1 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:14,680 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. 2 00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:20,400 Speaker 1: I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, one of 3 00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:25,159 Speaker 1: the really sort of tragic or frustrating aspects of this 4 00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 1: current crisis that I think about a lot is how good, 5 00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:34,720 Speaker 1: arguably the economic situation was for the labor market. Right 6 00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:38,479 Speaker 1: on the eve of the crisis, multi decade lows and 7 00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:42,919 Speaker 1: unemployment rate, wages had just started to pick up, basically 8 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,400 Speaker 1: right before this hit. A lot of things that people 9 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:47,839 Speaker 1: had wanted to see for a long time started to 10 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,600 Speaker 1: seem like they were materializing. Yeah, by a lot of measures. 11 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:55,200 Speaker 1: I guess we were at well nearly at full employment. 12 00:00:55,240 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: But I'm not sure it's tragic. Um, maybe ironic. I like, 13 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 1: you wouldn't have wanted to go into the crisis with 14 00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:07,760 Speaker 1: the economy already fragile, right, True, that's well put. But 15 00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:09,840 Speaker 1: I do think there was just a lot of frustration 16 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:12,840 Speaker 1: at you know, how slow was so we had, you know, 17 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 1: we had the crisis in two thousand and eight, two 18 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:18,280 Speaker 1: thousand nine, and then it just took years and years 19 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 1: and years to get back to something that you know, 20 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 1: economists would have called full employment. Yeah, I think that's right. 21 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:27,759 Speaker 1: And I think you've pointed out before that the danger 22 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:32,880 Speaker 1: with sudden increases in mass unemployment is that it does 23 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: really take a long time to normalize, that it takes 24 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,720 Speaker 1: a long time to train people for new jobs, and meanwhile, 25 00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:44,120 Speaker 1: the economy loses that expertise, loses that additional output, and 26 00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 1: it's just a bad situation. Right. I think there is 27 00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:50,280 Speaker 1: this view that if you know, as we embark on 28 00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 1: this recovery, if it takes similarly long to return to 29 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:58,320 Speaker 1: something resembling normal, that'd be unacceptable. I think that's why 30 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: there's probably a lot of rethinking about the role of 31 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:04,760 Speaker 1: monetary policy and the role of fiscal policy in accelerating 32 00:02:05,080 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 1: this recession, because the length of time of recovery last 33 00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:12,799 Speaker 1: time was pretty pretty unacceptable, not good. Yeah, it's that, 34 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:16,119 Speaker 1: and to me, it's also the nature of the current crisis. 35 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:21,079 Speaker 1: This is basically, in some ways a government mandated economic crisis. 36 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:24,240 Speaker 1: People need to stay home in order to stop the 37 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:26,720 Speaker 1: spread of the coronavirus. You don't really have a choice 38 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 1: when it comes to shutting down your business, and so 39 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:31,960 Speaker 1: I think people are looking to the government more than 40 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 1: they might be otherwise and asking for help with that. Right. 41 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:40,160 Speaker 1: Another aspect, And another sort of disappointing factor is that 42 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: prior to the crisis, for a long time, there's been 43 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 1: this big gap between black and white unemployment rates. You 44 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 1: look at the headline unemployment rate, the unemployment rate for 45 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: whites is below that. The unemployment rate for Black Americans 46 00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 1: has been significantly above that. That was starting to compress 47 00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:00,600 Speaker 1: prior to the crisis, and then once again it looks 48 00:03:00,639 --> 00:03:03,160 Speaker 1: like the status quo is that, you know, we just 49 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,760 Speaker 1: suffered another major setback on that gap. Yeah, I've seen 50 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 1: a number of statistics on this, not only for racial inequality, 51 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 1: but it's showing up in men versus women as well. 52 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,079 Speaker 1: The female unemployment rate is a lot higher right now 53 00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:17,760 Speaker 1: than the male unemployment rate. So it feels like the 54 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:22,480 Speaker 1: crisis is accelerating a lot of the inequality trends that 55 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 1: we saw in previous years. Right So there are a 56 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: lot of different issues for the Federal Reserve and other 57 00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 1: policy makers to think about as they bark on accelerating 58 00:03:34,880 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 1: this recovery. I want to bring in our guests very 59 