WEBVTT - Canadian Consumer Debt Has Never Been This High, Beattie Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. We

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>are now turning our attention to Canada, in particular the

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Canadian housing market. This week, Moody's Investors Service downgraded Canada

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>banks for the first time in more than four years.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Why expanding levels of private sector debt could weaken asset

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>quality in the future. That's according to David beat, senior

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>vice president in the Financial Institutions Group at Moody's, and

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he is based in Toronto, and he comes to us now. David,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Thanks for having

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>so I wanted just to start with, how much the

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>troubles at alternative mortgage lender Home Capital Group weighed in

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>your decision to downgrade other Canadian banks? Uh, not at all.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>These Um, we do not rate Home Capital as a

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, so I can't comment on the details

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of their situation. But I would just note that at

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about sixteen billion dollars in mortgages mortgage assets there you know,

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>a very small part of the one point five trillion

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar Canadian mortgage market. Uh. The reasons for their current

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>troubles are very idiosyncratic, and they're not anything to do

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with the assets they have on their books. It's more

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>confidence around funding. UM. So we don't view it as

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a as a probable source of contagion for the rest

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of the banks. Uh. And um, it didn't factor into

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>our decision. Okay, So home capital might not be the

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>problem or even the catalysts. Isn't like the asset back

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>commercial paper market uh circa two thousand seven in Canada

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>collapsing and then you know, singling and petting doom for

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. But it could potentially, just on a broader level,

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the housing market in Canada, particularly in Toronto, has been

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>under quite a bit of scrutiny for getting quite inflated. Um.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And you think that this could be a potential concern

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>for the banks in Canada, Well, yes, indeed, and that

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>elevated housing prices, particularly in the g t A, the

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Greater Toronto Area and the Greater Vancouver area have been

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on our radar for a number of years and have

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>figured UH quite prominently in the research that we've published

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>over that time. But the first the first stage of

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of our credit analysis for bank starts with what we

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>call the macro profile, which is our assessment of the

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>operating environment in which the banks operate and UH. In

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>our view UM, the degree of leverage in the in

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the system overall has is at a very high level

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and continues to rise, and that gives us concern about

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the future knock on negative effects on asset quality. When

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you see the amount of leverage in this system, are

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the dwindling down payments that consumers are

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>making on houses relative to the amount of debt that

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they're taking on. Are you talking about hedge funds and

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>other investors borrowing short term to lend long term? What

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly where are you seeing the biggest build up of leverage? Well,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>our primary metric when we look at this, and this

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the metric we use globally for assessment of our preating

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>environments is private debt to GDP and the rate of

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>growth of that metric. So we get our data from

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Statistics Canada and we review that on a regular basis.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That includes consumer debt, both mortgage and non mortgage, as

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>well as corporate and commercial debt UM. The corporate component

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is largely not held on the bank's balance sheets. We

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have a robust debt capital markets here in Canada and

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's largely institutional investors that have the corporate book. But

0:03:55.000 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the consumer mortgages and non real estate security the lending

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is where we have been more focused. And not even

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>really the mortgages. There are obviously concerns with the inflated

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>housing prices um and what that might do under stress um,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but there would still be significant collateral back in those mortgages.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>It's the credit cards and the indirect auto finance and

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>those types of less well secured exposures that would have

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, loss given default in the area of a

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent, which would be probably the driver of larger losses.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>When was the last time that you saw the levels

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of leverage by the metric metric that you just laid

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>out that are as high as they are today. I

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>don't believe they've ever been as high as they are today,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the component of it which relates to household

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>debt has never been as high. Which banks are most exposed. UM,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>there's relative degrees depending on how you cut the data

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of exposure to the Canadian consumer across the banking system. UM.

