.

0:41:19.796 --> 0:41:27.436
<v Speaker 1>I do I think that I think with Esther I did.

0:41:27.756 --> 0:41:31.596
<v Speaker 1>I did kind of understand it. Like I don't know

0:41:31.676 --> 0:41:34.196
<v Speaker 1>that Esther agreed with my assessment of it, But I

0:41:34.236 --> 0:41:37.596
<v Speaker 1>feel like, to some extent, we grew up in a

0:41:37.636 --> 0:41:40.716
<v Speaker 1>certain town with certain friends and family, and we go

0:41:40.756 --> 0:41:43.476
<v Speaker 1>away to college, we moved to a different place, and

0:41:43.516 --> 0:41:47.676
<v Speaker 1>we enjoy being someone different in small ways. And that

0:41:47.716 --> 0:41:50.156
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that we always lie about it, but I

0:41:50.196 --> 0:41:54.836
<v Speaker 1>think that sometimes it's born from this desire to remove

0:41:54.876 --> 0:41:57.876
<v Speaker 1>ourselves from a place where we were. And I think

0:41:57.876 --> 0:42:00.596
<v Speaker 1>that what happened in Esther's story in particular, is that

0:42:00.956 --> 0:42:03.276
<v Speaker 1>the law enforcement looked at is there must be some

0:42:03.356 --> 0:42:08.156
<v Speaker 1>sort of kind of deeper, more methodical, devious play here

0:42:08.276 --> 0:42:11.676
<v Speaker 1>of espionage or something. And to me, it like just

0:42:11.716 --> 0:42:16.996
<v Speaker 1>spoke to a more human impulse to just have space

0:42:17.076 --> 0:42:20.356
<v Speaker 1>and reinvent. And that is not again to excuse it

0:42:20.516 --> 0:42:23.236
<v Speaker 1>or to say that it's all right, but to try

0:42:23.276 --> 0:42:27.236
<v Speaker 1>to understand it as a kind of basic human desire

0:42:27.356 --> 0:42:30.116
<v Speaker 1>that just kind of, as she says, ran out of

0:42:30.156 --> 0:42:32.796
<v Speaker 1>control in her case. So yeah, in some ways the

0:42:32.796 --> 0:42:36.396
<v Speaker 1>answers yes, But with Santos, I don't know, it's in

0:42:36.476 --> 0:42:40.196
<v Speaker 1>his own category. What led to the media thinking Esther

0:42:40.396 --> 0:42:43.636
<v Speaker 1>was a potential spy when the story broke Yeah, so,

0:42:43.956 --> 0:42:46.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean it starts off. I was talking to a

0:42:46.636 --> 0:42:49.636
<v Speaker 1>listener in the audience during the intermission and we're kind

0:42:49.636 --> 0:42:53.716
<v Speaker 1>of on the same page. It started off with a

0:42:54.076 --> 0:42:57.676
<v Speaker 1>kind of John Campbell trying to come up with an

0:42:57.676 --> 0:43:00.036
<v Speaker 1>explot It didn't make sense, right, It doesn't make sense.

0:43:00.036 --> 0:43:02.916
<v Speaker 1>Why do you enroll at college is a different name,

0:43:04.156 --> 0:43:06.436
<v Speaker 1>and there's no obvious game to be made for it,

0:43:06.476 --> 0:43:09.436
<v Speaker 1>and so in the absence of that knowledge, start putting

0:43:09.436 --> 0:43:11.836
<v Speaker 1>together other possible theories. Oh, she's dated two guys from

0:43:11.876 --> 0:43:14.196
<v Speaker 1>West Point and the shipman. Maybe it's this. I mean,

0:43:14.276 --> 0:43:16.036
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, that's what detectives are supposed to do.

