WEBVTT - The Impact Of Liz Truss Resigning (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find a Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, the news

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the day, of course, list trust stepping down as

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of the UK. We need to get some

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>perspective here of maybe some next steps, if we will.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Ashworth, Bloomberg Opinion columnists. Uh joins us here, Marcus. Uh.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every time we talk to you, there's

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some weird news coming out of the UK. It's going

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>on over there with you guys. So I love I

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>love speaking to you guys, but it would be nice

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to do it and something more measured way than uh.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're all sort of flabbergasted here because you

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>may have heard that there is a chance it seems

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that Boris Johnson, remember him him? Sure he may. He

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>may put his hat in the ring again out of

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the national interests, which is one way of looking at it. Anyways,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, absolutely, Um. Up to up to then, it

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, well, you know, maybe it doesn't matter quite

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so much that Truss has gone because she wasn't really empowered.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Because the new chance of Jeremy Hunt, who is much

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>more about physical stability and not quite the reversion to

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>austerity perhaps that we've seen ten years ago under George Osborne,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but certainly far less of this dash for growth which

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the previous Chancellor Quasi Kwarteng had obviously stumbled so badly,

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and we set off this whole guilt crisis. Um well,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what seems years ago now, but it was only about

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>three or four weeks ago. Um, so you know, trust going.

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And if Hunt stayed at least in in as Chancellor

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>or possibly even as as as leader, would would have

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>been you know, it's fine. Um, I think it was

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Richie Snak, It's fine, Ben Wallace. This is the other

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of possible one who's the Defense secretary. Sort of

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fine again, as long as Hunt stays in in number

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of having the chance of things, which apparently said he's

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna run for leader. Looks you know, looks quite

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>certain until um we get the Boris news. As ever,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the wrecking ball so is that, you know, the programs

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that Jeremy Hunt has now shifted trust and am X too.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that in line with what Rishi Sunac wanted to

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>do in the first place. It's complicated, yes, but no,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I mean largely largely year I'm gonna say yes, um,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but I mean the way that the order in which

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, she said it was proposing to do it,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>uh is quite different. But then again, so much has changed.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Would you imagine someone like Sanak and Hunt thinking pretty much,

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>very closely in line, yes, you would, whereas the Trust

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Hunt relationship was clearly, you know, very much diametrically opposite

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in economic viewpoint, but they were going through the motions

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>for it, you know, just to keep her alive. She's

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer there. But Marcus, would the I mean the

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would would the UK be in a much better place

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>had they go was in soon act begin with oh

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>oh yes, in a sense of Okay, if you don't

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>want to risk premium into UK assets, the more the

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>more on risk people exactly, if you want to keep

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the cost of borrowing down, and we need to borrow

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than optically, yes, Now you could argue

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that Richie Snack's view of of increasing taxes and into

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>what like was certainly gonna be recession now, and you know,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>penalizing both employers employees and indeed corporates on the tax

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>rate was was madness. I personally thought it was a

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>very ill decided guided approach. Nonetheless, uh, you know, his

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>his views and what happened under his trust seemed totally precient. Now,

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in that sense, he's a logical candidate to

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>take over. I would think, all right, so Marcus, you

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have your finger on the pulse of the city of London,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Well what do you think the markets quote

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote I would like to see over the next couple

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of days, a couple of weeks, and maybe a couple

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of years. That's that's he's I mean, that's you can

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>see how guilt yields have dropped back again once Hunts

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in power, and that the fact that they barely reacted

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with trust going because they expect Hunter stay in number

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven as in Chancellor. Then you know that I think

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that shows you very clearly Sterling has you know, slightly

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>risen on the news, never a good thing for an

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>upgoing prime ministers. Know that the markets take their demise

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in as a bullish sign. So I think as long

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>as we don't get you know, an unexpected result, I

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>think markets you know, will will take this um as

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, the political side is so bad, as

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>long as the economic management of the economy and the

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>narrowing and the funding gap and the whole physical approach

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is back on on a level playing field, they'll take that. Obviously,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>longer term you could argue a more growth centric approach