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>UH suffice it to say that that we feel the

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that are baseline credit assessments, which is sort of our

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 1>starting point for rating the banks. UH is the best UH,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, indicator of of relative exposure. In that case,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>uh TD would be the highest rated of the Canadian

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>banks and National Bank of Canada would be the lowest

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of those six. David Beattie, thank you so much for

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us. This is a really important topic and we

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>look forward to hearing from you again. David Beatty is

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>senior vice president in the Financial Institutions Group at Moody's

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Investors Service. Moody's did downgrade UH a number of Canadian

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>banks for the first time in more than four years

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this week in part because of UH. Frankly, this incredible

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>expansion of consumer debt relative to g d P that

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we have seen, and David just said that he has

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not seen a level that has been this high UH

0:05:49.360 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in recent memory. Right now, I want to dig a

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit further into a political development that does not

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have to do with James Comey, the fired FBI director

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that has gained so much attention in Washington, d C.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, President Trump issued a commission ordered a

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>commission on Fraudulent Voting in elections, which caught my attention

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>because this could potentially rerange the landscape for how votes

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are broken up across the country and could potentially have

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>longer term effects. To understand a little bit more about

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what the stakes are here, I want to bring in

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Ken Doyle, senior editor of Bloomberg Bona's Money and Politics

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Reporter report, coming to us from Arlington, Virginia. Ken, thank

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Can you can you

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>first just give me a sense of what this Commission

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 1>on Fraudulent Voting in Elections actually is? Well, it's it's

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not it's not clearer exactly yet. What they haven't met,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they haven't actually started up that it was announced in

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>an executive order at the White House yesterday exactly. It's

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a fifteen member commission. They only announced

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>about five or six members. It's headed by uh, well,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it is headed by Advice President Pence, but it's the

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>vice chairman is going to be Chris Koback. Who's the

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State for Kansas, who's been a very outspoken,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>UH person on immigration and voter fraud issues, somebody who

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>has really staked out a position on these issues. And UH,

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like what they want to do with this

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is UM uh, you know, emphasize the claims that that

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump and other President Trump and others have made about

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>voter fraud being a major problem. This, of course, is

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not a view that's shared by UM everybody and and

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>many Democrats view this is a basically a partisan effort

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to UM to pass more voter I d UH legislation

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>would basically, you know, has the potential to suppress turnout,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>especially among minorities and people that might support Democrats. So

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a very controversial UM topic. It was something that

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was emphasized by Trump after the election in which he

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.239
<v Speaker 1>lost the popular vote by about three million votes, and

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't been talked about for the last really

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of months. UM. But they decided to

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>make this announcement yesterday. And I think the suspicion from

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump's critics you said at the beginning that this is

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>something other than the Russia comy issue, but the suspicion

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>from Trump's critics is that, um they wanted to talk

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about something else, and that's why it was brought up

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>this week. Well, okay, so let's put this in a perspective.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, should we care about this or is this

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>window dressing from President Trump trying to appease his his

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>core supporters. I think that that's the question is whether

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this would be a legitimate investigation. There have been similar

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>investigations in the past of problems with the voting system.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They generally have been more sort of on a bipartisan basis,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>where we look at all the issues. This is, you know,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a commission that was out to look at just one issue,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the voter fraud issue that the Republicans have emphasized and

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that I say has been you know, very controversial. There

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>were a couple of Democrats that were named yesterday, um

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>uh to who who were going to participate in the commission?

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gardner, the Secretary of State of New Hampshire, and

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Matt Dunlap, who's the Secretary of State

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of Maine. But both of those people have actually you know,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>pushed back against the Trump claims that there was widespread

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>voter fraud, and it's you know, it's difficult to find

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>any Democrats, and really many Republicans, you know, also feel

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that there was not um that this is just not

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a major issue. It's not an issue that affects um

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>election results in any kind of um significant way. Well,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let's zoom back a little bit and get a

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>sense of how quickly official can move to change these

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>standards by which people have to adhere in order to vote,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or potentially even rearranged districts. I mean, can people move

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>quickly without say, legislative action to rearrange the voting parameters? No,

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the thing. That's The laws on this

