WEBVTT - Do Animals Have a Sense of Humor?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, please take a second and leave us a review

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to the podcast.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot. Hey, welcome to Science Stuff, good production,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>enuff iHeartRadio. I'm hor hit Cham and today we are

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>asking whether animals are funny. Well, we know they can

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be funny to us, but are they in on the joke?

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Do animals have a sense of humor? We're going to

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be talking to animal experts, including a scientist involved in

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the largest study ever done on whether animals joke around

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with each other. So to the laughter and come find

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the punchline with us as we answer the question to

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 1>animals have a sense of humor? Enjoy. Hey everyone, We're

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna set up today's episode with a conversation with doctor

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark Beckoff about the argument that animals understand humor. As

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear, there hasn't been a lot of science looking

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into this question, but from what we know of animals,

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at least most mammals, doctor Beckhoff thinks animals should be

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>able to get jokes or at least find some things funny.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Here's my conversation with doctor Mark Beckoff. Well, thank you

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 1>doctor Beckoff for joining us. My pleasure can you please

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>te us your and what do you do?

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my name is Mark Beckoff. I'm a professor of

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 2>ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado and Boulder,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 2>and I'm interested in the general field of cognitive ethology,

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>which is a study of animal minds, their thoughts, their feelings.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 2>You know, what's in them? How do they work? What

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 2>do they know? What do they feel?

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, as I mentioned, there hasn't been a lot of

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>science looking at humor in animals, but doctor Beckoff's fifty

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>plus years studying animals tells them they surely must. Well,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>today we're interested in one particular coudient ability, which is

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>humor and understanding humor and having a sense of humor.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So we'll just open with a straight question, which is

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think animals have a sense of humor?

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think about it a lot. I think

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>they do. In fact, I feel sure they have their

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 2>own sort of species typical sense of humor, But like

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 2>anything else, it's hard to know. I would say I'm

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>sure they do, but we haven't quite done the studies

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that would show that.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Beckoff, a lot of people who own

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>pets or spend a lot of time observing animals would

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>say animals have a sense of humor, but so far

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this is mostly anecdotal. For instance, here are some examples

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of when doctor Becoff's dogs act that kind of funny.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>My dog Jethrow, I have some examples from him and

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 2>other dogs with whom I lived. So one example was

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>he used to run around when there were people there

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and maybe he wasn't getting the attention that he wanted.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're not paying attention to me, run around shaking

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>his rope or a towel or something in this and

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 2>then stop and look to see if people were saying, Oh,

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>isn't he cute or isn't that me?

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a.

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Tension getting that way, I see, playing keep away. I mean,

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 2>my dogs would do this all the time, run up

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 2>with an object, sometimes a rope, you know, play tug

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 2>a war, and the minute I would reach for the rope,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>they would run away and turn around to make sure

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that I'm looking at them.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So another example when I had two dogs defeating next

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to one another, and the dog who ate faster would

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>have an empty bowlt and he would run to the

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>front door bark, and then when the other dog came

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to see who was at the front door, and there

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>wasn't anyone there. The first dog would go back and

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>steal his food.

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like there's some evidence there that the

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>animal is aware that you have expectations about what's going

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and then the dog does something to subvert

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>those expectations or kind of play with your expectations about

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>what should happen.

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, that's exactly right.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is the first clue that maybe animals do

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of humor. Psychologists think that humor, at

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>least in humans, is based on the idea of having

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>expectations about a situation and then having something break those expectations.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It also has to do with having theory of mind,

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning having a sense of what other individuals are thinking

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and what they expect to happen. We know animals have

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>both of those things. We made a whole episode about

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>whether animals have consciousness a few months ago, so check

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>that out if you want to learn more. But the

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>problem in this case is that humor is particularly hard

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to verify. Why is it hard to prove that animals

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of humor?

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, in one sense, just because you can't

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 2>validate it. I can't say, well, you're trying to humor

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>me or my friends.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 3>I see.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying it's hard to validate because you can't

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ask the ad animal, did you do that because you

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>think it was funny?

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. In other words, part of having a sense of

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>humor is being funny on purpose. For example, you might

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>say or do something that other people find funny, but

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean necessarily that you have a sense of humor.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>You might be doing it by accident, and it's kind

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of hard to ask animals about their intentions. Now, you

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>might be thinking, what if we see an animal laughing

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at something, wouldn't that mean they have a sense of humor?

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there any evidence that animals laugh?