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to purely fixating on on on certain sort

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of types of austerity or cutting back of tax cuts

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>um you know, may not benefit the UK and a

0:04:58.480 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>long one, but that depends on what you believe in

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>capitalism mora or quas by socialism. So Marcus, if I

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>were to walk the countryside of of England and stuff

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>in you know, a pub every once in a while,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what would the local folks tell me about the economy

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of their outlook here? How is it in the UK? Well,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the Australians put it best is

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that the whining doesn't stop when the engines are turned

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>off when a UK plane arrives in Sydney. So we

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>are a bunch of windows. We talked about the weather.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Where we we we we we have certain fixations like

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>chewing and as you need usually saw with the queenseral

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>um So, I think most people are focused obviously on

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the cost of living crisis. I think they see this

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as a shambles, which evidently is in number ten where

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got a twelve year long government, you know, which

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>has been through several iterations, not able to choose amongst

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>itself who should be leading on what their policy should be.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, um I think there is a state of

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>general disbelief that we are and everyone else's focus. We

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be where the heck is. David Cameron

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, you know he's I don't know. Marcus Ashworth,

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. As always, we really appreciate getting your perspective.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>There are Marcus Ashworth Bloomberg opinion columnists in London. I'm

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping he's gonna get out to a public later this evening,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, checking with the people, see how the

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>local economy is going out there. Again, we need some

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>smart voices here to give us some context here for

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the UK at price. Principle of ERGO,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a global intelligence and Analysis consultancy. Is also

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a nonresident senior fellow at some little college downtown New York.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's n y U or something like that.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>He's also a former British Trade officials, so that makes

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>him sound kind of official. He's done a lot of

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff stuff, right, So, ed, what's going on with you

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>guys over there? I mean, I we we look to

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the UK for stability to feel bad? What's going on

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>over there? Right? I mean, you've introduced me as a

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>smart person, but I'm like, have to disappoint you strike

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>off the bat because again I don't know, and I

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone knows. That's the nature of it. But

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the headline is that the Prime Minister has

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>resigned after twenty minutes, never a good look, and there

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>will be a new prime minister within weeks, if not days.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>The immediate question, I think for your listeners is what's

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with that new fiscal budget that the

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Chancellor Hunt was talking about? Is he going to write

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that and then it's going to appear and be a

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fair company for the new prime minister. It's coming in

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve days that he is supposed to present that right

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>at Cobra thirty one. I wonder and have been asking

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>people would we be in a similar situation had Rishi

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunac been elected, or would we be in a much

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>better situation, and therefore should the parliament now elect him

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>as the new leader. Okay, so we would have been

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in a much better situation VISI V Markets visiby capital markets,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I contend um, But it doesn't necessarily mean that now

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we can as a country get him in. Here's the problem.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Rishi lost the popular election within the Conservative Party to

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>List Trust. If we now turn around and say, just kidding,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the popular candidate is not the prime minister, You've actually

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>got the candidate that lost to that popular candidate. What

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>does that say about Well, the popular candidate almost drove

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you into a situation where the I m F may

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have had to come in and bail you out. I mean,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the popular candidate did things so bad. I can't remember

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the leader of a Western world making such a huge

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>error in terms of the economy. So she's clearly gone.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>And I guess anyone except for those people in the

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Conservative Party that voted for Liz Trust Liz Trust should

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have a say and who the next leader is. Well,

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about a general election, right. Essentially you're

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that if and I agree with you, if this

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>disastrous piece of off road driving has ended, which it

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>has right with a sort of triple slow motion role, Um,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>then you then you really do need to go back

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and ask people, well, what do you want? The problem

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>is I think that we've kind of broken the seal

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on Sterling, right. We've now got people in markets thinking

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>about parity, cable rate parity, which, by the way, is

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. If not, you know it will be broken.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh boy. But then the question is, well,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is a pound anyway? And what's it worth?

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What are the fundamentals? I think that we're going to

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be okay. I think that the democratic process has got

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>rid of someone that clearly wasn't up to the job

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>quite quickly. You can't do that in Russia. You can't

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do that in China, as we just saw. So I

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>would say, I'm I'm medium long UK. I would say that, um,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but we are talking about a general election, surely, all right.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So if I talked to if I go into a

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>local pub, which I tend to do when I'm in

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>England and asked a local person. They're sitting on the

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>bar stoll mining his or her own business. I would

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think they would say, we just want stability. Boris Johnson,

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure would fit the bill for stability. What

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think the odds are that he actually comes

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>back and represents the Conservative Party? Hi, I think he

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>would quite like to do that. Um, and I think

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that he he said, has he not that he will?

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He will appear and take another girl at least standing.

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>But then, but then define stability because on the one hand,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we've always say the Brits want I want that s

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>word want stability. That's almost the same saying it's the

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>economy stupid. But on the other hand, we voted to

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>exit the largest single market in the world, with all

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the volatility that yeah, well there's a question. Is there

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>any possibility that that gets turned around or at least

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>undone in some ways? Yes, I think the United Kingdom

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>will join the euro within twenty years. Wow, that's what

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you both look shocked? Yes, Yes, well I am well.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I I was certainly against Brexit because I'm an internationalist

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as it were, but and that's not really in vogue

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>right now arguably, But I mean you're globalist. I'm just

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sad that Hong Kong. What's happening to Hong Kong,

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because that is a great global financial love hung was exactly,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, And that's sad what's happening there?

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So what are next steps here? I mean the markets

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>are kind of calm here. I'm looking at st not

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out twenty years, next week, next week, next week. Yeah,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the markets do look a bit calmer. I think guilt's

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>armed down, um sterling calm down. I think it all

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>depends now on the cadence and presentation of the new leaders.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they will be watched in the manner of

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>central bankers. I think Jeremy Hunt's actually doing quite a

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>good job of, you know, presenting that stable, calm, rational

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>face that you'd like to see from any chancellor. But

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it does depend, I think who the next leader is

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and how markets extrapolate the a physical capacity and b

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>fisical behavior of the United Kingdom on the basis of

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>who that leader will be. And markets are essentially calling

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the shot. Is that fair to say shots? Is that

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>fair to say? Absolutely? You can't buck the markets, but

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>the markets can buck you. Yeah, there you go, that's

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>are back. That's a headline for our podcast. Did you

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>coin that phrase? Because we could well, Margaret Thatcher coined

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the first half of that phrase. I think I just

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>came up with the second. But now you know we

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>have a podcast. I do know. I apparently I disappointed

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>one listener to whom I've responded, Yes, that was very

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>nice with landish comment that I made last week. But

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. Ed Price, thank you so much for joining

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Worker studio. At Prices,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a principle at ERGO, a global intelligence and analysis consultancy,

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>is also a nonresident senior fellow at NYU and a

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>former British trade official. Uh you know, kind of walking

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>around making the Maya colpus to some various media outlets. So,

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but which is it's not actually Adds fault just because

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he's British. Asked him to explain it to what's been

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>going on here big news of course out of the

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>UK or Liz Trust stepping down as Prime Minister. What

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do this mornings. Just get some perspective, uh,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>some context? Uh so, I said one of the people

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we have to get in studio is John Author's Bloomberg

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Opinion calumnists. I mean when I think England, when I

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think proper England, when I think proper English, I think

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>John Authors. I mean he went to this trade school

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>over the Oxford. I think it's pretty good. I don't know.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Um we think of we think of football a pint

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of Vale the Union, Jack and John Author. That's what

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we do. So I'm throwing beetles and Shakespeare while we're

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're maybe they're I'm throwing the blame it you,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend. What's going on over there? That's kind of

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>been my question of the morning. What are you guys

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>doing over there? I guess she was a quit or

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>not a fighter. H First of all, no, it's not

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>my fault. We did it. We did a Twitter spaces

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation at the point in early in the summer when

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the fields to replace Boris Johnson had been narrowed down

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to two, which was Lizz Trust and pretty soon Neck

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And it was me and three other Bloomberg Opinion columnists,

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Marks Ashworth and Adrian Wildridge and Terry's Raphael. And it