0:43:16.036 --> 0:43:19.236
<v Speaker 1>They're supposed to speculate. But what happened was, for those

0:43:19.236 --> 0:43:22.756
<v Speaker 1>of you that listen to know, is that when they

0:43:22.756 --> 0:43:24.716
<v Speaker 1>were trying to get the word out about the case,

0:43:25.276 --> 0:43:27.836
<v Speaker 1>the police chief in Traveler's Rest of the time told

0:43:27.956 --> 0:43:30.476
<v Speaker 1>John he should owe the detective, he should open the

0:43:30.476 --> 0:43:32.956
<v Speaker 1>file and feel free to talk to the press. And

0:43:32.996 --> 0:43:35.436
<v Speaker 1>that's when John started to air some of his theories

0:43:35.516 --> 0:43:38.916
<v Speaker 1>about espionage, and there was a local news station that

0:43:39.036 --> 0:43:42.436
<v Speaker 1>ran some of them, and then there was a kind

0:43:42.436 --> 0:43:46.116
<v Speaker 1>of middleman who job it was was to find interesting

0:43:46.116 --> 0:43:48.116
<v Speaker 1>local stories and selve them to the national media. And

0:43:48.156 --> 0:43:50.476
<v Speaker 1>he quickly wrote up a press release based on this

0:43:50.556 --> 0:43:55.596
<v Speaker 1>impartial information, and three days later later it was running nationally.

0:43:56.036 --> 0:43:58.596
<v Speaker 1>And so the story just kind of got a bit

0:43:58.636 --> 0:44:01.476
<v Speaker 1>ahead of itself. And that that's how I mean, that's

0:44:01.476 --> 0:44:03.516
<v Speaker 1>what we do an episode four, we kind of connect

0:44:03.596 --> 0:44:06.156
<v Speaker 1>the dots of this pipeline of how it comes from

0:44:06.236 --> 0:44:11.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, speculation to kind of headlines. Yeah,

0:44:11.836 --> 0:44:15.956
<v Speaker 1>sou new question. Part of the story is themed around

0:44:15.996 --> 0:44:19.636
<v Speaker 1>tough mental health challenges and also running away. What advice

0:44:19.676 --> 0:44:21.636
<v Speaker 1>do you think Esther might give to someone in a

0:44:21.676 --> 0:44:24.836
<v Speaker 1>similar situation? You know? This is It's interesting because when

0:44:24.836 --> 0:44:29.356
<v Speaker 1>we first started talking to Esther, I'm not sure how

0:44:29.356 --> 0:44:31.876
<v Speaker 1>exactly I posed it, but sometimes I'll often say this

0:44:31.916 --> 0:44:33.156
<v Speaker 1>is a version of like when I was asking you

0:44:33.156 --> 0:44:35.196
<v Speaker 1>before about nor like what do you want out of

0:44:35.196 --> 0:44:38.356
<v Speaker 1>the story, because it's just you don't always get an

0:44:38.356 --> 0:44:43.036
<v Speaker 1>honest answer, but it's helpful sometimes you do. And she said, look,

0:44:44.876 --> 0:44:51.436
<v Speaker 1>I was suffering from real mental health issues. And I

0:44:51.476 --> 0:44:53.876
<v Speaker 1>think that I felt and I made some bad choices,

0:44:53.916 --> 0:44:58.436
<v Speaker 1>and if I had had someone to talk to, OH,

0:44:58.476 --> 0:45:00.236
<v Speaker 1>I could have been honest about what was going on,

0:45:00.436 --> 0:45:03.236
<v Speaker 1>and I had been gotten some help earlier, I might

0:45:03.276 --> 0:45:07.596
<v Speaker 1>have made some better some better choices. And so I

0:45:07.636 --> 0:45:10.076
<v Speaker 1>think that she looks at this as situation of what

0:45:10.196 --> 0:45:14.396
<v Speaker 1>happens to kind of anxiety and desperation, and she has

0:45:14.396 --> 0:45:18.116
<v Speaker 1>social anxiety when it's kind of unchecked and left left

0:45:18.156 --> 0:45:21.196
<v Speaker 1>to kind of spiral with no help. And so to me,

0:45:21.236 --> 0:45:22.796
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a large part of the motivation

0:45:22.836 --> 0:45:30.316
<v Speaker 1>of her, of her of her talking about the story,

0:45:31.196 --> 0:45:35.356
<v Speaker 1>and she's now currently it's interesting that this is her

0:45:35.396 --> 0:45:38.236
<v Speaker 1>big thing, is like advocating for mental health kind of

0:45:38.276 --> 0:45:40.596
<v Speaker 1>premptively before people go off the rails and end up

0:45:40.676 --> 0:45:43.556
<v Speaker 1>in incarcerated. You know. One thing that strikes me about

0:45:43.676 --> 0:45:46.916
<v Speaker 1>Esther and Nora is that they had really strange things

0:45:46.956 --> 0:45:49.796
<v Speaker 1>happened to them that they participated in, but that like

0:45:50.316 --> 0:45:52.996
<v Speaker 1>also are just hard to explain. And I think there

0:45:53.076 --> 0:45:57.276
<v Speaker 1>is something about having someone just lay out your story clearly.

0:45:58.596 --> 0:46:01.076
<v Speaker 1>Noura sometimes says that she just like feels like she

0:46:01.116 --> 0:46:03.316
<v Speaker 1>can just take the magazine and hand it to people

0:46:03.476 --> 0:46:07.796
<v Speaker 1>just as an explanation of what happened. Anyway, I wonder

0:46:07.836 --> 0:46:10.916
<v Speaker 1>if that's something that helpful to esther, and I mean,

0:46:11.036 --> 0:46:15.036
<v Speaker 1>probably it is, right, I think so. I mean, I

0:46:15.076 --> 0:46:19.516
<v Speaker 1>didn't you know, we did this very intense session with

0:46:19.556 --> 0:46:22.356
<v Speaker 1>her when before it came out, where we went back

0:46:22.356 --> 0:46:24.716
<v Speaker 1>over it. I read back what other people said about her,

0:46:24.756 --> 0:46:27.356
<v Speaker 1>and I read back what I said to her, and

0:46:27.436 --> 0:46:30.036
<v Speaker 1>it was it was hot and it was intense. She

0:46:30.156 --> 0:46:32.836
<v Speaker 1>was not happy with some parts of it. But I

0:46:32.876 --> 0:46:37.516
<v Speaker 1>think that that even that even that conversation was a

0:46:37.556 --> 0:46:41.956
<v Speaker 1>conversation that she hadn't had in any of the previous

0:46:42.076 --> 0:46:45.036
<v Speaker 1>media treatments of it, And so I think that there

0:46:45.156 --> 0:46:46.676
<v Speaker 1>was When we talked to her a few days later,

0:46:46.716 --> 0:46:49.236
<v Speaker 1>she's like, I appreciate that we had at least the

0:46:49.316 --> 0:46:52.876
<v Speaker 1>chance to do that, and she was, but it's awkward.

0:46:52.916 --> 0:46:54.396
<v Speaker 1>I could see why hot people don't want to do

0:46:54.476 --> 0:46:56.956
<v Speaker 1>it because it wasn't fun. It is not fun, you know.

0:46:57.316 --> 0:46:59.476
<v Speaker 1>Last question, Yeah, it's kind of related to what we're

0:46:59.476 --> 0:47:02.396
<v Speaker 1>talking about. How do you recognize your past experiences and

0:47:02.436 --> 0:47:05.076
<v Speaker 1>traumas while covering a story and work to keep them

0:47:05.196 --> 0:47:11.356
<v Speaker 1>from influencing your interpretation and telling of the story. Wow. Well,

0:47:11.396 --> 0:47:13.476
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll start by saying that I don't think

0:47:13.516 --> 0:47:15.836
<v Speaker 1>I've had anything as traumatic happened to me as esther

0:47:15.956 --> 0:47:18.636
<v Speaker 1>had with I mean the loss of her mother at

0:47:18.636 --> 0:47:20.596
<v Speaker 1>that age. And if you've listened to the podcast, you

0:47:20.676 --> 0:47:24.316
<v Speaker 1>know how parents, how her parents divorced and she was struggling.

0:47:26.356 --> 0:47:29.636
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting. I did say to her at times, like, look,

0:47:29.676 --> 0:47:32.036
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I didn't say I get it. I

0:47:32.036 --> 0:47:37.316
<v Speaker 1>said I I am sympathetic because I have had anxiety before,

0:47:37.596 --> 0:47:40.556
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think i've had it like you. And

0:47:40.596 --> 0:47:44.196
<v Speaker 1>so I think that it's actually important not to assume

0:47:44.276 --> 0:47:48.996
<v Speaker 1>that you've had their experience, because that's the problem. Like,

0:47:49.596 --> 0:47:51.436
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I start to let myself think that, like, oh,

0:47:51.476 --> 0:47:53.956
<v Speaker 1>I've had anxiety too, and I didn't make up X

0:47:54.076 --> 0:47:56.876
<v Speaker 1>number of identities, then I'm not on some level getting it.

0:47:58.076 --> 0:48:02.636
<v Speaker 1>So I think that it's I think that you have

0:48:02.716 --> 0:48:06.156
<v Speaker 1>to the starting point almost has to be that I'm

0:48:06.156 --> 0:48:08.676
<v Speaker 1>not seeing this the way you see it, but like,

0:48:09.236 --> 0:48:11.596
<v Speaker 1>try to help me see it, right. I mean, I

0:48:11.676 --> 0:48:15.116
<v Speaker 1>think you're talking about empathy and one and recognizing the

0:48:15.156 --> 0:48:18.076
<v Speaker 1>limits of empathy in terms of pretending to stand in

0:48:18.156 --> 0:48:21.556
<v Speaker 1>someone's shoes, right. I mean, empathy is a tool for

0:48:21.676 --> 0:48:23.796
<v Speaker 1>journalists like us, but I think we also have to

0:48:23.796 --> 0:48:27.876
<v Speaker 1>be really careful and how we handle it totally. I mean,

0:48:27.916 --> 0:48:29.596
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why it's important. You've got to talk

0:48:29.636 --> 0:48:32.236
<v Speaker 1>to the other family members. And there's many things that

0:48:32.316 --> 0:48:35.276
<v Speaker 1>weren't included in this podcast, things that like, in some

0:48:35.316 --> 0:48:37.796
<v Speaker 1>ways the most you could say, some of the most

0:48:37.836 --> 0:48:40.276
<v Speaker 1>significant things that that are part of a story, the

0:48:40.396 --> 0:48:43.556
<v Speaker 1>things that are actually not included because you've debated at

0:48:43.676 --> 0:48:46.396
<v Speaker 1>nauseum about whether or not to include them, and they

0:48:46.396 --> 0:48:51.156
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting, but you feel you can't include them.

0:48:51.276 --> 0:48:54.876
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I feel like every twist in turn is

0:48:54.916 --> 0:48:57.156
<v Speaker 1>like some sort of dilemma in which you know and

0:48:57.156 --> 0:48:58.996
<v Speaker 1>you're getting back on Twitter, Oh you didn't do this,

0:48:59.036 --> 0:49:02.796
<v Speaker 1>you do that, and it's like, yeah, I had a

0:49:02.836 --> 0:49:05.876
<v Speaker 1>reason for it. Yeah, you're all right. You know, we're tried,

0:49:05.996 --> 0:49:08.996
<v Speaker 1>Like we told one version of the truth, the version

0:49:08.996 --> 0:49:10.756
<v Speaker 1>of the truth as best we could see it. And

0:49:10.796 --> 0:49:13.476
<v Speaker 1>that's where the team of people, the four of us,

0:49:13.556 --> 0:49:17.956
<v Speaker 1>sat down and went through this understanding, damn well, there's

0:49:18.036 --> 0:49:21.676
<v Speaker 1>no entirely objective way to tell a story, and you

0:49:21.716 --> 0:49:24.476
<v Speaker 1>want to tell it as compellingly as you possibly can,

0:49:24.756 --> 0:49:27.156
<v Speaker 1>so that we have the clicks that justify season four.