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's been a lot of research on rodents rats

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>who produce a vocalization that when you use a sonogram

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 2>to look at sort of the components of the vocalization,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 2>it looks like human laughter. And there's some evidence that

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 2>some great apes might laugh. Oh really, there's laughing hyaenas.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, people have talked about laughing hyaenas.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>So there's vocalization, but is there evidence that it's a

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>response to a subversion of expectation or is it just

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a vocalization that could mean something else.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody's looked at that. That would be

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.119
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting study.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess such a study as no laughing matter. Okay,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>joking aside. This did make me wonder if it would

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be possible to design an experiment that should you whether

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>animals have a sense of humor or not. What would

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it take to do such an experiment, Like if you

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>had to try to figure out if dogs have a

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor, what would that experiment look like? And

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I gave you ten million.

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Dollars, I would take the money and run.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Now that's funny, doctor Beckoff, I know that would be

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>my sense of humor.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you really have to look at animals, but

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>set it up to see whether, say, do they do

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 2>things out of context that could be surprising with the

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>intention of attracting other animals because they think what you're

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 2>doing is interesting.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, like if you see a dog severting the

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>expectation of another dog for their pleasure for play, right.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Or making the other individual inquisitive, you know, having them

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>really go God, you know what's going on here?

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, We're going to talk to another

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>scientist in the next segment that was involved in a

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>study that did just this experiment, So stick around for that.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But first I wanted to ask doctor Beckoff, why would

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it make sense for animals to develop a sense of

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>humor at all? What's the point of being funny? Why

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think humor has evolved in us and potentially

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>going further back in other animals.

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's enjoyable. It could be very positive,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's fun to laugh. Laughing is good, smiling's good.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>It could be to alleviate a situation that could get nasty,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to wait a pass time. So I may have seen

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>this with wild wolves and dogs or free ranging dogs

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and coyotes and foxes who used to live in my

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>neighborhood when I lived in the mountains. They just sometimes

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>do something that it doesn't make any sense. The only

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>tenable explanation is they're trying to humor another animal. They're

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to lighten up the load, let's go play. And

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>there's been people who argue that having a sense of

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>humor is common among social species because of this social

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>effect it could have for increasing group cohesion. So I

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>like that argument as an evolutionary biologist, because it would

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>be surprising to think in gregarious social living non humans

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>that those emotions, those capacities haven't evolved.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I see it.

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 2>Because they're really important for forming and maintaining groups.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We know it has a social use. Humor has a

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>social use in groups. So it would be our expectation

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that animals probably have a sense of humor. Yeah, which

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>means it would be funny. If they didn't, would be funny,

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be odd. Okay, we're now going to get

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to the first ever scientific result that shows that non

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>human animals can have a sense of humor. When we

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>come back, we're going to talk to one of the

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>scientists involved in this study, which looked at a form

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>of humor scientists call playful teasing. Do chimpanzees and a

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ragged tans joke around with each other? I kid you not.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that answer, so stay with us. We'll

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Okay, welcome back. We're talking about whether

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>animals have a sense of humor, and so far we've

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about the argument for the idea that animals, at

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>least social animals have evolved to be funny as a

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>way to bond with each other. I mean, remember the

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>last time someone told you a joke and you laughed

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot, you probably liked that person a little more

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or felt a little cl to them. But as we

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>also talked about, there hasn't been a lot of science

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>done to see if this argument is actually true until recently.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty four, scientists from the Universities of California,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, and San Diego published the result of one

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the largest studies ever done that shows that non

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>human animals do joke around. To tell us about this,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to the lead author of the study,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>doctor Isabelle Lamer. Well, thank you, doctor Lahmer for joining

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>us here.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Welcome.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you please tellus who you are and what do

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you do.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So, I'm a cognitive biologist and I'm currently working

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 4>at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior. So I'm

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 4>basically studying intelligence and emotions in animals, specifically great apes.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Lahmer and her colleagues doctor Sasha Winkler, Philrico Rossano,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and Erica Cartmeil looked at the behavior of four different

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>great aid species to see if they showed signs they

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had a sense of humor. Now, as we talked about before,

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to ask an animal to tell

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you something funny, or to tell them a joke and

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>see if they laugh. So doctor Lahmer and her colleagues

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>looked at a behavior related to humor called playful teasing.

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean?

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Playful teasing so, for example, often and withdrawal in children.

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.119
<v Speaker 4>So basically, when a child actually offers you an object

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 4>and the mother, for example, is reaching for it, but

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 4>in the second as the mother actually reaches for it,

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>this child draws the object back and laughs and looks

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 4>at the mother. Yeah, and this can happened repeatedly, right, So,

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 4>playful teasing is basically when you tease someone for fun.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>You might poke at them playfully or offer them something

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they want and then yank it away at the last second.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's playful behavior, but it shows a certain sense of humor.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 3>So playful teasing requires similar cognitive processes.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>What did you mean by that? What cognitive abilities.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 4>That you anticipate others responses, like as I mentioned with

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 4>the offer and withdrawal. Actually, there is quite a lot

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 4>of things going on in the brain during that because

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 4>in the moment that the child actually presents the object,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 4>it knows that the mother will reach for it, so

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 4>it will kind of foresee the action right that the

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 4>mother will reach for it. And it knows also in

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 4>this moment that when I draw it back, I will

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 4>create a moment of surprise in the mother. I see,

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 4>so this is actually what makes it funny, right, while

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 4>the child then also laughs, I'm kind of surprising you

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 4>with my action. I'm pretending to give it to you,

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 4>but actually I'm drawing it back to see you surprise.

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So playful teasing is a form of humor because it

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>requires you to know that the other individual is expecting something,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and it also requires you to know what it's expected.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Also understanding social norms, so I need to know what

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 4>is allowed what is not allowed. I mean children, for example,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 4>tis a lot by actually doing things that are not.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Allowed, right, and they find that funny.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 3>Yes, children usually.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Laugh by doing things that are not allowed, like, for example,

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 4>reaching towards a hot stove even though they know that

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 4>it's not allowed, but just reaching into that direction, checking

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 4>the mother's face, and then quickly drawing the hand back,

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 4>you know, and doing that repeatedly kind of in a

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 4>provocatis way.

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I have to sort of think about what's going to

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future, and I also have to put

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>myself in the mindset of the other person or the

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:38.239
<v Speaker 1>other individual.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this is called gury of mind.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And you said, we see this in pre verbal infants,

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning like really really young kids.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it starts at the age of eight months already.

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I see, at eight months, you're already a pain

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the bud.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And to some extent, yes, at.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Eight months you're already spressing out your mother on purpose.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you can think of playful teasing as

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>joking around. I see it's a Q and I engaged

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in an interaction and we both find it funny, or

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>only one of us find it funny.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it can go both ways, right.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 4>It can be teazing that is more on the provocative side,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 4>which just one party finds funny and interesting while the

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 4>other party is really annoyed. But oftentimes this also can

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 4>lead to mutual enjoyment as well.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh, And doctor Lahmer argues this joking around has

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a purpose.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this also brings you actually to the function of teasing,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 3>which is actually that there's mutual enjoyment and the social

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 3>bonds are strengthened, so teazing is a form to basic

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Kelly strengthen their relationship.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And so doctor Lahmer and her colleagues try to see

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>if you could find playful teasing in a four species

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of great apes, warnables, rangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 4>So we basicallyly set out to find instances of teasing

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 4>in videos. Actually, so we were basically looking through a

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 4>bunch of videos to find events that were basically neither

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 4>aggression nor play, but something in between.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Lammer, scientists had studied teasing before, where

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>one animal pokes at another animal as a form of

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>aggression or bullying, and they had also studied playfulness before,

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>which is when two animals played together, But playful teasing

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is something different.

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 4>So researchers, for example, they were studying agonistic forms of

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 4>cheesing like harassment or bullying, but never.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 3>The playful side of teasing.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 4>The playful side was kind of usually studied to as play,

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 4>but playful teas is not play.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a different behavior.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 4>So it's kind of in the gray zone between play

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 4>and aggression. That's why we really put a lot of

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 4>effort in developing a coding scheme that would actually show

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 4>exactly what playful teasing is. And we developed certain criterias

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 4>to define playful teasing.

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>What the third lumber is saying is that to study

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the videos of the four species of apes, she and

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>her colleagues came up with a checklist or a list

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of criteria of what counts as playful teasing or joking around.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So then you made a definition of playful teasing. What

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was in that definition, like, what was the criteria?

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 4>So the criteria of playful teasing is that the teasing

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 4>is actually one sided, so as a metrical so from

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 4>one individual towards the other. That it has playful elements

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 4>but also provocative in elements. One important aspect is also

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 4>that after the teasing action is basically performed, that the

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 4>actor is actually usually looking towards the target, so they

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 4>are interested in the reaction of the other, really interested

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 4>in the reaction of the other. And another criteria is

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 4>that the behavior is repetitive usually and also especially when

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 4>the target is not reacting.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>They also do elaboration of behavior.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>That means that they show different forms of behavior, so

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 4>the behavior is also very flexible.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I see, like if the other individual doesn't react, they'll

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>try it again in a different way.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly so.

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 4>And oftentimes there's even they might start with a poke,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 4>then it might become a hit. If that doesn't lead

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 4>to anything, they might even then jump.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 3>On the individual.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 4>So sometimes we could also observe instances like.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>This, I see, I feel like you're almost asking, can

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>animals be annoying on purpose?

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean there is definitely an annoying component to it.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Yes, being funny can be annoying sometimes if you're interested

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>in seeing what this humorous, playful teasing behavior actually looks like.

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Lahmer has posted clips of these videos on her

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel YouTube dot com slash doctor Isabel Lammer.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Of course, we don't know about the internal world right,

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 4>about the emotions that they feel while they do that,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 4>But this is all stuff for future work to look

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 4>into that. But for that you would also meet other methods.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 4>So this was just the initial study to really show

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 4>that our closest relatives also do show forms of humor,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 4>because before no one was actually speaking about humor in animals,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 4>at least not from a science perspective, right, So.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Lamber and her colleagues did this study, and now

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the question is what did they find do apes display

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a sense of humor or playful teasing? When we come back,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask doctor Lammer what they found and what does

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all means about whether animals have a sense of humor?

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>In other words, what's the puchline? So to stay with us,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back. Hey, welcome back. We're talking about

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>whether animals have a sense of humor or whether it's

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>only people that are intentionally funny. To answer this question,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>doctor Isabelle Lahmer and her colleagues did one of the

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>first and largest studies of playful teasing in great apes,

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the behavior of bonaboes, orangutans, chimpanzees, and gorillas.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>As we talked about, playful teasing is a very specific

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>behavior that the researchers argue requires you to have a

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor, or at least it uses the same

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>cognitive abilities as having a sense of humor. It's basically

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>joking around. Now, the question is what did they find

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in this study? So what did you find in this

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>study that you did with your colleagues. What were the results?

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 4>We found that all four species of great apes playfully teased,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 4>So in the bonobos, in the chimpanzees and the gorillas

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and the orangutans, they all showed similar forms of teasing.

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 4>So we found eighteen different teasing behaviors, and all of

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 4>those behaviors were provocative. They were intentional, involved, often playful.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Elements were asymmetric, and when they did a teasing action

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 4>that they actually also checked, you know, how the target

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 4>was reacting.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the researchers found that apes do joke around, and

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they saw one of the total signs that they are

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>joking around, which is that when one animal would tease another,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>they would look back and check to see how the

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>other animal reacted, as if they were saying, huh, huh,

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is that funny? The researchers also

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>found that this behave we're usually happened during particular moments

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the apes' lives.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 4>What we also found is that playful teasing, similar to

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 4>teasing and infants, also occurs during relaxed contexts.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean that they usually.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Do it when they are, for example, resting or sleeping

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 3>and the group is basically quite calm nice?

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Then is actually the time usually when you can observe behaviors.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Like this interesting? Does that tell you that they do

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it out of boredom maybe, or some form of boredom.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean even Shane Goodle already described in one

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>of her books when she studied the Gombat chimpanzees that

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 3>adult chimpanzees were basically resting and juveniles were then playfully

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 3>jumping on them while the others were resting, you know,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 3>and from behind. So I mean this is apparently a

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 3>thing eventually.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's definitely a thing in my house when

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>my kids were younger, it was hard to get some rest, yeah.

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in general, yeah, yeah, And it often also happens

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 4>then for example, two individuals are engaged in a certain behavior.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 4>For example, two apes are booming each other and the

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 4>teaser is actually then disturbing. This is also similar to

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 4>teasing and infants, right, because the mother might read a book, right,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 4>and in a moment, the child, for example, puts the hand.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 3>In the book. Yeah, and does that repeatedly, you know,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 3>to tindle.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's part of the fun, yeah, yeah, to

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>interrupt somebody while they're doing something. Yeah.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 4>And apes also had stealing, for example, of objects, and

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 4>this was not just like I steal something and then

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 4>use it myself, but this was actually for example, one

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 4>ape was using a tool for expecting food for example,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 4>and the other, for example, was then actually taking.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 3>The tool away, like stealing the tool.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 4>But then immediately let go of it and looking at

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 4>the target basically a guy. So it's basically stealing without

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 4>needing the object itself and without using it afterwards by myself,

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 4>but just for it to see the reaction.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, amazing. Doctor Lamber and her colleagues observe eighteen different

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>kinds of playful teasing in apes, and to be honest,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>some of these do sound hilarious.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean the top five were poking of course, hitting

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 4>a hindering movement when they would actually for.

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Example, one ape was going by and the other would

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 3>quickly catch the foot and pull on it. Yeah.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we had quite a lot of instances like that.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Also often a surprise. Many of the teasing events included

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 4>an element of surprise.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's also part of the fun. Okay, so

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>great apes do engage in playful teasing behavior, but does

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that mean they understand humor?

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 4>There are some anecdote observations of joke like behaviors in

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 4>great apes. Maybe you know the gorilla named Coco that

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 4>already died, and Penny Patterson. She basically taught Coco how

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 4>to do the sign language and to communicate in sign language,

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 4>and it apparently happened a couple of times that Coco

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 4>was answering to Penny wrongly even though she knew the

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 4>correct answer. For example, Penny was asking, Hey, what did

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 4>do you put on your toothbrush? And then Coco was

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 4>actually signing not toothpaste, but she would sign, for example,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 4>foot and.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Laugh at Coco last. Yes.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, But also, I mean, we need to be a

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 4>little bit careful also because the training history is not

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 4>fully known, like behaviors like that were rewarded in the past.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 4>So that's why we need to be a little bit cautious.

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 4>But I personally believe that probably she found it funny,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 4>but I mean we don't.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Know for sure.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it sounds funny. Brushing your teeth with foot

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is yeah, yeah, classic humor in my household. Now I

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>know what you're thinking. You're probably thinking, I see my

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>chihuahua chuckle, my cockitoo cackle. Cond Doctor Lamer and her

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>colleagues figure out if other animals have a sense of humor.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 3>So the first thing I.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Would do is would look more closely at other primates

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 4>other than great apes, and then also at animals that

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 4>also live in very complex social groups and that are

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 4>also very smart, like for example, prots and kobe. I

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 4>mean they are even though they have very small brain.

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Research found they have the same neural number as primates

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 4>as well, like also dolphins for example. Yeah, I would

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 4>first look at these animals. And of course I also

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 4>was a cat owner and also a dog owner, and yeah,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 4>again this needs to be really studied, and.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>You need to start looking up cat jokes.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 4>I think if the people that listen actually have instances

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 4>above teasing observed.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 3>In their animals.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 4>So Erica Cardinal that I was working on the teasing

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 4>study in grade eight, so she actually has a homepage

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 4>where she is collecting examples of teasing. So if you,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 4>as a listener, have an animal at home that is

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 4>actually repeatedly provocatively teasing you, this would be a good

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 4>time to actually record yourself and the animal and send

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 4>it to Erica's website.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh incredible, We're recruiting test subjects right now.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>If people are interested.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, will I get my name in the paper. I'm

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>just teasing you. I'm just teasing. Okay, the last question

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I had for doctor Lamer was, what is the fact

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that animals might have a sense of humor? See about us?

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for us as humans? Does that

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that a lot of our behaviors have been there

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time? Yeah?

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, since we found playful teasing in all four

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 3>great ape species, so that means likely that our last

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>common ancestor, which lived thirteen million years ago, also showed

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 3>similar forms of playful teasing.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 4>So it actually says it shows something about our evolutionary

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 4>past sentence. I feel like that humans think, oh, yeah,

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 4>they're so special, but actually, when you look more closely

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 4>into cognition in great apes, there are many similarities. So

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 4>we are more similar than we are different.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, So to recap, there's an argument to be

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>made that animals and social groups should have a sense humor,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and at least in great aids, we can see that

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they do get around with each other. All of this

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>means I think that the idea that humans are the

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>only ones that find things funny, i'd just be a

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bad joke. I mean, talk about a punchline. Thanks for

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>joining us, See you next time you've been listening to

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Science Stuff. The production of iHeartRadio written and produced by

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 1>me Or hitch Ham, credited by Rose Seguda, executive producer

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Rowland, and audio engineer and mixer Kasey Peckram. And

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you can follow me on social media. Just search for

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>PhD Comics and the name of your favorite platform. Be

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to subscribe to sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app,

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts, and please

0:28:48.520 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>tell your friends We'll be back next Wednesday with another episode.