WEBVTT - China Bans Micron Chips and Meta's Fine

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where innovation, money and power Collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Scarlett who in for Caroline Hide at Bloomberg World

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York, and.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Burnka in for Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Coming up an escalation in the US China tensions as

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>China bans microns chips on cybersecurity risks.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Will bring you all the details, plus a.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 3>Record find for Meta, the social media giant ordered to

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 3>pay one point three billion dollars to the EU after

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>regulators said it failed to protect personal information. We'll break

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>that decision down and forward.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Stepping up its electric vehicle output after reaching a series

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>of deals to buy lithium from projects in Canada to

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be hearing from the CEO later this hour,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 2>but first we want to give you a check on

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>markets and where things stand at midday here in New York.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 4>It's very much weight and.

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>See game when it comes to the broader equity market,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 2>both on the debt selling negotiations and what the Federal

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Reserve decides to do with interest rates. Negotiating teams, by

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the way, are back on at the table today in Washington,

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 2>d C. However, we do see the Nazak one hundred

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>leading the way. Tech stocks continue to be the outperformers here,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>even as chip makers are under pressure. We'll get to

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that a little bit later on the Nazak one hundred,

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>by the way, at a thirteen month high, and excel UF,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>which is the ETF that tracks financial stocks, up by

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.919
<v Speaker 2>a third of one percent, thanks very much. In focus

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 2>today with JP morgan Chase holding its investor day and

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>also helping to boost sentiment is pack West. The Beverly

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Hills based lender is not a holding in this ETF,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>but it is taking steps to boost its liquidity by

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>selling two point six billion dollars of real estate loans

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>at a discount and the two year yield ticking up

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 2>to four point three to three percent. There's no ECO

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>data today, so expect a lot of movement based on

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>incremental movement, hopefully progress in those debt sealing discussions. Let's

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>switch it up here and take a look at commodities.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Crude oil has now flipped to the upside, up by

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>four tenths of one percent, even as copper is down

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 2>by one point three percent. Still a lot of concerns

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>over what's going on in China. That post COVID rebound

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 2>has not been as strong as many people had hoped,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and the lack of fresh stimulus measures in China is

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 2>certainly holding back some of the medals.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 4>And I wanted to point.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Out the Hanksaying Index closing up by more than one

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>percent after Joe Biden, the President said that he expects

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>US China relations to improve very shortly.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Details on that coming up.

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And finally, Greek stocks getting a big, big day here.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>They made a new ten year high after national elections.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 2>It looks like the incumbent Prime Minister is in position

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>to get another four year term, which is certainly a

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 2>good thing for all his investment friendly policies. That investors

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 2>are keeping a very close eye on alex What about you?

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>What are you watching? I'm watching the top tech.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Mover today, Scarlett first with Meta Investors are really taking

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that one point three billion dollar fine in Stride coming

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>over from the EU. Perhaps that's because the company has

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 3>actually in the past threatened to leave if there's not

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 3>a resolution on the EU's kind of push for them

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 3>not to send userdata over overseas to the US. I'm

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 3>also looking at Albermarle. Now, this is a company that

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>just inked a lithium partnership with Ford. Ford has a

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty billion dollar electric vehicle plan and for Albemarle to

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 3>be in the mix. Investors are liking a little bit

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>of that now. In terms of what's going on in

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the cybersecurity space, there is.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Kind of our top name of the day, Micron.

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>China's cybersecurity regulator said it found relatively serious cybersecurity risks

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the company's chips. Whether this is

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 3>political banter or there are actual risks. We're going to

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>break all that down in the show, but for now,

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>investors drove the stock down around five percent. It's pairents

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 3>some of those laws, but we'll get into the details here,

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Suit Scarlett, all right, and let's stay on that right now,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 3>because we're going to go now to San Francisco and

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 3>bring in Ian King, who's covered semiconductors in Asia and

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>now on the West Coast. So Ian, with his decades

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>of experience, is certainly the best person to speak on this.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Ian, as Alex was setting up for us. It's curious

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>this ban on Micron products. What kind of history does

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Micron have with China specifically? Is there a notable significant

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>history between the two.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean there are a number of incidents. The

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 5>big thing to point out is that Micron, unlike it's

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 5>South Korean competitors Sam Song and s Khaynix, doesn't have

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 5>a production plant in China. Those guys do, which obviously

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 5>makes them a little bit closer to Beijing's heart in

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 5>terms of what that country wants to do with domesticating

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 5>its own chip industry. And the other sort of negative

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 5>thing that's happened for Micron in the past is Micron

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 5>went caught with a Taiwanese company arguing that that company

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 5>with stealing its IP to give to China. So there's

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 5>there's some real kind of tension there in the past.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Now Ian Micron obviously caught in the middle of this

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>political banter.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 4>If your Qualcom, if you're Broadcom.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 3>If you're Intel, should you be worried that your next

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 3>And if not, why is Micron the target of Beijing's

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 3>ire at the moment?

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the way to think about this is China

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 5>needs Qualcomm, China needs Intel. China needs Broadcom, it doesn't

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 5>need Micron. The chips that Micron makes, the DRAM and

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 5>the non flash memory chips are basically exactly the same

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 5>as the ones that Samsung makes, as the ones at

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 5>sk Henex makes, So literally you can drop them into

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 5>a piece of electronics, pull one out, put one in.

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 5>You can't do that with other products from those companies

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 5>you mentioned. So that's what's going on here.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>That's incredible context here because Micron's memory chips are kind

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 2>of commoditized. They're pretty standard components as opposed to say,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>in videos graphics chips. How much of this is trying

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to buying time or giving its own domestic industry some

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 2>time to bloom.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if that's the plan, we're talking a decade

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 5>two decades before they'll have equivalent capabilities. What this is

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 5>being seen as more of Scarlett is really Beijing has

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 5>just really had to take it on the chin. We've

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 5>seen all of these actions by the US government against

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 5>Chinese technology companies, and really Beijing has had nothing to

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 5>fight back with apart from Micron. It can take a

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 5>swing at them.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Ian King, our in house semiconductor expert, Thank you. I

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>want to now bring in the Washington angle on this.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 3>We have Bloomberg's Haley Lines. Kayley, as we see this

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of back and forth between Beijing and DC, what

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>do you think is next here or does dec have

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>a response to this.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Micron move from China.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, we've already heard from the Commerce Department on this,

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 6>saying that Beijing's conclusion here that micro imposes a cybersecurity

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 6>national security threat has no basis in fact, and that

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 6>this action, along with some other recent action that Beijing

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 6>has taken, is inconsistent with China's assertions that it's opening

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 6>up its markets and is committed to a transparent regulatory framework.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 6>So that's the US response. Of course, China, for its

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 6>part in releasing this conclusion from this review, says it

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 6>wasn't political, that it is about national security, but it

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 6>does kind of have this sense of escalating a fight

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 6>between the world's two largest economies when it comes to

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 6>this technology. Because we have to keep in mind the

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 6>US has already taken plenty of action on its own.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 6>It's blacklisted certain Chinese technology firms, and of course late

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 6>last year also introduced a pretty sweeping restriction on selling

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 6>advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipement to China.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's ironic that this is happening right as

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 2>President Joe Biden is in Asia attending the G seven

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>summit and making comments about how he sees he has

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 2>China relations actually improving very shortly. Give us some context

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 2>for when he made those comments and what he might

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 2>be referring to.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, that was him speaking before he left the G

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 6>seven seven in Japan, your right, Scarlett or Ambrey Horden,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 6>was asking him about China. Also the question around sanctions

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 6>to facilitate a meeting between Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 6>his counterpart, which that we understand is under review by

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 6>the administration, still something potentially in the works. But he

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 6>did say referring to the Chinese spy balloon incident that

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 6>captured all of our attention earlier this year, calling it silly,

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 6>saying that he does expect relations between the US and

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 6>China too thaw in the near term. It poses a

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 6>very interesting contrast between the tone of the President's remarks

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 6>over the weekend versus then just hours later later China

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 6>making this move against a US company.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, Kaylee, this isn't the only big conversation happening in DC.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>It is start of the week. Where are we next

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>on the debt ceiling debate? What do we expect today

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>on this Monday.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, at five point thirty pm, there is going to

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 6>be a meeting between President Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 6>So that's really what we're all looking forward to.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 6>Those two did speak on the phone yesterday when the

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 6>President Biden was on Air one on his.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Way back to the US.

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 6>It seemed that their tone coming out of that phone

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 6>call was one of more optimism. But really this is

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 6>going to be about real progress being made.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 7>We understand that.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 6>The two sides are still really far far apart in

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 6>the negotiations, as their different parties have been working over

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 6>the weekend, working again at the Capitol this morning on

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 6>this But the issue of spending cuts, spending caps, stricter

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 6>work requirements for entitlements, permitting reform, all still on the table,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 6>all still needing to be ironed out into an ultimate compromise.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 6>Because even once we get a deal between Speaker McCarthy

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 6>and President Biden, it still needs to work. It's the

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 6>way through both chambers of Congress to make it back

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 6>to the President's desk for him to sign off on it.

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 6>And we're just ten days out now from June first,

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 6>which Treasury Secretary Jenneyellen reiterated over the weekend could be

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 6>the earliest possible X State.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Cluck is sticking. Kelly, Thank you so much. Kelly

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Lines joining us from Washington.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 4>It's time now for talking tech.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 3>First up, Uber, the ride sharing company, is placing its

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 3>head of diversity on leave after complaints of insensitivity.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 7>CEO Dara Kashrashahi asked.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Bo Young Lee to take a leave of absence after

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 3>workers complained that an employee event she moderated called Don't

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Call Me Karen was insensitive to people of color. And

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 3>turmoil in the cyber insurance market. Global insurers are racing

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>to figure out how to avoid covering government sponsored cyber

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 3>attacks and catastrophic hacks. Ransomware attacks increased by eighty seven

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 3>percent in twenty twenty two from the year prior, with

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 3>global cyber premiums expected to exceed twenty three billion dollars

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 3>by twenty twenty five.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Plus.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Instagram ran into some technical difficulties on Sunday night. Tens

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 3>of thousands of users reported that they could not access

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the app and what was the second widespread disruption in

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 3>just over two months. Down detectors now reporting that the

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>problem lasted for about an hour and the app is

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>back up and running.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 4>Now, Scarlett, all right, well we're going.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 2>To stick with Instagram because his parent company Meta now

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>faces a record one point three billion dollar fine in

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the EU. So we want to bring in Alex Webb

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Quick Take, who covers all things tech, to

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 2>give us some more context here.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Alex, this is.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Something that was not a total surprise, but the amount

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>is certainly a surprise.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 8>Yes, it is a record fine for Facebook. The question

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 8>is whether ultimately they will end up paying it. There

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 8>sort pertains to the so called US EU privacy Shield.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 8>This was the agreement that previously let companies transfer data

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 8>from Europe to the US without any major questions asked.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 8>Then all of a sudden there were concerns that actually

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 8>US intelligence agencies might have access to this data, so

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 8>they scrapped the privacy shield. Facebook has, according to this decision,

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 8>at any rate, failed to prevent data from being shipped

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 8>over to the US. There is, however, a new privacy shield.

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 8>Talks about it are in the offering that could be

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 8>agreed upon by the end of the Northern Hemisphere summer.

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 3>Now alex The investors, though, are not necessarily seeing this

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 3>as about thing. Perhaps that's because the company in the

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 3>past has threatened to actually pull out of the EU.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>How are you taking this stock reaction that the shares

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>are up about two percent on the news even though

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 3>this is a record fine for Meta.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, Often in these sort of cases, when a fine

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 8>is sold out, stocks do tend to pop because investors

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 8>have clarity. They know how much this is likely to

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 8>cost the company if it does end up costing them

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 8>anything at all. That clarity therefore results in a stock

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 8>price gain. Often then, don't forget you know, Facebook has

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 8>met as oodles of money, has very healthy free cash flow,

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 8>even before the savings program that they've been putting into place.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 8>They've reported twenty eight billion of revenue in the first quarter.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 8>So one point three billion, you know, while clearly painful,

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 8>is not going to bankrupt the company.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And we've seen how those tech companies with their

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>free cash flow have been regarded as safe havens for

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 2>investors in this turbulent time in the markets. One thing

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that I did notice in the reporting is that metal

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 2>was given time to suspend any future transfer of data.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that there is a way out for

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the company where perhaps a fine could be whittled down.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 8>No, it means that if they don't do it by

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 8>that date, then there could be there's the risk of

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 8>further punishment. The real act. One of the really interesting

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 8>piece of reporting on this About a year ago, Motherboard

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 8>managed to get hold of an internal document from Facebook

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 8>which likened data to a pot of ink that is

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 8>thrown into a swimming pool. That the ink is in

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 8>the pool, Now, how do you gather that ink back up?

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 8>The internal Facebook document heavily implied that that was essentially impossible.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 8>That's the real challenge they face right now. Perhaps over

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 8>the course of the past year since this reporting was published,

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 8>they have found a way of putting the ink back

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 8>in the pot, but it is a real challenge and

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 8>will be interested to see how or if they do it.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Alex, this is meta cotton and crosshairs. This beats out

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 3>the record fine that was previously applied to Amazon. Are

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 3>there other companies in the EU that should be looking

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 3>at this as kind of a warning sign? Who should

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 3>be actually looking at where their ink is spread throughout

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 3>their organizations.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 8>I think that the EU has been very slow on GDPR,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 8>on the general Data Protection regulation, and they are that

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 8>clearly picking the big most egregious victims first. It's still

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 8>five years, so first, it's a very long timeline. It

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 8>is a warning shot to other people to say, you know,

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 8>sort your stuff out. I'm sure there are plenty of

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 8>other companies who have done this. Facebook also sits on

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 8>one of the biggest pools of consumer data in the world,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 8>so it's unsurprising therefore that they are gone for first.

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 8>I wouldn't like to name names on who else might

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 8>be in the firing line, but I'm sure there is

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 8>a very long list of people who could be vulnerable

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 8>to this well.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Alex Webb thanks for joining and some clarity on

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that situation. Rory Harvey, executive vice president of General Motors,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>spoke exclusively to Bloomberg's Matt Miller about its new line

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 3>of evs, including an electric Chevrolet Varado.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Take a listen.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 9>We have our Altium platform, and the Altium platform actually

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 9>gives us the ability to be able to configure battery

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 9>packs in many different formats in terms of the amount

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 9>of modules that are in there, so dependent upon the

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 9>capabilities of the vehicle, dependent upon the prices of the vehicle,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 9>dependent upon what functionality we want from the vehicle, then

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 9>we can figure those atium battery packs in a way

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 9>that fits the customer needs. So there's a huge decree

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 9>of commonality within autium. But it also provides us with

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 9>ultimate flexibility.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 10>Is altm able to scale from you know, a thirty

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 10>thousand dollars vehicle all the way up to one hundred

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 10>and fifty thousand dollars vehicle.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 9>It certainly is. That's one of the great things about

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 9>otium as a product.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 10>That's that's very impressive. Now, having said that, more people

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 10>who are ordering your vehicles are paying closer to the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 10>upper end. I saw that of the Silverado HD orders,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 10>which is a work truck. Let's be fair, right, eighty

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 10>four percent or for AT four and Denali trims. In

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 10>fact more than fifty percent or for Denali and Denali

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 10>Ultimate trims.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 4>So they're paying top dollar for these trucks.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, no, I mean, and I think that's again it's

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 9>just credibility in terms of the desirability of the product portfolio.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 9>If you looked at the general Motors product portfolio today,

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 9>I think it's outstanding. And if you looked at it

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 9>in terms of what customers are looking at to buy

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 9>to meet their needs. As an example, they're paying a premium.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 9>So again it just shows the desirability of our vehicles

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 9>and the fact that we've got vehicles that are attractive

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 9>to our customers.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 10>You have a small electric vehicle in the bolt that

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 10>addresses that issue. How are your EV sales as a

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 10>percentage of the total what do you expect for example,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 10>Rory in twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that one's really interesting because, as you know, Matt,

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 9>the adoption rates continue to change. If you looked at

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 9>the data for April, I think it was the highest

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 9>penetration of evs in the industry as an example. So

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 9>we adjust our production capabilities in line with could demand.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 9>So I guess I'm not going to give a definitive number,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 9>but suffice to say that you know it's increasing all

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 9>of the time. And if you looked at the second

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 9>half of the year, certainly if you take the Cadillac

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 9>Lyric as an example, we know that we started off

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 9>deliberately so with relatively low volumes and we're building significantly

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 9>in half two, so it's going to take an ever

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 9>greater proportion of general motor sales.

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 10>Rory, let me finally ask you about the chip situation.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 10>Are you all cut up in terms of the supply chain?

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 10>Can you get all the chips that you need to

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 10>produce in the size that you want to.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 9>I would say work in progress. I would say it's

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 9>significantly better than where it was historically. I would say

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 9>that we are not in a position that we could

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 9>declare that it's all totally behind us, but I would

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 9>say that it's much more stable, and I would say

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 9>that it's going to continue to improve going forward. So

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 9>a much better position overall.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 2>And you can watch Ry Harvey's full interview with Bloomberg

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>on the Terminal. Now, Matt Miller has been pretty busy

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 2>because he also sat down with Ford CEO Jim Farley

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>about that company ramping up its EV production, which includes

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>striking a number of deals to buy lithium for batteries.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Matt joins us now from Ford's production plant in Michigan. Matt,

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were going to wear a hard hat.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize you're outside in front of cars. But

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 2>of course you are tell us a little bit about

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the Ford Lithium partnership that it made public today. How

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 2>critical is this partnership to meeting Ford's edy goals.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's very important because you know, last year Ford

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 10>sold at least in the US, I think about sixty

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 10>one sixty two thousand electric vehicles in total. In twenty

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 10>twenty six, they want to sell two millions, so they've

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 10>got to ramp up substantially, and the most difficult part

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 10>of that, according to Jim Farley, is scaling up battery production.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 10>In order to build those batteries, they need a lot

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 10>of chemicals and minerals like lithium, they need nickel, they

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 10>need cobalt, and getting those things isn't particularly easy, especially

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 10>since eighty percent of that refining process currently sits in China.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 10>So Ford has made a number of deals three on

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 10>lithium with the biggest lithium producers in the world to

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 10>get that refining done in North America and in South America,

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 10>so in Canada and Mexico and in Chile. That's really

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 10>key to keeping costs down, and that's really the biggest

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 10>part of the vehicle. So they're going to be building

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 10>their next generation electric vehicles in Tennessee as well as

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 10>around the rest of North American plants that they already

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 10>have production in. But getting these chemicals, getting these minerals

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 10>is really important.

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 4>And Matt, that sounds expensive.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 7>Are those costs being passed along to consumers?

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 3>What's the pricing strategy look like for Ford's evs as

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 3>they roll them out?

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so it is very expensive. And right now they

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 10>have a negative one hundred percent margin and change right

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 10>they're losing three billion dollars this year on about three

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars in revenue. They hope to change that dramatically.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 10>So by twenty twenty six, remember is less than three

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 10>years away, they want to have an eight percent margin

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 10>on their entire electric vehicle fleet, so that would be

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 10>a massive change, a ten percent margin on the internal

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 10>combustion engine fleet.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 4>And they need.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 10>Those big margins which they already make on you know,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 10>the big trucks and the very expensive gas cars they sell,

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 10>like the Mustang or the Bronco that you see behind me.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 10>They need those profits to invest into this battery electric

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 10>vehicle business before it starts making its own money.

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's own virtuous circle. Matt, thank you. So much.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Matt Miller, of course, joining us right now from outside

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Ford's production plant. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Scarlettfoo in.

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 7>New York, and I'm Alex Brinkan San Francisco.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's get you.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 2>A check on the market gets at midday here in

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>New York, another day of muted price action when it

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>comes to equities and the major indexes, the SMP moving

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>up marshaling by one tenth of one percent. Clearly, investors

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>are waiting for any kind of progress on debt selling negotiations,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>as well as responding to commentary from FED officials. Two

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>FED Regional Bank presidents Neil Kashkari and James Buller giving

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>some hawkish commentary talking about how a pause is not

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>necessarily the thing that's going to come up next, perhaps

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a rat hike might be in order in the coming future,

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and also how inflation is still something the FED is

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 2>keeping its eye on. Nevertheless, you continue to see those

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>big cap tech stocks piling on gains. We have the

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>NAZAQ one hundred already at a thirteen month high, gaining

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 2>another two tenths of one percent.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Apple among the big gainers.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Here and XLF the ETF that tracks financial stocks in

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 2>focus today as JP Morgan Chase holds its Investor Day

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and PacWest makes some moves to shortest liquidity, the two

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 2>year yield inching up by six basis points these days,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 2>that kind of is an inching up at four point

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 2>three to two percent. We know that Treasury Secretary Janet

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Yellen has said that the chances the US can pay

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 2>all its bills by mid June, when the next round

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of tax receipts come in, are quite low. And we

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 2>do know that President Joe Biden and Kevin McCarthy, the

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Speaker of the House, are scheduled to resume meeting at

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>five thirty pm Eastern time today after the market's closed.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of wait and see until we

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>get to that point. Now, taking a look at one

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>individual name, it's Micron, and the stock is in retreat today,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 2>falling as much as five percent from Friday's close to

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>an eleven month high. But today it is coming down

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit because, like so many other tech socks,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Micron has had a banner twenty twenty three. So far,

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the memory chip maker had gained as much as thirty

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>seven percent after giving indication that the industry has worked

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>its way through most of the over supply of chips.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But what happened today is that China said Micron's products

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 2>fail to pass a cybersecurity review, and that's led to

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a decision to ban Micron products.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Other US chip makers.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Are falling in sympathy, while we've seen some Korean chip

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>makers like Kinix and sk gain as a result alex.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Now, increasingly leaders of AI companies are asking Congress to

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 3>establish safeguards to mitigate threats their technology poses, like open Ai,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 3>CEO and many others. But what kinds of threats does

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 3>AI pose to society exactly? We'll bring in Sarakraft's, director

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 3>of the Technology Institute over at Cornell, a non resident

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 3>senior fellow at the Brookings Institute who recently wrote that

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>large language models quote may disrupt far more than just

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the economy. They also appear poised to challenge democracy too.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring Sarah in for a deeper dive. Sarah, tell

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>me challenges to democracy?

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean by that?

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah? Thanks, It's great to be here. So one other things.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 12>So, I've been working with language models now for several years,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 12>and the concern I had was that if looking at

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 12>twenty sixteen, there were bad actors that were trying to

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 12>insinuate themselves in the democratic process. What happens now when

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 12>these language models enter in and make it really easy

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 12>to generate a lot of content, credible content, really quickly.

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 12>So we wanted to map that terrain, and so we

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 12>did an experiment and randomly sent AI generated texts and

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 12>human generated texts to members of Congress the state legislatures

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 12>around the country. And we saw that members of Congress

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 12>cannot tell the difference. And anyone who's worked with CHAGBT

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 12>can see just how plausible.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 11>Sounding this content is.

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 12>And so I think it's important for us to understand

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 12>the threat and by way of mitigating that threat.

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 11>And I think that's what we were trying to uncover

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 11>with this research.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 7>Sarah.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 3>When I think of where misinformation tiply lives, that's on

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>social media. So I have to ask AI companies. Folks

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>like Sam Altman are going to Congress saying hey, regulate

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>us social media companies. You've kind of heard the same tune.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Who do you think is actually where does the owners

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>fall in terms of who needs to intervene here and

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 3>make sure that AI misinformation and the impact on democracy

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't get out of control, right.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 12>I think what we've seen with technology and regulation is

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 12>that off it it's very reactive at.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 11>The federal level, and I think there are good reasons

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 11>for that. This technology is moving so quickly.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 12>And by contrast, for example, the European Union is trying

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 12>to really lean into regulation, but I think there's a

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 12>real risk that they are going to pass this AI Act.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 11>And it will come into force and already be obsolete.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 12>So I think some of the onus actually is on

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 12>the firms, and open AI has done some of this by.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 11>Making certain outputs not possible.

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 12>So anyone who's done certain types of trying to push

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 12>the boundaries on outputs might see that open AI.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 11>Doesn't actually permit those.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 12>So I think again this is a spirit of trying

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 12>to understand through the public and private partnerships, you know,

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 12>government and firms, kind of what that risk is, that

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 12>threat is, but also to try to think through anticipate is.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 11>This a too early you know, to regulate or too late?

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 12>And I think we're still really trying to understand what

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 12>this technology is about, and so lurching into something at

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 12>the federal level might be a little premature.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 2>So following on what you said, Sarah about the onus

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 2>falling on the firms, firms are made up of people,

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>so I wonder anytime there's a new leader in charge,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 2>or they have someone else looking over regulation or their

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 2>policy side, whatever they propose could change as well.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 4>How concerned are you about I guess.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 2>The quality of people who are making these kinds of

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 2>decisions at these big firms.

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 12>Right, And this is the question is a great question

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 12>because we've been thinking about this for several years in

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 12>different contexts content moderation, when Facebook was under fire for

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.239
<v Speaker 12>what they were permitting and not permitting. And it's a

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 12>real debate about kind of outsourcing the public market space,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 12>marketplace of ideas, for example, to private firms. And again

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 12>that's something that I think in Europe they're less tolerant of,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 12>and in the US I think for a good reason,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 12>we're saying, let's let these firms innovate. But what we

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 12>need to be thinking through is just what guardrails do

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 12>we need in place to kind of guard against the

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 12>more extreme consequences of those technologies.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that you said that Europe is already moving

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>ahead and perhaps whatever policy they institute might become obsolete quickly,

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>but because they are moving ahead, do they become do

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>they set the precedent that the USN needs to kind

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of follow up with.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 12>You know, if we look at previous technologies, I don't

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 12>think that we have. The US has fallen in lockstep

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 12>at all with Europe when it comes to big tech

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 12>and technology, and I think one reason is if you

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 12>look at where big tech resides, it's almost exclusively in

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 12>the United States, and so these things do become kind

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 12>of circular, which is Europe is more inclined to lean

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 12>into regulation in part because it's not harming their of

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 12>their firms, and the US maybe because it has not

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 12>leaned into regulation, has really I think fostered an environment

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 12>of innovation, and again kind of consequently, there are fewer

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 12>incentives for the US to be out in front. And

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 12>I think again, you know, when we look at where

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 12>there's an interesting story about Google's barred and they haven't

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 12>they released it in one hundred and eighty countries, but

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 12>not in Europe. And you know, when we look at

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 12>the history of big tech and legal you know, litigation,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 12>big tech American companies have not always fared well in Europe,

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 12>and so I think there is some wariness of these

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 12>these you know, chat GPT, which was banned by the

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 12>banned by the Italian government. Other firms actually not only

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 12>not following an offset, but really trying quite apprehensive of

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 12>engaging in that sort of European regulatory space.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 11>So I don't think the US will.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 12>Go in that direction, not just because of what we're

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 12>seeing already, but what we've seen with other forms of

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 12>technology in the past.

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, Sarah, you talk about the US being reactive when

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 3>it comes to regulation, we haven't seen any meaningful regulation

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>against raining and the power of big tach against reigning

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 3>and social media. What actually do you think needs to

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>happen for AI regulations to cross the line here in

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the United States.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's a great question, because you know, again everything

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 12>is so reactive when we look back to the history

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 12>of arms control. No, there was some indication that we

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 12>should do arms control on nuclear weapons early, but really

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 12>it didn't happen until after the Cuban missile crazes and

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 12>you know, where the world almost blew up. And unfortunately,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 12>I think that it takes kind of a real crisis,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 12>existential crisis like that to happen before meaningful regulation can

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 12>take place, and I do think it raises this question

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 12>of is are we at that point where meaningful regulation

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 12>is needed? And I would submit that, you know, we

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 12>have some threats on the horizon, but because this technology

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 12>is evolving so quickly, and because frankly, I don't think

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 12>these existential risks have presented and are really even a

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 12>hypothetical risk.

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 11>I think it is a little too early. But frankly,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 11>also we have to think about the political environment.

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 12>In Washington, which is not really conducive to doing anything

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 12>meaningful on really anything, because there might be an agreement

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 12>that something needs to be done, but disagreement.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 11>On how to do it.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 2>That seems to be the way of Washington. Sarah, I

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate your joining us and sharing your insight. Sarah

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Krepps is Professor of law and director of the Tech

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Policy Institute at Cornell. Now coming up, there is more

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 2>on AI, this time from an investing perspective. We're going

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to be joined by compounds of Michael Dempsey up next.

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And in the meantime, keeping an eye on shares of PayPal,

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 2>which are popping today as Venmo introduces an account for

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 2>teenagers who are between thirteen to seventeen years old for

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 2>sending and receiving money. This feature will come with a

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 2>debit card and plans to roll over to select customers

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 2>starting next month. PayPal up by better than three percent,

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 13>There are many companies that are going to struggle in

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 13>their transition to really deliver AI solutions at scale.

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 14>Consumers are really engaging with the AI in a way

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 14>that just seems so much more real and authentic than

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 14>they ever have.

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 13>I think the bigger opportunity actually lies in the enterprise.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I think AI is going to be deployed into every

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 4>facet of work.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 13>I think we're at a moment here where there is

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 13>a tremendous advantage for US based companies.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 8>I think on the application side, I think the Chinese

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 8>companies potentially can do really, really well.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I think we actually need to be going faster on

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the regulatory front.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 6>We are really thinking about generative AI as a tool

0:31:58.720 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 6>for good.

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I do think that an opportunity for perhaps pro technology

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 2>policy making. And that was a compilation of what our

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>recent VC Spotlight guests are saying about AI investments here

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and around the world. We're going to continue the conversation

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>now with Michael Dempsey. He is managing partner at Compound,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 2>which is a thesis driven, research centric seed stage investment

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.959
<v Speaker 2>firm that's focused on emerging technologies with more than two

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty five million dollars in assets under management.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Michael, it's so good to speak with you. Thanks a

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 4>lot for joining us.

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess I want to start with just the overall

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>state of AI, because from traditional market watcher's perspective, AI seems.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 4>To be in a bubble.

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett says tech is forming

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>a bubble, and AI in particular, isn't a baby bubble

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 2>bubbill start with easy money, they end with rate hikes.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 4>How much do you agree with that?

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 15>You know, I think in some ways I do agree

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 15>with it. I think that there's a kind of vacuum

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 15>of conviction and areas to spend time in on the

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 15>investor side today after kind of a very crazy the

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 15>past few years, and you know, things cycling in and

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 15>out of the zeitgeist, like crypto for an example. I

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 15>do think that, unlike a lot of prior areas, there

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 15>will be massive disruption and there is so much hard

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 15>y that can hop in with a ton of different industries,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 15>and I think for the first time people can see

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 15>it and feel it in a way that is very

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 15>tangible to their day to day lives. And so that

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 15>creates some sort of compounding effect of the kind of

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 15>zeitgeist in the moment and how big it feels, because

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 15>at every dinner, at every interaction, someone is talking about AI,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 15>someone's talking about the ethics of it, et cetera.

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Michael I used to cover tech deals and some of

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 3>this vibe kind of throws me back to when Airbnb

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Uber we're doing their massive funding grounds around some consumer

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 3>tech when they were still private. A lot of that

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 3>was driven by folks like yourself, but also bigger investors'

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 3>growth money, private equity firms piling in. Is that kind

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 3>of money already moving into this market? Do you think

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 3>that will fuel some of this potential for bubble that

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about.

0:33:57.880 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 11>It's starting to.

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 15>I think more and more people are trying to figure

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 15>out what are the areas in which they can properly

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 15>deploy hundreds of millions of dollars. And you've see that

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 15>on the foundation model side of things. In the larger

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 15>AI labs, and I think you're going to start to

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 15>see it on the more application layer and middleware side

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 15>of things, and so it's it's definitely starting. We're seeing

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 15>it now with the full stack kind of larger scale

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 15>VC firms, some of the growth firms, and then obviously

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 15>on the hedge fund side, we're seeing on public markets

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 15>people are trying to figure out outside of Nvidia, what

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 15>are the plays that they should be having to get

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 15>exposure to things that feel quite asymmetric from an upside

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 15>perspective and just incredibly large scale if it does work,

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 15>which is kind of our job.

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Michael.

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious about your investment portfolio. How much of it

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 2>centers on AI? Is it less than half more than

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>two thirds? And when we talk about centered on AI,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 2>are these companies that started with the goal of entering

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>and building out AI or have they pivoted to AI

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and expanded to AI from where they started.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 15>So we've been investing in AI or mL as we

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 15>used to call it, since twenty fourteen, and I think

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 15>probably about sixty percent of our portfolio falls within that

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 15>area now, and that's because AI moved from a very

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 15>kind of vertical specific misnomer too now being a horizontal platform,

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 15>and so everything from biology company is using AI to

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 15>kind of do more of a search and discover instead

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 15>of a random walk in discovery too. Core companies like Runway, Mlwave,

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 15>dot Ai that are doing kind of full stack building

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 15>their own models, using it in very unique ways. And

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 15>so I think for us, we ourselves as very AI

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 15>native investors and think that most of how we like

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 15>to invest is companies that either have a unique take

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 15>on product as it's enabled by the bleeding edge of

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 15>AI or our building and kind of pushing that bleeding

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 15>edge into their core category.

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk regulatory risk or appetite for regulation from some

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 3>of your portfolio companies.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Which side of that debate are you falling on?

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Where do you think in the US, in particular, our

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 3>government should be getting in and kind of laying out

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 3>the guard rails for what this industry's impact could be

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>on consumers, on businesses and tech writ large.