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was a somewhat uninteresting conversation because all four of us

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>did think soon it should win. And the reason or

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>four of us thought that was that we just didn't

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>believe that this trust was equal to the job, that

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you just wasn't good enough to take this on. Um.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And we were completely right. It's not. It's not as

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>though anybody not as though it was difficult to see

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this coming. Similarly, I and every other economic commentator, pretty

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>much one or two sort of very ideological exceptions, was

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>writing that, you know, the bond market isn't going to

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>stand for it if you try to do what you

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to do. So so, I mean these are remarkable

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>unforced errors. Um. Basically, I think, I think almost unprecedented, right.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you think it back to any other leader,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>world leader who has made such a huge economic own goal,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to I have been trying. I mean, there

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are there are examples of forced errors, you know, emerging

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>market finance ministers who devalue and things cut out of control. UM,

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know Nevill Chamberlain at Munich. UM. I mean you

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know that there are some awful mistakes out there, but

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>none of them were forced. I'm sorry, all of them

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>were forced. The idea of there was no pressure to

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>do this, UM. I and that's quite such big unfunded

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts and give no detail at all of how

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you were going to favorite There was there was no

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>pressure to do this apart from a pretty small group

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>within the Conservative Party, and it was there's there's nothing

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ideological about this either, even if you do believe in

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a small states and lower taxes, which we let's due

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to an extent that this was not the time to

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>try and making a big leap towards it. So so,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing is um, this is obviously a

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>very juicy story for journalists and in some ways it's

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fun and amusing. But for the British people this has

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>been awful. I mean, they were already in a tough

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>spot and the mistakes that she made, along with quasi

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>quar tang um, have very likely ruined the lives of

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of Britons right who need people who need to

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>re mortgage and can't afford to do it. They're then

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>forced to sell their homes at a lower price. The

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>guilts market, moving into any conversation immediately gets a bit

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>deader when you you say things like the guilt market.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It is calming down, basically by Jeremy Hunt's coming in

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and as firmly as he did just say no, we're

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not doing any of that. Um. So it is possible that,

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the shake up to confidence and the shock

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>won't go away. So I'm sure it has done lasting damage. Um.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't be necessary for the property markets to seize

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>up as totally as currently seems possible because mortgage rates,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, at one point, at one point long daily

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>guilts were yielding more than five percent. Now they're below four.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a very big difference to how much actual inter

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>people need to pay each month. Um. But but in

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>broader terms, yes, I mean it makes us look silly.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It happens immediately after, amazingly the co within days of

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the funeral of Elizabeth the Second, which I had a

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people thinking quite hard about what was good

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and bad about recent British history. And yes, it's it's

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's appalling. I actually feel sorry for plenty of

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>small c conservative people who aren't particularly ideological did votes

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>conservative and those are exactly the people who probably hurt

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>most and let down the most. And that's a large

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>junk of British society. All right, Johnny, if we fast

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>forward two years is an a fair assumption that the

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives will not be in power when the next election comes.

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it that bad that it will just be swiped

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out across the book. I'll stick to the wording I

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>used in my column last night, which is that I

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's possible for the Conservatives to win the

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>next election up Moore, it is still possible for Labor

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to lose it. The big comparison here is with John

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Major in ninety two, took over from Margaret Thatcher in

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>very messy circumstances, not of an awful lot more charismatic

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>than than Liz trust Um, but he was a fairly

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>safe pair of hands. And yes he is a decent man,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and um I actually quite liked as a person the

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Labor leader Neil Kinnock who ran against him. But but

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you didn't look like a very credible prime minister. And

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in remarkable circumstances, very big turn up for the books

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>major one. But it wasn't so much that major one.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>He just avoided making serious mistakes and gave Labor the

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>space to lose it. That's I think that's less likely

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to happen this time because Keir Starmer is if not

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not the second coming Winston Churchill, but he's a

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>perfectly credible by as far as I can see. And

0:18:55.680 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party is really determined to you know, this

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is what happens in parties has been out of power

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. They get really determined not to

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>mess up. John ed Brice was just in here and

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, now that markets have got the taste of it,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the pound is bound for parody again. Do you agree?

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Probably the question. Probably one of the ways the British country,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>British economy moves forwards is by accepting the somewhat higher

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>level of inflation and also therefore a somewhat lower level

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for the pound. It's one of the less painful options

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>available to the country at this point. Parity, I'm not

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>predicting it next week. Parities certainly very possible. Interesting, So

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>travel plans are including the UK and Europe. My friend

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we get a number of American friends have been asking

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>me advice some where by the country and bring it

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>back in the souvenirs exactly. John Arthur's great stuff has

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>always John, to his opinion calumnists for Bloomberg News, he

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is the pride of Great Britain and he is on

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>our blue but somehow he's an Englishman in New York,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a Red Sox fan. I don't get that. We

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have a situation in the UK. The Prime culture has

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>resigned after forty four days in office. Liz trust becomes

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the shortest ruling prime minister in great British history, and

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, um, her economic policy

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 1>mistake is the worst own goal. Yeah. I like how

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you put that in recent memory. I can't think of anything. Um,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you exclude like Latin America and dictatorships

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like Turkey, I can't imagine. I can't remember a situation

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that that was worse than this. Let's bring in our

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief, John michel Thwaite. UM two, help me

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>remember if it? Do you think that's the case? John?

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Is this the worst um at an amic blunder in

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the surest amount of time that you can recall in

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the Western world? Yes, I can't. I can't immediately. I

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have some dim reminiscence of I mean, I was Italian.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Italian governments have changed incredibly quickly, but that all, to

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be honest, that was just sort of internal politics going

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>backwards and forwards. In this case, it's a very simple thing.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>There was an unbelievable own girl the extent it's like

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you and done so quickly. Sometimes again, to carry on

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the analogy, in soccer, people score an own goal because

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side is attacking and you do it. This

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>was almost the opposite. It's like she started the match,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>turned round and hit it as hard as possible as

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>our own goal. But almost you know, within the seconds

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the kickoff that that and that alone is an

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>act of kind of that. That is the first I've

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>never seen that. Yeah, so, and we were talking with

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>John Authur's who said, you know, maybe Lehman Brothers fail,

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but that was something where you know, people in high

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>office is deliberated with each other for at least weeks,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if not months. This, as far as we can see,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is something that Liz Trust and Quasi Quartang kind of

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>just did without telling anyone. Yeah, it is. I mean,

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 1>basically I said earlier, it's possible, you know, it's possible

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to feel sorry for Trust. She's wanted to get this

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>job all her life, She's done all that sort of thing.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But the damage she has caused in that short time

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>has been utterly extraordinary. I mean, to the country, most

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously to lots of people whose mortgage rates have now

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>shut up, but also rather weirdly, you know, to the

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>party that elected her. Um too. You know, in some

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>ways it's also made life incredibly difficult for labor because

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever whoever comes in, and this applies to the people

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>running for leadership as well, whoever comes in, there's now

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>very narrow there's a very narrow room for maneuver. You

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do that much because the markets have lost confidence

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in us. John Baris Johnson, is there an option? Really?

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I know that's that's a question many people are asking themselves. Um.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the simple answer is, in terms of stability,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>um stability and Boris are not words that go together,

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and indeed that has been the true all his life.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like you'd rather sit on the back of that

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Miller's motorbike going high speed without a crash on it.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You would be you would be better, you'd stand a

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>better chance of getting through things. Boris has never been stable.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's he's inventive, he's clever, he's all those things.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>The one argument for him at all is that he

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is possibly the one person in the Conservative Party who's

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>shown an ability to make the current coalition of the

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Conservative Party work that taking these what they call red

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>walls seats from labor in the north, persuading working class

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Brexiteers that he was the answer, whilst at the same

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>time hanging on to most of the normal kind suburban

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Tory heartlands as well. But but he did that by

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>telling them both the same thing at the you know,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the the opposite things at the same time, with a

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of charm. But I think everything went wrong. So

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't and it certainly I was in Westminster last

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>night and you did not get a lot of feelings

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of support for Boris. They got rid of Boris and

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and and he was I think people see him as

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a symptom of the chaos. He didn't do anything quite

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as terrible as Trusted, but he still made a mess

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of things quite quickly. Why isn't Rishie

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Sunac the obvious choice? I mean, I still can't understand

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>why he lost versus Liz trust, But at this point

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you can see that she was the wrong choice. And um,

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Hunt is running some rather Sunakian policy, so why

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not bring him in? Yes, I mean that the it's

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult basically that the argument for Sunac is very simple

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is you know I told do you so? Is that

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he was the choice of the MPs. He was the

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>person who said this would happen, and it's happened. The

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>difficulty this time around is that you have to get

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it sort of just through the MPs, and there there

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is a group of people who are still very cross

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from the right wing of the party about the idea

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that Sunac was somehow guilty of getting rid of Boris

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Hunt. By contrast, there generally more well disposed

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to Hunt ran against Buck Johnson for the leadership a

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>long time ago, but then he behaved sort of relatively

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>well from then on, and people look at they don't

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have the same animous towards Hunt that they do towards Sunac.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>So from that point of view, actually, you know, Jeremy

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Hunter has played that yet another very clever candidate card

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>by immediately announcing that he won't stand. You could imagine

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a situation that maybe in four or five days that

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>will come back and not unlike Boris Johnson's heroes Cincinnatus,

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets dragged from the plow in the same way

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as people in this cool to run large editorial developments

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and be told to be told you know you're the

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>only person who can do this right, and that that

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there may be a bit of that in it. And

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the conservative partly a party writ large over you know,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>two years from now, do they have a shot of

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping power here or is it just gotten beyond the

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>pall Here They have a shot, but only in the

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of you're sitting there on the par three there

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>is a chance of you getting a hole in one, um,

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but the odds are generally not in your favor. Yeah,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they do. There is a narrow room whereby they go

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>through the following things. Number one is they do elect

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>probably either sac or Hunt. They elect someone who looks

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>grown up and looks as if he knows what he's doing.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Penny more than conceivably um if she had the other

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>two next daughter. But they suddenly look much more stable,

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>much more responsible. They somehow managed to keep the head

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>bangers in order, and at the same token, the core

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>bin Easta's inside the Labor Party goes slightly mad. And

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>then finally some event happens that changes things, and that

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in the end it's almost like events as your hope.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You look at British politics, like politics in several other countries,

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, at least in this way, it is

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>astonishingly febrile. You know, things change unbelievably. It was only

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>probably a year or so ago, a bit more than

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, that we were talking about Boris Johnson

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>being you know, definitely instable and definitely out of control,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but being totally unbeatable, where he was then got rid

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of because he parties and all that sort of stuff.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible that something similar will happen, which makes

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>whoever the incoming Prime minister is look very good and

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>makes Starma look bad. But at the moment a people

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a thirty point lead in British politics for

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a very very long time. John I might be old

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>school here, but you know, when I look across the

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>pond too, the you know, great Britain, I think of

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a world leader, stable, strong, uh you know, obviously a key, key,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>key partner for the United States. Is that feeling I mean?

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, the last several years, I've seen

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Brexit boy, and then I've seen you know, kind of this,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the volatility we've seen in the political circles here and

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are is Great Britain concerned that they have lost are

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>losing that type of reputation. Yeah, I think they are.

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean most obviously because you can see what the

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>way the markets are treating, you know, treating the economy.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>We are looking to see what markets think of us

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the same way as I can last remember that

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>very kind of dimly obviously in the in the nineteen seventies.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that was when you watched the British Chancellor

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>going off to the I m F to see if

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they get some money. But more generally, you know, that

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was the type of thing that we imagined happened to

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>countries like Italy. Um. And that's two points. That one

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>one is actually and I'm not trying to sound defensively

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>British about it, but there aren't There are a number

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of other places that could make the same kind of mistake.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Italy is a per absolute prize example. You go, not

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>only coming in with a somewhat truscy and style of