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: excited to talk to her. We're going to be speaking 60 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:45,400 Speaker 1: with Congresswoman Ayana Pressley. She represents the seventh District in Massachusetts, 61 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:48,280 Speaker 1: and she's, among other things, the recent co author of 62 00:03:48,320 --> 00:03:52,640 Speaker 1: a op ed at CNBC about the need for the 63 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,960 Speaker 1: FED to focus specifically and think more about the black 64 00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:01,280 Speaker 1: unemployment rate, talking about how monetary policy in the past 65 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 1: has contributed to inequality along race, and so we think 66 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 1: of monetary policy is being this sort of neutral thing, 67 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:11,520 Speaker 1: where we think of monetary policy is just affecting the 68 00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 1: economy in general, and the need for other policies to 69 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 1: address race specific issues. But perhaps there is more that 70 00:04:17,960 --> 00:04:20,840 Speaker 1: the FED could do. So without further ado, I want 71 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:23,640 Speaker 1: to bring in a Congresswoman Pressley, Thank you very much 72 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:26,359 Speaker 1: for joining us. Good to be with you, thank you 73 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:31,039 Speaker 1: for your interest. Absolutely so to start off, in your view, 74 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:35,599 Speaker 1: racial inequality in this country has numerous causes, but when 75 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:39,080 Speaker 1: it comes to monetary policy and the Federal Reserve, how 76 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 1: in your view has UH monetary policy contributed to the 77 00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 1: gap between the success of whites in the labor market 78 00:04:46,760 --> 00:04:49,920 Speaker 1: and the success of blacks and other non white minorities. 79 00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 1: Sure well, first let me just you know, um acknowledge 80 00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:56,640 Speaker 1: that we find ourselves in a moment of national reckoning 81 00:04:56,960 --> 00:05:00,839 Speaker 1: on racial justice, and every institution needs to address his 82 00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:04,440 Speaker 1: role in perpetuating systemic racism and what it can do 83 00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:06,719 Speaker 1: to be a part of the solution. And the FED 84 00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 1: should be no exception in that regard. You know, perhaps 85 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,440 Speaker 1: Donald Trump does not want to acknowledge the contributions of 86 00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:17,000 Speaker 1: John Lewis and what I would consider our other founding fathers, 87 00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:19,080 Speaker 1: but they've given us the blueprint on this. You know. 88 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:22,600 Speaker 1: Dr Martin Luther King Jr. Spoke about the fact that 89 00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 1: when Black Americans are unemployed, it's considered a social problem, 90 00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:30,960 Speaker 1: but when white Americans are unemployed, it's considered a depression. 91 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 1: That's what he said in nineteen and addressing the Memphis 92 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 1: sanitation workers, and of course um he also went on 93 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 1: in that same speech to say, what does it profit 94 00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:43,800 Speaker 1: a man to sit at an integrated lunch counter if 95 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 1: he cannot even afford to purchase a hamburger? And while 96 00:05:47,279 --> 00:05:50,760 Speaker 1: we're speaking about the King's CORRECTI Scott King in nineteen 97 00:05:50,920 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 1: seventy six let over twenty five thousand protesters to the 98 00:05:54,480 --> 00:05:58,599 Speaker 1: Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank. Rashi declared that outside of Congress, 99 00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve has, for apps more power to correct 100 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:06,720 Speaker 1: our economic ills than any other agency or institution. And 101 00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:10,400 Speaker 1: so UM I recently author this opped laying out three 102 00:06:10,440 --> 00:06:12,919 Speaker 1: steps that the FED could take to center racial equity 103 00:06:12,960 --> 00:06:16,520 Speaker 1: in its response um And they have to respond, you know, 104 00:06:16,600 --> 00:06:21,840 Speaker 1: not only because it is the federal government's role uh 105 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:26,880 Speaker 1: in a period of unprecedented hurt managing a crisis within 106 00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:30,560 Speaker 1: a crisis, but they have a responsibility. Only the federal 107 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:34,239 Speaker 1: government can meet the scale and scope of this crisis 108 00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:39,160 Speaker 1: and play a role in ensuring an equitable economic recovery. 109 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: And so the three things that we've laid out is 110 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:43,880 Speaker 1: that the FED must expand and modify the terms of 111 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:47,839 Speaker 1: its municipal liquid facility to ensure the big corporations aren't 112 00:06:47,839 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 1: getting a better deal than our community. And secondly, and 113 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:53,960 Speaker 1: this is what correctit Scott King was organized went around, 114 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:57,560 Speaker 1: the FED must comply with the Humphrey Hawkins Act, this 115 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 1: provision that requires efforts to reduce unemployment disparities by directly 116 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:05,560 Speaker 1: targeting the black unemployment rate, which is really a much 117 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:08,800 Speaker 1: better indicator of the country's true economic health. That will 118 00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 1: also prevent misguided action like raising interest rates too soon. 119 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 1: You know, the FEDS have prioritized price stability and low 120 00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:22,480 Speaker 1: inflation over full employment. And then finally, the federal reserve 121 00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:25,200 Speaker 1: must not stand in the way of a federal jobs guarantee. 