Speaker 1: Team Buck, Welcome to the freedom hunt. Biden signs the
Speaker 1: Infrastructure Bill. Oh my, Plus we have the jury deliberating
Speaker 1: in the written House trial. We've also got a Chinese
Speaker 1: dissident who says something unexpected to a liberal about who
Speaker 1: the real threat of authoritarianism comes from in America. And
Speaker 1: much more come in your way. We'll get into all
Speaker 1: of that in just a moment. When running a business,
Speaker 1: HR issues can kill you. You've got wrongful termination suits,
Speaker 1: minimum wage requirements, labor regulations. An HR manager salaries aren't
Speaker 1: cheap an average of seventy thousand dollars a year. Bambi
Speaker 1: spelled b Ambee was created specifically for small business. You
Speaker 1: can get a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy, and
Speaker 1: maintain your compliance all for just ninety nine dollars a month.
Speaker 1: With Bamby, you can change HR from your biggest liability
Speaker 1: to your biggest strength. Your dedicated HR manager is available
Speaker 1: by phone, email, or real time chat from onboarding determinations
Speaker 1: that customize your policies to fit your business and help
Speaker 1: you manage your employees day to day, all for just
Speaker 1: ninety nine dollars a month, month a month, no hidden fees.
Speaker 1: Cancel anytime go to Bamby dot com slash buck right
Speaker 1: now to schedule your free HR audit. That website is
Speaker 1: Bambi b A M b Ee dot com, slash Buck
Speaker 1: Bamby dot com slash Buck. Oh, it's all gonna turn
Speaker 1: around for the Democrats. Now, that's what they want you
Speaker 1: to believe. If only we get the next big bill through,
Speaker 1: it'll change everything, right, that's what they say. It's not true,
Speaker 1: it's ridiculous, and it's also based on all kinds of
Speaker 1: fuzzy and even just outright false math. Let's just start
Speaker 1: with the infrastructure bill for a second. Here. Biden signed it.
Speaker 1: And as part of this as well, there's the broader
Speaker 1: Build Back Better Agenda item right, that'll be next on
Speaker 1: the dock. Yet after do infrastructure, the next part of
Speaker 1: this is the just general spending package, which is essentially
Speaker 1: socialism and Green New Deal stuff or expansions of the
Speaker 1: social welfare state in this country. And the Green New
Speaker 1: Deal here is disconnected from reality. Multi multi millionaire Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi telling everybody that the Build Back Better Bill is
Speaker 1: actually a tax cut that is paid for. This is
Speaker 1: a great accomplishment and there's more to come, and so
Speaker 1: happy that hopefully this week we will be passing Build
Speaker 1: Back Better to get a tax tax cuts to America's
Speaker 1: working families, to create millions more jobs, to lower healthcare costs,
Speaker 1: and all of it paid for by making everyone pay
Speaker 1: his or her own fair share. Democrats are socialists. The
Speaker 1: only thing that stops them in this country from going
Speaker 1: full socialist, honestly is the Republican Party, as weak ineffective
Speaker 1: as it can be sometimes, and that they don't have
Speaker 1: a majority of the American people who are along with
Speaker 1: them yet. But Pelosi, if she could, she would raise
Speaker 1: taxes on people to Swedish levels, and they would have
Speaker 1: the government in even more control of different sectors of
Speaker 1: the economy. They would expand the government across the board.
Speaker 1: That's what would actually happen that. I mean, they would
Speaker 1: go much much more socialist than they currently can get
Speaker 1: away with. So what holds them back is not ideology,
Speaker 1: it's not sanity, it's political reality and then of course math.
Speaker 1: This is also why when Biden says stuff like this
Speaker 1: about the Build Back Better Bill, b B beat beat
Speaker 1: b B b B B Build Back Better Bill. When
Speaker 1: Biden says this stuff, it's not true, but it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter because it's all about getting people to think it's
Speaker 1: true until it's too late, you know, the same ghost
Speaker 1: or my plan to build back better for the people,
Speaker 1: getting folks back to work, and reducing costs of things
Speaker 1: like childcare, eldercare, housing, healthcare, prescription drugs, and meeting the
Speaker 1: moment on climate change. I'm confident that the House will
Speaker 1: pass this bill and then we're gonna have to fast
Speaker 1: it in the Senate, and it's fully paid for. It
Speaker 1: will reduce the deficit over long term recording and leading
Speaker 1: economists in the world. And again, no one earning less
Speaker 1: than four hundred thousands of dollars will pay a single
Speaker 1: penny more in federal taxes. And together together with the
Speaker 1: infrastructure bill, millions of lives will be changed for the better.
Speaker 1: So here's what this is all reliant on. It all
Speaker 1: is based on supercharging the irs to harass, terrify, and
Speaker 1: even in prison more and more Americans, to get as
Speaker 1: much to squeeze even more money out of them. That's
Speaker 1: what they think is going to do this. The projections,
Speaker 1: and I'm being serious with you, they have an expectation
Speaker 1: that the IRS getting an additional seventy thousand agents that's
Speaker 1: what they want, and being much more being told to
Speaker 1: be much more aggressive will result in hundreds of billions
Speaker 1: of dollars of additional revenue, hundreds of billions more. That's
Speaker 1: what they're saying right now. That should be terrifying to people.
Speaker 1: I mean, the irs is. The whole thing is preposterous
Speaker 1: when you think about it, the fact that you have
Speaker 1: to jump through all these hoops in the tax code,
Speaker 1: and there's all these opaque areas of it, and the
Speaker 1: whole thing is this absurd game where the government they
Speaker 1: know what you need to pay, but they don't tell
Speaker 1: you what you need to pay. It's up to you
Speaker 1: to figure out, even though it's impossible for you to
Speaker 1: know what they think you're supposed to pay. And if
Speaker 1: you get it wrong, they'll find you, and if you
Speaker 1: get it really wrong, they'll throw you in prison and
Speaker 1: ruin your reputation in your life. This is unusual, by
Speaker 1: the way, in developed countries, people don't generally live in
Speaker 1: fear of the tax collector harassing them and even throwing
Speaker 1: them in prison. This doesn't really happen in European countries,
Speaker 1: I mean in Greece. As you know, if you were
Speaker 1: paying attention to the financial collapse, like a tiny percentage
Speaker 1: of the of the country was even paying taxes. Now
Speaker 1: that obviously wasn't sustainable, hence the financial collapse, but they
Speaker 1: weren't throwing people in prison for tax evasion all the time. Look,
Speaker 1: it should be very straightforward. It should be how much
Speaker 1: money did you, what money was made? Take out a calculator,
Speaker 1: take a percentage. If we all agree on is the percentage,
Speaker 1: and that's it. Flat tax, baby, That should be the
Speaker 1: end of it, full stop, No no deductions, no nothing,
Speaker 1: just flat tax. But everyone wants their little little extra
Speaker 1: piece of pie, and they want other people to have
Speaker 1: less pie. This is why when Bastiat wrote in the
Speaker 1: Law about the fiction, that the state is the fiction
Speaker 1: by which man can live at the expense of every
Speaker 1: other man. This has been true for a long time.
Speaker 1: The government wants to convince you that you're not paying
Speaker 1: for this, someone else is paying for Well, that's the
Speaker 1: fundamental line. That's how they get away with all of
Speaker 1: this stuff, and that's how we have them telling us
Speaker 1: that this will all be paid for. They're passing a
Speaker 1: massive spending package and they already obviously signed infrastructure that's
Speaker 1: done now but they're trying to pass this BBB bill,
Speaker 1: and they're going to be spending more money in a
Speaker 1: bill that's a non emergency than at any time since
Speaker 1: the nineteen sixties. And yet we're supposed to think that
Speaker 1: just by having a more aggressive and harassing irs, things
Speaker 1: are going to be paid for. We're gonna be at
Speaker 1: thirty trillion dollars a dead here really soon. We already
Speaker 1: have inflation rising. What makes inflation go even higher massive
Speaker 1: government spending, monetary policy, inflation always and everywhere. I think
Speaker 1: it was Milton Friedman said, this is a monetary issue,
Speaker 1: monetary policy issue. And so they're doing the thing that
Speaker 1: will make this worse, and they're telling you that they
Speaker 1: will make it better, because that's what democrats do. They
Speaker 1: lie to your face until it's too late, just like
Speaker 1: the corporate democrat media. They lie to your face while
Speaker 1: it's useful to them about Russia collusion, about Jesse Smolett,
Speaker 1: about nooses and parks and on the door of a
Speaker 1: NASCAR garage, And they lie to you about Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: and the laptop, and they lie to you about just
Speaker 1: go down the list. But it's useful when they're lying
Speaker 1: to you and by the time we figure it out,
Speaker 1: time is passed. It's too late for there to be
Speaker 1: any real accountability. So that, my friends, that is the
Speaker 1: way they play the game, and I think it's important
Speaker 1: we all recognize that. So Ritten House jury is deliberating
Speaker 1: as I'm speaking to you. By the time some of
Speaker 1: you listen to this, there could already be a verdict.