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>doing things, well, you know, Italy has got even more debt.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's that be careful. Britain has a long record

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in politics of being a harbinger of of what happens

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in other places. Well that there's a bit there, the

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>bit which is different about Britain and which you mentioned

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, that is Brexit. And the truth is

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that ever since Brexit it's got harder. And the part

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of the hardness is that you have a group of

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people in the Conservative Party who have exactly the same

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>approach that people in the Labor Party. Some people in

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party had in the nineteen seventies. Was the

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>only reason why socialism didn't work was it hadn't been

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>done properly. Well, there's a group of people within the

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Tory Party who's only you've you were Brexit, as you know,

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the only reason why it hasn't appeared to work because

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been done properly, hasn't been as radical and

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>extreme as they would like it to be. That's that

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was what Trust came in sort of sucking up to,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't really help. But the underlying point is

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>really simple. We we are a medium upper medium sized

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>economy on the edge of an absolutely gigantic one in

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the European Union. And it's quite strong allies,

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out to the you know, so it's

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>strong historic links. But we trust Trust came in saying

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we are a big place. We can get away with this. Well,

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit like Sewers in the nineteen fifties. Is

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Britain is not as robust and independently as as it

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thought it was. I mean Britain. Of course, the Empire

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>has shrunk dramatically over the last century, most most regretfully

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in North America. But but but my point was going

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to be, you're London is still a financial capital, I mean,

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge hub of trade. And the pound has managed

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to recover from big problems before. Look at you know

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 1>how strong it got even after Soros. So I wonder,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it does the pound recover from this or

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are we headed for parody now? Or does it? Does

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it recover? There seems to be again, if I knew

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>how to gamble on the pound, I would be richer

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>than I am. But that but basically I think the

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>argument that we're in a kind of one ten to

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>one fift against the dollar bit, which means that you know,

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>there is there is definitely a cost of having had

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Liz Trust is that it's you know, the pound has

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>gone down a slought. On the other hand, the idea

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's unlikely to get down further, largely because the

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>government's the government in power can't do that much going forward.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So we sort of know. One of the interesting things

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about the drum the British and pitched themselves into is

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that actually, if if you divided yourselves into one is

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>labor Sweeney Labor Miller conservative, there's not a lot of

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>difference between what you could do, um that that that

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one of you might want to borrow a bit more

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to spend a bit more in terms of um social

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>equality and stuff, and the other one might be trying

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit more entrepreneurial. But there's not a

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>big difference because there simply isn't much. There's not much

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>money left and there's very little at the markets are

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>going to let you do, and that people have just

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>seen the cost of doing that. By any measure, Britain

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to borrow a lot of money

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>next year anyway. Just start dealing with the problems. It's

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>already paid for, alright. Great, great to get your time.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You really appreciate your perspective. John Michael Waite, Bloombert News

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>editor in Chief, reporting from London. Let's stay on the

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical track here, Mick mulroy, cofan of the Lobo Institute,

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Mike Weird, we've been focusing on the uk

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.959
<v Speaker 1>here that the potential of the coming pending change in

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>leadership there. It just kind of helps us refocus, you know,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the attention on Europe. I mean, it's it's started with

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia and the Ukraine and that is still front and center.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's I'd love to just get your thoughts about

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>where we are in Ukraine, how we should be thinking

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about it, and most importantly, how it might play out

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Yeah, so great to be with you guys.

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Um where we are in Ukraine right now. I think

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Russia has seen that they failed and they're objected to

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>take the country. Now they're failing, and they're objective to

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>maintain the terrain essentially that they've taken to The Ukrainian

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>counterfest is still being successful and he is he being president.

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Putin has resorted to just terrorizing the civilian population through

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>MRS strikes and now drown strikes, and now it looks

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like wholesale hostage taking of civilians in the Kirsan region,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>both to cover their with jaw and potentially to force

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>into some kind of constricted service against our own country. So, uh,

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>where we go from here? Where do they go from here? Um?

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>You know without the US putting boots in the ground

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or apparently planes in the air. Um, does Ukraine have

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance? Yes? I think Ukraine has the initiative right

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>now in the momentum I see them. Uh. It's gonna

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>slow down in the winter, as you would expect due

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to the conditions, but they will continue to take terrain back. Uh.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like the even the massive call up

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>is not going to turn that around. So Ukraine will

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>take incrementally take terrain back from the Russians throughout the winter,

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and then when the spring heads, I can see the

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>counter offensive going in the full swing. The problem that

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody is most concerned about is what will President Putin

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>do once he once he fully understands that he is

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to win this by the by staying within

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the bounds that he is right now, which is already uh,

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially a series of war crimes that's masquerading

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>as a military campaign. You know, Mike, you know you've

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 1>got the perspective here, your former US Marine, former power

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>military operations officer, at c I A. You know how

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>these things can play out. My question is in Russia itself,

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is there any scenario where Putin loses popular support and

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a change at that level? You know, at first

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I did not think that, and I'm no Russian expert,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>but i do know Russian experts and I've talked to them,

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and it would appear that he is losing public support rapidly.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is the fact that he's losing and

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the citizens and uncertainly the elite. Uh, I

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see that. But also this massive called

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>up turned everybody against the war. You know, before then, um,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it was it was somebody else's war essentially for the

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>average Russian. Now it's Russia's war. So in that might

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>be why he's not only created this martial law situation

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and the four illegally annexed areas of Ukraine, but he's

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>also uh setting a martial law in and around Moscow

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and other regions. So he might know that this is

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>something that could cause him to be removed from power.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And essentially dictators don't do well once they're removed from power.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they usually have a very short lifespan. So this.

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>This is something that's caused an issue back home. The

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>biggest concern is that he'll he'll go up and and

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>escalate this and potentially use uh tactic nuclear weapon or

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I am going to bring us back

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to the UK firm and in a way that maybe

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't expect. But word has it. You've just come

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>back from a philosophy conference in um in Athens, and Um,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I've I've read your posed a case for a philosopher

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>king on Modern Stoicism dot com. I was saying King

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 1>um all day about how rough this must be for Liz. Trust. Yes,

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's her own fault, she brought it on ourselves, but

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>she has just gone through what must feel like the

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 1>ultimate failure. You know, this is not like just failing

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>at your business or you know, making a mistake getting

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>fired at work. She's gone all the way up to

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>prime minister and has now lost and become the shortest

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ruling prime minister in UK history. And Um kind of

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>reminded me a bit of Marcus Aurelius when he was

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult situation. Um, how does a Stoic deal

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with this kind of horrific failure? With this kind of um,

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just humiliation. Well, first of all, thanks for reading my paper.

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, and my mom read that, so that's cool. Uh.

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And then I had a great time at the conference

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and not to get off topic, but

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>they're about to escavate Plato's academy, which is currently right

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>now park But it's super cool, very cool. So how

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>does it? How does I mean? The one thing that

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, UM, from the stoic perspective is failures

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in life are expected. Um, They're going to happen. Sometimes

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they're completely outside of your control. Not that this was um,

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's part of it. Is not is not that

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you try to avoid those failures. It's how you deal

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with the failure. Right. So you know, I used to

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be a boxing coach and I tell my boxers is

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>not whether you're getting knocked down, it's whether you get

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>back up, which I think is a very stoic way

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of looking at things. So she doesn't need advice from me,

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 1>but I would you know, you know, the stiff upper

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>lip and keep come and carry off. That's UK, that's

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the that's the UK saying, right, But it's also a

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>very stoic I would just tell her to basically do that.

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Winston Churchill also had some significant failures in his life,

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, he's going to go down as

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the most one of the most significant leaders in history

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly. So I'm not, you know, don't know how

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it'll work out for her, but I would certainly I

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>would certainly have a broader perspective, uh and and ask

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>her to consider that the UK is a significant major

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>ally in the So this is obviously concerned for us

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to not only the war in Ukraine

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but everything that we deal with internationally. Absolutely all right, Mick,

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking a time to join us.

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate getting your perspective. Mc mulroy, co founder

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Lobo Institute. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet On Ball

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.