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are set state by state. Um. There there have been

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>significant changes in the laws in some states. They they

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the states that have taken up this issue are generally

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>those states that have Republican majority legislatures and have have

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>moved ahead on this. There have been some significant Supreme

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Court decisions that have allowed more of that activity and

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the states to move ahead. But this commission,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that it's actually charged to do is

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to write a report to the President that says, you know,

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what what ought to be done, presumably about this Uh,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they say that the report won't come out until some

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>time next year. UM, and then at that point, presumably

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>they might pass along recommendations either to the states or

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly to Congress. I mean, there's some suspicion that, um,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the the Republicans might try to use this to roll

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>back what's called the Motor Voter Act and National Voter

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Registration Act, which was the national law that was put

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in place to ease voter registration requirements that there would be,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically you could fill out a postcard and

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>send it into state officials to register more easily, and

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>also requiring states to allow registration through you know, um,

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>driver license and other other state facilities. So the Republicans

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>might try to use it for something like that, but

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>not not immediately, you know. Can I have to wonder

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>if this is window dressing or if this is basically

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>plead or diversion to give core supporters of President Trump

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>something to think about other than the hurrah around James

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>come and his uh and his is getting fired. Is

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it is this emblematic of Washington spinning its wheels and

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>getting admired and stuff that is is not going to

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere and is a waste of time. Well, I mean,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a lot of interest in sort

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of controlling the narrative, right, I mean, whether and especially

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>at the White House, that they may feel like they've

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lost some control of what's going on and they're trying

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to get it back and have Trump be more you know,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the offense rather than the defense. This was something

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was pushing, he was talking about a lot

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year. And actually, I mean it's interesting

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people said, you know, that he

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be talking about this because there was there wasn't

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of evidence to back it up, and it

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of problematic. But it does I think it

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>does show the point that we're at that they've brought

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this up as as you know, an alternative, um, you know,

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>thing to talk about as opposed to the Russia coomy thing.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>And clearly they're they're very people in the White House

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>are very preoccupied by this at this point. This is

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>such a huge story this week that um, you know

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's hard for them to to talk about something else,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>but they like to. Obviously, is there anything else that

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we can expect them to try to divert the attention

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to I mean something even worthwhile like health care, taxes. Well,

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what they would certainly, that's what

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans on the Hill would like to talk about.

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>They'd like to be able to get back to that.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's certainly what um, you know, what

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the White House would like to They want to find

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>a way back to talking about other things, including those issues.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's gonna be hard for everybody. It's gonna be

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>hard for people in Congress. I think that to talk

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about those issues as well when they're going to be

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>asked questions about you know, this latest controversy. Yeah. Well

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the other is, I guess, Ron Meat, it's probably easier

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>for people to care about and get excited about rather

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>than very tricky things with lots of sides, like healthcare

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and taxes. Ken do thank you so much for joining us.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Ken Doyle is senior editor for Bloomberg Bonna's Money and

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Politics Report. Coming to us from Arlington, Virginia. Talking about

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the latest President Trump executive order ordering a commission on

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent voting in elections? Is it just a diversion tactic

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to move some IV halls away from the James comey drama.

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps we want to take a moment to let you

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>know about something new from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>can use our i O s app or our new

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Google Chrome extension to scan any news story on any website,

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>instantly revealing relevant news and market data from Bloomberg and

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>other sources related to the companies and people you're reading about.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So no matter where you're reading the news, you can

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bring the power of Bloomberg's news and data with you.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty amazing. Download our io s app or search

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Bloomberg extension on the Chrome Store to try

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it out. Learn more at Bloomberg dot com slash lens.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>We got some retail sales numbers today, and we've got

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole host of results from department stores over the

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>past twenty four hour and they kind of paint a

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>conflicting picture. To get a better sense of what it

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>all means, I want to bring in Sema Show, consumer

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>discretionary analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, as well as Bert Flickinger,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Managing director at Strategic Resource Group H and seem I

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>want to start with you to set the stage with

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>respect to these US retail sales numbers that we got

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for April that seemed to be okay. They weren't terrible,

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you Lisa. They were okay compared to last month,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but they still missed expectations. And I think part of

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the benefit was from the easter shift from March to April.