Speaker 1: I am expecting the verdict to come down today on Tuesday,
Speaker 1: November sixteenth. I'm expecting it will happen, and I am hopeful.
Speaker 1: I will not say expect things. I don't want to
Speaker 1: jinx anything that it will be not guilty on all accounts.
Speaker 1: But Kenosha in the background is preparing for riots which
Speaker 1: everyone knows will only occur if Written House goes free.
Speaker 1: Because the Left didn't care about the facts when they
Speaker 1: slandered in last year, nor do they care about the
Speaker 1: obvious truth of his self defense claims now. The left
Speaker 1: is full of civilizational arsonists. These people are kicking at
Speaker 1: and trying to burn down even the load bearing walls
Speaker 1: of our civilization just to see just because they're bitter,
Speaker 1: just because they're envious, because they reject objective truth. It's
Speaker 1: an ideology of destruction, unfortunately, and that is what is
Speaker 1: behind so much of the support for the rioters in Kenosha.
Speaker 1: You'll notice that people aren't the Democrats aren't embarrassed by
Speaker 1: what happened in Kenosha, and they think the only person
Speaker 1: who should be punished is a nice young man who
Speaker 1: lived twenty minutes away who didn't want to see stores
Speaker 1: burned down in a community where his father lived. The
Speaker 1: media's lack of interest in the actual facts here is
Speaker 1: appalling that I cannot say it is surprising. You have
Speaker 1: morons all over the place in the Democrat corporate media
Speaker 1: who have no integrity or ethics, who have no honor.
Speaker 1: Joe Scarborough comes to mind. I mean, the things that
Speaker 1: he has said about the trial in the last few days.
Speaker 1: He's he's just a reckless moron. Honestly, he should be
Speaker 1: called that. I don't actually enjoy ever saying mean things
Speaker 1: on this show or any show about people. I don't
Speaker 1: like criticizing individuals. I like to criticize ideas, but Scarborough
Speaker 1: is a jackass, and if I could get away with it,
Speaker 1: I would use different words here. But even though it's
Speaker 1: technically just a podcast, I got to keep it clean.
Speaker 1: In case, you're listening with the kids in the car.
Speaker 1: Scarborough is the absolute worst, and he is harming the
Speaker 1: public's ability to reason through this by filling their minds
Speaker 1: with things that are just provably, demonstrably untrue. But the
Speaker 1: prosecutors in this case, they really know better. You can
Speaker 1: tell their lips. First of all, rule of thumb, this
Speaker 1: guy Binger. Never trust a guy who wears a tie
Speaker 1: clip and a pocket square, all right, just start with that,
Speaker 1: you know, just you can never trust a guy who
Speaker 1: wears a tie clip in a pocket square. Till it's
Speaker 1: a rule for life, folks, it's a rule for life,
Speaker 1: one or the other. You don't you don't do both.
Speaker 1: And then beyond that, some of the stuff that was
Speaker 1: being said in that courtroom, including if you bring a gun,
Speaker 1: you don't have a self defense claim anymore, well, that
Speaker 1: undermines the entire basis of the Second Amendment as the
Speaker 1: right to bear arms in one's defense and as a
Speaker 1: defense against tyranny. But then there was the Kenosha assistant
Speaker 1: Da James Krause. They were trying to do this whole. Oh,
Speaker 1: it was a provocation, an escalation for rittenhouse to even
Speaker 1: be the and to be armed. Here's what Kraus said
Speaker 1: about this fight fourteen. Please clearly, if there is provocation,
Speaker 1: he's guilty. But even outside of provocation, why do you
Speaker 1: get to immediately just start shooting? As mister Binger said,
Speaker 1: he brought a gun to a fist fight, and he
Speaker 1: used too cowardly to use his own fists to fight
Speaker 1: his way out. He has to start shooting. Yes, James
Speaker 1: Kraus is a moron, too cowardly to use his fists
Speaker 1: to fight off a mob that is armed, that is
Speaker 1: attacking him with weapons. A skateboard is a weapon when
Speaker 1: someone swinging it at your head, and even who thinks otherwise, really, okay,
Speaker 1: is it a weapon if I take a wine bottle
Speaker 1: and swinging at someone's head, Yes it is, Yes, it is.
Speaker 1: It's a weapon. If you stab somebody with a pencil.
Speaker 1: You can actually do a lot of damage with these things.
Speaker 1: As you know, he's too cowardly to use his own fists.
Speaker 1: Is this ada? Honestly? Does he have an IQ in
Speaker 1: the fifties? He incapable of tying his shoes in the morning.
Speaker 1: Is it really possible that he's that stupid or are
Speaker 1: they just that desperate and they're that emotionally involved in
Speaker 1: trying to make Kyle Rittenhouse some kind of some kind
Speaker 1: of symbol of right wing vigilante racist, ultra nationalism or whatever.
Speaker 1: All these things they say about him, none of which
Speaker 1: have any basis in fact or reality, And the prosecutors
Speaker 1: should be ashamed of what they've been doing. They never
Speaker 1: should have brought this case in the first place. I think,
Speaker 1: deep down maybe they are intelligent enough to recognize that
Speaker 1: this entire thing is a sham, and they should be
Speaker 1: deeply embarrassed, deeply embarrassed about bringing this case. Here's also
Speaker 1: the assistant DA James Krause, again aggressively stupid, I mean,
Speaker 1: a really dumb person suggesting that, you know, maybe maybe
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse should have just gotten his ass kicked and taken
Speaker 1: it like a man. Play fifteen. Everybody takes a beating sometimes, right,
Speaker 1: Sometimes you get in a scuffle and maybe you do
Speaker 1: get hurt a little bit. That doesn't mean you could
Speaker 1: just start plugging people with your full metal jack at
Speaker 1: aar fifteen rounds. I mean, does this person know nothing
Speaker 1: about self defense? Probably not. I mean, he looks like
Speaker 1: a guy who's never taken a punch or throwing a
Speaker 1: punch in his entire life. You have an angry mob
Speaker 1: that is chasing you. Rittenhouse was trying he Rittenhouse was
Speaker 1: chased and assaulted. And I'm just gonna say this right
Speaker 1: now and put yourself in the skuy's shoes. If I
Speaker 1: let's just say I had a handout or an AAR,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Fine AAR. I've got an AAR. I'm
Speaker 1: walking down the street legally open carrying a semi automatic rifle.
Speaker 1: Some lunatic says I'm gonna kill you and runs at me.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna draw down and I'm gonna say stop. And
Speaker 1: if that guy keeps coming, I'm going to fill him
Speaker 1: with holes. That is going to happen. I've been trained
Speaker 1: to do it. That is what I would do. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't feel badly about it. What's the alternative? Hope that
Speaker 1: he tackles me to the ground and doesn't turn my
Speaker 1: gun on me. I mean, any of you law enforcement, No,
Speaker 1: it's completely outrageous. Any of you had any use of
Speaker 1: force training, military or otherwise. No, it's it's just it's
Speaker 1: beyond stupid. You have to take a beating, No, when
Speaker 1: you have a rifle. They made the decision there is
Speaker 1: a firearm in the mix. They made the decision to
Speaker 1: assault him. He was trying to turn himself in to
Speaker 1: law enforcement, and then the mob chased him. Because you see,
Speaker 1: this mob of idiot leftists is used to getting away
Speaker 1: with what it wants to do. They felt so self righteous. Oh,
Speaker 1: we're doing this because of social justice, because of racism.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna go burn down a tire store. We're
Speaker 1: gonna go loude a CVS because of racism. In this case,
Speaker 1: the three guys attacking him are white guys and their criminals,
Speaker 1: and they were trying to assault him. This is all
Speaker 1: very straightforward. Everyone takes a beating once in a while. No, No,
Speaker 1: mister Krause, the ada here complete and income poop. What
Speaker 1: he's saying is not true. If I had a rifle
Speaker 1: and a mob was chasing me, I would stop, I
Speaker 1: would say halt, and if they kept coming, I would shoot.
Speaker 1: And that is called self defense. That is legitimate, all right,
Speaker 1: that's reality. They pretended that he was some kind of
Speaker 1: active shooter or no, if he had showed up and
Speaker 1: there are people doing their own thing, even if they
Speaker 1: were just doing rioting, if they weren't threatening him and
Speaker 1: he just started picking people off. Yeah, that's an active shooter.
Speaker 1: That's a crime that you can't do if somebody comes
Speaker 1: at you. And what is the purpose of being able
Speaker 1: to bear arms at all? If the moment you have them,
Speaker 1: somebody else can say, well, I am unarmed, so I'm
Speaker 1: gonna I'm just gonna try to beat you to death. Now,
Speaker 1: there is only one just verdict in this case, and
Speaker 1: that is not guilty. And beyond that, I think Kyle
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse should get an apology from the state of Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: I think he should sue a number of people in
Speaker 1: the media for defamation. I know defamation is hard to prove,
Speaker 1: but I'm sure there's some lawyers that'd be happy to
Speaker 1: represent Kyle because they did to fame him. I hope
Speaker 1: on the time you hear this, at least we know
Speaker 1: that he's no longer facing a possible life sentence in
Speaker 1: prison for breaking no laws and on an ethical basis,
Speaker 1: doing nothing wrong. I've got to know Michae Lindell very well.
Speaker 1: Over the years he's inventor on my pillow and his
Speaker 1: team has been a game changer when it comes to
Speaker 1: my sleep because they've hooked me up with all the
Speaker 1: my pillow products. I've got the mattress toopper, the geeze
Speaker 1: A Dreams sheets, the my towels, my slippers, and of
Speaker 1: course to my pillows on my bed. Right now, you've
Speaker 1: got to try on my pillow. You'll be sleeping better
Speaker 1: than you have in years. Listeners like you have helped
Speaker 1: build my pillow and the incredible company it is today,
Speaker 1: and Michaelendell wants to give back to all of you.
Speaker 1: You can get great discounts on my Pillow products by
Speaker 1: going to my pillow dot com right now and clicking
Speaker 1: on the radio listener special square. You'll see rotational offers
Speaker 1: up to sixty six percent off products like their pillows,
Speaker 1: mattress topper, and the Geese of sheets, but also new
Speaker 1: products like their slippers, waited blankets, robes, waffle blank it's
Speaker 1: and more. All my Pillow products come with a sixty
Speaker 1: day money back guarantee. Enter promo code Buck for these
Speaker 1: great radio specials. Remember go to my pillow dot com,
Speaker 1: click on radiolist or specials, and then when you pick
Speaker 1: out what you want, use that promo code Buck. You'll
Speaker 1: get incredible discounts on these amazing products real quick. This
Speaker 1: was one of these more illuminating segments than the lib
Speaker 1: running it intended. It was a Margaret Hoover over on
Speaker 1: the rede of firing Line that nobody watches on PBS,
Speaker 1: but she had high way way the Chinese dissident on
Speaker 1: her show, and you can tell the leftist. So he's
Speaker 1: talking about authoritarianism and Trump, and Trump is an authoritarian.
Speaker 1: What are we gonna do? Because Trump is so scary
Speaker 1: and authoritarian, And this actual dissident in a country where
Speaker 1: there is true really totalitarianism, had a different view when
Speaker 1: you hear him talking about it, of who the threat
Speaker 1: of authoritarianism in America really comes from? Do you see
Speaker 1: Donald Trump as an authoritarian? If you sitary and you
Speaker 1: have to have a system in supporting you, you cannot
Speaker 1: just being austeritarian by yourself. But certainly in United States
Speaker 1: it's today's condition. You can easily have an ausitarian in
Speaker 1: many ways your dy in the austeritarian state. You just
Speaker 1: don't know it. So many since happens today in US
Speaker 1: can be compared culture revolution in China. Like people trying
Speaker 1: to be unifying in certain political correctness. That is very dangerous.
Speaker 1: People unified in political correctness is very dangerous. It ends
Speaker 1: a free society. The threat of authoritarianism today in America
Speaker 1: comes from the Democrats. It comes from the left. That's
Speaker 1: what he's saying, and we can all see it. His
Speaker 1: point also about the system. Trump was opposed to. The system.
Speaker 1: Trump was undermined by, attacked by, viciously, relentlessly attacked by
Speaker 1: the system. So how could he be an authoritarian? You
Speaker 1: have to have the apparatus and the apparat chicks to
Speaker 1: borrow from the Soviet Times, all at your disposal. Trump
Speaker 1: didn't have that. In fact, the apparatus that he was
Speaker 1: supposed to control of the federal government turned against him
Speaker 1: and tried to get rid of him illegally. So who
Speaker 1: does the threat of authoritarianism really come from? It comes
Speaker 1: from the left. It comes from the Democrats. They don't
Speaker 1: want to hear that, but it's true and we all
Speaker 1: know it. So who's destroying freedom in America today? Democrats?
Speaker 1: Who threatens individual liberty and individual rights today? The left?
Speaker 1: The Democrats. Don't never forget it. Thanks for being here
Speaker 1: on the buck Sexton Show podcast. Appreciate it. Folks, will
Speaker 1: be back with you tomorrow. Make sure you become a
Speaker 1: supporter at Bucksexton Dot Locals. Dot com. I'll talk to
Speaker 1: you soon. She'll tie