0:49:28.916 --> 0:49:35.956
<v Speaker 1>And yet at the same time, you know that you're

0:49:35.996 --> 0:49:39.516
<v Speaker 1>telling just one version of the truth, and you're going

0:49:39.556 --> 0:49:41.476
<v Speaker 1>to get it from one side to the other. And

0:49:41.636 --> 0:49:44.396
<v Speaker 1>as my wife says to me, it just has to

0:49:44.436 --> 0:49:47.356
<v Speaker 1>be a version of the truth that you can live

0:49:47.396 --> 0:49:49.556
<v Speaker 1>with even if no one else likes, which is really

0:49:49.556 --> 0:49:52.476
<v Speaker 1>hard to do, but that's the goal. I think. Yes,

0:49:52.596 --> 0:49:54.676
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I have heard that line from Kasha

0:49:54.676 --> 0:49:56.076
<v Speaker 1>a number of times from you, and it's like in

0:49:56.116 --> 0:49:58.396
<v Speaker 1>my head too, which I really appreciate because Kasha is

0:49:58.476 --> 0:50:01.716
<v Speaker 1>very wise. Jake, this has been so much fun. I

0:50:01.756 --> 0:50:05.076
<v Speaker 1>am really looking forward to season four. Thank you so much.

0:50:05.076 --> 0:50:12.516
<v Speaker 1>In congratulations, thanks for listening to this special live episode

0:50:12.516 --> 0:50:15.036
<v Speaker 1>of a deep Cover. I want to express my heartfelt

0:50:15.036 --> 0:50:18.596
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Emily for a great conversation. We'll have another

0:50:18.636 --> 0:50:22.076
<v Speaker 1>episode coming out next month. I'll be talking with Ben Ford,

0:50:22.236 --> 0:50:25.276
<v Speaker 1>the current chief of Police and Traveler's Rest, all about

0:50:25.316 --> 0:50:29.076
<v Speaker 1>Brooke Henson and the continued surge for closure in that case,

0:50:37.916 --> 0:50:39.956
<v Speaker 1>and I have a favor to ask. It'll only take

0:50:39.956 --> 0:50:43.596
<v Speaker 1>you about two minutes, I promise. If you like deep Cover,

0:50:44.116 --> 0:50:47.636
<v Speaker 1>please leave review on Apple Podcasts. It helps other people

0:50:47.676 --> 0:50:50.156
<v Speaker 1>find the show, it gets the word out, and it

0:50:50.236 --> 0:50:52.876
<v Speaker 1>helps us make the case that yes, there should be

0:50:52.916 --> 0:50:57.596
<v Speaker 1>a season four and beyond. Thank You. Deep Cover is

0:50:57.636 --> 0:51:01.116
<v Speaker 1>produced by Amy Gaines and Jacob Smith. This episode was

0:51:01.276 --> 0:51:05.876
<v Speaker 1>edited by Sophie Crane, mastering by Sarah Brugere. Our show

0:51:05.956 --> 0:51:09.676
<v Speaker 1>art was designed by Seancarney. Original scoring and our theme

0:51:09.796 --> 0:51:13.596
<v Speaker 1>was composed by Luis Gara. Special thanks to Nicole Morano,

0:51:13.876 --> 0:51:19.116
<v Speaker 1>Jason Gambrell, Mia Lobell, Greta Con, Jacob Weisberg, and Karen Shakerjee.

0:51:19.836 --> 0:51:23.836
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jake Albern. I want to remind you that when

0:51:23.836 --> 0:51:26.636
<v Speaker 1>you sign up for Pushkin Plus, you'll get access to

0:51:26.716 --> 0:51:30.196
<v Speaker 1>binge drops of future seasons of deep Cover and exclusive

0:51:30.196 --> 0:51:33.916
<v Speaker 1>content from other Pushkin true crime hits. Check out Pushkin

0:51:34.036 --> 0:51:37.276
<v Speaker 1>dot fm or the Apple Show page for more information.