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Um but I think if you step back and you

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>think about and also you look at what the components

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>were of retail sales, the a lot of the growth

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was coming from categories where we've seen growth before, building materials,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>non store retails, so basically online um so. And you

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>saw positive sales from autos, though they've declined since last year.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think going forward that's going to be a

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>risk for retail sales. And Bert certainly we saw nothing

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Rosie out the numbers out of most of the department stores, calls, UH, Nordstrom's,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Macy's really some devastatingly disappointing numbers. What do you make

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of all this? It's it's part of the day to them,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>all of many going down. So you see Bondon in

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a in a tune of Trouble Sears Holdings, which still

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sells a lot of apparel and accessories in trouble J

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>J Crew and trouble, Barney's in trouble. Even nice is Uh,

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You're the worldwide star of bonds and fixed income Lisa

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and Nemon Marcus market bonds are are trading way down,

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's some silver lining in Penny. Penny's gross margins

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if you stacked over a three year period or up

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about a thousand percent, gross margins are still trading up.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>SMP just upgraded the bonds to B plus, while Nordstrom

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and the others are triple C. And with Penny, you've

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>got more margin expansion. Uh, solid or flat same store

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>sales projected for the rest of the year. But four

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>cornerstones are really doing well. So for them find Jewelry

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>uh doing well, Boys and girls fashion doing well, at

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>home doing well. So Penny shifting a lot of sales

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from Sears, which is you, and SIMA said reporting next

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>week ton of trouble on shifting sales from just about

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody else in sector two. Well, Uh, Seema, I want

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to back to what one the thing that

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you were saying before we drill into the likely success

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>or failure of some of these companies. I want to

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dig into something that you were talking about with respect

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to the drivers of some of the gain in retail sales.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You talked about autos for example, where we have seen

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the sales slowing, we've seen building materials. I mean, do

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>these numbers suggest to you that there is kind of

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>more weakness that was going to play out in retail

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>sales that could sort of speak to something broader. Yeah.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think I've probably been a little bit more

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the bare side versus some of my colleagues because

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about how strong autos were last year, and

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if you step back, twee did this with each other.

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm very concerned about the rising auto loans, the delinquencies.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm very concerned about the synchronies and the alliance data

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>systems of the world raising their charge off rates, which is,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>by the way, credit income is a huge component of

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>many department doors and other retailers operating income, and it's

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge driver of sales. So credit. If people are

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>using credit to buy and then they're not paying it back,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that it paints the more negative picture of

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. If you step back and you think about

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the macro indicators. The economists talk about a lot of

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that wage increase, and it's on the low end, and

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>it might be that those people are shifting the money

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>either to their homes or just too basic necessities like healthcare,

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>which could go up if we have the American health

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Care Act pass, or just housing costs, you know. So

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm more concerned about the actual state and health of

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, and then what it means for the retailers

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>who are facing this potentially weaker consumer, and then the

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>secular pressure of the Amazons and rising competition in their space,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>right and burn, just to sort of what you were

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about with the winners and the losers of me

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk to Sephora. This has been a longstanding trend

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that people spend more on makeup because you know, because

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of possibly Instagram, because people want to look good in

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>their selfies. Right, They're getting more manicure. But Bert, I

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>mean like project out over the next two years, I

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>mean you said that Danue mo Are, We're going to

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>actually see some of these companies, these department stores really

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>truly closed. I mean, this has been going on for

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Yeah, Lisa's is your referenced so presently

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of our earlier broadcasts. When the retail bonds

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>go to triple C minus and trade sixty five or below. Uh,

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>they're really they're really in trouble. And that's also often