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so I watched the entire hearing last week, and

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 15>I think generally everyone did a really incredible job. Sam

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 15>obviously is what who got the most praise for his

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 15>embrace of regulation. I think he made a very strong

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 15>point which I agree with which is that on the

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 15>startup side and really even the mid sized company side,

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 15>I don't think regulation should come into.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 11>Play just yet.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 15>I think there's all sorts of ethical dilemmas to discuss

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 15>around how to use different types of training data, what

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 15>data you can train on, how do you get opt in, etc.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 15>But I think a lot of our companies are taking

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 15>an approach of making sure they're doing things responsibly and

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 15>making sure that they're doing things transparently, and I think

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 15>it's a little too early to be trying to put

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 15>into effect things that could hamstering development, especially in the

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 15>United States, because I do think this is some form

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 15>of an existential technology and we want to make sure

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 15>we're continually pushing the frontier of that. And while there

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 15>are certain areas like these large models and kind of

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 15>frontier models that could have regulation at the compute layer,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 15>I think more and more as people start to get

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 15>better at miniaturizing model doing things locally, it's going to

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 15>become really difficult. And I'm not sure on the government

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 15>side we yet have an understanding or a group of

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 15>people with enough understanding to properly regulate something that is

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 15>so important and honestly is moving so quickly.

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Our previous guest, Sarahcrafts of the Cornell Tech Policy Institute,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 2>was just saying that the owners really falls on the

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 2>firms themselves to propose regulation or to try to set

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 2>up their own guardrails to that end.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 4>Is there anyone that you've.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Encountered, that you've engaged with who you believe is a

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 2>leader in thinking through some of these issues that you

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.479
<v Speaker 2>think people need to be paying attention to.

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:39.959
<v Speaker 15>To be honest, I think it's most of the people

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 15>who are running thee these large labs, whether it's kind

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 15>of people like Sam, I think Gary marcusly it's some

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 15>really good points. As a professor in the hearing, I

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 15>think there are people that are trying to take ethical approaches.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 15>The teament Runway cares a lot about making sure they

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 15>work with creators. But I think to Sam's point, these

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 15>people have day jobs that are probably the most exciting

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 15>they've ever been and something they view as kind of

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 15>their life's work. So I do think it's hard. I

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 15>think more and more as more people who have been

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 15>at large organizations and scene regulation and other lines of

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 15>technology start to really dig in to AI, we will

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 15>start to have people rise naturally. But to be honest,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 15>right now, most of the people are those who have

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.959
<v Speaker 15>the depth of understanding of knowing how quickly this moves

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 15>in the scale at which it's moving, and those people

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 15>are building right now.

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Michael Dempsey, managing partner at Compound, thank you

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 2>so much for giving us your perspective.

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX launched four private astronauts and route to the International

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Space Station, including the first woman from Saudi Arabia to

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 3>travel to space. That crew lifted off a top of

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Falcon nine rocket Sunday evening from the Kennedy Space Center

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 3>in Florida. That mission, operated by Axiom Space, is the

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 3>second of four human space flight launches that SpaceX is

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 3>set to handle for the company.

0:38:58.280 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Axium has plans to build its.

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 7>Own space station in the future.

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Now, Apple is just a few weeks away from debuting

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 3>its mixed reality headset. Bloomberg's Mark German has been following

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the project incredibly closely, and he joins us now for more, Mark,

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 3>what do we need to know about what's coming.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:17.760
<v Speaker 4>We've heard about this for a minute.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 7>Give us the top deal on this headset.

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, thank you so much for having me. Yeah, it's

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 14>definitely been a minute. So we're actually right now two

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 14>weeks away, two weeks and five minutes away, I should say,

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 14>from that headsets launch event, this is going to be

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 14>Apple's first feature new product in eight years, right, since

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 14>the original Apple Watch was introduced and went on sale

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 14>in twenty fifteen. This is going to be a really

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 14>interesting test case for Apple, right. You know, Apple didn't

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 14>necessarily create the MP three player markets, the smartphone markets,

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.439
<v Speaker 14>the tablet markets, but there was a sense that those

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 14>areas were soon about to take off and explode.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Mixed reality is a little bit different.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 14>Apple is really going to have to come in here

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 14>and maybe define this market.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Right, Meta is there. HTC is a big player Sony,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 4>but it's super nascent.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 14>We're talking, you know, fewer than ten million units of

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 14>these devices going on sale are being sold on an

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 14>annual basis right now, Right, So Apple's going to have

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 14>to come in here and shake it up from the

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 14>very bottom. And they're coming in with a device that's

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 14>a little bit experimental. It's going to be very expensive

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 14>anywhere between I'm told twenty eight hundred dollars and thirty

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 14>two hundred dollars, right, It's going to have some pretty

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 14>intense technology, over a dozen censors on the outside. You'll

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 14>control it with your eyes and hands. You'll use it

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 14>for virtual reality, FaceTime and productivity. Very interesting to see

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 14>how Apple positions it. I'm told they're going to push

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 14>it towards creatives if people want to use it for

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 14>productivity as the future of the computer. I definitely think

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 14>this is going to be exciting for consumers, but there's

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 14>a very big risk here for the company, right I

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 14>think it's either going to be a huge flop or

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 14>a huge success, and for Apple, there's really nothing in between.

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Quite the binary call there from our very own Mark German,

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 3>thank you for joining us on Apple and their headsets.

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 3>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Make sure to tune in tomorrow as our very own

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Caroline Heights is down for an exclusive interview with TikTok

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO show Chow that comes from the Qatar Economic Forum.

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 4>You won't want to.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 7>Miss it, and don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 7>You can find it on the terminal as well as online.

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg