WEBVTT - Investing, Education, Retail, and the Fed (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Lyle him Baugh he

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is co founder at Granite Group Advisors. They're an independent

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>wealth management firm, and he joins us on the phone

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on his Black Friday. Lyle, Hey, good to have you

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>here with Paul and myself. So it's been quite a year.

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to wrapping it up, but I'm a

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>little cautious and concerned about what three brings. How do

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you see it? Well, thanks for having me and happy

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>trip to fend overload day. So I think you know

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>right now the way we're looking at the market. You know,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the market. Just to give you some contacts, the market

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>historically trade at fifteen to sixteen times forward numbers. Right

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>now the market refrain to the smp uh, we're trading

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>around almost seventeen and a half times forward numbers, which

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is not really terribly expensive. But when you overlay the

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of uh, you know, a potential slow down or

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>even a recession. We don't believe we're going to go

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to a recession. We think we're just going to slow down.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>To that of spending is pretty pretty strong. But what

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>really concerns me is, you know, the personal savings rate

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>as a percentage of disposal income is right where it

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was back in O eight, and we all knew what

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>happened after that, right from O to O nine. So um,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a little concerned. I mean, if I'm a

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a short term trader investor, I would be

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>very cautious here. I would not put on new positions.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>If you have your gigantic profits and Apple that you've

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>held for ten years, great, keep going Uh I went

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>buy uh too much? I'd be I'd wait for the

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>market to present an opportunity to get a better entry point.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, lie, we're up about twelve off of

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the recent lows in the SMP. That feels kind of

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>real to me or my getting a head fake here, No,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's real, But I just think you know, people

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have you know, there's a lot of hope built in

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this market that the FED is gonna slow the rate

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>to increase, and and they're going to but you have

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to understand the FED is data driven, and they can't

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>get all the data until January for the fourth quarters,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to raise rates again, you know, I

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>would you know, I think the investors need to take

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a real hard listen to what Mr Powell says. And

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he's raising rates. Is it fifty, it's seventy five. It's

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>still a raise, and he's probably gonna raise again in

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. It's just gonna be a slow rate. So

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of expectation built in that.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's it's gonna really slow or stop and right

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>now I don't see it. But then you have the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>market valuation on top of that, so there's not a

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>real lot. I don't see a big catalyst for the

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>markets to go up here in the short term. Well

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you make that when, as you said, the

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>FED is data driven. Doubt about a great story from

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal today, how the Fed's gonna be

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>watching Black Friday Cyber Monday for insights into the health

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of the US consumer. Wall Street Journal putting it this way,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the diagnosis this year takes on UH increased significance in

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>light of the deteriorating economic landscape. We know how important

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is to the US economy. So if we

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>see some sobering consumer spending numbers, might that change your

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>thought about maybe when the FED is done. Absolutely listen

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of GDPs retail sales, right, So that's why they have

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to look at that. So when you when you take

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that consideration, if we have a tough UH, if we

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have a tough retail sales numbers come out after this weekend,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the Fed's going to really keep going. They haven't.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>They haven't really seen anything different. They say they're going

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep going, So I think he'll just But you

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know what I have to say, I was thinking about

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this Paul coming in, which is pretty sobering since I

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was half awake, and this is what I was thinking about.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 1>But FED policy that if they do smaller increments, that

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>leaves the door open that they might not go to

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that higher FED funds. Right, they might see data points

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that say we don't have to go as high as

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we thought, and it could change the thinking in terms

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of evaluations. Well, that would that would absolutely change the thinking.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>But as of today, you know, or maybe we'll find

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>out on Monday that thinking hasn't changed. So I'm not

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of those you know, hoping, hoping,

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>pray for, you know, the power to change his mind. Right,

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So you've you've got to listen to what the man

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is saying, right, he's and he's not going to get

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>all the data he really needs to make a really

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>informed decision until really January, Lyle, you've got a call

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>on Mickey Mouse the Walt Disney Company. They made a

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>CEO change, shocking change in the CEO. What's you're calling

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the Walt Disney Company? You know, I think Disney is

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a great company for the long term. It's it's one

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the few stocks I fold, uh intimately, Um, but

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, Disney is fairly valued. I do

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's some upside there. I think that Mr Iger