122 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:28,360 Speaker 1: This is a really fascinating topic and you lay it 123 00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: out very clearly. I guess my first question is what 124 00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:35,920 Speaker 1: would you say to critics who will automatically respond with, well, 125 00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:39,240 Speaker 1: this isn't the FEDS role and why should the Fed? 126 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:42,480 Speaker 1: You know, it's a group of unelected officials, lots of 127 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:45,840 Speaker 1: people describe them as economist sitting in an ivory tower. 128 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:51,800 Speaker 1: Why should they be the ones to take this on? Yeah, 129 00:07:51,840 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 1: because they're the only ones that can. The federal government 130 00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:56,680 Speaker 1: were the only ones that can play the sort of 131 00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:59,960 Speaker 1: role necessary to meet the scale and scope of this crisis. 132 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:03,160 Speaker 1: And it's unprecedented, hurt. And uh, I'm gonna bring into 133 00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 1: the room another uh um civil rights leader, because I've 134 00:08:07,880 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: been doing a great deal of reading and looking for 135 00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 1: fortifying and uh, you know, inspiration and direction at this moment. 136 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 1: And Reverend William Barber, you know, said that we find 137 00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 1: ourselves in the midst of a reckoning, which requires a 138 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:25,000 Speaker 1: third reconstruction. And I think that, um, that reconstruction does 139 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:30,280 Speaker 1: mean everything from healthcare to ensuring that every individual that 140 00:08:30,400 --> 00:08:33,760 Speaker 1: is able to work, UM is working, and also housing 141 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 1: you know adults and policy makers don't make mistakes. They 142 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:42,320 Speaker 1: make choices, and poverty is a policy choice. In the 143 00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:45,319 Speaker 1: midst of this national reckoning, this is the time for 144 00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 1: a reconstructing and to be bold, and we'll have to 145 00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:51,880 Speaker 1: be in order to meet the scale and scope of 146 00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 1: the hurt um managing this crisis within a crisis, both 147 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:59,000 Speaker 1: a public health crisis and the economic hardship that it's wrought. 148 00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:01,760 Speaker 1: And of course, the crisis of black unemployment did not 149 00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:05,839 Speaker 1: begin with this pandemic. It's only been exacerbated. I mean, 150 00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:09,440 Speaker 1: I represent one of the most diverse, vibrant, dynamic districts 151 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:12,360 Speaker 1: in the country, has previously helped by John F. Kennedy himself, 152 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 1: one of the most progressive seats in the country and 153 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:18,280 Speaker 1: one of the most unequal, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 154 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,000 Speaker 1: also has the highest unemployment rate in the country at 155 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:24,520 Speaker 1: seventeen point four. I want to go back to something 156 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:26,600 Speaker 1: you said that I thought it was really interesting, and 157 00:09:26,640 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 1: you said, not only should the FED target black unemployment directly, 158 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 1: you said you also thought it was probably the best 159 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:37,560 Speaker 1: proxy that we could have for the state of the economy. 160 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:40,240 Speaker 1: Why do you think it's the best proxy? And also 161 00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:42,679 Speaker 1: just sort of flush it out a little bit in 162 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:46,040 Speaker 1: terms of how sort of specifically looking at the black 163 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:49,720 Speaker 1: unemployment rate could be incorporated into the FED mandate or 164 00:09:49,760 --> 00:09:52,439 Speaker 1: just the fence thinking in general, we'll just say the 165 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: bottom line for me is we can't afford to deny 166 00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: the Federal reserves role here as a potential equalizer. But 167 00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:01,080 Speaker 1: we also have to confer the fact that they've been 168 00:10:01,080 --> 00:10:05,440 Speaker 1: an exacerbator a racial and economic inequality. And so again 169 00:10:05,480 --> 00:10:07,040 Speaker 1: this is the tipping point in the moment where we 170 00:10:07,080 --> 00:10:10,439 Speaker 1: confront that past while we also chart a new path. 171 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 1: And so rooting out systemic racism and inequity in our 172 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:18,040 Speaker 1: economy can't happen without a key piece of that system. 173 00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:22,120 Speaker 1: And it just it requires a government wide approach, and 174 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:24,960 Speaker 1: that has to include the Federal Reserve. And and just 175 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:30,280 Speaker 1: picking up all my earlier comments regarding the Humphrey Hawkins Act, again, 176 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:34,080 Speaker 1: that provision requires the FED to reduce disparities and unemployment 177 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:38,360 Speaker 1: between marginalized groups. And so at this moment, it really 178 00:10:38,440 --> 00:10:42,560 Speaker 1: is about exacting every every level, every tool available to you, 179 00:10:42,920 --> 00:11:04,160 Speaker 1: and they've not done that. M H. You mentioned this 180 00:11:04,240 --> 00:11:08,960 Speaker 1: idea of a reconstruction in response to a great reckoning 181 00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:13,960 Speaker 1: I'm curious how do policymakers, such as yourself balance the 182 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:18,560 Speaker 1: need to respond quickly to what is quite a serious 183 00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 1: economic situation with the need potentially to to design or 184 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:27,800 Speaker 1: use the crisis as a jumping off point to redesign 185 00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:32,440 Speaker 1: big picture ideas like how the federal works, like how 186 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 1: the federal government should be funding states and municipalities. How 187 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 1: do you balance those two things. I think in this moment, 188 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:43,760 Speaker 1: it's not a matter of or, it's a matter of 189 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:47,679 Speaker 1: and UM and so UM. I seek to do both 190 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:51,680 Speaker 1: because the moment demands that I do both. And I 191 00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:55,320 Speaker 1: think I'm emboldened in that advocacy UM and in that 192 00:11:55,520 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 1: legislating because we have a mandate from the people. There's 193 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:04,960 Speaker 1: a decisive mandate from the people of this country, UM 194 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:08,680 Speaker 1: to move with the strength of conviction, to be bold 195 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:14,199 Speaker 1: and our legislative responses to address the inequities and disparities 196 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 1: and the racial injustices that not only persist, but we're 197 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 1: created by policy. Public sentiment around issues lack of federal 198 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 1: jobs guarantee and medicare for all, and affirming housing as 199 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:32,080 Speaker 1: a human right has only grown. Do you think that 200 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:36,920 Speaker 1: the left or progressives have underappreciated the role of monetary 201 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 1: policy or the Federal Reserve in advancing priorities. During the 202 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 1: Obama administration, there or long periods where seats on the 203 00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 1: FMC were left unfilled. It wasn't a priority to replace 204 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:53,679 Speaker 1: departing members. Should this be more? Should Do you think 205 00:12:53,720 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 1: there's a lack of awareness um in terms of what 206 00:12:56,400 --> 00:13:00,520 Speaker 1: monetary policy can do on the left? Yes, And that's 207 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:03,800 Speaker 1: exactly why I wrote the up ed you know, acknowledging 208 00:13:03,840 --> 00:13:06,079 Speaker 1: that I do have this platform and I want to 209 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:09,960 Speaker 1: be an effective steward of it, especially in this moment. 210 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:13,960 Speaker 1: It's one of the reasons why I was so excited 211 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:17,720 Speaker 1: to serve on via Financial Services Committee to address these 212 00:13:17,760 --> 00:13:21,320 Speaker 1: issues specifically. And you know, I think the role of 213 00:13:21,360 --> 00:13:24,680 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve for some maybe only really came into 214 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 1: view on the left in the role that it played 215 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:29,960 Speaker 1: and stabilizing the world economy. In two thousand and eight, 216 00:13:30,520 --> 00:13:32,520 Speaker 1: more people started to think about it in that way. 217 00:13:32,559 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 1: But you know, I'm again, I'm appreciative of the opportunity 218 00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:37,760 Speaker 1: to serve with the Final Services Committee so that I 219 00:13:37,760 --> 00:13:40,280 Speaker 1: can can lift up the role that it can play 220 00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:42,400 Speaker 1: and and it really should go without saying that all 221 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:44,640 Speaker 1: of this, you know that I'm looking for them to 222 00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:47,840 Speaker 1: do must be in addition to the FED acknowledging their 223 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:52,960 Speaker 1: abysmal record on diversity, and that can't just fall on 224 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:56,600 Speaker 1: the back of the only black Federal Reserve Bank president 225 00:13:56,679 --> 00:13:59,520 Speaker 1: and Raphael Bosti to name it and to call it out. 226 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:04,960 Speaker 1: So I'm also trying to provide some backup there. UM. 227 00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:07,440 Speaker 1: I wanted to talk a little bit about what's going 228 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 1: on in d C right at this moment. So I 229 00:14:10,640 --> 00:14:14,560 Speaker 1: think we have the second round of potential stimulus relief 230 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:17,280 Speaker 1: currently log jammed in the Senate. I should just mention 231 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:20,760 Speaker 1: that we're recording this on let's see August five, so 232 00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: things could change. So looking back at the original CARES Act, 233 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 1: how is that able to get bipartisan support? And what 234 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:32,440 Speaker 1: has changed between then and now? Why is it so 235 00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:36,120 Speaker 1: difficult to get a second relief package off the ground? 236 00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:40,160 Speaker 1: You know, Well, this Democratic majority House has been able 237 00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:43,680 Speaker 1: to move you know, something like four relief packages, um, 238 00:14:43,720 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 1: and they were bipartisan and I think, UM a lot 239 00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:49,400 Speaker 1: of that had to do with public outcry and sentiment, 240 00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 1: which is why we need people to continue to be 241 00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:56,480 Speaker 1: vigilant and their advocacy. UM. In that regard. You know, 242 00:14:56,800 --> 00:15:01,000 Speaker 1: it's very frustrating. I um, you know, day feel that 243 00:15:01,040 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 1: we are besieged by a dog whistles and uh and 244 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 1: in tropes and sort of a cruelty and a callousness. Um. 245 00:15:10,960 --> 00:15:15,880 Speaker 1: That proves that many people serving are completely removed and 246 00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:20,440 Speaker 1: disconnected from the hardship and the heart that their constituents 247 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:25,600 Speaker 1: are experiencing. In terms of what parties are I mean, 248 00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:28,760 Speaker 1: what do you think are this sort of absolute must 249 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 1: have in this bill? Yeah? Well, I mean, thirty million 250 00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:34,840 Speaker 1: people are still unemployed, and as I said, the Commonwealth 251 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 1: of Massachusetts is the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Um. 252 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:42,520 Speaker 1: And so yet this Senate GOP they want to cut 253 00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:45,520 Speaker 1: unemployment benefits, and they want to once again exclude our 254 00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:49,280 Speaker 1: immigrant neighbors from the economic stimulus checks. And they're forcing 255 00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:52,800 Speaker 1: K through twelve schools to reopen. It's shameful, it's reckless, 256 00:15:52,800 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 1: and it's just cruel. And so I think we have 257 00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:58,720 Speaker 1: to extend unemployment benefits, not cut them. Um. We need 258 00:15:58,760 --> 00:16:02,040 Speaker 1: reoccurring economics to list payments for everyone. We need to 259 00:16:02,080 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 1: extend the eviction moratoriums. We need to cancel rent and 260 00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:07,960 Speaker 1: mortgage payments. We have were on the precipice of an 261 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:13,840 Speaker 1: eviction tsunami. We're talking about the disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. Um, 262 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:16,520 Speaker 1: you know, we find ourselves what is this the early 263 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:19,480 Speaker 1: in the month of August. By August, one of Americans 264 00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:21,960 Speaker 1: said that they would not be able to pay their 265 00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 1: rent for the month, and that's thirty percent of Americans. 266 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:27,440 Speaker 1: Forty percent of Black Americans said they would not be 267 00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 1: able to pay their rent. So economic time stops, but 268 00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,560 Speaker 1: financial time does not. And even in the worst downturns, 269 00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:36,600 Speaker 1: people's bills will always still be due. And it's just 270 00:16:36,640 --> 00:16:39,000 Speaker 1: really past time that the Senate acts and that they 271 00:16:39,040 --> 00:16:43,800 Speaker 1: move with the urgency that reflects that economic time stops 272 00:16:43,840 --> 00:16:45,920 Speaker 1: but financial time does not. Is a really good way 273 00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 1: of putting it. But just on that note, and going 274 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:51,480 Speaker 1: back to the idea of debt forgiveness, how would that 275 00:16:51,520 --> 00:16:55,160 Speaker 1: work exactly? Because a lot of critics of that proposal 276 00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:58,760 Speaker 1: would immediately point to the fact that, you know, landlords, 277 00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: as much as many people dislike them, also require income, 278 00:17:03,040 --> 00:17:06,560 Speaker 1: and if they're not getting payments from their renters, that 279 00:17:06,680 --> 00:17:09,120 Speaker 1: has knock on effects to the financial system. It could 280 00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:12,359 Speaker 1: lead to losses for banks and things like that. How 281 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 1: would you, Uh, how would you deal with that? Yeah, 282 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:18,280 Speaker 1: I mean the point is though people are hurting, they 283 00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:21,919 Speaker 1: need real relief now and again, just I could have 284 00:17:21,960 --> 00:17:24,600 Speaker 1: too many examples to enumerate in terms of the disconnect 285 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:27,280 Speaker 1: and the cruelty and the councils of this administration. One 286 00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:29,080 Speaker 1: of the other issues that I've continued to push in 287 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 1: terms of a robust economic recovery is the canceling of 288 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:36,600 Speaker 1: student debt. This Department of Education garnish wages and benefits 289 00:17:36,920 --> 00:17:40,160 Speaker 1: fifty four thousand borrowers in the midst of a pandemic. 290 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:43,440 Speaker 1: People are hurting, they need real relief now, and and 291 00:17:43,560 --> 00:17:45,639 Speaker 1: might I also add that our greatest wealth as a 292 00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 1: nation is the health of our people. So the reason 293 00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:52,400 Speaker 1: why these other choices are being made is to prioritize 294 00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:55,199 Speaker 1: and then the best interest of the public health. And 295 00:17:55,240 --> 00:17:57,240 Speaker 1: so that has to be the priority right now. And 296 00:17:57,280 --> 00:17:59,560 Speaker 1: if that means that we are paying people to stay home, 297 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 1: then that's what that means, because we have to stave 298 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:05,000 Speaker 1: off the rate of transmission and we have to get 299 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:08,480 Speaker 1: this pandemic under control. That's number one. There's no economy 300 00:18:08,520 --> 00:18:11,719 Speaker 1: without workers or consumers. And so our greatest wealth as 301 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:32,240 Speaker 1: a nation is the health of its people. I want 302 00:18:32,240 --> 00:18:34,439 Speaker 1: to look forward a little bit. I know, you just 303 00:18:34,480 --> 00:18:37,960 Speaker 1: have a few more minutes. Um you know, suppose thinking 304 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:42,160 Speaker 1: about long term economic agenda, and suppose U Biden were 305 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:45,160 Speaker 1: to win the White House and Democrats were to control 306 00:18:45,520 --> 00:18:48,480 Speaker 1: both houses of Congress, as is possible, thinking about where 307 00:18:48,560 --> 00:18:53,080 Speaker 1: economic policy should go. I'm looking at Biden's Racial Economic 308 00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:56,800 Speaker 1: Equity Plan on his website and the first two things 309 00:18:56,840 --> 00:19:00,560 Speaker 1: one is something about first bullet points about public private investments. 310 00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:04,840 Speaker 1: The next one is opportunity zones and performing them. And 311 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:08,679 Speaker 1: I'm curious, do you think these are smart tools or 312 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:12,960 Speaker 1: would your vision for what racio economic equity would it 313 00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:16,120 Speaker 1: look different from this? I just think that it's um 314 00:19:16,280 --> 00:19:19,840 Speaker 1: it needs to be bolder, and it's about guaranteeing those 315 00:19:19,880 --> 00:19:23,280 Speaker 1: most basic human rights, which certainly is is not a 316 00:19:23,359 --> 00:19:29,560 Speaker 1: radical notion, but a lack of political will and leadership, 317 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:32,240 Speaker 1: and I think a deficit of empathy and an urgency 318 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:36,000 Speaker 1: has us where we are. And so, you know, I 319 00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:38,800 Speaker 1: think we do need a federal jobs guarantee. I think 320 00:19:38,840 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 1: we need Medicare for all, housing affirming the right to housing, 321 00:19:43,880 --> 00:19:46,720 Speaker 1: um so housing justice, and then on the economic justice front, 322 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:49,159 Speaker 1: a federal Jobs Guarantee, and when it comes to healthcare 323 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:52,120 Speaker 1: justice Medicare for all. In addition to all the other things, 324 00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:55,960 Speaker 1: I continue to fight for modernizing the Community Reinvestment Act. 325 00:19:56,359 --> 00:19:59,520 Speaker 1: You know, the fact that ercent of financial institutions continue 326 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:03,200 Speaker 1: to pass CR exams, but the practice of redlining persists 327 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:05,959 Speaker 1: the Fair Housing Act, which they seek to you know, 328 00:20:06,040 --> 00:20:10,520 Speaker 1: undermine and roll back those protections. Canceling student debt UM, 329 00:20:10,560 --> 00:20:12,960 Speaker 1: which I see as a racial justice issue because black 330 00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:17,760 Speaker 1: students borrow more than any other borrower and default more. 331 00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:20,280 Speaker 1: And that has everything to do with policies which has 332 00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:25,040 Speaker 1: obstructed black family's ability UM to equitably build generational wealth. 333 00:20:25,359 --> 00:20:27,480 Speaker 1: And that is also you know, one way to your 334 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:32,480 Speaker 1: your question tries around UM cancelation and and and people's 335 00:20:32,840 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 1: negative characterizations of that. That's also one way to jump 336 00:20:35,720 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 1: start the economy. UM. The average of borrower is saddled 337 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:45,080 Speaker 1: with about thirty dollars worth of student loan debt, and 338 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:47,879 Speaker 1: so by canceling that, then those are other those funds 339 00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:50,080 Speaker 1: can be used in other ways to jump starting to 340 00:20:50,119 --> 00:20:53,200 Speaker 1: invest in our economy. So those are some of my priorities. 341 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:57,080 Speaker 1: So I have one more question, just just leading off 342 00:20:57,119 --> 00:21:01,280 Speaker 1: from that, Why do you think so many people seem 343 00:21:01,359 --> 00:21:05,919 Speaker 1: to be instinctively opposed to bailouts and instinctively opposed to 344 00:21:06,160 --> 00:21:09,359 Speaker 1: policy that on the surface would appear to be good 345 00:21:09,840 --> 00:21:12,760 Speaker 1: for everyone and for the overall economy. And how do 346 00:21:12,800 --> 00:21:17,560 Speaker 1: you overcome that obstacle? That's sure, Maybe we've been, uh, 347 00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:20,320 Speaker 1: we're so used to the way things have been done 348 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:24,240 Speaker 1: for so long that perhaps it's a greater expectation, and 349 00:21:24,359 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 1: people are just used to corporations being been held out 350 00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:29,600 Speaker 1: and not the American people and our families and the 351 00:21:29,640 --> 00:21:33,320 Speaker 1: American worker and our communities. Um, you know. But again, 352 00:21:34,760 --> 00:21:40,040 Speaker 1: this is the moment we need to be disruptive and 353 00:21:40,119 --> 00:21:44,000 Speaker 1: we need to build something new that is intentional about 354 00:21:45,200 --> 00:21:49,760 Speaker 1: equity and justice. Reiterating my earlier point in terms of 355 00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:52,160 Speaker 1: the mandate from the people, I mean, the reason why 356 00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:56,880 Speaker 1: people still continue to protest, to demonstrate, to mobilize, to organize. Yes, 357 00:21:56,920 --> 00:22:00,280 Speaker 1: the tipping point was about the fact um that we 358 00:22:00,359 --> 00:22:03,159 Speaker 1: had been in the midst of a pandemic, besieged by 359 00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:07,879 Speaker 1: these images of unarmed black Americans being brutalized and murdered 360 00:22:07,880 --> 00:22:10,080 Speaker 1: by police. But that's not the only reason why people 361 00:22:10,119 --> 00:22:12,439 Speaker 1: are in the streets, and and that's and the reason 362 00:22:12,480 --> 00:22:15,919 Speaker 1: that movement is one that is multigenerational and multi racial. 363 00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:18,639 Speaker 1: There's unrest in the streets because there's unrest in the 364 00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:22,199 Speaker 1: lives of Americans, and that has everything to do with 365 00:22:22,240 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 1: the role that policy has played and creating these inequities 366 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,919 Speaker 1: and these disparities, and in particular these racial injustices. And 367 00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:31,240 Speaker 1: so this is the reckoning and that's why the movement 368 00:22:31,320 --> 00:22:34,080 Speaker 1: is not waying. It is a sustained one. And I 369 00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:36,879 Speaker 1: was speaking earlier about Cretis Scott King and and and 370 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:40,560 Speaker 1: Dr King, and you know, they gave us the blueprint. 371 00:22:40,640 --> 00:22:43,679 Speaker 1: It is to more organize, it is to mobilize, and 372 00:22:43,720 --> 00:22:46,560 Speaker 1: it is to legislate. That's what all that marching was about. 373 00:22:47,359 --> 00:22:50,320 Speaker 1: So you know, you can't say black lives matter and 374 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:53,760 Speaker 1: affirm that in this moment of culture shift, but then 375 00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:56,800 Speaker 1: not see that reflected in our laws and in our budgets. 376 00:22:57,200 --> 00:22:59,479 Speaker 1: Those are the only receipts that matter in this moment. 377 00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:02,879 Speaker 1: So if black lives matter, we need to lead like it, 378 00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 1: and we need to legislate like it, and we need 379 00:23:05,119 --> 00:23:09,440 Speaker 1: to act like it. And that includes the FED. Congresswoman, 380 00:23:09,480 --> 00:23:11,720 Speaker 1: I did one last question. You mentioned the FED because 381 00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:13,800 Speaker 1: I wanted to bring it back there. Looking again at 382 00:23:13,960 --> 00:23:19,080 Speaker 1: um Uh Biden's platform, he mentions also having the FED 383 00:23:19,160 --> 00:23:23,560 Speaker 1: focus more on racial economic gaps. Do you feel that 384 00:23:23,680 --> 00:23:25,880 Speaker 1: Powell gets this? There's gonna be a lot of questions 385 00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:29,000 Speaker 1: at some point in the theoretical Biden administration about whether 386 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 1: he should be reappointed. In your communications conversations, do you 387 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:36,640 Speaker 1: feel that Powell understands this and what it makes sense 388 00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 1: to reappoint him as recently I've been disappointed. I'm not 389 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:46,200 Speaker 1: sure that he understands um the gravity of the impact 390 00:23:46,359 --> 00:23:51,080 Speaker 1: of the lack of action by the FED and fully 391 00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:53,480 Speaker 1: appreciates the power that they have and the role that 392 00:23:53,520 --> 00:23:56,840 Speaker 1: they can play and addressing these racial injustice is and 393 00:23:56,880 --> 00:24:02,440 Speaker 1: in particular black unemployment and the racial wealth at Congressman Presley, 394 00:24:02,520 --> 00:24:06,119 Speaker 1: thank you so much for your time. Incredibly important topic 395 00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:08,679 Speaker 1: and I appreciate you coming out. Thank you, Thank you 396 00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:24,960 Speaker 1: so much. Tracy. I feel like so many of these 397 00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:29,160 Speaker 1: conversations keeps coming back to the question of can we 398 00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:32,760 Speaker 1: really go back to the status coo epidus. Yeah, I 399 00:24:32,760 --> 00:24:34,800 Speaker 1: think that's right, and I think the way the congresswoman 400 00:24:34,960 --> 00:24:38,840 Speaker 1: put it, the idea of a reckoning that will now 401 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:42,119 Speaker 1: lead to a reconstruction. That's a good way of thinking 402 00:24:42,160 --> 00:24:46,640 Speaker 1: about it. It seems pretty clear that policymakers have a 403 00:24:46,640 --> 00:24:50,880 Speaker 1: mandate to do something differently now, I guess, I guess 404 00:24:50,920 --> 00:24:54,080 Speaker 1: the question is how do they do it under time 405 00:24:54,119 --> 00:25:01,280 Speaker 1: pressure and how do they actually constructed and maintain that momentum. Yeah. Absolutely, 406 00:25:01,359 --> 00:25:05,280 Speaker 1: I think it's also really important and really interesting her 407 00:25:05,400 --> 00:25:09,119 Speaker 1: continued citation of the Humphrey Hawkins Act, because people have 408 00:25:09,200 --> 00:25:12,520 Speaker 1: this idea that it's like, okay, target full employment or 409 00:25:12,600 --> 00:25:17,960 Speaker 1: target maximum employment and price stability without really realizing well, 410 00:25:18,080 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 1: and then and then full employment gets redefined as just 411 00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:23,320 Speaker 1: sort of like, oh, this is like what a model 412 00:25:23,440 --> 00:25:27,480 Speaker 1: says employment should be before inflation takes off. And as 413 00:25:27,480 --> 00:25:30,640 Speaker 1: we saw during you know, the post crisis era, whether 414 00:25:30,680 --> 00:25:33,080 Speaker 1: it was the FED started high grades, I think in 415 00:25:35,240 --> 00:25:36,879 Speaker 1: you know, they really have no idea. And that's not 416 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,240 Speaker 1: even an insult per se to the Fed. It's like, 417 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:42,479 Speaker 1: these are really hard things. And so the idea of 418 00:25:42,560 --> 00:25:48,240 Speaker 1: taking full employment more seriously and not hiking rage just 419 00:25:48,320 --> 00:25:51,800 Speaker 1: because some model says, you know, pretty soon inflation might 420 00:25:51,800 --> 00:25:54,119 Speaker 1: pick up to two point one percent if we don't, 421 00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:56,920 Speaker 1: I think is going to be one of the big 422 00:25:57,000 --> 00:25:59,639 Speaker 1: changes and we already see that with you know, some 423 00:25:59,720 --> 00:26:02,359 Speaker 1: of the commentary out of the FED about not trying 424 00:26:02,440 --> 00:26:06,560 Speaker 1: to preemptively fight inflation this time. But if you, you know, 425 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:10,359 Speaker 1: looking back at that experience, looking back at the cyclical 426 00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:14,280 Speaker 1: aspect of the black white unemployment gap, perhaps this time 427 00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:19,680 Speaker 1: around actually taking full employment uh and getting the unemployment 428 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:22,040 Speaker 1: rate down to as low as possible, it seems like 429 00:26:22,040 --> 00:26:25,080 Speaker 1: it might be taken more seriously this time. Yeah, I 430 00:26:25,080 --> 00:26:27,640 Speaker 1: think it would. One thing that we didn't really discuss though, 431 00:26:27,840 --> 00:26:31,160 Speaker 1: is the role of the FED on asset prices. And 432 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:34,399 Speaker 1: if you think that, you know, low interest rates are 433 00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:38,080 Speaker 1: going to boost asset prices in general, and but if 434 00:26:38,119 --> 00:26:41,280 Speaker 1: you if you agree to that, then the vast majority 435 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:43,800 Speaker 1: of financial assets, you know, are held by rich people 436 00:26:43,840 --> 00:26:46,439 Speaker 1: who are generally well off, lots of white people. And 437 00:26:46,600 --> 00:26:49,720 Speaker 1: I guess there's a question around financial inclusion there as well, 438 00:26:49,800 --> 00:26:53,320 Speaker 1: like how do you get more people to participate in 439 00:26:53,880 --> 00:26:57,880 Speaker 1: a financialized economy? Yeah, no, I mean I think that's 440 00:26:58,119 --> 00:27:01,359 Speaker 1: I thought you had a really good question about the 441 00:27:01,480 --> 00:27:04,800 Speaker 1: sort of public cynicism around bailouts, and you know, these 442 00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:08,440 Speaker 1: are all slightly different things. In the word bailout gets used, Um, 443 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:11,200 Speaker 1: you know, some people think, you know, stimulus and bailout 444 00:27:11,200 --> 00:27:14,000 Speaker 1: and cutting rates, etcetera. But there is just a lot 445 00:27:14,040 --> 00:27:19,960 Speaker 1: of cynicism towards the potential for policy to make things 446 00:27:20,000 --> 00:27:23,080 Speaker 1: better for the public. And I feel like, you know 447 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,560 Speaker 1: you every time the Fed does something, people point to 448 00:27:26,680 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 1: exactly that and they're like, well, not everyone has assets 449 00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:33,400 Speaker 1: in the stock market. Not everyone benefits from a booming 450 00:27:33,440 --> 00:27:37,680 Speaker 1: housing market, particularly in cities, or particularly in places where 451 00:27:37,680 --> 00:27:40,919 Speaker 1: a lot of people are renting, and not um not 452 00:27:41,240 --> 00:27:44,840 Speaker 1: participating in that upside. And so I do think that 453 00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:49,639 Speaker 1: obviously monetary policy, interest rate policy as a role to play. 454 00:27:49,720 --> 00:27:53,960 Speaker 1: But I think congress Woman Congresswoman pointed out, it's really 455 00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:57,080 Speaker 1: a sort of it's a crisis, it's and it's an 456 00:27:57,080 --> 00:27:59,480 Speaker 1: issue that needs to be addressed at all different levels 457 00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 1: of government. Uh. To me, it almost gets to these 458 00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 1: big philosophical questions like whether people care more about absolute 459 00:28:07,640 --> 00:28:10,960 Speaker 1: gains versus relative gains, because you can argue that everyone 460 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:14,919 Speaker 1: will benefit in some way from whatever policy. But I 461 00:28:14,960 --> 00:28:19,720 Speaker 1: guess in reality, if people see their neighbor, for instance, 462 00:28:20,040 --> 00:28:24,600 Speaker 1: benefit more on a relative basis, I guess people still 463 00:28:24,600 --> 00:28:29,240 Speaker 1: get angry that that feels like the essence of the problem. 464 00:28:29,240 --> 00:28:31,440 Speaker 1: To me, like whether or not you believe relative gains 465 00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:36,520 Speaker 1: are more important or absolute gains. But again, big questions, Yeah, 466 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:41,280 Speaker 1: big questions and potentially a moment of a big change. 467 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:46,600 Speaker 1: But yeah, it'll be really interesting to have similar conversations, 468 00:28:46,920 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 1: hopefully not exactly the same, but more conversations on this 469 00:28:50,720 --> 00:28:55,080 Speaker 1: topic next year and see how much has actually like 470 00:28:55,160 --> 00:29:01,239 Speaker 1: shaken out in terms of change. Yeah. Absolutely, Okay, all right, 471 00:29:01,320 --> 00:29:04,800 Speaker 1: well this has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. 472 00:29:04,920 --> 00:29:07,560 Speaker 1: I'm Trucy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at 473 00:29:07,560 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 1: Trucy Alloway and I'm Joe Wasn't All. You can follow 474 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 1: me on Twitter at the Stalwart and follow our guest 475 00:29:14,960 --> 00:29:19,400 Speaker 1: on Twitter, Congresswoman Ianna Pressley. Her handle is at Ianna Pressley. 476 00:29:19,800 --> 00:29:23,560 Speaker 1: Follow our producer on Twitter, Laura Carlson at Laura M Carlson. 477 00:29:23,760 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 1: Follow the Bloomberg head of podcasts, Francesco Levi at Francesco Today, 478 00:29:28,800 --> 00:29:31,080 Speaker 1: and check out all of our podcasts under the handle 479 00:29:31,480 --> 00:30:00,120 Speaker 1: at podcast. Thanks for listening. A