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a leading bankruptcy indicator. So are there ones that are

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>ye so uh Sears Hole Holdings, km arts there, UH

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Jay crew hasn't gotten there, but easily easily could. The

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Barney's that's in a ton of trouble and mgen Neman,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Group, dash Burg dorses there and then a lot

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>of the teen retailers that have already gone over Niagara

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>falls in a barrel with without any padding, so route

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>route route one. There might be some bright, bright blue

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>skies ahead. We've got a Memorial Day coming up. The

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>last quarter reported with some of the worst weather between

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>cold rain, UH, floods, etcetera. Now there's some lighthouse lighthouses

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of economic activity between energy all levels from

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>renew renewable to carbons. Agricultures back on its feet, manufacturing

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is back on its feet. There'll be some more UH

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>spending and with the tax refunds because of the problems

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in Washington coming out late. UH second quarters should be

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>good and it's is un Sima presently pointed out. Auto

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>sales of UM hit the hit the wall at Darlington

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and bouncing off and limping to the finish line what

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that usually means. And with Apple in between product cycles,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>as people will go out to department stores, Spend or Disney,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the other theaters have a strong studio release schedule, So

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there are potentially more people going to the malls this summer.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>And when I talked to surviving retailers, they're seeing a

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of shoppers shift over in the same malls from

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the declining retailers are going going down swinging, trying to

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>liquidate their inventory for their vendors and unsecured creditors. You know,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>as you talk, I mean when you talk about some

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bonds that are trading down and sort of

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>uh indicating that there could be an imminent bankruptcy of

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>companies like Sears and Kmart and potentially Jay Crew in

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, I have to wonder. I mean, they've

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>been signaling this for a long time, and you know,

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Lampert, for example, with Sears, has really kept that

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>company afloat. But yeah, I was just go ahead, yeah, no,

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>please go. But I was just gonna say that retail

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>tends to die a slow death. Can look at radio shock,

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>right because a lot of the individual stores are profitable,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>so they just basically milk them for cash. And like,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>he's that's basically what he's done, right, He's not spending

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>any and so, yeah, Sears should have died ten years ago,

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's able to keep it alive. And you see

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that with many of the retailers. It's only that just

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of limp along and then. But is this part

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the problem, right, Is this part of the reason

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>why the retail sector has been unable to sort of

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>revive itself, apart from Amazon coming in and just completely

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 1>changing the landscape. Is it partly that you know, they

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>won't let a bad thing die. There's there's an insidious,

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>unreported story too, is that the greedy bankruptcy firms are

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>gouging these poor retailers, whether it's FTC M and a

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>UH in the case of a few firms, or some

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of the notable bankruptcy firms gouging these poor firms and

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the securits and the under secureds UH for over a

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred million in professional feast. They don't know what the

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>devil they're doing. They haven't done any work in retail.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>They bring in financial advisors, I don't know what the

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>devil they're doing, and it almost seems that their goal

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is boomerang bankruptcy, is to do a Chapter eleven bankruptcy

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>followed by a Chapter seven so they could do a

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred and professional fees twice while pairing the company. And

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the scandal that the bond holders and the secured creditors,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the unsecured largely the vendors and the landlords really have

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to get get after these bankruptcy firms that really have

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>load and no retail experience in the space and have

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>often failed in in in prior ones as U and

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Seim are so describing so well. Having these companies link

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>limp along and the only ones who are getting rich

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are the bankruptcy lawyers their firms and the professionals they

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in again with with close close to no relevant

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>retail experience. I mean, then I guess this makes sense.

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Right then you still have these people selling things that

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>chieper prices and it hurts the whole industry. You're not

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>getting that shake out that you need. So see what happens.

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>In my perspective, legacy retailers all need to rethink the

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>whole competitive landscape and how big they are. They grew

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all too much and too fast, and the two thousands

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>and the ones that exist probably have to be significantly

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>smaller to be profitable and to have upside, right because

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>online now is a growing part of their business. So

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just it's it's a huge They have

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to really step back and say what kind of business

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>should I be now? It's not the business it used to.

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And underpinning that question goes to something that you were

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>saying before, Sema, which is the idea that healthcare is

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>getting more expensive and housing costs are getting more expensive,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and a greater proportion of people's income is going to

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>those expenses. In other words, the amount that could potentially

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>go to discretionary spending to these retailers is going down.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, aside from the Amazon albatross, you know, are

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we seeing some kind of reduction in spending that we

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>can even see in the us A retail sales numbers.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that you are. Some of it is probably

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>due to spending shifting to other areas necessities, but it's

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>also I think people have to step back and think

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about human behavior. Since oh eight, everybody has been used

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to deals. I don't care how much money you are,

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>how wealthy. If you do not have a sale, you're

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to buy. It's so true. I used to

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>come home doesn't matter. I used to come home from

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the store and I would say to my husband. I'd

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>be like, I got this on sale, and he's like,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>how it's off? He said, how much did you spend?

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a fifty dollars you would roll as absolute amount.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that mindset is killing retail across

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the board because people want a deal. How can you

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>pull back from promotions to boost your gross margin where

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>you're going to kill your sales. So on top of

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this, it's really so the fact that these

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>retailers limp along that just sort of exacerbates. I think

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem that hey, you know, I'm not going to

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>buy that black shirt because I'm gonna get it next

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>week from Macy's with the twelve coupons they send me

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>every day in the mail. And the fresh vendors are

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>causing some of the problem too unwittingly. So in our

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>field work, we're seeing them under resourcing UH prestige and

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>luxury fashion shoes. Two retailers like Nordstrom because they think

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they can sell full price to their own stores, whether

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>it's Gooch or or others. And then what they ultimately

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>do is they don't they don't give enough luxury goods

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>leading department stores who made them, and then then they

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>wind up closing off on the internet or give it

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to Carol Myerwitz and Ernie Herman to close out at

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>t j X and the rest of the off price

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>places across American and worldwide. Vendor community share shares in

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the blame and pain. But there's going to be a

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>retail renaissance coming after this retail ice age, but it's

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>going to take about a thousand days for us to

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>go through the deep freeze and bounce back. Well, thank

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining me. Really a fascinating conversation.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I am sure it will be ongoing. SEMA shows consumers

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>espressional analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence and Bert Flickinger, Managing director

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>at Strategic Resource Group. Right now, I want to look

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in to a new type of lending. Oh, it's not

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that new. I guess this business is more than a

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>decade old, but it's certainly been ramping up. Jim Richard

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Talia is co chief executive officer of Unison home Ownership Investors,

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.239
<v Speaker 1>which is based in San Francisco, and Jim, we were

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>just talking a little bit offline about sort of the

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>objective of getting money to consumers who want to buy

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>houses to help pay for their down payments. Can you

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>explain a little bit about what this is? Sure, thanks

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. Uh. Unison has introduced a new

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>financial product category to the world. Is what we call

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it home ownership investment. It's long term funding. Uh, it's

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not alone. Unison invests in the home alongside you. There

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>are no interest payments, no interest charges when you sell

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the home. As partners, we share the outcome. We share

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the change in value of the home. So if the

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>home value rises, we will share the appreciation. If the

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>home value falls, will also share in the loss. One

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of the purposes of the funding that we provide is

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to use it as part of the down payment on

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a home purchase. So, uh, this this seems like it

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>has somewhat of a pretty big risk attached to it,

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just because you don't get paid out until you know,

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty years down the line when somebody sells the house,

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or unless it's gets prepaid earlier, and you know who's

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>investing and uh, what's what's the value proposition for them?

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So we raise money from institutional investors like pension funds

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and endowments. Residential real estate is a very attractive asset

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>class for these investors because it closely tracks inflation and

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a very large component of the economy. They've never

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>had any way to get exposure to it until now.

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that's very extraordinary about what

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we do is that, for the first time ever, Unison

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is making residential real estate, which is the world's largest

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>asset class, an investable asset class for institutional investors. So

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you opened the business in two thousand and five, what

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>has the one of the turn has been like, Uh,

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they've actually been very good. We have some of the

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>investors that invested with us way back have invested again.

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We've managed a pool of these assets that were generated

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>before the crisis through the crisis. They perform well. Um,

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a it's a it's a good program.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a it's a good deal. We strike

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>between the investor and the consumer. The consumer gets the

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>benefit of long term finance without payments, and the investor

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>gets the benefit of the new asset class. These investors

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>don't need payments. They're long term investors. They need exposure

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to the asset class. And the consumer likes the idea

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of not having to make payments on long term finance.

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's a there's a natural alignment between the two

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's the genesis for the business. How how what

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of the total volume of loans that have been

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>originated like this or not loans? They're not loans, they're

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>not to take that back financing excuse me. We are

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>growing very very quickly right now. We started the business,

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, back before the crisis, we had about

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen thousand consumers on our pipeline when we were forced

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to basically you know, hunkered down for the crisis for

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a while, so we had done you know, our first

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.239
<v Speaker 1>several hundred transactions at that point. After the crisis, we

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>relaunched our original program, the home buyer I'm sorry, the

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>homeowner program, and added the home buyer program, and now

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that program is ramping up very very quickly. We've got

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>very large amounts of capital committed, and as I said,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we're growing like ercent a month over month in terms

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of our our origination pipeline, Do you have certain parameters

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as far as how much money the homeowners have to

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>put down or sort of any of the loan to

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>value ratio or anything like that. In most cases, the

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>homeowner puts down half of the down payment and we

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>put down half that you know, by most cases they're

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>getting a loan on the property, so we share the

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>down payment fifty. Right, But as far as the parameters

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for the consumer and what you know, kinds of leverage are,

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to make sure that people aren't being

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>irresponsible or unable paypafter loaner, you know, because possibly they're

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to get a mortgage in addition to the

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>down payments, to make sure that it's not going to

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be uh, something that's gonna end up in foreclosure, which

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>could potentially become a problem. Right Sure, in general, the

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>LTV on the property is eighty percent or less. Remember

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a way for you to get to a

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>d l TV because you can buy a home with

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ten percent down in the with an agency loan. You

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>can do that today, but you're going to wind up

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>borrowing and paying mortgage insurance. So you have that high leverage.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>The monthly payment on that loan with mortgage insurance is

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be about fifteen to pent higher than the

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>monthly payment would be if you got an eighty percent

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>loan and didn't pay mortgage insurance. So what we do

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is we enable the consumer to get the benefit of

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>making a full twenty percent down payment with only putting

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of their cash in. And that benefit is huge.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It's additional purchasing power, it's a lower monthly payment, things

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. What regions of the country are you targeting.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We're currently in thirteen states, uh the entire West coast

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and the northeast order from Virginia up through Massachusetts. We're

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>also in Illinois and Arizona. The states that were in

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>as you, I'm sure you'll recognize a comprise a lot

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of the largest metro areas in the country. So we're

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>already in areas that that account for of the US

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate. Do you think that the target demographic is

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>really build millennial? That's certainly one of the people that

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we help, but our programs actually help people across the

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>entire their entire life. As a homeowner. We can help

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you buy your first home, and that definitely helps a millennial,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but we can help you with your last home, and

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we can help you finance your life needs in between

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>with our homeowner program that allows you to tap into

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>your existing home equity without borrowing. Jim RICHTELI thank you

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Really an interesting new type

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of financing. Jim Richitelli as co chief executive officer of

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Unison home Ownership Investors, which is based in San Francisco,

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and he joins us here in a bloombrook eleven three

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>oh studios in New York. Thanks for listening to the

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg p n L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramoids one. Before the podcast,

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio