WEBVTT - What Does Habeas Corpus Mean?

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of iHeartRadio, Hey Brainstuff, Lauren

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Bogelbaum here. For almost a thousand years, and in many societies,

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>there's been a legal concept that a person cannot be

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>imprisoned by their government unless that government has a valid

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and lawful reason for doing so. This is sometimes called

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>habeas corpus, which is Latin for you have the body,

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>which is basically a way of saying, Okay, you've got

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a prisoner in custody, bring that person before a judge

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so that we can figure out whether they're being imprisoned

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>legally or not. In countries around the world, there are

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>laws on the books that allow a prisoner to petition

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for habeas corpus relief, meaning that they can ask to

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have a judge look at whether it's legal that they've

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>been detained. Habeas corpus doesn't have anything to do with

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the prisoner's guilt or innocence. It's just a matter of

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>does the government have the right to detain me. It's

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a good question to be able to ask in terms

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of having human rights. So today let's talk about the

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>history of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus was first clearly laid

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>out in the year twelve fifteen in the Magna Carta,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>an English charter limiting the monarchy's power and establishing individual

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>freedoms for the upper class. Anyway, it said in its

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty ninth clause is something to the extent of no

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>man shall be arrested or imprisoned, except by the lawful

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>judgment of his peers and by the law of the land.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>The Magna Carto was based on prior documents, but has

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>often been cited as a foundation or inspiration for all

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of democratic law, and this clause in particular is pointed

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to as the basis for the system of trial by jury.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Habeas corpus protections started really seeing use in the sixteen

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hundreds in England, both as a way to limit the

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>monarchy's power to imprison people and to allow the monarchy

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to check other authorities power to imprison people. This was

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>pertinent at the time, perhaps especially due to concerns about

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>religious persecution. Parliament wrote the Habeas Corpus Act into law

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen seventy nine. A century later, the framers of

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution of the United States thought that it was

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>important enough to include a mention in the Bill of rights.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But Article one, Section nine, and Congress authorized federal courts

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to grant relief through it right off the bat in

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighty nine when they began laying out the powers

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of the courts. So, habeas corpus is old, Does that

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>mean that it's antiquated? The short answer is unequivocally no.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Without it, no one is truly free, because anyone could

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>be removed from their life and imprisoned indefinitely for no

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>reason at all, with no access to the due process

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of a fair trial. In a decision handed down by

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court in nineteen ninety two, the justices substantiated

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the importance of habeas corpus, calling it quote the fundamental

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So how exactly does habeas corpus support the dignity of

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the legal process? Habeas corpus is part of a twofold process.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>In a petition for habeas corpus, a prisoner or another

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>interested party raises doubts about the legality of their imprisonment.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>If the petition is successful in demonstrating that the imprisonment

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>justifies an examination, a judge will issue a writ of

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>habeas corpus. This is the order for the prisoner to

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>be brought to court. At that time, the judge examines

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the issue again. The writ of habeas corpus isn't meant

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to determine whether the detainee is guilty of the crime

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're accused of. It's a call for examination of

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the legality of their imprisonment, was the due process of

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>law followed. A due process is a group of constitutionally

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed rights that in the US includes a fair and

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>speedy trial, access to legal counsel, freedom from unlawful search

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and seizure, a trial by a jury of peers, and

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>an appearance before one's accusers. But even a constitutional guarantee

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>carries little weight if there's no mechanism in place to

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>grant recourse to the person on the receiving end of

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that guarantee. Habeas corpus ensures that the right to due

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>process is supported by action. Since its inception, Congress has

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>expanded federal court's power to provide habeas relief to state

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>prisoners too, if their imprisonment is in violation of federal law,

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>including civil rights. Sometimes habeas corpus is used as a

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>last ditch strategic tool to obtain freedom for a defendant

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in a criminal case, but only after the appeals process

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>has been exhausted. A court reviewing a habeas plea can

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>consider new evidence, whereas in an appeal no new evidence

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>can be submitted. Once an issue raised in a habeas

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>plea has been decided, however, it cannot be debated again

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in regard to the same case. Habeas corpus is so

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>important that several cases over the past one hundred years

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or so have confirmed the right of this due process

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to all people physically present in the United States or

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>detained elsewhere by the government of the United States, regardless

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of that person's citizenship. The US Constitution provides for suspension

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of habeas corpus in only extreme and express cases, but

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>as with any law, exactly when and what these cases

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>are is subject to interpretation. The framers of the Constitution

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>recognized that there are situations where revoking habeas corpus may

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be necessary for the common good. Article one, section nine

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>states that habeas corpus quote shall not be suspended unless

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>may require it. The such instances have emerged throughout our history.

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>During the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and a few specific situations starting in eighteen sixty one,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>which may have saved lives by allowing the Northern military

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to detain suspected spies, but was also technically legal until

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Congress approved the suspension in eighteen sixty three retroactively and

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for the duration of the war. Only Congress has the

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>legal ability to suspend habeas corpus. They did so briefly

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>during reconstruction in the South to prevent violence and intimidation

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>from white supremacist groups like the KKK in parts of

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. Another brief suspension of habeas corpus was put

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in place in the then territory of the Philippines by

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the American military in nineteen oh five during political unrest,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but there was a larger instance after Japan bombed Pearl

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Harbor in nineteen forty one. More than one hundred and

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand Japanese Americans were detained without recourse in Hawaii

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>under martial law and along the west coast of the

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>mainland by presidential decree. The majority were American born or

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>naturalized citizens. The Department of Justice voiced ethical and constitutional objections,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so the decree Executive Order in ninety sixty six authorized

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the military to exclude civilians from military areas. They divided

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast into military zones, evacuated Japanese Americans living there,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and detained them in internment camps indefinitely with no due process.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It was because of a writ of habeas corpus that

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the exclusion order was removed in late nineteen forty four,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and the camps were shut down entirely by nineteen forty six.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The twenty first century has seen suspensions of habeas corpus

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. After the attacks on September eleventh of two

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, President George W. Bush and Congress concluded

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that conditions warranted repealing the right to habeas corpus. The

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Detainee Treatment Act of two thousand and five and the

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Military Commissions Act of two thousand and six removed any

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>court's ability to hear a petition of habeas corpus for

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone deemed an enemy combatant by the US government, and

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they did so retroactively, relating to the detention of suspects

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>following September eleventh in places like Guantanamo Bay. This was

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>reversed by the Supreme Court in two thousand and eight. Then,

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in early twenty twenty five, the Trump administration began enacting

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>mass arrest and detention of many different refugees, temporary migrants,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and intendedly permanent immigrants living in the US in preparation

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for deporting them. The administration argued that the US is

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>being invaded by such people and that many of them

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>have violent criminal intent. As of June fifteenth of this year,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>over fifty six thousand people were actively being detained by

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Immigration and Customs Enforcement or ICE. Of those, seventy two

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>percent had no criminal record at all, and only seven

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>percent had any record of violence or property damage. Several

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>people have successfully applied for habeas relief and have been released,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and Supreme Court ruled in April that immigrants must be

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>given enough notice of deportation to begin due process and

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>petition for habeas relief if they choose. However, constitutional experts

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and human rights organizations have raised concerns that not all

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>detainees understand or are able to access their right to

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>due process because of the speed and scale of the detentions. Furthermore,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>officials in the administration have told the press that their

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>considering suspended ding Habeas corpus entirely. This is a potential

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>problem for everyone in America because without recourse against false

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or illegal imprisonment, you don't have the due process to

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>prove that you haven't committed a crime, or that you

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>are a citizen, or that you otherwise deserve to go free.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>If you can be imprisoned without due process, the other

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>rights granted to people in America go out the window.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So even if habeas corpus you have the body sounds archaic,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's actually quite important, perhaps especially today. Today's episode is

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>based on the article why is habeas corpus important? On

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>how stuffworks dot com written by Josh Clark. Brain Stuff

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartRadio in partnership with how stuffworks

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and it's produced by Tyler Klang. For more

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>podcasts my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>or whereever you listen to your favorite shows. M