WEBVTT - China's Crackdown on Tech a Headache for Investors

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. So we mentioned some of the

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID headlines, and our news team has certainly been covering them.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And among the COVID headlines also new coronavirus cases in

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the U s surging to the highest weekly level since

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>early February, fueled by that highly transmissible delta variant. Charlie

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was just talking about it, death rows By. That's the

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest weekly increase in December. And China is punishing dozens

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of local officials for failing to curb that COVID nineteen

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>outbreak in that country, and so the country's former health

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>chief they're saying the idea of quote living with the

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>virus is unacceptable. We've got a great voice to bring in.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>He is back with us, Dr Jacob B. Kraft. He's

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a biologist. He is CEO and co founder of the

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>privately held biopharmaceutical company Strand Therapeutics. He joins us on

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Boston, Massachusetts. Dr b. Craft, good to

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>have you back here on Bloomberg Radio. How are you.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm fantastic, Carol. How are you doing? Doing well? Doing well?

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Trying to manage through and filter through some of the

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>headlines the current round of virus headlines cases surging, especially

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for those not vaccinated. What needs to be top of

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.199
<v Speaker 1>mind for our audience and the general public in your view,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I think two things. One is, domestically, we need to

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're getting vaccines out as quickly as

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we as we possibly can. I think see I think now. Finally,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the BIDO administration is also taking the correct stuff, pressuring

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the FDA to prioritize the you know, the full review

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>UH and approval of the COVID vaccine um. And internationally,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to be getting vaccines out to the developing nations.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>The Delta variant was first picked up in India during

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>their UH during their major outbreak recently um or months ago,

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and that likely lead to a huge international spread of it,

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>which is now threatening you know, kind of the return

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to normal say that we saw right now. The Welcome

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Trust is reporting that one in two people in wealthy

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>nations is vaccinated, but only one in seventy four are

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated in the developing world, and in the developing world,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>where sanitation is often you know, not as as well,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and people are living in much tighter quarters in a

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of these areas, major cities in places like India.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It further increases our our risk of spread. And so

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just unacceptable that we still haven't been able to

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccines out into these UH developing areas because

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>every single day that goes by, we risk vaccine fully

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccine sort of resisted virus emerging either here or abroad.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>How tricky do you think it become, especially as people

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>start to talk about, including Dr FACCI, about giving out

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>boosters already, and how do we balance the developing world

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>where some of them haven't even gotten their first vaccine

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>individuals there and now we're talking about boosters potentially for

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>those in the developed world. Right now, we have a

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem than than just the boosters. We have a

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>problem of not enough people getting vaccinated in the United States,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>with which, honestly, while I respect everyone's right to choose themselves,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>when you live in a society, there is a certain

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of of of societal duty and and let's face it,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>patriotism that you should have to protect those Americans around you.

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>This outbreak of the new variant is due to uh

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>super spreader events happening, mostly driven by the unvaccinated population.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, now we're seeing them jump into the vaccinated

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>population and it's it's it's very sad to see. But meanwhile,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the state of Alabama. I saw

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>recently how seventy four thousand vaccines expire while they help

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>them as people did not take them. And so the

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>idea here, and it's been the entire time that we

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>have enough vaccines here state side, we should probably be

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>doing more to get vaccines out to the developing world

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>before they expire as well, um and continuing to just

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>incentivize the massive manufacturing of these vaccines. I think that

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>at this point, um, it's more of a logistical and

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a prioritization issue of getting vaccines where the most needed

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>than it is of just not simply having enough. I mean,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to say there's not enough for the

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>developing world, but then Alabama's gonna less seventy four thousand

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccines expire in a freezer, I think that that's also unacceptable.

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a crime. Many would argue, what are

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you doing for your own employees. There's increasingly we're seeing

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>employee employers another institutions saying if you want to work

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>with us, you've got to be vaccinated. UM. You know,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we we looked at and talked with a lot of

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>other executives in the industry about this. I think we're

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>very less both as a five set company and as

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a messenger RNA company to have, uh, you know, without

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>any prompting from US, a hundred percent vaccine adherents. UM.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Just you know. I think that people when they are

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>educated about the science and understand how how safe and

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>effective and impactful these vaccines are. UM, it wasn't something

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that really came up as a as a general issue. UM.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's nice actually to see that some

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the larger players of Southern Military recently UM saying

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be starting to mandate the vaccines.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that a lot of these employers

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>should should you really incent to buy their employees to

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>get these vaccines, especially people that work at tech and

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>biotech companies. It's you know, it's clearly what's going to

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>save us from from a vaccine resistant mutation. And while

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I think m R and A is a is an

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>absolutely miracle of a of a platform in terms of

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>how quickly it could be repurpose. Sefon den Cell and

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Ugo Sawhan from Maderna and Violent Tech of talk at

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>length about making new vaccines against the new variants to

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be more effective against new sort of mutations that may arise.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>But sect of the matter is we have an effected

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that we just need to get into people's arms immediately,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and it should be on employers. Really, I'd like to

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>see the US government really step up and start to

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mandate if if people really want to return to a

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>masthless life, we have to have a way to actually

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>verify that people have in bad dr B Kraft, we

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about the US backing uh waiving patents on COVID vaccines.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of researchers thought that was terrific

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that they thought that that was a good thing. A

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of drug makers didn't think. So what's your perspective

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on this and what does it mean in terms of

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>drug development creating new vaccines for the next mutation? Uh

0:06:54.000 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and so on. I just don't think it's fundamentally helpful. Um.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think I used this analogy before, maybe even

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>last time I was on here. But these therapy its

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at so new, they're so cutting edge that a lot

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of the innovation that's there's actually in in the manufacturing tide.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And so you can waive Madernast patents, but you won't

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to access all of their interior secrets to

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>how they make those vaccines and and the the the

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>actual sort of even reading through the patents that I

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think the best analogy that I that I had come

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up with was, you know, if you had Gordon Ramsay's

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>ingredients in front of you and his recipe in front

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of you, could you cook like him? And the answer

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is of course no, right, And that's kind of what

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at here. It's so I just don't believe

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's helpful, and I felt like in the Binding administration

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>did that, UM, and they washed the hands of this

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>vaccine issue and said, well, we've done all the help

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we can and walked away. And we're still sitting with

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>one out of seventy four people in developing countries with vaccines.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's just an absolute shame. To the

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>point is by not just you're saying that even if

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we just opened this up, it doesn't mean all of

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a sudden we'd be able to produce tons and tons

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of vaccines easily and readily, so that we could vacciny

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>basically everybody very much more quickly. They waived those patents

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>three months ago, four months ago, and please point me

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to the to the example of what country then spun

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>up their manufacturing and magically had COVID vaccine is ready

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to go. It was just the the obvious thing, of course,

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>would have been to go back to year and start

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>investing in the infrastructure of these vaccines and we can

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>start making those infrastructure investments. We're seeing people like Anthony

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Faucine now UM, echoing some statements that I've made before,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>which is we need to double down on both manufacturing

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure of these next generation therapeutics, and we need to

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about how are we better prepared for pandemics

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in general. But further than that, I think that we

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just need better manufacturing infrastructure. We should have. It's true

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we should have made that that those investments a year

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ago when it looked like the Almannay vaccines were going

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a promising way out of this, we didn't

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>make those investments. And so now now that I just

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like the administration seemed to want to waive the

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>patents as if that was going to fix the problem.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It didn't take the problem, and then here we are,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>um with without the problem being fixed. I'm not worried

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>about the patents as a drug company or and I

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think Stefan dem cell or talking or worried about

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it either, but it's just fundamentally not helpful. Well, so

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through a lot, to say, understatement of the

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>year of the decade, UH, in terms of the last

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>year and a half, are we you know, you understand

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this world. You're on the cutting edge in terms of

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at new science and developing UH new methodologies, if

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you will. So have we learned anything in terms of

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>being ready for the next pandemic in your view, I

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>think that we had the technology right the m R

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and A technology was already being progressed by by the

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>n I H by turning actually by all the people

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>who are there. What we really needed was public and

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>legislative support to invest in these things, to understand that

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>these were issues. Right the people at the d D,

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>people at DARK, people at the CDC, everyone has been

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>screaming about the fact that we are at risk for

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a new pandemic for decades. I've heard it my entire

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>professional life, almost to where you stop thinking about it

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>even as a professional in the space. And now I

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think where we're sitting at is we have a very

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>full public understanding of what a pandemic looks like in

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a modern age that nineteen twenty, but in a day

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>where you can you can be in Wuhan, China one day,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>step on a plane, and fourteen hours later be walking

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>out in to the middle of New York City, and

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a can be a very scary place for

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the propensitive of a pandemic. So I think now we

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have the understanding of the economic and personal toll that

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of things can take. And I hope I

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>really do hope that it means that we can get

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the public and the legislative support to actually make real,

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>bold investments into the future of defense. I'm gonna leave

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it on that note. Thank you so much. I always

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciate when you join us and find some time for us.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Jake Becraft he is the co founder and chief

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Strength Therapeutics, joining us on the phone

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>from Boston. Well online at Bloomberg business Week dot Com.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>A story on a topic that may make your make

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you roll your eyes a little bit or possibly glaze over,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's something that always seems to indicate another crisis

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>moment in Washington, until it doesn't, and then until it

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>rears its ugly head again. It's about the debt ceiling.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's get more from Bloomberg News Head of US

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Rates and f X Benjamin Purvis. He is here in

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>our interactive broker studio in New York City along with

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week editor Joe Weber on the remote access

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts. Is it fair to say, like your eyes

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>glaze over, or you shake your head, you roll your head,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You're like, okay, it's a story that's going to pass

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden it shows up again,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Joel uh and I was like, wait, what, it's back?

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course it is, um And it's been a

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit since we we've had to play this game

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of chicken, but it is, it is back, and you

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>know it will have repercussions and been our How are

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>those starting to already show up? What? What has investors

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and traders um freaking out? I I think you know,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>investors are sick of this thing, to be honest, I

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>mean you know, I think you make the point that

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know it comes up got your eyes glaze over.

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is important. Is at once ridiculous and and

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>u afterally important. Um, it's ridiculous in the sense that

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, these folks are voting on increasing a limit

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for debt that they've already you know, increased the spending

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>bills for so they've already approved the spending. Yet now

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to go out and improve the debt to

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to to finance it. But at the same time, you know,

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this is having real world impacts, and this is part

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of what we were we've been writing about recently, is

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the real world impacts on on borrowing costs, The real

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>world impacts on distorting things just because of some of

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the ins and outs and the arcane rules surrounding it.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So what is this thing we call debt ceiling because

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we throw it around and assume everybody knows what we're

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about, But I mean, what is it really? I mean, essentially,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the it's the amount the credit card limit, if

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you will, of the US government, And you know, the

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Congress sets what it allows the government to borrow and

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>then periodically has to raise that limit because America's debt

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>pile is is not getting any smaller. It's you know,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>ballooned and ballooned even more in this sort of post

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>COVID crisis to around twenty eight trillion, So you know,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this isn't getting any smaller. And the spending bills that

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>allow this, that that require this spending, this borrowing, you know,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>they've already been passed. This has already happened. So it's

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>literally just saying I'm going to agree to pay off

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the credit card bill for all this stuff that I

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>bought from Macy's or whatever. Um. And I could get

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff at Macy's, could buy Macs, you

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>probably could a few times over. But I mean, you know,

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as part of all of this, you know, we end

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>up with a partisan wrangle each time, and it's something

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>that happens under administrations of both parties. You know, it

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>happened under Barack Obama, it happened under Donald Trump, It's

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>happening again under Joe Biden. And one party holds the

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>other too, you know, to account. They like to describe it,

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's really just holding them hostage to what is fundamentally,

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a superfluous thing because we know they're going

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to find the money. Correct, Is that a stupid assumption?

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Or know everyone everyone bet you know, everyone is essentially

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>betting on the fact that you know, somehow or another,

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll come up with a with a fix

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on it. And and that's one of the other ludicrous

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>elements of this is that, you know, the debt limit

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is now back in place. It came back in place

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this month. Yet America is continuing

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to borrow because they've got so called extraordinary measures, which

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>allows them to wangle a few things here to a

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>few nips and tucks there, do a few accounting maneuvers

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. And all of this has an impact. Um.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's sort of underscores how ludicrous it is. Um. On.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>One element that really underscores that we we we talk

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about is this idea that you know, as part of

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole mechanics of it, they have to get the

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pile of cash that America has down. Um. The essential

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>reason being this is to stop them going out and say,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>issuing five trillion dollars worth of debt just before the

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>ceiling comes into place, and then just using that to

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pay their bills at their leisure without having to do it.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>This time around, everyone was talking about, oh, we have

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to get the cash pile down. We have to get

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it down to about a hundred and thirty billion dollars,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>which isn't chicken feed, but is not a huge amount

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in the grand scheme of things for Uncle Sam and

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then lo and behold. At some point in that process

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury says, actually that ms alright, for those of

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you whose eyes are glazing over, stay with us, right chel.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, because I think this is the other

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>element that comes into play here is that there's an anniversary.

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>This is ten years ago that the US actually uh

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, went through this whole song and dance and

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>snpeak with a decision that stripped the US of its

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>triple A creator credit rating, which been would have been

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the repercussions of that decision ever since and what kind

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of bearing might that have on on the conversations this

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>time around? Well, I mean the cynics would say that,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, America has only gone from you know, strength

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to strength in terms of what it can borrow and

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's being able to borrow since then. The debt

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>pile is you know, exploded since then. Interest rates have

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>actually been lower since then, So in real world terms,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't affected the ability of the borrower to borrow.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it did cause some major eructions within markets.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It caused some major troubles and and you know it

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>under underscores how fragile, you know, some of these things are,

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and that this isn't really a plaything that that Washington

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>folks should be you know, messing around with for partisan politics.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Because you're write about that to get the cash balanced down, correct,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Treasury does affect markets because it's not borrowing

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as many t bells. So this you know, supplied tom

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Right things happen. Yeah, I mean, it's it's you know,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of it's the biggest, baddest debt market on

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the planet. It you know, dictates the cost of every

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, of everything that sort of people overlay over it.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even minor changes that affect the interest

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>rates on say you're a three month bill or a

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>six month bill can have repercussions down the line. And

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Treasury deciding to issue half as much

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>as it did that will have a major impact on

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the costs. So when we think about how this could

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>come to ahead, what are you going to be watching, Ben, Well, Unfortunately,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's that good old waiting game of of looking at

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what Mitch mcconnald's doing, what Chuck Schumer's doing, and all

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the all the usual suspects in Washington. Um. You know,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we've just seen today, um the latest in the wrangling

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>over over this UM topic. And obviously it's it's being

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>interspersed with wrangling over other spending type priorities, over the

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bill we've got in Washington, over the broader spending

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>agenda the Biden administrations looking to pursue, and these are

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>all being counterbalanced as part of some you know, we

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>would like to say it's some big chess game, but

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not so so well thought out. I love

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how you end that. It's not to say that debt

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and deaf as it's don't matter. But the way the

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>u S thinks and legislates on the topic needs to change.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think most of us have been following this,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or like you, who have been watching this over and

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>over again, things need to change. Say all right, Benjamin,

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>purpose thank you so much. It's an important story to

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>understand what keeps coming round and round when it comes

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to government negotiations on spending and how to pay for it.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin of course, Benna's head of US Rates and f

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>X at Bloomberg News, and of course Joe Weber, our

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week, fun at online at Bloomberg

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovik on Bloomberg Radio. You

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are on a seed to Bloomberg Business Sweek on Bloomberg

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Radiom Carol Master, Tim Stanovic is off Bloomberg Business Week

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>brought to by s c I. Today's competitive marketplace requires

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>asset managers to become more operationally a deep see how

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you can transform your business with SEIS Global Platform at

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>se i C dot com slash. I m s, Well,

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been chronic the flow of headlines out of China,

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in particular crackdowns on the country's big tech companies and more.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But what's really going on here? Well, let's find out,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and he writes about it in his weekly column Bloomberg

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>New Economy Editorial Director Andy Brown. He notes that there

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is something much bigger going on. He joins us in

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So you and I've talked

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the headlines, and I feel like they

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>are fast and furious, NonStop, um, very thoughtful column. And

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at it in a different way. What's what

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>do you see is really going on here? So the

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>question everybody wants the answer to is why on arth

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese authorities going after the most dynamic, the most

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>profitable part of their comm me, which of course is

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector and particularly consumer tech at a crackdown

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>by the way that has cost listed Chinese companies in

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>excess of one trillion dollars. And I happen to think

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that the most popular explanation for this is also the

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>most unlikely. And the explanation everybody is coming up with

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 1>is this is this is sort of benign. This is

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 1>President Shi jim paying looking at rising prices in China

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and saying this is exacerbating inequality and we have to

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>do something about it, and that will that involves cracking

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>down on tech companies who are allegedly building monopolies and

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>underpaying their gig workers and abusing consumer data and so on.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>And so I haven't to think this is a fig

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>leaf that actually this is all about a monumental struggle

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for power and control in China. And the giveaway, the

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>giveaway here is the fact that the sharp end of

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>this crackdown and you're seeing it now, particularly last week,

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is led by ideologues in the party and including in

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda agencies, which really are core to power in China. Well, right,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and that I mean if you think about impacting people

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>right in terms of how they're thinking about it. So

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're basically saying, Andy, the Chinese government's all that

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>worried about losing its power of controlling its people. Is

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that it I think they look it's not it's certainly

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>not the full story, but it's a much more likely

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>explanation than going after tech moguls because that's their pathway

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for reducing inequality. If that really was what they had

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in mind, they would be doing something about public policy,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's public policy that shapes education, shapes healthcare, um

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, shapes shapes housing markets, which are the three

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest drivers of inequality in China today. Right. And what's

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting is you talk about I mean, the government controls

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>so many of these different markets right already. So it's like,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>well white right, well, so you take so they closed

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>down the entire hundred billion dollar tech sector, right, Okay,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>then you ask yourself why is how how did this

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sector come into being? Well, you know, it's a market

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:32.479
<v Speaker 1>response to a brutally, brutally competitive education system, which, by

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, in rural areas of China is chronically underfunded.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Parents will pay anything to get their kids through examinations,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly the gal call examination that gets you into good

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>colleges and is the it is the pathway to social

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>mobility in China. That's why you haven't it now. If

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to fix your your your problem, you do

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>something about the structure of education. And it's a similar

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>story in healthcare. The same story in housing, because if

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you control it or shut it down, it just becomes

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>even more accessible, right right, Well that's the crazy thing.

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Now Now, if if you're not going to be very

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>expensive to go online, uh, you're basically forcing forcing poorer family,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>middle class families to do except one on one home tutoring.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And do we have these conversations often with you and

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just generally because it's been impacting also financial markets. I mean,

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>where does it go? How do you see it playing out?

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You understand obviously having spent time there, kind of how

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>they think and how they approach things. So where does

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this go? How do you think this ultimately plays out?

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this this, this is by no means the

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the story. I think we're at the beginning

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of an almighty struggle, uh for for power and control

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in China. And this this is Ji Jimping and the

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Party saying, you know, we've identified the one part the

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the the one class of people in China that can

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>rival us the Party in influence. They have the wealth,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they have the social standing, and they have the strategic

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>resources big data. And the Party is saying, we want that,

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we want to clawback control and power. What could big tech. Ultimately,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>if they have their way and they're able to kind

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of keep running with it, how could that really change

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the power structure. I mean, I understand how it can

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>influence thought right, but I mean in terms of actually

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>changing the Chinese government, could it? No? You not, No,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean nobody, nobody is talking about overthrowing but people.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But the question, and you know from from Si Ching

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Pings point of view, is we're about to go into

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>we are in approach where now in a period of

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>extreme competition with the United States, Essentially they've decided that

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the US wants to contain China wants rise, wants to

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>take it down. They want the data, they need power,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they need to consolidate their control. Uh, they want to

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have a top down economy. They believe actually the big

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>data will be able to guide a high tech authoritarian

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>regime and it will be much much more successful than

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the US model. So for I know, I always bring

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>it back to you for this because and forgive my

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>ignorance in terms of kind of understanding, but I do

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>think about investors because I don't feel like I know

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Kathy would and ARC they've kind of pulled back a

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but not every investor has just got about

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds left here. Do investors need to be increasingly nervous?

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>They do need to be increasingly nervous because because there

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is no way of divining where this thing is going

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to play out once it enters the period, once it

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>enters the realm of ideology and politics, there is no

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>model that can predict where this is going, no matter

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>what Chinese regulators say, all right, going to leave it

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>on that. I know you sent us a lot more stories,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have to get to them next time. So

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I apologize, but I love I'm glad that we were

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>able to dig into this. Andy, thank you appreciate it.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown, He's editorial director at Blomberg New Economy. In

0:25:55.600 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>our interactive broker studio, this is the big Day, the

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>best of Bloomberg's in depth original reporting from around the globe.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>What we actually make sure we do, as the economy

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>covers is look at the data kind of broken down

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit. It's fun to becoming more and more expensively

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at the shifting billion dollars for the

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>red entry level. There's been ways of immigration that have

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>faced a lot of resistance, a lot of color behind

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the scenes in a great untold story. How did Bezos

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>really come out on top? As the cover says, Jeff wins,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>he always seems to win the big take on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, the Bloomberg Big Take happens to be

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>also the most read story on the Bloomberg today. It's

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about the little known hedge fund and it's manager that

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>blew up to the tune of twenty billion, making both

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the fun and the individual behind it household names just

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. Let's get more on this story,

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg hedge fund reporter Kathy Burton. She's with us in

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>our Interactor Broker studio in New York. There was a

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>period where like every day, this is what we talked about.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about our keegos, right, so remind our audience

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in case they forgot, because it really was this individual

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and fund that we never talked about. Really well, yes,

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that's it's actually a family office um

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for a guy named Bill Huong who used to be

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund manager. He got into a little bit

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of legal issues with the SEC and then he turned

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>into a family office of several years ago. That's right,

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I forgot he went through a couple of iterations, so

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>remind us though that, you know, then it blew up

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>right to the tune of twenty billion dollars spectacularly. Yes,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>no one realized that he had amassed an amazing fortune

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of more than twenty billion dollars. And then in two

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>days it disappeared. And we're still trying to You and

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I were talking before we got going. There's still so

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>many questions out there about kind of what happened. Yes, exactly,

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a big report that came out from Credit

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Suite several days ago, and in that report they said

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that our kid goes the family office likely lied about

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to the bank, but they provided no other details of

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what that means. And they did say that they

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>were going to go after Urchgos to try and get

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>some money back. Well, and to be fair, there are

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot of litigation going on at this point,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>uh yet, but we expect that yes, there will be.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's interesting, listen, Kathy, you follow Wall Street,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the financial community, the hedge fund industry. I mean, we

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of know what happened, right, because this

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of those stories that we think there's a

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of transparency right in the financial markets, and

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, something like this blows up and

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you're reminded that, wait a minute, something can happen to

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the tune of twenty billion dollars kind of from nowhere. Yes,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And in that Credit Swiss report which people can see, um,

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there are many examples of in which the bank actually said,

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>our kids sort of told us that they had similar

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>positions at other banks. Uh, And then it's really hard

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that they were allowed to build up a

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolio that was worth about a hundred and twenty billion

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars including leverage, which is pretty remarkable. Okay, So and

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>transparency maybe would have helped prevent that from all from happening.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>What's great about this story is, as I said to you,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a period where we were talking

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>about this constantly as as it unwound in the financial markets,

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of getting a grasp of who this

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>individual was. Um, he's still around. He's still around, he said,

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Um in New Jersey, that's where he lives right and

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>before and where he lived before, and he's uh, just

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to work through this big fiasco that's happened to

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>him and there's a SEC is looking into it, the

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>d o J is looking into it. He has employees

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>who are angry at him because they lost all their

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>deferred comp when the firm blew up. And he has

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>some employees that are hopening to start their own hedge funds,

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and is he supportive of that? As far as we

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can tell, he is, although we don't know if that

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>support extends to giving them money or not. And that's

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess one of the questions. As you said, there's

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of questions out there. I mean, he um,

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, lives in an expensive place in New Jersey, right,

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's not somebody though that was really flashy. Right. No? Not.

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean the house is nice, but it's not Steve

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Cohen nice or Ray Dalio nice. It's it's just a

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>nice house, right exactly. And and we don't still know

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what money he's got left right personally. No, his employees

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>speculate that he is still a billionaire. But because um,

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we're told that he has investments outside of our caghos.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>He was, for example, an early investor in Cathy Woods

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>um et F, although we don't know if he still

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>has that or not. We also know that and a

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>final week, he took about two billion dollars an excess

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>margin from Credit Sweez, But we don't know what happened

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to that money. We don't know if if he put

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it someplace out or if he used it to pay

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>off margin calls from other banks. We don't know. Um,

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just got about forty five seconds left here, Kathy, UM,

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do highly recommend, as I said, it's a

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>most read store, the most read on the Bloomberg in

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>doing this and kind of doing this update update on

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know where he is, how he's doing.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your big takeaway right now on either him and

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>just kind of where this story sits right now. Uh,

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly that there's just a lot more to come. We'll

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>probably see some sort of suit or something from Credit

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Sweee and which we'll be able to get more information

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe from the other banks too, we don't know. Uh.

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's just really an ongoing tail and it's

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see where if he's still

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tries to come out and have a new family office

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for exact right right, I mean we've seen people right

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn'min come back. UM, And it's just a reminder that

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this is evolving and more to come out. It's a

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>must read. I'll put it out on Twitter. There's so

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>much great detail in it. Kathy, thank you so much.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. Kathy Burton, hedge fund reporter at

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News in our Interactive Broker studio. As I said,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it is the Bloomberg Big take on this Monday, I'm

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>broc journal now. But you let me drive. Oh no,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no home honey, please, I'll do the righting

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>ravel Let me. I want to drive, Just drive, baby,

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the questions trying. This is the drive to the

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>globe commune. Thanks, we'll try us. Dawn on Bloomberg Radio.

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, just about ten and a half minutes left

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in today's trading day. It is time for the drive

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to the close back with us. It's got QB's chief

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>investment officer, Carson Group. He is with us on the

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>phone from Omaha, Nebraska. He's got good to have you

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>back here on Bloomberg. How are you great? And thanks

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for having me back. Carroll. What's good to have you here.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you see the market environment right now? You

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>know we're seeing this as a market that's obviously rallied

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot. We've had some great earnings news that I

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think is pretty much fully reflected in market prices. Uh

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And and so from that standpoint, I don't think we're

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>expecting super large, exorbitant games from this point forward. But

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I don't see that there's a

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure against the market sending it lower with

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple I think major risk factors out there, UM,

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID and some other ones that we can dive into

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. But we always seem a market that's reflected.

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the good news is out there, and

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't really want to encourage people not to chase

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>after markets that have already run from from some news

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is very much fully reflected in it all right, So

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good news out there reflected in the

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>prices existing already in the financial markets, the equity markets.

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet you're not necessarily saying that we now deserve

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a pullback either. No. I think that the valuations are

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are in a reasonable stage, and we've also got a

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of momentum going in the market. One of

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the things I think we've learned from the corporate earnings

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>news that came out this quarter, but actually, even going

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>back to two periods about a year ago, when things

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>were obviously uh during the greater degrees of lockdown and challenges,

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this Corporate America's ability to produce profits, it's really an

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing factor. It really starts to show one of those

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>longer term reasons about why we take risk in our portfolios,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>why we invest in the markets, why capitalism works for people,

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It is because it generates returns and the people are

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>managing the business is very well and whether it's smaller

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>profits but more than expected during COVID or really large rebounds,

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>what we've really seen is that being participating as an

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>owner in Corporate America has been a great, great proposition

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for investors for really especially the lie this year and

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a half. All Right, So, having said that, are there

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>particular parts of the market that you would prefer being

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in right now? Yeah? I think one of the areas

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that we continue to see some opportunities in the technology space,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>especially in the security spot. One of the areas that

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>we risk, you know, from our macro perspectives, we look

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we look at a number of major risks that are

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, and one of them we've identified is these

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>these attacks on companies um that are you know, where

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they're held hostage with their computer networks and those that

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of attack is something that hasn't hit us real hard.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been more of a minor irritant, but we raped

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that as one of our top risks out there, and

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the beneficiaries of that are

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be technology companies, especially those who provide security

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to corporations, especially those really vital to our system. And

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so that's one of those longer term trends at from

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a risk standpoint that we think people will rally to.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the areas that we're looking for

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for investments in is in the in in the technology

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>security area, right. And if you think about it, companies

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>increasingly they can't ignore it, right because their business is

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>put at risk if they're not making sure that their

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>business and certainly as things are much more online and digital, like,

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got to just make sure it's protected. UM. China

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>something we just talked about with Andy Brown a little

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>while ago of our Bloomberg New Economy about what's going

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on in China. How do you see it? What are

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the implications for investors as a result, You know, China

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has been another one of those risks that's been on

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>our top five for really a while. We see a

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>number of big trends that are negative, like the U

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>S and China butting heads on a lot of different areas.

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Partly from the Chinese perspective, it feels like the US

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is shutting them out of the value added technology space

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>just when their economy needs higher paying jobs because they

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have the same population growth as they used to

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in the shorter term, I think what we've really seen

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is that China is becoming much more negative in its

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>efforts to try to control the capitalist tendencies that were

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>so successful within the economy. That clearly is a very

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>very bad sign for for investors, and that's been very

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 1>much heavily reflected in prices. And I think there's also

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't seen much movement on trade or any

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>other issues that have been rollbacks of some of the

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump policies have been a few minor adjustments, but basically,

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>even though we had a change in administrations, I would

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>said that that overall system from the US investor standpoint

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>is probably more more concerning than it was before. And

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>therefore that's one of the big risk points that we've identified.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, that is interesting. What about the FED as

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a another risk, Yeah, I think that's definitely one that

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we see policy risk, partly on the fiscal side, but

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>really with the FED side. And I think that people

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>are overplaying the risk of FED to too much. To

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>one side. There's the idea that to the negative, yeah,

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's also you know, in the sense that they

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 1>could be too hawkish and they can also be too debblish.

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I think the FEDS had a fairly I think they

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>had a great response initially in COVID. They've had a

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy run. I mean, what are they going to

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>do next meeting? Pretty much the same thing they've been

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>doing for a while, meeting after meeting after meeting, not

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything to shock the world, Right, Like,

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we know, if anything we've learned, we understand policy will change,

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But we also know that the FED isn't going to

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden just go take a one eighty.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>That's just not how it happens. And I think one

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you raise there is a really

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>good point. I think investors are still concerned about going

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.879
<v Speaker 1>back to periods where the FED had problems communicating well.

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I really think that the FED, the last few FED

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>chairs have done a much better job of communicating what

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>their intentions were the market. And so I see that

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of taper tantrum risk where the market gets surprised

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to be much lower, and I think JAF Powell and

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>his team have done a great job of signaling what

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that is. And so that's the risk that we don't

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>see as high, being that the Federal surprises. I don't

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think the Fed's got a big surprise built in their system.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the things that when we look

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>at why we continue to invote, why we aren't so

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>negative or is concerned as some people are, is this

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>because we just don't see that risk as being particularly material.

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think they're tougher. One is how soon do they

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>start tapering and do they push it too hard? I

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think the last time when they tighten policy, I think

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>an eight consecutive meetings and they rolled back some other

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>policies in another one that we're loosers, so basically tighten

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy meeting after meeting after meeting. That was too fast,

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the harder thing for the FED

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is to say, how do we do it, what paste

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>do we do it so we don't get too far behind,

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But also in the Calas case that they got too

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 1>far ahead and had to roll some of those backs

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>even before the pandemic started, and really had a tighter

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>moletary policy than the U S could really handle. Commodity

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>move today significant in your view, um. I thought the

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>gold move was interesting because it represented a deviation from

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.479
<v Speaker 1>where really you real yields are. It's it's it's tied

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>very careously. I suspect that's a supply and demand something

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>different by investor moves. I think that. I also think

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>when I look at oil prices, my expectation is that

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>there's some degree of supply that is out there that

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is available to move in. The producers in the US

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>are trying to be more discipline, but in the end

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be more well drilled. I think the

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>other respect is concern about how the delta storing might

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>slow down demand in China more lockdowns essentially rolling through.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's something important for us to investors to know,

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is is that we're not the biggest demander of most commodities.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time, the Chinese are, and actions that

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they take can actually directly affect our markets pretty severely

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because of the prices. I think that's a good today,

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a good reminder of what we're seeing. My expectation as

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>oil will drift down lower, partly from supply and partly

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>from some of the demand on COVID until we start

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to see those next ways of booster shots come out.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So you will see some tightening of policy as far

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as lockdowns, but but not a ton. Uh. Dave Wilson,

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg Stocks calumnist and editor, pointed out that when

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at the tenure yielded at one

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two s and P dividend yield is at one

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>point thirty two, what does that say to you? And

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just got about twenty five seconds here. Uh, that yield

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on the tenure is not offer a really good return

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>compared to especially compared to where inflation patations are and

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>where they're going. And so that's a tough space, but

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's so good for risk reduction. But yeah, longer term bonds,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we would expect to see yields drift up some overtime,

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>but it is interesting to see them both right there

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>smack on the same. Hey, Scott good to check in

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>with you. Scott Kobe, he is senior investment strategist at

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Carston Group, on the phone from Omaha, Nebraska. Thanks

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.479
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News