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I always called him Mr Positivity. He is an absolute

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal leader. Bob Jacob Speck was clearly not the right

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>guy here at this moment in time. And we'll see

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens down the road. But uh Iger is going

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to do a great job. But here's the reality is

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>as great as is it's going to take some time

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>for him to you know, turn the battleship around. It's

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen overnight. He will turn around. It's

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>just amount of time. Right now. The valuation on Disney

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is fair. Canna go up to one ten, one tw absolutely,

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think eventually gets there. They've got the world's largest library,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They've got you know, ESPN and all the other ABC

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and everything else in there in Disney. Plus it's just

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>going to take some time. I would not be a

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seller here, and in fact, if we have any type

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of pull back, I'd be a pretty strong barrier of it.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna leave it on that note. Listen,

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Disney shares, by the way, they're

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>down thirty six percent so far. Here in Lyle Himba,

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>partner at Granted Group Advisors, joining us on the phone.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You might recall a Bloomberg story last month. It was

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal, and I think she and I

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are next guest. We talked about this, and I think

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>even Paul you might have been there. It was about

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>University of Pennsylvania's warton announcing it's NBA class was the

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>first in the programs a hundred and forty year history

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to be majority female, because you just don't see that happen.

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's see what Alyssa's sankster has to say. She

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is CEO at Forte Foundation. She joins us on the

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>phone on this Friday, ALYSSA, nice to have you here

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>with Paul and myself. UM tell us and remind our

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>audience exactly what you guys do at Forte Sure, Hi Carol,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Hi Paul. It's nice to be with you. And we

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>are celebrating twenty years this year. Forte Foundation is and

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>our goal is to increase opportunities for women in business leadership,

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and we partner with top business schools like the Wharton

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>School m among many others. And this year we were

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>really excited to see that number and then also that

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about seventeen of our member schools had reached or greater,

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>which is also a really significant milestone. And we've been

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>following this trend for the twenty years we've been working.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So UNLESSA, I see you've got your undergraduate degree from

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and M and proud Aggie and then the

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>m b A from the Lowry Mayze School of Business.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know Lowry very well from Clear Channel Communications.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Great great individual when you see women going into an

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>NBA program, what are they looking to do? Is it

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a career change? Is it just I want to better myself?

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And from a career perspective, what do most women look

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for when they go into a business program? Sure, and

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and NBA students generally our career changers, especially in full

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>time programs, And so when they make that commitment to

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.119
<v Speaker 1>go back, they really are looking for a different type

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity. And so women, much like men and women

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>going back to NBA programs are also doing that. But

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>what we see on the back side of that is

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that women report higher levels of confidence. They feel like

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they're specialists in particular areas. They're able to walk back

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>out into the workforce and feel empowered and um respected

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for the degree that they have and for the knowledge

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that they bring to the table. So it really does

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>build that confidence and um set them on that trajectory

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>towards leadership. And leadership is really where the NBA pathway

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>h takes you. Unlus, it sounds so it sounds like,

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like poke pol a little bit. So it

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>sounds like men and women both go to get an

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>NBA for the same reason. But I do wonder a

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>man having an NBA versus a woman having an NBA,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference? Does truly an m B A A

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>give a woman a huge leg up when it comes

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to climbing the corporate ladder? Um? Well, about six point

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>six percent of CEOs or women, and of that six

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>point six percent of them have an m B A.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That statistic is a little bit stronger for the men.

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at all of the other CEOs um,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, closer to So it's clearly a very

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>significant pathway leading to that c suite UM. The difference

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>between men and women is that when women get that

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>m B A it almost levels the playing field versus

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>giving them a leg up. And so where you see

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>women walking into a room to talk about business with

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>other men, if they don't have that NBA, their competence

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>level can sometimes not be as strong, and then they're

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>not feeling like they are contributing it the same way.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's more of a leveling the playing

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>field than it is um necessarily giving them a leg up.

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And listen, I serve on the Fuqua School of Business

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at Duke University on their board of Visitors and and

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and it seems that at Duke there's a real focus

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>on attracting UH a diverse class into their business school.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that typical of some of the leading schools out there?

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you find? Yes? I think that the schools we

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>work with UM, you know, gender equity has been very

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>much a focus UM. But at the same time they

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>are very interested in the intersection of race and gender

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that UM that their their student body

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>is diverse. We do a lot of work around UH

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>female protagonists in case studies. They're they're looking at how

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they teach the students, how many faculty members are diverse.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to create a diverse student profile. But they're

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>also looking at many other dimensions and how they deliver

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>business education. And that's because companies want that as well.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And the companies are saying to the business schools, we

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>want diversity in our pipeline, and we we need your

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>help and your partnership to create that diverse pipeline to

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>schools and businesses hand to hand, Alyssa, And forgive my sarcasm,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but I do feel like I had this conversation ten

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>years go, twenty years ago. I know it sometimes gets

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>better and all of a sudden, we see more women

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>who are CEOs, and then those numbers dwind alls. So

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I and I get building out the pipeline. But what

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is the real problem in terms of more women penetrating

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really the C suite? If you will, Yeah, I think

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's um gosh, you know, I wish I had a

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>silver bullet. UM. It really has been this layered onion

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>approach more that we've seen, and you know, the pipeline

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>getting more as many women in business school as there

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>were in law in medicine. I think that's healthy. I

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>think though, when companies bring an onboard these classes of employees,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got to really think about monitoring and watching and

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>closely UM investing in all populations and making sure they

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have the same access and they have the same mentors

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and sponsors. And so that's hard work. I mean, that's

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>every single day you have to be thinking intentionally about

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>how you're advancing employees into these leadership ranks. And if

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing it care fully, and if you're not

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>UM monitoring it and looking at metrics and making sure

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that you push those metrics UM, then you're not going

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to see success UM. And it really is about access

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and opportunity, because you can't go to the C suite

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>if somebody hasn't pulled you forward into those leadership UM ranks.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's hard work and there's always something more

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to be done. But I am encouraged because when I started,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there were zero CEOs. Now there's at least close to

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>seven women's CEO. Hey, hey, listen, how did this all

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>play out during the pandemic? Were there any meaningful changes

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in the trends of women in NBA programs? Um? No,

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the enrollment in NBA programs is

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>watches the markets, and it it goes. When economy is strong,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you see more UM students staying in the economy, and

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>when the economy weakens a little bit, you see more

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>students going back to get their NBA women held their own.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>They really stayed consistent in terms of their percentages. I

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think in NBA enrollment to dipped a little bit this

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>year over the pandemic, they were quite strong, UM, and

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing the women are retaining that percentage that

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they've always had. All right, UM, I think we're gonna

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>leave it at that. Really appreciate your time, Alyssa. Thank

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Have a great holiday season. Alyssa Sankster,

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>she's CEO at Forte Foundation, joining us on the on

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this Friday. I may drive past the Short Hills mal tonight,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's as bad as close as it's a full

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>contact sport in the parking lot there. Man, you have

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to be really aggressive to get a spot. I guess

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing for the retailers inside they do,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't do that. I'm a man at the

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>people here. UM put them Coyle. She covers all that

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>retail stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's been doing that for

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time. She's seen her share of black Fridays.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Where are you now in the great state of New Jersey? Putament,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing? I am on my way to

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Dick Sporting Goods. Um, it's crowded. You know. We have

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>analysts out on the West coast in Massachusetts. Um. In Chicago,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it is crowded and it is only getting more crowded. Um,

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's boss flowing down. I mean, you know, we

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>came into the season thinking that sales would be a little,

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a little muted. If this day is proof of anything,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's that people are spending I gotta tell you, Pam,

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I like to do Twitter polls, and I said, are

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you shopping at stores this Black Friday? It's been out

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>there for about three hours this Paul fifteen, almost six

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>say yes, they're out shopping at stores. Six said no,

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>said yes, but they're shopping online today, So I don't know.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe my poll is just people are just sitting at

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>home listening to us, so that's why they're not out shopping.

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like you and your team are really

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>surprised by the people coming back to the stores. And

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the lines are there too, right, so that means they're

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not only just looking at stuff, they're buying. Yeah. No,

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the poles are the poles. But as I

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, it's really the younger generation. I mean it

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is the team, the teenager is, the millennials. They are

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>who aren't in the store. So depending on who took

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that pole. But they're spending. Um, there's lots of shopping

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>bags floating around. It's busy and it's just getting busier.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Put And we were just talking to Daniel di Martino Booth.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>She's the CEO and chief strategist that Quill Intelligence, and

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>she was just pointing out that the consumers not as

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>strong as maybe we think. The consumer has drawn down savings,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>credit card debt is going up. What are the retail

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>companies say about the health of the consumer. You know,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd agree with that. I mean, retailers have been concerned

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for some time that consumers are going to be pinged,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why their bargain hunting and deal hunting, which

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is maybe why it's so busy today, right because somewhere

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in their minds they know that's the best field they're

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>going to occur this weekend. So if they want to

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>save money, if they want to get maximized what's on

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>their wallets, they need to be out today. They need

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to be buying over this weekend. Yeah, I was thinking

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about I was just looking at Visa uh, and I'm

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be interested to see what Visa master card

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>all of those folks have to say. No, no, are

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you still there? Punham? Maybe we lost her? Um, she's dropped. Yeah,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>she's out and about and she's checking out she said

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Dick Sporting good which I do think like when it

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to shopping around the holidays, sometimes those specialty stores,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>like people have very specific things on their wish lists

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to do well. Um, I feel like,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's electronics, whether it's sports, whether it's

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of different items like this. Yeah, I

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>was interested. I'm gonna be interested to see how this

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>all plays out in terms of the retail sales. Because

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you come out of the pandemic and it's all about experiences, traveling. Um,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that kind of thing. But the consumers still

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>out there in Strantham and Punam. We we we got you back.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us again. So when you

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think about a small segment of retail like sporting goods,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you look for? What do analysts look for

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>when I go to a sporting goods store and trying

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a channel check, I think it's really the

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>inventory levels, right, So when you see the shelves, how

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>high are they stopped? Are they picked through? Our consumers

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>gravitating towards one brand versus another, and then looking across

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the brand, right, is Nike more on sale than Idia does?

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot more discounted. What are consumers picking after?

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are kind of the things that we look for.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Dick Sporting Goods guys from about mid June it is

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>up almost seventy percent, so it has had quite a

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>run and quite a rally. Is there something to it?

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were talking Paula myself put it just

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea that when it comes to holidays, you know,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>when it's something very special or specialty store, I feel

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like those are the things that tend to show up

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on wish lists. Um, and I wonder if that's the

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>case when you look at retail and what tends to

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>do better? Is it? Is it those firms and those

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>companies and those retailers that have something very special and

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>unique to offer. Yeah, I think it's value or it's

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>something very special and very special. The only name that

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind really is that See. I think that's

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>where at he's been driving all year and they will

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to because they truly offer differentiated products, customer and

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>more personalized products. And put when we talk to retail

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>experts like yourself, you know, a topic that comes up

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>as kind of the US being overstored. There's still too

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>many stores for the demand out there. But this is

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>an issue we've been talking about for years and years.

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Where are we now in terms of the industry, and

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's retail footprint. I think there still are

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>too many stores, and I think you will continue to

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 1>see see store consolidation. But then there are stores that

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>need to expand. To write, whether it's the off price retailer,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some of the growth groups where some of the

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>international retailers, they're trying to gain presence here, whether it's

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like a Prime Mark which is a value oriented retailer,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or um some of the brands that are just looking

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to open up some retail out with but they're all

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>looking in the same space. They're all looking at area,

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the shorthills mall and malls like the

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Garden State Plausa. It's hard to still find real estates

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>there because that's where people want to be. You know,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I was looking at Etsy to you like there.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it was like around mid June there a

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of retailers kind of bottomed out, or at least

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a recent bottom. It is up sevent since. Made you

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like that is pretty remarkable. Um. I was thinking about

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so many stories put them coming into Black Friday that

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we said, you know, maybe tempered demand, maybe it's not

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be as optimism. Are you getting ready to

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of rethink your research based on what you're seeing

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and what you're hearing from the team. What we see

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>today is that it's Black Friday is back in motion.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>People are shopping, people are spending. It doesn't look muted

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to me by any means, but you know, there's a

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of holiday shopping still to go. This weekend is

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>just the beginning. So if everyone has shopped this weekend

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and they don't go back out over the next three weeks,

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>then holiday sales could still come in at the estimates

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen around which are normalized to be four

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to eight percent growth. So it really the beginning is

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>off to a great start, but we need to see

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if that momentum continues for the next three weeks because

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of holiday shopping still lies ahead of us,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>especially as bill's are to come in. It's like, okay,

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>well that we needed to hey, put them. I'm not

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>sure if you've spoken to your counterpart in London, Charles Allen,

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>who covers retail for Bloomberg Intelligence. What's the expectation for

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>good friends over there in England or maybe just you're

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>broadly defined. I have not spoken to my London London counterproducts.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I have spoken of people on the West Coast and

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing the same trend. We have an analyst at

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in the malls there and it's busy. It's the same

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>stores that are seeing the traffic. Where do you go

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>from here? And we've you've been so great talking to

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>us at the top of each hour. You know, you

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>started off at the Freehold Freehold Mall, mall? Excuse me,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you went to Coals, You're off to Dicks. Where else

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are you going to go check out? Today? So there's

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>another smaller mall, and I do want to go check

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>out the off price retailers which are in Black Friday destination,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but they do offer a lot of value to see

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if traffic picks up. It usually picks up later in

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the day. They're at the tv xs of the world.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But um, and then maybe take another trip back to

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the mall to see does it get busier or is

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>it just you know through three four o'clock and then

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the mall is kind of normalized it all right? Well,

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe I'll go out and if you want,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to shorth Host Mall for you and report back.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But that would you don't have to pay me a lot,

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>get a drive by. He's already said it. Yeah, I

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>think I might just drive by and I'll take a

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>picture of the parking lot and send it to you. Uh, Danielle, sorry,

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but put him Goyle, thanks so much for joining us

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>again at the top of the hour giving us the

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>latest on what's going on in Black Friday, and put him.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Goyle covers all that retail stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. So

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like every FED president speaks all the time.

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Has that always been the case? It just seems like

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>more and more every time we turn around when they're

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.239
<v Speaker 1>not in the quiet period, we're hearing from a FED Now.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's Yeah, the only person I care about

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>is a j pal, and I guess we're gonna hear

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from him next week. And so when I want to

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>get a sense on what's going on at the FED

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and on the economy, large return to Danielle di Martino Booth.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>She's the CEO and chief strategist that Quill Intelligence, former

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>advisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. She's or

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>go to voice on this stuff. So, Danielle, what is

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 1>my FED chairman going to tell me next week? Uh?

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think if that chair Um come Wednesday

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be resolute, even though reading through those

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>minutes on Wednesday it revealed that he is increasingly alone

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in standing up against the doves. Um. By the way,

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it is Friday, so I've got the Some people have

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the clock running down to New Year's Eve. I've got

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the clock running down to blackout, which is seven days

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from now, which is when those set officials. Now, that's

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a really good point, Um. And it did feel like

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the minutes, you know, even though they were a few

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks old, at this point, there was something almost for

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone Danielle and that maybe we'll see smaller increases by

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the f O m C, but still we're talking about

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a higher ultimate Fed funds rate. UM, So it did

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like there was something for everyone. What could J

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Powell say when he addresses the Brookings Institution in wash

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ington on Wednesday. He's going to talk economy, is going

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the labor market, He's going to take

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>audience questions, brave man. What could he say that could

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>change the thinking about Fed policy? I think as long

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>as J. Powell sticks to his narrative that you know,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>going from to fifty is still unusually large. Right, we

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't have fifty until before this there were still at

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>twice the magnitude, and that and that he sees nothing

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.719
<v Speaker 1>on the immediate horizon that suggests that the FED has

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>achieved returning to two percent, meaning we're not accustomed to

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED bringing the FED funds rate up and keeping

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it there. And I think he's going to re emphasize

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>his idea of until the job is done, and that

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to fly in the face of those who

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are expecting some kind of easing in the near term.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I say near term meaning six to nine months. I

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to refute that idea. So the Bolk

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>case out there for risk assets, I guess Daniel is

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>particated to some degree that, Hey, the FED has already

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>raised the interest rates pretty substantially and lo and behold,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's actually working. Whether you look at the housing market

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe look at some of the commodity prices rolling

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>over that a pause is a reasonable thing. But you're

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that's not where our FED chairman is. It's not

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't remember he's the lawyer. He's not a

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>PhD in economics. He follows the real time data, probably

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>more closely than a PhD in economics who would follow

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>only seconally adjusted long data series. He knows what's happening

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the market, but again, financial

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>conditions remain very loose historically speaking, and I think that

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that is more of his target, is trying to flush

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>out this whole speculative nature that we've had in the

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>markets for the last forty years. If his I've been maintaining,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he's got a grander plan. He's trying to put monetary

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>policy making back in the hands of the people. The

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>officials at the Federal Reserve as opposed to the market

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>make monetary policy on behalf of the Fed the tail

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>wagging the dog. But it is hard for to be

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fair for the Fed. It feels like Danielle, especially when

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you do whether it's the pandemic that causes all of

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a sudden precedented stimulus to be out there. Uh, you know,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we constantly see when we run into trouble that it

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>does feel like lawmakers UM in Washington are quick to

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of help out and lend a hand, and that

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>create changes kind of the liquidity story and does make

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>it trickier for the FED. It does, UM and you know,

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to the point of some St. Louis Fed research. You know,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we injected forty three of g d P into the

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>economy inside of twelve months. You know that compares to

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that the entire New Dealer forty fort of GDP. It

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>does make it more difficult, but we have to remember

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that they monetized every last penny of that. So the

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Fed played the role of enabler um. By the way,

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you get that out of this next congress.

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you get the same form of stimulus

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as we as there's a greater recognition of recession. Eight

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, we had one stay with rising unemployment state

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>initial unemployment claims. As of the nineteenth Wednesday's report, we

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have twenty nine states with rising initial state unemployment claims.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's a real shift. That's kind of where I

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>want to go, Danielle, because we're gonna get a jobs

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>numbered next week. But we've got record low unemployment. We've

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>been hearing from our retail analyst on the top of

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>every hour, here is out at the shopping malls. People

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are out there shopping. It seems like we've got a

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong consumer judging. If nothing else everybody's kind of

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>got a job, well, but everybody doesn't kind of have

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a job. If if if jobless claims were down forty

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>eight point nine percent, that was the best that it

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was right down as good jobless claims down, you over

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>your nationwide As of September, as of the nineteenth, jobless

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>claims were only down two point zero percent. In other words,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the time we get Thursday's print, this next Thursday's print,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims nationwide are going to be rising year over year.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think high high income consumers in University

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of Michigan data are telling you that they expect the

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate to rise as opposed to that middle here

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and the lowest tier. They don't see it coming yet,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>so do you. We go as far as to say

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that FED policy it is working. We see it in

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the housing market. And I agree with you that last

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>weekly jobless print showed, you know that things are starting

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to slow down in the labor market. We still have

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>ways to go. And you know, we certainly saw in

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the FOMC minutes to you know, FED staff warning of

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance of recession in next year's now near fifty percent.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So FED policy is working. Oh, it absolutely is. I mean,

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously you see it most in interest rate sensitive sectors.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>But for heaven's sake, I was I was just telling

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a friend we had a furniture Manufacturerloyees announced that they

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>were closing, like shutting up shop. We're not talking young

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>furniture manufacturer in Mississippi. Let's go on Tuesday period end.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>There will be ripple effects into the economy from this

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>slamming the brakes on the housing market. It's not just

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be contained mortgage lenders. It's going to have

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>broader economic rammifications. And we're beginning to see that. I

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>suspect we'll see a lull in layoff activity in the

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>month of December, because who wants to lay people off

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>right in front of the holidays? And then we get January,

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and then we get January, and it's gonna hurt. Hey, Danielle,

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in When I think of one of the most

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>vibrant markets in the United States, Dallas Fort Worth area,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>that metroplex down there, how's the economy down there? Well,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy down here is still relatively strong. If you

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the nation as a whole. Um Texas unemployment claims,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 1>you're still down four. So we're just on the cusp

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of starting to enter recession in Texas. It has certainly

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>been delayed because of the mass um migration here to

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>these markets, but even here you're seeing homebuilders put incentives

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out there, cut home prices and not gain any traction.

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And that tells you something about basically, if you follow

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the entrails of consumer confidence, there's now a recognition. And

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what's critical is nationwide people have

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>recognized that we're going into recessions. This isn't just a

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO survey. This is a broader recognition among the public

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's a game change. Or whenever in any cycle,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>whenever you get to that point of recognition, that's when

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>things start to change. Danielle. We heard from Lyle him

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>back him by earlier of Grantit Group Advisors reminding us

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>g d P is retail sales. So this is something

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're focused on today. Because of Black Friday. We've

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>been talking with our Punum Goyle, a Bloomberg intelligence out

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>at the malls. They're busy, they're getting busier, people waiting

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for parking spots. Black Friday can be a great data

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>point for the Federal Reserve in terms of whether or

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not consumers feel confident about shopping. At the same time,

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was maybe the New York FED that

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>put out some data about, you know, Americans, consumers are

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>adding more to their credit cards. So how might the

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>FED take Black Friday Cyber Monday data and kind of

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at it into their thinking about FED policy. Well, I

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>think I think consumer confidence, in the way you describe

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it um really speaks to people's willingness to completely max

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>out their credit cards. And the data that's not being

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>followed as closely is that we're about tapped out in

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of credit card lines, so and we've taken savings

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>down to such a level on a nominal basis that

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't enough savings to spend what Americans spent last

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>December in terms of burning through their savings. The willingness

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is a corollary, if you will, to financial conditions being easy.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Many Americans have never lived through the double difpercession of

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighties, and they don't they don't know of

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a FED that doesn't come in and rescue the economy

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very quickly and not let the pain be failed. And

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's how many. That's how many households and

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>many investors are operating. Daniel. We're gonna get the Jolts

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>data next week job openings, and it's still a big number.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me more than ten million. How do

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you interpret the Jolt's number or do you just kind

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of toss it aside? You know, I don't toss it aside.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I allowed some FED staff papers to allow me to

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>tos us it aside. If you if you net FED research,

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>there's the irony is that Powell is ignoring FED research.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>If you net out job postings that are written specifically

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to poach existing employed individuals. So I want to get

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a good employee from my competition and hire them for

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>more money. If you net those types of job postings out,

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Federal research data, your job openings are basically flat.

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a little bumped during COVID, but otherwise basically

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>flat job openings for people who are unemployed. So there's

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a critical distinction to be made there. It's a weird economy,

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, making sense of it and coming out of

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic, right, we haven't lived through this before. Um,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so what is this thing? I mean? FED policy monetary policy,

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>never never assure thing there is in a playbook that

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>says this is exactly what you have to do. Daniel,

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know this better than most. So what is the

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tricky thing? What is the major risk factor right here

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time for J. Powell and Company.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So the way I liken it's for for Quill's clients

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is cycle compression. So the way that he brushed off

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of lag when he was the podium, as

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>opposed to being recognized and written into the statement up

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>by the doves. And my greatest concern is that fannimated

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>research that showed that on average it takes five quarters

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>for home price increases in home price declines to manifest

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the consumer price inflation consumer price index. It's taking

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>only half of that time. In other words, the magnitude

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of the FED rate hiking cycle plus q T in

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the background is moving monetary policy into the real economy

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at twice the speed as what we've seen when it

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>used to be Alan Greenspan seventeen rate hikes in a row,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>only any five basis points at a time. So I

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>think that that's what we have to pay attention to,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is the rapidity with which lag is making its mark

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on the real economy. Hey, Danielle, just thirty seconds left.

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>What's the what do you get asked the most right

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>now by your clients? Hey? Explain this to us what

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>my clients want to know the most right now? Or

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>why are credit spreads as wide as they are and

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going to break? And my stock answer is you

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have to pay attention to other parts of the world.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>How yielding in Europe is degrading at a much faster pace.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>The credit event will happen, but so far because financial

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>conditions remain easy. It's going to keep the Feds pedal

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to the metal, so to speak. But credit remains on

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody's front mind. It always does end in credit. Danielle,

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Really appreciate and have a great weekend.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Danielle de Martinez de Martino excuse me, Booth CEO and

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>chief strategist over at Quill Intelligence. Thanks for listening to

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>on Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Radio